us-treasury-tax-treaties-388f5a885ccc072c8fc58d18•Notes on the Signing of the Amendment… US Luxembourg, May 20, 2009
Notes on the Signing of the Amendment… US Luxembourg, May 20, 2009
us-treasury-tax-treaties-388f5a885ccc072c8fc58d18Notes on the Signing of the Amendment… US Luxembourg, May 20, 2009Guidance
EmbassyoftheUnitedStaresofAmerica TheGrandDuchyofLuxembourg May20,2009 Excellency, IhavethehonortorefertotheConventionbetweentheGovernmentoftheUnited States ofAmericaandtheGovernmentoftheGrandDuchyofLuxembourgforthe Avoidance ofDoubleTaxationandthePreventionofFiscalEvasionwithrespect totaxesonIncomeandCapital,signedat Luxembourg,April3,1996, asamended bytheProtocolsignedtoday(the"Convention")andtoproposeonbehalf ofthe Government oftheUnitedStatesthefollowingunderstandings: I.ItisunderstoodthatthecompetentauthorityoftherequestedStateshallprovide uponrequestbythecompetentauthority oftherequestingStateinformationforthe purposesreferredto inparagraphIofArticle28.Suchinformationshallbe exchangedwithoutregardtowhethertherequestedStateneedssuchinformation foritsowntaxpurposesortheconductbeinginvestigatedwouldconstitutea crime underthelaws oftherequestedStateifithadoccurredintheterritoryofthe requestedState. 2.Pursuanttoparagraph5ofArticle28,itisunderstoodthateachContracting Stateshallensurethatitscompetentauthorityhastheauthoritytoobtainand provideuponrequest: a)informationheldbybanks,otherfinancialinstitutions,andanypersonactingin anagencyorfiduciarycapacityincludingnomineesandtrustees; b)informationregardingtheownership ofcompanies,partnerships,trusts, foundationsandotherpersons,includingownershipinformationonallsuch personsinanownershipchain;inthecaseoftrusts,infonnationonsettlors, trusteesandbeneficiaries;and inthecaseoffoundations,informationonfounders, membersofthefoundationcouncilandbeneficiaries;provided,however,thata requestedState isnotobligedtoprovideinformationwhichisneitherheldbyits authoritiesnorinthepossessionorcontrolofpersonswhoarewithinitsterritorial jurisdiction.Forpurposesoftheprecedingsentence,"authorities"includesall -2- governmentagencies,politicalsubdivisions,andlocalauthorities.Further,this ConventiondoesnotcreateanobligationontheContractingStatestoobtainor provideownershipinformationwithrespecttopubliclytradedcompaniesorpublic collectiveinvestmentfundsorschemesunlesssuchinformationcanbeobtained withoutgivingrise todisproportionatedifficulties. 3.ThecompetentauthorityoftheapplicantStateshallprovidethefollowing informationtothecompetentauthority oftherequestedStatewhenmakinga requestforinformationundertheConventiontodemonstratetheforeseeable relevance oftheinformationtotherequest: (a)theidentity ofthepersonunderexaminationorinvestigation; (b)a statement oftheinformationsoughtincludingitsnatureandtheformin whichtheapplicantStatewishestoreceivetheinformationfromtherequested State; (c)thetaxpurposeforwhichtheinfornlation issought; (d)grounds forbelievingthattheinformationrequestedisheldintherequested Stateor isinthepossessionorcontrolofa personwithinthejurisdictionofthe requestedState; (e)totheextentknown,thenameandaddress ofanypersonbelievedtobein possessionoftherequestedinformation; (I)a statementthattherequestisinconformitywiththelawandadministrative practices oftheapplicantState,thatiftherequestedinformationwaswithinthe jurisdiction oftheapplicantStatethenthecompetentauthorityoftheapplicant Statewould beabletoobtaintheinformationunderthelawsoftheapplicantState orinthenormalcourseofadministrativepracticeandthatitis inconformitywith thisConvention; (g)a statementthattheapplicantStatehaspursuedallmeansavailableinitsown territorytoobtaintheinformation,exceptthosethatwouldgiveriseto disproportionatedifficulties. 4.ThecompetentauthoritiesoftheContractingStateswillworktogetherto developmutualproceduresfortheexchange ofinformation,including,(i)with ecttospecificrequests,theformformakinga specificrequest,thetimeand ner ofrespondingtoa request,andthepossibilityfordeclininga request,and therproceduresorforms ofassistanceconcerningtheefficientexchangeof rmation. e foregoingunderstandingsmeetwiththeapprovaloftheGovernmentofthe ndDuchy ofLuxembourg,I havethefurtherhonortoproposethatthisNote youraffirmativeNote inreplyshallconstituteanagreementbetweenour ernmentswhichshallbecomeanintegralpart oftheConventiononthedateof y intoforceoftheProtocol. ept,YourExcellency,theexpression ofmyhighestconsiderations. J resp man (ii)o info Ifth Gra and Gov entr Acc LEGOUVERNEMENT DUGRAND-DUCHEDELUXEMBOURG MinisteredesFinances LeMinistreduTresoretduBudget Luxembourg,Ie20mai2009 Excellence, J'ait'honneurd'accuserreception devotrelettredu20mai2009,libelleecommesuit: "IhavethehonortorefertotheConventionbetweentheGovernmentoftheUnitedStatesof AmericaandtheGovernmentoftheGrandDuchyofLuxembourgfortheAvoidanceofDouble TaxationandthePrevention ofFiscalEvasionwithrespecttotaxesonIncomeandCapital, signedatLuxembourg,April 3,1996,asamendedbytheProtocolsignedtoday(the "Convention")andtopropose onbehalfoftheGovernmentoftheUnitedStatesthefollowing understandings: 1,ItisunderstoodthatthecompetentauthorityoftherequestedStateshallprovideuponrequest bythecompetentauthorityoftherequestingStateinformationforthepurposesreferredtoin paragraph1 ofArticle28.Suchinformationshallbeexchangedwithoutregardtowhetherthe requestedStateneedssuchinformationforitsowntaxpurposesortheconductbeing investigatedwouldconstitutea crimeunderthelawsoftherequestedStateif ithadoccurred in theterritoryof therequestedState. 2.Pursuanttoparagraph5 ofArticle28,itisunderstoodthateachContractingStateshallensure thatitscompetentauthorityhastheauthoritytoobtainandprovideuponrequest: a)informationheldbybanks,otherfinancialinstitutions,andanypersonactinginan agencyorfiduciarycapacityincludingnomineesandtrustees; b)information regardingtheownershipofcompanies,partnerships,trusts,foundations andotherpersons,includingownershipinformation onallsuchpersonsinanownership chain; inthecaseoftrusts,informationonsettlors,trusteesandbeneficiaries;andinthe caseoffoundations,informationonfounders,membersofthefoundationcounciland beneficiaries;provided,however,thatarequestedState isnotobligedtoprovide informationwhich isneitherheldbyitsauthoritiesnorinthepossessionorcontrolof personswhoarewithinitsterritorialjurisdiction.Forpurposes oftheprecedingsentence, "authorities"includesallgovernmentagencies,politicalsubdivisions,andlocal authorities.Further,thisConventiondoesnotcreate anobligationontheContracting States toobtainorprovideownershipinformationwithrespecttopubliclytraded companiesorpubliccollectiveinvestmentfundsorschemesunlesssuchinformationcan beobtainedwithoutgivingrisetodisproportionatedifficulties, .I.. SonExcellence MadameAnnLouiseWAGNER AmbassadeurdesEtats-Unisd'Amerique 22,boulevardEmmanuelServais L-2535LUXEMBOURG I7931luxellibourg - 2 - 3.ThecompetentauthorityoftheapplicantStateshallprovidethefollowinginformationtothe competentauthority oftherequestedStatewhenmakinga requestforinformationunderthe Conventiontodemonstratetheforeseeablerelevanceoftheinformationtotherequest: (a)theidentity ofthepersonunderexaminationorinvestigation; (b)a statementoftheinformationsoughtincludingitsnatureandtheforminwhichthe applicantStatewishestoreceivetheinformationfromtherequestedState; (c)thetaxpurposeforwhich theinformationis sought; (d)groundsforbelievingthattheinformationrequestedis heldintherequestedStateor is inthepossessionorcontrolofa personwithinthejurisdictionoftherequestedState; (e)totheextentknown,thenameandaddress ofanypersonbelievedtobein possessionoftherequestedinformation; (f)a statementthattherequestis inconformitywiththelawandadministrativepractices oftheapplicantState,thatif therequestedinformationwaswithinthejurisdictionoftheapplicant Statethenthecompetentauthority oftheapplicantStatewouldbeabletoobtaintheinformation underthelaws oftheapplicantStateorin thenormalcourseofadministrativepracticeandthatit is inconformitywiththisConvention; (g)astatementthattheapplicantStatehaspursuedallmeansavailableinitsown territorytoobtaintheinformation,exceptthosethatwould giverisetodisproportionatedifficulties. 4.ThecompetentauthoritiesoftheContractingStateswillworktogethertodevelopmutual proceduresfortheexchange ofinfonnation,including,(i)withrespecttospecificrequests,the formformakinga specificrequest,thetimeandmanner ofrespondingtoa request,andthe possibilityfordeclininga request,and (ii)otherproceduresorformsofassistanceconcerningthe efficientexchange ofinformation. If theforegoingunderstandingsmeetwiththeapproval oftheGovernmentoftheGrandDuchyof Luxembourg,I havethefurtherhonortoproposethatthisNoteandyouraffirmativeNoteinreplyshall constitute anagreementbetweenourGovernmentswhichshallbecomeanintegralpartofthe Conventiononthedate ofentryintoforceoftheProtocol." J'aiI'honneurdeconfirmerI'accorddu Grand-DucMdeLuxembourgsurIecontenudevotre lettre.Parconsequentvotrelettre etcetteconfirmationconstituentensembleunAccordentrenos gouvernementslequeldeviendrapartieintegrantedelaConvention aladatedeI'entreeen vigueurduProtocole. Veuiliezagreer,Excellence,I'assurancedematreshauteconsideration. \~-- LucFrieden
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.