title-11•Miss. Admin. Code Title 11 — Environment
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
Part 1 Administrative Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 1.1 Delegations _____________________
Introduction: Statutes regarding environmental and natural resources issues in Mississippi grant the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality ("Commission") broad discretion to delegate many of its statutory authorities to the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality ("MDEQ"). Since the creation of the Commission and its predecessor bodies, the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Commission and the Mississippi Commission on Natural Resources, the Commission has delegated certain authorities to the Executive Director by agency action reflected in the minutes of the Commission. The Commission now consolidates these delegations, adds additional delegations, and promulgates these delegations as a regulation pursuant to the Mississippi Administrative Procedures Law.
The chart below describes specific delegations of authority and lists the most pertinent statutory authorization for the delegation. The Commission, however, also is given a broad general authority to delegate its authority by Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-17(o). That section authorizes the Commission "to delegate in such manner as it sees fit the duties and powers relating to air and water quality and pollution control to the agency members presently engaged in the several fields of water or air control or pollution." Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-17(n) authorizes the Commission to "exercise all incidental powers necessary to carry out the purposes of Sections 49-17-1 through 49- 17-43 and Sections 17-17-1 through 17-17-47." The Commission interprets these statutes to allow the delegation of authority to the Executive Director to perform all actions within the jurisdiction of the Commission required to protect the quality and quantity of the state's water resources and the quality of the state's ambient air and to regulate solid nonhazardous and hazardous waste within the State. This delegation authority by definition allows delegation of authorities related to the three offices of MDEQ created by statute: The Office of Geology and Energy Resources, the Office of Land and Water Resources, and the Office of Pollution Control. See Miss. Code Ann. § 49-2-7.
The Commission also interprets these statutes as allowing the delegation to the Executive Director of authorities necessary to perform the day-to-day functions of MDEQ through the Office of Administrative Services, as created by Miss. Code Ann. § 49-2-17. Additionally, Miss. Code Ann. § 53-7-19(p) allows the Commission to authorize the director "to discharge or exercise any power or duty granted to the commission by the provisions" of the Surface Mining and
Reclamation Law. This regulatory action is not intended to revoke any authorization previously granted to the Executive Director and not listed in this regulation. Also, Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 69(1) allows the executive director to issue orders under prescribed circumstances under the Mississippi Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Law. § 53-9-69(1)(b) allows the executive director or the executive director’s authorized representative on the basis of any inspection to order the cessation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations or that portion of those operations when it is determined that any condition or practices exist or that any permittee is in violation of the chapter or any regulation or written order of the commission promulgated or issued under this chapter or any condition of a permit and the condition, practice or violation also creates an imminent danger to the health and safety of the public, or is causing or can reasonably be expected to cause significant imminent environmental harm to land, air or water resources. When on the basis of an inspection, the executive director or the executive director’s authorized representative determines that the condition, practice or violation does not create an imminent danger, an order to the permittee shall be issued setting a reasonable time of not more than 90 days for the abatement of the violations or, if deemed necessary, an immediate cessation of activities violating or resulting in the violation of this chapter, the regulations or any condition or limitation of a permit.§ 53-9-69 (1)(c). The delegation of authority to the Executive Director does not require the Executive Director to exercise the authority delegated. The Executive Director may determine, on a case-by-case basis, that a decision within his or her authority to make should be referred to the Commission for consultation and/or decision.
Rule 1.1. Delegations: The Commission delegates the following powers to the Executive Director of MDEQ:
A. To employ qualified professional personnel and technical and clerical staff as may be required for the operation of the Department.
B. To organize the administrative units of the Department and alter such organizational structure and reassign responsibilities as he or she may deem necessary to carry out the policies of the Commission within the limits of Miss. Code Ann. § 49-2-7.
C. To delegate the authority to sign Commission Orders to the Chief of Staff, Head of the Office of Pollution Control, the Head of the Office of Geology and Energy Resources, the Head of the Office of Land and Water Resources and the General Counsel of MDEQ to the extent that the Executive Director is allowed to issue Orders pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-2-13(j).
D. To issue Orders in accordance with Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-227 approving or denying in whole or in part Solid Waste Management Plans and/or amendments thereof.
E. To issue Administrative Orders:
Authorities listed in this rule are not inclusive and are in addition to authorities listed in the Introduction; Title 11, Part 1, Chapter 1.
(1) To prohibit, control or abate discharges of contaminants and wastes into the air and waters of the State.
(2) To require appropriate remedial measures to prevent, control or abate air and water pollution or to cause the proper management of solid wastes.
(3) To impose penalties which the Respondent agrees to pay.
(4) To require compliance with permits, laws and regulations.
(5) To issue Emergency Orders pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-27.
F. To execute all orders required by the Brownfields Statute that are not specifically required by Statute and/or Regulation to be issued by the full Commission.
G. To issue Cease Pumping Orders and Orders Conditioning Permitted Water Withdrawal; to issue Cease and Desist Orders to Surface Mining Operators who are mining without the required Permit or Notice of Intent to Mine or who are otherwise operating in violation of Mississippi law, regulations or condition(s) of any Permit or other Order; and to issue the authorized Orders to Surface Coal Mining Operators who are operating in violation of Mississippi law, regulations, or condition(s) of any Permit or other Order.
H. To make preliminary determinations necessary to file suit, file suit, conduct litigation, and settle all litigation matters on behalf of the Commission.
I. To enter into all contracts, grants and cooperative agreements allowed by Miss. Code Ann. § 49-2-9(e).
J. To delegate signature authority for Agency contracts, purchase orders, travel reimbursement authorizations, requisitions, personnel forms, and similar documents to the Chief of Staff, Head of the Office of Administrative Services and/or to the Division Chiefs within that Office.
K. To grant continuances for scheduled Formal Hearings; to issue Non-dispositive rulings regarding contested matters (such as, Scheduling Orders and decisions on Interlocutory Motions), and to Stay pending Evidentiary Hearing on the effectiveness of a Commission Order upon a showing of good cause by any party.
L. To issue, re-issue, deny, or revoke Asbestos Certifications and approve Asbestos Abatement Training Programs.
M. To issue, re-issue, deny, or revoke Underground Storage Tank (UST) Certifications to individuals authorized to install, alter and /or close USTs.
N. To issue, re-issue, deny, or revoke Landfill (Solid Waste) Operator and Class I Rubbish Site Operator Certifications.
O. To issue, re-issue, deny, or revoke Wastewater Operator Certifications and approve Wastewater Training Programs.
P. To issue, re-issue, deny, or revoke Water Well Driller Licenses.
Q. To issue, re-issue, deny, or revoke Lead Certifications and approve Lead-Based Paint Activities Training Programs.
R. To issue, re-issue, deny, or revoke Waste Tire Transporter Certificates.
S. To requisition and use funds in the Pollution Emergency Fund, Nonhazardous Solid Waste Corrective Action Trust Fund, Waste Tire Abatement Funds and all other Funds created by Title 17 and Title 49 and within the jurisdiction of the Commission for the statutory purposes allowed by the Code.
T. To discharge or exercise any power or duty granted to the Commission by the provisions of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Law and the Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Law and their respective rules and regulations.
U. To execute reciprocity agreements with other States whose Lead Based Paint Program requirements meet or exceed the Commission’s requirements.
V. To waive the late penalty for failure to pay UST fee upon sufficient demonstration that failure to pay timely was unavoidable due to financial hardship or otherwise beyond the control of the owner.
W. To compile and publish compilations of the regulations of the Commission and Permit Board.
X. To approve and award Local Governments Solid Waste Assistance Grants, Competitive Grants and Non-Competitive Grants), Local Governments Waste Tire Collection and Clean Up Grants, Local Governments Tire Derived Product Grants, Incentive Waste Tire Recycling and Research Grants, Local Governments Planning Grants, Right Way To Throw Away Grants (Local Hazardous Waste Amnesty/Collection Event Grants), Regional Recycling Cooperative Grants, Nonhazardous Solid Waste Corrective Action Trust Fund Cooperative Agreements, and Pollution Prevention/Recycling Grants otherwise allowed by Law.
Y. To execute, approve and amend environmental covenants.
Z. To issue administrative orders to require compliance to water well drillers who are operating in violation of Mississippi law, regulations, or other Orders.
AA. To enter into reciprocity agreements with other states related to certifications when so authorized by law or rules and regulations.
Part 1, Chapter 2: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Regulations Regarding the Review and Reproduction of Public Records.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 21-27-207, 21-27-211, 49-2-5 (3), 49-2-9(e) and (f), 49-2-13 (c), (e), (j) and (k), 49-2-17, 49-17-17 (c),(n), and (o), 49-17-23, 49-17-44.1, 49-17-43(d), 49-17-68, 49-17-421, 49-17-429, 49-17-507, 49-17-531, 49-35-11(4), 17-17-63, 17-17-65, 17-17-227, 17- 17-407(b), 17-17-425, 51-3-7, 53-7-19(l), (m) and (p), 37-138-9, 51-5-1(1) and (5), 49-31-1, et seq., 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., 49-17-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17- 401, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 53-7-1, et seq., 53-9-1, et seq. and 89-23-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.1 Authority and Purpose
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.2 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.3 Requesting Public Records
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.4 Processing Public Record Requests – General
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.5 Processing Public Record Requests – Electronic Records
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.6 Exemptions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.7 Third Party Information and Trade Secrets
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.8 Document Reproduction, Certification, and Other Costs
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.9 Review of Denials
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.1 Authority and Purpose
In 1983, the Mississippi Legislature passed the Mississippi Public Records Act (“the Act”), Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1 through 25-61-19 (Rev. 2010). The purpose of the Act is to provide the public full access to public records concerning the government’s conduct. This document sets forth the rules and procedures that the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”), the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality
(“Commission”), and the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board (“Permit Board”) follow in order to provide full access to public records. These rules provide information to people wishing to request access to public records of MDEQ and establish processes for both requestors and MDEQ Staff that are designed to best assist members of the public in obtaining such access. The Act and these rules will be interpreted in favor of disclosure. In carrying out its responsibilities of the Act, MDEQ will be guided by the provisions of the Act describing its purposes and interpretation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 25-61-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.2 Definitions
A. “Public body” means any department, bureau, division, council, commission, committee, subcommittee, board, agency and any other entity of the state or a political subdivision thereof, and any municipal corporation and any other entity created by the Constitution or by law, executive order, ordinance or resolution. The term “public body” includes the governing board of a charter school authorized by the Mississippi Charter School Authorizer Board. Within the meaning of this chapter, the term “entity” shall not be construed to include individuals employed by a public body or any appointed or elected public official.
B. “Public records” means all books, records, papers, accounts, letters, maps, photographs, films, cards, tapes, recordings or reproductions thereof, and any other documentary materials, regardless of physical form or characteristics, having been used, being in use, or prepared, possessed or retained for use in the conduct, transaction or performance of any business, transaction, work, duty or function of any public body, or required to be maintained by any public body.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 25-61-3 (Rev. 2010).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.3 Requesting Public Records
A. Freedom of Information Officer. The Freedom of Information Officer (“FOI Officer”), located in MDEQ, is responsible for overseeing compliance with the Act. Persons requesting public records maintained by MDEQ must submit a public records request to the FOI Officer within the agency. Although the FOI Officer oversees compliance with the Act, other staff members may process the request. The public records request must be made and addressed specifically to MDEQ and not any other agency or other governmental entity.
B. Format of Request. Any person requesting public records maintained by MDEQ must make a formal written request to the FOI Officer. The formal written request must include the following information:
-
Name of requestor;
-
Address of requestor;
-
Specifics
on the type of information requested;
-
Name of facility (if applicable);
-
City and county where facility is located (if applicable);
-
Other contact information, including telephone number and any e-mail address; and
-
The date and time of day of the request. A variety of records are available on the MDEQ website at http://www.deq.state.ms.us/mdeq.nsf/page/Main_Home?OpenDocument and more specifically http://opc.deq.state.ms.us/default.aspx. Requestors are encouraged to view the documents available on the web-site prior to submitting a records request. C. Record Request Submission. Public record requests must be submitted either by mail, e- mail, or fax to one of the following locations:
Mail: Freedom of Information Officer Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 2261 Jackson, MS 39225
E-mail: FOI_Mail@deq.state.ms.us
Fax: (601) 354-6356
Additional contact and other information can be found on MDEQ’s web-site located at http://www.deq.state.ms.us/mdeq.nsf/page/legal_foiaInquiries?OpenDocument.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.4 Processing Public Record Requests – General
A. Providing access. MDEQ acknowledges that “providing access to public records is a duty” and that “any person shall have the right to inspect, copy or mechanically reproduce or obtain a reproduction of any public record” in accordance with these
As a general rule, the more specific a requestor is about a public records request, the more likely MDEQ will be able to locate those records in response to the request. If a request does not reasonably describe the records being requested, the agency’s response to the request may be delayed.
policies. Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1 and 25-61-5 (Rev. 2010). The FOI Officer or his or her designee will process requests in the order allowing the most requests to be processed in the most efficient manner.
B. Inspection Location and Appointment. Public records requests are managed by MDEQ's FOI Officer. When an individual submits a written request, the FOI Officer, or his or her designee, determines the exact location of the records requested. All records normally will be reviewed at the MDEQ office location where the records are housed. If an individual seeks to review records that are housed at multiple MDEQ locations, the FOI Officer will work with other MDEQ staff and the individual requesting the record review to set up an appointment at the appropriate MDEQ location.
C. Records. A requestor shall not take MDEQ records from MDEQ offices. If the requestor wishes to have copies of the records made instead of simply inspecting them, he or she should so indicate and make arrangements to pay for copies of the records. Pursuant to Rule 2.8 of this regulation, standard photocopies will be provided at the approximate cost of searching, reviewing and/or duplicating the public records. The copying fee schedule will be posted at the FOI review room. The copying fee schedule may be amended and adjusted to cover the costs of complying with FOI requests.
D. Acknowledging receipt of request. Within seven (7) working days of receipt of the request, the FOI Officer will do one or more of the following:
-
Provide a reasonable estimate of when records will be available;
-
Request clarification where a request is unclear or does not sufficiently identify the requested records. Such clarification may be requested and provided by telephone. As a result of a clarification, the FOI Officer or his or her designee may revise the time estimate of when the requested records will be available;
-
Make the records available for inspection or copying in whole or in installments
(where applicable); or
- Deny the request.
E. Time Limit for Response. MDEQ will strive to provide records not exempt from disclosure for review or reproduction as soon as practicable, but no later than seven (7)
Production of documents in installments is limited to situations where the requestor has made a large public records request which cannot reasonably be processed or produced within the required response time. See R. 2.4.E. for further information.
working days from the date of receipt of the request, as allowed by the Act. The seven (7) working day response period will not include the day the request was initially received. For time calculation purposes the seven (7) working days will begin on the next working day. If MDEQ is unable to produce the documents within the seven (7) working days from the date of the receipt of the request, MDEQ will provide a written explanation (which may be provided by e-mail) to the person making the request which indicates the records are being gathered and specifies with particularity why the records cannot be produced within the seven-day period.
-
If MDEQ is unable to produce a public record by the seventh working day after the date of the receipt of the request, MDEQ will provide the record no later than fourteen (14) working days from MDEQ’s receipt of the original request after sending written notification to the requestor or at a later date upon mutual agreement of the parties. Requests for records in storage will be provided within seven (7) working days of availability of such records to MDEQ. If MDEQ determines the request would cause a disruption of business, the time period for production of records may be adjusted.
-
Providing records in installments. When the request is for a large number of records, the FOI Officer or his or her designee will provide access for inspection and copying in installments, if he or she reasonably determines that it would be practical to provide the records in that way. If, within thirty (30) days, the requestor fails to inspect the entire set of records or one or more of the installments, the FOI Officer or his or her designee may stop searching for the remaining records and close the request.
-
Supplemental, Amended, or Additional Requests. MDEQ treats supplemental, amended, or new requests by the requestor as new requests for purposes of determining all applicable time limitations.
F. Protecting the rights of others. In the event that the requested records contain information that may affect rights of others and may be exempt from disclosure, the FOI Officer may, prior to providing the records, provide notice to such others whose rights may be affected by the disclosure. The notice to the affected persons will include a copy of the request. Such notice should be given so as to make it possible for those other persons to contact the requestor and ask him or her to revise the request. If necessary, the other person may seek a hearing on its confidentiality claim before the commission to prevent or limit the disclosure of the information pursuant to Rule 2.7.
G. Records exempt from disclosure. Some records are exempt from disclosure, in whole or in part. If MDEQ believes that a record is exempt from disclosure and should be
withheld, the appropriate personnel will state the specific exemption and provide a brief explanation of why the record or a portion of the record is being withheld. If only a portion of a record is exempt from disclosure, but the remainder is not exempt, the appropriate personnel will redact the exempt portions, provide the nonexempt portions, and indicate to the requestor why portions of the record are being redacted.
H. Inspection of records.
-
Hours for Records Inspection. Public records are available for inspection and copying during MDEQ’s normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., excluding legal holidays and any days when MDEQ is not open as a result of inclement weather, loss of power, electricity or water or other circumstances. The time, place and manner of inspection and copying of records will not be allowed to interfere with other essential duties of MDEQ. Where the requestor is unable to inspect and/or copy the files within the agency’s hours of operations, as specified above, the FOI Officer will set up another reasonable time and date for inspection of the files with the requestor.
-
Inspection Location. Consistent with other demands, MDEQ shall promptly provide space to inspect public records. No member of the public may remove a document from the viewing area or disassemble or alter any document. The requestor shall indicate which documents he or she wishes to copy.
-
Time Limitation. The requestor must claim or review the assembled records within thirty days of the MDEQ notification to him or her that the records are available for inspection or copying. MDEQ will notify the requestor in writing (which may be by e-mail) of this requirement and inform the requestor that he or she should contact MDEQ to make arrangements to claim or review the records. If the requestor or a representative of the requestor fails to claim or review the records within the thirty-day period or make other arrangements, MDEQ may close the request and refile the assembled records. Other public records requests can be processed ahead of a subsequent request by the same person for the same or almost identical records, which can be processed as a new request.
-
Completion of inspection. When the inspection of the requested records is complete and all requested copies are provided, the FOI Officer or his or her designee will indicate that the MDEQ has completed a diligent search for the requested records and made any located nonexempt records available for inspection.
I. Closing withdrawn or abandoned requests. When the requestor either withdraws the request or fails to fulfill his or her obligations to inspect the records or pay for the requested copies, the FOI Officer will close the request and indicate to the requestor that MDEQ has closed the request.
J. Later discovered documents. If, after MDEQ has informed the requestor that it has provided all available records, MDEQ becomes aware of additional responsive documents existing at the time of the request, it will promptly inform the requestor of the additional documents and provide them on an expedited basis.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1, et seq., 25-61-2, 25-61-5.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.5 Processing Public Record Requests – Electronic Records
A. Requesting electronic records. The process for requesting electronic public records is the same as for requesting paper public records.
B. Providing electronic records. When a requestor requests records in an electronic format, the FOI Officer will provide the nonexempt records or portions of such records that are reasonably accessible in an electronic format that is used by the public body and is generally commercially available, or in a format that is reasonably translatable from the format in which the public body keeps the record. Costs for providing electronic records are governed by Rule 2.8.
C. Customized access to data bases. With the consent of the requestor, MDEQ may provide customized access if the record is not reasonably locatable or not reasonably translatable into the format requested. MDEQ may charge the actual cost for such customized access.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1, et seq., 25-61-10.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.6 Exemptions
The Public Records Act, as well as other statutes and court decisions, provide that a number of types of documents are exempt from public inspection and copying. In addition, other statutes or rules of law, such as various privacy restrictions, may prohibit disclosure. Requestors should be aware of the following exemptions
, outside the Public Records Act, that restrict the availability of some documents held by MDEQ for inspection and copying:
A. Attorney work product, examination, exemption, see § 25-1-102.
B. Environmental self-evaluation reports, public records act, exemption, see § 49-2-71.
This list is in no way considered to be a complete list of the Public Records Act exemptions that may apply to public records requests.
C. Insurance and insurance companies, risk based capital level requirements, reports exemption, see § 83- 5-415.
D. Personnel files exemption, see § 25-1-100.
E. Public records and trade secrets, proprietary commercial and financial information, exemption, see §§ 75-26-1, et seq. and 79-23-1.
F. Workers' compensation exemption, see § 71-3-66.
G. Exemption for records subject to privilege, such as Attorney/Client, Physician/Patient, etc.
Some records are exempt from disclosure, in whole or in part as provided in Rule 2.4.G.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1, et seq., 25-61-5, 25-61-11.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.7 Third Party Information and Trade Secrets
A. Confidential or exemption claims. When any person files or submits documents with MDEQ which the filer contends are exempt from disclosure under the Public Records Act, the filer shall provide a written statement at the time of filing which shall describe the documents filed and which shall fully explain why the documents are designated as exempt from disclosure and must specifically cite any statute or other legal authority in support of such designation. Such written statement shall itself be a public record subject to disclosure.
B. Clear Designation. Any document filed with MDEQ which contains trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information subject to the protection of any applicable law or court decision shall be clearly designated as such by the filer on its face and accompanying cover letter at the time of filing and shall be placed in an envelope other than white. Each page of each document shall be marked confidential
.
C. Confidential Information Claim Request. Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-27 and 49-17-39, citizens and regulated entities providing information to MDEQ can request that the information be held confidential and not be made available for public inspection; trade secret information or confidential business information that does not concern environmental protection may be treated as confidential. This protection can be claimed properly, however, only for information that does not concern environmental protection.
Merely stamping a document "confidential" is not sufficient to allow the Commission to treat the document as confidential.
In order to satisfy these statutes, a request for confidentiality must be made in the following manner:
-
The request must be made, in writing, at the same time the information is submitted to MDEQ;
-
The request must describe the information that the requestor would have treated as confidential and must explain the reason(s) why the information qualifies for confidential treatment; and
-
The request must allow disclosure of the confidential information "to authorized department employees and/or the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).” D. Prior to Filing. Any person filing documents with MDEQ shall, prior to filing, redact from the documents any social security numbers, account numbers or dates of birth not required to be listed. MDEQ shall determine on a case-by-case basis whether similar information may be redacted by the filer to prevent identity theft. In no event will MDEQ bear any responsibility for a filer’s failure to redact such information which leads to or may lead to identity theft or other crime or loss.
E. Commission approval or denial of Confidential Claim. In order for the claim of confidentiality to become effective against public review, the claim must be "determined by the Commission to be valid." This determination would be made (or denied) after an evidentiary hearing before the Commission held pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-35.
- Initial Acceptance of Confidential Claim. The Commission has adopted the following policy in order to minimize the number of Commission hearings on confidentiality claims that need be pursued. When a citizen or regulated entity submits information under a claim of confidentiality, the claim will be honored initially by MDEQ if the claim regards information that arguably could be considered as not "concerning environmental protection" and if the claim meets the three requirements set forth above in Rule 2.7.C.
If a claim of confidentiality is judged to meet these three requirements, and the document is judged arguably to include information not concerning environmental protection, then that information will be treated as confidential until and unless a member of the public requests to review the information. At the time the information is placed in an MDEQ confidential file, a notice will be
placed in the entity's public record file indicating that additional information to which a claim of confidentiality attaches is included in a confidential MDEQ file.
a. Notification of public record request. If and when a member of the public requests access to the information held by MDEQ under a claim of confidentiality, the supplier of the information will be notified of the request and will be given the option either to request a hearing before the Commission concerning the claim of confidentiality; work out a mutually agreeable arrangement with the requestor related to the information to be reviewed; or to allow all of the requested information to be reviewed.
b. Commission Hearing. If a hearing is requested, the information will be treated as confidential by MDEQ until the Commission makes a determination on the issue and during the time in which an appeal of that Commission determination could be taken (if the Commission determination is adverse to the person or entity claiming confidentiality).
- Initial Denial of Confidential Claim. If an initial claim of confidentiality is judged by MDEQ as not meeting the requirements set forth above, and/or as containing information concerning environmental protection, then the person supplying the information will be notified promptly of MDEQ's conclusion and will be notified of his or her right to pursue the claim of confidentiality before the Commission at the next available Commission meeting.
The claimant will be given ten days from notification of deficiency by MDEQ in which either to correct any deficiency in the confidentiality claim (such as the lack of required permission for EPA review) or to request in writing a hearing before the Commission on the confidentiality claim. After that ten-day period, the information will be treated as public information by MDEQ if no adequate correction of the claim or written request for a hearing has been made. Again, if a timely written request for a hearing is received, MDEQ will treat the information in question as confidential until the Commission makes a final determination and the period for perfecting an appeal regarding that decision has run.
a. Opportunity to Appeal. If the Commission denies the claim of confidentiality, the claimant may perfect an appeal of that decision to a
court of appropriate jurisdiction (by filing a notice of appeal with MDEQ, as required by Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-41).
b. Treatment of Information if appealed. MDEQ automatically will continue to treat the information at issue as confidential for thirty (30) days after the filing by MDEQ of the record on appeal with the appropriate court. Within those thirty (30) days, the claimant must apply to the court in which the appeal is lodged for any further protection of the information pending appeal (through an appeal with supersedeas, temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, or similar relief). MDEQ will treat the information as public information after that thirty- day period unless a court of appropriate jurisdiction instructs MDEQ to hold the information as confidential or unless all parties to the matter agree otherwise.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1, et seq., 25-61-9, 49-17-1, et seq., 49-17-35, 49-17-39, 49- 17-41, 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-27.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.8 Document Reproduction, Certification and Other Costs
The schedule of charges and/or fees will be posted in the File Review Room and with the FOI Officer.
A. MDEQ Staff and Contractor’s Time. A requestor is responsible for paying the actual costs for the time staff and/or the time contractors allot to the requestor’s public records request (this includes searching, reviewing and/ or duplicating the records). Costs will be calculated at the rate of the lowest level employee or contractor competent to respond to the request. This includes any costs associated with any public records request which involves a matter that MDEQ has contracted with outside attorneys on, which will require such attorneys’ review prior to document production. MDEQ will collect these fees before providing the requested documents for review.
B. Charges for searching, reviewing and redacting. The actual cost of searching for and reviewing and, if necessary, redacting exempt information from public records shall be based upon the hourly rate of compensation for the lowest paid agency employee qualified to perform the task, which shall be multiplied by the actual time to complete the task. This includes the actual costs required for searching, reviewing and redacting requested documents by contractors which have been contracted by MDEQ to work on the matters being requested.
C. Copies. MDEQ allows individuals submitting a written request for records to copy documents that are not exempt from disclosure or to have the documents copied for them. In general, MDEQ is not staffed sufficiently to respond to requests for MDEQ personnel to copy documents for members of the public. Although MDEQ staff will attempt to facilitate document availability and review, MDEQ usually will (and reserves the right to) deny requests to assign MDEQ staff the task of copying records for members of the public. Copies can be made by the requestor or by an approved copier service.
D. Costs for copies. Consistent with the copying fee schedule, MDEQ charges a specified amount for a standard black and white photocopy of a record, color copies and scanned copies selected by a requestor. A statement of the factors and the manner used to determine these charges are available from the FOI Officer.
E. Costs for electronic records. There is generally no charge for e-mailing electronic records to a requestor or for supplying electronic copies via the requestor’s storage device; however staff time and other actual costs may apply as fees or costs allowed under Miss. Code Ann. § 25-61-7(2) (Rev. 2010). Requestors may use their own new, in shrink wrap, storage device (clean and free of viruses or corruption) for electronic copies. Requestors must be aware that MDEQ is not responsible if the storage devices are lost, stolen, or damaged. Electronic media devices may be available to the requestor as agency supply permits; MDEQ is not required to supply requestors with electronic media devices. The cost of MDEQ providing an electronic media device will be the actual cost of the storage device. Any other type of electronic storage format charge, as technology advances permit, will be based on the actual cost of the storage device.
F. Costs of mailing. MDEQ may also charge actual costs of mailing, including the cost of the shipping container.
G. MDEQ shall require payment in advance for all costs before providing copies or access to records unless the requestor makes satisfactory prior billing arrangements for copying to ensure payment consistent with Rule 2.8.I.
H. Certification of Hard-Copy and Electronic Documents. MDEQ public record files are working documents, and documents are added to the files regularly. No certification will be made that the records reviewed are the “complete” file, only that the document(s) reproduced are certified as a true copy of the records limited to the date the documents were produced. Certifications will be signed and dated either by the MDEQ Executive Director, his or her designee, or the FOI Officer or his or her supervisor.
I. Payment and Copying Privileges. Payment may be made by check or money order to MDEQ. The costs of reproduction are payable by the requesting individual, firm, or their representative. In the event the individual, firm or representative making the copies has made prior arrangements for billing with MDEQ, MDEQ will mail a bill for payment for copies once the invoice is signed. Payment is due upon the receipt of the bill. Any individual, firm or their representative that has not made satisfactory arrangements to ensure payment through billing by invoice or purchase order must pay in advance or at the time of reproduction of the records. Failure to pay a bill will result in the individual, firm or their representative having to pay before the release of subsequent reproductions. Failure to timely pay for copies will result in the loss of future copying privileges until the outstanding bill is fully paid. Payment for the actual cost regarding MDEQ staff and/or contractor’s time to search, redact (if applicable) and review the public records related to the request must be made to MDEQ prior to production of the requested documents.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1, et seq., 21-61-5, 21-61-7.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 2.9 Review of Denials
A. Review by the Ethics Commission. Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 25-61-13, if MDEQ denies a requestor access to public records, the requestor may ask the Ethics Commission to review the matter. The Ethics Commission has adopted rules on such requests. They may be found at www.ethics.state.ms.us.
B. Judicial review. Any person whose request for public records was denied may institute a suit in the chancery court of Hinds County, seeking to reverse the denial, as set forth in Miss. Code Ann. § 25-61-13.
Part 1, Chapter 3: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Regulations Regarding Administrative Procedures Pursuant to the Mississippi Administrative Procedures Act. (Adopted November 17, 2005)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-61-1, et seq., 21-61-13.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.1 Description of Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality and Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.2 When Oral Proceedings Will be Scheduled on Proposed Rules
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.3 Notification of Oral Proceedings for Rule-Making
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.4 Presiding Officer
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.5 Public Presentations and Participation for Proposed Rule-Making
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.6 Conduct of Oral Proceeding for Proposed Rule-Making
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.7 Persons Who May Request Declaratory Opinions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.8 Subjects Which May be Addressed in Declaratory Opinions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.9 Circumstances in Which Declaratory Opinions Will Not be Issued
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.10 Where to Send Requests
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.11 Name, Address, and Signature of Requestor
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.12 Question Presented
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.13 Time for Commission’s Response
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.14 Notice by Commission to Third Parties
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.15 Public Availability of Requests and Declaratory Opinions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.16 Rule 3.16
Effect of Declaratory Opinions ___________________________ Rule 3.1 Description of Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality and Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality. Reference is made to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.. (Rev. 2003), which create and set forth the duties and responsibilities of the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (“Commission”) and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“Department”). The Commission is empowered to formulate environmental policy, adopt and enforce rules and regulations, receive funding, conduct studies for using the State's resources, and discharge duties, responsibilities and powers as necessary. The seven members are appointed by the governor. The Department serves as staff for the Commission. The Department staff is comprised of four (4) divisions: the Office of Administrative Services, the Office of Geology and Energy Resources, the Office of Land and Water Resources, and the Office of Pollution Control. The Executive Director of the Department serves as the Executive Director of the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.2 Oral Proceedings Will Be Scheduled on Proposed Rules
Prior to the adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules and regulations administered by the Department, the Commission shall conduct a public hearing after public notice. Such notice shall be given by publication once a week for three (3) successive weeks in a newspaper having a general circulation throughout the state. The notice shall contain a description of the proposed regulation and the time, date, and place of the hearing.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.3 Notification of Oral Proceeding for Proposed Rule-Making
The date, time, and place of all oral proceedings for proposed rule-making shall be filed with the Office of the Secretary of State and, within three (3) days of such filing, mailed to anyone who makes a timely request. The oral proceedings shall be scheduled no earlier than twenty (20) days from the filing of this information with the Office of the Secretary of State. For at least twenty-five (25) days from the filing with the Office of the Secretary of State of the notice of proposed rule adoption, the Commission shall afford persons the opportunity to submit, in writing, argument, data, and any views on the proposed rule.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104 , 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.4 Presiding Officer
The Executive Director of the Department, or his designee who is familiar with the substance of the proposed rule, shall preside at the oral proceeding on a proposed rule.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.5 Public Presentations and Participation for Proposed Rule-Making
A. At an oral proceeding on a proposed rule, persons may make oral statements and may make documentary and physical submissions, which may include views, comments, or arguments concerning the proposed rule.
B. The presiding officer may place time limitations on individual oral presentations when necessary to assure the orderly and expeditious conduct of the oral proceeding. To encourage joint oral presentations and to avoid repetition, additional time may be provided for persons whose presentations represent the views of other individuals as well as their own.
C. Persons making oral presentations are discouraged from restating matters that already have been submitted in writing.
D. There shall be no interruption of a participant who has been given the floor by the presiding officer, except that the presiding officer may, in his or her discretion, interrupt
or end the participant’s time for presentation where the orderly conduct of the proceeding so requires.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.6 Conduct of Oral Proceeding for Proposed Rule-Making
A. Presiding officer. The presiding officer shall have authority to conduct the proceeding for proposed rule-making in his or her discretion for its orderly conduct. The presiding officer may:
(1) call the proceeding to order;
(2) allow for a brief synopsis of the proposed rule and a statement of the statutory authority for the proposed rule;
(3) call on those individuals who desire to speak for or against the proposed rule;
(4) allow for additional statements following all participants’ comments; and
(5) adjourn the proceeding.
B. Questions. Where time permits and to facilitate the exchange of information, the presiding officer may open the floor to questions or general discussion concerning the proposed rule. The presiding officer in his or her discretion may question participants and/or permit the questioning of participants by other participants about any matter relating to that rule-making proceeding, including any prior written submissions made by those participants; however, no participant shall be required to answer any question.
C. Physical and Documentary Submissions. Submissions presented by participants in an oral proceeding with regard to proposed rule-making shall be submitted to the presiding officer. Such submissions become the property of the Commission and are subject to the Commission’s public records request procedures.
D. Recording. The Commission or Department may record oral proceedings for the purpose of rule-making by stenographic or electronic means, at its discretion.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.7 Persons Who May Request Declaratory Opinions
Any person with a substantial interest in the subject matter may request a declaratory opinion from the Commission by following the specified procedures. “Substantial interest in the subject matter” means: an individual, business group, or other entity that is directly affected by the Commission’s administration of a statute, rule, or order within its primary jurisdiction.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § § 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17 (i), 47-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.8 Subjects Which May Be Addressed In Declaratory Opinions
The Department on behalf of the Commission will issue declaratory opinions regarding the applicability to specified facts of:
A. a statute administered or enforceable by the Commission,
B. a rule promulgated by the Commission, or
C. an order issued by the Commission.
The Commission will not issue a declaratory opinion regarding a statute, rule, or order which is outside the primary jurisdiction of the agency. “Primary jurisdiction of the agency” means the agency has a constitutional or statutory grant of authority in the subject matter at issue.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.9 Circumstances In Which Declaratory Opinions Will Not Be Issued
The Department on behalf of the Commission may, for good cause, refuse to issue a declaratory opinion. The circumstances in which declaratory opinions will not be issued include, but are not necessarily limited to:
A. lack of clarity concerning the question presented or situations in which the facts presented in the request are not sufficient to answer the question presented;
B. pending or anticipated litigation, administrative action, or other adjudication or decision making which either may answer the question presented by the request or otherwise make an answer unnecessary;
C. requests that fail to contain information required by these rules or in which the requestor failed to follow the procedures set forth in these rules;
D. issues which have become moot, or are abstract or hypothetical such that the requestor is not substantially affected by the application of the statute or rule;
E. issues in which no present controversy exists, meaning that the requestor is not faced with existing facts or those certain to arise which raise a question concerning the application of the statute or rule;
F. questions concerning the legal validity of a statute or rule;
G. requests not based upon facts calculated to aid in the planning of future conduct, but rather, adjudication of the correctness of past conduct or efforts to establish the effect of that conduct;
H. questions involving the application of a criminal statute or sets of facts that may constitute a crime;
I. questions the answer to which would require disclosure of information which is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by law;
J. questions that are known to be currently the subject of an Attorney General’s opinion request or which already have been answered by an Attorney General’s opinion;
K. questions on which a similar request is pending before the Commission, or concerning which a proceeding is known to be pending on the same subject matter before any agency, administrative or judicial tribunal;
L. questions where issuance of a declaratory opinion may adversely affect the interests of the State, the Commission, or any of their officers or employees in any litigation pending or which reasonably may be expected to arise;
M. questions that involve eligibility for a license, permit, certificate, or other approval by the Commission or some other agency, where there is a statutory or regulatory application process by which eligibility for said license, permit, certificate, or other approval would be determined; or
N. requests not directed to the Executive Director of the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.10 Where to Send Requests
All requests for declaratory opinions from the Commission must be in writing and mailed, e-mailed, delivered, or transmitted via facsimile specifically to the Executive Director of the Department. The facsimile telephone number for the Department may be found at its website, . No oral or telephone requests or requests for declaratory opinions will be accepted. Requests not directed to the Executive Director of the Department shall not be considered as requests for declaratory opinions under these rules, and a response to such requests shall not be provided.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.11 Name, Address, and Signature of Requestor
Each request must include the full name, telephone number, and mailing address of the requestor. All requests shall be signed by the person filing the request, who shall attest that the request complies with the requirements set forth in these rules, including but not limited to, a full, complete, and accurate statement of
relevant facts. Such request shall also include the statement that, to the best of the requestor’s knowledge, no related proceedings are pending before any other administrative or judicial tribunal. A request must be limited to a single transaction or occurrence.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.12 Question Presented
Each request shall contain the following:
A. a clear and concise statement of all facts concerning which the opinion is requested, limited to a single transaction or occurrence;
B. a citation to the statute or regulation or rule at issue;
C. the question(s) sought to be answered in the opinion, stated clearly and concisely;
D. the identity of all other, known persons involved in or impacted by the described facts, including their relationship to the facts, their names, mailing addresses and telephone numbers; and
E. a statement to show that the person seeking the opinion has a substantial interest in the subject matter.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.13 Time for Commission’s Response
Within forty-five (45) days after the receipt of a request which complies with the requirements of these rules, the Department on behalf of the Commission shall:
A. issue a written declaratory opinion regarding the specified statute, rule, or order, as applied to the particular circumstances described in the request;
B. decline to issue a declaratory opinion, stating the reasons therefore; OR
C. agree to issue a declaratory opinion by a specified date, which shall be not later than ninety (90) days after receipt of the written request.
The forty-five (45) day period for response shall begin running on the State of Mississippi business day on which the request is received by the Executive Director of the Department on behalf of the Commission. A copy of the written declaratory opinion shall be mailed promptly to the requestor. The Department reserves the right to present the declaratory opinion to the Commission for final consideration.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.14 Notice By Commission to Third Parties
The Department on behalf of the Commission may, at its discretion, provide notice to any person, agency, or entity that a declaratory opinion has been requested, and it may receive or consider data, facts, arguments, and/or opinions from other persons, agencies, or other entities other than the requestor.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.15 Public Availability of Requests and Declaratory Opinions
Declaratory opinions and requests for declaratory opinions shall be available for public inspection and copying in accordance with the Public Records Act and the Commission’s regulations concerning public records requests, known as Title 11, Part 1, Chapter 2. All declaratory opinions and requests shall be indexed by name and subject. Declaratory opinions and requests may be held confidential by the Commission within the provisions of Title 11, Part 1, Chapter 2 regarding confidentiality of records or if the information is exempt from disclosure under the Mississippi Public Records Act or other laws of the State, including but not limited to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-27(6) and 49-17-39 (Rev. 2003).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 25-61-1, et seq., 17-17-27, 49- 17-25, 49-17-39, 49-17-41, 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., 49-17-1, et seq., and 17-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 3.16 Effect of Declaratory Opinions
The Commission will not pursue any civil or criminal action against a person who is issued a declaratory opinion from the Executive Director of the Department on behalf of the Commission and who, in good faith, follows the direction given in the opinion and acts in accordance therewith unless a court of competent jurisdiction holds that the opinion is manifestly wrong and without any substantial support. Any declaratory opinion rendered by the Executive Director on behalf of the Commission or the Department shall be binding only on the Department and the Commission and the person to whom the opinion is issued. No declaratory opinion will be used as precedent for any other transaction or occurrence beyond that set of facts described in the original request.
Part 1, Chapter 4: Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board Delegation of Permitting Authority Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-28(3), 49-17-29(3)(A), 51-3- 15(1) And 53-7-41(6) (Adopted October 22, 1996; Revised March 27, 2001; Revised December 14, 2004)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-17(i), 49-17-25, 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.1 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.2 Delegation and Reporting
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.3 Appeal __________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.1 Definitions
As used in these regulations, the following terms shall have the following definitions:
A. "Department" shall mean the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
B. "Executive Director" shall mean the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
C. "Delegated Permit" shall mean an air pollution control permit, a water pollution control permit, a permit required under the Solid Waste Disposal Law of 1974 (Title 17, Chapter 17 of the Mississippi Code Annotated, as amended), a permit to withdraw surface water or ground water pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 51-3-1 through 51-3-55, any related general permit, a water quality certification issued pursuant to § 401 of the federal Clean Water Act and Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-28(3) or the modification or renewal of any of the permit or certifications listed above. However, "Delegated Permit" shall not include any permit for a commercial hazardous waste management facility or for a municipal solid waste landfill or incinerator, or the modification or renewal of such a permit, or any permit which by law must be issued by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
D. “Delegated Surface Mining Permit” shall mean a permit for a surface mining operation pursuant to the Mississippi Surface Mining and Reclamation Act (Title 53, Chapter 7 of the Mississippi Code Annotated, as amended) including any general permit.
E. “Modify,” “Modified,” or “Modification,” shall include, but not be limited to, the transfer of any rights in a permit from one party to another.
F. "Permit Board" shall mean the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, created by Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-28.
History
- Source: Miss Code Ann. §§ 49-17-28(3), 49-17-29(3)(A), 51-3-15(1) 53-7-41(6), 49-2-1, et seq., 49-17-1, et seq., 51-3-1, et seq., 53-7-1, et, seq., and 17-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.2 Delegation and Reporting
A. By the adoption of these regulations, the Permit Board, pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29 and § 51-3-15(1), delegates to the Executive Director the authority to make decisions on the issuance, reissuance, denial, modification, or revocation of Delegated Permits. Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 53-7-41(6), the Permit Board further delegates to the Executive Director the authority to make decisions on the issuance, reissuance, modification, recission or cancellation of Delegated Surface Mining Permits. Delegated Surface Mining Permits may be cancelled at the request of the operator, if the operator
does not commence operations under the permit by stripping, grubbing or mining any part of the permit area. Delegated Surface Mining Permits may be rescinded if, because of a change in post-mining use of the land by the landowner, the completion of the approved reclamation plan by the operator is no longer feasible.
B. As a further condition prescribed by the Permit Board of this delegation of authority to the Executive Director, the Permit Board directs the Executive Director to delegate the authority to issue, reissue, deny, modify, or revoke Delegated Permits and to delegate the authority to issue, reissue, modify, rescind or cancel Delegated Surface Mining Permits to senior staff personnel within the Department, in order that the delegation made in section II.A. of these regulations will not detract in a significant way from the Executive Director's performance of his or her other duties. Delegated Permits may be issued, reissued, denied, revoked, or modified and Delegated Surface Mining Permits may be issued, reissued, modified, rescinded or cancelled by the Executive Director, by the Head of the Office of the Department in which the permit action is taken, or by the Division Chief for the Division of the Department in which the permit action is taken. The Executive Director may, at his discretion, determine which of these Office Heads and Division Chiefs will be granted the authority to issue, deny, revoke or modify Delegated Permits and to issue, reissue, modify, rescind or cancel Delegated Surface Mining Permits. The Executive Director may, at his discretion, determine that any application for the issuance, reissuance, modification, denial or revocation of a Delegated Permit and any application for the issuance, reissuance, modification, rescission or cancellation of a Delegated Surface Mining Permit will be presented to and determined by the Permit Board rather than by the Executive Director or Department personnel.
C. The Executive Director, in person or through his delegate, shall report to the Permit Board at its next regularly-scheduled meeting each action taken by him or by Department personnel listed above to issue, reissue, deny, modify, or revoke a Delegated Permit and to issue, reissue, modify, rescind or cancel a Delegated Surface Mining Permit. The Permit Board then shall vote to note and to record on its minutes the report of the Executive Director or his delegate. In determining whether to note and to record on its minutes the report, the Permit Board shall consider only whether the report accurately lists and describes the actions taken by the Executive Director or his delegate(s). The Permit Board shall not review any action regarding a permit taken by the Executive Director or his delegate(s) unless and until a formal hearing on the permit action is convened pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29(4)(b).
D. If the Department or Permit Board is required by any statute or regulation to notify the public of the receipt of an application for a permit or of the Department's intent to issue, reissue, deny, modify, or revoke a Delegated Permit or to issue, reissue, modify, rescind or cancel a Delegated Surface Mining Permit or to conduct a public hearing prior to taking any permit action, no Delegated Permit or Delegated Surface Mining Permit shall be issued by the Executive Director or his delegate until the statutory or regulatory public notice, hearing, and comment periods and procedures are completed as required for that permit action.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-28(3), 49-17-29(3)(A), 51-3-15(1), 53-7-41(6), 49-2-1, et seq., 49-17-1,et seq., 51-3-1, et seq., 53-7-1, et, seq., and 17-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.3 Rule 4.3
Appeal: The appeal of any issuance, reissuance, denial, modification, or revocation of a Delegated Permit and the appeal of any issuance, reissuance, denial, recission or cancellation of a Delegated Surface Mining Permit by the Executive Director shall be appealable pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29 in the same manner as a non-delegated permit or decision of the Permit Board. The time period in which an aggrieved party may file a request for a formal hearing before the Permit Board concerning a Delegated Permit action or a Delegated Surface Mining Permit action taken by the Executive Director or his delegate shall be calculated from the date of the Permit Board meeting at which the decision of the Executive Director or his delegate is accepted by the Permit Board. This time period shall be calculated in the manner prescribed by Mississippi Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a).
Part 1, Chapter 5: Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board: Regulations Regarding Administrative Procedures Pursuant to the Mississippi Administrative Procedures Act (Adopted November 8, 2005, Amended April 10, 2018)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-28(3), 49-17-29(3)(A), 51-3-15(1), 53-7-41(6), 49-2-1, et seq., 49-17-1,et seq., 51-3-1, et seq., 53-7-1, et, seq., and 17-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.1 Description of Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.2 When Oral Proceedings Will Be Scheduled on Proposed Rules
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.3 Notification of Oral Proceeding for Proposed Rule-Making
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.4 Presiding Officer
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.5 Public Presentation and Participation for Proposed Rule-Making
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.6 Conduct of Oral Proceeding for Proposed Rule-Making
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.7 Persons Who May Request Declaratory Opinions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.8 Subjects Which May be Addressed in Declaratory Opinions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.9 Circumstances in Which Declaratory Opinions Will Not Be Issued
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.10 Where to Send Requests
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.11 Name, Address, and Signature of Requestor
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.12 Question Presented
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.13 Time for Permit Board’s Response
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.14 Notice by Permit Board to Third Parties
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.15 Public Availability of Requests and Declaratory Opinions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.16 Effect of Declaratory Opinions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.1 Description of Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board
Reference is made to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-28 and 49-17-29 (Rev. 2012), which create and set forth the duties and responsibilities of the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board (“Permit Board”). The Permit Board issues, reissues, modifies, denies, transfers, and revokes Mississippi environmental permits and certifications administered under the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, state mining laws, and state water resource control laws. The membership of the Permit Board is set by Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-28 (Rev. 2012).
Seven of the Permit Board members serve by virtue of the State office they hold (“Ex Officio Members”). Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-28, the membership of the Permit Board shall be composed of the Chief of the Bureau of Environmental Health of the State Board of Health, or his designee; the Executive Director of the Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks, or his designee; the Head of the Office of Land and Water Resources of the Department of Environmental Quality, or his designee; the Supervisor of the State Oil and Gas Board, or his designee; the Executive Director of the Department of Marine Resources, or his designee; the Head of the Office of Geology and Energy Resources of the Department of Environmental Quality, or his designee; and the Commissioner of Agriculture and Commerce, or his designee.
The remaining two members of the Permit Board are appointed by the Governor and are required to be a retired professional engineer knowledgeable in the engineering of water wells and a retired water well contractor, respectively. Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-28, the retired professional engineer and the retired water well contractor shall only vote on matters pertaining to the Office of Land and Water Resources.
In accordance with 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 1, R. 1.1.B., at least a majority of the Ex Officio Members of the Permit Board shall represent the public interest and shall not derive any significant portion of their income from persons subject to permits under the federal Clean Air Act or enforcement orders under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA). Each Ex Officio Member of the Permit Board shall certify annually as to whether the member derives a significant portion of income from persons subject to permits under the CAA or enforcement orders under the CAA. If a majority of Ex Officio Members derives a significant portion of income from persons subject to permits under the CAA or enforcement orders under the CAA, then the Permit Board shall take such action as may be necessary to ensure the replacement of as many members of said majority as may be necessary with designates who do not derive a significant portion of income from persons subject to permits under the CAA or enforcement orders under the CAA. In order
to facilitate the replacement of an Ex Officio Member as may be necessary, the Bureau Chief, Executive Director, Office Head, Board Supervisor, or Commissioner who designated the member shall designate a replacement who does not derive a significant portion of income from persons subject to permits under the CAA or enforcement orders under the CAA.
The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“Department”) serves as staff for the Permit Board. The Department staff is comprised of four (4) divisions: the Office of Administrative Services, the Office of Geology and Energy Resources, the Office of Land and Water Resources, and the Office of Pollution Control. The Executive Director of the Department serves as the Executive Director of the Permit Board. The Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (“Commission”) is empowered to formulate environmental policy, adopt and enforce rules and regulations, receive funding, conduct studies for using the state’s resources, and discharge duties, responsibilities, and powers as necessary. The Department also serves as staff for the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.2 When Oral Proceedings Will Be Scheduled on Proposed Rules
Prior to the adoption, amendment, or repeal of rules and regulations administered by the Department, the Permit Board shall conduct a public hearing after public notice. Such notice shall be given by publication once a week for three (3) successive weeks in a newspaper having a general circulation throughout the state. The notice shall contain a description of the proposed regulation and the time, date, and place of the hearing.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.3 Notification of Oral Proceeding for Proposed Rule-Making
The date, time, and place of all oral proceedings for proposed rule-making shall be filed with the Office of the Secretary of State and, within three (3) days of such filing, mailed to anyone who makes a timely request. The oral proceedings shall be scheduled no earlier than twenty (20) days from the filing of this information with the Office of the Secretary of State. For at least twenty-five (25) days from the filing with the Office of the Secretary of State of the notice of proposed rule adoption, the Permit Board shall afford persons the opportunity to submit, in writing, argument, data, and any views on the proposed rule.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.4 Presiding Officer
The Executive Director of the Department, or his designee who is familiar with the substance of the proposed rule, shall preside at the oral proceeding on a proposed rule.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § § 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.5 Public Presentations and Participation for Proposed Rule-Making
A. At an oral proceeding on a proposed rule, persons may make oral statements and may make documentary and physical submissions, which may include views, comments, or arguments concerning the proposed rule.
B. The presiding officer may place time limitations on individual oral presentations when necessary to assure the orderly and expeditious conduct of the oral proceeding. To encourage joint oral presentations and to avoid repetition, additional time may be provided for persons whose presentations represent the views of other individuals as well as their own.
C. Persons making oral presentations are discouraged from restating matters that already have been submitted in writing.
D. There shall be no interruption of a participant who has been given the floor by the presiding officer, except that the presiding officer may, in his or her discretion, interrupt or end the participant’s time for presentation where the orderly conduct of the proceeding so requires.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.6 Conduct of Oral Proceeding for Proposed Rule-Making
A. Presiding officer. The presiding officer shall have authority to conduct the proceeding for proposed rule-making in his or her discretion for its orderly conduct. The presiding officer may:
(1) call the proceeding to order;
(2) allow for a brief synopsis of the proposed rule and a statement of the statutory authority for the proposed rule;
(3) call on those individuals who desire to speak for or against the proposed rule;
(4) allow for additional statements following all participants’ comments; and
(5) adjourn the proceeding.
B. Questions. Where time permits and to facilitate the exchange of information, the presiding officer may open the floor to questions or general discussion concerning the proposed rule. The presiding officer in his or her discretion may question participants and/or permit the questioning of participants by other participants about any matter
relating to that rule-making proceeding, including any prior written submissions made by those participants; however, no participant shall be required to answer any question.
C. Physical and Documentary Submissions. Submissions presented by participants in an oral proceeding with regard to proposed rule-making shall be submitted to the presiding officer. Such submissions become the property of the Permit Board and are subject to the Commission’s public records request procedures.
D. Recording. The Permit Board may record oral proceedings for the purpose of rule- making by stenographic or electronic means, at its discretion.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-3.104, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.7 Persons Who May Request Declaratory Opinions
Any person with a substantial interest in the subject matter may request a declaratory opinion from the Permit Board by following the specified procedures. “Substantial interest in the subject matter” means: an individual, business group, or other entity that is directly affected by the Permit Board’s administration of a statute, rule, or order within its primary jurisdiction.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.8 Subjects Which May Be Addressed In Declaratory Opinions
The Department on behalf of the Permit Board will issue declaratory opinions regarding the applicability to specified facts of:
A. a statute administered or enforceable by the Permit Board,
B. a rule promulgated by the Permit Board, or
C. an order issued by the Permit Board. The Permit Board will not issue a declaratory opinion regarding a statute, rule, or order which is outside the primary jurisdiction of the Board. “Primary jurisdiction of the Board” means the Board has a constitutional or statutory grant of authority in the subject matter at issue.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.9 Circumstances In Which Declaratory Opinions Will Not Be Issued
The Department on behalf of the Permit Board may, for good cause, refuse to issue a declaratory opinion. The circumstances in which declaratory opinions will not be issued include, but are not necessarily limited to:
A. lack of clarity concerning the question presented or situations in which the facts presented in the request are not sufficient to answer the question presented;
B. pending or anticipated litigation, administrative action, or other adjudication or decision making which either may answer the question presented by the request or otherwise make an answer unnecessary;
C. requests that fail to contain information required by these rules or in which the requestor failed to follow the procedures set forth in these rules;
D. issues which have become moot, or are abstract or hypothetical such that the requestor is not substantially affected by the application of the statute or rule;
E. issues in which no present controversy exists, meaning that the requestor is not faced with existing facts or those certain to arise which raise a question concerning the application of the statute or rule;
F. questions concerning the legal validity of a statute or rule;
G. requests not based upon facts calculated to aid in the planning of future conduct, but rather, adjudication of the correctness of past conduct or efforts to establish the effect of that conduct;
H. questions involving the application of a criminal statute or sets of facts that may constitute a crime;
I. questions the answer to which would require disclosure of information which is privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure by law;
J. questions that are known to be currently the subject of an Attorney General’s opinion request or which already have been answered by an Attorney General’s opinion;
K. questions on which a similar request is pending before the Permit Board, or concerning which a proceeding is known to be pending on the same subject matter before any agency, administrative or judicial tribunal;
L. questions where issuance of a declaratory opinion may adversely affect the interests of the State, the Permit Board, or any of its officers or employees in any litigation pending or which reasonably may be expected to arise;
M. questions that involve eligibility for a license, permit, certificate, or other approval by the Permit Board, or some other agency, where there is a statutory or regulatory application process by which eligibility for said license, permit, certificate, or other approval would be determined; or
N. requests not directed to the Executive Director of the Department.
Rule 5.10. Where to Send Requests. All requests for declaratory opinions from the Permit Board must be in writing and mailed, e-mailed, delivered, or transmitted via facsimile specifically to the Executive Director of the Department. The facsimile telephone number for the Department may be found at its website, http://www.mdeq.ms.gov No oral or telephone requests or requests for declaratory opinions will be accepted. Requests not directed to the Executive Director of the Department shall not be considered as requests for declaratory opinions under these rules, and a response to such requests shall not be provided.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq..
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.11 Name, Address, and Signature of Requestor
Each request must include the full name, telephone number, and mailing address of the requestor. All requests shall be signed by the person filing the request, who shall attest that the request complies with the requirements set forth in these rules, including but not limited to, a full, complete, and accurate statement of relevant facts. Such request shall also include the statement that, to the best of the requestor’s knowledge, no related proceedings are pending before any other administrative or judicial tribunal. A request must be limited to a single transaction or occurrence.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.12 Question Presented
Each request shall contain the following:
A. a clear and concise statement of all facts concerning which the opinion is requested, limited to a single transaction or occurrence;
B. a citation to the statute or regulation or rule at issue;
C. the question(s) sought to be answered in the opinion, stated clearly and concisely;
D. the identity of all other, known persons involved in or impacted by the described facts, including their relationship to the facts, their names, mailing addresses and telephone numbers; and
E. a statement to show that the person seeking the opinion has a substantial interest in the subject matter.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.13 Time for Permit Board’s Response
Within forty-five (45) days after the receipt of a request which complies with the requirements of these rules, the Department on behalf of the Permit Board shall:
The forty-five (45) day period for response shall begin running on the State of Mississippi business day on which the request is received by the Executive Director of the Department on behalf of the Permit Board. A copy of the written declaratory opinion shall be mailed promptly to the requestor. The Department reserves the right to present the declaratory opinion to the Permit Board for final consideration.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.14 Notice by Permit Board to Third Parties
The Department on behalf of the Permit Board may, at its discretion, provide notice to any person, agency, or entity that a declaratory opinion has been requested, and it may receive or consider data, facts, arguments, and/or opinions from other persons, agencies, or other entities other than the requestor.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.15 Public Availability of Requests and Declaratory Opinions
Declaratory opinions and requests for declaratory opinions shall be available for public inspection and copying in accordance with the Public Records Act and the Commission’s regulations concerning public records requests, known as MCEQ-2. All declaratory opinions and requests shall be indexed by name and subject. Declaratory opinions and requests may be held confidential by the Permit Board within the provisions of MCEQ-2 regarding confidentiality of records or if the information is exempt from disclosure under the Mississippi Public Records Act or other laws of the State, including but not limited to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-27(6) and 49-17-39 (Rev. 2012).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 5.16 Effect of Declaratory Opinions
The Permit Board will not pursue any civil or criminal action against a person who is issued a declaratory opinion from the Executive Director of the Department on behalf of the Permit Board and who, in good faith, follows the direction given in the opinion and acts in accordance therewith unless a court of competent jurisdiction holds that the opinion is manifestly wrong and without any substantial support. Any declaratory opinion rendered by the Executive Director on behalf of the Permit Board shall be binding only on the Department and the Permit Board and the person to whom the opinion is issued. No declaratory opinion will be used as precedent for any other transaction or occurrence beyond that set of facts described in the original request.
Part 1, Chapter 6: Rules of Practice and Procedure for Formal Evidentiary Hearings before the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 25-43-2.103, 25-43-1.101, et seq., 49-17-28, 49-17-29, and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.1 General
These rules are adopted pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49- 17-29 (3)(d) which provides the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board (“Permit Board”) may adopt rules of practice and procedure governing its proceedings consistent with the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality’s regulations. These Rules replace the previous “Procedures for Conducting Permit Board Evidentiary Hearings.”
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-29 (3)(d); 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.2 Formal Evidentiary Hearings
These procedures govern formal evidentiary hearings before the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board (“Permit Board”) held pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated, Section 49-17-29 (4)(b) (Rev. 2012), and apply to all parties including the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-29 (4)(b); 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.3 Severability
If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of any of these rules and regulations, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances, is for any reason challenged or held to be invalid or void, the remaining regulations or their application to other persons or circumstances will remain valid.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.4 Hearing Officer
A. Permit Board. The Permit Board created by Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-17- 28 (Rev. 2012) is the exclusive administrative body to make decisions on permit issuance, reissuance, denial, modification, transfer, or revocation of air pollution control and water pollution control permits (Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq.) and permits required under the Solid Wastes Disposal Law of 1974 (Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-1, et seq.) and all other permits within the jurisdiction of the Permit Board including, but not limited to the following: surface mining permits (Miss. Code Ann. § 53-7-1, et seq.); surface coal mining permits (Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9-1, et seq.); water withdrawal permits (Miss. Code Ann. § 51-3-1, et seq.; §401 water quality certifications; and dam safety permits (Miss. Code Ann. § 51-3-1, et seq.). The Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”) is also the Executive Director of the Permit Board. Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29 (3)(b).
B. Hearing Officer. The Permit Board may, through the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“MDEQ”), designate a Hearing Officer to conduct the formal evidentiary hearing on all or any part of the issues on behalf of the Permit Board. The Hearing Officer may be an attorney from the Mississippi Attorney General’s Office,
another attorney who does not represent a party in the hearing, or a member of the Permit Board. MDEQ will notify the parties once the Hearing Officer has been designated.
- Authority. The Hearing Officer shall have authority to conduct the hearing in his or her discretion for its orderly conduct. The Hearing Officer may perform functions including but not limited to the following:
a) call the proceeding to order; b) allow a brief synopsis of the proposed action; c) rule on procedural motions including motions to intervene; d) allow the parties to the matter to make opening arguments; e) rule on procedural and evidentiary matters; f) allow for questioning of witnesses including cross-examination, redirect, and for questioning by the Permit Board; g) allow the parties to the matter to make closing arguments; h) advise the Permit Board of procedures for going into executive session, out of executive session, and return to regular session; and i) close the evidentiary hearing.
-
Pre-hearing conference. The Hearing Officer may call a pre-hearing conference or conferences prior to any hearing to establish hearing guidelines and clarify issues, and to discuss scheduling deadlines and pre-hearing orders, if any. Any of the parties may request a pre-hearing conference.
-
Motion Hearing. The Hearing Officer may at the request of any party schedule a motion hearing to consider and decide non-dispositive motions prior to the formal evidentiary hearing. The Hearing Officer may hear dispositive motions and make recommendations to the Permit Board; however, the Permit Board will make the ultimate decision regarding all dispositive motions.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012); 17-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012); 51-3-1, et seq. (Rev. 2003); 53-7-1, et seq. (Rev. 2003); and 53-9-1, et seq. (Rev. 2003).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.5 Hearings
A. Hearing request. Any interested party aggrieved by the Permit Board’s issuance, denial, modification, transfer, revocation, or other permit action may request a formal evidentiary hearing in writing within 30 days after the date the Permit Board takes action upon permit issuance, denial, modification, transfer, revocation or other permit action as reflected on the Permit Board’s minutes pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29 (4)(b) (Rev. 2012); 51-3-15, (Rev. 2003); 53-7-41 (Rev. 2003); and 53-9-77 (Rev. 2003). Though the Permit Board’s action is reflected in the Permit Board’s minutes, which are written after the meeting, the manner for calculating the time in which to appeal is shown in Rule 6.5 B. and C.
B. The time period in which an aggrieved party may file a request for a formal hearing before the Permit Board, concerning a permit action taken by the Permit Board, will be calculated from the date of the Permit Board meeting at which the Permit Board made the decision.
C. Delegated Permits – Time Period. The time period in which an aggrieved party may file a request for a formal hearing before the Permit Board concerning a Delegated Permit action (as defined by 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.1.C) or a Delegated Surface Mining Permit action (as defined by 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.1.D) taken by the Executive Director or his or her delegate shall be calculated from the date of the Permit Board meeting at which the decision of the Executive Director or his or her delegate is accepted by the Permit Board. See 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 4.3.
D. An interested party is any person claiming an interest relating to the property or project which is the subject of the permit action, and who is so situated that the person may be affected by the disposition of that action. Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29 (4)(b) (Rev. 2012); 51-3-15 (Rev. 2003); 53-7-41 (Rev. 2003); and 53-9-77 (Rev. 2003).
E. Form of hearing request. Petitions or requests for hearing must be in writing and may be in the form of a letter, an email, or a facsimile transmission directed to the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality with a copy to the MDEQ legal staff. The petition should be brief and concise and must include the following: a statement of the matter upon which action of the Board is desired; a statement of the petitioner’s interest in the matter; a statement of how the petitioner is so situated that he or she will be affected by the action; and a statement of the relief sought.
F. Time and place of hearing. The Permit Board, through MDEQ, will schedule the time and place of such hearing and notify all parties, including the permittee, through a scheduling letter sent via certified mail.
G. The Permit Board may, at its sole discretion, require all parties to submit written direct and rebuttal testimony, all documentary evidence and exhibits the parties plan to submit into evidence at the hearing, witness lists specifying the witnesses the parties plan to question at the hearing, and written motions and motion responses in advance of the hearing pursuant to deadlines specified in a scheduling letter. Any party may, upon good cause shown, make a written request to file documents after the rebuttal testimony deadline has passed. Such request may be submitted via email to the Hearing Officer with copies to legal counsel for all represented parties and directly to unrepresented parties. The Hearing Officer has the discretion to allow or reject the request. In the event a matter needs to be heard in an expedited manner, the Permit Board may also, in its sole discretion, hold an expedited evidentiary hearing. If the Permit Board decides to hold an expedited hearing, the Board may do so without requiring the parties to pre-file testimony, documents, and other information prior to the hearing. MDEQ staff will notify the parties in writing if the Permit Board decides to hold an expedited hearing and whether the Board will require pre-filing of testimony, documents, and other information.
H. Continuance of hearing.
-
Any party to the hearing, including a party who timely filed a motion to intervene, may request a continuance for good cause shown in writing at least seven days before the evidentiary hearing. The motion must be mailed, emailed, or delivered to the Executive Director of the Permit Board and a copy mailed, emailed, or delivered to each party and intervenor to the hearing. A movant for continuance of the evidentiary hearing must mail, email, or deliver a copy of the motion for continuance to the permittee or permit applicant even if the permittee or applicant is not a party to the evidentiary hearing. All motions for continuance of an evidentiary hearing must state the reason for the continuance. The Hearing Officer or the Permit Board may consider a request for a continuance which is made less than seven days before the evidentiary hearing if the requestor demonstrates extraordinary circumstances necessitating a continuance.
-
The permittee or permit applicant, MDEQ, and all interested parties who have requested a hearing or have intervened in the matter may agree to a continuance of the hearing and may waive the notice requirements. If the parties do not agree to a continuance, the matter will be referred to the Permit Board or its Executive Director for a ruling on a motion to continue.
-
The Permit Board, its Executive Director, or the Hearing Officer on behalf of the Permit Board may grant, deny, or reschedule a hearing on a motion for continuance. The Permit Board, its Executive Director, or the Hearing Officer on behalf of the Permit Board, may grant motions for continuance.
I. Representation by counsel. Any party affected, or potentially affected, by a Permit Board decision may be advised and represented, at the party’s own expense, by a licensed attorney or attorneys.
-
Any party affected by a Permit Board decision may represent himself or herself (pro se). In the case of a corporation or other artificial person recognized by law, the party may participate through a duly authorized representative, such as an officer, director or appropriate employee, whether or not that person is a licensed attorney. Under no circumstances may a pro se party represent the interests of other parties in a manner constituting unauthorized practice of law pursuant to Mississippi law including Miss. Code Ann. § 73-3-55 (Rev. 2012) and as defined by the Mississippi Supreme Court in Darby v. Miss. State Bar, 185 So.2d 684, 687-88 (Miss. 1966).
-
Entry of appearance by counsel may be made by:
a. signing any filing;
b. filing a notice of appearance; or
c. appearance as counsel at a Permit Board pre-hearing conference or hearing.
-
After counsel makes an appearance on behalf of a party, all orders, notices and filings must be served only upon such counsel unless otherwise requested.
-
Counsel wishing to withdraw must provide written notice to the Executive Director, the Permit Board, or the Hearing Officer with a copy to the Legal Department, prior to the hearing.
-
Foreign Attorneys. Attorneys not licensed to practice law in the State of Mississippi must request admission pro hac vice to appear and represent a party before the Permit Board pursuant to the procedures set forth in Rule 46(b) of the Mississippi Rules of Appellate Procedure.
J. Abuse of process. The Permit Board may dismiss an evidentiary hearing request filed by a party who has previously abused the evidentiary hearing process by failing to attend or refusing to participate in past hearings requested by that party, or by leaving before the end of the hearing.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.6 Interventions
Any person who meets the statutory definition of “interested party” under Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29 (4)(b) and 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.5.D may file a written Motion to Intervene.
A. Leave. Leave to intervene will entitle the intervenor to the status of a party and to participate as a party.
B. Form. Motions to intervene shall set out clearly the facts from which the nature of the movant’s alleged right or interest can be determined, the grounds of the proposed intervention and any other pertinent facts. Movants will only be allowed to intervene if they meet the definition of “interested party” set forth in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29 (4)(b) and Rule 6.5.D which is as follows: “any person claiming an interest relating to the property or project which is the subject of the permit action, and who is so situated that the person may be affected by the disposition of that action.” The motion to intervene must contain a certificate of service upon all parties of record. The movant shall file a proposed order allowing intervention with the motion to intervene. The MDEQ Legal staff will provide example forms, upon request, to any proposed intervenor.
C. Time for. Motions to intervene must be filed on or before the date specified in the scheduling letter. An interested party who did not timely file a motion to intervene may not participate as a party at the evidentiary hearing except upon good cause shown.
D. Failure to comply with time limitations. Motions to intervene not timely filed under this rule will only be allowed in the discretion of the Permit Board and only upon good cause shown. Except as otherwise ordered, a grant of an untimely motion to intervene must not be a basis for delaying or deferring any procedural schedule established prior to the grant
of that motion. The Permit Board may limit a late intervenor’s participation to avoid delay and prejudice to the other participants.
E. Service of Copies. Documents filed after a person is allowed to intervene must be served on the intervenor in the same manner as for parties.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-29 (4)(b); 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.7 Subpoenas and Record Requests
A. Subpoenas. The Permit Board may subpoena and any party to the hearing may request subpoenas for appearance of witnesses who may have relevant knowledge and the same will be issued by the Executive Director of the Permit Board and served by any lawful officer in the county of the person to whom the subpoena will be directed.
B. Procedure. Upon the written request of any party or his or her attorney, no later than seven days prior to the evidentiary hearing, the Executive Director of the Permit Board may issue subpoenas. In issuing subpoenas, the original and all copies must show at whose instance the subpoena is issued. All persons responding to process issued under this rule will be entitled to the same per diem and mileage as witnesses attending the Circuit Courts in Mississippi. Such costs are to be borne by the party at whose instance the process is issued. Requesting parties are responsible for service of subpoenas on the subpoenaed witnesses.
C. Subpoenas Duces Tecum. Subpoenas duces tecum will be issued upon the written request of a party or his or her attorney, issued and served no later than 14 days prior to the evidentiary hearing, on parties or witnesses other than MDEQ and then only when the motion sets forth as plainly as possible the books, accounts, papers or records desired to be produced and the purpose of their production. Requests for MDEQ documents must be made through a public records request pursuant to 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, Ch. 2.
D. Motion to Quash Subpoenas and Subpoenas Duces Tecum. The Permit Board or the Hearing Officer may consider motions to quash subpoenas and subpoenas duces tecum, including such motion made by a non-party served with a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum. The Hearing Officer may schedule an expedited hearing or conference call to consider a motion to quash a subpoena or subpoena duces tecum.
E. Protection of Confidential Information. A party may file a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum which seeks information concerning trade secrets pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-27(6) or 49-17-39 if the party properly asserted confidentiality over that information as described in those statutes and in 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, Ch. 2.6. A party may alternatively produce the subpoenaed information with the trade secret information redacted. Challenges regarding the validity of a confidentiality claim may only be considered by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-29 and 49-17-39 and 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, Ch. 2.6.
F. Records Request. Requests for records from MDEQ may be made pursuant to the Mississippi Public Records Act through MDEQ’s Freedom of Information Office pursuant to 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, Ch. 2. If the party making a records request wishes to submit documents obtained as evidence at the evidentiary hearing, the documents must be submitted in accordance with Rule 6.3.G.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-29 (4)(b) and (5)(b); 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012); 17-17- 27(6) (Rev. 2012); and 25-61-1, et seq. (Rev. 2010).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.8 Service of Process
Subpoenas, subpoenas duces tecum, notices, orders, or other papers required to be served may be served in any manner provided by law. Any person serving such process is entitled to the same fees as are paid for like services in the courts of this state and the cost will be borne by the party at whose instance the process is served. It is the responsibility of the party seeking a subpoena, subpoena duces tecum, notice, orders, or other papers required to be served to arrange for service of process on the respective witness.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-29 (4)(b) and 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.9 Preliminary Motions
Any request for an action or ruling prior to a hearing on the merits in a contested permit must be made in writing.
A. The request must state the grounds therefore and set forth the relief or order sought. The Permit Board, its Executive Director, or Hearing Officer may shorten or extend the time for filing preliminary motions. If a time for filing motions is specified in a scheduling letter, any party filing a motion must file and serve the motion on the date specified. The parties may also mutually agree to shorten or extend the time for filing motions.
B. Any party opposing a preliminary motion must file and serve a response within the time specified in the scheduling letter. The Permit Board, its Executive Director, or Hearing Officer may shorten or extend the time for responding to any motion. If a time for responding to motions is specified in a scheduling letter, any party opposing a motion must file and serve a response on the date specified. The parties may also mutually agree to shorten or extend the time for filing responses.
C. Any party may, in a preliminary motion or response, request oral argument or the presentation of oral testimony or the Permit Board, its Executive Director, or Hearing Officer may order argument or the presentation of oral testimony to a Hearing Officer or the Permit Board. If such a request is granted or such an order entered, the Permit Board, or its Executive Director, will set the date and time therefore and may order that the argument be heard by telephone conference call.
D. Preliminary motions, responses, matters submitted in support thereof, and any orders with respect thereto must be filed with the Executive Director of the Permit Board and must be served on all parties, intervenors (if applicable), and the permittee or permit applicant if not a party.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.10 Pre-hearing Conference
Any party to an evidentiary hearing may request a pre- hearing conference.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.11 Ex Parte Communications
After the announcement of, or notice of intent to, request a formal evidentiary hearing before the Permit Board, there shall be no ex parte contacts relating to the facts or merits of the petitioner’s request between any person in favor of or opposed to the hearing petition and the Hearing Officer or any Permit Board member. Any communications with the hearing Officer or any Permit Board member must be copied to all parties.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.12 Scheduling Letter
The Permit Board, through MDEQ, may enter a scheduling letter which may include provisions for setting a pre-hearing conference, and which also may include instructions and deadlines for the parties to submit pre-filed direct and rebuttal testimony, documentary evidence, motions, responses, witness lists, and to exchange all exhibits expected to be introduced into the record of the evidentiary hearing. The scheduling letter will be sent certified mail to all parties and the permittee (or permit applicant), if not a party. Motions in Limine, if any, must be filed no later than seven days before the evidentiary hearing. Responses to Motions in Limine may be made on the day of the hearing prior to opening statements. The Hearing Officer may consider and rule upon Motions in Limine.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.13 Filing of Documents
A. Number of copies. The original and 10 copies of all petitions, pre-filed testimony, exhibits, motions, pleadings of any nature, and any other type of documents required or allowed to be filed must be filed with the Permit Board either by hand delivery to or by mailing to the following:
Executive Director’s Office Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality P.O. Box 2261 (39225) 515 E. Amite Street Jackson, Mississippi 39201
B. Filing by email or facsimile. Parties may meet the filing requirement by submitting all petitions, pre-filed testimony, exhibits, motions, pleadings of any nature, and any other type of documents required or allowed to be filed via email or facsimile to the Executive Director, with copies to MDEQ’s Legal Department and counsel for all parties by 5:00 p.m. on the date such documents are due. Parties who choose to meet the filing requirement by emailing documents must submit the original document and 10 hard copies of such emailed or faxed document to the Executive Director by the close of the following business day.
C. Service of Copies. One copy of all documents or pleadings required or allowed to be filed under the provisions of these rules must be served upon all parties as defined in these rules and the permittee (or permit applicant), if not a party, either in person or by mail to such parties, permittee, or their respective attorneys.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.14 Written Pre-filed Testimony
A. When filed. If required by the Permit Board or its Executive Director, written pre-filed testimony must be filed prior to hearing in accordance with deadlines specified in the scheduling letter sent by the Permit Board or its designee. The parties may also mutually agree to shorten or extend the time for filing written pre-filed testimony.
B. Form. Written pre-filed testimony must be submitted in affidavit form which must be sworn and notarized.
C. Exhibits. Any exhibits which may be used at hearing, including paper and electronic documents, photographs, videos, etc., must be attached to the pre-filed testimony or provided prior to the evidentiary hearing in accordance with the deadlines established in the scheduling letter.
D. Who may submit pre-filed testimony. Any party to the proceeding may submit pre-filed testimony.
E. Limitation of pre-filed testimony. A pro se party may submit pre-filed testimony on his or her own behalf, but not on behalf of any other party. Alternatively, the parties may retain legal counsel, at their own expense, to file pre-filed testimony on their behalf and to represent their interests. Upon request, MDEQ’s Legal Staff will provide any party, including a pro se party, with an example affidavit which may be used as a template for pre-filed testimony.
F. Submission of pre-filed direct testimony. All parties who wish to file pre-filed direct testimony and exhibits must file the testimony and exhibits with the Executive Director of the Permit Board on or before the date specified in the scheduling letter. A copy of any pre-filed direct testimony must be mailed to all parties and the permittee or permit applicant, if not a party, by the deadline for filing specified in the scheduling letter.
G. Submission of pre-filed rebuttal testimony. All parties who wish to file pre-filed rebuttal testimony and exhibits must file same with the Executive Director of the Permit Board on or before the deadline specified in the scheduling letter. A copy of any pre-filed rebuttal testimony must be mailed to all parties, and the permittee or permit applicant if not a party, by the deadline for filing specified in the scheduling letter. Pre-filed rebuttal testimony is limited to the scope of direct testimony that it is offered to rebut.
H. Submission of motions and motion responses. All parties must file any motions and motion responses with the Executive Director of the Permit Board on or before the deadline specified in the scheduling letter. A copy of any motions and motion responses must be mailed to all parties and the permittee or applicant, if not a party, by the deadline for filing specified in the scheduling letter.
I. Waiver and modification. The Permit Board, or its Executive Director, has the discretion to waive or modify the pre-filed document requirements.
J. Copies of pre-filed testimony, motions, responses, and witness lists. All parties must file the original and 10 copies of any pre-filed direct testimony, pre-filed rebuttal testimony, motions, responses, witness lists, and exhibits with the Executive Director of the Permit Board pursuant to the deadlines established in the scheduling letter and in accordance with Rule 6.13.
K. Procedure after Permit Board waiver. If the Permit Board, or its Executive Director, in its discretion waives the requirements for pre-filed testimony, then at least seven days before the hearing, all parties involved in the proceedings shall exchange a list of all witnesses each party anticipates will be called during the hearing, accompanied by a brief statement of the testimony expected from each. All parties must also exchange copies of all exhibits and documents they expect to introduce as evidence at the evidentiary hearing at least seven days prior to the hearing. Any motions will be considered prior to opening statements. The Hearing Officer may rule upon non-dispositive motions. At the hearing, each party may make opening and closing statements. Witnesses will be subject to direct examination, cross examination, and redirect examination. Re-cross examination will be allowed at the discretion of the Hearing Officer or the Permit Board. The Permit Board members and the Hearing Officer may question the witnesses at any time during the hearing.
L. Witness and exhibit list. A list of witnesses each party intends to call for direct and cross-examination and a copy of all exhibits and documents to be used at the hearing must be filed with the Executive Director of the Permit Board and a copy provided to all parties and the permittee (or permit applicant), if not a party, by the date specified in the scheduling letter or, if the Permit Board waived the requirement for pre-filed direct and rebuttal testimony, by the deadlines specified in Rule 6.14.K.
M. Failure to follow procedural rules. Failure to submit pre-filed testimony, exhibits, and documents in the manner set forth by these rules without expressed waiver or modification by the Permit Board or the Hearing Officer is grounds for exclusion of such testimony, exhibits, and documents from the evidentiary hearing.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.15 Hearing Procedures
A. Commencement. The Hearing Officer will open the hearing by identifying each of the
parties and describing the subject of the hearing.
B. Rules of evidence. The strict rules of evidence will not apply; however, all objections must be timely made. The Hearing Officer may limit or exclude testimony which is redundant or not relevant to the issues before the Permit Board. While the Permit Board will not be bound by the strict rules of evidence, it must base all of its determinations on sufficient evidence.
C. Sequestration. Any party to the hearing may move to invoke the rule of sequestration and the Hearing Officer may rule on the motion.
-
If the rule is invoked, no witnesses found improperly present in the hearing room during the hearing may testify.
-
The Hearing Officer may waive a violation of a sequestration order if all opposing parties consent to a waiver, or if the presence of the witness sequestered from the hearing does not substantially affect any other party.
-
Each party may have one corporate, agency, or other representative remain throughout the hearing and that representative may also testify as a witness.
D. Motions, responses, preliminary matters. The Permit Board may consider motions, responses, and any other preliminary matters prior to opening statements.
E. Order of proof. MDEQ staff will first present its proof and analysis and may give a recommendation with regard to the permit in question, followed by presentation of proof by the non-objecting party, if any, and subsequently by the objecting party.
F. Opening statements. Each party will be allowed to make a brief opening statement. Opening statements will be given prior to presentation of the party’s evidence to the Permit Board. The statement may include a brief statement regarding the party’s case and the evidence by which the party expects to support his or her case.
G. Questioning of witnesses.
-
Pre-filed testimony. Unless the Permit Board or its Executive Director allows an evidentiary hearing without requiring submission of pre-filed testimony, each witness will testify through his or her pre-filed testimony. A witness may present live testimony in the beginning of his or her testimony, as a summary of their pre- filed testimony, for up to 15 minutes.
-
Other testimony. A witness who has not submitted pre-filed testimony in an evidentiary hearing in which it is required will not be allowed to testify unless the witness is a subpoenaed adverse witness or unless the Permit Board so allows or unless all parties to the evidentiary hearing agree to allow the testimony. Such
witness will testify, if allowed, through examination by the party sponsoring the testimony.
-
Cross-examination. The Hearing Officer will allow cross-examination which will be limited to the subject matter of the direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness.
-
Redirect testimony. Redirect testimony will be limited to the scope of the cross- examination testimony and will be offered to rebut any allegation or inconsistency raised on cross-examination.
-
Further re-cross examination and rebuttal. The Hearing Officer must permit cross-examination, and redirect examination limited to matters raised on cross- examination, and may permit re-cross-examination limited to matters raised during redirect examination.
-
Questions by Permit Board and Hearing Officer. The Permit Board members and the Hearing Officer may question a witness at any time during the hearing.
-
Re-cross examination will be allowed at the discretion of the Hearing Officer or the Permit Board.
H. Witness availability. All witnesses who provide pre-filed testimony must be made available for cross-examination by all other parties and for questioning by the Permit Board.
-
Failure to make witness available. The Hearing Officer may, upon motion of a party to the hearing, strike the pre-filed testimony of a witness who fails to attend the evidentiary hearing from the hearing record. The Hearing Officer, in his or her discretion, may allow pre-filed testimony of an absent witness if the witness is absent due to death or extenuating circumstances to be made part of the record. Parties may agree to allow pre-filed testimony of an absent witness to be introduced into the hearing record.
-
Exception for adverse or impeachment witnesses. Parties are not required to submit pre-filed testimony for adverse witnesses or witness called solely for impeachment purposes (i.e., to attack the credibility of a witness), but these witnesses must be identified in the witness list as specified in the scheduling letter.
I. Objections - offers of proof. Grounds for objection to the admission or exclusion of evidence must be stated briefly at the time the evidence is offered. If the objection to the evidence offered is sustained, a proffer may be made for the record which consists of a statement of the substance of the excluded evidence. When a party objects to the admission of evidence, the Hearing Officer will rule on the objection.
J. Closing statements. At the conclusion of all testimony, each party may make a brief closing statement.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.16 Failure to Appear at the Hearing – Default
If the hearing petitioner fails to appear at the scheduled time and place set for the formal evidentiary hearing, the Permit Board may dismiss the petition for a formal evidentiary hearing.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.17 Executive Session
The Permit Board may recess into executive session to deliberate in accordance with the following procedure:
A. During the open meeting, a Permit Board member may move for a closed determination whether or not to declare an executive session. During the open meeting, the Permit Board must vote by a majority vote to close the meeting to determine the necessity of going into an executive session.
B. If a majority of the Permit Board votes for a closed determination, the Permit Board meeting must be closed for a preliminary determination of the necessity for an executive session. During the closed meeting, the Permit Board may not conduct other business until it discusses the matter of declaring an executive session and votes, by three-fifths of the Permit Board members present, to declare an executive session.
C. The vote whether or not to go into executive session will be recorded on the Permit Board’s minutes.
D. If the Permit Board votes to declare an executive session, the Board chairman will re- open the meeting and publicly state the reason for going into executive session.
E. The Permit Board will then go into executive session to deliberate.
F. The Permit Board’s return to the open meeting ends the executive session.
G. The Permit Board will state during the open meeting what, if any, decision it made during executive session.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 25-41-7 (Rev. 2010).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.18 Determinations and Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
A. The Permit Board may make its decision immediately upon the conclusion of evidence and closing arguments. The Permit Board may take the matter under advisement and may postpone its final determination until a later Permit Board meeting. All final rulings affirming, modifying, or reversing a prior decision to issue, deny, modify, transfer or
revoke a permit must be based on sufficient evidence and be entered into the Permit Board’s meeting minutes. The Permit Board, as the exclusive administrative body mandated by statute to make decisions regarding permit issuance, reissuance, denial, modification, or revocation of permits within its jurisdiction, may accept or reject the MDEQ staff recommended action.
B. MDEQ will prepare proposed draft Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (“FOFCOLs”), and submit them to all of the parties to the evidentiary hearing for comments. Parties may submit comments to the draft FOFCOLs within seven days of receipt of the draft FOFCOLs. MDEQ will then submit its proposed FOFCOLs and any comments by the parties to the Permit Board for consideration. The Permit Board may accept the FOFCOLs as drafted or may reject the proposed FOFCOLs with instructions to MDEQ to resubmit the proposed FOFCOLs with corrections specified by the Permit Board. Should the Permit Board adopt the proposed FOFCOLs by a majority vote of the present Permit Board members, the proposed FOFCOLs will become the Permit Board’s decision and the Permit Board will record the FOFCOLs supporting its decision in its minutes. All parties will be notified in writing of the Permit Board’s decision and furnished a copy of the Permit Board’s findings of fact and conclusions of law through certified mail.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.19 Finality and Appeal
All Permit Board rulings are final and conclusive unless appealed to the Chancery Court of the county of the situs in whole or in part of the subject matter within 20 days of the date the Permit Board votes to adopt and record the FOFCOLs into its minutes. "As recorded in the minutes of the Permit Board" means the date of the Permit Board meeting at which the Permit Board adopted the FOFCOLs.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-29 (5)(b) and 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.20 Hearing Record
The hearing record for the formal evidentiary hearing consists of all transcripts of evidentiary hearings, motion hearings, arguments, and other proceedings on the record and of all exhibits, admitted as part of the record at the hearing or hearings, and of all papers filed by the parties in the case file at the Permit Board, and all pre-filed testimony and attached exhibits of all the parties filed by the parties, and Permit Board minutes.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, R. 6.21 Hearing Transcript
The Permit Board, in its discretion, may not require a transcription of the evidentiary hearing record, except all evidentiary hearings after appeal will be transcribed.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2012).
Part 2 Air Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.1 Rule 1.1
General ................................................................................................................... Page 3 Rule 1.2 Definitions .............................................................................................................. Page 4 Rule 1.3 Specific Criteria for Sources of Particulate Matter .............................................. Page 7 A. Smoke..................................................................................................................... Page 8 B. Equivalent Opacity ................................................................................................. Page 8 C. General Nuisances .................................................................................................. Page 8 D. Fuel Burning .......................................................................................................... Page 8 E. Kraft Process Recovery Boilers.............................................................................. Page 9 F. Manufacturing Processes ........................................................................................ Page 9 G. Open Burning ....................................................................................................... Page 10 H. Incineration .......................................................................................................... Page 11 I. Sampling Ports ....................................................................................................... Page 12 J. More Restrictive Emission Limits ......................................................................... Page 12 Rule 1.4 Specific Criteria for Sources of Sulfur Compounds ........................................... Page 12 A. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Fuel Burning ..................................................... Page 13 B. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Processes ........................................................... Page 13 Rule 1.5 Specific Criteria for Sources of Chemical Emissions ......................................... Page 17 A. Flourides............................................................................................................... Page 17
B. Miscellaneous Chemical Emissions ..................................................................... Page 17 Rule 1.6 New Sources ......................................................................................................... Page 18 A. Kraft Pulping Mills .............................................................................................. Page 18 B. Other Limitations ................................................................................................. Page 18 C. New Source Performance Standards .................................................................... Page 18 D. Additional Requirements for Infectious Waste Incineration ............................... Page 18 Rule 1.7 Exceptions............................................................................................................. Page 19 Rule 1.8 Provisions for Hazardous Air Pollutants ............................................................ Page 19 A. Hazardous Air Pollutant Emission Standards ...................................................... Page 19 B. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Compliance Extensions for Early Reductions ............................................................................................ Page 20 C. Case by Case Maximum Achievable Control Technology Requirements ........... Page 20 Rule 1.9 Stack Height Considerations ............................................................................... Page 20 A. Definitions ............................................................................................................ Page 20 B. Stack Height Effect on Emission Limitations ...................................................... Page 24 Rule 1.10 Provisions for Upsets, Startups, and Shutdowns .............................................. Page 25 A. Upsets ................................................................................................................... Page 25 B. Startups and Shutdowns ....................................................................................... Page 25 Rule 1.11 Severability ......................................................................................................... Page 27 Rule 1.12 Provisions for Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators ....... Page 27 A. Applicability......................................................................................................... Page 27 B. Definitions ............................................................................................................ Page 28 C. Emission Limits.................................................................................................... Page 36 D. Operator Training and Qualification Requirements ............................................. Page 39 E. Waste Management Guidelines ............................................................................ Page 42 F. Inspection Guidelines ........................................................................................... Page 43 G. Compliance and Performance Testing ................................................................. Page 44 H. Monitoring ........................................................................................................... Page 52 I. Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements ........................................................ Page 55 J. Compliance Schedules .......................................................................................... Page 58 Rule 1.13 Provisions for Existing Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration
Units .................................................................................................................... Page 61 A. Emission Standards .............................................................................................. Page 61 B. Applicability ......................................................................................................... Page 61 C. Schedule for Compliance ..................................................................................... Page 65 D. Permitting Requirements...................................................................................... Page 66 E. Clarifications of Terminology .............................................................................. Page 66
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.1 General
A. Authority. Pursuant to the authority granted by Miss. Code Ann. 49-17-17, the following regulations are adopted for the purpose of preventing, abating, and controlling air pollution caused by air contaminants being discharged into the atmosphere as particulates, smoke, fly ash, solvents, and other chemicals or combinations thereof.
B. Pursuant to 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 1, Ch. 5, R. 5.1, the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board (“Permit Board”) shall ensure that at least a majority of the members of the Permit Board shall represent the public interest and shall not derive any significant portion of their income from persons subject to permits under the federal Clean Air Act or enforcement orders under the federal Clean Air Act.
C. Except as otherwise noted herein, stack emissions testing for demonstration of compliance with the regulations herein may be performed in accordance with the Test Methods of the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency in place at the time testing is performed or as otherwise approved by the staff of the Mississippi Office of Pollution Control and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(1) Notwithstanding this or any other provision in these or any other regulations, the owner or operator may use any credible evidence or information relevant to whether a source would have been in compliance with applicable requirements if the appropriate performance or compliance test had been performed, for the purpose of submitting compliance certifications.
(2) Notwithstanding any other provision in these or any other air pollution control regulations, any credible evidence or information relevant to whether a source would have been in compliance with applicable requirements if the appropriate performance or compliance test had been performed, can be used to establish whether or not a person has violated or is in violation of any standard or applicable requirement.
D. In the event of a conflict between any of the requirements of these regulations and/or applicable requirements of any other regulation or law, the more stringent requirements shall be applied.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.2 Definitions
The terms used in the regulations shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the following meanings:
A. “Air cleaning device.” Any method, process or equipment which removes, reduces or renders less noxious air contaminants discharged into the atmosphere. This term is synonymous with air pollution control device.
B. “Air contaminant.” Particulate matter, dust, fumes, gas, mist, smoke, or vapor, or any combination thereof produced by processes other than natural.
C. “Air contamination.” The presence in the outdoor ambient air of one or more air contaminants which contribute to a condition of air pollution.
D. “Air contamination source.” Any source at, from, or by reason of which there is emitted into the ambient air any air contaminant, regardless of who the person may be who owns or operates the building, premises, or other property in, at, or on which such source is located, or the facility, equipment or other property by which the emission is caused or from which the emission comes.
E. “Air contaminant point source.” Any single point of emissions of any air contaminant such as from an individual machine or combustion device.
F. “Air pollution.” The presence in the outdoor ambient air of one or more air contaminants in quantities, of characteristic, and of a duration which are materially injurious or can be reasonably expected to become materially injurious to human, plant, or animal life or to property, or which unreasonably interfere with enjoyment of life or use of property throughout the State or throughout such area of the State as shall be affected thereby.
G. “Air Quality Action Day.” A day(s) the Executive Director determines that the air quality data within a specifically named area within the state may reach levels at or above the national ambient air quality standard for a specific pollutant
H. “Ambient air.” The encompassing atmosphere existing in the matter of space and to which life of this earth is adapted. For the purposes of these regulations, that portion of the atmosphere outside of buildings, stacks, and ducts.
I. “Atmosphere.” The air that envelopes or surrounds the earth. This term is synonymous with ambient air.
J. “Commission.” The Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
K. “Excess (or excessive) emission.” The operation of a facility in which the emission of one or more pollutants exceeds the applicable limit(s).
L. “Fly ash.” Particulate matter capable of being gasborne or airborne or carried in the gas stream and consisting essentially of ash, fused ash, and/or unburned material.
M. “Ground level.” Unless otherwise specified in sampling techniques, will be considered to be in the range of one to twenty (20) feet of ground level. For ambient sampling, it shall also be outside the boundaries of the property which contains the air pollution source.
N. “Incinerator.” A combustion device specifically designed for the destruction by high temperature burning of solid, semi-solid, liquid or gaseous combustible wastes and from which the solid residues contain little or no combustibles.
O. “Modification.” Any physical change in, or change in the method of operation of, an affected facility which increases the amount of any air pollutant emitted by such facility or which results in the emission of any air pollutant not previously emitted, except that:
(1) Routine maintenance, repair and replacement shall not be considered physical changes, and
(2) An increase in the production rate or hours of operation shall not be considered a change in the method of operation, unless it is prohibited by a permit.
P. “Multiple chamber incinerator.” Any article, machine, equipment, contrivance, structure, or any part thereof used to dispose of combustible refuse by burning, which consists of three or more refractory walls, interconnected by gas passage points or ducts and employing adequate design parameters necessary for maximum combustion of the material to be burned.
Q. “Opacity.” The degree to which emissions reduce the transmission of light and obscure the background.
R. “Open burning.” The combustion of solid waste without (1) control of combustion air to maintain adequate temperature for efficient combustion, (2) containment of the combustion reaction in an enclosed device to provide sufficient residence time and mixing for complete combustion, and (3) control of the emission of the combustion products.
S. “Ozone Action Day.” A day(s) occurring between March 1 and October 31 of each year which the Executive Director has designated as being conducive to high rates of ozone formation for a named county(ies) among DeSoto, Hancock, Harrison, and Jackson Counties.
T. “Particulate matter.” Any airborne finely divided solid or liquid material with an aerodynamic diameter smaller than 100 micrometers.
U. “Particulate matter emissions.” All finely divided solid or liquid material, other than
uncombined water, emitted to the ambient air as measured by an applicable EPA Test Method, an equivalent or alternative method specified by the EPA, or by a test method specified in the approved State Implementation Plan.
V. “Person.” The State or other agency, or institution thereof, any municipality, political subdivision, public or private corporation, individual, partnership, association, or other entity, and includes any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality, political subdivision, or public or private corporation, or the United States or any officer or employee thereof.
W. “PM2.5” Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers as measured by a reference method based on Appendix L of 40 CFR 50 and designated in accordance with 40 CFR 53 or by an equivalent method designated in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53.
X. “PM2.5 emissions.” Finely divided solid or liquid material, with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers, emitted to the ambient air as measured by an applicable EPA Test Method, an equivalent or alternate method specified by the EPA, or by a test method specified in the approved State Implementation Plan.
Y. “PM10.” Particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers as measured by a reference method based on Appendix J of 40 CFR 50 and designated in accordance with 40 CFR 53 or by an equivalent method designated in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53.
Z. “PM10 emissions.” Finely divided solid or liquid material, with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers, emitted to the ambient air as measured by an applicable EPA Test Method, an equivalent or alternate method specified by the EPA, or by a test method specified in the approved State Implementation Plan.
AA. “Process weight.” The total weight of all materials introduced into a source operation including solid fuels and water. Excluded materials are as follows: Liquids and gases used solely as fuels or as a means of conveyance, liquids used as a pollutant removal medium, recycled process materials counted at initial introduction, and air introduced for purposes of combustion.
BB. “Recreational area.” Recreational area means:
(1) a national, state, county, or city designated park; or
(2) an outdoor recreational area, such as a golf course or swimming pool, owned by a city, county, or other public agency.
CC. “Residential area.” Residential area means:
(1) a group of 20 or more single family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of two or more units per acre, or
(2) a group of 40 or more single family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of one or more units per acre, or
(3) a subdivision containing at least 20 constructed houses, in which the subdivision plat is recorded in the chancery clerk's office of the appropriate county.
DD. “Shutdown.” The termination of operation of equipment. Relative to fuel-burning equipment, a shutdown shall be construed to occur only when a unit is taken from a fired to a non-fired state.
EE. “Smoke.” Small gasborne particles resulting from incomplete combustion and consisting predominantly, but not exclusively, of carbon, ash, and other combustible material.
FF. “Soot.” Aggregated particles consisting mainly of carbonaceous material.
GG. “Soot blowing.” The removal by mechanical means of accumulated carbon and/or ash from heat transfer surfaces of an operating fuel-burning unit.
HH. “Standard conditions.” Standard conditions for gas measurement and calculation will be a temperature of 60 degrees Fahrenheit and a pressure of 14.7 pounds per square inch absolute except where set by Applicable Rules and Regulations.
II. “Startup.” The bringing into operation from a non-operative condition. Relative to fuel- burning equipment, a startup shall be construed to occur only when a unit is taken from a non-fired to a fired state.
JJ. “Total reduced sulfur, (TRS)” means hydrogen sulfide, mercaptans, dimethyl sulfide, and any other organic sulfides present.
KK. “Total suspended particulate.” Particulate matter as measured by the method described in Appendix B of 40 CFR 50.
LL. “Upset.” An unexpected and unplanned condition of operation of the facility in which equipment operates outside of the normal and planned parameters. An upset shall not include a condition of operation caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventive maintenance, careless or improper operation, operator error, or an intentional startup or shutdown of equipment.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq., 49-17-17 and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.3 Specific Criteria for Sources of Particulate Matter
A. Smoke.
(1) No person shall cause, permit, or allow the emission of smoke from a point source into the open air from any manufacturing, industrial, commercial or waste disposal process which exceeds forty (40) percent opacity subject to the exceptions provided in Rule 1.3.A(2) & (3).
(2) Startup operations may produce emissions which exceed 40% opacity for up to fifteen (15) minutes per startup in any one hour and not to exceed three (3) startups per stack in any twenty-four (24) hour period.
(3) Emissions resulting from soot blowing operations shall be permitted provided such emissions do not exceed 60 percent opacity, and provided further that the aggregate duration of such emissions during any twenty-four (24) hour period does not exceed ten (10) minutes per billion BTU gross heating value of fuel in any one hour.
B. Equivalent Opacity. No person shall cause, allow, or permit the discharge into the ambient air from any point source or emissions, any air contaminant of such opacity as to obscure an observer's view to a degree in excess of 40% opacity, equivalent to that provided in Rule 1.3.A.(1) This shall not apply to vision obscuration caused by uncombined water droplets.
C. General Nuisances. No person shall cause, permit, or allow the emission of particles or any contaminants in sufficient amounts or of such duration from any process as to be injurious to humans, animals, plants, or property, or to be a public nuisance, or create a condition of air pollution.
(1) No person shall cause or permit the handling or transporting or storage of any material in a manner which allows or may allow unnecessary amounts of particulate matter to become airborne.
(2) When dust, fumes, gases, mist, odorous matter, vapors, or any combination thereof escape from a building or equipment in such a manner and amount as to cause a nuisance to property other than that from which it originated or to violate any other provision of this regulation, the Commission may order such corrected in a way that all air and gases or air and gasborne material leaving the building or equipment are controlled or removed prior to discharge to the open air
D. Fuel Burning
(1) Fossil Fuel Burning. The maximum permissible emission of ash and/or particulate matter from fossil fuel burning installations shall be limited as follows:
(a) Emissions from installations of less than 10 million BTU per hour heat input shall not exceed 0.6 pounds per million BTU per hour heat input.
(b) Emissions from installations equal to or greater than 10 million BTU per hour heat input but less than 10,000 million BTU per hour heat input shall not exceed an emission rate as determined by the relationship
E = 0.8808 * I -0.1667
where E is the emission rate in pounds per million BTU per hour heat input and I is the heat input in millions of BTU per hour.
(c) Emissions from installations equal to or greater than 10,000 million BTU per hour heat input shall not exceed 0.19 pounds per million BTU per hour heat input.
(2) Combination Boilers. Fuel burning operations utilizing a mixture of combustibles such as, but not limited to, fossil fuels plus bark, oil plus bark, or spent wood, or water treatment by-products sludge, to produce steam or heat water or any other heat transfer medium through indirect means may be allowed emission rates up to 0.30 grains per standard dry cubic foot.
E. Kraft Process Recovery Boilers. The emissions of particulate matter from a recovery furnace stack shall not exceed four (4) pounds per ton of equivalent air-dried Kraft pulp produced at any given time.
F. Manufacturing Processes.
(1) General. Except as otherwise specified, no person shall cause, permit, or allow the emission of particulate matter in total quantities in any one hour from any manufacturing process, which includes any associated stacks, vents, outlets, or combination thereof, to exceed the amount determined by the relationship
E = 4.1 p 0.67
where E is the emission rate in pounds per hour and p is the process weight input rate in tons per hour.
Conveyor discharge of coarse solid matter may be allowed if no nuisance is created beyond the property boundary where the discharge occurs.
(2) Kraft Pulping Mills. All mills existing prior to January 25, 1972, and not modified subsequent thereto shall comply with the following emission limits:
(a) Recovery Furnaces. The emission of particulate matter from recovery furnace stacks shall not exceed four pounds per ton of equivalent air-dried Kraft pulp.
(b) Lime Kilns. The emission of particulate matter from lime kilns shall not exceed one pound per ton of equivalent air-dried Kraft pulp.
(c) Smelt Tanks. The emission of particulate matter from smelt tanks shall not exceed one-half pound per ton of equivalent air-dried Kraft pulp.
G. Open Burning. The open burning of residential, commercial, institutional, or industrial solid waste, is prohibited, except as specified herein. This prohibition does not apply to infrequent burning of agricultural wastes in the field, silvicultural wastes for forest management purposes, land-clearing debris, debris from emergency clean-up operations, and ordnance; and permitted open burning at hazardous waste disposal facilities subject to regulation under Subtitle C of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
(1) Fires set for the burning of agricultural wastes in the field and/or silvicultural wastes for forest management purposes must meet the following conditions.
(a) A Permit must be obtained from the Mississippi Forestry Commission.
(b) The open burning must occur within a time period allowing adequate diffusion of air pollutants as defined by the permit and the daily weather guides issued by the National Weather Forecast Office.
(c) Starter or auxiliary fuels may consist of dried vegetation, petroleum derived fuels of the gasoline, kerosene, or light fuel oil types (diesel), or a combination thereof. Use of or burning of other combustible material that causes excessive visible emission (e.g., rubber tires, plastic materials, etc.) is prohibited.
(2) Open burning of land-clearing debris must not use starter or auxiliary fuels which cause excessive smoke (rubber tires, plastics, etc.); must not be performed if prohibited by local ordinances; must not cause a traffic hazard; must not take place where there is a High Fire Danger Alert declared by the Mississippi Forestry Commission or Emergency Air Pollution Episode Alert imposed by the Executive Director and must meet the following buffer zones.
(a) Open burning without a forced-draft air system must not occur within 500 yards of an occupied dwelling.
(b) Open burning utilizing a forced-draft air system on all fires to improve the combustion rate and reduce smoke may be done within 500 yards of but not within 50 yards of an occupied dwelling.
(c) Burning must not occur within 500 yards of commercial airport property,
private air fields, or marked off-runway aircraft approach corridors unless written approval to conduct burning is secured from the proper airport authority, owner or operator.
(3) Permitted open burning at a hazardous waste disposal facility subject to regulation under Subtitle C of RCRA is considered a stationary source of air pollution subject to Mississippi air emission permitting regulations.
(4) The prohibition of open burning of residential solid waste applies to open burning of leaves and other yard waste by residential property owners, except when the Department has deferred the regulation of the burning of leaves and other yard wastes to a county board of supervisors and/or municipal governing body, and that county or municipal governing body has in effect a local ordinance that regulates such open burning and has been approved by the Department. Local ordinances approved by the Department must provide that the leaves or other yard waste is burned on the residential property where it originated. Approved local ordinances must also be deemed protective of air quality and public welfare by the Department and must provide for appropriate burning prohibitions and restrictions during Air Quality Action Days. Additionally, approved local ordinances must include fire safety provisions including prohibitions and restrictions on open burning coordinated through the State Forestry Commission during dry weather conditions.
(5) Air Quality Action Days. Open burning of agricultural wastes and silvicultural wastes described in G(1) above, open burning of land-clearing debris described in G(2) above, permitted open burning at a hazardous waste disposal facility described in G(3) above, and open burning of residential leaves and other yard wastes described in G(4) above are prohibited in the specified county(ies) when an Air Quality Action Day is declared by the Executive Director. Certain Air Quality Action Days declared by the Executive Director may be designated as Ozone Action Days in DeSoto County, Hancock County, Harrison County and Jackson County. Ozone Action Days shall be noticed the evening before on the MDEQ website and/or with local news media. The Mississippi Department of Transportation, Mississippi State Forestry Commission, local fire officials, and County Emergency Management Agencies (EMA) shall also be notified the evening before an Ozone Action Day.
H. Incineration.
(1) The maximum discharge of particulate matter from any incinerator, except those specified in paragraph (2) or (3) of this rule, or those specified in Rule 1.6 and 1.12 shall not exceed 0.2 grains per standard dry cubic foot of flue gas calculated to twelve percent (12%) carbon dioxide by volume for products of combustion. This limitation shall apply when the incinerator is operating at design capacity.
The carbon dioxide produced by combustion of any auxiliary fuels shall be excluded from the calculation to twelve percent (12%) carbon dioxide. After May 8, 1970, any new equipment shall be of the multiple chamber type or its equivalent for emission control. In critical areas where an installation is in close proximity to a residential area, an incinerator, except those specified in paragraph (2) of this rule, or those specified in Rule 1.6 and 1.12, shall be limited to emissions of 0.1 grains per standard dry cubic foot of flue gases calculated to twelve percent (12%) carbon dioxide by volume for products of combustion.
(2) The maximum discharge of smoke from the incineration of waste material resulting totally from the ginning of cotton shall not obscure an observer's view to a degree in excess of 40% opacity.
Start-up operations may produce emissions which exceed 40% opacity for up to fifteen minutes per start-up in any one hour not to exceed three (3) start-ups in any twenty-four (24) hour period.
After July 1, 1994, the emission limitation specified in paragraph (1) of this rule shall also be applicable to cotton gin waste incinerators.
(3) The emission limitation in paragraph (1) above does not apply to afterburners, flares, thermal oxidizers, and other similar devices used to reduce the emissions of air pollutants from processes.
I. Sampling Ports.
(1) New Equipment: The owner or operator of any new air pollution control equipment, obtained after May 8, 1970, and vented to the atmosphere, shall have necessary sampling ports and ease of accessibility.
(2) Existing Equipment: The owner or operator of air pollution control equipment that is in existence prior to May 8, 1970, shall provide the necessary sampling ports and ease of accessibility when deemed necessary by the Permit Board.
J. More Restrictive Emission Limits. The Commission reserves the right to prescribe more stringent emission limits as it deems necessary in problem areas. The expansion, alteration, or establishment of a new industry may also result in the prescription of more stringent emission limits.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.4 Specific Criteria for Sources of Sulfur Compounds
A. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Fuel Burning
(1) The maximum discharge of sulfur oxides from any fuel burning installation in
which the fuel is burned primarily to produce heat or power by indirect heat transfer shall not exceed 4.8 pounds (measured as sulfur dioxide) per million BTU heat input.
(2) No person shall cause or permit the burning of fuel in any fuel burning equipment that results in an average emission of sulfur dioxide from any calendar year at a rate greater than was emitted by said fuel burning equipment for the corresponding calendar year 1970 unless otherwise authorized by the Commission. Installations under construction on January 25, 1972, are excluded from this requirement.
(3) The maximum discharge of sulfur dioxide from any modified fuel burning unit whose generation capacity is less than 250 million BTU per hour and in which the fuel is burned primarily to produce heat or power by indirect heat transfer shall not exceed 2.4 pounds (measured as sulfur dioxide) per million BTU heat input. For the purposes of Rule 1.4 of these regulations only, “modification” shall mean any physical change in an Air Contaminant Source which increases the amount of any air pollutant (to which a standard applies) emitted by such source or which results in the emission of any air pollutant (to which a standard applies) not previously emitted. B. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Processes
(1) Except as otherwise provided herein, no person shall cause or permit the emission of gas containing sulfur oxides (measured as sulfur dioxide) in excess of 2,000 ppm (volume) from any process equipment in existence on January 25, 1972, or in excess of 500 ppm (volume) from any process equipment constructed after January 25, 1972. The 500 ppm (volume) requirement shall apply for equipment constructed after January 25, 1972 unless otherwise provided by the Commission.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph B(6)(a) no person shall cause or permit the emission of any gas stream which contains hydrogen sulfide in excess of one grain per 100 standard cubic feet.
Gas streams containing hydrogen sulfide in excess of one grain per 100 standard cubic feet shall be incinerated at temperatures of not less than 1600°F for a period of not less than 0.5 seconds, or processed in such manner which is equivalent to or more effective for the removal of hydrogen sulfide.
Sulfur dioxide concentration limitations in the gas streams resulting from such incineration or processing shall be determined for each emission point on a case- by-case basis to insure that the resulting maximum ground level concentration of sulfur dioxide as determined by acceptable method or methods will be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for sulfur dioxide. Testing to determine the productive capacity of new fields shall be exempted from emission limitation provisions of the paragraph of the regulation providing such
testing has been previously negotiated and approved by the Mississippi Office of Pollution Control.
This regulation shall not apply to sulfur recovery plants.
(3) No person shall cause or permit acid mist emissions from sulfuric acid manufacturing plants to exceed 0.5 pounds/ton of acid produced. Sulfur trioxide emissions from sulfuric acid manufacturing plants shall not exceed 0.2 pounds/ton of acid produced.
(4) No person shall cause or permit emission of sulfur oxides, calculated as sulfur dioxide, from a sulfur recovery plant to exceed 0.12 pounds per pound of sulfur processed.
(5) No person shall cause or permit emissions of sulfur oxides, calculated as sulfur dioxide, from primary nonferrous smelters, in excess of the emission calculated as follows:
Copper smelters: Y = 0.2 X Zinc smelters: Y = 0.564 X 0.85
Lead smelters: Y = 0.98 X 0.77
Where X is the total sulfur fed to the smelter in pounds/hour and Y is the allowable sulfur emissions in pounds/hour. (6) Kraft Pulp Mills
(a) All mills existing prior to November 1, 1987, and not modified subsequent thereto, excluding mills or facilities subject to New Source Performance Standards, shall control the emission of total reduced sulfur compounds (TRS) so as to not exceed the emission limits set forth below:
(1) Straight recovery boiler systems - twenty (20) parts per million TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis corrected to 8% oxygen, on a 12-hour average basis, except that: (i) the International Paper Company, Vicksburg, Mississippi, shall be allowed 40 parts per million TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis corrected to 8% oxygen, on a 12-hour average basis, (ii) the International Paper Company, Natchez, Mississippi, Recovery Boilers 4 & 5, shall be allowed 40 parts per million TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis corrected to 8% oxygen, on a 12-hour average basis, and
(iii) the Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Monticello, Mississippi, shall be allowed 40 parts per million TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis corrected to 8% oxygen, on a 12-hour average basis. (2) Lime kiln systems - twenty (20) parts per million of TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis corrected to 10% oxygen, on a 12-hour average basis. (3) Digester systems - five (5) parts per million of TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis corrected to 10% oxygen, on a 12-hour average basis. (4) Multiple effect evaporator systems - five (5) parts per million of TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis corrected to 10% oxygen, on a 12-hour average basis. (5) Condensate stripper systems - five (5) parts per million of TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis corrected to 10% oxygen, on a 12-hour average basis. (6) Smelt dissolving tank - 0.016 gram of TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis, per kilogram of black liquor solids (dry weight). (7) Equivalent control systems (controls for treating collected noncondensible gases in a manner equivalent to incineration in a lime kiln) - five (5) parts per million TRS, expressed as hydrogen sulfide on a dry gas basis, corrected to the actual oxygen content of the untreated gas stream, on a 12-hour average basis. (b) All mills, as defined above, shall, by February 1, 1988, demonstrate compliance with the TRS emission limits set forth above. Compliance demonstration for recovery boilers, lime kilns, smelt tanks, and equivalent control systems for collected noncondensible gases shall be by testing in accordance with EPA Test Method 16 or 16A and submittal of a stack test report. Compliance demonstration for digester systems, multiple effect evaporator systems and condensate stripper systems shall be by certification that these systems are fully connected to a noncondensible gas collection system followed by incineration in the lime kiln or equivalent control and testing of lime kiln or equivalent control as specified above. A compliance schedule may be submitted, as set forth below, on any or all systems not expected to comply with the emission limit and such submittal will negate the requirement for immediate compliance demonstration, as referenced above, on those systems.
Any mill defined above which, on November 1, 1987, is unable to comply with the emission limits set forth above, shall, within three (3) months thereafter, submit a schedule for attaining compliance with these limits. The compliance schedule shall not extend past November 1, 1990. Compliance with emission limits shall be demonstrated by the methods specified above, as appropriate, no later than the end of the compliance schedule. Compliance demonstration for recovery boilers, lime kilns, smelt tanks, and equivalent control systems for collected noncondensible gases shall be by testing in accordance with EPA Test Method 16 or 16A and submittal of a stack test report. Compliance demonstration for digester systems, multiple effect evaporator systems and condensate stripper systems shall be by certification that these systems are fully connected to a noncondensible gas collection system followed by incineration in the lime kiln or equivalent control and testing of lime kiln or equivalent control as specified above. (c) All mills, as defined above, shall monitor the emission of TRS and/or other gas constituents as described below: (1) The TRS emission concentration in recovery boiler flue gas shall be monitored by either: (i) A continuous monitoring device which meets the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Performance Specification 5; or (ii) Performance of EPA Method 16 or 16A on no less than a (calendar) quarterly basis. (2) The oxygen concentration in recovery boiler flue gas shall be continuously monitored by a device which meets the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Performance Specification 3. (3) The TRS concentration in lime kiln flue gas shall be continuously monitored by a device which meets the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Performance Specification 5. (4) The oxygen concentration in lime kiln flue gas shall be continuously monitored by a device which meets the requirements of 40 CFR 60, Performance Specification 3. (d) All mills, as defined above, shall obtain the necessary continuous monitoring equipment and begin monitoring by November 1, 1988, or no later than the date of final compliance with the regulation, if compliance is not immediate. For mills choosing to use EPA Method 16 or 16A for recovery boiler monitoring, the necessary equipment and/or monitoring
capability must be obtained by February 1, 1988. Also, when Method 16 or 16A is used, each successive quarter's testing shall be separated from the previous quarter's by a period of not less than sixty (60) days and prior notice to the Mississippi Office of Pollution Control of all testing shall be made.
(e) All mills, as defined above, shall calculate and record, on a daily basis, the 12-hour average TRS concentration and O2 concentration for the two consecutive operating periods of each operating day for both the recovery boiler (if continuously monitored) and lime kiln. Each 12-hour average shall be determined as the arithmetic mean of the appropriate 12 continuous 1-hour average concentrations. Each 12-hour average TRS concentration shall be corrected to 10%, or 8% O2, as appropriate to the emission limit, using the equation defined in 40 CFR 60.284(c)(3).
(f) All mills, as defined above, shall report, for each calendar quarter, the periods of emissions which exceed the TRS limits specified above from the recovery boiler and lime kiln. The report shall specify the 12-hour period of each exceedance by time and date, the average emissions concentration for the period, and total number of 12-hour periods of mill operation during the quarter. The report shall also detail all outages of the monitoring devices by time and date. The report shall be due within forty- five (45) days following the end of the calendar quarter.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.5 Specific Criteria for Sources of Chemical Emissions
A. Fluorides. No person shall allow the emission of fluorides into the ambient air in excess of four-tenths (0.4) pound per ton of P
O
or equivalent. The allowable emission of fluorides shall be calculated by multiplying the unit emission, specified above, times the expressed design production capacity of the installation or plant. B. Miscellaneous Chemical Emissions. No person shall cause, permit, or allow the emission of toxic, noxious, or deleterious substances, in addition to those considered in these regulations, into the ambient air in concentrations sufficient to affect human health and well-being, or unreasonably interfere with the enjoyment of property or unreasonably and adversely affect plant or animal life beyond the boundaries of the property containing the air pollution source.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.6 New Sources
The provisions of this rule apply to the owner or operator of any source listed herein, the construction or modification of which is commenced after the date of adoption of specific emission limitations applicable to such source.
A. Kraft Pulping Mills. All sources shall minimize gaseous and particulate emission by use of modern equipment, devices, maintenance, and operating practices in accordance with best current technology. In no case shall emissions exceed the limits set forth in any applicable Federal Standard of Performance for New Stationary Sources
B. Other Limitations. The Mississippi Pollution Control Permit Board, in accordance with Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2, may require more stringent emission limitations which it deems necessary to meet applicable national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards, necessary to insure that ambient air pollution concentrations do not exceed ambient air increments or violate other requirements under Federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as of August 23, 1989, pursuant to Section 160 through 169 of the Federal Clean Air Act as amended, or necessary to meet other Federal law or regulations enacted or promulgated subsequent to this regulation.
C. New Source Performance Standards. The Federal New Source Performance Standards are those duly promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) 40 C.F.R. Part 60, pursuant to Section 111 of the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended, and Consolidated Federal Air Rule provisions duly promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) 40 C.F.R Part 65. All such regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as of February 2, 2018, are incorporated herein and adopted by reference by the Commission as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and shall hereafter be enforceable as such (except the word “Administrator” in said standards and general implementing regulations shall be replaced by the words “Executive Director” and the word “Agency” shall be replaced by the word “Department”). Hereafter, any facility subject to the Federal New Source Performance Standards shall comply with the emission limitations and other requirements of said standards.
D. Additional Requirements for Infectious Waste Incineration.
(1) Infectious waste incinerators which incinerate only those wastes generated on-site and are installed after December 9, 1993, shall comply with the following:
(a) Daily records shall be kept of the times of operation, quantity of wastes incinerated and the temperature of the secondary chamber which temperature shall be monitored continuously. Records shall be maintained on hand for at least two (2) years.
(b) Only wastes generated on-site may be incinerated. Disposal of wastes from off-site shall cause the incinerator to be classified as a commercial incinerator and, therefore, subject to the requirements applicable to such units.
(2) Commercial Incinerators. For purposes of this regulation, a commercial incinerator is any infectious waste incinerator that incinerates wastes other than or
in addition to wastes generated on-site. A commercial infectious waste incinerator installed or modified after December 9, 1993, shall comply with the following:
(a) A manifest system, including a detailed description of the waste collection and transportation system shall be employed. Daily records shall be kept of the times of incinerator operation, quantity of wastes incinerated and temperature of the secondary chamber which temperature shall be monitored continuously. Records shall be maintained on hand for at least two (2) years.
(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of Rule1.6.D(2)(a) and Rule 1.12, the Permit Board may in any permit, in accordance with Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2, establish more stringent requirements for emissions, operating parameters, monitoring, and recordkeeping subject to the provisions of Miss. Code Ann. 49-17-34(2) and (3).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.7 Exceptions
If any single source of emission or combination of sources of emissions is found to compromise the ambient air quality in the State, beyond the limitations set forth in any national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards now or hereafter established by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Clean Air Act as amended December 31, 1970, (Public Law 91-640) notwithstanding compliance with any maximum allowable emission rate allowed by this regulation, the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality may require such further reduction in emission from this or these sources as is necessary to obtain compliance with said national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.8 Provisions for Hazardous Air Pollutants
A. Hazardous Air Pollutant Emission Standards
Hazardous air pollutant emission standards are National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants duly promulgated by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) 40 C.F.R. Part 61 pursuant to Section 112 of the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended; National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories duly promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) 40 C.F.R. Part 63 pursuant to Section 112 of the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended; and Consolidated Federal Air Rule provisions duly promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) 40 C.F.R. Part 65. All such regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as of February 2, 2018, are incorporated herein and adopted by reference by the Commission as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and shall hereafter be enforceable as
such (except the word “Administrator” in said standards and general implementing regulations shall be replaced by the words “Executive Director” and the word “Agency” shall be replaced by the word “Department”). Hereafter, any facility subject to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants and/or the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Categories shall comply with the emission limitations and other requirements of said standards.
B. National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants; Compliance Extensions for Early Reductions.
The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Compliance Extensions for Early Reductions are regulations duly promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) 40 C.F.R. Part 63 pursuant to Section 112 of the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended. All such regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency are incorporated herein and adopted by reference by the Commission as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and shall hereafter be enforceable as such.
C. Case by Case Maximum Achievable Control Technology Requirements.
The Mississippi Pollution Control Permit Board, in accordance with Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2, may require emissions limitations necessary to meet case by case maximum achievable control technology (“MACT”) requirements in accordance with Section 112(j) and (g) of the Federal Act.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.9 Stack Height Considerations
A. Definitions
(1) “Emission limitation” and “emission standard.” A requirement established which limits the quantity, rate, or concentration of emissions of air pollutants on a continuous basis, including any requirements which limit the level of opacity, prescribe equipment, set fuel specifications, or prescribe operation or maintenance procedures for a source to assure continuous emission reduction.
(2) “Stack.” Any point in a source designed to emit solids, liquids, or gases into the air, including a pipe or duct but not including flares.
(3) “A stack in existence.” The owner or operator had either:
(a) Begun, or caused to begin, a continuous program of physical on-site construction of the stack, or
(b) Entered into binding agreements or contractual obligations, which could not be cancelled or modified without substantial loss to the owner or operator, to undertake a program of construction of the stack to be completed in a reasonable time.
(4) “Dispersion technique.” Any technique which attempts to affect the concentration of a pollutant in the ambient air by using that portion of a stack which exceeds good engineering practice stack height, varying the rate of emission of a pollutant according to atmospheric conditions or ambient concentrations of that pollutant, or increasing final exhaust gas plume rise by manipulating source process parameters, exhaust gas parameters, stack parameters, or combining exhaust gases from several existing stacks into one stack; or other selective handling of exhaust gas streams so as to increase the exhaust gas plume rise. The preceding sentence does not include:
(a) The reheating of a gas stream, following use of a pollution control system, for the purpose of returning the gas to the temperature at which it was originally discharged from the facility generating the gas stream:
(b) The merging of exhaust gas streams where:
(1) The source owner or operator demonstrates that the facility was originally designed and constructed with such merged gas streams;
(2) After July 8, 1985, such merging is part of a change in operation at the facility that includes the installation of pollution controls and is accompanied by a net reduction in the allowable emissions of a pollutant. This exclusion from the definition of “dispersion techniques” shall apply only to the emission limitation for the pollutant affected by such change in operation; or
(3) Before July 8, 1985, such merging was part of a change in operation at the facility that included the installation of emissions control equipment or was carried out for sound economic or engineering reasons. Where there was an increase in the emission limitation or, in the event that no emission limitation was in existence prior to the merging, an increase in the quantity of pollutants actually emitted prior to the merging, the reviewing agency shall presume that merging was significantly motivated by an intent to gain emissions credit for greater dispersion. Absent a demonstration by the source owner or operator that merging was not significantly motivated by such intent, the reviewing agency shall deny credit for the effects of such merging in calculating the allowable emissions for the source;
(c) The use of smoke management in agricultural or silvicultural prescribed burning programs; or
(d) Episodic restrictions on residential wood burning and open burning; or
(e) Techniques under Rule 1.9.A.(4) which increase final exhaust gas plume rise where the resulting allowable emissions of sulfur dioxide from the facility do not exceed 5,000 tons per year.
(5) “Good engineering practice (GEP) stack height.” The greater of: (a) 65 meters measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack;
(b) (1) For stacks in existence on January 12, 1979, and for which the owner or operator had obtained all applicable preconstruction permits or approvals required, Hg = 2.5 H, provided the owner or operator produces evidence that this equation was actually relied on in establishing an emission limitation;
(2) For all other stacks,
Hg = H + 1.5L, where
Hg = good engineering practice stack height, measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack, H = height of nearby structure(s) measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack, and L = lesser dimension (height or projected width) of nearby structure(s), provided that the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Commission may require the use of a field study or fluid model to verify GEP stack height for the source; or (3) The height demonstrated by a fluid model or a field study approved by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Commission, which ensures that the emissions from a stack do not result in excessive concentrations of any air pollutant as a result of atmospheric downwash, wakes, or eddy effects created by the source itself, nearby structures, or nearby terrain features. (c) “Nearby.” As used in Rule 1.9.A.(5)(b)(2) is defined for a specific structure or terrain feature and means: (1) For purposes of applying the formulae provided in Rule 1.9.A.5(b) that distance up to five times the lesser of the height or the width
dimension of a structure, but not greater than 0.8 km (1/2 mile), and (2) For conducting demonstrations under Rule 1.9.A(5)(c) that distance not greater than 0.8 km (112 mile), except that the portion of a terrain feature may be considered to be nearby which falls within a distance of up to 10 times the maximum height (Ht) of the feature, not to exceed 2 miles if such feature achieves a height (ht) 0.8 km from the stack that is at least 40 percent of the GEP stack height determined by the formulae provided in Paragraph 1.9.A(5)(2) of this part or 26 meters, whichever is greater, as measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack. The height of the structure or terrain feature is measured from the ground-level elevation at the base of the stack.
(d) “Excessive concentration.” For the purpose of determining good engineering practice stack height under Rule 1.9.A(5)(c) excessive concentration means:
(1) For sources seeking credit for stack height exceeding that established under Rule 1.9.A(5)(b) a maximum ground-level concentration due to emissions from a stack due in whole or part to downwash, wakes, and eddy effects produced by nearby structures or nearby terrain features which individually is at least 40 percent in excess of the maximum concentration experienced in the absence of such downwash, wakes, or eddy effects and which contributes to a total concentration due to emissions from all sources that is greater than an ambient air quality standard. For sources subject to the Prevention of Significant Deterioration program, an excessive concentration alternatively means a maximum ground-level concentration due to emissions from a stack due in whole or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects produced by nearby structures or nearby terrain features which individually is at least 40 percent in excess of the maximum concentration experienced in the absence of such downwash, wakes, or eddy effects and greater than a prevention of significant deterioration increment. The allowable emission rate to be used in making demonstrations under this part shall be prescribed by the new source performance standard that is applicable to the source category unless the owner or operator demonstrates that this emission rate is infeasible. Where such demonstrations are approved by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Commission, an alternative emission rate shall be established in consultation with the source owner or operator. (2) For sources seeking credit after October 11, 1983, for increases in existing stack heights up to the heights established under Rule 1.9.A(5)(b) either a maximum ground-level concentration due in whole or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects as provided in Rule 1.9.A(5)(b) of this rule, except that the emission rate specified by the State implementation plan (or, in the absence of such a limit, the actual
emission rate) shall be used, or the actual presence of a local nuisance caused by the existing stack, as determined by the Commission, and (3) For sources seeking credit after January 12, 1979, for a stack height determined under Rule 1.9.A(5)(b) where the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Commission requires the use of a field study or fluid model to verify GEP stack height, for sources seeking stack height credit after November 9, 1984, based on the aerodynamic influence of cooling towers, and for sources seeking stack height credit after December 31, 1970, based on the aerodynamic influence of structures not adequately represented by the equations in Rule 1.9.A(5)(b) a maximum ground-level concentration due in whole or part to downwash, wakes, or eddy effects that is at least 40 percent in excess of the maximum concentration experienced in the absence of such downwash, wakes, or eddy effects.
B. Stack Height Effect on Emission Limitations (1) The degree of emission limitation required of any source for control of any air pollutants shall not be affected by so much of any source's stack height that exceeds good engineering practice (GEP) or by any other dispersion technique, except as provided in (2) of this paragraph. (2) The provisions of Rule 1.9.B(1) shall not apply to stack heights in existence, or dispersion techniques implemented, prior to December 31, 1970, except where pollutants are being emitted from such stacks or using such dispersion techniques by sources, as defined in Section 111(a)(3) of the Clean Air Act, which were constructed, or reconstructed or for which major modifications, as defined pursuant to Rule 1.6. New Sources, were carried out after December 31, 1970. (3) If any existing source, after appropriate application of the preceding limitations and provisions, is found to exceed or potentially exceed an air quality standard or increment, as appropriate, when operating within previously established emission limitations, the emission limitations applicable to that source shall be modified so as to eliminate and prevent the exceedance. (4) If any new source or source modification, after appropriate application of the preceding limitations and provisions, is predicted to exceed an air quality standard, or increment, as appropriate, when considered as operating under emission limitations consistent with other Applicable Rules and Regulations, the emission limitations considered shall be deemed inadequate and different emission limits, based on air quality considerations, shall be made applicable. (5) If any source provides a field study or fluid modeling demonstration proposing a GEP stack height greater than that allowed by Rule 1.9.A(5)(a) and (b) then the public will be notified of the availability of the study and provided the opportunity for a public
hearing before any new or revised emission limitation or permit is approved. (6) The actual stack height used or proposed by a source shall not be restricted in any manner by requirements of this paragraph.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.10 Provisions for Upsets, Startups, and Shutdowns
A. Upsets
(1) For an upset defined in Rule 1.2, the Commission may pursue an enforcement action for noncompliance with an emission standard or other requirement of an applicable rule, regulation, or permit. In determining whether to pursue enforcement action, and/or the appropriate enforcement action to take, the Commission may consider whether the source has demonstrated through properly signed contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence the following:
(a) an upset occurred and that the source can identify the cause(s) of the upset;
(b) the source was at the time being properly operated;
(c) during the upset the source took all reasonable steps to minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standard or other requirement of an applicable rule, regulation, or permit;
(d) that within 5 working days of the time the upset began, the source submitted a written report to the Department describing the upset, the steps taken to mitigate excess emissions or any other noncompliance, and the corrective actions taken and;
(e) that as soon as practicable but no later than 24 hours of becoming aware of an upset that caused an immediate adverse impact to human health or the environment beyond the source boundary or caused a general nuisance to the public, the source provided notification to the Department.
(2) In any enforcement proceeding by the Commission, the source seeking to establish the occurrence of an upset has the burden of proof.
(3) This provision is in addition to any upset provision contained in any applicable requirement.
(4) These upset provisions apply only to enforcement actions by the Commission and are not intended to prohibit EPA or third party enforcement actions.
B. Startups and Shutdowns
(1) Startups and shutdowns are part of normal source operation. Emission limitations apply during startups and shutdowns unless source specific emission limitations or work practice standards for startups and shutdowns are defined by an applicable rule, regulation, or permit.
(2) Where the source is unable to comply with existing emission limitations established under the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and defined in this regulation, 11 Mississippi Administrative Code, Part 2, Chapter 1, the Department will consider establishing source specific emission limitations or work practice standards for startups and shutdowns. Source specific emission limitations or work practice standards established for startups and shutdowns are subject to the following requirements:
(a) The source must demonstrate that it is technically infeasible, considering its specific control strategy, to comply with existing SIP emission limitations during startups and shutdowns.
(b) The Department has analyzed the potential worst-case emissions that could occur during startups and shutdowns based on the established emission limitations or work practice standards for startups and shutdowns.
(c) The emission limitations or work practice standards for startups and shutdowns must be specific to the source and its specific control strategy and must include the following requirements:
(i) the source must limit the frequency and duration of startups and shutdowns to the greatest extent practicable;
(ii) the source must be operated in a manner consistent with best operating practices at all times;
(iii) all possible steps are taken to minimize the impact of emissions during startups and shutdowns on ambient air quality;
(iv) the source must document all startups and shutdowns using properly signed contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence;
(d) Where source specific emission limitations or work practice standards are established as an alternative to existing SIP emission limitations, the emission limitations or work practice standards must be established in a permit defined in 11 Mississippi Administrative Code, Part 2, Chapter 2. Following permit issuance, the emission limitations or work practice
standards are considered State-only requirements until they have been adopted into this regulation and approved by the EPA into the SIP.
(e) The following source specific emission limitations or work practice standards for startups and shutdowns are established as an alternative to existing SIP emission limitations for air contaminants contained in this regulation that provide protection of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards:
(i) (Reserved for source specific emission limits or work practice standards for startups and shutdowns).
(3) Where an upset as defined in Rule 1.2 occurs during startup or shutdown, see the upset requirements above.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.11 Severability
If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of any of these regulations, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for any reason challenged or held to be invalid or void, the validity of the remaining regulations and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.12 Provisions for Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators
A. Applicability. (1) Except as provided in subparagraphs (2) through (8) of this paragraph, the designated or affected facility to which Rule 1.12 applies is each individual hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerator (HMIWI) for which construction was commenced on or before June 20,1996.
(2) A combustor is not subject to Rule 1.12 of these regulations during periods when only pathological waste, low-level radioactive waste, and/or chemotherapeutic waste is burned, provided the owner or operator of the combustor:
(a) Notifies the Department of an exemption claim; and
(b) Keeps records on a calendar quarter basis of the periods of time when only pathological waste, low-level radioactive waste, and/or chemotherapeutic waste is burned.
(3) Any co-fired combustor is not subject to Rule 1.12 of these regulations if the owner or operator of the co-fired combustor:
(a) Notifies the Department of an exemption claim;
(b) Provides an estimate of the relative weight of hospital waste, medical/infectious waste, and other fuels and/or wastes to be combusted; and
(c) Keeps records on a calendar quarter basis of the weight of hospital waste and medical/infectious waste combusted, and the weight of all other fuels and wastes combusted at the co-fired combustor.
(4) Any combustor required to have a permit under Section 3005 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act is not subject to Rule 1.12 of these regulations.
(5) Any combustor which meets the applicability requirements in standards or guidelines for certain municipal waste combustors under Subpart Cb, Ea, or Eb of 40 C.F.R. 60 is not subject to Section 12 of these regulations.
(6) Any pyrolysis unit is not subject to Rule 1.12 of these regulations.
(7) Cement kilns firing hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste are not subject to Section 12 of these regulations.
(8) Physical or operational changes made to an existing HMIWI unit solely for the purpose of complying with Rule 1.12 of these regulations are not considered a modification and do not result in an existing HMIWI unit becoming subject to the new source provisions under Rule 1.6 of these regulations and Subpart Ec of 40 C.F.R. 60.
(9) Each existing HMIWI is subject to the permitting requirements in Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act,. Each owner and operator of an existing HMIWI shall submit an application for a Title V permit to the Department by December 15, 1999.
(10) Beginning September 15, 2000, designated facilities subject to Rule 1.12 of these regulations shall operate pursuant to a permit issued under Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act.
B. For the purpose of the requirements in Rule 1.12 of these regulations, the following definitions apply:
(1) “Administrator of EPA” means the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency or his authorized representative.
(2) “Batch HMIWI” means an HMIWI that is designed such that neither waste charging nor ash removal can occur during combustion.
(3) “Biologicals” means preparations made from living organisms and their products, including vaccines, cultures, etc., intended for use in diagnosing, immunizing, or treating humans or animals or in research pertaining thereto.
(4) “Blood products” means any product derived from human blood, including but not limited to blood plasma, platelets, red or white blood corpuscles, and other derived licensed products, such as interferon, etc.
(5) “Body Fluids” means liquid emanating or derived from humans and limited to blood; dialysate; amniotic, cerebrospinal, synovial, pleural, peritoneal and pericardial fluids; and semen and vaginal secretions.
(6) “Bypass stack” means a device used for discharging combustion gases to avoid severe damage to the air pollution control device or other equipment.
(7) “Chemotherapeutic waste” means waste material resulting from the production or use of antineoplastic agents used for the purpose of stopping or reversing the growth of malignant cells.
(8) “Co-fired combustor” means a unit combusting hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste with other fuels or wastes (e.g., coal, municipal solid waste) and subject to an enforceable requirement limiting the unit to combusting a fuel feed stream, 10 percent or less of the weight of which is comprised, in aggregate, of hospital waste and medical/infectious waste as measured on a calendar quarter basis. For purposes of this definition, pathological waste, chemotherapeutic waste, and low- level radioactive waste are considered “other” wastes when calculating the percentage of hospital waste and medical/infectious waste combusted.
(9) “Continuous emission monitoring system or CEMS” means a monitoring system for continuously measuring and recording the emissions of a pollutant from an affected facility.
(10) “Continuous HMIWI” means an HMIWI that is designed to allow waste charging and ash removal during combustion.
(11) “Dioxins/furans” means the combined emissions of tetra-through octa-chlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and dibenzofurans, as measured by EPA Reference Method 23.
(12) “Dry scrubber” means an add-on air pollution control system that injects dry alkaline sorbent (dry injection) or sprays an alkaline sorbent (spray dryer) to react with and neutralize acid gases in the HMIWI exhaust stream forming a dry powder material.
(13) “Fabric filter or baghouse” means an add-on air pollution control system that removes particulate matter (PM) and nonvaporous metals emissions by passing flue gas through filter bags.
(14) “Facilities manager” means the individual in charge of purchasing, maintaining, and operating the HMIWI or the owner's or operator's representative responsible for the management of the HMIWI. Alternative titles may include Director of Facilities or Vice President of Support Services.
(15) “High-air phase” means the stage of the batch operating cycle when the primary chamber reaches and maintains maximum operating temperatures.
(16) “Hospital” means any facility which has an organized medical staff, maintains at least six inpatient beds, and where the primary function of the institution is to provide diagnostic and therapeutic patient services and continuous nursing care primarily to human inpatients who are not related and who stay on average in excess of 24 hours per admission. This definition does not include facilities maintained for the sole purpose of providing nursing or convalescent care to human patients who generally are not acutely ill but who require continuing medical supervision.
(17) “Hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerator or HMIWI or HMIWI unit” means any device that combusts any amount of hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste.
(18) “Hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerator operator or HMIWI operator” means any person who operates, controls, or supervises the day-to-day operation of an HMIWI.
(19) “Hospital waste” means discards generated at a hospital, except unused items returned to the manufacturer. The definition of hospital waste does not include human corpses, remains, and anatomical parts that are intended for interment or cremation.
(20) “Infectious agent” means any organism (such as a virus or bacteria) that is capable of being communicated by invasion and multiplication in body tissues and capable of causing disease or adverse health impacts in humans.
(21) “Intermittent HMIWI” means an HMIWI that is designed to allow waste charging, but not ash removal, during combustion.
(22) “Large HMIWI” means:
(a) Except as provided in subparagraph (b)
(1) An HMIWI whose maximum design waste burning capacity is more than 500 pounds per hour; or
(2) A continuous or intermittent HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is more than 500 pounds per hour; or
(3) A batch HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is more than 4,000 pounds per day.
(b) The following are not large HMIWI: (1) A continuous or intermittent HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is less than or equal to 500 pounds per hour; or (2) A batch HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is less than or equal to 4,000 pounds per day.
(23) “Low-level radioactive waste” means waste material which contains radioactive nuclides emitting primarily beta or gamma radiation, or both, in concentrations or quantities that exceed applicable Federal or State standards for unrestricted release. Low-level radioactive waste is not high-level radioactive waste, spent nuclear fuel, or by-product material as defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 [42 U.S.C. 2014 (e)(2)].
(24) “Malfunction” means any sudden, infrequent, and not reasonably preventable failure of air pollution control equipment, process equipment, or a process to operate in a normal or usual manner. Failures that are caused, in part, by poor maintenance or careless operation are not malfunctions. During periods of malfunction the operator shall operate within established parameters as much as possible, and monitoring of all applicable operating parameters shall continue until all waste has been combusted or until the malfunction ceases, whichever comes first.
(25) “Maximum charge rate” means:
(a) For continuous and intermittent HMIWI, 110 percent of the lowest 3-hour average charge rate measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with all applicable emission limits.
(b) For batch HMIWI, 110 percent of the lowest daily charge rate measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with all applicable emission limits.
(26) “Maximum design waste burning capacity” means:
(a) For intermittent and continuous HMIWI,
C= PV * 15,000 8,500
Where:
C = HMIWI capacity, lb/hr
PV = primary chamber volume, ft
15,000 = primary chamber heat release rate factor, Btu/ft
/hr
8,500 = standard waste heating value, Btu/lb; (b) For batch HMIWI,
C = PV * 4.5
Where:
C = HMIWI capacity, lb/hr
PV = primary chamber volume, ft
4.5 = waste density, lb/ft;
8 = typical hours of operation of a batch HMIWI, hours.
(27) “Maximum fabric filter inlet temperature” means 110 percent of the lowest 3-hour average temperature at the inlet to the fabric filter (taken, at a minimum, once every minute) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the dioxin/furan emission limit.
(28) “Maximum flue gas temperature” means 110 percent of the lowest 3-hour average temperature at the outlet from the wet scrubber (taken, at a minimum, once every minute) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the mercury (Hg) emission limit.
(29) “Medical/infectious waste” means any waste generated in the diagnosis, treatment, or immunization of human beings or animals, in research pertaining thereto, or in the production or testing of biologicals that is listed in paragraphs (a) through (g) of this definition. The definition of medical/infectious waste does not include ash from incineration of medical/infectious waste, once the incineration process has been completed; human corpses, remains, and anatomical parts that are intended for interment or cremation; and domestic sewage materials, hazardous waste, and household waste identified, listed, or defined in Part 261 of Mississippi Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.
(a) Cultures and stocks of infectious agents and associated biologicals, including: cultures from medical and pathological laboratories; cultures and stocks of infectious agents from research and industrial laboratories; wastes from the production of biologicals; discarded live and attenuated vaccines; and culture dishes and devices used to transfer, inoculate, and mix cultures.
(b) Human pathological waste, including tissues, organs, and body parts and body fluids that are removed during surgery or autopsy, or other medical procedures, and specimens of body fluids and their containers.
(c) Human blood and blood products including:
(1) Liquid waste human blood; (2) Products of blood; (3) Items saturated and/or dripping with human blood; or (4) Saturated and/or dripping with human blood that are now caked with dried human blood; including serum, plasma, and other blood components, and their containers, which were used or intended for use in either patient care, testing and laboratory analysis or the development of pharmaceuticals. Intravenous bags are also included in this category.
(d) Sharps that have been used in animal or human patient care or treatment or in medical, research, or industrial laboratories, including hypodermic needles, syringes (with or without the attached needle), Pasteur pipettes, scalpel blades, blood vials, needles with attached tubing, and culture dishes (regardless of presence of infectious agents). Also included are other types of broken or unbroken glassware that were in contact with infectious agents, such as used slides and cover slips. (e) Animal waste including contaminated animal carcasses, body parts, and bedding of animals that were known to have been exposed to infectious agents during research (including research in veterinary hospitals), production of biologicals or testing of pharmaceuticals. (f) Isolation wastes including biological waste and discarded materials contaminated with blood, excretions, exudates, or secretions from humans who are isolated to protect others from certain highly communicable diseases, or isolated animals known to be infected with highly communicable diseases. (g) Unused sharps including the following unused, discarded sharps: hypodermic needles, suture needles, syringes, and scalpel blades. (30) “Medium HMIWI” means:
(a) Except as provided in subparagraph (b)
(1) An HMIWI whose maximum design waste burning capacity is more than 200 pounds per hour but less than or equal to 500 pounds per hour; or
(2) A continuous or intermittent HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is more than 200 pounds per hour but less than or equal to 500 pounds per hour; or
(3) A batch HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is more than 1,600 pounds per day but less than or equal to 4,000 pounds per day.
(b) The following are not medium HMIWI:
(1) A continuous or intermittent HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is less than or equal to 200 pounds per hour or more than 500 pounds per hour; or
(2) A batch HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is more than 4,000 pounds per day or less than or equal to 1,600 pounds per day.
(31) “Minimum dioxin/furan sorbent flow rate” means 90 percent of the highest 3-hour average dioxin/furan sorbent flow rate (taken, at a minimum, once every hour) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the dioxin/furan emission limit. (32) “Minimum Hg sorbent flow rate” means 90 percent of the highest 3-hour average Hg sorbent flow rate (taken, at a minimum, once every hour) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the Hg emission limit. (33) “Minimum hydrogen chloride (HCl) sorbent flow rate” means 90 percent of the highest 3-hour average HCl sorbent flow rate (taken, at a minimum, once every hour) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the HCl emission limit. (34) “Minimum horsepower or amperage” means 90 percent of the highest 3-hour average horsepower or amperage to the wet scrubber (taken, at a minimum, once every minute) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the applicable emission limits. (35) “Minimum pressure drop across the wet scrubber” means 90 percent of the highest 3- hour average pressure drop across the wet scrubber PM control device (taken, at a minimum, once every minute) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the PM emission limit. (36) “Minimum scrubber liquor flow rate” means 90 percent of the highest 3-hour average liquor flow rate at the inlet to the wet scrubber (taken, at a minimum, once every minute) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with all applicable emission limits.
(37) “Minimum scrubber liquor pH” means 90 percent of the highest 3-hour average liquor pH at the inlet to the wet scrubber (taken, at a minimum, once every minute) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the HC1 emission limit. (38) “Minimum secondary chamber temperature” means 90 percent of the highest 3-hour average secondary chamber temperature (taken, at a minimum, once every minute) measured during the most recent performance test demonstrating compliance with the PM, CO, or dioxin/furan emission limits. (39) “Modification or Modified HMIWI” means any change to an HMIWI unit after March 16, 1998, such that:
(a) The cumulative costs of the modifications, over the life of the unit, exceed 50 per centum of the original cost of the construction and installation of the unit (not including the cost of any land purchased in connection with such construction or installation) updated to current costs, or
(b) The change involves a physical change in or change in the method of operation of the unit which increases the amount of any air pollutant emitted by the unit for which standards have been established under Section 129 or Section 111 of the Federal Clean Air Act.
(40) “Operating day” means a 24-hour period between 12:00 midnight and the following midnight during which any amount of hospital waste or medical/infectious waste is combusted at any time in the HMIWI. (41) “Operation” means the period during which waste is combusted in the incinerator excluding periods of startup or shutdown. (42) “Particulate matter or PM” means the total particulate matter emitted from an HMIWI as measured by EPA Reference Method 5 or EPA Reference Method 29. (43) “Pathological waste” means waste material consisting of only human or animal remains, anatomical parts, and/or tissue, the bags/containers used to collect and transport the waste material, and animal bedding (if applicable). (44) “Primary chamber” means the chamber in an HMIWI that receives waste material, in which the waste is ignited, and from which ash is removed.
(45) “Pyrolysis” means the endothermic gasification of hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste using external energy. (46) “Secondary chamber” means a component of the HMIWI that receives combustion gases from the primary chamber and in which the combustion process is completed.
(47) “Shutdown” means the period of time after all waste has been combusted in the primary chamber. For continuous HMIWI, shutdown shall commence no less than 2 hours after the last charge to the incinerator. For intermittent HMIWI, shutdown shall commence no less than 4 hours after the last charge to the incinerator. For batch HMIWI, shutdown shall commence no less than 5 hours after the high-air phase of combustion has been completed. (48) “Small HMIWI” means:
(a) Except as provided in subparagraph (b)
(1) An HMIWI whose maximum design waste burning capacity is less than or equal to 200 pounds per hour; or
(2) A continuous or intermittent HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is less than or equal to 200 pounds per hour; or
(3) A batch HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is less than or equal to 1,600 pounds per day.
(b) The following are not small HMIWI:
(1) A continuous or intermittent HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is more than 200 pounds per hour.
(2) A batch HMIWI whose maximum charge rate is more than 1,600 pounds per day.
(49) “Standard conditions” means a temperature of 20DC and a pressure of 101.3 kilopascals. (50) “Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area or SMSA” means any areas listed in OMB Bulletin No. 93-17 entitled “Revised Statistical Definitions for Metropolitan Areas” dated June 30, 1993. (51) “Startup” means the period of time between the activation of the system and the first charge to the unit. For batch HMIWI, startup means the period of time between activation of the system and ignition of the waste.
(52) “Wet scrubber” means an add-on air pollution control device that utilizes an alkaline scrubbing liquor to collect particulate matter (including nonvaporous metals and condensed organic) and/or to absorb and neutralize acid gases.
C. Emission limits.
(1) Except as provided for in subparagraph (2) no owner or operator of an affected facility shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from that affected facility any gases that contain stack emissions in excess of the limits presented in Table 1 of this paragraph.
(2) The emission limits in Table 2 shall apply to any small HMIWI which is located more than 50 miles from the boundary of the nearest Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) and which burns less than 2,000 pounds per week of hospital waste and medical/infectious waste. The 2,000 lb/week limitation does not apply during performance tests.
(3) No owner or operator of an affected facility shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the stack of that affected facility any gases that exhibit greater than 10 percent opacity (6-minute block average).
TABLE 1. EMISSION LIMITS FOR SMALL, MEDIUM, AND LARGE HMIWI
Pollutant Units (7 percent oxygen, dry basis) Emission Limits HMIWI Size Small Medium Large Particulate matter Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (grains per dry standard cubic foot) 115(0.05) 69 (0.03) 34(0.015) Carbon monoxide Parts per million by volume 40 40 40 Dioxins/furans Nanograms per dry standard cubic meter total dioxins/furans (grains per billion dry standard cubic feet) or nanograms per dry standard cubic meter TEQ (grains per billion dry standard cubic feet) 125 (55) or 2.3(1.0) 125(55) or 2.3(1.0) 125(55) or 2.3(1.0) Hydrogen chloride Parts per million by volume or percent reduction 100 or 93% 100 or 93% 100 or 93% Sulfur dioxide Parts per million by volume 55 55 55 Nitrogen oxides Parts per million by volume 250 250 250 Lead Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (grains per thousand dry standard cubic feet) or percent reduction 1.2(0.52) or 70% 1.2(0.52) or 70% 1.2(0.52) or 70% Cadmium Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (grains per thousand dry standard cubic feet) or percent reduction 0.16(0.07) or 65% 0.16(0.07) or 65% 0.16(0.07) or 65% Mercury Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (grains per thousand dry standard cubic feet) or percent reduction 0.55 (0.24) or 85% 0.55 (0.24) or 85% 0.55 (0.24) or 85%
TABLE 2. EMISSION LIMITS FOR SMALL RURAL HMIWI
Pollutant Units (7 percent oxygen, dry basis) HMIWI Emission Limits Particulate matter Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (grains per dry standard cubic foot) 197(0.086) Carbon monoxide Parts per million by volume 40 Dioxins/furans Nanograms per dry standard cubic meter total dioxins/furans (grains per billion dry standard cubic feet) or nanograms per dry standard cubic meter TEQ (grains per billion dry standard cubic feet) 800 (350) or 15(6.6) Hydrogen chloride Parts per million by volume 3100 Sulfur dioxide Parts per million by volume 55 Nitrogen oxides Parts per million by volume 250 Lead Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (grains per thousand dry standard cubic feet) 10(4.4) Cadmium Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (grains per thousand dry standard cubic feet) 4(1.7) Mercury Milligrams per dry standard cubic meter (grains per thousand dry standard cubic feet) 7.5 (3.3)
D. Operator Training and Qualification Requirements.
(1) Compliance with the requirements of this paragraph shall occur no later than September 15, 2000.
(2) No owner or operator of an affected facility shall allow the affected facility to operate at any time unless a fully trained and qualified HMIWI operator is accessible, either at the facility or available within 1 hour. The trained and qualified HMIWI operator may operate the HMIWI directly or be the direct supervisor of one or more HMIWI operators.
(3) Operator training and qualification shall be obtained through a State-approved program that meets the requirements included in subparagraphs (4) through (11) of this paragraph.
(4) Training shall be obtained by completing an HMIWI operator training course that includes, at a minimum, the following provisions:
(a) 24 hours of training on the following subjects:
(1) Environmental concerns, including pathogen destruction and types of emissions; (2) Basic combustion principles, including products of combustion; (3) Operation of the type of incinerator to be used by the operator, including proper startup, waste charging, and shutdown procedures; (4) Combustion controls and monitoring; (5) Operation of air pollution control equipment and factors affecting performance (if applicable); (6) Methods to monitor pollutants (continuous emission monitoring systems and monitoring of HMIWI and air pollution control device operating parameters) and equipment calibration procedures (where applicable); (7) Inspection and maintenance of the HMIWI, air pollution control devices, and continuous emission monitoring systems; (8) Actions to correct malfunctions or conditions that may lead to malfunction; (9) Bottom and fly ash characteristics and handling procedures; (10) Applicable federal, state, and local regulations; (11) Work safety procedures; (12) Pre-startup inspections; and (13) Recordkeeping requirements.
(b) An examination designed and administered by the instructor.
(c) Reference material distributed to the attendees covering the course topics.
(5) Qualification shall be obtained by:
(a) Completion of a training course that satisfies the criteria under subparagraph (4) of this paragraph; and
(b) Either 6 months experience as an HMIWI operator, 6 months experience as a direct supervisor of an HMIWI operator, or completion of at least two burn cycles under the observation of two qualified HMIWI operators.
(6) Qualification is valid from the date on which the examination is passed or the completion of the required experience, whichever is later.
(7) To maintain qualification, the trained and qualified HMIWI operator shall complete and pass an annual review or refresher course of at least 4 hours covering, at a minimum, the following:
(a) Update of regulations;
(b) Incinerator operation, including startup and shutdown procedures;
(c) Inspection and maintenance;
(d) Responses to malfunctions or conditions that may lead to malfunction; and
(e) Discussion of operating problems encountered by attendees.
(8) A lapsed qualification shall be renewed by one of the following methods:
(a) For a lapse of less than 3 years, the HMIWI operator shall complete and pass a standard annual refresher course described in subparagraph (7) of this paragraph above.
(b) For a lapse of 3 years or more, the HMIWI operator shall complete and pass a training course with the minimum criteria described in subparagraph (4) of this paragraph above.
(9) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall maintain documentation at the facility that address the following:
(a) Summary of the applicable standards under Rule 1.12 of these regulations;
(b) Description of basic combustion theory applicable to an HMIWI;
(c) Procedures for receiving, handling, and charging waste;
(d) HMIWI startup, shutdown, and malfunction procedures;
(e) Procedures for maintaining proper combustion air supply levels;
(f) Procedures for operating the HMIWI and associated air pollution control systems within the standards established under Rule 1.12 of these regulations;
(g) Procedures for responding to periodic malfunction or conditions that may lead to malfunction;
(h) Procedures for monitoring HMIWI emissions;
(i) Reporting and recordkeeping procedures; and
(j) Procedures for handling ash.
(10) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall establish a program for reviewing the information listed in subparagraph (9) of this paragraph annually with each HMIWI operator.
(a) The initial review of the information listed in subparagraph (9) of this paragraph shall be conducted by March 15, 2000, or prior to assumption of responsibilities affecting HMIWI operation, whichever date is later.
(b) Subsequent reviews of the information listed in subparagraph (9) of this paragraph shall be conducted annually.
(11) The information listed in subparagraph (9) of this paragraph shall be kept in a readily accessible location for all HMIWI operators. This information, along with records of training shall be available for inspection by the Department upon request.
E. Waste Management Guidelines.
The owner or operator of an affected facility shall prepare a waste management plan. The waste management plan shall identify both the feasibility and the approach to separate certain components of solid waste from the health care waste stream in order to reduce the amount of toxic emissions from incinerated waste. A waste management plan may include, but is not limited to, elements such as paper, cardboard, plastics, glass, battery, or metal recycling; or purchasing recycled or recyclable products. A waste management plan may include different goals or approaches for different areas or departments of the facility and need not include new waste management goals for every waste stream. It should identify, where possible, reasonably available additional waste management measures, taking into account the effectiveness of waste management measures already in place, the costs of additional measures, the emission reductions expected to be achieved, and any other environmental or energy impacts they might have. The American Hospital Association publication entitled “An Ounce of Prevention: Waste Reduction Strategies for Health Care Facilities” shall be considered in the development of the waste management plan.
F. Inspection Guidelines.
(1) Requirements of this paragraph apply to any small HMIWI subject to the emission limits in Table 2 of paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations.
(2) Later than September 15, 2000 and annually thereafter (no more than 12 months following the previous annual equipment inspection) an equipment inspection shall be performed.
(a) At a minimum, an inspection shall include the following:
(1) Inspect all burners, pilot assemblies, and pilot sensing devices for proper operation; clean pilot flame sensor, as necessary; (2) Ensure proper adjustment of primary and secondary chamber combustion air, and adjust as necessary;
(3) Inspect hinges and door latches, and lubricate as necessary;
(4) Inspect dampers, fans, and blowers for proper operation;
(5) Inspect HMIWI door and door gaskets for proper sealing;
(6) Inspect motors for proper operation;
(7) Inspect primary chamber refractory lining; clean and repair/replace lining as necessary;
(8) Inspect incinerator shell for corrosion and/or hot spots;
(9) Inspect secondary/tertiary chamber and stack, clean as necessary;
(10) Inspect mechanical loader, including limit switches, for proper operation, if applicable;
(11) Visually inspect waste bed (grates), and repair/seal, as appropriate;
(12) For the burn cycle that follows the inspection, document that the incinerator is operating properly and make any necessary adjustments;
(13) Inspect air pollution control devices(s) for proper operation, if applicable;
(14) Inspect waste heat boiler systems to ensure proper operation, if applicable;
(15) Inspect bypass stack components;
(16) Ensure proper calibration of thermocouples, sorbent feed systems, and any other monitoring equipment; and
(17) Generally observe that the equipment is maintained in good operating condition.
(b) Within 10 operating days following an equipment inspection, all necessary repairs shall be completed unless the owner or operator obtains written approval from the Department establishing a date whereby all necessary repairs of the designated facility shall be completed.
G. Compliance and Performance Testing.
(1) The emission limits under paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations shall apply at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction, provided that no hospital waste or medical/infectious waste is charged to the affected facility during startup, shutdown, or malfunction.
(2) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall conduct an initial performance test in accordance with the performance test requirements contained in 40 C.F.R. 60.8 to determine compliance with the emission limits using the procedures and test methods listed in subparagraphs (2)(a) through (2)(j) of this paragraph. The use of the bypass stack during a performance test shall invalidate the performance test.
(a) All performance tests shall consist of a minimum of three test runs conducted under representative operating conditions.
(b) The minimum sample time shall be 1 hour per test run unless otherwise indicated.
(c) EPA Reference Method 1 of Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used to select the sampling location and number of traverse points.
(d) EPA Reference Method 3 or 3 A of Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used for gas composition analysis, including measurement of oxygen concentration. EPA Reference Method 3 or 3A of Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used simultaneously with each reference method.
(e) The pollutant concentrations shall be adjusted to 7 percent oxygen using the following equation:
Where: C adj = pollutant concentration adjusted to 7 percent oxygen; C meas = pollutant concentration measured on a dry basis; (20.9-7) = 20.9 percent oxygen - 7 percent oxygen (defined oxygen correction basis); 20.9 = oxygen concentration in air, percent; and %O
= oxygen concentration measured on a dry basis, percent.
(f) EPA Reference Method 5 or 29 Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used to measure the particulate matter emissions.
(g) EPA Reference method 9 of Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used to measure stack opacity.
(h) EPA Reference Method 10 or 10B of Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used to measure the CO emissions.
(i) EPA Reference Method 23 of Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used to measure total dioxin/furan emissions. The minimum sample time shall be 4 hours per test run. If the affected facility has selected the toxic equivalency standards for dioxin/furans, under paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations, the following procedures shall be used to determine compliance:
(1) Measure the concentration of each dioxin/furan tetra-through octa- congener emitted using EPA Reference Method 23.
(2) For each dioxin/furan congener measured in accordance with subparagraph (2)(i)(1) of this paragraph, multiply the congener concentration by its corresponding toxic equivalency factor specified in Table 3 in Rule 1.12 of these regulations. (3) Sum the products calculated in accordance with subparagraph (2)(i)(2) of this paragraph to obtain the total concentration of dioxins/furans emitted in terms of toxic equivalency.
( ) ( ) C C O adj meas = − −
. . %
(j) EPA Reference Method 26 of Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used to measure HCl emissions. If the affected facility has selected the percentage reduction standards for HCl under paragraph (C) in Rule 1.12 of these regulations, the percentage reduction in HCl emissions (%R HCI ) is computed using the following formula:
Where: (%R HCI ) = percentage reduction of HCl emissions achieved; E i = HCl emission concentration measured at the control device inlet, corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis); and E
= HCl emission concentration measured at the control device outlet, corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis).
(k) EPA Reference Method 29 of Appendix A of 40 C.F.R. 60 shall be used to measure Pb, Cd, and Hg emissions. If the affected facility has selected the percentage reduction standards for metals under paragraph (C) in Rule 1.12 of these regulations, the percentage reduction in emissions (%R metal ) is computed using the following formula:
Where:
(%R metal ) = percentage reduction of metal emission (Ph, Cd, or Hg) achieved;
E i = metal emission concentration (Pb, Cd, or Hg) measured at the control device inlet, corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis); and E
= metal emission concentration (Pb, Cd, or Hg) measured at the control device outlet, corrected to 7 percent oxygen (dry basis).
() %R EE E HCl io i = − 100 ( ) % R E E E metal i o i = −
TABLE 3. TOXIC EQUIVALENCY FACTORS
Dioxin/Furan Congener Toxic Equivalency Factor 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorinateddibenzo-p-dioxin 1 1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorinated dibenzo-p- dioxin 0.5 1,2,3,4,7,8- hexachlorinated dibenzo-p- dioxin 0.1 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexachlorinated dibenzo-p- dioxin 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexachlorinated dibenzo-p- dioxin 0.1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorinated dibenzo-p- dioxin 0.01 octachlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin 0.001 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorinateddibenzofuran 0.1 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorinateddibenzofuran 0.5 1,2,3,7,8-pentachlorinated dibenzofuran 0.05 1,2,3,4,7,8-hexachlorinated dibenzofuran 0.1 1,2,3,6,7,8-hexachlorinated dibenzofuran 0.1 1,2,3,7,8,9-hexachlorinated dibenzofuran 0.1 2,3,4,6,7,8-hexachlorinated dibenzofuran 0.1 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-heptachlorinated dibenzofuran 0.01 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-heptachIorinated dibenzofuran 0.01 octachlorinated dibenzofuran 0.001
(3) Following the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under the performance test requirements contained in 40 C.F.R. 60.8, whichever date comes first, the owner or operator of an affected facility shall:
(a) Determine compliance with the opacity limit by conducting an annual performance test (no more than 12 months following the previous performance test) using the applicable procedures and test methods listed in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph.
(b) Determine compliance with the PM, CO, and HCl emission limits by conducting an annual performance test (no more than 12 months following the previous performance test) using the applicable procedures and test methods listed in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. If all three performance tests over a 3-year period indicate compliance with the emission limit for a pollutant (PM, CO, or HCl), the owner or operator may forego a performance test for that pollutant for the subsequent 2 years. At a minimum, a performance test for PM, CO, and HCl shall be conducted every third year (no more than 36 months following the previous performance test). If a performance test conducted every third year indicates compliance with the emission limit for a pollutant (PM, CO, or HCl), the owner or operator may forego a performance test for that pollutant for up to an additional 2 years. If any performance test indicates noncompliance with the respective emission limit, a performance test for that pollutant shall be conducted annually until all annual performance tests over a 3-year period indicate compliance with the emission limit. The use of the bypass stack during a performance test shall invalidate the performance test.
(c) Facilities using a CEMS to demonstrate compliance with any of the emission limits under paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations shall:
(1) Determine compliance with the appropriate emission limit(s) using a 12-hour rolling average, calculated each hour as the average of the previous 12 operating hours (not including startup, shutdown, or malfunction).
(2) Operate all CEMS in accordance with the applicable procedures under Appendices B and F of 40 C.F.R. 60.
(4) The owner or operator of an affected facility equipped with a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter, a wet scrubber, or a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter and wet scrubber shall:
(a) Establish the appropriate maximum and minimum operating parameters, indicated in Table 4 of Rule 1.12 of these regulations for each control system, as site specific operating parameters during the initial performance test to determine compliance with the emission limits; and
(b) Following the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under the performance test requirements contained in 40 C.F.R. 60.8, whichever date comes first, ensure that the affected facility does not operate above any of the applicable maximum operating parameters or below any of the applicable minimum operating parameters listed in Table 4 in Rule 1.12 of these regulations and measured as 3-hour rolling averages (calculated each hour as the average of the previous 3 operating hours) at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction. Operating parameter limits do not apply during performance tests. Operation above the established maximum or below the established minimum operating parameter(s) shall constitute a violation of established operating parameter(s).
(5) Except as provided in subparagraph (8) of this paragraph, for affected facilities equipped with a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter:
(a) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum secondary chamber temperature (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the CO emission limit.
(b) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum fabric filter inlet temperature, above the maximum charge rate, and below the minimum dioxin/furan sorbent flow rate (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the dioxin/furan emission limit.
(c) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum HCl sorbent flow rate (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the HCl emission limit.
(d) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum Hg sorbent flow rate (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the Hg emission limit.
(e) Use of the bypass stack (except during startup, shutdown, or malfunction) shall constitute a violation of the PM, dioxin/furan, HCl, Pb, Cd and Hg emission limits.
(6) Except as provided in subparagraph (8) of this paragraph, for affected facilities equipped with a wet scrubber:
(a) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum pressure drop across the wet scrubber or below the
minimum horsepower or amperage to the system (each measured on a 3- hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the PM emission limit.
(b) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum secondary chamber temperature (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the CO emission limit.
(c) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate, below the minimum secondary chamber temperature, and below the minimum scrubber liquor flow rate (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the dioxin/furan emission limit.
(d) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum scrubber liquor pH (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the HCl emission limit.
(e) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum flue gas temperature and above the maximum charge rate (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the Hg emission limit.
(f) Use of the bypass stack (except during startup, shutdown, or malfunction) shall constitute a violation of the PM, dioxin/furan, HCl, Pb, Cd and Hg emission limits.
(7) Except as provided in subparagraph (h) of this paragraph, for affected facilities equipped with a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter and a wet scrubber:
(a) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum secondary chamber temperature (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the CO emission limit.
(b) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum fabric filter inlet temperature, above the maximum charge rate, and below the minimum dioxin/furan sorbent flow rate (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the dioxin/furan emission limit.
(c) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum scrubber liquor pH (each measured on a 3-hour
rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the HCl emission limit.
(d) Operation of the affected facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum Hg sorbent flow rate (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the Hg emission limit.
(e) Use of the bypass stack (except during startup, shutdown, or malfunction) shall constitute a violation of the PM, dioxin/furan, HCl, Pb, Cd and Hg emission limits.
(8) The owner or operator of an affected facility may conduct a repeat performance test within 30 days of violation of applicable operating parameter(s) to demonstrate that the affected facility is not in violation of the applicable emission limit(s). Repeat performance tests conducted pursuant to this paragraph shall be conducted using the identical operating parameters that indicated a violation under subparagraph (5), (6), or (7) of this paragraph.
(9) The owner or operator of an affected facility using an air pollution control device other than a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter, a wet scrubber, or a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter and a wet scrubber to comply with the emission limits under paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations shall petition the Administrator for other site-specific operating parameters to be established during the initial performance test and continuously monitored thereafter. The owner or operator shall not conduct the initial performance test until after the petition has been approved by the Administrator.
(10) The owner or operator of an affected facility may conduct a repeat performance test at any time to establish new values for the operating parameters. The Department may request a repeat performance test at any time.
(11) Any small HMIWI subject to the emission limits in Table 2 of paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations shall meet the following compliance and performance testing requirements:
(a) Conduct the performance testing requirements in subparagraphs (1), (2)(a) through (2)(i), (2)(k)(mercury only), and (3)(a) of this paragraph. The 2,000 lb/week limitation does not apply during performance tests.
(b) Establish maximum charge rate and minimum secondary chamber temperature as site-specific operating parameters during the initial performance test to determine compliance with applicable emission limits.
(c) Following the date on which the initial performance test is completed or is required to be completed under the performance test requirements
contained in 40 C.F.R. 60.8, whichever date comes first, ensure that the designated facility does not operate above the maximum charge rate or below the minimum secondary chamber temperature measured as 3-hour rolling averages (calculated each hour as the average of the previous 3 operating hours) at all times except during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. Operating parameter limits do not apply during performance tests. Operation above the maximum charge rate or below the minimum secondary chamber temperature shall constitute a violation of the established operating parameter(s).
(d) Except as provided in subparagraph (11)(e) of this paragraph below, operation of the designated facility above the maximum charge rate and below the minimum secondary chamber temperature (each measured on a 3-hour rolling average) simultaneously shall constitute a violation of the PM, CO, and dioxin/furan emission limits.
(e) The owner or operator of a designated facility may conduct a repeat performance test within 30 days of violation of applicable operating parameter(s) to demonstrate that the designated facility is not in violation of the applicable emission limit(s). Repeat performance tests conducted pursuant to this paragraph must be conducted using the identical operating parameters that indicated a violation under subparagraph (11)(d), of this paragraph above.
H. Monitoring.
(1) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate (to manufacturer’s specifications), maintain, and operate devices (or establish methods) for monitoring the applicable maximum and minimum operating parameters listed in Table 4 in Rule 1.12 of these regulations such that these devices (or methods) measure and record values for these operating parameters at the frequencies indicated in Table 4 in Rule 1.12 of these regulations at all times except during periods of startup and shutdown.
(2) The owner of operator of an affected facility shall install, calibrate (to manufacturer’s specifications), maintain, and operate a device or method for measuring the use of the bypass stack including date, time, and duration.
(3) The owner or operator of an affected facility using something other than a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter, a wet scrubber, or a dry scrubber followed by a fabric filter and a wet scrubber to comply with the emission limits under paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations shall install, calibrate (to the manufacturer’s specifications), maintain, and operate the equipment necessary to monitor the site-specific operating parameters developed pursuant to subparagraph G.(l) in Rule 1.12 of these regulations.
(4) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall obtain monitoring data at all times during HMIWI operation except during periods of monitoring equipment malfunction, calibration, or repair. At a minimum, valid monitoring data shall be obtained for 75 percent of the operating hours per day and for 90 percent of the operating days per calendar quarter that the affected facility is combusting hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste.
(5) Any small HMIWI subject to the emission limits in Table 2 of paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations shall meet the following monitoring requirements:
(a) Install, calibrate (to manufacturer’s specifications), maintain, and operate a device for measuring and recording the temperature of the secondary chamber on a continuous basis, the output of which shall be recorded, at a minimum, once every minute throughout operation.
(b) Install, calibrate (to manufacturer’s specifications), maintain, and operate a device which automatically measures and records the date, time, and weight of each charge fed into the HMIWI.
(c) The owner or operator of a designated facility shall obtain monitoring data at all times during HMIWI operation except during periods of monitoring equipment malfunction, calibration, or repair. At a minimum, valid monitoring data shall be obtained for 75 percent of the operating hour per day and for 90 percent of the operating hour per calendar quarter that the designated facility is combusting hospital waste and/or medical/infectious waste.
TABLE 4. OPERATING PARAMETERS TO BE MONITORED AND MINIMUM MEASUREMENT AND RECORDING FREQUENCIES
Operating Parameters to be Monitored
Minimum Frequency
Control System
Data Measurement
Data Recording
Dry Scrubber followed by Fabric Filter
Wet Scrubber
Dry Scrubber followed by Fabric Filter and Wet Scrubber
Maximum operating parameters:
Maximum charge rate
Continuous
1 x hour
X
X
X
Maximum fabric filter inlet temperature
Continuous
1 x minute
X
X
Maximum flue gas temperature
Continuous
1 x minute
X
X
Minimum operating parameters:
Minimum secondary chamber temperature
Continuous
1 x minute
X
X
X
Minimum dioxin/furan sorbent flow rate
Hourly
1 x hour
X
X
Minimum HCl sorbent flow rate
Hourly
1 x hour
X
X
Minimum mercury (Hg) sorbent flow rate
Hourly
1 x hour
X
X
Minimum pressure drop across the wet scrubber or minimum horsepower or amperage to wet scrubber
Continuous
1 x minute
X
X
Minimum scrubber liquor flow rate
Continuous
1 x minute
X
X
Minimum scrubber liquor pH
Continuous
1 x minute
X
X
I. Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements.
(1) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall maintain the following information (as applicable) for a period of at least 5 years:
(a) Calendar date of each record;
(b) Records of the following data:
(1) Concentrations of any pollutant listed in paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations or measurements of opacity as determined by the continuous emission monitoring system (if applicable);
(2) Results of fugitive emissions (by EPA Reference Method 22) tests, if applicable;
(3) HMIWI charge dates, times, and weights and hourly charge rates;
(4) Fabric filter inlet temperatures during each minute of operation, as applicable;
(5) Amount and type of dioxin/furan sorbent used during each hour of operation, as applicable;
(6) Amount and type of Hg sorbent used during each hour of operation, as applicable;
(7) Amount and type of HCl sorbent used during each hour of operation, as applicable;
(8) Secondary chamber temperatures recorded during each minute of operation;
(9) Liquor flow rate to the wet scrubber inlet during each minute of operation, as applicable;
(10) Horsepower or amperage to the wet scrubber during each minute of operation, as applicable;
(11) Pressure drop across the wet scrubber system during each minute of operation, as applicable;
(12) Temperature at the outlet from the wet scrubber during each minute of operation, as applicable;
(13) pH at the inlet to the wet scrubber during each minute of operation, as applicable;
(14) Records indicating use of the bypass stack, including dates, times, and durations; and
(15) For affected facilities complying with subparagraphs G(1) and H(3) in Rule 1.12 of these regulations, the owner or operator shall maintain all operating parameter data collected.
(c) Identification of calendar days for which data on emission rates or operating parameters specified under subparagraph (1)(b) of this paragraph have not been obtained, with an identification of the emission rates or operating parameters not measured, reasons for not obtaining the data, and a description of corrective actions taken.
(d) Identification of calendar days, times and durations of malfunctions, a description of the malfunction and the corrective action taken.
(e) Identification of calendar days for which data on emission rates or operating parameters specified under subparagraph (1)(b) of this paragraph exceeded the applicable limits, with a description of the exceedances, reasons for such exceedances, and a description of corrective actions taken.
(f) The results of the initial, annual, and any subsequent performance tests conducted to determine compliance with the emission limits and/or to establish operating parameters, as applicable.
(g) Records showing the names of HMIWI operators who have completed review of the information in subparagraph (D)(9) as required by subparagraph (D)(10) including the date of the initial review and all subsequent annual reviews;
(h) Records showing the names of the HMIWI operators who have completed the operator training requirements, including documentation of training and the dates of the training;
(i) Records showing the names of the HMIWI operators who have met the criteria for qualification under paragraph D. in Rule 1.12 of these regulations and the dates of their qualification; and
(j) Records of calibration of any monitoring devices as required under subparagraphs H(1), (2), and (3) in Rule 1.12 of these regulations.
(2) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall submit the information specified in subparagraphs (2)(a) through (2)(c) of this paragraph no later than 60 days following the initial performance test. All reports shall be signed by the facilities manager.
(a) The initial performance test data as recorded under subparagraphs G(2)(a) through (2)(k) as applicable.
(b) The values for the site-specific operating parameters established pursuant to subparagraphs G(4) or (9) as applicable.
(c) The waste management plan as specified in paragraph E in Rule 1.12 of these regulations.
(3) An annual report shall be submitted 1 year following the submission of the information in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph and subsequent reports shall be submitted no more than 12 months following the previous report (once the unit is subject to permitting requirements in Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act, the owner or operator of an affected facility must submit these reports semiannually). The annual report shall include the information specified in subparagraphs (3)(a) through (3)(h) of this paragraph. All reports shall be signed by the facilities manager.
(a) The values for the site-specific operating parameters established pursuant to subparagraph G(4) or (9) as applicable.
(b) The highest maximum operating parameter and the lowest minimum operating parameter, as applicable, for each operating parameter recorded for the calendar year being reported, pursuant to subparagraph G(4) or (9) as applicable.
(c) The highest maximum operating parameter and the lowest minimum operating parameter, as applicable for each operating parameter recorded pursuant to subparagraph G(4) or (9) for the calendar year preceding the year being reported, in order to provide the Department with a summary of the performance of the affected facility over a 2-year period.
(d) Any information recorded under (1)(c) through (1)(e) of this paragraph for the calendar year being reported.
(e) Any information recorded under subparagraphs (1)(c) through (1)(e) of this paragraph for the calendar year preceding the year being reported, in order to provide the Department with a summary of the performance of the affected facility over a 2-year period.
(f) If a performance test was conducted during the reporting period, the results of that test.
(g) If no exceedances or malfunctions were reported under subparagraphs (1)(c) through (1)(e) of this paragraph for the calendar year being reported, a statement that no exceedances occurred during the reporting period.
(h) Any use of the bypass stack, the duration, reason for malfunction, and corrective action taken.
(4) The owner or operator of an affected facility shall submit semiannual reports containing any information recorded under subparagraphs (1)(c) through (1)(e) of this paragraph no later than 60 days following the reporting period. The first semiannual reporting period ends 6 months following the submission of information in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph. Subsequent reports shall be submitted no later than 6 calendar months following the previous report. All reports shall be signed by the facilities manager.
(5) All records specified under subparagraph (1) of this paragraph shall be maintained onsite in either paper copy or computer-readable format, unless an alternative format is approved by the Department.
(6) Any small HMIWI subject to the emission limits in Table 2 of paragraph C in Rule 1.12 of these regulations shall meet the following reporting and recordkeeping requirements:
(a) Maintain records of the annual equipment inspections, any required maintenance, and any repairs not completed within 10 days of an inspection or the timeframe established by the Department; and
(b) Submit an annual report containing information recorded under subparagraph (6)(1) above no later than 60 days following the year in which data were collected. Subsequent reports shall be sent no later than 12 calendar months following the previous report (once the unit is subject to permitting requirements in Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act, the owner or operator must submit these reports semiannually). The report shall be signed by the facilities manager.
J. Compliance Schedules.
(1) Except as provided in subparagraph (2) designated or affected facilities to which the provisions in Rule 1.12 of these regulations applies (as defined in paragraph 1) shall comply with all requirements in Rule 1.12 of these regulations on or before September 15, 2000, regardless of whether the Department has identified a
designated or affected facility in the State Plan inventory required by Subpart B of 40 C.F.R. 60.
(2) For designated facilities planning to install the necessary air pollution control equipment, the Department may allow compliance on or before September 15, 2002, but as expeditiously as possible. No later than December 15, 1999, these facilities shall petition the Department in writing, as outlined in subparagraphs (a) through (b) below. Under no circumstances can compliance with the provisions in Rule 1.12 of these regulations extend beyond September 15, 2002.
(a) Documentation of the analyses undertaken to support the need for an extension, including an explanation of why September 15, 2002, is sufficient time to comply while September 15, 2000, is not sufficient. The documentation shall also include an evaluation of the option to transport the waste offsite to a commercial medical waste treatment and disposal facility on a temporary or permanent basis; and
(b) Documentation of measurable and enforceable incremental steps of progress to be taken towards compliance with the requirements in Rule 1.12 of these regulations, as defined in subparagraphs (1) through (10) below:
(1) Date for submitting a petition for site specific operating parameters under subparagraph G(9) in Rule 1.12 of these regulations;
(2) Date for obtaining services of an architectural and engineering firm regarding the air pollution control device(s);
(3) Date for obtaining design drawings of the air pollution control device(s);
(4) Date for ordering the air pollution control device(s);
(5) Date for obtaining the major components of the air pollution control device(s);
(6) Date for initiation of site preparation for installation of the air pollution control device(s);
(7) Date for initiation of installation of the air pollution control device(s);
(8) Date for initial startup of the air pollution control device(s); and
(9) Date for initial compliance test(s) of the air pollution control device(s);
(10) Date for final compliance.
(3) Designated facilities planning to shut down permanently to demonstrate compliance with subparagraph (1) of this paragraph shall notify the Department in writing, no later than December 15, 1999. The notification shall include documentation of measurable and enforceable incremental steps of progress to be taken towards compliance with the requirements in Rule 1.12 of these regulations, as defined in subparagraphs (a) though (f) below:
(a) Date for designated facility plan for shut down;
(b) Date for contract with the appropriate vendor (off-site hauler or alternative waste treatment equipment);
(c) Date to begin construction of alternative waste treatment equipment (if applicable);
(d) Date for complete installation of alternative waste treatment equipment (if applicable);
(e) Date for shut down of incinerator;
(f) Date for dismantling incinerator.
(4) Department Actions on Petitions. On receipt of a petition, the Department will authorize one of the following actions, as it shall determine:
(a) The petition may be dismissed if the Department determines that it is not adequate under subparagraph (2) of this paragraph.
(b) The Department may grant the request of the petition, as petitioned or by imposing such conditions as the requirements in Rule 1.12 of these regulations may require in the Title V permit, including the establishment of schedules of compliance.
(c) The Department may deny the petition. If such a denial is made, the Department shall notify the petitioner in writing, state the reasons for denial and outline procedures for appeal.
(5) Termination Procedures. Any petition granted by the Department may be terminated by the Department whenever the Department finds, after an opportunity for the petitioner to demonstrate compliance and after notice and an opportunity for hearing, that the petitioner is in violation of any requirement, condition, schedule, limitation or any other provision of the petition or that operation under the petition does not meet the minimum requirements established
by State and Federal laws and regulations or is unreasonably threatening the public health.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 1.13 Provisions for Existing Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units
A. Emission Standards. Provisions under this paragraph that apply to existing commercial and industrial solid waste incineration (CISWI) units are the requirements that are contained in 40 CFR 60.2575 through 60.2875. All such requirements are hereby adopted by reference by the Commission as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and shall hereafter be enforceable as such.
B. Applicability. The requirements of Rule 1.13 shall apply to each existing commercial and industrial solid waste incineration unit that commenced construction on or before November 30, 1999 and meets the following criteria:
(1) Commercial and industrial solid waste incineration (CISWI) unit means any combustion device that combusts commercial and industrial waste. The boundaries of a CISWI unit are defined as, but not limited to, the commercial or industrial solid waste fuel feed system, grate system, flue gas system, and bottom ash. The CISWI unit does not include air pollution control equipment or the stack. The CISWI unit boundary starts at the commercial and industrial solid waste hopper (if applicable) and extends through two areas:
(a) the combustion unit flue gas system, which ends immediately after the last combustion chamber and
(b) the combustion unit bottom ash system, which ends at the truck loading station or similar equipment that transfers the ash to final disposal. It includes all ash handling systems connected to the bottom ash handling system.
(2) Commercial and industrial waste means solid waste combusted in an enclosed device using controlled flame combustion without energy recovery that is a distinct operating unit of any commercial or industrial facility (including field- erected, modular, and custom built incineration units operating with starved or excess air), or solid waste combusted in an air curtain incinerator without energy recovery that is a distinct operating unit of any commercial or industrial facility.
(3) Solid waste means any garbage, refuse, sludge from a waste treatment plant, water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semisolid, or contained gaseous material resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, agricultural operations, and from community activities but does not include solid or dissolved material in domestic sewage, or solid or dissolved materials in irrigation return flows or industrial
discharges which are point sources subject to permits under Section 402 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1342), or source, special nuclear, or byproduct material as defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2014).
(4) Solid waste combustion units are exempt from the requirements of Rule 1.13 as described and set forth below:
(a) Pathological waste incineration units. Incineration units burning 90 percent or more by weight (on a calendar quarter basis and excluding the weight of auxiliary fuel and combustion air) of pathological waste, low- level radioactive waste, and/or chemotherapeutic waste as defined in 40 CFR 60.2875 are not subject to the requirements of Rule 1.13 if the owner or operator of the CISWI unit meets the two requirements specified in (a)(1) and (2) of this paragraph.
(1) Notify the Executive Director that the unit meets these criteria.
(2) Keep records on a calendar quarter basis of the weight of pathological waste, low-level radioactive waste, and/or chemotherapeutic waste burned, and the weight of all other fuels and wastes burned in the unit.
(b) Agricultural waste incineration units. Incineration units burning 90 percent or more by weight (on a calendar quarter basis and excluding the weight of auxiliary fuel and combustion air) of agricultural wastes as defined in 40 CFR 60.2875 are not subject to the requirements of Rule 1.13 if the owner or operator of the CISWI unit meets the two requirements specified in (b)(1) and (2) of this paragraph.
(1) Notify the Executive Director that the unit meets these criteria.
(2) Keep records on a calendar quarter basis of the weight of agricultural waste burned, and the weight of all other fuels and wastes burned in the unit.
(c) Municipal waste combustion units. Incineration units that meet either of the two criteria specified in (c)(1) and (2) of this paragraph.
(1) Are regulated under 40 CFR 60, Subpart Ea (Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors); 40 CFR 60, Subpart Eb (Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After September 20, 1994); 40 CFR 60, Subpart Cb (Emission Guidelines and Compliance Time for Large Municipal Combustors that are Constructed on or Before September 20, 1994); 40 CFR
60, Subpart AAAA (Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources: Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units); or 40 CFR 60, Subpart BBBB (Emission Guidelines for Existing Stationary Sources: Small Municipal Waste Combustion Units).
(2) Burn greater than 30 percent municipal solid waste or refuse- derived fuel, as defined in Subpart Ea, Subpart Eb, Subpart AAAA, and Subpart BBBB, and that have the capacity to burn less than 35 tons (32 megagrams) per day of municipal solid waste or refuse-derived fuel, if the owner or operator of the CISWI unit meets the two requirements in (c)(2)(i) and (ii) of this paragraph.
(i) Notify the Executive Director that the unit meets these criteria.
(ii) Keep records on a calendar quarter basis of the weight of municipal solid waste burned, and the weight of all other fuels and wastes burned in the unit.
(d) Medical waste incineration units. Incineration units regulated under 40 CFR 60, Subpart Ec (Standards of Performance for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators for Which Construction is Commenced After June 20, 1996) or 40 CFR 60, Subpart Ca (Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators).
(e) Small power production facilities. Units that meet the three requirements specified in (e)(1) through (3) of this paragraph.
(1) The unit qualifies as a small power-production facility under Section 3(17)(C) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796 (17)(C)).
(2) The unit burns homogeneous waste (not including refuse-derived fuel) to produce electricity.
(3) The owner or operator of the CISWI unit notifies the Executive Director that the unit meets all of these criteria.
(f) Co-generation facilities. Units that meet the three requirements specified in (f)(1) through (3) of this paragraph.
(1) The unit qualifies as a co-generation facility under section 3(18)(B) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796(18)(B)).
(2) The unit burns homogeneous waste (not including refuse-derived fuel) to produce electricity and steam or other forms of energy used for industrial, commercial, heating, or cooling purposes.
(3) The owner or operator of the CISWI unit notifies the Executive Director that the unit meets all of these criteria.
(g) Hazardous waste combustion units. Units that meet either of the two criteria specified in (g)(1) or (2) of this paragraph.
(1) Units for which the owner or operator is required to get a permit under section 3005 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act.
(2) Units regulated under Subpart EEE of 40 CFR Part 63 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors).
(h) Materials recovery units. Units that combust waste for the primary purpose of recovering metals, such as primary and secondary smelters.
(i) Air curtain incinerators. Air curtain incinerators that burn only the materials listed in (h)(1) through (3) of this paragraph are only required to meet the requirements under “Air Curtain Incinerators” 40 CFR 60.2810 through 60.2870.
(1) 100 percent wood waste.
(2) 100 percent clean lumber.
(3) 100 percent mixture of only wood waste, clean lumber, and/or yard waste.
(j) Cyclonic barrel burners. (See 40 CFR 60.2875)
(k) Rack, part, and drum reclamation units. (See 40 CFR 60.2875)
(l) Cement kilns. Kilns regulated under Subpart LLL of 40 CFR Part 63 (National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry).
(m) Sewage sludge incinerators. Incineration units regulated under Subpart O of 40 CFR Part 60 (Standards of Performance for Sewage Treatment Plants).
(n) Chemical recovery units. Combustion units burning materials to recover chemical constituents or to produce chemical compounds where there is an
existing commercial market for such recovered chemical constituents or compounds. The seven types of units described in (n)(1) through (7) of this paragraph are considered chemical recovery units.
(1) Units burning only pulping liquors (i.e., black liquor) that are reclaimed in a pulping liquor recovery process and reused in the pulping process.
(2) Units burning only spent sulfuric acid used to produce virgin sulfuric acid.
(3) Units burning only wood or coal feedstock for the production of charcoal.
(4) Units burning only manufacturing byproduct streams/residues containing catalyst metals which are reclaimed and reused as catalysts or used to produce commercial grade catalysts.
(5) Units burning only coke to produce purified carbon monoxide that is used as an intermediate in the production of other chemical compounds.
(6) Units burning only hydrocarbon liquids or solids to produce hydrogen, carbon monoxide, synthesis gas, or other gases for use in other manufacturing processes.
(7) Units burning only photographic film to recover silver.
(o) Laboratory analysis units. Units that burn samples of materials for the purpose of chemical or physical analysis.
C. Schedule for compliance.
(1) Except as provided in sub-paragraph (2), each designated or affected facility to which the provisions of Rule 1.13 are applicable, shall comply with the emission standards and requirements set forth in Rule 1.13 not later than December 1, 2003.
(2) Any designated or affected facility that does not comply with sub-paragraph (1) shall be subject to the increments of progress requirements set forth in 40 CFR 60.2575 through 60.2605 and shall comply as follows:
(a) Increment 1 - Submit final control plan - April 1, 2003
(b) Increment 2 - Achieve final compliance - December 1, 2005
D. Permitting requirements. Each CISWI unit affected by the provisions of Rule 1.13 shall be subject to the permitting requirements of Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act; and the owner and/or operator of the affected facility shall submit the necessary permit application not later than April 1, 2003. Beginning December 1, 2003, affected facilities shall only operate pursuant to authorization, or a permit issued, pursuant to the operating permit regulations referenced herein.
E. Clarifications of terminology. Clarification for certain terms contained in the requirements adopted by reference into Rule 1.13 are as follows:
(1) The term “Administrator”, as it relates to the State Air Pollution Control Agency in 40 CFR 60.2575 through 60.2875, means the “Executive Director” of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(2) The term “You” in 40 CFR 60.2575 through 60.2875 means the owner or operator of a CISWI unit.
(3) The term “State Plan” in 40 CFR 60.2575 through 60.2875 means the plan (including the requirements set forth in Rule 1.13) submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that implement the emission guidelines contained in 40 CFR 60, Subpart DDDD.
Part 2, Chapter 2: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment (Adopted May 8, 1970; Last Amended July 28, 2005)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17- 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
A. Replacement of Previous Regulation.
This regulation supercedes and replaces previously adopted Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2, “Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment.”
B. Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5, “Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality”, amended by the Commission on the date of this regulation amendment, provides in Rule 5.2 thereof for the adoption of 40 CFR 52.21 as amended and promulgated by July 1, 2004 as official Regulations of the State of Mississippi except for the exclusions and changes set forth in Rules 5.2 and 5.3. of Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5. Therefore, the definitions set forth in 40 CFR 52.21(b), including the definitions of “emissions unit”, “major stationary source”, “major modification”, and “net emissions increase” as used in this Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2, incorporated by reference and shall have the same definition in this Regulation, except for the exclusions and changes set forth in Rules 5.2 and 5.3 of Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5 and except for changes noted herein.
C. Definitions.
(1) “Applicable rules and regulations” Any Commission regulation concerning and/or affecting air emissions and air quality established pursuant to State Law.
(2) “Building, structure, facility, or installation”. All the pollutant-emitting activities which belong to the same industrial grouping, are located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties, and are under the control of the same person (or persons under common control) except the activities of any vessel. Pollutant- emitting activities shall be considered as part of the same industrial grouping if they belong to the same “Major Group” (i.e., which have the same first two digit code) as described in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972, as amended by the 1977 Supplement (U.S. Government Printing Office stock numbers 4101-0066 and 003-005-00176-0, respectively).
(3) “Commission”. The Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
(4) “Concentrated animal feeding operation” (CAFO). Any facility included within the definition of that term found at 40 CFR 122.23(b)(3).
(5) “De minimis NSR modification”. Any modification in which the emissions increase of each regulated NSR pollutant is less than three-fourths of the threshold for a major modification using the same procedures for calculating the emissions
increase as the procedures of 40 CFR 52.21(a)(2)(iv)(c) through (f) for calculating a significant emissions increase; and which is not one of the following types of modifications:
(a) a major modification;
(b) a moderate modification;
(c) a modification involving “netting” out of PSD;
(d) a modification involving medical waste incineration or hazardous waste incineration;
(e) a modification meeting the definition of "constructing or reconstructing a major source of hazardous air pollutants" in Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 8, “Air Toxics Regulations”, and 40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart B and thereby requiring a case-by-case Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) determination.
(6) “DEQ”. The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(7) “EPA”. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(8) “Federal Act”. The Federal Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, and any subsequent amendments.
(9) “Fixed capital cost”. The capital needed to provide all the depreciable components.
(10) “Light commercial area”. An area zoned for commercial use, or, in the absence of any local zoning ordinances, an area predominantly used for wholesale and retail trade in goods and services.
(11) “Major Title V source”. Any major stationary source as determined in the "Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act", Miss. Admin Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6.
(12) “Minor stationary source”. Any stationary source that is neither a major stationary source nor a moderate stationary source.
(13) “Moderate modification”. Any modification in which the source is making enforceable emissions reductions to avoid major source requirements of Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5, “Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality”, or Rule 2.5.E. of these regulations (i.e., “netting” out of PSD/NSR). These modifications are often called “synthetic minor modifications”.
(14) “Moderate stationary source”. Any new stationary source which makes enforceable emissions reductions to avoid major source requirements of Commission Regulation Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5, “Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality” or Rule 2.5.E of these regulations (i.e., “netting” out of PSD/NSR).
(15) “Modification”. Any physical change in or change in the method of operation of a facility which increases the actual emissions or the potential uncontrolled emissions of any air pollutant subject to regulation under the Federal Act emitted into the atmosphere by that facility or which results in the emission of any air pollutant subject to regulation under the Federal Act into the atmosphere not previously emitted. A physical change or change in the method of operation shall not include:
(a) routine maintenance, repair, and replacement;
(b) use of an alternative fuel or raw material by reason of an order under Sections 2 (a) and (b) of the Federal Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974 (or any superseding legislation) or by reason of a natural gas curtailment plan pursuant to the Federal Power Act;
(c) use of an alternative fuel by reason of an order or rule under Section 125 of the Federal Act;
(d) use of an alternative fuel or raw material by a stationary source which:
(1) the source was capable of accommodating before January 6, 1975, unless such change would be prohibited under any federally enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6, 1975, pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21 or under regulations approved pursuant to 40 CFR Part 51 Subpart I or 40 CFR 51.166; or
(2) the source is approved to use under any permit issued under 40 CFR 52.21 or under regulations approved pursuant to 40 CFR Part 51 Subpart I or 40 CFR 51.166;
(e) an increase in the hours of operation or in the production rate unless such change would be prohibited under any federally enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6, 1975, pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21 or under regulations approved pursuant to 40 CFR Part 51 Subpart I or 40 CFR 51.166; or
(f) any change in ownership of the stationary source.
(16) “Modified Permit”. Any permit already effective which is altered substantively as a result of the Permit Board's determination of the need for such alteration. Alterations to correct typographical errors or to clarify requirements shall not be considered substantive changes and, therefore, are not modifications for the purposes of this definition.
(17) “NSR”. New source review.
(18) “Permit Board”. The Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board.
(19) “PSD”. Prevention of Significant Deterioration.
(20) “Recreational area”. Recreational area means:
(a) a national, state, county, or city park; or
(b) an outdoor recreational area, such as a golf course or swimming pool, owned by a city, county, state, or other public agency.
(21) “Regulated air pollutant”. Any regulated NSR pollutant, any air pollutant subject to a standard promulgated under Section 112 or other requirements established under Section 112 of the Federal Act, and any other air pollutant for which there is a duly adopted state ambient air quality standard.
(22) “Regulated NSR pollutant”. An air pollutant defined as a regulated NSR pollutant in 40 CFR 52.21 (b)(50).
(23) “Residential area”. Residential area means:
(a) a group of 20 or more single-family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of two or more units per acre, or
(b) a group of 40 or more single-family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of one or more units per acre, or
(c) a subdivision containing at least 20 constructed houses, in which the subdivision plat is recorded in the chancery clerk's office of the appropriate county.
(24) “Responsible Official”. Responsible Official means as follows:
(a) for a corporation: a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the company or corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the company or corporation, or a duly authorized representative of such person if the representative is responsible for the overall operation of
one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated in accordance with corporate procedures;
(b) for a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or
(c) for a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official (for the purposes of these regulations, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency includes the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g., a Regional Administrator of EPA). A principal executive officer of a military facility includes the facility commander, chief executive officer, or any other similar person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the institution.
(25) “Significant minor source”. A stationary source that is (a) not a synthetic minor source; (b) is not a major Title V source and is not otherwise required to obtain a Title V Permit to Operate; and (c) is one of the following categories of sources:
(a) hot-mix asphalt plants,
(b) cotton gins,
(c) medical waste incinerators, not subject to the requirements of Rule 1.12 of Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 1, “Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air Pollutants”.
(d) rendering plants, or
(e) Any other new stationary source deemed by the Permit Board to be a significant minor source due to (i) the source’s potential to require significant air pollution control operations in order to avoid a violation of the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law or any regulation promulgated thereunder, (ii) the source’s potential to require significant compliance demonstration or testing requirements, (iii) the source’s potential to cause a substantial threat to public health, welfare, or the environment, or (iv) the sources’ potential to cause or substantially contribute to a violation of any applicable ambient air quality standard.
(26) “State Law”. The Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, specifically, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-1 through 49-17-45, and any subsequent amendments.
(27) “State Permit to Operate or State Operating Permit”. A permit issued under State Law to operate air emissions equipment at a significant minor source, exclusive of Title V Permits.
(28) “Stationary source”. For purposes of this regulation, any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit regulated air pollutant(s).
(29) “Synthetic minor source”. Any stationary source which would otherwise constitute a major source as defined by Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, “Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act”, except that the owner or operator of the stationary source elects for federally enforceable emissions limitations which may include permit conditions restricting hours of operation, or type or amount of material stored, combusted or processed, or establishing more stringent air pollution control efficiency requirements to lower allowable emissions for air pollutants in the State Permit to Operate below applicability thresholds for a Title V major source.
(30) “Title V”. The air operating permit program mandated in Title V of the 1990 amendments to the Federal Clean Air Act, codified in 42 U.S.C. §7661.
(31) “Title V permit”. Any permit or group of permits covering a Title V source that is issued, renewed, amended, or revised pursuant to Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6.
(32) “Title V sources”. Title V sources include the following:
(a) any major source;
(b) any source, including an area source, subject to a standard, limitation or other requirement under Section 111 of the Federal Act;
(c) any source, including an area source, subject to a standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Federal Act, except that a source is not required to obtain a permit solely because it is subject to regulations or requirements under Section 112(r) of the Federal Act;
(d) any affected source; and
(e) any source in a source category designated by the Administrator.
D. Permitting Requirements.
(1) Permit Types. The Permit Board will issue two types of air pollution control permits, a permit to construct air emissions equipment and a State Permit to
Operate such equipment. A State Permit to Operate is required for synthetic minor sources, major Title V sources, and significant minor sources.
(2) Unless otherwise provided by Rule 2.13 and 2.15 or other provisions of these Regulations, any new stationary source or modification of a stationary source must have a permit to construct or multi-media permit incorporating such permit before beginning construction.
(3) All applications must be submitted on the form supplied by the Permit Board and must be signed by a responsible official.
(4) The Permit Board may require the applicant to submit any additional information which the Permit Board deems relevant to its decision on the permit application including, but not limited, to ambient air quality modeling. The Permit Board may require that all other media permits for a facility be issued simultaneously with any required air permit or may issue the air permit prior to or subsequent to other permits required by the facility.
(5) A permit issued by the Permit Board will generally be for a specific site identified in the application. No permit application, except one for a portable facility which will be located only temporarily at a site or sites, will be processed unless the applicant controls the real property upon which the facility is located. The applicant may demonstrate control or the legal right to operate through ownership, lease, eminent domain, easement, license and/or contract. For portable facilities which will be located only temporarily at a site or sites, the Permit Board may issue a statewide permit or a permit for operation in multiple areas.
(6) It is the responsibility of the applicant/permittee to obtain all other approvals, permits, clearances, easements, agreements, etc., which may be required including, but not limited to, all required local government zoning approvals or permits. DEQ may delay processing any permit application until the applicant provides to DEQ information or documentation sufficient to demonstrate any approval listed in this paragraph.
(7) The provisions of a permit are severable. If any provision of a permit, or the application of any provision of a permit to any circumstances, is challenged or held invalid, the validity of the remaining permit provisions and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.
(8) In the event of a conflict between any of the requirements of these regulations and/or applicable requirements of any other regulation or law, the more stringent requirements shall be applied.
(9) A stationary source which emits or causes to be emitted matter other than through a stack or a defined outlet of an air cleaning device may be classified inadequate
in regard to control equipment. Facilities which comply with emission standards which specifically address and include fugitive emissions shall be presumed adequate provided all other Applicable Rules and Regulations are complied with.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.2 GENERAL STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO ALL PERMITS
A. Except as provided for in the “Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act”, Miss Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, no permit shall be issued unless the applicant has complied with applicable requirements of the Commission “Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air Contaminants”, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 1; the Commission “Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment”, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2 the Commission “Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes”, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 3; the Commission “Ambient Air Quality Standards”, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 4 except as provided for in Rule 2.5.E. herein; the Commission “Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality”, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5, any amendments to these Rules and Regulations, and additional relevant Rules and Regulations promulgated by the Commission and/or Permit Board.
B. General Provisions.
(1) Any stationary source which holds a valid Title V permit shall be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements regarding a State Permit to Operate contained in, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2 and State Law.
(2) The Permit Board may require a permittee to submit an application for a Title V permit at any time the permittee becomes subject to Title V. The Permit Board may require a permittee to submit a Title V application even though the permittee has previously submitted an application for renewal of its State Operating Permit.
(3) When requested by the Permit Board, an applicant shall submit information to demonstrate it has the financial resources to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit.
(4) When requested by the Permit Board, an applicant shall submit information on the applicant's compliance history to provide reasonable assurance that it will comply with the terms and conditions of the permit.
(5) The knowing submittal of a permit application with false information may serve as the basis for the Permit Board to void the permit issued pursuant thereto or
subject the applicant to penalties for operating without a valid permit pursuant to State Law.
(6) Acceptance by the Permit Board of a permit application does not constitute a waiver of the DEQ's right to assess appropriate penalties against the applicant pursuant to State Law for constructing or operating without a valid permit.
(7) The issuance of a permit does not release the permittee from liability for constructing or operating air emissions equipment in violation of any applicable statute, rule or regulation of state or federal environmental authorities.
(8) Applicants for all permits to construct or operate, or to renew a State Permit to Operate, shall specify in their application the air emission rate for each air pollutant subject to regulation under the Federal Act that can be reasonably expected to be emitted into the air as a result of operations from the source.
(9) Each application must be signed by the responsible official. The signature of the applicant shall constitute an agreement that the applicant assumes the responsibility for any alterations, additions or changes in operation that may be necessary to achieve and maintain compliance with all Applicable Rules and Regulations.
(10) The Permit Board may, in any permit, establish limitations and requirements on the emission of air pollutants and on other parameters of a stationary source to assure that the requirements of Applicable Rules and Regulations are met subject to Miss. Code Ann. §49-17-34(2) and (3). Where the Permit Board does not establish limitations and requirements in a permit, the permit shall provide that the rates of emissions and other operating conditions and parameters specified in the application shall be the applicable limitations and requirements.
(11) The Permit Board may, in any permit, establish requirements for compliance testing by emissions sampling and analysis, for emissions and operation monitoring, and for reporting of the results from such testing and monitoring. The Permit Board shall consider factors in establishing such requirements as follows:
(a) Applicable Rules and Regulations which address testing, monitoring, and reporting;
(b) prior results of testing and monitoring at the stationary source;
(c) the applicant's compliance history;
(d) the size of the stationary source;
(e) the cost of the testing, monitoring, reporting; and
(f) the potential environmental impact of the stationary source.
(12) The Permit Board may, in any permit, subdivide the permit requirements to facilitate their expression so as to adequately define, describe, and encompass emissions-producing units, processes, and other portions of a stationary source subject to the requirements.
(13) The Permit Board may, in any permit to construct, require the permittee to perform special environmental monitoring for the purpose of detecting, quantifying, and determining the impact of pollutants existing prior to the date the permittee begins to emit when, during the review of the application and the public participation process, questions arise, with regard to separate environmental impacts of pollution raised by the applicant or the Department and which cannot be determined by available scientific data and scientific methods. The Permit Board may, in any State Permit to Operate, require the permittee to perform special environmental monitoring for the purpose of detecting, quantifying, and determining the impact of pollutants emitted by the permittee when such monitoring is necessary because traditional air quality monitoring techniques will not measure the quality of the environment nor the impact of the pollutants emitted into the environment. Such special monitoring may include, but is not limited to, parameters such as ambient concentration, deposition, bio- accumulation in flora and fauna, etc.
(14) No permit for the construction or relocation of equipment which will cause the issuance of air contaminants shall be issued when said equipment cannot comply with buffer zone requirements as follows:
(a) All sources of air emissions must be at least 150 feet from the nearest residential or recreational area.
(b) All sources of air emissions at asphalt plants utilizing conventional technology for the control of air contaminants must be at least 1500 feet from the nearest residential, recreational or light commercial area.
(c) All sources of air emissions at asphalt plants utilizing best available technology for the control of air contaminants must be at least 600 feet from the nearest residential, recreational or light commercial area.
(d) Rendering plants or other similar operations which may cause objectionable odors must be at least 1500 feet from the nearest residential, recreational or light commercial area and be located in compliance with Miss. Code Ann. §41-51-19.
(e) Notwithstanding (a) above, incinerators must be at least 150 feet from any dwelling or from any light commercial building not owned by the applicant.
(f) Where buffer zone requirements cannot be met, the Permit Board will consider requests for exceptions to, or variances from, these requirements upon the applicant's submittal of sufficient proof that affected property owners within the subject buffer zone have had timely and sufficient notice of the proposed stationary source. Any comments received as a result of such notice shall be considered prior to action upon any request for exceptions to, or variances from, the buffer zone requirements.
(g) The Permit Board may establish buffer zone requirements for facilities not included in 15(a)-(f) considering factors including but not limited to, the type of emissions, the quantity of emissions, the physical characteristics of the stationary source (such as the location) and such other factors that the Permit Board deems appropriate to protect human health, welfare, or the environment.
(15) Each permit issued shall include the following:
(a) It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of the permit unless halting or reducing activity would create an imminent and substantial endangerment threatening the public health and safety of the lives and property of the people of this state.
(b) The permit and/or any part thereof may be modified, revoked, reopened, and reissued, or terminated for cause. Sufficient cause for a permit to be reopened shall exist when an air emissions stationary source becomes subject to Title V. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition.
(c) The permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege.
(d) The permittee shall furnish to the DEQ within a reasonable time any information the DEQ may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee shall also furnish to the DEQ copies of records required to be kept by the permit or, for information claimed to be confidential, the permittee shall furnish such records to the DEQ along with a claim of confidentiality.
The permittee may furnish such records directly to the Administrator along with a claim of confidentiality.
C. Permit Modification or Revocation
After notice and opportunity for hearing, the Permit Board may modify, or revoke in whole or in part any permit issued pursuant to these regulations for good cause shown including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) persistent violation of any of the terms or conditions of the permit;
(2) obtaining the permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts; or
(3) a change in federal, state or local laws or regulations that require either a temporary or permanent reduction or elimination of previously authorized air emissions.
D. Modification of Permits Without Modification of Facilities
The terms and conditions of a previously issued permit to construct or State Permit to Operate may, upon request of the permittee, be modified if the Permit Board finds that those terms and conditions are no longer necessary to insure compliance with all Applicable Rules and Regulations or that the modifications sought by the permittee result in operating conditions that are protective of human health and the environment.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49- 17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.3 Application for Permit to Construct and State Permit to Operate New Stationary Source
A. All engineering plans and specifications required by DEQ must bear the signature, registration number, and seal of a professional engineer registered in the State of Mississippi.
B. Information Required.
(1) The Permit Board may require each application for a permit to construct a new stationary source be accompanied by two (2) complete sets of site drawings, construction drawings, design calculations and specifications.
(2) Upon request by the Permit Board, the applicant shall furnish any additional information necessary to evaluate the design adequacy of the new stationary source.
(3) The Permit Board may require the applicant to predict the impact of emissions on air quality using air quality models as referenced in Rule 2.5.B. herein.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49- 17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.4 Public Participation and Public Availability of Information
A. For any application for a Prevention of Significant Deterioration Permit to Construct, the DEQ will follow public information procedures specified in Commission Regulation, Miss. Admin Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5, "Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality", and any other Applicable Rules and Regulations set forth herein.
B. For any application for a Title V Permit to Operate, the DEQ will follow public information procedures specified in Commission Regulation, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, "Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations For The Purposes Of Title V Of The Federal Clean Air Act".
C. For any application for a permit to construct a new moderate stationary source, a moderate modification, or a new major stationary source impacting a nonattainment area as defined in Rule 2.5.E., the DEQ will provide opportunity for public comment on information submitted by the owner and operator. The public information will include the DEQ's analysis of the effect of construction or modification on ambient air quality, including the DEQ's recommendation for permit issuance or denial and shall include, as a minimum, the following:
(1) availability for public inspection in at least one location in the area affected of the information submitted by the owner or operator and of DEQ's analysis of the effect on air quality;
(2) a 30-day period for submittal of public comment; and
(3) a notice, by prominent advertisement in the area affected, of the location of the source information and analysis.
A copy of the notice will be sent to the Administrator of EPA through Region IV, and to all other State and local air pollution control agencies having jurisdiction in the region in which such new or modified installation will be located. A permit to construct issued pursuant to this paragraph is federally enforceable.
D. For any application for a new State Permit to Operate a synthetic minor source, and any application for renewal of a State Permit to Operate a synthetic minor source, the DEQ will provide opportunity for public comment on information submitted by the owner or operator. The public information will include the application submitted, the DEQ's
recommendation for permit issuance or denial (including the draft permit) and shall include, as a minimum, the following:
(1) availability for public inspection in at least one location in the area affected of the information submitted by the owner or operator and of DEQ's recommendation and the draft permit;
(2) a 30-day period for submittal of public comment; and
(3) a notice, by prominent advertisement in the area affected, of the location of the source information.
A copy of the notice will be sent to the Administrator of EPA through Region IV, and to all other State and local air pollution control agencies having jurisdiction in the region in which the source is or will be located. A State Permit to Operate issued to a synthetic minor source is federally enforceable.
E. For any request for coverage under a general permit to construct a moderate source or moderate modification, the public information procedures described in C. above will be followed except that the public information will also include the request for coverage. A general permit to construct which covers a moderate source or moderate modification is federally enforceable.
F. For any request for coverage under a general permit to operate a synthetic minor source, the public information procedures described in D. above will be followed except that the public information will also include the request for coverage. A general permit to operate which covers a synthetic minor source is federally enforceable.
G. For a multi-media permit incorporating a permit to construct a new moderate stationary source, a moderate modification, or a new major stationary source impacting a nonattainment area as defined in Rule 2.5.E, the DEQ will follow public information procedures described in C. above. The incorporated permit to construct in such a permit is federally enforceable.
H. For a multi-media permit incorporating a State Permit to Operate a synthetic minor source, the DEQ shall follow public information procedures described in D. above. The incorporated State Permit to Operate in such a permit is federally enforceable.
I. For a multi-media general permit incorporating a general permit to construct a moderate source or moderate modification, the DEQ shall follow public information procedures described in C. and E. above. The incorporated general permit to construct in such a permit is federally enforceable.
J. For a multi-media general permit incorporating a general permit to operate a synthetic minor source, the DEQ shall follow public information procedures described in D. and F.
above. The incorporated general permit to operate in such a permit is federally enforceable.
K. For any application for a PAL permit at an existing major stationary source in accordance with Rule 2.15.B. of these regulations, the DEQ shall follow public information procedures described in 40 CFR 52.21(aa)(5) except that the term "Administrator" as it appears shall mean the Permit Board.
L. In addition to A. through F. above, the Permit Board may provide notice to the public and provide opportunity for public comment on any application for a construction permit or State Operating Permit.
M. In addition to public hearings on PSD permits, as provided for in Commission Regulation Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5, Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality, the Permit Board may hold a public hearing on any application for a construction permit or State Operating Permit if it determines that there is sufficient interest in the application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq..
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.5 Application Review
A. Standards for Approving an Application for a Permit to Construct.
(1) The stationary source shall be designed and constructed so as to operate without causing a violation of any Applicable Rules and Regulations.
(2) The stationary source shall be designed and constructed so as to operate without interfering with the attainment and maintenance of State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(3) The stationary source shall be designed and constructed so as to operate such that the emission of air toxics does not result in an ambient concentration sufficient to adversely affect human health and well-being or unreasonably and adversely affect plant or animal life beyond the stationary source boundaries.
(a) The Permit Board may require the applicant to provide data necessary to evaluate the impacts of air toxics, including the predicted emission rates and ambient concentrations, when it deems necessary, considering factors that follow:
(1) the types of air toxics involved;
(2) the quantity of emissions involved;
(3) the physical characteristics of the stationary source (such as the location, size, etc.);
(4) the anticipated human health effects;
(5) the weight of scientific data supporting the health effects associated with the air toxics;
(6) the level of air pollution control equipment employed; and
(7) such other factors as the Permit Board deems appropriate.
(b) When an air toxics evaluation is required by the Permit Board, the evaluation shall consider:
(1) an analysis of the chronic human health risks associated with the air toxics including the lifetime excess cancer risks to the most exposed individual from air toxics which are known, probable, or possible human carcinogens calculated or determined using appropriate pathways of exposure;
(2) an analysis of the acute human health effects associated with the air toxics utilizing the most current health-effects data published by EPA and/or recognized public health institutions or, in its absence, other extrapolative acute health-effects data; and
(3) where applicable, an analysis of the impacts and effects of the air toxics on plant and/or animal life beyond the boundaries of the applicant's property.
(c) The carcinogenic risk analysis shall be considered to have satisfied applicable requirements of this regulation and Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 1 when the lifetime excess cancer risk to the most exposed individual outside the property boundary is determined to be less than 1 x 10 -6 . When the excess cancer risk is determined to be greater than 1 x 10 -6 but less than 1 x 10 -4 , the Permit Board may either:
(1) require the applicant to demonstrate that, notwithstanding the calculated risks, public health is not threatened by the proposed emissions of air toxics; or
(2) establish permit conditions to limit or prohibit the emissions of air toxics.
When this excess cancer risk is calculated or determined to be greater than 1 x 10 -4 , the applicant must demonstrate that, notwithstanding the
calculated risks, public health is not threatened by the proposed emissions of air toxics.
(4) The construction of the stationary source shall be performed in such a manner so as to reduce fugitive dust emission from construction activities to a minimum.
B. Air Quality Models.
(1) All estimates of ambient concentrations of air pollutants shall be based on the applicable air quality models, data bases, and other requirements specified in the "Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)" 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix W, which are incorporated herein and adopted by reference.
(2) Where an air quality impact model specified in the "Guideline on Air Quality Models (Revised)" 40 CFR, Part 51, Appendix W, is inappropriate, the model may be modified or another model substituted. Such a modification or substitution of a model may be made on a case-by-case basis or, where appropriate, on a generic basis. Written approval of the DEQ and the Administrator of EPA must be obtained for any modification or substitution. In addition, use of a modified or substituted model shall be subject to public notice and opportunity for public comment.
C. Cancellation of Permit to Construct a New Stationary Source and Notification.
(1) The permit to construct will expire if construction does not begin within eighteen (18) months from the date of issuance or if construction is suspended for eighteen (18) months or more.
(2) The permittee must notify DEQ in writing when construction begins within fifteen (15) days of beginning actual construction.
(3) The permittee must notify DEQ in writing when construction does not begin within eighteen (18) months of issuance or if construction is suspended for eighteen (18) months or more.
(4) The Permit Board may extend the permit to construct for such additional time it deems appropriate if, at the time of the extension request, the applicant can demonstrate it meets all requirements necessary to issue a new permit to construct.
D. Certification of Construction, Beginning Operation, and Application for Permit to Operate.
(1) Upon the completion of construction or installation of an approved stationary source or modification, the applicant shall notify the Permit Board that
construction or installation was performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications on file with the Permit Board.
(2) The Permit Board shall be promptly notified in writing of any change in construction from the previously approved plans and specifications or permit. If the Permit Board determines the changes are substantial, it may require the submission of a new application to construct with "as built" plans and specifications. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the acceptance of an "as built" application shall not constitute a waiver of the right to seek compliance penalties pursuant to State Law.
(3) A new stationary source issued a Permit to Construct cannot begin operation until certification of construction by the permittee.
(4) Except as prohibited by (7) below, after certification of construction by the permittee, the Permit to Construct shall be deemed to satisfy the requirement for a permit to operate until the date the application for issuance or modification of the Title V Permit or the application for issuance or modification of the State Permit to Operate, whichever is applicable, is due. This provision is not applicable to a source excluded from the requirement for a permit to operate as provided by Rule 2.13.G.
(5) Except as otherwise required in (7) below, the application for issuance or modification of the State Permit to Operate or the application for issuance or modification of the Title V Permit, whichever is applicable, is due, twelve (12) months after beginning operation or such earlier date or time as specified in the Permit to Construct. The Permit Board may specify an earlier date or time for submittal of the application. Beginning operation will be assumed to occur upon certification of construction, unless the permittee specifies differently in writing.
(6) Except as otherwise required in (7) below, upon submittal of a timely and complete application for issuance or modification of a State Permit to Operate, or application for issuance or modification of a Title V Permit, whichever is applicable, the applicant may continue to operate under the terms and conditions of the Permit to Construct and in compliance with the submitted application until the Permit Board issues, modifies, or denies the Permit to Operate.
(7) For moderate modifications that require contemporaneous enforceable emissions reductions from more than one emission point in order to "net" out of PSD/NSR, the applicable Title V Permit to Operate or State Permit to Operate must be modified prior to beginning operation of the modified facilities.
E. Additional Requirements for a Construction Permit or a State Operating Permit for a New Major Stationary Source or Major Modification Significantly Impacting an Area in which a National Ambient Air Quality Standard is being exceeded or will be exceeded.
(1) The Offset Policy is the Emission Offset Interpretive Ruling adopted by EPA in (or to be printed in) 40 C.F.R. Part 51, Appendix S, and any subsequent amendments thereto as of April 25, 1988. A copy of such ruling is attached hereto and is incorporated herein and adopted by reference as Regulations of the Commission except as follows:
(a) Notwithstanding Appendix S, the requirements for Offsets and Lowest Achievable Emission Rate will apply to all major stationary sources and major modifications which have a significant impact on nonattainment of the applicable ambient air quality standard.
(b) The source types specified in Section IV.B. of Appendix S of 40 CFR Part 51 will not be excepted from any conditions of the Offset Policy or any of the requirements contained herein.
(c) All terms in Rule 2.5.E shall have the same definitions as those contained in the Offset Policy including the term "major stationary source" which is defined differently for purposes of this paragraph than throughout the remainder of Commission Regulations Miss. Adm. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2.
(2) Definitions
(a) "Nonattainment area." A geographical area of the state in which a violation of a National Ambient Air Quality Standard is occurring and which has been designated by the Commission or EPA as nonattainment with respect to that standard.
(b) "Nonattainment Area Implementation Plan." A revision to the Commission's Implementation Plan for the Control of Air Pollution, such revision having been adopted by the Commission and approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Federal Act, for the purpose of attainment and maintenance of the applicable National Ambient Air Quality Standard in a nonattainment area.
(c) "Reasonable Further Progress Schedule." An incremental reduction in total emissions of the applicable air pollutant allowed in order to provide for the attainment of the applicable National Ambient Air Quality Standard by the applicable statutory deadlines.
(d) "Significance Levels." Concentrations of pollutants against which air quality contributions of a stationary source are compared to determine whether the stationary source significantly impacts air quality in an area. The levels are as follows:
SO
1.0 μg/m
, annual average; 5 μg/m
, 24-hour average; 25 μg/m
, 3- hour average
PM
1.0 μg/m
, annual average; 5 μg/m
, 24-hour average
NO
1.0 μg/m
, annual average
CO 0.5 mg/m
, 8-hour average; 2.0 mg/m
, 1-hour average
(e) "Significant impact." Air quality impact which exceeds the significance level.
(3) A new stationary source which is a major stationary source or major modification for the pollutant which contributes to violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for which the area is nonattainment and which locates in or significantly impacts a nonattainment area must also meet the following requirements before a construction permit or a State Operating Permit is issued:
(a) The stationary source must meet the lowest achievable emission rate for the applicable air pollutant.
(b) When the applicable Nonattainment Area Implementation Plan contains a Reasonable Further Progress Schedule, the Permit Board must determine that, by the time the stationary source is to commence operation, total combined allowable emissions of the applicable air pollutant from existing sources in the area, the proposed new stationary source, and all other new facilities in the area shall be no greater than the total allowable emissions for the nonattainment area which represents reasonable further progress for attaining the standard as defined in the applicable Nonattainment Area Implementation Plan Reasonable Further Progress Schedule.
(c) The owner or operator of the proposed new stationary source must demonstrate that all major stationary sources which are owned or operated by such person (or by any entity controlled by, or under common control with such person) in the state are subject to emission limitations and are in compliance, or on a schedule for compliance, with all applicable emission limitations contained in any Applicable Rules and Regulations.
(d) Exceptions will be made to the inclusion of fugitive emissions in the determination of whether a new stationary source is a major stationary source or major modification to the extent that those exceptions are made in the Offset Policy.
(e) At such time that a particular source or modification becomes a major stationary source or major modification solely by virtue of a relaxation in an enforceable limitation on the capacity of the source or modification
otherwise to emit a pollutant, the requirements of these Regulations shall apply to the source or modification as though construction had not yet commenced.
(f) When the Reasonable Further Progress Schedule in an applicable Nonattainment Area Implementation Plan is determined to have become inapplicable due to consumption of all available growth allowance under such Schedule, the stationary source must meet the conditions of Rule 2.5.E(4) below.
(4) A new major stationary source which proposes to locate in or near an area where an air quality standard is being or will be exceeded but for which no nonattainment area implementation plan has been adopted shall be subject to the following:
(a) The stationary source shall be subject to the Offset Policy if:
(1) The stationary source is a major stationary source or major modification for the pollutant for which the standard is or will be exceeded; and
(2) The stationary source is within or has significant impact in the area where the standard is or will be exceeded.
(b) In addition to the requirements of the Offset Policy, the stationary source shall not be granted a construction permit or a State Operating Permit unless the owner or operator demonstrates that:
(1) emissions reductions to offset the new stationary source emissions will compensate for the adverse ambient impact caused by the new stationary source; and
(2) the emissions reductions have been achieved.
(5) The granting of a Permit shall not relieve the source of the responsibility to comply with other applicable requirements of this Regulation or with any other applicable Regulation or Law.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2003).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.6 Compliance Testing
A. Where compliance testing is required in any permit, it shall be performed as provided herein. The Permit Board may require in any permit the installation of sampling ports with safe access and the installation, maintenance and use of monitoring equipment.
B. Requirements.
(1) The emissions sampling and analysis will be performed in accordance with EPA Test Methods and with any continuous emission monitoring requirements, if applicable, unless otherwise approved by the Permit Board and the EPA. The Permit Board may establish an appropriate method for deviation from a test method.
(2) In the event there is no applicable EPA Test Method or method required by Applicable Rules and Regulations, the Permit Board may specify an appropriate test method, taking into consideration any test methodology proposed by the applicant.
(3) The results of the emissions sampling and analysis shall be expressed both in units consistent with the emission standards as set forth in any Applicable Rules and Regulations and in units of mass per time.
(4) Compliance testing will be performed at the expense of the applicant.
(5) The Permit Board may monitor compliance tests and perform compliance tests. Proper notification of compliance tests shall be provided to the Permit Board in accordance with Applicable Rules and Regulations or as specified in the applicable permit.
(6) The emissions sampling and analysis report shall include but not be limited to the following:
(a) detailed description of testing procedures;
(b) sample calculation;
(c) results; and
(d) comparison of results to all Applicable Rules and Regulations and to emission limitations in the permit.
(7) Unless otherwise specified in Applicable Rules and Regulations or by a condition of a permit issued by the Permit Board, compliance testing must be performed when the stationary source is operating at capacity and is otherwise operating normally. In the event that a demonstration of compliance by testing is performed at less than capacity, the Permit Board may modify the permit to limit capacity of the stationary source to the rate at which compliance was demonstrated if the Permit Board determines the rate was not representative of the normal operation of the stationary source or compliance with Applicable Rules and Regulations was not demonstrated. In the event that the stationary source is not operating or
being operated normally during a demonstration of compliance by testing, the results of such testing will not be accepted by the Permit Board as representative of normal operation and will be considered inadequate.
C. Compliance testing will be required of all facilities for which there is an applicable New Source Performance Standard or National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants in accordance with the methods and time frames allowed by the applicable standard codified at 40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63 and the Federal Act.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.7 Emissions Evaluation Report
Where emissions evaluation reporting is required in any permit, acceptable mathematical methods to demonstrate control adequacy shall include but not be limited to the following:
A. an emission inventory including:
(1) location and description of control equipment at each point source;
(2) determination of all possible pollutants at each point source (characteristics, conditions, particle size distribution, etc.);
(3) listing of all stack parameters at each point of emission, and
(4) detailed description of input material (e.g., percent sulfur content, percent moisture, average BTU heating value, input rate, etc.); and
B. a detailed engineering report including:
(1) sufficient calculations to demonstrate uncontrolled emissions;
(2) sufficient calculations to support or show design efficiency of control equipment;
(3) sufficient calculations to demonstrate controlled emissions; and
(4) comparison of calculated controlled emissions with the applicable emission standards as set forth in Commission Regulation Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 1.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.8 Procedures For Renewal Of State Permit To Operate
A. A State Permit to Operate shall expire five (5) years from the effective date of said permit or within any shorter period of time deemed appropriate by the Permit Board and stated in the State Permit to Operate when issued.
B. Not less than one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to the expiration date of the State Permit to Operate, the applicant shall make application for renewal of a State Permit to Operate if the applicant desires to continue operation of that stationary source. If the applicant submits a timely and complete application pursuant to this paragraph and the Permit Board, through no fault of the applicant, fails to act on the application on or before the expiration date of the existing permit, the applicant shall continue to operate the stationary source under the terms and conditions of the expired permit which shall remain in effect until final action on the application is taken by the Permit Board.
C. The application for renewal of a State Permit to Operate shall be substantiated with current emissions data, test results or reports, or other data as deemed necessary.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.9 Reporting & Recordkeeping
The Permit Board may require in any permit the maintenance of records relating to the operation of air contamination sources, and any authorized representatives of the Commission may examine and copy any such records pertaining to the operation of such air contaminant source. Copies of such records shall be submitted to the Permit Board as required by Applicable Rules & Regulations or the permit or upon request.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.10 Emission Reduction Schedule
A. In accordance with Commission Regulation Miss. Admin. Code Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 3, it is the responsibility of each and every stationary source with actual emissions in excess of 0.25 tons per day of total air contaminants, and other significant sources, to have a Commission-approved emissions reduction schedule which shall set forth preplanned abatement strategies in the event of an emergency episode.
B. Required Information.
(1) The emissions reduction schedule must have three (3) stages of reduction procedures: (1) alert level reduction; (2) warning level reduction; and (3) emergency level reduction.
(2) Each level of reduction procedures must show the type and source of air contaminants, the amount of reduction of contaminants, the time required to reduce, and the manner in which reduction will be achieved.
C. The emissions reduction schedule shall be subject to review and approval by the Commission.
D. An unacceptable emissions reduction schedule shall be returned to the applicant along with the Commission's reasons for denial.
E. The applicant shall have not more than thirty (30) days to amend a disapproved emissions reduction schedule to conform with the emission reduction standards as set forth by the Commission.
F. Any person aggrieved by the requirements to amend an emissions reduction schedule shall be entitled to a hearing.
G. Should an applicant fail to submit an emissions reduction schedule within the allowable time period or fail to submit an amended preplanned strategy, the Commission will establish or revise said plan to cause it to meet the standards as set forth by the Commission.
H. Such established or revised preplanned strategies will thereafter be the preplanned strategies which the applicant will put into effect upon the issuance of an appropriate order by the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.11 General Permits
The Permit Board may issue general permits to construct and operate as described below to classes of articles, machines, equipment, or other contrivances. A general permit shall be issued for a period of time not to exceed five years. The Permit Board shall establish the schedule for submittal of the notice of intent (NOI) and the information that shall be required in the NOI. The Permit Board may choose, for certain types of operations, to confer automatic coverage under a general permit without requiring the submittal of an application or other request. General permits to construct moderate sources, general permits to construct moderate modifications, general permits to operate a synthetic minor source, or general Title V Permits must require submittal of a NOI. For any request for coverage under a general permit to construct a moderate source or moderate modification or for a general permit to operate a synthetic minor source, the public information procedures required by Rule 2.4.E or Rule 2.4.F of these regulations shall be followed.
A. The applicant shall apply for coverage under an issued general permit in accordance with the schedule and requirements established in that general permit.
B. If the proposed determination is to grant coverage under an issued general permit, the Permit Board’s designee shall issue a certificate of coverage to the applicant
C. Any stationary source covered or eligible to be covered under a general permit may be required to obtain an individual permit at the discretion of the Permit Board. Any interested person may petition the Permit Board to take action under this paragraph.
D. The Permit Board may revoke and/or modify a general permit or coverage under a general permit.
E. Any stationary source covered by a general permit may request to be excluded from such coverage by applying for an individual permit. Coverage under the general permit is automatically terminated upon issuance of an individual permit.
F. Any stationary source excluded from coverage under a general permit solely because it is already covered under an individual permit may request that the individual permit be revoked and that it be covered by the general permit. Upon revocation of the individual permit by the Permit Board, coverage under the general permit may be granted to the stationary source if approved by the Permit Board.
G. A general permit shall remain in force until it is either reissued, modified, or revoked by the Permit Board. All coverages under the general permit continue until the general permit is reissued or as defined in the reissued general permit. A stationary source may apply for coverage under any general permit that is currently in force.
H. The granting of coverage under a general permit does not imply or express exclusion from the requirements of any emission-limiting regulation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.12 Multi-Media Permits
A. The Permit Board may issue a multi-media permit incorporating a permit to construct air emissions equipment and/or a State Permit to Operate such equipment.
B. For purpose of these regulations, a multi-media permit incorporating a permit to construct shall be the same as a permit to construct. The procedures for applying for such a multi- media permit and the standards applicable to such a permit follow those for a permit to construct. These procedures and standards are found in Rules 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, and 2.10.
C. For purpose of these regulations, a multi-media permit incorporating a State Permit to Operate shall be the same as a State Permit to Operate. The procedures for applying for such a multi-media permit and the standards applicable to such a permit follow those for a State Permit to Operate. These procedures and standards are found in Rule 2.1 through 2.4, and 2.6.
D. For purpose or these regulations, a multi-media general permit incorporating a permit to construct and/or a State Permit to Operate combined with certificate of coverage shall be the same as a permit to construct and/or a State Permit to Operate. The procedures for applying for coverage follow those for a general permit to construct and operate. These procedures are found in Rules 2.5 and 2.11 of these regulations.
E. Any stationary source of facility obtaining a multi-media permit under these provisions is subject to the permitting requirements found in Rule 2.1.C of these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.13 Exclusions
A. New Source Permit to Construct. Any new "Greenfield" stationary source must obtain a permit to construct except as excluded in D. or E.
B. Compliance with Other Applicable Requirements. Exclusions from permit requirements does not exclude anyone from complying with all other applicable requirements and regulations.
C. Maintenance of Emission Increase Records. Stationary sources excluded from the requirement for a permit to construct must maintain records of any emissions increases associated with any excluded activities and report that to DEQ upon request. Indirect measurements of emissions increases are allowable for these recordkeeping requirements.
D. Categorical Exclusions from Both Permit to Construct and Operate. The following are excluded from the requirement for a permit to construct or a permit to operate:
(1) Residential heating, cooking, or cleaning devices.
(2) Residential yard and garden equipment.
(3) Mobile sources.
(4) Air conditioning, space heating, or ventilating systems not uniquely designed or operated in a manner to remove air contaminants generated by or released from equipment.
(5) Stationary sources, other than incinerators or CAFOs, which neither emit nor have potential uncontrolled emissions of, 10 TPY or more of either PM
, SO
, NO x , CO or VOC, nor 1.0 TPY of a HAP, nor 2.5 TPY of all HAPs.
(6) Feed milling facilities which mill, formulate, or otherwise prepare animal feed products for direct local retail sale solely in prepackaged form and are not associated with a grain elevator. Milling facilities engaged in preparing feed
products for wholesale distribution and/or bulk sale are not included in this exclusion.
(7) Sawmills/woodworking plants which do not have drying kilns onsite and process less than 25,000 board feet/day.
(8) Any equipment used exclusively for preparation of food for direct retail sale at a restaurant, cafeteria, bakery, or food service.
(9) Auto body shops with only one (1) paint spray booth and with substantial portions of business devoted to repainting entire vehicles or collision repairs.
(10) Surface sand and/or gravel mining operations which do not utilize rock crushers, pneumatic conveyors, or dust collectors.
(11) Recreational heaters.
(12) Gasoline service stations with no more than 17 refueling positions.
(13) Retail propane filling operations.
(14) Outdoor kerosene heaters.
(15) Refrigeration systems.
E. Emission-Based Exclusion from Permit to Construct. The following emissions units are excluded from the requirement for a permit to construct provided the unit is not a new major stationary source, major source of hazardous air pollutants, major modification or moderate modification nor a part of a new major stationary source, major source of hazardous air pollutants, major modification, or moderate modification.
(1) Coal or residual oil-fired combustion devices or groups of devices with a total rated input capacity of less than 2,000,000 BTU/hr, clean wood waste boilers or groups of boilers with a total rated input capacity of less than 10,000,000 BTU/hr, distillate oil or combination distillate and gas-fired units or groups of units with a total rated input capacity less than 10,000,000 BTU/hr and natural gas fired and/or LPG fired devices or groups of devices with all individual rated input capacities of less than 10,000,000 BTU/hr and a total rated input capacity less than 25,000,000 BTU/hr.
(2) Equipment used exclusively for oil and gas field production, gathering, storing, and transmission, including, but not limited to: gas/oil separators, emulsion treaters, free water knockouts, compressors or group of compressors with a total rated capacity less than 500 brake horsepower, segregation basins, API oil/water separators, tank facilities, and crude oil loading equipment used solely for crude
oil collected from production wells onsite. Continuous flaring of sour gas and/or combustion devices firing sour gas are not excluded from permitting.
(3) Emergency safety relief systems, including pilot lights.
(4) Sand blasting operations which use no more than 83 tons of sand in any given 365-day period.
(5) Wood, plastic, and/or metal machining operations which are totally enclosed within a building, and which have no direct exhausts to the ambient air other than common building ventilation points.
(6) Petroleum products storage facilities with no individual storage tank greater than 19,800 gallons and total storage capacity less than 55,000 gallons.
(7) A compressor or groups of compressors firing either natural gas, gasoline, LPG and/or diesel fuel with a total rated capacity less than or equal to 500 brake horsepower.
(8) Surface coating operations which utilize less than 50 pounds per day of all solvents and coatings.
(9) Fire training exercises and equipment.
(10) Groundwater recovery/treatment facilities used for the remediation of motor fuel contamination addressed under the Underground Storage Tank Program when the facilities are located on the site of the contamination.
(11) Temporary storage/aeration of soils contaminated with motor fuel which are produced as a result of a remedial response to a release from an underground storage tank when the storage/operation is on the site of the tank.
(12) CERCLA/Superfund remediation or removal projects on the site of the contamination.
(13) Remediation of sites contaminated with hazardous constituents required under State authority on the site of the contamination.
(14) Portable TSCA treatment facilities permitted by EPA.
(15) Wastewater collection and treatment facilities, other than CAFOs or those listed in 40 CFR 61, Subpart FF - National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations and in 40 CFR 60, Subpart QQQ, - Standards of Performance for VOC Emissions from Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems, which have the potential to emit no more than 5 tons/year of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC).
(16) Surface coal mining operations for which a permit has been issued by the Permit Board pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. §53-9-1, et seq. or by the Federal Office of Surface Mining pursuant to the Federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, 30 U.S.C. §1201, et seq. However, any rock crushers, pneumatic conveyors, and dust collectors at such operations may require permitting if they meet the definition of "stationary source".
(17) Auto body shops.
(18) Dedicated fuel stations with total storage capacity less than 55,000 gallons and no individual tank greater than 19,800 gallons.
(19) Subject to Rule 2.14, any existing or new animal feeding operation that is not a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) and that does not incinerate animal carcasses or waste. For the purpose of this paragraph, "animal feeding operation" means any facility where animals have been, are, or will be stabled or confined, or allowed to roam or graze within a fenced or otherwise restricted area. This definition includes, but is not limited to, aquatic animal production facilities, kennels, swine growing operations, veal farms, chicken growing operations, cattle growing operations, and dairies.
(20) Initial field testing of oil and gas wells, after proper notification to the Commission provided such tests will not produce 100 tons per year or more of any pollutant.
F. De minimis NSR Modification Exclusion from Permit to Construct. A de minimis NSR modification is excluded from the requirements for a permit to construct. This does not eliminate any requirement for modification of Title V permits or permits to operate for de minimis modifications. Any other modifications including modifications involving netting are subject to the requirements for permits to construct.
G. Exclusion from Permit to Operate. Major Title V sources, other sources required to obtain a Title V Permit to Operate, synthetic minor sources, and significant minor sources are subject to the requirements for a permit to operate. Any other source is excluded from the requirement to obtain a permit to operate. Exclusion from the permit to operate requirement does not imply exclusion from any other requirements of these regulations including permit to construct requirements before construction and certification of construction requirements before beginning operation.
H. General Permit May Supercede Exclusions. The Permit Board may issue a general permit which shall supercede the exclusions listed in D., E., and G. above.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.14 CAFOs
Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are not excluded from the requirements for a permit or any other provisions of these regulations. CAFOs issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit or a state water pollution control permit prior to January 18, 2000, are required to submit an application for a permit to construct and/or operate or a multimedia permit in compliance with the provisions of these regulations at least 180 days prior to the expiration of the facility's NPDES permit or state water pollution control permit that was issued prior to the effective date of these regulations. Multimedia permits may be issued by the Permit Board as new permits or as a modification of an existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System or state water pollution control permit but all provisions and procedures of these regulations are applicable. The Permit Board on its own initiative or at the request of DEQ, may require any existing or new animal feeding operation or concentrated animal feeding operation to obtain a multimedia permit, including provisions regarding air emissions and/or odor control.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.15 Options
A. Plantwide Applicability Limitation (PAL). In accordance with 40 CFR 52.21(aa), any major stationary source may establish a plantwide applicability limitation based on baseline actual emissions (actuals PAL) for use in future NSR actions. The actuals PAL can be established in a PSD Permit to Construct, a Title V Permit, or a Permit to Operate a Synthetic Minor Source. The applicable permit to construct or permit to operate shall be referred to as a PAL permit and, in addition to the normal applicable procedures and requirements for the permit action, shall meet all the requirements for a PAL permit and issuance shall follow all procedures for a PAL permit as specified in 40 CFR 52.21(aa) except that the term "Administrator" as it appears in 40 CFR 52.21(aa) shall mean the Permit Board.
B. Optional Pre-Permit Construction. Pre-permit construction approval is available for new moderate stationary sources, new minor stationary sources, minor modifications, and moderate modifications except those sources and modifications excluded from this provision in 9. below. The applicant may request the Permit Board for approval to commence construction or modification of qualifying sources before receiving the required permit to construct. To obtain the Permit Board’s pre-construction approval, the applicant shall satisfy the following requirements:
(1) The applicant shall apply for a permit to construct or optional Title V permit modification in accordance with D. below.
(2) The applicant shall submit a pre-permit construction approval application which must contain, but not be limited to (a) a letter requesting approval to construct before obtaining the required permit to construct, (b) a copy of the notice referenced in 4. below, (c) proof of eligibility, (d) process description(s), (e) equipment list(s), (f) proposed emission limits, (g) proof that buffer zone
requirements in Rule 2.2.B.(14) are met, (h) certification that construction is at the applicant’s own risk, and (i) certification that the applicant shall not contest the final permit to construct or Title V permit modification decision based on the fact that construction has already begun.
(3) An applicant seeking enforceable limitations on a source’s potential to emit such as to qualify as a moderate stationary source or a moderate modification must describe in detail in the pre-permit construction application the proposed restrictions and certify that the applicant will comply with the restrictions, including any applicable monitoring and reporting requirements.
(4) The applicant shall provide notice to the public of the application for pre-permit construction approval by notice published in a newspaper of general circulation in the county(ies) in which the stationary source is or will be located. The notice shall be in the format provided by DEQ and shall include (a) a general description of the proposed source or modification, (b) a statement that pre-permit construction approval is being requested from the Permit Board, (c) the location and address where additional information about the proposed source or modification and application may be obtained, (d) a statement that comments may be made to DEQ, and (e) DEQ’s address where comments may be submitted; and shall provide at least ten (10) days for the public to comment to the Permit Board. Notarized proof of publication of the notice shall be included in the application for pre-permit construction approval.
(5) After determination that all requirements have been met and after sufficient time for receipt of all public comments submitted during the ten-day public notice, the Permit Board may grant pre-construction permit approval.
(6) Upon receipt of the pre-permit construction approval letter issued by the Permit Board, the applicant may begin construction at his own risk. Upon issuance of the pre-permit construction approval letter, any and all potential to emit limitations addressed in the pre-permit construction application shall become enforceable. The applicant cannot operate the new source or emissions units included in the proposed modification until issued the final permit to construct or Title V permit modification and until certification of construction in accordance with Rule 2.5.D. where applicable. This provision applies even if the source is excluded from the requirement to obtain a permit to operate.
(7) Issuance of the pre-permit construction approval letter shall have no bearing on the issuance or denial of the final permit to construct or Title V permit modification. If the final permit to construct is denied and/or the Title V permit modification is denied, the applicant must cease construction and follow the procedures allowed by law and regulation for any appeal. The fact that construction has already begun and that approval was granted for pre-permit construction shall not be a basis for appeal of the Permit Board’s decision.
(8) The Permit Board may deny the pre-permit construction approval application or revoke an existing pre-permit construction approval for any reason it deems valid including objection(s) from the public. Denial/revocation of the pre-permit construction approval application shall have no bearing on the issuance or denial of a final permit to construct or Title V permit modification.
(9) Pre-permit construction approval is not available for new major stationary sources, major modifications, medical waste incinerators or hazardous waste incinerators or any modification involving medical waste incineration or hazardous waste incineration, and new stationary sources or modifications meeting the definition of "constructing or reconstructing" a major source of hazardous air pollutants in Commission "Air Toxics Regulations," Miss, Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 8, and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart B and thereby requiring a case-by-case Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) determination
C. Optional Title V Permit Modification. For a modification of a source holding a valid Title V permit, a Permit to Construct may be issued as a modification of the Title V permit as an alternative to a new Permit to Construct. All requirements for a permit to construct are still applicable and the Title V permit modification must occur prior to beginning construction unless pre-permit construction approval is granted in accordance with C. above. If the applicant has been granted pre-permit construction approval, the Title V permit must be modified before beginning operation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.16 Permit Transfer
A. "Transfer" shall mean any sale, conveyance, or assignment of the rights held by the applicant in any permit issued pursuant to these Regulations which meets the conditions of both 1. and 2. below:
(1) There is a change of more than 50 percent of the equity ownership of the permit holder over a sustained period which results in a new majority owner. A new majority owner for purposes of this provision shall be an individual, partnership, company, or group of affiliated companies.
(2) The change in the ultimate ownership of the permit holder involves the parent, grandparent, or great-grandparent company.
B. A permit issued pursuant to these Regulations shall not be transferred except upon approval of the Permit Board.
C. When requested by the Permit Board, an applicant for transfer approval shall submit information to demonstrate that it has the financial resources, operational expertise and environmental compliance history over the last five years to ensure compliance with the
terms and conditions of the permit to be transferred except where this conflicts with State Law.
D. The application for approval of the transfer may be combined with an early application for permit renewal.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.17 Severability
If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of any of these regulations, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for any reason challenged or held to be invalid or void, the validity of the remaining regulations and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Part 2, Chapter 3: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes (Adopted May 8, 1970, Last Amended April 25, 1988)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 3.1 General
Authority. Pursuant to the authority granted by Section 49-17-17, Mississippi Code of 1972, Recompiled, the following regulations are adopted to prevent the excessive buildup of air pollutants during air pollution episodes, thereby preventing the occurrence of an emergency due to the effects of these pollutants on the health of persons.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 3.2 Definitions
A. “Air Standards.” The maximum allowable concentration of any air contaminant existing in the ambient air during a stated period of time, as adopted by the Commission.
B. “Director.” The Director of the Mississippi Department of Natural Resources.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 3.3 Episode Criteria
Conditions justifying the proclamation of an air pollution alert, air pollution warning, or air pollution emergency shall be deemed to exist whenever the Director determines that the accumulation of air pollutants in any place is attaining or has attained levels which could if such levels are sustained or exceeded, lead to a substantial threat to the health of persons. In making this determination, the Director will be guided by the following criteria:
A. “Air Pollution Forecast”: An internal watch by the Office of Pollution Control shall be actuated by a National Weather Service advisory that Atmospheric Stagnation Advisory is in effect or the equivalent local forecast of stagnant atmospheric condition.
B. “Alert”: The Alert level is that concentration of pollutants at which first stage control actions are to begin. An Alert will be declared when any one of the following levels is reached at any monitoring site:
(1) The SO
level is equal to or greater than 0.3 ppm (800 μg/m
) for a 24-hour average.
(2) The PM
level is equal to or greater than 350 μg/m
for a 24-hour average.
(3) The CO level is equal to or greater than 15 ppm (17 mg/m
) for an 8-hour average.
(4) The ozone (O
) level is equal to or greater than 0.2 ppm (400 μg/m
) for 1-hour average.
(5) The NO
level is equal to or greater than 0.6 ppm (1130 μg/m
) for a 1-hour average or 0.15 ppm (282 μg/m
) for a 24-hour average.
(6) In addition to the levels listed for the above pollutants, meteorological conditions are such that pollutant concentrations can be expected to remain at the above levels for twelve (12) or more hours or increase, or in the case of ozone, the situation is likely to reoccur within the next 24-hours unless control actions are taken.
C. “Warning”: The warning level indicates that air quality is continuing to degrade and that additional control actions are necessary. A warning will be declared when any one of the following levels is reached at any monitoring site:
(1) The SO
level is equal to or greater than 0.7 ppm (1600 μg/m
) for a 24-hour average.
(2) The PM
level is equal to or greater than 420 μg/m
for a 24-hour average.
(3) The CO level is equal to or greater than 30 ppm (34 mg/m
) for an 8-hour average.
(4) The ozone (O
) level is equal to or greater than 0.4 ppm (800 μg/m
) for a 1-hour average.
(5) The NO
level is equal to or greater than 1.2 ppm (2260 μg/m
) for a 1-hour average.
(6) In addition to the levels listed for the above pollutants, meteorological conditions are such that pollutant concentrations can be expected to remain at the above levels for twelve (12) or more hours or increase, or in the case of ozone, the situation is likely to reoccur within the next 24-hours unless control actions are taken.
D. “Emergency”: The emergency level indicates that air quality is continuing to degrade to a level that should never be reached and that the most stringent control actions are necessary. An emergency will be declared when any one of the following levels is reached at any monitoring site:
(1) The SO
level is equal to or greater than 0.8 ppm (2100 μg/m
) for a 24-hour average.
(2) The PM
level is equal to or greater than 500 μg/m
for a 24-hour average.
(3) The CO level is equal to or greater than 40 ppm (46 mg/m
) for an 8-hour average.
(4) The ozone (O
) level is equal to or greater than 0.5 ppm (1000 μg/m
) for a 1-hour average.
(5) The NO
level is equal to or greater than 1.6 ppm (3000 μg/m
) for a 1-hour average or 0.4 ppm (750 μg/m
) for a 24-hour average.
(6) In addition to the levels listed for the above pollutants, meteorological conditions are such that pollutant concentrations can be expected to remain at the above levels for twelve (12) or more hours or increase, or in the case of ozone, the situation is likely to reoccur within the next 24-hours unless control actions are taken.
E. “Termination”: Once declared, any status reached by application of these criteria will remain in effect until the criteria for that level are no longer met. At such time, the next lower status will be assumed.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 3.4 Emission Control Action Programs
A. Any person responsible for the operation of a source of air contaminant which emits 0.25 tons per day or more of air contaminants for which air standards have been adopted shall prepare emission control action programs, consistent with good industrial practice and safe operating procedures, for reducing the emission of air contaminants into the outdoor atmosphere during periods of an AIR POLLUTION ALERT, AIR POLLUTION WARNING, AND AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCY. Emission control action programs shall be designed to reduce or eliminate emissions of air contaminants into the
outdoor atmosphere in accordance with the objectives set forth in Tables 1-5 which are made a part of this rule.
B. Emission control action programs as required under Rule 3.4.A. shall be in writing and show the source of air contamination, the approximate amount of reduction of contaminants, the approximate time required to effect the program, a brief description of the manner in which the reduction will be achieved during each stage of an air pollution episode, and such other information as the Commission shall deem pertinent.
C. During a condition of AIR POLLUTION ALERT, AIR POLLUTION WARNING, AND AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCY, emission control action programs as required by Rule 3.4.A. shall be made available on the premises to any person authorized to enforce the provisions of the Commission’s emergency procedure.
D. Emission control action programs as required by Rule 3.4.A. shall be submitted to the Commission in accordance with procedures described in Commission Regulation Miss. Admin Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2; such emission control action programs shall be subject to review and approval by the Commission. If, in the opinion of the Commission, such emission control action programs do not effectively carry out the objectives as set forth in Tables 1-5, the Commission may disapprove said emission control action programs, state its reason for disapproval and order the preparation of amended emission control action programs within the time period specified in the order. Any person aggrieved by the order requiring the preparation of a revised program is entitled to a hearing in accordance with Section 49-17-41, Mississippi Code of 1972. If the person responsible fails within the time period specified in the order to submit an amended emission control action program which in the opinion of the Commission meets the said objectives, the Commission may revise the emission control action program to cause it to meet these objectives. Such revised program will thereafter be the emission control action program which the person responsible will put into effect upon the issuance of an appropriate order by the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 3.5 Emergency Orders
A. Following are emergency orders which may be appropriate for use by the Director upon his declaration that an Air Pollution Emergency Episode exists for any air contaminants for which air standards have been adopted:
(1) Air Pollution Alert
(a) Any one or combination of air contaminants:
(1) Any person responsible for the operation of a source of air contaminants as set forth in Rule 3.4.B. shall take all AIR POLLUTION ALERT actions as required for such source of air
contamination, and shall particularly put into effect the emission control action programs for an AIR POLLUTION ALERT.
(b) PM
(1) There shall be no open burning by any persons of tree waste, vegetation, refuse, or debris in any form.
(2) The use of incinerators for the disposal of any form of solid waste shall be limited to the hours between 12:00 Noon and 4:00 P.M.
(3) Persons operating fuel-burning equipment which requires boiler lancing or soot blowing shall perform such operations only between the hours of 12:00 Noon and 4:00 P.M.
(c) Nitrogen Oxides
(1) There shall be no open burning by any persons of tree waste, vegetation, refuse, or debris in any form.
(2) The use of incinerators for the disposal of any form of solid waste shall be limited to the hours between 12:00 Noon and 4:00 P.M.
(2) Air Pollution Warning
(a) Any one or combination of air contaminants
(1) Any person responsible for the operation of a source of air contamination as set forth in Rule 3.4.A. shall take all AIR POLLUTION WARNING actions as required for such source of air contamination; and shall particularly put into effect the emission control action programs for an AIR POLLUTION WARNING.
(b) PM
(1) There shall be no open burning by any persons of tree waste, vegetation, refuse, or debris in any form.
(2) The use of incinerators for the disposal of any form of solid waste or liquid waste shall be prohibited.
(3) Persons operating fuel-burning equipment which requires boiler lancing or soot blowing shall perform such operations only between the hours of 12:00 Noon and 4:00 P.M.
(c) Nitrogen oxides
(1) There shall be no open burning by any persons of tree waste, vegetation, refuse, or debris in any form.
(2) The use of incinerators for the disposal of any form of solid waste or liquid waste shall be prohibited.
(3) Air Pollution Emergency
(a) Any one or combination of contaminants:
(1) Any person responsible for the operation of a source of air contamination as described in Rule 3.4.A. shall take all AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCY actions as listed as required for such source of air contaminants; and shall particularly put into effect the emission control action programs for an AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCY.
(2) All manufacturing establishments except those included in Rule 3.4.A(3)(a)(1) will institute such action as will result in maximum reduction of air contaminants from their operations by ceasing, curtailing, or postponing operations which emit air contaminants to the extent possible without causing injury to persons or damage to equipment.
(3) All places of employment described below shall immediately cease operations:
(i) Mining and quarrying of non-metallic minerals.
(ii) All contract construction work except that which must proceed to avoid physical harm.
(iii) Wholesale trade establishments, i.e. places of business primarily engaged in selling merchandise to retailers, to industrial, commercial, institutional or professional users, or to other wholesalers, or acting as agents in buying merchandise for or selling merchandise to such persons or companies.
(iv) All offices of local, county, and state government including authorities, joint meetings, and any other public body; except to the extent that such office must continue to operate in order to enforce the requirements of this order pursuant to statute.
(v) All retail trade establishments except pharmacies and stores primarily engaged in the sale of food.
(vi) Banks; credit agencies other than banks; securities and commodities brokers, dealers, exchanges and services; office of insurance carriers, agents and brokers; real estate offices.
(vii) Wholesale and retail laundries; laundry services and cleaning and dyeing establishments; photographic studios; beauty shops, barber shops, shoe repair shops.
(viii) Advertising Offices; consumer credit reporting, adjustment and collection agencies; duplicating, addressing, blueprinting; photocopying, mailing, mailing list and stenographic services; equipment rental services; commercial testing laboratories.
(ix) Automobile repair, automobile services, garages.
(x) Establishments rendering amusement and recreation services including motion picture theaters.
(xi) Elementary and secondary schools, colleges, universities, professional schools, junior colleges, vocational schools, and public and private libraries.
(4) There shall be no open burning by any person of tree waste, vegetation, refuse, or debris in any form.
(5) The use of incinerators for the disposal of any form of solid waste or liquid waste shall be prohibited.
(6) The use of motor vehicles is prohibited except in emergencies with the approval of local or state police.
B. When the Director determines that an Air Pollution Emergency Episode condition exists at one or more monitoring sites solely because of emissions from a limited number of sources, he may order such source or sources to put into effect the emission control action programs which are applicable for each episode stage.
Table 1. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR PM
Source of Air Contamination Level Action Required
- Coal or oil-fired electric power generating facilities. by utilization of fuels Alert a. Substantial reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available ash content.
b. Maximum utilization of mid-day (12:00 Noon to 4:00 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing.
c. Substantial reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Alert Area.
Warning a. Maximum reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available ash content.
b. Maximum utilization of mid-day (12:00 Noon to 4:00 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing.
c. Maximum reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Warning Area.
Emergency a. Maximum reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available ash content.
b. Maximum utilization of mid- day (12:00 Noon to 4:00 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing.
c. Maximum reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Emergency Area
Table 1. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR PM
Source of Air Contamination Level Action Required
- Coal or oil-fired process steam generating facilities Alert a. Substantial reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available ash content
b. Maximum utilization of mid-day (12:00 Noon to 4:00 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing.
c. Reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operations.
Warning a. Maximum reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available ash content.
b. Maximum utilization of mid-day (12:00 Noon to 4:00 P.M.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing.
c. Reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operations.
d. Making ready for use a plan of action to be taken if an emergency develops.
Emergency a. Maximum reduction by reducing heat and steam demands to absolute necessities consistent with preventing equipment damage.
b. Maximum utilization of mid-day (12:00 Noon to 4:00 p.m.) atmospheric turbulence for boiler lancing and soot blowing.
Table 1. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR PM
Source of Air Contamination Level Action Required
- A - Manufacturing, processing, and mining industries.
AND
B - Other persons required by the Commission to prepare standby plans. Alert a. Substantial reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by curtailing, postponing, or deferring production and allied operations.
b. Maximum reduction by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit particles, gases, vapors or malodorous substances.
c. Reduction of heat load demands for processing consistent with continuing plant operations.
Warning. a. Maximum reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by, if necessary, assuming reasonable economic hardship by postponing production and allied operations.
Emergency a. Elimination of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by ceasing, curtailing, postponing or deferring production and allied operations to the extent possible without causing injury to persons or damage to equipment.
b. Elimination of air contaminants from trade waste disposal processes which emit particles, gases, vapors or malodorous substances.
c. Maximum reduction of heat load demands for processing.
Table 1. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR PM
Source of Air Contamination Level Action Required
- Refuse disposal operations Alert a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning. Alert a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning.
b. Substantial reduction by limiting burning of refuse in incinerators to the hours between 12:00 Noon and 4:00 p.m.
Warning a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning.
b. Complete elimination of the use of incinerators.
Emergency a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning.
b. Complete elimination of the use of incinerators.
Table 2. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR SULFUR OXIDES
Source of Air Contamination
Level
Action Required
- Coal or oil-fired electric power generating facilities. Alert a. Substantial reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available sulfur content.
b. Substantial reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Alert Area.
Warning a. Substantial reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available sulfur content.
b. Substantial reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Warning Area.
Emergency a. Maximum reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available sulfur content.
b. Maximum reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Emergency Area.
- Coal or oil-fired process steam generating facilities. Alert a. Substantial reduction by utilization of fuels having lowest available sulfur content.
b. Reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operations.
Warning a. Maximum reduction by utilization of fuels having the lowest available sulfur content.
b. Reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operations.
Table 2. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR SULFUR OXIDES
Source of Air Contamination
Level
Action Required
c. Making ready for use a plan of action to be taken if an emergency develops.
Emergency a. Maximum reduction by reducing heat and steam demands to absolute necessities consistent with preventing equipment damage.
b. Taking the action called for in the emergency plan.
- A - Manufacturing and Processing Industries
AND
B. – Other persons required by the Commission to prepare standby plans. Alert a. Substantial reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by curtailing, postponing, or deferring production and allied operations.
b. Maximum reduction by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit particles, gases, vapors, or malodorous substances.
c. Reduction of heat load demands for processing consistent with continuing plant operations.
Warning a. Maximum reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by, if necessary, assuming reasonable economic hardship postponing production and allied operations.
b. Maximum reduction by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit particles, gases, vapors, or malodorous substances.
Table 2. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR SULFUR OXIDES
Source of Air Contamination
Level
Action Required
c. Reduction of heat load demands for processing consistent with continuing plant operations.
Emergency a. Elimination of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by ceasing, curtailing, postponing, or deferring production and allied operations to the extent possible without causing injury to persons or damage to equipment.
b. Elimination of air contaminants from trade waste disposal processes which emit particles, gases, vapors or malodorous substances.
c. Maximum reduction of heat load demands for processing.
TABLE 3. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
Source of Air Contamination
Level
Action Required
- Steam-electric power generating facilities. Alert a. Substantial reduction by utilization of fuel which results in the formation of less air contaminant.
b. Substantial reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Alert Area.
Warning a. Maximum reduction by utilization of fuel which results in the formation of less air contaminant.
b. Maximum reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Warning Area.
Emergency a. Maximum reduction by diverting electric power generation to facilities outside of Emergency Area.
- Process steam generating facilities. Alert a. Substantial reduction by utilization of fuel which results in the formation of less air contaminant.
b. Reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operations.
Warning a. Maximum reduction by utilization of fuel which results in the formation of less air contaminant.
b. Reduction of steam load demands consistent with continuing plant operations.
TABLE 3. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
Source of Air Contamination
Level
Action Required
c. Making ready for use a plan of action to be taken if an emergency develops.
Emergency a. Maximum reduction by reducing heat and steam demands to absolute necessities consistent with preventing equipment damage.
- A.- Manufacturing and processing industries.
AND
B. – Other persons required by the Commission to prepare standby plans.
Alert a. Substantial reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by curtailing, postponing, or deferring production and allied operations.
b. Maximum reduction by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit particles, gases, vapors, or malodorous substances.
c. Reduction of heat load demands for processing consistent with continuing plant operations.
Warning a. Maximum reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by, if necessary, assuming reasonable economic hardship by postponing production and allied operations.
b. Maximum reduction by deferring trade waste disposal operations which emit particles, gases, vapors, or malodorous substances.
TABLE 3. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
Source of Air Contamination
Level
Action Required
c. Reduction of heat load demands for processing consistent with continuing plant operations.
Emergency a. Elimination of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by ceasing, curtailing, postponing or deferring production and allied operations to the extent possible without causing injury to persons or damage to equipment.
b. Elimination of air contaminants from trade waste disposal processes which emit particles, gases, vapors or malodorous substances.
c. Maximum reduction of heat load demands for processing.
4.Stationary internal combustion engines Alert a. Reduction of power demands for pumping consistent with continuing operations.
Warning a. Reduction of power demands for pumping consistent with continuing operations.
b. Maximum reduction by utilization of fuels or power source which results in the formation of less air contaminants.
- Refuse disposal operations. Alert. a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning.
b. Substantial reduction by limiting burning of refuse in incinerators to the hours between 12:00 Noon and 4:00 p.m.
TABLE 3. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR NITROGEN OXIDES
Source of Air Contamination
Level
Action Required
Warning a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning.
b. Complete elimination of the use of incinerators.
Emergency a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning.
b. Complete elimination of the use of incinerators.
Table 4. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR HYDROCARBONS
Source of Air Contamination
Alert
Action Required
- Petroleum products storage and distribution. Alert a. Substantial reduction of air contaminants by curtailing, postponing, or deferring transfer operations.
Warning a. Maximum reduction of air contaminants by assuming reasonable economic hardship by postponing transfer operations.
Emergency a. Elimination of air contaminants by curtailing, postponing, or deferring transfer operations to the extent possible without causing damage to equipment.
- Surface coating and preparation. Alert a. Substantial reduction of air contaminants by curtailing, postponing, or deferring transfer operations.
Warning a. Maximum reduction of air contaminants by assuming reasonable economic hardship by postponing transfer operations.
Emergency a. Elimination of air contaminants by curtailing, postponing, or deferring transfer operations to the extent possible without causing damage to equipment.
Table 4. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR HYDROCARBONS
Source of Air Contamination
Alert
Action Required
- A - Manufacturing and processing industries.
AND
B. – Other persons required by the Commission to prepare standby plans. Alert a. Substantial reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by curtailing, postponing, or deferring production and allied operations. Warning a. Maximum reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by, if necessary, assuming reasonable economic hardship by postponing production and allied operations. Emergency a. Elimination of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by ceasing, curtailing, postponing or deferring production and allied operations to the extent possible without causing injury to persons or damage to equipment.
TABLE 5. EMISSION REDUCTION OBJECTIVES FOR CARBON MONOXIDE Source of Air Contamination Level Action Required
- A-Manufacturing
AND
B – Other persons required by the Commission to prepare standby plans.
Alert a. Substantial reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by curtailing, postponing, or deferring production and allied operations.
Warning a. Substantial reduction of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by, if necessary, assuming reasonable economic hardship by postponing production and allied operations. Emergency a. Elimination of air contaminants from manufacturing operations by ceasing, curtailing, postponing or deferring production and allied operations to the extent possible without causing injury to persons or damage to equipment. Refuse disposal operations Alert a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning.
Warning a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning. Emergency a. Maximum reduction by prevention of open burning.
Part 2, Chapter 4: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Ambient Air Quality Standards (Adopted February 9, 1983, Amended June 22, 1988, June 27, 2002, and Last Amended October 24, 2013)
Rule 4.1. Except for odor, as covered below, the ambient air quality standards for Mississippi shall be the Primary and Secondary National Ambient Air Quality Standards as duly promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) 40 CFR Part 50, pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended. All such standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as of September 6, 2013, are hereby adopted and incorporated herein by the Commission by reference as the official ambient air quality standards of the State of Mississippi and shall hereafter be enforceable as such (except that the word “Administrator” in said standards shall be replaced by the words “Executive Director” and the word “Agency” in said standards shall be replaced by the word “Department”).
There shall be no odorous substances in the ambient air in concentrations sufficient to adversely and unreasonably:
A. affect human health and well-being;
B. interfere with the use or enjoyment of property; or
C. affect plant or animal life.
In determining that concentrations of such substances in the ambient air are adversely and unreasonably affecting human well-being or the use or enjoyment of property of plant or animal life, the factors to be considered by the Commission will include, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the number of complaints or petitioners alleging that such a condition exists, the frequency of the occurrence of such substances in the ambient air as confirmed by the Department of Environmental Quality staff, and the land use of the affected area.
.
Part 2, Chapter 5: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality (Adopted June 28, 1990. Amended April 25, 1991; December 9, 1993; August 22, 1996; July 28, 2005; August 23, 2007; October 28, 2010; April 28, 2011; December 14, 2011; and Last Amended April 28, 2016.
Table of Contents
Rule 5. 1 Purpose of this regulation ................................................................................. Page 121 Rule 5.2 Adoption of Federal Rules by Reference ........................................................... Page 121 Rule 5.3 Definition of term “Administrator” ................................................................... Page 121
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.4 Rule 5.4
Adoption of Federal Rules for Public Participation and Exclusions from Increment Consumption ..................................................................................... Page 122 Rule 5.5 Transmittal of Permit Applications to EPA Administrator .............................. Page 122 Rule 5.6 Applicability ........................................................................................................ Page 123
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.1 Rule 5.1
The purpose of this regulation is to implement a program for the prevention of significant deterioration of air quality as required by 40 CFR 51.166. This regulation supercedes and replaces the previous adoption by reference of 40 CFR 52.21 and 40 CFR 51.166. 40 CFR 52.21 and 51.166 as used in this regulation refer to the federal regulations as amended and promulgated by February 17, 2016, except as provided in Rule 5.2 below. CFR refers to the “Code of Federal Regulations”.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.2 Rule 5.2
Other than the subsections and phrases listed below and except for the changes set forth in Rule 5.3 of this regulation, the provisions of 40 CFR 52.21 as amended and promulgated by February 17, 2016, are incorporated herein and adopted by reference by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and shall hereafter be enforceable as such. The following subsection and phrases of 40 CFR 52.21 are excluded from this regulation:
A. (a)(1) [Plan disapproval],
B. (q) [Public Participation],
C. (s) [Environmental Impact Statements],
D. (u) [Delegation of authority], and
E. (cc) [Routine maintenance, repair, and replacement]
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.3 Rule 5.3
The term “Administrator” as it appears in 40 CFR 52.21 shall mean the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, except that:
A. In subparagraph (b)(3)(iii) [relating to “net emissions increase”], it shall mean either the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board or the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
B. In the following subsections, it shall continue to mean the Administrator of the USEPA:
(1) (b)(17) [definition of “federally enforceable”];
(2) paragraph b(37)(i);
(3) paragraph b(43);
(4) paragraph b(48)(ii)(c);
(5) paragraph b(50)(i);
(6) paragraph b(51);
(7) (g)(l)-(g)(6) [Redesignation];
(8) (1)(2) [Air quality models];
(9) (p)(2) [concerning Federal Land Manager];
(10) (t) [Disputed permits or redesignations].
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.4 Rule 5.4
Subsections 40 CFR 51.166(f) Exclusions from Increment Consumption (excluding the phrase “The plan may provide that”) and 40 CFR 51.166(q) “Public Participation” (excluding the phrase “The plan shall provide that.”) are incorporated herein and adopted by reference, except for the changes set forth below:
A. The phrases “the plan provides that” and "it shall also provide that” are excluded from paragraph 40 CFR 51.166(f)(2),
B. The term “Administrator” as it appears in subparagraphs (f)(1)(v),(f)(4), and (q)(2)(iv) shall continue to mean the Administrator of the USEPA,
C. The phrase “specified time period” in subparagraph (q)(l) shall mean thirty (30) days,
D. The phrase “reviewing authority” shall mean the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, and
E. The words “one year” in subparagraph (q)(2) shall be replaced by the words “one hundred and fifty (150) days.”
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.5 Rule 5.5
The Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality shall transmit to the Administrator of the USEPA a copy of each permit application filed under this regulation and shall notify the Administrator of the USEPA of each significant action the Executive Director takes on the
application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.6 Rule 5.6
This regulation applies to any stationary source or modification to which 40 CFR 52.21 applied as of the date of adoption of this regulation, but for which the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board had not issued a permit pursuant to 40 CFR 52.21 by that date.
Part 2, Chapter 6: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act (Adopted October 27, 1993. Amended: December 14, 1995; April 23, 1998; October 26, 2000; October 28, 2010; December 14, 2011; June 28, 2012; and Last Amended February 24, 2022)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.1 General Requirements...........................................................................................
Page 1 A. Definitions .............................................................................................................. Page 1 B. General Title V Permit Requirements .................................................................... Page 9 Rule 6.2 Permit Applications .............................................................................................. Page 11 A. Duty to apply ........................................................................................................ Page 11 B. Duty to supplement or correct application ........................................................... Page 12 C. Standard application form and required information ........................................... Page 13 D. Applicant's duty to apply for alternative scenarios .............................................. Page 16 E. Certification of truth, accuracy, and completeness .............................................. Page 16 Rule 6.3 Permit Content...................................................................................................... Page 16 A. Standard permit requirements .............................................................................. Page 16 B. Federally-enforceable requirements ..................................................................... Page 19 C. Compliance requirements ..................................................................................... Page 20 D. General permits .................................................................................................... Page 21 E. Temporary sources ............................................................................................... Page 22 F. Permit shield ......................................................................................................... Page 22 G. Emergency provision ........................................................................................... Page 23 H. Risk Management Plans ....................................................................................... Page 24
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.4 Permit Issuance(s), Renewal(s), Reopening(s), And Revision(s) ......................
Page 24 A. Action on application ........................................................................................... Page 24 B. Requirements for a permit .................................................................................... Page 25 C. Permit renewal and expiration.............................................................................. Page 25 D. Administrative permit amendments ..................................................................... Page 25 E. Permit Modification.............................................................................................. Page 27 F. Operational Flexibility .......................................................................................... Page 30 G. Reopening for cause ............................................................................................. Page 32 H. Reopenings for cause by EPA .............................................................................. Page 32 I. Public participation ................................................................................................ Page 33 Rule 6.5 Permit Review by EPA and Affected State(s) ...................................................... Page 33 A. Transmission of information to the Administrator .............................................. Page 33 B. Review by Affected State(s) ................................................................................ Page 34 C. EPA objection ...................................................................................................... Page 34 D. Public petitions to the Administrator ................................................................... Page 34 E. Prohibitions on default issuance ........................................................................... Page 34 Rule 6.6 Permit Fees ........................................................................................................... Page 35 A. Fee Amount .......................................................................................................... Page 35 B. Fee System ........................................................................................................... Page 35 C. Excess Fees .......................................................................................................... Page 36 D. Disputed Fees ....................................................................................................... Page 36 E. Due Dates ............................................................................................................. Page 36 Rule 6.7 Insignificant Activities and Emissions ................................................................ Page 37 Rule 6.8 Effective Date ....................................................................................................... Page 41
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.1 General Requirements
A. Definitions.
(1) Advisory Council is the Council created by State law to conduct an independent study of the costs for the development and administration of the Title V program within the Department of Environmental Quality and to conduct an annual review of the costs of administering such programs.
(2) Affected Source shall have the same meaning as set forth in the regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (3) Affected State(s) means all states whose air quality may be affected and that are contiguous to Mississippi; or are within 50 miles of the permitted source. (4) Affected unit shall have the same meaning as set forth in the regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (5) Applicable requirement means all of the following as they apply to emissions units in a Title V source (including requirements that have been promulgated or approved by EPA through rulemaking at the time of issuance but have future- effective compliance dates): (a) any standard or other requirement set forth in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) approved or promulgated by EPA through rulemaking under Title I of the Federal Act that implements the relevant requirements of the Federal Act, including any revisions to the SIP promulgated in 40 CFR Part 52; (b) any term or condition of any construction permits issued pursuant to Mississippi regulations approved or promulgated through rulemaking under Title I, including parts C or D, of the Federal Act;
(c) any standard or other requirement under Section 111 of the Federal Act, including Section 111(d); (d) any standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Federal Act, including any requirement concerning accident prevention under Section 112(r)(7) of the Federal Act; (e) any standard or other requirement of the acid rain program under Title IV of the Federal Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder; (f) any requirements established pursuant to Section 504(b) or Section 114(a)(3) of the Federal Act; (g) any standard or other requirement governing solid waste incineration under Section 129 of the Federal Act; (h) any standard or other requirement for consumer and commercial products under Section 183(e) of the Federal Act; (i) any standard or other requirement for tank vessels under Section 183(f) of the Federal Act;
(j) any standard or other requirement of the program to control air pollution from outer continental shelf sources under Section 328 of the Federal Act; (k) any standard or other requirement of the regulations promulgated to protect stratospheric ozone under Title VI of the Federal Act, unless the Administrator has determined that such requirements need not be contained in a Title V permit; and (l) any national ambient air quality standard or increment or visibility requirement under part C of Title I of the Federal Act applicable only with regard to temporary sources permitted pursuant to Section 504(e) of the Federal Act. (6) Commission means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality. (7) DEQ means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality. (8) Designated representative shall have the same meaning as set forth in Section 402(26) of the Federal Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. (9) Draft permit is the version of a recommended permit for which the DEQ offers public participation under Rule 6.4.I. or Affected State(s) review under Rule 6.5. (10) Emissions allowable under a permit means a federally enforceable permit term or condition determined at issuance to be required by an applicable requirement that establishes an emissions limit (including a work practice standard) or a federally enforceable emissions cap that the source has assumed to avoid an applicable requirement to which the source would otherwise be subject. (11) Emissions unit means any part or activity of a stationary source that emits or has the potential to emit any regulated air pollutant or any pollutant listed under Section 112(b) of the Federal Act. This term is not meant to alter or affect the definition of the term "unit" for purposes of Title IV of the Federal Act. (12) The EPA or the Administrator means the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or his designee. (13) Federal Act means the Federal Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§7401-7671, and any subsequent amendments. (14) Final permit means the version of a Title V permit issued by the Permit Board once all review procedures required by Rule 6.4 and Rule 6.5 have been completed. (15) Fugitive emissions are those emissions which could not reasonably pass through a stack, chimney, vent or other functionally-equivalent opening.
(16) General permit is a Title V permit that meets the requirements of Rule 6.3.D. (17) Major source is any stationary source (or any group of stationary sources that are located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties, and are under common control of the same person (or persons under common control)) belonging to a single major industrial grouping and that is described in Paragraph a., b., or c. of this definition. For the purposes of defining "major source", a stationary source or group of stationary sources shall be considered part of a single industrial grouping if all of the pollutant emitting activities at such source or group of sources on contiguous or adjacent properties belong to the same Major Group (i.e., all have the same two-digit code) as described in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987. (a) A major source under Section 112 of the Federal Act is defined as follows: (1) for pollutants other than radionuclides, any stationary source or group of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common control that emits or has the potential to emit, in the aggregate, 10 tons per year (tpy) or more of any hazardous air pollutant which has been listed pursuant to Section 112(b) of the Federal Act, 25 tpy or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants, or such lesser quantity as the Administrator may establish by rule (notwithstanding the preceding sentence, emissions from any oil or gas exploration or production well (with its associated equipment) and emissions from any pipeline compressor or pump station shall not be aggregated with emissions from other similar units, whether or not such units are in a contiguous area or under common control, to determine whether such units or stations are major sources); or (2) for radionuclides, "major source" shall have the meaning specified by the Administrator by rule. (b) A major stationary source of air pollutants, as defined in Section 302 of the Federal Act, that directly emits or has the potential to emit, 100 tpy or more of any air pollutant subject to regulation (including any major source of fugitive emissions of any such pollutant, as determined by rule by the Administrator). The fugitive emissions of a stationary source shall not be considered in determining whether it is a major stationary source for the purposes of Section 302(j)) of the Federal Act, unless the source belongs to one of the following categories of stationary sources: (1) coal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers); (2) kraft pulp mills; (3) portland cement plants;
(4) primary zinc smelters; (5) iron and steel mills; (6) primary aluminum ore reduction plants; (7) primary copper smelters; (8) municipal incinerators capable of charging more than 250 tons of refuse per day; (9) hydrofluoric, sulfuric, or nitric acid plants; (10) petroleum refineries; (11) lime plants; (12) phosphate rock processing plants; (13) coke oven batteries; (14) sulfur recovery plants; (15) carbon black plants (furnace process); (16) primary lead smelters; (17) fuel conversion plants; (18) sintering plants; (19) secondary metal production plants; (20) chemical process plants; (21) fossil-fuel boilers (or combination thereof) totaling more than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input; (22) petroleum storage and transfer units with a total storage capacity exceeding 300,000 barrels; (23) taconite ore processing plants; (24) glass fiber processing plants;
(25) charcoal production plant; (26) fossil-fuel-fired steam electric plants of more than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input; or (27) all other stationary source categories regulated by a standard promulgated under Section 111 or 112 of the Federal Act, but only with respect to those air pollutants that have been regulated for that category (c) A major stationary source as defined in part D of Title I of the Federal Act, including the following: (1) for ozone nonattainment areas, sources with the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of volatile organic compounds or oxides of nitrogen in areas classified as "marginal" or "moderate", 50 tpy or more in areas classified as "serious", 25 tpy or more in areas classified as "severe", and 10 tpy or more in areas classified as "extreme"; except that the references in this paragraph to 100, 50, 25 and 10 tpy of nitrogen oxides shall not apply with respect to any source for which the Administrator has made a finding under Section 182(f) (1) or (2) of the Federal Act, that requirements under Section 182(f) of the Federal Act do not apply;
(2) for ozone transport regions established pursuant to Section 184 of the Federal Act, sources with the potential to emit 50 tpy or more of volatile organic compounds; (3) for carbon monoxide nonattainment areas: (a) that are classified as "serious", and (b) in which stationary sources contribute significantly to carbon monoxide levels as determined under rules issued by the Administrator, sources with the potential to emit 50 tpy or more of carbon monoxide; and (4) for particulate matter (PM10) nonattainment areas classified as "serious", sources with the potential to emit 70 tpy or more of PM10. (18) Permit Board means the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board. (19) Permit modification means a revision to a Title V permit that meets the requirements of Rule 6.4.E as distinguished from an administrative amendment.
(20) Permit program cost means all reasonable direct and indirect costs required to develop and administer the Title V permit program, as authorized by State law and set forth in Miss. Code Ann. §49-17-14. (21) Permit revision means any permit modification or administrative permit amendment. (22) Potential to emit means the maximum capacity of a stationary source to emit any air pollutant under its physical and operational design consistent with 40 CFR 52.21. Any physical or operational limitation on the capacity of a source to emit an air pollutant, including air pollution control equipment and restrictions on hours of operation or on the type or amount of material combusted, stored, or processed, shall be treated as part of its design if the limitation is established in a construction permit required by the EPA approved Mississippi SIP for New Source Review (NSR) or a Title V permit. This term does not alter or affect the use of this term for any other purposes under the Federal Act, or the term "capacity factor" as used in Title IV of the Federal Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder. (23) Proposed permit means the version of a recommended permit that the DEQ proposes to be issued and forwards to the Administrator for review in compliance with Rule 6.5. (24) Regulated air pollutant includes the following:
(a) nitrogen oxides or any volatile organic compounds;
(b) any pollutant for which a national ambient air quality standard has been promulgated;
(c) any pollutant that is subject to any standard promulgated under Section 111 of the Federal Act;
(d) any class I or II substance subject to a standard promulgated under or established by Title VI of the Federal Act; or (e) any pollutant subject to a standard promulgated under Section 112 or other requirements established under Section 112 of the Federal Act, including Sections 112(g), (j), and (r) of the Federal Act, including the following:
(1) any pollutant subject to requirements under Section 112(j) of the Federal Act (if the Administrator fails to promulgate a standard by the date established pursuant to Section 112(e) of the Federal Act, any pollutant for which a subject source would be major shall be considered to be regulated on the date 18 months after the
applicable date established pursuant to Section 112(e) of the Federal Act); and
(2) any pollutant for which the requirements of Section 112(g)(2) of the Federal Act have been met, but only with respect to the individual source subject to Section 112(g)(2) requirements. (25) Renewal means the process by which a permit is reissued at the end of its term. (26) Responsible official means as follows: (a) for a corporation: a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation, or a duly authorized representative of such person if the representative is responsible for the overall operation of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities applying for or subject to a permit and either: (1) the facilities employ more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in second quarter 1980 dollars); or (2) the delegation of authority to such representative is approved in advance by the DEQ; (b) for a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; (c) for a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official (for the purposes of these regulations, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency includes the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g., a Regional Administrator of EPA); or (d) for affected sources:
(1) the designated representative in so far as actions, standards, requirements, or prohibitions under Title IV of the Federal Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder are concerned; and (2) the designated representative for any other purposes under Title V.
(27) Section 502(b)(10) changes are changes that contravene an express permit term. Such changes do not include changes that would violate applicable requirements
or contravene federally enforceable permit terms and conditions that are monitoring (including test methods), recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance certification requirements. (28) State Law means the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, specifically, Section 49-17-1 through 49-17-43 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, and any subsequent amendments. (29) Stationary source means any building, structure, facility, or installation that emits or may emit any regulated air pollutant or any pollutant listed under Section 112(b) of the Federal Act. (30) Sources or facilities required to hold Title V permits means all major sources and all other Title V sources beginning either five (5) years after full implementation of the Title V program in Mississippi or such other time as specified by EPA, whichever is later. (31) Subject to regulation means, for any air pollutant, that the pollutant is subject to either a provision in the Clean Air Act, or a nationally-applicable regulation codified by the Administrator in subchapter C of 40 CFR Chapter I, that requires actual control of the quantity of emissions of that pollutant, and that such a control requirement has taken effect and is operative to control, limit or restrict the quantity of emissions of that pollutant released from the regulated activity. Except that: (a) Greenhouse gases (GHGs), the air pollutant defined as the aggregate group of six greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride, shall not be subject to regulation unless, as of July 1, 2011, the GHG emissions are at a stationary source emitting or having the potential to emit 100,000 tpy of CO2e equivalent emissions. (b) The term tpy CO
equivalent emissions (CO
e) shall represent an amount of GHGs emitted, and shall be computed by multiplying the mass amount of emissions (tpy), for each of the six greenhouse gases in the pollutant GHGs, by the gas's associated global warming potential published at Table A-l to Subpart A of 40 CFR Part 98 - Global Warming Potentials, and summing the resultant value for each to compute a tpy CO
e.
(32) Title V means the air operating permit program mandated in Title V of the 1990 amendments to the federal Clean Air Act, codified in 42 U.S.C. § 7661. (33) Title V permit means any permit or group of permits covering a Title V source that is issued, renewed, amended, or revised pursuant to these regulations. (34) Title V sources include the following:
(a) any major source; (b) any source, including an area source, subject to a standard, limitation or other requirement under Section 111 of the Federal Act; (c) any source, including an area source, subject to a standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Federal Act, except that a source is not required to obtain a permit solely because it is subject to regulations or requirements under Section 112(r) of the Federal Act; (d) any affected source; and (e) any source in a source category designated by the Administrator pursuant to this section.
B. General Title V Permit Requirements.
(1) Except as provided or excepted below all Title V sources must comply with all provisions herein with regard to Title V permit responsibilities including but not limited to filing an application for and obtaining a Title V permit. (2) All sources that are not major sources, affected sources, or solid waste incineration units required to obtain a permit pursuant to Section 129(e) of the Federal Act are exempted from the obligation to obtain a Title V permit until either the date five years after full implementation of the Title V program in Mississippi or such time as the Administrator completes a rulemaking to determine how the program should be structured for nonmajor sources and the appropriateness of any permanent exemptions in addition to those provided for in Rule 6.1.B(5), whichever is later. (3) In the case of nonmajor sources subject to a standard or other requirement under either Section 111 or Section 112 of the Federal Act promulgated after July 21, 1992, the exemption of any or all such applicable sources from the requirement to obtain a Title V permit will be determined consistent with the newly promulgated standard and regulations. (4) Any source listed in Rule 6.1.B(2), (3), and/or (5) which is exempt from the requirement to obtain a Title V permit may opt to apply for a Title V permit under the Title V program.
(5) The following source categories are exempted from the obligation to obtain a Title V permit. (a) All sources and source categories that would be required to obtain a Title V - permit solely because they are subject to 40 CFR Part 60, subpart AAA Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters.
(b) All sources and source categories that would be required to obtain a Title V permit solely because they are subject to 40 CFR Part 61, subpart M - National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos § 61.145, Standard for Demolition and Renovation. (6) Emissions units and Title V sources. (a) For major sources, the Title V permit shall include all applicable requirements for all relevant emissions units in the major source. (b) For any nonmajor source subject to the Title V program under Paragraphs (2)-(5) of this section, the Permit Board shall include in the permit all applicable requirements applicable to emissions units that cause the source to be subject to the Title V program. (7) Fugitive emissions. Fugitive emissions from a Title V source shall be included in the permit application and the Title V permit in the same manner as stack emissions, regardless of whether the source category in question is included in the list of sources contained in the definition of major source. (8) For purposes of these regulations, the Commission shall not make any exceptions to and/or grant any exemptions and/or variances from any of the regulations regarding Title V permits except those specified herein.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.2 Permit Applications
A. Duty to apply. For each Title V source, the owner or operator shall submit a timely and complete permit application in accordance with this rule. (1) Timely application. (a) A timely application for a source applying for a Title V permit for the first time is one that is submitted within 12 months after the source becomes subject to the permit program or on or before such earlier date as the Permit Board may establish. In the latter case, at least six (6) months time shall be given for application submittal from the time the Permit Board notifies the source of the early submittal requirement.
(b) Title V sources required to meet the requirements under Section 112(g) of the Federal Act or to have a permit under the preconstruction review and construction permit requirements of Commission Regulation Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2, Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment shall file a
complete application to obtain the Title V permit or permit revision within 12 months after commencing operation or on or before such earlier date as the Permit Board may establish. Where an existing Title V permit would prohibit such construction or change in operation, the source must obtain a permit revision before commencing operation. (c) For purposes of permit renewal, a timely application is one that is submitted at least 6 months prior to the date of permit expiration. (d) Applications for initial phase II acid rain permits shall be submitted to the DEQ by January 1, 1996, for sulfur dioxide, and by January 1, 1998, for nitrogen oxides. (2) Complete application. To be deemed complete, an application must provide all information required pursuant to Rule 6.2.C, except that applications for permit revision need supply such information only if it is related to the proposed change. Information required under Rule 6.2.C. must be sufficient to evaluate the subject source and its application and to determine all applicable requirements. A responsible official shall certify the submitted information consistent with Rule 6.2.E. Unless the DEQ determines that an application is not complete within 60 days of receipt of the application, such application shall be deemed to be complete. If, while processing an application that has been determined or deemed to be complete, the DEQ determines that additional information is necessary to evaluate or take final action on that application, it may request such information in writing and set a reasonable deadline for a response. The source's ability to operate without a Title V permit, as set forth in Rule 6.4.B of these regulations, shall be in effect from the date the application is determined or deemed to be complete until the final permit is issued, provided that the applicant submits any requested additional information by the deadline specified by the DEQ. (3) Confidential information. In the event a source submits information to the DEQ under a claim of confidentiality, the Permit Board may also require the source to submit a copy of such information directly to the Administrator. B. Duty to supplement or correct application. Any applicant who fails to submit any relevant facts or who has submitted incorrect information in a permit application shall, upon becoming aware of such failure or incorrect submittal, promptly submit such supplementary facts or corrected information. In addition, an applicant shall provide additional information as necessary to address any requirements that become applicable to the source after the date it filed a complete application but prior to release of a draft permit to public participation.
C. Standard application form and required information. All applications must be submitted on the form supplied by the Permit Board. Insignificant activities which are specified in Rule 6.7.A, need not be included in permit applications. For insignificant activities which are specified in Rule 6.7.B, a list of such insignificant activities must be included in the
application. An application may not omit information needed to determine the applicability of, or to impose, any applicable requirement, or to evaluate the fee amount required under the schedule pursuant to Rule 6.6 of these regulations. The forms and attachments shall include the elements specified as follows: (1) identifying information, including company name and address (or plant name and address if different from the company name), owner's name and agent, and telephone number and names of plant site manager/contact; (2) a description of the source's process and products (by Standard Industrial Classification Code) including any associated with any alternate scenario identified by the source; (3) emission-related information as follows: (a) all emissions of pollutants for which the source is major, and all emissions of regulated air pollutants. Fugitive emissions from individual components within a facility may be determined collectively based on their relationship to the associated process unless individual emission rates are needed to determine the applicability of an applicable requirement such as NSPS, NESHAPS, a MACT standard, etc. or to determine air quality impacts. A permit application shall describe all emissions of regulated air pollutants emitted from any emissions unit, except where such units are exempted under Rule 6.7. The Permit Board shall require additional information related to the emissions of air pollutants sufficient to verify which requirements are applicable to the source, and other information necessary to collect any permit fees owed under the fee schedule pursuant to Rule 6.6 of these regulations. (b) identification and description of all points of emissions described in Rule 6.2.C(3)(a) of this rule in sufficient detail to establish. (c) emission rates in tpy and in such terms as are necessary to establish compliance consistent with the applicable standard reference test method; (d) to the extent it is needed to determine or regulate emissions, the information that follows: fuels, fuel use, raw materials, production rates, and operating schedules; (e) identification and description of air pollution control equipment and compliance monitoring devices or activities;
(f) limitations on source operation affecting emissions or any work practice standards, where applicable, for all regulated pollutants at the Title V source;
(g) other information required by any applicable requirement (including information related to stack height limitations developed pursuant to Section 123 of the Federal Act);
(h) calculations on which the information in Rule 6.2.C(3)(a) through (g) is based; (4) air pollution control requirements as follows: (a) citation and description of all applicable requirements, and (b) description of or reference to any applicable test method for determining compliance with each applicable requirement; (5) other specific information that may be necessary to implement and enforce other applicable requirements of the Federal Act or of these regulations or to determine the applicability of such requirements; (6) an explanation of any proposed exemptions from otherwise applicable requirements; (7) additional information as determined to be necessary by the Permit Board to define alternative operating scenarios identified by the source pursuant to Rule 6.3.A(9) of these regulations or to define permit terms and conditions implementing 40 CFR 70.4(b)(12) or Rule 6.3.A(10) of these regulations. (8) a compliance plan for all Title V sources that contains all of the following: (a) a description of the compliance status of the source with respect to all applicable requirements; (b) a description as follows: (1) for applicable requirements with which the source is in compliance, a statement that the source will continue to comply with such requirements; (2) for applicable requirements that will become effective during the permit term, a statement that the source will meet such requirements on a timely basis; (3) for requirements for which the source is not in compliance at the time of permit issuance, a narrative description of how the source will achieve compliance with such requirements; (c) a compliance schedule as follows:
(1) For applicable requirements with which the source is in compliance, a statement that the source will continue to comply with such requirements; (2) For applicable requirements that will become effective during the permit term, a statement that the source will meet such requirements on a timely basis. A statement that the source will meet in a timely manner applicable requirements that become effective during the permit term shall satisfy this provision, unless a more detailed schedule is expressly required by the applicable requirements; (3) A schedule of compliance for sources that are not in compliance with all applicable requirements at the time of permit issuance. Such a schedule shall include a schedule or remedial measures, including an enforceable sequence of actions with milestones, leading to compliance with any applicable requirements for which the source will be in noncompliance at the time of permit issuance. This compliance schedule shall resemble and be at least as stringent as that contained in any judicial consent decree or administrative order to which the source is subject. Any such schedule of compliance shall be supplemental to, and shall not sanction noncompliance with, the applicable requirements on which it is based; (d) a schedule for submission of certified progress reports, to be submitted no less frequently than every 6 months for sources required to have a schedule of compliance to remedy a violation; (e) the compliance plan content requirements specified in this paragraph shall apply and be included in the acid rain portion of a compliance plan for an affected source, except as specifically superseded by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act with regard to the schedule and method(s) the source will use to achieve compliance with the acid rain emissions limitations. (9) requirements for compliance certification, including the following: (a) a certification of compliance with all applicable requirements by a responsible official consistent with Rule 6.2.E and Section 114(a)(3) of the Federal Act; (b) a statement of methods used for determining compliance, including a description of monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods;
(c) a schedule for submission of compliance certifications during the permit term, to be submitted no less frequently than annually, or more frequently if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Permit Board;
(d) a statement indicating the source's compliance status with any applicable enhanced monitoring and compliance certification requirements of the Federal Act; and
(10) the use of nationally-standardized forms for acid rain portions of permit applications and compliance plans, as required by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act.
D. Applicant's duty to apply for alternative scenarios. Any operating scenario allowed for in an applicable Title V permit may be implemented by the facility without the need for any permit revision or any notification to the Permit Board. It is incumbent upon the Title V permit applicant to apply for any reasonably anticipated alternative facility operating scenarios at the time of initial or renewal permit application. E. Any application form, report, or compliance certification submitted pursuant to these regulations shall contain a certification of truth, accuracy, and completeness signed by a responsible official. This certification and any other certification required under these regulations shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.3 Permit Content
A. Standard permit requirements. Each permit issued under these regulations shall include the following requirements. (1) Emission limitations and standards, including those operational requirements and limitations that assure compliance with all applicable requirements at the time of permit issuance. (a) The permit shall specify and reference the origin of and authority for each term or condition, and identify any difference in form as compared to the applicable requirement upon which the term or condition is based. (b) The permit shall state that, where an applicable requirement of the Federal Act is more stringent than an applicable requirement of regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act, both provisions shall be incorporated into the permit and shall be enforceable by the Administrator and the Commission.
(2) Permit duration. The Permit Board shall issue permits for a fixed term of 5 years in the case of affected sources, and for a term not to exceed 5 years in the case of all other sources. Notwithstanding this requirement, the Permit Board shall issue permits for solid waste incineration units combusting municipal waste subject to standards under Section 129(e) of the Federal Act for a period not to exceed 12 years and shall review such permits at least every 5 years. (3) Monitoring and related recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
(a) Each permit shall contain the requirements with respect to monitoring as follows:
(1) all emissions monitoring and analysis procedures or test methods required under the applicable requirements, including any procedures and methods promulgated pursuant to Sections 114(a)(3) or 504(b) of the Federal Act; (2) where the applicable requirement does not require periodic testing or instrumental or non-instrumental monitoring (which may consist of recordkeeping designed to serve as monitoring), periodic monitoring sufficient to yield reliable data from the relevant time period that are representative of the source's compliance with the permit as reported pursuant to Rule 6.3.A(3)(e). Such monitoring requirements shall assure use of terms, test methods, units, averaging periods, and other statistical conventions consistent with the applicable requirement. Recordkeeping provisions shall be sufficient to meet the requirements of Rule 6.3.A(3)(b); and (3) as necessary, requirements concerning the use, maintenance, and, where appropriate, installation of monitoring equipment or methods. (b) With respect to recordkeeping, the permit shall incorporate all applicable recordkeeping requirements and require, where applicable, the following: (1) records of required monitoring information that include the following:
(i) the date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or measurements; (ii) the date(s) analyses were performed; (iii) the company or entity that performed the analyses; (iv) the analytical techniques or methods used;
(v) the results of such analyses; (vi) the operating conditions existing at the time of sampling or measurement; and
(2) retention of records of all required monitoring data and support information for a period of at least 5 years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. Support information includes all calibration and maintenance records, all original strip-chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all reports required by the permit. (c) With respect to reporting, the permit shall incorporate all applicable reporting requirements and require the following: (1) submittal of reports of any required monitoring at least every 6 months (all instances of deviations from permit requirements must be clearly identified in such reports and all required reports must be certified by a responsible official consistent with Rule 6.2.E of these regulations); and (2) prompt reporting of deviations from permit requirements, including those attributable to upset conditions as defined in the permit, the probable cause of such deviations, and any corrective actions or preventive measures taken. The Permit Board shall define "prompt" in the permit in relation to the degree and type of deviation likely to occur and the applicable requirements.
(4) A permit condition prohibiting emissions exceeding any allowances that the source lawfully holds under Title IV of the Federal Act or the regulations promulgated hereunder. (a) No permit revision shall be required for increases in emissions that are authorized by allowances acquired pursuant to the acid rain program, provided that such increases do not require a permit revision under any other applicable requirement. (b) No limit shall be placed on the number of allowances held by the source. The source may not, however, use allowances as a defense to noncompliance with any other applicable requirement. (c) Any such allowance shall be accounted for according to the procedures established in regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (5) A severability clause to ensure the continued validity of the various permit
requirements in the event of a challenge to any portions of the permit. (6) Provisions stating the following: (a) The permittee must comply with all conditions of the Title V permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Federal Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. (b) The need to halt or reduce activity is not a defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. (c) The permit and/or any part thereof may be modified, revoked, reopened, and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition. (d) The permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege. (e) The permittee shall furnish to the DEQ within a reasonable time any information the DEQ may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee shall also furnish to the DEQ copies of records required to be kept by the permittee or, for information claimed to be confidential, the permittee shall furnish such records to DEQ along with a claim of confidentiality. The permittee may furnish such records directly to the Administrator along with a claim of confidentiality. (7) A provision to ensure that a Title V source pays fees to the permitting authority consistent with the fee schedule pursuant to Rule 6.6 of these regulations. (8) Emissions trading. A provision stating that no permit revision shall be required, under any approved economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading and other similar programs or processes for changes that are provided for in the permit. (9) Terms and conditions for reasonably anticipated operating scenarios identified by the source in its application, as approved by the Permit Board, as follows:
(a) shall require the source, contemporaneously with making a change from one operating scenario to another, to record in a log at the permitted facility a record of the scenario under which it is operating; (b) may extend the permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F to all terms and conditions under each such operating scenario; and (c) must ensure that the terms and conditions of each such alternative scenario meet all applicable requirements and the requirements of these regulations. (10) If the permit applicant requests them, terms and conditions for the trading of emissions increases and decreases in the permitted facility, to the extent that the applicable requirements provide for trading such increases and decreases without a case-by-case approval of each emissions trade, as follows:
(a) shall include all terms required under Rule 6.3.A and Rule 6.3.C to determine compliance; (b) may extend the permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F to all terms and conditions that allow such increases and decreases in emissions; and (c) must meet all applicable requirements and requirements of these regulations.
B. Federally-enforceable requirements. (1) All terms and conditions in a Title V permit, including any provisions designed to limit a source's potential to emit, are enforceable by the Administrator and citizens under the Federal Act as well as the Commission. (2) Notwithstanding Rule 6.3.B(1), the Permit Board shall specifically designate as not being federally enforceable under the Federal Act, any terms and conditions included in the permit that are not required under the Federal Act or under any of its applicable requirements. Terms and conditions so designated are not subject to the requirements of Rules 6.3, 6.4, or 6.5 of these regulations, other than those contained in Rule 6.3.B. C. Compliance requirements. All Title V permits shall contain elements with respect to compliance as follows:
(1) Consistent with Rule 6.3 of this rule, compliance certification, testing, monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements sufficient to assure compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. Any document (including reports) required by a Title V permit to be submitted to the DEQ shall contain a certification by a responsible official that meets the requirements of Rule 6.2.E of
these regulations. (2) Inspection and entry requirements that require that, upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the permittee shall allow the DEQ, or an authorized representative, to perform the following: (a) enter upon the permittee's premises where a Title V source is located or emissions-related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of the permit; (b) have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of the permit; (c) inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under the permit; and
(d) as authorized by the Federal Act, sample or monitor, at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with the permit or applicable requirements. (3) A schedule of compliance consistent with Rule 6.2.C(8) of these regulations. (4) Progress reports consistent with an applicable schedule of compliance and Rule 6.2.C(8) of these regulations to be submitted at least semiannually, or at a more frequent period if specified in the applicable requirement or by the Permit Board. Such progress reports shall contain the following: (a) dates for achieving the activities, milestone(s), or compliance required in the schedule of compliance, and dates when such activities, milestone(s) or compliance were achieved; and (b) an explanation of why any dates in the schedule of compliance were not or will not be met, and any preventive or corrective measures adopted. (5) Requirements for compliance certification with terms and conditions contained in the permit, including emission limitations, standards, or work practices. Permits shall include each of the following: (a) the frequency (not less than annually or such more frequent period as specified in the applicable requirement or by the Permit Board) of submissions of compliance certifications; (b) in accordance with Rule 6.3.A(3) of these regulations, a means for monitoring the compliance of the source with its emissions limitations, standards, and work practices;
(c) a requirement that the compliance certification include the following: (1) the identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the certification; (2) the compliance status; (3) whether compliance was continuous or intermittent; (4) the method(s) used for determining the compliance status of the source, currently and over the reporting period consistent with Rule 6.3.A(3) and (5) such other facts as the DEQ may require to determine the compliance status of the source;
(d) a requirement that all compliance certifications be submitted to the Administrator as well as to the Permit Board; and (e) such additional requirements as may be specified pursuant to Sections 114(a)(3) and 504(b) of the Federal Act. (6) such other provisions as the Permit Board may require. D. General permits. (1) The Permit Board may, after notice and opportunity for public participation provided under Rule 6.4.I of these regulations, issue a general permit covering numerous similar sources. Any general permit shall comply with all requirements applicable to other Title V permits and shall identify criteria by which sources may qualify for the general permit. To sources that qualify, the DEQ shall extend coverage of the terms and conditions of the general permit for a period of time not to exceed five years from the date coverage is extended. Notwithstanding the shield provisions of Rule 6.3.F, the source shall be subject to enforcement action for operating without a Title V permit if the source is later determined not to qualify for the terms and conditions of the general permit. General permits shall not be authorized for affected sources under the acid rain program unless otherwise provided in regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (2) After notice and opportunity for a hearing, the Permit Board may revoke and/or modify a general permit. After notice and opportunity for a hearing, the Permit Board may also revoke or deny coverage under a general permit and require a facility to obtain a Title V permit. (3) Title V sources that would qualify for a general permit must apply to the DEQ for coverage under the terms of the general permit or must apply for a Title V permit
consistent with Rule 6.2 of these regulations. The Permit Board may, in the general permit, provide for applications which deviate from the requirements of Rule 6.2 of these regulations, provided that such applications meet the requirements of Title V of the Federal Act, and include all information necessary to determine qualification for, and to assure compliance with, the general permit. Without repeating the public participation procedures required under Rule 6.4.I of these regulations, the DEQ may grant a source's request for coverage under a general permit, but such a grant shall not constitute a final Permit Board action for purposes of appeal only. E. Temporary sources. The Permit Board may issue a single permit authorizing emissions from similar operations by the same source owner or operator at multiple temporary locations. The operation must be temporary and involve at least one change of location during the term of the permit. No affected source shall be permitted as a temporary source. Permits for temporary sources shall include the following:
(1) conditions that will assure compliance with all applicable requirements at all authorized locations; (2) requirements that the owner or operator notify the DEQ at least 10 days in advance of each change in location; and (3) conditions that assure compliance with all other provisions of this rule. F. Permit shield. (1) Except as provided in these regulations, the Permit Board shall expressly include in a Title V permit a provision stating that compliance with the conditions of the permit shall be deemed compliance with any applicable requirements as of the date of permit issuance, upon satisfaction of either condition as follows: (a) such applicable requirements are included and are specifically identified in the permit; or (b) the Permit Board, in acting on the permit application or revision, determines in writing that other requirements specifically identified are not applicable to the source, and the permit includes such determination or a concise summary thereof. (2) Nothing in Rule 6.3.F. or in any Title V permit shall alter or affect the following: (a) the provisions of Section 303 of the Federal Act (emergency orders), including the authority of the Administrator under that section; (b) the liability of an owner or operator of a source for any violation of applicable requirements prior to or at the time of permit issuance;
(c) the applicable requirements of the acid rain program, consistent with Section 408(a) of the Federal Act; or (d) the ability of EPA to obtain information from a source pursuant to Section 114 of the Federal Act. G. Emergency provision. (1) Definition. An "emergency" means any situation arising from sudden and reasonably unforeseeable events beyond the control of the source, including acts of God, which situation requires immediate corrective action to restore normal operation, and that causes the source to exceed a technology-based emission limitation under the permit, due to unavoidable increases in emissions attributable to the emergency. An emergency shall not include noncompliance to the extent caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper operation, or operator error.
(2) Effect of any emergency. An emergency constitutes an affirmative defense to an action brought for noncompliance with such technology-based emission limitations if the conditions of Rule 6.3.G(3) are met. (3) The affirmative defense of emergency shall be demonstrated through properly signed contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that include information as follows: (a) an emergency occurred and that the permittee can identify the cause(s) of the emergency; (b) the permitted facility was at the time being properly operated; (c) during the period of the emergency the permittee took all reasonable steps to minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards, or other requirements in the permit; and (d) the permittee submitted notice of the emergency to the DEQ within 2 working days of the time when emission limitations were exceeded due to the emergency. This notice fulfills the requirement of Rule 6.3.A(3)(c)(2) This notice must contain a description of the emergency, any steps taken to mitigate emissions, and corrective actions taken. (4) In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an emergency has the burden of proof. (5) This provision is in addition to any emergency or upset provision contained in any applicable requirement.
H. Risk Management Plans. If the source is required to develop and register a risk management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Act, the permit need only specify that it will comply with the requirement to register such a plan. The content of the risk management plan need not itself be incorporated as a permit term.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.4 Permit Issuance(s), Renewal(s), Reopening(s), And Revision(s)
A. Action on application.
(1) A permit, permit modification, or renewal may be issued only upon satisfaction of the conditions that follow: (a) the DEQ has received a complete application for a permit, permit modification, or permit renewal, except that a complete application need not be received before issuance of a general permit under Rule 6.3.D of these regulations;
(b) except for modifications qualifying for minor permit modification procedures under this section, the DEQ has complied with the requirements for public participation under this section; (c) the DEQ has complied with the requirements for notifying and responding to Affected State(s) under Rule 6.5.B of these regulations; (d) the conditions of the permit provide for compliance with all applicable requirements and the requirements of these regulations; and (e) the Administrator has received a copy of the proposed permit and any notices required under Rule 6.5.A. and Rule 6.5.B. of these regulations, and has not objected to issuance of the permit under Rule 6.5.C. of these regulations within the time period specified therein. (2) Except as provided under the initial transition plan or under regulations promulgated under Title IV or Title V of the Federal Act for the permitting of affected sources under the acid rain program, the Permit Board shall take final action on each permit application (including a request for permit modification or renewal) within 180 days or as otherwise provided for under State Law, after receiving a complete application. (3) The DEQ shall provide a statement that sets forth the legal and factual basis for the draft permit conditions (including references to the applicable statutory or regulatory provisions). The DEQ shall send this statement to any person upon a written request and to EPA.
(4) The submittal of a complete application shall not affect the requirement that any source have a Construction Permit. B. Requirement for a permit. Except as provided in the following sentence, and paragraphs of this section, no Title V source may operate after the time that it is required to submit a timely and complete application, except in compliance with a Title V permit. If a Title V source submits a timely and complete application for permit issuance (including for renewal), the source's failure to have a Title V permit is not a violation of these regulations until the Permit Board takes final action on the permit application, except as noted in this section. This protection shall cease to apply if, subsequent to the completeness determination made pursuant to Rule 6.2.A(2) and as required by Rule 6.2.A(2) of these regulations, the applicant fails to submit by the deadline specified in writing by the DEQ any additional information identified as being needed to process the application. C. Permit renewal and expiration. (1) Permits being renewed are subject to the same procedural requirements, including those for public participation, Affected State(s) review and EPA review, that apply to initial permit issuance; and
(2) Permit expiration terminates the source's right to operate unless a timely and complete renewal application has been submitted consistent with Rule 6.4.B and Rule 6.2.A(1)(c) of these regulations. D. Administrative permit amendments. (1) An "administrative permit amendment" is a permit revision that revises a permit as follows: (a) corrects typographical errors; (b) identifies a change in the name, address, or phone number of any person identified in the permit, or provides a similar minor administrative change at the source; (c) requires more frequent monitoring or reporting by the permittee; and, (d) allows for a change in ownership or operational control of a source in accordance with Rule 6.4.D(4). (2) Administrative permit amendments for purposes of the acid rain portion of the permit shall be governed by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (3) Administrative permit amendment procedures. Any administrative permit
amendment except for change in ownership or operational control may be made by the DEQ consistent with the following: (a) The DEQ shall take no more than 60 days from receipt of a request for an administrative permit amendment to take final action on such request, and may incorporate such changes without providing notice to the public or Affected State(s) provided that it designates any such permit revisions as having been made pursuant to this paragraph. (b) The DEQ shall submit a copy of the revised permit to the Administrator. (c) The source may implement the changes addressed in the request for an administrative amendment immediately upon submittal of the request. (4) Permit Transfer. An administrative permit amendment may be made by the Permit Board authorizing changes in ownership or operational control consistent with the following: (a) the Permit Board shall take action within 60 days after receipt of a completed request for a permit transfer, unless a public hearing is scheduled. The Permit Board may incorporate such changes without providing notice to the public or affected State(s) provided that it designates any such permit revision as having been made pursuant to this paragraph. (b) A permit transfer shall be approved upon satisfaction of the following: (1) the applicant for transfer approval can demonstrate to the Permit Board it has the financial resources, operational expertise and environmental compliance history over the last five years to insure compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit to be transferred except where this conflicts with State Law, and (2) the Permit Board determines that no other change in the permit is necessary, provided that a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between the current and new permittee has been submitted to the DEQ. (c) The DEQ shall submit a copy of the revised permit to the Administrator. E. Permit Modification. A permit modification is any revision to a Title V permit that cannot be accomplished under the program's provisions for administrative permit amendments under Rule 6.4.D. A permit modification for purposes of the acid rain portion of the permit shall be governed by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act.
(1) Minor permit modification procedures. (a) Minor permit modification procedures may be used only for those permit modifications that satisfy the following: (1) do not violate any applicable requirement; (2) do not involve significant changes to existing monitoring, reporting, or recordkeeping requirements in the permit; (3) do not require or change a case-by-case determination of an emission limitation or other standard, or a source-specific determination for temporary sources of ambient impacts, or a visibility or increment analysis; (4) do not seek to establish or change a permit term or condition for which there is no corresponding underlying applicable requirement and that the source has assumed to avoid an applicable requirement to which the source would otherwise be subject. Such terms and conditions include the following: (i) a federally enforceable emissions cap assumed to avoid classification as a modification under any provision of Title I; and
(ii) an alternative emissions limit approved pursuant to regulations promulgated under Section 112(i)(5) of the Federal Act;
(5) are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the Federal Act; and
(6) are not required by Commission regulations to be processed as a significant modification.
(b) Notwithstanding other paragraphs of this rule, minor permit modification procedures may be used for permit modifications involving the use of economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading, and other similar approaches, to the extent that such minor permit modification procedures are explicitly provided for in an applicable implementation plan or in applicable requirements promulgated by EPA. (c) Application. An application requesting the use of minor permit modification procedures shall meet the requirements of Rule 6.2.C of these regulations and shall include the following:
(1) a description of the change, the emissions resulting from the change, and any new applicable requirements that will apply if the change occurs; (2) the source's suggested draft permit; (3) certification by a responsible official, that the proposed modification meets the criteria for use of minor permit modification procedures and a request that such procedures be used; and (4) completed forms for the DEQ to use to notify the Administrator and Affected State(s) as required under Rule 6.5. (d) EPA and Affected State(s) notification. Within 5 working days of receipt of a complete permit modification application, the DEQ shall notify the Administrator and Affected State(s) of the requested permit modification. The DEQ shall promptly send any notice required to the Administrator. (e) Timetable for issuance. The Permit Board may not issue a final permit modification until after EPA's 45-day review period or until EPA has notified the DEQ that EPA will not object to issuance of the permit modification, whichever is first, although the Permit Board can approve the permit modification prior to that time. Within 90 days of the DEQ's receipt of an application under minor permit modification procedures or 15 days after the end of the Administrator's 45-day review period under Rule 6.5.C, whichever is later, the Permit Board shall take one of the actions as follows: (1) issue the permit modification as proposed;
(2) deny the permit modification application; (3) determine that the requested modification does not meet the minor permit modification criteria and should be reviewed under the significant modification procedures; or (4) revise the draft permit modification and transmit to the Administrator the new proposed permit modification as required by these regulations. (f) Source's ability to make change. The source may make the change proposed in its minor permit modification application immediately after it files such application. After the source makes the change allowed by the preceding sentence, and until the Permit Board takes any of the actions specified in Rule 6.4.E(1)(e)(1)-(4) the source must comply with both the
applicable requirements governing the change and the proposed terms and conditions of the permit. During this time period, the source need not comply with the existing permit terms and conditions it seeks to modify. However, if the source fails to comply with the proposed terms and conditions of its permit during this time period, the existing permit terms and conditions it seeks to modify may be enforced against it. (g) Permit shield. The permit shield does not extend to minor permit modifications. (2) Group processing of minor permit modifications. Consistent with this paragraph, the Permit Board may modify the procedure to process groups of a source's applications for certain modifications eligible for minor permit modification processing.
(a) Criteria. Group processing of modifications may be used only for those permit modifications which satisfy the following:
(1) meet the criteria for minor permit modification procedures and
(2) collectively, are below the threshold level. This threshold shall be 10 percent of the emissions allowed by the permit for the emissions unit for which the change is requested, 20 percent of the applicable definition of major source or 5 tons per year, whichever is least.
(b) Application. An application requesting the use of group processing procedures shall meet the requirements of Rule 6.2.C. and shall include the following: (1) a description of the change, the emissions resulting from the change, and any new applicable requirements that will apply if the change occurs;
(2) the source's suggested draft permit;
(3) certification by a responsible official consistent with Rule 6.2.E, that the proposed modification meets the criteria for use of group processing procedures and a request that such procedures be used;
(4) a list of the source's other pending applications awaiting group processing, and a determination of whether the requested modification, aggregated with these other applications, equals or exceeds the threshold set under this rule;
(5) certification that the source has notified EPA of the proposed
modification. Such notification need only contain a brief description of the requested modification;
(6) completed forms for the DEQ to use to notify the Administrator and Affected State(s) as required. (c) EPA and Affected State(s) notification. On a quarterly basis or within 5 business days of receipt of an application demonstrating that the aggregate of a source's pending applications equals or exceeds the threshold level, whichever is earlier, the DEQ promptly shall notify the Administrator and Affected State(s) of the requested permit modifications. The DEQ shall send any notice required under these regulations to the Administrator. (d) Timetable for issuance. The provisions of this rule shall apply to modifications eligible for group processing, except that the Permit Board shall take one of the actions specified in Rule 6.4.E(1)(e)(1)-(4) within 180 days of receipt of the application or 15 days after the end of the Administrator's 45-day review period whichever is later. (e) Source's ability to make change. The provisions of Rule 6.4.E(1)(f) shall apply to modifications eligible for group processing. (f) Permit shield. The provisions of Rule 6.4.E(1)(g) of this rule shall also apply to modifications eligible for group processing. (3) Significant modification procedures. (a) Criteria. Significant modification procedures shall be used for applications requesting permit modifications that do not qualify as minor permit modifications or as administrative amendments. The DEQ shall determine whether a modification is significant. At a minimum, every significant modification in existing monitoring permit terms or conditions and every relaxation of reporting or recordkeeping permit terms or conditions shall be considered significant.
(b) Significant permit modifications shall meet all requirements of these regulations, including those for applications, public participation, review by Affected State(s), and review by EPA, as they apply to permit issuance and permit renewal. F. Operational Flexibility. A permitted facility is authorized to make the changes described below within their facility without requiring a permit revision, if the changes are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the Act and the changes do not exceed the emissions allowable under the permit (whether expressed therein as a rate of emissions or in terms of total emissions): Provided that the facility provides the Administrator and the Department with written notification as required below in advance of the proposed
changes, which shall be a minimum of seven (7) days, unless other applicable regulations specify a different time frame for emergencies. The source, Department, and EPA shall attach each such notice to their copy of the relevant permit. (1) The permitted sources are allowed to make Section 502(b)(10) changes without requiring a permit revision, if the changes are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the Act and the changes do not exceed the emissions allowable under the permit (whether expressed therein as a rate of emissions or in terms of total emissions). (a) For each such change, the written notification required above shall include a brief description of the change within the permitted facility, the date on which the change will occur, any change in emissions, and any permit term or condition that is no longer applicable as a result of the change. (a) The permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F. shall not apply to any change made pursuant to Rule 6.4.F(1). (2) The Department may provide for permitted sources to trade increases and decreases in emissions in the permitted facility, where the Mississippi State Implementation Plan (SIP) provides for such emissions trades without requiring a permit revision and based on the 7-day notice prescribed herein. This provision is available in those cases where the permit does not already provide for such emissions trading.
(a) The written notification required above shall include such information as may be required by the provision in the SIP authorizing the emissions trade, including at a minimum, when the proposed change will occur, a description of each such change, any change in emissions, the permit requirements with which the source will comply using the emissions trading provisions of the SIP, and the pollutants emitted subject to the emissions trade. The notice shall also refer to the provisions with which the source will comply in the SIP and that provide for the emissions trade.
(b) Compliance with the permit requirements that the source will meet using the emissions trade shall be determined according to requirements of the SIP authorizing the emissions trade.
(c) The permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F shall not apply to any change made pursuant to Rule 6.4.F(2). (3) The Department shall, if a permit applicant requests it, issue permits that contain terms and conditions, including all terms required under Rule 6.3.A and 6.3.C to determine compliance, allowing for the trading of emissions increases and decreases in the permitted facility solely for the purpose of complying with a federally-enforceable emissions cap that is established in the permit independent
of otherwise applicable requirements. The permit applicant shall include in its application proposed replicable procedures and permit terms that ensure the emissions trades are quantifiable and enforceable. The Department shall not be required to include in the emissions trading provisions any emissions units for which emissions are not quantifiable or for which there are no replicable procedures to enforce the emissions trades. The permit shall also require compliance with all applicable requirements. (a) The written notification required above shall state when the change will occur and shall describe the changes in emissions that will result and how these increases and decreases in emissions will comply with the terms and conditions of the permit. (b) The permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F shall apply to any changes made pursuant to Rule 6.4.F(3). G. Reopening for cause. (1) Each issued permit shall include provisions specifying the conditions under which the permit will be reopened prior to the expiration of the permit. A permit shall be reopened and revised under any of the following circumstances: (a) Additional applicable requirements under the Federal Act become applicable to a major Title V source with a remaining permit term of 3 or more years. Such a reopening shall be completed no later than 18 months after promulgation of the applicable requirement. No such reopening is required if the effective date of the requirement is later than the date on which the permit is due to expire, unless the original permit or any of its terms and conditions has been extended. (b) Additional requirements (including excess emissions requirements) become applicable to an affected source under the acid rain program. Upon approval by the Administrator, excess emissions offset plans shall be deemed to be incorporated into the permit. (c) The Permit Board or EPA determines that the permit contains a material mistake or that inaccurate statements were made in establishing the emissions standards or other terms or conditions of the permit.
(d) The Administrator or the Permit Board determines that the permit must be revised or revoked to assure compliance with the applicable requirements. (2) Proceedings to reopen and issue a permit shall follow the same procedures as apply to initial permit issuance and shall affect only those parts of the permit for which cause to reopen exists. Such reopening shall be made as expeditiously as practicable.
(3) Reopenings shall not be initiated before a notice of such intent is provided to the Title V source by the DEQ at least 30 days in advance of the date that the permit is to be reopened, except that the Permit Board may provide a shorter time period in the case of an emergency. H. Reopenings for cause by EPA. (1) The DEQ shall within 90 days after receipt of notification from the Administrator that cause exists to terminate, modify, or revoke and reissue a permit, forward to EPA a proposed determination of termination, modification, or revocation and reissuance, as appropriate. (2) The Permit Board shall have 90 days from receipt of an EPA objection to resolve any objection that EPA makes and to terminate, modify, or revoke and issue the permit in accordance with the Administrator's objection. I. Public participation. Except for administrative permit amendments and modifications qualifying for minor permit modification procedures, all permit proceedings, including initial permit issuance, significant modifications, and renewals, shall provide adequate procedures for public notice including offering an opportunity for public comment and a hearing on the draft permit. These procedures shall include the following: (1) Notice shall be given by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the area where the source is located or in a State publication designed to give general public notice; to persons on a mailing list developed by the DEQ, including those who request in writing to be on the list; and by other means if necessary to assure adequate notice to the affected public; (2) The notice shall identify the affected facility; the name and address of the permittee; the name and address of the Permit Board; the activity or activities involved in the permit action; the emissions change involved in any permit modification; the name, address, and telephone number of a person from whom interested persons may obtain additional information, including copies of the permit draft, the application, all relevant supporting materials, and all other materials available to the Permit Board that are relevant to the permit decision; a brief description of the comment procedures required by these regulations; and the time and place of any hearing that may be held, including a statement of procedures to request a hearing (unless a hearing has already been scheduled);
(3) The DEQ shall provide notice and opportunity for participation by Affected State(s) as is provided for by Rule 6.5; (4) Timing. The DEQ shall provide at least 30 days for public comment and shall give notice of any public hearing at least 30 days in advance of the hearing; (5) The DEQ shall keep a record of all commenters and also of the issues raised
during the public participation process. Such records shall be available to the public.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.5 Permit Review by EPA and Affected State(s)
A. Transmission of information to the Administrator. (1) The DEQ shall provide to the Administrator a copy of each permit application (including any application for permit modification), each proposed permit and each final Title V permit. The applicant may be required by the Permit Board to provide a copy of the permit application (including the compliance plan) directly to the Administrator. Upon agreement with the Administrator, the DEQ may submit to the Administrator a permit application summary form and any relevant portion of the permit application and compliance plan, in place of the complete permit application and compliance plan. To the extent practicable, the preceding information shall be provided in computer-readable format compatible with EPA's national database management system. (2) The DEQ shall keep such records for 5 years and submit to the Administrator such information as the Administrator may reasonably require. B. Review by Affected State(s). (1) The DEQ shall give notice of each draft permit to any Affected State(s) on or before the time that the DEQ provides this notice to the public. (2) As part of the submittal of the proposed permit to the Administrator (or as soon as possible after the submittal for minor permit modification procedure), the DEQ shall notify the Administrator and any Affected State(s) in writing of any refusal by the Permit Board to accept all recommendations for the proposed permit that the Affected State(s) submitted during the public or Affected State(s) review period. The notice shall include the Permit Board's reasons for not accepting any such recommendation. The Permit Board is not required to accept recommendations that are not based on applicable requirements or the requirements of these regulations. C. EPA objection. (1) No permit for which an application must be transmitted to the Administrator shall be issued if the Administrator objects to its issuance in writing within 45 days of receipt of the proposed permit and all necessary supporting information.
(2) The DEQ shall within 90 days after the date of an objection revise and submit a proposed permit in response to the objection. D. Public petitions to the Administrator. If the Administrator objects to the permit as a result of a petition filed within 60 days after the expiration of the Administrator's 45-day review period to make such objection when no objection was made during that 45-day review period, the Permit Board shall not issue the permit until EPA's objection has been resolved, except that a petition for review does not stay the effectiveness of a permit or its requirements if the permit was issued after the end of the 45-day review period and prior to an EPA objection. If the Permit Board has issued a permit prior to receipt of an EPA objection under this paragraph and the Administrator modifies, terminates, or revokes such permit, the Permit Board may thereafter issue only a revised permit that satisfies EPA's objection. In any case, the source will not be in violation of the requirement to have submitted a timely and complete application. E. Prohibition on default issuance. A Title V permit (including a permit renewal or modification) will not issue until Affected State(s) and EPA have had an opportunity to review the proposed permit as required.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.6 Program Fees
A. Fees. The owner or operator of any stationary source that is required to hold a Title V permit shall pay to the Department an annual fee based on a fee schedule established by the Commission. The fee schedule for Title V program fees shall be set each year by order of the Commission in an amount sufficient to cover the costs of development and administration of the program. The Commission’s order shall follow receipt of the annual report and recommendation of the Title V Advisory Council, if timely received, and completion of a public hearing held to receive comments regarding the proposed annual fee. B. Fee System. Each owner or operator’s annual Title V program fee shall be calculated and assessed according to the following: (1) A portion of the fee shall be based on the source’s annual quantity of emissions. (a) Allowable emissions determined on the date of the fee calculation shall be used as the basis for this portion of the fee, except when the use of actual emissions is allowed under paragraph (b). Allowable emissions are those emissions limited by the Title V permit, as well as those emissions not expressly limited by the Title V permit but otherwise allowed by the
permit, as represented in the Title V application (refer to R.6.2C.(3)).
(b) Actual emissions may be used as the basis for this portion of the fee if the owner or operator submits a report of the source’s actual emissions for the previous calendar year by July 1. The report shall include, at a minimum, the completed annual fee reporting form provided by the Department and any calculations and supporting information used in completing the form. Supporting information shall include, but is not limited to, emissions monitoring data, direct emissions measurements, published emission factors, process data, or other data used to calculate the actual emissions reported on the annual fee reporting form. (c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and (b) above, when calculating this portion of the fee, a minimum annual fee shall be assessed according to the fee schedule established by the Commission. (2) A portion of the fee shall be based on the complexity of the source, as determined by the number of air regulations applicable to the source on the date of the fee calculation, according to the fee schedule established by the Commission. Only air regulations required to be addressed by a Title V permit may be included in the annual fee schedule. (3) The Department shall provide an annual fee reporting form to be used in reporting the information necessary to calculate the appropriate annual fee for each owner or operator. The Department may require additional information to support the annual fee reporting form, where necessary, to determine the appropriate annual fee for any owner or operator. (a) The owner or operator shall submit the completed annual fee reporting form to the Department by close of business on July 1 of each year. It is incumbent upon the owner or operator to demonstrate any submittal was made in a timely manner. (b) The annual fee reporting form shall be certified by a responsible official according to Rule 6.2.E. (c) If the annual fee reporting form is not filled out completely and accurately, certified in accordance with Rule 6.2.E., accompanied by all necessary calculations and supporting information, and received by the Department by close of business on July 1, allowable emissions or other information necessary to determine the appropriate annual fee shall be used in the fee calculation. (d) If the Commission determines that there is not sufficient information available to the owner or operator to accurately complete and submit the
annual fee reporting form by July 1, but such information becomes available and is submitted to the Department after July 1, the fee calculation and assessment may be altered according to the annual fee schedule. No fee actually paid to the Department shall be refunded due to a change in the fee calculation. If a fee is recalculated such that the amount assessed for an annual period is reduced and the source has already paid all or a portion of the fee, the revised fee assessment may not be reduced to an amount less than what the owner or operator has already paid regardless of the results of the recalculation. C. Excess Fees. If the annual fees collected exceed the cost of administering the Title V program for that fiscal year, then the excess shall be applied to the cost of administering the program for the succeeding fiscal year. If necessary, in the succeeding fiscal year, the assessment rates shall be adjusted to ensure that the excess anticipated to be retained in the fund does not exceed the current annual cost of administering the program. D. Disputed Fees. Any owner or operator required to pay the Title V program fee set forth under this chapter who disagrees with the calculation or applicability of the fee may petition the Commission in writing for a hearing in accordance with State Law. Any disputed portion of the fee for which a hearing has been requested will not incur any penalty or interest from and after the receipt by the Commission of the hearing petition. E. Due Dates. (1) The Title V program fee shall be due September 1 of each year. An owner or operator may elect a quarterly payment method of four (4) equal payments with the payments due September 1, December 1, March 1 and June 1. The owner or operator shall notify the Department that the quarterly payment method will be used by September 1.
(a) If any part of the Title V program fee imposed is not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date, a penalty often percent (10%) of the amount due shall at once accrue and be added thereto. If the fee is not paid in full, including any interest and penalty within sixty (60) days of the due date, the Permit Board may revoke the permit upon proper notice and hearing as required by law. (b) If at any time within the year the Commission determines that the information submitted by the owner or operator is insufficient or incorrect, the owner or operator will be notified of the deficiencies and the adjusted fee assessment. Past due fees from the adjusted fee assessment will be due at the time of the next scheduled quarterly payment.
(2) All newly applicable sources required to hold a Title V permit shall pay an annual fee to the Department in accordance with the following:
(a) any source commencing operation or increasing emissions between and including January 1 and September 1 of any year, such that the Title V program becomes applicable, shall pay a Title V program fee on or before September 1 of that year; and
(b) any source commencing operation or increasing emissions between and including September 2 and December 31 of any year, such that the Title V program becomes applicable, shall pay a Title V program fee on or before September 1 of the following year.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.7 Insignificant Activities and Emissions
A. The following activities/emissions sources are not required to be included in a Title V permit application: (1) new or modified pilot plants, subject to temporary source regulations located in Rule 6.3.E. (2) maintenance and upkeep: (a) maintenance, structural changes, or repairs which do not change the capacity of such process, fuel-burning, refuse-burning, or control equipment, and do not involve any change in quality, nature, or quantity of potential emissions of any regulated air pollutants; and (b) housekeeping activities or building maintenance procedures; (3) air conditioning or ventilation: comfort air conditioning or comfort ventilating systems which do not transport, remove, or exhaust regulated air pollutants to the atmosphere; (4) laboratory equipment: (a) laboratory equipment used exclusively for chemical or physical analysis for quality control or environmental monitoring purposes; or (b) non-production laboratory equipment used at non-profit health or non- profit educational institutions for chemical or physical analyses, bench scale experimentation or training, or instruction; (5) hot water heaters which are used for domestic purposes only and are not used to heat process water;
(6) fuel use related to food preparation by a restaurant, cafeteria, residential cooker or barbecue grill where the products are intended for human consumption; (7) clerical activities such as operating copy machines and document printers, except operation of such units on a commercial basis; (8) hand held equipment used for buffing, polishing, carving, cutting, drilling, machining, routing, sanding, sawing, surface grinding, or turning of ceramic art work, precision parts, leather, metals, plastics, fiber board, masonry, carbon, glass, or wood; (9) equipment for washing or drying fabricated glass or metal products, if no VOCs are used in the process and no oil or solid fuel is burned; (10) water cooling towers (except at nuclear power plants); water treatment systems for process cooling water or boiler feed water; and water tanks, reservoirs, or other water containers not used in direct contact with gaseous or liquid process streams containing carbon compounds, sulfur compounds, halogens or halogen compounds, cyanide compounds, inorganic acids, or acid gases; (11) domestic sewage treatment facilities (excluding combustion or incineration equipment, land farms, storage silos for dry material, or grease trap waste handling or treatment facilities); (12) stacks or vents to prevent escape of sewer gases through plumbing traps; (13) vacuum cleaning systems for housekeeping, except at a source with hazardous air pollutants; (14) alkaline/phosphate washers and associated cleaners and burners; (15) mobile sources; (16) livestock and poultry feedlots and associated fuel burning equipment other than incinerators; (17) outdoor kerosene heaters; (18) equipment used for hydraulic or hydrostatic testing; (19) safety devices, excluding those with continuous emissions; and (20) brazing, soldering, or welding equipment that is used intermittently or in a non- continuous mode.
B. The following activities/emissions sources must be listed in the application but emissions from these activities do not have to be quantified.
(1) all gas fired, #2 oil fired, infrared, electric ovens with no emissions other than products of fuel combustion; (2) combustion units with rated input capacity less than 10 million Btu/hr that are fueled by: (a) liquefied petroleum gas or natural gas supplied by a public utility; or (b) commercial fuel oil #2 or lighter; (3) equipment used for inspection of metal products; (4) equipment used exclusively for forging, pressing, drawing, spinning, or extruding metals; (5) equipment used exclusively to mill or grind coatings and molding compounds where all materials charged are in paste form; (6) mixers, blenders, roll mills, or calendars for rubber or plastics for which no materials in powder form are added and in which no organic solvents, diluents, or thinners are used; (7) all storage tanks used exclusively to store fuel oils, kerosene, diesel, jet fuel, crude oil, natural gas, or liquefied petroleum gas (the application must list the size of the tank, date constructed and/or modified, type tank, and material stored); (8) space heaters utilizing natural or LPG gas and used exclusively for space heating; (9) back-up or emergency use generators, boilers or other fuel burning equipment which is of equal or smaller capacity than normal main operating equipment, cannot be used in conjunction with normal main operating equipment, and does not emit, have or cause the potential to emit of any regulated air pollutant to increase; (10) blast cleaning equipment using a suspension of abrasives in water; (11) die casting machines; (12) foundry sand mold forming equipment to which no heat is applied and from which no organics are emitted; (13) bark and wood-waste storage and handling;
(14) log wetting areas; (15) log flumes;
(16) sodium hydrosulfide storage tank;
(17) sodium hydrosulfide storage tank;
(18) spout cooling water storage;
(19) effluent drains;
(20) white water chest;
(21) repulper vents;
(22) clay storage tank;
(23) alum storage tank;
(24) starch storage tank;
(25) steam vents and leaks;
(26) de-aerator vents;
(27) mill air and instrument air system;
(28) demineralizer water storage tank;
(29) acid storage tank;
(30) process water tank;
(31) air purification system vents;
(32) effluent neutralizing tank/system;
(33) dregs washer;
(34) lime silo;
(35) lime mud mix tank;
(36) lime mud slurry tank;
(37) H
O
storage tank;
(38) green liquor tank; and
(39) tall oil storage tank. C. Notwithstanding Rule 6.7.A. and 6.7.B. above, the applicant shall include all emissions sources and quantify emissions if needed to determine major source status, to determine compliance with an applicable requirement and/or the applicability of any applicable requirement such as a NSPS, NESHAP, MACT standard, etc. as such term is defined in Rule 6.1., or collect any permit fee owed under the approved fee schedule. D. Notwithstanding Rule 6.7.A. and B. above, the applicant shall include all emission sources with a potential to emit: (1) greater than 1 pound per hour of any regulated pollutant that is not a hazardous air pollutant, or is not a GHG; (2) greater than 0.1 pound per hour of any hazardous air pollutant. E. The permittee does not have to report the addition of any insignificant activity listed in Rule 6.7.A., unless the addition is a Title I modification or requires a permit to construct. If a Title I permit or a permit to construct is required, then the modification procedures outlined in Rule 6.4.E. shall be followed. F. The addition of any insignificant activity listed in Rule 6.7.B. shall be handled as an administrative amendment as defined in Rule 6.4.D. unless the addition is a Title I modification or requires a permit to construct. If a Title I permit or a permit to constructs required, then the modification procedures outlined in Rule 6.4.E. shall be followed.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.8 Effective Date
The effective date of the amendments herein to 11 Miss. Admin. Code, Pt. 2, Ch. 6, is September 1, 2022.
Part 2, Chapter 7: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Acid Rain Program Permit Regulations for Purposes of Title IV of the Federal Clean Air Act (Adopted November 17, 1994 Last Amended December 14, 2011)
Rule 7.1. The Federal permit regulations applicable to facilities affected by the requirements of Title IV of the Clean Air Act are those regulations promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) 40 CFR Parts 72 and 76. All such regulations duly promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as of November 4, 2011, are incorporated herein and adopted by reference by the Commission as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and shall hereafter be enforceable as such (the word "Administrator" in said regulations shall mean the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the words "permitting authority" shall mean "Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board").
In any case where the provisions or requirements of 40 CFR Parts 72 and 76 conflict with or are not included in Commission Regulation, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 6, Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act, the provisions of 40 CFR Parts 72 and 76 shall apply and take precedence.
Part 2, Chapter 8: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Air Toxics Regulations (Adopted May 28, 1998, Last Amended November 16, 2006)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49- 17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 8.1 Requirements for Control Technology Determinations for Major Sources in Accordance With Clean Air Act Section 112(g)
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 8.2 Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 8.1 Requirements for Control Technology Determinations for Major Sources in Accordance with Clean Air Act Section 112(g)
A. Regulations for case-by-case maximum achievable control technology (MACT) applicable to facilities affected by the requirements of Section 112(g) of the Federal Clean Air Act are those regulations duly promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) Subpart B of Part 63 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.). All such regulations promulgated by United States Environmental Protection Agency are incorporated herein and adopted by reference by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and shall hereafter be enforceable as such except as follows:
(1) The "effective date of Section 112(g)(2)(b)" as defined in 40 C.F.R. 63.41 shall be the effective date of this regulation.
(2) The "permitting authority" as defined in 40 C.F.R. 63.41 shall be the "Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board" (Permit Board).
(3) The "Notice of MACT Approval" as defined in 40 C.F.R. 63.41 shall be the "Permit to Construct" pursuant to Commission Regulation, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2, Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment, as adopted by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (Commission) and said Permit to Construct shall include the case-by-case MACT determination.
(4) In lieu of the administrative procedures for review of the Notice of MACT Approval as set forth in 40 C.F.R. 63.43(f)(1) through (5), the Permit Board will follow Commission Regulation, Miss. Admin. Code, Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2, Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment, as adopted by the Commission.
(5) In lieu of the opportunity for public comment on the Notice of MACT Approval as set forth in 40 C.F.R. 63.43(h), the Permit Board will provide opportunity for public comment on information submitted by the owner or operator. The public information will include the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality's (MDEQ’s) analysis of the case-by-case MACT determination, including the MDEQ's recommendation for permit issuance or denial. The public information and opportunity for comment shall also include the following:
(a) availability for public inspection in at least one location in the area affected of the information submitted by the owner or operator and of MDEQ's recommendation and the draft permit;
(b) a 30-day period for submittal of public comment; and
(c) a notice, by prominent advertisement in the area affected, of the location of the source information.
B. Applicability.
(1) Overall requirements. The requirements of the regulations referenced in Rule 8.1.A. apply to any owner or operator who constructs or reconstructs a major source of hazardous air pollutants after the effective date of this regulation unless the major source in question has been specifically regulated or exempted from regulation under a MACT standard issued pursuant to Section 112(d), a work practice standard or other requirement pursuant to Section 112(h), or an equivalent emission limitation by permit pursuant to Section 112(j) and incorporated in another Subpart of Part 63, or the owner or operator of such major source has received all necessary air quality permits for such construction or reconstruction project before the effective date of the regulations referenced in Rule 8.1.A.
(2) Exclusion for electric utility steam generating units. The requirements of the regulations referenced in Rule 8.1.A. do not apply to electric utility steam
generating units unless and until such time as these units are added to the source category list pursuant to Section 112(c)(5) of the Federal Clean Air Act as amended.
(3) Exclusion for stationary sources in deleted source categories. The requirements of the regulations referenced in Rule 8.1.A. do not apply to stationary sources that are within a source category that has been deleted from the source category list pursuant to Section 112(c)(9) of the Federal Clean Air Act as amended.
(4) Exclusion for research and development activities. The requirements of the regulations referenced in Rule 8.1.A. do not apply to research and development activities, as defined in the regulations referenced in Rule 8.1.A.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49- 17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 8.2 Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions
A. Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions are regulations duly promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency in (or to be printed in) Part 68 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. All such regulations promulgated by the United States Environmental Protection Agency as of September 15, 2006 are incorporated herein and adopted by reference by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and shall be enforceable as such except as follows:
(1) The word "Administrator" shall mean the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
(2) The words "air permitting authority" shall mean "Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board".
(3) The words "implementing agency" shall mean "Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality".
Part 2, Chapter 9: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Regulations for Lead-Based Paint Activities (Adopted January 22, 1998, Amended November 20, 2003, and Last Amended December 10, 2009, and Last Amended October 24, 2013)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49- 17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.1 General Scope and Applicability
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.2 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.3 Accreditation of Training Programs
A. Scope B. Application Process C. Requirements for the Accreditation of Training Programs D. Minimum Training Curriculum Requirements E. Requirements for the Accreditation of Refresher Training Programs F. Re-accreditation of Training Programs G. Suspension, Revocation, and Modification of Accredited Training Programs H. Procedures for Suspension, Revocation, or Modification of Training Program Accreditation I. Training Program Recordkeeping Requirements J. Amendment of Accreditation K. Training Course Notification L. Non-English Language Courses M. Type and Duration of Certificates N. Reciprocity
Rule 9.4. Certification of Individuals and Firms Engaged in Lead-Based Paint Activities
A. Certification of Individuals B. Inspector C. Risk Assessor D. Supervisor E. Project Designer F. Abatement Worker G. Renovator H. Dust Sampling Technician I. Documents J. Certification Based on Prior Training K. Re-Certification L. Certification of Firms M. Suspension, Revocation, and Modification of Certifications of Individuals Engaged in Lead-Based Paint Activities N. Suspension, Revocation, and Modification of Certifications of Firms Engaged in Lead- Based Paint Activities O. Procedures for Suspension, Revocation, or Modification of the Certification of Individuals or Firms P. Type and Duration of Certificates Q. Reciprocity
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.5 Work Practice Standards for Conducting Lead-Based Paint Activities
A. Effective Date, Applicability, and Terms
B. Inspection C. Lead Hazard Screen D. Risk Assessment E. Abatement F. Renovation G. Collection and Laboratory Analysis of Samples H. Composite Dust Sampling I. Recordkeeping J. Project Notifications K. Lead-Based Paint Activities Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.6 Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement
A. Compliance Inspections and Investigations B. Enforcement - Penalties, Reprimands, Suspensions, Revocation of Certificates, Proceedings, and Hearings before the Commission and Appeals C. Severability
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.1 General Scope and Applicability
Pursuant to the authority granted by the Lead-Based Paint Activity Accreditation and Certification Act, Miss. Code 49-17-501 through 49-17-531, the following regulations contain procedures and requirements for the accreditation of lead-based paint activities training programs, procedures and requirements for the certification of inspectors, risk assessors, project designers, supervisors, workers, renovators, dust sampling technicians, and firms engaged in lead-based paint activities, and work practice standards for performing such activities. No person may engage in lead-based paint activities in target housing or child- occupied facilities as an inspector, risk assessor, project designer, supervisor, worker, renovator, dust sampling technician, or firm on or after the effective date of these regulations, unless applicable initial or renewed certificates to so engage in lead-based paint activities have been issued to such persons by the Commission, and are currently in effect. No firm shall employ any person on a lead-based paint activity who does not possess a current certificate issued by the Commission or has not been appropriately trained as a renovation worker. No individual will be certified as an inspector, risk assessor, or supervisor until the individual has passed the required certification (3rd party) examination for the discipline.
These regulations are applicable to all persons engaged in lead-based paint activities in target housing and child-occupied facilities. These regulations also apply to lead-based paint activities performed on or in other non-residential buildings or structures located on the property of target housing and child-occupied facilities where the lead-based paint activity would pose a health risk to those using the property. Persons who perform lead-based paint activities within residential dwellings that they own and occupy are exempt from the regulations unless the residential dwelling is occupied by a person or persons other than the owner or owner’s immediate family while these activities are being performed, or a child residing in the building has been identified as having an elevated blood lead level as determined by the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
These regulations do not require the performance of lead-based paint activities but establish requirements and procedures to follow when lead-based paint activities are performed. Each department, agency, and instrumentality of the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the Federal Government having jurisdiction over any property or facility, or engaged in any activity resulting, or which may result, in a lead-based paint hazard, and each officer, agent, or employee thereof shall be subject to, and comply with all of the requirements of these regulations regarding lead-based paint, lead-based paint activities and lead-based paint hazards.
These regulations require that owners and occupants of target housing and child-occupied facilities receive information on lead-based paint hazards before renovations begin. The pamphlet, Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers, and Schools, must be distributed.
Compliance with these regulations shall not affect or substitute for compliance with all other applicable laws and regulations of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, the United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and other federal agencies with jurisdiction over issues concerning lead-based paint hazards.
It is the intent of the “Lead-Based Paint Activity Accreditation and Certification Act” that the cost of the administration and enforcement of the act be borne fully by federal grants and fees for accreditation, certification, and abatement projects. Any fee to fund activities shall be set by order of the Commission on Environmental Quality and shall be at levels graduated to reflect the type of certificate and the size of the project, as the case may be. Fees for more than one (1) discipline shall be paid by a separate check or money order for each discipline. All fees shall be submitted to the Commission by check or money order, payable to the Lead-Based Paint Program Operations Funds.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-501, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.2 Definitions
A. “Abatement” means any measure or set of measures designed to permanently eliminate lead-based paint hazards. Abatement includes, but is not limited to:
(1) The removal of lead-based paint and lead-contaminated dust, the permanent enclosure or encapsulation of lead-based paint, the replacement of lead-painted surfaces or fixtures, and the removal or covering of lead-contaminated soil; and
(2) All preparation, cleanup, disposal, and post-abatement clearance testing activities associated with such measures.
(3) Specifically, abatement includes, but is not limited to:
(a) Projects for which there is a written contract or other documentation, which provides that a person will be conducting activities in or to a
residential dwelling or child-occupied facility that will result in the permanent elimination of lead-based paint hazards; or are designed to permanently eliminate lead-based paint hazards as defined in this rule.
(b) Projects resulting in the permanent elimination of lead-based paint hazards, conducted by persons certified in accordance with Rule 9.4, unless such projects are covered by paragraph (3)(d) of this definition;
(c) Projects resulting in the permanent elimination of lead-based paint hazards, conducted by persons who, through their company name or promotional literature, represent, advertise, or hold themselves out to be in the business of performing lead-based paint activities as identified and defined by this rule, unless such projects are covered by paragraph (3)(d) of this definition; or
(d) Projects resulting in the permanent elimination of lead-based paint hazards that are conducted in response to state or local abatement orders.
(4) Abatement does not include renovation, remodeling, painting or repainting, landscaping or other activities, when such activities are not designed to permanently eliminate lead-based paint hazards, but, instead, are designed to repair, restore, or remodel a given structure or dwelling, even though these activities may incidentally result in a reduction or elimination of lead-based paint hazards. Furthermore, abatement does not include interim controls, operations and maintenance activities, or other measures and activities designed to temporarily, but not permanently, reduce lead-based paint hazards.
B. “Accredited training program” means a training program that has been accredited by either: the Commission, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), or an EPA-approved lead-based paint program in a state or tribe with reciprocity agreements with the Commission to provide training for individuals engaged in lead-based paint activities.
C. “Adequate quality control” means a plan or design to ensure the authenticity, integrity, and accuracy of samples, including dust, soil, and paint chip or paint film samples. Adequate quality control also includes provisions for representative sampling.
D. “Administrator” means the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.
E. “Certificate” means a document authorizing a person to perform lead-based paint activities as described in these regulations.
F. “Child-occupied facility”, as the term applies to abatements, means a building or portion of a building constructed prior to 1978, visited regularly by the same child, 6 years of age or under, on at least two different days within any week (Sunday through Saturday period), provided that each day’s visit lasts at least 3 hours and the combined weekly visit
lasts at least 6 hours, and the combined annual visits last at least 60 hours. Child- occupied facilities may include, but are not limited to, day-care centers, preschools and kindergarten classrooms.
G. “Child-occupied facility”, as the term applies to renovations, means a building, or portion of a building, constructed prior to 1978, visited regularly by the same child, under 6 years of age, on at least two different days within any week (Sunday through Saturday period), provided that each day’s visit lasts at least 3 hours and the combined weekly visits last at least 6 hours, and the combined annual visits last at least 60 hours. Child-occupied facilities may include, but are not limited to, day care centers, preschools and kindergarten classrooms. Child-occupied facilities may be located in target housing or in public or commercial buildings. With respect to common areas in public or commercial buildings that contain child-occupied facilities, the child-occupied facility encompasses only those common areas that are routinely used by children under age 6, such as restrooms and cafeterias. Common areas that children under age 6 only pass through, such as hallways, stairways, and garages are not included. In addition, with respect to exteriors of public or commercial buildings that contain child-occupied facilities, the child-occupied facility encompasses only the exterior sides of the building that are immediately adjacent to the child-occupied facility or the common areas routinely used by children under age 6.
H. “Clearance levels” are values that indicate the maximum amount of lead permitted in dust on a surface following completion of an abatement or renovation activity.
I. “Cleaning verification card” means a card developed and distributed, or otherwise approved, by EPA for the purpose of determining, through comparison of wet and dry disposable cleaning cloths with the card, whether post-renovation cleaning has been properly completed.
J. “Commission” means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
K. “Common area” means a portion of a building that is generally accessible to all occupants. Such an area may include, but is not limited to, hallways, stairways, laundry and recreational rooms, playgrounds, community centers, garages, and boundary fences.
L. “Component or building component” means specific design or structural elements or fixtures of a building, residential dwelling, or child-occupied facility that are distinguished from each other by form, function, and location. These include, but are not limited to, interior components such as: ceilings, crown molding, walls, chair rails, doors, door trim, floors, fireplaces, radiators and other heating units, shelves, shelf supports, stair treads, stair risers, stair stringers, newel posts, railing caps, balustrades, windows and trim (including sashes, window heads, jambs, sills or stools and troughs), built in cabinets, columns, beams, bathroom vanities, counter tops, and air conditioners; and exterior components such as: painted roofing, chimneys, flashing, gutters and downspouts, ceilings, soffits, fasciae, rake boards, corner boards, bulkheads, doors and door trim, fences, floors, joists, lattice work, railings and railing caps, siding handrails,
stair risers and treads, stair stringers, columns, balustrades, window sills or stools and troughs, casings, sashes and wells, and air conditioners.
M. “Containment” means a process to protect workers and the environment by controlling exposures to the lead-contaminated dust and debris created during an abatement or renovation. The containment must be constructed such that no dust or debris is permitted to leave the work area.
N. “Course agenda” means an outline of the key topics to be covered during a training course, including the time allotted to teach each topic.
O. “Course test” means an evaluation of the overall effectiveness of the training which shall test the trainee’s knowledge and retention of the topics covered during the course.
P. “Course test blue print” means written documentation identifying the proportion of course test questions devoted to each major topic in the course curriculum.
Q. “Department” means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
R. “Deteriorated paint” means paint that is cracking, flaking, chipping, peeling, or otherwise separating from the substrate of a building component or unit.
S. “Discipline” means one of the specific types or categories of lead-based paint activities identified in this rule for which individuals may receive training from accredited programs and become certified by the Commission. For example, “worker” is a discipline.
T. “Distinct painting history” means the application history, as indicated by its visual appearance or a record of application, over time, of paint or other surface coatings to a component, room, or unit of a building structure.
U. “Documented methodologies” are methods or protocols used to sample for the presence of lead in paint, dust, and soil.
V. “Dry disposable cleaning cloth” means a commercially available dry, electrostatically charged, white disposable cloth designed to be used for cleaning hard surfaces such as uncarpeted floors or counter tops.
W. “Dust sampling technician” means an individual employed to perform dust clearance sampling.
X. “Elevated blood lead level (EBL)” means an excessive absorption of lead as determined by the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Y. “Encapsulant” means a substance that forms a barrier between lead-based paint and the environment using a liquid-applied coating (with or without reinforcement materials) or an adhesively bonded covering material.
Z. “Encapsulation” means the application of an encapsulant.
AA. “Enclosure” means the use of rigid, durable construction materials that are mechanically fastened to the substrate in order to act as a barrier between lead-based paint and the environment.
BB. “EPA” means the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
CC. “Executive Director” means the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
DD. “Firm” means a company, partnership, corporation, sole proprietorship or individual doing business, association, or other business entity that performs or offers to perform lead-based paint activities. This term also includes a Federal, State, Tribal, or local government agency, or a nonprofit organization that performs or offers to perform lead- based paint activities.
EE. “Guest instructor” means an individual designated by the training program manager or principal instructor to provide instruction specific to the lecture, hands-on activities, or work practice components of a course.
FF. “HEPA vacuum” means a vacuum cleaner which has been designed with a high- efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter as the last filtration stage. A HEPA filter is a filter that is capable of capturing particles of 0.3 microns with 99.97% efficiency. The vacuum cleaner must be designed so that all the air drawn into the machine is expelled through the HEPA filter with none of the air leaking past it. HEPA vacuums must be operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions.
GG. “Hands-on skills assessment” means an evaluation which tests the trainees’ ability to satisfactorily perform the work practices and procedures identified in Rule 9.3.D, as well as any other skills taught in a training course.
HH. “Inspection” means a surface-by-surface investigation to determine the presence of lead- based paint and the provision of a report explaining the results of the investigation.
II. “Inspector” means an individual employed to inspect or reinspect for the presence of lead-based paint, to collect samples for the presence of lead in dust and soil for the purposes of abatement and renovation clearance testing and to prepare inspection reports.
JJ. “Interim controls” means a set of measures designed to temporarily reduce human exposure or likely exposure to lead-based paint hazards, including specialized cleaning, repairs, maintenance, painting, temporary containment, ongoing monitoring of lead-based
paint hazards or potential hazards, and the establishment and operation of management and resident education programs.
KK. “Lead-based paint” means paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter or more than 0.5 percent by weight.
LL. “Lead-based paint activities” means, in the case of target housing and child-occupied facilities, inspection, risk assessment, renovation, and abatement, as defined in this rule.
MM. “Lead-based paint hazard” means any condition that causes exposure to lead from lead- contaminated dust, lead-contaminated soil, or lead-contaminated paint that is deteriorated or present in accessible surfaces, friction surfaces, or impact surfaces that would result in adverse human health effects as identified by the Department pursuant to the federal Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) Section 403.
NN. “Lead-contaminated dust” means surface dust in residential dwellings, or child-occupied facilities that contains an area or mass concentration of lead at or in excess of levels identified by the Department pursuant to TSCA Section 403.
OO. “Lead-contaminated soil” means bare soil on residential real property and on the property of a child-occupied facility that contains lead at or in excess of levels identified by the Department pursuant to TSCA Section 403.
PP. “Lead-hazard screen” is a limited risk assessment activity that involves limited paint and dust sampling as described in Rule 9.5.C.
QQ. “Living area”, involving abatement activities, means any area of a residential dwelling used by one or more children age 6 and under, including, but not limited to, living rooms, kitchen areas, dens, play rooms, and children’s bedrooms
RR. “Living area”, in the case of renovations, means any area of a residential dwelling used by one or more children age 5 or under, including, but not limited to, living rooms, kitchen areas, dens, play rooms, and children’s bedrooms.
SS. “Minor repair and maintenance activities” are activities including minor heating, ventilation or air conditioning work, electrical work, and plumbing, that disrupts 6 square feet or less of painted surface per room for interior activities or 20 square feet or less of painted surface for exterior activities where none of the work practices prohibited or restricted by paragraph F.(2)(a)(3) of Rule 9.5 are used and where the work does not involve window replacement or demolition of painted surface areas. When removing painted components, or portions of painted components, the entire surface area removed is the amount of painted surface disturbed. Jobs, other than emergency renovations, performed in the same room within the same 30 days must be considered the same job for the purpose of determining whether the job is a minor repair and maintenance activity.
TT. “Multi-family dwelling” means a structure that contains more than one separate residential dwelling unit, which is used or occupied, or intended to be used or occupied, in whole or in part, as the home or residence of one or more persons.
UU. “Paint in poor condition” means more than 10 square feet of deteriorated paint on exterior components with large surface areas; or more than 2 square feet of deteriorated paint on interior components with large surface areas (e.g., walls, ceilings, floors, doors); or more than 10 percent of the total surface area of the component is deteriorated on interior or exterior components with small surface areas (window sills, baseboards, soffits, trim).
VV. “Painted surface” means a component surface covered in whole or in part with paint or other surface coatings.
WW. “Pamphlet” means the EPA pamphlet titled Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers and Schools developed under Section 406(a) of TSCA for use in complying with Section 406(b) of TSCA, or any State or Tribal pamphlet approved by EPA pursuant to 40 CFR 745.326 that is developed for the same purpose. This includes reproductions of the pamphlet when copied in full and without revision or deletion of material from the pamphlet (except for the addition or revision of state or local sources of information). Before December 7, 2008, the term “pamphlet” also meant any pamphlet developed by EPA under Section 406(a) of TSCA or any State or Tribal pamphlet approved by EPA pursuant to 40 CFR 745.326.
XX. “Permanently covered soil” means soil which has been separated from human contact by the placement of a barrier consisting of solid, relatively impermeable materials, such as pavement or concrete. Grass, mulch, and other landscaping materials are not considered permanent covering.
YY. “Person” means any natural or judicial person including any individual corporation, partnership, or association; any Indian Tribe, State, or political subdivision thereof; any interstate body; and any department, agency, or instrumentality of the Federal Government.
ZZ. “Principal instructor” means the individual who has the primary responsibility for organizing and teaching a particular course.
AAA. “Project designer” means an individual employed to prepare abatement project designs, occupant protection plans and abatement project reports.
BBB. “Recognized laboratory” means an environmental laboratory recognized by EPA pursuant to TSCA Section 405(b) as being capable of performing an analysis for lead compounds in paint, soil, and dust.
CCC. “Recognized test kit” means a commercially available kit recognized by EPA under 40 CFR 745.88 as being capable of allowing a user to determine the presence of lead at
levels equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter, or more than 0.5% lead by weight, in a paint chip, paint powder or painted surface.
DDD. “Reduction” means measures designed to reduce or eliminate human exposure to lead- based paint hazards through methods including interim controls, and abatement.
EEE. “Renovation” means the modification of any existing structure, or portion thereof, that results in the disturbance of painted surfaces, unless that activity is performed as part of an abatement as defined by this regulation. The term renovation includes (but is not limited to): The removal, modification, or repair of painted surfaces or painted components (e.g., modification of painted doors, surface restoration, window repair, surface preparation activity (such as sanding, scraping, or other such activities that may generate paint dust)); the removal of building components (e.g., walls, ceilings, plumbing, windows); weatherization projects (e.g., cutting holes in painted surfaces to install blown-in insulation or to gain access to attics, planing thresholds to install weather-stripping) and interim controls that disturb painted surfaces. A renovation performed for the purpose of converting a building, or part or a building, into target housing or a child-occupied facility is a renovation under this rule. The term renovation does not include minor repair and maintenance activities.
FFF. “Renovator” means an individual who either performs or directs workers who perform renovations. A certified renovator is a renovator who has successfully completed a renovator course accredited by EPA or an EPA-authorized State or Tribal program and has been certified to perform renovations in the State of Mississippi.
GGG. “Residential dwelling” means (1) a detached single family dwelling unit, including attached structures such as porches and stoops; or (2) a single family dwelling unit in a structure that contains more than one separate residential dwelling unit, which is used or occupied, or intended to be used or occupied, in whole or in part, as the home or residence of one or more persons.
HHH. “Risk assessment” means (1) an on-site investigation to determine the existence, nature, severity, and location of lead-based paint hazards, and (2) the provision of a report by the person conducting the risk assessment, explaining the results of the investigation and options for reducing lead-based paint hazards.
III. “Risk assessor” means an individual employed to conduct risk assessments and lead hazard screens, to prepare inspection reports and to collect samples for the presence of lead in dust and soil for the purposes of abatement and renovation clearance testing.
JJJ. “Room” means an enclosed or semi-enclosed living space within a residential dwelling or a child-occupied facility.
KKK. “Supervisor” means an individual designated by a contractor or certified firm to be responsible for the direction and conduct of lead-based paint abatement activities and to prepare occupant protection plans and abatement reports.
LLL. “Target housing”, as the term applies to abatement activities, means any housing constructed prior to 1978, except housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities (unless any one or more children age 6 years or under resides or is expected to reside in such housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities) or any zero-bedroom dwelling.
MMM. “Target housing” as the term applies to renovations, means any housing constructed before 1978, except housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities (unless any one or more children under the age of 6 years resides or is expected to reside in that housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities) or any zero-bedroom dwelling.
NNN. “Training curriculum” means an established set of course topics for instruction in an accredited training program for a particular discipline designed to provide specialized knowledge and skills.
OOO. “Training hour” means at least 50 minutes of actual learning, including, but not limited to time devoted to lecture, learning activities, small group activities, demonstrations, evaluations, and/or hands-on experience.
PPP. “Training manager” means the individual responsible for administering a training program and monitoring the performance of principal instructors and guest instructors.
QQQ. “Vertical containment” means a vertical barrier consisting of plastic sheeting or other impermeable material over scaffolding or a rigid frame, or an equivalent system of containing the work area. Vertical containment is required for some exterior renovations but it may be used on any renovation.
RRR. “Visual inspection for clearance testing” means the visual examination of a residential dwelling or a child-occupied facility following an abatement or renovation to determine whether or not the abatement or renovation has been successfully completed.
SSS. “Visual inspection for risk assessment” means the visual examination of a residential dwelling or a child-occupied facility to determine the existence of deteriorated lead-based paint or other potential sources of lead-based paint hazards.
TTT. “Wet disposable cleaning cloth” means a commercially available, pre-moistened, white disposable cloth designed to be used for cleaning hard surfaces such as uncarpeted floors or counter tops.
UUU. “Wet mopping system” means a device with the following characteristics: A long handle, a mop head designed to be used with disposable absorbent cleaning pads, a reservoir for cleaning solution, and a built-in mechanism for distributing or spraying the cleaning solution onto a floor, or a method of equivalent efficacy.
VVV. “Work area” means the area that the certified renovator establishes to contain the dust and debris generated by a renovation.
WWW.“Worker”, as the term applies to abatements, means an individual certified as a worker to work on abatement projects.
XXX. “Worker”, as the term applies to renovations, means an individual trained by a certified renovator to work on a renovation project.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-501, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.3 Accreditation of Training Programs
A. Scope.
(1) A training program may seek accreditation to offer lead-based paint activities courses in any of the following disciplines: inspector, risk assessor, supervisor, project designer, renovator, dust sampling technician, and abatement worker. A training program may also seek accreditation to offer refresher courses for each of the above listed disciplines.
(2) A training program shall not provide, offer, or claim to provide Commission accredited lead-based paint inspector, risk assessor, supervisor, project designer or abatement worker courses without applying for and receiving accreditation from the Commission as required under paragraph B. of this rule on or after August 31, 1998. A training program shall not provide, offer or claim to provide Commission accredited lead-based paint renovator or dust sampling technician courses without applying for and receiving accreditation from the Commission as required under paragraph B. of this rule on or after December 10, 2009.
B. Application Process. The following are procedures a training program shall follow to receive Commission accreditation to offer lead-based paint activities courses:
(1) A training program seeking accreditation shall submit the required accreditation fee along with the completed form prescribed by the Commission containing the following information:
(a) The training program’s name, address, and telephone number.
(b) A list of courses for which it is applying for accreditation. For the purpose of this rule, courses taught in different languages and electronic learning courses are considered different courses, and each must independently meet the accreditation requirements.
(c) A statement signed by the training program manager certifying that the training program meets the requirements established in paragraph C. of this rule. If a training program uses EPA-developed model training materials, or training materials approved by a State or Indian Tribe that
has been authorized by EPA, the training program manager shall include a statement certifying that, as well.
(d) A copy of the student and instructor manuals, or other materials to be used for each course.
(e) A copy of the course agenda for each course, including the time allotted to teaching each course topic.
(f) A copy of the course examination with the correct answers marked for each question.
(g) All training programs shall include in their application for accreditation the following:
(1) A description of the facilities and equipment to be used for lecture and hands-on training.
(2) A copy of the course test blueprint for each course.
(3) A description of the activities and procedures that will be used for conducting the assessment of hands-on skills for each course.
(4) A copy of the quality control plan for each course as described in paragraph C.(9) of this rule.
(5) A list of learning objectives for each lecture, exercise, and hands- on activity.
(6) Name and documentation of qualifications of the training manager and principal instructors.
(2) If a training program meets the requirements in paragraph C. of this rule, then the Commission shall approve the application for accreditation no more than 180 days after receiving a complete application from the training program contingent upon a satisfactory on-site course audit by the Department. In the case of approval, a certificate of accreditation shall be sent to the applicant. In the case of disapproval, a letter describing the reasons for disapproval shall be sent to the applicant. Prior to disapproval, the Department may, at its discretion, work with the applicant to address inadequacies in the application for accreditation. The Department may also request additional materials retained by the training program, under paragraph I. of this rule. If a training program’s application is disapproved, the program may reapply for accreditation at any time.
(3) A training program may apply for accreditation to offer courses or refresher courses in as many disciplines as it chooses. A training program may seek
accreditation for additional courses at any time as long as the program can demonstrate that it meets the requirements of this rule.
(4) For the purposes of this rule, courses taught in different languages, and electronic learning courses are considered different courses and each must independently meet the accreditation requirements.
(5) When applying for accreditation of a course in a language other than English, a signed statement from a qualified, independent translator that they had compared the course to the English language version and found the translation to be accurate.
C. Requirements for the Accreditation of Training Programs. For a training program to obtain accreditation from the Commission to offer lead-based paint activities courses, the program shall meet the following requirements for each discipline for which the program is seeking accreditation:
(1) The training program shall employ a training manager who has:
(a) At least 2 years of experience, education, or training in teaching adults; or
(b) A bachelor’s or graduate degree in building construction technology, engineering, industrial hygiene, safety, public health, education, business administration or program management or a related field; or
(c) Two years of experience in managing a training program specializing in environmental hazards; and
(d) Demonstrated 2 years of experience, education, or training in the construction industry including: lead or asbestos abatement, painting, carpentry, renovation, remodeling, occupational safety and health or industrial hygiene.
(2) The training manager shall designate a qualified principal instructor for each course who has:
(a) Demonstrated experience, education, or training in teaching workers or adults; and
(b) Successfully completed the initial and prerequisite training course requirements of the EPA-accredited or EPA-authorized State or Tribal- accredited training course to be taught; and
(c) Demonstrated experience, education, or training in lead or asbestos abatement, painting, carpentry, remodeling, occupational safety and health, or industrial hygiene.
(3) The principal instructor shall be responsible for the organization of the course, course delivery, and oversight of the teaching of all course material. The training manager may designate guest instructors as needed for a portion of the course to provide instruction specific to the lecture, hands-on activities, or work practice components of a course. However, the principal instructor is primarily responsible for teaching the course materials and must be present to provide instruction (or oversight of portions of the course taught by guest instructors) for the course for which he/she has been designated the principal instructor.
(4) The following documents shall be recognized by the Commission as evidence that training managers and principal instructors have the education, work experience, training requirements or demonstrated experience, specifically listed in paragraphs C.(1) and C.(2) of this rule. This documentation must be submitted with the accreditation application and retained by the training program as required by the recordkeeping requirements contained in paragraph I. of this rule. Those documents include the following:
(a) Official academic transcripts or diploma as evidence of meeting the education requirements.
(b) Resumes, letters of reference, or documentation of work experience as evidence of meeting the work experience requirements.
(c) Certificates from the train-the-trainer courses and lead-specific training courses, as evidence of meeting the training requirements.
(5) The training program shall ensure the availability of, and provide adequate facilities for, the delivery of the lecture, course test, hands-on training, and assessment activities. This includes providing training equipment that reflects current work practices and maintaining or updating the equipment and facilities as needed.
(6) To become accredited in the following disciplines, the training program shall provide training courses that meet the following training requirements:
(a) The inspector course shall last a minimum of 24 training hours, with a minimum of 8 hours devoted to hands-on training activities. The minimum curriculum requirements for the inspector course are contained in paragraph D.(1) of this rule.
(b) The risk assessor course shall last a minimum of 16 training hours, with a minimum of 4 hours devoted to hands-on training activities. The minimum curriculum requirements for the risk assessor course are contained in paragraph D.(2) of this rule.
(c) The supervisor course shall last a minimum of 32 training hours, with a minimum of 8 hours devoted to hands-on activities. The minimum curriculum requirements for the supervisor course are contained in paragraph D.(3) of this rule.
(d) The project designer course shall last a minimum of 8 training hours. The minimum curriculum requirements for the project designer course are contained in paragraph D.(4) of this rule.
(e) The abatement worker course shall last a minimum of 16 training hours, with a minimum of 8 hours devoted to hands-on training activities. The minimum curriculum requirements for the abatement worker course are contained in paragraph D.(5) of this rule.
(f) The renovator course must last a minimum of 8 training hours, with a minimum of 2 hours devoted to hands-on training activities. The minimum curriculum requirements for the renovator course are contained in paragraph D.(6) of this rule.
(g) The dust sampling technician course must last a minimum of 8 training hours, with a minimum of 2 hours devoted to hands-on training activities. The minimum curriculum requirements for the dust sampling technician course are contained in paragraph D.(7) of this rule.
(h) Electronic learning and other alternative course delivery methods are permitted for the classroom portion of renovator, dust sampling technician, or lead-based paint activities courses but not the hands-on portion of these courses, or for final course tests.
(7) For each course offered, the training program shall conduct a course test at the completion of the course, and if applicable, a hands-on skills assessment. Each student must successfully complete the hands-on skills assessment and receive a passing score on the course test to pass any course.
(a) The training manager is responsible for maintaining the validity and integrity of the hands-on skills assessment to ensure that it accurately evaluates the trainees’ performance of the work practices and procedures associated with the course topics contained in paragraph D. of this rule.
(b) The training manager is responsible for maintaining the validity and integrity of the course test to ensure that it accurately evaluates the trainees’ knowledge and retention of the course topics.
(c) The course test shall be developed in accordance with the test blueprint submitted with the training accreditation application.
(8) The training program shall issue unique course completion certificates to each individual who passes the training course. The course completion certificate shall include:
(a) The name, a unique identification number, and address of the individual.
(b) The name of the particular course that the individual completed.
(c) Dates of course completion/test passage.
(d) The name, address, and telephone number of the training program.
(e) The printed name of the training manager, printed name of the principal instructor, and the signature of either the training manager or the principal instructor.
(f) The language in which the course was taught.
(g) For renovator and dust sampling technician course completion certificates, a photograph of the individual. The photograph must be an accurate and recognizable image of the individual. As reproduced on the certificate, the photograph must not be smaller than 1 inch square.
(9) The training manager shall develop and implement a quality control plan. The plan shall be used to maintain and improve the quality of the training program over time. This plan shall contain at least the following elements:
(a) Procedures for periodic revision of training materials and the course test to reflect innovations in the field.
(b) Procedures for the training manager’s annual review of principal instructor competency.
(10) Courses offered by the training program must teach the work practice standards for conducting lead-based paint activities contained in rule 9.5. These standards must be taught in the appropriate courses to provide trainees with the knowledge needed to perform the lead-based paint activities they will be responsible for conducting.
(11) The training manager shall be responsible for ensuring that the training program complies at all times with all of the requirements in this rule.
(12) The training manager shall allow the Department to audit the training program to verify the contents of the application for accreditation as described in paragraph B. of this rule and to assure compliance with all requirements of the regulations regarding training.
D. Minimum Training Curriculum Requirements. To become accredited to offer lead-based paint courses in the specific disciplines listed below, training programs must ensure that their courses of study include, at a minimum, the following course topics.
(1) Inspector. Requirements (d), (e), (f), and (g) require hands-on activities as an integral component of the course.
(a) Role and responsibilities of an inspector.
(b) Background information on lead and its adverse health effects.
(c) Background information on Federal, State, and local regulations and guidance that pertains to lead-based paint and lead-based paint activities.
(d) Lead-based paint inspection methods, including selection of rooms and components for sampling or testing.
(e) Paint, dust, and soil sampling methodologies.
(f) Clearance standards and testing, including random sampling.
(g) Preparation of the final inspection report.
(h) Recordkeeping.
(2) Risk Assessor. Requirements (d), (f), and (g) require hands-on activities as an integral component of the course.
(a) Role and responsibilities of a risk assessor.
(b) Collection of background information to perform a risk assessment.
(c) Sources of environmental lead contamination such as paint, surface dust and soil, water, air, packaging, and food.
(d) Visual inspection for the purposes of identifying potential sources of lead- based paint hazards.
(e) Lead hazard screen protocol.
(f) Sampling for other sources of lead exposure.
(g) Interpretation of lead-based paint and other lead sampling results, including all applicable State or Federal guidance or regulations pertaining to lead-based paint hazards.
(h) Development of hazard control options, the role of interim controls, and operations and maintenance activities to reduce lead-based paint hazards.
(i) Preparation of a final risk assessment report.
(3) Supervisor. Requirements (e), (g), (h), (i), and (j) require hands-on activities as an integral component of the course.
(a) Role and responsibilities of a supervisor.
(b) Background information on lead and its adverse health effects.
(c) Background information on Federal, State, and local regulations and guidance that pertain to lead-based paint abatement.
(d) Liability and insurance issues related to lead-based paint abatement.
(e) Risk assessment and inspection report interpretation.
(f) Development and implementation of an occupant protection plan and abatement report.
(g) Lead-based paint hazard recognition and control.
(h) Lead-based paint abatement and lead-based paint hazard reduction methods, including restricted practices.
(i) Interior dust abatement/cleanup or lead-based paint hazard control and reduction methods.
(j) Soil and exterior dust abatement or lead-based paint hazard control and reduction methods.
(k) Clearance standards and testing.
(l) Cleanup and waste disposal.
(m) Recordkeeping.
(4) Project Designer
(a) Role and responsibilities of a project designer.
(b) Development and implementation of an occupant protection plan for large scale abatement projects.
(c) Lead-based paint abatement and lead-based paint hazard reduction methods, including restricted practices for large-scale abatement projects.
(d) Interior dust abatement/cleanup or lead hazard control and reduction methods for large-scale abatement projects.
(e) Clearance standards and testing for large scale abatement projects.
(f) Integration of lead-based paint abatement methods with modernization and rehabilitation projects for large scale abatement projects.
(5) Abatement Worker. Requirements (d), (e), (f), and (g) require hands-on activities as an integral component of the course.
(a) Role and responsibilities of an abatement worker.
(b) Background information on lead and its adverse health effects.
(c) Background information on Federal, State, and local regulations and guidance that pertain to lead-based paint abatement.
(d) Lead-based paint hazard recognition and control.
(e) Lead-based paint abatement and lead-based paint hazard reduction methods, including restricted practices.
(f) Interior dust abatement methods/cleanup or lead-based paint hazard reduction.
(g) Soil and exterior dust abatement methods or lead-based paint hazard reduction.
(6) Renovator. Requirements (d), (e), (f), and (g) and (h) require hands-on activities as an integral component of the course.
(a) Role and responsibilities of a renovator.
(b) Background information on lead and its adverse health effects.
(c) Background information on EPA, HUD, OSHA, and other Federal, State, and local regulations and guidance that pertains to lead-based paint and renovation activities.
(d) Procedures for using acceptable test kits to determine whether paint is lead-based paint.
(e) Procedures for collecting a paint chip sample and sending it to a laboratory recognized by EPA under Section 405(b) of TSCA.
(f) Renovation methods to minimize the creation of dust and lead-based paint hazards.
(g) Interior and exterior containment and cleanup methods.
(h) Methods to ensure that the renovation has been properly completed, including cleaning verification, and clearance testing.
(i) Waste handling and disposal.
(j) Providing on-the-job training to other workers.
(k) Record preparation.
(7) Dust sampling technician. Requirements (d) and (f) requires hands-on activities as an integral component of the course.
(a) Role and responsibilities of a dust sampling technician.
(b) Background information on lead and its adverse health effects.
(c) Background information on Federal, State, and local regulations and guidance that pertains to lead-based paint and renovation activities.
(d) Dust sampling methodologies.
(e) Clearance standards and testing.
(f) Report preparation.
E. Requirements for the Accreditation of Refresher Training Programs. A training program may seek accreditation to offer refresher courses in any of the following disciplines: inspector, risk assessor, supervisor, project designer, renovator, dust sampling technician, and abatement worker. To obtain Commission accreditation to offer refresher training, a training program must meet the following minimum requirements:
(1) Each refresher course shall review the curriculum topics of the full-length courses listed under paragraph D. of this rule, as appropriate. In addition, to become accredited to offer refresher training courses, training programs shall ensure that their courses of study include, at a minimum, the following:
(a) An overview of current safety practices relating to lead-based paint in general, as well as specific information pertaining to the appropriate discipline.
(b) Current laws and regulations relating to lead-based paint in general, as well as specific information pertaining to the appropriate discipline.
(c) Current technologies relating to lead-based paint in general, as well as specific information pertaining to the appropriate discipline.
(2) Refresher courses for inspector, risk assessor, supervisor, and abatement worker must last a minimum of 8 training hours. Refresher courses for project designer, renovator, and dust sampling technician must last a minimum of 4 training hours.
(3) For all other courses offered except for project designer, the training program must conduct a hands-on assessment and must conduct a course test at the completion of the course.
(4) A training program may apply for accreditation of a refresher course concurrently with its application for accreditation of the corresponding training course as described in paragraph B. of this rule. If so, the Commission shall use the approval procedure described in paragraph B. of this rule. In addition, the minimum requirements contained in paragraphs C.(1) through C.(5) and C.(7) through C.(12) and E.(1) through E.(3) of this rule shall also apply.
(5) A training program seeking accreditation to offer refresher training courses only shall submit a completed application on forms provided by the Commission containing the following information:
(a) The refresher training program’s name, address, and telephone number.
(b) A list of courses for which it is applying for accreditation.
(c) The name and documentation of the qualifications of the training program manager and principal instructor.
(d) A statement signed by the training program manager certifying that the refresher training program meets the minimum requirements established in paragraph C. of this rule, except for the requirements in paragraph C.(6) of this rule. If a training program uses EPA-developed model training materials, or training materials approved by a State or Indian Tribe that has been authorized by EPA to develop its refresher training course materials, the training manager shall include a statement certifying that, as well.
(e) A copy of the student and instructor manuals to be used for each course.
(f) A copy of the course agenda for each course.
(g) A copy of the course examination with the correct answers marked for each question.
(h) All refresher training programs shall include in their application for accreditation the following:
(1) A description of the facilities and equipment to be used for lecture and hands-on training.
(2) A copy of the course test blueprint for each course.
(3) A description of the activities and procedures that will be used for conducting the assessment of hands-on skills for each course (if applicable).
(4) A copy of the quality control plan as described in paragraph C.(9) of this rule.
(5) A list of learning objectives for each lecture, exercise, and hands- on activity.
(i) The requirements in paragraphs C.(1) through C.(5) and C.(7) through C.(12) of this rule apply to refresher training providers.
(j) If a refresher training program meets the requirements listed in this paragraph and has paid the required fee, then the Commission shall approve the application for accreditation no more than 180 days after receiving a complete application from the refresher training program contingent upon a satisfactory on-site course audit by the Department. In the case of approval, a certificate of accreditation shall be sent to the applicant. In the case of disapproval, a letter describing the reasons for disapproval shall be sent to the applicant. Prior to disapproval, the Commission may, at its discretion, work with the applicant to address inadequacies in the application for accreditation. The Commission may also request additional materials retained by the refresher training program under paragraph I. of this rule. If a refresher training program’s application is disapproved, the program may reapply for accreditation at any time.
F. Re-accreditation of Training Programs.
(1) Unless re-accredited, a training program’s accreditation (including refresher training accreditation) shall expire 4 years after the date of issuance. If a training
program meets the requirements of this rule, the training program shall be re- accredited.
(2) A training program seeking re-accreditation shall submit an application to the Commission no later than 180 days before its accreditation expires. If a training program does not submit its application for re-accreditation by that date, the Commission cannot guarantee that the program will be re-accredited before the end of the accreditation period.
(3) The training program’s application for re-accreditation shall contain:
(a) The training program’s name, address, and telephone number.
(b) A list of courses for which it is applying for re-accreditation.
(c) The name and qualifications of the training program manager.
(d) The name(s) and qualification of the principal instructor(s).
(e) A description of any changes to the training facility, equipment, or course materials since the last application was approved.
(f) A statement signed by the program manager stating:
(1) That the training program complies at all times with all requirements in paragraphs C. and E. of this rule, as applicable; and
(2) The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in paragraph I. of this rule shall be followed.
(g) Payment of appropriate fees.
(4) Upon request, the training program shall allow the Department to audit the training program to verify the contents of the application for re-accreditation as described in paragraph F.(3) of this rule and to assure compliance with all requirements of the regulations regarding training.
G. Suspension, Revocation, and Modification of Accredited Training Programs.
(1) The Commission may, after notice and an opportunity for hearing, suspend, revoke, or modify training program accreditation (including refresher training accreditation) if a training program, training manager, or other person with supervisory authority over the training program has:
(a) Misrepresented the contents of a training course to the Commission and/or the student population.
(b) Failed to submit required information or notifications in a timely manner.
(c) Failed to maintain required records.
(d) Falsified accreditation records, instructor qualifications, or other accreditation-related information or documentation.
(e) Failed to comply with the training standards and requirements in this rule.
(f) Failed to comply with Federal, State, or local lead-based paint statutes or regulations.
(g) Made false or misleading statements to the Commission in its application for accreditation or re-accreditation which the Commission relied upon in approving the application.
H. Procedures for Suspension, Revocation or Modification of Training Program Accreditation.
(1) Prior to taking action to suspend, revoke, or modify the accreditation of a training program, the Commission shall notify the affected entity in writing of the following:
(a) The legal and factual basis for the suspension, revocation, or modification.
(b) The anticipated commencement date and duration of the suspension, revocation, or modification.
(c) Actions, if any, which the affected entity may take to avoid suspension, revocation, or modification, or to receive accreditation in the future.
(d) The opportunity and method for requesting a hearing prior to final Commission action to suspend, revoke or modify accreditation.
(e) Any additional information, as appropriate, which the Commission may provide.
(2) If a hearing is requested by the accredited training program, all proceedings and hearings before the Commission shall be conducted in accordance with Sections 49-17-31 through 49-17-41, Mississippi Code of 1972.
I. Training Program Recordkeeping Requirements.
(1) Accredited training programs shall maintain, and make available to the Commission or the Department upon request, the following records:
(a) All documents specified in paragraphs C.(4), E.(5), and F.(3) of this rule that demonstrate the qualifications listed in paragraphs C.(1) and C.(2) of this rule of the training manager and principal instructors.
(b) Current curriculum/course materials and documents reflecting any changes made to these materials.
(c) The course test blueprint.
(d) Information regarding how the hands-on assessment is conducted including, but not limited to:
(1) Who conducts the assessment.
(2) How the skills are graded.
(3) What facilities are used.
(4) The pass/fail rate.
(e) The quality control plan as described in paragraph C.(9) of this rule.
(f) Results of the student’s hands-on skills assessments and course tests, and a record of each student’s course completion certificate.
(g) Any other material not listed above in paragraphs I.(1)(a) through I.(1)(f) of this rule that was submitted to the Commission as part of the program’s application for accreditation.
(h) For renovator refresher and dust sampling technician refresher courses, a copy of each trainee’s prior course completion certificate showing that each trainee was eligible to take the refresher course.
(i) For course modules delivered in an electronic format, a record of each student’s log-ins, launches, progress, and completion, and a copy of the electronic learning completion certificate for each student.
(2) The training program shall retain these records at the address specified on the training program accreditation application (or as modified in accordance with paragraph I.(3) of this rule) for a minimum of 5 years and 6 months.
(3) The training program shall notify the Commission in writing within 30 days of changing the address specified on its training program accreditation application or transferring the records from that address.
J. Amendment of Accreditation.
(1) A training program must amend its accreditation application within 90 days of the date that a change occurs to the information that was submitted in the program’s most recent application. If the training program fails to amend its accreditation application within 90 days of the date the change occurs, the program may not provide lead-based paint activities training until its accreditation application is amended.
(2) The training program must specify in their amended application what changes have occurred to the information that was submitted in their most recent accreditation or re-accreditation application.
(3) If the amendment includes a new training program manager or any new or additional principal instructor(s), the training provider is not permitted to provide training under the new training manager or offer courses taught by any new principal instructor(s) until the Department approves the amendment.
K. Training Course Notification.
(1) Not less than ten (10) days prior to the first day of an anticipated training course, training course providers must provide written notification to the Department, on forms developed by the Department, of the following: (a) Notification type (original, update, cancellation);
(b) The course discipline; and type (initial/refresher);
(c) Training program name, address, and telephone number;
(d) Date and time of the training course;
(e) Exact location of the site of the training course (if the location is different from the principal location of the training provider, a vicinity map, sketch or detailed written directions showing the training site location shall be included in the notification, unless a vicinity map has previously been submitted for the specific location);
(f) Information about the language to be used in the training course;
(g) The name of the principal instructor; and
(h) A copy of the training course agenda. If the agenda is identical to an agenda which has previously been submitted, an additional copy of the agenda is not required with the notification.
(2) Failure to provide re-notification of changes in the time or location of the training course or any other information listed on the original notification within two (2) working days prior to the first day of the pending training course may lead to rejection of any certificate of training issued by the training provider in support of individual accreditation in Mississippi.
(3) Within seven (7) calendar days after completion of a training course, the training course provider must provide the Department with a written roster containing the following:
(a) The name of the course indicating the discipline and whether the course is an initial or refresher training course;
(b) The names of all course applicants;
(c) For each participant, whether the participant passed or failed the examination;
(d) The date, time and location of the training course;
(e) For each participant, the training certificate number;
(f) The name of the principal instructor;
(g) The name, address and phone number of the training provider; and
(h) For renovator or dust sampling technician courses only, a digital photograph of each participant.
(4) Failure to submit a roster may result in the rejection of any certificate of training submitted to the Department in support of an application for accreditation.
L. Non-English Language Courses. The following shall apply to all courses taught in non- English languages:
(1) Training courses shall be taught in the language in which all participating students are fluent;
(2) Written materials, including examinations, must be correctly translated into the language in which all participating students are fluent; and
(3) Interpreters may not be used to teach or instruct training courses.
M. Type and Duration of Certificates
Unless the Commission revokes or suspends a certificate, an initial certification of training providers shall be valid for one year. Training providers may obtain a renewal of their certificates annually. To maintain certification, training providers must be reaccredited every four (4) years.
N. Reciprocity
Any training provider which has been issued a certificate of accreditation in another state or a tribe which has certification, educational, and experience requirements equal to or greater than those of this State, and which grants equal accreditation privileges to training providers accredited in this State, may be issued an equivalent accreditation in this State upon terms and conditions determined by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-501, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.4 Rule 9.4
Certification of Individuals and Firms Engaged in Lead-Based Paint Activities: Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities.
A. Certification of Individuals.
(1) Individuals seeking certification by the Commission to engage in lead-based paint activities must either:
(a) Submit to the Commission an application demonstrating that they meet the requirements established in paragraphs B. thru H. of this Rule for the particular discipline for which certification is sought; or
(b) Submit to the Commission an application with a copy of a valid lead- based paint activities certification from a State or Tribal program that has been authorized by EPA and has established accreditation and certification reciprocity agreements with the State of Mississippi covering the certification being requested.
(2) Following the submission of an application provided by the Department demonstrating that all the requirements of this rule have been met, and the required fee, the Commission shall certify an applicant as an inspector, risk assessor, supervisor, project designer, renovator, dust sampling technician, or abatement worker, as appropriate.
(3) Upon receiving certification by the Commission, individuals conducting lead- based paint activities shall comply with the work practice standards for performing the appropriate lead-based paint activities as established in Rule 9.5.
(4) Individuals receiving certification by the Commission must have their current Mississippi certification certificate with them at the work site.
(5) Beginning on the date of adoption, it shall be a violation of these regulations for an individual to conduct any of the lead-based paint activities described in Rule 9.5 if that individual has not been certified by the Commission pursuant to this rule to do so.
B. Inspector.
(1) To become certified as an inspector, an individual must:
(a) Have a high school diploma or its equivalent;
(b) Successfully complete an accredited training program for lead-based paint inspectors;
(c) Pass the EPA approved inspector certification exam offered by the Commission; and
(d) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the applicant is familiar with and capable of complying with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations.
(e) The inspector certification exam must be passed with a minimum score of 70% within six (6) months of receiving the course completion certificate. During this six (6) months, the certification exam can be taken no more than three (3) times. If an individual does not pass the certification exam and receive a certificate within the six (6) month period after receiving their course completion certificate, the individual must retake the course from an accredited training program before reapplying for certification from the Commission.
C. Risk Assessor.
(1) To become certified as a risk assessor an individual must:
(a) (1) Be a registered professional engineer or a licensed architect; or
(2) Have a bachelor’s degree in a profession related to engineering, health or environmental science and one (1) year of experience in a related field, as determined by the Commission (e.g., lead, asbestos, or environmental remediation work); or
(3) Have an associate’s degree and two (2) years of experience in a related field, as determined by the Commission (e.g., lead, asbestos, or environmental remediation work); or
(4) Have a high school diploma or equivalent and three (3) years of experience in a related field, as determined by the Commission (e.g., lead, asbestos, or environmental remediation work);
(b) Successfully complete an accredited training program for lead-based paint risk assessors and lead-based paint inspectors;
(c) Pass the EPA approved risk assessor certification exam offered by the Commission;
(d) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the applicant is familiar with and capable of complying with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations; and
(e) The risk assessor certification exam must be passed with a minimum score of 70% within six (6) months of receiving the course completion certificate. During this six (6) months, the certification exam can be taken no more than three (3) times. If an individual does not pass the certification exam and receive a certificate within the six (6) month period after receiving their course completion certificate, the individual must retake the course from an accredited training program before reapplying for certification from the Commission.
D. Supervisor.
(1) To become certified as a supervisor, an individual must:
(a) Have a high school diploma or its equivalent and one (1) year of experience as a certified lead-based paint abatement worker or two (2) years of experience in a related field, as determined by the Commission (e.g., lead, asbestos, or environmental remediation work) or in the building trades;
(b) Successfully complete an accredited training program for lead-based paint supervisors;
(c) Pass the EPA approved supervisor certification exam offered by the Commission; and
(d) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the applicant is familiar with and capable of complying with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations;
(e) The supervisor certification exam must be passed with a minimum score of 70% within six (6) months of receiving the course completion certificate. During this six (6) months, the certification exam can be taken no more than three (3) times. If an individual does not pass the certification exam and receive a certificate within the six (6) month period after receiving their course completion certificate, the individual must retake the course from an accredited training program before reapplying for certification from the Commission.
E. Project Designer.
(1) To become certified as a project designer an individual must:
(a) (1) Be a registered professional engineer or a licensed architect; or
(2) Have a bachelor’s degree in engineering, architecture or a profession related to engineering or architecture and one (1) year of experience in building design or a related field, as determined by the Commission; or
(3) Have an associate’s degree and two (2) years of experience in building design or a related field, as determined by the Commission; or
(4) Have a high school diploma or equivalent and three (3) years of experience in building design or a related field, as determined by the Commission.
(b) Successfully complete an accredited training program for lead-based paint project designers and lead-based paint supervisors; and
(c) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the applicant is familiar with and capable of complying with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations.
F. Worker.
(1) To become certified as an abatement worker an individual must:
(a) Successfully complete an accredited training program for lead-based paint abatement workers; and
(b) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the applicant is familiar with and capable of complying with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations.
(2) An individual working on renovation projects as a worker does not have to be certified but must be trained by a certified renovator to perform the required renovation work duties.
G. Renovator.
(1) To become certified as a renovator, an individual must:
(a) Have a high school diploma or its equivalent and one (1) year of experience as a certified lead-based paint abatement worker or two (2) years of experience in a related field, as determined by the Commission (e.g., lead, asbestos, or environmental remediation work) or in the building trades;
(b) Successfully complete an accredited training program for lead-based paint renovators;
(c) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the applicant is familiar with and capable of complying with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations;
(d) Individuals who have successfully completed an accredited abatement worker or supervisor course, or individuals who successfully completed an EPA, HUD, or EPA/HUD model renovation training course before October 4, 2011 may take an accredited refresher renovator training course in lieu of the initial renovator training course to become a certified renovator.
(2) Renovator responsibilities. Certified renovators are responsible for ensuring compliance with paragraph F.(2) of Rule 9.5 at all renovations to which they are assigned. A certified renovator must:
(a) Perform all of the tasks described in paragraph F.(2)(b) of Rule 9.5 and must either perform or direct workers who perform all of the tasks described in paragraph F.(2)(a) of Rule 9.5;
(b) Provide training to workers on the work practices required by F.(2)(a) of Rule 9.5 that they will be using in performing their assigned tasks;
(c) Be physically present at the work site when the signs required by paragraph F.(2)(a)(1) of Rule 9.5 are posted, while the work area containment required by paragraph F.(2)(a)(2) of Rule 9.5 is being established, and while the work area cleaning required by paragraph F.(2)(a)(5) of Rule 9.5 is performed;
(d) Regularly direct work being performed by other individuals to ensure that the work practices are being followed, including maintaining the integrity of the containment barriers and ensuring that dust or debris does not spread beyond the work area;
(e) Be available, either on-site or by telephone, at all times that renovations are being conducted;
(f) When requested by the party contracting for renovation services, use an acceptable test kit to determine whether components to be affected by the renovation contain lead-based paint;
(g) Have with them at the work site their current Mississippi renovator certification certificate; and
(h) Prepare the records required by paragraphs F.(3)(b)(1) and (6) of Rule 9.5.
H. Dust Sampling Technician. (1) To become certified as a dust sampling technician an individual must: (a) Have a high school diploma or its equivalent; (b) Successfully complete an accredited training program for lead-based paint dust sampling technicians; and
(c) Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the applicant is familiar with and capable of complying with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations.
(d) Individuals who have successfully completed an accredited lead-based paint inspector or risk assessor course before October 4, 2011, may take an accredited refresher dust sampling technician course in lieu of the initial training to become a certified dust sampling technician. Individuals who are currently certified as lead-based paint inspectors or risk assessors may act as certified dust sampling technicians without further training.
(2) Dust sampling technician responsibilities. When performing optional dust clearance sampling under paragraph F.(2)(c) of Rule 9.5, a certified dust sampling technician must:
(a) Collect dust samples in accordance with paragraph E.(8) of Rule 9.5,
(b) Send the collected samples to a laboratory recognized by EPA under TSCA Section 405(b), and
(c) Compare the results to the clearance levels in accordance with paragraph A.(4) of Rule 9.5.
(d) Have with them at the work site a copy of their current Mississippi dust sampling technician certification certificate.
I. Documents.
(1) The following documents shall be recognized by the Commission as evidence of meeting the requirements listed in paragraphs B. thru F. of this Rule.
(a) Official academic transcripts or diploma, as evidence of meeting the education requirements.
(b) Resumes, letters of reference, or documentation of work experience, as evidence of meeting the work experience requirements.
(c) Course completion certificates from lead-specific or other related training courses, issued by accredited training programs, as evidence of meeting the training requirements.
J. Certification Based on Prior Training.
(1) Any individual who received risk assessor, inspector, project designer, supervisor, or worker lead based paint activity training between October 1, 1990, and August 31, 1998, shall be eligible for certification by the Commission under the alternative procedures contained in this paragraph. Individuals who have received lead-based paint activities training at an EPA-authorized State or Tribal accredited training program shall also be eligible for certification by the Commission under the following alternative procedures.
(a) Applicants for certification as an inspector, risk assessor, or supervisor shall:
(1) Show proof that the applicant has successfully completed training for the appropriate discipline.
(2) Show proof that the applicant meets or exceeds the education and/or experience requirements in paragraphs B. thru D. of this rule for the appropriate discipline.
(3) Successfully complete an accredited refresher training course for the appropriate discipline.
(4) Pass a certification exam administered by the Commission for the appropriate discipline.
(b) Applicants for certification as an abatement worker or project designer shall:
(1) Show proof that the applicant has successfully completed training for the appropriate discipline,
(2) Show proof that the applicant meets the education and/or experience requirements in paragraph E. or F. of this rule as applicable; and
(3) Successfully complete an accredited refresher training course for the appropriate discipline.
(2) Individuals shall have until February 1, 1999, to apply to the Commission for certification under the above procedures. After that date, all individuals wishing to obtain certification must do so through the procedures described in paragraphs A. thru H. of this rule, according to the discipline for which certification is sought.
K. Re-Certification.
(1) To maintain certification in the project designer, inspector, risk assessor, renovator, dust sampling technician, supervisor and abatement worker disciplines, the certified individual shall apply to and be re-certified by the Commission in that discipline every three (3) years.
(2) An individual shall be re-certified if the individual successfully completes the appropriate accredited refresher training course and submits the appropriate refresher course completion certificate, the appropriate application and fee.
L. Certification of Firms.
(1) Beginning on the date of adoption, all firms which perform or offer to perform any of the lead-based paint activities described in Rule 9.5 must be certified by the Commission.
(2) A firm seeking certification shall submit to the Commission: a completed application provided by the Department; a letter attesting that the firm shall only employ appropriately certified employees to conduct lead-based paint activities, and that the firm and its employees shall follow the work practice standards in Rule 9.5 for conducting lead-based paint activities; and the required fee.
(3) After receiving the firm’s application, letter requesting certification, and the required certification fee, the Commission shall have 90 days to approve or disapprove the firm’s request for certification. Within that time, the Commission
shall respond with either a certificate of approval or a letter describing the reasons for disapproval.
(4) The firm shall maintain all records pursuant to the requirements in Rule 9.5.
(5) To maintain their certification, firms must renew their certification license annually by submitting the required application and renewal fee.
(6) A firm must amend its certification within 90 days of the date a change occurs to the information included in the firm’s most recent certification application. To amend a certification, a firm must submit a completed “Application for Firms” signed by an authorized agent of the firm, noting on the form that it is submitted as an amendment and indicating the information that has changed. The firm must also pay the correct amount of fees.
(7) Firm responsibilities. Firms performing renovations must ensure that:
(a) All individuals performing renovation activities on behalf of the firm are either certified renovators or have been trained by a certified renovator in accordance with paragraph G.(2) of this rule.
(b) A certified renovator is assigned to each renovation performed by the firm and discharges all of the certified renovator responsibilities identified in paragraph G.(2) of this rule.
(c) All renovations performed by the firm are performed in accordance with the work practice standards in paragraph F.(2) of Rule 9.5.
(d) The pre-renovation education requirements of paragraph F.(4) of Rule 9.5 have been performed. Requires distribution of pamphlet Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers and Schools.
(e) The recordkeeping requirements of paragraph F.(3) of Rule 9.5 are met.
M. Suspension, Revocation, and Modification of Certifications of Individuals Engaged in Lead-Based Paint Activities.
(1) The Commission may, after notice and opportunity for hearing, suspend or revoke or modify an individual’s certification if an individual has:
(a) Obtained training documentation through fraudulent means.
(b) Gained admission to and completed an accredited training program through misrepresentation of admission requirements.
(c) Obtained certification through misrepresentation of certification requirements or related documents dealing with education, training, professional registration, or experience.
(d) Performed work requiring certification at a job site without having proof of certification.
(e) Permitted the duplication or use of the individual’s own certificate by another.
(f) Performed work for which certification is required, but for which appropriate certification has not been received.
(g) Failed to comply with the appropriate work practice standards for lead- based paint activities at Rule 9.5.
(h) Failed to comply with Federal, State, or local lead-based paint statutes or regulations.
N. Suspension, Revocation, and Modification of Certifications of Firms Engaged in Lead- Based Paint Activities.
(1) The Commission may, after notice and opportunity for hearing, suspend, revoke, or modify a firm’s certification if a firm has:
(a) Performed work requiring certification at a job site with individuals who are not certified.
(b) Failed to comply with the work practice standards established in Rule 9.5.
(c) Misrepresented facts in its letter of application for certification to the Commission.
(d) Failed to maintain required records.
(e) Failed to comply with Federal, State, or local lead-based paint statutes or regulations.
O. Procedures for Suspension, Revocation, or Modification of the Certification of Individuals or Firms.
(1) If the Commission decides to suspend, revoke, or modify the certification of any individual or firm, it shall notify the affected entity in writing of the following:
(a) The legal and factual basis for the suspension, revocation, or modification.
(b) The commencement date and duration of the suspension, revocation, or modification.
(c) Actions, if any, which the individual or affected entity may take to avoid suspension, revocation, or modification or to receive certification in the future.
(d) The opportunity and method for requesting a hearing prior to final Commission action to suspend, revoke, or modify certification.
(e) Any additional information, as appropriate, which Commission may provide.
(2) If a hearing is requested by the certified individual or firm, all proceedings and hearings before the Commission shall be conducted in accordance with Sections 49-17-31 through 49-17-41, Mississippi Code of 1972.
P. Type and Duration of Certificates
(1) Certification of Individuals (Inspectors, Risk Assessors, Project Designers, Supervisors, Renovators, Dust Sampling Technicians and Abatement Workers).
Unless the Commission revokes or suspends a certificate, an initial certificate shall remain in effect during the period of time training is effective, but not to exceed one (1) year after the date of issuance. To maintain certification in a particular discipline an individual must comply with the following requirements:
(a) Each certificate must be renewed annually during the period of required training.
(b) Refresher training must be successfully completed in each discipline every three (3) years following successful completion of the initial training course.
(2) Certification of Firms
Unless the Commission revokes or suspends a certificate, the initial certificate shall remain in effect for a period of one (1) year. To maintain certification, the certification license must be renewed annually.
Q. Reciprocity
Any person who has been issued a certificate in another state or a tribe which has certification, educational, and experience requirements equal to or greater than those of this State, and which grants equal certification privileges to persons certified in this State,
may be issued a certificate in this State upon terms and conditions determined by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-501, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.5 Work Practice Standards for Conducting Lead-Based Paint Activities
A. Effective Date, Applicability, and Terms.
(1) Beginning on the date of adoption all lead-based paint abatement and renovation activities shall be performed pursuant to the work practice standards contained in this rule.
(2) When performing any lead-based paint activity described by the certified individual as an inspection, lead-hazard screen, risk assessment, renovation, or abatement, a certified individual must perform that activity in compliance with the appropriate requirements below.
(3) Documented methodologies that are appropriate for this rule are found in the following: The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing; the EPA Guidance on Residential Lead-Based Paint, Lead- Contaminated Dust, Lead-Contaminated Soil; the EPA Residential Sampling for Lead: Protocols for Dust and Soil Sampling (EPA report number 7474-R-95-001); 40 CFR Part 745, Lead; Requirements for Lead-Based Paint activities in Target Housing and Child-occupied Facilities: Final Rule (Federal Register, Volume 61, Number 169, Thursday, August 29, 1996); EPA Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program: Final Rule (Federal Register, Volume 73, Number 78, April 22, 2008); and other equivalent methods and guidelines.
(4) Clearance levels appropriate for the purposes of this rule may be found in the EPA January 2001 rules (40 CFR 745; Identification of Dangerous Levels of Lead, Final Rule) at 745.227(e)(8)(viii).
B. Inspection.
(1) An inspection shall be conducted only by a person certified by the Commission as an inspector or risk assessor and, if conducted, must be conducted according to the procedures in this paragraph.
(2) When conducting an inspection, the following locations shall be selected according to documented methodologies and tested for the presence of lead-based paint:
(a) In a residential dwelling and child-occupied facility, each component with a distinct painting history and each exterior component with a distinct
painting history shall be tested for lead-based paint, except those components that the inspector or risk assessor determines to have been replaced after 1978, or to not contain lead-based paint; and
(b) In a multi-family dwelling or child-occupied facility, each component with a distinct painting history in every common area, except those components that the inspector or risk assessor determines to have been replaced after 1978, or to not contain lead-based paint.
(3) Paint shall be sampled in the following manner:
(a) The analysis of paint to determine the presence of lead shall be conducted using documented methodologies which incorporate adequate quality control procedures; and/or
(b) All collected paint chip samples shall be analyzed according to paragraph G. of this rule to determine if they contain detectable levels of lead that can be quantified numerically.
(4) The certified inspector or risk assessor shall prepare an inspection report which shall include the following information:
(a) Date of each inspection.
(b) Address of building.
(c) Date of construction.
(d) Apartment numbers (if applicable).
(e) Name, address, and telephone number of the owner or owners of each residential dwelling or child-occupied facility.
(f) Name, signature, and certification number of each certified inspector and/or risk assessor conducting testing.
(g) Name, address, and telephone number of the certified firm employing each inspector and/or risk assessor, if applicable.
(h) Each testing method and device and/or sampling procedure employed for paint analysis, including quality control data and, if used, the serial number of an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) device.
(i) Specific locations of each painted component tested for the presence of lead-based paint.
(j) The results of the inspection expressed in terms appropriate to the sampling method used.
C. Lead Hazard Screen.
(1) A lead hazard screen shall be conducted only by a person certified by the Commission as a risk assessor.
(2) If conducted, a lead hazard screen shall be conducted as follows:
(a) Background information regarding the physical characteristics of the residential dwelling or child-occupied facility and occupant use patterns that may cause lead-based paint exposure to one or more children age 6 years and under shall be collected.
(b) A visual inspection of the residential dwelling or child-occupied facility shall be conducted to:
(1) Determine if any deteriorated paint is present, and
(2) Locate at least two dust sampling locations.
(c) If deteriorated paint is present, each surface with deteriorated paint, which is determined, using documented methodologies, to be in poor condition and to have a distinct painting history, shall be tested for the presence of lead.
(d) In residential dwellings, two composite dust samples shall be collected, one from the floors and the other from the windows, in rooms, hallways, or stairwells where one or more children, age 6 or under, are most likely to come in contact with dust.
(e) In multi-family dwellings and child-occupied facilities, in addition to the floor and window samples required in paragraph C.(2)(d) of this Rule, the risk assessor shall also collect composite dust samples from common areas where one or more children, age 6 and under, are most likely to come into contact with dust.
(3) Dust samples shall be collected and analyzed in the following manner:
(a) All dust samples shall be taken using documented methodologies that incorporate adequate quality control procedures.
(b) All collected dust samples shall be analyzed according to paragraph G. of this rule to determine if they contain detectable levels of lead that can be quantified numerically.
(4) Paint shall be sampled in the following manner:
(a) The analysis of paint to determine the presence of lead shall be conducted using documented methodologies which incorporate adequate quality control procedures; and/or
(b) All collected paint chip samples shall be analyzed according to paragraph G. of this Rule to determine if they contain detectable levels of lead that can be quantified numerically.
(5) The risk assessor shall prepare a lead hazard screen report, which shall include the following information:
(a) The information required in a risk assessment report as specified in paragraph D. of this rule, including paragraphs D.(11)(a) through D.(11)(n), and excluding paragraphs D.(11)(o) through D.(11)(r) of this rule. Additionally, any background information collected pursuant to paragraph C.(2)(a) of this rule shall be included in the risk assessment report; and
(b) Recommendations, if warranted, for a follow-up risk assessment, and as appropriate, any further actions.
D. Risk Assessment.
(1) A risk assessment shall be conducted only by a person certified by the Commission as a risk assessor and, if conducted, must be conducted according to the procedures in this paragraph.
(2) A visual inspection for risk assessment of the residential dwelling or child- occupied facility shall be undertaken to locate the existence of deteriorated paint, assess the extent and causes of the deterioration, and other potential lead-based paint hazards.
(3) Background information regarding the physical characteristics of the residential dwelling or child-occupied facility and occupant use patterns that may cause lead- based paint exposure to one or more children age 6 years and under shall be collected.
(4) Each surface with deteriorated paint, which is determined, using documented methodologies, to be in poor condition and to have a distinct painting history, shall be tested for the presence of lead. Each other surface determined, using documented methodologies, to be a potential lead-based paint hazard and having a distinct painting history, shall also be tested for the presence of lead.
(5) In residential dwellings, dust samples (either composite or single-surface samples) from the window and floor shall be collected in all living areas where one or more children, age 6 and under, are most likely to come into contact with dust.
(6) For multi-family dwelling and child-occupied facilities, the samples required in paragraph D.(4) of this rule shall be taken. In addition, window and floor dust samples (either composite or single-surface samples) shall be collected in the following locations:
(a) Common areas adjacent to the sampled residential dwelling or child- occupied facility; and
(b) Other common areas in the building where the risk assessor determines that one or more children, age 6 or under, are likely to come into contact with dust.
(7) For child-occupied facilities, window and floor dust samples (either composite or single-surface samples) shall be collected in each room, hallway, or stairwell utilized by one or more children, age 6 and under, and in other common areas in the child-occupied facility where the risk assessor determines one or more children, age 6 or under, are likely to come into contact with dust.
(8) Soil samples shall be collected and analyzed for lead concentrations in the following locations:
(a) Exterior play areas where bare soil is present; and
(b) Drip line/foundation areas where bare soil is present; and
(c) The rest of the yard (i.e., non-play areas) where bare soil is present.
(9) Any paint, dust, or soil sampling or testing shall be conducted using documented methodologies that incorporate adequate quality control procedures.
(10) Any collected paint chip, dust, or soil samples shall be analyzed according to paragraph G. of this Rule to determine if they contain detectable levels of lead that can be quantified numerically.
(11) The certified risk assessor shall prepare a risk assessment report which shall include the following information:
(a) Date of assessment.
(b) Address of each building.
(c) Date of construction of buildings.
(d) Apartment number (if applicable).
(e) Name, address, and telephone number of each owner of each building.
(f) Name, signature, and certification of the certified risk assessor conducting the assessment.
(g) Name, address and telephone number of the certified firm employing each certified risk assessor if applicable.
(h) Name, address, and telephone number of each recognized laboratory conducting analysis of collected samples.
(i) Results of the visual inspection.
(j) Testing method and sampling procedure for paint analysis employed.
(k) Specific locations of each painted component tested for the presence of lead.
(l) All data collected from on-site testing, including quality control data and, if used, the serial number of any XRF device.
(m) All results of laboratory analysis on collected paint, soil, and dust samples.
(n) Any other sampling results.
(o) Any background information collected pursuant to paragraph D.(3) of this Rule.
(p) To the extent that they are used as part of the lead-based paint hazard determination, the results of any previous inspections or analyses for the presence of lead-based paint, or other assessments of lead-based paint- related hazards.
(q) A description of the location, type, severity of identified lead-based paint hazards and any other potential lead hazards.
(r) A description of interim controls and/or abatement options for each identified lead-based paint hazard and a suggested prioritization for addressing each hazard. If the use of an encapsulant or enclosure is recommended, the report shall recommend a maintenance and monitoring schedule for the encapsulant or enclosure.
E. Abatement.
(1) An abatement shall be conducted only by an individual certified by the Commission, and if conducted, shall be conducted according to the procedures in this paragraph.
(2) A certified supervisor is required for each abatement project and shall be onsite during all work site preparation and during the post-abatement cleanup and clearance of work areas. At all other times when abatement activities are being conducted, the certified supervisor shall be onsite or available by telephone, pager or answering service, and able to be present at the work site in no more than 2 hours.
(3) The certified supervisor and the certified firm employing that supervisor shall: (1) ensure that all abatement activities are conducted according to the requirements of this rule and all other Federal, State, and local requirements, and (2) maintain all certificates for all firms, supervisors and workers who are employed in connection with the abatement project at the abatement project site. All such certificates shall be made available to Department personnel during abatement project inspections.
(4) Notification of the commencement of lead-based paint abatement activities in a residential dwelling or child-occupied facility or as a result of a Federal, State, or local order shall be given to the Department prior to the commencement of abatement activities as required in paragraph J. of this rule.
(5) A written occupant protection plan shall be developed for all abatement projects and shall be prepared according to the following procedures:
(a) The occupant protection plan shall be unique to each residential dwelling or child-occupied facility and be developed prior to the abatement. The occupant protection plan shall describe the measures and management procedures that will be taken during the abatement to protect the building occupants from exposure to any lead-based paint hazards.
(b) A certified supervisor or project designer shall prepare the occupant protection plan.
(6) The work practices listed below shall be restricted during an abatement as follows:
(a) Open-flame burning or torching of lead-based paint is prohibited;
(b) Machine sanding or grinding or abrasive blasting or sandblasting of lead- based paint is prohibited unless used with High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) exhaust control which removes particles of 0.3 microns or larger from the air at 99.97 percent or greater efficiency;
(c) Dry scraping of lead-based paint is permitted only in conjunction with heat guns or around electrical outlets or when treating defective paint spots totaling no more than 2 square feet in any one room, hallway or stairwell or totaling no more than 20 square feet on exterior surfaces; and
(d) Operating a heat gun on lead-based paint is permitted only at temperatures below 1100 degrees Fahrenheit.
(7) If conducted, soil abatement shall be conducted in one of the following ways:
(a) If soil is removed, the lead-contaminated soil shall be replaced with soil that is not lead-contaminated; or
(b) If soil is not removed, the lead-contaminated soil shall be permanently covered, as defined in these regulations.
(8) The following post-abatement clearance procedures shall be performed only by a certified inspector or risk assessor:
(a) Following an abatement, a visual inspection shall be performed to determine if deteriorated painted surfaces and/or visible amounts of dust, debris or residue are still present. If deteriorated painted surfaces or visible amounts of dust, debris or residue are present, these conditions must be eliminated prior to the continuation of the clearance procedures.
(b) Following the visual inspection and any post-abatement cleanup required by paragraph E.(8)(a) of this Rule, clearance sampling for lead- contaminated dust shall be conducted by employing single-surface sampling or composite sampling techniques.
(c) Dust samples for clearance purposes shall be taken using documented methodologies that incorporate adequate quality control procedures.
(d) Dust samples for clearance purposes shall be taken a minimum of 1 hour after completion of final post-abatement cleanup activities.
(e) The following post-abatement clearance activities shall be conducted as appropriate based upon the extent or manner of abatement activities conducted in or to the residential dwelling or child-occupied facility:
(1) After conducting an abatement with containment between abated and unabated areas, one dust sample shall be taken from one window (if available) and one dust sample shall be taken from the floor of no less than four rooms, hallways or stairwells within the containment area. In addition, one dust sample shall be taken from
the floor outside the containment area. If there are less than four rooms, hallways or stairwells within the containment area, then all rooms, hallways or stairwells shall be sampled.
(2) After conducting an abatement with no containment, two dust samples shall be taken from no less than four rooms, hallways or stairwells in the residential dwelling or child-occupied facility. One dust sample shall be taken from one window (if available) and one dust sample shall be taken from the floor of each room, hallway or stairwell selected. If there are less than four rooms, hallways or stairwells within the residential dwelling or child- occupied facility then all rooms, hallways or stairwells shall be sampled.
(3) Following an exterior paint abatement, a visual inspection shall be conducted. All horizontal surfaces in the outdoor living area closest to the abated surface shall be found to be cleaned of visible dust and debris. In addition, a visual inspection shall be conducted to determine the presence of paint chips on the dripline or next to the foundation below any exterior surface abated. If paint chips are present, they must be removed from the site and properly disposed of, according to all applicable Federal, State and local requirements.
(f) The rooms, hallways or stairwells selected for sampling shall be selected according to documented methodologies.
(g) The certified inspector or risk assessor shall compare the residual lead level (as determined by the laboratory analysis) from each dust sample with applicable clearance levels for lead in dust on floors and windows. If the residual lead levels in a dust sample exceed the clearance levels, all the components represented by the failed sample shall be recleaned and retested until clearance levels are met.
(9) In a multi-family dwelling with similarly constructed and maintained residential dwellings, random sampling for the purposes of clearance may be conducted provided:
(a) The certified individuals who abate or clean the residential dwellings do not know which residential dwelling will be selected for the random sample.
(b) A sufficient number of residential dwellings are selected for dust sampling to provide a 95 percent level of confidence that no more than 5 percent or 50 of the residential dwellings (whichever is smaller) in the randomly sampled population exceed the appropriate clearance levels.
(c) The randomly selected residential dwellings shall be sampled and evaluated for clearance according to the procedures found in paragraph E.(8) of this Rule.
(10) An abatement report shall be prepared by a certified supervisor or project designer. The abatement report shall include the following information:
(a) Start and completion dates of abatement.
(b) The name and address of each certified firm conducting the abatement and the name of each supervisor assigned to the abatement project.
(c) The occupant protection plan prepared pursuant to paragraph E.(5) of this Rule.
(d) The name, address, and signature of each certified risk assessor or inspector conducting clearance sampling and the date of clearance testing.
(e) The results of clearance testing and all soil analyses (if applicable) and the name of each recognized laboratory that conducted the analyses.
(f) A detailed written description of the abatement, including abatement methods used, locations of rooms and/or components where abatement occurred, reason for selecting particular abatement methods for each component, and any suggested monitoring of encapsulants or enclosures.
F. Renovation
(1) Applicability
(a) This rule applies to all renovations performed for compensation in target housing and child-occupied facilities, except for the following:
(1) Renovations in target housing or child-occupied facilities in which a written determination has been made by a certified inspector or risk assessor that the components affected by the renovation are free of paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 milligrams/per square centimeter (mg/cm
) or 0.5% by weight, where the firm performing the renovation has obtained a copy of the determination.
(2) Renovations in target housing or child-occupied facilities in which a certified renovator, using an EPA recognized test kit and following the kit manufacturer’s instructions, has tested each component affected by the renovation or has collected a paint chip
sample from each painted component affected by the renovation and a laboratory recognized by EPA pursuant to Section 405(b) of TSCA as being capable of performing analyses for lead compounds in paint chip samples has determined that the components are free of paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 mg/cm
or 0.5% by weight. If the components make up an integrated whole, such as the individual stair treads and risers of a single staircase, the renovator is required to test only one of the individual components, unless the individual components appear to have been repainted or refinished separately.
(3) Persons who perform lead-based paint activities within residential dwellings that they own and occupy are exempt from the regulations unless the residential dwelling is occupied by a person or persons other than the owner or owner’s immediate family while these activities are being performed, or a child residing in the building has been identified as having an elevated blood lead level as determined by the United States Department of Health and Human Services; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
(b) The information distribution requirements in paragraph F.(4) of this rule do not apply to emergency renovations, which are renovation activities that were not planned but result from a sudden, unexpected event (such as non-routine failures of equipment) that, if not immediately attended to, presents a safety or public health hazard, or threatens equipment and/or property with significant damage. Interim controls performed in response to an elevated blood lead level in a resident child are also emergency renovations. Emergency renovations other than interim controls are also exempt from the warning sign, containment, waste handling, training, and certification requirements in paragraph F.(2) of this rule, L. of Rule 9.4, and G. of Rule 9.4 to the extent necessary to respond to the emergency. Emergency renovations are not exempt from the cleaning requirements of paragraph F.(2)(a)(5) of this Rule, which must be performed by certified renovators or individuals trained in accordance with paragraph G.(2) of Rule 9.4, the cleaning verification requirements of paragraph F.(2)(b) of this rule, which must be performed by certified renovators, and recordkeeping requirements of paragraph F.(3)(b)(6) of this rule.
(2) Work practice standards listed below shall be followed.
(a) Standards for renovation activities. Renovations must be performed by certified firms using certified renovators as required in paragraph L.(7)(a) of Rule 9.4 The responsibilities of certified firms are set forth in paragraph L.(7) of Rule 9.4 The responsibilities of certified renovators are set forth in paragraph G.(2) of Rule 9.4.
(1) Occupant protection. Firms must post signs clearly defining the work area warning occupants and other persons not involved in renovation activities to remain outside of the work areas. To the extent practicable, these signs must be in the primary language of the occupants. These signs must be posted before beginning the renovation and must remain in place and readable until the renovation and the post-renovation cleaning verification has been completed. If warning signs have been posted in accordance with 24 CFR 35.1345(b)(2) or 29 CFR 1926.62(m), additional signs are not required by this rule.
(2) Containing the work area. Before beginning the renovation, the firm must isolate the work area so that no dust or debris leaves the work area while the renovation is being performed. In addition, the firm must maintain the integrity of the containment by ensuring that any plastic or other impermeable materials are not torn or displaced, and taking any other steps necessary to ensure that no dust or debris leaves the work area while the renovation is being performed. The firm must also ensure that containment is installed in such a manner that it does not interfere with occupant and worker egress in an emergency.
(i) Interior renovations. The firm must:
(A) Remove all objects from the work area, including furniture, rugs, and window coverings, or cover them with plastic sheeting or other impermeable material with all seams and edges taped or otherwise sealed.
(B) Close and cover all ducts opening in the work area with taped down plastic sheeting or other impermeable material.
(C) Close windows and doors in the work area. Doors must be covered with plastic sheeting or other impermeable material. Doors used as an entrance to the work area must be covered with plastic sheeting or other impermeable material in a manner that allows workers to pass through while confining dust and debris to the work area.
(D) Cover the floor surface, including installed carpet, with taped down plastic sheeting or other impermeable material in the work area 6 feet beyond the perimeter of surfaces undergoing
renovation or a sufficient distance to contain the dust, whichever is greater. Floor containment measures may stop at the edge of the vertical barrier when using a vertical containment system consisting of impermeable barriers that extend from the floor to the ceiling and are tightly sealed at joints with the floor, ceiling and walls.
(E) Use precautions to ensure that all personnel, tools, and other items, including the exteriors of containers of waste, are free of dust and debris before leaving the work area.
(ii) Exterior renovations. The firm must:
(A) Close all doors and windows within 20 feet of the renovation. On multi-story buildings, close all doors and windows within 20 feet of the renovation on the same floor as the renovation, and close all doors and windows on all floors below that are the same horizontal distance from the renovation.
(B) Ensure that doors within the work area that will be used while the job is being performed are covered with plastic sheeting or other impermeable material in a manner that allows workers to pass through while confining dust and debris to the work area.
(C) Cover the ground with plastic sheeting or other disposable impermeable material extending 10 feet beyond the perimeter of surfaces undergoing renovation or a sufficient distance to collect falling paint debris, whichever is greater, unless the property line prevents 10 feet of such ground covering. Ground containment measures may stop at the edge of the vertical barrier when using a vertical containment system.
(D) If the renovation will affect surfaces within 10 feet of the property line, the renovation firm must erect vertical containment or equivalent extra precautions in containing the work area to ensure that dust and debris from the renovation does not contaminate adjacent buildings or migrate to adjacent properties. Vertical containment or equivalent extra
precautions in containing work area may also be necessary in other situations in order to prevent contamination of other buildings, other areas of the property, or adjacent buildings or properties.
(3) Prohibited and restricted practices. The work practices listed below are prohibited or restricted during a renovation as follows:
(i) Open-flame burning or torching of painted surfaces is prohibited;
(ii) The use of machines designed to remove paint or other surface coatings through high speed operation such as sanding, grinding, power planing, needle gun, abrasive blasting, or sandblasting, is prohibited on painted surfaces unless such machines have shrouds or containment systems and are equipped with a HEPA vacuum attachment to collect dust and debris at the point of generation. Machines must be operated so that no visible dust or release of air occurs outside the shroud or containment system.
(iii) Operating a heat gun on painted surfaces is permitted only at temperatures below 1100 degrees Fahrenheit.
(4) Waste from renovations
(i) Waste from renovation activities must be contained to prevent releases of dust and debris before the waste is removed from the work area for storage or disposal. If a chute is used to remove waste from the work area, it must be covered.
(ii) At the conclusion of each work day and at the conclusion of the renovation, waste that has been collected from renovation activities must be stored under containment, in an enclosure or behind a barrier that prevents release of dust and debris out of the work area and prevents access to dust and debris.
(iii) When the firm transports waste from renovation activities, the firm must contain the waste to prevent release of dust and debris.
(5) Cleaning the work area. After the renovation has been completed, the firm must clean the work area until no dust, debris or residue remains.
(i) Interior and exterior renovations. The firm must:
(A) Collect all paint chips and debris and, without dispersing any of it, seal this material in a heavy- duty bag.
(B) Remove the protective sheeting. Mist the sheeting before folding it, fold the dirty side inward, and either tape shut to seal or seal in heavy-duty bags. Sheeting used to isolate contaminated rooms from non-contaminated rooms must remain in place until after the cleaning and removal of other sheeting. Dispose of the sheeting as waste.
(ii) Additional cleaning for interior renovation. The firm must clean all objects and surfaces in the work area and within 2 feet of the work area in the following manner, cleaning from higher to lower:
(A) Walls. Clean walls starting at the ceiling and working down to the floor by either vacuuming with a HEPA vacuum or wiping with a damp cloth.
(B) Remaining surfaces. Thoroughly vacuum all remaining surfaces and objects in the work area, including furniture and fixtures, with a HEPA vacuum. The HEPA vacuum must be equipped with a beater bar when vacuuming carpets and rugs.
(C) Wipe all remaining surfaces and objects in the work area, except for carpeted or upholstered surfaces, with a damp cloth. Mop uncarpeted floors thoroughly, using a mopping method that keeps the wash water separate from the rinse water, such as the 2-bucket mopping method, or using a wet mopping system.
(b) Standards for post-renovation cleaning verification.
(1) Interiors.
(i) A certified renovator must perform a visual inspection to determine whether dust, debris or residue is still present. If dust, debris or residue is present, these conditions must be
removed by re-cleaning and another visual inspection must be performed.
(ii) After a successful visual inspection, a certified renovator must:
(A) Verify that each windowsill in the working area has been adequately cleaned, using the following procedure:
(a) Wipe the windowsill with a wet disposable cleaning cloth that is damp to the touch. If the cloth matches or is lighter than the cleaning verification card, the windowsill has been adequately cleaned.
(b) If the cloth does not match and is darker than the cleaning verification card, re-clean the windowsill as directed in paragraphs F.(2)(a)(5)(ii)(B) and (a)(5)(ii)(C) of this Rule, then either use a new cloth or fold the used cloth in such a way that an unused surface is exposed, and wipe the surface again. If the cloth matches or is lighter than the cleaning verification card, that windowsill has been adequately cleaned.
(c) If the cloth does not match and is darker than the cleaning verification card, wait for 1 hour or until the surface has dried completely, whichever is longer.
(d) After waiting for the windowsill to dry, wipe the windowsill with a dry disposable cleaning cloth. After this wipe, the windowsill has been adequately cleaned.
(B) Wipe uncarpeted floors and countertops within the work area with a wet disposable cleaning cloth. Floors must be wiped using an application device with a long handle and a head to which the cloth is attached. The cloth must remain damp at all times while it is being used to wipe the surface for post- renovation cleaning verification. If the surface within the work area is greater than 40 square feet, the surface within the work area must be divided
into roughly equal sections that are each less than 40 square feet. Wipe each such section separately with a new wet disposable cleaning cloth. If the cloth used to wipe each section of the surface within the work area matches the cleaning verification card, the surface has been adequately cleaned.
(a) If the cloth used to wipe a particular section does not match the cleaning verification card, re-clean that section of the surface as directed in paragraphs F.(2)(a)(5)(ii)(B) and (a)(5)(ii)(C) of this rule, then use a new wet disposal cleaning cloth to wipe that section again. If the cloth matches the cleaning verification card, that section of the surface has been adequately cleaned.
(b) If the cloth used to wipe a particular surface section does not match the cleaning verification card after the surface has been re-cleaned, wait for one hour or until the entire surface within the work area has dried completely, whichever is longer.
(c) After waiting for the entire surface within the work area to dry, wipe each section of the surface that has not yet achieved post- renovation cleaning verification with a dry disposable cleaning cloth. After this wipe, that section of the surface has been adequately cleaned.
(iii) When the work area passes the post-renovation cleaning verification, remove the warning signs.
(2) Exteriors. A certified renovator must perform a visual inspection to determine whether dust, debris or residue is still present on surfaces in and below the work area, including windowsills and the ground. If dust, debris or residue is present, these conditions must be eliminated and another visual inspection must be performed. When the area passes the visual inspection, remove the warning signs.
(c) Optional dust clearance testing. Cleaning verification need not be performed if the contract between the renovation firm and the person contracting for the renovation requires:
(1) The renovation firm to perform dust clearance sampling at the conclusion of a renovation covered by this subpart.
(2) The dust clearance samples are required to be collected by a certified inspector, risk assessor or dust sampling technician.
(3) The renovation firm is required to re-clean the work area until the dust clearance sample results are below the clearance standards in paragraph A.4. of this rule.
(d) Activities conducted after post-renovation cleaning verification. Activities that do not disturb paint, such as applying paint to walls that have already been prepared, are not regulated by this subpart if they are conducted after post-renovation cleaning verification has been performed.
(3) Recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
(a) Firms performing renovations must retain and, if requested, make available to the Commission all records necessary to demonstrate compliance with this subpart for a period of 3 years following completion of the renovation.
(b) Records that must be retained pursuant to paragraph F.(3)(a) of this rule shall include (where applicable):
(1) Records or reports certifying that a determination had been made that lead-based paint was not present on the components affected by the renovation as described in paragraph F.(1)(a)(1) of this rule. These records or reports include:
(i) Reports prepared by a certified inspector or certified risk assessor.
(ii) Records prepared by a certified renovator after using EPA- recognized test kits, including an identification of the manufacturer and model of any test kits used, a description of the components that were tested including their locations, and the results of each test kit used.
(iii) Records prepared by a certified renovator after collecting paint chip samples, including a description of the components that were tested including their locations, the name and address of the NLLAP-recognized entity performing the analysis, and the results for each sample.
(2) Signed and dated acknowledgments of receipt as described in paragraphs F.(4)(a)(1)(i), (a)(2)(i), (b)(1)(i), (c)(1)(i)(A) and (c)(1)(ii)(A) of this rule.
(3) Certificates of attempted delivery as described in paragraphs F.(4)(a)(2)(i) and (c)(1)(ii)(A) of this rule.
(4) Certificates of mailing as described in paragraphs F.(4)(a)(1)(ii), (a)(2)(ii), (b)(1)(ii), (c)(1)(i)(B) and (c)(I)(ii)(B) of this rule.
(5) Records of notification activities performed regarding common area renovations, as described in paragraphs F.(4)(b)(3) and (4) of this rule, and renovations in child-occupied facilities, as described in paragraph F.(4)(c)(2) of this rule.
(6) Documentation of compliance with the requirements of paragraph F.(2) of this rule, including documentation that a certified renovator was assigned to the project, that the certified renovator provided on-the-job training for workers used on the project, that the certified renovator performed or directed workers who performed all of the tasks described in paragraph F.(2)(a). of this rule, and that the certified renovator performed the post-renovation cleaning verification described in paragraph F.(2)(b). of this rule. If the renovation firm was unable to comply with all of the requirements of this rule due to an emergency as defined in paragraph F.(1)(c) of this rule, the firm must document the nature of the emergency and the provisions of the rule that were not followed. This documentation must include a copy of the certified renovator’s training certificate, a copy of the renovator’s Mississippi renovator certification certificate, and a certification by the certified renovator assigned to the project that:
(i) Training was provided to workers (topics must be identified for each worker).
(ii) Warning signs were posted at the entrances to the work area.
(iii) If test kits were used, that the specified brand of kits was used at the specified locations and that the results were as specified.
(iv) If paint chip samples were collected, that the samples were collected at the specified locations, that the specified NLLAP-recognized laboratory analyzed the samples, and that the results were as specified.
(v) The work area was contained by:
(A) Removing or covering all objects in the work area (interiors).
(B) Closing and covering all HVAC ducts in the work area (interiors).
(C) Closing all windows in the work area (interiors) or closing all windows in and within 20 feet of the work area (exteriors).
(D) Closing and sealing all doors in the work area (interiors) or closing and sealing all doors in and within 20 feet of the work area (exteriors).
(E) Covering doors in the work area that were being used to allow passage but prevent spread of dust.
(F) Covering the floor surface, including installed carpet, with taped-down plastic sheeting or other impermeable material in the work area 6 feet beyond the perimeter of surfaces undergoing renovation or a sufficient distance to contain the dust, whichever is greater (interiors) or covering the ground with plastic sheeting or other disposable impermeable material anchored to the building extending 10 feet beyond the perimeter of surfaces undergoing renovation or a sufficient distance to collect falling paint debris, whichever is greater, unless the property line prevents 10 feet of such ground covering, weighted down by heavy objects (exteriors).
(G) Installing (if necessary) vertical containment to prevent migration of dust and debris to adjacent property (exteriors).
(vi) Waste was contained on-site and while being transported off site.
(vii) The work area was properly cleaned after the renovation by:
(A) Picking up all chips and debris, misting protective sheeting, folding it dirty side inward, and taping it for removal.
(B) Cleaning the work area surfaces and objects using a HEPA vacuum and/or wet cloths or mops (interiors).
(viii) The certified renovator performed the post-renovation cleaning verification (the results of which must be briefly described, including the number of wet and dry cloths used).
(c) When the final invoice for the renovation is delivered or within 30 days of the completion of the renovation, whichever is earlier, the renovation firm must provide information pertaining to compliance with this rule as follows:
(1) In a regulated structure:
(i) The owner of the building; and, if different,
(ii) An adult occupant of the residential dwelling, if the renovation took place within a residential dwelling, or an adult representative of the child-occupied facility, if the renovation took place within a child-occupied facility.
(2) When performing renovations in common areas of multi-unit target housing, renovation firms must post the information required by this rule or instructions on how interested occupants can obtain a copy of this information. This information must be posted in areas where it is likely to be seen by the occupants of all of the affected units.
(3) The information required to be provided by paragraph F.(3)(c) of this rule may be provided by completing the sample form titled “Sample Renovation Recordkeeping Checklist” or a similar form containing the test kit information and the training and work practice compliance information required by paragraph F.(3)(b)(6) of this rule.
(d) If dust clearance sampling is performed in lieu of cleaning verification as permitted by paragraph F.(2)(c) of this rule, the renovation firm must provide, when the final invoice for the renovation is delivered or within 30 days of the completion of the renovation, whichever is earlier, a copy of the dust sampling report to:
(1) The owner of the building; and, if different,
(2) An adult occupant of the residential dwelling, if the renovation took place within a residential dwelling, or an adult representative of the child-occupied facility, if the renovation took place in a child-occupied facility.
(3) When performing renovations in common areas of multi-unit target housing, renovation firms must post these dust sampling reports or information on how interested occupants of the housing being renovated can obtain a copy of the report. This information must be posted by the occupants of all of the affected units.
(4) Information distribution requirements.
(a) Renovations in dwelling units. No more than 60 days before beginning renovation activities in any residential dwelling unit of target housing, the firm performing the renovation must:
(1) Provide the owner of the unit with the pamphlet Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers and Schools, and comply with one of the following:
(i) Obtain, from the owner, a written acknowledgement that the owner has received the pamphlet.
(ii) Obtain a certificate of mailing at least 7 days prior to the renovation.
(2) In addition to the requirements in paragraph F.(4)(a)(1) of this rule, if the owner does not occupy the dwelling unit, provide an adult occupant of the unit with the pamphlet, and comply with one of the following:
(i) Obtain, from the adult occupant, a written acknowledgement that the occupant received the pamphlet; or certify in writing that a pamphlet has been delivered to the dwelling and that the renovator has been unsuccessful in obtaining a written acknowledgement from an adult occupant. Such certification must include the address of the unit undergoing renovation, the date and method of delivery of the pamphlet, names of the persons delivering the pamphlet, reason for lack of acknowledgement (e.g., occupant refuses to sign, no adult occupant available), the signature of the renovator, and the date of signature.
(ii) Obtain a certificate of mailing at least 7 days prior to the renovation.
(b) Renovations in common areas. No more than 60 days before beginning renovation activities in common areas of multi-unit target housing, the firm performing the renovation must:
(1) Provide the owner with the pamphlet Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers and Schools, and comply with one of the following:
(i) Obtain, from the owner, a written acknowledgement that the owner has received the pamphlet.
(ii) Obtain a certificate of mailing at least 7 days prior to the renovation.
(2) Comply with one of the following:
(i) Notify in writing, or ensure written notification of, each affected unit and make the pamphlet available upon request prior to the start of renovation. Such notification shall be accomplished by distributing written notice to each affected unit. The notice shall describe the general nature and locations of the planned renovation activities; the expected starting and ending dates; and a statement of how the occupant can obtain the pamphlet, and a copy of the records required by paragraphs F.(3)(c) and F.(3)(d) of this rule, at no charge to the occupants, from the firm performing the renovation, or
(ii) While the renovation is ongoing, post informational signs describing the general nature and locations of the renovation and the anticipated completion date. These signs must be posted in areas where they are likely to be seen by the occupants of all the affected units. The signs must be accompanied by a posted copy of the pamphlet or information on how interested occupants can review a copy of the pamphlet or obtain a copy from the renovation firm at no cost to occupants. The signs must also include information on how interested occupants can review a copy of the records required by paragraphs F.(3)(c) and F.(3)(d) of this rule or obtain a copy from the renovation firm at no cost to the occupants.
(3) Prepare, sign, and date a statement describing the steps performed to notify all occupants of the intended renovation activities and to provide the pamphlet.
(4) If the scope, locations, or expected starting and ending dates of the planned renovation activities change after the initial notification, and the firm provided written initial notification to each affected unit, the firm performing the renovation must provide further written notification to the owners and occupants providing revised information on the ongoing planned activities. This subsequent notification must be provided before the firm performing the renovation initiates work beyond that which was described in the original notice.
(c) Renovations in child-occupied facilities. No more than 60 days before beginning renovation activities in any child-occupied facility, the firm performing the renovation must:
(1) Provide the owner of the building with the pamphlet Renovate Right: Important Lead Hazard Information for Families, Child Care Providers and Schools, and comply with one of the following:
(i) Obtain, from the owner, a written acknowledgement that the owner has received the pamphlet.
(ii) Obtain a certificate of mailing at least 7 days prior to the renovation.
(2) If the operator of a child-occupied facility is not the owner of the building, provide an adult representative of the child-occupied facility with the pamphlet, and comply with one of the following:
(i) Obtain, from the adult representative, a written acknowledgment that the adult representative has received the pamphlet; or certify in writing that a pamphlet has been delivered to the facility and that the firm performing the renovation has been unsuccessful in obtaining a written acknowledgement from an adult representative. Such certification must include the address of the child-occupied facility undergoing renovation, the date and method of delivery of the pamphlet, names of the persons delivering the pamphlet, reason for lack of acknowledgment (e.g., representative refuses to sign), the signature of a representative of the firm performing the renovation, and the date of signature.
(ii) Obtain a certificate of mailing at least 7 days prior to the renovation.
(3) Provide the parents and guardians of children using the child- occupied facility with the pamphlet and information describing the general nature and locations of the renovation and the anticipated completion date and information on how interested parents or guardians of children frequenting the child-occupied facility can review a copy of the records required by paragraphs F.(3)(c) and F.(3)(d) of this rule or obtain a copy from the renovation firm at no cost to the occupants by complying with one of the following:
(i) Mail or hand-deliver the pamphlet and the renovation information to each parent or guardian of a child using the child-occupied facility; or
(ii) While the renovation is ongoing, post informational signs describing the general nature and locations of the renovation and the anticipated completion date. These signs must be posted in areas where they can be seen by the parents or guardians of children frequenting the child- occupied facility can review a copy of the pamphlet or obtain a copy from the renovation firm at no cost to the parents or guardians. The signs must also include information on how interested parents or guardians of children frequenting the child-occupied facility can review a copy of the records required by paragraphs F.(3)(c) and F.(3)(d) of this rule or obtain a copy from the renovation firm at no cost to the parents or guardians.
(4) The renovation firm must prepare, sign, and date a statement describing the steps performed to notify all parents and guardians of the intended renovation activities and to provide the pamphlet.
(d) Written acknowledgment. The written acknowledgements required by paragraphs F.(4)(a)(1)(i), (a)(2)(i), (b)(1)(i), (c)(1)(i)(A), and (c)(1)(ii)(A) of this rule must:
(1) Include a statement recording the owner or occupant’s name and acknowledging receipt of the pamphlet prior to the start of renovation, the address of the unit undergoing renovation, the signature of the owner or occupant as applicable, and the date of signature.
(2) Be either a separate sheet or part of any written contract or service agreement for the renovation.
(3) Be written in the same language as the text of the contract or agreement for the renovation or, in the case of non-owner occupied target housing, in the same language as the lease or rental agreement or the pamphlet.
G. Collection and Laboratory Analysis of Samples. Any paint chip, dust, or soil samples collected pursuant to the work practice standards contained in this rule shall be:
(1) Collected by persons certified by the Commission as an inspector, risk assessor, or dust sampling technician; and
(2) Analyzed by a laboratory recognized by EPA pursuant to Section 405(b) of TSCA as being capable of performing analyses for lead compounds in paint chip, dust, or soil samples.
H. Composite Dust Sampling. Composite dust sampling may only be conducted in the situations specified in paragraphs C. through E. of this rule. If such sampling is conducted, the following conditions shall apply:
(1) Composite dust samples shall consist of at least two subsamples;
(2) Every component that is being tested shall be included in the sampling; and
(3) Composite dust samples shall not consist of subsamples from more than one type of component.
I. Recordkeeping. All reports or plans required in this rule shall be maintained by the certified firm or individual who prepared the report for a minimum of 3 years. The certified firm or individual also shall provide copies of these reports to the building owner who contracted for its services and the occupant of the building.
J. Project Notifications.
(1) General Provision. The Department shall be notified in writing on a form provided by the Department of any lead-based paint abatement or renovation activity in target housing or child-occupied facility no less than six (6) working days prior to commencement of the activity. Abatement or renovation notifications involving one or more units at the same address may be submitted on a single notification form; however, only one address per each notification form submitted to the Department. The Department notification form must be filled out completely and properly. Blanks which do not apply shall be marked “N/A”. The designation of “N/A” will not be accepted for references requiring identification of the work site, building description, building owner, abatement and renovation companies, and individuals required to be identified on the notification form. An original signature is required of the certified firm’s owner
or an authorized agent of the firm on each notification form. A copied signature is not acceptable. The notification shall be considered invalid if it does not contain an original signature.
(2) Responsibility. It is the responsibility of the certified firm’s owner or an authorized agent of the firm to notify the Department under this rule.
(3) Timeliness of Notification. Written notifications of lead-based paint abatement or renovation activity must be hand delivered, express mailed, or postmarked at least six (6) working days (not calendar days) before the start of lead-based paint abatement or renovation. Notifications must be delivered by United States Postal Service, commercial delivery, or by hand delivery. Telephone facsimile (FAX) is not permitted. The start date is considered to be the date when lead-based paint abatement or renovation begins.
(4) Start-Date Change to Later Date. When lead-based paint abatement or renovation activity will begin later than the date contained in the notice, the certified firm’s owner or an authorized agent of the firm shall:
(a) Notify the Department of the changed start date by telephone as soon as possible but prior to the original start date. An amended notification is required in writing immediately following the foregoing notification; and
(b) Provide the Department with a written notice of the new start date as soon as possible, but no later than the original start date. Delivery of the updated notice by the United States Postal Service, commercial delivery service, hand delivery, or electronically is acceptable.
(5) Start-Date Change to Earlier Date. When lead-based paint abatement or renovation will begin on a date earlier than the date contained in the notice, the certified firm’s owner or an authorized agent of the firm shall provide the Department with a written notice of the new start date at least six working days before the start of work.
(6) Start-Date/Stop-Date (completion date) requirement. In no event shall lead-based paint abatement or renovation activity, as covered by this rule, begin or be completed on a date other than the date contained in the written notice. Amendments to start date changes are to be submitted as required in J.(4) and J.(5) of this rule. An amendment is required for any stop dates which change by more than one work day for each week (seven calendar day period) for which the project has been scheduled and notification submitted. The certified firm shall provide schedule changes to the Department no less than 24 hours prior to the change or completion of the project. Emergency notification can be confirmed with the Department telephonically and followed up in writing.
(7) Provision for Emergency. In the event lead-based paint abatement or renovation activity is required due to an unexpected or unplanned lead-based paint incident, notification shall be made as soon as practicable, but not later than the following work day after the occurrence of the incident. Initial notification can be made by telephone, followed by formal notification on the Department’s notification form. Emergencies shall be documented to the extent that the need for the emergency is evident. An emergency lead-based paint abatement or renovation activity means a lead-based paint abatement or renovation activity that was not planned, but results from a sudden, unexpected event which if not immediately attended to, presents a public health or safety hazard, and is necessary to protect equipment from damage, or is necessary to avoid imposing an unreasonable financial burden. This term includes activities necessitated by non-routine failures of equipment. This term does not include immediate abatement or renovation work solely from a lack of adequate planning for foreseeable lead-based paint abatement activity.
(8) Lead-based Paint Abatement Notification Fees. The certified firm’s owner or an authorized agent of the firm shall remit to the Department a fee that is based on each individual and separate residential dwelling or multi-family dwelling or child-occupied facility at the same address to be abated or renovated as listed in this paragraph. Current fees are listed on the Department’s schedule of fees for lead-based paint activities.
K. Lead-Based Paint Activities Requirements.
Lead-based paint activities, as defined in these regulations, shall only be conducted according to the procedures and work practice standards contained in this rule. No individual or firm may offer to perform or perform any lead-based paint activity as defined in these regulations, unless certified to perform that activity according to the procedures in Rule 9.4.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-501, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 9.6 Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement
A. Compliance Inspections and Investigations
(1) The Department may inspect or investigate the practices of any person involved in lead-based paint activities in target housing or child-occupied facilities as defined in these rules.
(2) Advance notice of inspections or investigations by the Department is not required.
(3) Department representatives shall not be impeded or refused entry in the course of their official duties in accordance with these regulations by reason of any regulatory or contractual specification.
(4) All persons engaged in lead-based paint activities must have the Commission- issued certificate or required training records present at the worksite.
B. Enforcement - Penalties, Reprimands, Suspensions, Revocation of Certificates, Proceedings and Hearings before the Commission and Appeals.
Penalties, reprimands, suspensions and revocations of certificates shall be governed by Section 49-17-529, Mississippi Code Annotated. All proceedings and hearings before the Commission regarding violations of Section 49-17-501, et seq. Mississippi Code Annotated, or any rule or regulation, written order of the Commission, emergency order of the Executive Director or certificates issued or renewed by the Commission pursuant to Section 49-17-501, et seq., Mississippi Code Annotated and all appeals therefrom shall be conducted in accordance with Section 49-17-31 through 49-17-41, Mississippi Code Annotated.
C. Severability.
If any rule, paragraph, subparagraph, provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of any of these regulations, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for any reason challenged or held to be invalid or void, the validity of the remaining regulations and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Part 2, Chapter 10: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Regulations for the Accreditation and Certification of Asbestos Abatement Personnel (Adopted December 20, 1989, Amended October 25, 1990, Amended May 25, 1995, Amended November 20, 2003, Last Amended March 26, 2026)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-501, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.1 General
A. The Asbestos Abatement Accreditation and Certification Act, codified as Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1 through 37-138-31, requires that, beginning on the effective date of these regulations, all persons who perform inspections and re-inspections, prepare management plans and perform as air monitors, contractors, project designers, supervisors, and workers in abatement projects for the purpose of identifying, evaluating, and abating the hazard of asbestos-containing material in public and private elementary and secondary school buildings and in all public and commercial buildings in this State must be accredited and certified as qualified to perform such activities.
B. These regulations provide requirements for the accreditation and certification of inspectors, management planners, project designers, air monitors, contractors, supervisors, and workers for the abatement of asbestos containing material. These regulations do not provide requirements pertaining to the quality of inspections, management plans, project designs, or asbestos projects but instead require the utilization
of personnel certified in accordance with these regulations in the event such activities are performed in or on a school building, public building, or commercial building.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.2 Definitions
A. “Act” means the Asbestos Abatement Accreditation and Certification Act.
B. “Asbestos” means the asbestiform varieties of: chrysotile (serpentine); crocidolite (riebeckite); amosite (cummingtonite-grunerite); anthophyllite; tremolite; and actinolite.
C. “Asbestos-containing materials” (ACM) means any material or product which contains more than one percent (1%) asbestos.
D. “Asbestos project” means a project for the abatement of ACM in school buildings, public buildings or commercial buildings including the abatement of shingles, tiles, or felt containing ACM in the roof or exterior siding of such building except for exclusions adopted by the Commission in accordance with Section 37-138-9(a) and except for abatement of asbestos-containing resilient floor tile, sheet vinyl flooring and associated adhesives provided there is a two-working-day advance notification to the Commission of the abatement of asbestos-containing floor tile, sheet vinyl flooring and associated adhesives, unless sanding, grinding, burning or sawing occurs or such abatement is otherwise considered a “response action” or would cause the material to become “friable” as both those terms are defined under 40 CFR Section 763.83.
E. “Building” means (1) any structure having two or more walls and a roof or ceiling or (2) any other structure that is totally enclosed.
F. “Certificate” means a document issued by the Commission or its designee authorizing an individual to perform certain specific activities related to the identification, evaluation or abatement of ACM in or on school buildings, public buildings and commercial buildings as described in these regulations.
G. “Commercial building” means any privately owned building, including any industrial building, in which the public is invited or allowed access and any other privately owned building so located that the conduct of any asbestos abatement activities therein could reasonably expose any person or persons to ACM hazards.
H. “Commission” means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
I. “Continuous” and “continuously current” mean, with respect to training as required herein, that applicable refresher course(s) have been successfully completed annually since the successful completion of the initial training course.
(1) For purposes of this definition, “annually” shall be construed to mean the one-year period from an applicable initial or refresher training completion date and the anniversary of that date or any shorter period.
(2) For purposes of this definition, “annually” shall be construed to be greater than a one-year period only if an individual demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Commission that
(a) a reasonable effort was made by the individual to complete applicable training within one year,
(b) failure to complete training was beyond the individual’s control, and
(c) training was completed as soon as possible following the one-year anniversary.
J. “Contract for the performance of an asbestos project” shall mean an agreement, either oral or written, which is for the purpose of the performance, in whole or in part, of an asbestos project for a valuable consideration.
K. “Duly authorized representative (DAR)” means a representative of a responsible official who, in accordance with corporate by-laws or policy, can legally bind the business entity and is to be held responsible for actions, standards, requirements, and prohibitions under state and federal asbestos control regulations. Notification of the designation of the DAR by the responsible official must be submitted to MDEQ in writing and must be signed by a responsible official prior to any action by the DAR and/or submission of any documentation by the DAR.
L. “Director” means the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality or his/her designee.
M. “EPA” means the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
N. “Encapsulation” means the treatment of ACM with a material that surrounds or embeds asbestos fibers in an adhesive matrix to prevent the release of fibers as the encapsulant creates a membrane over the surface (bridging encapsulant) or penetrates the material and binds its components together (penetrating encapsulant).
O. “Enclosure” means an airtight, impermeable, permanent barrier around ACM to prevent the release of asbestos fibers into the air and does not include a temporary barrier erected for the purpose of ACM removal.
P. “Friable” when referring to ACM in or on a school building, public building or commercial building, means that the material, when dry, may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure, and includes previously nonfriable ACM after such
previously nonfriable ACM becomes damaged to the extent that when dry it may be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.
Q. “Individual” means a natural person as distinguished from the State or other agency or institution thereof, any municipality, political subdivision, public or private corporation, partnership, association or other entity.
R. “Major fiber release episode” means any uncontrolled or unintentional disturbance of friable asbestos containing building materials (ACBM), resulting in a visible emission, which involves the falling or dislodging of more than three (3) square or linear feet of ACBM.
S. “Minor fiber release episode” means any uncontrolled or unintentional disturbance of ACBM, resulting in a visible emission, which involves the falling or dislodging of three (3) square or linear feet or less of friable ACBM.
T. “Model Plan” means the Model Accreditation Plan for States promulgated under Title II of Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) (Section I of Appendix C to Title 40, Part 763, Subpart E of the Code of Federal Regulations) which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference except as otherwise noted.
U. “Non-friable” means ACM in or on a school building, public building or commercial building which when dry, may not be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.
V. “Person” means the State or other agency or institution thereof, any municipality, political subdivision, public or private corporation, individual, partnership, association or other entity, and includes any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality, political subdivision, or public or private corporation, or the United States or any officer or employee thereof.
W. “Public building” means any building owned by the State, counties, municipalities, institutions of higher learning, community colleges or any political subdivision.
X. “Removal” means the taking out or the stripping of ACM from a school building, public building or commercial building.
Y. “Repair” means returning damaged ACM to an undamaged condition or to an intact state so as to prevent fiber release.
Z. “Residence” means a building other than a school building, public building or commercial building or portion of a commercial building, which is actually owned or leased and simultaneously occupied by one or more individuals as a fixed or permanent place of habitation, including but not limited to and primarily consisting of single family unit houses and apartment buildings having four or fewer dwelling units.
AA. “Response action” means a method including removal, encapsulation, enclosure, and repair, and operation and maintenance, or some other method which disturbs ACM and is intended to protect human health and the environment from friable ACM except for small-scale, short-duration projects. It includes response(s) to major fiber release episodes as defined in Section I of the Model Plan.
BB. “Responsible official” means:
(1) For a corporation: a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation, or a duly authorized representative;
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; and
(3) For any other business entity: the owner or disclosed agent who can legally bind that business entity.
CC. “Routine maintenance activities” mean an asbestos project consisting of maintenance activities performed on a scheduled basis or during an emergency situation, where the abatement of ACM is necessary for conducting the scheduled or emergency maintenance activities. Such maintenance activities shall not have as any of its intended purposes the abatement of ACM. Routine maintenance activities can include, but are not limited to, the replacement of gasket materials, removal or replacement of pipes, the rebuilding of valves, or the removal of beams above ceilings.
DD. “School building” means:
(1) Any structure suitable for use as a classroom, including a school facility such as a laboratory, library, school eating facility, or facility used for the preparation of food.
(2) Any gymnasium or other facility which is specially designed for athletic or recreational activities or for an academic course in physical education.
(3) Any other facility used for the instruction or housing of students or for the administration of educational or research programs.
(4) Any maintenance, storage or utility facility, including any hallway, essential to the operation of any facility described in this definition of “school building” under paragraphs (1), (2) or (3).
(5) Any portico or covered exterior hallway or walkway.
(6) Any exterior portion of a mechanical system used to condition interior space.
EE. “Small-scale, short-duration abatement activities” shall have the meaning as set forth in the Model Plan which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.3 Prohibition
A. No person shall engage in any asbestos project in a school building, public building, or commercial building as an inspector, management planner, project designer, air monitor, contractor, supervisor, or worker on or after the effective date of these regulations, prior to the receipt of a valid applicable initial or renewed certificate issued by the Commission. A certificate shall be issued only to the individual who has applied for such applicable certification discipline(s) and not to any other person.
B. No person shall engage in the physical activities associated with the abatement of ACM in a school building, public building, or commercial building except for an individual in receipt of a valid initial or renewed worker certificate. A contractor shall not employ any worker, or any other individual of a different certification discipline, on an asbestos project who does not possess a valid and appropriate certificate issued by the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.4 Type and Duration of Certificates
A. The Commission shall have the authority to issue certificates for inspectors, management planners, project designers, air monitors, contractors, supervisors, and workers.
B. Unless the Commission revokes or suspends a certificate, an initial certificate shall remain in effect and valid during the period of time for which training is effective but not to exceed one (1) year after the date of certificate issuance. An initial certificate may be renewed annually in accordance with these regulations. A renewal certificate shall remain in effect and valid during the period of time for which training is effective but not to exceed one (1) year after the date of certificate issuance.
C. No less than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date of an initial or renewal certificate, the applicant shall submit an application for renewal of the applicable certification discipline in accordance with Rule 10.5 of these regulations if the applicant desires to maintain a valid certification in effect. If the applicant submits a timely and complete application in accordance with Rule 10.5 of these regulations and the Commission, through no fault of the applicant, fails to act on the application on or before the expiration date of the existing issued certificate, the existing certificate shall continue in effect until final action on the application is taken by the Commission.
D. The Commission may modify, revoke, or suspend any certificate issued to an individual accredited and certified in accordance with these regulations if the individual:
(1) Knowingly submits false or inaccurate information for issuance or renewal of a certificate under these regulations;
(2) Willfully fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the certificate issued by the Commission;
(3) Violates any provision of these regulations, the Asbestos Abatement Accreditation and Certification Act, or any laws, rules, regulations, or written orders of the Commission;
(4) Performs work on a project that requires accreditation and/or certification prior to the receipt of a valid certificate for the applicable discipline(s);
(5) Permits the duplication or use of one's own accreditation or certification certificate by another; or
(6) Obtains accreditation from a training provider that has not been approved by either EPA or an EPA-approved state program to offer such training for the particular discipline.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.5 Applications
A. No individual shall be considered for an initial or renewal certificate unless the qualification requirements and accreditation training requirements found in Rule 10.9 for the applicable discipline have been satisfied prior to submittal of an application. In addition, no individual shall be issued an initial or renewal certificate if the applicant fails to submit valid payment for the applicable fee as outlined in Rule 10.7 of these regulations for the applicable discipline as provided for in Paragraph E below.
B. Each application for an initial or renewal certificate shall be completed on the forms prepared by the Commission for this purpose and shall contain the information that the Commission deems necessary to determine whether an initial or renewal certificate should be issued in accordance with the Act.
C. Each application for an initial or renewal certificate shall be signed by the individual requesting the initial or renewal certificate. The signature shall be made under oath and shall constitute personal affirmation that the statements made in the application are true and complete.
D. An individual applying for certification in more than one (1) discipline may submit multiple applications in the same transmittal. Each application submitted shall be
completed as required above so as to be separable from the others. However, an applicant for a contractor certificate may also apply for a supervisor certificate within the same application. If an individual meets all the requirements of these regulations, including the submittal of valid payment of the fees for both contractor certification and supervisor certification, the individual shall be issued both a contractor certificate and a supervisor certificate.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.6 Consideration of Applications and Issuance of Certificates
A. The Commission shall review each application and all supporting documentation. If an application is deemed incomplete, the Commission may return the materials submitted by the applicant and advise the applicant as to what additional information is necessary to deem the application complete.
B. If an application is deemed complete and approved by the Commission, the Commission shall issue to the applicant an initial or renewal certificate for the specified discipline within thirty (30) days after receipt of the complete application.
C. The Commission may deny an application for certification if the Commission determines that the applicant:
(1) Has not complied with all of the provisions of these regulations and with all other applicable federal, State and local statutes and regulations; or
(2) Submits inaccurate or falsified information within an application; or
(3) Fails to submit the necessary additional information after receiving notice from the Commission as outlined in Paragraph A above. The Commission shall make a determination regarding the issuance or denial of an applicable certificate based upon the information contained in the application, the applicant’s compliance history, and any other pertinent information that is available to the Commission. The Commission is not required to conduct any investigation concerning an applicant other than to review information directly available to the Commission.
D. An applicant who is issued an initial or renewal certificate by the Commission shall be subject to the terms and conditions set forth and embodied in the initial or renewal certificate as the Commission deems necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of these regulations in accordance with the Act.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.7 Fees
All fees required by these regulations shall be submitted to the Commission through a Commission-authorized method of payment, payable to the Asbestos Accreditation and Certification Act Fund. The fee for an initial or renewal certificate under each specified discipline shall be established by the Commission in accordance with all Department regulations and State Law.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.8 Accreditation Training Requirements
A. Training Providers. Pursuant to Section 37-138-27 of the Mississippi Code, the Board of Trustees of State Institutions of Higher Learning designated Mississippi State University (MSU) to offer all accreditation training courses set forth in these regulations. MSU has certified in writing to the Commission that it is currently offering all such training courses. After November 1, 1990, all such training courses offered by MSU shall meet the requirements of the Model Plan, 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C, which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference except as otherwise noted. MSU has certified in writing to the EPA and Commission that all training courses offered meet the requirements of the Model Plan. The Commission has received such written certification by MSU and has approved the training courses offered by MSU as meeting the requirements for accreditation training under these regulations.
The only training courses offered within the geographic boundaries of the State of Mississippi that will be approved by the Commission as meeting accreditation requirements under these regulations are those offered by MSU and worker courses conducted that are approved by the Commission in accordance with Section 37-138-7, Mississippi Code Annotated. All state programs duly authorized by EPA and EPA-approved training courses offered outside of the geographic boundaries of the State of Mississippi and approved by the Commission will meet accreditation training requirements under these regulations. Each applicant who submits proof of the successful completion of an applicable EPA-approved training course shall also provide proof of EPA approval of such training course.
B. Initial Training. Each individual applying for an initial certificate shall have attended and successfully completed (a) an applicable initial training course approved by the Commission or (b) an initial training course offered outside the geographic boundaries of the State of Mississippi approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA for the appropriate discipline for which the initial certificate is requested within one (1) year prior to application. However, an individual is not required to attend and successfully complete any additional initial training course prior to applying for an initial certificate if the required refresher training has been successfully completed within twenty-four (24) months of the initial and/or subsequent refresher course completed thereafter, as applicable.
C. Refresher Training.
(1) Each individual applying for a renewal certificate shall have attended and successfully completed (a) an applicable refresher training course as approved by the Commission or (b) a refresher training course offered outside the geographic boundaries of the State of Mississippi approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA for the discipline for which a renewal certificate is requested within one (1) year after the expiration date of the initial certificate or renewal certificate, as applicable.
(2) If an individual fails to successfully complete a Commission-approved refresher training course or an EPA-approved refresher training course offered outside the geographic boundaries of the State of Mississippi for the discipline for which an application is requested within one (1) year after the expiration date of the initial certificate or renewal certificate, the individual shall complete all applicable requirements for an initial certificate to receive a renewal certificate.
(3) The Commission may allow an individual to attend and complete an online refresher training course if: i. The course was conducted by MSU; ii. The course was conducted by a training provider approved by an EPA- approved state program for students residing outside the geographic boundaries of the State of Mississippi; or iii. The course is conducted by MSU or a training provider approved by an EPA-approved state program for certification of a the “worker” discipline.
D. The Commission shall have authority to monitor and audit all initial and refresher training courses offered within the geographic boundaries of the State of Mississippi.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.9 Qualifications
In addition to completing an applicable training course that meets the requirements of the Model Plan and as provided in Rule 10.8, each applicant submitting an application for an initial or renewal certificate must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Commission that the applicant is familiar with and capable of complying with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations and possesses the following qualifications listed below prior to submitting the application:
A. Inspectors - Education qualifications: high school diploma or Graduate Equivalent Degree (GED).
B. Management Planners - Education and professional license qualifications:
(1) Bachelor of Science degree in engineering or its equivalent from an accredited university and a current, valid license as a registered professional engineer; or
(2) Bachelor of Science degree in architecture or its equivalent from an accredited university and a current, valid license as an architect; or
(3) Certification as a Certified Industrial Hygienist or its equivalent in a related scientific field.
C. Project Designer - Education and professional license qualifications:
(1) Bachelor of Science degree in engineering or its equivalent from an accredited university and a current, valid license as a registered professional engineer; or
(2) Bachelor of Science degree in architecture or its equivalent from an accredited university and a current, valid license as an architect; or
(3) Certification as a Certified Industrial Hygienist or its equivalent in a related scientific field.
D. Contractor - Education qualifications: high school diploma or GED. The applicant for a contractor certificate must be a responsible official or duly authorized representative (DAR).
E. Supervisor - Education qualifications: high school diploma or GED.
F. Worker - Medical qualifications: a written certificate, on a form provided by the Commission, by a licensed physician in accordance with State Law approving the applicant to work on an asbestos project, which must be submitted to the Commission with the applicant’s application for an initial certificate. The certificate must only accompany the applicant’s application for a renewal certificate once every three (3) years thereafter. A chest x-ray is not required for either the initial certificate or a renewal certificate.
G. Air Monitor - Education and training requirements:
(1) Have earned a high school diploma or GED;
(2) Satisfactorily complete a Commission-approved training course for supervisors. A supervisor training course approved by the EPA completed satisfactorily shall be sufficient to meet this requirement; and
(3) Satisfactorily complete a Commission-approved training course for collecting and evaluating air samples. The successful completion of the National Institute for Occupational Safety & Health (NIOSH) 582 course, or similar air monitoring training course, shall be sufficient to meet this requirement.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.10 Exclusion
Notwithstanding anything in these regulations to the contrary, small-scale, short-duration abatement activities may be conducted in a school building, public building, or commercial building without the utilization of a certified inspector, management planner, project designer, supervisor, air monitor, contractor, or worker.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.11 Supervision of Asbestos Projects
At least one (1) certified supervisor is required to be present at an asbestos project at all times while abatement activities are in progress. In addition, certified workers must have access to a certified supervisor throughout the duration of the asbestos project. The contractor(s) and supervisor(s) for an asbestos project shall maintain the certificates for all contractors, supervisors, and workers who are employed in connection with the asbestos project at the physical asbestos project site. The contractor(s) and/or supervisor(s) shall make available all such certificates to the Commission during an inspection of an asbestos project site.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.12 Rule 10.12
Enforcement - Penalties, Reprimands, Suspensions, Revocation of Certificates, Proceedings and Hearings Before the Commission and Appeals.
A. If the Commission decides to suspend, revoke, or modify the certification of an individual, the Commission shall notify the affected individual in writing of the following, as applicable:
(1) The legal and factual basis for the suspension, revocation, or modification.
(2) The commencement date and duration of the suspension, revocation, or modification.
(3) The actions, if any, which the individual may take to avoid the suspension, revocation, or modification or to receive certification in the future.
(4) The opportunity and method for requesting a hearing prior to final Commission action to suspend, revoke, or modify certification.
(5) Any additional information, as appropriate, which the Commission may provide.
B. In the event the Commission suspends and/or revokes the certificate of a contractor, the Commission may also order any business entity for which the individual is a responsible official or DAR to cease and desist performing asbestos abatement activities if necessary to ensure that the business entity does not then operate without appropriately certified personnel, or in violation of any emission standard, regulation, or written order of the Commission.
C. If the Commission determines that an individual has submitted false information, the Commission has the discretion to invoke a lifetime revocation or denial.
D. Penalties, reprimands, suspensions, and revocations of certificates shall be governed by Section 37-138-27, Mississippi Code Annotated. All proceedings and hearings before the Commission regarding violations of Section 37-138-1, et seq., Mississippi Code Annotated, or any rule or regulation, written order of the Commission, emergency order of the Director or certificates issued or renewed by the Commission pursuant to Section 37-138-1, et seq., Mississippi Code Annotated and all appeals therefrom shall be conducted in accordance with Section 49-17-31 through 49-17-41, Mississippi Code Annotated.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-17-31 through 49-17-41, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.13 Other Laws
Compliance with these regulations shall not affect or substitute for compliance with all other applicable laws and regulations concerning the accreditation of asbestos abatement personnel, including but not limited to, National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Occupational Safety Health Act (OSHA), and Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) requirements.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.14 Severability
If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of these regulations, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for any reason challenged or held to be invalid or void, the validity of the remaining regulations and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 10.15 Training Course Standards
The following are the requirements for initial training courses and refresher training courses that must be successfully completed by any individual seeking certification to perform asbestos-related work pursuant to these regulations.
A. Initial training:
(1) Training courses required for any individuals seeking certification as an inspector, management planner, project designer, contractor, supervisor, or worker as well as the applicable EPA-approved training courses for an air monitor must meet all requirements of Section I(B) of the Model Plan, which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference unless otherwise noted.
(2) Initial training courses must be discipline-specific for the certification being sought.
(3) Initial training courses must be completed within a two (2) week period.
(4) Any person enrolled in a training course is not required to attend more than eight (8) hours of actual training in any single 24-hour period.
(5) Attendance in training courses following regular work hours shall not exceed a maximum of four (4) hours in any single session.
(6) An examination as defined in Section I(C) of the Model Plan, which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference unless otherwise noted, must be given at the conclusion of the initial training course. Each examination shall be closed book, and demonstration testing may be included as part of the overall examination. A person seeking accreditation in a specific discipline must pass the examination for that discipline to receive accreditation.
B. Refresher training courses
Annual refresher training is required for reaccreditation of each discipline. Refresher courses shall be specific to each discipline and must meet all requirements of Section I(D) of the Model Plan, which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference unless otherwise noted. For each discipline, the refresher course shall review and discuss changes in federal and State regulations, developments in state-of-the-art procedures, and a review of key aspects of the initial training course. Any individual seeking reaccreditation as an “air monitor” must complete the refresher course in accordance with the requirements for the “supervisor” discipline.
At the conclusion of the refresher training courses in all disciplines, the training provider shall administer a closed book exam with a minimum of twenty-five (25) multiple-choice questions. Applicants must pass the exam with a minimum score of seventy (70) percent. The exam shall be developed by the training provider, and the training provider shall make the exam available for review by the Department.
Refresher training courses may be offered online if the training course provider is able to provide proof that the course meets all the requirements of the Model Plan.
C. Training course approval. Any training course provider seeking approval of its training course(s) must meet the requirements of these regulations and Section I of the Model Plan, which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference unless otherwise noted. A training provider shall submit the following documentation for evaluation and approval by the Commission prior to conducting an initial course.
(1) A completed application on the form provided by the Department and supporting documentation. The form and supporting documentation shall include the following:
(a) The name, address, and telephone number of the training provider, and name and signature of the contact person;
(b) The course title, location and the language in which the course is to be taught;
(c) A student manual and an instructor manual for each course;
(d) The course agenda;
(e) A copy or description of all audio/visual materials used;
(f) A description of each hands-on training activity;
(g) A copy of a sample exam; and
(h) A sample certificate with the following information:
(i) The name of student;
(ii) The training course title specifying initial or refresher;
(iii) The inclusive dates of course and applicable examination;
(iv) A statement that the student completed the course and passed any examination required;
(v) The unique certificate number as required;
(vi) For courses covered under 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C (as amended), the certificate expiration date that is one (1) year after the date the course was completed and the applicable examination passed;
(vii) The printed name and signature of the training course administrator and printed name of the principal instructor;
(viii) The name, address, and phone number of the training provider; and
(ix) A statement that the person receiving the certificate has completed the requisite training for asbestos accreditation under Title II of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).
(i) A list of any other states that currently approve the training course.
(2) A list of the instructors and their qualifications including, but not limited to, any academic and/or field experience.
(3) Contingent approval shall be granted if the application and supporting documentation meet the criteria of this rule. Full approval shall be granted for any course with contingent approval after successful completion of an on-site audit of the course. The on-site audit shall include, but not be limited to, an evaluation of the following:
(a) Instructor effectiveness;
(b) Technical accuracy;
(c) Course administration; and
(d) Course content.
D. Withdrawal of training course approval.
The Commission may suspend or revoke approval of any training course approved under this regulation that is determined to be in violation of these regulations and Section III(c) of the Model Plan. In addition, the Department may perform a periodic audit of any training course to ensure compliance with all requirements of the regulations regarding training.
E. Recordkeeping requirements.
(1) Each approved training provider shall maintain all records required by Section I(F) of the Model Plan, which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference unless otherwise noted, for a minimum of three (3) years.
(2) If an approved training provider ceases to conduct training, the training provider shall notify the approving government body (i.e., EPA or the Department) so that the approving government body may take possession of the asbestos training records maintained by the training provider.
F. Training course notification.
(1) No less than ten (10) calendar days prior to the first day of an anticipated training course, a training course provider must provide written notification to the Department, on forms developed by the Department, of the following:
(a) The course discipline;
(b) The date and time of the training course;
(c) The exact location of the site of the training course (if the location is different from the principal location of the training provider, a vicinity map, sketch or detailed written directions showing the training site location shall be included in the notification, unless a vicinity map has previously been submitted for the specific location);
(d) Information about the language to be used in the training course;
(e) The name of the principal instructor; and
(f) A copy of the training course agenda. (If the agenda is identical to an agenda that has been previously submitted, an additional copy of the agenda is not required with the notification).
(2) Failure to provide re-notification of any changes in the time or location of the training course or any other information outlined on the original notification within two (2) working days prior to the first day of the pending training course may lead to rejection of any certificate of training issued by the training provider in support of an individual accreditation in the State of Mississippi.
(3) Within seven (7) calendar days after completion of a training course, the training course provider must provide the Department with a written roster containing the following:
(a) The name of the course indicating the discipline and whether the course is an initial or refresher training course;
(b) The names of all course participants;
(c) For each participant, whether the participant passed or failed the examination;
(d) The date, time, and location of the training course;
(e) For each participant, the training certificate number;
(f) The name of the principal instructor; and
(g) The name, address, and phone number of the training provider.
(4) Failure to submit a roster as required by Rule 10.15.F(3) may result in the rejection of any certificate of training submitted to the Department in support of an application for accreditation.
G. Non-English language courses. The following shall apply to any course taught in a non- English language:
(1) The training course must be taught in the language in which all participating students are fluent;
(2) The written materials, including the examination, must be correctly translated into the language in which all participating students are fluent; and
(3) Any interpreter present may not be used to teach or instruct a training course.
H. Instructor qualifications. Any person seeking approval as an instructor for courses covered under Section I of the Model Plan, which is incorporated herein and adopted by reference unless otherwise noted, shall meet the following applicable requirements:
(1) Application – Any person seeking approval as an instructor must submit a completed “Training Course Instructor Application” as provided by the Department. The required information includes personal data, training course and topics, education history, training history, employment history, accreditation or licenses issued by other states, professional registrations, and submittals to EPA or other states.
(2) Work practice topics for each discipline shall include:
(a) For the “worker” discipline course: state-of-the-art work practices;
(b) For the “contractor” and “supervisor” discipline courses: state-of-the-art work practices, and techniques for asbestos abatement activities;
(c) For the “inspector” discipline course: pre-inspection planning and review of previous inspection records, inspecting for friable and nonfriable ACM, assessing the condition of friable ACM, bulk sampling/documentation of asbestos in schools, recordkeeping and writing inspection reports;
(d) For the “management planner” discipline course: the evaluation/ interpretation of survey results, hazard assessment, developing an operations and maintenance plan, recordkeeping for the management planner, and assembling and submitting the management plan;
(e) For the abatement “project designer” discipline course: safety system design specifications, designing abatement solutions, budgeting/cost estimation, writing abatements specifications, preparing abatement drawings and occupied buildings; and
(f) For the “air monitor” discipline course: air monitoring strategies, conducting visual inspections, and recordkeeping and report writing.
(3) Each instructor for work practice topics, hands-on exercises, workshops, or field trips that are required for any course covered under 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C as amended, shall meet the following requirements as applicable:
(a) For the “worker” discipline initial and refresher training courses and the “supervisor” discipline initial and refresher training courses:
(1) The applicant shall have successfully completed the initial and subsequent refresher training course requirements for the “supervisor” discipline; and
(2) The applicant shall meet at least one (1) of the following educational and asbestos work experience combinations:
(i) If the applicant does not possess either a high school diploma or its equivalent, the applicant shall:
(A) Have at least 1,440 hours of experience in a worker or supervisory capacity at a contained work area; and
(B) Have at least 360 hours as an instructor for a “worker” discipline training course that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA.
(ii) If the applicant possesses either a high school diploma or its equivalent, the applicant shall:
(A) Have at least 960 hours of experience in a worker, supervisory, or consulting capacity at a contained work area; or
(B) Have at least 240 hours as an instructor for a “worker” discipline training course, a “supervisor” discipline training course, or any other occupational safety and health or environmental course required to meet federal and state regulations that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA.
(iii) If the applicant possesses at least an associate degree from a regionally accredited college or university, the applicant shall:
(A) Have at least 480 hours of experience in a worker, supervisory, or consulting capacity at a contained area; or
(B) Have at least 120 hours as an instructor for a “worker” discipline training course, a “supervisor” discipline training course, or any other occupational safety and health or environmental course required to meet federal and state regulations that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA.
(b) For the “inspector” discipline initial and refresher training courses:
(1) The applicant shall have successfully completed the initial and subsequent refresher training course requirements for the “inspector” discipline; and
(2) The applicant shall meet at least one (1) of the following educational and asbestos work experience combinations:
(i) If the applicant possesses either a high school diploma or its equivalent, the applicant shall:
(A) Have documented experience, which must include asbestos inspections of at least one million square feet of building space in the past three (3) years; or
(B) Have at least sixty (60) hours as an instructor for an “inspector” discipline training course or any other occupational safety and health or environmental course required to meet federal and state regulations that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA.
(ii) If the applicant possesses at least an associate degree from a regionally accredited college or university, the applicant shall:
(A) Have documented experience, which must include asbestos inspections of at least 500,000 square feet of building space in the past three (3) years; or
(B) Have at least forty (40) hours as an instructor for a “inspector” discipline training course or any other occupational safety and health or environmental
course required to meet federal and state regulations that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA
(c) For the “management planner” discipline initial and refresher courses:
(1) The applicant shall have successfully completed the initial and subsequent refresher training course requirements for the “management planner” discipline; and
(2) The applicant shall meet at least one (1) of the following educational and asbestos work experience combinations:
(i) If the applicant possesses either a high school diploma or its equivalent, the applicant shall:
(A) Have documented management planning experience showing at least twenty-five (25) management plans or reinspection reports written in the past three (3) years, or documented experience as the management consultant for at least twenty-five (25) asbestos projects in the past three (3) years, or a combination of management plans and projects managed; or
(B) Have at least forty-eight (48) hours as an instructor for a “management planner” discipline training course or any other occupational safety and health or environmental course required to meet federal and state regulations that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA.
(ii) If the applicant possesses at least an associate degree from a regionally accredited college or university, the applicant shall:
(A) Have documented management planning experience showing at least twelve (12) management plans or reinspection reports written in the past three (3) years, or documented experience as the management consultant for at least twelve (12) asbestos projects in the past three (3) years, or a combination of management plans and projects managed; or
(B) Have at least thirty-two (32) hours as an instructor for a “management planner” discipline training course or any other occupational safety and health or environmental course required to meet federal and state regulations that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA.
(d) For the “project designer” discipline initial and refresher courses:
(1) The applicant shall have successfully completed the initial and subsequent refresher training course requirements for the abatement “project designer” discipline; and
(2) The applicant shall meet at least one (1) of the following educational and asbestos work experience combinations:
(i) If the applicant possesses either a high school diploma or its equivalent, the applicant shall:
(A) Have documented asbestos abatement project design experience including the design of at least twelve (12) asbestos projects in the past three (3) years; or
(B) Have at least thirty (30) hours as an instructor for an abatement “project designer” discipline training course or any other occupational safety and health or environmental course required to meet federal and state regulations that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA.
(ii) If the applicant possesses at least an associate degree from a regionally accredited college or university, the applicant shall:
(A) Have documented asbestos abatement project design experience, including the design of at least six (6) asbestos projects in the past three (3) years; or
(B) Have at least twenty (20) hours as an instructor for an abatement “project designer” discipline training course or any other occupational safety and health or environmental course required to meet federal and state regulations that has been approved by EPA or a state program duly authorized by EPA.
(e) For an instructor of a Commission-approved NIOSH 582 training course or a Commission-approved air monitoring training course:
(1) Have a high school diploma or its equivalent; and
(2) Successfully complete the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 582 training course or a Commission- approved air monitoring training course.
(f) Each instructor approved under these regulations shall take a refresher training course in at least one (1) discipline from a training provider other than their employer every other year.
(4) Each instructor who will teach a segment(s) of a training course covered under 40 CFR Part 763, Subpart E, Appendix C, as amended, other than work practice topics, hands-on exercises, workshops, or field trips, shall meet the following requirements:
(a) Be actively working in the field of expertise in which training is conducted; and
(b) Have a minimum of a high school diploma or its equivalent.
.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 37-138-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 11.1 General ...............................................................................................................
Page 1
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 11.2 Definitions ..........................................................................................................
Page 1
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 11.3 Emissions Statement .........................................................................................
Page 2
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 11.1 General
The purpose of this regulation is to implement Section 182(a)(3)(B) of the Federal Clean Air Act which sets requirements for areas designated as nonattainment for National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 11.2 Definitions
The terms used in the regulations shall, unless the context otherwise requires, have the following meanings:
A. “Commission” means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
B. “Department” means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (Department).
C. “NAAQS” means National Ambient Air Quality Standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
D. “Nonattainment area” means any area, designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, that does not meet (or that contributes to ambient air quality in a nearby area that does not meet) the national primary or secondary national ambient air quality standard(s).
E. “Emissions Statement” means the annual emissions statement as required by Rule 11.3 of this regulation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 11.3 Emissions Statement
A. The requirements of Rule 11.3.A-C of this regulation shall apply to all stationary sources of nitrogen oxides or volatile organic compounds which have the potential to emit 25 tons or more of either pollutant per calendar year and are located in area(s) designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
B. Owners and operators of stationary sources of nitrogen oxides or volatile organic compounds shall provide the Department with a statement, in such form as the Department may prescribe, showing the actual emissions of nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds from that source. The statement shall contain a certification that the information contained in the statement is accurate to the best knowledge of the individual certifying the statement.
C. The Emissions Statement shall be submitted to the Department by July 1 of every year and shall show the actual emissions of the previous calendar year.
Part 2, Chapter 2: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment (Adopted May 8, 1970. Amended: May 11, 1972; January 31, 1978; January 23, 1979; March 12, 1981; August 26, 1981; November 12, 1981; May 9, 1984; March 23, 1988; April 25, 1988; August 23, 1989;
April 25, 1991; December 9, 1993; June 24, 1999; October 28, 1999; July 28, 2005; and Last Amended February 22, 2024)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.1 General Requirements
C. Replacement of Previous Regulation.
This regulation supersedes and replaces previously adopted “Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment,” 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 2.
D. Definitions Incorporated by Reference.
The definitions set forth in the most recent version of “Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality,” 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 5., are incorporated by reference and shall have the same definition in this Regulation, except for changes noted herein.
C. Definitions.
(1) “Applicable Rules and Regulations.” Any Commission regulation concerning and/or affecting air emissions and air quality established pursuant to State Law.
(2) “CFR.” The Code of Federal Regulations.
(3) “Commission.” The Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
(4) “Concentrated animal feeding operation” (CAFO). Any facility included within the definition of that term found at 40 CFR 122.23(b)(2).
(5) “De minimis NSR modification.” Any modification in which the emissions increase of each regulated NSR pollutant is less than three-fourths of the threshold for a major modification using the same procedures for calculating the emissions increase as the procedures of 40 CFR 52.21(a)(2)(iv)(a) through (f) for calculating a significant emissions increase; and which is not one of the following types of modifications:
(a) a major modification;
(b) a moderate modification;
(c) a modification involving medical waste incineration or hazardous waste incineration;
(d) a modification meeting the definition of “constructing or reconstructing a major source of hazardous air pollutants” in the “Air Toxics Regulations,”
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 11 Rule 11
Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 8. and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart B, and thereby requiring a case-by-case Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) determination.
(6) “DEQ.” The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(7) “EPA.” The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
(8) “Federal Act.” The Federal Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, and any subsequent amendments.
(9) “Hazardous air pollutant.” A hazardous air pollutant (HAP), as listed in Section 112(b) of the Federal Act.
(10) “Light commercial area.” An area zoned for commercial use, or, in the absence of any local zoning ordinances, an area predominantly used for wholesale and retail trade in goods and services.
(11) “Major Title V source.” Any stationary source meeting the definition of a major source in the “Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act,” 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 6.
(12) “Minor stationary source.” Any stationary source that is neither a major stationary source nor a moderate stationary source.
(13) “Moderate modification.” Any modification in which the source is making federally enforceable physical and/or operational limitations on the capacity of the source in order to reduce the potential to emit and/or render one or more contemporaneous decreases federally enforceable to avoid major source requirements of 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 5. or Rule 2.5.E. of these regulations.
(14) “Moderate stationary source.” Any new stationary source which makes federally enforceable physical and/or operational limitations on the capacity of the source in order to reduce the potential to emit to avoid major source requirements of 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 5. or Rule 2.5.E. of these regulations.
(15) “Modification.” Any physical change in or change in the method of operation of a facility which increases the actual emissions or the potential uncontrolled emissions of any air pollutant subject to regulation under the Federal Act emitted into the atmosphere by that facility or which results in the emission of any air pollutant subject to regulation under the Federal Act into the atmosphere not previously emitted. A physical change or change in the method of operation shall not include:
(a) routine maintenance, repair, and replacement;
(b) use of an alternative fuel or raw material by reason of an order under Sections 2 (a) and (b) of the Federal Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974 (or any superseding legislation) or by reason of a natural gas curtailment plan pursuant to the Federal Power Act;
(c) use of an alternative fuel by reason of an order or rule under Section 125 of the Federal Act;
(d) use of an alternative fuel or raw material by a stationary source which:
(1) the source was capable of accommodating before January 6, 1975, unless such change would be prohibited under any federally enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6, 1975, pursuant to 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 2. and/or Ch. 5.; or
(2) the source is approved to use under any permit issued under 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 2. and/or Ch. 5.;
(e) an increase in the hours of operation or in the production rate unless such change would be prohibited under any federally enforceable permit condition which was established after January 6, 1975, pursuant to 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 2. or Ch. 5.; or
(f) any change in ownership of the stationary source.
(16) “Modified Permit.” Any permit already effective which is altered substantively as a result of the Permit Board's determination of the need for such alteration. Alterations to correct typographical errors or to clarify requirements shall not be considered substantive changes and, therefore, are not modifications for the purposes of this definition.
(17) “NSR.” New source review.
(18) “Permit Board.” The Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board.
(19) “PSD.” Prevention of Significant Deterioration.
(20) “Recreational area.” Recreational area means:
(a) a national, state, county, or city park; or
(b) an outdoor recreational area, such as a golf course or swimming pool, owned by a city, county, state, or other public agency.
(21) “Regulated air pollutant.” Any regulated NSR pollutant, any air pollutant subject to a standard promulgated under Section 112 or other requirements established under Section 112 of the Federal Act, and any other air pollutant for which there is a duly adopted state ambient air quality standard.
(22) “Residential area.” Residential area means:
(a) a group of 20 or more single-family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of two or more units per acre, or
(b) a group of 40 or more single-family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of one or more units per acre, or
(c) a subdivision containing at least 20 constructed houses, in which the subdivision plat is recorded in the chancery clerk's office of the appropriate county.
(23) “Responsible Official.” Responsible Official means one of the following:
(a) for a corporation: a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the company or corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the company or corporation, or a duly authorized representative of such person if the representative is responsible for the overall operation of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities applying for or subject to a permit and either:
(1) the facilities employ more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in 1980 dollars); or
(2) the delegation of authority to such representatives is approved in advance by the permitting authority.
(b) for a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or
(c) for a municipality, State, Federal, or other public agency: either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For the purposes of these regulations, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency includes the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g., a Regional Administrator of EPA). A principal executive officer of a military facility includes the facility commander, chief executive officer, or any other similar person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the institution.
(24) “Significant minor source.” A stationary source that is not a synthetic minor source; is not a major Title V source or otherwise required to obtain a Title V permit; and is one of the following categories of sources:
(a) hot-mix asphalt plants;
(b) cotton gins;
(c) medical waste incinerators, not subject to the requirements of Rule 1.12 of “Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air Pollutants,” 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 1.;
(d) rendering plants; or
(e) any other new stationary source deemed by the Permit Board to be a significant minor source due to (i) the source’s potential to require significant air pollution control operations in order to avoid a violation of the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law or any regulation promulgated thereunder, (ii) the source’s potential to require significant compliance demonstration or testing requirements, (iii) the source’s potential to cause a substantial threat to public health, welfare, or the environment, or (iv) the sources’ potential to cause or substantially contribute to a violation of any applicable ambient air quality standard.
(25) “State Law.” The Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, specifically, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-1 through 49-17-45, and any subsequent amendments.
(26) “State Permit to Operate or State Operating Permit.” A permit issued under State Law to operate air emissions equipment, exclusive of Title V permits.
(27) “Stationary source.” For purposes of this regulation, any building, structure, facility, or installation which emits or may emit a regulated air pollutant.
(28) “Synthetic minor source.” Any stationary source which would otherwise constitute a major source as defined by 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 6., except that the owner or operator of the stationary source elects for federally enforceable physical or operational limitations on the capacity of the source to reduce the potential to emit below the applicability thresholds for a Title V major source. Such limitations may include, but are not limited to, permit conditions restricting hours of operation or type or amount of material stored, combusted or processed, or permit conditions establishing more stringent air pollution control efficiency requirements.
(29) “Title V.” The air operating permit program mandated in Title V of the 1990 amendments to the Federal Clean Air Act, codified in 42 U.S.C. §7661.
(30) “Title V permit.” Any permit or group of permits covering a Title V source that is issued, renewed, amended, or revised pursuant to 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 6.
(31) “Title V sources.” Title V sources include the following:
(a) any major source;
(b) any source, including an area source, subject to a standard, limitation or other requirement under Section 111 of the Federal Act;
(c) any source, including an area source, subject to a standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Federal Act, except that a source is not required to obtain a permit solely because it is subject to regulations or requirements under Section 112(r) of the Federal Act;
(d) any affected source; and
(e) any source in a source category designated by the Administrator of EPA.
D. Permitting Requirements.
(1) Permit Types. The Permit Board will issue two types of air pollution control permits, a permit to construct air emissions equipment and a State Permit to Operate such equipment. A State Permit to Operate is required for synthetic minor sources, major Title V sources, and significant minor sources, except as noted in Rule 2.2.B(1). With exception of a Title V source required to obtain a Title V permit under 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 6, the Permit Board may elect to issue a single permit addressing the requirements for both a permit to construct and State Permit to Operate air emissions equipment if the permit addresses all applicable requirements for both types of permits found herein.
(2) Unless otherwise provided by Rule 2.13 and 2.15 or other provisions of these Regulations, any new stationary source or modification of a stationary source must have a permit to construct or multi-media permit incorporating such permit before beginning actual construction.
(3) All applications must be submitted on the form supplied by the Permit Board and must be signed by a Responsible Official.
(4) The Permit Board may require the applicant to submit any additional information which the Permit Board deems relevant to its decision on the permit application including, but not limited to, ambient air quality modeling. The Permit Board may require that all other media permits for a facility be issued simultaneously with any required air permit or may issue the air permit prior to or subsequent to other permits required by the facility.
(5) A permit issued by the Permit Board will generally be for a specific site identified in the application. No permit application, except one for a portable facility which will be located only temporarily at a site or sites, will be processed unless the applicant controls the real property upon which the facility is located. The applicant may demonstrate control or the legal right to operate through ownership, lease, eminent domain, easement, license and/or contract. For portable facilities which will be located only temporarily at a site or sites, the Permit Board may issue a statewide permit or a permit for operation in multiple areas.
(6) It is the responsibility of the applicant/permittee to obtain all other approvals, permits, clearances, easements, agreements, etc., which may be required including, but not limited to, all required local government zoning approvals or permits. DEQ may delay processing any permit application until the applicant provides to DEQ information or documentation sufficient to demonstrate any approval listed in this paragraph.
(7) The provisions of a permit are severable. If any provision of a permit, or the application of any provision of a permit to any circumstances, is challenged or held invalid, the validity of the remaining permit provisions and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances, shall not be affected thereby.
(8) In the event of a conflict between any of the requirements of these regulations and/or applicable requirements of any other regulation or law, the more stringent requirements shall be applied.
(9) A stationary source which emits or causes to be emitted matter other than through a stack or a defined outlet of an air cleaning device may be classified inadequate in regard to control equipment. Facilities which comply with emission standards which specifically address and include fugitive emissions shall be presumed adequate provided all other Applicable Rules and Regulations are complied with.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.2 General Standards Applicable To All Permits
A. Except as provided for in 11 Miss Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 6., no permit shall be issued unless the applicant has complied with applicable requirements of 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 1.; 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 2.; the “Regulations for the Prevention of Air Pollution Emergency Episodes,” 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 3.; the “Ambient Air Quality Standards,” 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 4., except as provided for in Rule 2.5.E. herein; 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 5.; any amendments to these Applicable Rules and Regulations; and additional relevant Applicable Rules and Regulations promulgated by the Commission and/or Permit Board.
B. General Provisions.
(1) Any stationary source which holds a valid Title V permit shall be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements regarding a State Permit to Operate contained herein and State Law.
(2) The Permit Board may require a permittee to submit an application for a Title V permit at any time the permittee becomes subject to Title V. The Permit Board may require a permittee to submit a Title V application even though the permittee has previously submitted an application for renewal of its State Operating Permit.
(3) When requested by the Permit Board, an applicant shall submit information to demonstrate it has the financial resources to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit.
(4) When requested by the Permit Board, an applicant shall submit information on the applicant's compliance history to provide reasonable assurance that it will comply with the terms and conditions of the permit.
(5) The knowing submittal of a permit application with false information may serve as the basis for the Permit Board to void the permit issued pursuant thereto or subject the applicant to penalties for operating without a valid permit pursuant to State Law.
(6) Acceptance by the Permit Board of a permit application does not constitute a waiver of the DEQ’s right to assess appropriate penalties against the applicant pursuant to State Law for constructing or operating without a valid permit.
(7) The issuance of a permit does not release the permittee from liability for constructing or operating air emissions equipment in violation of any applicable statute, rule, or regulation of state or federal environmental authorities.
(8) Applicants for all permits to construct or operate, or to renew a State Permit to Operate, shall specify in their application the air emission rate for each air pollutant subject to regulation under the Federal Act that can be reasonably expected to be emitted into the air as a result of operations from the source.
(9) Each application must be signed by the Responsible Official. The signature of the applicant shall constitute an agreement that the applicant assumes the responsibility for any alterations, additions or changes in operation that may be necessary to achieve and maintain compliance with all Applicable Rules and Regulations.
(10) The Permit Board may, in any permit, establish limitations and requirements on the emission of air pollutants and on other parameters of a stationary source to
assure that the requirements of Applicable Rules and Regulations are met subject to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-34(2) and (3). Where the Permit Board does not establish limitations and requirements in a permit, the permit shall provide that the rates of emissions and other operating conditions and parameters specified in the application shall be the applicable limitations and requirements.
(11) The Permit Board may, in any permit, establish requirements for compliance testing by emissions sampling and analysis, for emissions and operation monitoring, and for reporting of the results from such testing and monitoring. The Permit Board shall consider factors in establishing such requirements as follows:
(a) Applicable Rules and Regulations which address testing, monitoring, and reporting;
(b) prior results of testing and monitoring at the stationary source;
(c) the applicant's compliance history;
(d) the size of the stationary source;
(e) the cost of the testing, monitoring, reporting; and
(f) the potential environmental impact of the stationary source.
(12) The Permit Board may, in any permit, subdivide the permit requirements to facilitate their expression so as to adequately define, describe, and encompass emissions-producing units, processes, and other portions of a stationary source subject to the requirements.
(13) The Permit Board may, in any permit to construct, require the permittee to perform special environmental monitoring for the purpose of detecting, quantifying, and determining the impact of pollutants existing prior to the date the permittee begins to emit when, during the review of the application and the public participation process, questions arise, with regard to separate environmental impacts of pollution raised by the applicant or the Department and which cannot be determined by available scientific data and scientific methods. The Permit Board may, in any State Permit to Operate, require the permittee to perform special environmental monitoring for the purpose of detecting, quantifying, and determining the impact of pollutants emitted by the permittee when such monitoring is necessary because traditional air quality monitoring techniques will not measure the quality of the environment nor the impact of the pollutants emitted into the environment. Such special monitoring may include, but is not limited to, parameters such as ambient concentration, deposition, bio- accumulation in flora and fauna, etc.
(14) No permit for the construction or relocation of equipment which will cause the issuance of air contaminants shall be issued when said equipment cannot comply with buffer zone requirements as follows:
(a) All sources of air emissions must be at least 150 feet from the nearest residential or recreational area.
(b) All sources of air emissions at asphalt plants utilizing conventional technology for the control of air contaminants must be at least 1500 feet from the nearest residential, recreational or light commercial area.
(c) All sources of air emissions at asphalt plants utilizing best available technology for the control of air contaminants must be at least 600 feet from the nearest residential, recreational or light commercial area.
(d) Rendering plants or other similar operations which may cause objectionable odors must be at least 1500 feet from the nearest residential, recreational or light commercial area and be located in compliance with Miss. Code Ann. § 41-51-19.
(e) Notwithstanding (a) above, incinerators must be at least 150 feet from any dwelling or from any light commercial building not owned by the applicant.
(f) Where buffer zone requirements cannot be met, the Permit Board will consider requests for exceptions to, or variances from, these requirements upon the applicant's submittal of sufficient proof that affected property owners within the subject buffer zone have had timely and sufficient notice of the proposed stationary source. Any comments received as a result of such notice shall be considered prior to action upon any request for exceptions to, or variances from, the buffer zone requirements.
(g) The Permit Board may establish buffer zone requirements for facilities not included in 15(a)-(f) considering factors including but not limited to, the type of emissions, the quantity of emissions, the physical characteristics of the stationary source (such as the location) and such other factors that the Permit Board deems appropriate to protect human health, welfare, or the environment.
(15) Each permit issued shall include the following:
(a) It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of the permit unless halting or reducing activity would create an imminent and substantial endangerment
threatening the public health and safety of the lives and property of the people of this state.
(b) The permit and/or any part thereof may be modified, revoked, reopened, and reissued, or terminated for cause. Sufficient cause for a permit to be reopened shall exist when an air emissions stationary source becomes subject to Title V. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition.
(c) The permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege.
(d) The permittee shall furnish to the DEQ within a reasonable time any information the DEQ may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee shall also furnish to the DEQ copies of records required to be kept by the permit or, for information claimed to be confidential, the permittee shall furnish such records to the DEQ along with a claim of confidentiality. The permittee may furnish such records directly to the Administrator of EPA along with a claim of confidentiality.
C. Permit Modification or Revocation
After notice and opportunity for hearing, the Permit Board may modify, or revoke in whole or in part any permit issued pursuant to these regulations for good cause shown including, but not limited to, the following:
(1) persistent violation of any of the terms or conditions of the permit;
(2) obtaining the permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts; or
(3) a change in federal, state or local laws or regulations that require either a temporary or permanent reduction or elimination of previously authorized air emissions.
D. Modification of Permits without Modification of Facilities
The terms and conditions of a previously issued permit to construct or State Permit to Operate may, upon request of the permittee, be modified if the Permit Board finds that those terms and conditions are no longer necessary to ensure compliance with all Applicable Rules and Regulations or that the modifications sought by the permittee result in operating conditions that are protective of human health and the environment.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49- 17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.3 Application for Permit to Construct and State Permit to Operate New Stationary Source
A. All engineering plans and specifications required by DEQ must bear the signature, registration number, and seal of a professional engineer registered in the State of Mississippi.
B. Information Required.
(4) The Permit Board may require each application for a permit to construct a new stationary source be accompanied by two (2) complete sets of site drawings, construction drawings, design calculations and specifications.
(5) Upon request by the Permit Board, the applicant shall furnish any additional information necessary to evaluate the design adequacy of the new stationary source.
(6) The Permit Board may require the applicant to predict the impact of emissions on air quality using air quality models as referenced in Rule 2.5.B. herein.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49- 17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.4 Public Participation and Public Availability of Information
A. For any application for a Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit to construct, the DEQ will follow the public participation procedures specified in 11 Miss. Admin Code Pt. 2, Ch. 5. in lieu of the requirements set forth herein.
B. For any application for a Title V permit, the DEQ will follow the public participation procedures specified in 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 6. in lieu of the requirements set forth herein.
C. For any application for a permit to construct or State Permit to Operate that requests federally enforceable physical and/or operational limitations on the capacity of the source to limit the source’s potential to emit or that is subject to review and permitting under R. 2.5.E., the DEQ will provide opportunity for public comment on information submitted by the owner and operator. These procedures shall include the following:
(1) The DEQ shall publish the public notice and draft permit on the DEQ’s website. The public notice and draft permit will remain available on the website for the
duration of the public comment period. The DEQ may supplement the website noticing method by other noticing methods on individual permits. (2) The public notice shall identify the following information: (a) the affected facility; (b) the name and address of the permittee; (c) the name and address of the Permit Board; (d) the activity or activities involved in the permit action; (e) the emissions change involved in any permit modification; (f) the name and contact information of a person from whom interested persons may obtain additional information, including the draft permit, the application, and all other materials relevant to the permit decision except for information entitled to confidential treatment; (g) a brief description of the comment procedures and deadline for receipt of comments; and (h) the time and place of any hearing that may be held or a statement of procedures to request a hearing. (3) The DEQ shall provide at least 30 days for public comment and shall give notice of any public hearing at least 30 days in advance of the hearing. (4) A copy of the notice will be sent to the Administrator of EPA through Region IV, and to all other State and local air pollution control agencies having jurisdiction in the region in which the source is currently located or is proposed to be located. (5) The DEQ shall make available for public inspection the DEQ’s analysis of the effect of construction or modification on ambient air quality, including the DEQ’s proposed issuance or denial, and, upon request, the information submitted by the permit applicant. (6) The DEQ may hold a public hearing on any application for a permit to construct or State Permit to Operate if it determines that there is sufficient interest in the application. (7) A permit issued pursuant to these procedures is considered federally enforceable. D. In addition to A. through C. above, the Permit Board may provide notice to the public and provide opportunity for public comment on any application for a permit to construct or State Permit to Operate.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.5 Application Review
A. Standards for Approving an Application for a Permit to Construct.
(4) The stationary source shall be designed and constructed so as to operate without causing a violation of any Applicable Rules and Regulations.
(5) The stationary source shall be designed and constructed so as to operate without interfering with the attainment and maintenance of State and National Ambient Air Quality Standards.
(6) The stationary source shall be designed and constructed so as to operate such that the emission of air toxics does not result in an ambient concentration sufficient to adversely affect human health and well-being or unreasonably and adversely affect plant or animal life beyond the stationary source boundaries.
(a) The Permit Board may require the applicant to provide data necessary to evaluate the impacts of air toxics, including the predicted emission rates and ambient concentrations, when it deems necessary, considering factors that follow:
(1) the types of air toxics involved;
(2) the quantity of emissions involved;
(3) the physical characteristics of the stationary source (such as the location, size, etc.);
(4) the anticipated human health effects;
(5) the weight of scientific data supporting the health effects associated with the air toxics;
(6) the level of air pollution control equipment employed; and
(7) such other factors as the Permit Board deems appropriate.
(b) When an air toxics evaluation is required by the Permit Board, the evaluation shall consider:
(1) an analysis of the chronic human health risks associated with the air toxics including the lifetime excess cancer risks to the most exposed individual from air toxics which are known, probable, or
possible human carcinogens calculated or determined using appropriate pathways of exposure;
(2) an analysis of the acute human health effects associated with the air toxics utilizing the most current health-effects data published by EPA and/or recognized public health institutions or, in its absence, other extrapolative acute health-effects data; and
(3) where applicable, an analysis of the impacts and effects of the air toxics on plant and/or animal life beyond the boundaries of the applicant's property.
(c) The carcinogenic risk analysis shall be considered to have satisfied applicable requirements of this regulation and 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 1. when the lifetime excess cancer risk to the most exposed individual outside the property boundary is determined to be less than 1
-6 . When the excess cancer risk is determined to be greater than 1 10 -6
but less than 1 10 -4 , the Permit Board may either:
(1) require the applicant to demonstrate that, notwithstanding the calculated risks, public health is not threatened by the proposed emissions of air toxics; or
(2) establish permit conditions to limit or prohibit the emissions of air toxics.
When this excess cancer risk is calculated or determined to be greater than 1 10 -4 , the applicant must demonstrate that, notwithstanding the calculated risks, public health is not threatened by the proposed emissions of air toxics.
(4) The construction of the stationary source shall be performed in such a manner so as to reduce fugitive dust emission from construction activities to a minimum.
B. Air Quality Models.
(3) All estimates of ambient concentrations of air pollutants shall be based on the applicable air quality models, databases, and other requirements specified in the version of the “Guideline on Air Quality Models,” 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W, approved in 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 5.
(4) Where an air quality impact model specified in the “Guideline on Air Quality Models,” 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix W, is inappropriate, the model may be modified or another model substituted. Such a modification or substitution of a model may be made on a case-by-case basis or, where appropriate, on a generic basis. Written approval of the DEQ and the Administrator of EPA must be
obtained for any modification or substitution. In addition, use of a modified or substituted model shall be subject to public notice and opportunity for public comment.
C. Cancellation of Permit to Construct a New Stationary Source and Notification.
(5) The permit to construct will expire if construction does not begin within 18 months from the date of issuance or if construction is suspended for 18 months or more.
(6) The permittee must notify DEQ in writing when construction begins within 15 days of beginning actual construction.
(7) The permittee must notify DEQ in writing when construction does not begin within 18 months of issuance or if construction is suspended for 18 months or more.
(8) The Permit Board may extend the permit to construct for such additional time it deems appropriate if, at the time of the extension request, the applicant can demonstrate it meets all requirements necessary to issue a new permit to construct.
D. Certification of Construction, Beginning Operation, and Application for Permit to Operate.
(8) Upon the completion of construction or installation of an approved stationary source or modification, the applicant shall notify the Permit Board that construction or installation was performed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications on file with the Permit Board.
(9) The Permit Board shall be promptly notified in writing of any change in construction from the previously approved plans and specifications or permit. If the Permit Board determines the changes are substantial, it may require the submission of a new application to construct with “as built” plans and specifications. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the acceptance of an “as built” application shall not constitute a waiver of the right to seek compliance penalties pursuant to State Law.
(10) A new stationary source issued a permit to construct cannot begin operation until certification of construction by the permittee.
(11) After certification of construction by the permittee, the permit to construct shall be deemed to satisfy the requirement for a permit to operate until the date the application for issuance or modification of the Title V permit or the application for issuance or modification of the State Permit to Operate, whichever is
applicable, is due. This provision is not applicable to a source excluded from the requirement for a permit to operate as provided by Rule 2.13.G.
(12) The application for issuance or modification of the State Permit to Operate or the application for issuance or modification of the Title V permit, whichever is applicable, is due 12 months after beginning operation or such earlier date or time as specified in the permit to construct. The Permit Board may specify an earlier date or time for submittal of the application. Beginning operation will be assumed to occur upon certification of construction, unless the permittee specifies differently in writing.
(13) Upon submittal of a timely and complete application for issuance or modification of a State Permit to Operate or application for issuance or modification of a Title V permit, whichever is applicable, the applicant may continue to operate under the terms and conditions of the permit to construct and in compliance with the submitted application until the Permit Board issues, modifies, or denies the Permit to Operate.
E. Additional Requirements for a permit to construct or a State Operating Permit for a New Major Stationary Source or Major Modification Significantly Impacting an Area in which a National Ambient Air Quality Standard is being exceeded or will be exceeded.
(1) The Offset Policy is the Emission Offset Interpretive Ruling adopted by EPA in (or to be printed in) 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix S, and any subsequent amendments thereto as of April 25, 1988. A copy of such ruling is attached hereto and is incorporated herein and adopted by reference as Regulations of the Commission except as follows:
(d) Notwithstanding Appendix S, the requirements for Offsets and Lowest Achievable Emission Rate will apply to all major stationary sources and major modifications which have a significant impact on nonattainment of the applicable ambient air quality standard.
(e) The source types specified in Section IV.B. of Appendix S of 40 CFR Part 51 will not be excluded from any conditions of the Offset Policy or any of the requirements contained herein.
(f) All terms in Rule 2.5.E. shall have the same definitions as those contained in the Offset Policy including the term “major stationary source” which is defined differently for purposes of this paragraph than throughout the remainder of 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 2.
(2) Definitions
(a) “Nonattainment area.” A geographical area of the state in which a violation of a National Ambient Air Quality Standard is occurring and
which has been designated by the Commission or EPA as nonattainment with respect to that standard.
(b) “Nonattainment Area Implementation Plan.” A revision to the Commission's Implementation Plan for the Control of Air Pollution, such revision having been adopted by the Commission and approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency pursuant to the Federal Act, for the purpose of attainment and maintenance of the applicable National Ambient Air Quality Standard in a nonattainment area.
(c) “Reasonable Further Progress Schedule.” An incremental reduction in total emissions of the applicable air pollutant allowed in order to provide for the attainment of the applicable National Ambient Air Quality Standard by the applicable statutory deadlines.
(d) “Significance Levels.” Concentrations of pollutants against which air quality contributions of a stationary source are compared to determine whether the stationary source significantly impacts air quality in an area. The levels are as follows:
SO
1.0 μg/m
, annual average; 5 μg/m
, 24-hour average; 25 μg/m
, 3- hour average
PM
1.0 μg/m
, annual average; 5 μg/m
, 24-hour average
NO
1.0 μg/m
, annual average
CO 0.5 mg/m
, 8-hour average; 2.0 mg/m
, 1-hour average
(e) “Significant impact.” Air quality impact which exceeds the significance level.
(3) A new stationary source which is a major stationary source or major modification for the pollutant which contributes to violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for which the area is nonattainment and which locates in or significantly impacts a nonattainment area must also meet the following requirements before a permit to construct or a State Operating Permit is issued:
(a) The stationary source must meet the lowest achievable emission rate for the applicable air pollutant.
(b) When the applicable Nonattainment Area Implementation Plan contains a Reasonable Further Progress Schedule, the Permit Board must determine that, by the time the stationary source is to commence operation, total combined allowable emissions of the applicable air pollutant from existing sources in the area, the proposed new stationary source, and all other new
facilities in the area shall be no greater than the total allowable emissions for the nonattainment area which represents reasonable further progress for attaining the standard as defined in the applicable Nonattainment Area Implementation Plan Reasonable Further Progress Schedule.
(c) The owner or operator of the proposed new stationary source must demonstrate that all major stationary sources which are owned or operated by such person (or by any entity controlled by, or under common control with such person) in the state are subject to emission limitations and are in compliance, or on a schedule for compliance, with all applicable emission limitations contained in any Applicable Rules and Regulations.
(d) Exceptions will be made to the inclusion of fugitive emissions in the determination of whether a new stationary source is a major stationary source or major modification to the extent that those exceptions are made in the Offset Policy.
(e) At such time that a particular source or modification becomes a major stationary source or major modification solely by virtue of a relaxation in an enforceable limitation on the capacity of the source or modification otherwise to emit a pollutant, the requirements of these Regulations shall apply to the source or modification as though construction had not yet commenced.
(f) When the Reasonable Further Progress Schedule in an applicable Nonattainment Area Implementation Plan is determined to have become inapplicable due to consumption of all available growth allowance under such Schedule, the stationary source must meet the conditions of Rule 2.5.E(4). below.
(4) A new major stationary source which proposes to locate in or near an area where an air quality standard is being or will be exceeded but for which no nonattainment area implementation plan has been adopted shall be subject to the following:
(a) The stationary source shall be subject to the Offset Policy if:
(1) the stationary source is a major stationary source or major modification for the pollutant for which the standard is or will be exceeded; and
(2) the stationary source is within or has significant impact in the area where the standard is or will be exceeded.
(b) In addition to the requirements of the Offset Policy, the stationary source shall not be granted a permit to construct or a State Operating Permit unless the owner or operator demonstrates that:
(1) emissions reductions to offset the new stationary source emissions will compensate for the adverse ambient impact caused by the new stationary source; and
(2) the emissions reductions have been achieved.
(5) The granting of a Permit shall not relieve the source of the responsibility to comply with other applicable requirements of this Regulation or with any other applicable Regulation or Law.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq. (Rev. 2003).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.6 Compliance Testing
A. Where compliance testing is required in any permit, it shall be performed as provided herein. The Permit Board may require in any permit the installation of sampling ports with safe access and the installation, maintenance and use of monitoring equipment.
B. Requirements.
(1) The emissions sampling and analysis will be performed in accordance with EPA Test Methods and with any continuous emission monitoring requirements, if applicable, unless otherwise approved by the Permit Board and the EPA. The Permit Board may establish an appropriate method for deviation from a test method.
(2) In the event there is no applicable EPA Test Method or method required by Applicable Rules and Regulations, the Permit Board may specify an appropriate test method, taking into consideration any test methodology proposed by the applicant.
(3) The results of the emissions sampling and analysis shall be expressed both in units consistent with the emission standards as set forth in any Applicable Rules and Regulations and in units of mass per time.
(4) Compliance testing will be performed at the expense of the applicant.
(5) The Permit Board may monitor compliance tests and perform compliance tests. Proper notification of compliance tests shall be provided to the Permit Board in accordance with Applicable Rules and Regulations or as specified in the applicable permit.
(6) The emissions sampling and analysis report shall include but not be limited to the following:
(a) a detailed description of testing procedures;
(b) sample calculations;
(c) results; and
(d) a comparison of results to all Applicable Rules and Regulations and to emission limitations in the permit.
(7) Unless otherwise specified in Applicable Rules and Regulations or by a condition of a permit issued by the Permit Board, compliance testing must be performed when the stationary source is operating at capacity and is otherwise operating normally. In the event that a demonstration of compliance by testing is performed at less than capacity, the Permit Board may modify the permit to limit capacity of the stationary source to the rate at which compliance was demonstrated if the Permit Board determines the rate was not representative of the normal operation of the stationary source or compliance with Applicable Rules and Regulations was not demonstrated. In the event that the stationary source is not operating or being operated normally during a demonstration of compliance by testing, the results of such testing will not be accepted by the Permit Board as representative of normal operation and will be considered inadequate.
C. Compliance testing will be required of all facilities for which there is an applicable New Source Performance Standard or National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants in accordance with the methods and time frames allowed by the applicable standard codified at 40 CFR Parts 60, 61, and 63 and the Federal Act.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.7 Emissions Evaluation Report
Where emissions evaluation reporting is required in any permit, acceptable mathematical methods to demonstrate control adequacy shall include but not be limited to the following:
A. An emission inventory including:
(5) location and description of control equipment at each point source;
(6) determination of all possible pollutants at each point source (characteristics, conditions, particle size distribution, etc.);
(7) listing of all stack parameters at each point of emission; and
(8) detailed description of input material (e.g., percent sulfur content, percent moisture, average BTU heating value, input rate, etc.); and
B. A detailed engineering report including:
(5) sufficient calculations to demonstrate uncontrolled emissions;
(6) sufficient calculations to support or show design efficiency of control equipment;
(7) sufficient calculations to demonstrate controlled emissions; and
(8) comparison of calculated controlled emissions with the applicable emission standards as set forth in 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 1.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.8 Procedures For Renewal Of State Permit To Operate
A. A State Permit to Operate shall expire five (5) years from the effective date of said permit or within any shorter period of time deemed appropriate by the Permit Board and stated in the State Permit to Operate when issued.
B. Not less than one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to the expiration date of the State Permit to Operate, the applicant shall make application for renewal of a State Permit to Operate if the applicant desires to continue operation of that stationary source. If the applicant submits a timely and complete application pursuant to this paragraph and the Permit Board, through no fault of the applicant, fails to act on the application on or before the expiration date of the existing permit, the applicant shall continue to operate the stationary source under the terms and conditions of the expired permit which shall remain in effect until final action on the application is taken by the Permit Board.
E. The application for renewal of a State Permit to Operate shall be substantiated with current emissions data, test results or reports, or other data as deemed necessary.
F. Renewal of the State Permit to Operate shall comply with the public participation procedures of Rule 2.4.C., as applicable.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.9 Reporting & Recordkeeping
The Permit Board may require in any permit the maintenance of records relating to the operation of air contamination sources, and any authorized representatives of the Commission may examine and copy any such records pertaining to the
operation of such air contaminant source. Copies of such records shall be submitted to the Permit Board as required by Applicable Rules and Regulations or the permit or upon request.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.10 Emission Reduction Schedule
A. In accordance with 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 3., it is the responsibility of each and every stationary source with actual emissions in excess of 0.25 tons per day of total air contaminants, and other significant sources, to have a Commission-approved emissions reduction schedule which shall set forth preplanned abatement strategies in the event of an emergency episode.
B. Required Information.
(3) The emissions reduction schedule must have three stages of reduction procedures: (1) alert level reduction; (2) warning level reduction; and (3) emergency level reduction.
(4) Each level of reduction procedures must show the type and source of air contaminants, the amount of reduction of contaminants, the time required to reduce contaminants, and the manner in which reduction will be achieved.
C. The emissions reduction schedule shall be subject to review and approval by the Commission.
D. An unacceptable emissions reduction schedule shall be returned to the applicant along with the Commission’s reasons for denial.
E. The applicant shall have not more than 30 days to amend a disapproved emissions reduction schedule to conform with the emission reduction standards as set forth by the Commission.
F. Any person aggrieved by the requirements to amend an emissions reduction schedule shall be entitled to a hearing.
G. Should an applicant fail to submit an emissions reduction schedule within the allowable time period or fail to submit an amended preplanned strategy, the Commission will establish or revise said plan to cause it to meet the standards as set forth by the Commission.
H. Such established or revised preplanned strategies will thereafter be the preplanned strategies which the applicant will put into effect upon the issuance of an appropriate order by the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.11 General Permits
The Permit Board may issue general permits to construct and operate, as described below, classes of articles, machines, equipment, or other contrivances. Issuance of a general permit shall comply with the public participation procedures of Rule 2.4.C., as applicable. Issuance of a general permit allowing operation of a Title V source must comply with the requirements of 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.3.D. A general permit shall be issued for a period of time not to exceed five years. The Permit Board shall establish the schedule for submittal of the notice of intent (NOI) and the information that shall be required in the NOI. The Permit Board may choose, for certain types of operations, to confer automatic coverage under a general permit without requiring the submittal of an application or other request. General permits allowing construction of moderate stationary sources or moderate modifications and general permits allowing operation of synthetic minor sources or major Title V sources must require submittal of a NOI. For any request for coverage of a moderate stationary source, moderate modification, and/or synthetic minor source under a general permit, the DEQ will follow the public participation procedures required by Rule 2.4.C. of these regulations.
A. The applicant shall apply for coverage under an issued general permit in accordance with the schedule and requirements established in that general permit.
B. If the proposed determination is to grant coverage under an issued general permit, the Permit Board’s designee shall issue a certificate of coverage to the applicant
C. Any stationary source covered or eligible to be covered under a general permit may be required to obtain an individual permit at the discretion of the Permit Board. Any interested person may petition the Permit Board to take action under this paragraph.
D. The Permit Board may revoke and/or modify a general permit or coverage under a general permit.
E. Any stationary source covered by a general permit may request to be excluded from such coverage by applying for an individual permit. Coverage under the general permit is automatically terminated upon issuance of an individual permit.
F. Any stationary source excluded from coverage under a general permit solely because it is already covered under an individual permit may request that the individual permit be revoked and that it be covered by the general permit. Upon revocation of the individual permit by the Permit Board, coverage under the general permit may be granted to the stationary source if approved by the Permit Board.
G. A general permit shall remain in force until it is either reissued, modified, or revoked by the Permit Board. All coverages under the general permit continue until the general permit is reissued or as defined in the reissued general permit. A stationary source may apply for coverage under any general permit that is currently in force.
H. The granting of coverage under a general permit does not imply or express exclusion from the requirements of any emission-limiting regulation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.12 Multi-Media Permits
A. The Permit Board may issue a multi-media permit incorporating a permit to construct air emissions equipment and/or a State Permit to Operate such equipment. Issuance of a multi-media permit shall comply with the public participation procedures of Rule 2.4.C., as applicable.
B. For purpose of these regulations, a multi-media permit incorporating a permit to construct shall be the same as a permit to construct. The procedures for applying for such a multi- media permit and the standards applicable to such a permit follow those for a permit to construct. These procedures and standards are found in Rules 2.1 through 2.10.
C. For purpose of these regulations, a multi-media permit incorporating a State Permit to Operate shall be the same as a State Permit to Operate. The procedures for applying for such a multi-media permit and the standards applicable to such a permit follow those for a State Permit to Operate. These procedures and standards are found in Rule 2.1 through 2.4 and 2.6.
D. For purpose or these regulations, a multi-media general permit incorporating a permit to construct and/or a State Permit to Operate combined with certificate of coverage shall be the same as a permit to construct and/or a State Permit to Operate. The procedures for applying for coverage follow those for a general permit to construct and operate. These procedures are found in Rules 2.5 and 2.11 of these regulations.
E. Any stationary source or facility obtaining a multi-media permit under these provisions is subject to the permitting requirements found in Rule 2.1.C. of these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.13 Exclusions
A. New Source Permit to Construct. Any new “Greenfield” stationary source must obtain a permit to construct except as excluded in D. or E.
B. Compliance with Other Applicable Requirements. Exclusions from permit requirements does not exclude anyone from complying with all other applicable requirements and regulations.
C. Maintenance of Emissions Records. Stationary sources excluded from the requirement for a permit to construct and/or State Permit to Operate must maintain records of any emissions associated with any excluded activities and report that to DEQ upon request. Indirect measurements of emissions are allowable for these recordkeeping requirements.
D. Categorical Exclusions from Both Permit to Construct and Operate. The following are excluded from the requirement for a permit to construct and a permit to operate:
(16) Residential heating, cooking, or cleaning devices.
(17) Residential yard and garden equipment.
(18) Mobile sources.
(19) Air conditioning, space heating, or ventilating systems not uniquely designed or operated in a manner to remove air contaminants generated by or released from equipment.
(20) Stationary sources, other than incinerators or CAFOs, which have potential uncontrolled emissions less than 10 tons per year (TPY) of PM
, SO
, NO x , CO and VOC, as determined for each pollutant; less than 1.0 TPY of each hazardous air pollutant (HAP); and less than 2.5 TPY of all HAPs combined.
(21) Feed milling facilities which mill, formulate, or otherwise prepare animal feed products for direct local retail sale solely in prepackaged form and are not associated with a grain elevator. Milling facilities engaged in preparing feed products for wholesale distribution and/or bulk sale are not included in this exclusion.
(22) Sawmills/woodworking plants which do not have drying kilns onsite and process less than 25,000 board feet/day.
(23) Any equipment used exclusively for preparation of food for direct retail sale at a restaurant, cafeteria, bakery, or food service.
(24) Auto body shops with only one (1) paint spray booth and with substantial portions of business devoted to repainting entire vehicles or collision repairs.
(25) Surface sand and/or gravel mining operations which do not utilize rock crushers, pneumatic conveyors, or dust collectors.
(26) Recreational heaters.
(27) Gasoline service stations with no more than 17 refueling positions.
(28) Retail propane filling operations.
(29) Outdoor kerosene heaters.
(30) Refrigeration systems.
E. Emission-Based Exclusion from Permit to Construct. The following emissions units are excluded from the requirement for a permit to construct provided the unit is not a new major stationary source, major source of hazardous air pollutants, new moderate stationary source, major modification, or moderate modification nor a part of a new major stationary source, major source of hazardous air pollutants, new moderate stationary source, major modification, or moderate modification.
(21) Coal or residual oil-fired combustion devices or groups of devices with a total rated input capacity of less than 2,000,000 BTU/hr, clean wood waste boilers or groups of boilers with a total rated input capacity of less than 10,000,000 BTU/hr, distillate oil or combination distillate and gas-fired units or groups of units with a total rated input capacity less than 10,000,000 BTU/hr and natural gas fired and/or LPG fired devices or groups of devices with all individual rated input capacities of less than 10,000,000 BTU/hr and a total rated input capacity less than 25,000,000 BTU/hr.
(22) Equipment used exclusively for oil and gas field production, gathering, storing, and transmission, including, but not limited to: gas/oil separators, emulsion treaters, free water knockouts, compressors or group of compressors with a total rated capacity less than 500 brake horsepower, segregation basins, API oil/water separators, tank facilities, and crude oil loading equipment used solely for crude oil collected from production wells onsite. Continuous flaring of sour gas and/or combustion devices firing sour gas are not excluded from permitting.
(23) Emergency safety relief systems, including pilot lights.
(24) Sand blasting operations which use no more than 83 tons of sand in any given 365-day period.
(25) Wood, plastic, and/or metal machining operations which are totally enclosed within a building, and which have no direct exhausts to the ambient air other than common building ventilation points.
(26) Petroleum products storage facilities with no individual storage tank greater than 19,800 gallons and total storage capacity less than 55,000 gallons.
(27) A compressor or groups of compressors firing either natural gas, gasoline, LPG and/or diesel fuel with a total rated capacity less than or equal to 500 brake horsepower.
(28) Surface coating operations which utilize less than 50 pounds per day of all solvents and coatings.
(29) Fire training exercises and equipment.
(30) Groundwater recovery/treatment facilities used for the remediation of motor fuel contamination addressed under the Underground Storage Tank Program when the facilities are located on the site of the contamination.
(31) Temporary storage/aeration of soils contaminated with motor fuel which are produced as a result of a remedial response to a release from an underground storage tank when the storage/operation is on the site of the tank.
(32) CERCLA/Superfund remediation or removal projects on the site of the contamination.
(33) Remediation of sites contaminated with hazardous constituents required under State authority on the site of the contamination.
(34) Portable TSCA treatment facilities permitted by EPA.
(35) Wastewater collection and treatment facilities, other than CAFOs or those listed in 40 CFR 61, Subpart FF - National Emission Standard for Benzene Waste Operations and in 40 CFR 60, Subpart QQQ - Standards of Performance for VOC Emissions from Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems, which have the potential to emit no more than 5 TPY of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC).
(36) Surface coal mining operations for which a permit has been issued by the Permit Board pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. §53-9-1, et seq. or by the Federal Office of Surface Mining pursuant to the Federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, 30 U.S.C. §1201, et seq. However, any rock crushers, pneumatic conveyors, and dust collectors at such operations may require permitting if they meet the definition of “stationary source.”
(37) Auto body shops.
(38) Dedicated fuel stations with total storage capacity less than 55,000 gallons and no individual tank greater than 19,800 gallons.
(39) Subject to Rule 2.14, any existing or new animal feeding operation that is not a concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) and that does not incinerate animal carcasses or waste. For the purpose of this paragraph, “animal feeding operation” means any facility where animals have been, are, or will be stabled or confined, or allowed to roam or graze within a fenced or otherwise restricted area. This definition includes, but is not limited to, aquatic animal production facilities,
kennels, swine growing operations, veal farms, chicken growing operations, cattle growing operations, and dairies.
(40) Initial field testing of oil and gas wells, after proper notification to the Commission provided such tests will not produce 100 tons per year or more of any pollutant.
F. De minimis NSR Modification Exclusion from Permit to Construct. A de minimis NSR modification is excluded from the requirements for a permit to construct. This does not eliminate any requirement for modification of the related Title V permit or State Permit to Operate to address a de minimis NSR modification. A modification other than a de minimis NSR modification is subject to the requirements for a permit to construct.
G. Exclusion from Permit to Operate. Major Title V sources, other sources required to obtain a Title V permit, synthetic minor sources, and significant minor sources are subject to the requirements for a permit to operate. Any other source is excluded from the requirement to obtain a permit to operate. Exclusion from the requirement to obtain a permit to operate does not imply exclusion from any other requirements of these regulations, including the requirement to obtain a permit to construct before beginning actual construction and the certification of construction requirements specified in R. 2.5.D.
H. General Permit May Supersede Exclusions. The Permit Board may issue a general permit which shall supersede the exclusions listed in D., E., F., and G. above.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.14 CAFOs
Concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are not excluded from the requirements for a permit or any other provisions of these regulations. CAFOs issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit or a state water pollution control permit prior to January 18, 2000, are required to submit an application for a permit to construct and/or operate or a multimedia permit in compliance with the provisions of these regulations at least 180 days prior to the expiration of the facility's NPDES permit or state water pollution control permit that was issued prior to the effective date of these regulations. Multimedia permits may be issued by the Permit Board as new permits or as a modification of an existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System or state water pollution control permit but all provisions and procedures of these regulations are applicable. The Permit Board on its own initiative or at the request of DEQ, may require any existing or new animal feeding operation or concentrated animal feeding operation to obtain a multimedia permit, including provisions regarding air emissions and/or odor control.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.15 Options
A. Plantwide Applicability Limitation (PAL). In accordance with 40 CFR 52.21(aa), any major stationary source may establish a plantwide applicability limitation based on baseline actual emissions (actuals PAL) for use in future NSR actions. The actuals PAL can be established in a PSD Permit to Construct, a Title V permit, or a State Permit to Operate a synthetic minor source. The applicable permit to construct or permit to operate shall be referred to as a PAL permit and, in addition to the normal applicable procedures and requirements for the permit action, shall meet all the requirements for a PAL permit. The issuance shall follow all procedures for a PAL permit as specified in 40 CFR 52.21(aa), except that the term “Administrator” as it appears in 40 CFR 52.21(aa) shall mean the Permit Board and the phrase “§§ 51.160 and 51.161 of this chapter” as it appears in 40 CFR 52.21(aa)(5) shall mean 11 Miss. Admin. Code. Pt. 2, R. 2.4.
B. Optional Pre-Permit Construction. Pre-permit construction approval is available for new moderate stationary sources, new minor stationary sources, minor modifications, and moderate modifications except those sources and modifications excluded from this provision in paragraph (9) below. The applicant may request approval from the Permit Board to begin actual construction or modification of qualifying sources before receiving the required permit to construct. To obtain the Permit Board’s pre-permit construction approval, the applicant shall satisfy the following requirements:
(10) The applicant shall apply for a permit to construct or Optional Operating Permit Modification in accordance with C. below.
(11) The applicant shall submit a pre-permit construction approval application which must contain, but not be limited to the following:
(a) a letter requesting approval to begin actual construction before obtaining the required permit to construct,
(b) a copy of the notice referenced in paragraph (4) below,
(c) demonstration that the applicant is not precluded from this provision per paragraph (9) below,
(d) process description(s),
(e) equipment list(s),
(f) proposed emission limits,
(g) proof that buffer zone requirements in Rule 2.2.B(14). are met,
(h) certification that construction is at the applicant’s own risk, and
(i) certification that the applicant shall not contest the final decision to issue or deny the permit to construct, Title V permit modification, or State Operating Permit modification, as applicable, based on the fact that construction has already begun.
(12) An applicant seeking enforceable limitations on a source’s potential to emit, such as to qualify as a moderate stationary source or a moderate modification, must describe in detail in the pre-permit construction application the proposed limitations and certify that the applicant will comply with the limitations, including any applicable monitoring and reporting requirements required by the permit.
(13) The applicant shall provide notice to the DEQ of the application for pre-permit construction approval. The notice shall be in the format provided by DEQ and shall include the following:
(a) a general description of the proposed source or modification,
(b) a statement that pre-permit construction approval is being requested from the Permit Board,
(c) the location and address where additional information about the proposed source or modification and application may be obtained,
(d) a statement that comments may be made to DEQ, and
(e) DEQ’s address where comments may be submitted.
The DEQ shall provide at least ten (10) days for the public to comment to the Permit Board by posting the notice on the DEQ’s website for the duration of the comment period.
(14) After determination that all requirements have been met and after sufficient time for receipt of all public comments submitted during the ten-day public notice, the Permit Board may grant pre-permit construction approval.
(15) Upon receipt of the pre-permit construction approval letter issued by the Permit Board, the applicant may begin construction at their own risk. Upon issuance of the pre-permit construction approval letter, any and all potential to emit limitations addressed in the pre-permit construction application shall become enforceable. The applicant cannot operate the new source or emissions units included in the proposed modification until issued the final permit to construct, Title V permit modification, or State Operating Permit modification, as applicable, and until certification of construction in accordance with Rule 2.5.D., where applicable. This provision applies even if the source is excluded from the requirement to obtain a permit to operate.
(16) Issuance of the pre-permit construction approval letter shall have no bearing on the issuance or denial of the final permit to construct, Title V permit modification, or State Operating Permit modification, as applicable. If the final permit is denied, the applicant must cease construction and follow the procedures allowed by law and regulation for any appeal. The fact that construction has already begun and that approval was granted for pre-permit construction shall not be a basis for appeal of the Permit Board’s decision.
(17) The Permit Board may deny the pre-permit construction approval application or revoke an existing pre-permit construction approval for any reason it deems valid including objection(s) from the public. Denial/revocation of the pre-permit construction approval application shall have no bearing on the issuance or denial of a final permit.
(18) Pre-permit construction approval is not available for new major stationary sources, major modifications, medical waste incinerators or hazardous waste incinerators or any modification involving medical waste incineration or hazardous waste incineration, and new stationary sources or modifications meeting the definition of “constructing or reconstructing” a major source of hazardous air pollutants in 11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, Ch. 8. and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart B, and thereby requiring a case-by-case Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) determination
C. Optional Operating Permit Modification. For a modification of a source holding a valid Title V permit or State Operating Permit, a permit to construct may be issued as a modification of the Title V permit or State Operating Permit as an alternative to a new permit to construct. All requirements for a permit to construct are still applicable and the operating permit modification must occur prior to beginning actual construction unless pre-permit construction approval is granted in accordance with B. above. If the applicant has been granted pre-permit construction approval, the operating permit must be modified before beginning operation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.16 Permit Transfer
A. “Transfer” shall mean any sale, conveyance, or assignment of the rights held by the applicant in any permit issued pursuant to these Regulations which meets the conditions of both (1) and (2) below:
(3) There is a change of more than 50 percent of the equity ownership of the permit holder over a sustained period which results in a new majority owner. A new majority owner for purposes of this provision shall be an individual, partnership, company, or group of affiliated companies.
(4) The change in the ultimate ownership of the permit holder involves the parent, grandparent, or great-grandparent company.
B. A permit issued pursuant to these Regulations shall not be transferred except upon approval of the Permit Board.
C. When requested by the Permit Board, an applicant for transfer approval shall submit information to demonstrate that it has the financial resources, operational expertise and environmental compliance history over the last five years to ensure compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit to be transferred except where this conflicts with State Law.
D. The application for approval of the transfer may be combined with an early application for permit renewal.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 2.17 Severability
If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of any of these regulations, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for any reason challenged or held to be invalid or void, the validity of the remaining regulations and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Part 2, Chapter 5: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality (Adopted June 28, 1990. Amended April 25, 1991; December 9, 1993; August 22, 1996; July 28, 2005; August 23, 2007; October 28, 2010; April 28, 2011; December 14, 2011; April 28, 2016; and Last amended February 22, 2024)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.1 Rule 5.1
The purpose of this regulation is to implement a program for the prevention of significant deterioration of air quality as required by 40 C.F.R. § 51.166. This regulation supersedes and replaces the previous adoption of Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 5, “Regulations for the Prevention of Significant Deterioration of Air Quality.” “C.F.R.” refers to the Code of Federal Regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.2 Rule 5.2
Other than the subsections listed below and except for the changes set forth in Rule 5.3 of this regulation, the provisions of 40 C.F.R. § 52.21, as amended and promulgated by [Start date of public notice], are incorporated herein and adopted by reference by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality as official regulations of the State of Mississippi and
shall hereafter be enforceable as such. The following subsections of 40 C.F.R. § 52.21 are excluded from this regulation:
A. (a)(1) [Plan disapproval],
B. (q) [Public Participation],
C. (s) [Environmental Impact Statements],
D. (u) [Delegation of authority], and
E. (cc) [Routine maintenance, repair, and replacement]
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.3 The term “Administrator” as it appears in 40 C.F.R
§ 52.21 shall mean the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, except that:
A. In subparagraph (b)(3)(iii) [relating to “net emissions increase”], it shall mean either the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board or the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
B. In the following subsections, it shall continue to mean the Administrator of the USEPA:
(1) (b)(17) [definition of “federally enforceable”];
(2) paragraph b(37)(i);
(3) paragraph b(43);
(4) paragraph b(48)(ii)(c);
(5) paragraph b(50)(i);
(6) paragraph b(51);
(7) (g)(l)-(g)(6) [Redesignation];
(8) (1)(2) [Air quality models];
(9) (p)(2) [concerning Federal Land Manager]; and
(10) (t) [Disputed permits or redesignations].
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.4 Rule 5.4
Subsection 40 CFR 51.166(f) “Exclusions from Increment Consumption” (excluding the phrase “The plan may provide that”), as amended and promulgated by [Start date of public notice], is incorporated herein and adopted by reference, except for the changes set forth below:
A. The phrases “the plan provides that” and "it shall also provide that” are excluded from paragraph 40 CFR 51.166(f)(2), and
B. The term “Administrator” as it appears in 40 C.F.R. § 51.166(f) shall mean the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, except that the term “Administrator” as it appears in subparagraphs (f)(1)(v) and (f)(4) shall continue to mean the Administrator of the USEPA.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.5 Rule 5.5
The Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality shall transmit to the Administrator of the USEPA a copy of each permit application filed under this regulation and shall notify the Administrator of the USEPA of each significant action the Executive Director takes on the application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.6 Rule 5.6
This regulation applies to any stationary source or modification to which 40 CFR 52.21 applied as of the date of adoption of this regulation, but for which the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board had not issued a permit pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 52.21 by that date.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 5.7 Public Participation
A. The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (“the Department”) shall notify all applicants within 30 days as to the completeness of the application or any deficiency in the application or information submitted. In the event of such a deficiency, the date of receipt of the application shall be the date on which the Department received all required information.
B. Within 150 days after receipt of a complete application, the Department shall:
(1) Make a preliminary determination whether construction should be approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved.
(2) Make available in at least one location in each region in which the proposed source would be constructed, a copy of all materials the applicant submitted, a copy of the preliminary determination, and a copy or summary of other materials, if any, considered in making the preliminary determination. This requirement may be met by making these materials available at a physical location or on the Department’s website.
(3) Notify the public of the application, the preliminary determination, the degree of increment consumption that is expected from the source or modification, the opportunity to comment at a public hearing, and the opportunity to submit written public comments. The Department will publish the public notice on its website, and the notice will remain available on the website for the duration of the public comment period. The Department shall allow for at least 30 days for public comment. The Department must include the following on the public website for the duration of the public comment period: the public notice, the draft permit, information on how to access the administrative record for the draft permit, and information on how to request or attend a public hearing on the draft permit, if a hearing has already been scheduled. If the Department deems it appropriate, the Department may supplement the website noticing method by other noticing methods on individual permits.
(4) Send a copy of the public notice to the applicant, the Administrator of the USEPA, and to officials and agencies having cognizance over the location where the proposed construction would occur as follows: Any other State or local air pollution control agencies; the chief executives of the city and county where the source would be located; any comprehensive regional land use planning agency; and any State, Federal Land Manager, or Indian Governing body whose lands may be affected by emissions from the source or modification.
(5) Provide opportunity for a public hearing for interested persons to appear and submit written or oral comments on the air quality impact of the source, alternatives to it, the control technology required, and other appropriate considerations.
(6) Consider all written comments submitted within a time specified in the public notice and all comments received at any public hearing in making a final decision on the approvability of the application. The Department will make all comments available for public inspection at the same physical location or on the same website where the Department made available preconstruction information relating to the proposed source or modification.
(7) Make a final determination whether construction should be approved, approved with conditions, or disapproved.
(8) Notify the applicant in writing of the final determination and make such notification available for public inspection at the same location or on the same website where the Department made available preconstruction information and public comments relating to the proposed source or modification.
Part 2, Chapter 6: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Air Emissions Operating Permit Regulations for the Purposes of Title V of the Federal Clean Air Act (Adopted October 27, 1993. Amended: December 14, 1995; April 23, 1998; October 26, 2000; October 28, 2010; December 14, 2011; June 28, 2012; February 24, 2022; and Last Amended June 27, 2024)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.1 General Requirements
A. Definitions.
(1) Advisory Council is the Council created by State law to conduct an independent study of the costs for the development and administration of the Title V program within the Department of Environmental Quality and to conduct an annual review of the costs of administering such programs. (2) Affected source shall have the same meaning as set forth in the regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (3) Affected State(s) means all states whose air quality may be affected and that are contiguous to Mississippi; or are within 50 miles of the permitted source. (4) Affected unit shall have the same meaning as set forth in the regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (5) Alternative operating scenario (AOS) means a scenario authorized in a Title V permit that involves a change at the Title V source for a particular emissions unit, and that either results in the unit being subject to one or more applicable requirements which differ from those applicable to the emissions unit prior to implementation of the change or renders inapplicable one or more requirements previously applicable to the emissions unit prior to implementation of the change. (6) Applicable requirement means all of the following as they apply to emissions units in a Title V source (including requirements that have been promulgated or approved by EPA through rulemaking at the time of issuance but have future- effective compliance dates): (a) any standard or other requirement set forth in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) approved or promulgated by EPA through rulemaking under Title I of the Federal Act that implements the relevant requirements of the Federal Act, including any revisions to the SIP promulgated in 40 CFR Part 52; (b) any term or condition of any construction permits issued pursuant to Mississippi regulations approved or promulgated through rulemaking under Title I, including parts C or D, of the Federal Act;
(c) any standard or other requirement under Section 111 of the Federal Act, including Section 111(d); (d) any standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Federal Act, including any requirement concerning accident prevention under Section 112(r)(7) of the Federal Act; (e) any standard or other requirement of the acid rain program under Title IV of the Federal Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder; (f) any requirements established pursuant to Section 504(b) or Section 114(a)(3) of the Federal Act; (g) any standard or other requirement governing solid waste incineration under Section 129 of the Federal Act; (h) any standard or other requirement for consumer and commercial products under Section 183(e) of the Federal Act; (i) any standard or other requirement for tank vessels under Section 183(f) of the Federal Act; (j) any standard or other requirement of the program to control air pollution from outer continental shelf sources under Section 328 of the Federal Act; (k) any standard or other requirement of the regulations promulgated to protect stratospheric ozone under Title VI of the Federal Act, unless the Administrator has determined that such requirements need not be contained in a Title V permit; and (l) any national ambient air quality standard or increment or visibility requirement under part C of Title I of the Federal Act applicable only with regard to temporary sources permitted pursuant to Section 504(e) of the Federal Act. (7) Commission means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality. (8) DEQ means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality. (9) Designated representative shall have the same meaning as set forth in Section 402(26) of the Federal Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. (10) Draft permit is the version of a recommended permit for which the DEQ offers public participation under Rule 6.4.I. or Affected State(s) review under Rule 6.5. (11) Emissions allowable under the permit means a federally enforceable permit term
or condition determined at issuance to be required by an applicable requirement that establishes an emissions limit (including a work practice standard) or a federally enforceable emissions cap that the source has assumed to avoid an applicable requirement to which the source would otherwise be subject. (12) Emissions unit means any part or activity of a stationary source that emits or has the potential to emit any regulated air pollutant or any pollutant listed under Section 112(b) of the Federal Act. This term is not meant to alter or affect the definition of the term "unit" for purposes of Title IV of the Federal Act. (13) The EPA or the Administrator means the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or his designee. (14) Federal Act means the Federal Clean Air Act as amended in 1990, 42 U.S.C. §§7401-7671, and any subsequent amendments. (15) Final permit means the version of a Title V permit issued by the Permit Board once all review procedures required by Rule 6.4. and Rule 6.5. have been completed. (16) Fugitive emissions are those emissions which could not reasonably pass through a stack, chimney, vent or other functionally-equivalent opening. (17) General permit is a Title V permit that meets the requirements of Rule 6.3.D. (18) Greenhouse gases (GHGs) means the air pollutant defined in 40 CFR 86.1818– 12(a) as the aggregate group of six (6) greenhouse gases: Carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. To represent an amount of GHGs emitted, the term tpy CO
equivalent emissions (CO
e) shall be used and computed as follows: a. Multiply the mass amount of emissions (tpy), for each of the six greenhouse gases in the pollutant GHGs, by the gas’s associated global warming potential published at Table A–1 to subpart A of Part 98, Title 40. b. Sum the resultant value for each gas to compute a tpy CO
e. (19) Major source is any stationary source (or any group of stationary sources that are located on one or more contiguous or adjacent properties, and are under common control of the same person (or persons under common control) belonging to a single major industrial grouping and that is described in paragraph (a), (b), or (c) of this definition. For the purposes of defining “major source”, a stationary source or group of stationary sources shall be considered part of a single industrial grouping if all of the pollutant emitting activities at such source or group of sources on contiguous
or adjacent properties belong to the same Major Group (i.e., all have the same two-digit code) as described in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987. For onshore activities belonging to Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Major Group 13: Oil and Gas Extraction, pollutant emitting activities shall be considered adjacent if they are located on the same surface site; or if they are located on surface sites that are located within
⁄
-mile of one another (measured from the center of the equipment on the surface site) and they share equipment. Shared equipment includes, but is not limited to, produced fluids storage tanks, phase separators, natural gas dehydrators or emissions control devices. Surface site, as used herein, has the same meaning as in 40 CFR 63.761. (a) A major source under Section 112 of the Federal Act is defined as follows: (1) For pollutants other than radionuclides, any stationary source or group of stationary sources located within a contiguous area and under common control that emits or has the potential to emit, in the aggregate, 10 tons per year (tpy) or more of any hazardous air pollutant which has been listed pursuant to Section 112(b) of the Federal Act, 25 tpy or more of any combination of such hazardous air pollutants, or such lesser quantity as the Administrator may establish by rule. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, emissions from any oil or gas exploration or production well (with its associated equipment) and emissions from any pipeline compressor or pump station shall not be aggregated with emissions from other similar units, whether or not such units are in a contiguous area or under common control, to determine whether such units or stations are major sources; or (2) For radionuclides, “major source” shall have the meaning specified by the Administrator by rule. (b) A major stationary source of air pollutants, as defined in Section 302 of the Federal Act, that directly emits or has the potential to emit, 100 tpy or more of any air pollutant subject to regulation except the pollutant greenhouse gases as defined in this section. This definition of major stationary source includes any major source of fugitive emissions of any such pollutant (except the pollutant greenhouse gases as defined in this section), as determined by rule by the Administrator. The fugitive emissions of a stationary source shall not be considered in determining whether it is a major stationary source for the purposes of Section 302(j) of the Federal Act, unless the source belongs to one of the following categories of stationary sources: (1) coal cleaning plants (with thermal dryers);
(2) kraft pulp mills; (3) portland cement plants; (4) primary zinc smelters; (5) iron and steel mills; (6) primary aluminum ore reduction plants; (7) primary copper smelters; (8) municipal incinerators capable of charging more than 250 tons of refuse per day; (9) hydrofluoric, sulfuric, or nitric acid plants; (10) petroleum refineries; (11) lime plants; (12) phosphate rock processing plants; (13) coke oven batteries; (14) sulfur recovery plants; (15) carbon black plants (furnace process); (16) primary lead smelters; (17) fuel conversion plants; (18) sintering plants; (19) secondary metal production plants; (20) chemical process plants (The term chemical processing plant shall not include ethanol production facilities that produce ethanol by natural fermentation included in NAICS codes 325193 or 312140.); (21) fossil-fuel boilers (or combination thereof) totaling more than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input; (22) petroleum storage and transfer units with a total storage capacity exceeding 300,000 barrels; (23) taconite ore processing plants; (24) glass fiber processing plants;
(25) charcoal production plant; (26) fossil-fuel-fired steam electric plants of more than 250 million British thermal units per hour heat input; or (27) any other stationary source category, which as of August 7, 1980, is being regulated by a standard promulgated under Section 111 or 112 of the Federal Act. (c) A major stationary source as defined in part D of Title I of the Federal Act, including the following: (1) for ozone nonattainment areas, sources with the potential to emit 100 tpy or more of volatile organic compounds or oxides of nitrogen in areas classified as “marginal’ or “moderate”, 50 tpy or more in areas classified as “serious”, 25 tpy or more in areas classified as "severe", and 10 tpy or more in areas classified as “extreme”; except that the references in this paragraph to 100, 50, 25 and 10 tpy of nitrogen oxides shall not apply with respect to any source for which the Administrator has made a finding under Section 182(f)(1) or (2) of the Federal Act, that requirements under Section 182(f) of the Federal Act do not apply;
(2) for ozone transport regions established pursuant to Section 184 of the Federal Act, sources with the potential to emit 50 tpy or more of volatile organic compounds; (3) for carbon monoxide nonattainment areas: (a) that are classified as "serious", and (b) in which stationary sources contribute significantly to carbon monoxide levels as determined under rules issued by the Administrator, sources with the potential to emit 50 tpy or more of carbon monoxide; and (4) for particulate matter (PM
) nonattainment areas classified as "serious", sources with the potential to emit 70 tpy or more of PM
. (20) Permit Board means the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board. (21) Permit modification means a revision to a Title V permit that meets the requirements of Rule 6.4.E. as distinguished from an administrative amendment. (22) Permit program cost means all reasonable direct and indirect costs required to develop and administer the Title V permit program, as authorized by State law and set forth in Miss. Code Ann. §49-17-14. (23) Permit revision means any permit modification or administrative permit amendment.
(24) Potential to emit means the maximum capacity of a stationary source to emit any air pollutant under its physical and operational design. Any physical or operational limitation on the capacity of a source to emit an air pollutant, including air pollution control equipment and restrictions on hours of operation or on the type or amount of material combusted, stored, or processed, shall be treated as part of its design if the limitation is established in a construction permit required by the EPA-approved Mississippi SIP for New Source Review (NSR) or a Title V permit. This term does not alter or affect the use of this term for any other purposes under the Federal Act, or the term “capacity factor” as used in Title IV of the Federal Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder. (25) Proposed permit means the version of a recommended permit that the DEQ proposes to be issued and forwards to the Administrator for review in compliance with Rule 6.5. (26) Regulated air pollutant includes the following:
(a) nitrogen oxides or any volatile organic compounds;
(b) any pollutant for which a national ambient air quality standard has been promulgated;
(c) any pollutant that is subject to any standard promulgated under Section 111 of the Federal Act;
(d) any class I or II substance subject to a standard promulgated under or established by Title VI of the Federal Act; or (e) any pollutant subject to a standard promulgated under Section 112 or other requirements established under Section 112 of the Federal Act, including Sections 112(g), (j), and (r) of the Federal Act, including the following:
(1) any pollutant subject to requirements under Section 112(j) of the Federal Act (if the Administrator fails to promulgate a standard by the date established pursuant to Section 112(e) of the Federal Act, any pollutant for which a subject source would be major shall be considered to be regulated on the date 18 months after the applicable date established pursuant to Section 112(e) of the Federal Act); and
(2) any pollutant for which the requirements of Section 112(g)(2) of the Federal Act have been met, but only with respect to the individual source subject to Section 112(g)(2) requirements. (27) Renewal means the process by which a permit is reissued at the end of its term. (28) Responsible official means as follows:
(a) for a corporation: a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation, or a duly authorized representative of such person if the representative is responsible for the overall operation of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities applying for or subject to a permit and either: (1) the facilities employ more than 250 persons or have gross annual sales or expenditures exceeding $25 million (in second quarter 1980 dollars); or (2) the delegation of authority to such representative is approved in advance by the DEQ; (b) for a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; (c) for a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For the purposes of these regulations, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency includes the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g., a Regional Administrator of EPA); or (d) for affected sources:
(1) the designated representative in so far as actions, standards, requirements, or prohibitions under Title IV of the Federal Act or the regulations promulgated thereunder are concerned; and (2) the designated representative for any other purposes under Title V.
(29) Section 502(b)(10) changes are changes that contravene an express permit term. Such changes do not include changes that would violate applicable requirements or contravene federally enforceable permit terms and conditions that are monitoring (including test methods), recordkeeping, reporting, or compliance certification requirements. (30) State Law means the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, specifically, Section 49-17-1 through 49-17-43 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, and any subsequent amendments. (31) Stationary source means any building, structure, facility, or installation that emits or may emit any regulated air pollutant or any pollutant listed under Section 112(b) of the Federal Act.
(32) Subject to regulation means, for any air pollutant, that the pollutant is subject to either a provision in the Clean Air Act, or a nationally-applicable regulation codified by the Administrator in subchapter C of 40 CFR Chapter I, that requires actual control of the quantity of emissions of that pollutant, and that such a control requirement has taken effect and is operative to control, limit or restrict the quantity of emissions of that pollutant released from the regulated activity. Pollutants subject to regulation include, but are not limited to, greenhouse gases as defined in this section. (33) Title V means the air operating permit program mandated in Title V of the 1990 amendments to the federal Clean Air Act, codified in 42 U.S.C. § 7661. (34) Title V permit means any permit or group of permits covering a Title V source that is issued, renewed, amended, or revised pursuant to these regulations. (35) Title V sources include the following: (a) any major source; (b) any source, including an area source, subject to a standard, limitation or other requirement under Section 111 of the Federal Act; (c) any source, including an area source, subject to a standard or other requirement under Section 112 of the Federal Act, except that a source is not required to obtain a permit solely because it is subject to regulations or requirements under Section 112(r) of the Federal Act; (d) any affected source; and (e) any source in a source category designated by the Administrator pursuant to this section.
B. General Title V Permit Requirements.
(1) Except as provided or exempted below all Title V sources must comply with all provisions herein with regard to Title V permit responsibilities including but not limited to filing an application for and obtaining a Title V permit. (2) All sources that are not major sources, affected sources, or solid waste incineration units required to obtain a permit pursuant to Section 129(e) of the Federal Act are exempted from the obligation to obtain a Title V permit until either the date five (5) years after full implementation of the Title V program in Mississippi or such time as the Administrator completes a rulemaking to determine how the program should be structured for nonmajor sources and the appropriateness of any permanent exemptions in addition to those provided for in Rule 6.1.B(5)., whichever is later.
(3) In the case of nonmajor sources subject to a standard or other requirement under either Section 111 or Section 112 of the Federal Act promulgated after July 21, 1992, the exemption of any or all such applicable sources from the requirement to obtain a Title V permit will be determined consistent with the newly promulgated standard and regulations.
(4) The following source categories are exempted from the obligation to obtain a Title V permit. (a) All sources and source categories that would be required to obtain a Title V permit solely because they are subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart AAA – Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters; and (b) All sources and source categories that would be required to obtain a Title V permit solely because they are subject to 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M – National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos, specifically 40 CFR 61.145 – Standard for Demolition and Renovation. (5) Emissions units and Title V sources. (a) For major sources, the Title V permit shall include all applicable requirements for all relevant emissions units in the major source. (b) For any nonmajor source subject to the Title V program under Paragraphs (2) – (5) of this section, the Title V permit shall include all applicable requirements for the emissions unit(s) that causes the source to be subject to the Title V program. (6) Fugitive emissions. Fugitive emissions from a Title V source shall be included in the permit application and the Title V permit in the same manner as stack emissions, regardless of whether the source category in question is included in the list of sources contained in the definition of major source. (7) For purposes of these regulations, the Commission shall not make any exceptions to and/or grant any exemptions and/or variances from any of the regulations regarding Title V permits except those specified herein.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.2 Permit Applications
A. Duty to apply. For each Title V source, the owner or operator shall submit a timely and complete permit application in accordance with this rule. (1) Timely application.
(a) A timely application for a source applying for a Title V permit for the first time is one that is submitted within twelve (12) months after the source becomes subject to the permit program or on or before such earlier date as the Permit Board may establish. In the latter case, at least six (6) months time shall be given for application submittal from the time the Permit Board notifies the source of the early submittal requirement.
(b) Title V sources required to meet the requirements under Section 112(g) of the Federal Act or to have a permit under the preconstruction review and construction permit requirements of “Permit Regulations for the Construction and/or Operation of Air Emissions Equipment”, 11 Miss. Admin. Code, Pt. 2, Ch. 2, shall file a complete application to obtain the Title V permit or permit revision within twelve (12) months after commencing operation or on or before such earlier date as the Permit Board may establish. Where an existing Title V permit would prohibit such construction or change in operation, the source must obtain a permit revision before commencing operation. (c) For purposes of permit renewal, a timely application is one that is submitted at least six months prior to the date of permit expiration. (d) Applications for initial phase II acid rain permits shall be submitted to the DEQ by January 1, 1996, for sulfur dioxide, and by January 1, 1998, for nitrogen oxides. (2) Complete application. To be deemed complete, an application must provide all information required pursuant to Rule 6.2.C., except that applications for permit revision need supply such information only if it is related to the proposed change. Information required under Rule 6.2.C. must be sufficient to evaluate the subject source and its application and to determine all applicable requirements. A responsible official shall certify the submitted information consistent with Rule 6.2.E. Unless the DEQ determines that an application is not complete within 60 days of receipt of the application, such application shall be deemed to be complete. If, while processing an application that has been determined or deemed to be complete, the DEQ determines that additional information is necessary to evaluate or take final action on that application, it may request such information in writing and set a reasonable deadline for a response. The source's ability to operate without a Title V permit, as set forth in Rule 6.4.B. of these regulations, shall be in effect from the date the application is determined or deemed to be complete until the final permit is issued, provided that the applicant submits any requested additional information by the deadline specified by the DEQ. (3) Confidential information. In the event a source submits information to the DEQ under a claim of confidentiality, the Permit Board may also require the source to submit a copy of such information directly to the Administrator.
B. Duty to supplement or correct application. Any applicant who fails to submit any relevant facts or who has submitted incorrect information in a permit application shall, upon becoming aware of such failure or incorrect submittal, promptly submit such supplementary facts or corrected information. In addition, an applicant shall provide additional information as necessary to address any requirements that become applicable to the source after the date it filed a complete application but prior to release of a draft permit to public participation.
C. Standard application form and required information. All applications must be submitted on the form supplied by the Permit Board. Insignificant activities specified in Rule 6.7.A. need not be included in permit applications. For insignificant activities specified in Rule 6.7.B., a list of such insignificant activities must be included in the application. An application may not omit information needed to determine the applicability of, or to impose, any applicable requirement, or to evaluate the fee amount required under the schedule pursuant to Rule 6.6. of these regulations. The forms and attachments shall include the elements specified as follows: (1) identifying information, including company name and address (or plant name and address if different from the company name), owner's name and agent, and telephone number and names of plant site manager/contact; (2) a description of the source's process and products (by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Code) including any associated with any alternative operating scenario identified by the source; (3) emission-related information as follows: (a) all emissions of pollutants for which the source is major, and all emissions of regulated air pollutants. Fugitive emissions from individual components within a facility may be determined collectively based on their relationship to the associated process unless individual emission rates are needed to determine the applicability of a requirement, such as a New Source Performance Standard (NSPS), National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), etc., or to determine air quality impacts. A permit application shall describe all emissions of regulated air pollutants emitted from any emissions unit, except where such units are exempted under Rule 6.7. The Permit Board shall require additional information related to the emissions of air pollutants sufficient to verify which requirements are applicable to the source, and other information necessary to collect any permit fees owed under the fee schedule pursuant to Rule 6.6. of these regulations. (b) identification and description of all points of emissions described in Rule 6.2.C(3)(a). of this rule in sufficient detail to establish the basis for fees and applicability of requirements of the Federal Act or of the regulations contained herein.
(c) emission rates in tons per year (tpy) and in such terms as are necessary to establish compliance consistent with the applicable standard reference test method. For emissions units subject to an annual emissions cap, tons per year can be reported as part of the aggregate emissions associated with the cap, except where more specific information is needed, including where necessary to determine and/or assure compliance with an applicable requirement. (d) to the extent it is needed to determine or regulate emissions, the information that follows: fuels, fuel use, raw materials, production rates, and operating schedules; (e) identification and description of air pollution control equipment and compliance monitoring devices or activities;
(f) limitations on source operation affecting emissions or any work practice standards, where applicable, for all regulated pollutants at the Title V source;
(g) other information required by any applicable requirement (including information related to stack height limitations developed pursuant to Section 123 of the Federal Act);
(h) calculations on which the information in Rule 6.2.C(3)(a) through (g) is based; (4) air pollution control requirements as follows: (a) citation and description of all applicable requirements, and (b) description of or reference to any applicable test method for determining compliance with each applicable requirement; (5) other specific information that may be necessary to implement and enforce other applicable requirements of the Federal Act or of these regulations or to determine the applicability of such requirements; (6) an explanation of any proposed exemptions from otherwise applicable requirements; (7) additional information as determined to be necessary by the Permit Board to define alternative operating scenarios identified by the source pursuant to Rule 6.3.A(9). of these regulations or to define permit terms and conditions implementing 40 CFR 70.4(b)(12) or Rule 6.3.A(10). of these regulations. (8) a compliance plan for all Title V sources that contains all of the following:
(a) a description of the compliance status of the source with respect to all applicable requirements; (b) a description as follows: (1) for applicable requirements with which the source is in compliance, a statement that the source will continue to comply with such requirements; (2) for applicable requirements that will become effective during the permit term, a statement that the source will meet such requirements on a timely basis; (3) for requirements for which the source is not in compliance at the time of permit issuance, a narrative description of how the source will achieve compliance with such requirements; (c) a compliance schedule as follows: (1) For applicable requirements with which the source is in compliance, a statement that the source will continue to comply with such requirements. (2) For applicable requirements that will become effective during the permit term, a statement that the source will meet such requirements on a timely basis. A statement that the source will meet in a timely manner applicable requirements that become effective during the permit term shall satisfy this provision, unless a more detailed schedule is expressly required by the applicable requirements. (3) A schedule of compliance for sources that are not in compliance with all applicable requirements at the time of permit issuance. Such a schedule shall include a schedule or remedial measures, including an enforceable sequence of actions with milestones, leading to compliance with any applicable requirements for which the source will be in noncompliance at the time of permit issuance. This compliance schedule shall resemble and be at least as stringent as that contained in any judicial consent decree or administrative order to which the source is subject. Any such schedule of compliance shall be supplemental to, and shall not sanction noncompliance with, the applicable requirements on which it is based. (4) For applicable requirements associated with a proposed AOS, a statement that the source will meet such requirements upon implementation of the AOS. If a proposed AOS would implicate an applicable requirement that will become effective during the permit term, a statement that the source will meet such requirements on a timely basis. A statement that the source will meet in a timely manner applicable requirements that become effective during the permit term will satisfy this provision, unless a more detailed schedule is expressly required by the applicable requirement. (d) a schedule for submission of certified progress reports, to be submitted no less frequently than every six (6) months for sources required to have a schedule of compliance to remedy a violation;
(e) the compliance plan content requirements specified in this paragraph shall apply and be included in the acid rain portion of a compliance plan for an affected source, except as specifically superseded by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act with regard to the schedule and method(s) the source will use to achieve compliance with the acid rain emissions limitations. (9) requirements for compliance certification, including the following: (a) a certification of compliance with all applicable requirements by a responsible official consistent with Rule 6.2.E. and Section 114(a)(3) of the Federal Act; (b) a statement of methods used for determining compliance, including a description of monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements and test methods; (c) a schedule for submission of compliance certifications during the permit term, to be submitted no less frequently than annually, or more frequently if specified by the underlying applicable requirement or by the Permit Board;
(d) a statement indicating the source's compliance status with any applicable enhanced monitoring and compliance certification requirements of the Federal Act; and
(10) the use of nationally-standardized forms for acid rain portions of permit applications and compliance plans, as required by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act.
D. Applicant's duty to apply for alternative scenarios. Any operating scenario allowed for in an applicable Title V permit may be implemented by the facility without the need for any permit revision or any notification to the Permit Board. It is incumbent upon the Title V permit applicant to apply for any reasonably anticipated alternative facility operating scenarios at the time of initial or renewal permit application. E. Any application form, report, or compliance certification submitted pursuant to these regulations shall contain a certification of truth, accuracy, and completeness signed by a responsible official. This certification and any other certification required under these regulations shall state that, based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and complete.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.3 Permit Content
A. Standard permit requirements. Each permit issued under these regulations shall include the following requirements. (1) Emission limitations and standards, including those operational requirements and limitations that assure compliance with all applicable requirements at the time of permit issuance. (a) The permit shall specify and reference the origin of and authority for each term or condition, and identify any difference in form as compared to the applicable requirement upon which the term or condition is based. (b) The permit shall state that, where an applicable requirement of the Federal Act is more stringent than an applicable requirement of regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act, both provisions shall be incorporated into the permit and shall be enforceable by the Administrator and the Commission. (2) Permit duration. The Permit Board shall issue permits for a fixed term of five years in the case of affected sources, and for a term not to exceed five (5) years in the case of all other sources. Notwithstanding this requirement, the Permit Board shall issue permits for solid waste incineration units combusting municipal waste subject to standards under Section 129(e) of the Federal Act for a period not to exceed twelve (12) years and shall review such permits at least every five (5) years. (3) Monitoring and related recordkeeping and reporting requirements.
(a) Each permit shall contain the requirements with respect to monitoring as follows:
(1) all emissions monitoring and analysis procedures or test methods required under the applicable requirements, including 40 CFR Part 64 and any procedures and methods promulgated pursuant to Sections 114(a)(3) or 504(b) of the Federal Act. If more than one monitoring or testing requirement applies, the permit may specify a streamlined set of monitoring or testing provisions provided the specified monitoring or testing is adequate to assure compliance at least to the same extent as the monitoring or testing applicable requirements that are not included in the permit as a result of such streamlining. (2) where the applicable requirement does not require periodic testing or instrumental or non- instrumental monitoring (which may consist of recordkeeping designed to serve as monitoring), periodic monitoring sufficient to yield reliable data from the relevant time period that are representative of the source's compliance with the permit as reported pursuant to Rule 6.3.A(3)(e). Such monitoring requirements shall assure use of terms, test methods, units, averaging periods, and other statistical conventions consistent with the applicable requirement. Recordkeeping provisions shall be sufficient to meet the requirements of Rule 6.3.A(3)(b).; and
(3) as necessary, requirements concerning the use, maintenance, and, where appropriate, installation of monitoring equipment or methods. (b) With respect to recordkeeping, the permit shall incorporate all applicable recordkeeping requirements and require, where applicable, the following: (1) records of required monitoring information that include the following:
(i) the date, place as defined in the permit, and time of sampling or measurements; (ii) the date(s) analyses were performed; (iii) the company or entity that performed the analyses; (iv) the analytical techniques or methods used; (v) the results of such analyses; (vi) the operating conditions existing at the time of sampling or measurement; and
(2) retention of records of all required monitoring data and support information for a period of at least five (5) years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report, or application. Support information includes all calibration and maintenance records, all original strip-chart recordings for continuous monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all reports required by the permit. (c) With respect to reporting, the permit shall incorporate all applicable reporting requirements and require the following: (1) submittal of reports of any required monitoring at least every six months (all instances of deviations from permit requirements must be clearly identified in such reports and all required reports must be certified by a responsible official consistent with Rule 6.2.E. of these regulations); and (2) prompt reporting of deviations from permit requirements, including those attributable to upset conditions as defined in the permit, the probable cause of such deviations, and any corrective actions or preventive measures taken. The Permit Board shall define “prompt” in the permit in relation to the degree and type of deviation likely to occur and the applicable requirements.
(4) A permit condition prohibiting emissions exceeding any allowances that the source lawfully holds under Title IV of the Federal Act or the regulations promulgated hereunder. (a) No permit revision shall be required for increases in emissions that are authorized by allowances acquired pursuant to the acid rain program, provided that such increases do not require a permit revision under any other applicable requirement. (b) No limit shall be placed on the number of allowances held by the source. The source may not, however, use allowances as a defense to noncompliance with any other applicable requirement. (c) Any such allowance shall be accounted for according to the procedures established in regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (5) A severability clause to ensure the continued validity of the various permit requirements in the event of a challenge to any portions of the permit. (6) Provisions stating the following: (a) The permittee must comply with all conditions of the Title V permit. Any permit noncompliance constitutes a violation of the Federal Act and is grounds for enforcement action; for permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification; or for denial of a permit renewal application. (b) The need to halt or reduce activity is not a defense. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of this permit. (c) The permit and/or any part thereof may be modified, revoked, reopened, and reissued, or terminated for cause. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit modification, revocation and reissuance, or termination, or of a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition. (d) The permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege. (e) The permittee shall furnish to the DEQ within a reasonable time any information the DEQ may request in writing to determine whether cause exists for modifying, revoking and reissuing, or terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee shall also furnish to the DEQ copies of records required to be kept by the permittee or, for information claimed to be confidential, the permittee
shall furnish such records to DEQ along with a claim of confidentiality. The permittee may furnish such records directly to the Administrator along with a claim of confidentiality. (7) A provision to ensure that a Title V source pays fees to the permitting authority consistent with the fee schedule pursuant to Rule 6.6. of these regulations. (8) Emissions trading. A provision stating that no permit revision shall be required, under any approved economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading and other similar programs or processes for changes that are provided for in the permit. (9) Terms and conditions for reasonably anticipated alternative operating scenarios identified by the source in its application, as approved by the Permit Board. Such terms and conditions: (a) shall require the source, contemporaneously with making a change from one operating scenario to another, to record in a log at the permitted facility a record of the alternative operating scenario under which it is operating; (b) may extend the permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F. to all terms and conditions under each such alternative operating scenario; and (c) must ensure that the terms and conditions of each such alternative operating scenario meet all applicable requirements and the requirements of these regulations. (10) If the permit applicant requests them, terms and conditions for the trading of emissions increases and decreases in the permitted facility, to the extent that the applicable requirements provide for trading such increases and decreases without a case-by-case approval of each emissions trade, as follows:
(a) shall include all terms required under Rule 6.3.A. and Rule 6.3.C. to determine compliance; (b) may extend the permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F. to all terms and conditions that allow such increases and decreases in emissions; and (c) must meet all applicable requirements and requirements of these regulations.
B. Federally-enforceable requirements. (1) All terms and conditions in a Title V permit, including any provisions designed to limit a source's potential to emit, are enforceable by the Administrator and
citizens under the Federal Act as well as the Commission. (2) Notwithstanding Rule 6.3.B(1)., the Permit Board shall specifically designate as not being federally enforceable under the Federal Act, any terms and conditions included in the permit that are not required under the Federal Act or under any of its applicable requirements. Terms and conditions so designated are not subject to the requirements of Rules 6.3., 6.4., or 6.5. of these regulations, other than those contained in Rule 6.3.B. C. Compliance requirements. All Title V permits shall contain elements with respect to compliance as follows:
(1) Consistent with Rule 6.3. of this rule, compliance certification, testing, monitoring, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements sufficient to assure compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit. Any document (including reports) required by a Title V permit to be submitted to the DEQ shall contain a certification by a responsible official that meets the requirements of Rule 6.2.E. of these regulations. (2) Inspection and entry requirements that require that, upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the permittee shall allow the DEQ, or an authorized representative, to perform the following: (a) enter upon the permittee's premises where a Title V source is located or emissions-related activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of the permit; (b) have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of the permit; (c) inspect at reasonable times any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under the permit; and
(d) as authorized by the Federal Act, sample or monitor, at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with the permit or applicable requirements. (3) A schedule of compliance consistent with Rule 6.2.C(8). of these regulations. (4) Progress reports consistent with an applicable schedule of compliance and Rule 6.2.C(8). of these regulations to be submitted at least semiannually, or at a more frequent period if specified in the applicable requirement or by the Permit Board. Such progress reports shall contain the following:
(a) dates for achieving the activities, milestone(s), or compliance required in the schedule of compliance, and dates when such activities, milestone(s) or compliance were achieved; and (b) an explanation of why any dates in the schedule of compliance were not or will not be met, and any preventive or corrective measures adopted. (5) Requirements for compliance certification with terms and conditions contained in the permit, including emission limitations, standards, or work practices. Permits shall include each of the following: (a) the frequency (not less than annually or such more frequent period as specified in the applicable requirement or by the Permit Board) of submissions of compliance certifications; (b) in accordance with Rule 6.3.A(3). of these regulations, a means for monitoring the compliance of the source with its emissions limitations, standards, and work practices; (c) a requirement that the compliance certification include the following: (1) the identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the certification; (2) the compliance status; (3) whether compliance was continuous or intermittent; (4) the method(s) used for determining the compliance status of the source, currently and over the reporting period consistent with Rule 6.3.A(3). and (5) such other facts as the DEQ may require to determine the compliance status of the source;
(d) a requirement that all compliance certifications be submitted to the Administrator as well as to the Permit Board; and (e) such additional requirements as may be specified pursuant to Sections 114(a)(3) and 504(b) of the Federal Act. (6) such other provisions as the Permit Board may require. D. General permits. (1) The Permit Board may, after notice and opportunity for public participation
provided under Rule 6.4.I. of these regulations, issue a general permit covering numerous similar sources. Any general permit shall comply with all requirements applicable to other Title V permits and shall identify criteria by which sources may qualify for the general permit. To sources that qualify, the DEQ shall extend coverage of the terms and conditions of the general permit for a period of time not to exceed five (5) years from the date coverage is extended. Notwithstanding the shield provisions of Rule 6.3.F., the source shall be subject to enforcement action for operating without a Title V permit if the source is later determined not to qualify for the terms and conditions of the general permit. General permits shall not be authorized for affected sources under the acid rain program unless otherwise provided in regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (2) After notice and opportunity for a hearing, the Permit Board may revoke and/or modify a general permit. After notice and opportunity for a hearing, the Permit Board may also revoke or deny coverage under a general permit and require a facility to obtain a Title V permit. (3) Title V sources that would qualify for a general permit must apply to the DEQ for coverage under the terms of the general permit or must apply for a Title V permit consistent with Rule 6.2. of these regulations. The Permit Board may, in the general permit, provide for applications which deviate from the requirements of Rule 6.2. of these regulations, provided that such applications meet the requirements of Title V of the Federal Act, and include all information necessary to determine qualification for, and to assure compliance with, the general permit. Without repeating the public participation procedures required under Rule 6.4.I. of these regulations, the DEQ may grant a source's request for coverage under a general permit, but such a grant shall not constitute a final Permit Board action for purposes of appeal only. E. Temporary sources. The Permit Board may issue a single permit authorizing emissions from similar operations by the same source owner or operator at multiple temporary locations. The operation must be temporary and involve at least one change of location during the term of the permit. No affected source shall be permitted as a temporary source. Permits for temporary sources shall include the following:
(1) conditions that will assure compliance with all applicable requirements at all authorized locations; (2) requirements that the owner or operator notify the DEQ at least 10 days in advance of each change in location; and (3) conditions that assure compliance with all other provisions of this rule. F. Permit shield.
(1) Except as provided in these regulations, the Permit Board shall expressly include in a Title V permit a provision stating that compliance with the conditions of the permit shall be deemed compliance with any applicable requirements as of the date of permit issuance, upon satisfaction of either condition as follows: (a) such applicable requirements are included and are specifically identified in the permit; or (b) the Permit Board, in acting on the permit application or revision, determines in writing that other requirements specifically identified are not applicable to the source, and the permit includes such determination or a concise summary thereof. (2) A Part 70 permit that does not expressly state that a permit shield exists shall be presumed not to provide such a shield. (3) Nothing in Rule 6.3.F. or in any Title V permit shall alter or affect the following: (a) the provisions of Section 303 of the Federal Act (emergency orders), including the authority of the Administrator under that section; (b) the liability of an owner or operator of a source for any violation of applicable requirements prior to or at the time of permit issuance; (c) the applicable requirements of the acid rain program, consistent with Section 408(a) of the Federal Act; or (d) the ability of EPA to obtain information from a source pursuant to Section 114 of the Federal Act. G. Reserved. H. Risk Management Plans. If the source is required to develop and register a risk management plan pursuant to Section 112(r) of the Federal Act, the permit need only specify that it will comply with the requirement to register such a plan. The content of the risk management plan need not itself be incorporated as a permit term.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.4 Permit Issuance(s), Renewal(s), Reopening(s), And Revision(s)
A. Action on application.
(1) A permit, permit modification, or renewal may be issued only upon satisfaction of the conditions that follow:
(a) the DEQ has received a complete application for a permit, permit modification, or permit renewal, except that a complete application need not be received before issuance of a general permit under Rule 6.3.D. of these regulations;
(b) except for modifications qualifying for minor permit modification procedures under this section, the DEQ has complied with the requirements for public participation under this section; (c) the DEQ has complied with the requirements for notifying and responding to Affected State(s) under Rule 6.5.B. of these regulations; (d) the conditions of the permit provide for compliance with all applicable requirements and the requirements of these regulations; and (e) the Administrator has received a copy of the proposed permit and any notices required under Rule 6.5.A. and Rule 6.5.B. of these regulations, and has not objected to issuance of the permit under Rule 6.5.C. of these regulations within the time period specified therein. (2) Except as provided under the initial transition plan or under regulations promulgated under Title IV or Title V of the Federal Act for the permitting of affected sources under the acid rain program, the Permit Board shall take final action on each permit application (including a request for permit modification or renewal) within 180 days or as otherwise provided for under State Law, after receiving a complete application. (3) The DEQ shall provide a statement that sets forth the legal and factual basis for the draft permit conditions (including references to the applicable statutory or regulatory provisions). The DEQ shall send this statement to any person upon a written request and to EPA. (4) The submittal of a complete application shall not affect the requirement that any source have a Construction Permit. B. Requirement for a permit. Except as provided in the following sentence and paragraphs of this section, no Title V source may operate after the time that it is required to submit a timely and complete application, except in compliance with a Title V permit. If a Title V source submits a timely and complete application for permit issuance (including for renewal), the source's failure to have a Title V permit is not a violation of these regulations until the Permit Board takes final action on the permit application, except as noted in this section. This protection shall cease to apply if, subsequent to the completeness determination made pursuant to Rule 6.2.A(2). and as required by Rule 6.2.A(2). of these regulations, the applicant fails to submit by the deadline specified in writing by the DEQ any additional information identified as being needed to process the application.
C. Permit renewal and expiration. (1) Permits being renewed are subject to the same procedural requirements, including those for public participation, Affected State(s) review and EPA review, that apply to initial permit issuance; and
(2) Permit expiration terminates the source's right to operate unless a timely and complete renewal application has been submitted consistent with Rule 6.4.B. and Rule 6.2.A(1)(c). of these regulations. D. Administrative permit amendments. (1) An “administrative permit amendment” is a permit revision that revises a permit as follows: (a) corrects typographical errors; (b) identifies a change in the name, address, or phone number of any person identified in the permit, or provides a similar minor administrative change at the source; (c) requires more frequent monitoring or reporting by the permittee; or (d) allows for a change in ownership or operational control of a source in accordance with Rule 6.4.D(4). (2) Administrative permit amendments for purposes of the acid rain portion of the permit shall be governed by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (3) Administrative permit amendment procedures. Any administrative permit amendment except for change in ownership or operational control may be made by the DEQ consistent with the following: (a) The DEQ shall take no more than sixty (60) days from receipt of a request for an administrative permit amendment to take final action on such request, and may incorporate such changes without providing notice to the public or Affected State(s) provided that it designates any such permit revisions as having been made pursuant to this paragraph. (b) The DEQ shall submit a copy of the revised permit to the Administrator. (c) The source may implement the changes addressed in the request for an administrative amendment immediately upon submittal of the request.
(4) Permit Transfer. An administrative permit amendment may be made by the Permit Board authorizing changes in ownership or operational control consistent with the following: (a) the Permit Board shall take action within sixty (60) days after receipt of a completed request for a permit transfer, unless a public hearing is scheduled. The Permit Board may incorporate such changes without providing notice to the public or affected State(s) provided that it designates any such permit revision as having been made pursuant to this paragraph. (b) A permit transfer shall be approved upon satisfaction of the following: (1) the applicant for transfer approval can demonstrate to the Permit Board it has the financial resources, operational expertise and environmental compliance history over the last five years to insure compliance with the terms and conditions of the permit to be transferred except where this conflicts with State Law, and (2) the Permit Board determines that no other change in the permit is necessary, provided that a written agreement containing a specific date for transfer of permit responsibility, coverage, and liability between the current and new permittee has been submitted to the DEQ. (c) The DEQ shall submit a copy of the revised permit to the Administrator. E. Permit Modification. A permit modification is any revision to a Title V permit that cannot be accomplished under the program's provisions for administrative permit amendments under Rule 6.4.D. A permit modification for purposes of the acid rain portion of the permit shall be governed by regulations promulgated under Title IV of the Federal Act. (1) Minor permit modification procedures. (a) Minor permit modification procedures may be used only for those permit modifications that satisfy the following: (1) do not violate any applicable requirement; (2) do not involve significant changes to existing monitoring, reporting, or recordkeeping requirements in the permit; (3) do not require or change a case-by-case determination of an emission limitation or other standard, or a source-specific determination for temporary sources of ambient impacts, or a visibility or increment analysis;
(4) do not seek to establish or change a permit term or condition for which there is no corresponding underlying applicable requirement and that the source has assumed to avoid an applicable requirement to which the source would otherwise be subject. Such terms and conditions include the following: (i) a federally enforceable emissions cap assumed to avoid classification as a modification under any provision of Title I; and
(ii) an alternative emissions limit approved pursuant to regulations promulgated under Section 112(i)(5) of the Federal Act;
(5) are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the Federal Act; and
(6) are not required by Commission regulations to be processed as a significant modification.
(b) Notwithstanding other paragraphs of this rule, minor permit modification procedures may be used for permit modifications involving the use of economic incentives, marketable permits, emissions trading, and other similar approaches, to the extent that such minor permit modification procedures are explicitly provided for in an applicable implementation plan or in applicable requirements promulgated by EPA. (c) Application. An application requesting the use of minor permit modification procedures shall meet the requirements of Rule 6.2.C. of these regulations and shall include the following: (1) a description of the change, the emissions resulting from the change, and any new applicable requirements that will apply if the change occurs; (2) the source's suggested draft permit; (3) certification by a responsible official, consistent with Rule 6.2.E., that the proposed modification meets the criteria for use of minor permit modification procedures and a request that such procedures be used; and (4) completed forms for the DEQ to use to notify the Administrator and Affected State(s) as required under Rule 6.5.
(d) EPA and Affected State(s) notification. Within five (5) working days of receipt of a complete permit modification application, the DEQ shall notify the Administrator and Affected State(s) of the requested permit modification. The DEQ shall promptly send any notice required under Rule 6.5.B(2). to the Administrator. (e) Timetable for issuance. The Permit Board may not issue a final permit modification until after EPA's 45-day review period or until EPA has notified the DEQ that EPA will not object to issuance of the permit modification, whichever is first, although the Permit Board can approve the permit modification prior to that time. Within ninety (90) days of the DEQ's receipt of an application under minor permit modification procedures or fifteen (15) days after the end of the Administrator's 45-day review period under Rule 6.5.C., whichever is later, the Permit Board shall take one of the actions as follows: (1) issue the permit modification as proposed;
(2) deny the permit modification application; (3) determine that the requested modification does not meet the minor permit modification criteria and should be reviewed under the significant modification procedures; or (4) revise the draft permit modification and transmit to the Administrator the new proposed permit modification as required by Rule 6.5.A. (f) Source's ability to make change. The source may make the change proposed in its minor permit modification application immediately after it files such application. After the source makes the change allowed by the preceding sentence, and until the Permit Board takes any of the actions specified in Rule 6.4.E(1)(e)(1) – (4) the source must comply with both the applicable requirements governing the change and the proposed terms and conditions of the permit. During this time period, the source need not comply with the existing permit terms and conditions it seeks to modify. However, if the source fails to comply with the proposed terms and conditions of its permit during this time period, the existing permit terms and conditions it seeks to modify may be enforced against it. (g) Permit shield. The permit shield does not extend to minor permit modifications. (2) Group processing of minor permit modifications. Consistent with this paragraph, the Permit Board may modify the procedure to process groups of a source's
applications for certain modifications eligible for minor permit modification processing.
(a) Criteria. Group processing of modifications may be used only for those permit modifications which satisfy the following:
(1) meet the criteria for minor permit modification procedures and
(2) collectively, are below the threshold level. This threshold shall be ten percent (10%of the emissions allowed by the permit for the emissions unit for which the change is requested, twenty percent (20%) of the applicable definition of major source or five (5) tons per year, whichever is least.
(b) Application. An application requesting the use of group processing procedures shall meet the requirements of Rule 6.2.C. and shall include the following: (1) a description of the change, the emissions resulting from the change, and any new applicable requirements that will apply if the change occurs;
(2) the source's suggested draft permit;
(3) certification by a responsible official consistent with Rule 6.2.E., that the proposed modification meets the criteria for use of group processing procedures and a request that such procedures be used;
(4) a list of the source's other pending applications awaiting group processing, and a determination of whether the requested modification, aggregated with these other applications, equals or exceeds the threshold set under this rule;
(5) certification that the source has notified EPA of the proposed modification. Such notification need only contain a brief description of the requested modification;
(6) completed forms for the DEQ to use to notify the Administrator and Affected State(s) as required. (c) EPA and Affected State(s) notification. On a quarterly basis or within five business days of receipt of an application demonstrating that the aggregate of a source's pending applications equals or exceeds the threshold level, whichever is earlier, the DEQ promptly shall notify the Administrator and Affected State(s) of the requested permit modifications. The DEQ shall send any notice required under Rule 6.5.B(2). to the Administrator.
(d) Timetable for issuance. The provisions of Rule 6.4.E(1)(e). shall apply to modifications eligible for group processing, except that the Permit Board shall take one of the actions specified in Rule 6.4.E(1)(e)(1) – (4). within 180 days of receipt of the application or 15 days after the end of the Administrator's 45-day review period whichever is later. (e) Source's ability to make change. The provisions of Rule 6.4.E(1)(f). shall apply to modifications eligible for group processing. (f) Permit shield. The provisions of Rule 6.4.E(1)(g). of this rule shall also apply to modifications eligible for group processing. (3) Significant modification procedures. (a) Criteria. Significant modification procedures shall be used for applications requesting permit modifications that do not qualify as minor permit modifications or as administrative amendments. The DEQ shall determine whether a modification is significant. At a minimum, every significant modification in existing monitoring permit terms or conditions and every relaxation of reporting or recordkeeping permit terms or conditions shall be considered significant. Nothing herein shall be construed to preclude the permittee from making changes consistent with these regulations that would render existing permit compliance terms and conditions irrelevant.
(b) Significant permit modifications shall meet all requirements of these regulations, including those for applications, public participation, review by Affected State(s), and review by EPA, as they apply to permit issuance and permit renewal. F. Operational Flexibility. A permitted facility is authorized to make the changes described below within their facility without requiring a permit revision, if the changes are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the Act and the changes do not exceed the emissions allowable under the permit (whether expressed therein as a rate of emissions or in terms of total emissions), provided that the facility provides the Administrator and the DEQ with written notification as required below in advance of the proposed changes, which shall be a minimum of seven (7) days, unless other applicable regulations specify a different time frame for emergencies. The source, DEQ, and EPA shall attach each such notice to their copy of the relevant permit. (1) The permitted sources are allowed to make Section 502(b)(10) changes without requiring a permit revision, if the changes are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the Act and the changes do not exceed the emissions allowable under the permit (whether expressed therein as a rate of emissions or in terms of total emissions).
(a) For each such change, the written notification required above shall include a brief description of the change within the permitted facility, the date on which the change will occur, any change in emissions, and any permit term or condition that is no longer applicable as a result of the change. (b) The permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F. shall not apply to any change made pursuant to Rule 6.4.F(1). (2) The DEQ may provide for permitted sources to trade increases and decreases in emissions in the permitted facility, where the Mississippi State Implementation Plan (SIP) provides for such emissions trades without requiring a permit revision and based on the 7-day notice prescribed herein. This provision is available in those cases where the permit does not already provide for such emissions trading.
(a) The written notification required above shall include such information as may be required by the provision in the SIP authorizing the emissions trade, including at a minimum, when the proposed change will occur, a description of each such change, any change in emissions, the permit requirements with which the source will comply using the emissions trading provisions of the SIP, and the pollutants emitted subject to the emissions trade. The notice shall also refer to the provisions with which the source will comply in the SIP and that provide for the emissions trade.
(b) Compliance with the permit requirements that the source will meet using the emissions trade shall be determined according to requirements of the SIP authorizing the emissions trade.
(c) The permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F. shall not apply to any change made pursuant to Rule 6.4.F(2). (3) The DEQ shall, if a permit applicant requests it, issue permits that contain terms and conditions, including all terms required under Rule 6.3.A. and 6.3.C. to determine compliance, allowing for the trading of emissions increases and decreases in the permitted facility solely for the purpose of complying with a federally-enforceable emissions cap that is established in the permit independent of otherwise applicable requirements. The permit applicant shall include in its application proposed replicable procedures and permit terms that ensure the emissions trades are quantifiable and enforceable. The DEQ shall not be required to include in the emissions trading provisions any emissions units for which emissions are not quantifiable or for which there are no replicable procedures to enforce the emissions trades. The permit shall also require compliance with all applicable requirements. (a) The written notification required above shall state when the change will occur and shall describe the changes in emissions that will result and how
these increases and decreases in emissions will comply with the terms and conditions of the permit. (b) The permit shield described in Rule 6.3.F. shall apply to any changes made pursuant to Rule 6.4.F(3). G. Reopening for cause. (1) Each issued permit shall include provisions specifying the conditions under which the permit will be reopened prior to the expiration of the permit. A permit shall be reopened and revised under any of the following circumstances: (a) Additional applicable requirements under the Federal Act become applicable to a major Title V source with a remaining permit term of three or more years. Such a reopening shall be completed no later than 18 months after promulgation of the applicable requirement. No such reopening is required if the effective date of the requirement is later than the date on which the permit is due to expire, unless the original permit or any of its terms and conditions has been extended. (b) Additional requirements (including excess emissions requirements) become applicable to an affected source under the acid rain program. Upon approval by the Administrator, excess emissions offset plans shall be deemed to be incorporated into the permit. (c) The Permit Board or EPA determines that the permit contains a material mistake or that inaccurate statements were made in establishing the emissions standards or other terms or conditions of the permit.
(d) The Administrator or the Permit Board determines that the permit must be revised or revoked to assure compliance with the applicable requirements. (2) Proceedings to reopen and issue a permit shall follow the same procedures as apply to initial permit issuance and shall affect only those parts of the permit for which cause to reopen exists. Such reopening shall be made as expeditiously as practicable. (3) Reopenings shall not be initiated before a notice of such intent is provided to the Title V source by the DEQ at least thirty (30) days in advance of the date that the permit is to be reopened, except that the Permit Board may provide a shorter time period in the case of an emergency. H. Reopenings for cause by EPA. (1) The DEQ shall within ninety (90) days after receipt of notification from the Administrator that cause exists to terminate, modify, or revoke and reissue a
permit, forward to EPA a proposed determination of termination, modification, or revocation and reissuance, as appropriate. (2) The Permit Board shall have ninety (90) days from receipt of an EPA objection to resolve any objection that EPA makes and to terminate, modify, or revoke and issue the permit in accordance with the Administrator's objection. I. Public participation. Except for administrative permit amendments and modifications qualifying for minor permit modification procedures, all permit proceedings, including initial permit issuance, significant modifications, and renewals, shall comply with the following procedures for public notice: (1) Notice shall be given to the public by posting the notice and draft permit on the DEQ’s website for the duration of the public comment period. In addition, notice shall be given to persons on a mailing list developed by the DEQ using generally accepted methods that enable interested parties to subscribe to the mailing list. The DEQ may update the mailing list periodically by requesting written indication of continued interest from those listed. The DEQ may delete from the list the name of any person who fails to respond to such a request within a reasonable timeframe. The DEQ may also use other means to provide adequate notice to the affected public. (2) The notice shall identify the following: a. the affected facility; b. the name and address of the permittee; c. the name and address of the Permit Board; d. the activity or activities involved in the permit action; e. the emissions change involved in any permit modification; f. the name, address, and telephone number of a person (or an email or website address) from whom interested persons may obtain additional information, including copies of the draft permit, the statement required by Rule 6.4.A(3). for the draft permit, the application, all relevant supporting materials including any compliance plan and monitoring and compliance certification report pursuant to section 503(e) of the Federal Act (except for information entitled to confidential treatment pursuant to section 114(c) of the Federal Act), and all other materials available to the Permit Board (except for publicly-available materials and publications) that are relevant to the permit decision; g. a brief description of the comment procedures required by these
regulations; and h. the time and place of any hearing that may be held, including a statement of procedures to request a hearing (unless a hearing has already been scheduled).
(3) The DEQ shall provide notice and opportunity for participation by Affected State(s) as is provided for by Rule 6.5. (4) Timing. The DEQ shall provide at least thirty (30) days for public comment and shall give notice of any public hearing at least thirty (30) days in advance of the hearing; (5) The DEQ shall keep a record of all commenters and also of the issues raised during the public participation process, as well as records of the written comments submitted during that process, so that the Administrator may fulfill his obligation under section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Act to determine whether a citizen petition may be granted. Such records shall be available to the public. (6) The DEQ shall respond in writing to all significant comments raised during the public participation process, including any such written comments submitted during the public comment period and any such comments raised during any public hearing on the permit.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.5 Permit Review by EPA and Affected State(s)
A. Transmission of information to the Administrator. (1) The DEQ shall provide to the Administrator a copy of each permit application (including any application for permit modification), the statement required by Rule 6.4.A(3)., each proposed permit and each final Title V permit. If significant comment is received during the public participation process, the DEQ shall also provide to the Administrator the written response to comments (which shall include a written response to all significant comments raised during the public participation process on the draft permit and recorded under Rule 6.4.I(5).), and an explanation of how those public comments and the DEQ’s responses are available to the public. The applicant may be required by the Permit Board to provide a copy of the permit application (including the compliance plan) directly to the Administrator. Upon agreement with the Administrator, the DEQ may submit to the Administrator a permit application summary form and any relevant portion of the permit application and compliance plan, in place of the complete permit
application and compliance plan. To the extent practicable, the preceding information shall be provided in computer-readable format compatible with EPA's national database management system. a. Where the public participation process for a draft permit concludes before the proposed permit is submitted to the Administrator, the statement required by Rule 6.4.A(3). and the written response to comments, if significant comments were received during the public participation process, must be submitted with the proposed permit along with other supporting materials required in Rule 6.5.A(1)., excepting the final permit. b. In instances where the Administrator has received a proposed permit from the DEQ before the public participation process on the draft permit has been completed, the statement required by Rule 6.4.A(3). must be submitted with the proposed permit along with other supporting materials required in Rule 6.5.A(1)., excepting the final permit and the written response to comments. If the DEQ receives significant comment on the draft permit during the public participation process, but after the submission of the proposed permit to the Administrator, the DEQ shall make any revisions to the permit and permit record necessary to address such public comments, including preparation of a written response to comments (which shall include a written response to all significant comments raised during the public participation process on the draft permit and recorded under Rule 6.4.I(5).), and shall submit the proposed permit and the supporting material required under Rule 6.5.A(1)(a)., excepting the final permit, to the Administrator after the public comment period has closed. (2) The DEQ shall keep such records for five years and submit to the Administrator such information as the Administrator may reasonably require. B. Review by Affected State(s). (1) The DEQ shall give notice of each draft permit to any Affected State(s) on or before the time that the DEQ provides this notice to the public. (2) As part of the submittal of the proposed permit to the Administrator (or as soon as possible after the submittal for minor permit modification procedure), the DEQ shall notify the Administrator and any Affected State(s) in writing of any refusal by the Permit Board to accept all recommendations for the proposed permit that the Affected State(s) submitted during the public or Affected State(s) review period. The notice shall include the Permit Board's reasons for not accepting any such recommendation. The Permit Board is not required to accept recommendations that are not based on applicable requirements or the requirements of these regulations.
C. EPA objection. (1) No permit for which an application must be transmitted to the Administrator under Rule 6.5.A. shall be issued if the Administrator objects to its issuance in writing within 45 days of receipt of the proposed permit and all necessary supporting information required by Rule 6.5.A(1)., including under Rule 6.5.A(1)(a) or (b).
(2) The DEQ shall within ninety (90) days after the date of an objection under Rule 6.5.C(1). revise and submit a proposed permit in response to the objection. D. Public petitions to the Administrator. If the Administrator does not object in writing under Rule 6.5.C., any person may petition the Administrator within 60 days after the expiration of the Administrator’s 45-day review period to make such objection. Public petitions shall comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 70.12. The petitioner shall provide a copy of such petition to the Permit Board and the applicant. Any such petition shall be based only on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period provided for in Rule 6.4.I., unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise such objections within such period, or unless the grounds for such objection arose after such period. If the Administrator objects to the permit as a result of a petition filed under this paragraph, the Permit Board shall not issue the permit until EPA's objection has been resolved, except that a petition for review does not stay the effectiveness of a permit or its requirements if the permit was issued after the end of the 45-day review period and prior to an EPA objection. If the Permit Board has issued a permit prior to receipt of an EPA objection under this paragraph and the Administrator modifies, terminates, or revokes such permit, the Permit Board may thereafter issue only a revised permit that satisfies EPA's objection. In any case, the source will not be in violation of the requirement to have submitted a timely and complete application. E. Prohibition on default issuance. A Title V permit (including a permit renewal or modification) will not be issued until Affected State(s) and EPA have had an opportunity to review the proposed permit as required under these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.6 Program Fees
A. Fees. The owner or operator of any stationary source that is required to hold a Title V permit shall pay to the DEQ an annual fee based on a fee schedule established by the Commission. The fee schedule for Title V program fees shall be set each year by order of the Commission in an amount sufficient to cover the costs of development and
administration of the program. The Commission’s order shall follow receipt of the annual report and recommendation of the Title V Advisory Council, if timely received, and completion of a public hearing held to receive comments regarding the proposed annual fee. B. Fee System. Each owner or operator’s annual Title V program fee shall be calculated and assessed according to the following: (1) A portion of the fee shall be based on the source’s annual quantity of emissions. (a) Allowable emissions determined on the date of the fee calculation shall be used as the basis for this portion of the fee, except when the use of actual emissions is allowed under Paragraph (b). Allowable emissions are those emissions limited by the Title V permit, as well as those emissions not expressly limited by the Title V permit but otherwise allowed by the permit, as represented in the Title V application [refer to R.6.2C.(3)].
(b) Actual emissions may be used as the basis for this portion of the fee if the owner or operator submits a report of the source’s actual emissions for the previous calendar year by July 1. The report shall include, at a minimum, the completed annual fee reporting form provided by the DEQ and any calculations and supporting information used in completing the form. Supporting information shall include, but is not limited to, emissions monitoring data, direct emissions measurements, published emission factors, process data, or other data used to calculate the actual emissions reported on the annual fee reporting form. (c) Notwithstanding Paragraphs (a) and (b) above, when calculating this portion of the fee, a minimum annual fee shall be assessed according to the fee schedule established by the Commission. (2) A portion of the fee shall be based on the complexity of the source, as determined by the number of air regulations applicable to the source on the date of the fee calculation, according to the fee schedule established by the Commission. Only air regulations required to be addressed by a Title V permit may be included in the annual fee schedule. (3) The DEQ shall provide an annual fee reporting form to be used in reporting the information necessary to calculate the appropriate annual fee for each owner or operator. The DEQ may require additional information to support the annual fee reporting form, where necessary, to determine the appropriate annual fee for any owner or operator. (a) The owner or operator shall submit the completed annual fee reporting form to the DEQ by close of business on July 1 of each year. It is
incumbent upon the owner or operator to demonstrate any submittal was made in a timely manner. (b) The annual fee reporting form shall be certified by a responsible official according to Rule 6.2.E. (c) If the annual fee reporting form is not filled out completely and accurately, certified in accordance with Rule 6.2.E., accompanied by all necessary calculations and supporting information, and received by the DEQ by close of business on July 1, allowable emissions or other information necessary to determine the appropriate annual fee shall be used in the fee calculation. (d) If the Commission determines that there is not sufficient information available to the owner or operator to accurately complete and submit the annual fee reporting form by July 1, but such information becomes available and is submitted to the DEQ after July 1, the fee calculation and assessment may be altered according to the annual fee schedule. No fee actually paid to the DEQ shall be refunded due to a change in the fee calculation. If a fee is recalculated such that the amount assessed for an annual period is reduced and the source has already paid all or a portion of the fee, the revised fee assessment may not be reduced to an amount less than what the owner or operator has already paid regardless of the results of the recalculation. C. Excess Fees. If the annual fees collected exceed the cost of administering the Title V program for that fiscal year, then the excess shall be applied to the cost of administering the program for the succeeding fiscal year. If necessary, in the succeeding fiscal year, the assessment rates shall be adjusted to ensure that the excess anticipated to be retained in the fund does not exceed the current annual cost of administering the program. D. Disputed Fees. Any owner or operator required to pay the Title V program fee set forth under this chapter who disagrees with the calculation or applicability of the fee may petition the Commission in writing for a hearing in accordance with State Law. Any disputed portion of the fee for which a hearing has been requested will not incur any penalty or interest from and after the receipt by the Commission of the hearing petition. E. Due Dates. (1) The Title V program fee shall be due September 1 of each year. An owner or operator may elect a quarterly payment method of four (4) equal payments with the payments due September 1, December 1, March 1 and June 1. The owner or operator shall notify the DEQ that the quarterly payment method will be used by September 1.
(a) If any part of the Title V program fee imposed is not paid within thirty
(30) days after the due date, a penalty of ten percent (10%) of the amount due shall at once accrue and be added thereto. If the fee is not paid in full, including any interest and penalty within sixty (60) days of the due date, the Permit Board may revoke the permit upon proper notice and hearing as required by law. (b) If at any time within the year the Commission determines that the information submitted by the owner or operator is insufficient or incorrect, the owner or operator will be notified of the deficiencies and the adjusted fee assessment. Past due fees from the adjusted fee assessment will be due at the time of the next scheduled quarterly payment.
(2) All newly applicable sources required to hold a Title V permit shall pay an annual fee to the DEQ in accordance with the following:
(a) any source commencing operation or increasing emissions between and including January 1 and September 1 of any year, such that the Title V program becomes applicable, shall pay a Title V program fee on or before September 1 of that year; and
(b) any source commencing operation or increasing emissions between and including September 2 and December 31 of any year, such that the Title V program becomes applicable, shall pay a Title V program fee on or before September 1 of the following year.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 2, R. 6.7 Insignificant Activities and Emissions
A. The following activities/emissions sources are not required to be included in a Title V permit application: (1) new or modified pilot plants, subject to temporary source regulations located in Rule 6.3.E. (2) maintenance and upkeep: (a) maintenance, structural changes, or repairs which do not change the capacity of such process, fuel-burning, refuse-burning, or control equipment, and do not involve any change in quality, nature, or quantity of potential emissions of any regulated air pollutants; and (b) housekeeping activities or building maintenance procedures; (3) air conditioning or ventilation: comfort air conditioning or comfort ventilating
systems which do not transport, remove, or exhaust regulated air pollutants to the atmosphere; (4) laboratory equipment: (a) laboratory equipment used exclusively for chemical or physical analysis for quality control or environmental monitoring purposes; or (b) non-production laboratory equipment used at non-profit health or non- profit educational institutions for chemical or physical analyses, bench scale experimentation or training, or instruction; (5) hot water heaters which are used for domestic purposes only and are not used to heat process water;
(6) fuel use related to food preparation by a restaurant, cafeteria, residential cooker or barbecue grill where the products are intended for human consumption; (7) clerical activities such as operating copy machines and document printers, except operation of such units on a commercial basis; (8) hand held equipment used for buffing, polishing, carving, cutting, drilling, machining, routing, sanding, sawing, surface grinding, or turning of ceramic art work, precision parts, leather, metals, plastics, fiber board, masonry, carbon, glass, or wood; (9) equipment for washing or drying fabricated glass or metal products, if no VOCs are used in the process and no oil or solid fuel is burned; (10) water cooling towers (except at nuclear power plants); water treatment systems for process cooling water or boiler feed water; and water tanks, reservoirs, or other water containers not used in direct contact with gaseous or liquid process streams containing carbon compounds, sulfur compounds, halogens or halogen compounds, cyanide compounds, inorganic acids, or acid gases; (11) domestic sewage treatment facilities (excluding combustion or incineration equipment, land farms, storage silos for dry material, or grease trap waste handling or treatment facilities); (12) stacks or vents to prevent escape of sewer gases through plumbing traps; (13) vacuum cleaning systems for housekeeping, except at a source with hazardous air pollutants; (14) alkaline/phosphate washers and associated cleaners and burners;
(15) mobile sources; (16) livestock and poultry feedlots and associated fuel burning equipment other than incinerators; (17) outdoor kerosene heaters; (18) equipment used for hydraulic or hydrostatic testing; (19) safety devices, excluding those with continuous emissions; and (20) brazing, soldering, or welding equipment that is used intermittently or in a non- continuous mode. B. The following activities/emissions sources must be listed in the application but emissions from these activities do not have to be quantified.
(1) all gas fired, No. 2 oil fired, infrared, electric ovens with no emissions other than products of fuel combustion; (2) combustion units with rated input capacity less than 10 million Btu/hr that are fueled by: (a) liquefied petroleum gas or natural gas supplied by a public utility; or (b) commercial fuel oil No. 2 or lighter; (3) equipment used for inspection of metal products; (4) equipment used exclusively for forging, pressing, drawing, spinning, or extruding metals; (5) equipment used exclusively to mill or grind coatings and molding compounds where all materials charged are in paste form; (6) mixers, blenders, roll mills, or calendars for rubber or plastics for which no materials in powder form are added and in which no organic solvents, diluents, or thinners are used; (7) all storage tanks used exclusively to store fuel oils, kerosene, diesel, jet fuel, crude oil, natural gas, or liquefied petroleum gas (the application must list the size of the tank, date constructed and/or modified, type tank, and material stored); (8) space heaters utilizing natural or LPG gas and used exclusively for space heating; (9) back-up or emergency use generators, boilers or other fuel burning equipment
which is of equal or smaller capacity than normal main operating equipment, cannot be used in conjunction with normal main operating equipment, and does not emit, have or cause the potential to emit of any regulated air pollutant to increase; (10) blast cleaning equipment using a suspension of abrasives in water; (11) die casting machines; (12) foundry sand mold forming equipment to which no heat is applied and from which no organics are emitted; (13) bark and wood-waste storage and handling; (14) log wetting areas; (15) log flumes;
(16) sodium hydrosulfide storage tank;
(17) sodium hydrosulfide storage tank;
(18) spout cooling water storage;
(19) effluent drains;
(20) white water chest;
(21) repulper vents;
(22) clay storage tank;
(23) alum storage tank;
(24) starch storage tank;
(25) steam vents and leaks;
(26) de-aerator vents;
(27) mill air and instrument air system;
(28) demineralizer water storage tank;
(29) acid storage tank;
(30) process water tank;
(31) air purification system vents;
(32) effluent neutralizing tank/system;
(33) dregs washer;
(34) lime silo;
(35) lime mud mix tank;
(36) lime mud slurry tank;
(37) H
O
storage tank;
(38) green liquor tank; and
(39) tall oil storage tank. C. Notwithstanding Rule 6.7.A. and 6.7.B. above, the applicant shall include all emissions sources and quantify emissions if needed to determine major source status, to determine compliance with an applicable requirement and/or the applicability of any applicable requirement such as a NSPS, NESHAP, MACT standard, etc. as such term is defined in Rule 6.1., or collect any permit fee owed under the approved fee schedule. D. Notwithstanding Rule 6.7.A. and B. above, the applicant shall include all emission sources with a potential to emit: (1) greater than 1 pound per hour of any regulated pollutant that is not a hazardous air pollutant or a GHG; and/or (2) greater than 0.1 pound per hour of any hazardous air pollutant. GHGs are excluded from the requirements of Rule 6.7.D. E. The permittee does not have to report the addition of any insignificant activity listed in Rule 6.7.A., unless the addition is a Title I modification or requires a permit to construct. If a Title I permit or a permit to construct is required, then the modification procedures outlined in Rule 6.4.E. shall be followed. F. The addition of any insignificant activity listed in Rule 6.7.B. shall be handled as an administrative amendment as defined in Rule 6.4.D. unless the addition is a Title I modification or requires a permit to construct. If a Title I permit or a permit to constructs required, then the modification procedures outlined in Rule 6.4.E. shall be followed.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-28, 49-17-29, 49-17-30, 49-17-32, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
Part 3 Hazardous Waste Management Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.1 General
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.2 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.3 Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.4 Annual Reporting for Generators of Hazardous Waste
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.5 Standards Applicable to Transporters of Hazardous Waste
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.6 Annual Reporting for Transporters of Hazardous Waste
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.7 Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.8 Annual Reporting for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.9 Location Standards for the Establishment or Expansion of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.10 Financial Capability, Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.11 Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.12 Annual Reporting for Owners or Operators of Interim Status facility for Treatment, Storage, Recycling, or Disposal
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.13 Standards for the Management of Specific Hazardous Wastes and Specific Types of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.14 Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Facilities Operating under a Standardized Permit
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.15 Schedule for Land Disposal Restrictions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.16 Hazardous Waste Permitting Program
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.17 Contents of Part B: Additional General Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.18 Financial Capability, Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.19 Disclosure Regulations, Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.20 Permit Transfer
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.21 Standards for Universal Waste Management
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.22 Recycled Used Oil Management Standards
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.23 Procedures for Decision Making
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.24 Penalties, Notification, Effective Date and Certification __________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.1 General
The standards for the management of hazardous waste, the definitions of terms, and the provisions for rulemaking petitions (with the exception of the last sentence of 260.34(a) and 260.34(a)(1)-(3)) shall have the meaning as found in the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 260; 45 FR 12724, February 26, 1980, Effective August 26, 1980; 45 FR 33073, May 19, 1980, Effective November 19, 1980; 45 FR 72028, October 30, 1980; 45 FR 76075, November 17, 1980; 45 FR 76630, November 19, 1980; 45 FR 86968, December 31, 1980; 45 FR 2348, January 9, 1981; 46 FR 27476, May 20, 1981; 46 FR 35247, July 7, 1981; 47 FR 32349, July 26, 1982; 48 FR 2511, January 19, 1983; 48 FR 14153, April 1, 1983; 49 FR 47391, December 4, 1984; 49 FR 10500, March 20, 1984, Effective September 20, 1984; 50 FR 661, January 4, 1985; 50 FR 14219, April 11, 1985; 50 FR 18374, April 30, 1985; 50 FR 28742, July 15, 1985; 51 FR 10174, March 24, 1986, Effective September 22, 1986; 51 FR 16443, May 2, 1986, Effective October 29, 1986; 51 FR 25470, July 14, 1986, Effective January 12, 1987; 51 FR 28682, August 8, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 51 FR 40636, November 7, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986 and November 8, 1988; 52 FR 8073, March 16, 1987; 52 FR 41295, October 27,1987; 52 FR 46963, December 10, 1987, Effective January 11, 1988; 53 FR 27301, July 19, 1988; 53 FR 34086, September 2, 1988; 54 FR 26198, June 22, 1989; 54 FR 27116, June 27, 1989; 54 FR 40266, September 29, 1989, Effective October 30, 1989; 55 FR 2322, January 23, 1990, Effective July 23, 1990; 55 FR 8948, March 9, 1990; 55 FR 25454, June 21, 1990, Effective December 21, 1990; 55 FR 50482, December 6, 1990, Effective January 1, 1994; 55 FR 7134, February 21, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 32688, July 17, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 66368, December 23 1991, Effective June 23, 1992; 57 FR 3486, January 29, 1992, Effective July 29, 1992; 57 FR 37262, August 18, 1992, Effective November 16, 1992; 57 FR 38558, August 25, 1992, Effective August 11, 1992; 57 FR 39275, August 28, 1992; 57 FR 41173, September 9, 1992; 57 FR 41611, September 10, 1992, Effective March 8,
1993; 57 FR 54452, November 18, 1992, Effective May 18, 1993; 58 FR 8682, February 16, 1993, Effective April 19, 1993; 58 FR 38816, July 20, 1993, Effective August 19, 1993; 58 FR 46040, August 31, 1993; 59 FR 468, January 4, 1994; 59 FR 28484, June 2, 1994; 59 FR 47982, September 19, 1994, Effective December 19, 1994 except Section 266.100 and Appendix VIII are Effective September 19, 1994; 59 FR 62926, December 6, 1994, Effective June 5, 1995; 60 FR 3095, January 13, 1995; 60 FR 17004, April 4, 1995; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 60 FR 35452, July 7, 1995; 61 FR 16290, April 12, 1996, Effective July 11, 1996; 62 FR 6650, February 12, 1997, Effective August 12, 1997; 62 FR 32462, June 13, 1997; 63 FR 65874, November 30, 1998,; 64 FR 36466, July 6, 1999; 64 FR 52828, September 30, 1999; 67 FR 2962, January 22, 2002; 70 FR 10776, March 4, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005; 70 FR 34538, June 14, 2005, Effective July 14, 2005; 70 FR 45508, August 5, 2005; 70 FR 53420, September 8, 2005, Effective October 11, 2005; 70 FR 59402, October 12, 2005, Effective December 12, 2005; 71 FR 16862, April 4, 2006, Effective May 4, 2006; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 71 FR 42928, July 28, 2006, Effective January 29, 2007; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, Effective June 16, 2010; 78 FR 46448, July 31, 2013, Effective January 31, 2014; 79 FR 350, January 3, 2014, Effective March 4, 2014; 79 FR 7518, February 7, 2014, Effective August 6, 2014; 79 FR 36220, June 26, 2014, Effective December 26, 2014; 73 FR 64668, October 30, 2008, Effective December 29, 2008, as amended by 80 FR 1694, January 13, 2015, Effective July 7, 2015, as amended by 83 FR 24664, May 30, 2018, Effective May 30, 2018; 80 FR 18777, April 8, 2015, Effective April 8, 2015; 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016; 82 FR 41015, August 29, 2017 (announcing the AES filing compliance date as December 31, 2017); 82 FR 60894, December 26, 2017, Effective June 26, 2018; 83 FR 420, January 3, 2018, Effective June 30, 2018; 83 FR 61552, November 30, 2018, Effective November 30, 2018; 84 FR 67202, December 9, 2019, Effective February 7, 2020, and 85 FR 40594, July 7, 2020, Effective September 8, 2020, except those like terms defined differently in the Mississippi Code, Section 17-17-3. Wherever the term Administrator or Regional Administrator is used in the EPA regulations, the term shall have the meaning of the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, or the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality as Mississippi state law directs, except at 40 CFR 268.5, 268.6, 268.42(b), 268.44, 268.13, 262.83(i)(3), 262.84(h)(4), 261.4(a)(25)(xi), 261.11, 261.10, 260.10 and 261, Subpart D (when used in the definition of Hazardous Waste Constituent), and 261.196 Note 1. The import/export provisions and operation of the e-manifest system and its user fees in 40 CFR 260 are non-delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
For the purpose of these regulations, the following definitions also apply:
A. Perpetual Care Period - that period of time following the post-closure period.
B. Commercial Hazardous Waste Landfill - any hazardous waste landfill disposing of more than one type of hazardous waste from more than one site.
C. Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facility - any facility engaged in the storage, treatment, recovery, or disposal of hazardous waste for a fee and which accepts hazardous waste from more than one (1) generator.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.2 Identification and Listing of Hazardous Waste
Hazardous waste is identified and listed in this regulation as is found in Part 261 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 261 (with the exception of 40 CFR 261.149 and 261.150); 45 FR 33119, May 19, 1980, Effective November 19, 1980; 45 FR 47833, July 16, 1980; 45 FR 72028, 72037, 72039, 72041, October 30, 1980; 45 FR 74890, November 12, 1980; 45 FR 76620, 76623, November 19, 1980; 45 FR 78529, 78531, 78541, November 25, 1980; 45 FR 80287, December 4, 1980; 46 FR 4617, January 16, 1981; 46 FR 27476, May 20, 1981; 45 FR 29708, June 3, 1981; 46 FR 34587, July 2, 1981; 46 FR 35247, July 7, 1981; 46 FR 44972, September 8, 1981; 46 FR 47429, September 25, 1981; 46 FR 56588, November 17, 1981; 47 FR 36097, August 18, 1982; 48 FR 2532, January 20, 1983; 48 FR 14153, April 1, 1983; 48 FR 15256, April 8, 1983; 48 FR 30115, June 30, 1983; 49 FR 5313, February 10, 1984; 49 FR 19923, May 10, 1984; 49 FR 23287, June 5, 1984; 49 FR 44980, November 13, 1984; 50 FR 661, January 4, 1985; 50 FR 1999, January 14, 1985; 50 FR 14219, April 11, 1985; 50 FR 20238, May 15, 1985; 50 FR 28742, July 15, 1985; 50 FR 33541, August 20, 1985; 50 FR 42942, October 23, 1985; 50 FR 49202, November 29, 1985, Effective March 31, 1986; 50 FR 53319, December 31, 1985, Effective January 30, 1986; 51 FR 2702, January 21, 1986; 51 FR 5330, February 13, 1986, Effective August 13, 1986; 51 FR 6541, February 25, 1986, Effective August 25, 1986; 51 FR 10174, March 24, 1986, Effective September 22, 1986; 51 FR 19322, May 28, 1986; 51 FR 25471, July 14, 1986; 51 FR 28297, August 6, 1986; 51 FR 28682, August 8, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 51 FR 33612, September 22, 1986; 51 FR 37728, October 24, 1986; 51 FR 40636, November 7, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 52 FR 11821, April 13, 1987; 52 FR 21306, June 5, 1987; 52 FR 26012, July 10, 1987; 52 FR 28698, August 3, 1987, Effective September 2, 1987; 53 FR 13382, April 22, 1988; 53 FR 27163, July 19, 1988; 53 FR 27301, July 19, 1988; 53 FR 35420, September 13, 1988; 53 FR 43878, October 31, 1988; 54 FR 36592, September 1, 1989, Effective March 1, 1990; 54 FR 40266, September 29, 1989, Effective October 30, 1989; 55 FR 2322, January 23, 1990, Effective July 23, 1990; 55 FR 5340, February 14, 1990; 55 FR 8948, March 9, 1990; 55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 18496, May 2, 1990, Effective November 2, 1990; 55 FR 18726, May 4, 1990; 55 FR 22520, June 1, 1990; 55 FR 23634, June 11, 1990; 55 FR 25454, June 21, 1990, Effective December 21, 1990; 55 FR 26986, June 29, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 31387, August 2, 1990; 55 FR 32733, August 10, 1990; 55 FR 39409, September 27, 1990; 55 FR 40834, October 5, 1990; 55 FR 46354, November 2, 1990, Effective May 2, 1991; 55 FR 50482, December 6, 1990, Effective January 1, 1994; 55 FR 51707, December 17, 1990; 56 FR 3864, January 31, 1991; 56 FR 5910, February 13, 1991; 56 FR 7134, February 21, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 7567, February 25, 1991; 56 FR 13411, April 2, 1991, Effective March 25, 1991; 56 FR 19951, May 1, 1991; 56 FR 21955, May 13, 1991, Effective May 2, 1991; 56 FR 27318, June 13, 1991, Effective July 15, 1991; 56 FR 30195, July 1, 1991; 56 FR 32688, July 17, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 41176, August 19, 1991, Effective August 8, 1991; 56 FR 42504, August 27, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 57 FR 12, January 2, 1992, Effective January 13, 1992; 57 FR 7632, March 3 1992, Effective February 18, 1992; 57 FR 21532, May 20, 1992, Effective June 19, 1992; 57 FR 23062, June 1, 1992; 57 FR 27880, June 22, 1992; 57 FR 29220, July 1, 1992; 57 FR 30657, July 10, 1992; 57 FR 37262, August 18, 1992, Effective November 16, 1992; 57 FR 37305, August 18, 1992, Effective
February 18, 1993; 57 FR 38558, August 25, 1992, Effective August 11, 1992; 57 FR 39275, August 28, 1992; 57 FR 41173, September 9, 1992; 57 FR 41611, September 10, 1992, Effective March 8, 1993; 57 FR 47385, October 15, 1992, Effective April 15, 1993; 57 FR 49278, October 30, 1992; 57 FR 55117, November 24, 1992; 57 FR 61502, December 24, 1992, Effective January 1, 1994; 58 FR 6854, February 2, 1993; 58 FR 26424, May 3, 1993, Effective March 8, 1993; 58 FR 46040, August 31, 1993; 59 FR 468, January 4, 1994; 59 FR 8365, February 18, 1994; 59 FR 31551, June 20, 1994; 59 FR 38545, July 28, 1994; 59 FR 47982, September 19, 1994, Effective December 19, 1994 except Section 266.100 and Appendix VIII are Effective September 19, 1994; 60 FR 7848, February 9, 1995, Effective August 9, 1995; 60 FR 19165, April 17, 1995; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 60 FR 25620, May 12, 1995, Effective August 9, 1995; 60 FR 33913, June 29, 1995; 61 FR 13106, March 26, 1996, Effective May 28, 1996; 61 FR 16290, April 12, 1996, Effective July 11, 1996; 61 FR 34278 , July 1, 1996, Effective January 1, 1998; 61 FR 59950, November 25, 1996; 62 FR 6650, February 12, 1997, Effective August 12, 1997; 62 FR 25998, May 12, 1997; 62 FR 32977, June 17, 1997; 63 FR 24596, May 4, 1998; 63 FR 24963, May 6, 1998; 63 FR 28556, May 26, 1998, Multiple Effective Dates; 63 FR 33782, June 19, 1998; 63 FR 42110, August 6, 1998; 63 FR 64372, November 19, 1998; 63 FR 65874, November 30, 1998, Effective June 1, 1999; 64 FR 6806, February 11, 1999; Effective February 5, 1999; 64 FR 6806, February 11, 1999; 64 FR 25408, May 11, 1999; 64 FR 31986, June 15, 1999; 64 FR 36466, July 6, 1999; 64 FR 52828, September 30, 1999; 64 FR 56469, October 20, 1999; 64 FR 63209, November 19, 1999; 65 FR 14472, March 17, 2000; 65 FR 32214, May 22, 2000; 65 FR 36365, June 8, 2000; 65 FR 42292, July 10, 2000; 65 FR 67067, November 8, 2000; 66 FR 27218, May 16, 2001; 66 FR 27266, May 16, 2001, Effective August 14, 2001; 66 FR 50332, October 3, 2001; 66 FR 58258, November 20, 2001; 66 FR 60153, December 3, 2001; 67 FR 11251, March 13, 2002; 67 FR 16263, April 4, 2002; 67 FR 48393, July 24, 2002; 68 FR 44659, July 30, 2003; 70 FR 9138, February 24, 2005, Effective August 23, 2005; 70 FR 10776, March 4, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005; 70 FR 34538, June 14, 2005, Effective July 14, 2005; 70 FR 35032, June 16, 2005, Effective August 23, 2005; 70 FR 44150, August 1, 2005, 70 FR 45508, August 5, 2005; 70 FR 53420, September 8, 2005, Effective October 11, 2005; 70 FR 57769, October 4, 2005, Effective November 3, 2005; 71 FR 16862, April 4, 2006, Effective May 4, 2006; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 71 FR 42928, July 28, 2006, Effective January 29, 2007; 73 FR 31756 June 4, 2008, Effective July 7, 2008; 73 FR 72912, December 1, 2008, Effective December 31, 2008; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, Effective June 16, 2010; 75 FR 78918, December 17, 2010, Effective January 18, 2011; 77 FR 22229, April 13, 2012, Effective May 14, 2012; 78 FR 46448, July 31, 2013, Effective January 31, 2014; 79 FR 350, January 3, 2014, Effective March 4, 2014; 79 FR 36220, June 26, 2014, Effective December 26, 2014; 73 FR 64668, October 30, 2008, Effective December 29, 2008, as amended by 80 FR 1694, January 13, 2015, Effective July 7, 2015, as amended by 83 FR 24664, May 30, 2018, Effective May 30, 2018 ; 80 FR 18777, April 8, 2015, Effective April 8, 2015; 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; 82 FR 41015, August 29, 2017 (announcing the AES filing compliance date as December 31, 2017); 83 FR 38262, August 6, 2018; 82 FR 60894, December 26, 2017, Effective June 26, 2018; 83 FR 61552, November 30, 2018, Effective November 30, 2018; 84 FR 5816, February 22, 2019, Effective August 21, 2019; 84 FR 67202, December 9, 2019, Effective February 7, 2020; 85 FR 40594, July 7, 2020, Effective September 8, 2020, and all subsequent amendments to this part. The export provisions regarding Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) in 261.39(a)(5), 261.40, and 261.41, the export provisions associated with the
management of hazardous secondary materials (HSM) in 40 CFR 261.4(a)(25)(i-xii), and the implementation of the e-manifest system are non-delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.3 Standards Applicable to Generators of Hazardous Waste
Generators of hazardous waste in Mississippi shall meet the requirements of Part 262 as published in the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 262; 45 FR 12732, February 26, 1980, Effective August 26, 1980; 45 FR 33142, May 19, 1980, Effective November 19, 1980; 45 FR 76624, 76626, November 19, 1980; 45 FR 78529, November 25, 1980; 45 FR 86970, 86973, December 31, 1980; 46 FR 8395, January 26, 1981; 47 FR 1251, January 11, 1982; 47 FR 7841, February 23, 1982; 47 FR 44938, October 12, 1982; 48 FR 3981, January 28, 1983; 48 FR 13027, March 29, 1983; 48 FR 14293, April 1, 1983; 49 FR 10500, March 20, 1984, Effective September 20, 1984; 49 FR 49571, December 20, 1984; 50 FR 28742, July 15, 1985; 51 FR 10175, March 24, 1986, Effective September 22, 1986; 51 FR 25472, July 14, 1986, Effective January 12, 1987; 51 FR 28682, August 8, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 51 FR 35192, October 1, 1986, Effective September 22, 1986; 51 FR 40637, November 7, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 52 FR 25787, July 8, 1987; 52 FR 35898, September 23, 1987; 53 FR 27164, July 19, 1988; 53 FR 37583, September 27, 1988; 53 FR 45089, November 8, 1988; 54 FR 7036, February 16, 1989; 55 FR 2322, January 23, 1990, Effective July 23, 1990; 55 FR 22520, June 1, 1990; 55 FR 50482, December 6, 1990, Effective January 1, 1994; 56 FR 30195, July 1, 1991; 56 FR 43704, September 4, 1991; 57 FR 37262, August 18, 1992, Effective June 20, 1992; 57 FR 39275, August 28, 1992; 57 FR 41173, September 9, 1992; 59 FR 62926, December 6, 1994, Effective June 5, 1995; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 60 FR 35452, July 7, 1995; 61 FR 4911, February 9, 1996, Effective June 6, 1996; 61 FR 16290, April 12, 1996, Effective July 11, 1996; 61 FR 59950, November 25, 1996; 62 FR 6650, February 12, 1997, Effective August 12, 1997; 64 FR 3382, January 21, 1999; 64 FR 25408, May 11, 1999; 64 FR 52828, September 30, 1999; 64 FR 56469, October 20, 1999; 65 FR 12378, March 8, 2000; 69 FR 21737, April 22, 2004; 69 FR 62217, October 25, 2004; 70 FR 10776, March 4, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005, 70 FR 35034, June 16, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 73 FR 72912, December 1, 2008, Effective December 31, 2008; 75 FR 1236, January 8, 2010, Effective July 7, 2010; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, effective June 16, 2010; 75 FR 31716, June 4, 2010; 75 FR 79304, December 20, 2010, Effective March 7, 2011; 79 FR 7518, February 7, 2014, Effective August 6, 2014; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016; 82 FR 41015, August 29, 2017 (announcing the AES filing compliance date as December 31, 2017); 83 FR 38262, August 6, 2018; 82 FR 60894, December 26, 2017, Effective June 26, 2018; 83 FR 420, January 3, 2018, Effective June 30, 2018; 83 FR 61552, November 30, 2018, Effective November 30, 2018; and 84 FR 5816, February 22, 2019, Effective August 21, 2019;. Rule 1.4 supersedes the re-notification requirement under 40 CFR Part 262.18(d). The manifest registry functions in 262.21, as well as the import/export provisions and operation of the e-manifest system in 40 CFR 262, are non-delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The term “EPA” shall mean the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality at 40 CFR 262.16(d), 262.17(a)(8), 262.17(b), 262.17(e), 262.17(f)(1) (except with
respect to the term “EPA form”), 262.232(a)(2), 262.232(a)(7)(vi), 262.232(b)(2), 262.232(b)(6)(vi), and 262.233(a)(1)-(2).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.4 Annual Reporting for Generators of Hazardous Waste
Each generator of greater than two hundred twenty (220) pounds of hazardous waste in any calendar month during the previous calendar year shall report annually by March 1 of each calendar year to the Department, on forms provided by the Department, the type and amount of hazardous waste generated during the preceding calendar year. Rule 1.4 supersedes the biennial reporting requirements in 40 CFR 262.41 for the generators described above. All other generators must comply with 40 CFR 262.41.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.5 Standards Applicable to Transporters of Hazardous Waste
Transporters of hazardous waste in and through Mississippi shall meet all the requirements of Part 263 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 263; 45 FR 12743, February 26, 1980, Effective August 26, 1980; 45 FR 33151, May 19, 1980, Effective November 19, 1980; 45 FR 85022, December 24, 1980; 45 FR 86968, 86973, December 31, 1980; 48 FR 14153, April 1, 1983; 51 FR 10176, March 24, 1986, Effective September 22, 1986; 61 FR 16309290, April 12, 1996, Effective July 11, 1996; 51 FR 28685, August 8, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 51 FR 40637, November 7, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 62 FR 6650, February 12, 1997, Effective August 12, 1997; 70 FR 10776, March 4, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005; 75 FR 1236, January 8, 2010, Effective July 7, 2010; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, Effective June 16, 2010; 79 FR 7518, February 7, 2014, Effective August 6, 2014; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016; 82 FR 41015, August 29, 2017 (announcing the AES filing compliance date as December 31, 2017; 83 FR 420, January 3, 2018, Effective June 30, 2018; and all other applicable requirements of the Mississippi Public Service Commission and the U. S. Department of Transportation. The import/export provisions and operation of the e-manifest system in 40 CFR 263 are non- delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.6 Annual Reporting for Transporters of Hazardous Waste
Each transporter of hazardous waste shall report annually by March 1 of each calendar year to the Department, on forms provided by the Department, the transporter's location, mailing address, and contact person.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.7 Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities
Owners and operators of hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities in Mississippi shall design, construct, operate, close, and maintain such facilities in accordance with the requirements found in Part 264 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 264 (with the exception of 40 CFR 264.149 and 264.150); 45 FR 33221, May 19, 1980, Effective November 19, 1980; 45 FR 76075, November 17, 1980; 45 FR 76630, November 19, 1980; 45 FR 86968, 86970, 86973, December 31, 1980; 46 FR 2847, January 12, 1981; 46 FR 7670, January 23, 1981; 46 FR 8395, January 26, 1981; 46 FR 18025, March 23, 1981; 46 FR 27476, May 20, 1981; 46 FR 35247, July 7, 1981; 46 FR 55112, November 6, 1981; 46 FR 57285, November 23, 1981; 47 FR 7841, February 23, 1982; 47 FR 8306, February 25, 1982; 47 FR 10006, March 9, 1982; 47 FR 15032, April 7, 1982; 47 FR 16544, April 16, 1982; 47 FR 17989, April 27, 1982; 47 FR 19995, May 10, 1982; 47 FR 27531, June 24, 1982; 47 FR 32349, July 26, 1982; 47 FR 44938, October 12, 1982; 48 FR 2511, January 19, 1983; 48 FR 3981, January 28, 1983; 48 FR 14293, April 1, 1983; 48 FR 30115, June 30, 1983; 50 FR 661, January 4, 1985; 50 FR 1999, January 14, 1985; 50 FR 18374, April 30, 1985; 50 FR 28742, July 15, 1985; 50 FR 49203, November 29, 1985, Effective March 31, 1986; 51 FR 16443, May 2, 1986, Effective October 29, 1986; 51 FR 25354, July 11, 1986, Effective September 9, 1986; 51 FR 25472, July 14, 1986, Effective January 12, 1987; 51 FR 28556, August 8, 1986; 51 FR 29430, August 15, 1986; 51 FR 40637, November 7, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 52 FR 21016, June 4, 1987; 52 FR 25787, July 8, 1987; 52 FR 25946, July 9, 1987, Effective September 28, 1987; 52 FR 44320, November 18, 1987, Effective December 18, 1987; 52 FR 45798, December 1, 1987; 52 FR 46963, December 10, 1987, Effective January 11, 1988; 53 FR 7740, March 10, 1988; 53 FR 27164, July 19, 1988; 53 FR 31211, August 17, 1988; 53 FR 34086, September 2, 1988; 53 FR 37934, September 28, 1988; 53 FR 39728, October 11, 1988; 54 FR 26198, June 22, 1989; 54 FR 26647, June 23, 1989; 54 FR 33393, August 14, 1989; 55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990, 55 FR 19262, May 9, 1990; 55 FR 22520, June 1, 1990; 55 FR 25454, June 21, 1990, Effective December 21, 1990; 55 FR 25978, June 26, 1990; 55 FR 26986, June 29, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 31387, August 2, 1990; 55 FR 32733, August 10, 1990; 55 FR 39409, September 27, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 53 FR 37934, September 28, 1988; 53 FR 37934, September 28, 1988; 55 FR 50482, December 6, 1990, Effective January 1, 1994; 56 FR 7134, February 21, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 19290, April 26, 1991, Effective December 21, 1990; 56 FR 30195, July 1, 1991; 56 FR 32688, July 17, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 30200, July 1, 1991; 57 FR 3486, January 29, 1992, Effective July 29 1992; 57 FR 8088, March 6, 1992; 57 FR 37262, August 18, 1992, Effective February 18, 1993; 57 FR 38558, August 25, 1992, Effective August 11, 1992; 57 FR 39275, August 28, 1992; 57 FR 41173, September 9, 1992; 57 FR 42835, September 16, 1992; 57 FR 54452, November 18, 1992, Effective May 18, 1993; 57 FR 61502, December 24, 1992, Effective January 1, 1994; 58 FR 8682, February 16, 1993, Effective April 19, 1993; 58 FR 26424, May 3, 1993, Effective March 8, 1993; 58 FR 29884, May 24, 1993, Effective May 10, 1993; 58 FR 46040, August 31, 1993; 59 FR 13891, March 24, 1994; 59 FR 29959, June 10, 1994, Effective August 9, 1994; 59 FR 47982, September 19, 1994, Effective December 19, 1994 except Section 266.100 and Appendix VIII are Effective September 19, 1994; 59 FR 62926, December 6, 1994, Effective June 5, 1995; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 60 FR 26828, May 19, 1995, Effective December 6, 1995; 60 FR 35452, July 7, 1995; 60 FR 35705, July 11,
1995, Effective September 11, 1995; 60 FR 50428, September 29, 1995, Effective December 6, 1995; 61 FR 4911, February 9, 1996, Effective June 6, 1996; 61 FR 16290, April 12, 1996, Effective July 11,1996; 61 FR 59950, November 25, 1996; 62 FR 6650, February 12, 1997, Effective August 12, 1997; 62 FR 32462, June 13, 1997; 62 FR 64656, December 8, 1997; 63 FR 56710, October 22, 1998; 63 FR 65874, November 30, 1998, Effective June 1, 1999; 64 FR 3382, January 21, 1999; 64 FR 36466, July 6, 1999; 64 FR 52828, September 30, 1999; 66 FR 35087, July 3, 2001, Effective October 16, 2001; 67 FR 2962, January 22, 2002; 67 FR 6792, February 13, 2002; 69 FR 22602, April 26, 2004, Effective June 25, 2004; 70 FR 10776, March 4, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005; 70 FR 34538, June 14, 2005, Effective July 14, 2005; 70 FR 35034, June 16, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005; 70 FR 44150, August 1, 2005; 70 FR 45508, August 5, 2005; 70 FR 59402, October 12, 2005, Effective December 12, 2005; 71 FR 16862, April 4, 2006, Effective May 4, 2006; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 73 FR 18970, April 8, 2008; 75 FR 1236, January 8, 2010, Effective July 7, 2010; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, Effective June 16, 2010; 79 FR 7518, February 7, 2014, Effective August 6, 2014; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016; 83 FR 420, January 3, 2018, Effective June 30, 2018; 84 FR 5816, February 22, 2019, Effective August 21, 2019; 84 FR 67202, December 9, 2019, Effective February 7, 2020, and all conditions of any additional siting requirements stated in this part. Provisions of 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE as referenced in 40 CFR 264.340 and 264.601 have been adopted into the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air Contaminants, which is codified at 11 Mississippi Administrative Code Part 2, Chapter 1, Rule 1.8(A), as amended. The import/export provisions and operation of the e-manifest system and its user fees in 40 CFR 264 are non-delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.8 Annual Reporting for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities
The owner or operator of any facility for the treatment, storage, recycling, or disposal of hazardous waste shall report by March 1 of each calendar year to the Department, on forms provided by the Department, the types and amounts of hazardous waste treated, stored, recycled, and/or disposed during the preceding calendar year. Rule 1.8 supersedes 40 CFR 264.75.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.9 Location Standards for the Establishment or Expansion of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
A. Applicability. These regulations shall apply to (1) hazardous waste permit applications pending before the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality on the effective date of these regulations and (2) hazardous waste permit applications submitted to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality after the effective date of these regulations.
B. Definitions. For purposes of this Rule 1.9, all words and phrases not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 17-17-3 of the Mississippi Code unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Terms not defined either herein or in Section 17-17-3 of the Mississippi Code shall have their ordinary meanings unless such terms have a specialized meaning within the hazardous waste field. Terms having such a specialized meaning are to be given that specialized meaning unless otherwise defined herein or in Section 17-17- 3 of the Mississippi Code.
(1) "Active portion of the facility" means that portion of the facility where treatment, storage, or disposal operations are being or have been conducted and which is not a closed portion.
(2) "Airport" means a public-use airport open to the public without prior permission and without restrictions within the physical capacities of available facilities.
(3) "Aquifer" means a geological formation, group of formations, or portion of a formation capable of yielding significant quantities of groundwater to wells or springs.
(4) "Areas susceptible to mass movement" means those areas of influence (i.e., areas characterized as having an active or substantial possibility of mass movement) where the movement of earth material at, beneath, or adjacent to the unit, because of slope stability or other natural or man-induced events, results in the downslope transport of soil and rock material by means of gravitational influence. Areas of mass movement include, but are not limited to, landslides, avalanches, debris slides and flows, soil fluction, block sliding, and rock fall.
(5) "Closed portion" means that portion of a facility which has closed in accordance with the facility closure plan and all applicable closure requirements.
(6) "Department" means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(7) "Displacement" means the relative movement of any two sides of a fault measured in any direction.
(8) "Endangered or threatened species" means any species listed as such pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, or as defined by Section 49-5-105, Mississippi Code of 1972.
(9) "Facility" means all contiguous land, and structures, other appurtenances, and improvements on the land, used for treating, storing, or disposing of hazardous waste. A facility may consist of several treatment, storage, or disposal operational units (e.g., one or more landfills, surface impoundments, or combinations of them).
(10) "Fault" means a fracture or a zone of rock fractures in material along which strata on one side have been displaced with respect to those on the other side.
(11) "Holocene" means the most recent geologic epoch of the Quaternary Period, from the end of the Pleistocene Epoch to the present.
(12) "Horizontal ground acceleration" means the maximum change in velocity over time relative to horizontal movement of the earth's surface as measured at a particular point during an earthquake.
(13) "Incinerator" means any enclosed device that:
i. Uses controlled flame combustion and neither meets the criteria of classification as a boiler, sludge dryer, or carbon regeneration unit, nor is listed as an industrial furnace as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 260.10; or
ii. Meets the definition of infrared incinerator or plasma arc incinerator established in 40 CFR 260.10.
(14) "Karst Terranes" means areas where karst topography, with its characteristic surface and subterranean features, is developed as the result of dissolution of limestone, dolomite, or other soluble rock. Characteristic physiographic features present in karst terranes include, but are not limited to, sinkholes, sinking streams, caves, large springs, and blind valleys.
(15) "Lake or reservoir" means a body of water, not owned by the applicant, having greater than ten (10) acres of surface area at such time as the spillway overflows and the primary purpose of which is not for wastewater storage or treatment.
(16) "Land-Based Unit" means a unit subject to Rule 1.7 (40 CFR, Subpart F) of these regulations, including landfills, surface impoundments, waste piles, land treatment units, and certain hazardous waste management units subject to Rule 1.7 (40 CFR, Subpart F) of these regulations, Land based unit also means a tank that closes under Rule 1.7 (40 CFR, 264.197(b)) of these regulations, leaving contaminated soils in place.
(17) "Mass movement" means any downslope unit movement of earth materials, including, but not necessarily restricted to, landslides, avalanches, debris slides and flows, creep, solifluction, blocksliding, rock falls, and slump.
(18) "Nonattainment area" means an area which is shown by monitored data or which is calculated by air quality modeling to exceed any national ambient air quality standard.
(19) "Non-Land Based Unit" means any hazardous waste management unit not subject to Part F of Part 264.
(20) "100-year-flood" means a flood that has a 1-percent or greater chance of recurring in any given year or a flood of a magnitude equaled or exceeded once in 100 years on the average over a significantly long period.
(21) "100-year floodplain" means any land area which is subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year from any source.
(22) "Ordinary waste" means "garbage" as that term is defined in Section 17-17-3 of the Mississippi Code.
(23) "Outcrop" means that part of a geologic formation or structure that appears at the surface of the earth; also, bedrock that is covered only by surficial deposits such as alluvium.
(24) “Permit Board" means the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board.
(25) "Poor foundation conditions" means those areas where features exist which indicate that a natural or man-induced event may result in inadequate foundation support for the structural components of a land-based or non-land-based unit.
(26) "Seismic impact zone" means an area with a ten percent or greater probability that the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material will equal or exceed 0.10g (expressed as a fraction of the earth's gravitational pull (g)) in 250 years.
(27) "7Q10 flow" means the average streamflow rate over seven (7) consecutive days that may be expected to be reached as an annual minimum no more frequently than one (1) year in ten (10).
(28) "Stream or river" means a flowing body of water with a 7Q10 flow greater than zero.
(29) "Structural integrity" means the ability of a unit to withstand physical forces exerted upon designed components, ancillary devices, and containment structures of the unit.
(30) "Surficial deposit" means unconsolidated and residual, alluvial, or glacial deposits, lying on bedrock or occurring on or near the earth's surface.
(31) "Unstable area" means a location that is susceptible to natural or human-induced events or forces capable of impairing the structural integrity of a commercial hazardous waste management facility constructed at the location. Unstable areas
can include, but are not limited to, areas exhibiting poor foundation conditions, areas susceptible to mass movement, and Karst terranes.
(32) "Water well or special purpose hole" means a well or hole including but not necessarily limited to, a potable well, agricultural well, monitoring well, observation well, saline or brackish water withdrawal well, contaminant recovery well, heat pump water supply hole, vertical closed-loop system hole, industrial supply well, or a rig supply well.
(33) "Zone of deformation" means the area adjacent to and surrounding a fault which is subject to structural deformation as a result of movement along the fault. Geologic features that may occur in a zone of deformation may include, but are not limited to, splay or satellite faults, gouge zones, en echelon fault clusters, and deformed strata.
C. Hydrological and Geological Factors
(1) Floodplains.
No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded in a 100-year floodplain unless the permit applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Permit Board that the proposed facility will not restrict the flow of the 100-year flood, reduce the temporary water storage capacity of the floodplain, or result in washout of hazardous waste so as to pose a hazard to human health or the environment.
(2) Seismic Considerations.
i. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that it would be located closer than 200 feet to any fault along which displacement has occurred during the Holocene epoch unless a site-specific demonstration is made showing that any movement along the Holocene fault and in the adjacent zone of deformation will not disrupt the contents of any unit or damage the structural integrity of any unit, or in any way threaten human health or the environment. The owner or operator may be required to perform site and regional studies to demonstrate that the zone of deformation associated with the fault is smaller than 200 feet.
ii. No commercial hazardous waste management land-based unit shall be established or expanded such that it would be located in a seismic impact zone.
iii. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that it would be located in areas susceptible to damage caused by any ground shaking, liquefaction, or seismic wave motion based
on approved seismic risk maps or methods, unless it can be demonstrated that appropriate engineering measures will be applied to ensure unit structural integrity and to mitigate the threats posed to human health and the environment by any ground shaking, liquefaction, or seismic wave motion.
(3) Unstable Areas. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that it would be located in an unstable area unless the applicant can demonstrate to the Permit Board that the facility will be designed so that the structural integrity of the facility will be maintained. The applicant for a permit to establish or expand a commercial hazardous waste management facility must consider the following factors, at a minimum, in determining whether an area is unstable:
(a) On-site or local soil conditions that may result in significant differential settling;
(b) On-site or local geologic or geomorphologic features; and
(c) On-site or local human-made features or events (both surface and subsurface).
(4) Geologic Barrier Thickness and Permeability. No land-based commercial hazardous waste management unit shall be established or expanded such that it would be located in an area where a geologic barrier material of soils or rock formations with low permeability is not present between the unit and the upper most aquifer. This barrier shall be at least 150 feet thick. The upper 50 feet of the geologic barrier material shall have a saturated hydraulic conductivity averaging no greater than 1x10 -7 cm/sec, including consideration of any significant discontinuities or lithologic changes. Hydraulic conductivity values averaging no greater than 1 x 10 -6 cm/sec. will be acceptable in the material comprising the remainder of the geologic barrier below the 50 foot section exhibiting the 1 x 10 -7
cm/sec hydraulic conductivity values.
(5) Presence of Hydrocarbon Test Wells and Water Wells.
(a) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that an active, inactive, or abandoned hydrocarbon well would be present within or beneath the active portion of the facility.
(b) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that an active, inactive, or abandoned water well or other special purpose hole would be present within or beneath the active portion of the facility, unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Permit Board that such well or hole has been abandoned according to all applicable State abandonment procedures and regulations. Exceptions to
this criterion include any wells or other special purpose holes the Permit Board determines to be necessary for the detection or removal of contaminants within the active portion of the facility.
(6) Sole Source Aquifers and Aquifer Outcrop Areas.
(a) No commercial hazardous waste management land-based unit facility shall be established or expanded such that it would be located in the outcrop area of a sole source aquifer designated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department.
(b) No commercial hazardous waste management land-based unit facility shall be established or expanded such that it would be located in the outcrop area of a freshwater aquifer which has use as a present or potential source of water for a community water system as defined in 40 CFR 141.2 of the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.
(7) Surface and Subsurface Mineral Interests. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded on any property for which the permit applicant does not own the mineral rights within the boundary of the proposed facility.
D. Protection of Natural Resources.
(1) Wetlands. No hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded in wetlands unless the permit applicant obtains formal written approval regarding the operation from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Additionally, no such facility shall be established or expanded in coastal wetlands unless the applicant obtains formal written concurrence, as required by Mississippi law, from the Department of Marine Resources.
(2) Endangered or Threatened Species. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded unless in compliance with all statutes, rules, and regulations concerning protection of endangered or threatened species within the jurisdiction of the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks.
(3) Significant Historical and Archaeological Areas. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded in such a manner as to impact significantly and adversely cultural resources listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, unless impact to those cultural resources may be appropriately mitigated.
(4) Parks and Recreational Areas.
(a) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that it would be, on the date the application is submitted to the Department, located within 0.5 miles of any of the following areas, without the specific written consent of the agency responsible for managing such area:
(1) A national, state, or city designated park; or
(2) An outdoor recreational area, such as a golf course or swimming pool, owned by a city, county, or other public agency.
(b) A greater setback distance may be established by the Permit Board on a site specific basis.
(5) Forests, Wilderness Areas, Wildlife Management Areas, and Natural Areas.
(a) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that it would be, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, located within any of the following areas, without the specific written consent of the person responsible for managing such area:
(1) National forest land, national wilderness areas, and national wildlife refuge areas, as designated by the appropriate federal agency; or
(2) State wildlife management areas, state game management areas, and state natural areas, as designated by the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks.
(b) A setback distance may be established by the Permit Board on a site specific basis.
(6) Surface Waters
(a) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be located within 0.5 mile of the banks of any section of a river, stream, lake, or coastal waters classified by the Commission on Environmental Quality as recreational or shellfish harvesting on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department.
(b) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be located closer than five hundred (500) feet from the banks of a stream, river, lake, reservoir, or coastal waters.
(7) Air Quality. An applicant for an air and/or water pollution control permit to establish or expand a commercial hazardous waste management facility shall comply with the State of Mississippi Guidelines for Review of Siting Criteria in Applications for Air and Water Pollution Control Permits (Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 2 and Title 11, Part 6, Chapter 1), as amended.
(8) Protection of Agriculture, Aquaculture, Forestry, Fish, and Wildlife. No commercial hazardous waste incinerator or landfill shall be located such that operations of the facility would have a significant adverse impact on agriculture, aquaculture, forests, fish, or wildlife. The applicant must provide to the Department a documented report, predicting any impacts of the proposed facility on agriculture, aquaculture, forests, fish, and wildlife within a five-mile radius of the site.
E. Local Land Use and Proximity to Public Water Supplies, Airports, and Certain Structures and Institutions.
(1) Local Land Use and Local Zoning.
No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded if, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, the site would be in conflict with lawful regulations or ordinances of state agencies, or local governments.
(2) Proximity to Residences.
(a) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be located less than 1000 feet from any residence in existence on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department.
(b) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be located within one mile of a residential area in existence on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, unless the proposed facility would be located in an established industrial park, in which case the active portion of the facility shall not be located less than 1000 feet from any residential area in existence on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department.
(c) For purposes of this rule,
-
"residential area" means a group or cluster of 10 or more single family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of two or more units per acre, and
-
"single family dwelling unit" means either (a) a conventional single family detached dwelling or mobile home, or (b) a unit within a multi-family residential complex (townhouses, condominiums, or apartments).
(3) Proximity to Public Water Supply Sources.
(a) No commercial hazardous waste management land-based unit shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, within one mile of any well supplying water to a community water system as defined in 40 CFR 141.2 of the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.
(b) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, within one mile from a surface water intake for a public water supply. If the runoff from the facility would enter the water body upgradient of the intake structure, this distance shall be increased to at least twenty (20) miles.
(4) Proximity to Airports. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that it would adversely affect operations or safety at any airport in existence on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department.
(5) Proximity to Buildings Housing Multiple Relatively Immobile Occupants. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, located within one (1) mile of any existing hospital, nursing home, school, or other multi-occupant institution, the purpose and function of which is to provide services to immobile populations.
(6) Proximity to Churches. No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, located within one thousand (1,000) feet of any existing church.
(7) Proximity to Municipalities. No commercial hazardous waste incinerator or land- based unit shall be established or expanded such that the active portion of the facility would be, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, located within one-half (1/2) mile of the incorporated limits of any existing municipality.
(8) Proximity to Existing or Abandoned Ordinary Waste Disposal Sites. No commercial hazardous waste landfill shall be established or expanded such that
the active portion of the facility would be, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, located on the same site or within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing or abandoned ordinary waste disposal site, unless the hazardous waste to be disposed of in said commercial hazardous waste landfill is specifically approved as exempted from this prohibition by the Department.
F. Transportation Factors. The applicant for a permit to establish or expand a commercial hazardous waste management facility must demonstrate to the Permit Board that the anticipated additional traffic along the primary route to the facility would not significantly increase the safety risk within a ten (10) mile radius of the active portion of the facility. The demonstration shall address at least the following factors:
(1) the primary route(s) that the applicant expects will be used for the transportation of hazardous waste to the facility within a ten (10) mile radius of the active portion of the facility;
(2) an estimate of the number and types of vehicles routinely traveling on the primary route(s) within said ten (10) mile radius;
(3) an estimate of the number and types of vehicles expected by the applicant to transport hazardous waste to the facility via the primary route(s) within said ten (10) mile radius;
(4) an estimate of the loaded weight of each type of vehicle expected to transport hazardous waste to the facility via the primary route(s) within the ten (10) mile radius; and
(5) proximity to waste generators.
The Permit Board may require such reasonable restrictions and limitations as it deems appropriate regarding the primary transportation route(s) to the facility if it should determine that the primary route(s) of transportation to the facility by hazardous waste hauling vehicles would significantly increase the safety risks within the ten (10) mile radius.
G. Aesthetic Factors.
(1) Visibility and Appearance of the Facility.
(a) No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded such that, on the date the permit application is submitted to the Department, the active portion of the facility would be less than 1000 feet from the edge of the right-of-way of any interstate or primary highway, as designated by the Mississippi Department of Transportation, except the following:
(1) those locations which will be screened by natural objects, planting, fences, or other appropriate means so as not to be visible from the main-traveled highway system, or otherwise removed from sight; planting, fences, or other appropriate means so as not to be visible from the main-traveled highway system, or otherwise removed from sight;
(2) those locations which are within areas zoned for industrial use under authority of law; or
(3) those locations which will not be visible from the main-traveled highway.
(b) The Permit Board may, at its discretion, apply the requirements of G.l.a. in relation to any public road other than an interstate or primary highway.
(2) Noise
No commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be established or expanded unless the applicant for a permit for the facility can demonstrate to the Permit Board that the facility shall be located, configured, designed, constructed, and operated such that the noise level at the facility boundary caused by normal waste management operations of the facility but not by vehicular movement into or out of the facility will not exceed an eight-hour time weighted average (TWA) of 65 decibels between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. or an eight-hour TWA of 55 decibels between the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m.
H. Buffer Zones
The Permit Board may establish buffer zone requirements in addition to or more stringent than the minimums prescribed in this section for new or expanding commercial hazardous waste management facilities, and all buffer zone requirements around all other new or expanding hazardous waste management facilities, all as may be required for protection of the public health or environment or because of the proximity of such things as individual residences, roadways, waterways, commercial establishments, existing or abandoned solid or hazardous waste facilities or other natural or man-made structures, on a case-by-case basis using good engineering judgment.
I. Notice to Landowners.
Within sixty (60) days after the date on which an application for a permit to establish or expand a commercial hazardous waste landfill is filed with the Department, the applicant shall give notice of the filing to all landowners within one-half (1/2) mile of the property line of the proposed facility.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.10 Financial Capability, Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
a. For the purposes of this Rule 1.10, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) "Incinerator" means any enclosed device that:
(a) Uses controlled flame combustion and neither meets the criteria of classification as a boiler, sludge dryer, or carbon regeneration unit, nor is listed as an industrial furnace as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 260.10; or
(b) Meets the definition of infrared incinerator or plasma arc incinerator established in 40 CFR 260.10.
(2) "Land disposal facility" means a facility with any unit subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 264 Subpart F.
b. Annually, the owner and operator of a commercial hazardous waste management incinerator or land disposal facility must provide to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality documentation of a current actual or implied (hypothetical) rating no lower than BB (Standard and Poor's Corporation) or Ba (Moody's Investor Service) or equivalent on senior unsecured debt obligations from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization as established by the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission. This rating must be for the owner and operator named in the permit application.
c. Annually, the owner and operator of any kind of commercial hazardous waste management facility other than an incinerator or land disposal facility must provide to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality documentation of a current actual or implied (hypothetical) rating no lower than B (Standard and Poor's Corporation) or B (Moody's Investor Service) or equivalent on senior unsecured debt obligations from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization as established by the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission. This rating must be for the owner and operator named in the permit application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.11 Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities
Owners and operators of hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities in Mississippi that have fully complied with the requirements for interim status shall meet the requirements in Part 265 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 265 (with the exception of 40 CFR 265.149 and 265.150); 45 FR 33232, May 19, 1980, Effective November 19, 1980; 45 FR 72040, October 30, 1980; 45 FR 76075, November 17, 1980; 45 FR 76630, November 19, 1980; 45 FR 78529, November 25, 1980; 45 FR 86968, 86970, 86973, December
31, 1980; 46 FR 2847, January 12, 1981; 46 FR 7678, January 23, 1981; 46 FR 8395, January 26, 1981; 46 FR 13494, February 20, 1981; 46 FR 18025, March 23, 1981; 46 FR 27467, May 20, 1981; 46 FR 33507, June 29, 1981; 46 FR 35247, July 7, 1981; 46 FR 56596, November 17, 1981; 47 FR 1255, January 11, 1982; 47 FR 2316, January 15, 1982; 47 FR 7841, February 23, 1982; 47 FR 8306, February 25, 1982; 47 FR 10006, March 9, 1982; 47 FR 12316, March 22, 1982; 47 FR 15032, April 7, 1982; 47 FR 16544, April 16, 1982; 47 FR 17989, April 27, 1982; 47 FR 19995, May 10, 1982; 47 FR 27531, June 24, 1982; 47 FR 32349, July 26, 1982; 47 FR 44938, October 12, 1982; 48 FR 2511, January 19, 1983; 48 FR 3981, January 28, 1983; 48 FR 14153, April 1, 1983; 48 FR 30115, June 30, 1983; 48 FR 52720, November 22, 1983; 49 FR 46095, November 21, 1984; 50 FR 661, January 4, 1985; 50 FR 1999, January 14, 1985; 50 FR 16048, April 23, 1985; 50 FR 18374, April 30, 1985; 50 FR 28742, July 15, 1985; 50 FR 49203, November 29, 1985, Effective March 31, 1986; 51 FR 16451, May 2, 1986, Effective October 29, 1986; 51 FR 19177, May 28, 1986; 51 FR 25355, July 11, 1986, Effective September 9, 1986; 51 FR 25478, July 14, 1986, Effective January 12, 1987; 51 FR 28556, August 8, 1986; 51 FR 29430, August 15, 1986; 51 FR 40637, November 7, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 52 FR 8704, March 19, 1987, Effective September 15, 1987; 52 FR 21016, June 4, 1987; 52 FR 25787, July 8, 1987; 52 FR 44321, November 18, 1987, Effective December 18, 1987; 52 FR 45798, December 1, 1987, Effective December 31, 1987; 53 FR 7740, March 10, 1988; 53 FR 27164, July 19, 1988; 53 FR 31211, August 17, 1988; 53 FR 34086, September 2, 1988; 53 FR 37934, September 28, 1988; 54 FR 26647, June 23, 1989; 54 FR 33393, August 14, 1989; 55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 22520, June 1, 1990; 55 FR 25454, June 21, 1990, Effective December 21, 1990; 55 FR 25978, June 26, 1990; 55 FR 26986, June 29, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 31387, August 2, 1990; 55 FR 32733, August 10, 1990; 55 FR 39409, September 27, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 50482, December 6, 1990, Effective January 1, 1994; 56 FR 7134, February 21, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 19290, April 26, 1991, Effective December 21, 1990; 56 FR 30195, July 1, 1991; 56 FR 32688, July 17, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 42504, August 27, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 46912, September 23, 1991; 56 FR 66368, December 23, 1991, Effective June 23, 1992; 57 FR 3486, January 29, 1992, Effective July 29, 1992; 57 FR 8088, March 6, 1992; 57 FR 37262, August 18, 1992, Effective February 18, 1993; 57 FR 38558, August 25, 1992, Effective August 11, 1992; 57 FR 39275, August 28, 1992; 57 FR 41173, September 9, 1992; 57 FR 42835, September 16, 1992; 57 FR 54452, November 18, 1992, Effective May 18, 1993; 57 FR 61502, December 24, 1992, Effective January 1, 1994; 58 FR 8682, February 16, 1993, Effective April 19, 1993; 58 FR 26424, May 3, 1993, Effective March 8, 1993; 58 FR 29884, May 24, 1993, Effective May 10, 1993; 58 FR 46040, August 31, 1993; 59 FR 13891, March 24, 1994; 59 FR 47982, September 19, 1994, Effective December 19, 1994 except Section 266.100 and Appendix VIII are Effective September 19, 1994; 59 FR 62926, December 6, 1994, Effective June 5, 1995; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 60 FR 26828, May 19, 1995, Effective December 6, 1995; 60 FR 35452, July 7, 1995; 60 FR 35705, July 11, 1995, Effective September 11, 1995; 60 FR 50428, September 29, 1995, Effective December 6, 1995; 61 FR 4911, February 9, 1996, Effective June 6, 1996; 61 FR 16309, April 12, 1996, Effective July 11, 1996; 61 FR 59950, November 25, 1996; 62 FR 6650, February 12, 1997, Effective August 12, 1997; 62 FR 32462, June 13, 1997; 62 FR 64656, December 8, 1997; 63 FR 56710, October 22, 1998; 63 FR 65874, November 30, 1998, Effective June 1, 1999; 64 FR 3382, January 21, 1999; 64 FR 36466, July 6, 1999; 64 FR 52828, September 30, 1999; 67 FR 6792, February 13, 2002; 69 FR 22602, April 26, 2004, Effective June 25, 2004; 70 FR 10776,
March 4, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005; 70 FR 34538, June 14, 2005, Effective July 14, 2005; 70 FR 35034, June 16, 2005, Effective September 6, 2005; 70 FR 45508, August 5, 2005; 70 FR 59402, October 12, 2005, Effective December 12, 2005; 71 FR 16862, April 4, 2006, Effective May 4, 2006; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 75 FR 1236, January 8, 2010, Effective July 7, 2010; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, Effective June 16, 2010; 79 FR 7518, February 7, 2014, Effective August 6, 2014; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016; 83 FR 420, January 3, 2018, Effective June 30, 2018; 84 FR 5816, February 22, 2019, Effective August 21, 2019; and 84 FR 67202, December 9, 2019, Effective February 7, 2020. Provisions of 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE as referenced in 40 CFR 265.340 have been adopted into the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air Contaminants, which is codified at 11 Mississippi Administrative Code Part 2, Chapter 1, Rule 1.8(A), as amended. The import/export provisions and operation of the e-manifest system and its user fees in 40 CFR 265 are non-delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.12 Annual Reporting for Owners or Operators of Interim Status Facility Treatment, Storage, Recycling, or Disposal
The owner or operator of any interim status facility for the treatment, storage, recycling, or disposal of hazardous waste shall report by March 1 of each calendar year to the Department, on forms provided by the Department, the types and amounts of hazardous waste treated, stored, recycled, and/or disposed during the preceding calendar year. Rule 1.12 supersedes 40 CFR 265.75.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.13 Standards for the Management of Specific Hazardous Wastes and Specific Types of Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
Generators, transporters and treatment, storage and disposal facilities conducting activities identified in Part 266 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations shall comply with the requirements of Part 266 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 266; 50 FR 661, January 4, 1985; 50 FR 14219, April 11, 1985; 50 FR 28742, July 15, 1985; 50 FR 33541, August 20, 1985; 50 FR 49204, November 29, 1985, Effective March 31, 1986; 52 FR 11821, April 13, 1987; 52 FR 21306, June 5, 1987; 53 FR 31211, August 17, 1988; 54 FR 26647, June 23, 1989; 55 FR 32733, August 10, 1990; 56 FR 7134, February 27, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 32688, July 17, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 42504, August 27, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 43874, September 5, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 57 FR 27880, June 22, 1992; 57 FR 38558, August 25, 1992, Effective August 11, 1992; 57 FR 41611, September 10, 1992, Effective March 8, 1993; 57 FR 44999, September 30, 1992; 58 FR 38816, July 20, 1993, Effective August 19, 1993; 58 FR 59598, November 9, 1993, Effective October 15, 1993; 59 FR 38545, July 28, 1994; 59 FR 43499, August 24, 1994, Effective February 24, 1995; 59 FR 47982, September 19, 1994, Effective December 19, 1994 except Section 266.100
and Appendix VIII are Effective September 19, 1994; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 60 FR 33913, June 29, 1995; 61 FR 16309, April 12, 1996, Effective July 11, 1996; 61 FR 56631, November 4, 1996; 62 FR 6650, February 12, 1997, Effective August 12, 1997; 62 FR 32462, June 13, 1997; 63 FR 28556, May 26, 1998, Multiple Effective Dates; 63 FR 42110, August 6, 1998; 63 FR 54356, October 9, 1998; 63 FR 71225, December 24, 1998; 64 FR 52828, September 30, 1999; 64 FR 63209, November 19, 1999; 66 FR 27218, May 16, 2001, Effective November 13, 2001; 67 FR 6792, February 13, 2002; 67 FR 6968, February 14, 2002; 67 FR 48393, July 24, 2002; 70 FR 34538, June 14, 2005, Effective July 14, 2005; 70 FR 59402, October 12, 2005, Effective December 12, 2005; 71 FR 16862, April 4, 2006, Effective May 4, 2006; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 73 FR 18970, April 8, 2008; 75 FR 1236, January 8, 2010, Effective July 7, 2010; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, Effective June 16, 2010; 75 FR 31716, June 4, 2010; 77 FR 22229, April 13, 2012, Effective May 14, 2012; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016 ; and 84 FR 5816, February 22, 2019, Effective August 21, 2019. Provisions of 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE as referenced in 40 CFR 266.100 and 266.506(b)(3) have been adopted into the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air Contaminants, which is codified at 11 Mississippi Administrative Code Part 2, Chapter 1, Rule 1.8(A), as amended. The import/export provisions in 40 CFR 266 are non-delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.14 Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Facilities Operating under a Standardized Permit
Owners and operators of hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities in Mississippi under a 40 CFR Subpart J standardized permit shall meet all the requirements of Part 267 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 267 (with the exception of 267.150): 70 CFR 53420, September 8, 2005, Effective October 11, 2005; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; and 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016. The import/export provisions in 40 CFR 267 are non-delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.15 Schedule for Land Disposal Restrictions
Generators, transporters, and owners and operators of hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities in Mississippi shall meet all the requirements of Part 268 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 268; 51 FR 19300, May 28, 1986, Effective June 27, 1986; 51 FR 40638, November 7, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986, except for the provisions in Sections 268.30(b) and 268.31(a), which will become effective on November 8, 1988; 52 FR 21016, June 4, 1987; 52 FR 25788, July 8, 1987; 52 FR 41296, October 27, 1987; 53 FR 27164, July 19, 1988; 53 FR 31211, August 17, 1988; 54 FR 4021, January 27, 1989, Revoked; 54 FR 8266 February 27, 1989; 54 FR 18837, May 2, 1989; 54 FR 26647, June 23, 1989; 54 FR 36970,
September 6, 1989; 55 FR 11798, March 29, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 22520, June 1, 1990; 55 FR 23935, June 13, 1990; 55 FR 26986, June 29, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 31387, August 2, 1990; 55 FR 39409, September 27, 1990, Effective September 25, 1990; 55 FR 3864, January 31, 1991; 56 FR 41176, August 19, 1991, Effective August 8, 1991; 57 FR 8088, March 6, 1992; 57 FR 20770, May 15, 1992, Effective May 8, 1992; 57 FR 28632, June 26, 1992, Effective June 5, 1992; 57 FR 37262, August 18, 1992, Effective November 16, 1992; 57 FR 39275, August 28, 1992; 57 FR 41173, September 9, 1992; 57 FR 47772, October 20, 1992 and Expires May 8, 1993; 58 FR 8682, February 16, 1993, Effective April 19, 1993; 58 FR 14319, March 17, 1993, Effective March 17, 1993; 58 FR 29884, 58 FR 28506, May 14, 1993, Effective May 8, 1993; May 24, 1993, Effective May 10, 1993; 58 FR 460490, August 31, 1993; 59 FR 31551, June 20, 1994; 59 FR 43499, August 24, 1994, Effective February 24, 1995; 59 FR 47980, September 19, 1994, Effective August 31, 1993; 59 FR 47982, September 19, 1994, Effective December 19, 1994 except Section 266.100 and Appendix VIII are Effective September 19, 1994; 60 FR 244, January 3, 1995, Effective December 19, 1994; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 61 FR 15596 April 8, 1996; 61 FR 19117, April 30, 1996; 61 FR 33682 June 28, 1996; 61 FR 36419, July 10, 1996; 61 FR 43927, August 26, 1996; 62 FR 1997, January 14, 1997, Effective January 8, 1997; 62 FR 7504, February 19, 1997; 62 FR 25990, May 12, 1997, 62 FR 32977, June 17, 1997; 62 FR 37699, July 14, 1997; 62 FR 45572, August 28, 1997, 63 FR 24596, May 4, 1998, 63 FR 28556, May 26, 1998, Multiple Effective Dates; 63 FR 31266, June 8, 1998; 63 FR 35147, June 29, 1998; 63 FR 42110, August 6, 1998; 63 FR 46332, August 31, 1998; 63 FR 47410, September 4, 1998; 63 FR 48124, September 9, 1998, Effective August 28, 1998; 63 FR 51254, September 24, 1998, Effective September 21, 1998; 63 FR 54356, October 9, 1998; 63 FR 65874, November 30, 1998, Effective June 1, 1999; 64 FR 25408, May 11, 1999; 64 FR 36466, July 6, 1999; 64 FR 56469, October 20, 1999; 65 FR 14472, March 17, 2000; 65 FR 36365, June 8, 2000; 65 FR 67067, November 8, 2000; 65 FR 81373, December 26, 2000; 66 FR 27266, May 16, 2001, Effective August 14, 2001; 66 FR 27266, May 16, 2001, Effective August 14, 2001; 66 FR 58258, November 20, 2001; 67 FR 16263, April 4, 2002; 67 FR 17119, April 9, 2002;67 FR 48393, July 24, 2002; 67 FR 62618, October 7, 2002, Effective November 21, 2002; 70 FR 9138, February 24, 2005, Effective August 23, 2005; 70 FR 34538, June 14, 2005, Effective July 14, 2005; 70 FR 45508, August 5, 2005; 71 FR 16862, April 4, 2006, Effective May 4, 2006; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, Effective June 16, 2010; 75 FR 78918, December 17, 2010, Effective January 18, 2011; 76 FR 34147, June 13, 2011, Effective August 12, 2011; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; 84 FR 5816, February 22, 2019, Effective August 21, 2019; and 84 FR 67202, December 9, 2019, Effective February 7, 2020.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.16 Hazardous Waste Permitting Program
Owners and operators of hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities in Mississippi must obtain a Mississippi Hazardous Waste Management Permit from the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board. Such owners and operators shall meet the requirements of Part 270 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 270; 48 FR 14153, April 1, 1983; 48 FR 30113, June 30, 1983; 48 FR 39619, September 1, 1983; 49 FR 17718, April 24, 1984; 50 FR 661, January 4, 1985; 50 FR 1999, January 14, 1985; 50 FR 18374, April 30, 1985; 50 FR
28702, July 15, 1985; 51 FR 10176, March 24, 1986, Effective September 22, 1986; 51 FR 16458, May 2, 1986; 51 FR 25486, July 14, 1986, Effective January 12, 1987; 51 FR 29431, August 15, 1986; 51 FR 40653, November 7, 1986, Effective November 8, 1986; 52 FR 8073, March 16, 1987; 52 FR 23450, June 22, 1987; 52 FR 25791, July 8, 1987; 52 FR 25953, July 9, 1987, Effective September 28, 1987; 52 FR 33936, September 9, 1987; 52 FR 45798, December 1, 1987, Effective December 31, 1987, Revoke Parts 270.41(a)(3), 270.41(a)(3)(i), 270.41(a)(3)(ii), and 270.41(a)(3)(iii); 52 FR 46965, December 10, 1987, Effective January 11, 1988; 53 FR 7740, March 10, 1988; 53 FR 27164, July 19, 1988; 53 FR 34086, September 2, 1988; 53 FR 37934, September 28, 1988; 53 FR 41649, October 24, 1988; 54 FR 615, January 9, 1989; 54 FR 4286, January 30, 1989; 54 FR 9596, March 7, 1989; 53 FR 37934; 54 FR 26198, June 22, 1989; 54 FR 33393, August 14, 1989; 55 FR 22520, June 1, 1990; 55 FR 25454, June 21, 1990, Effective December 21, 1990; 55 FR 50482, December 6, 1990, Effective January 1, 1994; 55 FR 3864, January 31, 1991; 56 FR 7134, February 21, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 56 FR 19290, April 26, 1991, Effective December 21, 1990; 56 FR 30195, July 1, 1991; 56 FR 32688, July 17, 1991, Effective August 21, 1991; 57 FR 3486, January 29, 1992, Effective July 29, 1992; 57 FR 37262, August 18, 1992, Effective February 18, 1993; 57 FR 39275, August 28, 1992; 57 FR 41173, September 9, 1992; 58 FR 8682, February 16, 1993, Effective April 19, 1993; 58 FR 29884, May 24, 1993, Effective May 10, 1993; 58 FR 46040, August 31, 1993; 59 FR 62926, December 6, 1994, Effective June 5, 1995; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 60 FR 26828, May 19, 1995, Effective December 6, 1995; 60 FR 33913, June 29, 1995; 60 FR 35452, July 7, 1995; 60 FR 63431, December 11, 1995, Effective June 11, 1996; 61 FR 4911, February 9, 1996, Effective June 6, 1996; 61 FR 59950, November 25, 1996; 62 FR 6650, February 12, 1997, Effective August 12, 1997; 62 FR 64656, December 8, 1997; 63 FR 33782, June 19, 1998; 63 FR 56710, October 22, 1998; 63 FR 65874, November 30, 1998, Effective June 1, 1999; 64 FR 36466, July 6, 1999; 64 FR 52828, September 30, 1999; 65 FR 30886, May 15, 2000, Effective June 14, 2000; 65 FR 42292, July 10, 2000; 66 FR 24270, May 14, 2001; 67 FR 2962, January 22, 2002; 67 FR 6792, February 13, 2002; 67 FR 6968, February 14, 2002; 67 FR 77687, December 19, 2002; 70 FR 34538, June 14, 2005, Effective July 14, 2005; 70 FR 45508, August 5, 2005; 70 FR 53420, September 8, 2005, Effective October 11, 2005; 70 FR 59402, October 12, 2005, Effective December 12, 2005; 71 FR 16862, April 4, 2006, Effective May 4, 2006; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 75 FR 12989, March 18, 2010, Effective June 16, 2010; 73 FR 64668, October 30, 2008, Effective December 29, 2008; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017; 84 FR 5816, February 22, 2019, Effective August 21, 2019; 84 FR 67202, December 9, 2019, Effective February 7, 2020; and all permit conditions specified by the State permitting authority in accordance with applicable laws and regulation. Provisions of 40 CFR 63 Subpart EEE as referenced in 40 CFR Part 270 have been adopted into the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air Contaminants, which is codified at 11 Mississippi Administrative Code Part 2, Chapter 1, Rule 1.8(A), as amended.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.17 Contents of Part B: Additional General Requirements
A. Commercial Hazardous Waste Landfill Perpetual Care
(1) At the time an application for a permit for a commercial hazardous waste landfill is made, the owner/operator shall prepare and submit to the Department for approval a plan stating provisions for converting the site to its suitable perpetual use, its use restrictions, and a maintenance schedule that will, when carried out, maintain the integrity of the site through perpetuity. The plan shall include the operations and estimated annual cost necessary to maintain the site. This annual cost estimate shall be revised and submitted to the Department annually until final closure is completed.
(2) At the time an application for a commercial hazardous waste landfill permit is made the owner/operator shall submit a copy of the property deed showing an easement authorizing the appropriate entity access to the property to monitor, inspect or conduct any activity necessary to maintain the integrity of the site and shall record this deed along with the easement in the proper county record. In addition to the easement, the property owner shall include in the property record the land use restriction shown in the perpetual care plan and a description of the facility and the characteristics of its content.
B. Applicant's Financial Capabilities and Past Compliance Record for all Applicants except Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facilities.
As part of or during review of the application for a permit to either construct or operate any treatment, storage, or disposal facility except a commercial hazardous waste management facility the applicant shall submit, for the applicant and any other individual or entity designated to own or operate the proposed facility, the following information:
(1) information to demonstrate the availability of adequate financial resources to comply with the terms and conditions of the permit;
(2) information on compliance history sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that terms and conditions of the permit will be complied with.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.18 Financial Capability, Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
A. For purposes of this Rule 1.18, the following definitions shall apply:
(1) "Incinerator" means any enclosed device that:
(a) Uses controlled flame combustion and neither meets the criteria of classification as a boiler, sludge dryer, or carbon regeneration unit, nor is listed as an industrial furnace as these terms are defined in 40 CFR 260.10; or
(b) Meets the definition of infrared incinerator or plasma arc incinerator established in 40 CFR 260.10.
(2) "Land disposal facility" means a facility with any unit subject to the requirements of 40 CFR 264 Subpart F.
B. An applicant for a permit to establish or expand a commercial hazardous waste management incinerator or land disposal facility must provide to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality documentation of an actual or implied (hypothetical) rating no lower than BB (Standard and Poor's Corporation) or Ba (Moody's Investor Service) or equivalent on senior unsecured debt obligations from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization as established by the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission. This rating must be for the applicant as named in the permit application.
C. An applicant for a permit to establish or expand any kind of hazardous waste management facility other than an incinerator or land disposal facility must provide to the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality documentation of an actual or implied (hypothetical) rating no lower than B (Standard and Poor's Corporation) or B (Moody's Investor Service) or equivalent on senior unsecured debt obligations from a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization as established by the Federal Securities and Exchange Commission. This rating must be for the applicant as named in the permit application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.19 Disclosure Regulations, Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facilities
Every applicant for issuance, reissuance, or transfer of a permit for a commercial hazardous waste management facility must comply with the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Hazardous and Nonhazardous Solid Waste Applicant Disclosure Regulations, promulgated pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section 17-17-501, et. seq. [Miss. Laws, 1991, ch. 583], Mississippi Code Annotated Section 17-17-27, and Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-17-17.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-27, 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.20 Permit Transfer
"Transfer" shall mean any sale, conveyance, or assignment of the rights held by the applicant in any permit issued pursuant to these Regulations. Any change of more than 50 percent of the equity ownership of the permit holder over a sustained period which results in a new majority owner shall constitute a transfer. A new majority owner for purposes of this provision shall be an individual, partnership, company, or group of affiliated companies.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.21 Standards for Universal Waste Management
Generators and transporters of hazardous waste as well as destination facilities, who choose to manage hazardous waste as universal waste shall meet the requirements of Part 273 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR Part 273; 60 FR 25540, May 11, 1995; 61 FR 16309, April 12, 1996, Effective July 11, 1996; 63 FR 71225, December 24, 1998; 64 FR 36466, July 6, 1999; 70 FR 45508, August 5, 2005; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; 72 FR 35666, June 29, 2007; 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2016; 81 FR 85696, November 28, 2016, Effective December 31, 2016; 84 FR 5816, February 22, 2019, Effective August 21, 2019; 84 FR 67202, December 9, 2019, Effective February 7, 2020, and 85 FR 40594, July 7, 2020, Effective September 8, 2020. The import/export provisions are non-delegable and will be implemented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.22 Recycled Used Oil Management Standards
Used oil generators, transporters, processors, re-refiners, burners, and marketers of recycled used oil shall meet the requirements of Part 279 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR Part 279; 57 FR 41611, September 10, 1992, Effective March 8, 1993; 58 FR 26424, May 3, 1993, Effective March 8, 1993; 58 FR 33342, June 17, 1993; 59 FR 10559, March 4, 1994, Effective January 1, 1995; 63 FR 24963, May 6, 1998; 68 FR 44659, July 30, 2003; 70 FR 34538, June 14, 2005, Effective July 14, 2005; 71 FR 40254, July 14, 2006; and 81 FR 85732, November 28, 2016, Effective May 30, 2017.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.23 Procedures for Decision Making
The Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board and the Board’s designee shall conform, in the consideration and issuance of hazardous waste management permits, to the procedures found in Subparts A and B of Part 124 of the EPA Hazardous Waste Regulations 40 CFR 124; 45 FR 33484, May 19, 1980, Effective July 18, 1980; 45 FR 52729, August 4, 1980; 45 FR 68391, October 15, 1980; 46 FR 22584, April 20, 1981; 46 FR 36706, July 15, 1981; 47 FR 15304, April 8, 1982; 48 FR 14146, April 1, 1983; 48 FR 30115, June 30, 1983; 48 FR 39619, September 1, 1983; 49 FR 17718, April 24, 1984; 53 FR 28118, July 26, 1988, Effective August 25, 1988; 53 FR 37396, September 26, 1988, Effective October 26, 1988; 54 FR 246, January 4, 1989; 60 FR 63431, December 11, 1995, Effective June 11, 1996, 65 FR 30886, May 15, 2000, Effective June 14, 2000; 70 FR 53420, September 8, 2005, Effective October 11, 2005; and those administrative procedures as required under State law.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 1.24 Penalties
Any person violating any provision of the Mississippi Solid Waste Disposal Law, as amended, and any rule or regulation made pursuant hereto or violating any order or permit condition issued by the Department shall be punished in accordance with Section 17-17-29 of the Mississippi Code of 1972, as amended.
Part 3, Chapter 2: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Final Regulations Governing Brownfield Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment in Mississippi (Adopted May 27, 1999, Amended February 28, 2002, and October 26, 2023)
TABLE OF CONTENTS __________________________
SUBCHAPTER 1.
Rule 2.1.1. General Requirements
A. Purpose
B. Authority
C. Definitions
D. Acronyms
E. Applicability
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq. 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.2 Brownfield Application Requirements
A. General Requirements
B. Procedural Requirements
C. Brownfield Consulting Firm Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.3 Brownfield Agreement Requirements and Procedures
A. General Requirements
B. Risk-based Remediation Requirements and Land-use Restrictions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.4 Public Notice Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.5 Decisions on Brownfield Agreement
A. Decision on Brownfield Agreement
B Filing of Notice of Brownfield Agreement
C. Notice by Brownfield Party of Conveyance of Brownfield Property
D. Prospective Purchases Notice
E. Executive Direction Authority
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.6 Modification of Brownfield Agreement
A. Conditions for Modification
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.7 Liability Protection and no Further Action Letter
A. Liability Protection
B. No Further Action Letter
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.8 Cancellation of Notice of Brownfield Agreement
A. Cancellation
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.9 Fees and Trust Fund
A. Fees
B. Brownfield Cleanup and Redevelopment Trust Fund
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.10 Hearings and Enforcement
A. Hearings
B. Enforcement and Agency Reporting
SUBCHAPTER 2. RISK EVALUATION PROCEDURES
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.1 General
A. Introduction
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.2 Brownfield Site Evaluation
A. Conceptual Exposure Model (SCEM)
B. Criteria for Completing the SCEMs
C. Site Characterization
D. Site Ecological Checklist
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.3 Tier 1 Evaluation
A. Tier 1 Evaluation Target Risk Level
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.4 Tier 2 Evaluation
A. Tier 2 Evaluation Target Risk Level
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.5 Tier 3 Evaluation
A. Tier 3 Evaluation Target Risk Level
B. Tier 3 Evaluation (Risk Assessment) Procedures
C. Tier 3 Ecological Risk Evaluation Procedures
D. Tier 3 Risk Assessment Data Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.6 Risk-Based Remediation
A. Risk-Based Remediation Goals
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.7 Petroleum Hydrocarbons
A. Introduction
B. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation Procedures
C. Tier 1 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation
D. Tier 2 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation - TPH Fractioning
E. Tier 3 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation
SUBCHAPTER 3. REVOLVING LOAN FUND
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.1 General
A. Introduction
B. Purpose
C. Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.2 Revolving Loan Fund Application Requirements
A. General Requirements
B. Procedural Requirements
C. Brownfield Consulting Firm Requirement
D. Public Notice Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.3 Decisions on Loans and Subgrants
A. Decisions on Loans and Subgrants
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.4 Loan Terms and Conditions
A. Loan Terms and Conditions
B. Cancellation of Notice of Brownfield Agreement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.5 Insurance
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.1 General Requirements
A. Purpose
The purpose of these regulations is to promote the voluntary remediation of contaminated sites in Mississippi. The regulations establish remediation requirements that are based on public health and environmental risks specific to the Brownfield Agreement Site. The formats and procedures set forth in these regulations are designed to advise a person, prior to submitting an application, of the information necessary to achieve the adequate and cost-effective characterization and remediation of a Brownfield Agreement Site. All information requirements may not be applicable for all Brownfield Agreement Sites as long as the Applicant provides written justification.
B. Authority
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (MCEQ) are authorized to administer the requirements of the Act and the regulations promulgated there under as set forth in Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-35-1 through 27.
C. Definitions
As used in these regulations, the following terms have the specified meaning, except where otherwise indicated.
(1) Absorption factors mean the chemical-specific values that represent the fraction of the chemical from an environmental medium such as soil that can pass across the exchange boundaries of the organism (e.g., skin, lungs, gut) for absorption. The relevant absorption factors for chemicals into humans will be those published by EPA (e.g., the EPA’s Dermal Exposure Assessment: Principles and Applications [EPA/600/8-91/011B), EPA Region 4's Supplemental Guidance to Risk Assessment Guidance to Superfund [RAGS]), those published in peer- reviewed literature, or other appropriate values as approved by MCEQ.
(2) Act means the Mississippi Brownfields Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act, Miss. Code Ann. Sections 49-35-1 through 27.
(3) AIHC means American Industrial Health Council.
(4) Application means forms prescribed by MCEQ or MDEQ, the accompanying information specified in the forms, and other additional information requested by the MCEQ or the MDEQ pursuant to Section 49-35-7 of the Act.
(5) Applicant or “Brownfield Applicant” means the person(s) who has applied to become a Brownfield Party.
(6) Aqueous Solubility means the solubility of a pure substance in water. It is the maximum amount of a chemical that will dissolve in pure water at a temperature of 30 degrees Celsius.
(7) Assessment endpoint means the explicit expressions of the actual environmental value that is to be protected. See also the definition for measurement endpoint.
(8) ASTM means the American Society for Testing and Materials.
(9) Background chemical means a substance which is: (a) consistently present in the environment at and in the vicinity of the Brownfield Agreement Site; and (b) attributable to geologic or natural conditions.
(10) Bioconcentration means the uptake and accumulation or concentration of a chemical in an individual organism.
(11) Biomagnification means the accumulation of a chemical (that has the property to bioconcentrate) in humans or an animal through the food chain, i.e., from the ingestion of organisms or other animals tainted with the chemical.
(12) Brownfield Agreement or “Agreement” means an agreement between the Applicant and MCEQ for the remediation of a Brownfield Agreement Site.
(13) Brownfield Agreement Order or “Agreement Order” means an Order issued by the Commission which embodies a Brownfield Agreement.
(14) Brownfield Agreement Site or “site” means Brownfield Property that is remediated under a Brownfield Agreement. The Site shall consist of the Brownfield Property that is the subject of the application and any other Brownfield Property:
(a) for which the source of contamination is environmental contamination or activities on or under the Brownfield Property that is the subject of the application, and
(b) concerning which the MCEQ determines that remediation is necessary.
(15) Brownfield Party means any person who desires to execute and implement a Brownfield Agreement.
(16) Brownfield Property means any property where use is limited by actual or potential environmental contamination, or the perception of environmental contamination, and that is or may be subject to remediation under any state environmental law, regulation or program or under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 USCS 9601 et seq. (1997)(CERCLA), but does not include any of the following:
(a) sites proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the National Priorities List (NPL) but not listed on the NPL or sites listed on the NPL, except those NPL sites for which the United States Environmental Protection Agency has issued certificates of completion of the remediation set forth in the records of decision for those sites or concerning which EPA has subsequently determined that listing is inappropriate;
(b) sites for which an administrative or judicial order is issued which is still in effect or enforcement action commenced under CERCLA or Sections 001(b)(3)(B)(iv.), 3008(h), 3013(a) or 7003(c) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, 42 USCS 6901 et seq. (1994 and Supp. 1997) (RCRA); or
(c) sites undergoing corrective action under RCRA Section 3004(u), 3004(v) or 3008(h), except those sites that the United States Environmental Protection Agency determines have completed corrective action.
(17) Brownfields Corrective Action Plan (CAP) means a document or a set of documents that outlines remedial objectives, scope of the design investigation, conceptual designs, pre-construction design specifications, construction management and schedules, quality control, and operation and maintenance in connection with remedial actions conducted pursuant to the Act and these regulations. The content and format of the CAP is provided in MDEQ’s “Brownfields Corrective Action Plan Format,” which may be required as part of the application.
(18) Brownfields Corrective Action Report means a document or a set of documents that provide information supporting the remediation of human health and environmental risks specific to the Brownfield Agreement Site to levels appropriate for the land-use of the Site.
(19) Brownfields Site Characterization Report means a document or a set of documents that provides information supporting the delineation of the vertical and horizontal extent of contamination on or under a Site in order to develop remediation requirements for the Site or to determine that remediation is necessary. The contents and format of the Brownfield Site Characterization Report is provided in MDEQ’s “Brownfields Site Characterization Report Format,” which shall be required as part of the application.
(20) Carcinogen means any substance which may cause cancer as identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
(21) Carcinogenic risk or upperbound excess lifetime carcinogenic risk means the likelihood of developing cancer or tumor incidence for an individual from lifetime exposure to a carcinogen, not including exposure to cancer causing background chemicals.
(22) CERCLA means the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (Superfund) (Public Law 96-510), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. 9601 et seq.. (23) Chemical of Concern (CoC) means a contaminant or a chemical that poses public health and environmental risks specific to the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(24) Complete Application means a Brownfield Agreement Application which the MDEQ determines contains information addressing each application requirement of the Act and these regulations and contains all information necessary to initiate formal processing of the application, as determined by MCEQ. Only a complete application constitutes an application for the purposes of Section 49-35-7(2).
(25) Cost effective, when applied to remediation requirements, use restrictions, or engineering controls, means that these measures are economically and technically feasible and practicable in protecting human health or the environment for the intended use of a Brownfield Agreement Site.
(26) Cumulative excess cancer risk means the upper bound on the estimated cancer risk above the background risk associated with exposure to multiple hazardous substances or multiple exposure pathways.
(27) Cumulative site risk means the summation of risks to a human receptor or ecological receptor from one or more hazardous substances. The cumulative site risk for noncarcinogens is the site’s hazard index. The cumulative site risk for carcinogens is the cumulative excess cancer risk.
(28) DAF means a Dilution-Attenuation Factor approved for use in the Brownfields Program by MDEQ.
(29) Deterministic risk assessment means the traditional approach to estimating a site’s potential risk by solving the risk algorithm (intake multiplied by the dose- response) analytically by the assignment of average or high-end values in the algorithm to calculate the risk (dependent variable) posed by independent variables (such as exposure factors and exposure point concentrations that produce the intake).
(30) DNAPL means dense non-aqueous phase liquid.
(31) Ecological receptor of concern means specific ecological communities, populations, or individual organisms protected by federal or state laws and/or regulations, or those local populations which provide important natural or economic resources, functions and values.
(32) Ecosystem means an integrated, self-functioning system consisting of interactions among both the biotic community and abiotic environment within a specified location in space and time.
(33) Effective Solubility means the solubility of a compound that will dissolve from a chemical mixture (e.g., gasoline). The effective solubility of a compound from a chemical mixture is less than its aqueous solubility.
(34) Engineering control means an existing condition or modification to a Brownfield Agreement Site that reduces or eliminates the potential for exposure to contaminants. These conditions or modifications may include, but are not limited to, physical or hydraulic control measures (such as groundwater recovery trenches and leachate collection systems), groundwater treatment systems, engineered
caps, liner systems, slurry walls, or permanent structures, but shall not include the exclusive use of security fencing.
(35) Environmental contamination means the presence of hazardous substances or constituents that pose unacceptable risks to the environment, humans, or ecological receptors.
(36) EPA means the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
(37) Executive Director means the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(38) Exposure means contact of an organism with a chemical or physical agent. Exposure is quantified by exposure point concentration in an exposure medium (such as soil, sediment, air, groundwater, and surface water) and the intake of the medium (expressed as the amount of the medium taken into the body by the organism per unit body weight per day).
(39) Exposure factors means values used to estimate exposure in risk assessment, such as the number of days per year, number of years that exposure is expected to occur, the amount of contaminated media that a person or an organism might contact per day, the extent of uptake or absorption of the medium contacted, and the body weight.
(40) Exposure pathway means the manner by which a person or an organism may be exposed to a chemical of concern or contaminant. A complete exposure pathway consists of a source, a release from a source, a migration and transport mechanism, an exposure medium (e.g., air) or media (in cases of intermediate transfer), an exposure point, and an exposure route.
(41) Exposure point concentration (EPC) is the amount of CoC available at the exchange boundaries of the organism (e.g., skin, lungs, gut) for absorption by humans.
(42) Exposure route means the portal of entry which results in the intake of a contaminated medium into the human body or an organism (e.g., ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation). (43) Fate and Transport means the behavior and movement of a chemical through an environmental media. The movement is affected by many factors such as sunlight (UV radiation), wind-blown or wave actions, microbial activity, groundwater and surface water flow, chemical properties (e.g., solubility, density), physical- chemical properties of the medium (e.g., grain size, porosity, permeability, and organic carbon content), and presence of solubility-enhancing solvents or buried piping and utilities.
(44) Free product means a discharged hazardous substance or environmental pollutant that is present in the environment as a floating or sinking non-aqueous phase liquid. Free Product is considered present if:
(a) measurable using best available technologies, or
(b) for groundwater, the concentration of the chemical of concern is at or above the aqueous solubility limit for that pure compound or the effective solubility limit for that compound in a chemical mixture, or
(c) for soils, the concentration of the chemical of concern is at or above the soil saturation limit for that compound for all chemicals with a melting point less than 30 degrees Celsius.
(45) Groundwater quality standard means the chemical-specific numerical value published by EPA as Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL). Where the groundwater intersects surface water, ambient water quality criteria values identified in the “Mississippi Water Quality Criteria for Intrastate, Interstate, and Coastal Waters” or other values determined by the MDEQ to be protective will be applicable.
(46) Habitat means the area or type of environment to which an organism or biological population is indigenous.
(47) Hazard index means the sum of the hazard quotients for multiple substances and/or multiple exposure pathways.
(48) Hazard quotient means the value which quantifies non-carcinogenic hazard for a single chemical for an individual receptor over a specified exposure period. The hazard quotient is equal to the ratio of an intake of a chemical to the chemical’s reference dose. Hazard quotient shall be based on similar-acting non-carcinogens, i.e., systemic toxicants that act on the same organ or organ system.
(49) Hazardous substance mean any substance which is a hazardous substance as defined in Section 101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, and any substance which is designated as a hazardous substance under Section 102 of such Act. (50) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) means the database system of that name developed and maintained by EPA.
(51) Land-use restriction or institutional control means the limitation on use of or access to a Brownfield Agreement Site to reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to contaminants. These restrictions may include, but are not limited to, deed restrictions, use restrictions, restrictive covenants, or restrictive zoning.
(52) Legal and Equitable Interest Owners mean persons who have a legal or equitable interest in the Brownfield Agreement Site and may include, but are not limited to, property owners, tenants, or lending institutions.
(53) LNAPL means light non-aqueous phase liquid.
(54) Local government means a county or municipality within the State of Mississippi.
(55) MCL means maximum contaminant level published by EPA under the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 United States Code 300f, et seq.).
(56) MCEQ means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
(57) MDEQ means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(58) Measurement endpoint means the measurable responses to chemicals or physical changes in the environment that are related to the valued characteristics chosen as the assessment endpoint.
(59) mg/Kg means milligram per kilogram.
(60) mg/L means milligram per Liter.
(61) Monitored Natural Attenuation means remediation by natural attenuation that is monitored to determine achievement of remediation goals over a specified time period.
(62) Natural Attenuation means the reduction in the concentration or mass of a substance and its breakdown products in an environmental medium (such as groundwater), due to naturally occurring physical, chemical, and biological processes without human intervention or enhancement. These processes include, but are not limited to, dispersion, diffusion, sorption and retardation, and degradation processes such as biodegradation, abiotic degradation and radioactive decay.
(63) NAPL means non-aqueous phase liquid, which can be heavier or lighter than water. NAPL that is lighter than water is called light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) or a floater. NAPL that is heavier than water is called dense non- aqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) or a sinker.
(64) NPL means the National Priorities List published by EPA pursuant to CERCLA Section 105.
(65) Person means any person as defined in Section 17-17-3 of the Mississippi Code Annotated.
(66) Potentially responsible party means a person who is or may be liable for remediation under any state or federal law, regulation, or program.
(67) Previously unknown contaminant means any chemical or contaminant that has not been delineated in the Brownfields Site Characterization Report and/or remediated to a risk-level appropriate for the land-use of the Site as described in the Brownfields Corrective Action Report.
(68) PRG means the Preliminary Remediation Goal developed by EPA Region 9 for a specific chemical.
(69) Principal threat chemical means a CoC, by itself or with other CoCs, which has been shown to contribute a substantial part (majority) of the total Site risk based on a Tier 3 site-specific risk assessment.
(70) Probabilistic risk assessment means a site-specific risk assessment performed using a statistical sampling technique that produces a probabilistic approximation of the potential risk from the site-specific risk assessment algorithm or model.
(71) Property boundary or site boundary means the boundary of the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(72) Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) means a document or set of documents that integrates all technical and quality aspects of a project, including planning, implementation, and assessment. The purpose of the QAPP is to document planning results for environmental data operations and to provide a project- specific “blueprint” for obtaining the type and quality of environmental data needed for a specific decision or use.
(73) Quality Management Plan (QMP) means a document or set of documents that describes how an organization structures its quality system and describes its quality policies and procedures, criteria for and areas of application, and roles, responsibilities, and authorities. It also describes an organization’s policies and procedures for implementing and assessing the effectiveness of the quality system.
(74) Quantitation limit means the lowest concentration for an analytical test method and sample matrix at which the quantity of a particular substance can be routinely measured with a stated degree of confidence. The quantitation limit for a particular sample analysis and analytical method is called the sample quantitation limit (SQL) or reporting limit.
(75) Radioactive material means a radionuclide or substance that spontaneously emits ionizing radiation or particles.
(76) RBC means the risk-based concentration developed by utilizing equations developed by EPA Region III for a specific chemical.
(77) RBSL means risk-based screening levels developed by ASTM in the Emergency Standard Guide (ES 38-94) and in the Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (ASTM E 1739-95), 1995.
(78) RCRA means the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 USC 6901 et seq..
(79) Readily apparent harm means the observations of stressed biota and/or their habitat.
(80) Receptor means environmental resources, including but not limited to, plant and animal species, humans, sensitive environments and habitats, water supply wells, and locations that have the potential to be, or have actually been, exposed to contamination.
(81) Reference concentration (RfC) means a value representing a daily exposure level for the human population, including sensitive subpopulations, that is not likely to cause deleterious and non-reversible adverse noncancer health effects during a chronic or subchronic exposure period. Reference concentration is generally expressed in the unit of milligram per cubic meter (mg/m3).
(82) Reference dose (RfD) means a value representing a daily exposure level for the human population, including sensitive subpopulations, that is not likely to cause deleterious and non-reversible adverse noncancer health effects during a chronic or subchronic exposure period. Reference dose is generally expressed in the unit of milligram per kilogram body weight (mg/Kg/day).
(83) Regionally Prevalent Chemical means a substance found throughout a substantial geographic region, as approved by MDEQ (e.g., Delta region), that can be attributed to conditions, as approved by MDEQ, such as atmospheric deposition and aerial application.
(84) Remediation means action to cleanup, mitigate, correct, abate, minimize, eliminate, control, treat, remove, or to implement institutional and/or engineering controls in order to prevent the spreading, migration, leaking, leaching, volatilization, spilling, transport, exposure, or further release of a contaminant to the environment in order to protect public health or the environment.
(85) Remediation goal (RG) means the target cleanup level or objective that is cost- effective, implementable, and protective of human health and the environment. The RG can be quantitative, i.e., numerical cleanup level (generally expressed in mg/kg [soil or sediment] or mg/L [water]) or can be qualitative (e.g., basis for an
engineered barrier, to prevent/minimize exposure). Fencing alone cannot be the RG.
(86) Restricted site means a Brownfield Agreement Site where access to the general public is limited and/or controlled. The restrictions may include, but are not limited to, deed restrictions, use restrictions, restrictive covenants, or restrictive zoning.
(87) Risk means the likelihood or probability that a hazardous substance, when released to the environment, will cause adverse effects in exposed humans or other biological receptors. Risk is further classified as carcinogenic (from exposure to carcinogens) or noncarcinogenic (from exposure to noncarcinogens, i.e., systemic toxicants).
(88) Risk assessment or “site-specific risk assessment” means a site-specific characterization of the current or potential threats that may be posed to human health and the environment by contamination migrating to or in groundwater or surface water, discharging to the air, leaching through or remaining in soil, bioaccumulating in the food chain, or other complete and significant exposure pathways identified in the Site Conceptual Exposure Model (SCEM). Key components of a risk assessment are the identification of hazard (i.e., identifying site-related chemicals and their concentrations in the exposure media), exposure assessment (identifying complete and significant exposure pathways and quantifying intake), toxicity assessment (identifying the toxic effects and dose- response [toxicity value]), risk characterization, and discussion of uncertainties. For the purposes of these regulations, a Tier 3 Risk Assessment is considered a “site-specific risk assessment.”
(89) Risk-based remediation requirements means remediation requirements based on public health and environmental risks specific to a Brownfield Agreement Site.
(90) Risk Management means the evaluation of options or measures to reduce risk, including, but not limited to, such options as no further action, monitoring only, or gathering additional data before making a decision.
(91) Sediment means particles in surface waters or wetlands or on the bottom of surface waters or wetlands that are derived from the erosion of rock, minerals, soils and biological materials, as well as chemical precipitation from the water column. Sediment particles are transported by, suspended in or deposited by water.
(92) Sensitive environment means an area of exceptional environmental value, where a discharge or release could pose a greater threat than a discharge to other areas, including but not limited to: wetlands; habitat used by state or federally designated endangered or threatened species; national or state fish and wildlife
refuges and fish and wildlife management areas; and state and federal designated wild and scenic rivers.
(93) Site Conceptual Exposure Model (SCEM) means a graphical presentation of actual or hypothetical conditions, based on current data and understanding of the Site, under which the chemicals of concern or contaminants from a Brownfield Agreement Site may be released from a source, moved (migration/transport) in the environment, present in the exposure media, and absorbed by the receptor through the exposure routes. The SCEM will be used to identify data needs to assess risk and may be modified to consider new data in determining whether an exposure pathway is incomplete or complete. The SCEM is used in the development of remediation goals and identification of remedial options.
(94) Slope factor means the upperbound estimate of probability in the occurrence of excess cancer risk (increase in cancer risk over the background risk) associated with a specific carcinogen for an individual who is exposed to a unit of intake over lifetime. The unit for a slope factor is the probability per unit intake, i.e., the inverse of milligram per kilogram body weight (mg/Kg/day) -1 .
(95) SPLP means Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure, an EPA analytical method (Method 1312) published in SW-846.
(96) SSL means a soil screening level developed by EPA in the Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document (EPA/540/R-95/128).
(97) Stakeholders mean persons or parties who have a legitimate interest in the remediation and redevelopment of the Brownfield Agreement Site. These persons include, but are not limited to, the property owners adjoining the Brownfield Agreement Site property and local governments.
(98) SW-846 means Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste - Physical/Chemical Methods published by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste on November 1986, and its updates.
(99) Systemic Toxicant means a substance or agent that may enter the body, injure an organ or organ system, or have an effect other than causing cancer. The toxicity value used for risk characterization of the chronic effect for a systemic toxicant is the reference dose (RfD).
(100) Target remediation goals (TRGs) mean risk-based media concentrations utilized in the Tier 1 evaluation of human health and environmental impacts in these regulations. Soil TRGs are soil concentrations developed by MDEQ for individual chemicals to address the soil ingestion and inhalation exposure pathways and environmental risks. Groundwater TRGs are either the groundwater quality standards (current MCLs published by EPA) or risk-based remediation goals derived by MDEQ. Soil and groundwater TRGs are provided
in MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures developed for these regulations. Surface water TRGs are the water quality criteria published by the MDEQ. TRGs are to be compared with the exposure point concentrations. TRGs alone do not always trigger the need for response actions or define unacceptable levels of contaminants in soil or groundwater. The Tier 1 TRGs may either be used as “default” remediation goals or as screening values that will initiate a Tier 2 Evaluation or Tier 3 Evaluation.
(101) Target risk means a de minimis or insignificant risk to humans below which further action (remediation, institutional control, monitoring, etc.) is not warranted.
(102) Technical Impracticability or “Technically impracticable” means the inability to achieve certain remediation requirements and is based on engineering feasibility and reliability, cost-effectiveness, and risk-based considerations. For the purposes of these regulations, EPA’s OSWER Directive 9234.2-25: “Guidance for Evaluating the Technical Impracticability of Groundwater Restoration,” dated September 1993 may be utilized in developing a demonstration of technical impracticability with regard to groundwater and soil remediation, free product removal, and other site-specific conditions approved by MDEQ.
(103) Tier 1 Evaluation means a comparison of CoC exposure point concentrations in soil or sediment with chemical-specific TRGs for the evaluation of human health and environmental impacts and an evaluation of ecological impacts through completion of an Ecological Checklist. Ecological evaluations are used to determine whether ecological receptors of concern are present and may include, but are not limited to, the collection of field observation data for any readily apparent harm on the ecological receptors of concern.
(104) Tier 2 Evaluation means a more in-depth evaluation of site-specific conditions beyond the Tier 1 Evaluation methodology. The Tier 2 Evaluation may include, but is not limited to, an evaluation of site-specific conditions by (1) comparing the UCL of the Mean for a CoC applying statistical methods to the Tier 1 TRGs, (2) comparing EPCs to calculated background chemical concentrations, (3) comparing EPCs to calculated regionally prevalent chemical concentrations, (4) utilizing site-specific variables (i.e., exposure frequency, exposure duration, etc.) to calculate site-specific RGs, (5) eliminating/minimizing exposure routes, (6) conducting an analysis of Petroleum Hydrocarbons using TPH Fractioning, or (7) other methods approved by MDEQ. (105) Tier 3 Evaluation means a site-specific risk assessment (Risk Assessment). The Tier 3 human health risk evaluation is the characterization of the risks of cancer and adverse non-cancer health effects in humans in accordance with EPA’s Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) and other risk assessment guidance published by EPA including, but not limited to, the Adult Lead Model and the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model (IEUBK) for lead. The Tier 3 ecological risk evaluation is the characterization of environmental effects
qualitatively or quantitatively in accordance with the EPA’s Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment guidance, as amended.
(106) Treatability study means the testing and documentation activities to evaluate the effectiveness of a proposed remediation method (remedial action) prior to full scale design and implementation. Treatability study includes, but is not limited to, bench scale studies and pilot scale studies, and may be required by the Corrective Action Plan if the remediation method has not been evaluated by EPA or an independent consultant or trade association to be capable of treating the medium (or medium of similar physical and chemical characteristics) at the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(107) Unacceptable risks mean that the carcinogenic risks, non-carcinogenic hazards, or ecological risks posed by the CoCs at the point of exposure, according to a Tier 1, Tier 2, or Tier 3 Evaluation, have exceeded established target risk levels for humans or ecological receptors. The term can also be applied qualitatively if there is a sufficient basis to conclude that the likelihood of impact to the ecological receptors of concern or the sensitive environment is high based on findings of an ecological risk assessment.
(108) Unrestricted site, relevant to a Brownfield Agreement Site, means that the use of the property is not restricted by an applicable Brownfield Agreement.
(109) Volatile Compounds means those compounds with a Henry’s Law Constant greater than 1 x 10-5 and a molecular weight less than 200 g/mole, for all media.
(110) Wetlands means those areas where water is at, near or above the land surface long enough to be capable of supporting aquatic or hydrophytic vegetation, and which have soils indicative of wet (hydrid) conditions.
D. Acronyms
(1) CAP Corrective Action Plan (2) CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (Superfund) (Public Law 96-510), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (3) CoC Chemical of Concern (4) EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency (5) MCEQ Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (6) MCL Maximum Contaminant Level
(7) MDEQ Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (8) NPL EPA’s National Priorities List (9) OSWER EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (10) QAPP Quality Assurance Project Plan (11) QMP Quality Management Plan (12) QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control (13) RBCs Risk-Based Concentrations (14) RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, 42 USC 6901, et seq.
(15) RG Remediation Goal (16) SCEM Site Conceptual Exposure Model (17) TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon (18) TRGs Target Remediation Goals (19) VEP Mississippi Uncontrolled Site Voluntary Evaluation Program
(20) UCL Upper Confidence Level
E. Applicability.
(1) The following sites are not eligible for inclusion in a Brownfield Agreement Site:
(a) Sites proposed by the EPA for the National Priorities List (NPL) but not listed on the NPL or those sites listed on the NPL, except those NPL sites for which the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has issued certificates of completion of the remediation set forth in the records of decision for those sites or concerning which EPA has subsequently determined that listing is inappropriate.
(b) Sites for which an administrative or judicial order is issued which is still in effect or enforcement action commenced under CERCLA or Sections 3001(b)(3)(B)(iv), 3008(h), 3013(a) or 7003(c) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, 42 USCS 6901, et seq. (1994 and Supp. 1997) (RCRA) and which is still in effect; and
(c) Sites undergoing corrective action under RCRA Section 3004(u), 3004(v) or 3008(h), except those sites that the United States Environmental Protection Agency determines have completed corrective action.
(2) The MCEQ may exclude properties that pose an imminent and substantial threat to human health and the environment and require immediate remedial and/or cleanup action.
(3) The MCEQ may exclude properties that are under an existing MCEQ agreement or order.
(4) Sites that are participating in the Uncontrolled Site Voluntary Evaluation Program (VEP) pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section 17-17-54 prior to the effective date of these regulations shall not be required to pay the initial $2000.00 application fee under these regulations if the Applicant is current on any payments due MDEQ under the VEP.
(5) In order to be eligible for the Brownfield Program, an Applicant must satisfy the requirements regarding financial resources, technical resources, managerial resources, and compliance history set forth in these regulations.
(6) Only Brownfield Properties which require remediation may be included in a Brownfield Agreement.
(7) The Brownfield Party shall comply with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations.
(8) Nothing in the Brownfield Agreement or these regulations shall be construed to convey or determine any interest in property.
(9) Nothing in the Brownfield Agreement or these regulations shall be construed to be an allocation of costs or an indemnification by the State, MDEQ, and/or MCEQ.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-54, 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17- 17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.2 Brownfield Application Requirements
A. General Requirements.
(1) Brownfield Agreement applications must be filed in the format prescribed by MDEQ. Prior to approval, the application must be complete and must contain all of the information required by MDEQ, including, but not limited to, information necessary to demonstrate the following:
(a) That as a result of the proposed remediation, the Brownfield Property will be suitable for the use or uses specified in the application while fully protecting public health and the environment;
(b) That the Brownfield Party has or can obtain the financial, managerial, and technical resources to implement fully and complete the proposed remediation and to assure the safe use of the Brownfield Property;
(c) That the current owners of all surface interests (including legal and equitable) in the Brownfield Properties that are the subject of the application have given written approval for inclusion of their property interest in the Brownfield Agreement Site. This approval shall be provided on the form prescribed by MDEQ;
(d) That the Brownfield Party will comply with all applicable procedural requirements; and
(e) That all items contained in the application form have been addressed by either providing the required information or stating that the item is not applicable. In the event that an item is considered not applicable, the Brownfield Party must include a written justification in the application that demonstrates to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the item is not applicable to the application.
(2) If the Brownfield Applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of MDEQ that activities on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site involving the use, extraction, or production of mineral interests will not increase the level of risk to the public health or the environment beyond the level that forms the basis for the risk-based remediation requirements in the Brownfield Agreement, then the current owners and lessees of those mineral interests (including legal and equitable) in or under the Brownfield Properties that are the subject of the application are not required to give written approval for the submission of the application and the inclusion of their property interest in the Brownfield Agreement Site. All owners and lessees of a legal or equitable interest in the surface and/or mineral estates of the Brownfield Properties that are the subject of the application who do not give written approval for execution of the Brownfield Agreement shall be subject to Rule 2.1.7.A.(5)(c) of these regulations. Otherwise, written approval of the mineral interest owner(s) for inclusion of the Brownfield Property in the Brownfield Agreement site must be provided on the form prescribed by MDEQ;
(3) As part of the application, the Applicant shall submit a title certificate prepared by an attorney who is licensed to practice law in the State of Mississippi identifying the following:
(a) The legal description of the Brownfield Property;
(b) The names and addresses of all persons who have an interest in the Brownfield Properties that are the subject of the application as defined in Rule 2.1.2.A(1) and (2) of these regulations; and
(c) The names and addresses of all surface-interest property owners contiguous to the Brownfield Property.
(4) As part of the application, the Applicant shall submit a copy of any local zoning requirements, classifications, statutes or ordinances, comprehensive zoning plan designations, and/or any current land use approvals obtained regarding the Brownfield Property and the property contiguous to the Brownfield Property.
(5) At the time a Brownfield Agreement application is filed, the Applicant shall submit $2000.00 in the form of a check or money order made payable to MDEQ as advance costs for the costs described in paragraph (6).
(6) At the time a Brownfield Agreement application is filed, the Applicant must execute a statement in the form required by MDEQ that provides that the Applicant agrees to pay all direct and indirect costs of MDEQ associated with the processing of the Brownfield Agreement application and administration of the Brownfield Agreement.
(7) As part of the application, the Applicant shall submit a schedule which sets forth its estimate of the amount of time it expects will be required to complete the Brownfield Agreement.
(8) With regard to financial resources, the applicant shall be required to file with MDEQ, as part of its application, an estimate of the costs of performance of all requirements of the Brownfield Agreement including corrective action, operation and maintenance, monitoring, post-closure activities, and contingency actions. The cost estimate shall be based on a professional third party’s cost of performing all of the requirements of the Brownfield Agreement. These cost estimates must be submitted to MDEQ for its concurrence. The applicant shall provide MDEQ proof of financial resources in an amount equal to the cost estimates for performance of all requirements of the Brownfield Agreement including corrective action, operation and maintenance, monitoring, closure, post-closure activities, and contingency actions. Proof of financial resources, if applicable, may include the following financial instruments: insurance, escrow accounts; surety bonds, including performance or financial guarantee bonds; irrevocable letters of credit; certificates of deposit; securities; and/or other documents
approved by MDEQ. The financial instruments shall be issued by a surety company or financial institution licensed to do business in the State of Mississippi. MDEQ may, in its discretion, exempt an applicant from these financial resource requirements based on the applicant’s demonstration of financial resources submitted to MDEQ in another MDEQ program and/or such other factors deems appropriate. In the event the cost estimates to complete all requirements in the Brownfield Agreement increase or decrease, MDEQ may require the Brownfield Party to submit additional and/or amended financial instruments.
(9) With regard to technical resources, the applicant shall be required to file with the MDEQ, as part of the application on a form prescribed by the MDEQ, a statement certifying that the Applicant shall utilize a consulting firm listed on the approved list of Brownfield Consulting Firms or the staff of the MDEQ.
(10) With regard to managerial resources, the applicant shall be required to file with MDEQ, as part of its application on a form prescribed by MDEQ, a statement of key personnel considered essential to the work being performed under the Brownfield Agreement. Prior to removing, replacing, or diverting any of the specified individuals, the Brownfield Party shall notify MDEQ in advance and shall submit justification, including proposed substitutions, in sufficient detail to demonstrate that the substitutions have sufficient qualifications to manage all assignments associated with the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(11) With regard to compliance history, the MDEQ may require the applicant to submit the following:
(a) A statement of whether the applicant has had a federal or state environmental permit revoked in the five years preceding the date of submission of the Brownfield Agreement application. If any revocation has occurred, the applicant will be required to submit a brief explanation of the facts involving the revocation including: identification of the authority that revoked the permit and the stated reasons; the date, location and type of any administrative or judicial proceedings initiated concerning the revocation; and the current status of the proceedings.
(b) A list of all orders, citations, and notices of violation issued against the Applicant during the five years preceding the date of submission of the application for any violations or alleged violations of environmental permits, laws and/or regulations. For each document listed, the Applicant shall include a brief description of the particular violation alleged, the terms of the order, including any required action and penalty, and the current status of the proceeding.
(c) MDEQ may require the Applicant to submit additional information with regard to compliance history.
(12) The applicant shall submit all other information required by MDEQ.
B. Procedural Requirements.
(1) Within thirty (30) days after the date an application is submitted to MDEQ, MDEQ shall review the application to determine whether the application is a complete application and forward a letter to the Applicant advising either:
(a) that the application is complete or;
(b) that the application is incomplete and listing the specific sections that must be submitted or supplemented to make the application complete.
(2) Within thirty (30) days after the date that MDEQ forwards a letter to the Applicant advising that the application is complete, MCEQ shall issue an order which sets forth a schedule for:
(a) the identification of other Brownfield Property that has been impacted by activities on or under the Brownfield Property that is the subject of the application;
(b) MDEQ’s technical review of the application; and
(c) the Brownfield Party’s submission of additional information required by MDEQ.
(3) The Applicant shall promptly update and/or correct information previously submitted as part of the application whenever the Applicant discovers that this information is incomplete or inaccurate.
(4) If Brownfield Property other than that property which is the subject of the original application is identified as necessary for inclusion in the Brownfield Agreement Site, the Brownfield Party shall obtain written approval, on the form prescribed by the MDEQ, from all persons who have an interest in the additional Brownfield Property for inclusion of that Brownfield Property in the Brownfield Agreement Site, in accordance with Rule 2.1.2.A(1)(c) and (2) of these regulations.
(5) If MDEQ’s technical review indicates that no remediation is required at the Site, MDEQ will issue a letter so stating.
C. Brownfield Consulting Firm Requirements.
(1) In order to be listed on the approved list of Brownfield Consulting Firms, a firm must, at a minimum,
(a) Submit an application to MCEQ for its approval, in a format prescribed by MDEQ;
(b) Have as an employee either a Professional Engineer or a Professional Geologist, registered in the State of Mississippi, with at least four (4) years experience in hazardous site characterization and remediation of which one year must be within five (5) years preceding the date of the application;
(c) Have either as an employee or as a subcontractor a Professional Engineer or a Professional Geologist (whichever Professional designation is not satisfied by Rule 2.1.2.C(1)(b) of these regulations), registered in the State of Mississippi, with:
(1) at least four (4) years experience in hazardous site characterization and remediation of which one year must be within five (5) years preceding the date of the application and
(2) a current certificate of comprehensive general liability insurance (or other insurance acceptable to MDEQ) of at least $1,000,000.00 or greater as required by MDEQ;
(d) Submit a Quality Management Plan to MDEQ for its approval, in a format prescribed by MDEQ;
(e) Supply a current certificate of comprehensive general liability insurance (or other insurance acceptable to MDEQ) of at least $1,000,000.00 or greater as required by MDEQ; and
(f) Supply such other information as required by MDEQ.
(2) An approved Brownfield Consulting Firm must notify MDEQ within 10 days of any modification in the information previously submitted, and must submit updated information within 30 days of the modification. If the modification renders the firm unable to remain on the list of approved Brownfield Consulting Firms, then MCEQ may remove the firm from that list. MDEQ or MCEQ may require the Brownfield Party to certify its retention of an approved Brownfield Consulting Firm within 30 days of a determination that the Party’s consultant no longer is an approved Brownfield Consulting Firm.
(3) All key personnel of an approved Brownfield Consulting Firm must attend MDEQ-approved continuing education, as required by MDEQ.
(4) An approved Brownfield Consulting Firm may be removed from the approved list for a period of time specified by the MCEQ for any of the following:
(a) Submission of false information;
(b) Failure to submit an updated application upon modification of material information, as required by Rule 2.1.2.C(2) of these regulations;
(c) Failure to perform in a responsible manner with respect to matters including, but not limited to, responsiveness, technical competence, workmanship, or any other matter essential to the efficient and effective completion of the Brownfield Agreement, as determined by MCEQ;
(d) Failure of key personnel to attend MDEQ-approved continuing education, as required by MDEQ;
(e) Failure to meet any of the requirements of this rule; and
(f) Such other good cause as determined by MCEQ.
(5) Any interested party may request a hearing before MCEQ as provided in Sections 49-17-31, 49-17-33, 49-17-35, 49-17-37, 49-17-41 or other applicable provisions of law regarding any of the provisions of this rule, including but not limited to:
(a) Listing of a firm on the approved list of Brownfield Consulting Firms;
(b) Removal of a firm on the approved list of Brownfield Consulting Firms; and
(c) Denial of an application for listing of a firm on the approved list of Brownfield Consulting Firms.
-
The listing of a Brownfield Consulting Firm does not authorize any individual to perform work from which it is restricted by any state or federal law or regulation.
-
MDEQ may, itself, conduct those activities necessary to delineate or remediate Brownfield Property.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.3 Brownfield Agreement Requirements And Procedures
A. General Requirements
(1) Once MDEQ has completed its review of the application and any other information required to be submitted by the Applicant, MDEQ shall prepare a proposed Brownfield Agreement.
(2) The Brownfield Agreement shall contain the following:
(a) A description of the Brownfield Agreement Site sufficient to serve as a legal description of that Site,
(b) A description of all remediation to be conducted on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site, including:
(1) A description of specific areas where remediation is to be conducted;
(2) The remediation method or methods to be employed;
(3) The financial, technical and managerial resources that the Brownfield Party will make available;
(4) A schedule of remediation activities;
(5) Remediation requirements that are based on public health and environmental risks specific to the Brownfield Agreement Site;
(6) A schedule for implementation and completion of the remediation;
(7) Any land-use restrictions or engineering controls constituting any part of the remediation required by MCEQ;
(8) A requirement that the Brownfield Party shall notify MDEQ at least fourteen (14) days prior to the date scheduled for any field work to provide MDEQ an opportunity to observe, inspect, and/or collect split samples; and
(9) A plat which identifies any part of the Brownfield Property for which use is restricted.
(c) The proposed uses of the Brownfield Agreement Site after all remediation required by MCEQ is complete.
(d) A schedule for administration of the Brownfield Agreement by MDEQ.
(e) Requirements, as deemed appropriate by MCEQ, for reporting on the progress of remediation conducted on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(f) Requirements as deemed appropriate by MCEQ for reporting on the status of the Brownfield Agreement Site following completion of all remediation including the status of the institutional controls, engineering controls and monitoring.
(g) Any other provisions deemed necessary by MCEQ to implement the Brownfield Agreement.
(3) Prior to approval of the Brownfield Agreement by the Commission, the Brownfield Party shall submit to MDEQ, on a form prescribed by MDEQ, a statement of consent signed by all owner(s) of interests in the Brownfield Property (other than the Brownfield Party) stating that such owners have read and understand the Brownfield Agreement and that they consent to the inclusion of their property interest in the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(4) Prior to execution of the Brownfield Agreement, and with thirty days written prior notice to MDEQ, the applicant may withdraw the Brownfield Agreement application. The applicant shall be required to pay all costs associated with the processing of the Brownfield Agreement application prior to the effective date of withdrawal. Failure to pay all accrued costs shall subject the Brownfield Party to remedies contained in Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-17-43. In addition, MCEQ may proceed with any and all remedies available to it with regard to the Brownfield Property and/or Brownfield Applicant.
B. Risk-based Remediation Requirements and Land-use Restrictions.
(1) A Brownfield Agreement shall establish remediation requirements that are based on public health and environmental risks specific to the Brownfield Agreement Site and in accordance with Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-35-7. In establishing the risk-based remediation requirements in a Brownfield Agreement, MCEQ shall consider the use of appropriate land-use restrictions and/or engineering controls proposed by the Brownfield Party. MCEQ may determine that permanent engineering controls in conjunction with appropriate land-use restrictions satisfy the remediation required by MCEQ in the Brownfield Agreement. These risk-based remediation requirements may include contaminant- specific, state-specific, site-specific and/or likelihood-of-risk methodologies for the implementation of these risk-based remediation requirements. Any party to a Brownfield Agreement who complies with the requirements of a Brownfield Agreement may rely on these risk-based remediation requirements, land-use restrictions and engineering controls as governing the extent of remediation required to be performed by the Brownfield Party on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site for all purposes of the Act. Any risk-based remediation requirements, land-use restrictions and engineering controls implemented under a Brownfield Agreement shall be conducted in a cost-effective manner, consistent with projected future uses of the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(2) Remediation options include, but are not limited to, the use of appropriate land- use restrictions, engineering controls, monitored on-site containment, excavation, monitored natural attenuation, soil vapor extraction, dual-phase extraction, pump & treat, phytoremediation, landfarming, and/or any other remediation option or combinations thereof approved by MCEQ.
(3) The three procedures for determining risk-based remediation requirements follow:
(a) Tier 1 Evaluation
(1) The Tier 1 human health and environmental evaluation consists of comparing the maximum or high-end concentrations or Minimum Quantitation Limits (MQLs) (if results are presented as not detected [ND]) of site-related chemicals (Chemicals of Concern [CoCs]) in soil or sediment (and groundwater or leachate, as necessary) with chemical-specific Target Remediation Goals (TRGs) for the assessment of potential risks to humans. Human health TRGs, except for surface water TRGs, are presented in MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures developed for use with these regulations. The Tier 1 TRGs may either be used as “default” remediation goals or may be used as a screening tool that will trigger a Tier 2 Evaluation.
(2) The Tier 1 ecological risk screen is performed to determine whether ecological receptors of concern are present and potentially impacted. If they are present and potentially impacted, a Tier 3 assessment of ecological risk shall be performed to assess the potential ecological impact. A Tier 1 Evaluation is applicable for Sites with no known ecological receptors of concern present.
(b) Tier 2 Evaluation
(1) A Tier 2 Evaluation is a more in-depth evaluation of site-specific conditions beyond the Tier 1 Evaluation methodology. The Tier 2 Evaluation may include, but is not limited to, an evaluation of site- specific conditions by:
(i) comparing the UCL of the Mean for a CoC utilizing statistical methods to the Tier 1 TRGs,
(ii) comparing EPCs to calculated background chemical concentrations, (iii) comparing EPCs to calculated regionally prevalent chemical concentrations,
(iv) utilizing site-specific variables (i.e., exposure frequency, exposure duration, etc.) to calculate site-specific RGs,
(v) eliminating or minimizing exposure to contaminants,
(vi) conducting an analysis of Petroleum Hydrocarbons using TPH Fractioning, or
(vii) other methods approved by MDEQ.
(2) Statistical Methods - If the Brownfield Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the Upper Confidence Level (UCL) of the Mean for a CoC utilizing statistical methods is less than the Tier 1 TRG for that CoC, then the Brownfield Applicant shall have the option of using the UCL of the Mean instead of the highest concentration on-site using Tier 1 Methodologies. The Brownfield Applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the data are statistically normal or can be statistically normalized.
(3) Site Background - CoC concentrations may be compared to site background chemical concentrations to evaluate appropriate remedial actions at the Brownfield Agreement Site in accordance with MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures. To establish background chemical concentrations, the Brownfield Applicant may collect samples from locations outside of the influence of known contaminated areas and regionally prevalent chemicals and must analyze these samples using the same analytical methods as the CoC analyses. Sites where the concentrations of CoCs are at or below background chemical concentrations are subject to Rule 2.1.1(E)(5) and Rule 2.1.2(B)(5) of these Regulations.
(4) Regionally Prevalent Chemicals - CoC concentrations may be compared to regionally prevalent chemical concentrations to evaluate appropriate remedial actions at the Brownfield Agreement Site in accordance with MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures. To establish regionally prevalent chemical concentrations, the Brownfield Applicant may collect samples from locations throughout a substantial geographic region and outside the influence of known contaminated areas and must analyze these samples using the same analytical methods as the CoC analyses. Sites where the concentrations of CoCs are at or below regionally prevalent chemical concentrations are subject to Rule 2.1.1(E)(5) and Rule 2.1.2(B)(5) of these Regulations.
(5) Site-Specific Variables - If the Brownfield Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that site-specific variables (i.e., exposure duration, exposure frequency, moisture content, etc.) are more representative of site conditions than the default variables utilized in the development of the Tier 1 TRGs, the Brownfield Applicant may utilize site-specific variables to develop RGs for the CoCs.
(6) Eliminate/Minimize Exposure Routes - If the Brownfield Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that land- use restrictions and engineering controls at the site will eliminate all complete exposure pathways or will minimize contamination exposure to levels that will be protective of human health and the environment, MDEQ may determine that further remediation is not required. The Commission considers the presence of free product to be an unacceptable potential risk to public health and the environment because it is considered to be a continuing source of contamination that may increase the level of risk that is the basis for the remediation requirements, may reduce the margin of safety provided by the remediation design, or may jeopardize the permanence of the Brownfield Agreement. Therefore, free product must be removed unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of MDEQ that removal of the free product is technically impracticable. The Applicant must also demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the contamination is confined and will remain confined within the site boundaries. Any monitoring plan must be approved by MDEQ.
(7) Tier 2 TPH Fractioning – For sites that do not meet the Tier 1 TPH TRGs, the Brownfield Party may either
(i) conduct a more detailed evaluation of petroleum hydrocarbons using the methodology outlined in MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures or
(ii) conduct another TPH risk evaluation of approved by MDEQ.
(8) Other Approved Methods - MDEQ may approve other risk evaluation methodologies under Tier 2.
(c) Tier 3 Evaluation
(1) A Tier 3 Evaluation is a site-specific assessment of the baseline risk of the Site (risk posed by the Site without remediation) based on current EPA risk assessment guidance, specifically those
published by the Office of Emergency and Remedial Response (Superfund program), the Risk Assessment Forum, and selected EPA Regional Offices. In this evaluation, an assessment of risk for all completed exposure pathways to humans and/or ecological receptors must be calculated.
(i) Human Health Evaluation - For human health, the remediation goal (RG) for each individual contaminant which is a carcinogen must be calculated to attain a Risk Level of 10-6 (i.e.,1 in a million). For a systemic toxicant, the remediation goal must be calculated to attain a total hazard quotient of not more than 1, except with regard to a background chemical concentration or a regionally prevalent chemical concentration. In cases where contaminants with corrective action concentrations established through federal and/or state programs (i.e., Safe Drinking Water Act maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)) are present, the MDEQ will determine the appropriate corrective action concentration on a contaminant-by- contaminant basis. MDEQ may consider an alternative quantitative or qualitative remediation goal (RG) for each individual contaminant, provided the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the attainment of a Risk Level of 10-6 for each individual carcinogenic contaminant or a total hazard quotient of not more than 1 for each individual systemic toxicant is technically impracticable, except with regard to a background chemical concentration or a regionally prevalent chemical concentration. In no event, except with regard to background chemical concentrations, may either the cumulative (total) site carcinogenic risk exceed 1 x 10-4 for carcinogenic CoCs or the site hazard index (summation of hazard quotients) exceed 3 for non-carcinogenic CoCs affecting the same organ or organ system.
(ii) Ecological Evaluation - For the assessment of ecological risk, the maximum or high-end soil, sediment, or surface water data must be compared with threshold or benchmark values for the protection of the ecological receptors of concern. The Brownfield Applicant must demonstrate either that the concentration of the affected media is below the threshold or benchmark values or that the hazard quotient for the individual CoCs is below 1 utilizing the quotient method.
(2) Risk-based remediation goal - The risk-based remediation goal (RG) may be qualitative or quantitative. A qualitative RG involves the exclusion of exposure pathways by engineering controls. A quantitative RG involves calculating the maximum numerical CoC(s) concentration in a medium which would not exceed the acceptable baseline risk at the exposure point. The numerical risk- based RG may be adjusted upward or downward depending on risk management considerations as approved by the MDEQ.
(3) Free Product - Free Product refers to the presence of a hazardous substance or an environmental pollutant in the environment as a floating or sinking non-aqueous phase liquid. Free Product is considered present if measurable using best available technologies or if the concentration of the chemicals of concern in groundwater or soils is at or above the solubility limit for all chemicals or soil saturation limit for all chemicals with a melting point less than 30 degrees Celsius. On a site-specific basis, MDEQ may require either the effective solubility or the aqueous solubility to be utilized. Free product must be removed from the Brownfield Agreement Site, unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of MDEQ that removal of the free product is:
(i) technically impracticable and that
(ii) the contamination is confined and will remain confined within the site boundaries.
(4) Historical data - Historical data approved by MDEQ may be submitted in lieu of collecting new data provided the Site characterization data requirements are summarized and presented in accordance with the Site Characterization Work Plan and Report Formats and the data was collected in a manner consistent with appropriate sampling protocols. All detailed information must be referenced in the reports including sampling protocols. In any event, relevant historical Site characterization reports shall be submitted with the application.
(5) Site Conceptual Exposure Model (SCEM) - The Brownfields Applicant must complete a BASELINE SCEM and a REMEDIAL SCEM on the forms prescribed by MDEQ as described in MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures.
(6) Petroleum Hydrocarbons - Brownfield Agreement Sites impacted with petroleum compounds must assess the area(s) and media of impact for petroleum hydrocarbon compounds (e.g., benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, total xylenes, and polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons). In areas where the concentration of these constituents cannot be determined due to dilution, and/or interference, the Brownfield Applicant may either;
(i) use the petroleum hydrocarbon methodologies as established in MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures or
(ii) another TPH risk evaluation methodology approved by MDEQ.
(7) Land-Use Restrictions - Before conducting the risk-based evaluation and/or corrective action, if applicable, land-use for the Brownfield Agreement Site shall be proposed by the Applicant, in consultation with MDEQ, as either restricted or unrestricted.
(i) Unrestricted land-use - The unrestricted land-use designation is available to property with contaminant concentrations at or below the Tier 1 table concentrations (provided in MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures) for unrestricted land-use.
(ii) Restricted land-use - Brownfield Property that has contaminant concentrations that exceed the unrestricted contaminant concentration values in the Tier 1 table provided in MDEQ’s Risk Evaluation Procedures are classified as restricted. A Brownfield Agreement regarding restricted property must require the creation of a land use restriction referenced in the Brownfield Agreement and in the deed notice, entitled the Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site. The Brownfield Agreement, any required Consent Forms, and the Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site must be filed by the Brownfield Party in the appropriate county courthouse. The Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site must identify the contaminant(s) present at the Site above the Tier 1 table for unrestricted land-use, the media affected, and delineate the vertical and horizontal extent of the contaminant(s) on the Brownfield Property. If the contaminant(s) concentration is at or below the Tier 1 table concentration for restricted land-use, or at or below the site-specific Tier 2 or Tier 3 calculated concentration for restricted land-use, specific restrictions including, but not limited to,
property access, property use, or property activities (with an acceptable human exposure duration) shall be stated in the Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site. In addition, the description, location, and maintenance, if applicable, of any engineering controls shall be included in the Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.4 Public Notice Requirements
A. Public Notice Requirements
(1) Public Notice by the MCEQ:
(a) At least forty-five days (45) before the date MCEQ considers the proposed Brownfield Agreement, MDEQ shall publish a public notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties in which the Brownfield Agreement Site is located. The public notice shall:
(1) describe the proposed Brownfield Agreement, including the proposed Brownfield Agreement Site;
(2) request public comment on the proposed agreement within thirty (30) days after the date of publication of the notice; and
(3) provide the date and location of MCEQ's consideration of the proposed Brownfield Agreement.
(b) At the time it forwards the notice for publication, MDEQ shall mail or deliver to the governing authorities of the local governments in which the proposed Site is located, including but not limited to the local zoning authorities, a copy of the public notice.
(c) A copy of the proposed Brownfield Agreement shall be filed for public inspection in the office of the chancery clerk of the county or counties in which the proposed Brownfield Agreement Site is located.
(2) Public Notice by the Applicant
(a) At the time of publication of the public notice under paragraph (a) of this subsection, an Applicant Brownfield Party shall notify by certified mail, return receipt requested, each record surface owner of property contiguous to the Brownfield Agreement Site (at the address contained in
the county records, if available) identified by the Brownfield Party after examination of the land records of the county or counties in which the Brownfield Agreement Site is located.
(b) The Brownfield Party shall submit to the MDEQ copies of all letters forwarded to contiguous property owners and copies of the completed return receipts within thirty days after mailing.
(3) Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site
(a) A Brownfield Party entering into a Brownfield Agreement shall submit to MDEQ for its approval a proposed Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site before execution of the Brownfield Agreement as provided in Rule 2.1.5 of these regulations.
(b) A Notice of-Brownfield Agreement Site:
(1) Shall be titled "Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site";
(2) Shall include a survey plat of the Brownfield Agreement Site prepared and certified by a professional land surveyor registered in the State of Mississippi which contains a legal description of the Brownfield Agreement Site and identifies the following:
(i) The location and dimensions of the areas of potential environmental contamination with respect to permanently surveyed benchmarks;
(ii) The type, location, and quantity of contaminants known to exist on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site;
(iii) All land-use restrictions to be applied to the current or future use of the Brownfield Agreement Site. These land- use restrictions may apply to activities on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site, including, but not limited to, use of groundwater, building, filling, grading, excavating, and mining;
(iv) All engineering controls included in the Brownfield Agreement; and
(v) Names and addresses of all persons who have an interest in the Brownfield Property;
(3) Shall be signed by the Applicant and all persons who have an interest in the Brownfield Agreement Site; and
(4) Shall contain a statement that all parties who have an interest in the Brownfield Agreement Site agree to the land-use restrictions, if applicable.
(4) Public Hearing Regarding Brownfields Agreement
(a) MDEQ may conduct a public hearing on the proposed Brownfield Agreement in the county in which the majority of the proposed Brownfield Agreement Site is located, or in any other location in the local area of the proposed Brownfield Agreement Site that is convenient to the members of the public who may have an interest in the proposed Brownfield Agreement.
(b) MDEQ shall publish a notice of the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties in which the proposed Brownfield Agreement Site is located.
(5) MDEQ shall provide to MCEQ for review before its consideration of the proposed Brownfield Agreement all public comments and the transcript of any public hearing on the proposed Brownfield Agreement.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.5 Decision on Brownfield Agreement
A. Decision on Brownfield Agreement
(1) The approval of a Brownfield Agreement shall be based on a complete application which MDEQ determines to contain all information required under the Act or these regulations. If MCEQ finds that the proposed Brownfield Agreement complies with the Act and these regulations, the MCEQ, by order, shall approve the proposed Brownfield Agreement. After approval of the Brownfield Agreement, the Executive Director and the Brownfield Party shall execute the Brownfield Agreement.
(2) MCEQ may consider an Applicant’s financial resources, technical resources, managerial resources and compliance history in determining whether or not to approve a Brownfield Agreement.
(3) Prior to approval of the Brownfield Agreement, MCEQ may require the applicant to demonstrate to the satisfaction of MCEQ that contamination (the source of which is not environmental contamination or activities on or under the Brownfield
Property that is the subject of the application but which is contributing or potentially contributing to contamination on or under the Brownfield Property that is the subject of the application) will not migrate onto the Brownfield Property or otherwise compromise the level of remediation of the Brownfield Property required by the Brownfield Agreement. This demonstration may include institutional controls, engineering controls or other preventive measures. In the event information is presented to MCEQ that migration of contamination has occurred or the level of remediation required under the Brownfield Agreement is being compromised, MCEQ may reopen the Brownfield Agreement.
(4) MDEQ shall consider all environmental contamination on or under the Brownfield Property that is the subject of the application to be attributed to activities on or under said Property, unless the Brownfield Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that:
(a) the source of environmental contamination is off-site and
(b) that conditions on or under said Property have not and will not exacerbate or contribute to the contamination.
MCEQ may, as it deems appropriate, inspect or require inspections; investigate or require investigations; evaluate or require evaluations; and/or issue orders regarding properties which are a source of contamination on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(5) MCEQ may enter into a Brownfield Agreement as proposed by MDEQ or may modify that agreement before entering into it. MCEQ subsequently may modify any Brownfield Agreement by entry of an order. The MCEQ orders issued under this Act shall be reviewable as provided in Section 49-17-41.
(6) MCEQ may disapprove a proposed Brownfield Agreement or decline to enter into a Brownfield Agreement by entry of an order. In the order, MCEQ shall state the reasons for disapproval of the agreement or declining to enter into the agreement.
B. Filing of Notice of Brownfield Agreement
(1) Within fifteen (15) days after the Brownfield Agreement is executed, the Brownfield Party shall file a certified copy of the Brownfield Agreement and a Notice of the Brownfield Agreement Site in the office of the chancery clerk of the county in which the Site is located. The chancery clerk shall record and enter the Notice of the Brownfield Agreement Site and the Brownfield Agreement in the land records in accordance with Section 89-5-33 and collect the fees provided in Section 25-7-9. Any subsequent deed or other instrument conveying an interest in Brownfield Property shall state in the deed or instrument that the property is Brownfield Property and subject to a Brownfield Agreement, unless the notice is canceled under Rule 2.1.8 of these regulations.
(2) If the notice has not been canceled under Rule 2.1.8 of these regulations, the seller of Brownfield Property shall disclose in the contract for the purchase of the Brownfield Property that the property is Brownfield Property and subject to a Brownfield Agreement.
C. Notice by Brownfield Party of Conveyance of Brownfield Property
Until the Executive Director issues a "no further action" letter under Rule 2.1.7.B. of these regulations, the Brownfield Party shall submit written notice to MCEQ at least thirty days prior to any sale, conveyance or other change in surface ownership of any portion of the Brownfield Agreement Site. Approval from MCEQ shall be required for any sale, conveyance or other change in surface ownership of any portion of the Brownfield Agreement Site owned by the Brownfield Party desiring to make the change in ownership, if the new surface owner will be required to or will assume an obligation to perform any obligations under the Brownfield Agreement. In that case, the Brownfield Party and the new surface owner jointly shall provide information satisfactory to MCEQ that the new surface owner has the financial, managerial and technical resources to complete performance of the Brownfield Agreement obligations to be transferred and that the new surface owner agrees to complete this performance. The new surface owner shall also submit a statement to MDEQ on a form prescribed by MDEQ which sets forth the requirements of the Brownfield Agreement for which it accepts responsibility. The Brownfield Party shall remain responsible for the payment of all reasonable direct and indirect costs of MDEQ associated with administration of the Brownfield Agreement until MDEQ receives a form from the new surface owner by which the new surface owner accepts responsibility for the payment of such costs. If MCEQ determines that the new surface owner has the necessary financial, managerial and technical resources, and an appropriate compliance history, to complete the performance of the Brownfield Agreement and that the new owner has agreed to do so, the MCEQ shall issue an order approving the transfer.
D. Prospective Purchaser Notice
The Brownfield Party shall provide written notice of the Brownfield Agreement Site’s status as Brownfield Property to any prospective purchaser of any interest in the Brownfield Agreement Site.
E. Executive Director Authority
Except for orders issued under Rule 2.1.5.A(2), 2.1.5.A(3) and Rule 2.1.10.B(3) of these regulations, MCEQ, under any conditions it may prescribe, may authorize the Executive Director to issue any orders required under this Act. A decision by the Executive Director shall be a decision of MCEQ and shall be reviewable as provided under Section 49-17-41.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq., 49- 17-1, et seq. and 89-5-33.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.6 Modification of Brownfield Agreement
A. Conditions for Modification
(1) A Brownfields Agreement may be modified by order of MCEQ, if:
(a) MCEQ receives new information demonstrating that a contaminant on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site poses less risk than the risk that formed a basis for the remediation requirements. Public notice as designated in Rule 2.1.4 is required prior to any modification under this subparagraph (1)(a);
(b) The Brownfield Party provides or has provided to MCEQ false information or fails to disclose to MCEQ relevant information about environmental contamination on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site that forms a basis for the Brownfield Agreement or that is offered to demonstrate compliance with the Brownfield Agreement;
(c) New information becomes available after execution of the Brownfield Agreement indicating the existence of previously unknown contaminants or an area of previously unknown environmental contamination that has not been remediated to standards required by applicable federal or state law other than this Act. The Brownfield Agreement may be amended to include remediation of any previously unknown contaminants and any additional areas in the same Brownfield Agreement Site;
(d) The level of risk to public health or the environment resulting from the Brownfield Agreement Site is increased beyond the level that forms a basis for the risk-based remediation requirements in the Brownfield Agreement due to changes in exposure conditions, including:
(1) A change in land-use at the Site or contiguous to the Site that increases the probability of exposure to contaminants on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site or
(2) The failure of remediation to mitigate risks to the extent required to make the Brownfield Agreement Site fully protective of public health and the environment as provided in the Brownfield Agreement; or
(3) The receipt by MDEQ of new information after execution of the Brownfield Agreement about a contaminant on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site that increases the risk to public health or the environment on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site beyond the level that is the basis for the risk-based remediation
requirements in the Brownfield Agreement and in a manner or to a degree not anticipated in the Brownfield Agreement.
(2) Minor modifications are not required to comply with the public notice requirements set forth in Rule 2.1.4. All other modifications are required to go through public notice. Minor modifications include:
(a) Typographical errors;
(b) Equipment replacement or upgrade with functionally equivalent components;
(c) Changes in the frequency of or procedures for monitoring, reporting, sampling or maintenance activities;
(d) Changes in interim compliance dates;
(e) Changes to waste sampling or analysis methods to conform with MDEQ or EPA guidance or regulations;
(f) Changes in name, address, or phone number of contacts;
(g) Changes in groundwater sampling or analysis procedures; or
(h) Such other changes determined by MDEQ not significantly to change or have the reasonable potential significantly to change the Brownfield Agreement.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.7 Liability Protection and No Further Action Letter
A. Liability Protection
(1) Except as provided under Rule 2.1.7(A)(5) and Rule 2.1.10(B)(3) of these regulations, a Brownfield Party who executes a Brownfield Agreement shall be relieved of liability to all persons other than the United States for:
(a) remediation of the Brownfield Agreement Site other than the remediation required by the Brownfield Agreement; and
(b) all costs reasonably related to the remediation other than the remediation and costs required by the Brownfield Agreement or these regulations.
However, these regulations shall not affect the right of any person to seek relief against any party to the Brownfield Agreement who may have liability with respect to a Brownfield Agreement Site, except as provided in this section.
(2) The liability protection provided under and as limited by this section applies to the following persons to the same extent as to a Brownfield Party:
(a) Any person under the direction or control of the Brownfield Party who directs or contracts for remediation or redevelopment of the Brownfield Agreement Site;
(b) Any current owner and any future owner of the Brownfield Agreement Site;
(c) Any person who develops, redevelops or lawfully occupies the Brownfield Agreement Site;
(d) Any successor or assign of any person to whom the liability protection provided under this section applies; and
(e) Any lender or fiduciary that provided financing for remediation or redevelopment of the Brownfield Agreement Site.
(3) A person who conducts an environmental assessment on a Brownfield Agreement Site and who is not otherwise a potentially responsible party shall not become a potentially responsible party as a result of conducting the environmental assessment, unless that person increases the risk of harm to public health or the environment by failing to exercise due diligence and reasonable care in performing the environmental assessment.
(4) The liability protection provided pursuant to this section shall become effective upon execution of a Brownfield Agreement by MCEQ and shall remain effective unless MCEQ removes the liability protection pursuant to Rule 2.1.10(B)(3).
(5) A Brownfield Party who satisfactorily completes the remediation required under a Brownfield Agreement, and any other person who receives liability protection under this section, shall not be required to perform additional remediation on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site unless:
(a) The Brownfield Party provides to MCEQ false information or fails to disclose to MCEQ relevant information about environmental contamination on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site that forms a basis for the Brownfield Agreement, that is offered to demonstrate compliance with the Brownfield Agreement;
(b) New information becomes available after execution of the Brownfield Agreement indicating the existence of previously unknown contaminants or an area of previously unknown environmental contamination that has not been remediated to standards required applicable federal or state law other than these regulations. The Brownfield Agreement may be amended to include remediation of any previously unknown contaminants and any additional areas in the same Brownfield Agreement Site;
(c) The level of risk to public health or the environment resulting from the Brownfield Agreement Site is increased beyond the level that forms a basis for the risk-based remediation requirements in the Brownfield Agreement due to changes in exposure conditions, including:
(1) A change in land-use at the Site or contiguous to the Site that increases the probability of exposure to contaminants on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site; or
(2) The failure of remediation to mitigate risks to the extent required to make the Brownfield Agreement Site fully protective of public health and the environment as provided in the Brownfield Agreement.
(d) MDEQ receives new information after execution of the Brownfield Agreement about a contaminant on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site that increases the risk to public health or the environment on or under the Brownfield Agreement Site beyond the level that is the basis for the risk-based remediation requirements in the Brownfield Agreement and in a manner or to a degree not anticipated in the Brownfield Agreement; or
(e) Brownfield Party fails to file a timely and proper Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site under Rule 2.1.4(A)(3) of these regulations.
B. No Further Action Letter
Upon completion of the Brownfield Agreement, the Brownfield Party may petition MCEQ to determine that the Brownfield Party has completed performance of the Brownfield Agreement. If MCEQ determines after conducting an inspection of the Brownfield Agreement Site that the Brownfield Party has completed the Brownfield Agreement, MCEQ shall issue an order stating MCEQ’s conclusion. Following issuance of an order by MCEQ, the Executive Director shall issue a "no further action" letter. The letter shall include the following statement: "Based upon the information provided by [Brownfield Party] concerning property located at [location], it is the opinion of the Commission on Environmental Quality that [Brownfield Party] has successfully and satisfactorily implemented and completed the approved Brownfield Agreement. No further action is required to assure that the remediation required under the Brownfield
Agreement is protective of public health and the environment in accordance with the existing and proposed uses of this property.”
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.8 Cancellation of Notice of Brownfield Agreement
A. Cancellation.
If a Brownfield Party remediates a Brownfield Agreement Site to a risk level of unrestricted use, the Brownfield Party may petition MCEQ to cancel the Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site. If MCEQ issues an order canceling the notice, the current owner of the Brownfield Agreement Site shall file a statement issued by the Executive Director in accordance with MCEQ’s order canceling the notice in the office of the chancery clerk in any county in which the Brownfield Agreement Site is located. The Executive Director’s statement shall contain the names of the owners of the Brownfield Agreement Site as shown in the Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site and reference the book and page where the notice is recorded. After collecting the proper fee fixed in Section 25-7-9, the chancery clerk shall record the Executive Director’s statement as provided in Rule 2.1.7.A. The chancery clerk shall make a marginal entry on the Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site showing the date of cancellation and the book and page where the Executive Director’s statement is recorded, and the chancery clerk shall sign the entry.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.9 Fees and Trust Fund
A. Fees
(1) The Brownfield Party who submits a Brownfield Agreement application shall pay all reasonable direct and indirect costs of MDEQ associated with the processing of the Brownfield Agreement application and administration of the Brownfield Agreement less the advance costs required in Rule 2.1.9(A)(2) of this rule, unless another funding source (e.g., EPA Cooperative Agreement) is available, acceptable, and approved by MDEQ.
(2) A Brownfield Party who submits a Brownfield Agreement application for review by MDEQ shall pay advance costs of Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) at the time the application is submitted to MDEQ. MDEQ will apply the Two Thousand Dollar ($2,000.00) advance costs to the final invoice as determined by MDEQ.
(3) MCEQ shall set by order a schedule of costs for the processing of the Brownfield Agreement applications and the administration of Brownfield Agreements by MDEQ.
(4) Reasonable direct and indirect costs shall include the cost of MDEQ’s utilization of the services of an independent contractor and/or contractual worker to evaluate information associated with the processing of the Brownfield Agreement application and administration of the Brownfield Agreement less the advance costs required in Rule 2.1.9(A)(2) of this rule.
(5) MCEQ may delegate to MDEQ responsibility for the collection of costs in Rule 2.1.9(A)(1) and (2).
(6) All costs under Rule 2.1.9(A)(1) shall be due before a date specified by MDEQ, which shall be no less than thirty (30) days following the invoice date. If any part of the costs that are imposed is not paid within thirty (30) days after the due date, a penalty of up to twenty-five percent (25%) of the amount due may be imposed and added to that amount. Any penalty collected under this section shall be deposited into the Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment Trust Fund created by Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-35-25(4). If MDEQ pursues legal action to collect costs incurred, reasonable attorney's fees and costs may be assessed against the delinquent party pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-35-25(7).
(7) Any person required to pay costs under this section who disagrees with the calculation or applicability of the costs may petition MCEQ for a hearing in accordance with Section 49-17-35.
(8) Costs collected under this section shall not supplant or reduce in any way the general fund appropriation to the MDEQ for the administration of this program, pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-35-25(9).
(9) MDEQ shall suspend any activities or actions related to the processing of the Brownfield Agreement application or administration of a Brownfield Agreement, if the Brownfield Party or Parties fails to pay any required costs or penalties imposed under this section. In addition, the MCEQ shall issue an order in accordance with Rule 2.1.10(B)(2) requiring the Brownfield Party to pay the required costs within a certain time. Failure to comply with the order may subject the Brownfield Party to remedies set forth Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-17-43 and removal of liability protection set forth in Rule 2.1.7(A).
(10) MDEQ shall submit a final invoice to the Brownfield Party within sixty (60) days of the issuance of a “No Further Action Letter” for Sites that do not require post- closure activities or compliance monitoring. For those Sites that require post- closure activities or compliance monitoring, MDEQ and the Brownfield Party shall agree upon reasonable direct and indirect costs associated with the administration of post-closure activities or compliance monitoring as outlined in the Brownfield Agreement.
(11) Nothing in this section affects any existing program at MDEQ or affects any authority of MCEQ or MDEQ to take any action authorized by law.
B. Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment Trust Fund
(1) Pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-35-25(4), there is created in the State Treasury a fund to be designated as the "Brownfields Cleanup and Redevelopment Trust Fund," referred to in this section as "fund," to be administered by the Executive Director.
(2) Monies in the fund shall be utilized to pay reasonable direct and indirect costs associated with the processing of the Brownfield Agreement applications and the administration of Brownfield Agreements.
(3) Expenditures may be made from the fund upon requisition by the Executive Director.
(4) The fund shall be treated as a special trust fund. Interest earned on the principal shall be credited by the Treasurer to the fund.
(5) The fund may receive monies from any available public or private source, including, but not limited to, collection of costs, interest, grants, taxes, public and private donations, judicial actions and appropriated funds.
(6) Monies in the fund at the end of the fiscal year shall be retained in the fund for use in the next succeeding fiscal year.
(7) All monies collected under this section shall be deposited into the fund.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.1.10 Hearings and Enforcement
A. Hearings
Any person or interested party aggrieved by any order of MCEQ pursuant to the Act or these regulations may file a request for hearing or notice of appeal pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-17-41. Any person who disagrees with any other action of MCEQ pursuant to the Act or these regulations may file a petition with MCEQ for a hearing pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-17-35.
B. Enforcement and Agency Reporting
(1) Any material failure of a Brownfield Party or the agents or employees of a Brownfield Party to comply with the Brownfield Agreement constitutes a violation of this rule by the Brownfield Party. If a Brownfield Party violates this section, MCEQ may issue an order requiring the Brownfield Party to correct the violation in an appropriate time period established by the order.
(2) If the Brownfield Party fails to comply with an order issued under Rule 2.1.10(B)(2) or provides false information to MCEQ or MDEQ during the application process or in reports required by the Brownfield Agreement or by state or federal law, MCEQ may remove the liability protection afforded by the Brownfield Agreement under Rule 2.1.7.A., require additional remediation, and/or assess civil penalties pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-17-43.
(3) This section shall not create a defense against the imposition of criminal or civil penalties or other administrative remedies authorized by law for violations of law caused by the Brownfield Party while implementing or failing to implement the Brownfield Agreement.
(4) Any land-use restriction or engineering control in a Brownfield Agreement and in a Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site filed under this section may be enforced by MCEQ by initiating an administrative proceeding or by filing a civil action without first having exhausted all available administrative remedies.
(5) A land-use restriction or engineering control shall not be declared unenforceable due to lack of privity of estate or contract, due to lack of benefit to particular land, or due to lack of any property interest in particular Brownfield Property within the Brownfield Agreement Site. Any person who owns or leases Brownfield Property within the Brownfield Agreement Site subject to a land-use restriction or engineering control under this section shall abide by the land-use restriction or engineering control.
(6) MCEQ may terminate a Brownfield Agreement by order issued pursuant to Rule 2.1.10.B(3). The order shall direct the executive director to issue a notice of cancellation of Brownfield Agreement. Any order to terminate shall provide that all liability protection provided by the Brownfield Agreement has been removed. The statement issued by the executive director shall direct the chancery clerk to make a marginal entry of termination on the Notice of Brownfield Agreement Site and the Brownfield Agreement. In the event a Brownfield Agreement is terminated, the Brownfield Party shall be responsible for notifying the following parties of the termination:
(a) All owners of interest in the Brownfield Agreement Site;
(b) All persons who own property contiguous to the Brownfield Agreement Site;
(c) All local governments that were originally notified of the Brownfield Agreement
(7) Additionally, upon termination the Brownfield Party shall:
(a) Publish a notice of cancellation in a local newspaper;
(b) Record all instruments of cancellation in the office of the chancery clerk in each county in which the Brownfield Agreement Site is located;
(c) Pay all costs for the foregoing; and
(d) Forward to MDEQ documentation evidencing the accomplishment of the foregoing.
SUBCHAPTER 2. RISK EVALUATION PROCEDURES
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 49-17-35, 49-17-41, 49- 17-43, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.1 General
A. Introduction
(1) The Mississippi Brownfields Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Program (Brownfields Program) utilizes risk-based criteria for Site evaluation and remediation. The risk-based procedures and rationale for evaluating environmental contamination on or under a Site are presented in this Subchapter II. This evaluation is necessary to develop remediation requirements that are protective of human health and the environment. All remediation and/or corrective actions must be approved by MDEQ.
(2) In considering the risk-based evaluation of conditions on or under a Site, the following must be addressed:
(a) complete the Site Conceptual Exposure Model (SCEM) to evaluate site- specific risk and exposure conditions before and after remediation;
(b) conduct a Site Characterization to delineate the nature and extent (vertically and horizontally) of contamination found on or under the Site;
(c) complete the Site Ecological Checklist to determine whether an ecological risk assessment is necessary; and
(d) conduct a Risk-Based Evaluation of the Site utilizing the Brownfields Program three-tiered approach.
(3) The cornerstone of the Brownfields Program is a three-tiered risk-based process for evaluating human health and environmental risks. These tiers are referred to as Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3. These tiers are designed to allow the Applicant to evaluate and determine appropriate remedial options for site specific conditions. A description of each tier is discussed below.
(a) A Tier 1 Evaluation is the comparison of site-specific data to a "look-up" table of chemical-specific target remediation goals (TRGs). Specific TRG concentrations have been determined to be protective of human health and the environment for restricted use and unrestricted use of a Site. The Tier 1 TRG Table is presented in Appendix A.
(b) A Tier 2 Evaluation provides the Applicant the option of performing a more in-depth evaluation of site-specific conditions to develop site-specific Remediation Goals (RG) and/or to better define site-specific data to be used for a Tier 1 Evaluation.
(c) A Tier 3 Evaluation is a site-specific risk assessment to evaluate the potential human health and ecological risks at the Site that will result in the development of site-specific Remediation Goals (RGs).
(4) Land use plays an integral role in the three-tiered approach and in the development of the SCEM. Land-use restrictions may reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to contaminants and risk.
(5) Specific criteria for evaluating Sites impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons is contained in Rule 2.2.7 of this Subchapter.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.2 Brownfield Site Evaluation
A. Conceptual Exposure Model (SCEM)
(1) The SCEM is a graphical representation of actual and potential Site conditions based on available data and an understanding of those Site conditions. A BASELINE and a REMEDIAL SCEM must be completed and are provided in forms prescribed by MDEQ. The BASELINE SCEM represents the risk and exposure conditions that exist prior to the implementation of remediation. The REMEDIAL SCEM represents the risk and exposure conditions that exist or are expected to exist after the implementation of remediation. Items to be identified in the SCEM include the following:
(a) chemical of concern (CoC) sources;
(b) CoC movement (migration/transport);
(c) the actual or potential exposure pathways; and
(d) the actual or potential receptor populations.
(2) Based on the results of the completed BASELINE SCEM, exposure point concentrations (EPCs) must be identified for CoC(s) with completed and potentially completed exposure pathways. EPCs are the concentrations of site- related compounds in a specific media that a human or environmental receptor will contact (Complete) or may potentially contact (Potentially Complete) through ingestion or inhalation at the point of exposure.
(3) All four elements identified in the SCEM must be complete for exposure to occur. It is important to note that the BASELINE SCEM should be developed early in the process (i.e., Brownfield Application and/or work plan stage) and identified as "draft" if additional information is pending. The BASELINE SCEM can be updated and modified as the site investigation progresses and more site-specific information becomes available. BASELINE SCEM should be identified as "final" once the Site Characterization is complete.
(4) If additional issues of concern pertaining to exposure at the site (additional pathways, media, sources, transport mechanisms, receptors, etc.) are not specifically addressed in the SCEMs, the Applicant should provide an attachment(s) to the appropriate SCEM discussing the additional issues.
(5) The BASELINE and REMEDIAL SCEM worksheets must be included as part of the Site Characterization Report and the Corrective Action Report.
(6) The procedures for completing the SCEMs follow:
(a) Identify the Primary Sources (on-site and off-site) of contamination that exist or are believed to have existed.
(b) Identify the Secondary Sources. Mark the media (soils, groundwater, sediments, or surface water) that have been impacted (Complete) or could potentially be impacted (Potentially Complete) by a release from a primary source.
(c) Identify the Transport Mechanisms by which the contaminants may move through the environment.
(d) Identify the Exposure Pathway that is the medium (soil, groundwater, air,
sediments, or surface water) that a receptor will contact (Complete) or may contact (Potentially Complete).
(e) Identify the Actual (Complete) and the Future (Potentially Complete) Receptors for restricted and unrestricted land-use.
B. Criteria For Completing The SCEMs
(1) BASELINE SCEM - The following sections describe the criteria for evaluating the completeness and potential completeness of contaminant exposure for the Site. All potential exposure pathways should be evaluated for completeness, as identified in the SCEM worksheets. The Applicant should provide as much detail as possible. Indicate all sources, transport mechanisms, pathways and receptors that are complete or potentially complete. If information is not available to support a pathway as incomplete then that pathway should be considered to be potentially complete and should be identified for evaluation until such information becomes available. A description of each of the BASELINE SCEM criteria is provided in the following sections.
(a) Sources can be defined as either Primary Sources or Secondary Sources. Primary Sources are those present or past storage units (i.e., tanks, impoundments, piles), distribution systems (i.e., piping, manifolds, lines, pumps), operations (i.e., wash areas, repair bays, water treatment, blending tanks, formulation areas), waste management units (i.e., burn pits, disposal units, dumps) and other on-site and off-site sources of actual or potential contamination that have or may have leaked, leached, spilled, or otherwise been released and may have impacted the Site. Several categories of potential primary sources are included on the SCEM worksheet and can be identified by filling in the appropriate boxes on the worksheet. If the sources listed do not pertain to the Site, then use "Other". The Applicant should be as specific as possible about the source of contamination. Supporting documentation (i.e., analytical results, product storage/transmission information, tank information, etc.) of the primary source of contamination should be provided in the appropriate section(s) of the Work Plan and/or Site Characterization Report.
Secondary Sources are defined as transport media (i.e., surficial soils, subsurface soils, groundwater, sediments, or surface water) that have been impacted or potentially impacted by the primary (release) source. Identify all media that may serve as secondary sources of contamination. For the purposes of this Subchapter 2 surficial soil is defined as extending to 6 ft. below ground surface (bgs). The presence of CoCs that cannot be attributed to background should be identified as "complete," and any secondary source that is potentially affected by an on-site or off-site primary source should be identified as potentially complete." The
Applicant must provide adequate documentation to demonstrate that a secondary source has not been affected in order to remove that medium from further consideration. If such documentation has not yet been gathered to support the exclusion of a secondary source, then that medium must be identified as "potentially complete" until such time as such information becomes available. The BASELINE SCEM can be updated as additional site-specific data are gathered.
(b) Transport Mechanisms are means by which the CoC release can migrate from the identified secondary sources and result in actual or potential human exposure. A variety of potential transport mechanisms are generally applicable to a site. Indicate on the BASELINE SCEM Worksheet those transport mechanisms that are applicable or potentially applicable to the site. Those transport mechanisms identified as applicable or potentially applicable should be marked "complete" or "potentially complete," respectively.
(1) Surficial Soils - If surficial soil has been identified as a secondary source, then the following transport mechanisms must be identified as "complete" or "potentially complete":
(i) Wind Erosion and Atmospheric Dispersion (For Non- Volatile Compound Only)
(ii) Volatilization and Atmospheric Dispersion (For Volatile Compounds Only)
(iii) Volatilization and Enclosed-Space Accumulation (For Volatile Compounds Only)
(iv) Leaching and Groundwater Transport
Note: The Soil Exposure Pathway must also be identified as "complete" or "potentially complete" if surficial soil has been identified as a secondary source.
(2) Subsurface Soils - If subsurface soil has been identified as a secondary source, then the following transport mechanisms must be identified as "complete" or "potentially complete":
(i) Volatilization and Enclosed-Space Accumulation (For Volatile Compounds Only)
(ii) Leaching and Groundwater Transport
(3) Groundwater – If groundwater has been identified as a secondary source, then the following transport mechanisms must be identified as “complete” or “potentially complete”:
(i) Volatilization and Enclosed-Space Accumulation (For Volatile Compounds Only)
(ii) Leaching and Groundwater Transport
(4) Sediments or Surface Water - If sediment or surface water has been identified as a secondary source, then Surface Water Runoff or Surface Water Transport must be identified as "complete" or "potentially complete."
(c) Exposure Pathways are the processes by which human uptake or exposure to site-related compounds may occur. Identify all "complete" or potentially complete" exposure pathways at the Site that may provide a means for human exposure. All exposure pathways should be identified as potentially complete if supporting information for the exclusion of the pathway is not currently available.
(1) Soil - If surficial soils are affected, then direct exposure through incidental ingestion must be indicated as complete or potentially complete. Contamination in surface and subsurface soils may be available for exposure through direct contact during intrusive activities, such as construction. The future use of the site and any plans for construction should be considered when evaluating the completeness of direct contact to subsurface soils.
(2) Air - Contamination of surface soil provides the potential for human uptake or exposure through inhalation of vapor from volatile compounds and through inhalation of non-volatile compounds that have adsorbed to surface soil particulates. Contamination of subsurface soil provides the potential for human uptake or exposure through inhalation of vapor from volatile compounds (i.e., migration into basements or during intrusive activities such as construction) and through inhalation of non- volatile compounds that have adsorbed to subsurface soil particulates during intrusive activities, such as construction. In addition, the presence of volatile compounds in groundwater at the site produces the potential for volatilization into air (i.e., migration into basements, depth to groundwater is less than six (6) feet or intrusive activities).
(3) Groundwater - Contamination of groundwater requires that the Groundwater Exposure Pathway be marked as "complete" in the BASELINE SCEM. Surface and subsurface soils capable of leaching into groundwater at levels above the Groundwater TRG require that the Groundwater Exposure Pathway be marked as "complete" in the BASELINE SCEM. The presence of CoCs in surface and subsurface soils requires that the Groundwater Exposure Pathway be marked as "potentially complete" in the BASELINE SCEM. The Applicant must provide adequate documentation to demonstrate that CoCs in surface and subsurface soils will not leach into groundwater in order to remove that medium from further consideration. If documentation has not been gathered to support the exclusion of exposure pathway, that pathway must be identified as "potentially complete." The BASELINE SCEM can be updated as additional site-specific data are gathered.
(4) Surface Water - The exposure pathways applicable to surface water are included in the SCEM Worksheet in order to protect surface water bodies that may be used for domestic or recreational purposes. The presence of site-related compounds in soils, sediments, surface water, or groundwater provides the potential for migration or discharge to either on-site or off-site surface water bodies that may be used for recreational purposes, for a potable water supply, or for livestock watering. If contaminants are present in onsite media and such a surface water body is present within 500 ft. of the Site boundary, the pathway should indicate "potentially complete." Provide documentation in the Work Plan and/or the Site Characterization Report that a water body is not associated with or affected by the Site.
(d) The identification of Potential Receptor populations at the site is an important part of the completion of the BASELINE SCEM. It is important to know as much about the current and potential future use of the site and receptor populations, as possible. The receptor populations and the planned future use of the site are integral in supporting the remedial options at the site. Any and all potential receptor populations that could be exposed to site-related compounds should be identified on the BASELINE SCEM.
(2) REMEDIAL SCEM - Once the BASELINE SCEM has been completed, remedial options (i.e., institutional controls, engineering controls, or active cleanup) for the Site that can "shut off" or eliminate exposure to contamination should be evaluated. Those complete and potentially complete exposure routes linking sources to receptor populations must be remediated using one or a combination of options. Free product must be remediated in a manner consistent
with Rule 2.2.6(A)(4)(d). The REMEDIAL SCEM includes shut-off valves to graphically depict "open" or "closed" pathways between contaminated media and the receptor population. Shut-off valves are marked (shut) to indicate the remedial action that has been taken or proposed for the Site. A description of the types of remedial actions follow:
(a) Institutional Controls - The use of institutional controls (land use restrictions and agreed order with MDEQ) can serve as barriers in preventing future contact with subsurface soils and groundwater. Site land-use may be "unrestricted" or "restricted" that relates generally to residential and industrial/commercial, respectively. The potential to restrict the future use of the site (example: use of the site to a defined industrial use only, or the limitations of future construction activities, prohibiting groundwater use) can be considered in the remediation of the Site. If no restrictions for future use will be placed on the property by the Applicant, the identified remediation goals will be based on the future unrestricted (residential) use of the Site. Documentation of the institutional controls must be provided to support the proposed site remediation. A land use restriction and agreed order with MDEQ shall be used for "restricting" the Site. Institutional controls are to be used to "shut off" exposure to contamination. The Site Characterization Report and/or Corrective Action Plan must document the appropriate restrictions to be implemented. The Institutional Control Shut-off Valve on the REMEDIAL SCEM should be marked to reflect this option. An institutional control by itself cannot be used if there is further migration and/or Expansion of the contamination.
(b) Engineering Controls - The use of engineering controls can reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to contaminants through containment. Engineering Controls may include, but are not limited to, physical or hydraulic control measures (such as groundwater recovery trenches and leachate collection systems), groundwater treatment systems, engineered caps, liner systems, slurry walls or permanent structures, but shall not include the exclusive use of security fencing. Ingestion and dermal contact of soil contamination that exists under a building may be considered "shut off" provided the institutional control restricts contamination via ingestion or dermal contact. If an engineering control is used to "shut- off" exposure to contamination, the Site Characterization Report and/or Corrective Action Plan must document the appropriate engineering control and/or institutional control to be implemented. The Engineering Control Shut-off Valve on the REMEDIAL SCEM should be marked to reflect this option. An institutional control must be coupled with the engineering control to ensure the engineering control is maintained until the site is remediated to an unrestricted level.
(c) Active Cleanup - The active cleanup (i.e., removal, treatment) of contamination to levels that are protective of human health and the environment can reduce or eliminate the potential for exposure to contaminants. If active cleanup is used to "shut off" exposure to contamination, the Site Characterization Report and/or Corrective Action Plan must document the active cleanup activities and/or institutional control to be implemented. The Active Cleanup Shut-off Valve on the REMEDIAL SCEM should be marked to reflect this option. An institutional control may be necessary, depending upon the projected length of the cleanup, particularly if groundwater has been impacted (e.g., pump and treat system has been installed and projected to continue for 30 years).
C. Site Characterization
(1) A Site Characterization must be conducted to delineate the nature and extent (vertically and horizontally) of contamination on and under the Site. Site characterization data should be collected and presented in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) and Site Characterization Report formats. In general, the Applicant must demonstrate that the data are representative of the actual and/or potential contamination conditions at the Site. Collected data must include information describing and delineating the contaminant source area. Information pertaining to the characteristics of the CoCs, including the chemical and physical properties as well as the potential of the CoCs to migrate and transport to receptor locations through or in the affected media, must also be provided.
(2) The degree of contamination in surface and subsurface soil should be determined by performing soil boring(s) down to the depth of groundwater in the saturated zone. Surface soil is defined as the soil located at the surface and extending to a depth of six (6) feet below the ground surface. The subsurface soil depth is any depth beyond six feet. The Applicant must address ingestion, potential dermal contact, and inhalation (through volatilization and particulates) of hazardous chemicals present in the surface soil. In addition, CoCs in the surface soil may be transported off-site through precipitation runoff.
(3) The Applicant must demonstrate that groundwater is not impacted by the site- related contaminant; or that if groundwater is impacted, the impacted groundwater is confined and will remain confined within the Site. Groundwater contaminant concentrations should be determined by collecting groundwater samples.
(4) Measured data are those data collected from temporary or permanent (monitoring) wells. The Applicant should install wells, as necessary, to delineate the vertical and horizontal extent of groundwater impact and to determine flow direction and groundwater quality. Wells must be installed, developed, purged, and sampled in a manner consistent with EPA Region IV, Science and Ecological Support
Division, Environmental Investigations Standard Operating Procedures and Quality Assurance Manual, May 1996, as amended, or other procedures approved by MDEQ. Measured groundwater data must be based on unfiltered groundwater samples.
(5) The site characterization data should be collected in accordance with data quality objectives (DQOs) stipulated in the QAPP. The DQOs shall, at a minimum, identify the number of field and quality control samples, quantitation limits, analytical methods, and sample collection, preservation, and handling methods. Matrix interferences shall be minimized to the extent feasible by modified sample extraction and preparation methods in accordance with EPA or MDEQ approved analytical methodologies.
(6) The data collection strategy should be based on the Site Conceptual Exposure Model (SCEM) that hypothesizes or describes how the source chemicals or CoCs are released, transported, and exposed to the receptors.
(7) The Applicant must demonstrate that the analytical laboratory data have been reviewed for compliance with the DQOs. In the Site Characterization Report, the Applicant shall data that meet DQOs.
(8) To establish background chemical concentrations, the Applicant may collect samples from locations, as approved by MDEQ, outside of the influence of known contaminated areas and regionally prevalent chemicals and must analyze these samples using the same analytical methods as the CoC analyses.
(9) To establish regionally prevalent chemical concentrations, the Applicant may collect samples from locations, as approved by MDEQ, throughout a substantial geographic region and outside the influence of known contaminated areas and must analyze these samples using the same analytical methods as the CoC analyses.
(10) Historical data approved by MDEQ may be submitted in lieu of collecting new data provided that:
(a) the Site characterization data requirements are summarized and presented in accordance with the Quality Assurance Project Plan and Site Characterization Report Formats; and
(b) the data was collected in a manner consistent with appropriate sampling protocols, as approved by MDEQ.
All detailed information must be referenced in the reports including sampling protocols. In any event, relevant previous site characterization reports should be submitted along with the application. Deviations from the required methodologies
in the Quality Assurance Project Plan, Site Characterization Report, for Corrective Action Plan formats must be presented to and approved by MDEQ.
D. Site Ecological Checklist
The Ecological Checklist is used to determine if ecological receptors of concern are present and potentially impacted (See Appendix D). If such receptors are present, MDEQ will make a determination as to whether a Tier 3 assessment of ecological risk should be performed to assess the potential ecological impact. Tier 1 and Tier 2 Evaluations are applicable for Sites with no known ecological receptors of concern.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.3 Tier 1 Evaluation
A. Tier 1 Evaluation Target Risk Level
The TRGs presented in the Tier 1 TRG table, Appendix A, are based on either:
(1) a 1x10-6 target risk level for each carcinogenic chemical,
(2) a hazard index not to exceed 1 for each systemic toxicant, or
(3) constituent TRG concentrations established through federal/state programs (i.e., Safe Drinking Water Act). The values presented in the Tier 1 TRG table will be modified periodically based on EPA updates of toxicity values obtained from the sources presented in Rule 2.2.5(B)(3)(b) of this Subchapter 2.
B. Tier 1 Evaluation Procedures
(1) The basic methodology for a Tier 1 Evaluation shall be the comparison of the highest concentration of each contaminant in each media to the TRGs provided in the Tier 1 TRG table. Results of the comparison will be used to determine if the site specific data are:
(a) at or below the unrestricted risk value;
(b) above the unrestricted risk value, but at or below the restricted risk value; or
(c) above the restricted risk value.
(2) Sites that do not require an ecological evaluation beyond the Site Ecological Checklist and that exhibit chemical concentrations that are at or below the unrestricted TRGs do not require further evaluation or action. Such sites are not
eligible for the Brownfields Program since remediation is not necessary as required in Section 49-5-5(b) of Mississippi Code Annotated, as amended.
(3) Sites with chemical concentrations in soils that are greater than the unrestricted TRGs but below the restricted TRGs may:
(a) clean-up and/or remove the affected media to a value at or below the unrestricted TRG values resulting in an unrestricted land-use site;
(b) implement appropriate institutional controls (i.e., land use restriction and agreed order with MDEQ) resulting in a restricted land use site; or
(c) perform a Tier 2 Evaluation.
(4) Sites with chemical concentrations in soils that exceed the restricted TRGs may:
(a) clean-up and/or remove the affected media to a value at or below the unrestricted TRG values resulting in an unrestricted land use site;
(b) clean-up and/or remove the affected media to a value at or below the restricted TRG values but above the unrestricted TRG values resulting in a restricted land use site and implement appropriate institutional controls (i.e., land use restriction and agreed order with MDEQ); or
(c) perform a Tier 2 Evaluation.
(5) Sites with chemical concentrations in groundwater that are greater than the unrestricted TRGs may:
(a) clean-up the affected media to a value at or below the unrestricted TRG values resulting in an unrestricted land-use site;
(b) implement appropriate institutional controls (i.e., land use restriction and agreed order with MDEQ) resulting in a restricted land use site; or
(c) perform a Tier 2 Evaluation.
(6) MDEQ may consider utilizing the Method Detection Limit (MDL) in place of the Target Remediation Goal (TRG) on a case by case basis.
(7) In areas of a site where chemical concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbon indicator compounds (e.g., BTEX, PAHs, MTBE) are not quantifiable to the Tier 1 TRGs (e.g., dilution and/or matrix interference) may:
(a) use the Tier 1 TRGs for TPH-GRO/DRO for performing a Tier 1 Evaluation; or
(b) perform a Tier 2 TPH Fractioning Evaluation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.4 Tier 2 Evaluation
A. Tier 2 Evaluation Target Risk Level
For human health, the remediation goal (RG) for each individual contaminant which is (1) a carcinogen must be calculated to attain a Risk Level of 10-6 (i.e.,1 in a million) and (2) a systemic toxicant must be calculated to attain a total hazard quotient of not more than 1 except with regard to a background chemical concentration or a regionally prevalent chemical concentration. In cases where contaminants with corrective action concentrations established through federal and/or state programs (i.e., Safe Drinking Water Act maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)) are present, the MDEQ will determine the appropriate corrective action concentration on a contaminant by contaminant basis. In no event, except with regard to a background chemical concentration, may either (1) the cumulative (total) site carcinogenic risk exceed 1 x 10-4 for carcinogenic CoCs or (2) the site hazard index (summation of hazard quotients) exceed 3 for non-carcinogenic CoCs affecting the same organ or organ system without the use of both an engineering control and an institutional control.
B. Tier 2 Evaluation Options
(1) Tier 2 Evaluation is a more in-depth evaluation of site-specific conditions beyond the Tier 1 Evaluation methodology. The Tier 2 Evaluation may include, but is not limited to, an evaluation of site-specific conditions by:
(a) determining the Upper Confidence Limit (UCL) of the Mean for a CoC utilizing statistical methods and comparing the UCL to the Tier 1 TRGs,
(b) comparing EPCs to calculated background chemical concentrations,
(c) comparing EPCs to calculated regionally prevalent chemical concentrations,
(d) utilizing site-specific variables (i.e., exposure frequency, exposure duration, etc.) to calculate site-specific RGs,
(e) eliminating or minimizing exposure to contaminants,
(e) conducting an analysis of Petroleum Hydrocarbons using TPH
Fractioning, or
(f) utilizing other methods approved by MDEQ.
(1) Statistical Methods - If the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the UCL of the Mean for a CoC utilizing statistical methods is less than the Tier 1 TRG for that CoC, this calculated value may be used instead of the highest CoC concentration. The UCL of the Mean is then compared to the Tier 1 TRG to evaluate remedial options. The Applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the data are statistically normal or can be statistically normalized
(i) The methodology used to determine the UCL of the Mean should be conducted in accordance with the EPA's Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term (EPA, 992a), or another method approved by MDEQ.
(2) Site Background - CoC concentrations may be compared to site background chemical concentrations to evaluate appropriate remedial actions at the Site.
(i) To establish background chemical concentrations, the Brownfield Applicant may collect samples from locations outside of the influence of known contaminated areas and regionally prevalent chemicals (both vertically and horizontally), as approved by MDEQ and must analyze these samples using the same analytical methods as the CoC analyses.
(ii) If the Applicant can establish that the background chemical concentration of a CoC is higher than the Tier 1 TRG concentration for that CoC listed in Appendix A, the Applicant shall have the option of using the background chemical concentration as the Remedial Goal (RG).
(iii) Remediation of a CoC above its established background chemical concentration will not be necessary.
(iv) The methodology used to determine background chemical concentrations in soil shall be conducted in accordance with EPA's Engineering Forum Issue: Determination of Background Concentrations of Inorganics in Soils and Sediments at Hazardous Waste Sites (EPA/540/S-96/500),
December 1995, or another method approved by MDEQ.
(v) The methodology used to determine background chemical concentrations in groundwater shall be conducted in accordance with EPA's Guidance Document on the Statistical Analysis of Ground-Water Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities (EPA/530/SW-89/026), April 1989, or another method approved by MDEQ.
(3) Regionally Prevalent Chemicals - CoC concentrations may be compared to regionally prevalent chemical concentrations to evaluate appropriate remedial actions at the Site.
(i) To establish regionally prevalent chemical concentrations, the Brownfield Applicant may collect samples from locations throughout a substantial geographic region and outside the influence of known contaminated areas, as approved by MDEQ, and must analyze these samples using the same analytical methods as the CoC analyses.
(ii) If the Applicant can establish that the concentration of a CoC is higher than the concentration of a regionally prevalent chemical, the Applicant shall have the option of using the concentration of the regionally prevalent chemical as the Remedial Goal (RG) provided
(a) the cumulative (total) site carcinogenic risk does not exceed 1 x 10-4 for all on-site carcinogenic CoCs and
(b) the site hazard index (summation of hazard quotients) does not exceed 3 for all on-site non- carcinogenic CoCs that affect the same organ or organ system.
(iii) The methodology used to determine regionally prevalent chemical concentrations in soil shall be conducted in accordance with EPA's Engineering Forum Issue: Determination of Background Concentrations of Inorganics in Soils and Sediments at Hazardous Waste Sites (EPA/540/S-96/500), December 1995, or another method approved by MDEQ.
(iv) The methodology used to determine regionally prevalent chemical concentrations in groundwater shall be conducted in accordance with EPA's Guidance Document on the
Statistical Analysis of Ground-Water Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities (EPA/530/SW-89/026), April 1989, or another method approved by MDEQ.
(4) Site-Specific Variables - If the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that site-specific variables (i.e., exposure duration, exposure frequency, moisture content, etc.) are more representative of site conditions than the default variables utilized in the development of the Tier 1 TRGs, the Applicant may modify site-specific variables in the risk calculation to develop RGs for the CoCs. Chemical-specific values (i.e., Henry's law constant, diffusivity in water, etc.) must be taken from EPA's Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document (EPA/540/R-95/128), May 1996, unless otherwise approved by MDEQ. The Applicant shall not adjust the following variables in the development of site- specific RGs in Tier 2:
(i) Oral cancer slope factor;
(ii) Inhalation cancer slope factor;
(iii) Oral chronic reference dose;
(iv) Inhalation chronic reference dose;
(v) Target excess individual lifetime cancer risk;
(vi) Target hazard index;
(vii) Body weight, adult; or
(viii) Body weight, child.
(5) Eliminate/Minimize Exposure Routes - If the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that land-use restrictions and engineering controls at the site will eliminate all complete exposure pathways or will minimize contamination exposure to levels that will be protective of human health and the environment, MDEQ may determine that further remediation is not required. The Commission considers the presence of free product to be an unacceptable potential risk to public health and the environment because it is considered to be a continuing source of contamination that may increase the level of risk that is the basis for the remediation requirements, may reduce the margin of safety provided by the remediation design, or may jeopardize the permanence of the Brownfield Agreement. Therefore, free product
must be removed unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of MDEQ that removal of the free product is technically impracticable. The Applicant must also demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the contamination is confined and will remain confined within the site boundaries. Any monitoring plan must be approved by MDEQ.
(6) TPH Fractioning - In areas where concentrations of Tier 1 petroleum hydrocarbon indicator compounds are not quantifiable to the Tier 1 TRGs and where the concentrations of TPH exceed the Tier 1 TRG for TPH-GRO/DRO, the Brownfield Applicant may either (1) conduct a more detailed evaluation of petroleum Hydrocarbons using the methodology outlined in Rule 2.2.7 of this Subchapter or (2) conduct an evaluation of TPH utilizing another methodology approved by MDEQ.
(7) Other Approved Methods - MDEQ may approve other risk evaluation methodologies or combinations thereof under Tier 2.
(2) MDEQ may consider utilizing the Method Detection Limit (MDL) as the site-specific Remediation Goal (RG) on a case by case basis.
(3) References for any fate and transport models used for the exposure point calculations (EPA-approved model or models that have been peer reviewed by experts in the modeling field) and all input values and assumptions for the models must be provided to and approved by MDEQ.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.5 Tier 3 Evaluation
A. Tier 3 Evaluation Target Risk Level
(1) Human Health
(a) The remediation goal (RG) for each individual contaminant which is a carcinogen must be calculated to attain a Risk Level of 10 -6 (i.e., 1 in a million) or which is a systemic toxicant must be calculated to attain a total hazard quotient of not more than 1, except with regard to a background chemical concentration or a regionally prevalent chemical concentration. In cases where contaminants with corrective action concentrations established through federal and/or state programs (i.e., Safe Drinking Water Act maximum contaminant levels (MCLs)) are present, the MDEQ will determine the appropriate corrective action concentration on a
contaminant by contaminant basis. In no event, except with regard to a background chemical concentration, may either:
(1) the cumulative (total) site carcinogenic risk exceed 1 x 10 -4
for carcinogenic CoCs or
(2) the site hazard index (summation of hazard quotients) exceed 3 for non-carcinogenic CoCs affecting the same organ or organ system.
(b) The MDEQ may consider an alternative quantitative or qualitative remediation goal (RG) for each individual contaminant, provided the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the attainment of (1) a Risk Level of 10 -6 for each individual carcinogenic contaminant or a total hazard quotient of not more than 1 for each individual systemic toxicant is technically impracticable, except with regard to a background chemical concentration or a regionally prevalent chemical concentration.
(c) The Site risk levels shall be based on high-end exposure (use of high-end values for the exposure point concentration and exposure duration parameters) in the intake calculation of a deterministic risk assessment or 90th percentile of the risk presented in the probabilistic risk assessment. The Site hazard indices and/or quotients shall be based on high-end exposure in a deterministic risk assessment or 90th percentile of the exposure presented in the probabilistic risk assessment.
(2) Ecological
(a) For a Tier 3 Ecological Evaluation, one of the following must be satisfied:
(1) High-end CoC concentrations in the impacted media must be below their respective threshold concentrations or regulatory values that are protective of the ecological receptors of concern or the valued resources to be protected;
(2) Findings from a field survey indicate that there is no readily apparent harm at the site or notable difference (at 95% confidence level) between the site and the potentially impacted ecological receptors;
(3) Individual hazard quotients estimated for the ecological receptors of concern, valued natural resources, or their surrogate species are below unity (1) for each CoC; or
(4) Additional ecological risk evaluations performed under the MDEQ approved work plan conclude that the potential ecological risk is insignificant or readily recoverable.
B. Tier 3 Evaluation (Risk Assessment) Procedures
(1) The Applicant may choose to conduct a site-specific risk assessment (Tier 3), develop and meet site-specific RGs, and have the site-specific RGs approved by MDEQ. This Tier 3 option may entail additional costs to the applicant for MDEQ to subcontract the review of the toxicological and/or risk assessment evaluation. These additional costs shall be paid by the Applicant.
(2) For a human health evaluation of the site or areas within the site (if the site characterization data support such area delineations), the Applicant shall perform risk characterization and present information on risk assessment uncertainty in accordance with the following options:
(a) Deterministic risk assessment according to RAGS - Part A methodology (high-end risk and hazard).
(b) Deterministic risk assessment according to RAGS - Part A (high-end and average risk and hazard).
(c) Probabilistic risk assessment according to EPA's Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis (EPA/630/R-97/001) or RAGS - Part E methodology to provide probability density function [PDF] for identifying and 90th percentile risk and hazard.
(d) Population cancer risk characterization based on the product of average site carcinogenic risk for an individual and the projected number of exposed individuals. Population non-cancer hazard characterization will be based on the projected number of individuals who are likely to be exposed resulting in the hazard index for each specified systemic effect exceeding one (1).
(3) The human health evaluation report shall include, at a minimum, four components: hazard identification, toxicity assessment, exposure assessment, and characterization of risk and uncertainty.
(a) Hazard identification - This component presents the site history, area(s) where releases have occurred, and the identified site-related chemicals (i.e., CoCs). Site data shall be compiled at the 95% UCL of the mean and compared with the 95% UCL of the mean background data to establish whether the concentration for a detected chemical is above or below background level.
(b) Toxicity assessment - This component requires the identification of CoCs as carcinogenic, non-carcinogenic (causing systemic effects), or both. Toxicity values used in the risk assessment are slope factors and reference doses and must be obtained from:
(1) EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS),
(2) Health Effects and Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST),
(3) Toxicological Profiles prepared by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), and
(4) Other peer-reviewed reference sources or literature approved by MDEQ.
(c) Exposure Assessment - This component estimates the type and magnitude of exposures to the CoCs that are present at or migrating from the Site. The results of the exposure assessment are combined with chemical- specific toxicity information to characterize potential risks. The general procedure for conducting an exposure assessment is outlined in Chapter 6 of RAGS.
(d) Characterization of Risk and Uncertainty - This section describes the final step of the health risk assessment process. In this step, the toxicity and exposure assessments are summarized and integrated into quantitative and qualitative expressions of risk. Major assumptions, scientific judgments, and, to the extent possible, estimates of the uncertainties embodied in the assessment are also presented.
(4) Non-carcinogens that act on the same organ systems can be identified in Table 2, EPA's Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document (EPA/540/R- 95/128) or Appendix A, Tables E, Title 35 Illinois Administrative Code Part 742, as amended. The Applicant must identify the uncertainty associated with each toxicity value. Toxicity values with a high degree of uncertainty should not be used in the risk assessment.
(5) The Applicant shall provide information on the CoC exposure point concentrations (EPCs), activities, and exposure routes that lead to exposure. Site- specific information in combination with relevant information found in EPA's Exposure Factors Handbook (Volumes I, II, and III, EPA's National Center for Environmental Assessment, March 1998), AIHC's Exposure Factors Sourcebook, or other peer-reviewed literature approved by MDEQ may be used to assess exposure. At a minimum, the exposure assessment shall include:
(a) a SCEM to provide the basis for determining which exposure pathways are complete; and
(b) specific input values and their basis (references) for exposure parameters such as the exposure frequency (days per year), duration (number of years), and absorption factors.
(6) Carcinogenic risk and non-carcinogenic hazard posed by the CoCs shall be estimated for the Site or areas within the Site where past releases have occurred. Risks from all complete exposure pathways (i.e., incidental ingestion, dermal contact, inhalation of volatiles or particulates), and contaminated on-site food sources (indirect exposure) shall be characterized, as identified in the SCEM.
(a) Carcinogenic risks from individual CoCs for all complete exposure pathways shall be summed to provide the total site carcinogenic risk (cumulative excess lifetime cancer risk to an individual).
(b) Non-carcinogenic hazards (hazard quotients) from individual CoCs that act on the same organ or organ system for all complete exposure pathways shall be summed to provide the site hazard indices.
(7) The following risk assessment protocols shall be followed for assessing special chemicals or categories of chemicals, unless otherwise approved by MDEQ:
(a) Chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans - The evaluation of chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans must be consistent with EPA Region IV's Human Health Risk Assessment Bulletins: Supplement to RAGS (http://www.epa.gov/region04/waste/ots/healtbul.htm).
(b) Lead and lead-based compounds - For the assessment of risk to children (if such receptors are reasonably anticipated to be present under the current and future use scenarios), the EPA's Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model (IEUBK) (EPA/540/R-93/081) shall be used. If adults are the receptors, the Adult Lead Model published in the "Recommendations of the Technical Review Workgroup for Lead for an Interim Approach to Assessing Risks Associated with Adult Exposures to Lead in Soil" (December 1996) by the EPA Technical Review Workgroup (TRW) shall be used to assess the hazard of lead exposure.
(c) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) - The evaluation of PAHs must be consistent with EPA Region IV's Human Health Risk Assessment Bulletins: Supplement to RAGS (http://www.epa.gov/region04/waste/ots/healtbul.htm).
(d) Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) – A slope factor of 7.7 (mg/kg/day)-1 shall be used for total PCBs. If congener-specific or group-specific (mono-
through deca-chlorinated) biphenyls are analyzed and quantified using Modified EPA Method 1668, the slope factor to be used will be 2.0 (mg/kg/day)-1 for tri-, tetra-, penta-, hexa-, and hepta-chlorinated PCBs. Slope factors lower than 2.0 (mg/kg/day)-1may be used if there are low concentrations of 2,3,7,8-substituted PCBs). The lowestslope factor of 0.4 (mg/kg/day)-1 can be used if 2,3,7,8-substituted PCBs are not present. The Applicant shall bear the burden of providing documentation to MDEQ to justify using slope factors lower than 7.7 (mg/kg/day) -1 in the risk assessment report.
(e) Radioactive materials or radionuclides - The risk assessment of radioactive materials shall be in accordance with Chapter 10 of RAGS - Part A. Other methodologies (e.g., dose reconstruction for exposure assessment) shall be approved by MDEQ on a case-by-case basis.
C. Tier 3 Ecological Risk Evaluation Procedures
(1) For the entire Site or areas within the Site (if the site physical characteristics support delineations of different ecosystems), the Applicant shall perform screening and/or more in-depth ecological risk evaluations and present uncertainty associated with the evaluations in accordance with the following options:
(a) Identify the ecological receptors of concern and compare CoC concentrations in the potentially impacted media with their respective benchmark or threshold values that are protective of the receptors of ecological concern. The initial screening levels and procedures are available in the EPA Region 4 Ecological Risk Assessment Bulletins— Supplement to RAGS (http://www.epa.gov/region04/waste/ots/ecolbul.htm).
(b) Additional ecological benchmark values are available from EPA (e.g., Office of Technical Services Supplemental Guidance to RAGs: Region IV), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration, or other values in peer-reviewed literature, as appropriate.
(c) Conduct biological field surveys for species diversity and abundance in the potentially impacted area and a reference (background) area and compare both survey results to determine whether there are significant differences at 95% level of confidence.
(d) Identify assessment and measurement endpoints and perform a deterministic risk evaluation on the receptors of ecological concern or their indicator species by the hazard quotient method.
(e) Perform additional ecological risk evaluations based on an MDEQ- approved work plan submitted by the Applicant that is consistent with the EPA's Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment guidance and its subsequent update.
(2) A deterministic risk evaluation shall include a minimum of four components: problem formulation, ecological effects assessment, exposure assessment, and characterization of risk and uncertainty.
(a) Problem formulation - This component presents the site history (including documented incidents of readily apparent harm), physical characteristics, area(s) where releases have occurred, and identified site- related chemicals (i.e., CoCs).This component also proposes and provides the rationale for identifying any ecological receptors of concern and valued resources present on site that may be impacted by the CoCs. The basis for assessment and measurement endpoint(s) selection should be provided to MDEQ.
(b) Ecological effects assessment - This component requires the identification of potential or known acute and chronic toxic effects of the CoCs on the ecological receptors of concern, valued resources, and any surrogate species proposed as the measurement endpoints. Dose-response data shall be obtained from EPA data bases or other federal/state databases approved by MDEQ.
(c) Exposure assessment - This component presents the SCEM and explains how the CoCs are released, transported, bioconcentrated or biomagnified in organisms, and exposed to the ecological receptors of concern or valued resources to be protected. Where appropriate, behavior patterns or reasonable assumptions should be used to estimate daily intake of the CoCs.
(d) Characterization of risk and uncertainty - This component shall present the risk assessment results and the underlying uncertainty associated with the assessment method employed. If a quotient method is used, the hazard quotients shall be estimated for the ecological receptors of concern or their surrogates. Risk may be characterized qualitatively by the weight-of- evidence approach based on professional judgment. This component should identify types and magnitude of potential effects anticipated, the spatial and temporal extent of the effects, significance of the effects on the ecosystems, and recovery potential.
(3) A Tier 3 ecological risk evaluation shall be presented in the following report format: problem formulation, approach and rationale, and presentation of results, uncertainties, and recommendations. In interpreting these evaluation findings, the Applicant should consider the effects of natural succession, non-site related
impacts (e.g., farm or urban runoff), and seasonal changes on the data or observations collected. The report format may vary based on MDEQ requirements of the ecological risk evaluation work plan.
D. Tier 3 Risk Assessment Data Requirements
(1) The basic procedure for the assessment of human health and ecological receptors of concern for a Tier 3 risk assessment shall be to obtain representative site characterization data in order to perform a screening or more in-depth risk assessment. Specific requirements for performing a Tier 3 risk assessment include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Site characterization data shall be obtained in accordance with the MDEQ- approved Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP). The Applicant must demonstrate that the Site has been adequately characterized to delineate the nature and extent of contamination. The scope of the site investigation shall be based on the considerations set forth below.
(1) Previous field investigations should be used to define the SCEM and identify data gaps or uncertainty for the nature and extent of the site characterization under this site investigation phase.
(2) Field analytical data may be used to identify areas of contamination and to supplement fixed-laboratory analyses if the Applicant can demonstrate that the field analytical data are comparable to fixed laboratory data by regression or co-relational analyses and meet DQO requirements for precision, accuracy, and reproducibility. A minimum of 10% of the collected samples shall be fixed-laboratory data to demonstrate correlation. Samples must be collected from the areas exhibiting the highest field concentrations and analyzed at a fixed laboratory.
(3) Areas with distinct high concentrations of site-related chemicals shall be segregated from other areas for data compilation purposes. Additional field characterization of high-concentration areas or areas with buried wastes is necessary to support remedial design.
(4) The RAGS procedure for the selection of CoCs shall be followed to properly characterize the Site. The Applicant should exclude background chemicals, laboratory and field contaminants or artifacts, and chemicals that are essential nutrients present at or below the recommended daily allowance intake levels.
(5) All reported data shall be in compliance with the DQOs established in the QAPP. In addition to data review, the data will be validated by a qualified technical individual, familiar with data validation, at
the rate of at least 10% or as otherwise specified by MDEQ. The Applicant shall provide data review and validation summaries in the Site Characterization Report.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.6 Risk-Based Remediation
A. Risk-Based Remediation Goals
(1) Risk-based remediation goals (RGs) may be quantitative for chemical-specific RGs or qualitative for remedial action-specific RGs. The methodology for quantifying the chemical-specific RGs involves solving for the concentration term given a defined risk level in a deterministic or probabilistic risk assessment and shall be proposed for the principal threat chemicals or all CoCs if the principal threat chemicals cannot be identified. The chemical-specific RG may be modified upward or downward based on risk management considerations by MDEQ. A qualitative RG is established by describing the objectives for engineering controls that reduce site risk to an acceptable level. Risk-based remediation goals shall accompany the proposed remedial action(s) in the Site Characterization Report and/or the Corrective Action Plan (CAP).
(2) Quantitative RG - Site-specific information that is relevant to the future use of the Site shall be used in the risk methodology.
(a) The derived value shall not be higher than the soil saturation limit (Csat) for the soil or sediment RG for a CoC with a melting point less than 30 degrees Celsius. The derived value shall not be higher than the solubility limit (Csol) for the groundwater RG for groundwater. At sites where a mixture of contaminants is present (e.g., gasoline), the effective solubility limit may be used if required by MDEQ. Values for Csat and Csol may be found or derived from equations in EPA's Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document (EPA/540/R-95/128), May 1996 or other reference approved by MDEQ.
(b) The derived chemical-specific RG for a carcinogen for the protection of human health shall be:
(1) the MCL value,
(2) a value derived using the acceptable carcinogenic risk level of 1x10 -6 , or
(3) a value defined in state/federal programs and approved by MDEQ.
(c) The derived chemical-specific RG for a non-carcinogen for the protection of human health shall be:
(1) the MCL value,
(2) a value derived using the acceptable hazard quotient level of unity (1), or a value defined in state/federal programs and approved by MDEQ.
(d) The MDEQ may consider an alternative quantitative or qualitative remediation goal (RG) for each individual contaminant, provided the Applicant can demonstrate to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the attainment of (1) a Risk Level of 10 -6 for each individual carcinogenic contaminant or (2) a total hazard quotient of not more than 1 for each individual systemic toxicant is technically impracticable except with regard to a background chemical concentration or a regionally prevalent chemical. In no event, except with regard to a background chemical concentration, may either (1) the cumulative (total) site carcinogenic risk exceed 1x10 -4 for carcinogenic CoCs or (2) the site hazard index (summation of hazard quotients) exceed 3 for non-carcinogenic CoCs affecting the same organ or organ system.
(e) Any of the following methods may be used to derive chemical- specific quantitative RGs in soil or sediment to protect human health:
(1) algorithms or methodology employed by MDEQ in deriving the TRGs in appendix A of this Subpart II;
(2) algorithms or methodology employed by EPA Region III (Technical and Program Support Branch, 3HW70) to derive the Risk-Based Concentrations (RBCs);
(3) algorithms or methodology employed by EPA (Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response) to derive the SSLs using EPA's Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document (EPA/540/R-95/128), May 1996;
(4) algorithms or methodology employed by the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) to derive the Risk-Based Screening Levels (RBSLs) (Emergency Standard Guide ES 38-94); or
(5) other EPA published or peer-reviewed methodologies that have been reviewed and approved by MDEQ.
Note: All input/default values must be approved by MDEQ prior to employing any of the above methodologies.
(f) Fate and transport modeling and/or the use of a dilution- attenuation factor (DAF) to determine migration-to-groundwater soil RGs approved by MDEQ may be used to demonstrate that the concentrations of CoCs at the source area provide adequate protection of human health and the environment at the Site boundary, except when it appears that free product is present.
(g) The acceptable level of a CoC in groundwater at the Site boundary is its groundwater RG or if the boundary is a surface water body, the water quality criteria published by MDEQ, whichever is lower.
(h) Any of the following methods may be used to derive chemical-specific quantitative RGs in groundwater:
(1) algorithms or methodology employed by MDEQ in deriving the TRGs in Appendix A of this Subchapter II;
(2) algorithms or methodology employed by EPA Region IX (Technical Support Team, DFD-8-B) to derive the Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs); or
(3) other EPA published or peer-reviewed methodologies that have been reviewed and approved by MDEQ.
(i) The quotient method may be used to derive quantitative RGs for the protection of an ecological receptor of concern.
(j) The following methods may be used to derive chemical-specific quantitative RGs in soil and sediment for protection of an ecological receptor of concern:
(1) algorithms or methodology described in the Risk Assessment Handbook, Volume 2 - Environmental Evaluation (EM 200-1-4) developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; or
(2) other EPA published or peer-reviewed methodologies that have been reviewed and approved by MDEQ.
(3) Qualitative RG - A qualitative RG shall define objectives and describe how land- use restrictions and/or engineering controls are expected to reduce site risk to an acceptable level. The following information shall be presented:
(a) complete exposure pathway that contribute to human health or
environmental risk;
(b) the CoC or principal threat chemical and its background concentrations;
(c) physical, chemical, and fate and transport properties of the CoC or principal threat chemical (including the potential for adsorption and monitored natural attenuation);
(d) presence of any man-made or natural conveyances, conduits, or transport routes from the source to the receptor location;
(e) Potential engineering controls that will exclude the exposure pathway based on treatability study data and/or practical experience may also be considered. Engineering controls may include physical or hydraulic control measures, but shall not include the exclusive use of security fencing. Typical engineering controls are presented below and the Applicant may propose alternative controls for MDEQ approval.
(1) groundwater recovery trenches and leachate collection systems;
(2) groundwater extraction (pumpage) and treatment systems;
(3) engineered caps with or without liner systems;
(4) slurry walls, funnel-and-gate barrier walls, bio-polymer walls, or any modifications thereof; and
(5) permanent structures such as building, driveways, and paved roads.
(4) No further action at the Site shall be based on obtaining either the quantitative or qualitative RGs, or both, and/or other terms and conditions stipulated by MDEQ (i.e., Brownfield Agreement, Corrective Action Plan). The Applicant has the option to propose either type of RGs or a combination of the two for delineated areas of the Site, depending on the site-specific factors, chemical data, and risk management considerations approved by the MDEQ. The following criteria shall be met for this determination:
(a) The remedial action has achieved the chemical-specific RGs based on verification sampling and analyses at the point of exposure or at the contaminated source area. The 95% UCL of the normalized verification sample data must be less that the chemical-specific RG.
(b) The engineered control measures proposed by the Applicant and approved by MDEQ completed.
(c) The groundwater quality at the Site boundary shall not exceed MCLs or
risk-based TRGs for groundwater identified in Appendix A. The Point of Compliance is the Site Boundary.
(d) Free product must be removed from the Site, unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of MDEQ that removal of the free product is technically impracticable and that the contamination is confined and will remain confined within the Site boundaries. Free product is considered to exist if:
(1) concentrations in soil exceed Csat for CoCs with a melting point of less than 30 degrees Celsius;
(2) concentrations in groundwater exceed Csol for any CoC or the effective Csol or
(3) measurable using best available technologies.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.2.7 Petroleum Hydrocarbons
A. Introduction
(1) Specific procedures and evaluation criteria have been developed for sites with petroleum hydrocarbon contamination. This criteria has been developed to simplify the contaminant analyses required to characterize the site and to establish site-specific remediation goals (RGs). Petroleum hydrocarbon indicator compounds (i.e., Benzene, Toluene, PAHs, etc.) may not be quantifiable at the Tier 1 TRG Table concentrations because high petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations in the sample may cause analytical interferences resulting in either of the following:
(a) Dilution of the extract, which would cause elevated detection limits and useless surrogate recovery data; and/or
(b) Inaccurate compound identification and quantification, due to a poor peak separation or an elevated baseline during chromatography.
(2) In addition, of the 250 individual compounds identified in petroleum, only 95 have toxicity data. Of these 95 compounds with toxicity data, only 25 have sufficient data to develop toxicity criteria. The interactive effects of all compounds present in TPH cannot be determined by data on 25 individual compounds. Therefore, to account for these unknowns, as well as to account for instances as described in Rule 2.2.7(A)(1), these procedures have been developed.
(3) To evaluate human health and environmental risks specific to a Site under the circumstances in Rule 2.2.7(A)(1)(a) and (b), MDEQ has developed procedures for petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated Sites.
B. Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation Procedures
(1) The Applicant shall utilize the procedures presented herein for the evaluation of potential human health and environmental risks from petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and groundwater.
(2) A Tier 1 Evaluation of indicator compounds of petroleum hydrocarbons and TPH is required to establish the vertical and horizontal extent of indicator compound concentrations and TPH below the unrestricted values of the Tier 1 TRG Table.
(3) A Site Ecological Checklist must be completed.
(4) Petroleum-impacted soil and groundwater shall be assessed using the petroleum hydrocarbon indicator compounds, TPH-GRO, and TPH-DRO as presented in Appendix B, Table 1. Petroleum hydrocarbon categories presented in Appendix B, Table 1 represent typical hydrocarbon products. The Applicant shall correlate the site-specific hydrocarbon release and/or knowledge of the released hydrocarbon product to the appropriate category listed in Appendix B, Table 1. If the specific product that has been released is unknown, then a complete analytical evaluation must be conducted.
(5) The Applicant shall perform soil and groundwater laboratory testing for the following indicator compounds:
(a) Volatile Organic Compounds, including MTBE by SW-846 Method 8260B, or other Method approved by MDEQ.
(b) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) by Method 8310, with appropriate sample extraction, clean-up and instrumental finish. Analysis to be conducted for the PAHs listed in Appendix B, Table 1, or other Method approved by MDEQ.
(c) Metals
by SW-846 Method 6010, 6020, or the appropriate 7000 series, or other Method approved by MDEQ.
(d) Methyl ethyl ketone
by SW-846 Method 8260B, or other Method approved by MDEQ.
(e) Methyl isobutyl ketone
by SW-846 Method 8260B, or other Method approved by MDEQ.
Note:
All soil samples collected for VOC analysis must be collected in a manner consistent with MDEQ's Guidance for Collecting Volatile Organic Compounds in Soil, unless otherwise approved by MDEQ.
When suspected to be present.
(6) Although lead (organic and inorganic) has not been used as a gasoline additive for some time (since the late 1970's to early 1980's), there may be sites where lead (organic and inorganic) may be present due to historical activities on the Site. At sites where lead is suspected to be present as a potential site-related compound, inorganic lead and organic lead (specifically tetraethyl lead) must be identified as target analytes by appropriate analytical methods approved by MDEQ.
C. Tier 1 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation
(1) A Tier 1 Evaluation of indicator compounds of petroleum hydrocarbons, TPH- GRO, and TPH-DRO is required to establish the extent of indicator compound concentrations and TPH-GRO/DRO below the Tier 1 TRG Table.
(2) Results of the indicator compound analysis, TPH-GRO, and TPH-DRO shall be compared with the TRGs presented in the Tier 1 TRG Table in Appendix A utilizing the Tier 1 Evaluation Procedures outlined in Rule 2.2.3.B of this Subchapter 2.
(3) The Applicant shall address a hydrocarbon release using TPH analyses using SW- 846 Method 8015B or other Method approved by MDEQ and by analyzing the indicator compounds as described in Rule 2.2.7.A.
(4) In areas of the site where the indicator compounds cannot be quantified to the Tier 1 Target Remedial Goal concentrations, the Applicant has the option of either:
(a) conducting a Tier 1 Evaluation utilizing the Tier 1 Evaluation Procedures outlined in Rule 2.2.3.B of this Subchapter 2 for TPH-GRO and TPH- DRO;
(b) conducting a Tier 2 Evaluation using TPH Fractioning; or
(c) conducting a Tier 3 Evaluation using methods approved by MDEQ.
D. Tier 2 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation - TPH Fractioning
(1) A Tier 2 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation is primarily utilized in cases as described in Rule 2.2.7.A of this Subchapter 2 where indicator compound concentrations cannot be determined due to dilution and interference and where the concentrations of TPH-GRO/DRO exceed the restricted Tier 1 TRG levels for TPH-GRO/DRO. Along with the required comparison of indicator compounds as described in 2.2.7.C(2) of this Subchapter 2, the Applicant shall have the option
of utilizing the TPH Carbon Fraction TRGs in Table 2 of Appendix B.
(2) Massachusetts Method
(a) The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) VPH/EPH Approach may be utilized to evaluate petroleum hydrocarbons under Tier 2. This method quantifies the total petroleum hydrocarbon fractions into collective aliphatic and aromatic ranges. To account for the hydrocarbon ranges present in contaminated media, MADEP's Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbon (VPH) method and Extractible Petroleum Hydrocarbon (EPH) method have been developed. A detailed description of the MADEP VPH/EPH Approach may be found on the MADEP Web Site at (http://www.state.ma.us/dep/bwsc/vph_eph.htm).
(b) The following principles form the basis for this approach:
(1) Petroleum products are comprised mainly of aliphatic/alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbon compounds.
(2) Aromatic hydrocarbons appear to be more toxic than aliphatic compounds.
(3) The toxicity of aliphatic compounds appear to be related to their carbon number/molecular weight.
(c) Under this approach, the non-cancer toxicity of petroleum contaminated soil or water has been established by
(1) determining the collective concentrations of specified ranges of aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, and
(2) assigning a toxicity value to each range. Well-characterized compounds within specified ranges have been selected as "surrogate" indicators to define the toxicity of the entire range.
Toxicological Approach for Non-Carcinogens Hydrocarbon Fraction Analytical Fraction Analytical Method Surrogate Compound Reference Dose (mg/kg/d) C
-C
Aliphatics C
-C
VPH n-Hexane 0.06 C
-C
Aliphatics C
-C
C
-C
VPH EPH n-Nonane n-Nonane 0.06 0.06 C
-C
Aliphatics C
-C
EPH Eicosane 6.0
C
-C
Aromatics C
-C
C
-C
VPH EPH Pyrene Pyrene 0.03 0.03
(d) Carcinogenic and additional non-carcinogenic effects must be evaluated for the indicator constituents listed in Table 1 of Appendix B.
(e) The EPH method separates the TPH Carbon Ranges (Fractions) into 3 sub-fractions and indicator PAH compounds. The VPH method separates the GRO Carbon Ranges (Fractions) into 3 sub-fractions and indicator compounds (i.e., BTEX, MTBE and naphthalene).
(f) The VPH Method is a Purge and Trap, GC/PID/FID procedure and the EPH Method is a solvent extraction/fractionation GC/FID procedure.
(g) The unrestricted TRGs listed in Table 2 of Appendix B have been adopted by MDEQ and correlate with the GW-1 groundwater zone the S-1 soil zone as defined by MADEP.
(h) The restricted TRGs listed in Table 2 of Appendix B have been adopted by MDEQ and correlate to the GW-1 groundwater zone and the S-3 soil zone as defined by MADEP.
(i) The Applicant must ensure and provide documentation to MDEQ that the Laboratory conducting the MADEP VPH/EPH Methodology is equipped to so do and will utilize appropriate Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) as required by this methodology.
(3) MDEQ may approve other TPH risk evaluation methodologies (e.g., TPHWG Methodology) or combinations thereof under Tier 2.
E. Tier 3 Petroleum Hydrocarbon Evaluation
(1) Alternative petroleum hydrocarbon Remedial Goals (RGs) may be established using a Tier 3 Risk Assessment approach. The alternative RGs shall be reviewed and approved or disapproved by MDEQ on a case-by-case basis.
References
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), Standard Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at Petroleum Release Sites (ASTM E 1739-95), 1995.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), Toxicological Profile for Mineral Oil Hydraulic Fluids, Organophosphate Ester Hydraulic Fluids, and Polyalphaolefin
Hydraulic Fluids, 1994.
Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, Characterizing Risk posed by Petroleum Contaminated Sites: Implementation of MADEP VPH/EPH Approach, 1996.
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, April 1998, Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (Proposed), April 1998.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Handbook of RCRA Ground-Water Monitoring Constituents, Chemical and Physical Properties, 40 CFR Part 264, Appendix 9. September 1992.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Soil Screening Guidance: Technical Background Document (EPA/540/R-95/128), May 1996.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term, EPA 1992, 9285.7-081 (EPA, 1992a).
SUBCHAPTER 3. REVOLVING LOAN FUND
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.1 Revolving Loan Fund – General
A. Introduction
MDEQ has been awarded a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) § 104(k) Brownfield Revolving Loan Fund (BRLF) Grant by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). MDEQ may receive supplemental funding from EPA each year up until the initial grant award is closed. Upon closeout of the initial grant, MDEQ may apply for and receive subsequent BRLF grants from EPA. The BRLF may receive monies from additional federal, state, or private resources. BRLF grant funds shall be used to issue funds in the form of loans and/or subgrants to Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (MCEQ or Commission)-approved Brownfield Parties for the purpose of remediating brownfield sites and for administrative and other costs associated with administering the BRLF program. All program income and repayments of BRLF loan funds shall be used for future BRLF loans and/or subgrants for brownfield site(s) remediation and for administrative and other programmatic costs until closeout of a grant award in which all funds revolved under that grant may be eligible for other brownfield site activities in accordance with the EPA closeout agreement.
B. Purpose
The purpose of these regulations is to establish a BRLF Program for providing loans and/or subgrants to eligible applicants for the cleanup of eligible brownfield sites.
These regulations establish the loan and subgrant application requirements in conjunction with EPA grant terms and conditions under CERCLA § 104(k) (as amended) and the MDEQ Brownfield Program as established in Miss. Admin. Code Title 11, Part 3, Chapter 2 et. seq.
C. Definitions
Applicant. For this subchapter, “applicant” shall refer to a BRLF loan or subgrant applicant.
Subgrant. For this subchapter “subgrant” shall refer to funds MDEQ provides to an eligible entity or nonprofit organization under terms that do not require repayment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the EPA grant requirements.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b) and (c), 49-17-17 (d), 49-35-1, et seq., 49-17-17, 17- 17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.2 BRLF Application Requirements
A. General Requirements
-
All BRLF applicants must apply to be a Brownfield Party and must be approved for a Brownfield Agreement under Miss. Admin. Code 11, Part 3, Ch. 2 et. seq., to be eligible to receive a loan or subgrant.
-
The applicant may be a public, non-profit, or a private entity. Private entities are not eligible for subgrants.
-
The proposed site must meet the definition of a Brownfield Property as identified in Rule 2.1.1(C)(16) and as defined by federal regulations.
-
In accordance with the CERCLA § 104(k) (as amended) terms and conditions, to receive a loan or subgrant, the applicant must be non-liable for any contamination related to the proposed site as defined under CERCLA §107 (as amended)
(a) An applicant requesting a subgrant must also own the property and maintain ownership throughout the performance period of the subgrant agreement.
- Since BRLF funding is limited, loans and subgrants will be issued to eligible sites only as funding allows.
B. Procedural Requirements
- Prior to submitting a Brownfield Agreement application (as defined in Rule 2.1.2) in which a BRLF loan or subgrant will be requested, a pre-eligibility meeting shall be
scheduled with MDEQ for a determination of the proposed site’s eligibility for federal funding and the Mississippi Brownfield Program. If the site and the applicant are determined to be eligible, MDEQ will provide a financial application to the applicant.
- Final approval and award of a loan or subgrant is contingent upon the approval of a Brownfield Agreement by the MCEQ.
C. Brownfield Consulting Firm Requirement
- A Brownfield Consulting Firm as required in Rule 2.1.2(A)(9) and as defined in Rule 2.1.2(C) is required to conduct all cleanup activities as required under a MCEQ approved Brownfield Agreement.
D. Public Notice Requirements
-
A Community Involvement Plan is required by CERCLA § 104k (as amended) terms and conditions for a site receiving BRLF funding.
-
Applicants shall submit a Community Involvement Plan to MDEQ for approval prior to Public Notice as described in Rule 2.1.4.
-
Applicant shall comply with all Public Notice requirements as applicable under Rule 2.1.4(A)(2) et. seq.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b) and (c), 49-17-17 (d), 49-35-1, et seq., 49-17-17, 17- 17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.3 Decisions on Loans and Subgrants
A. Decisions on Loans and Subgrants
- The approval of a loan or subgrant shall be based on a complete financial application that must be submitted in a format prescribed by MDEQ. Prior to approval, the financial application must be complete and must contain all information required by MDEQ, including, but not limited to, information necessary to demonstrate the following:
i. That the Brownfield Party is financially viable to repay the loan or manage a subgrant for the duration of the agreement,
ii. That the Brownfield Party has or can obtain the financial, managerial, and technical resources in addition to the loan or subgrant to implement fully and complete the proposed remediation,
iii. That the Brownfield Party demonstrates the programmatic capability to meet all state and federal regulations required under the Act, these regulations, and CERCLA §104(k) (as amended) terms and conditions,
iv. That all items contained in the financial application have been addressed by either providing the required information or stating that the item is not applicable. If an item is considered not applicable, the Brownfield Party must include a written justification in the financial application that demonstrates to the satisfaction of MDEQ that the item is not applicable to the financial application, and
v. Rule 2.3.2(B)(2).
- Upon execution of the Brownfield Agreement and receipt of a certified copy of the filing of the Notice of Brownfield Agreement as required in Rule 2.1.5(B), the final BRLF loan or subgrant agreement may be executed by the Brownfield Party and MDEQ in accordance with the Mississippi Brownfields Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Act (Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq.).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b) and (c), 49-17-17 (d), 49-35-1, et seq., 49-17-17, 17- 17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.4 Loan Terms and Conditions
A. Loan Terms and Conditions
-
Interest rates for loans shall be below market rates at a negotiable duration, no greater than ten (10) years.
-
Loans and subgrants shall be issued in accordance with all CERCLA § 104k (as amended) terms and conditions and any other applicable State or Federal financial regulations as it pertains to loans and subgrants.
-
All BRLF loans shall be repaid in full in accordance with the loan terms and conditions. Events of, and remedies for, loan default will be as outlined in the BRLF loan conditions.
-
MDEQ’s initial BRLF grant award requires a cost share of 20% which may include but is not limited to “in kind” services. An applicant shall be required to provide the 20% cost share under their loan or subgrant agreement unless waived by MDEQ and EPA. Supplemental BRLF funding from EPA may not require a 20% cost share in the future, and if so, will not be required to be provided by the applicant.
-
Public entity applicants are eligible for a loan discount. The amount of loan discount is negotiable as subject to CERCLA § 104k (as amended) terms and conditions and
will be determined on a project specific basis.
- Where any of the terms and conditions herein conflict with the provisions of CERCLA § 104k (as amended), then the provisions in CERCLA § 104k (as amended) will control.
B. Cancellation of Notice of Brownfield Agreement
-
Cancellation of Notice of Brownfield Agreement shall not be executed until a BRLF loan is repaid in full or a subgrant has completed the performance period of the subgrant agreement.
-
Upon completion of a Brownfield Agreement as approved by the MCEQ in accordance Rule 2.1.7(B), a No Further Action Letter and Completion Order may be issued prior to full repayment of a loan.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b) and (c), 49-17-17 (d), 49-35-1, et seq., 49-17-17, 17- 17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 2.3.5 Insurance
Applicant may purchase insurance, including environmental insurance, if the expense is necessary to carry out cleanup activities and associated cleanup activities are carried out in accordance with the terms and conditions of the loan or subgrant.
APPENDIX A
TIER 1 TARGET REMEDIAL GOAL TABLE
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
APPENDIX B
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TABLES
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
TABLE 1
PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON INDICATOR COMPOUNDS1 Type of Release Indicator Compound Gasoline Kerosene, Jet Fuel Diesel, Light Fuel Oils Heavy Fuel Oils Crude Oil Highly Refined Base Oils2 Used Motor Oil, Lubricating Oil Unknown T TPH-GRO X X
X TPH-DRO
X X X X X X X Volatiles X X
X Acenaphthene
X X X X X X X Acenaphthylene
X X X X X X X Anthracene
X X X X X X X Benz[a]anthracene
X X X X X X X Benzo[a]pyrene
X X X X X X X Benzo[b]fluoranthene
X X X X X X X Benzo[g,h,i]perylene
X X X X X X X Benzo(k)fluoranthene
X X X X X X X Chrysene
X X X X X X X Fluoranthene
X X X X X X X Fluorene
X X X X X X X Indeno[1,2,3- c,d]pyrene
X X X X X X X 2-Methylnaphthalene
X X X X X X X Naphthalene
X X X X X X X Phenanthrene
X X X X X X X Pyrene
X X X X X X X Metals
X X Methyl tertbutyl ether X
X Methyl ethyl ketone X3
X Methyl isobutyl ketone X3
X
NOTES: 1 ASTM 1995 and TPH Criteria Working Group; for large releases additional indicator constituents may be identified for evaluation.
2 Applies to oils formulated with highly refined base oils including hydraulic fluids (Mineral-oil based hydraulic fluids, Toxicological Profile for Mineral Oil Hydraulic Fluids, Organophosphate Ester Hydraulic Fluids, and Polyalphaolefin Hydraulic Fluids, ATSDR 1994), motor oils, industrial oils, and automatic transmission fluid-type oils (i.e., severely refined base oils).
3 When suspected to be present.
TABLE 2
TIER 2 PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON TARGET REMEDIATION GOALS (TRGS) Carbon Fraction Method Groundwater (ìg/L) Soils Unrestricted (mg/kg) Soils Restricted (mg/kg) C
-C
Aliphatic 400 100 500 C
-C
Aliphatic 4,000 1,000 5,000 C
-C
Aromatic 200 100 100 C
-C
Aliphatic 200 100 5,000 C
-C
Aliphatic 5,000 2,500 5,000 C
-C
Aromatic 200 200 200
APPENDIX D
ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY BROWNFIELD VOLUNTARY CLEANUP PROGRAM ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST
Section I- Facility Information
-
Name of Facility: _______________________________________________________
-
Location of Facility: _______________________________________________________
County: _______________________________________________________
-
Mailing Address: _______________________________________________________
-
Type of Facility: _______________________________________________________
-
Describe land use at and in the vicinity of the release site _______________________
- Attach a USGS topographic map of the facility and aerial and other photographs of the release site and surrounding areas.
Section 2-Surrounding Land Use Information
-
Describe land use adjacent to the facility. ___________________________________________________________________________
-
Provide the following information regarding the nearest water body: Name of surface water body: ________________________________
Type of surface water body (pond, lake, river etc: ________________________________
- Do any potentially sensitive environmental areas exist adjacent to or in proximity to the site, e.g., Federal and State parks, National and State Monuments, wetlands, etc. ____________________________________________________________________________
Section 3 - Release Information
-
Nature of release. ________________________________
-
Location of the release (within the facility) ________________________________
-
Location of the release with respect to the facility property boundaries:
___________________________________________________________________________ 4. Chemicals of Concern (COC) known or suspected to have been released: __________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________
-
Indicate which media are known or suspected to be impacted and if sampling data are available: ____________________________________________________________________________ Soil 0-6 feet bgs yes no ____________________________________________________________________________ groundwater yes no ____________________________________________________________________________ surface water/sediment yes no ____________________________________________________________________________
-
Has migration occurred outside the facility property boundaries? yes no
If yes, describe the designated use of the land impacted: ____________________________________________________________________________
Section 4 - Criteria for Further Assessment
If the Area of Impact (AOI) meets all of the criteria presented below, then typically no further ecological evaluation shall be required. If the AOI does not meet all of the criteria, then a screening level ecological risk shall be conducted. The Submitter should make the initial decision regarding whether or not a screening level ecological risk assessment is warranted based on compliance of the AOI with criteria listed below. After review of the ecological checklist and other available site information, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality will make a final determination on the need for a screening level ecological risk assessment. If site conditions at the AOI change such that one or more of the criteria are not met, then a screening level ecological risk assessment shall be conducted.
The criteria for exclusion from further ecological assessment include:
The area of impacted soil is approximately 1 acre or less in size;
There is no current (or potential) release (via runoff or groundwater discharge) of COCs from the AOI to a surface water body;
Recreational species, commercial species, threatened or endangered species, and/or their habitats are not currently being exposed, or expected to be exposed, to COCs present at or migrating from the AOI; and
There are no obvious impacts to ecological receptors or their habitats.
Section 5 - Site Summary
The ecological checklist submittal shall include a site summary which presents sufficient information to verify that the AOI meets or does not meet the criteria for further assessment.
Section 6 - Submitter Information Date:
Name of person submitting this check list:
Affiliation:
Signature
Additional Preparers:
Part 3, Chapter 3: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality “Right-Way-To- Throw-Away Program” Regulations – Adopted February 25, 1993
TABLE OF CONTENTS ___________________________
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b) and (c), 49-17-17 (d), 49-35-1, et seq., 49-17-17, 17- 17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-35-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17, 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.1 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.2 Applicability
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.3 Application
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.4 Site Plan
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.5 Management /Operation Plan
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.6 Safety and Emergency Response Plan
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.7 Recordkeeping and Reporting Procedures
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.8 Recycling and Reuse Plan
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.9 Public Information and Education Plan
Subchapter 2 Household Hazardous Waste Program
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.1 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.2 Eligibility
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.3 Allocation of Funds
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.4 Application
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.5 Selection of Applicants for Funding
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.6 The Department May Refuse to Approve or Grant Application for Any of the Following Reasons
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.7 If Insufficient Fund are not Available for the “Right-Way-to-Throw-Away Program,” No Grant will be Awarded
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.8 Rule 3.2.8
If the Department Should Refuse to Approve a Grant Application for any Reason, the Applicant May Request a Hearing Before the Commission in Accordance with Section 49-17-35, Mississippi Code of 1972.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.9 Conditions of Grant
Subchapter 1 Household Hazardous Waste Regulation
This regulation is promulgated by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality under the authority of Mississippi Code Annotated Sections 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17- 443, and 17-17-445, Mississippi Code of 1972 (Supp. 1992).
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.1 Definitions
For the purposes of this regulation, the following words shall have the definitions ascribed herein unless the context requires otherwise:
A. “Commission” shall mean the Commission on Environmental Quality.
B. “Department” shall mean the Department of Environmental Quality.
C. “Collection contractor” shall mean a person approved by the Department and retained by a county, municipality, or multicounty agency to operate a household hazardous waste collection and management program.
D. “Household hazardous waste” shall mean any waste that would be considered hazardous under the Solid Waste Disposal Law of 1974, Section 17-17-1 et seq., Mississippi Code of 1972, or any rules or regulations promulgated thereunder, but for the fact that it is produced in quantities smaller than those regulated under such laws or regulations and is generated by persons not otherwise covered by such laws or regulations.
E. “Applicant” shall mean a county, municipality, or multicounty agency requesting to operate a household hazardous waste collection and management program.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.2 Applicability
These requirements shall apply to all applicants requesting to establish a program for the collection and management of household hazardous waste. Prior to implementation, the Department must approve and certify all proposed household hazardous waste collection and management programs.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.3 Application
A. Any person proposing to establish a program for the collection and management of household hazardous waste must submit an application to the Department. All applications shall be completed by the appropriate person at least 120 days prior to the proposed collection day or prior to the establishment of a permanent facility on forms provided by the Department.
B. Each application shall include, at a minimum, (1) a site plan, (2) a management/operations plan, (3) a health and safety plan, (4) recordkeeping and reporting procedures, (5) a recycling or reuse plan, and (6) a public information and education plan.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq..
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.4 Site Plan
The site plan shall describe all pertinent information concerning the site where the collection program will be conducted, and shall include, at the minimum, the following:
A. a description of the general characteristics and location of the site;
B. a U.S. Geological Survey map with the site location identified;
C. a detailed site map (8 ½” X 11” or larger”) indicating structure locations, access roads, property lines (the collection facility shall be a minimum of 50 feet from the property line), surface waters (the collection facility shall be a minimum of 250 feet from any surface waters), and water wells (the collection facility shall be a minimum of 250 feet from any public water well).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.5 Management/Operations Plan
A. General description
The applicant shall describe in narrative form the management and collection of the household hazardous waste collection program, discussing all pertinent aspects, including, but not necessarily limited to:
(1) day (s) and hours of operation;
(2) a listing of all waste categories that will be accepted by the facility including an estimate of the amount of waste expected to be collected by waste category;
(3) the name, address, and contact person of the collection contractor;
(4) description of the collection contractor’s previous experience, and a list of key personnel’s experience and training.
B. Material drop-off, handling, storage, and containment
The applicant shall describe the method the applicant will use to handle each waste type that will be accepted, procedures for waste identification and characterization, and on-site storage and containment. The description shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) a copy of the collection contractor’s operation manual, if applicable;
(2) a description of the traffic circulation at the facility;
(3) a description of the traffic areas as they relate to the waste storage areas;
(4) a description of how the materials will be transferred from the participant’s vehicles to the waste storage area;
(5) a description of security and safety procedures to be used by the collection contractor to control access to the waste storage area;
(6) a description of the procedures and methodology used by the collection contractor for characterizing all waste as either reactive, explosive, corrosive, ignitable, or toxic to ensure the proper handling of the wastes;
(7) a description of the procedures for handling unknown wastes, and for handling wastes brought in that are not accepted by the collection contractor;
(8) a description of the procedures for handling wastes that that are received in corroded or leaking containers;
(9) a description of the procedures for handling wastes brought to the facility by businesses;
(10) a description of the procedures used to ensure that all wastes and storage containers are chemically compatible such that no reaction or leakage occurs;
(11) a description of the procedures to remove all waste materials from the site within ten (10) days after the approved collection day;
(12) the name, address, telephone number, EPA ID number, and contact person of the transporter of the household hazardous waste collected;
(13) a listing of the amounts and destinations of the wastes that were collected.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.6 Safety and Emergency Response Plan
The applicant shall describe the procedures to ensure the public’s health and safety for any unplanned release of hazardous waste or hazardous waste constituents to the air, soil, groundwater, or surface water. These procedures should include the following:
A. a device, such as a telephone or hand-held two-way radio, capable of summoning emergency assistance from local police departments, or state or local emergency response teams;
B. a fire extinguisher system;
C. a list of eye wash, showers, first aid, or other safety equipment necessary to prevent or mitigate injury to personnel who handle wastes. The applicant shall include detailed information on protective gear that personnel will wear as standard practice;
D. a list of names of all persons qualified to act as emergency coordinator, designating one person as primary contact and listing others in the order in which they assume responsibility;
E. a description of the arrangements agreed to by local police department, fire and rescue, hospitals, and state and local emergency response teams to coordinate and deliver emergency services;
F. a list of contact persons and telephone numbers for the police department, fire and rescue units, hospitals, and state and local emergency response teams;
G. a description of actions which facility personnel are to take in response to fires, explosions, or any release of waste constituents to air, soil, or surface water at the facility;
H. a description of the evacuation plan for the facility in case of an emergency.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.7 Recordkeeping and Reporting Procedures
A. The applicant shall describe procedures for recording the amounts of material received and transported for disposal.
B. The applicant shall describe procedures for the submittal of the following to the Department within 30 days after the collection day or on a quarterly basis for permanent facilities:
(1) the type of wastes collected;
(2) the amounts of waste collected, by waste type;
(3) the method utilized for disposal, by waste type.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.8 Recycling and Reuse Plan
The applicant shall describe in detail the procedures used for the recycling or reuse of nay of the collected household hazardous wastes.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.1.9 Public Information and Education Plan
A. The applicant shall describe plans to inform the public concerning the collection day, hours of operations, types and amounts of wastes accepted, and the proper transportation of these materials to the collection site.
B. The applicant shall describe any educational presentations and materials to encourage waste reduction, minimization, or recycling that will be made available to the participants.
Subchapter 2 Household Hazardous Waste Grant Program.
This regulation is promulgated by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality under the authority of Mississippi Code Annotated Sections 49-17-17, 49-17-29, and 17-17-441, Mississippi Code of 1972 ( Supp. 1992).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.1 Definitions
For the purpose of this regulation, the following words shall have the definition ascribed herein unless the context requires otherwise:
A. “Commission” shall mean the Commission on Environmental Quality.
B. “Department” shall mean the Department of Environmental Quality.
C. “Local government” shall mean a county, municipality, or multicounty agency.
D. “Household hazardous waste” shall mean any waste that would be considered hazardous under the Solid Waste Disposal Law of 1974, Section 17-17-1 et seq.., Mississippi Code of 1972, or any rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, but for the fact that it is produced in quantities smaller than those regulated under such laws or regulations and is generated by persons not otherwise covered by such laws or regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.2 Eligibility
All counties, municipalities and multicounty agencies in Mississippi are eligible to apply for funding under the “Right-Way-To-Throw-Away Program”.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.3 Allocation of Funds
A. Monies allocated to counties, municipalities and multicounty agencies can be utilized for the following purposes:
(1) the collection and proper treatment, storage, or disposal of household hazardous waste.
(2) transportation costs associated with the proper treatment, storage, or disposal of the household hazardous waste collected.
(3) costs for administration and dissemination of public information associated with the collection or transportation of household hazardous waste.
(4) other costs determined by the Department to be integral to a successful household hazardous waste program.
B. The Department shall accept applications on an annual basis by July 1 of each year, beginning in 1993. The Commission shall award funds after the Department has reviewed
applications received prior to July 1 of each year. If monies remain after the Commission funds the projects received and approved before July 1 of each year, additional applications will be evaluated and, if approved, may be funded after the Commission awards the projects received prior to July 1.
C. For grants to counties, municipalities, and multicounty agencies, no more than 75% of the costs of the project shall be eligible for grant funding.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.4 Applications
Entities requesting funding for a “Right-Way-To-Throw-Away Program” shall submit to the Department an original and two (2) copies of a grant application. This application shall contain the following:
A. a completed grant application form, as provided by the Department.
B. a detailed narrative description of the proposed household hazardous waste program.
C. a detailed narrative description of any proposed recycling/reuse activities.
D. the applicant’s resolution authorizing the submission of a household hazardous waste grant application.
E. if applicable, a copy of the applicant’s intergovernmental compact or agreement between the applicable counties or municipalities.
F. a statement of the applicant’s assurances for providing at least 25% local match for the grant request.
G. the applicant’s proposed budget, which shall include the program’s cost estimate, by major expense category, for the funding being requested.
H. the applicant’s agreement with the collection contractor that will be responsible for collecting hazardous waste, and transporting the waste to the appropriate permitted recycling, storage, treatment, or disposal facility.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.5 Selection of Applicants for Funding
Where funds requested exceed funds available, applications shall be evaluated and ranked, with prioritization for funding based on the following criteria:
A. the extent to which a project would serve an area that is not being presently served by a household hazardous waste program or which has not been served with the past twelve months.
B. the number of people served and the amount of the household hazardous waste to be collected by the project.
C. the extent to which the project proposes to recycle or reuse specified household hazardous waste rather than merely to treat, store, or dispose of such waste.
D. the amount of the funds that exceed the minimum twenty-five percent (25%) matching requirement.
E. the extent to which the project allows for the transfer of both technical and management information to other household hazardous waste grant applications.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.6 The Department May Refuse To Approve A Grant Application For Any Of The Following Reasons:
A. the Department determines that the project is not consistent with the “Right-Way-To- Throw-Away Program”.
B. the Department determines that the applicant does not have the technical or administrative capacity to conduct the proposed project.
C. the applicant is in violation of, or delinquent on, any condition of a previously awarded grant by the department.
D. The applicant has been significantly or habitually in violation of environmental laws, regulations, or permits.
Rule 3.2.7
If insufficient funds are available for the “Right-Way-To-Throw-Away Program”, no grant will be awarded.
Rule 3.2.8
If the Department should refuse to approve a grant application for any reason, the applicant may request a hearing before the Commission in accordance with Section 49-17-35, Mississippi Code of 1972.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 3.2.9 Conditions of Grant
A. Grants made to counties, municipalities, or multicounty agencies shall require compliance with all applicable procurement and purchasing regulations established by the Mississippi Department of Finance and Administration, Bureau of Purchasing.
B. At the discretion of the Commission, monies which are unspent twelve (12) months after the grant award shall be forfeited back to the Department.
C. The applicant shall submit to the Department additional material, as required by the “Right-Way-To-Throw-Away Program” Title 11, Part 3, Chapter 3, within sixty days of the grant award.
D. The Department may include any other conditions as part of the grant award which it feels necessary to reasonably manage the project or to protect the environment.
Part 3 Hazardous Waste Management Regulations
Part 3, Chapter 4: Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board Commercial Hazardous Waste Management Facility Demonstration of Need Regulations, (Adopted October 22, 1991, Effective November 25, 1991)
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 17-17-439, 17-17-443, 17-17-445, 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.1 Scope and Authority
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.2 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.3 Demonstration of Need
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.4 Evaluation Criteria
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.5 Permit Board Authority
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.6 Permit Board ___________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.1 Scope and Authority
This regulation is promulgated by the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board under the authority of Mississippi Code Annotated Sections 49-17-17, 49-17-29, and 17-17-151 (Supp. 1991). Other regulations will apply to applicants seeking permits to establish or expand a commercial hazardous waste management facility.
and 49-17-1, et seq.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-151, 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.2 Definitions
For the purpose of this regulation, all words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed to them in Section 17-17-3 of the Mississippi Code unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Terms not defined therein shall have their ordinary meaning within the hazardous waste field. Terms having such a specialized meaning are to be given that specialized meaning unless otherwise defined in Section 17-17-3 of the Mississippi Code.
and 49-17-1, et seq.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-151, 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.3 Demonstration of Need
Each application for a permit to establish or expand a commercial hazardous waste management facility shall be accompanied by a written demonstration of need for such facility in the anticipated service area. The demonstration of need shall be specific as to the types of hazardous waste to be managed and shall include, as a minimum, the following:
A. A description of the service area for the proposed facility with an explanation of the economics of hazardous waste collection, transportation, treatment, storage and disposal as these relate to the proposed service area.
B. Documentation of the available capacity at existing commercial hazardous waste management facilities in the area to be served by the facility.
C. Documentation of the current quantity of hazardous waste generated and the quantity of hazardous waste reasonably expected to be generated during the next twenty (20) years within the anticipated service area, including documentation of the anticipated quantity of hazardous waste suitable for treatment, storage or disposal at the proposed facility.
D. Documentation of the extent to which the proposed facility is needed to replace other facilities in the proposed service area.
E. A description of any additional factors, such as physical limitation on the transportation of the hazardous waste or the existence of additional capacity outside the area to be served, which may satisfy the projected need.
F. Documentation of the extent to which the proposed commercial hazardous waste management facility is in conformance with the Mississippi Capacity Assurance Plan and any interstate or regional agreements associated therewith.
G. Additional information as the Permit Board may require.
and 49-17-1, et seq.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-151, 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.4 Evaluation Criteria
The Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board shall consider the following criteria in evaluating the need for the proposed commercial hazardous waste management facility:
A. The extent to which the proposed commercial hazardous waste management facility is in conformance with the Mississippi Capacity Assurance Plan and any interstate or regional agreements.
B. An approximate service area for the proposed facility which takes into account the economics of the hazardous waste collection, transportation, treatment, storage and disposal.
C. The quantity of hazardous waste generated within the anticipated service area suitable for treatment, storage or disposal at the proposed facility.
D. The design capacity of existing commercial hazardous waste management facilities located within the anticipated service area of the proposed facility.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-151, 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.5 Permit Board Authority
If the Permit Board determines that a proposed commercial hazardous waste management facility is inconsistent with or contradictory to the factors set forth in Rule 4.4, the Permit Board may deny any permit for such facility.
A. The extent to which the proposed facility is needed to replace other facilities, if the need for a proposed commercial hazardous waste management facility cannot be established under Rule 4.4 A-D through Rule 4.5 A.
B. The extent to which the proposed facility will result in a proliferation of necessary facilities in the county where the proposed facility is located.
History
- Source: §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-151, 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 4.6 Permit Board
If the Permit Board determines that a proposed commercial hazardous waste management facility is inconsistent with or contradictory to the factors set forth in Rule 4.4, the Permit Board may deny any permit for such facility.
and 49-17-1, et seq.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-151, 49-17-17, 49-17-29, 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 5.1 Introduction
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 5.2 Applicability
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 5.3 Numerical Groundwater Standards
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 5.4 Table 1 – Numerical Groundwater Standards
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 5.1 Introduction (Adopted November 21, 1991)
Mississippi groundwaters are among the basic resources of the state. They are utilized for many economically beneficial purposes, including agricultural irrigation, aquaculture, livestock watering, & industrial manufacturing. The most critical use, however, is that it serves as the principal source of drinking water in the state. In fact, over 90% of the population of the state utilizes groundwater as its potable water supply. Therefore, the standards adopted herein focus on preserving the quality of the groundwater as a drinking water resource. In doing so, it is generally believed that other uses will be adequately protected. It is the policy of the Commission on Environmental Quality that where alternate technology is available, groundwater should not be used for wastewater disposal. Therefore, the standards adopted herein should not be misconstrued to allow or condone deliberate, limited degradation of groundwater from disposal practices that can be avoided with alternate technology.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 5.2 Applicability
The standards adopted herein are applicable to all groundwater aquifers with a total dissolved solids (TDS) concentration less than 10,000 mg/l, except those incapable of yielding an adequate volume of water to serve the potable water needs of an average residence using standard well
construction and pumping technology. Generally, the soil water (unsaturated zone) and the saturated water found in clay or shale formations (aquitards) do not yield water in sufficient quantities to be used as a potable water supply, and the standards incorporated herein are not intended to apply to such waters. However, some protection or remediation of these waters will be necessary, particularly if it is determined that they may be interconnected with other groundwater and thus impact the chemical quality of that water. Also, it is recognized that the implementation of federal programs such as Subtitle C of the Resource, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) may require the applicability of these or more stringent standards to all groundwater.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 5.3 Numerical Groundwater Standards
Groundwater is expected to meet the water quality standards equivalent to the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of any constituent, as established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Table 1 is a list of those chemicals for which EPA has promulgated MCL's. As EPA adopts additional or different MCL's, this table will be revised and updated accordingly. For chemicals with no established MCL, the water quality standard shall be calculated using the procedure outlined in this section.
A. Carcinogens
(1) A water quality standard may be calculated from Risk-Specific Doses (RSD's) developed according to EPA Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. The RSD is an upper bound estimate of the average daily dose of a carcinogenic substance that corresponds to a specified excess cancer risk for lifetime exposure. The standards calculated are derived from the following basic formula:
RSD = (R/q1) x (W/I) Equation (1)
Where:
RSD = the Risk Specific Dose, or standard for the toxicant of interest;
R = the specified risk level (e.g. 10-6);
q1 = the carcinogen slope factor (CSF) in (mg/kg/day)-1 developed by the Carginogen Assessment Group (CAG) of the EPA, Office of Health & Environmental Assessment, or the EPA's Carcinogen Risk Assessment Verification Endeavor (CRAVE) Workgroup;
W = the assumed weight of the exposed individual; and
I = the intake amount for a given time period.
(2) For purposes of calculating groundwater quality standards, it is assumed that the weight of the exposed individual (W) will be 70 kg & that the intake rate (I) will be 2 liters/day over a lifetime. Therefore, equation (1) is reduced to:
RSD = 35 x R/q1 Equation (2)
(3) Except as provided in Paragraph E of this section, the standard calculated from Equation (2) shall correspond to a risk level (R) of no less than 10-6 for Class A & B carcinogens, or 10-5 for Class C carcinogens.
B. Systemic Toxicants
(1) A water quality standard may be calculated from Reference Doses (RfD's) developed according to EPA accumulated data describing noncarcinogenic end points of toxicity. The RfD is an estimate of the daily exposure an individual (including sensitive individuals) can experience without appreciable risk of health effects during a lifetime. The standards calculated are derived from the following basic formula:
C = (RfD) x (W/I) x (RSC) Equation (3)
where:
C = concentration for the toxicant of interest;
RfD = Reference Dose in mg/kg/day;
W = the assumed weight of the exposed individual;
I = the intake amount for a given time period; and
RSC = Relative Source Contribution, or the fraction of the overall exposure contributed by ingestion of water over the lifetime of an individual.
(2) For purposes of calculating groundwater quality standards, it is usually assumed that the weight of the exposed individual (W) will be 70 kg and that the intake rate (I) will be 2 liters/day over a lifetime. Therefore, Equation (3) is reduced to:
C = 35 x RfD X RSC Equation (4)
The Relative Source Contribution (RSC) may vary widely with each application of Equation (4). Again, for purposes of calculating a groundwater quality standard, it should be assumed that ingestion from drinking water contributes a minimum of 20% of the overall exposure of a specific contaminant over the lifetime of an individual. If, however, there is information indicating that ingestion represents a higher fraction of
the overall exposure, the RSC value may be adjusted, but in no case should it exceed 80%.
C. TOXICANTS WHICH ARE BOTH CARGINOGENS & SYSTEMICALLY TOXIC
Some toxicants may be both carginogenic and systemically toxic. In such cases, the lower of the two values as calculated by Equations (1) - (4) shall be the standard.
D. DETECTION LIMITS
In cases where the calculated standard is below the current analytical detection limit, the standard shall be the detection limit.
E. ALTERNATIVE STANDARDS
(1) For remedial purposes only, the Commission on Environmental Quality may establish an alternative standard (AS) in lieu of the calculated standard, as long as:
(a) the AS established is based upon human health criteria; and
(b) the AS does not exceed a lifetime cancer risk level of 10-4.
(2) Environmental, technological, and economic factors, as well as consistency with EPA regulations and guidance may be considered in establishing an AS.
(3) An AS may be site specific or for a group of remedial sites with similar characteristics.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9 (1)(b), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 3, R. 5.4 Table 1 – Numerical Groundwater Standards
------------------------------------------------------ Contaminant Standard (PPB) ------------------------------------------------------ Alachlor 2 Aldicarb 3 Aldicarb Sulfone 2 ------------------------------------------------------ Aldicarb Sulfoxide 4 Antimony 6 Arsenic 50 Atrazine 3 ------------------------------------------------------ Barium 2,000 Benzene 5 Benzo(a) pyrene 0.2 ------------------------------------------------------ Beryllium 4 Cadmium 5
Carbofuran 40 ------------------------------------------------------ Carbon Tetrachloride 5 Chlordane 2 Chromium 100 ------------------------------------------------------ Cyanide 200 2,4-D 70 Dalapon 200 ------------------------------------------------------ Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) 0.2 o-Dichlorobenzene 600 p-Dichlorobenzene 75 ------------------------------------------------------ 1,2-Dichloroethane 5 1,1-Dichloroethylene 7 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene 70 ------------------------------------------------------ trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene 100 Dichloromethane (Methylene Chloride) 5 1,2-Dichloropropane 5 ------------------------------------------------------ Di(2-ethylhexyl)adipate 400 Di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate 6 Dinoseb 7 ------------------------------------------------------ Diquat 20 Endothall 100 Endrin 2 ------------------------------------------------------ Ethylbenzene 700 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) 0.05 Fluoride 4 ------------------------------------------------------ Glyphosate 700 Heptachlor 0.4 Heptachlor Epoxide 0.2 ------------------------------------------------------ Hexachlorobenzene 1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 50 Lead 50 ------------------------------------------------------ Lindane 0.2 Mercury 2 Methoxychlor 40 ------------------------------------------------------ Monochlorobenzene 100 Nickel 100 Nitrates (as N) 10,000 ------------------------------------------------------ Nitrites (as N) 1,000 Nitrites & Nitrates (as N) 10,000 Oxamyl (Vydate) 200 ------------------------------------------------------ Pentachlorophenol 1 PCB's 0.5 Picloram 500
------------------------------------------------------ Selenium 50 Silver 50 Simazine 4 ------------------------------------------------------ Styrene 100 2,3,7,8-TCDD (Dioxin) 0.00003 2,4,5-TP 50 ------------------------------------------------------ Tetrachloroethylene 5 Thallium 2 Toluene 1,000 ------------------------------------------------------ Toxaphene 3 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 70 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 200 ------------------------------------------------------ 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 5 Trichloroethylene 5 Vinyl Chloride 2 ------------------------------------------------------ Xylene 10,000
Part 4 Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.1 General Information Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.2 Permit Procedures
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.3 Siting Criteria
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.4 Landfill Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.5 Transfer Station, Storage, Collection, & Transportation Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.6 Rubbish Site Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.7 Processing Facility Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.8 Land Application Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.9 Composting Facility Requirements _________________________ Rule 1.1 General Information Requirements
A. Purpose, Scope and Applicability
(1) The purpose of these regulations is to establish minimum State criteria under the Mississippi Solid Waste Law, as amended, for all solid waste management facilities. These minimum State criteria ensure the protection of human health and the environment. Statutory authority for these regulations includes Sections 17-17-
27, 17-17-213, 17-17-229, 17-17-231, 21-27-207, and 49-17-17, Mississippi Code Annotated.
(2) Rules 1.2 and 1.3 of these regulations apply to all solid waste management facilities as described therein, unless otherwise specified or excluded in paragraph B. of this rule.
(3) Rule 1.4 of these regulations applies to all landfills as described therein, unless otherwise specified or excluded in paragraph B. of this rule.
(4) Rule 1.5 of these regulations applies to all transfer stations and to the storage and collection of solid wastes, unless otherwise specified or excluded in paragraph B. of this rule.
(5) Rule 1.6 of these regulations applies to all rubbish sites as described therein, unless otherwise specified or excluded in paragraph B. of this rule.
(6) Rule 1.7 of these regulations applies to all processing facilities as described therein, unless otherwise specified or excluded in paragraph B. of this rule.
(7) Rule 1.8 of these regulations applies to all land application sites as described therein, unless otherwise specified or excluded in paragraph B. of this rule.
(8) Rule 1.9 of these regulations applies to all composting facilities as described therein, unless otherwise specified or excluded in paragraph B. of this rule.
(9) Solid waste management facilities failing to satisfy these criteria are considered to be open dumps for purposes of State waste management planning and are prohibited under Section 4005 of RCRA and the Mississippi Solid Waste Disposal Law, where there are criteria applicable to the facilities.
(10) MSWLF units containing sewage sludge and failing to satisfy these criteria violate sections 309 and 405(e) of the Clean Water Act.
(11) Solid waste management facilities which manage or dispose of sewage sludge must comply with 40 CFR 503 – Standards for the Use or Disposal of Sewage Sludge, which are incorporated herein and adopted by reference.
B. Exclusions. Notwithstanding anything in these regulations to the contrary, the management of solid waste is subject to these regulations except as described herein:
(1) Hazardous wastes, which are subject to regulation under Subtitle C of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended.
(2) Domestic sewage or industrial wastewater that passes through a sewer system or wastewater treatment works and which is subject to regulation under any other
state or federal environmental regulatory program. (Unless paragraph B.5. of this rule is applicable, this exclusion does not apply to sludges and other materials once they are removed from the wastewater treatment works and disposed.)
(3) Solid wastes generated by the growing or harvesting of agricultural crops or the raising of animals (including animal manure), where such wastes are uniformly and promptly returned to the soil as fertilizers or soil conditioners.
(4) Rubbish that is legitimately used, reused, recycled or reclaimed, except for rubbish wastes which is composted or which, due to its chemical or physical constituency, would result in an endangerment to the environment or the public health, safety, or welfare.
(5) Beneficial uses of solid wastes that have been determined by the Department to have physical and chemical qualities that make the wastes suitable for use as a replacement material for other raw materials or products. The Commission may adopt additional guidance or standards to evaluate such wastes for beneficial use.
(6) Beneficial fill projects involving an area occupying less than one acre in size and for a duration of less than 120 days. Beneficial fill projects involving an area larger than one acre or for a duration of more than 120 days may be excluded upon the review and approval of the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee.
(7) Solid wastes generated in silviculture activities (e.g., timber harvesting slash and land clearing debris) whenever such wastes are left onsite.
(8) Solid wastes processed on the same property on which wastes are generated in a processing facility owned and operated by the generator.
(9) Solid wastes which do not constitute an endangerment to the environment or the public health, safety or welfare and which are disposed of on the same property on which wastes are generated, upon the concurrence of the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee. In determining whether a solid waste constitutes an endangerment to the environment or the public health, safety or welfare, the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee shall consider both the quantity and quality of the solid waste, the method of disposal, the location of the disposal property and any other factors which would warrant special concern. Garbage and rubbish containing garbage have been determined by the Commission and by the Department to have characteristics that constitutes an endangerment to the environment, public health, safety, and welfare of the general public within the meaning of Section 17-17-13, Mississippi Code Annotated, and accordingly, are not included in this exemption. All garbage and rubbish containing garbage regardless of where it is disposed or who the generator is, shall be managed in accordance with these regulations and other laws, rules, and regulations pertaining to the management of garbage and rubbish containing garbage.
(10) Solid wastes contained within mining overburden that is returned to the mine site.
(11) Wastes subject to regulation under Part C of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (Underground injection wells).
(12) Wastes associated with the exploration or production of crude oil or natural gas, except where those wastes are disposed or processed in a commercial oil field exploration and production waste disposal facility.
C. Definitions. Unless otherwise noted, all terms contained in this regulation are defined by their plain meaning. This section contains definitions for terms that appear throughout this regulation. Additional definitions appear in the specific sections to which they apply.
(1) "Active life" means the period of operation beginning with the initial receipt of solid waste and ending at completion of closure activities in accordance with these regulations.
(2) "Active portion" means that part of a facility or unit that has received or is receiving wastes and that has not been closed in accordance with these regulations.
(3) "Airport" means a public-use airport open to the public without prior permission and without restrictions within the physical capacities of available facilities.
(4) "Aquifer" means a geological formation, group of formations, or portion of a formation capable of yielding significant quantities of groundwater to wells or springs.
(5) "Areas susceptible to mass movement" means those areas of influence (i.e., areas characterized as having an active or substantial possibility of mass movement) where the movement of earth material at, beneath, or adjacent to the landfill, because of natural or man-induced events, results in the downslope transport of soil and rock material by means of gravitational influence. Areas of mass movement include, but are not limited to, landslides, avalanches, debris slides and flows, soil fluction, block sliding, and rock fall.
(6) "Backyard composting or vermicomposting" means the composting of organic solid waste, such as yard waste and household garbage, generated by a homeowner or tenant of a single or multi-family residential unit, where such composting occurs at the site of the residence.
(7) “Beneficial Fill” means the use of uncontaminated, non-water soluble, non- decomposable class II rubbish wastes to level an area or bring the area to a grade for beneficial purposes, where an earthen cover is applied upon completion of the fill. Such beneficial purposes must not be conducted for monetary compensation and may include landscaping, erosion control or repair, land stabilization, construction base preparations or other land improvements.
(8) “Beneficial Use” means the legitimate use of a solid waste in the manufacture of a product or as a product for construction, soil amendment, or other purposes, where the solid waste replaces a natural or other resource material by its utilization.
(9) "Bird hazard" means an increase in the likelihood of bird/aircraft collisions that may cause damage to the aircraft or injury to its occupants.
(10) "Cation Exchange Capacity" means the sum of exchangeable cations a soil can absorb expressed in milliequivalents per 100 grams of soil as determined by sampling the soil to the depth of cultivation or solid waste placement, whichever is greater, and analyzing by the summation method for distinctly acid soils or the sodium acetate method for neutral, calcareous or saline soils.
(11) "Certificate of Coverage" means a written grant of coverage under an existing general permit.
(12) "Church" means a permanent structure with a permanent foundation and constructed roof, floors, and walls, the primary use of which is for a group of persons to meet at least weekly for religious services.
(13) "Class I Rubbish Site" means a rubbish site, which receives the types of rubbish described in Rule 6.B of these regulations.
(14) "Class II Rubbish Site" means a rubbish site, which receives only the type of rubbish described in Rule 6.C of these regulations.
(15) "Coastal wetlands" means such areas as defined by and subject to the Coastal Wetlands Protection Act.
(16) "Commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility" means any facility engaged in the storage, treatment, processing or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste for compensation or which accepts nonhazardous solid waste from more than one (1) generator not owned by the facility owner.
(17) "Commercial oil field exploration and production waste disposal" means storage, treatment, recovery, processing, disposal or acceptance of oil field exploration and production waste from more than one (1) generator or for a fee.
(18) "Commercial solid waste" means all types of solid waste generated by stores, offices, restaurants, warehouses, and other nonmanufacturing activities, excluding residential and industrial wastes.
(19) "Commercial waste incinerator" means an incinerator which burns solid waste received from more than one generator or for compensation, but excluding those which burn only wood or paper waste.
(20) "Commission" means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
(21) "Composite liner" means a system consisting of two components; the upper component must consist of a minimum 30-mil flexible membrane liner (FML), and the lower component must consist of at least a two-foot layer of compacted soil with a hydraulic conductivity of no more than 1 x 10 -7 cm/sec. FML components consisting of High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) shall be at least 60-mil thick. The FML component must be installed in direct and uniform contact with the compacted soil component.
(22) "Compost" means the resulting product from a composting facility after having undergone biological decomposition, less residuals or recyclables, and which has been stabilized to a degree that it is potentially beneficial to plant growth and which is used or sold for use as a soil amendment, artificial topsoil, growing medium amendment, or other similar uses.
(23) "Composting facility" means a facility which produces compost, excluding backyard composting or vermicomposting, or normal farming operations.
(24) "Composting or compost plant" means an officially controlled method or operation whereby putrescible solid wastes are broken down through microbic action to a material offering no hazard or nuisance factors to public health or well- being.
(25) “Cumulative pollutant loading rate” means the maximum amount of an inorganic pollutant that can be applied to an area of land.
(26) "Curing" means the final stage of the composting process beginning in the later part of the mesophilic stage. During the curing process oxygen demand is reduced as the pile is recolonized by soil-dwelling micro-organisms. Once cured, the compost will not generate odors.
(27) "Department" means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(28) "Disposal" means the discharge, deposit, injection, dumping, spilling, leaking, or placing of any solid waste into or on any land or water so that such solid waste or any constituent thereof may enter the environment or be emitted into the air or discharged into any water, including groundwater.
(29) "Disease vectors" means any rodents, birds, flies, mosquitoes, or other animals, including insects, capable of transmitting disease to humans.
(30) "Displacement" means the relative movement of any two sides of a fault measured in any direction.
(31) "Dumpster" means a specially constructed, removable waste container of any size designed to be mechanically picked up, dumped, and/or transported by a specially constructed vehicle designed for that purpose. (Commonly referred to as roll-off containers, green boxes, or commercial containers.)
(32) "Endangered or threatened species" means any species listed as such pursuant to the Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, or as defined by Section 49-5-105, Mississippi Code Annotated.
(33) "Executive Director" means the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(34) "Existing facility" means a facility that has obtained a valid permit or other authorization from the Department before the effective date of the rules applicable to the facility, excluding those which have closed and are no longer authorized to receive solid waste.
(35) "Existing MSWLF unit" means any municipal solid waste landfill unit that is receiving solid waste as of the effective date of these regulations. Waste placement in existing units must be consistent with past operating practices or modified practices to ensure good management.
(36) "Facility" means all contiguous land and structures, other appurtenances, and improvements on the land used for the management of solid waste.
(37) "Fault" means a fracture or a zone of fractures in any material along which strata on one side have been displaced with respect to that on the other side.
(38) "Floodplain" means the lowland and relatively flat areas adjoining inland and coastal waters, including flood-prone areas of offshore islands that are inundated by the 100-year flood.
(39) "Garbage" means putrescible animal and vegetable wastes resulting from the handling, preparation, cooking and consumption of food, including wastes from markets, storage facilities, handling and sale of produce and other food products, and excepting such materials that may be serviced by garbage grinders and handled as household sewage.
(40) "Gas condensate" means the liquid generated as a result of gas recovery process(es) at an MSWLF unit.
(41) "General Permit" means a permit, which applies to a specified category of similar facilities or activities that involve similar solid wastes or have similar operating and/or monitoring requirements and restrictions.
(42) "Groundwater" means water below the land surface in a zone of saturation.
(43) "Hazardous wastes" means any waste or combination of waste of a solid, liquid, contained gaseous, or semisolid form which because of its quantity, concentration or physical, chemical or infectious characteristics, may
(a) cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible or incapacitating reversible illness; or
(b) pose a substantial present or potential hazard to human health or the environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, disposed of, or otherwise managed which are listed by the Environmental Protection Agency as hazardous wastes which exceed the threshold limits set forth in the Environmental Protection Agency regulations for classifying hazardous waste.
Such wastes include, but are not limited to, those wastes which are toxic, corrosive, flammable, irritants, strong sensitizers, or which generate pressure through decomposition, heat or other means. Such wastes do not include those radioactive materials regulated pursuant to the Mississippi Radiation Protection Law of 1976, appearing in Section 45-14-1 et seq..
(44) "Holocene" means the most recent epoch of the Quaternary period, extending from the end of the Pleistocene Epoch to the present.
(45) "Household waste" means any solid waste (including garbage, trash, and sanitary waste in septic tanks) derived from households (including single and multiple residences, hotels and motels, bunkhouses, ranger stations, crew quarters, campgrounds, picnic grounds, and day-use recreation areas).
(46) "Incinerator" means a combustion device specifically designed for the destruction by high temperature burning of solid, semi-solid, liquid, or gaseous combustible waste and from which the solid residues contain little or no combustibles.
(47) "Individual Permit" means a permit, which applies only to a specific facility or location.
(48) "Industrial solid waste" means solid waste generated by manufacturing or industrial processes that is not a hazardous waste regulated under Subtitle C of RCRA. Such waste may include, but is not limited to, waste resulting from the following manufacturing processes: Electric power generation; fertilizer/agricultural chemicals; food and related products/by-products; inorganic
chemicals; iron and steel manufacturing; leather and leather products; nonferrous metals manufacturing/foundries; organic chemicals; plastics and resins manufacturing; pulp and paper industry; rubber and miscellaneous plastic products; stone, glass, clay, and concrete products; textile manufacturing; transportation equipment; and water treatment. This term does not include mining waste or oil and gas waste.
(49) "Karst terrains" means areas where karst topography, with its characteristic surface and subterranean features, is developed as the result of dissolution of limestone, dolomite, or other soluble rock. Characteristic physiographic features present in karst terrains include, but are not limited to, sinkholes, sinking streams, caves, large springs, and blind valleys.
(50) "Lake or reservoir" means a body of water, not owned by the applicant or facility owner, having greater than ten acres of surface area at such time as the spillway overflows, with a primary purpose other than wastewater storage or treatment.
(51) “Land Application” means the incorporation of waste into the soil, the injection of waste below the land surface or other application of waste to the land for soil amendment or conditioning purposes or for biodegradation of the waste.
(52) "Land application site" means a site upon which land application activities are conducted.
(53) "Landfill" means a controlled area of land upon which solid wastes are deposited, compacted, and covered with no on-site burning of wastes, and which is so located, contoured, drained and operated so that it will not cause an adverse effect on public health or the environment. This term includes MSWLF units and other landfills, but not sites which receive only rubbish.
(54) "Lateral expansion" means a horizontal expansion of the waste boundaries of an existing solid waste management facility. In the context of an MSWLF unit, this term includes previously permitted areas where such areas have not received wastes. In the context of other facilities, this term does not include previously permitted areas where such areas have not received waste.
(55) "Leachate" means a liquid that has passed through or emerged from solid waste and contains soluble, suspended, or miscible materials removed from such waste.
(56) "Liquid waste" means any waste material that is determined to contain "free liquids" as defined by Method 9095 (Paint Filter Liquids Test), as described in "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes, Physical/Chemical Methods" (EPA Pub. No. SW-846).
(57) "Lithified earth material" means all rock, including all naturally occurring and naturally formed aggregates or masses of minerals or small particles of older rock
that formed by crystallization of magma or by induration of loose sediments. This term does not include man-made materials, such as fill, concrete, and asphalt, or unconsolidated earth materials, soil, or regolith lying at or near the earth's surface.
(58) "Lower explosive limit" means the lowest percent by volume of a mixture of explosive gases in air that will propagate a flame at 25 o C and atmospheric pressure.
(59) "Maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material" means the maximum expected horizontal acceleration depicted on a seismic hazard map, with a 90 percent or greater probability that the acceleration will not be exceeded in 250 years, or the maximum expected horizontal acceleration based on a site-specific seismic risk assessment.
(60) "Mesophilic stage" means the biological stage in the composting process characterized by active bacteria which favor a moderate temperature range of 20 to 45C (68 to 113F). It occurs later in the composting process after the thermophilic stage and is associated with a moderate rate of decomposition.
(61) “Mining Overburden” means all earth and other natural materials which are removed to gain access to the desired minerals in the process of surface mining and shall mean such material before or after its removal by surface mining.
(62) "Municipal solid waste" means any nonhazardous solid waste resulting from the operation of residential, commercial, governmental, industrial or institutional establishments except oil field exploration and production wastes and sewage sludge.
(63) "Municipal solid waste management facility" means any land, building, plant, system, motor vehicles, equipment or other property, whether real, personal or mixed, or any combination of either thereof, used or useful or capable of future use in the collection, storage, treatment, utilization recycling, processing, transporting or disposal of municipal solid waste, including transfer stations, incinerators, sanitary landfill facilities or other facilities necessary or desirable.
(64) "Municipal solid waste landfill unit (MSWLF unit)" means a discrete area of land or an excavation that receives household waste (including ash from a municipal solid waste combustion facility) and that is not a land application unit, surface impoundment, injection well, or waste pile, as those terms are defined under 40 CFR Part 257.2. A MSWLF unit may also receive other types of RCRA subtitle D wastes, such as commercial solid waste, nonhazardous sludge, small quantity generator waste and industrial solid waste. Such a landfill may be publicly or privately owned. A MSWLF unit may be a new MSWLF unit, an existing MSWLF unit or a lateral expansion.
(65) "New facility" means a facility that has not received waste and which has not applied for or received a valid permit or other authorization from the Department to receive waste prior to the effective date of the rule applicable to the facility, including any land area of an existing facility that has not been previously permitted.
(66) "New landfill" means a landfill that has not received waste and which has not applied for or received a valid permit or other authorization from the Department to receive waste prior to the effective date of the rule applicable to the landfill, including any land area of an existing landfill that has not been previously permitted.
(67) "New MSWLF unit" means any municipal solid waste landfill unit that has not received waste prior to the effective date of the rule applicable to the unit.
(68) "Normal Farming Operations" means the customary and generally accepted activities, practices, and procedures that farmers adopt or utilize on their own property for their own use during the production and preparation for market of poultry, livestock and associated farm products, and in the production and harvesting of crops, including agronomic, horticultural and silvicultural crops.
(69) "Open burning" means the combustion of solid waste without the following:
(a) control of combustion air to maintain adequate temperature for efficient combustion,
(b) containment of the combustion reaction in an enclosed device to provide sufficient residence time and mixing for complete combustion, and
(c) control of the emission of the combustion products.
(70) "100-year flood" means a flood that has a 1-percent or greater chance of recurring in any given year or a flood of a magnitude equalled or exceeded once in 100 years on the average over a significantly long period.
(71) "Outdoor facility" means a facility in which any solid waste management activity, including storage, is not adequately enclosed within a walled and roofed structure.
(72) "Owner" means the person(s) who owns a facility or part of a facility and is responsible for the overall operation.
(73) “Pathogens” means disease-causing organisms, including but not limited to certain bacteria, protozoa, viruses and viable helminth ova.
(74) "Permit" means the formal written approval issued by the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board to operate a solid waste management
facility. A permit may be an individual permit, issued to a person, or a general permit, issued for a specified category of similar facilities or activities that involve similar solid wastes or have similar operating and/or monitoring requirements and restrictions.
(75) "Permit Board" means the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board, as established under Section 49-17-28, Mississippi Code Annotated.
(76) "Permit Board's designee" means the Executive Director or a member of the Department staff.
(77) "Person" means any individual, trust, firm, joint-stock company, public or private corporation (including a government corporation), partnership, association, state, or any agency or institution thereof, municipality, Commission, political subdivision of a state or any interstate body, and includes any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality, political subdivision, or the United States or any officer or employee thereof.
(78) "Plant Available Nitrogen" means the amount of nitrogen available for plant uptake. It consists of all of the nitrate and ammonia present in the soil and a fraction of the organic nitrogen present which can be expected to be converted to an inorganic form during a given year.
(79) "Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)" means any chemical substance that is limited to the biphenyl molecule that has been chlorinated to varying degrees or any combination of substances, which contains such substances.
(80) "Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) waste(s)" means those PCBs and PCB items that are subject to the disposal requirements of Subpart D of 40 CFR Part 761.
(81) "Poor foundation conditions" means those areas where features exist which indicate that a natural or man-induced event may result in inadequate foundation support for the structural components of a landfill.
(82) "Processing facility" means a facility, other than a composting facility or transfer station used to sort, shred, grind, bale, treat or otherwise process solid waste. The term does not include facilities which receive and manage only recyclable components of solid wastes that are removed at least annually.
(83) "Public water supply well" means a water supply well, which is regulated by the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, the Mississippi Drinking Water Law of 1976, or regulations promulgated thereunder.
(84) "Putrescible wastes" means solid wastes which are capable of being decomposed by micro-organisms with sufficient rapidity to cause nuisances from odors or gases.
(85) "Qualified groundwater scientist" means a scientist, geologist or engineer, who has received a baccalaureate or post-graduate degree in the natural sciences, geology or engineering and has sufficient training and experience in groundwater hydrology and related fields as may be demonstrated by State registration, professional Certifications, or completion of accredited university programs that enable that individual to make sound professional judgments regarding groundwater monitoring, contaminant fate and transport, and corrective-action.
(86) "Recyclables" means materials which are intended to be sold or delivered to the open market for recycling or processing into a marketable product.
(87) "Regulated hazardous waste" means a solid waste that is a hazardous waste, as defined in 40 CFR Part 261.3, that is not excluded from regulation as a hazardous waste under 40 CFR Part 261.4(b) or was not generated by a conditionally exempt small quantity generator as defined in 40 CFR Part 261.5.
(88) "Residuals" means material removed from a processing or composting facility which cannot be processed or composted.
(89) "Rubbish" means nonputrescible solid wastes (excluding ashes) consisting of both combustible and noncombustible wastes. Combustible rubbish includes paper, rags, cartons, wood, furniture, rubber, plastics, yard trimmings, leaves and similar material. Noncombustible rubbish includes glass, crockery, metal cans, metal furniture and like material which will not burn at ordinary incinerator temperatures (not less than 1600 degrees F.).
(90) "Rubbish site" means a site, which receives rubbish for the purpose of disposal.
(91) "Run-off" means any rainwater, leachate, or other liquid that drains over land from any part of a facility.
(92) "Run-on" means any rainwater, leachate, or other liquid that drains over land onto any part of a facility.
(93) "Saturated zone" means that part of the earth's crust in which all voids are filled with water.
(94) "Scavenging" means the uncontrolled and unauthorized removal of materials at any point in the solid waste management system.
(95) "Seismic impact zone" means an area with a ten percent or greater probability that the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material, expressed as a fraction of the earth's gravitational pull (g), will exceed 0.10g in 250 years.
(96) "7Q10 flow" means the average streamflow rate over seven (7) consecutive days that may be expected to be reached as an annual minimum no more frequently than one (1) year in ten (10).
(97) "Sewage Sludge" means the solid, semi-solid or liquid residue generated during treatment of municipal wastewater in a treatment works. Sewage sludge includes, but is not limited to, domestic septage; scum or solids removed in primary, secondary, or advanced wastewater treatment processes; and a material derived from sewage sludge. Sewage sludge does not include ash generated during the firing of sewage sludge in a sewage sludge incinerator or grit and screenings generated during preliminary treatment of domestic sewage in a treatment works.
(98) "Single family dwelling unit" means either
(a) a conventional single family detached dwelling or mobile home, or
(b) a unit within a multi-family residential complex (townhouses, condominiums, or apartments).
(99) "Sludge" means any solid, semi-solid, or liquid waste generated from a municipal, commercial, or industrial wastewater treatment plant, water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility exclusive of the treated effluent from a wastewater treatment plant.
(100) "Solid waste" means any garbage, or refuse, sludge from a wastewater treatment plant, water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, and agricultural operations, and from community activities, but does not include solid or dissolved materials in domestic sewage, or solid or dissolved materials in irrigation return flows or industrial discharges that are point sources subject to permit under 33 U.S.C. 1342, or source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (68 Stat. 923).
(101) "Solid waste management facility" means any facility which manages nonhazardous solid waste, including landfills, rubbish sites, land application sites, processing facilities, composting facilities, transfer stations, and waste incinerators, but excluding ordinary storage vessels such as trash cans, dumpsters, etc.
(102) "Storage" means the containment of wastes, either on a temporary basis or for a period of years, in such a manner as not to constitute disposal of such wastes.
(103) "Stream or river" means a flowing body of water with a 7Q10 flow greater than zero.
(104) "Structural components" means liners, leachate collection systems, final covers, run-on/run-off systems, and any other component used in the construction and operation of the MSWLF that is necessary for protection of human health and the environment.
(105) "Thermophilic stage" means the biological stage in the composting process characterized by active bacteria which favor a high temperature range of 45 to 75C (113 to 167F). It occurs early in the composting process before the mesophilic stage and is associated with a high rate of decomposition.
(106) "Transport" means the movement of wastes from the point of generation to any intermediate points, and finally to the point of ultimate storage or disposal.
(107) "Transfer station" means a fixed facility used for the primary purpose of transferring solid waste from one solid waste transportation vehicle to another. Dumpsters or other comparable solid waste containers loaded and unloaded onto a transportation vehicle are not included in this definition.
(108) "Unstable area" means a location that is susceptible to natural or human-induced events or forces capable of impairing the integrity of some or all of the landfill structural components responsible for preventing releases from a landfill. Unstable areas can include poor foundation conditions, areas susceptible to mass movements, and Karst terrains.
(109) "Uppermost aquifer" means the geologic formation nearest the natural ground surface that is an aquifer, as well as, lower aquifers that are hydraulically interconnected with this aquifer within the facility's property boundary.
(110) "Vermicomposting" means a composting process that utilizes worms in the biological decomposition of waste.
(111) "Washout" means the carrying away of solid waste by waters of the base flood.
(112) "Waste management unit boundary" means a vertical surface located at the hydraulically downgradient limit of the unit. This vertical surface extends down into the uppermost aquifer.
(113) "Wetlands" means those areas that are defined in 40 CFR 232.2. Wetlands include, but are not limited to, swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.
(114) "Yard Waste" means the leaves, grass cuttings, weeds, garden waste, tree limbs, and other vegetative wastes generated at residential, commercial, institutional, governmental, or industrial properties.
D. Effective Date
The effective date of these regulations is October 1, 1993, except where Part 258 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations allows for a later date for MSWLF units and except where amendments to these regulations are effective at a later date. The effective date of the amendments adopted by the Commission on February 22, 1996, is April 3, 1996. The effective date of the amendments adopted by the Commission on April 28, 2005 is June 17, 2005.
E. Severability
If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of any of these regulations, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances is for any reason challenged or held to be invalid or void, the validity of the remaining regulations and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.2 Permit Procedures
A. No solid waste management facility shall be operated without an individual permit from the Permit Board or a certificate of coverage under a general permit.
B. The Permit Board may issue a general permit for a specified category or group of facilities that involve similar wastes or have similar operating requirements and restrictions.
C. No new solid waste management facility nor any lateral expansion of an existing facility beyond the area previously approved shall be granted either an individual permit from the Permit Board or a certificate of coverage under a general permit, unless such facility is consistent with the approved local solid waste management plan for the area in which the facility is located. Solid waste management facilities existing prior to the date of Commission approval of the applicable local plan are considered to be consistent with such local plans, even if there is no recognition of such facilities in the plan. However, any lateral expansion of such existing facilities which has not been approved by the Permit Board prior to the date of Commission approval of the plan must be expressly recognized in the plan in order to be considered consistent with the plan.
D. An application for issuance, re-issuance or transfer of an individual permit or a certificate of coverage under a general permit shall be made on forms provided by the Department. In addition to the information required in the application form, the Department may require other information as necessary to evaluate the proposed facility.
E. Applicant Disclosure Statement Requirements
(1) Applicants for the issuance, re-issuance or transfer of an individual permit shall also file with the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee a disclosure statement in accordance with Section 17-17-501 through 17-17-507, Mississippi Code Annotated, and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.
(2) Applicants for the issuance, re-issuance or transfer of a certificate of coverage under a general permit shall also file with the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee a disclosure statement in accordance with Section 17-17-501 through 507, Mississippi Code Annotated, and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.
(3) For the purposes of Paragraphs E.1 and E.2 of this rule, the term "applicants" means any persons, except public agencies, applying for a permit or a certificate of coverage to operate and/or construct a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility.
(4) If the owner (except a public agency) of a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility contracts with any person other than a public agency to operate the facility, the owner shall not allow the contractor to begin operation until disclosure statements with regard to the owner and the contractor have been submitted to and approved by the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee in accordance with Section 17-17-501, Mississippi Code Annotated and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto. If a public agency applies for a permit and proposes to operate a facility by contract, the contractor shall be required to file a disclosure statement.
F. Notwithstanding the authority and the requirements of Section 17-17-501 through 17-17- 507, Mississippi Code Annotated, the Permit Board or the Permit Board's designee may require a reasonable amount of information concerning the financial capability and/or the performance history of an applicant and may use the information in determining whether an individual permit or a certificate of coverage under a general permit should or should not be granted.
G. An application for the issuance, re-issuance, modification or transfer of any solid waste management permit or certificate of coverage and all reports required by the solid waste management permit or other information requested by the Permit Board shall be signed as follows:
(1) For a corporation: a president, vice-president, secretary, or treasurer of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation;
(2) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: a general partner or the proprietor, respectively;
(3) For a municipality, county, state, federal, or other public agency; either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official;
(4) The signature of a Duly Authorized Representative (DAR) shall be a valid signature under these Regulations, in lieu of the signatures described above provided the following conditions are met;
(a) The DAR is an employee of the entity seeking the solid waste- management permit or certificate of coverage.
(b) The DAR is identified to the Department by the ranking officer of the corporation, partnership, proprietorship, municipality, county, state, federal or other public agency.
(c) The DAR is responsible for the overall management of the solid waste facility.
H. When the Department is satisfied that an application for an individual permit is complete, or that a proposed general permit has been completed it shall develop a proposed recommendation as follows:
(1) If the proposed recommendation is to issue the individual or general permit, the Department shall, at a minimum, prepare a public notice and allow the general public a period of at least 30 days to provide comment regarding the application or to request a public hearing in accordance with Section 49-17-29(4)(a), Mississippi Code Annotated 1972. A public notice may be waived by the Department for modifications to existing facilities which do not involve an expansion of the facility or a significant change in the method of waste management. The Department may conduct a public hearing for proposals when a significant level of public interest exists in the project area or where warranted by other factors.
(2) If the proposal applies to the issuance of a general permit or an individual permit for an MSWLF unit, or the modification pertaining to the expansion of an MSWLF unit beyond the permitted capacity or area of an individual permit or a general permit, or the transfer of an individual permit for an MSWLF unit, a public hearing shall be conducted.
(3) The Permit Board may conduct a single public hearing on related groups of draft individual or general permits.
(4) Following a public notice and any public hearing which may be conducted, the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee shall make a decision regarding the issuance of the permit.
I. When the Department determines that an application for coverage under a general permit is complete, the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee shall make a decision regarding the issuance of the Certificate of Coverage.
J. Any interested party aggrieved by any action of the Permit Board or the Permit Board's designee with regard to permit or certificate of coverage issuance, denial, modification or revocation may file a written request for a formal hearing in accordance with Section 49- 17-29(4)(b), Mississippi Code Annotated.
K. A permit shall not be issued for more than ten (10) years. Any existing permit which does not have an expiration date shall be re-evaluated and may be reissued for a period not to exceed ten (10) years after the date of reissuance. Such re-evaluation shall be limited to an evaluation of:
(1) The terms and conditions of the permit to determine consistency with current requirements of the Department,
(2) The operating history of the permittee at the permitted facility, and
(3) The permittee's ability to comply with Rule 1.3 of these regulations (Siting Criteria).
Permits are subject to modification, revocation, and/or reissuance for good cause at any time during the life of the permit.
L. A transfer of an individual permit or a certificate of coverage under a general permit from one person to another shall be made prior to any sale, conveyance, or assignment of the rights in the permit held by the permittee. Any change of more than 50 percent of the equity ownership of the facility or permittee over a sustained period resulting in a new majority owner shall constitute a transfer. A new majority owner for purposes of this provision shall be an individual, partnership, company, or group of affiliated companies. A transfer, as described in this paragraph, must be approved by the Permit Board. All transfers approved by the Permit Board shall be made contingent upon the final sale, conveyance, or assignment of rights in the permit being completed within one year of Permit Board action, and shall be effective on the date of final sale, conveyance, or assignment of rights in the permit.
M. It is the responsibility of the permittee to possess or acquire a sufficient interest in or right to the use of the property for which a permit or certificate of coverage is issued, including the access route. The granting of a permit or a certificate of coverage does not convey any property rights or interest in either real or personal property; nor does it authorize any injury to private property, invasion of personal rights, or impairment of previous contract rights; nor any infringement of federal, state, or local laws or regulations outside the scope of the authority under which a permit or certificate of coverage is issued.
N. Storage, processing, disposal or other placement of waste shall be limited to the area described in the application form required in paragraph D. of this rule, unless an amended application is submitted to the Department and approved.
O. When a disaster occurs, such as a tornado, hurricane, or flood, and results in urgent need for public solid waste disposal or processing facilities, the Department may approve a site or facility for immediate operation subject to stipulated conditions and for a limited period of time.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.3 Siting Criteria
A. Applicability
(1) Except as specifically excluded, the requirements of this rule shall apply to all solid waste management facilities including landfills, rubbish sites, processing facilities, land application sites, composting facilities, waste incinerators, and transfer stations, as specified in this regulation.
(2) The requirements of paragraphs B, L, and X do not apply to:
(a) composting facilities which receive less than 5 tons per day of only natural vegetation, such as yard waste, tree limbs, etc.
(b) rubbish sites, processing facilities, and transfer stations, any of which receive only Class II rubbish materials (as described in Rule 1.6.C of these regulations).
(3) The requirements of paragraphs P through U and paragraphs W through Y of this rule do not apply to solid waste management facilities which dispose only of industrial solid waste, where such facilities are located on the same industrial property on which the wastes are generated, unless the Permit Board, or where appropriate, the Permit Board's designee determines that such criteria should be applicable (such as property line setbacks).
(4) The distances specified in this section shall be measured from the edge of the active disposal, processing, composting, transfer or storage area.
(5) Any structure or area described in paragraph I, J, P, R, S, U and X of this rule (e.g., a park, dwelling, etc.) shall not be considered applicable in the siting of a new solid waste management facility if the structure or area was designated by the applicable governmental body or was established after the site disclosure date. The site disclosure date shall be the date upon which an application for a permit or other authorization is submitted to the Department, unless the applicant chooses to notify the Department and the public at an earlier date, in which case the site disclosure date shall be the completion of such notification as follows:
(a) the submittal of a notice to the Department containing the following information:
(1) the name, address, telephone number, and contact person of the applicant;
(2) a description of the type of proposed operation (i.e., landfill, land application site, etc.);
(3) an exact location and approximate size of the proposed facility; and
(4) where the applicant is a public agency, such as a county, municipality, or a regional authority, a copy of a duly adopted resolution stating the desire of the applicant to pursue a permit or other authorization for the operation of a solid waste management facility at the site described in paragraph A.5.a.(3) of this rule; and
(b) public notification of the information listed in paragraph A.5.a. of this rule shall consist of a prominent notice in at least one daily or weekly newspaper of general circulation within the area of the proposed facility. The notice shall be no less than four inches by seven inches in size and shall not be placed in that portion where legal notices and classified advertisements appear.
(c) if notification is accomplished as described in paragraph A.5.a. and A.5.b. of this rule, an application for a permit or other authorization must be submitted no later than one year after completion of notification for this exclusion to apply.
(6) For new facilities that are adjacent to and part of an existing facility, the Permit Board, or where appropriate, the Permit Board's designee may, on a site specific basis, designate a smaller setback distance to any structure or area described in paragraphs I, J, P, R, S, U and X of this rule (e.g., a park, dwelling, etc.) if the following are met:
(a) before April 1, 1991, the applicant obtained ownership or control of the property upon which the new facility is proposed, through an option to purchase or similar instruments vesting rights in the real property;
(b) the applicant has demonstrated that a smaller setback distance would not present an unreasonable risk to the environment and to the health, safety, and welfare of the public; and
(c) the facility is consistent with the approved local solid waste management plan.
The provisions of this paragraph shall be applicable only in cases where paragraph A.5 of this rule does not apply.
B. Airport Safety
(1) Owners of existing landfills and lateral expansions, outdoor processing facilities, and outdoor composting facilities which (1) accept waste on or after the effective date of these regulations, (2) accept waste likely to attract birds, and (3) are located within 10,000 feet of any airport runway end used by turbojet aircraft or within 5,000 feet of any airport runway end used only by piston-type aircraft, must demonstrate to the Department that the facility is designed and operated so that it does not pose a bird hazard to aircraft.
(2) No new landfill, new outdoor processing facility, or new outdoor composting facility, which will accept waste likely to attract birds, shall be located within 10,000 feet of any airport runway end unless the state aeronautical agency states that the airport does not routinely serve turbojet aircraft.
(3) No new landfill, new outdoor processing facility, or new outdoor composting facility, or lateral expansion of any such existing facilities, which will accept waste likely to attract birds, shall be located less than 5,000 feet from an airport runway end.
(4) The restrictions described in paragraph B.2 and B.3 of this rule are not applicable if the owner can demonstrate in writing the following:
(a) the facility will be designed and operated so that it does not pose a bird hazard to aircraft, and
(b) the airport is not being routinely utilized for scheduled commercial passenger services.
(5) Any person proposing to locate a new MSWLF or implement a lateral expansion within a five-mile radius of any airport runway end used by turbojet or piston- type aircraft must notify the affected airport and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).
(6) Any person proposing to locate a new MSWLF within 6 miles of a public airport as described in 49 U.S.C. § 44718(d) as amended in Section 503 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21 st Century, Pub. L. No. 106-181 (April 5, 2000) “Structures interfering with air commerce” must demonstrate compliance with the site limitations of said Act.
(7) The specific requirements of this rule are not applicable to airports such as agricultural runways or other airstrips not open to the public. However, the
Permit Board may establish a buffer zone between any such airstrip and a new landfill as deemed necessary.
C. Floodplains
Owners of new solid waste management facilities and lateral expansions, and owners of existing landfills and land application sites that accept waste on or after the effective date of these regulations, which are located within the 100-year floodplain, must demonstrate to the Department in writing that the facility will not restrict the flow of the 100-year flood, reduce the temporary water storage capacity of the floodplain, or result in washout of solid waste so as to pose a hazard to human health or the environment.
D. Wetlands
(1) New solid waste management facilities and lateral expansions shall not be located in wetlands, unless the applicant obtains approval as required by federal law from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers or from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Commission, where agricultural lands are involved.
(2) New solid waste management facilities and lateral expansions shall not be located in coastal wetlands unless the applicant obtains approval as required by state law from the Bureau of Marine Resources of the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks.
(3) The owner must demonstrate compliance with paragraphs D.1 and D.2 of this rule by placing a copy of the permit in the operating record and must notify the Department in writing that it has been placed in the operating record.
E. Fault Areas
MSWLF units and lateral expansions of any existing MSWLF units shall not be located within 200 feet (60 meters) of a fault that has had displacement in Holocene time unless the applicant demonstrates to the Department that an alternative setback distance of less than 200 feet (60 meters) will not result in damage to the structural integrity of the landfill and will be protective of human health and the environment.
F. Seismic Impact Zones
MSWLF units and lateral expansions of any existing MSWLF units shall not be located in seismic impact zones, unless the applicant demonstrates to the Department that all containment structures, including liners, leachate collection systems, and surface water control systems, are designed to resist the maximum horizontal acceleration in lithified earth material for the site.
G. Unstable Areas
Owners of new MSWLF units, existing MSWLF units, lateral expansions of existing MSWLF units and new rubbish sites, which are located in an unstable area, must demonstrate to the Department that engineering measures have been incorporated into the landfill or rubbish site design to ensure that the integrity of the structural components of the facility will not be disrupted. The owner must consider the following factors, at a minimum, when determining whether an area is unstable:
(1) on-site or local soil conditions that may result in significant differential settling;
(2) on-site or local geologic or geomorphologic features; and
(3) on-site or local human-made features or events (both surface and subsurface).
H. Hydrocarbon Wells and Water Wells
No new landfill, new rubbish site, new land application site, or lateral expansion of any such existing facilities, shall be located such that an active or inactive hydrocarbon well or an active or inactive water well would be present beneath the actual disposal area, unless the applicant demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the Department, that the well has been adequately plugged.
I. Public Water Supplies
(1) No new landfill or new land application site shall be located within 0.5 mile of a public water supply intake structure in a surface water body. If the runoff from the facility would enter the water body upgradient of the intake structure, this distance shall be increased to at least ten (10) miles. The Permit Board, or where appropriate, the Permit Board's designee may establish a greater distance based upon the nature of the surface water supply.
(2) No new landfill or new land application site shall be located within 1000 feet of any existing public water supply well. This distance shall be increased to 0.5 mile if the proposed facility is hydraulically upgradient of any existing public water supply well.
(3) Any new landfill or land application site proposed for location within a designated local wellhead protection area must comply with any duly adopted ordinances or regulations established pursuant to an approved Wellhead Protection Program.
J. Surface Water
(1) No new landfill or new land application site shall be located within 0.5 mile of the banks of any section of a river, stream, lake or reservoir, or coastal water classified by the Commission as recreational or shellfish harvesting.
(2) No new landfill, new land application site, new outdoor processing facility, or new outdoor composting facility shall be located within 250 feet of the banks of any river, stream, lake or reservoir, or coastal water.
(3) No new outdoor solid waste management facility shall be located within 100 feet of the banks of any river, stream, lake or reservoir, or coastal water.
K. Surface Water Drainage Areas
No new solid waste management facility shall be located in an area which may result in recurring washout of waste, such as in a surface water drainage channel.
L. Natural Geology
(1) New landfills shall be located where there are adequate naturally occurring geological materials present of low permeability to act as a buffer between the base of the landfill liner and the top of the uppermost aquifer. Such materials shall generally consist of clays, silty clays, clayey silts, or other soils which have an average hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10 -6 cm/sec or less. The thickness, or depth, of these materials shall extend to at least five feet immediately beneath the base of the landfill liner.
(2) Existing landfills which accepted waste on or after the effective date shall be located in an area as described in paragraph L.1. of this rule unless:
(a) all unused disposal areas of the landfill as of the effective date of these regulations which will receive waste on or after that date, are constructed with a liner according to state requirements; and
(b) the naturally occurring geological materials present below the disposal area generally consist of clays, silty clays, clayey silts, or other soils which are of low permeability.
(3) New rubbish sites, new composting facilities subject to Rule 1.9.C of these regulations, any such existing rubbish sites and composting facilities receiving waste on or after April 9, 1994, shall be located in a site in which the top of the uppermost aquifer is at least five feet below the base of the liner. The liner shall consist of either of the following:
(a) adequate naturally occurring geological materials present immediately below the disposal or composting area and on all sidewalls. Such materials shall generally consist of clays, silty clays, clayey silts, or other soils, which are of low permeability. The thickness, or depth, of these materials should extend to at least five feet below the disposal or composting area, and for sites having sidewalls, at least three feet laterally; or
(b) a constructed or alternate liner, as approved by the Department.
M. Air Quality. No new solid waste incinerator shall be sited in an area which conflicts with state law and/or regulations.
N. Endangered or Threatened Species. No new solid waste management facility shall be located within an area which may affect:
(1) a federally listed endangered or threatened species, unless in compliance with all statutes, rules, and regulations within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or
(2) a state listed endangered or threatened species, unless in compliance with all statutes, rules, and regulations within the jurisdiction of the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks.
O. Historical and Archaeological Areas. No new solid waste management facility shall be located in such a manner as to significantly and adversely impact the cultural resources listed in, or eligible for listing in, the National Register of Historic Places, unless such impact to those cultural resources may be appropriately mitigated.
P. Parks and Recreational Areas
(1) No new landfill, new rubbish site, new outdoor processing facility, new outdoor composting facility, new land application site receiving putrescible waste or new commercial waste incinerator shall be located within 0.5 mile of any of the following areas, without the specific written consent of the person responsible for managing such area:
(a) a national, state, county, or city designated park; or
(b) an outdoor recreational area, such as a golf course or swimming pool, owned by a city, county, or other public agency.
(2) A greater setback distance may be established by the Permit Board, or where appropriate, the Permit Board's designee on a site specific basis.
Q. Forests, Wilderness Areas, Wildlife Management Areas, and Natural Areas
(1) No new landfill, new rubbish site, new outdoor processing facility, new outdoor composting facility, new land application site receiving putrescible waste, or new commercial waste incinerator shall be located within any of the following areas, without the specific written consent of the person responsible for managing such area:
(a) national forest land, national wilderness area, and national wildlife refuge areas, as designated by the appropriate federal agency; or
(b) state wildlife management areas, state game management areas, and state natural areas, as designated by the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks.
(2) A setback distance may be established by the Permit Board, or where appropriate, the Permit Board's designee on a site specific basis.
R. Structures. No new landfill, new land application site receiving putrescible waste, new outdoor processing facility, or new outdoor composting facility receiving putrescible waste shall be located within 0.5 mile of any licensed school, licensed day-care center, licensed hospital, or licensed nursing home, or within 1000 feet of any church. The Permit Board, or where appropriate, the Permit Board's designee may allow a smaller setback distance if a written agreement is obtained from the owner or appropriate representative stating that a smaller setback is acceptable.
S. Residential Areas
(1) No new landfill or new land application site receiving putrescible waste shall be located within one mile of a residential area, unless the proposed facility would be located in an established industrial park, in which case the facility shall not be located less than 1000 feet from any residential area.
(2) For purposes of this rule, "residential area" means:
(a) a group of 20 or more single family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of two or more units per acre; or
(b) a group of 40 or more single family dwelling units on contiguous property and having an average density of one or more units per acre; or
(c) a subdivision containing at least 20 constructed houses, in which the subdivision plat is recorded in the chancery clerk's office of the appropriate county.
T. Property Line Setbacks (Buffer Zones)
(1) All new solid waste management facilities shall be designed to comply with setback distances between the edge of the actual disposal, processing, composting, transfer or storage area and the property line as follows:
(a) For transfer and processing facilities, except such outdoor facilities, the setback shall be at least 50 feet.
(b) For outdoor transfer stations, outdoor processing facilities, composting facilities, and land application sites, the setback shall be at least 200 feet, except where adequate on-site screening, whether natural or artificial, will restrict the offsite view of the facility, in which case the setback shall be no less than 100 feet.
(c) For rubbish sites the setback shall be at least 200 feet, except where adequate on-site screening, whether natural or artificial, will restrict the offsite view of the facility, in which case the setback shall be no less than 150 feet.
(d) For landfills, the setback shall be at least 500 feet, except where adequate on-site screening, whether natural or artificial, will restrict the offsite view of the landfill, in which case the setback shall be no less than 250 feet.
(2) The Permit Board, or where appropriate, the Permit Board's designee will consider requests for a smaller property setback distance upon the applicant's submittal of sufficient proof that affected property owners within the subject buffer zone have had timely and sufficient notice of the proposed facility. Any comments received as a result of such notice shall be considered prior to action upon any request for a decrease in the buffer zone requirements of paragraph T.1 of this rule.
(3) Existing facilities shall comply with the property setback distances that were approved at the time the site was permitted or authorized.
U. Aesthetics and Visibility. New landfills and new rubbish sites shall be located such that the actual disposal area is at least 1000 feet from the edge of the right-of-way of any interstate or primary highway, as designated by the Mississippi State Highway Commission, except the following:
(1) those which will be screened by natural objects, planting, fences, or other appropriate means so as not to be visible from the main-traveled highway system, or otherwise removed from sight;
(2) those which are located within areas which are zoned for industrial use under authority of law;
(3) those which will be located within unzoned industrial areas, as determined by the Mississippi State Highway Department; or
(4) those which will not be visible from the main-traveled highway system.
V. Local Government Regulations/Solid Waste Management Plans. New solid waste management facilities shall be located such that, on the date an application is submitted
to the Department, the site does not conflict with regulations or ordinances of local governments, and is consistent with the state approved local or regional nonhazardous solid waste management plan.
W. Transportation Factors. Owners of new commercial landfills must demonstrate to the Permit Board that the anticipated additional traffic along the primary route to the facility will not significantly increase the safety risk within a five (5) mile radius of the disposal area of the facility. At a minimum, the demonstration shall address the following factors:
(1) the primary route(s) that the applicant expects will be used for the transportation of waste to the facility within a five (5) mile radius of the disposal area;
(2) an estimate of the number and types of vehicles routinely traveling on the primary route(s) within said five (5) mile radius;
(3) an estimate of the number and types of vehicles expected by the applicant to transport waste to the facility via the primary route(s) within said five (5) mile radius;
(4) an estimate of the loaded weight of each type of vehicle expected to transport waste to the facility via the primary route(s) within the five (5) mile radius; and
(5) proximity to waste generators.
The Permit Board may require such reasonable restrictions and limitation as it deems appropriate regarding the primary transportation route(s) to the facility if it determines that the primary route(s) of transportation to the facility by waste hauling vehicles would significantly increase the safety risks within the five (5) mile radius.
X. Noise Factors. To attenuate for noise, no new landfill or new outdoor processing facility shall be located closer than 1500 feet of a single family dwelling unit, and no new rubbish site, new indoor processing facility, or lateral expansions of any such facilities shall be located closer than 500 feet of a single family dwelling unit unless:
(1) the owner of such dwelling provides written consent to a smaller distance; or
(2) the applicant can demonstrate that the facility will be located, configured, designed, constructed, and operated such that the noise level at the neighboring dwelling, caused by the normal waste management operations of the facility, but not by vehicular movement into or out of the facility, will not exceed an eight- hour time weighted average (TWA) of 65 decibels between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., and an eight-hour TWA of 55 decibels between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m.
The Department may require a greater distance, or may require noise abatement measures, if it determines that the noise level at a neighboring dwelling, caused by the normal waste management operations of the facility, but not by vehicular movement into
or out of the facility, will exceed an eight-hour TWA of 65 decibels between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m., or an eight-hour TWA of 55 decibels between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m.
Y. Existing Facility Demonstrations
(1) By the effective date of these regulations, owners of existing MSWLF units, which accept waste after that date, must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Department, compliance with or non-applicability of the requirements of paragraphs B., C., G. and L. of this rule. The Department may establish a closure schedule for facilities failing to satisfy this demonstration. In no event shall facilities which fail to satisfy this demonstration remain in operation after October 9, 1996.
(2) By April 9, 1994, owners of all existing land application sites, rubbish sites, processing facilities, composting facilities, and existing landfills other than MSWLF units which accept waste on or after that date, must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Department, compliance or non-applicability with the requirements of paragraphs B, C, and L of this rule. The Department may establish a closure schedule for facilities failing to meet this demonstration.
Z. Recordkeeping. Documentation of compliance or non-applicability of the requirements of this rule shall be retained by the owner at the facility or at another approved site until otherwise directed by the Department, but in no case shall records be required to be retained longer than 5 years after the completion of any applicable closure and post- closure requirements. Such documentation shall be made available to the Department upon request.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.4 Landfill Requirements
A. Applicability
(1) The requirements of this rule do not apply to MSWLF units that stopped receiving solid waste before October 9, 1991, or to other landfills that stopped receiving solid waste before the effective date of these regulations.
(2) MSWLF units that received waste after October 9, 1991 but stopped receiving waste before the effective date of these regulations are exempt from all the requirements of this rule, except for the closure requirements specified in paragraph E.2 of this rule. The owner must complete closure requirements within six months of last receipt of wastes. Owners of MSWLF units that fail to complete closure requirements, as required in this paragraph, will be subject to all the requirements of this rule.
(3) Notwithstanding paragraphs A.1 and A.2 of this rule, the Commission or Permit Board may impose additional requirements on any landfill on a case-by-case basis in order to prevent, abate, control or correct groundwater contamination, public endangerment or as otherwise determined necessary to protect human health, welfare or the environment.
(4) All landfills that received waste on or after the effective date of these regulations, must comply with the requirements of this rule, unless otherwise specified.
B. Operating Requirements
(1) Procedures for Excluding the Receipt of Hazardous Waste and other Unauthorized Wastes
(a) Owners of all MSWLF units must implement a program at the facility for detecting and preventing the disposal of the following wastes:
(1) hazardous waste as defined by and subject to the Mississippi Hazardous Waste Management Regulations and Subtitle C of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act;
(2) polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) waste;
(3) liquid wastes as described in Paragraph B.(10) of this rule;
(4) regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM) which have not been properly bagged or contained in such a manner as to prevent the wastes from becoming airborne; and
(5) whole waste tires which have not been shredded, chopped, cut or otherwise processed as described in Rule 4.4.Bof the Mississippi Waste Tire Management Regulations.
(b) At a minimum, the program required in paragraph B.1.a of this rule, must include the following procedures:
(1) The owner must obtain information on any industrial process waste stream, prior to disposal, including the following:
(i) generator's name and address
(ii) transporter's name and address
(iii) name of the waste
(iv) process generating the waste
(v) physical and chemical properties of the waste
(vi) quantity of waste
(vii) certification from the generator that the waste is not a regulated hazardous waste under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and the Mississippi Hazardous Waste Management Regulations.
(2) The owner shall forward the information required above to the Department and shall not accept the industrial process waste if the Department objects to the disposal of such waste at this facility. If the Department does not object to the disposal of such waste within 14 days of receipt of the information required above, the permittee may assume that the Department has no objections. The Department may require the submission of additional information in order to further describe or characterize the waste.
(3) For purposes of this rule, the term "industrial process waste" shall mean any solid waste generated as a result of the manufacture of a product, except uncontaminated packaging materials and containers, uncontaminated machinery components, tires, land clearing or landscaping wastes, office wastes, cafeteria wastes, and construction and demolition wastes.
(4) The owner shall conduct random inspections of incoming loads unless the owner takes other steps to ensure that incoming loads do not contain regulated hazardous wastes or PCB wastes.
(5) The owner shall maintain records of any inspections.
(6) The owner shall insure that all facility personnel are properly trained to recognize regulated hazardous waste and PCB wastes.
(7) The owner shall notify the Department if a regulated hazardous waste or PCB waste is discovered at the facility.
(2) Cover Material Requirements
(a) Except as provided in paragraph B.2.c. of this rule, the owners of all MSWLF units, except ash monofills, must cover disposed solid waste with at least six inches of earthen material at the end of each operating day, or at more frequent intervals if determined to be necessary by the Department to control disease vectors, fires, odors, blowing litter, and scavenging.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph B.2.c. of this rule, the owners of all MSWLF units which receive only ash and owners of all landfills other than MSWLF units must cover disposed solid waste with at least six inches of earthen material at a frequency determined by the Department.
(c) Alternate Cover Materials
(1) Alternative materials of an alternative thickness (other than at least six inches of earthen material) may be approved by the Department, if the owner demonstrates that the alternative material, thickness and/or method of application adequately control disease vectors, fires, odors, blowing litter, and scavenging without presenting a threat to human health and the environment.
(2) The use of alternate cover materials shall generally require the weekly application of a soil cover, unless otherwise determined by the Department.
(3) Disease Vector Control
Populations of disease vectors shall be minimized through proper compaction and covering procedures. Approved pesticides, or use of other techniques appropriate for the protection of human health and the environment, shall be employed for vector control when necessary.
(4) Explosive Gases Control
(a) Owners of all MSWLF units must ensure that:
(1) the concentration of methane gas generated by the facility does not exceed 25 percent of the lower explosive limit for methane in facility structures (excluding gas control or recovery system components); and
(2) the concentration of methane gas does not exceed the lower explosive limit for methane at the facility property boundary.
(b) Owners of all MSWLF units must implement a routine methane monitoring program to ensure that the standards of paragraph B.4.a. of this rule are met. A plan describing the methane monitoring program should be submitted to the Department for approval. The plan should provide for the following:
(1) The type and frequency of monitoring must be determined based on the following factors:
(i) soil conditions;
(ii) the hydrogeologic conditions surrounding the facility;
(iii) the hydraulic conditions surrounding the facility; and
(iv) the location of facility structures and property boundaries.
(2) The minimum frequency of monitoring shall be quarterly.
(3) Results of all methane monitoring pursuant to paragraph B.4.b. of this rule shall be submitted to the Department no later than sixty (60) days following each monitoring period.
(c) If methane gas levels exceeding the limits specified in paragraph B.4.a. of this rule are detected, the owner must:
(1) immediately take all necessary steps to ensure protection of human health and notify the Department;
(2) within seven days of detection, submit to the Department and place in the operating record the methane gas levels detected and a description of the steps taken to protect human health; and
(3) within 60 days of detection, implement a remediation plan for the methane gas releases. A copy of the plan shall be submitted to the Department for approval and upon approval shall be placed in the operating record. The plan shall describe the nature and extent of the problem and the proposed remedy.
(d) The Department may establish alternative schedules for demonstrating compliance with paragraphs B.4.c.(2) and B.4.c.(3) of this rule.
(5) Air Criteria
(a) Owners of all landfills must ensure that they do not violate any applicable requirements developed under a State Implementation Plan (SIP) approved or promulgated by the Administrator pursuant to Section 110 of the Clean Air Act, as amended.
(b) Open burning of solid waste, except for land clearing debris generated on the site of the facility, shall be prohibited. Open burning of land clearing debris shall be conducted in accordance with Rule 1.3.G. of the “Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air
Contaminants.” (Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 1). An adequate supply of water under pressure at the site or an adequate stockpile of earth reasonably close to the disposal area shall be provided, or there shall be a nearby, organized Fire Department providing service when called. The Department may approve alternate methods of fire protection or waive this requirement when there is no need for fire protection. Should an accidental fire occur, the operator shall immediately take action to extinguish the fire and shall notify the Department by the close of the Department’s next business day.
(6) Waste Placement
(a) Disposal activity shall be restricted to the area defined in the approved application.
(b) For landfills subject to the construction quality assurance (CQA) requirements of Rule 1.4(B)(19):
Prior to construction or preparation of any new disposal cell or area at a landfill, the cell boundaries shall be appropriately located and marked by a land surveyor licensed by the State of Mississippi to ensure construction within the approved area.
(c) For Landfills not subject to the CQA requirements of Rule 1.4(B)(19):
Prior to construction or preparation of any new disposal cell or area, disposal area boundaries shall be located and clearly marked by a land surveyor licensed by the State of Mississippi. Permanent markers shall be erected at the corners of the approved disposal area. The markers shall be a minimum, 3-foot high concrete posts, metal pipes, weather resistant wood posts or other suitable markers approved by the Department. The markers shall be placed in the ground to a sufficient depth to facilitate permanence and shall be maintained by the owner. Markers that become damaged shall be promptly re-established by the owner with the assistance of a licensed land surveyor, where necessary.
(7) Access Requirements. Unloading of solid waste shall be confined to as small an area as practical. Adequate security, including use of artificial barriers, natural barriers, or both, as appropriate to protect human health and the environment and to control access into the facility and to prevent the disposal of unauthorized materials, unauthorized vehicular traffic and illegal dumping of wastes, shall be provided. An attendant shall be on duty during operating hours and during special site utilization to direct unloading of solid waste.
(8) Run-On/Run-Off Control Systems
(a) Owners of all landfills must design, construct, and maintain:
(1) a run-on control system to prevent flow onto the active portion of the landfill during the peak discharge from a 25-year storm;
(2) a run-off control system from the active portion of the landfill to collect and control at least the water volume resulting from a 24-hour, 25-year storm.
(b) Run-off from the active portion of the landfill unit must be handled in accordance with paragraph B.9 of this rule.
(9) Surface Water Requirements
(a) Landfills shall not:
(1) cause a discharge of pollutants into waters of the State, including wetlands, that violates any requirements of the Clean Water Act or the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Act, including but not limited to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements.
(2) cause the discharge of a non-point source of pollution to waters of the State, including wetlands, that violates any requirement of an area-wide or state-wide water quality management plan that has been approved under Section 208 or 319 of the Clean Water Act, as amended.
(b) Monitoring of surface waters may be required in some instances. Where monitoring of surface waters is required, the frequency of sampling, the parameters to be analyzed, and the reporting requirements shall be established in the permit.
(10) Liquids Restrictions
(a) Bulk or non-containerized liquid waste may not be placed in landfills unless:
(1) the waste is household waste other than septic waste; or
(2) the waste is leachate or gas condensate derived from the landfill. Prior to placing such liquids in the landfill the owner must demonstrate and obtain approval from the Department that the landfill, whether it is a new or existing landfill or lateral expansion, is designed with a composite liner and leachate collection system as described in paragraph C.1.b. of this rule. The owner must place
the demonstration in the operating record and notify the Department that it has been placed in the operating record.
(b) Containers holding liquid waste may not be placed in a landfill unless:
(1) the container is a small container similar in size to that normally found in household waste;
(2) the container is designed to hold liquids for use other than storage; or
(3) the waste is household waste.
(11) Recordkeeping Requirements
(a) The owner of a landfill must keep an accurate written daily record of deliveries of solid waste to the facility including but not limited to: the name of the hauler, the source of the waste, the types of waste received and the weight of solid waste measured in tons received at the facility. For those facilities that do not have access to weight scales, the weight should be converted to tons from cubic yards using conversion factors developed or approved by the Department.
(b) The owner of a landfill must record and retain near the facility in an operating record or in an alternative location approved by the Department the following information as it becomes available:
(1) any location restriction demonstration required under Rule 1.3 of these regulations;
(2) inspection records, training procedures, notification procedures, and any other information necessary to demonstrate compliance with paragraph B.1. of this rule;
(3) any gas monitoring results from monitoring and any remediation plans required by paragraph B.4 of this rule;
(4) any landfill design documentation for placement of leachate or gas condensate in the landfill as required under paragraph 10.a.(2) of this rule;
(5) any demonstration, certification, finding, monitoring, testing, or analytical data required by paragraph D of this rule;
(6) closure and post-closure care plans and any monitoring, testing, or analytical data as required by paragraph E of this rule; and
(7) any cost estimates and financial assurance documentation required by paragraph F of this rule.
(c) The owner must notify the Department when the documents from paragraph B.11.b of this rule have been placed or added to the operating record and shall make such documents available at all reasonable times for inspection by the Department. Additionally, upon request by the Department, a copy of any information contained in the operating record must be furnished to the Department.
(d) The Department may set alternative schedules for recordkeeping and notification requirements as specified in paragraphs B.11.b. and B.11.c of this rule, except for the notification requirements in Rule 1.3.B.5 of this rule and paragraph D.5.g(1)(iii) of this rule.
(12) Buffer Requirements to Utility Easements. Unless otherwise required by special circumstances, owners of all landfills must maintain a minimum distance of 25 feet between the disposal operation and pipeline, underground utility or electrical transmission line easements. The buffer should provide enough distance to ensure the safety of the operating personnel and facilities to be protected and should also provide space for drainage controls.
(13) Windblown Materials. A portable fence or other suitable means of containment shall be employed, if necessary, to confine windblown materials from unloading, spreading and compaction operations to the smallest area practical. It shall be the responsibility of the site operator to collect and return to the active disposal area all windblown materials at least every operating day or as necessary to minimize unhealthy, unsafe or unsightly conditions.
(14) All Weather Access. All-weather roads shall be provided within the site to any designated unloading area. Provisions shall be made to provide proper cover during wet weather.
(15) Annual Report. The owner of a solid waste landfill shall submit an annual report to the Department each year on or before February 28 th , to include information describing the operations from the preceding calendar year. At a minimum, the report shall contain the following:
(a) aggregate information on the types, amounts and sources of waste received during the calendar year. Listed types should be divided minimally into residential and non-residential wastes. The amounts of waste received should be reported in units of tons, with the amount of waste originating in-state and out-of-state listed separately. The sources of waste should list cities and/or counties individually, with a clear indication of wastes originating from out-of-state.
(b) a contour drawing of the landfill showing areas filled during the report year and total cumulative areas filled.
(c) the estimated remaining capacity, in terms of volume and years of life remaining.
(d) if the owner or contract operator is a private concern, an updated disclosure statement. If all information from the previously submitted disclosure statement is unchanged, a letter stating such may be included in lieu of an updated disclosure statement.
(e) an adjusted closure and post-closure cost estimate, if applicable.
(f) an audit of the financial assurance document and the end-of-year value of the financial assurance mechanism, if applicable.
(g) a modified financial assurance document, if necessary.
(16) Contract Operator - Disclosure Requirements. If the owner of a commercial solid waste landfill contracts with any person other than a public agency to operate the facility, the owner shall not allow the contractor to begin operation until a disclosure statement has been submitted to and approved by the Permit Board or the Permit Board’s designee in accordance with Section 17-17-501, Mississippi Code Annotated, and the regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.
(17) Equipment. Owners of a landfill must insure that adequate numbers and types of operating equipment are provided at all times to properly manage the landfill operation. Replacement equipment shall be promptly brought to the site, as necessary, in the event of equipment breakdown.
(18) Excavation of Waste. No excavation of solid waste shall be conducted without approval of the Department.
(19) Liner Quality Assurance. At least two weeks prior to disposal of solid waste in any new MSWLF unit or lateral expansion of existing MSWLF unit, or other landfill where deemed necessary by the Permit Board, a construction quality assurance report shall be submitted to the Department. The report shall contain a certification from an independent registered professional engineer that the area has been constructed according to the approved design plans.
(20) Operator Certification
(a) Each commercial solid waste landfill must be operated by a person who holds a current certificate of competency issued by the Commission in accordance with Title 11, Part 4, Chapter 8 (Operator Regs.). Such person
must have direct supervision over and be personally responsible for the daily operation and maintenance of the landfill.
(b) In the event of temporary loss of a certified operator due to illness, death, discharge, or other legitimate cause, written notice shall be given to the Department within 7 days. The continued operation of such system without a certified operator may proceed on an interim basis for a period not to exceed 180 days, except for good cause shown upon petition to the Commission.
C. Design Criteria
(1) New landfills and lateral expansions of existing, MSWLF units shall be constructed in accordance with one of the following designs:
(a) with a composite liner as defined by these regulations and a leachate collection system that is designed and constructed to maintain less than a 30-cm depth (11.81 inches) of leachate over the liner, excluding sumps and collection trenches; or
(b) with a design approved by the Department. For new MSWLF units and lateral expansions of existing MSWLF units, the design must ensure that the concentration values listed in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 258 (Subpart D) will not be exceeded in the uppermost aquifer at the relevant point of compliance, as specified by the Department under paragraph C.3 of this rule.
(2) When approving a design that complies with paragraph C.1.b of this rule, the Department shall consider at least the following factors:
(a) the hydrogeologic characteristics of the facility and surrounding land;
(b) the climatic factors of the area;
(c) the volume and physical and chemical characteristics of the waste and the leachate; and
(d) other relevant factors as determined by the Department.
(3) The relevant point of compliance specified by the Department shall be no more than 150 meters from the waste management unit boundary and shall be located on land owned by the owner of the landfill. In determining the relevant point of compliance, the Department shall consider at least the following factors:
(a) the hydrogeologic characteristics of the facility and surrounding land;
(b) the volume and physical and chemical characteristics of the leachate;
(c) the quantity, quality, and direction, of flow of groundwater;
(d) the proximity and withdrawal rate of the groundwater users;
(e) the availability of alternative drinking water supplies;
(f) the existing quality of the groundwater, including other sources of contamination and their cumulative impacts on the groundwater and whether groundwater is currently used or reasonably expected to be used for drinking water;
(g) public health, safety, and welfare effects;
(h) practicable capability of the owner; and
(i) other relevant factors as determined by the Department.
D. Groundwater Monitoring and Corrective Action Requirements
(1) Schedule of Compliance
(a) Owners of landfills must comply with the groundwater monitoring requirements of this rule before waste can be placed in the landfill.
(b) The Department may approve an alternative schedule for the owners of existing landfills and lateral expansions to comply with the groundwater monitoring requirements specified in this section. In setting the compliance schedule, the Department must consider potential risks posed by the unit to human health and the environment. The following factors should be considered in determining potential risk:
(1) proximity of human and environmental receptors;
(2) design of the landfill;
(3) age of the landfill;
(4) the size of the landfill;
(5) types and quantities of wastes disposed including sewage sludge; and
(6) resource value of the underlying aquifer, including:
(i) current and future uses;
(ii) proximity and withdrawal rate of users; and
(iii) groundwater quality and quantity.
(c) Once established at a landfill, groundwater monitoring shall be conducted throughout the active life and post-closure care period of that landfill as specified in paragraph E. of this rule.
(d) The Department may establish alternative schedules for demonstrating compliance with:
(1) paragraph D.2.d.(2) of this rule, pertaining to notification of placement of certification in operating record;
(2) paragraph D.4.d.(1) of this rule, pertaining to notification that statistically significant increase (SSI) notice is in operating record;
(3) paragraphs D.4.d.(2) and D.4.d.(3) of this rule, pertaining to an assessment monitoring program;
(4) paragraph D.5.b of this rule, pertaining to sampling and analyzing Appendix II constituents;
(5) paragraph D.5.d.(1) of this rule, pertaining to placement of notice (Appendix II constituents detected) in record and notification of notice in record;
(6) paragraph D.5.d.(2) of this rule, pertaining to sampling for Appendix I and II;
(7) paragraph D.5.g. of this rule, pertaining to notification (and placement of notice in record) of SSI above groundwater protection standard;
(8) paragraphs D.5.g.(1)(iv) and D.6.a of this rule, pertaining to assessment of corrective measures;
(9) paragraph D.7.a of this rule, pertaining to selection of remedy and notification of placement in record;
(10) paragraph D.8.c.(4) of this rule, pertaining to notification of placement in record (alternative corrective action measures); and
(11) paragraph D.8.f of this rule, pertaining to notification of placement in record (certification of remedy completed).
(e) Groundwater monitoring requirements under paragraphs D.2 through D.5 of this rule may be suspended by the Department, if the owner can demonstrate that there is no potential for migration of hazardous constituents from the landfill to the uppermost aquifer during the active life of the landfill and the post-closure care period. This demonstration must be certified by a qualified groundwater scientist and approved by the Department, and must be based upon:
(1) site-specific field collected measurements, sampling, and analysis of physical, chemical, and biological processes affecting contaminant fate and transport; and
(2) contaminant fate and transport predictions that maximize contaminant migration and consider impacts on human health and environment.
For landfills other than MSWLF units the Department may approve an alternative demonstration process.
(2) Groundwater Monitoring Systems
(a) A groundwater monitoring system must be installed that consists of a sufficient number of wells, installed at appropriate locations and depths, to yield groundwater samples from the uppermost aquifer that:
(1) Represent the quality of background groundwater that has not been affected by leakage from a unit. A determination of background quality may include sampling of wells that are not hydraulically upgradient of the waste management area where:
(i) hydrogeologic conditions do not allow the owner or operator to determine what wells are hydraulically upgradient; or
(ii) sampling at other wells will provide an indication of background groundwater quality that is as representative or more representative than that provided by the upgradient wells.
(2) Represent the quality of groundwater passing the relevant point of compliance specified by the Department under paragraph C.3 of this rule. The downgradient monitoring system must be installed at the relevant point of compliance specified by the Department
under paragraph C.3. of this rule that ensures detection of groundwater contamination in the uppermost aquifer. When physical obstacles preclude installation of groundwater monitoring wells at the relevant point of compliance at existing units, the down-gradient monitoring system may be installed at the closest practicable distance hydraulically down-gradient from the relevant point of compliance specified by the Department, under paragraph C.3 of this rule that ensure detection of groundwater contamination in the uppermost aquifer.
(b) The Department may approve a multi-unit groundwater monitoring system instead of separate groundwater monitoring systems for each landfill unit when the facility has several units, provided the multi-unit groundwater monitoring system meets the requirement of paragraph D.2.a of this rule and will be as protective of human health and the environment as individual monitoring systems for each landfill unit, based on the following factors:
(1) number, spacing, and orientation of the landfill units;
(2) hydrogeologic setting;
(3) site history;
(4) engineering design of the landfill units; and
(5) type of waste accepted at the landfill units.
(c) Monitoring wells must be cased in a manner that maintains the integrity of the monitoring well bore hole. This casing must be screened or perforated and packed with gravel or sand, where necessary, to enable collection of groundwater samples. The annular space (i.e., the space between the bore hole and well casing) above the sampling depth must be sealed to prevent contamination of samples and the groundwater.
(1) The owner must notify the Department that the design, installation, development, and decommission of any monitoring wells, piezometers and other measurement, sampling, and analytical devices documentation has been placed in the operating record; and
(2) The monitoring wells, piezometers, and other measurement, sampling, and analytical devices must be operated and maintained so that they perform to design specifications throughout the life of the monitoring program.
(d) The number, spacing, and depths of monitoring systems shall be:
(1) Determined based upon site-specific technical information that must include thorough characterization of:
(i) aquifer thickness, groundwater flow rate, groundwater flow direction including seasonal and temporal fluctuations in groundwater flow; and
(ii) saturated and unsaturated geologic units and fill materials overlying the uppermost aquifer, materials comprising the uppermost aquifer, and materials comprising the confining unit defining the lower boundary of the uppermost aquifer; including, but not limited to: thicknesses, stratigraphy, lithology, hydraulic conductivities, porosities and effective porosities.
(2) Certified by a qualified groundwater scientist and approved by the Department. Within 14 days of this certification, the owner must notify the Department that the certification has been placed in the operating record.
(3). Groundwater Sampling and Analysis Requirements
(a) The groundwater monitoring program must include consistent sampling and analysis procedures that are designed to ensure monitoring results that provide an accurate representation of groundwater quality at the background and downgradient wells installed in compliance with paragraph D.2.a of this rule. The owner must notify the Department that the sampling and analysis program documentation has been placed in the operating record and the program must include procedures and techniques for:
(1) sample collection;
(2) sample preservation and shipment;
(3) analytical procedures;
(4) chain of custody control; and
(5) quality assurance and quality control.
(b) The groundwater monitoring program must include sampling and analytical methods that are appropriate for groundwater sampling and that accurately measure hazardous constituents and other monitoring
parameters in groundwater samples. Groundwater samples shall not be field-filtered prior to laboratory analysis.
(c) The sampling procedures and frequency must be protective of human health and the environment.
(d) Groundwater elevations must be measured in each well immediately prior to purging, each time groundwater is sampled. The owner must determine the rate and direction of groundwater flow each time groundwater is sampled. Groundwater elevations in wells which monitor the same waste management area must be measured within a period of time short enough to avoid temporal variations in groundwater flow which could preclude accurate determination of groundwater flow rate and direction.
(e) The owner must establish background groundwater quality in a hydraulically upgradient or background well(s) for each of the monitoring parameters or constituents required in the particular groundwater monitoring program that applies to the landfill, as determined under paragraph D.4.a or paragraph D.5.a of this rule. Background groundwater quality may be established at wells that are not located hydraulically upgradient from the landfill if it meets the requirements of paragraph D.2.a (1) of this rule.
(f) The number of samples collected to establish groundwater quality data must be consistent with the appropriate statistical procedures determined pursuant to paragraph D.3.g of this rule. The sampling procedures shall be those specified under paragraph D.4.b of this rule for detection monitoring, paragraphs D.5.b and D.5.d of this rule for assessment monitoring, and paragraph D.6.b of this rule for corrective action.
(g) The owner must specify in the operating record one of the following statistical methods to be used in evaluating groundwater monitoring data for each hazardous constituent. The statistical test chosen shall be conducted separately for each hazardous constituent in each well.
(1) A parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparisons procedures to identify statistically significant evidence of contamination. The method must include estimation and testing of the contrasts between each compliance well's mean and the background mean levels for each constituent.
(2) An analysis of variance (ANOVA) based on ranks followed by multiple comparisons procedures to identify statistically significant evidence of contamination. The method must include estimation and testing of the contrasts between each compliance well's median and the background median levels for each constituent.
(3) A tolerance or prediction interval procedure in which an interval for each constituent is established from the distribution of the background data, and the level of each constituent in each compliance well is compared to the upper tolerance or prediction limit.
(4) A control chart approach that gives control limits for each constituent.
(5) Another statistical test method that meets the performance standards of paragraph D.3.h of this rule. The owner must place a justification for this alternative in the operating record and obtain approval from the Department for the use of this alternative test. The justification must demonstrate that the alternative method meets the performance standards of paragraph D.3.h of this rule.
(h) Any statistical method chosen under paragraph D.3.g of this rule shall comply with the following performance standards, as appropriate:
(1) The statistical method used to evaluate groundwater monitoring data shall be appropriate for the distribution of chemical parameters or hazardous constituents. If the distribution of the chemical parameters or hazardous constituents is shown by the owner to be inappropriate for a normal theory test, then the data should be transformed or a distribution-free theory test should be used. If the distributions for the constituents differ, more than one statistical method may be needed.
(2) If an individual well comparison procedure is used to compare an individual compliance well constituent concentration with background constituent concentrations or a groundwater protection standard, the test shall be done at a Type I error level no less than 0.01 for each testing period. If a multiple comparisons procedure is used, the Type I experiment wise error rate for each testing period shall be no less than 0.05; however, the Type I error of no less than 0.01 for individual well comparisons must be maintained. This performance standard does not apply to tolerance intervals, prediction intervals, or control charts.
(3) If a control chart approach is used to evaluate groundwater monitoring data, the specific type of control chart and its associated parameter values shall be protective of human health and the environment. The parameters shall be determined after considering the number of samples in the background data base,
the data distribution, and the range of the concentration values for each constituent of concern.
(4) If a tolerance interval or a predictional interval is used to evaluate groundwater monitoring data, the levels of confidence and, for tolerance intervals, the percentage of the population that the interval must contain, shall be protective of human health and the environment. These parameters shall be determined after considering the number of samples in the background database, the data distribution, and the range of the concentration values for each constituent of concern.
(5) The statistical method shall account for data below the limit of detection with one or more statistical procedures that are protective of human health and the environment. Any practical quantitation limit (pql) that is used in the statistical method shall be the lowest concentration level that can be reliably achieved within specified limits of precision and accuracy during routine laboratory operating conditions that are available to the facility.
(6) If necessary, the statistical method shall include procedures to control or correct for seasonal and spatial variability as well as temporal correlation in the data.
(i) The owner must determine whether or not there is a statistically significant increase over background values for each parameter or constituent required in the particular groundwater monitoring program that applies to the landfill, as determined under paragraphs D.4.a or D.5.a of this rule.
(1) In determining whether a statistically significant increase has occurred, the owner must compare the groundwater quality of each parameter or constituent at each monitoring well designated pursuant to paragraph D.2.a.(2) of this rule to the background value of that constituent, according to the statistical procedures and performance standards specified under paragraphs D.3.g and D.3.h of this rule.
(2) Within a reasonable period of time after completing sampling and analysis, the owner must determine whether there has been a statistically significant increase over background at each monitoring well.
(4) Detection Monitoring Program
(a) Detection monitoring is required at all groundwater monitoring wells defined under paragraphs D.2.a.(1) and D.2.a.(2) of this rule. At a
minimum, a detection monitoring program must include the monitoring for the constituents listed in Appendix I of 40 CFR Part 258.
(1) The Department may delete any of the Appendix I monitoring parameters for a landfill if it can be shown that the removed constituents are not reasonably expected to be contained in or derived from the waste contained in the landfill.
(2) The Department may establish an alternative list of inorganic indicator parameters for a landfill, in lieu of some or all of the heavy metals (constituents 1-15 in Appendix I of 40 CFR Part 258, if the alternative parameters provide a reliable indication of inorganic releases from the landfill to the groundwater. In determining alternative parameters, the Department shall consider the following factors:
(i) the types, quantities, and concentrations of constituents in waste managed at the landfill;
(ii) the mobility, stability, and persistence of waste constituents or their reaction products in the unsaturated zone beneath the landfill;
(iii) the detectability of indicator parameters, waste constituents, and reaction products in the groundwater; and
(iv) the concentration or values and coefficients of variation of monitoring parameters or constituents in the groundwater background.
(b) The monitoring frequency for all constituents listed in Appendix I of 40 CFR Part 258, or in the alternative list approved in accordance with paragraph D.4.a.(2) of this rule, shall be at least semiannual during the active life of the facility (including closure) and the post-closure period. A minimum of four independent samples from each well (background and downgradient) must be collected and analyzed for the Appendix I constituents, or the alternative list approved in accordance with paragraph D.4.a.(2) of this rule, during the first semiannual sampling event. At least one sample from each well (background and downgradient) must be collected and analyzed during subsequent semiannual sampling events.
The Department may specify an appropriate alternative frequency for repeated sampling and analysis for Appendix I constituents, or the alternative list approved in accordance with paragraph D.4.a.(2) of this rule, during the active life (including closure) and the post-closure care period. The alternative frequency during the active life (including closure)
shall be no less than annual. The alternative frequency shall be based on consideration of the following factors:
(1) lithology of the aquifer and unsaturated zone;
(2) hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer and unsaturated zone;
(3) groundwater flow rates;
(4) minimum distance between upgradient edge of the landfill and downgradient monitoring well screen (minimum distance of travel); and
(5) resource value of the aquifer.
(c) Results of all detection monitoring pursuant to paragraph D.4.a of this rule shall be submitted to the Department no later than sixty (60) days following each monitoring period.
(d) If the owner determines, pursuant to paragraph D.3.g of this rule, that there is a statistically significant increase (SSI) over background for one or more of the constituents listed in Appendix I of 40 CFR Part 258, or in the alternative list approved in accordance with paragraph D.4.a.(2) of this rule, at any monitoring well at the boundary specified under paragraph D.2.a.(2) of this rule, the owner:
(1) must, within 14 days of this finding, place a notice in the operating record indicating which constituents have shown statistically significant changes from background levels, and notify the Department that this notice was placed in the operating record; and
(2) must establish an assessment monitoring program meeting the requirements of paragraph D.5. of this rule within 90 days except as provided for in paragraph D.4.d.(3) of this rule.
(3) the owner may demonstrate that a source other than the landfill caused the contamination or that the statistically significant increase resulted from error in sampling, analysis, statistical evaluation, or natural variation in groundwater quality. A report documenting this demonstration must be certified by a qualified groundwater scientist and approved by the Department and shall be placed in the operating record. If a successful demonstration is made and documented, the owner may continue detection monitoring as specified in this section. If, after 90 days, a successful demonstration is not made, the owner must initiate an
assessment monitoring program as required in paragraph D.5. of this rule.
(5) Assessment Monitoring Program
(a) Assessment monitoring is required whenever a statistically significant increase (SSI) over background has been detected for one or more of the constituents listed in Appendix I of 40 CFR Part 258 or in the alternative list approved in accordance with paragraph D.4.a.(2) of this rule.
(b) Within 90 days of triggering an assessment monitoring program, and annually thereafter, the owner must sample and analyze the groundwater for all constituents identified in Appendix II of 40 CFR Part 258. A minimum of one sample from each downgradient well must be collected and analyzed during each sampling event. For any constituent detected in the downgradient wells as the result of the complete Appendix II analysis, a minimum of four independent samples from each well (background and downgradient) must be collected and analyzed to establish background for the new constituents.
The Department may specify an appropriate subset of wells to be sampled and analyzed for Appendix II constituents during assessment monitoring. The Department may delete any of the Appendix II monitoring parameters if it can be shown that the removed constituents are not reasonably expected to be in or derived from the waste contained in the unit.
Results of all assessment monitoring pursuant to this paragraph shall be submitted to the Department no later than sixty (60) days following each monitoring period.
(c) The Department may specify an appropriate alternate frequency for repeated sampling and analysis for the full set of Appendix II constituents required by paragraph D.5.b of this rule, during the active life (including closure) and post-closure care of the unit considering the following factors:
(1) lithology of the aquifer and unsaturated zone;
(2) hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer and unsaturated zone;
(3) groundwater flow rates;
(4) minimum distance between upgradient edge of the landfill and downgradient monitoring well screen (minimum distance of travel);
(5) resource value of the aquifer; and
(6) nature (fate and transport) of any constituents detected in response to this section.
(d) After obtaining the results from the initial or subsequent sampling events required in paragraph D.5.b of this rule, the owner must:
(1) within 14 days, place a notice in the operating record identifying the Appendix II constituents that have been detected and notify the Department that this notice has been placed in the operating record;
(2) within 90 days, and on at least a semiannual basis thereafter, resample all wells specified by paragraph D.2.a. of this rule, conduct analyses for all constituents in Appendix I of 40 CFR Part 258 or in the alternative list approved in accordance with paragraph D.4.a.(2) of this rule, and for those constituents in Appendix II of 40 CFR Part 258 that are detected in response to paragraph D.5.b of this rule, and record their concentrations in the facility operating record. At least one sample from each well (background and downgradient) must be collected and analyzed during these sampling events.
The Department may specify an alternative monitoring frequency during the active life (including closure) and the post closure period for the constituents referred to in this paragraph. The alternative frequency for Appendix I constituents, or the alternative list approved in accordance with paragraph D.4.a.(2) of this rule, during the active life (including closure) shall be no less than annual. The alternative frequency shall be based on consideration of the factors specified in paragraph D.5.c. of this rule;
(3) establish background concentrations for any constituents detected pursuant to paragraphs D.5.b or D.5.d.(2) of this rule; and
(4) establish groundwater protection standards for all constituents detected pursuant to paragraphs D.5.b. or D.5.d of this rule. The groundwater protection standards shall be established in accordance with paragraphs D.5.h or D.5.i of this rule.
(e) If the concentrations of all Appendix II constituents are shown to be at or below background values, using the statistical procedures in paragraph D.3.g of this rule, for two consecutive sampling events, the owner must notify the Department of this finding and may return to detection monitoring.
(f) If the concentrations of any Appendix II constituents are above background values, but all concentrations are below the groundwater protection standard established under paragraphs D.5.h or D.5.i of this rule, using the statistical procedures in paragraph D.3.g of this rule, the owner must continue assessment monitoring in accordance with this section.
(g) If one or more Appendix II constituents are detected at statistically significant levels above the groundwater protection standard established under paragraphs D.5.h or D.5.i of this rule in any sampling event, the owner must, within 14 days of this finding, place a notice in the operating record identifying the Appendix II constituents that have exceeded the groundwater protection standard and notify the Department and all appropriate local government officials that the notice has been placed in the operating record.
(1) The owner also:
(i) must characterize the nature and extent of the release by installing additional monitoring wells as necessary;
(ii) must install at least one additional monitoring well at the facility boundary in the direction of contaminant migration and sample this well in accordance with paragraph D.5.d.(2) of this rule;
(iii) must notify all persons who own the land or reside on the land that directly overlies any part of the plume of contamination if contaminants have migrated off-site if indicated by sampling of wells in accordance with paragraph D.5.g.(1) of this rule; and
(iv) must initiate an assessment of corrective measures as required by paragraph D.6 of this rule within 90 days; or
(2) The owner may demonstrate that a source other than the landfill caused the contamination, or that the SSI resulted from error in sampling, analysis, statistical evaluation, or natural variation in groundwater quality. A report documenting this demonstration must be certified by a qualified groundwater scientist and approved by the Department and placed in the operating record. If a successful demonstration is made the owner must continue monitoring in accordance with the assessment monitoring program pursuant to this section, and may return to detection monitoring if the Appendix II constituents are at or below background as
specified in paragraph D.5.e of this rule. Until a successful demonstration is made, the owner must comply with paragraph D.5.g of this rule including initiating an assessment of corrective measures.
(h) The owner must establish a groundwater protection standard for each Appendix II constituent detected in the groundwater. The groundwater protection standard shall be:
(1) for constituents for which a maximum contaminant level (MCL) has been promulgated under Section 1412 of the Safe Drinking Water Act (codified) under 40 CFR Part 141, the MCL for that constituent;
(2) for constituents for which MCLs have not been promulgated, the background concentration for the constituent established from wells in accordance with paragraph D.2.a.(1) of this rule; or
(3) for constituents for which the background level is higher than the MCL identified under paragraph D.5.h.(1) of this rule or health based levels identified under paragraph D.5.i.(1) of this rule, the background concentration.
(i) The Department may establish an alternative groundwater protection standard for constituents for which MCLs have not been established. These groundwater protection standards shall be appropriate health based levels that satisfy the following criteria:
(1) the level is derived in a manner consistent with the United States Environmental Protection Agency guidelines for assessing the health risks of environmental pollutants (51 FR 33992, 34006, 34014, 34028, September 24, 1986);
(2) the level is based on scientifically valid studies conducted in accordance with the Toxic Substances Control Act Good Laboratory Practice Standards (40 CFR part 792) or equivalent;
(3) for carcinogens, the level represents a concentration associated with an excess lifetime cancer risk level (due to a continuous lifetime exposure) within the 1 x 10 -4 to 1 x 10 -6 range;
(4) for systemic toxicants, the level represents a concentration to which the human population (including sensitive subgroups) could be exposed to on a daily basis that is likely to be without appreciable risk of deleterious effects during a lifetime. For
purposes of these regulations, systemic toxicants include toxic chemicals that cause effects other than cancer or mutation; and
(5) the level is not less stringent than any applicable State groundwater standards.
(j) In establishing groundwater protection standards under paragraph D.5.i of this rule, the Department may consider the following:
(1) multiple contaminants in the groundwater;
(2) exposure threats to sensitive environmental receptors; and
(3) other site-specific exposure or potential exposure to groundwater.
(6) Assessment of Corrective Measures
(a) Within 90 days of finding that any of the constituents listed in Appendix II of 40 CFR Part 258 have been detected at a statistically significant level exceeding the groundwater protection standards defined under paragraph D.5.h or D.5.i of this rule, the owner must initiate an assessment of corrective measures. Such an assessment must be completed within a reasonable period of time.
(b) The owner must continue to monitor in accordance with the assessment monitoring program as specified in paragraph D.5. of this rule.
(c) The assessment shall include an analysis of the effectiveness of potential corrective measures in meeting all of the requirements and objectives of the remedy as described under paragraph D.7 of this rule, addressing at least the following:
(1) the performance, reliability, ease of implementation, and potential impacts of appropriate potential remedies, including safety impacts, cross-media impacts, and control of exposure to any residual contamination;
(2) the time required to begin and complete the remedy;
(3) the costs of remedy implementation; and
(4) the institutional requirements such as State or local permit requirements or other environmental or public health requirements that may substantially affect implementation of the remedy(s).
(d) The owner must discuss the results of the corrective measures assessment, prior to the selection of remedy, in a public meeting with interested and affected parties.
(7) Selection of Remedy
(a) Based on the results of the corrective measures assessment conducted under paragraph D.6 of this rule, the owner must select a remedy that, at a minimum, meets the standards listed in paragraph D.7.b of this rule. The owner must notify the Department, within 14 days of selecting a remedy, that a report describing the selected remedy has been placed in the operating record and how it meets the standards in paragraph D.7.b of this rule.
(b) Remedies must:
(1) be protective of human health and the environment;
(2) attain the groundwater protection standard as specified pursuant to paragraphs D.5.h or D.5.i of this rule;
(3) control the source(s) of releases so as to reduce or eliminate, to the maximum extent practicable, further releases of Appendix II constituents into the environment that may pose a threat to human health or the environment; and
(4) comply with standards for management of wastes as specified in paragraph D.8.d of this rule.
(c) In selecting a remedy that meets the standards of paragraph D.7.b of this rule, the owner shall consider the following evaluation factors:
(1) the long- and short-term effectiveness and protectiveness of the potential remedy(s), along with the degree of certainty that the remedy will prove successful based on consideration of the following:
(i) magnitude of reduction of existing risks;
(ii) magnitude of residual risks in terms of likelihood of further releases due to waste remaining following implementation of a remedy;
(iii) the type and degree of long-term management required including monitoring, operation, and maintenance;
(iv) short-term risks that might be posed to the community, workers, or the environment during implementation of such a remedy, including potential threats to human health and the environment associated with excavation, transportation, and redisposal or containment;
(v) time until full protection is achieved;
(vi) potential for exposure of humans and environmental receptors to remaining wastes, considering the potential threat to human health and the environment associated with excavation, transportation, redisposal, or containment;
(vii) long-term reliability of the engineering and institutional controls; and
(viii) potential need for replacement of the remedy.
(2) the effectiveness of the remedy in controlling the source to reduce further releases based on consideration of the following factors:
(i) the extent to which containment practices will reduce further releases; and
(ii) the extent to which treatment technologies may be used.
(3) the ease or difficulty of implementing a potential remedy(s) based on consideration of the following types of factors:
(i) degree of difficulty associated with constructing the technology;
(ii) expected operational reliability of the technologies;
(iii) need to coordinate with and obtain necessary approvals and permits from other agencies;
(iv) availability of necessary equipment and specialists; and
(v) available capacity and location of needed treatment, storage, and disposal services.
(4) practicable capability of the owner, including a consideration of the technical and economic capability.
(5) the degree to which community concerns are addressed by a potential remedy(s).
(d) The owner shall specify as part of the selected remedy a schedule(s) for initiating and completing remedial activities. Such a schedule must require the initiation of remedial activities within a reasonable period of time taking into consideration the factors set forth in paragraphs D.7.d.(1) through D.7.d.(8) of this rule. The owner must consider the following factors in determining the schedule of remedial activities:
(1) extent and nature of contamination;
(2) practical capabilities of remedial technologies in achieving compliance with groundwater protection standards established under paragraphs D.5.g or D.5.h of this rule and other objectives of the remedy;
(3) availability of treatment or disposal capacity for wastes managed during implementation of the remedy;
(4) desirability of utilizing technologies that are not currently available, but which may offer significant advantages over already available technologies in terms of effectiveness, reliability, safety, or ability to achieve remedial objectives;
(5) potential risks to human health and the environment from exposure to contamination prior to completion of the remedy;
(6) resource value of the aquifer including:
(i) current and future uses;
(ii) proximity and withdrawal rate of users;
(iii) groundwater quantity and quality;
(iv) the potential damage to wildlife, crops, vegetation, and physical structures caused by exposure to waste constituent;
(v) the hydrogeologic characteristic of the facility and surrounding land;
(vi) groundwater removal and treatment costs; and
(vii) the cost and availability of alternative water supplies.
(7) practicable capability of the owner; and
(8) other relevant factors.
(e) The Department may determine that remediation of a release of an Appendix II constituent from a landfill is not necessary if the owner demonstrates to the Department that:
(1) the groundwater is additionally contaminated by substances that have originated from a source other than a landfill and those substances are present in concentrations such that cleanup of the release from the landfill would provide no significant reduction in risk to actual or potential receptors; or
(2) the constituent(s) is present in groundwater that:
(i) is not currently or reasonably expected to be a source of drinking water; and
(ii) is not hydraulically connected with waters to which the hazardous constituents are migrating or are likely to migrate in a concentration(s) that would exceed the groundwater protection standards established under paragraph D.5.h or D.5.i of this rule; or
(3) remediation of the release(s) is technically impracticable; or
(4) remediation results in unacceptable cross-media impacts.
(f) A determination by the Department pursuant to paragraph D.7.e of this rule shall not affect the authority of the State to require the owner to undertake source control measures or other measures that may be necessary to eliminate or minimize further releases to the groundwater, to prevent exposure to the groundwater, or to remediate the groundwater to concentrations that are technically practicable and significantly reduce threats to human health or the environment.
(8) Implementation of the Corrective Action Program
(a) Based on the schedule established under paragraph D.7.d of this rule for initiation and completion of remedial activities the owner must:
(1) establish and implement a corrective action groundwater monitoring program that:
(i) at a minimum, meets the requirements of an assessment monitoring program under paragraph D.5 of this rule;
(ii) indicates the effectiveness of the corrective action remedy; and
(iii) demonstrates compliance with groundwater protection standard pursuant to paragraph D.8.e of this rule.
(2) implement the corrective action remedy selected under paragraph D.7 of this rule; and
(3) take any interim measures necessary to ensure the protection of human health and the environment. Interim measures should, to the greatest extent practicable, be consistent with the objectives of and contribute to the performance of any remedy that may be required pursuant to paragraph D.7 of this rule. The following factors must be considered by an owner in determining whether interim measures are necessary:
(i) time required to develop and implement a final remedy;
(ii) actual or potential exposure of nearby populations or environmental receptors to hazardous constituents;
(iii) actual or potential contamination of drinking water supplies or sensitive ecosystems;
(iv) further degradation of the groundwater that may occur if remedial action is not initiated expeditiously;
(v) weather conditions that may cause hazardous constituents to migrate or be released;
(vi) risks of fire or explosion, or potential for exposure to hazardous constituents as a result of an accident or failure of a container or handling system; and
(vii) other situations that may pose threats to human health and the environment.
(b) An owner may determine, based on information developed after implementation of the remedy has begun or other information, that compliance with requirements of paragraph D.7.b of this rule are not being achieved through the remedy selected. In such cases, the owner must implement other methods or techniques that could practicably achieve
compliance with the requirements, unless the owner makes the determination under paragraph D.8.c of this rule.
(c) If the owner determines that compliance with requirements under paragraph D.7.b of this rule cannot be practically achieved with any currently available methods, the owner must:
(1) obtain certification of a qualified groundwater scientist and approval by the Department that compliance with requirements under paragraph D.7.b of this rule cannot be practically achieved with any currently available methods;
(2) implement alternate measures to control exposure of humans or the environment to residual contamination, as necessary to protect human health and the environment;
(3) implement alternate measures for control of the sources of contamination, or for removal or decontamination of equipment, units, devices, or structures that are:
(i) technically practicable; and
(ii) consistent with the overall objective of the remedy.
(4) notify the Department within 14 days that a report justifying the alternative measures prior to implementing the alternative measures has been placed in the operating record.
(d) All solid wastes that are managed pursuant to a remedy required under paragraph D.7 of this rule, or an interim measure required under paragraph D.8.a.(3) of this rule, shall be managed in a manner:
(1) that is protective of human health and the environment; and
(2) that complies with applicable RCRA requirements.
(e) Remedies selected pursuant to paragraph D.7 of this rule shall be considered complete when:
(1) the owner complies with the groundwater protection standards established under paragraph D.5.h or D.5.i of this rule at all points within the plume of contamination that lie beyond the groundwater monitoring well system established under paragraph D.2.a of this rule.
(2) compliance with the groundwater protection standards established under paragraphs D.5.h or D.5.i of this rule has been achieved by demonstrating that concentrations of Appendix II constituents have not exceeded the groundwater protection standard(s) for a period of three consecutive years using the statistical procedures and performance standards in paragraph D.3.g and D.3.h of this rule. The Department may specify an alternative length of time during which the owner must demonstrate that concentrations of Appendix II constituents have not exceeded the groundwater protection standard(s) taking into consideration:
(i) Extent and concentration of the release(s);
(ii) Behavior characteristics of the hazardous constituents in the groundwater;
(iii) Accuracy of monitoring or modeling techniques, including any seasonal, meteorological, or other environmental variabilities that may affect the accuracy; and
(iv) Characteristics of the groundwater.
(3) all actions required to complete the remedy have been satisfied.
(f) Upon completion of the remedy, the owner must notify the Department within 14 days that a certification that the remedy has been completed in compliance with the requirements of paragraph D.8.e of this rule has been placed in the operating record. The certification must be signed by the owner and by a qualified groundwater scientist and approved by the Department.
(g) When, upon completion of the certification, the owner determines that the corrective action remedy has been completed in accordance with the requirements under paragraph D.8.e of this rule, the owner shall be released from the requirements for financial assurance for corrective action under paragraph F of this rule.
E. Closure and Post-Closure Care
(1) Closure/Post-Closure Plan.
(a) Owners of MSWLF units must prepare a written closure/post-closure plan that describes the steps necessary to close all MSWLF units at any point during its active life in accordance with the requirements of paragraph E.2 of this rule, to monitor and care for the facility during the post-closure period in accordance with the requirements of paragraph E.3 of this rule,
and to reclaim any on-site borrow areas used for obtaining daily or final cover. The plan, at a minimum, must include the following information:
(1) a description of the final cover, designed in accordance with paragraph E.2.a or E.2.b of this rule, and the methods and procedures to be used to install the cover;
(2) an estimate of the largest area of the MSWLF unit ever requiring a final cover as required in paragraph E.2.a of this rule at any time during the active life;
(3) an estimate of the maximum inventory of wastes ever on-site over the active life of the landfill facility;
(4) a schedule for completing all activities necessary to satisfy the closure requirements in paragraph E.2 of this rule.
(5) a description of the monitoring and maintenance activities required in paragraph E.3 of this rule for each MSWLF unit, and frequency at which these activities will be performed;
(6) name, address, and telephone number of the person or office to contact about the facility during the post-closure period; and
(7) a description of the planned use of the property during the post- closure period. Post-closure use of the property shall not disturb the integrity of the final cover, liner(s), or any other components of the containment system, or the function of the monitoring systems unless necessary to comply with any other state or federal regulations. The Department may approve any other disturbance if the owner demonstrates that disturbance of the final cover, liner or other component of the containment system, including any removal of waste, will not increase the potential threat to human health or the environment.
(b) Owners of MSWLF units must notify the Department that a closure/post- closure plan has been prepared and placed in the operating record no later than the effective date of these regulations, or by the initial receipt of waste, whichever is later.
(c) Closure and post-closure activities at an MSWLF unit must be conducted in accordance with the closure/post-closure plan after approval of the plan is granted by the Department. Any proposed change to the plan must be submitted to the Department for approval. No changes to the plan may be made without approval by the Department. A copy of the approved plan
must be kept at the landfill or another approved site until the owner has been released from the requirements for closure and post-closure care.
(2) Closure Requirements.
(a) Owners of MSWLF units and all other landfills must install a final cover system that is designed to minimized infiltration and erosion. The final cover system must be comprised of an erosion layer underlain by an infiltration layer as follows:
(1) The infiltration layer must be comprised of a minimum of 18 inches of earthen material that has a permeability less than or equal to the permeability of any bottom liner system or natural subsoils present, or a permeability no greater than 1 x 10 -5 cm/sec, whichever is less, and
(2) The erosion layer must consist of a minimum of 6 inches of earthen material that is capable of sustaining native plant growth.
(b) The Department may approve an alternative final cover design that includes:
(1) an infiltration layer that achieves an equivalent reduction in infiltration as the infiltration layer specified in paragraph E.2.a.(1) of this rule, and
(2) an erosion layer that provides equivalent protection from wind and water erosion as the erosion layer specified in paragraph E.2.a.(2) of this rule.
(c) The final cover gradient on landfills that receive waste on or after the effective date of these regulations shall be a minimum of four percent (4%) and a maximum of twenty-five percent (25%), unless otherwise approved by the Department.
(d) The final cover gradient on MSWLF units that stop receiving waste before the effective date of these regulations shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%), unless otherwise approved by the Department.
(e) A native grass seed or other shallow-rooted vegetation suitable to minimize soil erosion, as approved by the Department, must be planted and maintained over each closed unit. Trees may not be used in lieu of or in addition to the grass cover.
(f) Following closure of each MSWLF unit or other landfill, the owner must notify the Department that a certification, signed by an independent
registered professional engineer, verifying that the final cover system has been completed in accordance with paragraphs E.2.a through E.2.e of this rule, has been placed in the operating record. Such certification must be placed in the operating record within sixty (60) days after planting the grass seed in accordance with paragraph E.2.e of this rule.
(g) (1) Within ninety (90) days after all landfill units are closed, the owner must record on the deed to the landfill facility property, or some other instrument that is normally examined during title search, a notation and survey plat, prepared by a registered land surveyor, indicating the location and dimensions of the actual filled area with respect to permanently surveyed benchmarks or Section corners, and notify the Department that the notation and survey plat have been recorded and a copy of each has been placed in the operating record.
(2) The notation on the deed must in perpetuity notify any potential purchaser of the property of the following information:
(i) the land has been used as a landfill facility;
(ii) the name of the landfill owner(s);
(iii) the year the landfill started and ended disposal operations; and
(iv) its use is restricted under paragraph E.1.a.(7) of this rule.
(h) The owner of a landfill may request permission from the Department to remove the notation and survey plat from the deed if all wastes are removed from the facility.
(i) Prior to beginning closure of each MSWLF unit or other landfill as specified in paragraph E.2.j of this rule, an owner must notify the Department that a notice of intent to close the unit or landfill has been placed in the operating record.
(j) The owner must begin closure activities of each MSWLF unit or other landfill no later than 30 days after the date on which the unit receives the known final receipt of wastes or, if the unit has remaining capacity and there is a reasonable likelihood that the unit will receive additional wastes, no later than one year after the most recent receipt of wastes. Extensions beyond the one-year deadline for beginning closure may be granted by the Department if the owner demonstrates that the unit has the capacity to receive additional wastes and the owner has taken and will continue to
take all steps necessary to prevent threats to human health and the environment from the unclosed unit.
(k) The owner must complete closure activities of each MSWLF unit or other landfill within 180 days following the beginning of closure as specified in paragraph E.2.j of this rule. Extensions of the closure period may be granted by the Department if the owner demonstrates that closure will, of necessity, take longer than 180 days and he has taken and will continue to take all steps to prevent threats to human health and the environment from the unclosed unit.
(3) Post-Closure Requirements
(a) Following closure of each MSWLF unit or other landfill, the owner must conduct post-closure care. Post-closure care must be conducted for 30 years, except as provided under paragraph E.3.b of this rule.
(b) The length of the post-closure care period may be:
(1) decreased by the Department if the owner demonstrates that the reduced period is sufficient to protect human health and the environment and this demonstration is approved by the Department; or
(2) increased by the Department if the Department determines that the lengthened period is necessary to protect human health and the environment.
(c) Post-closure care must consist of at least the following:
(1) maintaining the integrity and effectiveness of any final cover, including making repairs to the cover as necessary to correct the effects of settlement, subsidence, erosion, or other events, preventing run-on and run-off from eroding or otherwise damaging the final cover, and preventing the growth of trees on the landfill cover.
(2) maintaining and operating any required leachate collection system in accordance with paragraph C of this rule. The Department may allow the owner to stop managing leachate if the owner demonstrates that leachate no longer poses a threat to human health and the environment;
(3) monitoring the groundwater in accordance with paragraph D of this rule and maintaining the groundwater monitoring system, if applicable;
(4) maintaining and operating any required gas monitoring system in accordance with paragraph B.4 of this rule.
(d) Following completion of the post-closure care period for each MSWLF unit or other landfill, the owner must notify the Department that a certification, signed by an independent registered professional engineer, verifying that post-closure care has been completed in accordance with paragraph E.3 of this rule, has been placed in the operating record. Such certification must be placed in the operating record within sixty (60) days after the completion of the post-closure care period.
F. Financial Assurance. Financial assurance requirements under paragraph F apply to owners of MSWLF units and other commercial landfills, except owners who are State or Federal government entities whose debts and liabilities are the debts and liabilities of the State of Mississippi or the United States. The requirements of this paragraph may be applicable to other landfills as determined necessary by the Permit Board.
(1) Financial Assurance for Closure
(a) The owner must have a detailed written estimate, in current dollars, of the cost of hiring a third party to close the largest area ever requiring a final cover as required under paragraph E of this rule, at any time during the active life. The owner must notify the Department that the estimate has been placed in the operating record.
(1) The cost estimate must equal the cost of closing the largest area ever requiring a final cover at any time during the active life when the extent and manner of its operation would make closure the most expensive.
(2) During the active life of the landfill, the owner must annually adjust the closure cost estimate for inflation.
(3) The owner must increase the closure cost estimate and the amount of financial assurance provided under paragraph F.1.b of this rule if changes to any applicable closure plan or landfill conditions increase the maximum cost of closure at any time during the remaining active life.
(4) Upon approval of the Department and notification in the operating record, the owner may reduce the closure cost estimate and the amount of financial assurance provided under paragraph F.1.b of this rule if the cost estimate exceeds the maximum cost of closure at any time during the remaining life of the landfill.
(b) The owner must establish financial assurance for closure in compliance with paragraph F.4 of this rule. The owner must provide continuous coverage for closure until released from financial assurance requirements by demonstrating compliance with paragraph E.2 of this rule.
(2) Financial Assurance for Post-Closure Care
(a) The owner must have a detailed written estimate, in current dollars, of the cost of hiring a third party to conduct post-closure care for the landfill in compliance with paragraph E. of this rule. The post-closure cost estimate used to demonstrate financial assurance in paragraph F.2.b of this rule must account for the total costs of conducting post-closure care, including annual and periodic costs over the entire post-closure care period. The owner must notify the Department that the estimate has been placed in the operating record.
(1) The cost estimate for post-closure care must be based on the most expensive costs of post-closure care during the post-closure care period.
(2) During the active life of the landfill and during the post-closure care period, the owner must annually adjust the post-closure cost estimate for inflation.
(3) The owner must increase the post-closure care cost estimate and the amount of financial assurance provided under paragraph F.2.b of this rule if changes in any applicable post-closure plan or landfill conditions increase the maximum costs of post-closure care.
(4) The owner may reduce the post-closure cost estimate and the amount of financial assurance provided under paragraph F.2.b of this rule if the cost estimate exceeds the maximum costs of post- closure care remaining over the post-closure care period. The owner must notify the Department that the justification for the reduction of the post-closure cost estimate and the amount of financial assurance has been placed in the operating record.
(b) The owner must establish, in a manner in accordance with paragraph F.4 of this rule, financial assurance for the costs of post-closure care as required under paragraph E.3.c of this rule. The owner must provide continuous coverage for post-closure care until released from financial assurance requirements for post-closure care by demonstrating compliance with paragraph E.3.d of this rule.
(3) Financial Assurance for Corrective Action
(a) An owner required to undertake a corrective action program under paragraph D.8 of this rule must have a detailed written estimate, in current dollars, of the cost of hiring a third party to perform the corrective action in accordance with the program required under paragraph D.8 of this rule. The corrective action cost estimate must account for the total costs of corrective action activities as described in the corrective action plan for the entire corrective action period. The owner must notify the Department that the estimate has been placed in the operating record.
(1) The owner must annually adjust the estimate for inflation until the corrective action program is completed in accordance with paragraph D.8.f of this rule.
(2) The owner must increase the corrective action cost estimate and the amount of financial assurance provided under paragraph F.3.b of this rule if changes in the corrective action program or landfill conditions increase the maximum costs of corrective action.
(3) The owner may reduce the amount of the corrective action cost estimate and the amount of financial assurance provided under paragraph F.3.b of this rule if the cost estimate exceeds the maximum remaining costs of corrective action. The owner must notify the Department that the justification for the reduction of the corrective action cost estimate and the amount of financial assurance has been placed in the operating record.
(b) The owner required to undertake a corrective action program under paragraph D.8 of this rule must establish, in a manner in accordance with paragraph F.4 of this rule, financial assurance for the most recent corrective action program. The owner must provide continuous coverage for corrective action until released from financial assurance requirements for corrective action by demonstrating compliance with paragraphs D.8.(f) and D.8.(g) of this rule.
(4) Criteria for Allowable Mechanisms
The mechanisms used to demonstrate financial assurance under this section must ensure that the funds necessary to meet the costs of closure, post-closure care, and corrective action for known releases will be available whenever they are needed. Owners must choose from the options specified in paragraphs F.4.a through F.4.i of this rule.
(a) Trust Fund.
(1) An owner may satisfy the requirements of this rule by establishing a trust fund, which conforms to the requirements of this paragraph. The trustee must be an entity, which has the authority to act as a trustee and whose trust operations are regulated and examined by a Federal or State of Mississippi agency. A copy of the trust agreement must be placed in the facility's operating record.
(2) Payments into the trust fund must be made annually by the owner over the term of the initial permit or over the remaining life of the MSWLF unit or other landfill, whichever is shorter, in the case of a trust fund for closure or post-closure care, or over one-half of the estimated length of the corrective action program in the case of corrective action for known releases. This period is referred to as the pay-in period.
(3) For a trust fund used to demonstrate financial assurance for closure and post-closure care, the first payment into the fund must be at least equal to the current cost estimate for closure or post-closure care, divided by the number of years in the pay-in period as defined in paragraph F.4.a.(2) of this rule. The amount of subsequent payments must be determined by the following formula:
Next Payment = CE-CV Y
where CE is the current cost estimate for closure or post-closure care (updated for inflation or other changes), CV is the current value of the trust fund, and Y is the number of years remaining in the pay-in period.
(4) For a trust fund used to demonstrate financial assurance for corrective action, the first payment into the trust fund must be at least equal to one-half of the current cost estimate for corrective action, divided by the number of years in the corrective action pay-in period as defined in paragraph F.4.a.(2) of this rule. The amount of subsequent payments must be determined by the following formula:
Next Payment = RB-CV Y
where RB is the most recent estimate of the required trust fund balance for corrective action (i.e., the total costs that will be incurred during the second half of the corrective action period),
CV is the current value of the trust fund, and Y is the number of years remaining on the pay-in period.
(5) The initial payment into the trust fund must be made before the initial receipt of waste or before April 9, 1994, whichever is later, in the case of closure and post-closure care, or no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8 of this rule.
(6) If the owner establishes a trust fund after having used one or more alternate mechanisms specified in this section, the initial payment into the trust fund must be at least the amount that the fund would contain if the trust fund were established initially and annual payments made according to the specifications of paragraph F.4.a of this rule, as applicable.
(7) The owner or other person authorized to conduct closure, post-closure care, or corrective action activities may request reimbursement from the trustee for these expenditures. Requests for reimbursement will be granted by the trustee only if sufficient funds are remaining in the trust fund to cover the remaining costs of closure, post-closure care, or corrective action, and if justification and documentation of the cost is placed in the operating record. The owner must notify the Department that the documentation of the justification for reimbursement has been placed in the operating record and that reimbursement has been received.
(8) The trust fund may be terminated by the owner only if the owner substitutes alternate financial assurance as specified in this section or if he is no longer required to demonstrate financial responsibility in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b, or F.3.b of this rule.
(b) Surety Bond Guaranteeing Payment or Performance.
(1) An owner may demonstrate financial assurance for closure or post-closure care by obtaining a payment or performance surety bond which conforms to the requirements of this paragraph. An owner may demonstrate financial assurance for corrective action by obtaining a performance bond which conforms to the requirements of this paragraph. The bond must be effective before the initial receipt of waste in the case of closure and post-closure care, or no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8. of this rule. The owner must notify the Department
that a copy of the bond has been placed in the operating record. The surety company issuing the bond must, at a minimum, be among those listed as acceptable sureties on Federal bonds in Circular 570 of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
(2) The penal sum of the bond must be in an amount at least equal to the current closure, post-closure care or corrective action cost estimate, whichever is applicable, except as provided in paragraph F.4.j of this rule.
(3) Under the terms of the bond, the surety will become liable on the bond obligation when the owner fails to perform as guaranteed by the bond.
(4) The owner must establish a standby trust fund. The standby trust fund must meet the requirements of paragraph F.4.a of this rule except the requirements for initial payment and subsequent annual payments specified in paragraphs F.4.(a)(2), F.4.(a)(3), F.4.(a)(4) and F.4.(a)(5) of this rule.
(5) Payments made under the terms of the bond will be deposited by the surety directly into the standby trust fund. Payments from the trust fund must be approved by the trustee.
(6) Under the terms of the bond, the surety may cancel the bond by sending notice of cancellation by certified mail to the owner and to the Department 120 days in advance of cancellation. If the surety cancels the bond, the owner must obtain alternate financial assurance as specified in this section.
(7) The owner may cancel the bond only if alternate financial assurance is substituted as specified in this section or if the owner is no longer required to demonstrate financial responsibility in accordance with paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b or F.3.b of this rule.
(c) Letter of Credit.
(1) An owner may satisfy the requirements of this rule by obtaining an irrevocable standby letter of credit, which conforms to the requirements of this paragraph. The letter of credit must be effective before the initial receipt of waste in the case of closure and post-closure care, or no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8 of this rule. The owner must notify the Department that a copy of the letter of credit has been placed in the operating record. The issuing institution must be an entity,
which has the authority to issue letters of credit and whose letter-of-credit operations are regulated and examined by a Federal or State of Mississippi agency.
(2) A letter from the owner referring to the letter of credit by number, issuing institution, and date, and providing the following information: name, and address of the facility, and the amount of funds assured, must be included with the letter of credit in the operating record.
(3) The letter of credit must be irrevocable and issued for a period of at least one year in an amount at least equal to the current cost estimate for closure, post-closure care or corrective action, whichever is applicable, except as provided in paragraph F.4.j of this rule. The letter of credit must provide that the expiration date will be automatically extended for a period of at least one year unless the issuing institution has canceled the letter of credit by sending notice of cancellation by certified mail to the owner and to the Department 120 days in advance of cancellation. If the letter of credit is canceled by the issuing institution, the owner must obtain alternate financial assurance.
(4) The owner may cancel the letter of credit only if alternate financial assurance is substituted as specified in this section or if the owner is released from the requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b or F.3.b of this rule.
(d) Insurance.
(1) An owner may demonstrate financial assurance for closure and post-closure care by obtaining insurance, which conforms to the requirements of this paragraph. The insurance must be effective before the initial receipt of waste. At a minimum, the insurer must be licensed to transact the business of insurance, or eligible to provide insurance as an excess or surplus lines insurer, in the State of Mississippi. The owner must notify the Department that a copy of the insurance policy has been placed in the operating record.
(2) The closure or post-closure care insurance policy must guarantee that funds will be available to close the MSWLF unit or other landfill whenever final closure occurs or to provide post-closure care for the MSWLF unit or other landfill whenever the post-closure care period begins, whichever is applicable. The policy must also guarantee that once closure or post-closure care begins, the insurer will be responsible for the paying out of funds to the owner or other person authorized to conduct closure or
post-closure care, up to an amount equal to the face amount of the policy.
(3) The insurance policy must be issued for a face amount at least equal to the current cost estimate for closure or post-closure care, whichever is applicable, except as provided in paragraph F.4.a. of this rule. The term "face amount" means the total amount the insurer is obligated to pay under the policy. Actual payments by the insurer will not change the face amount, although the insurer's future liability will be lowered by the amount of the payments.
(4) An owner, or any other person authorized to conduct closure or post-closure care, may receive reimbursements for closure or post-closure expenditures, whichever is applicable. Requests for reimbursement will be granted by the insurer only if the remaining value of the policy is sufficient to cover the remaining costs of closure or post-closure care, and if justification and documentation of the cost is placed in the operating record. The owner must notify the Department that the documentation of the justification for reimbursement has been placed in the operating record and that reimbursement has been received.
(5) Each policy must contain a provision allowing assignment of the policy to a successor owner. Such assignment may be conditional upon consent of the insurer, provided that such consent is not unreasonably refused.
(6) The insurance policy must provide that the insurer may not cancel, terminate or fail to renew the policy except for failure to pay the premium. The automatic renewal of the policy must, at a minimum, provide the insured with the option of renewal at the face amount of the expiring policy. If there is a failure to pay the premium, the insurer may cancel the policy by sending notice of cancellation by certified mail to the owner and to the Department 120 days in advance of cancellation. If the insurer cancels the policy, the owner must obtain alternate financial assurance as specified in this section.
(7) For insurance policies providing coverage for post-closure care, commencing on the date that liability to make payments pursuant to the policy accrues, the insurer will thereafter annually increase the face amount of the policy. Such increase must be equivalent to the face amount of the policy, less any payments made, multiplied by an amount equivalent to 85 percent of the most recent investment rate or of the equivalent coupon-issue yield announced by the U.S. Treasury for 26-week Treasury securities.
(8) The owner may cancel the insurance policy only if alternate financial assurance is substituted as specified in this section or if the owner is no longer required to demonstrate financial responsibility in accordance with the requirements of paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b or F.3.b of this rule.
(e) Corporate Financial Test
An owner may satisfy the requirements of this rule by demonstrating financial assurance up to the amount specified in this section:
(1) Financial component.
(i) The owner must satisfy one of the following three conditions:
(A) A current rating for its senior unsubordinated debt of AAA, AA, A, or BBB as issued by Standard and Poor's or Aaa, Aa, A or Baa as issued by Moody's;
(B) A ratio of less than 1.5 comparing total liabilities to net worth; or
(C) A ratio of greater than 0.10 comparing the sum of net income plus depreciation, depletion and amortization, minus $10 million, to total liabilities.
(ii) The tangible net worth of the owner must be greater than:
(A) The sum of the current closure, post-closure care, corrective action cost estimates and any other environmental obligations, including guarantees, covered by a financial test plus $10 million except as provided in paragraph F.4.e.1.ii.B of this rule.
(B) $10 million in net worth plus the amount of any guarantees that have not been recognized as liabilities on the financial statements provided all of the current closure, post-closure care, and corrective action costs and any other environmental obligations covered by a financial test are recognized as liabilities on the owner's audited financial statements, and subject to the approval of the State Director.
(iii) The owner must have assets located in the United States amounting to at least the sum of current closure, post- closure care, corrective action cost estimates and any other environmental obligations covered by a financial test as described in paragraph F.4.e.3 of this rule.
(2) Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements.
(i) The owner or operator must place the following items into the facility's operating record:
(A) A letter signed by the owner's chief financial officer that:
(1) Lists all the current cost estimates covered by a financial test, including, but not limited to, cost estimates required for municipal solid waste management facilities under these regulations, cost estimates required for UIC facilities under 40 CFR part 144, if applicable, cost estimates required for petroleum underground storage tank facilities under 40 CFR part 280, if applicable, cost estimates required for PCB storage facilities under 40 CFR part 761, if applicable, and cost estimates required for hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities under 40 CFR parts 264 and 265, if applicable; and
(2) Provides evidence demonstrating that the firm meets the conditions of either paragraph F.4.e.1.i.A or F.4.e.1.i.B or F.4.e.1.i.C of this rule and paragraphs F.4.e.1.ii and F.4.e.1.iii of this rule.
(B) A copy of the independent certified public accountant's unqualified opinion of the owner's financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year. To be eligible to use the financial test, the owner's financial statements must receive an unqualified opinion from the independent certified public accountant. An adverse opinion, disclaimer of opinion, or other qualified opinion will be cause for disallowance, with the potential exception for qualified opinions provided in the next sentence.
The Director of an approved State may evaluate qualified opinions on a case-by-case basis and allow use of the financial test in cases where the Director deems that the matters which form the basis for the qualification are insufficient to warrant disallowance of the test. If the Director of an approved State does not allow use of the test, the owner must provide alternate financial assurance that meets the requirements of this rule.
(C) If the chief financial officer's letter providing evidence of financial assurance includes financial data showing that owner satisfies paragraph F.4.e.(1)(i)(B) or F.4.e.(1)(i)(C) of this rule that are different from data in the audited financial statements referred to in paragraph F.4.e.(2)(i)(B) of this rule or any other audited financial statement or data filed with the SEC, then a special report from the owner's independent certified public accountant to the owner is required. The special report shall be based upon an agreed upon procedures engagement in accordance with professional auditing standards and shall describe the procedures performed in comparing the data in the chief financial officer's letter derived from the independently audited, year- end financial statements for the latest fiscal year with the amounts in such financial statements, the findings of that comparison, and the reasons for any differences.
(D) If the chief financial officer's letter provides a demonstration that the firm has assured for environmental obligations as provided in paragraph F.4.e.(1)(ii)(B) of this rule, then the letter shall include a report from the independent certified public accountant that verifies that all of the environmental obligations covered by a financial test have been recognized as liabilities on the audited financial statements, how these obligations have been measured and reported, and that the tangible net worth of the firm is at least $10 million plus the amount of any guarantees provided.
(ii) An owner must place the items specified in paragraph F.4.e.(2)(i) of this rule in the operating record and notify the State Director that these items have been placed in the
operating record before the initial receipt of waste in the case of closure, and post-closure care, or no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8 of this rule.
(iii) After the initial placement of items specified in paragraph F.4.e.2(i) of this rule in the operating record, the owner must annually update the information and place updated information in the operating record within 90 days following the close of the owner's fiscal year. The Director of a State may provide up to an additional 45 days for an owner who can demonstrate that 90 days is insufficient time to acquire audited financial statements. The updated information must consist of all items specified in paragraph F.4.e.(2)(i) of this rule.
(iv) The owner is no longer required to submit the items specified in this paragraph F.4.e.(2) or comply with the requirements of this rule when:
(A) He substitutes alternate financial assurance as specified in this section that is not subject to these recordkeeping and reporting requirements; or
(B) He is released from the requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b or F.3.b of this rule.
(v) If the owner no longer meets the requirements of paragraph F.4.e.(1) of this rule, the owner must, within 120 days following the close of the owner's fiscal year, obtain alternative financial assurance that meets the requirements of this rule, place the required submissions for that assurance in the operating record, and notify the State Director that the owner no longer meets the criteria of the financial test and that alternate assurance has been obtained.
(vi) The Director of an approved State may, based on a reasonable belief that the owner or operator may no longer meet the requirements of paragraph F.4.e.(1) of this rule, require at any time the owner to provide reports of its financial condition in addition to or including current financial test documentation as specified in paragraph F.2.e.(2) of this rule. If the Director of an approved State
finds that the owner no longer meets the requirements of paragraph F.4.e.(1) of this rule, the owner must provide alternate financial assurance that meets the requirements of this rule.
(3) Calculation of costs to be assured. When calculating the current cost estimates for closure, post-closure care, corrective action, or the sum of the combination of such costs to be covered, and any other environmental obligations assured by a financial test referred to in this section, the owner must include cost estimates required for municipal solid waste management facilities under this part, as well as cost estimates required for the following environmental obligations, if it assures them through a financial test: obligations associated with UIC facilities under 40 CFR part 144, petroleum underground storage tank facilities under 40 CFR part 280, PCB storage facilities under 40 CFR part 761, and hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities under 40 CFR parts 264 and 265.
(f) Local Government Financial Test.
An owner may satisfy the requirements of paragraphs F.4.f.(1) through F.4.f.(3) of this rule by demonstrating financial assurance up to the amount specified in paragraph F.4.f.(4) of this rule:
(1) Financial component.
(i) The owner must satisfy paragraph F.4.f.(1)(i)(A) or (B) of this rule as applicable:
(A) If the owner has outstanding, rated, general obligation bonds that are not secured by insurance, a letter of credit, or other collateral or guarantee, it must have a current rating of Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa, as issued by Moody's, or AAA, AA, A, or BBB, as issued by Standard and Poor's on all such general obligation bonds; or
(B) The owner must satisfy each of the following financial ratios based on the owner's most recent audited annual financial statement:
(1) A ratio of cash plus marketable securities to total expenditures greater than or equal to 0.05; and
(2) A ratio of annual debt service to total expenditures less than or equal to 0.20.
(ii) The owner must prepare its financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles for governments and have its financial statements audited by an independent certified public accountant (or appropriate State agency).
(iii) A local government is not eligible to assure its obligations under paragraph F.4.f of this rule, if it:
(A) Is currently in default on any outstanding general obligation bonds; or
(B) Has any outstanding general obligation bonds rated lower than Baa as issued by Moody's or BBB as issued by Standard and Poor's; or
(C) Operated at a deficit equal to five percent or more of total annual revenue in each of the past two fiscal years; or
(D) Receives an adverse opinion, disclaimer of opinion, or other qualified opinion from the independent certified public accountant (or appropriate State agency) auditing its financial statement as required under paragraph F.4.(f)(1)(ii) of this rule. However, the Director of an approved State may evaluate qualified opinions on a case-by-case basis and allow use of the financial test in cases where the Director deems the qualification insufficient to warrant disallowance of use of the test.
(iv) The following terms used in this paragraph are defined as follows:
(A) Deficit equals total annual revenues minus total annual expenditures;
(B) Total revenues include revenues from all taxes and fees but does not include the proceeds from borrowing or asset sales, excluding revenue from funds managed by local government on behalf of a specific third party;
(C) Total expenditures include all expenditures excluding capital outlays and debt repayment;
(D) Cash plus marketable securities is all the cash plus marketable securities held by the local government on the last day of a fiscal year, excluding cash and marketable securities designated to satisfy past obligations such as pensions; and
(E) Debt service is the amount of principal and interest due on a loan in a given time period, typically the current year.
(2) Public notice component. The local government owner must place a reference to the closure and post-closure care costs assured through the financial test into its next comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) prior to the initial receipt of waste at the facility. Disclosure must include the nature and source of closure and post-closure care requirements, the reported liability at the balance sheet date, the estimated total closure and post-closure care cost remaining to be recognized, the percentage of landfill capacity used to date, and the estimated landfill life in years. A reference to corrective action costs must be placed in the CAFR not later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8 of this rule. For the first year the financial test is used to assure costs at a particular facility, the reference may instead be placed in the operating record until issuance of the next available CAFR if timing does not permit the reference to be incorporated into the most recently issued CAFR or budget. For closure and post-closure costs, conformance with Government Accounting Standards Board Statement 18 assures compliance with this public notice component.
(3) Recordkeeping and Reporting Requirements.
(i) The local government owner must place the following items in the facility's operating record:
(A) A letter signed by the local government's chief financial officer that:
(1) Lists all the current cost estimates covered by a financial test, as described in paragraph F.4.f.(4) of this rule;
(2) Provides evidence and certifies that the local government meets the conditions of paragraphs F.4.f.(1)(i), F.4.f.(1)(ii), and F.4.f.(1)(iii) of this rule; and
(3) Certifies that the local government meets the conditions of paragraphs F.2.f.(2) and F.4.f.(4) of this rule.
(B) The local government's independently audited year- end financial statements for the latest fiscal year (except for local governments where audits are required every two years where unaudited statements may be used in years when audits are not required), including the unqualified opinion of the auditor who must be an independent, certified public accountant or an appropriate State agency that conducts equivalent comprehensive audits;
(C) A report to the local government from the local government's independent certified public accountant (CPA) or the appropriate State agency based on performing an agreed upon procedures engagement relative to the financial ratios required by paragraph F.4.f(1)(i)(B) of this rule, if applicable, and the requirements of paragraphs F.4.f(1)(ii) and F.4.f.(1)(iii)(C)and(D) of this rule. The CPA or State agency's report should state the procedures performed and the CPA or State agency's findings; and
(D) A copy of the comprehensive annual financial report (CAFR) used to comply with paragraph F.4.f.(2) of this rule or certification that the requirements of General Accounting Standards Board Statement 18 have been met.
(ii) The items required in paragraph F.4.f.(3)(i) of this rule must be placed in the facility operating record as follows:
(A) In the case of closure and post-closure care, prior to the initial receipt of waste at the facility; or
(B) In the case of corrective action, not later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy is selected in
accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8 of this rule.
(iii) After the initial placement of the items in the facility's operating record, the local government owner must update the information and place the updated information in the operating record within 180 days following the close of the owner’s fiscal year.
(iv) The local government owner is no longer required to meet the requirements of paragraph F.4.f.(3) of this rule when:
(A) The owner substitutes alternate financial assurance as specified in this section; or
(B) The owner is released from the requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b, or F.3.b of this rule.
(v) A local government must satisfy the requirements of the financial test at the close of each fiscal year. If the local government owner or operator no longer meets the requirements of the local government financial test it must, within 210 days following the close of the owner fiscal year, obtain alternative financial assurance that meets the requirements of this rule, place the required submissions for that assurance in the operating record, and notify the State Director that the owner no longer meets the criteria of the financial test and that alternate assurance has been obtained.
(vi) The Director of an approved State, based on a reasonable belief that the local government owner may no longer meet the requirements of the local government financial test, may require additional reports of financial condition from the local government at any time. If the Director of an approved State finds, on the basis of such reports or other information, that the owner no longer meets the requirements of the local government financial test, the local government must provide alternate financial assurance in accordance with this section.
(4) Calculation of costs to be assured. The portion of the closure, post- closure, and corrective action costs for which an owner can assure under this paragraph is determined as follows:
(i) If the local government owner does not assure other environmental obligations through a financial test, it may assure closure, post-closure, and corrective action costs that equal up to 43 percent of the local government's total annual revenue.
(ii) If the local government assures other environmental obligations through a financial test, including those associated with UIC facilities under 40 CFR 144.62, petroleum underground storage tank facilities under 40 CFR Part 280, PCB storage facilities under 40 CFR Part 761, and hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal facilities under 40 CFR Parts 264 and 265, it must add those costs to the closure, post-closure, and corrective action costs it seeks to assure under this paragraph. The total that may be assured must not exceed 43 percent of the local government's total annual revenue.
(iii) The owner must obtain an alternate financial assurance instrument for those costs that exceed the limits set in paragraphs F.4.f.(4) (i) and (ii) of this rule.
(g) Corporate Guarantee
(1) An owner may meet the requirements of this rule by obtaining a written guarantee. The guarantor must be the direct or higher-tier parent corporation of the owner, a firm whose parent corporation is also the parent corporation of the owner, or a firm with a “substantial business relationship” with the owner. The guarantor must meet the requirements for owners in paragraph F.4.e of this rule and must comply with the terms of the guarantee. A certified copy of the guarantee must be placed in the facility's operating record along with copies of the letter from the guarantor's chief financial officer and accountants' opinions. If the guarantor's parent corporation is also the parent corporation of the owner, the letter from the guarantor's chief financial officer must describe the value received in consideration of the guarantee. If the guarantor is a firm with a “substantial business relationship” with the owner, this letter must describe this “substantial business relationship” and the value received in consideration of the guarantee.
(2) The guarantee must be effective and all required submissions placed in the operating record before the initial receipt of waste or before the effective date of the requirements of this rule, in the case of closure and post-closure care, or in the case of corrective action no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has
been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8 of this rule.
(3) The terms of the guarantee must provide that:
(i) If the owner fails to perform closure, post-closure care, and/or corrective action of a facility covered by the guarantee, the guarantor will:
(A) Perform, or pay a third party to perform, closure, post-closure care, and/or corrective action as required (performance guarantee); or
(B) Establish a fully funded trust fund as specified in paragraph F.4.a of this rule in the name of the owner (payment guarantee).
(ii) The guarantee will remain in force for as long as the owner must comply with the applicable financial assurance requirements of this Subpart unless the guarantor sends prior notice of cancellation by certified mail to the owner and to the State Director. Cancellation may not occur, however, during the 120 days beginning on the date of receipt of the notice of cancellation by both the owner and the State Director, as evidenced by the return receipts.
(iii) If notice of cancellation is given, the owner must, within 90 days following receipt of the cancellation notice by the owner and the State Director, obtain alternate financial assurance, place evidence of that alternate financial assurance in the facility operating record, and notify the State Director. If the owner fails to provide alternate financial assurance within the 90-day period, the guarantor must provide that alternate assurance within 120 days of the cancellation notice, obtain alternative assurance, place evidence of the alternate assurance in the facility operating record, and notify the State Director.
(4) If a corporate guarantor no longer meets the requirements of paragraph F.4.g.1 of this rule, the owner or operator must, within 90 days, obtain alternative assurance, place evidence of the alternate assurance in the facility operating record, and notify the State Director. If the owner fails to provide alternate financial assurance within the 90-day period, the guarantor must provide that alternate assurance within the next 30 days.
(5) The owner is no longer required to meet the requirements of this paragraph F.4.g when:
(i) The owner substitutes alternate financial assurance as specified in this section; or
(ii) The owner is released from the requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b or F.3.b of this rule.
(h) Local Government Guarantee.
An owner may demonstrate financial assurance for closure, post-closure, and corrective action, as required by paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b, and F.3.b of this rule by obtaining a written guarantee provided by a local government. The guarantor must meet the requirements of the local government financial test in paragraph F.4.f of this rule, and must comply with the terms of a written guarantee.
(1) Terms of the written guarantee. The guarantee must be effective before the initial receipt of waste or before the effective date of this rule, whichever is later, in the case of closure, post-closure care, or no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8 of this rule. The guarantee must provide that:
(i) If the owner fails to perform closure, post-closure care, and/or corrective action of a facility covered by the guarantee, the guarantor will:
(A) Perform, or pay a third party to perform, closure, post-closure care, and/or corrective action as required; or
(B) Establish a fully funded trust fund as specified in paragraph F.4.a of this rule in the name of the owner.
(ii) The guarantee will remain in force unless the guarantor sends notice of cancellation by certified mail to the owner and to the State Director. Cancellation may not occur, however, during the 120 days beginning on the date of receipt of the notice of cancellation by both the owner and the State Director, as evidenced by the return receipts.
(iii) If a guarantee is cancelled, the owner must, within 90 days following receipt of the cancellation notice by the owner and the State Director, obtain alternate financial assurance, place evidence of that alternate financial assurance in the facility operating record, and notify the State Director. If the owner fails to provide alternate financial assurance within the 90-day period, the guarantor must provide that alternate assurance within 120 days following the guarantor's notice of cancellation, place evidence of the alternate assurance in the facility operating record, and notify the State Director.
(2) Recordkeeping and Reporting.
(i) The owner must place a certified copy of the guarantee along with the items required under paragraph F.4.f.(3) of this rule into the facility's operating record before the initial receipt of waste or before the effective date of this rule, whichever is later, in the case of closure, post-closure care, or no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8 of this rule.
(ii) The owner is no longer required to maintain the items specified in paragraph F.4.h(2) of this rule when:
(A) The owner substitutes alternate financial assurance as specified in this section; or
(B) The owner is released from the requirements of this rule in accordance with paragraphs F.1.b, F.2.b or F.3.b of this rule.
(iii) If a local government guarantor no longer meets the requirements of paragraph F.4.f of this rule, the owner, must, within 90 days, obtain alternative assurance, place evidence of the alternate assurance in the facility operating record, and notify the State Director. If the owner fails to obtain alternate financial assurance within that 90-day period, the guarantor must provide that alternate assurance within the next 30 days.
(i) Other Mechanisms. An owner may satisfy the requirements of this rule by providing evidence of financial assurance through the use of any mechanism that is adopted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under Part 258, Subpart G, of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
or any other mechanism that meets the criteria specified in paragraph F.4.k of this rule and that is approved by the Commission.
(j) Use of Multiple Financial Mechanisms. An owner may satisfy the requirements of this rule by establishing more than one financial mechanism per facility. The mechanisms must be as specified in paragraphs F.4.a through F.4.i of this rule, except that it is the combination of mechanisms, rather than the single mechanism, which must provide financial assurance for an amount at least equal to the current cost estimate for closure, post-closure care or corrective action, whichever is applicable. The financial test and a guarantee provided by a corporate parent, sibling, or grandparent may not be combined if the financial statements of the two firms are consolidated.
(k) The language of the mechanisms listed in paragraphs F.4.a through F.4.i of this rule must ensure that the instruments satisfy the following criteria:
(1) the financial assurance mechanisms must ensure that the amount of funds assured is sufficient to cover the costs of closure, post-closure care, and corrective action for known releases when needed;
(2) the financial assurance mechanisms must ensure that funds will be available in a timely fashion when needed;
(3) the financial assurance mechanisms must be obtained by the owner by the effective date of these regulations in the case of closure and post-closure care, and no later than 120 days after the corrective action remedy has been selected in accordance with the requirements of paragraph D.8. of this rule, until the owner is released from the financial assurance requirements under paragraphs F.1, F.2 and F.3 of this rule; and
(4) the financial assurance mechanisms must be legally valid, binding, and enforceable under State of Mississippi and Federal law.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.5 Transfer Station, Storage, Collection, And Transportation Requirements
A. Transfer Station Permit Requirements
(1) An individual permit or a certificate of coverage under a general permit is required for the operation of a transfer station. The individual permit or certificate
of coverage under any applicable general permit must be issued prior to the receipt of any waste.
(2) An applicant for a new transfer station shall complete an application for coverage under any applicable general permit or for an individual permit on forms provided by the Department. Such submittal shall demonstrate that the transfer station will comply with all applicable requirements of Rules 1.2, 1.3 and 1.5 of these regulations and the terms and conditions of a general permit or an individual permit.
(3) Owners of existing transfer stations, which have been previously issued an individual permit, may request that their permit be revoked and that they be issued a certificate of coverage under any applicable general permit. Likewise, owners of existing transfer stations, which have been previously issued a certificate of coverage under a general permit, may request that their certificate of coverage be revoked and that they be issued an individual permit.
B. Transfer Stations shall be operated in accordance with the following requirements as well as the general requirements of Rule 1.5.C of these regulations:
(1) Access to a transfer station shall not be allowed to the general public unless an attendant is on-site at all times the facility is open.
(2) Unless a transfer station is operated within an enclosed building, a wood or wire fence shall be constructed around the facility for the purpose of preventing any windblown litter from escaping the property. The Department may grant a waiver from this requirement if the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Department another acceptable method of containing the litter.
(3) Litter shall be collected at the end of each operating day or as necessary to keep the property reasonably clean.
(4) Open burning of solid waste, except for land clearing debris generated on the site of the facility, shall be prohibited at a transfer station.
(5) Transfer stations, which accept household garbage or other putrescible wastes, must be designed to contain all off-loading and storage of solid wastes within a walled and roofed structure that will prevent windblown litter, stormwater contact and unauthorized discharge of leachate and contaminated stormwater. An alternate design may be approved by the Department upon sufficient demonstration by the owner that the alternate design will prevent windblown litter and will adequately collect and contain leachate and contaminated stormwater.
(6) All garbage and other putrescible waste must be removed at least once per week or more frequently where necessary to maintain sanitary conditions at the site.
(7) Requirements for Tipping Floor Transfer Stations
(a) All tipping floors and other related equipment shall be washed down or otherwise cleaned a minimum of once per day to reduce odors and to maintain appropriate sanitary working conditions.
(b) All tipping floor and equipment washwater shall be collected and properly disposed of according to the applicable wastewater regulations of the Commission on Environmental Quality.
(8) All solid waste transported from a transfer station must be delivered to an authorized waste disposal facility or to another facility acceptable to the Department.
C. Storage, Collection, and Transportation
(1) All solid waste shall be stored in such a manner that it does not constitute a fire, safety or health hazard or provide food or harborage for animals and vectors, and shall be contained or bundled so as not to result in litter. It shall be the responsibility of the occupant of a residence or the owner or manager of an establishment to utilize a storage system that will include containers of adequate size and strength, and in sufficient numbers, to contain all solid waste that the residence or other establishment generates in the period of time between collections. The owner or, if leased, the lessee of the storage containers shall be responsible for compliance with this requirement.
(2) Solid waste containing putrescible materials shall be collected and transported to a disposal facility at a frequency adequate to prevent propagation and attraction of vectors and the creation of a public health nuisance.
(3) All vehicles and equipment used for the collection and transportation of a solid waste shall be constructed, operated and maintained to prevent loss of liquids or solid waste material, and to minimize health and safety hazards to solid waste management personnel and the public. Collection vehicles and equipment shall be maintained in a sanitary condition to preclude odors and fly-breeding.
(4) Areas where solid wastes are spilled during collection and/or transportation shall be promptly cleaned and remediated.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.6 Rubbish Site Requirements
A. (1) An individual permit or a certificate of coverage under a general permit is required for the operation of a rubbish site. The individual permit or certificate of coverage must be issued prior to the receipt of any waste at the site.
(2) An applicant for a new rubbish site shall complete an application for coverage under any applicable general permit or an application for an individual permit on forms provided by the Department. Such submittal shall demonstrate that the facility will comply with all applicable requirements of Rules 1.2, 1.3 and 1.6 of these regulations and the terms and conditions of a general permit or an individual permit.
(3) Owners of existing rubbish sites, which have been issued an individual permit, may request that their permit be revoked and that they be issued a certificate of coverage under any applicable general permit. Likewise, owners of existing rubbish sites, which have previously issued a certificate of coverage under a general permit, may request that their certificate of coverage be revoked and that they be issued an individual permit.
B. A Class I Rubbish Site may receive the following wastes for disposal:
(1) construction and demolition debris, such as wood, metal, etc.
(2) brick, mortar, concrete, stone, and asphalt
(3) cardboard boxes
(4) natural vegetation, such as tree limbs, stumps, and leaves.
(5) appliances (other than refrigerators and air conditioners) which have had the motor removed
(6) furniture
(7) plastic, glass, crockery, and metal, except containers
(8) sawdust, wood shavings, and wood chips
(9) other similar wastes specifically approved by the Department.
C. A Class II Rubbish Site may receive the following wastes for disposal:
(1) natural vegetation, such as tree limbs, stumps, and leaves
(2) brick, mortar, concrete, stone, and asphalt
(3) other similar rubbish specifically approved by the Department.
D. The following wastes shall be prohibited from disposal at all rubbish sites:
(1) any acceptable waste which has been contaminated by a pollutant, such as a food or chemical, unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Department that such waste has no adverse effect on the environment.
(2) household garbage and other food and drink waste
(3) liquids, sludges, and contaminated soils
(4) paint, paint buckets, oil containers and chemical containers
(5) engines, motors, whole tires, and all types of batteries
(6) toxic or hazardous waste
(7) regulated asbestos and asbestos containing material originating from a facility, as defined by the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR 61, Subpart M)
(8) medical waste
(9) bulk fabric and paper loads, refrigerators, air conditioners, cut or shredded tires, and any metal, glass, plastic, or paper container, unless specifically approved by the Department. The Department shall consider the characteristics of the waste, the operating plan of the site, and other site specific conditions in determining the acceptability of any such waste
(10) other waste which are specifically determined by the Department to have an adverse effect on the environment.
E. Class I and Class II Rubbish Sites shall be operated in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) Prior to the disposal of any solid waste, all borings drilled on site in preparation of the permit application, which will not be converted to monitoring or supply wells, shall be properly sealed in accordance with the requirements of the Office of Land and Water Resources.
(2) Adequate security and monitoring shall be established and maintained to prevent uncontrolled access and disposal. An attendant shall be on duty at any time access to the site is unsecured.
(3) Disposal of waste shall be limited to wastes described in applicable paragraph B. or C. of this rule.
(4) Disposal activity shall be restricted to the area defined in the approved application. The disposal area boundaries shall be located and clearly marked by a land surveyor licensed by the State of Mississippi. At a minimum, the corners of the disposal area shall be marked. The markers shall be a minimum, 3-foot high concrete posts, metal pipes, weather resistant wood posts or other suitable markers approved by the Department. The markers shall be placed in the ground to a sufficient depth to facilitate permanence and shall be maintained by the owner. Markers that become damaged shall be promptly re-established by the owner with the assistance of a licensed land surveyor, where necessary.
(5) Prior to the unloading and disposal of each waste load, the facility operator or a designated, trained spotter shall visually inspect each waste load and remove any unauthorized wastes from the load. Incoming waste loads that contain significant amounts of unauthorized wastes shall be refused disposal at the facility. Incidental amounts of unauthorized wastes identified after waste unloading shall be immediately removed from the disposal area. All unauthorized wastes removed from incoming loads and/or the disposal area shall be collected and properly disposed at an authorized disposal facility.
(6) a liner must be constructed at a facility, in whole or in part, as specified in the approved application, at least two weeks prior to disposal in the area, a construction quality assurance report shall be submitted to the Department. The report shall contain a certification from an independent professional engineer registered in Mississippi that the construction of the area was performed in accordance with the plans as stated in the approved application. Construction of the liner may be accomplished at one time with one certification, or in stages, each with a separate certification, as stated in the approved application.
(7) A periodic cover consisting of a minimum of six inches of earthen material shall be applied to the wastes at least every two weeks. The Department may alter the frequency of cover depending upon the amount or type of wastes received, the location of the site, and other conditions.
(8) Rubbish shall be managed so that it shall not become windblown or attract vectors.
(9) Windblown and scattered litter and debris shall be collected from around the entire facility at the end of every operating day and returned to the active working area for proper disposal.
(10) Open burning of solid waste, except for land clearing debris generated on the site of the facility, shall be prohibited. Open burning of land clearing debris shall be conducted in accordance with Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 1, Rule 1.3.G. of the “Air Emission Regulations for the Prevention, Abatement, and Control of Air Contaminants.” (Title 11, Part 2, Chapter 1).
(11) An adequate supply of water under pressure at the site or an adequate stockpile of earthen material reasonably close to the disposal area shall be provided, or there shall be a nearby, organized Fire Department providing service when called. The Department may approve alternate methods of fire protection or waive this requirement when there is no need for fire protection. Should an accidental fire occur, the owner shall immediately take action to extinguish the fire and shall notify the Department by the close of the Department’s next business day.
(12) Rubbish shall not be disposed in standing water nor in any manner that may result in washout of waste. Furthermore, the active disposal area shall not be located or constructed in a manner that causes or allows wastes to come into contact with the seasonal high water table.
(13) A rubbish site shall be developed and contoured to direct run-on and/or runoff away from the active disposal area and to prevent ponding of water in and over areas of waste disposal.
(14) Unloading and disposal of rubbish shall be controlled by the owner and shall be confined to as small an area as practical.
(15) Each commercial class I rubbish site must be operated by a person who holds a current certificate of competency issued by the Commission in accordance with Rule 8.3.(B) of the Regulations for the Certification of Operators of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities. Such person must have direct supervision over and be personally responsible for the daily operation and maintenance of the rubbish site.
In the event of the temporary loss of a certified operator due to illness, death, discharge, or other legitimate cause, written notice shall be given to the Department within 7 days. Continued operation of such system without a certified operator may proceed on an interim basis for a period not to exceed 180 days, except for good cause shown upon petition to the Commission.
(16) The owner of a rubbish site must keep an accurate written daily record of deliveries of solid waste to the facility including but not limited to: the name of the hauler, the source of the waste, the types of waste received and the weight of solid waste measured in tons received at the facility. For those facilities that do not have access to weight scales, the weight should be converted to tons from cubic yards using conversion factors as developed or approved by the Department. A copy of these records must be maintained by the owner at the rubbish site or at another site approved by the Department. The records shall be made available to the Department for inspection, upon request.
(17) The owner of a rubbish site shall submit an annual report to the Department each year no later than February 28 th , to include information regarding the facility for the preceding calendar year. At a minimum, the report shall contain the following:
(a) the total amount of waste received during the calendar year, in units of tons, and the source of wastes listed by county of origin with a clear indication of wastes originating from out-of-state counties.
(b) estimated remaining capacity at the facility, in terms of acreage, or cubic yards, and years remaining; and
(c) if the owner of the facility or the contract operator of the facility is a private concern, an updated disclosure statement. If all information from the previously submitted disclosure statement is unchanged, a letter stating such may be included in lieu of an updated disclosure statement.
(18) Within 30 days of completing an area, at least two feet of a low permeable earthen cover shall be applied as final cover. Following soil placement, suitable vegetation shall be promptly established and maintained. Any erosion occurring on completed areas shall be promptly repaired. Any area containing waste materials, which has not received waste in the past twelve (12) months, shall be covered in accordance with this paragraph.
(19) The final cover gradient on a rubbish site shall be a minimum of four percent (4%) and a maximum of twenty-five percent (25%), unless otherwise approved by the Department.
(20) The owner shall notify the Department within 14 days upon final closure of the site.
(21) The owner shall comply with any additional requirements included in the permit.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.7 Processing Facility Requirements
A. (1) An individual permit or a certificate of coverage of a general permit is required for the operation of a processing facility. An individual permit or certificate of coverage under any applicable general permit must be issued prior to the receipt of any waste.
(2) An applicant for a new processing facility shall complete an application for coverage under any applicable general permit or an individual permit on forms provided by the Department. Such submittal shall demonstrate that the facility will comply with all applicable requirements of Rules 1.2, 1.3, and 1.7 of these regulations and the terms and conditions of a general permit or an individual permit.
(3) Owners of existing processing facilities, which have been issued an individual permit, may request that their permit be revoked and that they be issued a certificate of coverage under any applicable general permit. Likewise, owners of existing processing facilities, which have been previously issued a certificate of coverage under a general permit may request that their certificate of coverage be revoked and that they be issued an individual permit.
B. Processing facilities shall comply with all applicable federal and state air emission and wastewater discharge laws and regulations.
C. Surface drainage in and around the facility shall be controlled to minimize surface water runoff onto, into, and off the treatment area.
D. Any liquids accumulated at the facility, including leachate, washwater, or contaminated rainfall runoff, shall be controlled in a manner that will prevent obnoxious odors and pollution of waters of the State.
E. Processing facilities shall be operated in manner that ensures the health, safety, and aesthetic aspects of a community are not endangered by the location and operation of the facility. Depending on the specific solid waste handling or processing operation involved, several of the operational standards prescribed for solid waste landfill sites may be applicable and shall be followed, if appropriate.
F. The facility shall not accumulate solid waste in quantities that cannot be processed within such times as will preclude the creation of objectionable off-site odors, fly-breeding, or harborage of other vectors. If such accumulations occur, additional solid waste shall not be received until the adverse conditions are abated.
G. If a significant work stoppage should occur at a solid waste processing facility, due to a mechanical breakdown or other cause and is anticipated to last long enough to create objectionable odors, fly-breeding, or harborage of vectors, steps shall be taken to remove the accumulated solid waste from the site to an approved alternate back-up processing or disposal facility.
H. When processing putrescible wastes, all working surfaces that come in contact with wastes shall be washed down or otherwise cleaned as needed to prevent objectionable odors, vector breeding and harborage, nuisance conditions, or other unsanitary conditions.
I. If a facility is not completely enclosed, wire or other type fencing or screening shall be provided when necessary to minimize windblown materials. Litter resulting from the operation shall be collected and returned to the processing area as frequently as necessary to minimize unsightly conditions and fire hazards.
J. Open burning of solid waste, except for land clearing debris generated on the site of the facility, shall be prohibited. An adequate supply of water under pressure at the site or an
adequate stockpile of earth reasonably close to the processing area shall be provided, or there shall be a nearby organized Fire Department providing service when called. The Department may approve alternate methods of fire protection or waive this requirement when there is no need for fire protection. Should an accidental fire occur, the owner shall immediately take action to extinguish the fire and shall promptly notify the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.8 Land Application Requirements
A. (1) Except as provided for in Rule 1.1.B, an individual permit or a certificate of coverage of a general permit is required for the operation of a land application site. An individual permit or certificate of coverage under any applicable general permit must be issued prior to the receipt of any waste.
(2) An applicant for a new land application site shall complete an application for coverage under any applicable general permit or for an individual permit on forms provided by the Department. Such submittal shall demonstrate that the facility will comply with all applicable requirements of Rules 1.2, 1.3, and 1.8 of these regulations and the terms and conditions of a general permit or an individual permit.
(3) Owners of existing land application sites, which have been issued an individual permit, may request that their permit be revoked and that they be issued a certificate of coverage under any applicable general permit. Likewise, owners of existing land application sites, which have been previously issued a certificate of coverage under a general permit, may request that their certificate of coverage be revoked and that they be issued an individual permit.
B. No waste shall be placed on saturated grounds. Saturation may be determined by digging a hole one-foot deep at the lowest point of the ground and observing for 30 minutes. If water appears in the hole, the soil is considered to be saturated.
C. Land application sites shall be located in a hydrologic section where the historic high water table is at a safe depth below the zone of incorporation.
D. The application area shall be located a minimum of 300 feet from any inhabited building unless the applicant can justify otherwise. Furthermore, the Department may require larger buffer zones when circumstances warrant.
E. Land application of wastes shall be conducted by incorporation into the soil, by injection below the land surface, or by other appropriate means of application, as approved by the Department. Incorporation should normally be accomplished by applying the wastes uniformly and disking or plowing until the waste is adequately turned under the soil or thoroughly mixed with the soil. Incorporation shall be accomplished during or
immediately following application.
F. Wastes which contain significant amounts of nitrogen shall be applied at an agronomic rate not to exceed the plant available nitrogen levels specified in Table 1 of this rule, unless data can be presented to justify otherwise.
G. The soil pH shall be maintained at or above 6.5 unless otherwise authorized by the Department.
H. The annual loading rate for cadmium shall not exceed 0.45 pounds/acre/year.
I. The cumulative (life-time) application of pollutants shall not exceed the levels specified in Table 2 of this rule or where applicable, the levels specified in 40 CFR 503.
J. In addition to the requirements in these regulations, land application of sewage sludge must be conducted in a manner which complies with 40 CFR 503 - Standards for the Use and Disposal of Sewage Sludge, which are incorporated herein and adopted by reference.
K. Where sewage sludge is applied to public contact sites, access to the facility shall be controlled to restrict unauthorized personnel during operation and for at least 12 months following final application.
L. Where sludge is applied, grazing by animals shall be restricted during operation and for 30 days thereafter.
M. Prior to land application, sewage sludges and other pathogen-containing sludges shall be treated by a process to significantly reduce pathogens (PSRP) or by a process to further reduce pathogens (PFRP). The PSRP’s and PFRP’s are listed in Table 3 of this rule.
N. Where sludge is applied, no crops that will be consumed raw by humans shall be planted until at least 18 months have passed from the date of the last application. For all other crops grown for indirect human consumption, at least 30 days shall pass between the date of the last application and the date the crop is planted.
O. Limitations may be placed on the loading rates of other contaminants when necessary to protect the environment and public health.
P. Where the permit applicant and the solid waste generator are not the same person, the generator shall be responsible for ensuring that the waste characteristics are compatible with a safe disposal operation. Monitoring data, which characterizes the solid waste, shall be provided to the permittee by the generator on a regular basis as required by the permit. All other monitoring (groundwater, surface water, soils, etc.) shall be the responsibility of the permittee and shall be determined on a site-specific basis.
Q. If substances that may be deleterious to human health are placed on the land in amounts that are in excess of those established as acceptable for growing food chain crops, notice
of such shall be given to future landowners (via notice to the deed). When soil analyses show that such levels of contaminants are no longer present, the notice to future landowners shall not be required. TABLE 1
MAXIMUM PLANT AVAILABLE NITROGEN LEVELS TO BE APPLIED TO CROPLANDS
CROP MAXIMUM P.A.N. LBS/AC/YR)
Bahia grass 160
Bermuda grass 300
Fescue 120
Grain sorghum 180
Silage sorghum 300
Millett 150
Rye grass 220
Alfalfa, clover, vetch 450
Cotton 180
Corn 240
Soybeans 300
Wheat 135
Other cover vegetation may be grown, if approved by the Department .
TABLE 2
MAXIMUM CUMULATIVE POLLUTANT LOADING RATES TO BE APPLIED AT LAND APPLICATION SITES
Metals Loading Rates
CEC* CEC* CEC*
<5 5-15 >15
kg/ha (lb/ac) kg/ha (lb/ac) kg/ha (lb/ac)
Lead (Pb) 500 (455) 1000 (890) 2000 (1780)
Zinc (Zn) 250 (222) 500 (445) 1000 (890)
Copper (Cu) 125 (111) 250 (222) 500 (445)
Nickel (Ni) 125 (111) 250 (222) 500 (445)
Cadmium (Cd) 5 (4.4) 10 (8.9) 20 (17.8)
- CEC - Cation Exchange Capacity, meq/100
TABLE 3
PROCESSES TO SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE PATHOGENS (PSRP)
Aerobic Digestion: The process is conducted by agitating sludge with air or oxygen to maintain conditions at residence times ranging from 60 days at 15 °C to 40 days at 20 °C, with a volatile solids reduction of at least 38 percent.
Air Drying: Liquid sludge is allowed to drain and/or dry on under-drained sand beds, or paved or unpaved basins in which the sludge is at a depth of nine inches. A minimum of three months is needed, two months of which temperatures average on a daily basis above 0 °C.
Anaerobic Digestion: The process is conducted in the absence of air at residence time ranging from 60 days at 20 °C to 15 days at 35 - 55 °C, with a volatile solids reduction of at least 38 percent.
Composting: Using the within-vessel, static aerated pile or windrow composting methods, the solid waste is maintained at minimum operating conditions of 40 °C for 5 days. For four hours during this period the temperature exceeds 55 °C.
Lime Stabilization: Sufficient lime is added to produce a pH of 12 after 2 hours of contact.
Other Methods: Other methods or operating conditions may be acceptable if pathogens and vector attraction of the waste (volatile solids) are reduced to an extent equivalent to the reduction achieved by any of the above methods.
PROCESSES TO FURTHER REDUCE PATHOGENS (PFRP)
Composting: Using the within-vessel method, the solid waste is maintained at operating conditions of 55 C or greater for three days. Using the static aerated pile conditions of 55 C or greater for three days. Using the windrow composting method, the solid waste attains a temperature of 55 C or greater for at least 15 days during the composting period. Also, during the high temperature period, there will be a minimum of five turnings of the windrow.
Heat Drying: De-watered sludge cake is dried by direct or indirect contact with hot gases, and moisture content is reduced to 10 percent or lower. Sludge particles reach temperatures well in excess of 80 C, or the wet bulb temperature of the gas stream in contact with the sludge at the point where it leaves the dryer is in excess of 80 C.
Heat Treatment: Liquid sludge is heated to temperatures of 180 C for 30 minutes.
Thermophillic Aerobic Digestion: Liquid sludge is agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic conditions at residence times of 10 days at 55 – 60 C, with a volatile solids reduction of at least 38 percent.
Other Methods: Other methods or operating conditions may be acceptable if pathogens and vector attraction of the waste (volatile solids) are reduced to an extent equivalent to the reduction achieved by any of the methods described above.
Any of the processes listed below, if added to one of the PSRP processes listed in this Table 3, may be acceptable as the Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens.
Beta Ray Irradiation: Sludge is irradiated with beta rays from an accelerator at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature (ca. 20 C).
Gamma Ray irradiation: Sludge is irradiated with gamma rays from certain isotopes, such as 60 Cobalt and 137 Cesium, at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature (ca. 20 C).
Pasteurization: Sludge is maintained for at least 30 minutes at a minimum temperature of 70 C.
Other Methods: Other methods or operating conditions may be acceptable if pathogens are reduced to an extent to the equivalent to the reduction achieved by any of the above methods.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.9 Composting Facility Requirements
A. (1) An individual permit or a certificate of coverage under a general permit is required for the operation of a composting facility. The individual permit or certificate of coverage under any applicable general permit must be issued prior to the receipt of any waste.
(2) An applicant for a new composting facility shall complete a notification of intent for coverage under any applicable general permit or an application for an individual permit on forms provided by the Department. Such submittal shall demonstrate that the facility will comply with all applicable requirements of Rules 1.2, 1.3, and 1.9 of these regulations and the terms and conditions of a general permit or an individual permit.
(3) Owners of existing composting facilities, which have been issued an individual permit, may request that their permit be revoked and that they be issued a certificate of coverage under any applicable general permit. Likewise, owners of existing composting facilities which have been previously issued a certificate of
coverage under a general permit may request that their certificate of coverage be revoked and that they be issued an individual permit.
B. Requirements for facilities that receive only yard waste or rubbish.
(1) Access to the facility shall be closed to the general public unless an attendant is on site.
(2) Non-biodegradable bags, as well as all unauthorized waste materials, as determined by the Department, shall be removed from the compost and stored in appropriate containers for ultimate disposal or management at a facility approved by the Department.
(3) Open burning of solid waste, except for land clearing debris generated on the site of the facility, shall be prohibited. Immediate action shall be taken to extinguish any accidental fire and the Department shall be notified as soon as possible.
(4) Compost offered for use must be produced by a process that encompasses turning on a regular basis to aerate the waste, maintain temperatures, and/or reduce pathogens. Similar technologies that accomplish the same may also be considered by the Department.
(5) Surface water drainage shall be diverted around and away from the composting area and controlled to prevent any washing or escape of waste from the property. If the Department deems it necessary, a leachate collection and treatment system may be required.
(6) An annual report shall be submitted to the Department on or before February 28 th
of the following calendar year, which includes the following information:
(a) the facility name, address, and permit number;
(b) the total quantity, by weight or volume, of the waste received for composting;
(c) the total quantity, by weight or volume, of all residuals and recyclables separated from the waste or compost, and a description of how these materials were disposed or managed;
(d) the total quantity, by weight or volume, of the compost produced;
(e) the total quantity, by weight or volume, of the compost removed from the facility, and a description of how the compost was distributed or used; and,
(f) the remaining capacity for storage of compost at the facility based upon the amount of compost on site at the beginning of the year, the amount of compost produced, and the amount removed during the year.
C. Requirements for facilities that receive household garbage, wastewater sludge, animal wastes and manures and/or other solid waste with similar properties or characteristics, as determined by the Department.
(1) Design requirements:
(a) Specifications for site preparation must be included in the engineering design report developed for the site, such as clearing and grubbing, berm construction, drainage control structure, access roads, screening, fencing, etc.
(b) Surface water drainage shall be diverted around and away from the composting area and controlled to prevent any escape of waste from the property. Washdown water, leachate and any other contaminated water generated in the facility other than domestic wastewater shall be directed to sumps for use within the process. No discharge of contaminated water shall occur unless specifically allowed by the issuance of a wastewater permit.
(c) For facilities which process household garbage, the receiving area and the composting area must be covered with a roof capable of preventing rainfall from directly contacting the waste or compost. Final curing areas are not required to be roofed.
(2) Operational Requirements
(a) The individual(s) responsible for making the decisions critical to the composting process such as turning, wetting, screening, etc., shall have a knowledge of the biological processes at work and the expertise and knowledge capable of operating the facility in compliance with the requirements of this rules.
(b) All waste delivered to the facility must be confined to a designated delivery or receiving area. For facilities which receive household garbage, the waste must be processed within 72 hours or removed and disposed in another appropriate facility.
(c) Access to the facility shall be controlled by a permanent fence and gate or enclosed buildings. All access points shall be secured whenever the facility is not open for business or when no authorized personnel are on site.
(d) Residuals and recyclables shall be stored in a manner to prevent vector intrusion and aesthetic degradation. Appropriate steps shall be taken as necessary to alleviate any problems with flies, mosquitoes, or other vectors. Recyclables shall be removed at least annually; non-recyclable residuals shall be removed at least weekly.
(e) Unless the Permit Board authorizes different operating conditions based upon a sufficient demonstration that such conditions would result in a compost of equal or better quality, the following conditions shall apply:
(1) Where the windrow method of composting is utilized, a temperature of at least 55 °C must be maintained in the windrow for at least three weeks. Aerobic conditions must be maintained during the compost process. The windrow must be turned at least twice weekly during the three-week period.
(2) Where the static aerated pile method of composting is utilized, a temperature of at least 55 °C must be maintained for at least seven days. Aerobic conditions must be maintained during the compost process.
(3) Where the in-vessel method of composting is utilized, a retention time in the vessel must be at least 24 hours with the temperature maintained at 55 °C or higher. A stabilization period of at least seven days must follow the minimum retention period. Temperature in the compost pile must be maintained at least at 55 °C for at least three days during the stabilization period.
(3) Testing and Monitoring
(a) A composite sample of the compost produced shall be taken and analyzed at intervals of every 20,000 tons of compost produced or every three months, whichever comes first. At a minimum, the following tests shall be conducted:
Parameter Units to be Expressed Moisture % Total Nitrogen (as N) % dry weight Ammonia Nitrogen (as N) % dry weight Nitrate Nitrogen (as N) % dry weight Total Phosphorous % dry weight Total Potassium % dry weight Organic Matter % dry weight
Reduction in Organic Matter % pH standard units Arsenic, Total mg/kg dry weight Arsenic, TCLP ppm Barium, Total mg/kg dry weight Barium, TCLP ppm Cadmium, Total mg/kg dry weight Cadmium, TCLP ppm Chromium, Total mg/kg dry weight Chromium, TCLP ppm Copper, Total mg/kg dry weight Lead, Total mg/kg dry weight Lead, TCLP ppm Mercury, Total mg/kg dry weight Mercury, TCLP ppm Nickel, Total mg/kg dry weight Selenium, Total mg/kg dry weight Selenium, TCLP ppm Silver, Total mg/kg dry weight Silver, TCLP ppm Zinc, Total mg/kg dryweight (b) In addition to the test parameters required in paragraph C.3.a of this rule where sewage sludge, animal manures and wastes or other similar wastes are composted, a fecal coliform count shall be conducted before and after composting.
(c) The Permit Board may require additional or fewer test parameters or may increase or decrease the frequency of analysis based upon the quantity or characteristics of the waste, the location of the facility, or other factors which the Permit Board deems relevant.
(d) Composite samples of the compost taken pursuant to this section shall consist of at least five individual samples of equal volume taken from separate areas along the side of each pile of compost. Each sampling point shall be at a depth of two feet into the pile from the outside surface.
(e) Analytical methods for all tests shall be approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency or the Department.
(f) The Permit Board may require other monitoring activities such as groundwater and/or surface water monitoring.
(g) The reduction in organic matter required pursuant to paragraph D.1.b of this rule shall be determined by comparing the organic matter content of the feedstock and the organic matter content of the compost product, using the following calculation:
% ROM = [1- OMP (100 - OMF) } X 100 OMF (100 - OMP)
where % ROM = reduction in organic matter
OMF = % organic matter of the feedstock (before decomposition)
OMP = % organic matter of the compost product (after decomposition)
(4) Recordkeeping and Reporting.
(a) Records shall be maintained at the facility of the quantity of incoming waste, residuals and recyclables, and the quantity and quality of compost produced.
(b) Records of analytical testing and monitoring shall be maintained for a period of at least five (5) years, including:
(1) the date of measurement and the person measuring the quantity of incoming waste, residuals, recyclables, and compost produced, and the results thereof;
(2) the dates all analyses were performed;
(3) the person or contract lab who performed all analyses;
(4) the analytical techniques or methods used; and
(5) the results of all analyses.
(c) Records shall be available for inspection by Department personnel during normal business hours and shall be sent to the Department upon request.
(d) An annual report shall be submitted to the Department on or before February 28 th of the following calendar year, which includes the following information:
(1) the facility name, address, and permit number;
(2) the total quantity in weight or volume of waste received at the facility;
(3) the total quantity in weight or volume of all residuals and recyclables separated from the waste or compost, and a description of how these materials were disposed or managed;
(4) the total quantity in tons (dry weight) or volume of waste processed for composting at the facility;
(5) the total quantity in tons (dry weight) or volume of compost produced at the facility;
(6) the total quantity in tons (dry weight) or volume of compost removed from the facility, and a description of how the compost was distributed, used, or disposed; and
(7) the remaining capacity for storage of compost at the facility based upon the amount of compost on site at the beginning of the year, the amount of compost produced, and the amount removed during the year.
D. Classification of Compost
(1) Compost shall be classified based upon the type of waste processed, product maturity, particle size, moisture content, and chemical quality.
(a) Types of waste processed shall include the following:
(1) yard waste or rubbish only;
(2) sewage sludge;
(3) animal manures and wastes,
(4) household garbage, or other solid waste.
(5) some combination of the above wastes
(b) Product maturity.
(1) Mature compost is a highly stabilized compost material that has been exposed to prolonged periods of decomposition. It will not reheat upon standing to greater than 20°C above ambient temperature. The material should be brown to black in color. This level of maturity is indicated by a reduction in organic matter of greater than 60%.
(2) Semi-mature compost is compost material that is at the mesophilic stage. It may reheat upon standing to greater than 20°C above ambient temperature. The material should be light to dark brown in color. This level of maturity is indicated by a reduction in organic matter of greater than or equal to 40% but less than or equal to 60%.
(3) Fresh compost is compost material that has not completed the thermophilic stage and has undergone only partial decomposition. The material will reheat upon standing to greater than 20°C above ambient temperature. The material is usually similar in texture and color to the feedstock of the composting process. This level of maturity is indicated by a reduction in organic matter of greater than or equal to 20% but less than or equal to 40%.
(c) Particle size.
(1) Fine compost is compost that will pass a 10mm screen.
(2) Coarse compost is compost that will not pass a 10mm screen, but will pass a 25mm screen.
(3) Material, which will not pass a 25mm screen, shall be considered as residuals and not compost. It may be placed back into the compost process for additional reduction in size and decomposition.
(d) Moisture content.
Any finished compost which is not mature shall have a moisture content no higher than 60% at the time it is released from the facility for distribution or use.
(e) Chemical Quality.
The chemical quality of the compost shall be determined by the toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP) for the following metals, and shall be defined as either good or poor:
Metal Good Quality Poor Quality____ Arsenic < 0.5 ppm 0.5 - 5.0 ppm Barium <10.0 ppm 10.0 - 100 ppm Cadmium < 0.1 ppm 0.1 - 1.0 ppm Chromium < 0.5 ppm 0.5 - 5.0 ppm Lead < 0.5 ppm 0.5 - 5.0 ppm Mercury <0.02 ppm 0.02 - 0.2 ppm Selenium < 0.1 ppm 0.1 - 1.0 ppm Silver < 0.5 ppm 0.5 - 5.0 ppm
(2) Compost shall be classified as follows:
(a) Class I is compost made only from yard waste and/or other rubbish, which is mature or semi-mature, and is fine or coarse. For such compost, the chemical quality is assumed to be good, and no analytical testing is required unless the Department has reason to believe that the quality of the compost may not be good. If the compost is semi-mature, the moisture content must be less than or equal to 60%
(b) Class II is compost made from sewage sludge, or from yard waste/rubbish mixed with sewage sludge, which is mature, fine, and has a good chemical quality.
(c) Class III is compost made from household garbage or any other solid wastes with similar properties or characteristics, which is mature, fine, and has a good chemical quality.
(d) Class IV is compost made from household garbage or any other solid wastes with similar properties or characteristics, which is mature or semi- mature, and is fine or coarse, and has a good chemical quality. If the compost is semi-mature, the moisture content must be less than or equal to 60%.
(e) Class V is compost made from any solid waste which is fresh, or which has a poor chemical quality.
E. Compost distribution and use.
(1) Compost classified as Class I or II shall have unrestricted distribution.
(2) Compost classified as Class III or IV shall be restricted to use by commercial, agricultural, institutional, or governmental operations. However, if it is used where contact with the general public is likely, such as in a park, only Class III compost may be used.
(3) Compost classified as Class V shall only be used as landfill cover, with the specific approval of the Department.
(4) Compost, which cannot be processed to meet the definition of one of the five classifications in Part D.2 of this rule, must be disposed in a facility approved by the Department.
(5) A release form shall be provided to every person who receives for distribution or use compost classified as Class II, III, or IV, which contains, at a minimum, the following information:
(a) the name of the person to whom the compost is released, and the date released;
(b) the classification and quantity of compost released;
(c) the results of the latest chemical analysis of the compost conducted pursuant to paragraph C.3 of this rule;
(d) the amount of total cadmium, copper, nickel, lead and zinc present in the compost, expressed in pounds per dry ton of compost;
(e) the maximum allowable compost application rate (MACAR), in tons per acre, based upon the concentration of total cadmium, copper, nickel, lead and zinc, as computed and restricted in paragraph E.6 of this rule;
(f) a statement that any application of the compost in excess of the maximum allowable compost application rate as shown on this form is a violation of the laws of the State of Mississippi;
(g) if the compost is classified as Class IV, a statement that the compost shall not be applied where contact with the general public is likely, such as in a park.
(h) the signature of a representative of the compost facility and the person to whom the compost is released.
If the person listed in paragraph E.5.a of this rule indicates in the release form that he/she will not distribute or use the compost within the State of Mississippi, or, if the compost will only be used for landfill cover, the information in paragraph E.5.d, E.5.e, or E.5.f of this rule are not required to be provided.
(6) The maximum allowable compost application rate (MACAR) shall be computed according to the following equation:
{MACAR} M = {MAMAR} M
{CONC} M X 10 -6 X 2000
where {MACAR} M = maximum allowable compost application rate, in tons/ac/yr, based upon the specific metals listed in paragraph E.7.a of this rule.
[MAMAR} M =maximum allowable metal application rate, in lbs/ac/yr., for each of the metals listed in paragraph E.7.a of this rule.
{CONC} M = the total metal concentration, in mg/kg dry weight, for each of the metals listed in paragraph E.7.a of this rule.
After computing the MACAR for each of the metals listed in paragraph E.7.a. of this rule, the lowest value computed shall be the MACAR to be provided in the release form pursuant to paragraphE.5 of this rule.
(7) (a) Except as provided in paragraphs E.7.b and E.7.e of this rule, no person who applies or uses compost on land within the State of Mississippi, other than for landfill cover, shall do so in a manner that exceeds the following maximum allowable metal application rates (MAMAR's):
Metal MAMAR (lbs/ac/yr)
Cadmium 0.45 Copper 11.1 Lead 44.5 Nickel 11.1 Zinc 22.2
(b) For applications where repeated use of the compost is not expected, such as land reclamation or as a soil amendment on highway right-of-ways, request for higher application rates may be made to the Department. Such request must be made in writing to the Department, stating the site upon which the compost will be used. The request must be approved in writing by the Department.
In no case will the Department allow an application rate of more than 10 times the MAMAR's listed in this part, except as provided in paragraph E.7.c of this rule.
(c) If a person wishing to apply compost to the soil can demonstrate through an analysis of the soil cation exchange capacity and other physical or chemical characteristics of the soil that a higher MAMAR will provide an equal degree of protection to the environment, the Department may approve such application rates.
Part 4, Chapter 2: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Regulations Regarding Evaluation Criteria for Local Solid Waste Management Plans
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 2.1 Authority and Scope
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 2.2 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 2.3 Evaluation Criteria
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 2.4 Approval/Disapproval by Commission __________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 2.1 Authority and Scope
The Mississippi Solid Waste Planning Act of 1991 requires that every county, either individually or in cooperation with others, in cooperation with municipalities within the county, shall prepare, adopt, and submit to the Commission on Environmental Quality for review and approval a local nonhazardous solid waste management plan for the county. The act also requires the Commission to establish criteria for the evaluation of local nonhazardous solid waste plans. These criteria are adopted pursuant to Section 17-17- 225 of the act, and include the following:
A. The unit of local government's demonstration of the understanding of its nonhazardous solid waste management system, including the sources, composition, and quantities of nonhazardous solid waste generated within the planning area and transported into the planning area for management, and existing and planned nonhazardous solid waste management capacity, including remaining available capacity;
B. The adequacy of the local strategy for achieving the twenty-five percent (25%) waste minimization goal;
C. The reasonableness of the projections of nonhazardous solid waste generated within the planning area; and
D. The adequacy of plans and implementation schedules for providing needed nonhazardous solid waste management capacity.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 17-17-1, et seq. 49-2- 1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 2.2 Definitions
A. “Contiguous Property” - shall mean any property sharing a common border or point with a property where a new or expanded solid waste management facility is proposed. A property shall also meet this definition if the property would otherwise be contiguous except for separation by a street, highway, railroad line or other similar transit or utility right-of-way or other property owned by the applicant.
B. "Minor Modification" shall mean an amendment or addition to an approved plan, which is an administrative change or which does not involve or result in a significant change in the manner of solid waste management in the planning area. A minor modification would also include the addition or expansion of solid waste facilities, which do not require solid waste management permits or which are noncommercial, on-site and captive to wastes generated solely by the owner of the facility. A minor modification would not include: the addition of a new or expanded commercial solid waste management facility (facility); a significant change in the operation of an existing facility; a change in the service area for an existing facility; or any other significant change in the manner in which solid wastes are managed in the planning area.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 17-17-1, et seq. 49-2- 1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 2.3 Evaluation Criteria
A. Understanding of the Solid Waste Management System
(1) Each plan must clearly demonstrate that it has accounted for residential, commercial, and industrial nonhazardous wastes, and any special wastes which may be a problem unique to that area.
(2) Each plan must clearly demonstrate that it has determined the composition of nonhazardous solid waste currently disposed in facilities receiving household solid waste.
(a) The composition of residential waste shall be determined by at least two sampling events conducted in the planning area, one representative of an incorporated area, and the other representative of the unincorporated area.
Sampling events shall be repeated at least every five (5) years.
(b) Large quantities of industrial waste should be added into the overall waste composition.
(c) The composition of solid waste should be categorized into at least the following components:
(1) Cardboard/corrugated paper
(2) Newsprint
(3) Other paper
(4) Plastic
(5) Metals (ferrous, aluminum, etc.)
(6) Glass
(7) Wood/yard waste
(8) Food waste
(9) Textiles, other organics (rubber, leather, etc,)
(3) (a) Each plan must clearly demonstrate that it has determined the quantity of nonhazardous solid waste currently generated in the planning area and transported into the planning area, including residential, commercial, and industrial wastes, and any special wastes which may be a problem unique to that area.
(b) The quantity must be determined by actual measurements or records of representative samples of solid wastes generated in the planning area and transported into the planning area.
(4) Each plan must clearly demonstrate that it has inventoried all existing facilities managing municipal solid waste, and that each facility has been generally described in terms of the type waste received, the operational history, the environmental suitability of the site, and the remaining available permitted capacity of each facility.
(a) At a minimum, the facilities inventoried must include all facilities authorized by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, including public and private landfills, landfarms, and processing facilities.
(b) For any existing facilities receiving household solid waste which plan to discontinue operations before October 9, 1993,
(1) the environmental suitability may be generally addressed by declaring the facility unsuitable for long-term use, and
(2) the operational history may be generally addressed in terms of length of operations and types of wastes received.
(c) For any existing facilities receiving household solid waste which plan to continue operations after October 9, 1993, or which may be later evaluated for long-term use,
(1) the environmental suitability should be generally addressed with a discussion of those features and characteristics which make it favorable for long-term use, and
(2) the operational history should be generally addressed in terms of length of operations, types of waste received, and past enforcement actions taken against the facility.
(d) For any existing facilities receiving wastes other than household solid wastes, the plan should determine the long-term plans of the facility and its role in helping to meet the solid waste needs of the planning area.
(5) Each plan must clearly demonstrate that solid waste collection services are provided for all areas within the plan.
(6) Each plan must demonstrate the commitment of the county or planning authority to identifying and cleaning up all known open dumps within the planning area through the utilization of local enforcement authority.
(7) Each plan must describe its proposed system for waste tire management within the planning area. A clear understanding of the extent of the waste tire problem in the area shall be demonstrated by an estimation of the quantity of waste tires generated in the planning area and an inventory of waste tire collection sites or dumps in the area. The plan must contain an implementation schedule for starting up its proposed system.
B. Adequacy of Local Strategy for Waste Minimization. Each plan must contain an adequate local strategy for achieving a 25% waste minimization goal. The strategy shall contain specific programs or actions toward meeting the goal, such as policies promoting waste education, education programs, recycling or composting projects, and a schedule for implementation.
C. Reasonableness of Solid Waste Projections. Each plan must demonstrate that the projections of solid waste generated over the planning period are adequate to meet the needs of the area. Such projections shall be based upon reasonably expected population projections over the next 20 years, and may also include any anticipated commercial or industrial growth. Any solid waste projected to be transported into the planning area from outside the planning area shall also be accounted for in any projections.
D. Adequacy of Plans and Implementation Schedules.
(1) Each plan shall include a list of existing solid waste management facilities and also any additional planned facilities needed to meet the projected solid waste management needs of the planning area.
(a) Existing facilities shall be specifically identified, including all municipal solid waste landfills and other commercial landfills, rubbish disposal facilities, compost facilities, transfer stations, industrial disposal facilities and other solid waste management facilities. The role of each existing facility in meeting the intermediate and long-term needs of the planning area shall be described.
(b) Planned solid waste management facilities, whether new or expansions of existing facilities, which are expected to meet the solid waste needs shall be identified in the plan specifically as to the type, the name of the facility, the location, the size, and expected ownership and service area. Any plan, which does not identify the specific location of such facilities, must be modified to include such information, before an application for a permit is submitted to the Department.
(c) A proposed new or modified plan shall include a demonstration that owners of contiguous property to any planned new or expanded solid waste management facility, except land application facilities, are sent notice in writing of the proposed facility and of the specific facility information described in Rule 2.3(D)(1)(b) above. Written notification shall be sent by certified mail to the landowner's address as indicated on county tax records. The notice shall be sent no later than the date of issuance of the public notice, required by Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17- 227, and shall contain a copy of the subject public notice. The demonstration provided to the Department should include copies of the signed receipts of certified mail delivery or a copy of any returned certified mail item, that is refused or otherwise undeliverable.
(2) Each plan shall include a specific schedule for implementation.
(3) For any publicly-owned facilities, the plan shall include an estimation of the costs of such facilities. If any local government entity or regional authority plans to
contract with the private sector for use of privately-owned facilities, an estimation of the total contractual costs shall be made.
(4) Each plan shall identify the proposed method of financing any public expenditures for solid waste management services.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 17-17-1, et seq. 49-2- 1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 2.4 Approval/Disapproval by Commission
A. If the Commission determined that a plan has met the criteria specified herein, it shall by order, approve the plan.
B. (1) If the Commission determines that one or more of the criteria herein has not been fully met, but that Rule 2.3(D) of this criteria has been met in relation to the residential and commercial solid waste needs of the planning area, it may by order conditionally approve the plan. The Commission shall include in the order the conditions, upon which the plan is approved, including a list of deficiencies, which prevent the plan from becoming fully approved and a schedule for correcting those deficiencies.
(2) Should the county or planning authority fail to correct the deficiencies listed by the Commission within the established schedule, the Commission may take any enforcement action which it is authorized by law to administer, or it may, by order, rescind its conditional approval.
(3) Upon correction of the deficiencies listed with any conditional approval, the Commission shall fully approve the plan.
C. If the Commission determines that the plan fails to meet the criteria of Rule 2.3(D) with respect to residential and commercial waste needs, or that other criteria herein have not been met, it may, by order, disapprove the plan. The Commission shall include in the order a statement outlining the deficiencies in the plan and shall direct the county or planning authority to submit a revised plan that remedies those deficiencies. Any person found by the Commission to be in violation of said order shall be subject to civil penalties pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17-29.
D. No new plan or modification to an approved plan shall be approved or conditionally approved by the Commission, until it has been duly ratified in accordance with Paragraph (5) of Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17-227 and Rule 2.3(D) of these Regulations, except where the action involves a minor modification to the plan.
In the case of a minor modification to an approved plan, ratification of the modified plan shall be approved in accordance with Paragraph 5 of Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17-227 and Rule 2.3(D) of these regulations except as described below:
(1) A minor modification may be approved without the mandatory public notice and public hearing requirements and the adjacent county notice procedures described in Part 5(a) of Paragraph 5 of Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17-227.
(2) A minor modification may be approved by the local government without the notification to the contiguous property owners as required by Rule 2.3(D)(1)(c) of these regulations.
Part 4, Chapter 3: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Grant Regulations for Waste Tire and Solid Waste Assistance Funds, Authority
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 17-17-1, et seq. 49-2- 1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 3.1 Waste Tire Grant Guidelines
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 3.2 Local Governments Solid Waste Assistance Grant Guidelines
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 3.3 Solid Waste Planning Grant Guidelines
APPENDIX Intergovernmental Review Process _____________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 3.1 Waste Tire Grant Guidelines
A. Eligibility and Allocation of Funds
(1) Monies allocated to the Environmental Protection Trust Fund from waste tire fees shall be utilized for making grants as follows:
(a) To counties, municipalities, or regional solid waste management authorities
(1) for providing a waste tire collection site(s) for small quantity waste tire generators, and
(2) for use in clean-up of small scattered unauthorized waste tire dumps, not abated under the Department’s waste tire abatement
program. These grants shall herein be known as "local community waste tire collection and clean-up grants";
(b) To persons that will manufacture products from waste tires, use recovered rubber from waste tires or use waste tires as a fuel or fuel supplement and for funding research and demonstration projects directly related to solving solid waste problems resulting from waste tires, herein known as "waste tire recycling/research grants".
(c) To counties, municipalities or regional solid waste authorities for purchase of products derived from Mississippi Waste Tires, herein known as tire- derived product grants.
(d) To counties, municipalities or regional solid waste authorities for providing funds for employment of a solid waste enforcement officer, herein known as solid waste enforcement officer grants.
(2) For local community waste tire collection and clean-up grants:
(a) The Department of Environmental Quality (Department) may receive grant applications at any time. All applications received will be evaluated for consistency with these regulations, subject to the availability of funds.
(b) The entire cost of the local community waste tire collection and clean-up program may be eligible for grant award.
(3) For waste tire recycling/research grants:
(a) The Department will receive grant applications semiannually. All applications received by April 1 and October 1 of each year will be evaluated for consistency with these regulations, subject to the availability of funds.
(b) (1) No more than 50% of the costs of the project are eligible to provide incentive grants to persons that will manufacture products from waste tires, use recovered rubber from waste tires or use waste tires as a fuel or fuel supplement.
(2) No more than 50% of the costs of the project are eligible to provide funding for research and demonstration projects related to solving waste tire problems resulting from waste tires if such a project is proposed by a private, commercial establishment. However, up to 100% of the costs of the project are eligible for grant awards, if such project is proposed by a public or nonprofit entity.
(4) For tire-derived product grants:
(a) Based on the availability of funding, the Commission on Environmental Quality (Commission) may set aside designated funds for use in awarding grants to local governments to purchase products derived from waste tires generated in Mississippi. Upon the designation of such funds by the Commission, the Department shall advertise the availability of the funding and shall determine and advertise a date during the fiscal year to receive applications for these grant funds.
(b) Grant funds are only available to purchase products that have been sufficiently demonstrated or, where necessary, have been certified as a product for use in the intended purpose.
(5) For solid waste enforcement officer grants:
(a) The Department of Environmental Quality (Department) may receive grant applications from local governments at any time. All applications received will be evaluated for consistency with these regulations, subject to the availability of funds.
(b) Local government applicants which obtain grant funding under Rule 3.2(A)(1) of these regulations for up to 50% of the cost of employing a local solid waste enforcement officer are eligible to receive an additional 25% of the total funding to supplement the primary grant award. Overall funding under these conditions shall not exceed 75% of the total costs of employing a local solid waste enforcement officer.
(c) Local government applicants which obtain grant funding as described in Rule 3.1(A)(5)(b) above may be eligible for an additional 10% of the total funding where the government has adopted an enforceable local solid waste dumping ordinance or code. Overall grant funding under these conditions shall not exceed 85% of the total costs of employing a local solid waste enforcement officer.
(d) In instances where solid waste assistance funds under Rule 3.2(A)(2) are unavailable or where the local government has already committed its eligible solid waste assistance funds to other uses, the local government applicant may be eligible to receive funds under this Section as the primary funding for the cost of employing a local solid waste enforcement officer. Under these conditions, the local government applicant may apply for funds for the payment of up to 50% of the cost of employing the officer.
(e) The cost of employing a solid waste enforcement officer shall be limited to salary and fringe benefits for purposes of these regulations.
(f) Enforcement officers employed with support from these funds shall comply with the conditions and work duties prescribed by the Department for local solid waste enforcement officers.
(g) Where possible, grants under this Section will be awarded either as part of a local community waste tire collection and clean-up grant, described in Rule 3.1(A)(1)(a) and 3.1(A)(2) or a part of a grant awarded for the cost of employing a solid waste enforcement officer, described in Rule 3.2(A)(1)(d) and 3.2(A)(8).
(6) Other Grant Guidelines
(a) Generally, no grant shall be awarded under Rule 3.1(A)(3) and (4) for any activity, which receives less than 75% of its waste tires from Mississippi waste tire sites, retailers or residents. However, the Commission may consider requests for funding from applicants who do not meet this requirement contingent upon the applicant demonstrating that the activity does or will accept Mississippi waste tires and that the award of the requested funding would be in the best interest of the State of Mississippi. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to demonstrate that eligibility requirements have been met.
(b) No grant shall be awarded for the purchase or lease of equipment or other property, unless it can be demonstrated that such equipment or property is integral to the successful achievement of the overall goals of Rule 3.1(A)(1)(a), (b), or (c).
(c) No grant shall be awarded to a local government under Rule 3.1(A)(3), (4), or (5), if it is determined that the local government has not developed an adequate local waste tire collection and clean-up program.
(d) No grant shall be awarded if the grant is determined by the Department to be inconsistent with a local, solid waste management plan that has been submitted to and approved by the Commission.
B. Grant Application Procedures
(1) In order to receive consideration for a grant award from the Commission on Environmental Quality, persons or entities shall submit to the Department an application package, including an original and two (2) copies of a grant application. The application package shall contain the following items:
(a) a completed grant application form, as provided by the Department;
(b) a detailed narrative description of the proposed activity and discussion of the technical and economic feasibility of the project;
(c) documentation of completion of the intergovernmental review process as described in the appendix to this rule, including copies of all intergovernmental review agency comments received;
(d) a copy of all local, state, and federal permits to conduct the proposed activity;
(e) all other forms, documents, and supporting information required by the Department.
(2) Where funds requested exceed funds available, applications shall be evaluated and ranked, with preference for approval based on the following factors:
(a) For local community waste tire collection and clean-up grants:
(1) The applicant has not been previously funded or has not received funds during the current state fiscal year.
(2) The project proposes to recycle waste tires for other uses rather than conducting activities which simply lead to the disposal of the tires.
(3) The funds requested will be used as leverage, or matching for additional funds.
(4) The project is proposed to serve an area that has inadequate waste tire management capacity.
(5) The project proposes to process or manage a larger number of waste tires than other projects proposed.
(b) For waste tire recycling/research grants:
(1) The project proposes to recycle the whole tire rather than use only parts of the tire.
(2) The project is an integral part of a county or regional waste tire management plan.
(3) The funds requested will be used as leverage, or matching for additional funds.
(4) The technical and/or economic merits of the project appear superior to other projects proposed.
(5) The project is proposed to serve an area that has inadequate waste tire management capacity.
(6) The project proposes to process or manage a larger number of waste tires than other projects proposed.
(7) The project proposes to employ higher numbers of persons than other projects proposed.
(8) The proposal is vital to the continuation and/or completion of an on-going research project.
(9) The project is proposed by a university, college, other academic group, or public agency.
(c) For tire-derived product grants:
(1) The applicant has not been previously funded or has not received funds during the current state fiscal year.
(2) The tire-derived product to be used is a newly developed product or has not previously been utilized in Mississippi.
(3) The purchase of the tire-derived product will lead to the establishment or growth of efforts to manufacture the product in Mississippi.
(4) The proposal is deemed to be creative and innovative and has a high potential for providing additional solutions to the problems of waste tire management.
(5) The local government applicant has established an ongoing successful waste tire collection and clean-up program including an adequate number of collection sites and appropriate public outreach efforts.
(d) For solid waste enforcement officer grants:
(1) The applicant has established an ongoing, successful, local solid waste enforcement program.
(2) The applicant has adopted enforceable and appropriate local dumping ordinances or laws.
(3) The applicant has demonstrated a long term commitment of funding support to the employment and work efforts of a local solid waste officer, rather than for just the proposed grant period.
(4) The applicant proposes an enforcement program that will serve a wider geographic area and/or a larger population base than other projects.
(5) The applicant has established an ongoing successful waste tire collection and clean-up program including an adequate number of collection sites and appropriate public outreach efforts.
C. Disapproval of Grant Applications
(1) The Department may refuse to approve a grant application for any of the following reasons:
(a) the Department determines that the project is not consistent with state law or with Rule 3.1(A) or (B) of these regulations;
(b) the Department determines that the project is not consistent with the approved local solid waste management plan;.
(c) the Department determines that, for those proposals involving incentive recycling projects, the project is not likely to result in the utilization of a manufactured product or recovered rubber, or the utilization of waste tires as a fuel or fuel supplement;
(d) the Department determines that, for those proposals involving research and demonstration projects, the project is not directly related to solving a solid waste problem resulting from waste tires, or is not likely to result in solving the problem;
(e) the Department determines that the applicant does not possess the required local, state, or federal permits necessary to construct or conduct the proposed activity;
(f) the applicant is in violation of, or delinquent on, any condition of a previously awarded grant by this Department;
(g) the applicant has been significantly or habitually in violation of environmental laws, regulations, or permits;
(h) the applicant has deliberately falsified information submitted as part of the application;
(i) the Department determines that the applicant has proposed expenditures for grant project activities or components that are unnecessary or that exceed the expected usual and customary costs for such activities or components.
(j) the Department determines there are insufficient funds in the waste tire account.; and
(k) the proposal ranks lower than other projects based on the factors described in Rule 3.1(B).
(2) If the Department should refuse to approve a grant application for any reason, the applicant may request a hearing before the Commission in accordance with Section 49-17-35, Mississippi Code Annotated.
D. Conditions of Grant Awards
(1) Grants made to counties, municipalities or regional solid waste management authorities shall require compliance with all applicable procurement and purchasing regulations established pursuant to state law.
(2) At the discretion of the Commission, monies which are unspent after the expiration date of the grant award shall be forfeited back into the waste tire account.
(3) Grants made to any person or group which are awarded for less than 100% of the total estimated costs of the project shall ensure that the grantee's matching share is expended or committed in proportion to the release of state grant funds.
(4) The Commission may include any other conditions as part of the grant award which it determines are necessary to reasonably manage the project and/or protect the environment.
E. Reallocation of Funds
The Commission, upon determination that unused grant funds are available in a particular category, may reallocate funds between the programs described in paragraph A.1 of this rule.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 17-17-201, et seq., 17- 17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 3.2 Local Governments Solid Waste Assistance Grant Guidelines
A. Eligibility and Allocation of Funds
(1) The Local Governments Solid Waste Assistance Fund shall be used to provide grants to counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities or multi-county entities for one or more of the following purposes:
(a) Clean-up of existing and future unauthorized dumps on public or private property, subject to the limitation of Section 17-17-65(3), Mississippi Code, Annotated and paragraph A.9 of this Rule.
(b) Establishment of a collection center or program for white goods, recyclables or other bulky rubbish waste not managed by local residential solid waste collection programs;
(c) Provision of public notice and education related to the proper management of solid waste, including recycling;
(d) Payment of a maximum of fifty percent (50%) of the cost of employing a local solid waste enforcement officer;
(e) Payment of a maximum of seventy-five percent (75%) of the cost of conducting household hazardous waste collection day programs in accordance with Sections 17-17-249 through 17-17-445 and the Mississippi “Right-Way to throw away Program” Regulations; and
(f) Development of other local solid waste management program activities associated with the prevention, enforcement or abatement of unauthorized dumps, as approved by the Commission.
(2) Excepting those monies used by the Department for administration of this program, as provided in Section 17-17-65, monies deposited annually in the Local Governments Solid Waste Assistance Fund and any balance of funds not awarded from the previous year shall be allocated as follows:
(a) One-half (1/2) shall be allocated to each county based on the percentage of State Aid road mileage as established by the Mississippi Department of Transportation State Aid road formula at the beginning of the fiscal year. This portion of the fund shall be referred to as the non-competitive funds.
(b) One-half (1/2) shall be made available to counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or other multi-county entities for grants on a competitive basis. This portion of the fund shall be referred to as the competitive fund.
(3) The amount of non-competitive funds allocated to individual counties shall be based upon the amount of money estimated to be deposited into the Local Governments Solid Waste Assistance Fund during the first three months of the fiscal year plus the balance of funds not awarded from the previous year. All money deposited into the fund after the first three months of the fiscal year shall be retained in the fund for the succeeding fiscal year and included in that year's allocation.
(4) Any county belonging to a regional solid waste management authority or other multi-county entity shall adopt a resolution to allow the regional authority or other multi-county entity to apply for and use the county's noncompetitive funds. In such a case, the county will not be eligible for the annual allocation until the next fiscal year, but remain eligible for the competitive funds.
(5) No grantee shall use more than three percent (3%) of the funds provided to defray the costs of administration of the grant.
(6) Funds provided through a grant award shall not be used to pay any costs of the establishment or operation of a landfill, rubbish disposal site or other type of solid waste disposal facility, for the routine collection of garbage or to collect any fees assessed under Section 19-5-21 or 21-19-2, Mississippi Code Annotated.
(7) A county or municipality that has an inadequate garbage collection and disposal system or an inadequate rubbish disposal system as required by Section 19-5-17 or 21-19-1, Mississippi Code, Annotated, may not receive funding assistance from this fund. Additionally, the county must have a waste tire collection program in place, as required by Section 17-17-409, Mississippi Code Annotated, before a grant award can be approved by the Department.
(8) (a) A grantee may receive funds for the payment of up to fifty percent (50%) of the cost of employing a local solid waste enforcement officer. The costs of employment of a local enforcement officer shall be limited to salary and fringe benefits for purposes of these regulations.
(b) Enforcement officers employed with support from these funds shall comply with the conditions and work duties prescribed by the Department for solid waste enforcement officers.
(9) If a grantee receives funds to clean up any unauthorized dumps on public or private property, the grantee shall make a reasonable effort to determine if a responsible party or person can be identified and, if so, to require that party or person to clean up the property. If the grantee is unable to locate or identify the responsible party or person, or if the grantee determines that party or person is financially or otherwise incapable of cleaning up the property, the
grantee shall make a reasonable effort to recover any funds expended from any known responsible person or from any person subsequently located or identified. Any such funds recovered may be retained and used by the grantee for any lawful expenditure relating to the solid waste assistance grant award.
(10) No grant shall be awarded for the purchase or lease of equipment or other property, unless it can be demonstrated that such equipment or property is integral to and will be primarily used for the successful achievement of the project purposes as described in Rule 3.2(A)(1). For purposes of this rule, property shall include structures, fencing, or other items, but not land purchases.
B. Grant Application Procedures
In order to receive consideration for a grant award from the Commission on Environmental Quality, counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, and other multi-county entities shall submit an application as per the following procedures:
(1) Non-Competitive Fund Grant Applications - Counties may submit an application for the amount of allocated funds described in Rule 3.2(A)(2)(a) these regulations, upon annual notification by the Department.
(a) The Department may receive grant applications at any time, but not later than April 30 of the funding year. Any county not submitting a complete grant application by the above date shall forfeit its funding allocation for that state fiscal year.
(b) The entire cost of the program may be eligible for funding, subject to the limitations in Rules 3.2(A)(2)(a) and (A)(8).
(c) Grant applications shall be submitted on a form provided by the Department and shall include a detailed narrative description of the scope of work and a proposed budget for the planned activities.
(2) Competitive Fund Grant Applications - Counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities and other multi-county entities may submit an application for a grant up to the amounts described in Rule 3.2(B)(2)(b) below.
(a) The Department will receive competitive grant applications twice each year. All applications received by April 1 and October 1 of each funding year will be evaluated consistent with these regulations, subject to the availability of funds.
(b) Unless specifically approved by the Commission, applicants shall be limited to the following maximum funding levels:
(1) For counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or multi-county entities whose latest census population is 50,000 or greater, the maximum funding level shall be $75,000.
(2) For counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or other multi-government entities whose latest census population is 25,000 or greater but less than 50,000, the maximum funding level shall be $50,000.
(3) For counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or other multi-government entities whose latest census population is 10,000 or greater, but less than 25,000, the maximum funding level shall be $25,000.
(4) For counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or other multi-government entities whose latest census population is less than 10,000, the maximum funding level shall be $15,000.
(c) Grant applications shall be submitted on forms provided by the Department and shall contain the following items:
(1) a completed grant application form as provided by the Department;
(2) a detailed narrative description and a proposed budget of the planned activity;
(3) a discussion of how the project will be an integral part of the city/county/regional solid waste management plan for the area;
(4) a copy of any local, state, and/or federal permits, if applicable, to conduct the proposed activity;
(d) A city and county may apply jointly for the competitive funds with one entity as the lead applicant.
(e) If a county, municipality, regional solid waste management authority, or other multi-county entity uses the total population of a county or counties to apply for the maximum funding level allowed in Rule 3.2(B)(2) of these regulations, the proposed project or program must
provide for benefits and/or services to all persons included in the population base.
(f) Any application submitted by a regional solid waste management authority or other multi-county entity must contain documents of authorization from a majority of the members.
(g) Applications shall be evaluated and ranked with preference for approval based on the following factors:
(1) The applicant has not been previously funded under this grant category.
(2) The project is deemed creative and innovative.
(3) The funds requested will be used as leverage, or matching for additional funds.
(4) The project will result in significant enhancement or improvement of the solid waste management program or services of the project area.
(5) The technical and economic merits of the project appear superior to other projects.
(6) The project proposes a long term commitment of staff and monies by the applicant to a comprehensive solid waste management program rather than for just the proposed grant period.
(7) The project is proposed for an area containing a greater population base than other projects.
C. Disapproval of Grant Applications
(1) The Department may refuse to approve a grant application for any of the following reasons:
(a) the Department determines that the project is not consistent with these regulations;
(b) the Department determines that the applicant has failed to provide a complete application as per Rule 3.2(B)(1)(c) and/or (B)(2)(c);
(c) the Department determines that the applicant does not possess the required local, state, or federal permit(s) necessary to conduct the proposed project;
(d) the applicant is in violation of, or delinquent on, any condition of a previously awarded grant by this Department;
(e) the applicant has deliberately falsified information submitted as part of the application;
(f) the Department determines that the applicant has proposed expenditures for grant project activities or components that are unnecessary or that exceed the expected usual and customary costs for such activities or components; and
(g) there are insufficient grant funds in the subject accounts of the local governments solid waste assistance fund;
(h) the proposal is ranked lower by the Department than other proposals based on the factors described in Rule 3.2(B)(2)(g).
(2) If the Department should refuse to approve a grant application for any reason, the applicant may request a hearing before the Commission in accordance with Section 49-17-35, Mississippi Code, Annotated.
D. Conditions of Grant Award
(1) The grantee shall comply with all applicable procurement and purchasing regulations established pursuant to state law.
(2) At the discretion of the Department, monies which are unspent after the grant expiration date shall be forfeited back to the local governments solid waste assistance fund.
(3) The grantee's matching share, if applicable, shall be expended or committed in proportion to the release of state grant funds.
(4) A summary report shall be prepared and submitted to the Department with each reimbursement request, detailing the cost of the project and a summary of the activity conducted during the payment period.
(5) The Commission may include other conditions as part of the grant award, which are determined necessary to reasonably manage the project and/or protect the environment.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 17-17-201, et seq., 17- 17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 3.3 Solid Waste Planning Grant Guidelines
A. Eligibility and Allocation of Funds
(1) Ten percent (10%) of the amount deposited in the local governments solid waste assistance fund annually shall be set aside in a “solid waste planning grants fund.” This fund shall be used to make grants to counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or other multi-county entities to assist in defraying the cost of preparing solid waste management plans as required by Section 17-17-227 of the Mississippi Code, Annotated. Such grants for purposes of these regulations shall be herein referred to as “planning grants.”
(2) Any funds remaining in the solid waste planning grants fund at the end of the State Fiscal Year that are not awarded shall be deposited back into the Solid Waste Assistance Fund and shall be reallocated as described in Section 17-17- 65 of the Mississippi Code, Annotated.
(3) Planning grant awards shall only be made to counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities or other multi-county entities to conduct planning efforts involving the comprehensive development or comprehensive update of a local solid waste management plan. No planning grant shall be awarded for conducting efforts involving only amendments or modifications to a local plan, such as the addition of a new facility or program, the change in service area for a facility, or other limited planning modifications that are not comprehensive in scope.
(4) No planning grant shall be awarded to a county or municipality that is a member of a regional solid waste management authority or other multi-county entity, unless that county or municipality has formally withdrawn from the authority or multi-county entity in a manner consistent with the applicable sections of state law.
(5) Planning grants may be used to defray the costs of preparing and developing a local solid waste management plan, where the employee, person, contractor, or organization developing the plan has obtained approval from the Department to prepare such comprehensive solid waste plans in the State of Mississippi. A grant applicant may select an approved person or organization to conduct the local planning efforts from a listing maintained by the Department. Inclusion of persons or organizations on the listing shall be based upon the presentation of credentials demonstrating knowledge and expertise of solid waste planning in Mississippi and upon other information determined necessary by the Commission. Persons that are denied inclusion on the listing may appeal such decision to the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
(6) Whether an applicant chooses to utilize internal resources or contractual resources to conduct the planning project, the planning project costs eligible for grant funding shall generally be limited to the following:
(a) the salary of the personnel directly involved in the collection of planning information and in preparing the plan, for only that time expended in the development of the plan,
(b) the associated travel costs of appropriate personnel for only that travel that directly relates to the collection of information to develop the plan,
(c) the costs of formally adopting the plan including the costs of public notice and hearing and other associated expenditures related to complying with the procedures outlined in state law and regulations for adoption of local solid waste management plans, and
(d) other miscellaneous costs such as publication costs, survey costs, mailing and delivery costs, and other items directly related to collecting information and preparing the plan.
Project costs must be specifically disclosed and justified in the proposed budget submitted with the grant application as described in Rule 3.3(B)(2).
(7) No grant shall be awarded under this program for the purchase or lease of equipment or other property.
B. Grant Application Procedures
In order to receive consideration for a grant award from the Commission on Environmental Quality, counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities and other multi-county entities shall submit an application as per the following procedures:
(1) The Department may receive planning grant applications at any time, but not later than April 30 of the funding year. All applications received before that date will be evaluated for consistency with these regulations, subject to the availability of funds.
(2) Grant applications shall be submitted on a form provided by the Department and shall include a narrative description of the scope of work and an itemized budget for the planning project. The itemized budget shall indicate the overall total costs of conducting the planning effort and the amount of grant funds proposed to be applied towards the total cost of the planning effort.
(3) Grant applicants that propose to utilize contractual assistance in preparing the plan shall include the name, the contact information, and the primary person(s) of contact for the contractor selected by the applicant and the reasons for the selection of the contractor.
(4) Unless specifically approved by the Commission, applicants shall be limited to the following grant funding levels:
(a) For counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or multi-county entities whose latest census population is 75,000 or greater, the maximum funding level shall not exceed 50% of the total costs of conducting the planning project.
(b) For counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or multi-county entities whose latest census population is 25,000 or greater but less than 75,000, the maximum funding level shall not exceed 60% of the total costs of conducting the planning project.
(c) For counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or multi-county entities whose latest census population is less than 25,000, the maximum funding level shall not exceed 75% of the total costs of conducting the planning project.
(d) For counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or other multi-county entities that are deemed to be economically disadvantaged communities, the maximum funding level may be up to 90% of the total costs of conducting the planning project. For the purposes of these regulations, an economically disadvantaged community shall be defined as one that meets at least one of the following criteria:
(1) The county has an annualized unemployment rate that is 200% of the state unemployment rate as determined by the Mississippi Employment Security Commission’s most recently published data, or
(2) 30% or more of the population of the county is at or below the federal poverty level, based on data compiled in the most recent federal census.
Local governments applying for funding as economically disadvantaged communities must demonstrate in the grant application that the community meets at least one of these criteria.
(5) Applications shall be evaluated and ranked with preference for approval based on the following factors:
(a) Circumstances have occurred where no approved solid waste plan exists for the jurisdictional area of the applicant.
(b) The proposed planning project is the result of an order or directive of the Commission on Environmental Quality.
(c) The level of need of the local planning project is greater than for other proposed projects.
(d) The applicant has not been previously funded under this grant category.
When funds requested exceed funds available, the ranking factors above maybe used to determine which projects are awarded grant funding. However, the Commission, in its discretion, may also apportion available funding to all applicants in a fair and equitable manner when the factors above do not yield clear award preferences. Such apportionment shall be made utilizing the maximum funding percentages of Rule 3.3(B)(4) as guidance.
C. Disapproval of Grant Applications
(1) The Department may refuse to approve a grant application for any of the following reasons:
(a) the Department determines that the planning project is not consistent with these regulations or with State laws or regulations governing the development of a local solid waste management plan;
(b) the Department determines that the applicant has failed to provide a complete grant application as per Rules 3.3(B)(1) and/or (2);
(c) the applicant is in violation of, or delinquent on any condition of a previously awarded grant by this Department;
(d) the applicant has deliberately falsified information submitted as part of the grant application;
(e) the Department determines that the applicant has proposed expenditures for grant project activities or components that are unnecessary or that exceed the usual and customary costs for such activities or components;
(f) there are insufficient grant funds in the solid waste planning grants fund;
(g) the grant application is ranked lower by the Department than other proposals based on the factors described in Rule 3.3(B)(5); and
(h) other appropriate factors as determined by the Commission on Environmental Quality.
(2) Should the Department refuse to approve a grant application for any reason, the applicant may request a hearing before the Commission in accordance with Section 49-17-35, Mississippi Code, Annotated.
D. Conditions of Grant Award
(1) The grantee shall comply with all applicable procurement and purchasing regulations established pursuant to state law.
(2) The grantee shall ensure that the development and adoption of the local solid waste management plan shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the applicable state laws and regulations and with the comprehensive planning guidance provided by the Department for the development of a local solid waste management plan.
(3) Upon completion of the grant project and adoption of the resulting plan, the grantee shall provide three official copies of the local solid waste management plan to the Department for review and consideration. Two of the copies shall be hard copies of the plan and one copy shall be an electronic version. The grantee shall also retain a sufficient number of copies of the plan for its own continual review and implementation.
(4) At the discretion of the Commission, monies which are unspent after the grant expiration date shall be forfeited back to the solid waste planning grants fund.
(5) The grantee's matching share, if applicable, shall be expended or committed in proportion to the release of state grant funds.
(6) A summary report shall be prepared and submitted to the Department with each reimbursement request, detailing the cost of the planning project and a summary of the activity conducted during the payment period.
(7) The Commission may include other conditions as part of the grant award, which are determined necessary to ensure that the planning provisions of state law and regulations are followed.
APPENDIX
Intergovernmental Review Process
- If the applicant proposes new facilities for construction and/or use, the following agencies shall be consulted prior to the formal submittal of a grant application concerning the proposed site location and the existence of any known or possible archaeological/cultural sites, endangered wildlife, wetlands, shellfish/coastal program impacts:
(a) Mississippi Department of Archives & History (For archaeological/cultural review);
(b) Mississippi Natural Heritage Program (For endangered wildlife review);
(c) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (For wetlands review);
(d) Mississippi Department of Marine Resources (For shellfish/coastal review - Jackson, Harrison, and Hancock County projects only).
- Where applicable, a written description of the project plan shall be submitted to the agencies listed in this section with a request for written comments and a determination on any required surveys, permits, or other actions.
Documentation of the applicant's request for comments, and any comments received in response to such request, shall be attached with the grant application, as required in Section B.1.c of these regulations.
Part 4, Chapter 4: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Waste Tire Management Regulations
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 17-17-201, et seq., 17- 17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.1 Applicability
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.2 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.3 Waste Tire Collection Sites
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.4 Waste Tire Processing Facilities
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.5 Waste Tire Disposal Sites
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.6 Financial Responsibility Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.7 Agriculture, Erosion Control, or Other Uses of Waste Tires _________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.1 Applicability
A. Except as provided in Rules 4.1.(B), (C), (D), and (E), these requirements shall apply to persons who store, process, or dispose of waste tires.
B. Waste tire generators which chop, cut, shred or vertically slice waste tires that they generate in a manner consistent with Rule 4.4(B), on the site of generation, in order to facilitate recycling, resource recovery, or disposal at an approved waste tire disposal site are exempt from the permitting requirements of Rule 4.4(A).
C. Any tire retailer, tire wholesaler, motor vehicle dismantler, or salvage dealer who owns or operates a waste tire collection site is exempt from the requirements of Rule 4.3(A) if the site does not:
(1) hold more than five hundred (500) waste tires, or (2) hold more than one hundred waste tires for a period exceeding ninety days.
D. Facilities or businesses which receive reusable and/or waste tires for purposes such as retreading or resale are not considered to be waste tire processing facilities; however, such facilities that store more than 500 waste tires on site, or that store 100 or more waste tires for more than 90 days, shall be considered to be waste tire collection sites.
E. Persons who propose to use waste tires for agricultural, erosion control and other purposes as approved by the Department are exempt from the authorization requirements of Rule 4.3(A) if the site does not store more than 500 waste tires, except as provided in Rule 4.7(C).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401 et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.2 Definitions
A. “Commission” means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
B. “Department” means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
C. “Mobile waste tire processing equipment” means a mobile waste tire processing operation which does not operate at any one fixed facility for more than ninety (90) days annually.
D. “Motor vehicle” means an automobile, motorcycle, trailer, semi-trailer, truck tractor and semi-trailer combination, farm equipment or any other vehicle operated on the roads of the state, used to transport persons or property, and propelled by power other than muscular power, but does not include traction engines, road rollers, earth movers, graders, loaders, and other similar construction equipment requiring oversized tires, any vehicles which run only upon a track, bicycles or mopeds. For purposes of this article, “farm equipment” means any vehicle which uses tires having the following designations: I-1, I-2, I-3, R-l, R-2, R-3, F-l, F-2, and Farm Highway Service.
E. “Reusable tire” means a whole tire which has been specifically separated from waste tires for and which is suitable for processing or resale for its original intended purpose. A used tire which appears to be suitable for its original intended purpose, but which has not been separated from waste tires for such purposes shall be considered to be a waste tire.
F. “Tire” means a continuous solid or pneumatic rubber covering encircling the wheel of a motor vehicle.
G. “Waste tire” means a whole tire that is no longer suitable for its original intended purpose because of wear, damage, or defect.
H. “Waste tire collection site” means a site used for the storage of 100 or more waste tires.
I. “Waste tire disposal site” means a site where tires are buried or incinerated in a manner that does not facilitate recycling, resource recovery, or reuse of the waste tires or its by- products.
J. “Waste tire generator” means any person who produces or stores waste tires on property owned or leased by that person.
K. “Waste tire hauler” means any person engaged in the collection and/or transportation of 50 or more waste tires for the purpose of storage, processing, or disposal or any person transporting waste tires for compensation.
L. “Waste tire processing facility” means a site where tires are reduced in volume by shredding, cutting, chopping, or otherwise altered to facilitate recycling, resource recovery, or disposal. The term includes mobile waste tire processing equipment. Commercial enterprises processing waste tires shall not be considered solid waste management facilities.
M. “Waste tire transporter” means any person engaged in the transportation of waste tires.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401 et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.3 Waste Tire Collection Sites
A. (1) A person must obtain written authorization from the Department to operate a waste tire collection site. The person normally required to obtain authorization shall be the owner or leasee of the operation. In order to obtain authorization, a person must complete an application supplied by the Department, and comply with the applicable requirements and regulations.
(2) In certain instances, the Permit Board may require that a permit be obtained to operate a waste tire collection site. In determining whether a permit should be required, the Permit Board shall consider the quantity of waste tires to be stored on site, the location of the site, and any other relevant factors which would warrant special concern. Where a permit is required, the same application shall be completed and the same process followed as required in Rule 4.3(A)(1), although the Department may require additional information as part of the application.
(3) Persons operating waste tire collection sites which are not an integral part of a waste tire processing facility may obtain authorization or a permit only if the applicant is able to demonstrate with an executed contract or other document that each waste tire collected on site will be processed or removed within a reasonable time frame not to exceed 90 days.
B. A person operating a waste tire collection site in which waste tires are stored indoors shall comply with the following technical and operational standards:
(1) Each waste tire storage pile shall have no greater dimensions than 25 feet wide and 50 feet long.
(2) Storage clearance in all directions from roof structures shall not be less than 3 feet.
(3) The width of main aisles between piles shall be not less than 8 feet.
(4) Depending upon the number of tires to be stored at a facility and the location of the facility, an automatic sprinkler system may be required.
(5) Storage clearance from the top of storage to sprinkler deflectors shall not be less than 3 feet.
(6) Tires shall be stored clear of all blower and exhaust ducts.
(7) Storage clearance from unit heaters, radiant spaceheaters, duct furnaces, and flues shall not be less than 3 feet in all directions.
(8) Clearance shall be maintained to lights or light fixtures to prevent possible ignition.
(9) Clearance shall be maintained to all entrance ways, exits, and fire doors.
(10) The person operating the site shall control mosquitos and rodents so as to protect the public health and welfare and to prevent public nuisances. These actions may include periodic application of an approved mosquito controllant to the waste tire storage pile, the frequency of which should increase during warm/wet weather periods of the year.
C. A person operating a waste tire collection site in which waste tires are stored outdoors must comply with the following technical and operational standards:
(1) Each waste tire storage pile shall have no greater dimensions than 15 feet high, 50 feet wide, and 100 feet long.
(2) A minimum separation distance of 50 feet shall be maintained between waste tire storage piles as a fire lane. Access to the fire lane for emergency vehicles must be unobstructed at all times.
(3) The site shall be kept free of grass, underbrush, and other potentially flammable vegetation at all times.
(4) The person operating the site shall control mosquitos and rodents so as to protect the public health and welfare. These actions may include periodic application of an approved mosquito controllant to the waste tire stockpile, the frequency of which should increase during warm/wet weather periods of the year.
(5) Waste tire storage piles should generally be kept at least 50 feet from the adjacent property line. However, an alternate separation distance may be approved by the Department contingent upon such factors as date of facility establishment, quantity of waste tires stored, nature of business operations, (6) surrounding property use, and other factors.
(7) Access to the site shall be controlled through the use of fences gates, natural barriers or other means.
D. A person may receive approval to operate a waste tire collection site in which waste tires are stored in trailers, vans, or other mobile storage facilities.
E. The Department shall establish the maximum storage capacity of waste tire collection sites on a site specific basis. A site shall normally not store more than 5,000 tires at any
time. However, the waste tire storage limit may also be affected by such site specific conditions as the amount of storage area available, local laws or ordinances, the general land use of the surrounding properties and other pertinent factors. The Department may consider requests for approval of storage limits in excess of 5,000, provided that the person operating the site can adequately demonstrate that such an increase will not result in problems of mosquito breeding, harborage of rodents, potential fire hazards or compliance problems.
F. Persons who operate waste tire collection sites at which reusable tires are separated from waste tires for processing or resale for their original intended purpose shall store the reusable tires in a manner consistent with Rules 4.3(B) and 3(C) of these requirements. Furthermore, such tires shall be removed from the collection site on a frequency sufficient to prevent problems of mosquito breeding, harborage of rodents, potential fire hazards or compliance problems.
G. All waste tires shall either be processed or removed from the site within a reasonable time frame not to exceed 90 days. The Department may approve an alternate storage duration contingent upon the quantity of waste tires stored and other operating conditions of the facility.
H. If the waste tire collection site receives tires from persons other than the operator of the site, a sign shall be posted at the entrance of the site stating operating hours. An attendant shall be present at the site at all operating hours of the facility.
I. Fire protection services for the waste tire collection site shall be assured through notification of local fire protection authorities and compliance with any local fire codes or ordinances.
J. In the event that a fire should occur at the site, the person operating the site shall initiate immediate action to extinguish the fire and to limit the off-site impact of said fire and shall notify the Department as soon as possible.
K. A person operating a waste tire collection site shall comply with the transportation and certification requirements of the Waste Tire Transportation Regulations as adopted by the Commission.
L. A person operating a waste tire collection site shall maintain the following records for a minimum of three years after the date of removal of the tires:
(1) for waste tire loads of five (5) or more received at the site, the name and waste tire hauler identification number of the hauler who delivered the waste tires to the facility and the quantity of waste tires received from that hauler; or the name, address, and telephone number of the waste tire transporter and the quantity of tires received from that transporter;
(2) for waste tire loads of five (5) or more shipped from the site, the name and waste tire hauler identification number of the hauler who transported the tires from the site and the quantity of waste tires shipped with that hauler; or the name, address, and telephone number of the waste tire transporter and the quantity of tires shipped with that transporter;
(3) for waste tire loads of five (5) or less received or shipped from the site, the total monthly quantity of waste tires received and the total monthly quantity of waste tires shipped for all transporters; and
(4) where applicable, the quantity of reusable tires separated from incoming loads at the site and the retreading/resale facility to which they are shipped.
M. A person operating a waste tire collection site which receives tires from persons other than the operator shall submit a monthly report on forms provided by the Department, detailing the information required by Rule 4.3(L) as well as other activities at the collection site. This monthly report shall be submitted to the Department before the 15th of the following month. The Department may waive this requirement for small local government waste tire collection sites.
N. As a part of the application for an operating permit required pursuant to Rule 4.3(A), the applicant shall submit a closure plan which includes:
(1) a description of how and when the area will be closed;
(2) the method of final disposition of any waste tires remaining on the site at the time notice of closure is given to the Department.
(3) Proof of financial responsibility pursuant to Rule 4.6 of these regulations.
O. A person operating a waste tire collection site shall implement the closure plan required pursuant to Rule 4.3(N) and shall take the following actions to ensure that the site is properly closed upon cessation of operations:
(1) notify the Department at least ninety (90) days prior to the date of expected closure.
(2) take action to prevent public access to the site;
(3) post a notice at the site indicating that the site is closed;
(4) take action to ensure that all tires at the site have been properly processed, disposed, or otherwise managed;
(5) take other appropriate remediation action at the site if deemed necessary by the Department; and
(6) notify the Department upon completion of the closure activity.
P. No waste tires may be received by the waste tire collection site after the date of closure.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401 et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.4 Waste Tire Processing Facilities
A. (1) Except as provided in Rule 4.4(A)(2), a person must obtain a waste tire management permit from the Permit Board in order to operate a waste tire processing facility. The person normally required to obtain a permit shall be the owner or lessee of the operation. In order to obtain a permit, a person must complete an application supplied by the Department, and comply with the applicable requirements and regulations. A waste tire management permit shall be issued in accordance with the permit procedures for solid waste management permits in Rule 1.2 of the Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations.
(2) A person operating mobile waste tire processing equipment where such equipment is moved from site to site must obtain authorization from the Department in order to operate the processing equipment. The person normally required to obtain a permit shall be the owner or lessee of the equipment. In order to obtain authorization, a person must complete an application supplied by the Department, and comply with the applicable requirements and regulations.
(3) A person operating a waste tire processing facility which is not an integral part of a solid waste landfill, waste tire disposal site, or waste tire recycling facility may obtain a permit only if the applicant is able to demonstrate with an executed contract or other document that the waste tires processed on site will be removed to a solid waste landfill, waste tire disposal site, waste tire recycling facility, or other site or facility approved by the Department. This requirement does not apply to persons operating mobile processing equipment in accordance with Rule 4.4(A)(2).
B. The following are permissible methods of waste tire processing:
(1) Slicing vertically, resulting in each waste tire being divided into at least two (2) approximately equal donut-shaped halves;
(2) Chopping or cutting of the waste tire into a minimum of four (4) approximately equal pieces.
(3) Shredding or chipping into multiple pieces;
(4) Grinding into crumbs;
(5) Other methods as approved by the Commission.
C. Except for the conditions of Rules 4.3(A), (E) and (G) waste tire processing facilities shall comply with Rule 4.3 of these regulations for waste tire collection sites with regard to the storage of both waste and processed tires.
D. A waste tire processing facility may not accept waste tires for processing if it has reached its waste tire storage limit. The waste tire storage limit for processing facilities shall be established by the Department on a site specific basis, and shall be no more than 7 times the daily through-put of the processing site. (In determining the daily through-put of the processing facility the person operating the site should take into consideration the average through-put capacity of the processing equipment as well as expected downtime of the equipment.) The waste tire storage limit may also be affected by site specific conditions such as amount of storage space available, local government laws or ordinances, the use of the surrounding properties, and other pertinent factors. The Department may consider requests for storage limits in excess of the general waste tire storage limit, if the person operating the facility can adequately demonstrate that the storage site will be maintained in a manner that will preclude mosquito breeding, harborage of rodents, and potential fire hazards.
E. A waste tire processing facility may not exceed its processed tire storage limit. The processed tire storage limit shall be established by the Department on a site-specific basis. If the storage of processed tires is necessary for recycling or reuse of the subject material, the processed tire storage limit shall generally be 30 times the daily through-put of the processing facility. If the processed tires are destined for disposal, the processed tire storage limit shall, as a minimum not exceed 7 times the daily through-put of the facility. These processed tire storage limits may also be affected by the degree of processing that the tire has undergone, the manner of storage proposed, storage space available, local government laws or ordinances, the general land use of the surrounding properties, and other pertinent factors. The Department may consider requests for storage limits in excess of the general processed tire storage limits, if the person operating the facility can adequately demonstrate that the storage pile will be maintained in a manner that will preclude mosquito breeding, harborage of rodents, potential fire problems and that storage of the processed tires is necessary for recycling or reuse of the subject material.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401 et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.5 Waste Tire Disposal Sites
A. A person must obtain a permit from the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board or from the Board’s designee in order to operate a waste tire disposal site as described in
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 1.2 Rule 1.2
of the Mississippi Nonhazardous Waste Management Regulations, subject to the provisions of Section 17-17-407 of the Mississippi Code Annotated. The person normally required to obtain a permit shall be the owner or operator of the facility. In order to obtain a permit, a person must complete an application supplied by the Department and comply with the applicable requirements and regulations.
B. Persons who operate permitted solid waste landfills, approved rubbish disposal sites and/or approved waste tire monofills shall not accept whole waste tires for disposal. Processed tires which meet or exceed the conditions of Rule 4.4(B) of these regulations may be disposed of at said facilities as per the conditions of the Mississippi Nonhazardous Waste Management Regulations. Existing rubbish landfills which intend to accept processed tires must request authorization from the Department to accept said materials. This request must include, at a minimum, a description of the processed form in which the tires will be landfilled, the estimated amounts and sources of the tires, and a description of how the tires will be managed at the site.
C. Persons who operate permitted solid waste landfills or rubbish sites may establish waste tire collection sites or waste tire processing facilities at or adjacent to said facilities subject to the conditions of Rules 4.3 and 4.4 of these regulations, the conditions of the Mississippi Nonhazardous Waste Management Regulations, and the conditions of the subject landfill facility’s operating permit.
D. Persons who operate landfill sites at which tires are monofilled or disposed of with rubbish materials shall comply with the following operational conditions:
(1) The active waste disposal area shall be covered with 6 inches of dirt at least every two weeks. This cover frequency may be increased or decreased by the Department contingent upon such site specific conditions as the degree of processing that the waste tires have undergone, the availability of cover dirt, the site’s performance history and other pertinent factors.
(2) Adequate fire prevention measures shall be taken at the site including notification of the local fire protection authorities and maintenance of an adequate dirt stockpile adjacent to the active disposal area as a fire extinguishment measure.
E. Persons who operate incineration units, pyrolysis systems and other air emissions equipment which propose to burn processed tires shall comply with Rules 4.3(B),(C),(I),(J),(N) and (P), and 4.4(E) of these regulations regarding the storage of processed tires. Said facilities which burn whole waste tires shall comply with all of Rule 4.3, except Rule 4.3(E), and shall comply with Rule 4.4(D) of these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.6 Financial Responsibility Requirements
A. Persons who operate waste tire collection sites or waste tire processing facilities shall estimate the costs of processing and disposal of the maximum number of waste tires/processed tires expected on site before closure of the facility, and must update such estimates annually, unless an alternate schedule is approved by the Department. Cost estimates must be approved by the Department. The costs shall be based on a third party performing the work, reported on a per unit basis. Such persons shall provide the Department with proof of financial responsibility issued in the amount of such approved estimate for closure of the facility. Proof of financial responsibility may include the following financial instruments: escrow accounts, surety bonds, including performance bonds or financial guarantee bonds; irrevocable letters of credit; certificates of deposit; securities; and other documents, approved by the Department. The financial instruments shall be issued by a surety company or financial institution licensed to do business in the State of Mississippi. Persons operating an authorized solid waste management landfill which includes a waste tire collection site/waste tire processing facility as a part of their operations and whose proof of financial responsibility for closure of the landfill is deemed adequate by the Department to cover closure costs of the waste tire collection site/waste tire processing facility, may not be required to submit new documentation of financial responsibility. The Department may, in its discretion, exempt certain persons from these financial assurance requirements based on the duration of the proposed project and the quantity of tires to be managed by the project.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 4.7 Agriculture, Erosion Control, or Other Uses of Waste Tires
A. Waste tires which have been processed as described in Rule 4.4(B) may, upon the approval of the Department, be used for erosion control. The Department may consider requests to use tires which have been processed by other means on a site specific basis.
B. Waste/processed tires used for agricultural and erosion control purposes shall be stored/stockpiled, while not in use, in a manner which precludes mosquito breeding problems, rodent harborage, and potential fire hazards.
C. Waste/processed tires used for erosion control or other civil engineering purposes shall not remain stockpiled on site for more than 90 days unless a waste tire collection site permit is obtained.
D. Waste/processed tires used for agricultural or other approved purposes shall upon completion of use be deposited for disposal or recycling at a properly permitted waste tire collection site, waste tire processing facility, or waste tire disposal site.
E. The Department may approve other uses of waste/processed tires upon a site specific basis provided that the user can demonstrate that the waste tires will be managed properly and will either result in a legitimate end use of the waste tire or proper disposal upon completion of the subject project.
Part 4, Chapter 5: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Waste Tire Transportation Regulations
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.1 Applicability
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.2 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.3 Waste Tire Generator Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.4 Waste Tire Transporter Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.5 Waste Tire Hauler Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.6 Waste Tire Collection, Processing and Disposal Site Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.7 Enforcement Authority and Penalties __________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.1 Applicability
A. Except as provided in Rule 5.1(B), (C), (D) and (E), these requirements shall apply to waste tire generators, transporters, haulers, and the owners/operators of waste tire collection, processing and disposal sites concerning the transportation of waste tires in Mississippi, including instances where
(1) waste tires are transported into the State of Mississippi from out-of-state generators for the purposes of storage, processing, disposal, or retreading/ resale in Mississippi, or for transportation through the State to destinations outside Mississippi; and where
(2) waste tires originating in Mississippi are transported outside the State for the purposes of storage, processing, disposal or retreading/resale in another state.
B. Certification requirements of Rules 5.3(A) and (B), 5.4(A), (B) and (C), and 5.6(A) and (B) shall not apply to:
(1) tires that are provided for storage, processing, disposal or retreading/resale in quantities of five (5) or less by a person other than a waste tire collector, waste tire processor, or waste tire hauler, or
(2) tires transported within or into the State of Mississippi, where such tires were neither generated in the state nor destined for storage, processing, disposal, or retreading/resale in the state.
C. The requirements of Rule 5.5(C) and (D) shall not apply to waste tire haulers when the tires being transported are neither generated in the state nor destined for storage, processing, disposal, or retreading/resale in the state.
D. These requirements shall not apply to the transportation of reusable tires to facilities or businesses which process or sell such tires. However, for the purposes of these requirements all used tires shall be considered to be waste tires until such time that those tires which are reusable tires have been specifically separated from the waste tires.
E. Facilities or businesses which receive reusable and/or waste tires for purposes such as retreading or resale are not considered to be waste tire processing facilities; however, such facilities that store more than 500 waste tires on site, or that store 100 or more waste tires for more than 90 days, may be considered to be waste tire collection sites.
F. For purposes of this regulation, tires which have been cut, chopped, sliced, shredded or otherwise processed into multiple pieces shall be considered to be waste tires.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.2 Definitions
A. For purposes of this regulation, the following definitions apply:
(1) “Department" means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(2) "Reusable tire" means a whole tire which has been specifically separated from waste tires for and which is suitable for processing or resale for its original intended purpose. A used tire which appears to be suitable for its original intended purpose, but which has not been separated from waste tires for such purposes shall be considered to be a waste tire.
(3) "Waste tire" means a whole tire that is no longer suitable for its original intended purpose because of wear, damage or defect.
(4) "Waste tire collection site" means a site used for the storage of 100 or more waste tires.
(5) "Waste tire disposal site" means a site where tires are buried or incinerated in a manner that does not facilitate recycling, resource recovery, or reuse of the waste tires or its by-products.
(6) "Waste tire generator" means any person who produces or stores waste tires on property owned or leased by that person.
(7) "Waste tire hauler" means any person engaged in the collection and/or transportation of 50 or more waste tires for the purposes of storage, processing, or disposal or any person transporting waste tires for compensation.
(8) "Waste tire processing facility" means a site where tires are reduced in volume by shredding, cutting, chipping or otherwise altered to facilitate recycling, resource recovery, or disposal. The term includes mobile waste tire processing equipment. Commercial enterprises processing waste tires shall not be considered solid waste management facilities.
(9) "Waste tire transporter" means any person engaged in the transportation of waste tires.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.3 Waste Tire Generator Requirements
A. A waste tire generator providing waste tires for transportation to a facility for storage, processing, disposal, or retreading/resale shall complete and sign a certification form as provided by the Department certifying the following:
(1) the number of waste tires to be transported or in the event that the waste tires have been cut, chopped, sliced, shredded or otherwise processed into multiple pieces, the volume of processed waste tires to be transported;
(2) the county and state in which the tires were collected; and
(3) the name and address of the waste tire processing, storage, disposal or retreading resale facility for which the tires are destined.
B. The waste tire generator, after completing all applicable portions of the certification form, shall provide the form to the person transporting the waste tires for his completion and signature, and shall retain a copy of the certification form signed by the waste tire generator and the waste tire transporter for at least three (3) years.
C. The waste tire generator shall only allow a registered waste tire hauler who possesses a valid identification number pursuant to Rule 5.5(A) to collect and transport waste tires, if:
(1) 50 or more tires are transported, or
(2) if the transporter is compensated by the generator for such service.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.4 Waste Tire Transporter Requirements
A. A waste tire transporter shall complete and sign the certification form initially completed by the waste tire generator, certifying the receipt of waste tires from the waste tire generator.
B. The waste tire transporter shall not transport a waste tire load from the generator's site, unless the waste tire generator has completed and signed all applicable portions of the certification form.
C. The waste tire transporter shall present the certification form to the owner/operator of a waste tire collection, processing, disposal or retreading/resale site at the time of delivery of the tires for storage, processing, disposal or retreading/resale and shall retain a copy of the completed certification form containing all signatures for at least three (3) years.
D. Persons transporting wastes tires shall not deposit the tires for storage, processing, disposal or retreading/resale within the State of Mississippi except at an appropriately authorized waste tire collection, processing, disposal site, at a retreading/resale facility or at another facility approved by the Department to accept waste tires.
E. A waste tire transporter who hauls 50 or more waste tires for storage, processing or disposal or who hauls tires for compensation shall obtain a valid identification number pursuant to Rule 5.5(A).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.5 Waste Tire Hauler Requirements
A. From and after January 1, 1992, any waste tire hauler transporting waste tires within or into the state must register with the Department of Environmental Quality and obtain a waste tire hauler identification number. The Department may consider the compliance history of the applicant and may deny the issuance of an identification number if it finds that the applicant has committed significant or habitual violations of pollution control laws.
B. Waste tire haulers shall submit a registration application to the Department to receive the waste tire hauler identification number. Proof of obtaining this identification number shall be kept at all times on all vehicles used to transport waste tires. Registration applications should be submitted on forms as provided by the Department at least 14 days before the waste tires hauler intends to begin transporting waste tires. The waste tire hauler shall renew this registration by July 1 of each year after the initial registration and
should submit the renewal application at least 30 days prior to the registration expiration date.
C. A waste tire hauler shall record and maintain for three years the following information regarding its activities for each three month period of operation:
(1) The approximate quantity of waste tires hauled
(2) Where or from whom the waste tires were received.
(3) Where the waste tires were deposited.
Records shall be available for inspection by Department personnel during normal business hours.
D. Waste tire haulers shall submit to the Department an annual report that summarizes the information collected under Rule 5.5(C) above for the previous calendar year. The information shall be submitted on forms as provided by the Department. This report shall be submitted to the Department in conjunction with submittal of the annual renewal application, or if no renewal application is submitted, the report shall be submitted by July 1 after the calendar year.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.6 Waste Tire Collection, Processing, and Disposal Site Requirements
A. The owner/operator of a waste tire collection, processing, or disposal site, retreading/resale facility, or other facility approved to accept waste tires shall not accept waste tires unless the waste tire transporter provides a certification form which has been completed and signed by both the waste tire generator and transporter.
B. The owner/operator of a waste tire collection, processing, or disposal site, retreading/resale facility, or other solid waste management facility receiving waste tires shall sign the certification form and shall retain a copy of said form containing all signatures, for at least three years.
C. The owner/operator of a waste tire collection, processing or disposal site, retreading/resale facility or other facility approved to accept waste tires shall not accept 50 or more waste tires from any person unless the transporter is a registered waste tire hauler who possesses a valid identification number pursuant to Rule 5.5(A).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 5.7 Enforcement Authority and Penalties
A. Any person who fails to comply with this rule is subject to having their waste tire hauler identification number or waste tire collection, processing, or disposal site permit, approval, or authorization revoked, as well as other penalties provided by law.
Part 4, Chapter 6: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Nonhazardous Solid Waste Corrective Action Trust Fund Regulations
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 17-17-401, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-1, et seq., and 49-2-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.1 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.2 Eligibility for Reimbursement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.3 Administrative Procedures for Reimbursement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.4 Reimbursable Costs
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.5 Prioritization of Funds ___________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.1 Definitions
A. Closure - activities conducted by the owner to properly secure a solid waste disposal facility in such a manner as to prevent or reduce the potential for contaminants to be released to an off-site location or to prevent or minimize the possibility of persons being exposed to the solid wastes disposed at the facility.
B. Corrective Action - actions considered necessary to assess and remediate contaminants at a nonhazardous solid waste management facility. In the case of an emergency, corrective action is the necessary action to eliminate the immediate or future threat to human health and the environment or to reduce said threat to a level acceptable by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
C. Commission - Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
D. Department - Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
E. Household Waste - any solid waste (including garbage, trash, and sanitary waste in septic tanks) derived from households (including single and multiple residences, hotels and motels, bunkhouses, ranger stations, crew quarters, campgrounds, picnic grounds, and day-use recreation areas).
F. Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Corrective Action Trust Fund (Trust Fund) -a fund established for the purpose of providing reimbursements for the costs of emergency, preventive or corrective actions which may be required or determined necessary by the Department of Environmental Quality of any private and publicly owned nonhazardous solid waste disposal facility which received in whole or in part household waste and which closed prior to the effective date of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 258.
G. Owner - the person to whom the Department issued a permit to operate a nonhazardous solid waste disposal facility and who was the permittee at the time the facility closed. In cases where the current owner of the facility property is different from the permittee, the Commission may declare the current property owner to be the owner or co-owner of the facility.
H. Post-Closure Care - those actions that are conducted after the closure of a nonhazardous solid waste disposal facility in order to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of any closure action and that are required by the Department to monitor the site and to continue the removal of any potential contaminants which may migrate from the site. Post-closure care may also include prevention of ponded water and migration of leachate and methane gas.
I. Solid waste disposal facility - any facility used for the purpose of disposing of nonhazardous solid waste, and receiving in whole or in part household waste at some time during its operation.
History
- Source: Miss Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17- 17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.2 Eligibility For Reimbursement
A. Only those nonhazardous solid waste disposal facilities which received in whole or in part household waste and which closed prior to the effective date of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 258, are eligible for receiving funds from the Trust Fund.
B. The Commission may utilize funds in the Trust Fund for the following purposes:
(1) to take whatever emergency action is necessary or appropriate to assure that the public health or safety is not threatened whenever there is a release or substantial threat of a release of contaminants from any source within the permitted area of an eligible facility;
(2) to take preventive or corrective actions where the release of contaminants from any source within the permitted area of an eligible facility presents an actual or potential threat to human health or the environment including, but not limited to, closure and post-closure care of an eligible facility; and
(3) to take such actions as may be necessary to monitor and provide post-closure care of any eligible facility, including preventive and corrective actions, without regard to identity or solvency of the owner thereof
C. The Trust Fund may not be used to pay for the normal costs of closure and post-closure care of an eligible facility or where no release or substantial threat of a release of contaminants has been found by the Commission.
D. Expenditures may be made from the Trust Fund upon requisition by the Executive Director of the Department for payment directly to an owner or to a contractor of the Department.
History
- Source: Miss Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17- 17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.3 Administrative Procedures For Reimbursement
A. If an owner of a nonhazardous solid waste disposal facility has sufficient evidence that a release or substantial threat of a release of contaminants from a facility exists, he shall notify the Department and submit all such evidence to the Department.
B. If the Commission determines that a release or substantial threat of a release exists at an eligible facility, either from evidence submitted by an owner or another person, or from evidence compiled by the Department itself the Commission shall determine what actions, if any, are necessary.
C. The owner of the facility shall be responsible for obtaining the services of qualified personnel or contractors to conduct remedial investigations, monitoring activities, develop remedial design plans, or to otherwise conduct activities eligible for reimbursement from the Trust Fund.
D. Site assessments, installation of monitoring wells and other activities associated with remedial investigations shall be conducted by a person who complies with the following criteria:
(1) The person must have a minimum of three years experience as an environmental consultant;
(2) the person must have conducted remedial investigations or corrective actions at a minimum of two other sites; and
(3) the person must possess a certificate of professional liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00).
The Department may require that documentation be submitted demonstrating that the person conducting the work described in this paragraph complies with the above criteria.
E. All engineering and remediation plans must be designed and certified by a professional engineer or engineering company that complies with the following criteria:
(1) The professional engineer must be licensed to practice in the State of Mississippi, or, in the case of an engineering company, the company must employ in a full- time capacity (40 hours per week) at least one professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Mississippi;
(2) the professional engineer or engineering company must have previously conducted remedial investigations and/or corrective actions at a minimum of two other sites; and
(3) the professional engineer or engineering company must possess a current certificate of professional liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000)
The Department may require that documentation be submitted demonstrating that the engineer or engineering company conducting work described in this paragraph complies with the above criteria.
F. All remedial activities conducted by a general contractor must be done by a contractor that complies with the following criteria:
(1) The contractor must hold a current certificate of responsibility issued by the State of Mississippi Board of Contractors;
(2) the contractor must possess a current certificate of contractors general liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000); and
(3) if water wells are to be drilled for monitoring purposes, the contractor must be licensed with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Land & Water Resources.
The Department may require that documentation be submitted demonstrating that the contractor conducting work described in this paragraph complies with the above criteria.
G. The Department may require competitive bidding of general contractors in order to ensure reasonable and fair costs.
H. If the owner of the facility cannot be identified or located, or if the owner does not take prompt corrective action as directed by the Commission or Department, the Department may execute a contract with a third party to conduct whatever action is determined necessary by the Commission.
I. Unless the Department executes a contract directly with a third party pursuant to Rule 6.3(H) of this regulation, the Department shall make payments from the Trust Fund only to the owner of the facility.
J. Payments from the Trust Fund shall be 100% of the reasonable costs, as determined by the Department, and shall be made after submittal of an invoice and any other documents determined necessary by the Department.
K. No payments shall be made for any activity unless the activity and its costs have been approved by the Department prior to initiating the activity.
L. The Department may deny any reimbursement request incurred if it finds such request to be unreasonable, unnecessary, or that the costs were not incurred in accordance with these regulations or the procedures developed for managing the Trust Fund. Any owner who is denied reimbursement in whole or in part shall have the right to a hearing before the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17- 17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.4 Reimbursable Costs
The Trust Fund may be used to reimburse owners of a facility for costs incurred as a result of emergency actions, assessment or remediation of contaminants, long term monitoring where necessary, and to provide for post-closure care not considered to be normal costs.
It is the intent of these regulations to cover costs stated above. While determination of eligible costs must be made on a case-by-case basis, the following activities are considered eligible when performed in a diligent and fair manner and when prior approval of the Department has been obtained:
A. Development of remedial plans.
B. Drilling of soil borings.
C. Installation of groundwater monitoring wells.
D. Sampling and analysis of soil and groundwater.
E. Installation of groundwater recovery wells.
F. Removal of contaminants by approved methods.
G. Disposal or treatment of contaminated media.
H. Replacement of contaminated water supply wells.
I. Legal fees and costs, where such costs are necessary to ensure the proper conduct of any site assessment, preventive or corrective action, monitoring activity, or closure or post- closure activity. Examples of such costs include any legal documents necessary to obtain access to the adjoining property or legal costs associated with executing a contract. Legal costs associated with litigation regarding the site or facility are not eligible for reimbursement.
J. Other costs determined appropriate by the Commission for remediation of the site.
History
- Source: Miss Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17- 17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 6.5 Prioritization of Funds
A. Whenever there are insufficient unencumbered funds to pay for the costs of all activities or facilities which have been identified as needing corrective action, the following factors shall be used by the Department in establishing priorities:
(1) Sites where methane gas in explosive concentrations has migrated from the property boundary and is threatening an adjacent inhabited building shall receive the highest priority.
(2) Sites or facilities which present a threat or potential threat to contaminate a drinking water supply that is currently being used by the public shall be given priority over those which present a threat or potential threat only to potential drinking water supplies.
(3) Where a threatened or potentially threatened drinking water supply is actually being used by the public, the number of persons currently using the water supply shall be considered.
(4) Where a threatened or potentially threatened drinking water supply is not being used by the public, the number of persons residing within one mile of the site or facility shall be considered.
(5) The degree of contamination found, including the areal extent of contamination, the depth of contamination, the concentration of contaminants, and the toxicity level of the specific contaminants, shall also be considered
Part 4, Chapter 7: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Hazardous and Nonhazardous Solid Waste Applicant Disclosure Regulations
History
- Source: Miss Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17- 17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.1 Scope and Authority
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.2 Title and Suggested Citation Form
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.3 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.4 Filing of Disclosure Statement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.5 Content of Disclosure Statement Forms
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.6 Execution of Disclosure Statements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.7 Changes in Circumstance Relevant to Disclosure Statement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.8 Method of Reporting Changes in Circumstances
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.9 Department May Require the Filing of a New Disclosure Statement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.10 Staff May Call on Other State Agencies in Reviewing Disclosure Statements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.11 Annual Update of Disclosure Statement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.12 Failure to Annually Update Disclosure Statement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.13 Disclosure Statement to be Public Records
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.14 Additional Information
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.15 Grounds for Refusal to Issue, Reissue or Transfer a Permit
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.16 Consideration of Facts and Mitigating Circumstances
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.17 Evidence of Rehabilitation
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.18 Reconsideration of Permit Based on Change in Circumstances
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.19 Regulations Severable
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.20 Administrative Appeals
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.21 The Commission on Environmental Quality May Waive Filing
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.22 Effective Date _______________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.1 Scope and Authority
These Regulations are promulgated by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated section 17-17-501 (Supp. 1993), as amended by House Bill No. 1345 effective March 29, 1994, et seq.. [Miss. Laws, 1991, ch. 583, Miss. Laws, 1992, ch. 583 and Miss. Laws, 1994, Ch. 540.], Mississippi Code Annotated section 17-17-27 (Supp. 1993) and Mississippi Code Annotated section 49-17-17 (Supp. 1993), for the purpose of implementing the provisions of those laws. These Regulations may be codified by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality as they are here presented or in such other order or form [i.e., number or letter designations] as the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, in its discretion, may decide. Please note: other regulations apply to persons seeking issuance, reissuance or transfer of permits to operate and/or construct a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility or commercial hazardous waste management facility.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.2 Title
These Regulations shall be entitled Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Hazardous and Nonhazardous Solid Waste Applicant Disclosure Regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.3 Definitions
The following words and phrases shall have the meanings ascribed herein unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Terms not defined herein shall have their ordinary meanings unless such terms have a specialized meaning within the nonhazardous solid waste and hazardous waste field. Terms having such a specialized meaning are to be given that specialized meaning unless otherwise defined.
A. "Act" means Mississippi Code Annotated section 17-17-501 (Supp. 1993), as amended by House Bill No. 1345 effective March 29, 1994, et seq. [Miss. Laws, 1991, ch. 583, Miss. Laws, 1992, ch. 583 and Miss. Laws, 1994, Ch. 540.].
B. “Applicant" means any person (except a public agency) applying for a permit to operate and/or construct a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility or commercial hazardous waste management facility. If a public agency applies for a permit and proposes to operate a facility by contract, the contractor shall also be required to file a disclosure statement as described in Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17-503 (Supp. 1993),
as amended by House Bill No.1345 effective March 29, 1994, and the Permit Board shall evaluate such statement as described in Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17-505 (Supp. 1993).
C. "Application" means an application (other than an application submitted by a public agency) for the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit to operate and/or construct a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility or commercial hazardous waste management facility.
D. "Business concern" means any corporation, association, firm, partnership, trust, joint venture or other form of commercial organization.
E. "Chartered lending institution" means any bank or banking institution chartered under the laws of the United States or of any state.
F. "Commercial hazardous waste management facility" means any facility engaged in the storage, treatment, recovery or disposal of hazardous waste for a fee and which accepts hazardous waste from more than one (1) generator.
G. "Commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility" means any facility engaged in the storage, treatment, processing or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste for compensation or which accepts nonhazardous solid waste from more than one (1) generator not owned by the facility owner.
H. "Commission" means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
I. "Debt liability" means the total actual debt of an applicant business concern or any disclosed business concern including, but not limited to, bonds, debentures, notes, surety agreements, mortgages and loans of any kind, secured or unsecured, and other similar debt instruments.
J. "Department" means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
K. "Disclosure Statement" means the signed and sworn statement required by Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17-503 (Supp. 1993), as amended by House Bill No. 1345 effective March 29, 1994, and Rules 1.1, et. seq. of this Chapter to be filed by each applicant at the time the application is filed, together with any other information required by the Permit Board to be furnished by the Applicant pursuant to these regulations.
L. "Enforcement Action" means any action that is pending or has concluded in a finding of violation or entry of a consent agreement resulting from an alleged violation of any
(1) environmental ordinance, regulation, rule or statute,
(2) environmental permit or
(3) order issued to prohibit, control or abate an environmental problem.
M. "Equity" means any ownership interest of an applicant or any disclosed person in a sole proprietorship or business concern including, but not limited to, the shares of a partnership and stock in a corporation.
N. "Individuals related within the third degree" means individuals related within the third degree according to the Civil Law. Such relatives would include parents, children, grandparents, grandchildren, brothers, sisters, uncles, aunts, nephews, nieces, great- grandparents and great-grandchildren of any disclosed individual. Such individuals related within the third degree must be disclosed if together they own a cumulative of five percent (5%) or more of the equity in or debt liability of a disclosed publicly traded corporation except when the disclosed public corporation is an investment company which is publicly traded or a chartered lending institution.
O. "Investment Company which is publicly traded" means a business concern, including a mutual fund, which engages primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading in stock and securities and which uses its capital to invest in other companies. The equity stock and securities of an investment company which is publicly traded are registered under federal and state securities laws and publicly traded on a national or regional stock or securities exchange.
P. "Key employee" means any person employed by an applicant in a management capacity and empowered to make operational or financial management decisions with respect to nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste management operations of the business concern including, but not by way of limitation,
(1) the officer or other employee of the applicant located on and in charge of operations on the site that is the subject of the application and all persons in the applicant's chain of command above him [i.e., his supervisor, his supervisor's supervisor, etc.]; and,
(2) contractors, consultants, brokers or other persons performing duties or functions commonly performed in the industry by employees exercising discretion over the operations of the applicant, but shall not include employees primarily engaged in the physical or mechanical treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste.
Q. "Parent business concern" means a business concern that holds five percent (5%) or more of the debt or equity in the applicant business concern.
R. "Permit" means a permit to construct and/or operate a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility or commercial hazardous waste management facility.
S. "Permit Board" means the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board.
T. "Person" means (unless stated otherwise) any individual, trust, firm, joint stock company, business concern, public or private corporation (including a government corporation), partnership, association, state or any agency or institution thereof, municipality, commission, political subdivision of a state or any interstate body, and includes any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality, political subdivision or the United States or any officer or employee thereof.
U. "Public agency" means any incorporated city or town, county, political subdivision, governmental district or unit, public corporation, public institution of higher learning, community college district, planning and development district or governmental agency created under the laws of the state.
V. "Publicly traded corporation" means a business concern, the equity securities of which are registered under federal and state securities laws and publicly traded on a national or regional stock or securities exchange.
W. "Sister business concern" means a business concern with which the applicant shares a common parent business concern, and which is located in the United States of America.
X. "Staff" means employees of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
Y. "Subsidiary business concern" means a business concern in which the applicant holds five percent (5%) or more of the business concern's debt or equity.
Z. "Transfer" means
(1) any sale, conveyance or assignment of the rights held by any person in any permit issued pursuant to these Regulations, except to applicant's parent business concern or wholly-owned subsidiary business concern for which all information required by these regulations has been previously disclosed in a disclosure statement pursuant to these regulations;
(2) any change of more than fifty percent (50%) of the equity ownership of the applicant over any period of time which results in a different majority ownership from that at the time of the last disclosure under these Regulations or the last action of the Permit Board regarding the permit (any person may be a new majority owner for purposes of this provision); or
(3) an action by the Permit Board modifying a permit or revoking and reissuing a permit to reflect the changes in ownership described in subparts (1) and (2), above.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.4 Filing of Disclosure Statement
A. Every applicant (other than a public agency) for issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit for the treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste at a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility or hazardous waste at a commercial hazardous waste management facility shall file with the Permit Board at the time the application is filed a disclosure statement. All applicable information requested in the disclosure statement must be provided. If any questions in the disclosure statement are not applicable to the applicant, the applicant must so indicate.
(1) Public Agencies. If a public agency applies for a permit, the Permit Board shall consider the performance history of that agency as prescribed by Mississippi Code Annotated section 17-17-27 (Supp. 1993).
(2) Contractors for Public Agencies. If a public agency applies for a permit and proposes to operate a facility by contract with an individual or a business concern, such individual or business concern shall be required to file a disclosure statement as described in Miss. Code Ann. section 17-17-503 (Supp. 1993), as amended by House Bill No. 1345 effective March 29, 1994, and as provided by these Regulations. The Permit Board shall evaluate such statement as described in Miss. Code Ann. 17-17-505 (Supp. 1993) and in Rules 7.15 through 7.18 of these Regulations.
B. Where to File Disclosure Statements.
(1) An applicant seeking a permit to construct and/or operate a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility shall file a disclosure statement with the Head of the Office of Pollution Control, Office of Pollution Control, Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, 515 East Amite Street, Jackson, MS 39201, P.O. Box 2261, Jackson, Mississippi 39225-2261.
(2) An applicant seeking a permit to construct and/or operate a commercial hazardous waste management facility shall file a disclosure statement with the Head of the Office of Pollution Control, Office of Pollution Control, Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, 515 East Amite Street, Jackson, MS 39201, P.O. Box 2261, Jackson, Mississippi 39225-2261.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.5 Content of Disclosure Statement Forms
The disclosure statement shall be filed on forms supplied by the Department and shall contain the following information:
A. Applicant Identity. A description of the business structure of the entity making the application, i.e., whether the applicant is an individual, a partnership, a corporation or some other type of business concern.
B. Applicant Information.
(1) Individual. If the applicant is an individual, applicant's:
(a) Full name;
(b) Business address;
(c) Date of birth;
(d) Social security number;
(e) Business telephone number.
(2) Business Concern. If the applicant is a business concern, applicant's:
(a) Full name;
(b) Business address;
(c) Date of establishment;
(d) Federal employer identification number;
(e) Business telephone number.
C. Business Concern Applicant's Personnel. For each officer, director, partner or key employee of the applicant, such person's:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Date of birth;
(4) Social security number;
(5) Business telephone number;
(6) Position, i.e., officer, director, partner, key employee.
D. Holders of Equity or Debt Liability in Business Concern Applicants.
(1) Business Concern Applicant that is not a Publicly Traded Corporation.
(a) If the business concern applicant is not a publicly traded corporation, for each person other than a business concern holding an equity interest in such applicant business concern, such person's:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Date of birth;
(4) Social security number;
(5) Business telephone number;
(6) Percentage of equity held.
(b) If the business concern applicant is not a publicly traded corporation, for each business concern (other than an investment company which is publicly traded or a chartered lending institution) which is an equity holder of the applicant business concern, such business concern's:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Date of establishment;
(4) Federal employer identification number;
(5) Business telephone number;
(6) Percentage of equity held.
(c) If the business concern applicant is not a publicly traded corporation, for each investment company which is publicly traded or chartered lending institution holding equity in such applicant business concern, such investment company's or lending institution's:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Business telephone number;
(4) Percentage of equity held.
(d) If the business concern applicant is not a publicly traded corporation, a listing of all persons or business concerns holding debt liability in such applicant business concern shall be provided with such listing to include the following information for such persons or business concerns:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Federal employer identification number, if applicable;
(4) Amount of debt liability held in U.S. Dollars; and
(5) Percentage of the total debt liability held.
For the purposes of Rule 7.5(D)(1)(d), persons and business concerns holding debt liability in the applicant business concern and disclosed pursuant to Rule 7.5(D)(1)(d) are not subject to further disclosure requirements and shall not be considered a "disclosed business concern" unless expressly requested by the permit board.
(2) Publicly Traded Corporation Applicant.
(a) If the applicant business concern is a publicly traded corporation, for individuals related within the third degree holding a cumulative of five percent (5%) and for any other person (other than a business concern) holding more than five percent (5%) of the equity in such publicly traded corporation, such person's:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Date of birth;
(4) Social Security number;
(5) Business telephone number;
(6) Percentage of equity held.
(b) If the applicant business concern is a publicly traded corporation, for each business concern (other than an investment company which is publicly traded or a chartered lending institution holding equity or debt liability of a business concern disclosed in applicant's disclosure statement) holding more than five percent (5%) of the equity in such publicly traded corporation, such business concern's:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Date of establishment;
(4) Federal employer identification number;
(5) Business telephone number;
(6) Percentage of equity held.
(c) If the applicant business concern is a publicly traded corporation, for each investment company which is publicly traded or chartered lending institution holding more than five percent (5%) of the equity in such publicly traded corporation, such investment company's or lending institution's:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Business telephone number;
(4) Percentage of equity held.
(d) If the applicant business concern is a publicly traded corporation, a listing of all individuals or business concerns holding more than five percent (5%) or individuals related within the third degree holding a cumulative of five percent (5%) or more of the debt liability in the applicant business concern shall be provided with such listing to include the following information for such persons or business concerns:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Federal employer identification number, if applicable;
(4) Amount of debt liability held in U.S. Dollars; and
(5) Percentage of the total debt liability held.
For the purposes of Rule 7.5(D)(2)(d), persons and business concerns holding debt liability in the applicant business concern and disclosed pursuant to Rule 7.5(D)(2)(d) are not subject to further disclosure requirements and shall not be considered a "disclosed business concern" unless expressly requested by the permit board.
E. Disclosed Business Concern Information.
(1) Officers, Directors, and Partners. For each officer, director or partner of any business concern disclosed in the statement supplied pursuant to these Regulations (other than an investment company which is publicly traded or a chartered lending institution), such person's:
(a) Full name;
(b) Business address;
(c) Date of birth;
(d) Social security number;
(e) Business telephone number;
(f) Position, i.e., officer, director, partner, key employee as defined in Rule 7.3(P) of these Regulations.
(g) Employer's name, company name or business name.
(2) Equity and Debt Liability Holders.
(a) Disclosed Business Concern that is not a Publicly Traded Corporation.
(1) If the business concern applicant is not a publicly traded corporation, for each person other than a business concern holding equity in the disclosed business concern, such person's:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Business address;
(iii) Date of birth;
(iv) Social security number;
(v) Business telephone number;
(vi) Percentage of equity held.
(2) If the disclosed business concern is not a publicly traded corporation, for each business concern (other than an investment company which is publicly traded or a chartered lending institution) which is an equity holder of the disclosed business concern, such business concern's:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Business address;
(iii) Date of establishment;
(iv) Federal employer identification number;
(e) Business telephone number;
(v) Percentage of equity held.
(3) If the disclosed business concern is not a publicly traded corporation, for each investment company which is publicly traded or chartered lending institution holding equity in such disclosed business concern, such investment company's or lending institution's:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Business address;
(iii) Business telephone number;
(iv) Percentage of equity held.
(4) If the disclosed business concern is not a publicly traded corporation, a listing of all persons or business concerns holding debt liability in such disclosed business concern shall be provided with such listing to include the
following information for such persons or business concerns:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Business address;
(iii) Federal employer identification number, if applicable;
(iv) Amount of debt liability held in U.S. Dollars; and
(v) Percentage of the total debt liability held.
For the purposes of Rule 7.5(E)(2)(a)(4), persons and business concerns holding debt liability in disclosed business concerns and disclosed pursuant to Section Rule 7.5(E)(2)(a)(4) are not subject to further disclosure requirements and shall not be considered a "disclosed business concern" unless expressly requested by the Permit Board.
(b) Publicly Traded Corporation Disclosed Business Concern.
(1) If the disclosed business concern is a publicly traded corporation, for individuals related within the third degree holding a cumulative of five percent (5%) and for any other person (other than a business concern) holding more than five percent (5%) of the equity in such publicly traded corporation, such person's:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Business address;
(iii) Date of birth;
(iv) Social Security number;
(v) Business telephone number;
(vi) Percentage of equity held.
(2) If the disclosed business concern is a publicly traded corporation, for each business concern (other than an investment company which is publicly traded or a chartered lending institution holding equity in a business concern disclosed in applicant's disclosure
statement) holding more than five percent (5%) of the equity in such publicly traded corporation, such business concern's:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Business address;
(iii) Date of establishment;
(iv) Federal employer identification number;
(v) Business telephone number;
(vi) Percentage of equity held.
(3) If the disclosed business concern is a publicly traded corporation, for each investment company which is publicly traded or chartered lending institution holding more than five percent (5%) of the equity in such publicly traded corporation, such investment company's or lending institution's:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Business address;
(iii) Business telephone number;
(iv) Percentage of equity held.
(4) If the disclosed business concern is a publicly traded corporation, a listing of all individuals and business concerns holding more than five percent (5%) or individuals related within the third degree holding a cumulative of five percent (5%) or more of the debt liability in the disclosed business concern shall be provided with such listing to include the following information for such persons or business concerns:
(i) Full name;
(ii) Business address;
(iii) Federal employer identification number, if applicable;
(iv) Amount of debt liability held in U.S. Dollars; and
(v) Percentage of the total debt liability held.
For the purposes of Rule 7.5(E)(2)(b)(4), persons and business concerns holding debt liability in disclosed business concerns and disclosed pursuant to Rule 7.5(E)(2)(b)(4) are not subject to further disclosure requirements and shall not be considered a "disclosed business concern" unless expressly requested by the permit board.
(F) Applicant's Interest in Waste Business Concerns. For each business concern that collects, transports, treats, processes, stores or disposes of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste in which the applicant holds an equity interest of five percent (5%) or more, such business concern's:
(1) Full name;
(2) Business address;
(3) Date of establishment;
(4) Federal employer identification number;
(5) Business telephone number.
(G) Applicant's Business Experience and Credentials.
(1) If the applicant is a person other than a business concern, a description of the business experience and credentials of the applicant, including any past or present permits or licenses, possessed by the applicant, for the treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste.
(2) If the applicant is a business concern, a description of the business experience and credentials of the applicant's key employee(s), officers, directors and/or partners, including any past or present permits or licenses, possessed by such persons for the treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste.
(H) History of Related Business Concerns.
(1) If the applicant is seeking a permit to operate and/or construct a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility and either the applicant or a parent business concern has engaged in the commercial treating, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste in Mississippi for fewer than five (5) years preceding the filing of its application or if the applicant is seeking a permit to operate and/or construct a commercial hazardous waste management facility and either the applicant or a parent business concern has engaged in the
commercial treating, processing, storage or disposal of hazardous waste in Mississippi for fewer than five (5) years preceding the filing of its application, the following information about each sister business concern of applicant that has engaged in the commercial treating, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste within such five-year period:
(a) Full name;
(b) Business address;
(c) Date of establishment;
(d) Federal employer identification number;
(e) Business telephone number.
(2) If neither the applicant nor its parent business concern(s) nor any sister business concern of the applicant has engaged in the commercial treating, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste within the five-year period preceding the filing of its application, provide the following information about any sister business concerns that, within the five-year period preceding the filing of applicant's application, have been the subjects of any enforcement actions:
(a) Full name;
(b) Business address;
(c) Date of establishment;
(d) Federal employer identification number;
(e) Business telephone number;
(f) Listing and explanation of each such enforcement action [include the name and address of the regulatory agency involved].
(I) Environmental History. Any person required to be disclosed in the disclosure statement, except a person required to be disclosed pursuant to Rule 7.5(h)(2) of these Regulations, shall provide a listing and explanation of any:
(1) notices of violation;
(2) prosecutions;
(3) administrative orders (whether by consent or otherwise);
(4) license or permit revocations or suspensions; and,
(5) enforcement actions by any state or federal authority within the five- year period immediately preceding the filing of the application, which are pending or have concluded in a finding of violation or entry of a consent agreement regarding any allegation of the civil or criminal violation of any law, regulation or requirement related to the treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste [include the name and address of the regulatory agency involved].
(J) Felony Information. For each person required to be disclosed in the disclosure statement, an itemized list of any and all final convictions of and pleas of guilty or nolo contendere to any crime punishable as a felony in any jurisdiction within the five-year period immediately preceding the filing of the application [include the name of the jurisdiction in which the conviction(s) and/or plea(s) occurred].
(K) Nonhazardous Solid Waste or Hazardous Waste Agency Information.
(1) A listing of each agency outside of Mississippi that has or has had regulatory responsibility over the applicant regarding the applicant's treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste within the five-year period immediately preceding the filing of the application.
(2) A listing of each agency outside of Mississippi that has or has had regulatory responsibility over a parent, subsidiary or sister business concern of applicant regarding such parent, subsidiary or sister business concern's treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste within the five-year period immediately preceding the filing of the application. This disclosure need be made concerning sister business concerns only if such sister business concern is required to be disclosed under Rule 7.5(h), supra.
(L) Other Related Information. Applicant shall provide any other information the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board may require prior to making its decision concerning the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.6 Execution of Disclosure Statements
A. Disclosure statements shall be signed and sworn to or affirmed by the applicant, as follows:
(1) If the applicant is a corporation, by at least one of the following: its president, its chairman of the board, any other chief executive officer thereof, its secretary, its treasurer or other officer or employee of the corporation authorized by the applicant to execute the disclosure statement on behalf of the corporation. The Department or the Permit Board may require an applicant to present proof of such person's authority to execute the disclosure statement on behalf of the corporation.
(2) If the applicant is a partnership [except a limited partnership], by at least one of its partners who has authority to execute the disclosure statement on behalf of the partnership.
(3) If the applicant is a limited partnership, by at least one of its general partners who has authority to execute the disclosure statement on behalf of the limited partnership.
(4) If the applicant is any other business concern, by its chief executive officer, its secretary or its treasurer.
(5) If the applicant is an individual, by the individual himself or herself.
B. All signatures on original disclosure statements shall be dated and signed in ink and sworn before a notary public or other lawful officer authorized to administer oaths. Signatures on copies may be photocopied, typed, stamped or printed. The name and address of the signatory shall be typed, stamped or printed beneath each signature.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.7 Changes in Circumstances Relevant to Disclosure Statement
If, while applicant is awaiting action upon a permit application [within the scope of these Regulations] by the Permit Board, a change in circumstances renders any information provided in a disclosure statement incorrect, misleading or otherwise inaccurate, applicant shall advise the Department within thirty (30) days and supplement the disclosure statement accordingly within sixty (60) days of any such change in circumstances. Failure to do so may be considered by the Permit Board to be a misrepresentation or concealment of such change in circumstances.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.8 Method of Reporting Changes in Circumstances
Changes in circumstances shall be reported on amendment forms provided by the Department. The amendment form(s) shall be
signed and sworn to or affirmed by the same person(s) and in the same manner as authorized by Rule 7.6 above for the disclosure statement.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.9 Department May Require the Filing of a New Disclosure Statement
Where multiple changes in circumstances are to be reported, the Department, in its discretion, may require the filing of a new disclosure statement.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.10 Staff May Call on Other State Agencies in Reviewing Disclosure Statements
The staff is authorized to call on criminal investigatory and prosecutorial authorities and other agencies of the state to assist in the review and investigation of disclosure statements and applicants.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.11 Annual Update of Disclosure Statement
Following issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit within the scope of these Regulations, the person to whom the permit was issued shall file an updated disclosure statement annually on the anniversary of the permit issuance date as stated on the permit. If there has been no such changes since the most recent disclosure statement filing or updating, the filing of an additional disclosure statement will not be required if said person, no later than the anniversary of the permit issuance date, indicates by means of a letter to the Head of the Office of Pollution Control that no such changes have occurred.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.12 Failure to Annually Update Disclosure Statement
Failure of a holder of a permit within the scope of these Regulations to annually update the disclosure statement originally filed with the issuance, reissuance or transfer of such permit shall be grounds for revocation of the permit by the Permit Board.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.13 Disclosure Statements to be Public Records
Disclosure statements and the information contained therein, except in so far as such may be accorded confidentiality pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated section 17-17-27(6) (Supp. 1993) or pursuant to other laws of the state of Mississippi, are public records within the meaning of Miss. Code Ann. Section 25-61-5 (Supp. 1993). Applicants shall comply with the requirements of said Section 17-17-27(6) to preserve confidentiality claims.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.14 Additional Information
The Permit Board, the Staff or both may require the applicant to submit additional information in the disclosure statement beyond what is specifically required by these Regulations. For purposes of these disclosure regulations, such additional information is limited to items which are specifically requested, and individuals as well as business concerns which are disclosed pursuant to this provision are not subject to any of the earlier disclosure provisions unless expressly indicated in the request by the Permit Board and/or the Staff. Therefore, a business concern revealed pursuant to this provision would not be a "disclosed business concern" as referred to earlier in these regulations.
S Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.15 Grounds for Refusal to Issue, Reissue or Transfer a Permit
The Permit Board may refuse to issue, reissue or transfer a permit if the Permit Board finds that the applicant or any person required to be listed in the disclosure statement:
A. has misrepresented or concealed any material fact in the disclosure statement;
B. has obtained a permit from the Permit Board by misrepresentation or concealment of a material fact;
C. has been convicted of a felony or pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to a felony involving any federal or state laws, including but not limited to environmental laws, within the five- year period immediately preceding the filing of the application for the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit;
D. has habitually violated any provisions of federal or state environmental laws, rules or regulations related to the management of nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste within the five-year period immediately preceding the filing of the application for the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit, or, if neither the applicant nor any person required to be listed in the disclosure statement has worked or done business in the nonhazardous solid waste or hazardous waste fields within the five-year period immediately preceding the filing of the application for the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit, has habitually violated any other provisions of federal or state environmental law, rules or regulations within the same five year period;
E. has been adjudicated in contempt of an order of any court enforcing any state or federal environmental laws within the five-year period immediately preceding the filing of the application for the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit;
F. has been convicted of or pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to bribery or attempting to bribe a public officer or employee of the federal government or of any state or local government in the United States in the public officer's or employee's official capacity
within the five-year period immediately preceding the filing of the application for the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit; or
G. has been convicted of or pleaded guilty or nolo contendere to collusion among bidders or prospective bidders in restraint of freedom of competition by agreement to bid a fixed price within the five-year period immediately preceding the filing of the application for the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.16 Consideration of Facts and Mitigating Circumstances
In determining whether to issue, reissue or transfer a permit for the treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste at a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility or hazardous waste at a commercial hazardous waste management facility, the Permit Board shall consider the facts and any mitigating factors, including:
A. the relevance of the offense to the business for which a permit is sought or the nature and responsibilities of the position which a convicted individual would hold;
B. the nature and seriousness of the offense;
C. the circumstances under which the offense occurred;
D. the date of the offense; and
E. the ownership and management structure of the applicant at the time of the offense.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.17 Evidence of Rehabilitation
The Permit Board shall allow the applicant to submit evidence of rehabilitation and shall consider the applicant's efforts to prevent recurrence of the unlawful activity in its determination under Rule 7.15 of these Regulations.
A. Items to be considered by the Permit Board shall include:
(1) the applicant's record and history of implementing successful corrective actions undertaken to prevent or minimize the likelihood of recurrence of the offense;
(2) whether the offense was an isolated event or repeated incident (i.e., part of a pattern of activity);
(3) whether the applicant cooperated with governmental bodies during (3) investigations or voluntarily provided information regarding any offense under consideration;
(4) the number and types of permits held by applicant and the experience of applicant in conducting its business;
(5) implementation by the applicant of formal policies, training programs or management controls to substantially minimize or prevent the occurrence of future violations or unlawful activities;
(6) implementation by the applicant of an environmental compliance audit program to assess and monitor compliance with environmental laws, rules, regulations and permit conditions; and
(7) the applicant's discharge of individuals or severance of the interest of or affiliation with responsible parties who would otherwise cause the Permit Board to deny a permit.
B. If the Permit Board finds pursuant to this section that mitigating factors exist or that the applicant has demonstrated rehabilitation, the Permit Board may issue, reissue or transfer the permit for the treatment, processing, storage or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste at a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility or hazardous waste at a commercial hazardous waste management facility.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.18 Reconsideration of Permit Based on Change in Circumstances
If, following issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit, a change in circumstances is reported by the permit holder, the Permit Board may reconsider such action after notice to the applicant and the opportunity for a hearing in accordance with Miss. Code Ann. section 49-17-29 (4) (Supp. 1993) and, if it deems appropriate, revoke or modify the permit.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.19 Regulations Severable
Each of these Regulations promulgated under the Act and each part or subpart of said Regulations are intended by the Commission to be severable such that should any Regulation or any part or subpart of any Regulation be held to be invalid by any court, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts and/or subparts of these Regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.20 Administrative Appeals
Any applicant denied the issuance, reissuance or transfer of a permit because of information disclosed pursuant to these Regulations, or any other interested party aggrieved by actions of the Permit Board related thereto, may request a formal hearing
concerning such action before the Permit Board as provided in Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-17- 29 (4) (Supp. 1993).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.21 Rule 7.21
The Commission on Environmental Quality may waive the filing of disclosure information related to applicants for permits involving the storage, treatment, processing or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste only if the information regards the holder of less than five percent (5%) of the equity of the applicant or the holder of less than five percent (5%) of the equity in any business concern which holds equity in the applicant.
A. In order to apply for the waiver, the applicant shall file a sworn petition requesting such waiver and allege either:
(1) that the information cannot be ascertained after reasonable and diligent search and inquiry, setting forth in the petition the facts and circumstances alleged to constitute the reasonable and diligent search and inquiry to obtain the information; or
(2) that the information required is not relevant or material, setting forth in the petition the facts and circumstances in support of the irrelevancy or immateriality of the information.
B. The Commission may waive the filing of such information if the Commission finds and declares such information either:
(1) to be unobtainable after reasonable and diligent search and inquiry; or
(2) to be irrelevant or immaterial to the review of the application; and
(3) unnecessary to the discharge of its responsibilities with regard to such permit as set forth by law.
C. Any applicant, other person or interested party, aggrieved by an Order of the Commission waiving the filing of such information may appeal the decision of the Commission in the manner provided in Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-17-41 (1972), as amended.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 7.22 Effective Date
The original Regulations were adopted by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality on October 24, 1991. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, the initial amendments to the original Regulations included herein were adopted on December 17,
1992, and became effective on January 18, 1993. The amendments included herein were adopted on July 28, 1994, and shall become effective on August 30, 1994.
Part 4, Chapter 8: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Regulations For The Certification Of Operators of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-501, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.1 General Information
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.2 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.3 Certification Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.4 Renewal of Certificates
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.5 Revocation or Suspension of Certificates
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.6 Reciprocity
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.7 Enforcement and Appeals _________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.1 General Information
A. These regulations are promulgated under the authority provided by the Miss. Code Ann. Section 21-27-207.
B. The Miss. Code Ann. Section 21-27-211 and the Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations require that all commercial solid waste landfills and class I rubbish sites must employ a certified operator. Any person designated by the landfill or class I rubbish site owner as the person having direct supervision over and personal responsibility for the daily operation of the landfill or rubbish site must apply for and obtain operator certification under the conditions contained in these regulations.
C. Certificates shall be valid for three (3) years, unless revoked or invalidated by the Commission for just cause.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq. 17-17-201, et seq., 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.2 Definitions
The definitions provided in this section are for the purposes of these regulations. All other relevant terms for which no definition is provided in these regulations shall be used as defined by the Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations.
A. “Certificate” means the written certification of competency issued by the Commission stating that the operator of a landfill or class I rubbish site has met the requirements for the specified operator classification.
B. “Commercial Class I rubbish site” means a permitted rubbish site, which accepts for disposal Class I rubbish, as defined by the Commission, for compensation or from more than one (1) generator.
C. “Commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility” means any facility engaged in the storage, treatment, processing or disposal of nonhazardous solid waste for compensation or which accepts nonhazardous solid waste from more than (1) generator not owned by the facility owner.
D. “Commission” means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
E. “Department” means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
F. “Experience” means direct observation of and/or participation in the operation and maintenance of a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility or other relevant work activities as determined by the Department.
G. “Operator” means the person who directly supervises and is personally responsible for the daily operation and maintenance of a commercial nonhazardous solid waste management facility.
H. “Rubbish” means nonputrescible solid wastes (excluding ashes) consisting of both combustible and noncombustible wastes. Combustible rubbish includes paper, rags, cartons, wood, furniture, rubber, and plastics, yard trimmings, leaves and similar material. Noncombustible rubbish includes glass, crockery, metal cans, metal furniture and like material which will not burn at ordinary incinerator temperatures (not less than 1600 degrees F.)
I. “Rubbish site” means, for the purposes of these regulations, a commercial class I rubbish site.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq. 17-17-201, et seq., 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.3 Certification Requirements
A. Qualifications for Commercial Solid Waste Landfill Operator Certification
(1) An applicant may receive a certificate of competency as a Commercial Landfill Operator from the Commission if the applicant is a graduate of an accredited high school or an equivalent (GED) program, has at least five (5) years of experience in landfill operation, and has passed a Commission approved written examination pursuant to paragraph E.1 of this rule. An applicant may receive credit from the Department for experience and education as follows:
(a) An applicant seeking commercial landfill operator certification under paragraph A.1 of Rule 8.3 who has completed additional years of education beyond a high school diploma or GED may receive partial credit for deficiencies in their experience, not to exceed three (3) years per degree completed. Such education should be in the field of engineering or engineering technology, biology, chemistry, geology, physics or other natural sciences. Other degrees may be considered based upon the curriculum’s applicability to landfill operations as determined by the Department.
(b) An applicant seeking commercial landfill operator certification under paragraph A.1 of Rule 8.3 that has obtained comparable work experience in areas that are not directly related to landfill operations, may request that the Department review and consider such work experience to account for up to three (3) years of credit for required work experience. Comparable work experience could include work in other areas of solid waste management, work with other types of pollution control technology, work with equipment commonly used in landfill operations, or other similar work activities. The relevance of such experience as well as the amount of credit the applicant may receive shall be determined by the Department on a case by case basis, based upon the comparability to skills used in landfill operations.
(c) In no case, shall the applicant be considered for certification with less than one year of direct experience in landfill operations.
(2) An applicant that is seeking certification to operate a commercial non-municipal solid waste landfill may request that the Department allow the applicant to seek certification under Rule 8.3(B)(1)(a) of these regulations where the affected landfill operations are more comparable to a rubbish site.
B. Qualifications for Commercial Class I Rubbish Site Operator Certification
(1) An applicant may receive a certificate of competency as a Class I Rubbish Site Operator from the Commission if:
(a) the applicant is a graduate of an accredited high school or has obtained an equivalent (GED), has at least one (1) year of experience in the operation of a rubbish site or other comparable disposal site, and has
passed a Commission approved written examination pursuant to paragraph E.1 of Rule 8.3.
(b) the applicant currently holds a valid certificate of competency as a Commercial Solid Waste Landfill Operator and has passed the Rubbish Site Operator Examination pursuant to paragraph E.1 of this rule.
(c) the applicant is the operator of an existing class I rubbish site in Mississippi open and receiving waste on June 30, 2005. Such certification shall be valid only until June 30, 2006 and only for operating the facility at which he/she was employed on June 30, 2005, and shall not be renewable.
(d) the applicant is the operator of a new commercial class I rubbish site expected to open in Mississippi prior to the Commission’s initial examination date, provided that the person has graduated from an accredited high school or equivalent (GED)program, and has at least one (1) year of experience operating a rubbish site. Such certification shall only be valid until June 30, 2006 and shall not be renewable.
(2) An applicant may receive credit for the experience and educational requirements of paragraph B.1.(a) as follows:
(a) An applicant seeking class I rubbish site operator certification under paragraph B.1 of this rule who has completed additional years of education beyond a high school diploma or GED may receive up to 6 months of credit for deficiencies in their work experience. The award of such credit will be based upon the applicability of the curriculum to solid waste disposal operations as determined by the Department.
(b) An applicant seeking class I rubbish site operator certification under paragraph B.1 of Rule 8.3 that has obtained comparable work experience in areas that are not directly related to rubbish site operations, may request that the Department review and consider such work experience to account for up to one (1) year of credit for required work experience. The relevance of such experience as well as the amount of credit the applicant may receive shall be determined by the Department on a case by case basis, based upon the comparability to skills used in rubbish site operations.
(3) Only one (1) operator per facility may be certified under paragraphs B(1)(c) or (d) of Rule 8.3.
C. Terms of Certification. A certificate of competency issued by the Commission under these regulations shall be valid for three (3) years, unless otherwise revoked or invalidated for just cause.
D. Application for Certification
(1) An applicant seeking certification shall submit an application to the Department on a form provided by the Department for review and determination of eligibility.
(2) The Commission shall issue certificates of competency when the applicant meets the minimum qualifications and requirements of these regulations.
(3) The Commission may deny an application if the applicant has not complied with all the provisions of these regulations and with all other applicable Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations or has submitted inaccurate or false information in the application, or has submitted incomplete application forms after being notified in writing by the Department that the application is incomplete. The Commission shall make a determination regarding issuance or denial of the certificate based upon the information contained in the application, the applicant’s actions during any prior term of certification, and any other pertinent information that is available to the Commission.
E. Examinations
(1) An applicant must pass a written examination developed, prepared, and given by the Commission, or developed, prepared, and given by another organization that is approved by the Commission.
(2) An applicant who fails to pass an examination may repeat the examination at the next regularly scheduled examination date.
(3) Examination papers will not be returned to the applicant.
(4) An applicant who fails to pass an examination given by the Commission may review his/her examination by submitting a written request to the Department within thirty (30) days following notification of the exam grade. An applicant who fails an exam administered by a Commission approved organization is subject to the guidelines of that organization.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq. 17-17-201, et seq., 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.4 Renewal of Certificates
A. Eligibility for Renewal/Recertification
(1) A certificate of competency issued under Rules 8.3(A) and (B)(1)(a) and B. of these regulations may be renewed. Such renewal may be made without examination, provided that a renewal application is submitted prior to the
expiration of the existing certificate. The renewal application must be accompanied by proof of completion of the continuing education requirements described in Rules 8.3(B) of these regulations.
(2) Certified operators who submit renewal applications more than sixty (60) days after the expiration of their certificate will be required to pass the written examination as described in Rule 8.3(E) of these regulations in order to be eligible for re-certification.
B. Continuing Education Requirements
(1) In order for a certificate of competency to be renewed under Rule 8.4 of these regulations, commercial solid waste landfill operators must earn at least forty- eight (48) hours of continuing education during the period in which the current certificate is valid. Those operators who have been certified for at least three (3) consecutive terms (or nine (9) years) must earn at least thirty (30) hours of continuing education during the period in which the current certificate is valid.
(2) In order for a certificate of competency to be renewed under Rule 8.4 of these regulations, commercial class I rubbish site operators must earn at least twenty-four (24) hours of continuing education during the period in which the current certificate is valid. Those operators who have been certified for at least three (3) consecutive terms (or nine (9) years) must earn at least sixteen (16) hours of continuous education during the period in which the current certificate is valid.
(3) Class I Rubbish Site Operators certified under Rule 8.3(B)(1)(b) of these regulations must earn at least eight (8) hours of continuing education specific to rubbish site operations during the period in which his or her certification is valid.
(4) Continuing Education requirements may be satisfied by attending Department- sponsored training sessions, Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA)-sponsored technical programs, or by obtaining comparable training approved by the Department. Continuing education credit will generally be given as follows:
(a) one (1) hour of Department-sponsored training shall be equivalent to one (1) hour of continuing education, not to exceed ten (10) hours per day.
(b) one (1) hour of a related SWANA-sponsored technical program shall be equivalent to one (1) hour of continuing education not to exceed ten (10) hours per day.
(c) attending one (1) week long related SWANA-sponsored course, or other course(s) determined by the Department to be equivalent in scope and duration, shall be equivalent to forty (40) hours of continuing education.
(d) special schools, experience, training, correspondence courses, etc., may be approved at the discretion of the Department.
(5) The Department reserves the right to reduce the number of hours of continuing education units granted or determine how much credit will be given for courses where the content, or portions of, is determined to be unrelated to landfill or rubbish site operations. The Department will review the course content to determine how much, if any, credit will be given to the operator for attendance.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.5 Revocation or Suspension of Certificates
A. The Commission may revoke or suspend the certificate of an operator, following a hearing before the Commission, when it is found that the operator:
(1) has practiced fraud or deception,
(2) fails to use reasonable care, judgment, and/or apply knowledge in the performance of duties,
(3) is incompetent or unable to properly perform duties,
(4) knowingly submits false or inaccurate information for issuance or renewal of a certificate under these regulations,
(5) willfully fails to comply with the conditions of the certificate issued by the Department, or
(6) violates any provision of any applicable state or federal law, regulation, or permit condition.
B. In the event the Commission suspends the certificate of an operator, the Commission may as a part of the suspension, require the operator to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, to obtain additional continuing education and/or to complete other actions as required by the Commission. Failure to comply with the terms of the suspension may result in revocation of the operator’s certificate.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.6 Reciprocity
A. Certificates of competency may be issued, without examination, to an operator who holds a current, valid certificate from another state or a private company that has entered into a reciprocity agreement with the Commission.
B. Reciprocity agreements may be established if the Commission determines that the certification and training program of another state or a private company meets or exceeds that of the Commission’s.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 8.7 Enforcement And Appeals
Enforcement and appeals shall be in accordance with the Sections 21-27-201 through 21-27-221 of the Mississippi Code Annotated.
Part 4, Chapter 9: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Regulations For The Beneficial Use of Nonhazardous Solid Waste
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 21-27-201, et seq., 49-2- 9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 9.1 General Information
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 9.2 Procedures for Beneficial Use Determinations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 9.3 Beneficial Use Categories
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 9.4 Reporting Requirements
Appendix I
Appendix II _________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 9.1 General Information
A. Purpose, Scope and Applicability
(1) As per Rule 1.1(B)(5) of the Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality may make determinations that allow for the beneficial use of eligible nonhazardous solid wastes in the state.
(2) These regulations shall apply to any person, organization, industry, business, agency, or institution that intends to obtain, distribute and/or use an eligible solid waste or by-product for the purposes of beneficial use in a manner for which the material was not specifically manufactured.
B. Exclusions
(1) These regulations do not apply to the recovery of common residential or commercial recyclable materials such as steel, aluminum, plastic, glass, paper, cardboard, wood or other materials that are post-consumer materials or pre- consumer off-specification materials where such materials are processed and/or managed as recyclable commodities.
(2) These regulations do not apply to compost materials developed in compliance with Rule 1.9 of the Mississippi Nonhazardous Waste Management Regulations.
(3) These regulations do not apply to uses of solid wastes in beneficial fill activities as described in Rule 1.1(B)(6) of the Mississippi Nonhazardous Waste Management Regulations.
(4) Hazardous wastes are excluded from consideration for beneficial use under these regulations as defined by the Mississippi Hazardous Waste Management Regulations and Subtitle C of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Furthermore, solid wastes or by-products proposed for beneficial use must be nonhazardous in the post-manufactured or generated state without first modifying or treating the by-product to render it nonhazardous.
C. Definitions. The definitions provided herein are for the purposes of these requirements. All other relevant words for which no definition is provided by these requirements are used as defined by the Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations.
(1) “Application” means a written request to the Department for consideration of a by-product for a Beneficial Use Determination, submitted on forms provided by the Department with appropriate supporting documentation.
(2) “Beneficial Use” means the legitimate use of a solid waste in the manufacture of a product or as a product, for construction, soil amendment or other purposes, where the solid waste replaces a natural or other resource material by its utilization.
(3) “Beneficial Use Determination” means a written determination issued by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality to an applicant after review and approval of an application, to allow the legitimate beneficial use of a solid waste or by-product as a product.
(4) “By-Product” means a solid waste material that is generated as a result of the manufacture of a primary product that, barring any form of alternate or beneficial use of that material, would otherwise be discarded at a landfill or other solid waste disposal facility.
(5) “Department” means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
(6) “Distributor or Supplier” means the person, organization or business engaged in the provision of a by-product to an end user.
(7) “End user” means the person, organization or business that will utilize a by- product in a manner consistent with these regulations and with the conditions of a Beneficial Use Determination issued under these regulations.
(8) “Generator” means the person, organization, business, industry, agency or institution whose daily activities or business results in the production of a by- product.
(9) “Putrescible Waste” means solid wastes, which are capable of being decomposed by micro-organisms with sufficient rapidity to cause nuisances from odors or gases.
(10) "Solid waste" means any garbage, or refuse, sludge from a wastewater treatment plant, water supply treatment plant, or air pollution control facility and other discarded material, including solid, liquid, semi-solid, or contained gaseous material resulting from industrial, commercial, mining, and agricultural operations, and from community activities, but does not include solid or dissolved materials in domestic sewage, or solid or dissolved materials in irrigation return flows or industrial discharges that are point sources subject to permit under 33 U.S.C. 1342, or source, special nuclear, or by-product material as defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (68 Stat. 923).
(11) “Standing Use Determination” means a Beneficial Use Determination approved by the Department for a specific by-product/use combination or for a category of by-product/use combinations that are contained or conducted in such a manner that does not offer potential for adverse environmental or public health impacts. Uses with standing determinations do not require a use specific application nor review and approval by the Department under these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq., 49-17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 9.2 Procedures for Beneficial Use Determinations
A. Eligibility Requirements
(1) Solid wastes or by-products may be eligible for consideration for a Beneficial Use Determination from the Department where such materials meet the following requirements:
(a) The material, proposed for beneficial use, must be a “by-product” as defined in Rule 9.1(C) of these regulations.
(b) The solid waste or by-product proposed for beneficial use must be adequately characterized to confirm that the proposed use is adequately protective of the environment and human health and that the by-product possesses physical and/or chemical properties which make the material suitable for the intended use.
(c) The solid waste or by-product, proposed for beneficial use, must not be a putrescible waste as defined in Rule 9.1(C) or have other similar characteristics for potential nuisance.
(2) The proposed beneficial use must conform to the following use specific standards to be eligible for consideration for a Beneficial Use Determination from the Department.
(a) Unless otherwise approved by the Department, a proposed beneficial use must employ a by-product in such manner that the by-product serves as a suitable replacement for a raw material or other feedstock and, through its use, provides a benefit comparable to the material it is proposed to replace.
(b) The beneficial use must not solely serve the purpose of discarding or disposing of the material, as determined by the Department.
(c) A proposed beneficial use of a by-product must have a demonstrated use and/or market. For unproven uses, a demonstration project or effort may be considered and approved by the Department to verify the legitimacy of the intended beneficial use. Applications that propose speculative accumulation of a by-product for unproven uses or for uses with no currently available market or end use shall not be approved by the Department.
B. Application Procedures
(1) An application for a Beneficial Use Determination must be submitted to the Department for review and consideration, on forms provided by the Department,
prior to implementation of the intended use for any intended beneficial use of an eligible by-product, except for Category I determined uses described in Rule 9.3(A) of these Regulations.
(2) An application for a Beneficial Use Determination may be submitted to the Department by the generator, distributor or supplier, or end user of a by-product, as appropriate. Applications submitted by persons other than the generator must be accompanied by written consent for the proposed use from the generator or other owner of the material.
(3) Upon the review and conclusion that an application is consistent with these regulations, the Department shall issue a Beneficial Use Determination to the applicant. At such time, one or more of the following conditions shall apply:
(a) By-products approved for beneficial use shall be considered a solid waste and subject to the transportation and storage conditions of Rule 1.5 of the Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations until the moment that the by-product is utilized and/or packaged for use as stipulated in the Beneficial Use Determination.
(b) Upon utilization of the material, a by-product for which a Beneficial Use Determination has been issued shall no longer be subject to the Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations, provided the by-product is utilized in a manner consistent with the terms and conditions of the Beneficial Use Determination.
(c) The placement, dumping or other use of a by-product in a manner inconsistent with the Beneficial Use Determination may be considered as unauthorized dumping under the Mississippi Solid Waste Law and the responsible party may be subject to enforcement actions by the Department.
(d) Beneficial Use Determinations issued by the Department are only valid for uses conducted within the state of Mississippi.
(e) The issuance of a Beneficial Use Determination does not exempt the generator, supplier, end user and/or the registrant from compliance with applicable water quality and air quality regulations when managing or beneficially using a by-product under these regulations.
(f) Should the beneficial use of a by-product result in conditions that create environmental or public health problems, the generator, distributor or supplier, or end user of the material may share responsibility for needed corrective actions.
(4) For applications that are found to be inconsistent with these regulations by the Department, the following conditions shall apply:
(a) The Department shall notify the applicant in writing of the denial; and
(b) By-products for which a Beneficial Use Determination is denied by the Department are considered solid wastes and shall remain subject to the Mississippi Nonhazardous Solid Waste Management Regulations.
(5) A Beneficial Use Determination issued by the Department should not be considered to be an endorsement of the approved use or an endorsement of that by-product and should not be construed as such. Nor should such a determination be considered protection from liability and responsibility created under other applicable laws and regulations. The Department reserves the authority to modify, terminate or rescind any Beneficial Use Determination authorized under these regulations for just cause.
(6) Applicants may appeal the denial or the conditions of a Beneficial Use Determination to the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality within thirty (30) days of notification of the action. Such appeal shall be made in a manner consistent with Section 49-17-29 (4.b) of the Mississippi Code, Annotated.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq., 49-17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 9.3 Beneficial Use Categories
A. Category I uses are uses that have a Standing Use Determination that has been approved by the Department. Category I uses must fulfill the following conditions:
(1) Category I uses must be consistent with one of the following Standing Use Determinations approved by the Department:
(a) Uses of uncontaminated and untreated wood, wood chips, bark, or sawdust where such materials are used as mulch, landscaping, animal bedding, wood fuel production, bulking agents or additives at a permitted composting facility, or other directly comparable uses.
(b) Rubbish that is legitimately used, reused, recycled or reclaimed, except for rubbish wastes which is composted or which, due to its chemical or physical constituency, would result in an endangerment to the
environment or the public health, safety, or welfare.
(c) Uses consistent with and approved under the conditions of the Mississippi Waste Tire Management Regulations as they pertain to the beneficial use of waste tires or waste tire derived materials;
(d) Contained uses in a regulated environmental system that the Department regulates through an existing permit, order, or regulation. Such uses may include stabilization or solidification of a solid waste for ultimate disposal in a municipal solid waste landfill, alternate cover uses in a municipal solid waste landfill or other type disposal facility, construction uses within a lined landfill cell and other similar uses as determined by the Department;
(e) Uses in which a by-product is utilized as a contained and/or encapsulated additive in the manufacture of a product; or
(f) Other uses which have been sufficiently demonstrated by the owner, distributor or supplier or user and subsequently approved by the Department for a Standing Use Determination.
(2) The by-product must satisfy Rule 9.2(A) of these regulations regarding eligibility requirements.
(3) For Category I uses, the generator/distributor shall be exempt from the requirements of Rules 9.2(B) and 9.4 of these regulations.
B. Category II uses are uses in which the by-product is utilized in engineered construction or other civil engineering uses. Category II determined uses must fulfill the following conditions:
(1) The by-product must satisfy Rule 9.2(A) of these regulations regarding eligibility requirements.
(2) An applicant must comply with Rule 9.2(B) of these regulations for the Department’s consideration of a proposed beneficial use.
(3) By-Product Characterization - A by-product must be adequately characterized to ensure that the use of the material does not cause environmental or public health problems. At a minimum, the characterization must include a demonstration of the following:
(a) The applicant must conduct an appropriate analysis of the by-product that identifies the primary chemical constituents and demonstrates the physical characteristics of the material and must submit that analytical data with the application for beneficial use.
(b) The by-product should not contain constituents that exceed the Beneficial Use Characteristic Standard of Table A in Appendix 1 for the following metals: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury, Selenium and Silver. Where a constituent(s) in the by-product exceeds a Table A standard, the constituent(s) should be analyzed by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) to confirm that the material does not exceed the leachability standards of Table B in Appendix 1. The Department may consider the use of an alternate leaching test, upon the written request and demonstration by the applicant that the alternate test provides a comparable and appropriate analysis for the use proposed.
(c) The Department may establish additional constituent standards for a by- product or may require that the applicant conduct an appropriate risk assessment of the by-product, depending upon the process generating the by-product. In such cases, the additional constituents must be analyzed and reported to the Department.
(d) Where a by-product does not meet an established beneficial use standard as described in Rules 9.3(B)(3)(b) and (B)(3)(c), the applicant may propose an alternate demonstration to the Department of the suitability of the by-product, based on an appropriate contaminant risk assessment of the material.
(4) The registrant of the by-product must have the certification of a professional engineer licensed in the State of Mississippi that the by-product has physical or chemical properties suitable for the proposed construction or civil engineering use. Where ASTM standards or other recognized standards exist relating to the proposed use, the by-product must comply with those standards.
(5) Where appropriate, the Department may adopt written best management practices for more common construction or civil engineering uses of by-products in the state. Upon the development of such best management practices, the registrant must provide a written copy to the end user or users at the point of sale or distribution of the by-product.
C. Category III determined uses are uses in which the by-product is utilized as a soil amendment, soil amendment additive, or direct application to the land. Category III determined uses must fulfill the following conditions:
(1) The by-product must satisfy Rule 9.2(A) of these regulations regarding eligibility requirements.
(2) An applicant must comply with Rule 9.2(B) of these regulations for the Department’s consideration of a proposed beneficial use.
(3) By-Product Characterization – A by-product must be adequately characterized to ensure that the proposed use of the material does not cause environmental or public health problems. At a minimum, the characterization must include a demonstration of the following:
(a) The applicant must conduct an appropriate analysis of the by-product that identifies the primary chemical constituents and demonstrates the physical characteristics of the material and must submit that analytical data with the application for beneficial use.
(b) The by-product should not contain constituents that exceed the Beneficial Use Characteristic Standard of Table A in Appendix 1 for the following metals: Arsenic, Barium, Cadmium, Chromium, Lead, Mercury, Selenium and Silver. Where a constituent(s) in the by-product exceeds a Table A standard, the constituent(s) should be analyzed by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) to confirm that the material does not exceed the leachability standards of Table B in Appendix 1. The Department may consider the use of an alternate leaching test, upon the written request and demonstration by the applicant that the alternate test provides a comparable and appropriate analysis for the use proposed.
(c) The pollutant concentrations of a by-product proposed for Category III determined uses should not exceed the secondary soil amendment constituent standards in Appendix 2.
(d) The Department may establish additional constituent standards for a by- product or may require that the applicant conduct an appropriate risk assessment of the by-product, depending upon the process generating the by-product. In such cases, the additional constituents must be analyzed and reported to the Department.
(e) Where a by-product does not meet an established beneficial use standard as described in Rules 9.3(C)(3)(b) and (c) , the applicant may propose an alternate demonstration to the Department of the suitability of the by- product, based on an appropriate contaminant risk assessment of the material.
(4) A supplier or distributor must advise end users of the by-product in writing of the acceptable agronomic rate of application and agronomic practices for use of the by-product. Where appropriate, the Department may adopt written best management practices for more common soil amendment uses of by-products in the state. Upon the development of such best management practices, the registrant must provide a written copy to the end user or users at the point of sale or distribution of the by-product.
(5) Prior to a Category III use of the by-product, the applicant must apply for and obtain proper certification from the Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce (MDAC) for the use of the proposed material as a soil amendment, where applicable.
D. Category IV determined uses are all other miscellaneous uses that do not fall into one of the preceding categories. Such uses must fulfill the following conditions:
(1) The by-product must satisfy Rule 9.2(A) of these regulations regarding eligibility requirements.
(2) An applicant must comply with Rule 9.2(B) of these regulations for the Department’s consideration of a proposed beneficial use.
(3) Based upon the conditions of the proposed use, the Department may require that the applicant comply with part or all of the conditions in Rules 9.3(B) or (C) of these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq., 49-17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 9.4 Reporting Requirements
Beneficial Use Determinations issued under Rules 9.3(B), (C) and (D) of these regulations are subject to annual reporting requirements, unless otherwise determined by the Department. Such reporting requirements are as follows:
A. The registrant to whom a beneficial use determination was issued shall be required to submit an annual report to the Department, unless otherwise stated. All annual reports shall be submitted to the Department no later than February 28 of each year, for activity conducted during the previous calendar year. At a minimum, the report must contain the following information:
(1) The approximate quantity of the by-product used and/or distributed for use during the previous calendar year for the approved use(s);
(2) An appropriate physical and chemical characterization of the approved by- product. If the process generating the by-product has not changed, a signed certification from the generator or other party approved by the Department stating that the physical and chemical characteristics of the by-product are consistent with the information submitted in the approved application may be submitted in lieu of additional testing;
(3) Any other information specified as a reporting condition of the Beneficial Use Determination; and
(4) Registrants that have been issued multiple Beneficial Use Determinations for a by-product may submit one composite report for the information described in Rule 9.4(A). The composite report must distinguish the information for each determined use.
B. In addition to the requirements of Rule 9.4(A), Registrants issued a Beneficial Use Determination under Rule 9.3(C) of these regulations shall also submit a copy of the original the renewed product certification, where applicable, from the Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce (MDAC). The copy of the original or renewed product certification shall be submitted within 21 days of receipt of the certificate from the MDAC.
Beneficial Use Characteristic Standards
Appendix 1
Table A.
Total Metals Thresholds
Contaminant Regulatory Level (mg/kg) Arsenic 10.0 Barium 200.0 Cadmium 2.0 Chromium 10.0 Lead 10.0 Mercury 0.4 Selenium 2.0 Silver 10.0
Table B.
Leaching Procedure Thresholds
Contaminant Regulatory Level (mg/L) Arsenic 0.5 Barium 10.0 Cadmium 0.1 Chromium 0.5
Lead 0.5 Mercury 0.02 Selenium 0.1 Silver 0.5
Appendix 2
Secondary Soil Amendment Thresholds*
Pollutant Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg) Arsenic 41 Cadmium 39 Copper 1500 Lead 300 Mercury 17 Molybdenum 18 Nickel 420 Selenium 36 Zinc 2800
- Table 3, 40 CFR Part 503.13
Part 4, Chapter 10: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Recycling Cooperative Grant Regulations
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49- 2-1, et seq., 49-17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 10.1 Eligibility and Allocation of Funds
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 10.2 Grant Application Content and Procedures
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 10.3 Disapproval of Grant Applications
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 10.4 Conditions of Grant Award
Appendix ____________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 10.1 Eligibility and Allocation of Funds
A. In accordance with Mississippi Code Annotated Section 17-17-63, ten percent (10%) of the amount of funds available in the Mississippi Nonhazardous Corrective Action Trust Fund shall be set aside in the Recycling Cooperative Grant Fund on July 1 of each State Fiscal Year. The funds will be used by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality (Commission) to provide grants to regional recycling cooperative organizations formed by counties, municipalities, regional solid waste management authorities, or other multi-county/city entities for the purpose of jointly participating in the collection, processing and marketing of recyclables. Such grants for purposes of these regulations shall be herein referred to as “recycling cooperative grants.”
B. Any funds remaining in the Recycling Cooperative Grant Fund at the end of the State Fiscal Year that have not been awarded shall be deposited back into the Recycling Cooperative Grant Fund for award in the next fiscal year, unless the Recycling Cooperative Grant Fund has expired as described in Miss. Code Ann. Section 17-17-63.
C. Recycling cooperative grant awards shall only be made to cooperative organizations formed by local government entities to conduct recycling efforts in conjunction with achieving the state waste reduction goal of 25%. Recycling cooperative grants shall not be awarded for activities or appurtenances associated with the management of materials or wastes where that activity is not considered recycling as defined in Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-31-9 (i).
D. No recycling cooperative grant shall be awarded for a program or activity that is inconsistent with the approved solid waste management plan of the local government jurisdiction(s).
E. Recycling cooperative grants may be used to defray the following recycling program costs:
(1) Designing and developing a local or regional community recycling system;
(2) Construction of structures or appurtenances associated with an approved local community recycling system;
(3) Transportation activities or equipment associated with the collection and/or transport of recyclable materials to processors or markets;
(4) Processing activities or equipment associated with an approved local community recycling system;
(5) Integral personnel costs for the implementation of a local community recycling system;
(6) Grant Administrative costs (not to exceed 3% of the total budget);
(7) Public information and outreach costs; and
(8) Other miscellaneous costs deemed integral and appropriate for the success of the recycling program as approved by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. 49- 17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 10.2 Application Content and Procedures
In order to receive consideration for a grant award from the Commission, recycling cooperative organizations or a lead local government of an organization or cooperative effort shall submit an application as per the following procedures:
A. MDEQ will provide notice annually of the availability of the recycling cooperative grants including the anticipated amount of funds available and a deadline by which grant proposals must be submitted. All applications received by the advertised deadline date will be evaluated for consistency with these regulations, subject to the availability of funds.
B. Grant applications shall be submitted on an application form provided by the MDEQ and shall include a detailed narrative description of the scope of work and a detailed itemized budget for the cooperative recycling project. The itemized budget shall indicate the overall total costs of conducting the project and the amount of grant funds proposed to be applied towards the total cost of the recycling system.
C. Grant applicants that propose to utilize contractual assistance in the design or construction of the recycling system or any unit or component of the system, shall
include the name, the contact information, and the primary person(s) of contact for the contractor selected by the applicant and the reasons for the selection of the contractor. If a contractor has not been selected at the time of filing the application, the applicant shall describe the process to be used to select the contractor.
D. Grant applications that propose construction of new facilities or structures shall provide documentation of completion of the intergovernmental review process as described in the Appendix to this rule. This documentation shall include copies of comments received during the intergovernmental review process. If the process is not complete at the time of filing the application, the applicant shall provide information on the status of the intergovernmental review process and shall describe the applicant’s proposed actions to complete the review process.
E. Unless specifically approved by the Commission, an award to an applicant shall be limited to the total amount of available grant funds advertised by the MDEQ.
F. Applications shall be evaluated and ranked with preference for approval based on the following factors:
(1) The proposed recycling cooperative project will result in multiple new local recycling programs being created or in substantial enhancements to existing local recycling programs for the jurisdictional area of the applicant organization. (20 points).
(2) The level of need of the local recycling cooperative project is deemed to be greater than for other proposed projects. (20 points).
(3) The recycling cooperative project proposal has demonstrated that the proposed recycling programs will be self-sustainable and/or will offer a long term commitment of resources by the member local governments to the project. (20 points).
(4) The proposed recycling cooperative project will be supported or matched by additional funding of member governments of the cooperative organization or by other grant awards to the cooperative organization or to its member local governments. (15 points).
(5) The proposed recycling cooperative project will be supported or matched by the contribution of physical properties, structures or equipment from the cooperative organization or its member governments. (15 points).
(6) The applicant has not been previously funded under this grant category. (10 points).
When funds requested exceed funds available, the ranking factors above may be used to determine which projects are awarded grant funding. However, the Commission, in its
discretion, may also apportion available funding to applicants in a fair and equitable manner when the factors above do not yield clear award preferences.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. 49- 17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 10.3 Disapproval of Grant Applications
A. The MDEQ may refuse to approve a grant application for any of the following reasons:
(1) The MDEQ determines that the recycling cooperative project is not consistent with these regulations or with State laws or regulations governing the establishment and management of recycling programs;
(2) The MDEQ determines that the applicant has failed to provide a complete grant application as per Section B of these regulations;
(3) The applicant is in violation of or delinquent on any condition of a previously awarded grant by the MDEQ or other state agency;
(4) The applicant has deliberately falsified information submitted as part of the grant application;
(5) The MDEQ determines that the applicant has proposed expenditures for grant project activities or components that are unnecessary or that exceed the usual and customary costs for such activities or components;
(6) There are insufficient grant funds in the Recycling Cooperative Grant Fund;
(7) The grant application is ranked lower by the MDEQ than other proposals based on the factors described in Rule 10.2(F); and
(8) Other appropriate factors as determined by the Commission on Environmental Quality.
B. Should the MDEQ refuse to approve a grant application, the applicant may request a hearing before the Commission in accordance with Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-17-35.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. 49- 17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 4, R. 10.4 Conditions of Grant Award
A. The grantee shall comply with all applicable procurement and purchasing regulations established pursuant to state law.
B. Grant awards shall be limited to eligible program costs as described in Rule 10.1(E) above. No grant funds shall be utilized for costs not identified in the approved grant application, unless otherwise approved by the MDEQ.
C. The grant funds shall be distributed by reimbursement to the grantee for eligible program costs, upon provision of a complete request-for-payment form to MDEQ with the appropriate supporting documentation. If a grant award includes the contribution of matching funds to the program by the grantee, these grant funds should be expended proportionally to the expenditure of the matching funds provided by the grantee.
D. A summary report shall be prepared and submitted to the MDEQ with each reimbursement request, detailing how the costs were incurred in the project and a summary of the activity conducted during the payment period.
E. At the discretion of the Commission, monies which are unspent after the grant expiration date shall be forfeited back to the Recycling Cooperative Grant Fund, until such time that the Recycling Cooperative grants program has expired. Upon expiration of the Recycling Cooperative Grant Fund, any uncommitted, unspent monies will be forfeited back to the Nonhazardous Corrective Action Trust Fund.
F. The Commission may include program specific conditions, as part of the grant award, that are determined necessary to ensure that any other applicable provisions of state law and regulations are followed.
APPENDIX
Intergovernmental Review Process
- If the applicant proposes new facilities for construction and/or use, the following agencies shall be consulted prior to the formal submittal of a grant application concerning the proposed site location and the existence of any known or possible archaeological/cultural sites, endangered wildlife, wetlands, shellfish/coastal program impacts:
a) Mississippi Department of Archives & History (For archaeological/cultural review); b) Mississippi Natural Heritage Program (For endangered wildlife review); c) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (For wetlands review); d) Mississippi Department of Marine Resources (For shellfish/coastal review - Jackson, Harrison, and Hancock County projects only).
e) Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality – Environmental Permits Division (For environmental permits review). f) Other agencies deemed appropriate due to the nature of the project.
-
Where applicable, a written description of the project plan shall be submitted to the agencies listed in this section with a request for written comments and a determination on any required surveys, permits, or other actions.
-
Documentation of the applicant's request for comments and any comments received in response to such request shall be attached with the grant application, as required in Section B.4 of these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. 49- 17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 17-17-63, 17-17-201, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. 49- 17-1, et seq. and 49-31-1, et seq.
Part 5 Underground Storage Tank Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.2 Legal Authority
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.3 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.4 Immediate Response Action Contractor (IRAC) Application Process
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.5 IRAC Submittal of Documentation Requested by the Department
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.6 IRAC Application Review
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.7 IRAC Performance Standards
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.8 Denial of IRAC Applications
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.9 Removal From the Approved List of IRAC'S
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.10 Environmental Response Action Contractor (ERAC) Application Process
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.11 ERAC Submittal of Documentation Requested by the Department
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.12 ERAC Performance Standards
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.13 Removal from the Approved List of ERAC'S
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.14 Denial of ERAC Applications
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.15 Eligibility for Reimbursement from the Mississippi Groundwater Protection Trust Fund
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.16 Reimbursable Costs
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.17 Funds Disbursement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.18 Third Party Claims
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.19 Denial of Claims
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.20 Enforcement Actions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.21 Property Rights ____________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.1 General Intent
The general intent and effect of the Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act of 1988 (the Act) includes but is not limited to the following:
A. to provide an incentive for owners of underground storage tanks to stay in substantial compliance according to applicable law and to promptly, and in accordance with applicable law, monitor, report, and respond to any release of motor fuel from an underground storage tank system;
B. to provide a fund to reimburse owners who are in substantial compliance with the Act for reasonable and necessary costs incurred to determine the extent of and to clean up contamination resulting from releases of motor fuels from underground storage tanks where those releases pose a threat to the environment or a threat to the public health, safety or welfare;
C. to provide an alternative source of financial responsibility for owners of underground storage tanks (USTs) containing motor fuels; and
D. to provide a fund from which to pay for third party damages caused by releases of motor fuels when a final judgment has been obtained according to the Act.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.2 Legal Authority
A. These regulations are promulgated pursuant to the provisions of the Underground Storage Tank Act of 1988, Miss. Code Ann., Section 49-17-405, which created the Mississippi Groundwater Protection Trust Fund (the Trust Fund).
B. Under the Act, the Executive Director of the Department of Environmental Quality (the Department) has the responsibility of administering the Trust Fund.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.3 Definitions
All definitions found in Miss. Code Ann., Section 49-17-403, are incorporated in these regulations. The following definitions also apply to these regulations:
A. "Environmental Response Action Contractor (ERAC)" means a person who has been approved by the Commission to carry out any response action, including a person retained or hired by such person to provide services relating to a response action.
B. "Immediate Response Action" means a response action which the Department determines must be conducted on an immediate basis.
C. "Immediate Response Action Contractor (IRAC)" is a person who has been approved by the Commission to carry out any immediate response action, including a person retained or hired by such person to provide services relating to a response action.
D. "Response Action" means any activity, including evaluation, planning, design, engineering, geological investigation(s), construction and ancillary services, which is carried out in response to any discharge, release, or threatened release of motor fuels.
E. "Subcontractor" means any individual or company that provides services, personnel, or supplies to an ERAC or IRAC in the course of a response action.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.4 Immediate Response Action Contractor (IRAC) Application Process
A. IRAC's shall be responsible for response actions on an immediate basis which may at a minimum include planning, designing, construction, and services related to any discharge, release, or threatened release of motor fuels. The Department shall determine when a release necessitates an immediate response from an IRAC.
B. To be considered for listing as an IRAC, an applicant must submit a completed application to the Department's Underground Storage Tank Branch. The application must contain at a minimum, the following documentation:
(1) copy of a current certificate of responsibility issued by the State of Mississippi Board of Contractors;
(2) copy of a current certificate of insurance showing coverage of at least one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) under the contractor's general liability insurance;
(3) copy of a current certification from the Department for a full-time (40 hours per week) employee of the company to permanently close UST systems;
(4) copies of certificates of applicable Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) training for all personnel who will be on site during UST related work;
(5) evidence that the applicant has successfully completed at least three (3) jobs within one year prior to application submittal. Such jobs must have involved remediation of soils or water at UST sites;
(6) signed certification affidavit that the applicant can meet and maintain the requirements of Rule 1.5 and 1.6 of these regulations; and
(7) other appropriate documentation as required by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.5 IRAC Submittal of Documentation Requested by the Department
A. To remain on the list of approved IRAC’S, and IRAC must annually submit an updated application. The application must be submitted no later than one year after approval of the IRAC.
B. An IRAC shall notify the Department, in writing, within ten (10) days of changes to information submitted under Rule 1.4.B of these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.6 IRAC Application Review
Applicants meeting the requirements of Rule 1.4 of these regulations must be capable, at a minimum, of performing the following services in a satisfactory manner:
A. excavating, transporting, and properly disposing of soil and/or groundwater contaminated with motor fuels;
B. installing, operating, and maintaining groundwater and product recovery wells;
C. effectively recovering and properly disposing of free phase petroleum hydrocarbons and contaminated groundwater;
D. properly collecting and analyzing soil and groundwater samples;
E. responding to any site within 24 hours after notification to proceed, or within any other time as specified by the Department, and having on hand basic and necessary equipment such as excavators, dump trucks, traffic barricades, containers, sorbents, pumps, skimmer
systems, fire extinguishers, and first aid supplies; and
F. other services deemed necessary by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.7 IRAC Performance Standards
Approved IRAC's must, at a minimum, perform satisfactorily in the following areas:
A. assigning proper supervisory personnel to the work site to ensure efficient and effective site management, use of personnel, and coordination of subcontractors;
B. submitting true and accurate invoices on a form required by the Department to any party contracting for services;
C. paying all subcontractors within a reasonable time or as agreed to between the subcontractor and the IRAC;
D. responding to the work site within 24 hours after notification to proceed, or within any other time as specified by the Department, and with proper equipment including but not limited to equipment listed in Rule 1.6.E;
E. handling all aspects of the immediate response action in an efficient, effective, and workman-like manner;
F. having personnel on site with the appropriate OSHA training; and
G. fulfilling other requirements established by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.8 Denial of IRAC Applications
A. The Commission may deny an IRAC application if the Commission has reason to believe that the applicant cannot satisfy the requirements of Rule 1.6 of these regulations or the performance standards in Rule 1.7 of these regulations.
B. Causes which may result in denial of an IRAC application include any of those listed in Rule 1.9.B of these regulations.
C. The Commission may deny an IRAC application for other good cause.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.9 Removal From The Approved List of IRAC's
A. IRAC's may be removed for cause from the approved list of contractors at any time by the Commission according to the procedures established in Miss. Code Ann., Section 49- 17-427. A contractor who is removed from the approved list of IRAC's shall not be reconsidered for approval for a length of time specified by the Commission.
B. Causes which may result in nonrenewal, removal, and/or penalties include but are not limited to:
(1) fraud and/or lack of integrity;
(2) bankruptcy;
(3) failure to pay subcontractors within a reasonable time or within the time agreed to by the subcontractor and the IRAC;
(4) failure to exercise good safety practices;
(5) failure to maintain the skills and satisfy the requirements on which approval was originally based;
(6) failure to meet any of the performance standards in Rule 1.7 of these regulations; or
(7) other good cause deemed appropriate by the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.10 Environmental Response Action Contractor (ERAC) Application Process
A. ERAC's shall be responsible for the engineering and/or geologic portion of response actions related to any discharge, release, or threatened release of motor fuels. The Department shall determine when a release necessitates a response from an ERAC.
A Registered Professional Engineer (PE) that is listed as an ERAC is limited to the work identified in Miss. Code Ann. Sections 73-13-1, et seq., related to the practice of engineering. A Registered Professional Geologist (PG) that is listed as an ERAC is limited to the work identified in Miss. Code Ann. Sections 73-63-1, et seq., related to the practice of geology. ERACs shall be identified on the approved list maintained by the Department by their professional designation(s) of PE, PG, or PE and PG for dual designations.
B. To be considered for listing as an ERAC, an applicant must submit a completed application to the Department's Underground Storage Tank Branch. The application must contain, at a minimum, the following documentation:
(1) demonstration that the applicant is a Professional Engineer or Registered Professional Geologist or, in the case of a firm or business, employs at least one full time (40 hours per week) Professional Engineer or Registered Professional Geologist licensed to practice in Mississippi;
(2) a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan developed in accordance with the requirements of the Department;
(3) a current certificate of insurance proving that the applicant holds professional liability insurance in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000); and,
(4) evidence of the successful completion of three (3) assessments and the successful implementation of two (2) remediation activities. Such work must have been performed within five (5) years preceding the date of application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.11 ERAC Submittal of Documentation Requested by the Department
A. To remain on the list of approved ERAC's, an ERAC must annually submit an updated application. The updated application must be submitted no later than one year after approval of the ERAC.
B. To remain on the list of approved ERAC's, an ERAC must submit a revised QA/QC Plan as requested by the Department.
C. An ERAC shall notify the Department, in writing, within ten (10) days of any changes to information submitted under Rule 1.10.B of these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.12 ERAC Performance Standards
Approved ERAC's must at a minimum perform satisfactorily, as determined by the Department, in the following areas:
A. having the necessary equipment on site to effectively and efficiently perform the response action;
B. assigning proper supervisory personnel to the work site to ensure efficient and effective site management, use of personnel, and coordination of subcontractors;
C. responding in a timely manner to work sites and having sufficient personnel and/or equipment available to complete projects in an effective and efficient manner;
D. having personnel on site with the appropriate OSHA training;
E. completing a project in a timely manner;
F. submitting true and accurate invoices on a form required by the Department to any party contracting for services;
G. managing the project to reasonably control costs;
H. satisfying just debts incurred through the employment of subcontractors or the purchase of other goods and services necessary to respond to a motor fuel release;
I. following the ERAC's Department-approved QA/QC Plan;
J. following the Department-approved scope of work;
K. ensuring that bid and contract documents are followed, if the Department has requested bids to be submitted on a project;
L. submitting complete and accurate reports; and
M. submitting reports by the date required by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.13 Removal From The Approved List of ERAC's
A. An ERAC or applicant may have its approval revoked or application for renewal denied for a length of time as specified by the Commission for cause according to the procedures established in Miss. Code Ann., Section 49-17-427.
B. Causes which may result in nonrenewal, revocation, and/or penalties include but are not limited to:
(1) fraud or lack of integrity;
(2) failure to submit a revised QA/QC Plan when requested by the Department;
(3) failure to submit an updated application;
(4) failure to maintain the requirements on which approval was originally based;
(5) failure to meet any of the performance standards in Rule 1.12 of these regulations; or
(6) other good cause deemed appropriate by the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.14 Denial of ERAC Applications
A. The Commission may deny an ERAC application if the Commission has reason to believe that the applicant cannot satisfy the performance standards in Rule 1.12 of these regulations.
B. Causes which may result in denial of an ERAC application include any of those listed in Rule 1.13.B of these regulations.
C. The Commission may deny an ERAC application for other good cause.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.15 Eligibility for Reimbursement from The Mississippi Groundwater Protection Trust Fund
To be eligible for reimbursement of costs incurred during any response action the following minimum conditions must be met:
A. the release must have been confirmed and reported to the Department after July 1, 1988;
B. the release must be from an active UST containing motor fuels; and
C. the owner or operator must be in substantial compliance with the underground storage tank law, rules and regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.16 Reimbursable Costs
A. The Trust Fund may be used at eligible sites for costs incurred in conducting site investigations, assessments, and remediation, in replacing potable water supplies, and in
paying third party claims in accordance with Rule 1.18 of these regulations. Owner's and/or operator's reimbursement may be reduced by $100/day for documents submitted after a written deadline date established by the Department.
B. The Trust Fund may be used to reimburse costs at eligible sites for the following activities:
(1) recovery and disposal of released motor fuels;
(2) recovery and disposal of contaminated soils;
(3) installation and operation of monitoring and/or recovery wells;
(4) soil borings, soil, and water sampling, and laboratory analyses;
(5) removal, treatment, and disposal of motor fuel contaminated wastes of any kind;
(6) replacement of contaminated public or private water supplies; and
(7) other costs determined by the Department to be reasonable and necessary for assessment and remediation.
C. Only costs determined by the Department to be fair and reasonable will be reimbursed. The Department may require competitive bidding in order to establish fair and reasonable cost.
D. The Trust Fund may not be used to reimburse costs for the following activities:
(1) repairing, permanently closing, or replacing underground storage tank systems;
(2) lost revenue;
(3) confirmation of a release;
(4) rental of temporary motor fuel storage tanks;
(5) loss of any real or personal property not directly associated with the investigation, assessment, or remediation;
(6) loss of motor fuel;
(7) legal fees; or
(8) other costs determined by the Department not to be reasonable and necessary for
assessment and remediation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.17 Funds Disbursement
Payments from the Trust Fund may be made to underground storage tank owners, and response action contractors, for their eligible costs incurred up to $1,500,000 for investigation, assessment, and/or remediation for each confirmed release, provided the following minimum conditions are met:
A. a representative of the Department has approved any activity and costs prior to the initiation of such activity;
B. the UST tank owner and/or response action contractor has first submitted a certification affidavit on a form furnished by the Department certifying that the costs incurred were necessary, fair, and reasonable; and
C. the UST owner and/or response action contractor has submitted to the Department any other documentation or information concerning the costs incurred which the Department deems necessary to ensure costs are eligible, reasonable, and necessary and to ensure fiscal integrity of the Trust Fund.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.18 Third Party Claims
Payments of up to $1,000,000 per site per release occurrence may be made to any third party who brings a third party claim against any owner of an underground storage tank and the Commission as trustee of the Mississippi Groundwater Protection Trust Fund and who obtains a final judgment in such action which is valid and enforceable in this state against such parties. Payments shall be paid to the third party upon such party's filing an application with the Department attaching the original or a certified copy of the final judgment.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.19 Denial of Claims
The Department may deny any reimbursement request of an eligible party if the costs incurred were unreasonable, unnecessary, or were not incurred in accordance with these regulations, the UST technical regulations, or the procedures developed for managing the Mississippi Groundwater Protection Trust Fund. Any owner of an underground storage tank who is denied reimbursement in whole or in part shall have the right to a hearing before the Commission on
Environmental Quality according to Mississippi Code Ann., Sections 49-17-31 through 49-17- 35.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.20 Enforcement Actions
Hearings may be requested regarding any of these provisions of these rules. A person who violates any provision of these regulations or of state law is subject to any actions and remedies allowed under state law. Enforcement and appeals shall be accordance with the Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act of 1988, 49-17-401, et seq.., and the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law 49-17-1 et seq.
History
- Source: Miss. Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-17-31 through 49-17- 41, 49-2-1, et seq., 49-17-1, et seq. and 17-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 1.21 Property Rights
These regulations do not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, invasion of personal rights or any infringement of federal, state, or local law.
History
- Source: Miss. Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-17-31 through 49-17- 41, 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.1 Program Scope and Interim Prohibition
§280.10 Applicability. §280.11 Installation requirements for partially excluded UST systems. §280.12 Definitions. §280.13 Industry codes and recommended practices.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.2 UST Systems: Design, Construction, Installation and Notification
§280.20 Performance standards for new UST systems. §280.21 Upgrading of existing UST systems. §280.22 Notification requirements.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.3 General Operating Requirements
§280.30 Operation and maintenance of spill and overfill prevention. §280.31 Operation and maintenance of secondary containment. §280.32 Operation and maintenance of corrosion protection. §280.33 Compatibility. §280.34 Repairs and replacements. §280.35 Reporting and recordkeeping. §280.36 Delivery prohibition. §280.37 Operator training.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.4 Leak Detection
§280.40 General requirements for all UST systems. §280.41 Requirements for petroleum UST systems. §280.42 Requirements for hazardous substance UST systems. §280.43 Methods of leak detection for tanks. §280.44 Methods of leak detection for piping. §280.45 Leak detection recordkeeping.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.5 Leak Reporting, Release Reporting, Investigation, and Confirmation
§280.50 Reporting of leaks and suspected releases. §280.51 Investigation due to off-site impacts. §280.52 Release investigation and confirmation steps. §280.53 Reporting and cleanup of spills and overfills.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.6 Release Response and Corrective Action for UST Systems Containing Petroleum or Hazardous Substances
§280.60 General. §280.61 Initial response. §280.62 Initial abatement measures and site check. §280.63 Initial site characterization. §280.64 Free product removal. §280.65 Investigations for soil and ground-water cleanup. §280.66 Corrective action plan. §280.67 Public participation.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.7 Out-of-Service UST Systems and Closure
§280.70 Temporary closure. §280.71 Permanent closure and changes-in-service. §280.72 Assessing the site at closure or change-in-service. §280.73 Applicability to previously closed UST systems. §280.74 Closure records.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.8 Financial Responsibility
§ 280.90 Applicability. § 280.91 Compliance dates. § 280.92 Definition of terms. § 280.93 Amount and scope of required financial responsibility. § 280.94 Allowable mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms. § 280.95 Financial test of self-insurance. § 280.96 Guarantee. § 280.97 Insurance and risk retention group coverage. § 280.98 Surety bond. § 280.99 Letter of credit. § 280.100 Use of state-required mechanism. § 280.101 State fund or other state assurance. § 280.102 Trust fund. § 280.103 Standby trust fund. § 280.104 Local government bond rating test. § 280.105 Local government financial test. § 280.106 Local government guarantee. § 280.107 Local government fund. § 280.108 Substitution of financial assurance mechanisms by owner or operator. § 280.109 Cancellation or nonrenewal by a provider of financial assurance. § 280.110 Reporting by owner or operator. § 280.111 Recordkeeping. § 280.112 Drawing on financial assurance mechanisms.
§ 280.113 Release from the requirements. § 280.114 Bankruptcy or other incapacity of owner or operator or provider of financial assurance. § 280.115 Replenishment of guarantees, letters of credit, or surety bonds. § 280.116 Suspension of enforcement. [Reserved]
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.9 Lender Liability
§280.120 Definitions. §280.121 Participation in management. §280.122 Ownership of an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system or facility or property on which an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system is located. §280. 123 Operating an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.10 UST Systems with Field-Constructed Tanks and Airport Hydrant Fuel Distribution Systems
§280.130 Definitions. §280.131 General requirements. §280.132 Additions, exceptions, and alternatives for UST systems with field-constructed tanks and airport hydrant systems.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.1 Program Scope and Interim Prohibition
§280.10 Applicability. (a) The requirements of this part apply to all owners and operators of an UST system as defined in §280.12 except as otherwise provided in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of this section. Any UST system listed in paragraph (c) of this rule must meet the requirements of §280.11. (1) Previously deferred UST systems. Airport hydrant fuel distribution systems, UST systems with field-constructed tanks, and UST systems installed prior to October 1, 2008 that store fuel solely for use by emergency power generators must meet the requirements of this part as follows: (i) Airport hydrant fuel distribution systems and UST systems with field constructed tanks must meet the requirements in Rule 2.10. (ii) UST systems installed prior to October 1, 2008 that store fuel solely for use by emergency power generators must meet the Rule 2.4 requirements on or before October 5, 2021. (iii) UST systems that store fuel solely for use by emergency power generators installed after October 1, 2008 must meet all applicable requirements of this part at installation. (b) The following UST systems are excluded from the requirements of this part:
(1) Any UST system holding hazardous wastes listed or identified under Subtitle C of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, or a mixture of such hazardous waste and other regulated substances. (2) Any wastewater treatment tank system that is part of a wastewater treatment facility regulated under section 402 or 307(b) of the Clean Water Act. (3) Equipment or machinery that contains regulated substances for operational purposes such as hydraulic lift tanks and electrical equipment tanks. (4) Any UST system whose capacity is 110 gallons or less. (5) Any UST system that contains a de minimis concentration of regulated substances. (6) Any emergency spill or overflow containment UST system that is expeditiously emptied after use. (c) Deferrals. Rules 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.7 do not apply to any of the following types of UST systems: (1) Wastewater treatment tank systems that are not covered under paragraph (b)(2) of this section;
(2) Any UST systems containing radioactive material that are regulated under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 and following); and
(3) Any UST system that is part of an emergency generator system at nuclear power generation facilities regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under 10 CFR part 50.
(4) Aboveground storage tanks associated with: (i) Airport hydrant fuel distribution systems regulated under Rule 2.10; and (ii) UST systems with field-constructed tanks regulated under Rule 2.10; §280.11 Installation requirements for partially excluded UST systems. (a) No person may install an UST system listed in §280.10(c) for the purpose of storing regulated substances unless the UST system (whether of single- or double-wall construction): (b) Will prevent leaks due to corrosion or structural failure for the operational life of the UST system: (1) Is cathodically protected against corrosion, constructed of non-corrodible material, steel clad with a non-corrodible material, or designed in a manner to prevent the leak or threatened leak of any stored substance; and (2) Is constructed of materials that are compatible with the stored substance.
§280.12 Definitions. Aboveground release means any release to the surface of the land or to surface water. This includes, but is not limited to, releases from the above-ground portion of an UST system and above- ground releases associated with overfills and transfer operations as the regulated substance moves to or from an UST system.
Ancillary equipment means any devices including, but not limited to, such devices as piping, fittings, flanges, valves, dispensers, and pumps used to distribute, meter, or control the flow of regulated substances to and from an UST. Belowground release means any release to the subsurface of the land and to groundwater. This includes, but is not limited to, releases from the belowground portions of an underground storage tank system and belowground releases associated with overfills and transfer operations as the regulated substance moves to or from an underground storage tank. Beneath the surface of the ground means beneath the ground surface or otherwise covered with earthen materials. Cathodic protection is a technique to prevent corrosion of a metal surface by making that surface the cathode of an electrochemical cell. For example, a tank system can be cathodically protected through the application of either galvanic anodes or impressed current. Cathodic protection tester means a person who can demonstrate an understanding of the principles and measurements of all common types of cathodic protection systems as applied to buried or submerged metal piping and tank systems. At a minimum, such persons must have education and experience in soil resistivity, stray current, structure-to-soil potential, and component electrical isolation measurements of buried metal piping and tank systems. CERCLA means the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended. Certificate of Operation (Receipt of UST Payment) means a document identifying an underground storage tank facility as being registered with the MDEQ and having paid all of the known tank regulatory fees for the time period indicated on the certificate. The Certificate of Operation will be issued annually upon payment of tank regulatory fees and is valid only for the fiscal year in which it was issued. The Certificate of Operation must be conspicuously displayed at the facility. The Certificate of Operation does not verify that all components of the UST system have been properly registered with the MDEQ as MDEQ is unable to make that determination until the time of an inspection. Compatible means the ability of two or more substances to maintain their respective physical and chemical properties upon contact with one another for the operational life of the tank system under conditions likely to be encountered by the UST system. Connected piping means all underground piping including valves, elbows, joints, flanges, and flexible connectors attached to a tank system through which regulated substances flow. For the
purpose of determining how much piping is connected to any individual UST system, the piping that joins two UST systems should be allocated equally between them. Consumptive use with respect to heating oil means consumed on the premises. Containment sump means a liquid tight, secondary containment device installed underneath a dispenser, at the tank or along a piping system designed to prevent leaks from the dispenser, submersible pump, piping connectors, fittings or other UST system ancillary components from reaching the environment. Containment sumps may be single walled or secondarily contained. Corrosion expert means a person who, by reason of thorough knowledge of the physical sciences and the principles of engineering and mathematics acquired by a professional education and related practical experience, is qualified to engage in the practice of corrosion control on buried or submerged metal piping systems and metal tanks. Such a person must be accredited or certified as being qualified by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers or be a registered professional engineer who has certification or licensing that includes education and experience in corrosion control of buried or submerged metal piping systems and metal tanks. Delivery prohibition means prohibiting the delivery, deposit, or acceptance of product to an underground storage tank that has been determined to be ineligible for such delivery, deposit or acceptance. Delivery prohibition tag means a tag, device, or mechanism on the tank's fill pipe that identifies an underground storage tank as ineligible for product delivery. The tag or device is easily visible to the product supplier and clearly states and conveys that it is unlawful to deliver to, deposit into, or accept product into the ineligible underground storage tank. Dielectric material means a material that does not conduct direct electrical current. Dielectric coatings are used to electrically isolate UST systems from the surrounding soils. Dielectric bushings are used to electrically isolate portions of the UST system (e.g., tank from piping). Dispenser means a device located above ground that meters the amount of regulated substances transferred to a point of use outside of the UST system, such as a motor vehicle. This definition does not include the "hanging hardware" (breakaways, hoses, nozzles) associated with the dispenser. Dispenser system means the dispenser and the equipment necessary to connect the dispenser to the underground storage tank system. Electrical equipment means underground equipment that contains dielectric fluid that is necessary for the operation of equipment such as transformers and buried electrical cable. Excavation zone means the volume containing the tank system and backfill material bounded by the ground surface, walls, and floor of the pit and trenches into which the UST system is placed at the time of installation. Existing tank system means a tank system used to contain an accumulation of regulated substances or for which installation has commenced on or before December 22, 1988. For purposes of determining whether or not secondary containment is required, an existing tank
system means a tank system used to contain an accumulation of regulated substances for which installation has commenced before October 1, 2008. Installation is considered to have commenced if: (a) The owner or operator has obtained all federal, state, and local approvals or permits necessary to begin physical construction of the site or installation of the tank system; and if,
(1) Either a continuous on-site physical construction or installation program has begun; or (2) The owner or operator has entered into contractual obligations—which cannot be cancelled or modified without substantial loss—for physical construction at the site or installation of the tank system to be completed within a reasonable time. Expeditiously emptied means that any accumulation of regulated substances in a UST is removed within 24 hours or another time frame determined by the MDEQ to be reasonable. Farm tank is a tank located on a tract of land devoted to the production of crops or raising animals, including fish, and associated residences and improvements. A farm tank must be located on the farm property. "Farm" includes fish hatcheries, rangeland and nurseries with growing operations. Flow-through process tank is a tank that forms an integral part of a production process through which there is a steady, variable, recurring, or intermittent flow of materials during the operation of the process. Flow-through process tanks do not include tanks used for the storage of materials prior to their introduction into the production process or for the storage of finished products or by- products from the production process. Free product refers to a regulated substance that is present as a non-aqueous phase liquid (e.g., liquid not dissolved in water.) Gathering lines means any pipeline, equipment, facility, or building used in the transportation of oil or gas during oil or gas production or gathering operations. Guidelines for the Permanent Closure of Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Systems means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality document containing the established procedures for conducting permanent closure of petroleum underground storage tank systems Hazardous substance UST system means an underground storage tank system that contains a hazardous substance defined in section 101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (but not including any substance regulated as a hazardous waste under subtitle C) or any mixture of such substances and petroleum, and which is not a petroleum UST system. Heating oil means petroleum that is No. 1, No. 2, No. 4—light, No. 4—heavy, No. 5—light, No. 5—heavy, and No. 6 technical grades of fuel oil; other residual fuel oils (including Navy Special Fuel Oil and Bunker C); and other fuels when used as substitutes for one of these fuel oils. Heating oil is typically used in the operation of heating equipment, boilers, or furnaces.
Hydraulic lift tank means a tank holding hydraulic fluid for a closed-loop mechanical system that uses compressed air or hydraulic fluid to operate lifts, elevators, and other similar devices. Interstitial monitoring means a method of monitoring the interstitial space of a secondarily contained UST system for a leak of regulated substances or ingress of external fluids (groundwater or other fluids not intended as monitoring fluids).
Interstitial space means the opening formed between the primary (inner) and secondary (outer) wall of a UST system with double-walled construction or the opening formed between the wall of a containment sump and the UST system component that it contains. Leak means any spilling, leaking, emitting, discharging, escaping, leaching or disposing from an UST system or resulting from the operation of the UST system. A leak may or may not result in a release to the environment. A leak from a single-walled UST system will normally result in a release to the environment. A leak from the primary containment of a secondarily contained UST system may or may not result in a release to the environment depending upon the integrity of the secondary containment. Leak detection means determining if a leak of a regulated substance has occurred from the UST system. Life safety/critical function UST means any one or combination of tanks (including underground pipes connected thereto) that is used to contain an accumulation of regulated substances, and the volume of which (including the volume of underground pipes connected thereto) is 10 percent or more beneath the surface of the ground and is used to maintain operation of critical function equipment for the preservation of human life. Liquid trap means sumps, well cellars, and other traps used in association with oil and gas production, gathering, and extraction operations (including gas production plants), for the purpose of collecting oil, water, and other liquids. These liquid traps may temporarily collect liquids for subsequent disposition or reinjection into a production or pipeline stream, or may collect and separate liquids from a gas stream. MDEQ means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality. Maintenance means the normal operational upkeep to prevent an underground storage tank system from leaking or releasing product. Motor fuel means petroleum, petroleum-based substances, biofuels or any petroleum/biofuel blend that is typically used in the operation of a motor engine. This definition includes all biofuels, including 100% biodiesel or ethanol. New tank system means a tank system that will be used to contain an accumulation of regulated substances and for which installation has commenced after December 22, 1988. (See also "Existing Tank System.") This term applies to underground tanks, piping, dispensers, and submersible pumps. a) Underground tank - A new tank is one that is installed where there previously was no tank. The
tank may be one that has never been used before or may be one that has been previously used but recertified by the manufacturer. b) Pipe - A new pipe is one that is installed where there previously was no pipe. It may be an entirely new piping run from the tank to the dispensers or it may be a new section of pipe added to an existing pipe. The new piping cannot have been previously used. c) Dispensers - A new dispenser is one that is installed where there previously was no dispenser. The dispenser may be one that has never been used before or may be one that has been previously used.
d) Submersible pump - A new submersible pump is one that is installed where there previously was no submersible pump. The submersible pump may be one that has never been used before or may be one that has been previously used. Noncommercial purposes with respect to motor fuel means not for resale. On the premises where stored with respect to heating oil means UST systems located on the same property where the stored heating oil is used. Operational life refers to the period beginning when installation of the tank system has commenced until the time the tank system is properly closed under Rule 2.7. Operator means any person in control of, or having responsibility for, the daily operation of the UST system. Overfill release is a release that occurs when a tank is filled beyond its capacity, resulting in a discharge of the regulated substance to the environment. Owner means: (a) In the case of an UST system in use on November 8, 1984, or brought into use after that date, any person who owns an UST system used for storage, use, or dispensing of regulated substances; and (b) In the case of any UST system in use before November 8, 1984, but no longer in use on that date, any person who owned such UST immediately before the discontinuation of its use. Person means an individual, trust, firm, joint stock company, federal agency, corporation, state, municipality, commission, political subdivision of a state, or any interstate body. "Person" also includes a consortium, a joint venture, a commercial entity, and the United States Government. Petroleum UST system means an underground storage tank system that contains petroleum, biofuel, or a mixture of petroleum with de minimis quantities of other regulated substances. Such systems include those containing motor fuels, jet fuels, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, petroleum solvents, and used oils. Pipe or Piping means a hollow cylinder or tubular conduit that is constructed of non-earthen materials that routinely contains and conveys regulated substances from the underground storage tank
to the dispenser or other end-use equipment. Such piping includes any elbows, couplings, unions, valves, or other in-line fixtures that routinely contain and convey regulated substances. This definition does not include vent, vapor recovery, fill lines or tank risers. Pipeline facilities (including gathering lines) are new and existing pipe rights-of-way and any associated equipment, facilities, or buildings. Register means: (a) In the case of equipment, to submit written notification to MDEQ on a “State of Mississippi Notification of Underground Storage Tank System” form for any installation, replacement, change in operational status of an underground storage tank, pipe, dispenser or submersible pump; and (b) In the case of ownership/operation, to submit written notification to MDEQ on a “State of Mississippi Notification of Underground Storage Tank System” form or a “State of Mississippi Underground Storage Tank System Change in Ownership” form when any person becomes the owner/operator of a new or existing underground storage tank system
Regulated substance means: (a) Any substance defined in section 101(14) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980 (but not including any substance regulated as a hazardous waste under subtitle C); (b) Petroleum, including crude oil or any fraction thereof that is liquid at standard conditions of temperature and pressure (60 degrees Fahrenheit and 14.7 pounds per square inch absolute); and (c) Any substance defined as a "motor fuel". The term "regulated substance" includes but is not limited to petroleum and petroleum-based substances comprised of a complex blend of hydrocarbons derived from crude oil though processes of separation, conversion, upgrading, and finishing, such as motor fuels, jet fuels, distillate fuel oils, residual fuel oils, lubricants, petroleum solvents, and used oils. Release means a leak from an UST system or resulting from the operation of the UST system that reaches the environment. Release detection means determining whether a leak of a regulated substance that has occurred from the UST system has reached the environment or a leak has occurred into the interstitial space between the UST system and its secondary barrier or secondary containment around it Repair means to restore to proper operating condition a tank or UST system component that has caused a leak of product from the UST system or has failed to function properly. As it applies to the integrity of underground storage tanks, piping, and other UST system components, repair means any activity intended to restore a UST system to proper operational condition that does not meet the definition of replace.
Replace - This term applies to underground tanks, piping, dispensers, and submersible pumps. Replaced equipment is considered a new UST system or new UST system components and therefore subject to the same requirements of a new UST system. (a) Underground tank - Replace means to remove an existing tank and install another tank in its place. The replacement tank may be one that has never been used or one that has been used but recertified by the manufacturer. (b) Pipe - Replace means to remove an existing pipe and install another pipe in its place. In order to be considered a piping replacement, 50 percent or more of the piping, excluding connectors, needed to transfer the regulated substance from a single tank to the most distant dispenser or end use device must be removed and replaced. Connectors include any flexible connectors, risers or other transitional components such as fittings. The replacement piping must be new from the factory and cannot have been previously used. For tanks with multiple piping runs, this definition applies independently to each piping run. (c) Dispenser - Replace means to remove an existing dispenser and install another dispenser in its place and the equipment used to connect the dispenser to the piping is also replaced. The equipment necessary to connect the dispensers may include check valves, shear valves, risers, flexible connectors or other transitional components that are beneath the dispenser and connect the dispenser to the piping. The replacement dispensers may be new or may have been used before. (d) Submersible pump - Replace means to remove an existing submersible pump and install another submersible pump in its place and the equipment used to connect the submersible pump is also replaced. The equipment needed to connect the submersible pump may include ball valves, check valves, flexible connectors unions, tees, ells or other pipe fittings and transitional components that connect the submersible pump to the piping. The replacement submersible pump may be new or may have been used before. Residential tank is a tank located on property used primarily for dwelling purposes. SARA means the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986. Secondary containment means an impervious layer or barrier (liquid tight) that extends around the primary (inner) tank or pipe that is designed, constructed and installed to contain any leak from any part of the tank or piping that routinely contains regulated substances. Examples of secondarily contained systems include double-walled or jacketed tanks, double-walled or jacketed piping and/or containment sumps that may be installed at the top of the tanks, under dispensers or at piping transitions. Secondary containment must be designed, constructed and installed to: (a) Prevent the release of regulated substances to the environment for the operational life of the secondary containment system; (b) Prevent the ingress of water or other external fluids into the interstitial space for the operational life of the secondary containment system; (c) Allow for monitoring of the interstitial space to detect any leak from the primary tank system and ingress of external fluids;
(d) Be checked for evidence of a leak and ingress of external fluids at least once every 30 days in accordance with §280.43(g) and §280.44(c); and (e) Be compatible with the substances stored and external soil/fluids for the operational life of the secondary containment system. Septic tank is a water-tight covered receptacle designed to receive or process, through liquid separation or biological digestion, the sewage discharged from a building sewer. The effluent from such receptacle is distributed for disposal through the soil and settled solids and scum from the tank are pumped out periodically and hauled to a treatment facility. Storm water or wastewater collection system means piping, pumps, conduits, and any other equipment necessary to collect and transport the flow of surface water run-off resulting from precipitation, or domestic, commercial, or industrial wastewater to and from retention areas or any areas where treatment is designated to occur. The collection of storm water and wastewater does not include treatment except where incidental to conveyance. Submersible pump (also referred to as a "submerged turbine pump") means a device installed within a tank designed to transfer product from the tank to the dispenser in a pressurized piping system. The term submersible pump includes the submersible motor, extractor assembly and the pump head (housing) assembly. Supplier means any person who delivers or deposits motor fuels into an underground storage tank. This term may include oil companies, jobbers, petroleum transportation companies, or other product delivery entities. Surface impoundment is a natural topographic depression, man-made excavation, or diked area formed primarily of earthen materials (although it may be lined with man-made materials) that is not an injection well. Tank is a stationary device designed to contain an accumulation of regulated substances and constructed of non-earthen materials (e.g., concrete, steel, plastic) that provide structural support. Under-dispenser containment or UDC means containment underneath a dispenser system designed to prevent leaks from the dispenser and piping within or above the UDC from reaching soil or groundwater Underground area means an underground room, such as a basement, cellar, shaft or vault, providing enough space for physical inspection of the exterior of the tank situated on or above the surface of the floor. Underground release means any belowground release. Underground storage tank or UST means any one or combination of tanks (including underground pipes connected thereto) that is used to contain an accumulation of regulated substances, and the volume of which (including the volume of underground pipes connected thereto) is 10 percent or more beneath the surface of the ground. This term does not include any: (a) Farm or residential tank of 1,100 gallons or less capacity used for storing motor fuel for
noncommercial purposes;
(b) Tank used for storing heating oil for consumptive use on the premises where stored; (c) Septic tank; (d) Pipeline facility (including gathering lines):
(1) Which is regulated under chapter 61 of Title 49, or
(2) Which is an intrastate pipeline facility regulated under state laws as provided in chapter 601 of Title 49, and which is determined by the Secretary of Transportation to be connected to a pipeline, or to be operated or intended to be capable ofoperating at pipeline pressure or as an integral part of a pipeline; (e) Surface impoundment, pit, pond, or lagoon; (f) Storm water or wastewater collection system; (g) Flow-through process tank; (h) Liquid trap or associated gathering lines directly related to oil or gas production and gathering operations; or (i) Storage tank situated in an underground area (such as a basement, cellar, mine working, drift, shaft, or tunnel) if the storage tank is situated upon or above the surface of the floor. The term "underground storage tank" or "UST" does not include any pipes connected to any tank which is described in paragraphs (a) through (i) of this definition. Upgrade means the addition or retrofit of some systems such as cathodic protection, lining, or spill and overfill controls to improve the ability of an underground storage tank system to prevent the leak of product. UST compliance manager means any person or persons identified by the owner/operator who has primary responsibility for the proper management, operation and maintenance of the tank system at a UST facility. The UST compliance manager is also responsible for the implementation of all applicable MDEQ requirements necessary to achieve and maintain compliance with the UST system including monitoring, testing, reporting and record keeping. A UST compliance manager can also be known as a Class A/B operator. UST operations clerk means any person or persons identified by the owner/operator who has primary responsibility for the initial response to any alarms or other indications of emergencies presented by a spill, leak or release from a UST system. The UST operations clerk is typically on- site at the facility and monitors the dispensing of product. A UST operations clerk can also be known as a Class C operator.
UST system or Tank system means an underground storage tank, connected underground piping, underground ancillary equipment, and containment system, if any. Wastewater treatment tank means a tank that is designed to receive and treat an influent wastewater through physical, chemical, or biological methods. §280.13 Industry codes and recommended practices. The following industry codes and recommended practices may be utilized to comply with the requirements of Rule 2.2, 2.3, 2.4 and 2.7. Other codes and recommended practices may also be utilized provided they have been determined by the MDEQ to be no less protective of human health and the environment than those listed below. API 1007, "Loading and Unloading of MC 306/DOT 406 Cargo Tank Motor Vehicles" API 1604, "Closure of Underground Petroleum Storage Tanks" API 1615, "Installation of Underground Petroleum Storage Systems" API 1621, "Bulk Liquid Stock Control at Retail Outlets" API 1626, "Storing and Handling Ethanol and Gasoline-Ethanol Blends at Distribution Terminals and Service Stations" API 1627, "Storing and Handling of Gasoline-Methanol/Cosolvent Blends at Distribution Terminals and Service Stations" API 1631, "Interior Lining and Periodic Inspection of Underground Storage Tanks" API 1637, "Using the API Color-Symbol System to Mark Equipment and Vehicles for Product Identification at Service Stations and Distribution Terminals" ASTM El430, "Standard Guide for Using Release Detection Devices with Underground Storage Tanks" ASTM El 526, "Standard Practice for Evaluating the Performance of Release Detection Systems for Underground Storage Tank Systems" Fiberglass Tank and Pipe Institute Protocol, “Field Test Protocol for Testing the Annual Space of Installed Underground Fiberglass Double and Triple-Wall Tanks with Dry Annular Space” FPTPIT-95-2, "Remanufacturing of Fiberglass Reinforced Underground Storage Tanks" KWA "Recommended Practice for Inspecting Buried Lined Steel Tanks Using a Video Camera" NACE SP-0169, "Control of External Corrosion Protection on Underground Storage Tank Systems by Cathodic Protection"
NACE RP-0177, "Mitigation of Alternating Current and Lightning Effects on Metallic Structures and Corrosion Control Systems" NACE RP-0178, "Design, Fabrication, and Surface Finish of Metal Tanks and Vessels to be Lined for Chemical Immersion Service" NACE RP-0184, "Repair of Lining Systems" NACE SP-0285, "External Corrosion Control of Underground Storage Tank Systems by Cathodic Protection"
NACE RP-0288, "Inspection of Linings on Steel and Concrete" NACE TM-0101, "Measurement Techniques Related to Criteria for Cathodic Protection of Underground Storage Tank Systems" NACE TM-0497, "Measurement Techniques Related to Criteria for Cathodic Protection on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems" NFPA 30, "Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code" NFPA 30A, "Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages" NFPA 326, "Standard for the Safeguarding of Tanks and Containers for Entry, Cleaning, or Repair" NFPA 385 "Standard for Tank Vehicles for Flammable and Combustible Liquids" PEI RP100, "Recommended Practices for Installation of Underground Liquid Storage Systems" PEI RP500, "Recommended Practices for Inspection and Maintenance of Motor Fuel Dispensing Equipment" PEI RP900, "Recommended Practices for the Inspection and Maintenance of UST Systems" PEI RP1200, “Recommended Practices for the Testing and Verification of Spill, Overfill, Leak Detection and Secondary Containment Equipment at UST Facilities” STI "STI-P3 Specification and Manual for External Corrosion Protection of Underground Steel Storage Tanks" STI F841, "Standard for Dual Wall Underground Steel Storage Tanks" STI F894, "ACT-100 Specification for External Corrosion Protection of FRP Composite Steel Underground Storage Tanks" STI F961, "ACT-100-U Specification for External Corrosion Protection of FRP Composite Steel Underground Storage Tanks"
STI R012, “Recommended Practice for Interstitial Tightness Testing of Existing Underground Double Wall Steel Tanks” STI R892, "Recommended Practice for Corrosion Protection of Underground Piping Networks Associated with Liquid Storage and Dispensing Systems" STI R922, "Specification for Permatank" STI R972, "Recommended Practice for the Addition of Supplemental Anodes for STI-P3® USTs" UL 58, "Steel Underground Tanks for Flammable and Combustible Liquids" UL 79, "Power-Operated Pumps for Petroleum Dispensing Products"
UL 87, "Power-Operated Dispensing Devices for Petroleum Products" UL 971, "Non-Metallic Underground Piping for Flammable Liquids" UL 1316, "Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastic Underground Storage Tanks for Petroleum Products, Alcohols and Alcohol-Gasoline Mixtures" UL 1746, "External Corrosion Protection Systems for Steel Underground Storage Tanks"
History
- Source: Miss. Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.2 UST Systems: Design, Construction, Installation and Notification
§280.20 Performance standards for new UST systems. In order to prevent leaks due to structural failure, corrosion, or spills and overfills for as long as the UST system is used to store regulated substances, all owners and operators of new UST systems must meet the following requirements. (a) Tanks. Each tank must be properly designed and constructed, and any portion underground that routinely contains product must be protected from corrosion, in accordance with a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory as specified below and all new or replacement tanks installed on or after October 1, 2008, must have secondary containment in accordance with §280.20(a)(4): (1) The tank is constructed of fiberglass-reinforced plastic; or
(2) The tank is constructed of steel and cathodically protected in the following manner: (i) The tank is coated with a suitable dielectric material; (ii) Field-installed cathodic protection systems are designed by a corrosion expert;
(iii)Impressed current systems are designed to allow determination of current operating status as required in §280.32(c); (iv) Cathodic protection systems are operated and maintained in accordance with §280.32; and (v) The cathodic protection systems meet the MDEQ “Guidance for the Evaluation of Underground Storage Tank Cathodic Protection Systems” document or similar guidance as approved by MDEQ or (3) The tank is of composite construction (steel clad with fiberglass-reinforced plastic or other polymeric materials); or (4) The tank is of secondary containment construction. Secondarily contained tanks shall comply with the following:
(i) Prevent the release of regulated substances to the environment for the operational life of the tank; (ii) Prevent the ingress of water or other external fluids into the interstitial space for the operational life of the tank; (iii) Allow for monitoring of the interstitial space to detect any leak from the primary tank and ingress of external fluids; (iv) Be checked for evidence of a leak and ingress of external fluids at least once every 30 days in accordance with §280.43(g) and be repaired within 90 days of an observed failure, or another timeframe as approved by MDEQ; and (v) Be compatible with the substances stored and external soil/fluids for the operational life of the tank; or (5) The tank construction and corrosion protection are determined by the MDEQ to be designed to prevent the leak or threatened leak of any stored regulated substance in a manner that is no less protective of human health and the environment than paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this rule.
(b) Piping. Each pipe and ancillary component that routinely contains regulated substances must be properly designed, constructed, and protected from corrosion as specified below and all new or replacement piping installed on or after October 1, 2008, that is not part of a repair must be secondarily contained in accordance with §280.20(b)(4): (1) The piping is constructed of fiberglass-reinforced plastic or other polymeric materials; or (2) The piping is constructed of steel and cathodically protected in the following manner: (i) The piping is coated with a suitable dielectric material;
(ii) Field-installed cathodic protection systems are designed by a corrosion expert; (iii)Impressed current systems are designed to allow determination of current operating status as required in §280.32(c); (iv) Cathodic protection systems are operated and maintained in accordance with §280.32; and (v) The cathodic protection systems meet the MDEQ “Guidance for the Evaluation of Underground Storage Tank Cathodic Protection Systems” document or similar guidance as approved by MDEQ; or (3) The piping is of composite construction (metal with fiberglass-reinforced plastic or other polymeric materials; or (4) The piping is of secondarily contained construction. Secondarily contained piping shall comply with the following: (i) Prevent the release of regulated substances to the environment for the operational life of the piping system; (ii) Prevent the ingress of water or other external fluids into the interstitial space for the operational life of the piping system; (iii)Allow for monitoring of the interstitial space to detect any leak from the primary pipe and ingress of external fluids; (iv) Be checked for evidence of a leak and ingress of external fluids at least once every 30 days in accordance with §280.44(c) and be repaired within 90 days of an observed failure, or another timeframe as approved by MDEQ; and (v) Be compatible with the substances stored and external soil/fluids for the operational life of the piping system; or (5) The piping construction and corrosion protection are determined by the MDEQ to be designed to prevent the leak or threatened leak of any stored regulated substance in a manner that is no less protective of human health and the environment than the requirements in paragraphs (b) (1) through (4) of this section (c) Spill prevention equipment. Except as provided in §280.20(e)(2), to prevent spilling associated with product transfer to the UST system, owners and operators must use spill prevention equipment that will, for the operational life of the spill prevention equipment: (1) Prevent the release of any product to the environment that may leak from the transfer hose/tank connection during the product transfer; and (2) Be compatible with the substances stored and external soil/fluids.
(3) The spill prevention equipment must be checked for evidence of a leak and/or ingress of external fluids at least once every 12 months in accordance with §280.30 and be repaired within 90 days of an observed failure, or another timeframe as approved by MDEQ. (d) Overfill prevention equipment. Except as provided in §280.20(e)(2), and, to prevent overfilling of the tank during product transfer to the UST system, owners and operators must use overfill prevention equipment that is accessible for inspection, compatible with the substances stored and will, for the operational life of the overfill prevention equipment, meet one of the following:
(1) Automatically shut off flow into the tank when the tank is no more than 95 percent full; or (2) Alert the transfer operator when the tank is no more than 90 percent full by restricting the flow into the tank or triggering a high-level alarm; or (3) An alternative method approved by MDEQ prior to installation.
The overfill prevention equipment must be checked for proper operation at least once every 12 months in accordance with §280.30 and be repaired within 90 days of an observed failure, or another timeframe as approved by MDEQ.
Note to paragraph (d): Flow restrictors used in vent lines may not be used to comply with paragraph (d) when overfill prevention is installed or replaced after October 5, 2018.
e) Owners and operators are not required to use the spill and overfill prevention equipment specified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this rule if: (1) Alternative equipment is used that is determined by the MDEQ to be no less protective of human health and the environment than the equipment specified in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this rule; or (2) The UST system is filled by transfers of no more than 25 gallons at one time. (f) Installation. All tanks, piping and ancillary equipment must be properly installed in accordance with one or more of the industry codes and recommended practices listed in §280.13 and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. (g) Certification of installation. All owners and operators must ensure that all tanks, piping and applicable ancillary components are installed by a contractor certified by the MDEQ as a UST installer. Owners and operators must provide certification of compliance with these requirements on the UST notification form in accordance with §280.22. In addition, one or more of the following may also be required in order to demonstrate compliance with paragraph (f) of this rule by providing a certification of compliance on the UST notification form in accordance with §280.22.
(1) The installer has been certified by the manufacturer; or (2) All work listed in the manufacturer's installation checklists have been completed; or
(3) The owner and operator have complied with another method for ensuring compliance with paragraph (f) of this rule that is determined by the MDEQ to be no less protective of human health and the environment. (h) Dispensers. All new or replacement dispensers installed on or after October 1, 2008, must have secondary containment installed that will: (1) Prevent the release of regulated substances to the environment for the operational life of the dispenser secondary containment; (2) Prevent the ingress of water or other external fluids into the interstitial space for the operational life of the dispenser secondary containment; (3) Allow for monitoring of the interstitial space to detect any leak from the dispensers or enclosed components of the piping system and ingress of external fluids;
(4) Be checked for evidence of a leak and ingress of external fluids at least once every 30 days in accordance with §280.45 and be repaired within 90 days of an observed failure, or another timeframe as approved by MDEQ; and (5) Be compatible with the substances stored and external soil/fluids for the operational life of the dispenser secondary containment. (i) Submersible pumps. All new or replacement submersible pumps installed on or after October 1, 2008, must have secondary containment installed that will: (1) Prevent the release of regulated substances to the environment for the operational life of the submersible pump secondary containment; (2) Prevent the ingress of groundwater or other external fluids into the interstitial space for the operational life of the submersible pump secondary containment; (3) Allow for monitoring of the interstitial space to detect any leak from the submersible pump or enclosed components of the piping system and ingress of external fluids; (4) Be checked for evidence of a leak and ingress of external fluids at least once every 30 days in accordance with §280.45 and be repaired within 90 days of an observed failure, or another timeframe as approved by MDEQ; and (5) Be compatible with the substances stored and external soil/fluids for the operational life of the submersible pump secondary containment. (j) Piping shear valves. All pressurized piping must be equipped with shear valves designed to shut-off the flow of product in the event a dispenser cabinet is impacted. All shear valves must be:
(1) Properly installed in accordance with one or more of the industry codes and recommended practices listed in §280.13 and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. (2) Effective October 1, 2009, be tested for functionality (the poppet valve or other shut off mechanism is manually closed to confirm that it will shut off the flow of product) at least once every 12 months and be repaired within 90 days of an observed failure, or another timeframe as approved by MDEQ. (3) Records. A written record documenting the shear valve testing must be maintained (in accordance with §280.35) to demonstrate compliance with this section. These records must provide the results of the last two (2) tests required in this section. §280.21 Upgrading of existing UST systems.
Owners and operators must permanently close (in accordance with Rule 2.7) any UST system that does not meet the new UST system performance standards in §280.20 or has not been upgraded in accordance with paragraph (b) through (d) of this section. This does not apply to previously deferred UST systems described in Rule 2.10 of this part and where an upgrade is determined to be appropriate by MDEQ.
(a) Alternatives allowed. All existing UST systems must comply with one of the following requirements:
(1) New UST system performance standards under §280.20;
(2) The upgrading requirements in paragraphs (b) through (d) of this rule; or (3) Closure requirements under Rule 2.7 of this part, including applicable requirements for corrective action under Rule 2.6. (b) Tank upgrading requirements. Steel tanks must be upgraded to meet one of the following requirements in accordance with any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13: (1) Interior lining. A tank may be upgraded by internal lining if: (i) The lining is installed in accordance with the requirements of §280.34, and (ii) Within 10 years after lining, and every 5 years thereafter, the lined tank is internally inspected and found to be structurally sound with the lining still performing in accordance with original design specifications. (2) Cathodic protection. A tank may be upgraded by cathodic protection if the cathodic protection system meets the requirements of §280.20(a)(2) (ii), (iii), and (iv) and the integrity of the tank is ensured using one of the following methods: (i) The tank is internally inspected and assessed to ensure that the tank is structurally sound and free of corrosion holes prior to installing the cathodic protection system; or
(ii) The tank has been installed for less than 10 years and is monitored monthly for leaks in accordance with §280.43 (d) through (h); or (iii)The tank has been installed for less than 10 years and is assessed for corrosion holes by conducting two (2) tightness tests that meet the requirements of §280.43(c). The first tightness test must be conducted prior to installing the cathodic protection system. The second tightness test must be conducted between three (3) and six (6) months following the first operation of the cathodic protection system; or (iv) The tank is assessed for corrosion holes by a method that is determined by the MDEQ to prevent leaks in a manner that is no less protective of human health and the environment than paragraphs (b)(2) (i) through (iii) of this section. (3) Internal lining combined with cathodic protection. A tank may be upgraded by both internal lining and cathodic protection if: (i) The lining is installed in accordance with the requirements of §280.34; and (ii) The cathodic protection system meets the requirements of §280.20(a)(2)(ii), (iii), and (iv). (c) Piping upgrading requirements. Metal piping that routinely contains regulated substances and is in contact with the soil and/or water (electrolyte) must be cathodically protected in accordance with one or more of the industry codes recommended practices listed in §280.13 and must meet the requirements of §280.20(b)(2)(ii), (iii), and (iv).
(d) Spill and overfill prevention equipment. To prevent spilling and overfilling associated with product transfer to the UST system, all existing UST systems must comply with new UST system spill and overfill prevention equipment requirements specified in §280.20 (c) and (d). §280.22 Notification requirements. (a) Any owner who intends to install a new or replace an existing underground storage tank, pipe, dispenser, or submersible pump on or after October 1, 2008, must, within 30 days of such planned installation, submit a "State of Mississippi Notice of Upcoming Underground Storage Tank System Installation" form. Note: If an unplanned replacement of an existing tank, pipe, dispenser, or submersible pump is necessary due to failure, an accident or for other circumstances the MDEQ deems appropriate, submittal of a "State of Mississippi Notice of Upcoming Underground Storage Tank System Installation" form is not required unless replacement is scheduled to occur more than 90 days after failure or accident. (b) Any owner who brings into use, installs, replaces or changes the operational status of an underground storage tank, pipe, dispenser or submersible pump, after May 8, 1986, must within 30 days of bringing such tank, pipe, dispenser or submersible pump into use or
changing the operational status of, register with MDEQ by submittal of a "State of Mississippi Notification for Underground Storage Tank System" form. Note: Owners and operators of UST systems that were in the ground on or after May 8, 1986, unless taken out of operation on or before January 1, 1974, were required to notify the designated state or local agency in accordance with the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984, Pub. L. 98-616, on a form published by EPA on November 8, 1985, (50 FR 46602) unless notice was given pursuant to section 103(c) of CERCLA. (c) Any person who becomes the owner of an existing underground storage tank system must, within 30 days of becoming the owner, register with MDEQ by submittal of a "State of Mississippi Underground Storage Tank System Change of Ownership" form or a "State of Mississippi Notification for Underground Storage Tank System" form. (d) All owners and operators of UST systems installed on or after December 22, 1988, must certify in the notification form compliance with the following requirements:
(1) Installation of tanks and piping under §280.20(g); (2) Cathodic protection of steel tanks and piping under §280.20 (a) and (b); (3) Financial responsibility under Rule 2.8 of this part; and (4) Leak detection under §§280.41 and 280.42. (e) All owners and operators of UST systems installed on or after December 22, 1988, must ensure that the installer certifies in the notification form that the methods used to install the tanks and piping complies with the requirements in §280.20(f). (f) Beginning October 24, 1988, any person who sells a tank intended to be used as an underground storage tank must notify the purchaser of such tank of the owner's notification obligations under paragraph (b) of this rule. (g) Any owner who changes the content of a UST to a regulated substance containing greater than 10 percent ethanol or greater than 20 percent biodiesel must notify the MDEQ at least 30 days prior to such change.
History
- Source: Miss. Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.3 General Operating Requirements
§280.30 Operation and maintenance of spill and overfill prevention equipment. (a) Owners and operators must ensure that releases due to spilling or overfilling do not occur. The owner and operator must ensure that the volume available in the tank is greater than the volume of product to be transferred to the tank before the transfer is made and that the transfer operation is monitored constantly to prevent overfilling and spilling. Prior to receiving a
delivery, owners and operators must ensure that the spill prevention equipment is free of any fluids or debris and the full volume of the spill containment device is available to contain any spills that may occur during the delivery. After completion of the delivery, owners and operators must ensure that the spill prevention equipment is emptied of any regulated substances that may have accumulated during the delivery operation. (b) The owner and operator must report, investigate, and clean up any spills and overfills in accordance with §280.53. (c) The integrity of all spill prevention equipment must be tested in accordance with the following requirements: (1) Frequency. (i) Spill prevention equipment installed on or after October 1, 2008, must be tested after installation and before the UST system receives any delivery of regulated substances and at least once every 12 months thereafter. (ii) Spill prevention equipment installed before October 1, 2008, must be tested by October 1, 2009, and at least once every 12 months thereafter. (iii)Spill prevention equipment must be tested whenever it is suspected, by visual evidence or other means, that the integrity of the spill prevention equipment may be in question.
(2) Criteria. All spill prevention equipment integrity testing must be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13. Note: In the absence of manufacturer's specifications or an applicable industry code or recommended practice, the inspection may be accomplished by filling the spill containment with water or other suitable liquid and checking to ensure that no more than one-eighth inch of liquid is lost or gained over a one (1) hour period. Alternative test methods may be utilized only if recognized by the MDEQ as no less protective of human health and the environment than those test methods listed above.
(3) Records. A written record documenting the integrity testing of spill containment equipment must be maintained (in accordance with §280.35) to demonstrate compliance with this section. These records must provide the results of the last two (2) tests required in this section. (d) Overfill prevention equipment (including any tight-fill adapters that may be in use) must be inspected and proper operation ensured in accordance with the following requirements: (1) Frequency. (i) Overfill prevention equipment installed on or after October 1, 2008, must be inspected for proper operation at installation and before the UST system receives any delivery of regulated substances and at least once every 12 months thereafter.
(ii) Overfill prevention equipment installed before October 1, 2008, must be inspected for proper operation by October 1, 2009, and at least once every 12 months thereafter. (iii)Overfill prevention equipment must be inspected whenever it is suspected, by visual evidence or other means, that the proper operation of the overfill prevention equipment may be in question. (2) Criteria. At a minimum, the inspection must ensure that the overfill prevention equipment: (i) Is properly installed meeting the performance standards listed in §280.20(d); and
(ii) Is properly functioning in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13. Note: In the absence of manufacturer's specifications or an applicable industry code or recommended practice, the inspection may be accomplished by removal of the equipment from the tank, visual examination and confirmation that the overfill device is installed at the correct height within the tank. (3) Records. A written record documenting the inspection of the overfill prevention equipment must be maintained (in accordance with §280.35) to demonstrate compliance with this section. These records must provide the results of the last two (2) inspections required in this section. §280.31 Operation and maintenance of secondary containment. Owners and operators of UST systems installed on or after October 1, 2008, and all secondarily contained UST systems utilizing interstitial monitoring in accordance with §280.43(g), §280.44(c), or §280.45 must comply with the following requirements in order to ensure that releases due to improper operation and maintenance of secondary containment do not occur: (a) The owner and operator must report and investigate any leak or suspected release in accordance with Rule 2.5. (b) Any regulated substances found within the secondary containment must be removed within 24 hours of discovery or another time frame determined by the MDEQ to be appropriate. (c) All secondary containment must be inspected for proper operation in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) Frequency. (i) Secondary containment equipment must be tested at installation and before the UST system receives any delivery of regulated substances and at least once every 36 months thereafter.
(ii) The integrity of all secondary containment components of a UST that can be observed must be visually inspected at least once every 12 months. (iii)Secondary containment equipment must be integrity tested whenever it is suspected, by visual evidence or other means, that the integrity of the secondary containment equipment may be in question. (iv) On or before October 5, 2019., continuously monitored secondary containment shall be visually inspected at least once every 12 months. Note: If a containment sump is not the lowest point in a piping run, then at least once every 36 months the primary piping and the secondary containment jacket interstitial space shall be integrity tested. (2) Criteria for inspection. At a minimum, the inspection must ensure that the secondary containment: (i) Is maintained free of liquids and debris if the interstice is designed to be dry; (ii) Appears to be liquid tight with no cracks, broken seals or other visual evidence of failure; and (iii) The integrity of the secondary containment must be tested in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13 if there is evidence of failure. The presence of fluids other than the substance stored or the hydrostatic monitoring fluid within the interstice may be sufficient to require testing of the integrity. If the integrity of the secondary containment is in question, testing must be conducted unless it can be shown that the source of the fluid has been determined and the condition has been corrected. (3) Criteria for integrity testing. At a minimum, the integrity of the secondary containment must be tested in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications and by filling the secondary containment with water or other suitable liquid to a level at least four (4) inches above the highest penetration fitting or joint and at least four (4) inches above the existing groundwater elevation and checking to ensure that no more than one-eighth inch of liquid is lost or gained over one (1) hour period. If the secondary containment is not the lowest point in the UST system, an alternate integrity test method must be proposed. Alternative test methods may be utilized only if recognized by the MDEQ as no less protective of human health and the environment than those test methods listed above.
(4) Records. A written record documenting the integrity testing and of the secondary containment must be maintained (in accordance with §280.35) to demonstrate compliance with this section. These records must provide the results of the last two (2) tests required in this section.
§280.32 Operation and maintenance of corrosion protection.
All owners and operators of steel UST systems with corrosion protection must comply with the following requirements to ensure that leaks due to corrosion are prevented for as long as the UST system can be used to store regulated substances: (a) All corrosion protection systems must be operated and maintained to continuously provide corrosion protection to the metal components of that portion of the tank, piping, and ancillary equipment that routinely contain regulated substances and are in contact with the soil and/or water (electrolyte). (b) All UST systems equipped with cathodic protection systems must be inspected for proper operation by a qualified cathodic protection tester in accordance with the following requirements: (1) Frequency. All cathodic protection systems must be tested within 6 months of installation and at least every 3 years thereafter or according to another reasonable time frame established by the MDEQ; and (2) Inspection criteria. The criteria that are used to determine that cathodic protection is adequate as required by this section must be in accordance with the requirements in "Guidelines for the Evaluation of Underground Storage Tank Cathodic Protection Systems" and any applicable industry code or recommended practice listed in §280.13. (c) UST systems with impressed current cathodic protection systems must also be inspected every 60 days to ensure the equipment is running properly. (d) For UST systems using cathodic protection, records of the operation of the cathodic protection must be maintained (in accordance with §280.35) to demonstrate compliance with the performance standards in this section. These records must provide the following: (1) The results of the last six (6) inspections required in paragraph (c) of this rule; and (2) The results of testing from the last two (2) inspections required in paragraph (b) of this rule.
§280.33 Compatibility. (a) Owners and operators must use an UST system made of or lined with materials that are compatible with the substances stored in the UST system and with any soils backfill materials, interstitial monitoring fluids, groundwater or other fluids the tanks system may be exposed to either internally or externally. (b) Owners and operators with UST systems storing a regulated substance containing greater than 10 percent ethanol or greater than 20 percent biodiesel must meet one of the following: (1) Demonstrate compatibility of the UST system (including the tank, piping, containment sumps, pumping equipment, release detection equipment, spill equipment, and overfill
equipment). Owners and operators may demonstrate compatibility of the UST system by using one of the following options: (i) Certification or listing of UST system equipment or components by a nationally recognized, independent testing laboratory for use with the regulated substance stored; or (ii) Equipment or component manufacturer approval. The manufacturer’s approval must be in writing, indicate an affirmative statement of compatibility, specify the range of biofuel blends the equipment or component is compatible with, and be from the equipment or component manufacturer; or (2) Use another option determined by MDEQ to be no less protective of human health and the environment than the options listed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. (c) Owners and operators must maintain records in accordance with §280.35(b) documenting compliance with paragraph (b) of this section for as long as the UST system can be used to store regulated substances. §280.34 Repairs and replacements allowed Owners and operators of UST systems must ensure that repairs will prevent leaks due to structural failure or corrosion as long as the UST system is used to store regulated substances. The repairs must be made within 90 days of an observed failure, or another timeframe as approved by MDEQ and meet the following requirements: (a) Repairs to UST systems must be properly conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13. (b) Repairs to fiberglass-reinforced plastic tanks must be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13. (c) Metal pipe sections and fittings that have leaked product as a result of corrosion or other damage must be replaced. Replaced as it applies to metal pipe sections means that only the section of pipe from joint-to-joint must be replaced when repairing such a pipe system. It is not intended to imply that the entire piping system must be replaced with a secondarily contained pipe system unless more than 50 percent of the individual piping run has to be repaired. Repairs to fiberglass-reinforced plastic piping must be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13. (d) Repaired tanks and piping must be tightness tested in accordance with §280.43(c) and §280.44(b) after such repairs are complete and before the UST system is brought back into service. (e) Repairs to secondary containment areas of tanks and piping used for interstitial monitoring and to containment sumps used for interstitial monitoring of piping must have the secondary containment tested for tightness in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13 after such repairs are complete and before the UST system in brought back into service.
(f) Repaired spill containment equipment and secondary containment that cannot be tightness tested must be tested in accordance with §280.30(c) and §280.31(d) after such repairs are complete and before the UST system is brought back into service. (g) Repaired dispensers, submersible pumps and other ancillary equipment that cannot be tightness tested must be visually inspected for any leaks to ensure integrity after such repairs are complete and before the UST system is brought back into service. (h) If an existing underground storage tank, pipe, dispenser, or submersible pump is replaced, the requirements in §280.20 apply only to the specific underground storage tank, pipe, dispenser, or submersible pump being replaced, not to other underground storage tanks, piping, dispensers or submersible pumps located at the underground storage tank facility. (i) The MDEQ may waive the requirement that secondary containment be installed when a dispensers or submersible pump is replaced because of an accident or for other circumstances the MDEQ deems appropriate. (j) Within 6 months following the repair of any cathodically protected UST system, the cathodic protection system must be tested in accordance with §280.32 (b) and (c) to ensure that it is operating properly. (k) UST system owners and operators must maintain records of each repair and replacement for the remaining operating life of the UST system that demonstrate compliance with the requirements of this rule. §280.35 Reporting and recordkeeping. Owners and operators of UST systems must cooperate fully with inspections, monitoring and testing conducted by the MDEQ, as well as requests for document submission, testing, and monitoring by the owner or operator pursuant to section 9005 of Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended. (a) Reporting. Owners and operators must submit the following information to the MDEQ: (1) Notification for all UST systems (§280.22), which includes registration and certification of installation for new and replacement UST systems (§280.20(g)); (2) Notification for registration when any person assumes ownership of an UST system (§280.22(c)); (3) A notification within 30 days of changing the status of a tank (§280.22(b)); (4) A notification before installation of new tanks, piping, dispensers, and submersible pumps (§280.22(a)); (5) Notification prior to UST systems switching to certain regulated substances listed in §280.22(g);
(6) Reports of all leaks including suspected releases (§280.50), spills and overfills (§280.53), and confirmed releases (§280.61); (7) Corrective actions planned or taken including initial abatement measures (§280.62), initial site characterization (§280.63), free product removal (§280.64), investigation of soil and ground-water cleanup (§280.65), and corrective action plan (§280.66); (8) A notification before permanent closure or change-in-service (§280.71); and (9) Notification of persons trained in accordance with §280.37(d) as UST compliance managers
(b) Recordkeeping. Owners and operators must maintain the following information: (1) Recent compliance with piping shear valve testing requirements (§280.20(j)); (2) Recent compliance with spill prevention testing requirements (§280.30(c)); (3) Recent compliance with overfill prevention inspection requirements (§280.30(d)); (4) Recent compliance with secondary containment inspection and testing requirements (§280.31);
(5) Documentation of operation of corrosion protection equipment (§280.32); (6) Documentation of UST system repairs and replacement (§280.34); (7) Recent compliance with leak detection requirements (§280.45); (8) Results of the site investigation conducted at permanent closure (§280.74); (9) Records documenting the training of all persons trained in accordance with §280.37(d) as UST compliance managers and §280.37(e) as UST operations clerks; (10) Records documenting UST compatibility (§280.33(a)): and (11) Documentation of periodic walkthrough inspections (§ 280.38(c)). (c) Availability and maintenance of records. Owners and operators must keep the records required either: (1) At the UST site and immediately available for inspection by the MDEQ; or (2) At a readily available alternative site and be provided for inspection to the MDEQ upon request.
§280.36 Delivery Prohibition
Effective October 1, 2008, it shall be unlawful for any person to deliver to, deposit into, or accept a regulated substance into an underground storage tank at a facility that has been identified by the MDEQ to be ineligible for such delivery, deposit, or acceptance. (a) Classification as ineligible. (1) The MDEQ shall classify an underground storage tank as ineligible for delivery, deposit, or acceptance of a regulated substance as soon as practicable after it is determined one or more of the following conditions exists: (i) Assessed tank regulatory fees are more than 90 days past due for payment;
(ii) Required spill prevention equipment is not installed; (iii) Required overfill prevention equipment is not installed; (iv) Required leak detection equipment is not installed; (v) Required corrosion protection equipment is not installed; (vi) Required secondary containment is not installed; (vii) Required shear valve is not installed or a shear valve is purposely disabled;
(viii) A leak of regulated substances which presents an eminent threat of release or for which the owner/operator has not initiated repairs or an appropriate response in a timely manner; or
(ix) Other conditions where MDEQ deems equipment has been purposely disabled. (2) The MDEQ may classify an underground storage tank or underground storage tank facility as ineligible for delivery, deposit, or acceptance of a regulated substance if the owner/operator of the tank system has been issued a written warning for any of the following violations and the owner/operator fails to complete corrective action within 60 days of the issuance of the written warning, unless the deadline is extended: (i) Required spill prevention equipment is not properly operated or maintained; (ii) Required overfill prevention equipment is not properly operated or maintained; (iii)Required leak detection equipment is not properly operated or maintained; (iv) Required corrosion protection equipment is not properly operated or maintained; (v) Required secondary containment is not properly operated or maintained; or (vi) Other conditions the MDEQ deems appropriate.
(3) The MDEQ may defer the application of delivery prohibition if it is determined that delivery prohibition is not in the public interest. (b) Notification of ineligibility. (1) The MDEQ will provide owners/operators with a written notice of the determination of ineligibility prior to the prohibition of delivery, deposit, or acceptance of regulated substances into the tank becoming effective. The written notice may be: (i) Personally delivered to the owner/operator or the authorized representative of the owner/operator at the conclusion of the inspection or as soon as practicable thereafter; or (ii) Sent via US mail to the last known address of the owner/operator. (2) The MDEQ may provide further notification to owners/operators of the determination of ineligibility by one or more of the following: (i) Telephone;
(ii) Electronic mail;
(iii)Facsimile;
(iv) Posting a listing of ineligible tanks on the MDEQ website; or
(v) Presence of a delivery prohibition tag on the fill riser of an ineligible tank. (3) The MDEQ will notify suppliers of tanks determined to be ineligible for delivery by posting a list of ineligible tanks on the MDEQ website. Suppliers may also be notified of ineligible tanks by one or more of the following: (i) Telephone;
(ii) Electronic mail;
(iii) Facsimile;
(iv) US mail; or
(v) Presence of a delivery prohibition tag on the fill riser of an ineligible tank. (4) Owners/Operators shall document that they have notified the appropriate product suppliers when the MDEQ has made a determination of product delivery ineligibility for any tank that they own/operate.
(c) Identification of ineligible underground storage tanks. Once a determination of ineligibility has been made, the MDEQ will identify those underground storage tanks by placing them on a list of ineligible tanks on the MDEQ website. The ineligible tanks may also be identified by one or more of the following: (1) Delivery prohibition tags may be placed on the fill riser or other appropriate alternative location of any ineligible tank. It shall be unlawful for anyone to remove, alter, destroy, deface or otherwise tamper with a delivery prohibition tag without valid authorization from the MDEQ; or (2) Withdrawal of the Certificate of Operation. (d) Reclassification of underground storage tanks that have reestablished compliance. The MDEQ shall reclassify any ineligible tank as eligible to receive deliveries as soon as practicable upon receipt of documentation that the conditions that caused the ineligibility have been satisfactorily corrected, the MDEQ will subsequently: (1) If present, remove the delivery prohibition tag from the tank or alternatively provide the owner/operator with the authority to remove the red tag; (2) Remove the name of the facility from the list of ineligible tanks on the MDEQ website; and (3) Provide a letter to the owner/operator stating the tank is eligible to receive product. §280.37 UST compliance manager and UST operations clerk training. To ensure UST systems are managed, operated and maintained in a compliant manner protective of human health and the environment, trained UST compliance managers and UST operations clerks must be identified for every UST facility that is operating. (a) General Requirements. (1) Owners must identify at least one person as the UST compliance manager for each of their UST facilities. (2) Owners must identify at least one person as the UST operations clerk for each of their manned, operating UST facilities. (3) Separate individuals may be identified as a UST compliance manager and a UST operations clerk or the same individual may be identified as both. (4) For manned facilities, at least one UST operations clerk must be present onsite whenever the UST system is operating. Emergency contact information and appropriate emergency response procedures shall be available at the facility. (5) For unmanned facilities, emergency contact information and appropriate emergency response procedures shall be prominently posted at the facility.
(b) UST compliance manager training requirements. The training required for UST compliance managers must provide the instruction necessary to operate and maintain a UST system in compliance with all applicable MDEQ requirements including, but not limited to: (1) Notification; (2) Emergency response and release reporting; (3) Record keeping, testing, and inspections; (4) Temporary and permanent closure; (5) Release detection; (6) Spill and overfill prevention; (7) Corrosion protection; (8) UST system construction and product compatibility; (9) Financial responsibility; and (10) UST operations clerk training. (c) UST operations clerk training requirements. The training required for UST operations clerks must provide the instruction necessary to: (1) Properly respond to emergencies involving the operation of the UST system that pose an immediate danger or threat to the public or to the environment; and (2) Properly respond to alarms caused by spills, leaks or releases from an UST system. (d) Acceptable methods of UST compliance manager training. The training requirements for UST compliance managers may be satisfied by any one of the following: (1) A MDEQ approved program consisting of classroom, on-line, or hands-on training. An evaluation must be conducted after the training to measure and verify that the person has the skills necessary to maintain compliance with the applicable UST rules and regulations. Examples of evaluation include written testing, practical demonstration, or other tools acceptable to MDEQ; or (2) A MDEQ approved examination designed to measure and verify that the person tested has the skills necessary to maintain compliance with the applicable UST rules and regulations; or (3) Training that is determined by MDEQ to be no less protective of human health and the environment as the methods described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
section. (e) Acceptable methods of UST operations clerk training. The training requirements for UST operations clerks may be satisfied by any one of the following: (1) Training conducted by the UST compliance manager that includes, at a minimum, the requirements in §280.37(c). (2) Training that is determined by MDEQ to be no less protective of human health and the environment as the method described in paragraph (1) of this rule. (f) Schedule for training. (1) Owners shall ensure that UST compliance managers and UST operations clerks for each of their UST facilities is trained no later than August 8, 2012. (i)After August 8, 2012, any new UST compliance manager must be trained in accordance with §280.37(d) within 30 days of assuming UST system compliance responsibilities. (2) After August 8, 2012, any new UST operations clerk must be trained in accordance with §280.37(e) before assuming UST clerk responsibility (3) Retraining. If a UST facility is determined by MDEQ to be out of significant operational compliance, the UST compliance manager must be retrained in accordance with §280.37(d) or a new compliance manager designated for that facility.
§280.38 Operation and maintenance walkthrough inspections.
(a) To properly operate and maintain UST systems, not later than October 5, 2021, owners and operators must conduct a walkthrough inspection every 30 days that meet one of the following:
(1) Inspects spill prevention equipment and release detection equipment; or
(i) Spill prevention equipment shall be visually checked for damage. All liquid or debris shall be removed. Fill lines shall be visually inspected with any obstructions removed. Fill caps must be inspected to ensure a tight fit. Double walled spill prevention equipment with interstitial monitoring shall be checked for a leak in the interstitial area. Note: UST systems receiving deliveries at intervals greater than every 30 days may reduce spill prevention equipment inspections to coincide with fuel deliveries.
(ii) Release detection equipment shall be visually checked to ensure the equipment is operating with no alarms or other unusual operating conditions present. All records of release detection testing and alarm reconciliation are reviewed and current.
(2) Inspects UST equipment according to a standard code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory that checks equipment comparable to (a)(1) of this section.
(b) To properly operate and maintain UST systems, not later than October 5, 2021, owners and operators must conduct a walkthrough inspection every 12 months to (1) review annual testing results which can include (i) Spill bucket testing; (ii) Overfill prevention testing; (iii) Shear valve testing; (iv) Release detection equipment testing for tanks and piping; and (v) Containment sump integrity inspecting; and (2) inspect hand held release detection equipment such as tank gauge sticks, vapor meters, oil/water interface probes, or groundwater bailers for operability and serviceability. Vapor meters shall be calibrated annually by a third party.
(c) Owners and operators must maintain records of operation and maintenance walkthrough inspections for one year. Records must include:
(1) A list of each item checked;
(2) Operational condition of each item checked;
(3) Certificate of Verification for third party inspection of vapor meter, if applicable;
(4) Description of actions taken for each item found to be out of compliance with operational requirements; and
(5) Fuel delivery records if spill prevention equipment is checked less frequently than every 30 days due to infrequent deliveries.
History
- Source: Miss. Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.4 Leak Detection
§280.40 General requirements for all UST systems. (a) Owners and operators of new and existing UST systems must provide a method, or combination of methods, of leak detection that: (1) Can detect a leak from any portion of the tank and the connected underground piping and ancillary equipment that routinely contains product; (2) Is installed, calibrated, operated, and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13, including routine maintenance and service checks for operability or running condition;
(3) Beginning on [three years after effective date of rule], is operated and maintained, and electronic and mechanical components are tested for proper operation. The leak detection equipment shall be tested for proper operation in accordance with one of the following: manufacturer’s instructions; a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory; or requirements determined by MDEQ to be no less protective of human health and the environment than the two options listed above. A test of the proper operation must be performed at least every 12 months and, at a minimum, as applicable to the facility, cover the following components and criteria: (i) Automatic tank gauge and other controllers: test alarm; verify system configuration; test battery backup; (ii) Probes and sensors: inspect for proper placement; remove any residual buildup; ensure floats move freely; ensure shaft is not damaged; ensure cables are free of kinks and breaks; test alarm operability and communication with controller; (iii)Automatic line leak detector: test operation to meet criteria in § 280.44(a) by simulating a leak; (iv) Vacuum pumps and pressure gauges: ensure proper communication with sensors and controller; and (v) Hand-held electronic sampling equipment associated with groundwater and vapor monitoring: ensure proper operation: and (4) Meets the performance requirements in §280.43, §280.44, §280.45, or Rule 2.10 with any performance claims and their manner of determination described in writing by the equipment manufacturer or installer. In addition, methods used must be capable of detecting the leak rate or quantity specified for that method in the corresponding section of the rule with a probability of detection of 0.95 and a probability of false alarm of 0.05.
(b) When a leak detection method operated in accordance with the performance standards in §280.43, §280.44, §280.45, or Rule 2.10 indicates a leak may have occurred, owners and operators must notify the MDEQ in accordance with Rule 2.5. (c) Any UST system that can not apply a method of leak detection that complies with the requirements of this rule must complete the closure procedures in rule 2.7. §280.41 Requirements for petroleum UST systems. Owners and operators of petroleum UST systems must provide leak detection for tanks, piping, and ancillary equipment within secondary containment sumps as follows: (a) Tanks. Tanks installed on or after October 1, 2008, must be monitored at least every 30 days for leaks in accordance with §280.43(g). Tanks installed before October 1, 2008, must be
monitored at least every 30 days for leaks using one of the methods listed in §280.43 (d) through (h) except that: (1) UST systems that meet the performance standards in §280.20 or §280.21, and the monthly inventory control requirements in §280.43 (a) or (b), may use tank tightness testing (conducted in accordance with §280.43(c)) at least every 5 years until December 22, 1998, or until 10 years after the tank is installed or upgraded under §280.21(b), whichever is later; (2) Tanks with capacity of 550 gallons or less may use weekly tank gauging (conducted in accordance with §280.43(b)). (b) Piping. Underground piping that routinely contains regulated substances must be monitored for leaks in a manner that meets one of the following requirements: (1) Pressurized piping. Underground piping that conveys regulated substances under pressure must be equipped with an automatic line leak detector conducted in accordance with §280.44(a) except for life safety/critical function UST systems, in which case, an alternative method of leak detection must be approved by MDEQ; and (i) Pressurized piping installed before October 1, 2008, must have an annual line tightness test conducted in accordance with §280.44(b) or have monthly monitoring conducted in accordance with §280.44(c) or §280.44(d). (ii) Pressurized piping installed on or after October 1, 2008, must be monitored at least once every 30 days for leaks in accordance with §280.44(c). (2) Suction piping. Underground piping that conveys regulated substances under suction must: (i) Have a line tightness test conducted at least every 3 years and in accordance with §280.44(b), or use a monthly monitoring method conducted in accordance with §280.44(c) or §280.44(d) if it was installed before October 1, 2008. No release detection is required for suction piping that is designed and constructed to meet the following standards:
(A) The below-grade piping operates at less than atmospheric pressure;
(B) The below-grade piping is sloped so that the contents of the pipe will drain back into the storage tank if the suction is released; (C) Only one check valve is included in each suction line; (D) The check valve is located directly below and as close as practical to the suction pump; and
(E) A method is provided that allows compliance with paragraphs (b)(2)(iii) (B)-(D) of this rule to be readily determined. (ii) Must be monitored at least every 30 days for leaks in accordance with §280.44(c) if it was installed on or after October 1, 2008. (c) Ancillary equipment in secondary containment sumps. Ancillary equipment within secondary containment sumps where the containment sumps were installed on or after October 1, 2008, must be monitored at least every 30 day for leaks or ingress of water in accordance with §280.45. §280.42 Requirements for hazardous substance UST systems. Owners and operators of hazardous substance UST systems must provide leak detection that meets the following requirements: (a) Leak detection at existing UST systems must meet the requirements for petroleum UST systems in §280.41. By December 22, 1998, all existing hazardous substance UST systems must meet the leak detection requirements for new systems in paragraph (b) of this rule. (b) Leak detection at new hazardous substance UST systems must meet the following requirements: (1) Secondary containment systems must be designed, constructed and installed to: (i) Contain regulated substances leaked from the tank system until they are detected and removed; (ii) Prevent the release of regulated substances to the environment at any time during the operational life of the UST system; and (iii)Be checked for evidence of a leak at least every 30 days. Note: The provisions of 40 CFR 265.193, Containment and Detection of Releases, may be used to comply with these requirements. (2) Double-walled tanks must be designed, constructed, and installed to: (i) Contain a leak from any portion of the inner tank within the outer wall; (ii) Detect the failure of the inner wall. (3) External liners (including vaults) must be designed, constructed, and installed to:
(i) Contain 100 percent of the capacity of the largest tank within its boundary;
(ii) Prevent the interference of precipitation or ground-water intrusion with the ability to contain or detect a leak of regulated substances; and
(iii)Surround the tank completely (i.e., it is capable of preventing lateral as well as vertical migration of regulated substances). (4) Underground piping must be equipped with secondary containment that satisfies the requirements of paragraph (b)(1) of this rule. In addition, underground piping that conveys regulated substances under pressure must be equipped with an automatic line leak detector in accordance with §280.44(a). (5) Other methods of leak detection may be used if owners and operators: (i) Demonstrate to the MDEQ that an alternate method can detect a release of the stored substance as effectively as any of the methods allowed in §280.43(b) through (h) can detect a release of petroleum; (ii) Provide information to the MDEQ on effective corrective action technologies, health risks, and chemical and physical properties of the stored substance, and the characteristics of the UST site; and, (iii) Obtain approval from the MDEQ to use the alternate release detection method before the installation and operation of the new UST system. §280.43 Methods of leak detection for tanks. Each method of leak detection for tanks used to meet the requirements of §280.41 must be conducted in accordance with the following: (a) Inventory control. Product inventory control (or another test of equivalent performance) must be conducted monthly to detect a leak of at least 1.0 percent of flow-through plus 130 gallons on a monthly basis in the following manner: (1) Inventory volume measurements for regulated substance inputs, withdrawals, and the amount still remaining in the tank are recorded each operating day; (2) The equipment used is capable of measuring the level of product over the full range of the tank's height to the nearest one-eighth of an inch; (3) The regulated substance inputs are reconciled with delivery receipts by measurement of the tank inventory volume before and after delivery; (4) Deliveries are made through a drop tube that extends to within one foot of the tank bottom;
(5) Product dispensing is metered and recorded within the local standards for meter calibration or an accuracy of 6 cubic inches for every 5 gallons of product withdrawn; and (6) The measurement of any water level in the bottom of the tank is made to the nearest one- eighth of an inch at least once a month.
(b) Manual tank gauging. Manual tank gauging must meet the following requirements: (1) Tank liquid level measurements are taken at the beginning and ending of a period using the appropriate minimum duration of test value in the table below during which no liquid is added to or removed from the tank; (2) Level measurements are based on an average of two consecutive stick readings at both the beginning and ending of the period; (3) The equipment used is capable of measuring the level of product over the full range of the tank's height to the nearest one-eighth of an inch; (4) A leak is suspected and subject to the requirements of Rule 2.5 if the variation between beginning and ending measurements exceeds the weekly or monthly standards in the following table:
Nominal tank capacity Minimum Duration Weekly standard (one test) Monthly standard (average of four tests)
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 550 Rule 550
gallons or less 36 hours 10 gallons 5 gallons. 551-1,000 gallons (when tank diameter is 64 inches)
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 44 Rule 44
hours 9 gallons 551-1,000 gallons (when tank diameter is 48 inches) 58 hours 12 gallons 551-1,000 gallons 36 hours 13 gallons 7 gallons. 1,001-2,000 gallons 36 hours 26 gallons 13 gallons. (5) Only tanks of 550 gallons or less nominal capacity may use this as the sole method of leak detection. Tanks of 551 to 2,000 gallons may use this method in place of manual inventory control in §280.43(a). Tanks of greater than 2,000 gallons nominal capacity may not use this method to meet the requirements of this rule.
(c) Tank tightness testing. Tank tightness testing (or another test of equivalent performance) must be capable of detecting a 0.1 gallon per hour leak rate from any portion of the tank that routinely contains product while accounting for the effects of thermal expansion or contraction of the product, vapor pockets, tank deformation, evaporation or condensation, and the location of the water table. (d) Automatic tank gauging. Equipment for automatic tank gauging that tests for the loss of product must meet the following requirements:
(1) The automatic product level monitor test can detect a 0.2 gallon per hour leak rate from any portion of the tank that routinely contains product. The equipment must be capable of visual or audible alarms and the equipment must be capable of printing the completed 0.2 gallon per hour leak rate test; and
(2) The equipment is inspected for proper operation at least once every 12 months. The inspection must be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's periodic maintenance specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13. (3) The test must be performed with the system operating in one of the following modes: (i) In-tank static testing conducted at least once every 30 days; or (ii) Continuous in-tank leak detection operating on an uninterrupted basis or operating within a process that allows the system to gather incremental measurements to determine the leak status of the tank at least once every 30 days.
(e) Vapor monitoring. Testing or monitoring for vapors within the soil gas of the excavation zone must meet the following requirements: (1) The materials used as backfill are sufficiently porous (e.g., gravel, sand, crushed rock) to readily allow diffusion of vapors from releases into the excavation area; (2) The stored regulated substance, or a tracer compound placed in the tank system, is sufficiently volatile (e.g., gasoline) to result in a vapor level that is detectable by the monitoring devices located in the excavation zone in the event of a release from the tank; (3) The measurement of vapors by the monitoring device is not rendered inoperative by the ground water, rainfall, or soil moisture or other known interferences so that a release could go undetected for more than 30 days; (4) The level of background contamination in the excavation zone will not interfere with the method used to detect releases from the tank; (5) The vapor monitors are designed and operated to detect any significant increase in concentration above background of the regulated substance stored in the tank system, a component or components of that substance, or a tracer compound placed in the tank system; (6) In the UST excavation zone, the site is assessed to ensure compliance with the requirements in paragraphs (e) (1) through (4) of this rule and to establish the number and positioning of monitoring wells that will detect releases within the excavation zone from any portion of the tank that routinely contains product and (7) Monitoring wells are clearly marked and secured to avoid unauthorized access and tampering. (f) Ground-water monitoring. Testing or monitoring for liquids on the ground water must meet the following requirements: (1) The regulated substance stored is immiscible in water and has a specific gravity of less than one; (2) Ground water is never more than 20 feet from the ground surface and the hydraulic conductivity of the soil(s) between the UST system and the monitoring wells or devices is
not less than 0.01 cm/sec (e.g., the soil should consist of gravels, coarse to medium sands, coarse silts or other permeable materials); (3) The slotted portion of the monitoring well casing must be designed to prevent migration of natural soils or filter pack into the well and to allow entry of regulated substance on the water table into the well under both high and low ground-water conditions; (4) Monitoring wells shall be sealed from the ground surface to the top of the filter pack; (5) Monitoring wells or devices intercept the excavation zone or are as close to it as is technically feasible; (6) The continuous monitoring devices or manual methods used can detect the presence of at least one-eighth of an inch of free product on top of the ground water in the monitoring wells; (7) Within and immediately below the UST system excavation zone, the site is assessed to ensure compliance with the requirements in paragraphs (f) (1) through (5) of this rule and to establish the number and positioning of monitoring wells or devices that will detect releases from any portion of the tank that routinely contains product; and (8) Monitoring wells are clearly marked and secured to avoid unauthorized access and tampering. (g) Interstitial monitoring. Monitoring of the space between the inner (primary) and the outer (secondary) tank walls may be used, but only if the system is designed, constructed and installed to meet the following requirements: (1) The sampling or testing method can detect a release from any portion of the tank that routinely contains product; (2) The sampling or testing method can detect ingress of external fluids (groundwater or other fluids not intended as monitoring fluids) into the interstice; (3) Records must be maintained that show the interstice has been checked at least every 30 days for evidence of a leak or ingress of external fluids; (i) If the interstice is monitored continuously, records must document that the electronic device monitoring the interstice is in communication with the control console at least monthly;
(ii) If the interstice is monitored continuously, records must document the alarm history and provide the response action taken, appropriate reporting (if applicable) and reconciliation of each alarm;
(iii)Any electronic device that monitors the interstice must be tested at least once every 12 months for proper function. The functionality test must simulate a leak and be in
accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable industry code or recommended practice listed in §280.13; and (4) Any regulated substance that enters the interstice must be removed within 24 hours of discovery or another time frame determined by the MDEQ to be reasonable. (h) Other methods. Any other type of leak detection method, or combination of methods, can be used if: (1) It can detect a 0.2 gallon per hour leak rate or a release of 150 gallons within a month with a probability of detection of 0.95 and a probability of false alarm of 0.05; or (2) The MDEQ may approve another method if the owner and operator can demonstrate that the method can detect a release as effectively as any of the methods allowed in paragraphs (c) through (h) of this rule. In comparing methods, the MDEQ shall consider the size of leak that the method can detect and the frequency and reliability with which it can be detected. If the method is approved, the owner and operator must comply with any conditions imposed by the MDEQ on its use to ensure the protection of human health and the environment.
§280.44 Methods of leak detection for piping. Each method of leak detection for piping used to meet the requirements of §280.41 must be conducted in accordance with the following: (a) Automatic line leak detectors. Methods which alert the operator to the presence of a leak by restricting or shutting off the flow of regulated substances through piping or triggering an audible or visual alarm may be used only if they detect leaks of 3 gallons per hour at 10 pounds per square inch line pressure within 1 hour. Testing must be performed in accordance with the following requirements: (1) Frequency. (i) Automatic line leak detectors installed on or after October 1, 2008, must be tested in accordance with the requirements of this rule at startup to verify proper operation and at least once every 12 months thereafter. (ii) Automatic line leak detectors installed before October I, 2008, must be tested in accordance with the requirements of this rule by no later than October 1, 2009, and at least once every 12 months thereafter. (2) Criteria. All testing of automatic line leak detectors must be conducted in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable code of practice listed in §280.13 and
(i) Involve the simulation of a leak in the piping at the dispenser that is at the highest elevation above the submersible pump. If there is no change in elevation, the test must be conducted at the dispenser that is the furthest away from the submersible pump; (ii) Be conducted with the leak detector installed in the system as it normally would be during operation; (iii)Verify that the leak detector is capable of detecting a leak equivalent to 3 gallons per hour at 10 pounds per square inch line pressure within 1 hour; and (iv) Be conducted finitely and the test results reported quantitatively. (3) Records. A written record documenting the testing of automatic line leak detectors must be maintained (in accordance with §280.35) to demonstrate compliance with this section. These records must provide the results of the last two (2) tests required in this section. (b) Line tightness testing. A periodic test of piping may be conducted only if it can detect a 0.1 gallon per hour leak rate at one and one-half times the operating pressure and the test is conducted in accordance with manufacturer specifications or other recommended code of practice. (c) Interstitial monitoring. Monitoring of the space between the inner (primary) and the outer (secondary) pipe walls may be used, but only if the system is designed, constructed and installed to meet the following requirements:
(1) The sampling or testing method can detect a leak from any portion of the pipe that routinely contains product; (2) The sampling or testing method can detect ingress of water or other external fluids into the interstice; (3) Records must be maintained that show the interstice has been checked at least every 30 days for evidence of a leak or ingress of external fluids; (i) If the interstice is monitored continuously, records must document that the electronic device monitoring the interstice is in communication with the control console at least monthly; (ii) If the interstice is monitored continuously, records must document the alarm history and provide the appropriate reporting (if applicable) and reconciliation of each alarm; (iii)Any electronic device that monitors the interstice must be tested at least once every 12 months for proper function. The functionality test must be in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and any applicable industry code or recommended practice listed in §280.13. The functionality test must simulate a leak; and (4) Any regulated substance that enters the interstice must be removed within 24 hours of discovery or another time frame determined by the MDEQ to be reasonable.
(d) Applicable tank methods. Any of the methods in §280.43 (e), (0 or (h) may be used if they are designed to detect a leak from any portion of the underground piping that routinely contains regulated substances. § 280.45 Methods of leak detection for ancillary equipment within secondary containment sumps Each method of leak detection for ancillary equipment within secondary containment sumps used to meet the requirements of §280.31 and §280.41 must be conducted in accordance with the following: (a) Visual Monitoring. Testing or monitoring for liquids in the containment sump or in the interstice of a double walled containment sump must meet the following requirements: (1) Records must be maintained that show the containment sump or the interstice of a double walled containment sump has been checked at least every 30 days for evidence of a leak or ingress of external fluids (2) Once measurements have been recorded, any fluids in the containment sumps shall be removed and properly dispose (b) Electronic Monitoring. Testing or monitoring for liquids in the containment sump must meet the following requirements: (1) The electronic sensors must be securely mounted permanently within the sump to prevent tampering, removal, or adjustment of the sensor (2) The electronic sensors must be placed no more than 1 inch off the bottom of the containment sump § 280.46 Leak detection recordkeeping. All UST system owners and operators must maintain records in accordance with §280.35 demonstrating compliance with all applicable requirements of this rule. These records must include the following: (a) All written performance claims pertaining to any leak detection system used, and the manner in which these claims have been justified or tested by the equipment manufacturer or installer, must be maintained for 5 years, or for another reasonable period of time determined by the MDEQ, from the date of installation; (b) The results of any sampling, testing, or monitoring must be maintained for at least 1 year, or for another reasonable period of time determined by the MDEQ, except that the results of tank tightness testing conducted in accordance with §280.43(c) must be retained until the next test is conducted; and (c) The results of annual operation tests conducted in accordance with §280.40(a)(3) must be maintained for three years. At a minimum, the results must list each component tested, indicate whether each component tested meets criteria in § 280.40(a)(3) or needs to have action taken, and
describe any action taken to correct an issue; (d) Written documentation of all calibration, maintenance, and repair of leak detection equipment permanently located on-site must be maintained for at least one year after the servicing work is completed, or for another reasonable time period determined by the MDEQ. Any schedules of required calibration and maintenance provided by the leak detection equipment manufacturer must be retained for 5 years from the date of installation.
History
- Source: Miss. Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.5 Leak Reporting, Release Reporting, Investigation, and Confirmation
§280.50 Reporting of leaks and suspected releases. Owners and operators of UST systems must report to the MDEQ within 24 hours, or another reasonable time period specified by the MDEQ, and follow the procedures in §280.52 for any of the following conditions: (a) The discovery by owners and operators or others of released regulated substances at the UST site or in the surrounding area (such as the presence of free product or vapors in soils, basements, sewer and utility lines, and nearby surface water);
(b) The discovery by owners and operators or others of regulated substances within the interstitial space of a double-walled tank or pipe. In the case of containment sumps, reporting is required only if the amount of regulated substances is equal to or greater than one eighth inch or if there is evidence of a leak and it appears the containment sump is not liquid tight; (c) Unusual operating conditions observed by owners and operators (such as the erratic behavior of product dispensing equipment, the sudden loss of product from the UST system, or an unexplained presence of water in the tank), unless system equipment is found to be defective but not leaking, and is immediately repaired or replaced; (d) The discovery by owners and operators or others of failures of UST system equipment (such as failed spill buckets, failed line leak detectors, failed sensors, etc.), if the failed UST system equipment is not repaired and re-tested within 24 hours of the discovery of the failure; and (e) Monitoring results from a leak detection method required under §280.41 and §280.42 that indicate a leak may have occurred unless: (1) The monitoring device is found to be defective, and is immediately repaired, recalibrated or replaced, and additional monitoring does not confirm the initial result; or (2) In the case of inventory control, a second month of data does not confirm the initial result.
(3) The alarm was investigated and determined to be a non-release event (for example, from a power surge or caused by filling the tank during release detection testing).
§280.51 Investigation due to off-site impacts. When required by the MDEQ, owners and operators of UST systems must follow the procedures in §280.52 to determine if the UST system is the source of off-site impacts. These impacts include the discovery of regulated substances (such as the presence of free product or vapors in soils, basements, sewer and utility lines, and nearby surface and drinking waters) that has been observed by the MDEQ or brought to its attention by another party. §280.52 Release investigation and confirmation steps. Unless corrective action is initiated in accordance with Rule 2.6, owners and operators must immediately investigate and confirm all suspected releases of regulated substances requiring reporting under §280.50 within 7 days, or another reasonable time period specified by the MDEQ, using either the following steps or another procedure approved by the MDEQ: (a) System test. Owners and operators must conduct tests (according to the requirements for tightness testing in §280.43(c) and §280.44(b) or, as appropriate, secondary containment testing described in §280.31(c)(3)) that determine whether a leak exists in that portion of the tank that routinely contains product, or the attached delivery piping, or both, or if a breach of either wall of the secondary containment has occurred. (1) Owners and operators must repair, replace or upgrade the UST system, and begin corrective action in accordance with Rule 2.6 if the test results for the system, tank, or delivery piping indicate that a leak exists. (2) Further investigation is not required if the test results for the system, tank, and delivery piping do not indicate that a leak exists and if environmental contamination is not the basis for suspecting a release. (3) Owners and operators must conduct a site check as described in paragraph (b) of this section if the test results for the system, tank, and delivery piping do not indicate that a leak exists but environmental contamination is the basis for suspecting a release. (b) Site check. Owners and operators must measure for the presence of a release where contamination is most likely to be present at the UST site. In selecting sample types, sample locations, and measurement methods, owners and operators must consider the nature of the stored substance, the type of initial alarm or cause for suspicion, the type of backfill, the depth of ground water, and other factors appropriate for identifying the presence and source of the release. (1) If the test results for the excavation zone or the UST site indicate that a release has occurred, owners and operators must begin corrective action in accordance with subpart F;
(2) If the test results for the excavation zone or the UST site do not indicate that a release has occurred, further investigation is not required.
§280.53 Reporting and cleanup of spills and overfills. (a) Owners and operators of UST systems must contain and immediately clean up a spill or overfill and report to the MDEQ within 24 hours, or another reasonable time period specified by the MDEQ, and begin corrective action in accordance with Rule 2.6 in the following cases: (1) Spill or overfill of petroleum that results in a release to the environment that exceeds 25 gallons or another reasonable amount specified by the MDEQ, or that causes a sheen on nearby surface water; and (2) Spill or overfill of a hazardous substance that results in a release to the environment that equals or exceeds its reportable quantity under CERCLA (40 CFR part 302). (b) Owners and operators of UST systems must contain and immediately clean up a spill overfill of petroleum that is less than 25 gallons or another reasonable amount specified by the MDEQ, and a spill or overfill of a hazardous substance that is less than the reportable quantity. If cleanup cannot be accomplished within 24 hours, or another reasonable time period established by the MDEQ, owners and operators must immediately notify the MDEQ.
Note: Pursuant to §§302.6 and 355.40, a release of a hazardous substance equal to or in excess of its reportable quantity must also be reported immediately (rather than within 24 hours) to the National Response Center under sections 102 and 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 and to appropriate state and local authorities under Title III of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986.
History
- Source: Miss. Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.6 Release Response and Corrective Action for UST Systems Containing Petroleum or Hazardous Substances
§280.60 General.
Owners and operators of petroleum or hazardous substance UST systems must, in response to a confirmed release from the UST system, comply with the requirements of this subpart except for USTs excluded under §280.10(b) and UST systems subject to RCRA Subtitle C corrective action requirements under section 3004(u) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended.
§280.61 Initial response.
Upon confirmation of a release in accordance with §280.52 or after a release from the UST system is identified in any other manner, owners and operators must perform the following initial response actions within 24 hours of a release or within another reasonable period of time determined by the MDEQ: (a) Report the release to the MDEQ (e.g., by telephone or electronic mail); (b) Take immediate action to prevent any further release of the regulated substance into the environment; and (c) Identify and mitigate fire, explosion, and vapor hazards. §280.62 Initial abatement measures and site check. (a) Unless directed to do otherwise by the MDEQ, owners and operators must perform the following abatement measures: (1) Remove as much of the regulated substance from the UST system as is necessary to prevent further release to the environment; (2) Visually inspect any aboveground releases or exposed belowground releases and prevent further migration of the released substance into surrounding soils and ground water; (3) Continue to monitor and mitigate any additional fire and safety hazards posed by vapors or free product that have migrated from the UST excavation zone and entered into subsurface structures (such as sewers or basements); (4) Remedy hazards posed by contaminated soils that are excavated or exposed as a result of release confirmation, site investigation, abatement, or corrective action activities. If these remedies include treatment or disposal of soils, the owner and operator must comply with applicable State and local requirements; (5) Measure for the presence of a release where contamination is most likely to be present at the UST site, unless the presence and source of the release have been confirmed in accordance with the site check required by §280.52(b) or the closure site assessment of §280.72(a). In selecting sample types, sample locations, and measurement methods, the owner and operator must consider the nature of the stored substance, the type of backfill, depth to ground water and other factors as appropriate for identifying the presence and source of the release; and (6) Investigate to determine the possible presence of free product, and begin free product removal as soon as practicable and in accordance with §280.64. (b) Within 10 days after release confirmation, or within another reasonable period of time determined by the MDEQ, owners and operators must submit a report to the MDEQ summarizing the initial abatement steps taken under paragraph (a) of this rule and any resulting information or data.
§ 280.63 Initial site characterization. (a) Unless directed to do otherwise by the MDEQ, owners and operators must assemble information about the site and the nature of the release, including information gained while confirming the release or completing the initial abatement measures in §§280.60 and 280.61. This information must include, but is not necessarily limited to the following: (1) Data on the nature and estimated quantity of release; (2) Data from available sources and/or site investigations concerning the following factors: surrounding populations, water quality, use and approximate locations of wells potentially affected by the release, subsurface soil conditions, locations of subsurface sewers, climatological conditions, and land use; (3) Results of the site check required under §280.62(a)(5); and (4) Results of the free product investigations required under §280.62(a)(6), to be used by owners and operators to determine whether free product must be recovered under §280.64. (b) Within 45 days of release confirmation or another reasonable period of time determined by the MDEQ, owners and operators must submit the information collected in compliance with paragraph (a) of this rule to the MDEQ in a manner that demonstrates its applicability and technical adequacy, or in a format and according to the schedule required by the MDEQ. § 280.64 Free product removal. At sites where investigations under §280.62(a)(6) indicate the presence of free product, owners and operators must remove free product to the maximum extent practicable as determined by the MDEQ while continuing, as necessary, any actions initiated under §§280.61 through 280.63, or preparing for actions required under §§280.65 through 280.66. In meeting the requirements of this rule, owners and operators must: (a) Conduct free product removal in a manner that minimizes the spread of contamination into previously uncontaminated zones by using recovery and disposal techniques appropriate to the hydrogeologic conditions at the site, and that properly treats, discharges or disposes of recovery byproducts in compliance with applicable local, State and Federal regulations; (b) Use abatement of free product migration as a minimum objective for the design of the free product removal system; (c) Handle any flammable products in a safe and competent manner to prevent fires or explosions; and (d) Unless directed to do otherwise by the MDEQ, prepare and submit to the MDEQ, within 45 days after confirming a release, a free product removal report that provides at least the following information:
(1) The name of the person(s) responsible for implementing the free product removal measures; (2) The estimated quantity, type, and thickness of free product observed or measured in wells, boreholes, and excavations; (3) The type of free product recovery system used;
(4) Whether any discharge will take place on-site or off-site during the recovery operation and where this discharge will be located; (5) The type of treatment applied to, and the effluent quality expected from, any discharge; (6) The steps that have been or are being taken to obtain necessary permits for any discharge; and (7) The disposition of the recovered free product. §280.65 Investigations for soil and ground-water cleanup.
(a) In order to determine the full extent and location of soils contaminated by the release and the presence and concentrations of dissolved product contamination in the ground water, owners and operators must conduct investigations of the release, the release site, and the surrounding area possibly affected by the release if any of the following conditions exist:
(1) There is evidence that ground-water wells have been affected by the release (e.g., as found during release confirmation or previous corrective action measures); (2) Free product is found to need recovery in compliance with §280.64; (3) There is evidence that contaminated soils may be in contact with ground water (e.g., as found during conduct of the initial response measures or investigations required under §§280.60 through 280.64); and (4) The MDEQ requests an investigation, based on the potential effects of contaminated soil or ground water on nearby surface water and ground-water resources. (b) Owners and operators must submit the information collected under paragraph (a) of this section as soon as practicable or in accordance with a schedule established by the MDEQ. §280.66 Corrective action plan. (a) At any point after reviewing the information submitted in compliance with §§280.61 through 280.63, the MDEQ may require owners and operators to submit additional information or to develop and submit a corrective action plan for responding to contaminated soils and ground water. If a plan is required, owners and operators must submit the plan according to a schedule and format established by the MDEQ. Alternatively, owners and operators may, after fulfilling the requirements of §§280.61 through 280.63, choose to submit a corrective
action plan for responding to contaminated soil and ground water. In either case, owners and operators are responsible for submitting a plan that provides for adequate protection of human health and the environment as determined by the MDEQ, and must modify their plan as necessary to meet this standard. (b) The MDEQ will approve the corrective action plan only after ensuring that implementation of the plan will adequately protect human health, safety, and the environment. In making this determination, the MDEQ should consider the following factors as appropriate:
(1) The physical and chemical characteristics of the regulated substance, including its toxicity, persistence, and potential for migration; (2) The hydrogeologic characteristics of the facility and the surrounding area; (3) The proximity, quality, and current and future uses of nearby surface water and ground water; (4) The potential effects of residual contamination on nearby surface water and ground water; (5) An exposure assessment; and
(6) Any information assembled in compliance with this rule. (c) Upon approval of the corrective action plan or as directed by the MDEQ, owners and operators must implement the plan, including modifications to the plan made by the MDEQ. They must monitor, evaluate, and report the results of implementing the plan in accordance with a schedule and in a format established by the MDEQ. (d) Owners and operators may, in the interest of minimizing environmental contamination and promoting more effective cleanup, begin cleanup of soil and ground water before the corrective action plan is approved provided that they:
(1) Notify the MDEQ of their intention to begin cleanup; (2) Comply with any conditions imposed by the MDEQ, including halting cleanup or mitigating adverse consequences from cleanup activities; and (3) Incorporate these self-initiated cleanup measures in the corrective action plan that is submitted to the MDEQ for approval. §280.67 Public participation. (a) For each confirmed release that requires a corrective action plan, the MDEQ must provide notice to the public by means designed to reach those members of the public directly affected by the release and the planned corrective action. This notice may include, but is not limited to, public notice in local newspapers, block advertisements, public service announcements, publication in a state register, letters to individual households, or personal contacts by field staff.
(b) The MDEQ must ensure that site release information and decisions concerning the corrective action plan are made available to the public for inspection upon request. (c) Before approving a corrective action plan, the MDEQ may hold a public meeting to consider comments on the proposed corrective action plan if there is sufficient public interest, or for any other reason. (d) The MDEQ must give public notice that complies with paragraph (a) of this rule if implementation of an approved corrective action plan does not achieve the established cleanup levels in the plan and termination of that plan is under consideration by the MDEQ.
History
- Source: Miss. Ann. §§ 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.7 Out-of-Service UST Systems and Closure
§280.70 Temporary closure. (a) When an UST system is temporarily closed, owners and operators must notify the MDEQ and continue operation and maintenance of corrosion protection in accordance with §280.32, and any leak detection in accordance with Rule 2.4 and Rule 2.10. Rule 2.5 and Rule 2.6 must be complied with if a release is suspected or confirmed. However, leak detection is not required as long as the UST system is empty. The UST system is empty when all materials have been removed using commonly employed practices so that no more than one ( 1 ) inch of residue remains in the system. (b) When an UST system is temporarily closed for 3 months or more, owners and operators must also comply with the following requirements: (1) Leave vent lines open and functioning; (2) Cap and secure all other lines, pumps, manways, and ancillary equipment; (3) Empty the tank in accordance with §280.70(a); and (4) Continue operation and maintenance of corrosion protection in accordance with §280.32. (c) When an UST system is temporarily closed for more than 12 months, owners and operators must permanently close the UST system if it does not meet either performance standards in§280.20 for new UST systems or the upgrading requirements in §280.21, except that the spill and overfill equipment requirements do not have to be met. Owners and operators must permanently close the substandard UST systems at the end of this 12-month period in accordance with §§280.71-280.74, unless the MDEQ provides an extension of the 12-month temporary closure period. Owners and operators must complete a site assessment in accordance with §280.72 before such an extension can be applied for.
(d) On or before October 5, 2019, when an UST system is temporarily closed for more than 12 months and the UST system meets the performance standards in §280.20 for new UST system or the upgrading requirements in §280.21, owners and operators shall permanently close the UST system at the end of this 12-month period in accordance with §280.71- 280.74, or complete a site assessment in accordance with §280.72. At the end of the 12- month period and each calendar year thereafter, the owner and operator must perform and document an UST system inspection to verify the UST system is empty (less than one inch of petroleum product is in the tank), vent lines are open and functioning, piping is securely capped, and corrosion protection is operating correctly. The records for the annual temporary closure inspection shall be made available to MDEQ upon request. §280.71 Permanent closure and changes-in-service.
(a) At least 30 days before beginning either permanent closure or a change-in-service under paragraphs (b) and (c) of this rule, or within another reasonable time period determined by the MDEQ, owners and operators must notify the MDEQ of their intent to permanently close or make the change-in-service, unless such action is in response to corrective action. The required assessment of the excavation zone under §280.72 must be performed after notifying the MDEQ but before completion of the permanent closure or a change-in-service. (b) To permanently close a tank system, owners and operators must empty and clean it by removing all liquids and accumulated sludges from the tank system. All tank systems taken out of service permanently must also be either removed from the ground or filled with an inert solid material. (c) Continued use of an UST system to store a non-regulated substance is considered a change- in-service. Before a change-in-service, owners and operators must empty and clean the tank by removing all liquid and accumulated sludge and conduct a site assessment in accordance with §280.72. §280.72 Assessing the site at closure or change-in-service.
(a) Before permanent closure or a change-in-service is completed, owners and operators must measure for the presence of a release in accordance with "Guidelines for the Permanent Closure of Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Systems" and any applicable industry code or recommended practice listed in §280.13. (b) If contaminated soils, contaminated ground water, or free product as a liquid or vapor is discovered under paragraph (a) of this rule, or by any other manner, owners and operators must begin corrective action in accordance with Rule 2.6. §280.73 Applicability to previously closed UST systems. When directed by the MDEQ, the owner and operator of an UST system permanently closed before December 22, 1988 must assess the excavation zone and close the UST system in accordance with this rule if releases from the UST may, in the judgment of the MDEQ, pose a current or potential threat to human health and the environment.
§280.74 Closure records.
Owners and operators must maintain records in accordance with §280.35 that are capable of demonstrating compliance with closure requirements under this rule. The results of the excavation zone assessment required in §280.72 must be maintained for at least 3 years after completion of permanent closure or change-in-service in one of the following ways:
(a) By the owners and operators who took the UST system out of service; (b) By the current owners and operators of the UST system site; or
(c) By mailing these records to the MDEQ if they cannot be maintained at the closed facility.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § § 49-2-9(1)(b); 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.8 Financial Responsibility
§ 280.90 Applicability. (a) This rule applies to owners and operators of all petroleum underground storage tank (UST) systems except as otherwise provided in this section. (b) Owners and operators of petroleum UST systems are subject to these requirements if they are in operation on or after the date for compliance established in §280.91. (c) State and Federal government entities whose debts and liabilities are the debts and liabilities of a state or the United States are exempt from the requirements of this rule. (d) The requirements of this rule do not apply to owners and operators of any UST system described in §280.10 (b) or (c). (e) If the owner and operator of a petroleum underground storage tank are separate persons, only one person is required to demonstrate financial responsibility; however, both parties are liable in event of noncompliance. § 280.91 Compliance dates. Owners of petroleum underground storage tanks are required to comply with the requirements of this rule by the following dates: (a) All petroleum marketing firms owning 1,000 or more USTs and all other UST owners that report a tangible net worth of $20 million or more to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Dun and Bradstreet, the Energy Information Administration, or the
Rural Electrification Administration; January 24, 1989, except that compliance with §280.94(b) is required by: July 24, 1989. (b) All petroleum marketing firms owning 100–999 USTs; October 26, 1989. (c) All petroleum marketing firms owning 13–99 USTs at more than one facility; April 26, 1991. (d) All petroleum UST owners not described in paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this section, excluding local government entities; December 31, 1993. (e) All local government entities (including Indian tribes) not included in paragraph (f) of this section; February 18, 1994. (f) Indian tribes that own USTs on Indian lands which meet the applicable technical requirements of this part; December 31, 1998. [53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 5452, Feb. 3, 1989; 55 FR 18567, May 2, 1990; 55 FR 46025, Oct. 31, 1990; 56 FR 66373, Dec. 23, 1991; 59 FR 9607, Feb. 28, 1994] § 280.92 Definition of terms. When used in this rule, the following terms shall have the meanings given below: Accidental release means any sudden or non-sudden release of petroleum from an underground storage tank system that results in a need for corrective action and/or compensation for bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended by the tank owner or operator. Bodily injury shall have the meaning given to this term by applicable state law; however, this term shall not include those liabilities which, consistent with standard insurance industry practices, are excluded from coverage in liability insurance policies for bodily injury. Chief Financial Officer, in the case of local government owners and operators, means the individual with the overall authority and responsibility for the collection, disbursement, and use of funds by the local government. Controlling interest means direct ownership of at least 50 percent of the voting stock of another entity. Director of the Implementing Agency means the EPA Regional Administrator, or, in the case of a state with a program approved under section 9004, the Director of the designated state or local agency responsible for carrying out an approved UST program. Financial reporting year means the latest consecutive twelve-month period for which any of the following reports used to support a financial test is prepared: (1) a 10–K report submitted to the SEC; (2) an annual report of tangible net worth submitted to Dun and Bradstreet; or
(3) annual reports submitted to the Energy Information Administration or the Rural Electrification Administration. “Financial reporting year” may thus comprise a fiscal or a calendar year period. Legal defense cost is any expense that an owner or operator or provider of financial assurance incurs in defending against claims or actions brought, (1) By EPA or a state to require corrective action or to recover the costs of corrective action; (2) By or on behalf of a third party for bodily injury or property damage caused by an accidental release; or (3) By any person to enforce the terms of a financial assurance mechanism. Local government shall have the meaning given this term by applicable state law and includes Indian tribes. The term is generally intended to include: (1) Counties, municipalities, townships, separately chartered and operated special districts (including local government public transit systems and redevelopment authorities), and independent school districts authorized as governmental bodies by state charter or constitution; and (2) Special districts and independent school districts established by counties, municipalities, townships, and other general purpose governments to provide essential services. Occurrence means an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to conditions, which results in a release from an underground storage tank. Note: This definition is intended to assist in the understanding of these regulations and is not intended either to limit the meaning of “occurrence” in a way that conflicts with standard insurance usage or to prevent the use of other standard insurance terms in place of “occurrence.” Owner or operator, when the owner or operator are separate parties, refers to the party that is obtaining or has obtained financial assurances. Petroleum marketing facilities include all facilities at which petroleum is produced or refined and all facilities from which petroleum is sold or transferred to other petroleum marketers or to the public. Petroleum marketing firms are all firms owning petroleum marketing facilities. Firms owning other types of facilities with USTs as well as petroleum marketing facilities are considered to be petroleum marketing firms. Property damage shall have the meaning given this term by applicable state law. This term shall not include those liabilities which, consistent with standard insurance industry practices, are excluded from coverage in liability insurance policies for property damage. However, such
exclusions for property damage shall not include corrective action associated with releases from tanks which are covered by the policy. Provider of financial assurance means an entity that provides financial assurance to an owner or operator of an underground storage tank through one of the mechanisms listed in §§280.95– 280.103, including a guarantor, insurer, risk retention group, surety, issuer of a letter of credit, issuer of a state-required mechanism, or a state. Substantial business relationship means the extent of a business relationship necessary under applicable state law to make a guarantee contract issued incident to that relationship valid and enforceable. A guarantee contract is issued “incident to that relationship” if it arises from and depends on existing economic transactions between the guarantor and the owner or operator. Substantial governmental relationship means the extent of a governmental relationship necessary under applicable state law to make an added guarantee contract issued incident to that relationship valid and enforceable. A guarantee contract is issued “incident to that relationship” if it arises from a clear commonality of interest in the event of an UST release such as coterminous boundaries, overlapping constituencies, common ground-water aquifer, or other relationship other than monetary compensation that provides a motivation for the guarantor to provide a guarantee. Tangible net worth means the tangible assets that remain after deducting liabilities; such assets do not include intangibles such as goodwill and rights to patents or royalties. For purposes of this definition, “assets” means all existing and all probable future economic benefits obtained or controlled by a particular entity as a result of past transactions. Termination under §280.97(b)(1) and §280.97(b)(2) means only those changes that could result in a gap in coverage as where the insured has not obtained substitute coverage or has obtained substitute coverage with a different retroactive date than the retroactive date of the original policy. [53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 47081, Nov. 9, 1989; 58 FR 9050, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.93 Amount and scope of required financial responsibility. (a) Owners or operators of petroleum underground storage tanks must demonstrate financial responsibility for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks in at least the following per-occurrence amounts: (1) For owners or operators of petroleum underground storage tanks that are located at petroleum marketing facilities, or that handle an average of more than 10,000 gallons of petroleum per month based on annual throughput for the previous calendar year; $1 million. (2) For all other owners or operators of petroleum underground storage tanks; $500,000.
(b) Owners or operators of petroleum underground storage tanks must demonstrate financial responsibility for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks in at least the following annual aggregate amounts: (1) For owners or operators of 1 to 100 petroleum underground storage tanks, $1 million; and (2) For owners or operators of 101 or more petroleum underground storage tanks, $2 million. (c) For the purposes of paragraphs (b) and (f) of this section, only, “a petroleum underground storage tank” means a single containment unit and does not mean combinations of single containment units. (d) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, if the owner or operator uses separate mechanisms or separate combinations of mechanisms to demonstrate financial responsibility for: (1) Taking corrective action; (2) Compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by sudden accidental releases; or (3) Compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by non- sudden accidental releases, the amount of assurance provided by each mechanism or combination of mechanisms must be in the full amount specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. (e) If an owner or operator uses separate mechanisms or separate combinations of mechanisms to demonstrate financial responsibility for different petroleum underground storage tanks, the annual aggregate required shall be based on the number of tanks covered by each such separate mechanism or combination of mechanisms. (f) Owners or operators shall review the amount of aggregate assurance provided whenever additional petroleum underground storage tanks are acquired or installed. If the number of petroleum underground storage tanks for which assurance must be provided exceeds 100, the owner or operator shall demonstrate financial responsibility in the amount of at least $2 million of annual aggregate assurance by the anniversary of the date on which the mechanism demonstrating financial responsibility became effective. If assurance is being demonstrated by a combination of mechanisms, the owner or operator shall demonstrate financial responsibility in the amount of at least $2 million of annual aggregate assurance by the first-occurring effective date anniversary of any one of the mechanisms combined (other than a financial test or guarantee) to provide assurance. (g) The amounts of assurance required under this section exclude legal defense costs.
(h) The required per-occurrence and annual aggregate coverage amounts do not in any way limit the liability of the owner or operator. § 280.94 Allowable mechanisms and combinations of mechanisms. (a) Subject to the limitations of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, (1) An owner or operator, including a local government owner or operator, may use any one or combination of the mechanisms listed in §§280.95 through 280.103 to demonstrate financial responsibility under this rule for one or more underground storage tanks, and (2) A local government owner or operator may use any one or combination of the mechanisms listed in §§280.104 through 280.107 to demonstrate financial responsibility under this rule for one or more underground storage tanks. (b) An owner or operator may use a guarantee under §280.96 or surety bond under §280.98 to establish financial responsibility only if the Attorney(s) General of the state(s) in which the underground storage tanks are located has (have) submitted a written statement to the implementing agency that a guarantee or surety bond executed as described in this section is a legally valid and enforceable obligation in that state. (c) An owner or operator may use self-insurance in combination with a guarantee only if, for the purpose of meeting the requirements of the financial test under this rule, the financial statements of the owner or operator are not consolidated with the financial statements of the guarantor. [53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988, as amended at 58 FR 9051, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.95 Financial test of self-insurance. (a) An owner or operator, and/or guarantor, may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by passing a financial test as specified in this section. To pass the financial test of self- insurance, the owner or operator, and/or guarantor must meet the criteria of paragraph (b) or (c) of this section based on year-end financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year. (b)(1) The owner or operator, and/or guarantor, must have a tangible net worth of at least ten times: (i) The total of the applicable aggregate amount required by §280.93, based on the number of underground storage tanks for which a financial test is used to demonstrate financial responsibility to EPA under this section or to a state implementing agency under a state program approved by EPA under 40 CFR part 281; (ii) The sum of the corrective action cost estimates, the current closure and post-closure care cost estimates, and amount of liability coverage for which a financial test is used to
demonstrate financial responsibility to EPA under 40 CFR 264.101, 264.143, 264.145, 265.143, 265.145, 264.147, and 265.147 or to a state implementing agency under a state program authorized by EPA under 40 CFR part 271; and (iii) The sum of current plugging and abandonment cost estimates for which a financial test is used to demonstrate financial responsibility to EPA under 40 CFR 144.63 or to a state implementing agency under a state program authorized by EPA under 40 CFR part 145. (2) The owner or operator, and/or guarantor, must have a tangible net worth of at least $10 million. (3) The owner or operator, and/or guarantor, must have a letter signed by the chief financial officer worded as specified in paragraph (d) of this section. (4) The owner or operator, and/or guarantor, must either: (i) File financial statements annually with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Energy Information Administration, or the Rural Utilities Service; or (ii) Report annually the firm's tangible net worth to Dun and Bradstreet, and Dun and Bradstreet must have assigned the firm a financial strength rating of 4A or 5A. (5) The firm's year-end financial statements, if independently audited, cannot include an adverse auditor's opinion, a disclaimer of opinion, or a “going concern” qualification. (c)(1) The owner or operator, and/or guarantor must meet the financial test requirements of 40 CFR 264.147(f)(1), substituting the appropriate amounts specified in §280.93 (b)(1) and (b)(2) for the “amount of liability coverage” each time specified in that section. (2) The fiscal year-end financial statements of the owner or operator, and/or guarantor, must be examined by an independent certified public accountant and be accompanied by the accountant's report of the examination. (3) The firm's year-end financial statements cannot include an adverse auditor's opinion, a disclaimer of opinion, or a “going concern” qualification. (4) The owner or operator, and/or guarantor, must have a letter signed by the chief financial officer, worded as specified in paragraph (d) of this section. (5) If the financial statements of the owner or operator, and/or guarantor, are not submitted annually to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Energy Information Administration or the Rural Utilities Service, the owner or operator, and/or guarantor, must obtain a special report by an independent certified public accountant stating that:
(i) He has compared the data that the letter form the chief financial officer specifies as having been derived from the latest year-end financial statements of the owner or operator, and/or guarantor, with the amounts in such financial statements; and (ii) In connection with that comparison, no matters came to his attention which caused him to believe that the specified data should be adjusted. (d) To demonstrate that it meets the financial test under paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, the chief financial officer of the owner or operator, or guarantor, must sign, within 120 days of the close of each financial reporting year, as defined by the twelve-month period for which financial statements used to support the financial test are prepared, a letter worded exactly as follows, except that the instructions in brackets are to be replaced by the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Letter from Chief Financial Officer I am the chief financial officer of [insert: name and address of the owner or operator, or guarantor]. This letter is in support of the use of [insert: “the financial test of self-insurance,” and/or “guarantee”] to demonstrate financial responsibility for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage”] caused by [insert: “sudden accidential releases” and/or “non-sudden accidential releases”] in the amount of at least [insert: dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate arising from operating (an) underground storage tank(s). Underground storage tanks at the following facilities are assured by this financial test or a financial test under an authorized State program by this [insert: “owner or operator,” and/or “guarantor”]: [List for each facility: the name and address of the facility where tanks assured by this financial test are located, and whether tanks are assured by this financial test or a financial test under a State program approved under 40 CFR part 281. If separate mechanisms or combinations of mechanisms are being used to assure any of the tanks at this facility, list each tank assured by this financial test or a financial test under a State program authorized under 40 CFR part 281 by the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR 280.22 or the corresponding State requirements.] A [insert: “financial test,” and/or “guarantee”] is also used by this [insert: “owner or operator,” or “guarantor”] to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in the following amounts under other EPA regulations or state programs authorized by EPA under 40 CFR parts 271 and 145: EPA Regulations Amount Closure (§§264.143 and 265.143) $____ Post-Closure Care (§§264.145 and 265.145) $____ Liability Coverage (§§264.147 and 265.147) $____ Corrective Action (§§264.101(b)) $____
Plugging and Abandonment (§144.63) $____ Closure $____ Post-Closure Care $____ Liability Coverage $____ Corrective Action $____ Plugging and Abandonment $____ Total $____ This [insert: “owner or operator,” or “guarantor”] has not received an adverse opinion, a disclaimer of opinion, or a “going concern” qualification from an independent auditor on his financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year. [Fill in the information for Alternative I if the criteria of paragraph (b) of §280.95 are being used to demonstrate compliance with the financial test requirements. Fill in the information for Alternative II if the criteria of paragraph (c) of §280.95 are being used to demonstrate compliance with the financial test requirements.] Alternative I 1. Amount of annual UST aggregate coverage being assured by a financial test, and/or guarantee $____ 2. Amount of corrective action, closure and post-closure care costs, liability coverage, and plugging and abandonment costs covered by a financial test, and/or guarantee $____ 3. Sum of lines 1 and 2 $____ 4. Total tangible assets $____ 5. Total liabilities [if any of the amount reported on line 3 is included in total liabilities, you may deduct that amount from this line and add that amount to line 6] $____ 6. Tangible net worth [subtract line 5 from line 4] $____ Yes No 7. Is line 6 at least $10 million? __ _ 8. Is line 6 at least 10 times line 3? __ _ 9. Have financial statements for the latest fiscal year been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission? __ _ 10. Have financial statements for the latest fiscal year been filed with the Energy Information Administration? __ _
- Have financial statements for the latest fiscal year been filed with the Rural Utilities Service? __ _ 12. Has financial information been provided to Dun and Bradstreet, and has Dun and Bradstreet provided a financial strength rating of 4A or 5A? [Answer “Yes” only if both criteria have been met.] __ _
Alternative II 1. Amount of annual UST aggregate coverage being assured by a test, and/or guarantee $____ 2. Amount of corrective action, closure and post-closure care costs, liability coverage, and plugging and abandonment costs covered by a financial test, and/or guarantee $____ 3. Sum of lines 1 and 2 $____ 4. Total tangible assets $____ 5. Total liabilities [if any of the amount reported on line 3 is included in total liabilities, you may deduct that amount from this line and add that amount to line 6] $____ 6. Tangible net worth [subtract line 5 from line 4] $____ 7. Total assets in the U.S. [required only if less than 90 percent of assets are located in the U.S.] $____ Yes No 8. Is line 6 at least $10 million? $__ _ 9. Is line 6 at least 6 times line 3? __ _ 10. Are at least 90 percent of assets located in the U.S.? [If “No,” complete line 11.] __ _ 11. Is line 7 at least 6 times line 3? __ _ [Fill in either lines 12–15 or lines 16–18:] 12. Current assets $____ 13. Current liabilities ____ 14. Net working capital [subtract line 13 from line 12] _____ Yes No 15. Is line 14 at least 6 times line 3? __ _ 16. Current bond rating of most recent bond issue __ _ 17. Name of rating service __ _ 18. Date of maturity of bond __ _
- Have financial statements for the latest fiscal year been filed with the SEC, the Energy Information Administration, or the Rural Utilities Service? __ _ [If “No,” please attach a report from an independent certified public accountant certifying that there are no material differences between the data as reported in lines 4–18 above and the financial statements for the latest fiscal year.] [For both Alternative I and Alternative II complete the certification with this statement.] I hereby certify that the wording of this letter is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.95(d) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown immediately below. [Signature] [Name] [Title] [Date] (e) If an owner or operator using the test to provide financial assurance finds that he or she no longer meets the requirements of the financial test based on the year-end financial statements, the owner or operator must obtain alternative coverage within 150 days of the end of the year for which financial statements have been prepared. (f) The Director of the implementing agency may require reports of financial condition at any time from the owner or operator, and/or guarantor. If the Director finds, on the basis of such reports or other information, that the owner or operator, and/or guarantor, no longer meets the financial test requirements of §280.95(b) or (c) and (d), the owner or operator must obtain alternate coverage within 30 days after notification of such a finding. (g) If the owner or operator fails to obtain alternate assurance within 150 days of finding that he or she no longer meets the requirements of the financial test based on the year-end financial statements, or within 30 days of notification by the Director of the implementing agency that he or she no longer meets the requirements of the financial test, the owner or operator must notify the Director of such failure within 10 days. § 280.96 Guarantee. (a) An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by obtaining a guarantee that conforms to the requirements of this section. The guarantor must be: (1) A firm that (i) possesses a controlling interest in the owner or operator; (ii) possesses a controlling interest in a firm described under paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section; or, (iii) is controlled through stock ownership by a common parent firm that possesses a controlling interest in the owner or operator; or,
(2) A firm engaged in a substantial business relationship with the owner or operator and issuing the guarantee as an act incident to that business relationship. (b) Within 120 days of the close of each financial reporting year the guarantor must demonstrate that it meets the financial test criteria of §280.95 based on year-end financial statements for the latest completed financial reporting year by completing the letter from the chief financial officer described in §280.95(d) and must deliver the letter to the owner or operator. If the guarantor fails to meet the requirements of the financial test at the end of any financial reporting year, within 120 days of the end of that financial reporting year the guarantor shall send by certified mail, before cancellation or nonrenewal of the guarantee, notice to the owner or operator. If the Director of the implementing agency notifies the guarantor that he no longer meets the requirements of the financial test of §280.95 (b) or (c) and (d), the guarantor must notify the owner or operator within 10 days of receiving such notification from the Director. In both cases, the guarantee will terminate no less than 120 days after the date the owner or operator receives the notification, as evidenced by the return receipt. The owner or operator must obtain alternative coverage as specified in §280.110(c). (c) The guarantee must be worded as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Guarantee Guarantee made this [date] by [name of guaranteeing entity], a business entity organized under the laws of the state of [name of state], herein referred to as guarantor, to [the state implementing agency] and to any and all third parties, and obligees, on behalf of [owner or operator] of [business address]. Recitals. (1) Guarantor meets or exceeds the financial test criteria of 40 CFR 280.95 (b) or (c) and (d) and agrees to comply with the requirements for guarantors as specified in 40 CFR 280.96(b). (2) [Owner or operator] owns or operates the following underground storage tank(s) covered by this guarantee: [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR 280.22 or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility.] This guarantee satisfies 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.7 requirements for assuring funding for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”; if coverage is different for different tanks or locations, indicate the type of coverage applicable to each tank or location] arising from operating the above-identified underground storage tank(s) in the amount of [insert dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert dollar amount] annual aggregate.
(3) [Insert appropriate phrase: “On behalf of our subsidiary” (if guarantor is corporate parent of the owner or operator); “On behalf of our affiliate” (if guarantor is a related firm of the owner or operator); or “Incident to our business relationship with” (if guarantor is providing the guarantee as an incident to a substantial business relationship with owner or operator)] [owner or operator], guarantor guarantees to [implementing agency] and to any and all third parties that: In the event that [owner or operator] fails to provide alternative coverage within 60 days after receipt of a notice of cancellation of this guarantee and the [Director of the implementing agency] has determined or suspects that a release has occurred at an underground storage tank covered by this guarantee, the guarantor, upon instructions from the [Director], shall fund a standby trust fund in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. In the event that the [Director] determines that [owner or operator] has failed to perform corrective action for releases arising out of the operation of the above-identified tank(s) in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, subpart F, the guarantor upon written instructions from the [Director] shall fund a standby trust in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. If [owner or operator] fails to satisfy a judgment or award based on a determination of liability for bodily injury or property damage to third parties caused by [“sudden” and/or “non-sudden”] accidental releases arising from the operation of the above-identified tank(s), or fails to pay an amount agreed to in settlement of a claim arising from or alleged to arise from such injury or damage, the guarantor, upon written instructions from the [Director], shall fund a standby trust in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 280.108 to satisfy such judgment(s), award(s), or settlement agreement(s) up to the limits of coverage specified above. (4) Guarantor agrees that if, at the end of any fiscal year before cancellation of this guarantee, the guarantor fails to meet the financial test criteria of 40 CFR 280.95 (b) or (c) and (d), guarantor shall send within 120 days of such failure, by certified mail, notice to [owner or operator]. The guarantee will terminate 120 days from the date of receipt of the notice by [owner or operator], as evidenced by the return receipt. (5) Guarantor agrees to notify [owner or operator] by certified mail of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code naming guarantor as debtor, within 10 days after commencement of the proceeding. (6) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee notwithstanding any modification or alteration of any obligation of [owner or operator] pursuant to 40 CFR part 280. (7) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee for so long as [owner or operator] must comply with the applicable financial responsibility requirements of 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.7 for the above-identified tank(s), except that guarantor may cancel this
guarantee by sending notice by certified mail to [owner or operator], such cancellation to become effective no earlier than 120 days after receipt of such notice by [owner or operator], as evidenced by the return receipt. (8) The guarantor's obligation does not apply to any of the following: (a) Any obligation of [insert owner or operator] under a workers' compensation, disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (b) Bodily injury to an employee of [insert owner or operator] arising from, and in the course of, employment by [insert owner or operator]; (c) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (d) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaded to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by [insert owner or operator] that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank; (e) Bodily damage or property damage for which [insert owner or operator] is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 280.93. (9) Guarantor expressly waives notice of acceptance of this guarantee by [the implementing agency], by any or all third parties, or by [owner or operator]. I hereby certify that the wording of this guarantee is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR 280.96(c) as such regulations were constituted on the effective date shown immediately below. Effective date:____________________ [Name of guarantor] [Authorized signature for guarantor] [Name of person signing] [Title of person signing] Signature of witness or notary: ____________________ (d) An owner or operator who uses a guarantee to satisfy the requirements of §280.93 must establish a standby trust fund when the guarantee is obtained. Under the terms of the guarantee, all amounts paid by the guarantor under the guarantee will be deposited directly
into the standby trust fund in accordance with instructions from the Director of the implementing agency under §280.112. This standby trust fund must meet the requirements specified in §280.103. § 280.97 Insurance and risk retention group coverage. (a) An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by obtaining liability insurance that conforms to the requirements of this section from a qualified insurer or risk retention group. Such insurance may be in the form of a separate insurance policy or an endorsement to an existing insurance policy. (b) Each insurance policy must be amended by an endorsement worded as specified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, or evidenced by a certificate of insurance worded as specified in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, except that instructions in brackets must be replaced with the relevant information and the brackets deleted: (1) Endorsement Name: [name of each covered location] Address: [address of each covered location] Policy Number Period of Coverage: [current policy period] Name of [Insurer or Risk Retention Group]: Address of [Insurer or Risk Retention Group]: Name of Insured: Address of Insured:
Endorsement: 1. This endorsement certifies that the policy to which the endorsement is attached provides liability insurance covering the following underground storage tanks: [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR 280.22, or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility.]
for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”; in accordance with and subject to the limits of liability, exclusions, conditions, and other terms of the policy; if coverage is different for different tanks or locations, indicate the type of coverage applicable to each tank or location] arising from operating the underground storage tank(s) identified above. The limits of liability are [insert the dollar amount of the “each occurrence” and “annual aggregate” limits of the Insurer's or Group's liability; if the amount of coverage is different for different types of coverage or for different underground storage tanks or locations, indicate the amount of coverage for each type of coverage and/or for each underground storage tank or location], exclusive of legal defense costs, which are subject to a separate limit under the policy. This coverage is provided under [policy number]. The effective date of said policy is [date]. 2. The insurance afforded with respect to such occurrences is subject to all of the terms and conditions of the policy; provided, however, that any provisions inconsistent with subsections (a) through (e) of this Paragraph 2 are hereby amended to conform with subsections (a) through (e); a. Bankruptcy or insolvency of the insured shall not relieve the [“Insurer” or “Group”] of its obligations under the policy to which this endorsement is attached. b. The [“Insurer” or “Group”] is liable for the payment of amounts within any deductible applicable to the policy to the provider of corrective action or a damaged third-party, with a right of reimbursement by the insured for any such payment made by the [“Insurer” or “Group”]. This provision does not apply with respect to that amount of any deductible for which coverage is demonstrated under another mechanism or combination of mechanisms as specified in 40 CFR 280.95–280.102 and 280.104-280.107. c. Whenever requested by [a Director of an implementing agency], the [“Insurer” or “Group”] agrees to furnish to [the Director] a signed duplicate original of the policy and all endorsements. d. Cancellation or any other termination of the insurance by the [“Insurer” or “Group”], except for non-payment of premium or misrepresentation by the insured, will be effective only upon written notice and only after the expiration of 60 days after a copy of such written notice is received by the insured. Cancellation for non-payment of premium or misrepresentation by the insured will be effective only upon written notice and only after expiration of a minimum of 10 days after a copy of such written notice is received by the insured. [Insert for claims-made policies: e. The insurance covers claims otherwise covered by the policy that are reported to the [“Insurer” or “Group”] within six months of the effective date of cancellation or non-renewal of the policy except where the new or renewed policy has the same retroactive date or a retroactive date earlier than that of the prior policy, and which arise out of any covered occurrence that commenced after the policy retroactive date, if applicable, and prior to such policy renewal or termination
date. Claims reported during such extended reporting period are subject to the terms, conditions, limits, including limits of liability, and exclusions of the policy.] I hereby certify that the wording of this instrument is identical to the wording in 40 CFR 280.97(b)(1) and that the [“Insurer” or “Group”] is [“licensed to transact the business of insurance or eligible to provide insurance as an excess or surplus lines insurer in one or more states”]. [Signature of authorized representative of Insurer or Risk Retention Group] [Name of person signing] [Title of person signing], Authorized Representative of [name of Insurer or Risk Retention Group] [Address of Representative] (2) Certificate of Insurance Name: [name of each covered location] ____________________ ____________________ Address: [address of each covered location] ____________________ ____________________ Policy Number:____________________ Endorsement (if applicable):____________________ Period of Coverage: [current policy period] ____________________ Name of [Insurer or Risk Retention Group]: ____________________ ____________________ Address of [Insurer or Risk Retention Group]: ____________________ ____________________ Name of Insured:____________________
Address of Insured: ____________________ ____________________ ____________________ Certification: 1. [Name of Insurer or Risk Retention Group], [the “Insurer” or “Group”], as identified above, hereby certifies that it has issued liability insurance covering the following underground storage tank(s): [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR 280.22, or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility.] for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “non-sudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”; in accordance with and subject to the limits of liability, exclusions, conditions, and other terms of the policy; if coverage is different for different tanks or locations, indicate the type of coverage applicable to each tank or location] arising from operating the underground storage tank(s) identified above. The limits of liability are [insert the dollar amount of the “each occurrence” and “annual aggregate” limits of the Insurer's or Group's liability; if the amount of coverage is different for different types of coverage or for different underground storage tanks or locations, indicate the amount of coverage for each type of coverage and/or for each underground storage tank or location], exclusive of legal defense costs, which are subject to a separate limit under the policy. This coverage is provided under [policy number]. The effective date of said policy is [date]. 2. The [“Insurer” or “Group”] further certifies the following with respect to the insurance described in Paragraph 1: a. Bankruptcy or insolvency of the insured shall not relieve the [“Insurer” or “Group”] of its obligations under the policy to which this certificate applies. b. The [“Insurer” or “Group”] is liable for the payment of amounts within any deductible applicable to the policy to the provider of corrective action or a damaged third-party, with a right of reimbursement by the insured for any such payment made by the [“Insurer” or “Group”]. This provision does not apply with respect to that amount of any deductible for which coverage is demonstrated under another mechanism or combination of mechanisms as specified in 40 CFR 280.95–280.102 and 280.104-280.107 .
c. Whenever requested by [a Director of an implementing agency], the [“Insurer” or “Group”] agrees to furnish to [the Director] a signed duplicate original of the policy and all endorsements. d. Cancellation or any other termination of the insurance by the [“Insurer” or “Group”], except for non-payment of premium or misrepresentation by the insured, will be effective only upon written notice and only after the expiration of 60 days after a copy of such written notice is received by the insured. Cancellation for non-payment of premium or misrepresentation by the insured will be effective only upon written notice and only after expiration of a minimum of 10 days after a copy of such written notice is received by the insured. [Insert for claims-made policies: e. The insurance covers claims otherwise covered by the policy that are reported to the [“Insurer” or “Group”] within six months of the effective date of cancellation or non-renewal of the policy except where the new or renewed policy has the same retroactive date or a retroactive date earlier than that of the prior policy, and which arise out of any covered occurrence that commenced after the policy retroactive date, if applicable, and prior to such policy renewal or termination date. Claims reported during such extended reporting period are subject to the terms, conditions, limits, including limits of liability, and exclusions of the policy.] I hereby certify that the wording of this instrument is identical to the wording in 40 CFR 280.97(b)(2) and that the [“Insurer” or “Group”] is [“licensed to transact the business of insurance, or eligible to provide insurance as an excess or surplus lines insurer, in one or more states”]. [Signature of authorized representative of Insurer] [Type name] [Title], Authorized Representative of [name of Insurer or Risk Retention Group] [Address of Representative] (c) Each insurance policy must be issued by an insurer or a risk retention group that, at a minimum, is licensed to transact the business of insurance or eligible to provide insurance as an excess or surplus lines insurer in one or more states. [53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 47081, Nov. 9, 1989] § 280.98 Surety bond. (a) An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by obtaining a surety bond that conforms to the requirements of this section. The surety company issuing the bond must be among those listed as acceptable sureties on federal bonds in the latest Circular 570 of the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
(b) The surety bond must be worded as follows, except that instructions in brackets must be replaced with the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Performance Bond Date bond executed:____________________ Period of coverage:____________________ Principal: [legal name and business address of owner or operator] ____________________ Type of organization: [insert “individual,” “joint venture,” “partnership,” or “corporation”] ____________________ State of incorporation (if applicable): ____________________ Surety(ies): [name(s) and business address(es)] ____________________ Scope of Coverage: [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR 280.22, or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility. List the coverage guaranteed by the bond: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases” “arising from operating the underground storage tank”]. Penal sums of bond: Per occurrence $____________________ Annual aggregate $____________________ Surety's bond number:____________________ Know All Persons by These Presents, that we, the Principal and Surety(ies), hereto are firmly bound to [the implementing agency], in the above penal sums for the payment of which we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns jointly and severally; provided that, where the Surety(ies) are corporations acting as co-sureties, we, the Sureties, bind ourselves in such sums jointly and severally only for the purpose of allowing a joint action or actions against any or all of us, and for all other purposes each Surety binds itself, jointly and
severally with the Principal, for the payment of such sums only as is set forth opposite the name of such Surety, but if no limit of liability is indicated, the limit of liability shall be the full amount of the penal sums. Whereas said Principal is required under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended, to provide financial assurance for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”; if coverage is different for different tanks or locations, indicate the type of coverage applicable to each tank or location] arising from operating the underground storage tanks identified above, and Whereas said Principal shall establish a standby trust fund as is required when a surety bond is used to provide such financial assurance; Now, therefore, the conditions of the obligation are such that if the Principal shall faithfully [“take corrective action, in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.6 and the Director of the state implementing agency's instructions for,” and/or “compensate injured third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden” or “nonsudden” or “sudden and nonsudden”] accidental releases arising from operating the tank(s) identified above, or if the Principal shall provide alternate financial assurance, as specified in 40 CFR part 280, subpart H, within 120 days after the date the notice of cancellation is received by the Principal from the Surety(ies), then this obligation shall be null and void; otherwise it is to remain in full force and effect. Such obligation does not apply to any of the following: (a) Any obligation of [insert owner or operator] under a workers' compensation, disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (b) Bodily injury to an employee of [insert owner or operator] arising from, and in the course of, employment by [insert owner or operator]; (c) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (d) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaned to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by [insert owner or operator] that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank; (e) Bodily injury or property damage for which [insert owner or operator] is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 280.93. The Surety(ies) shall become liable on this bond obligation only when the Principal has failed to fulfill the conditions described above.
Upon notification by [the Director of the implementing agency] that the Principal has failed to [“take corrective action, in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.6 and the Director's instructions,” and/or “compensate injured third parties”] as guaranteed by this bond, the Surety(ies) shall either perform [“corrective action in accordance with 40 CFR part 280 and the Director's instructions,” and/or “third-party liability compensation”] or place funds in an amount up to the annual aggregate penal sum into the standby trust fund as directed by [the Regional Administrator or the Director] under 40 CFR 280.112. Upon notification by [the Director] that the Principal has failed to provide alternate financial assurance within 60 days after the date the notice of cancellation is received by the Principal from the Surety(ies) and that [the Director] has determined or suspects that a release has occurred, the Surety(ies) shall place funds in an amount not exceeding the annual aggregate penal sum into the standby trust fund as directed by [the Director] under 40 CFR 280.112. The Surety(ies) hereby waive(s) notification of amendments to applicable laws, statutes, rules, and regulations and agrees that no such amendment shall in any way alleviate its (their) obligation on this bond. The liability of the Surety(ies) shall not be discharged by any payment or succession of payments hereunder, unless and until such payment or payments shall amount in the annual aggregate to the penal sum shown on the face of the bond, but in no event shall the obligation of the Surety(ies) hereunder exceed the amount of said annual aggregate penal sum. The Surety(ies) may cancel the bond by sending notice of cancellation by certified mail to the Principal, provided, however, that cancellation shall not occur during the 120 days beginning on the date of receipt of the notice of cancellation by the Principal, as evidenced by the return receipt. The Principal may terminate this bond by sending written notice to the Surety(ies). In Witness Thereof, the Principal and Surety(ies) have executed this Bond and have affixed their seals on the date set forth above. The persons whose signatures appear below hereby certify that they are authorized to execute this surety bond on behalf of the Principal and Surety(ies) and that the wording of this surety bond is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR 280.98(b) as such regulations were constituted on the date this bond was executed. Principal [Signature(s)] [Names(s)] [Title(s)]
[Corporate seal] Corporate Surety(ies) [Name and address] [State of Incorporation: _____ [Liability limit: $_____ [Signature(s)] [Names(s) and title(s)] [Corporate seal] [For every co-surety, provide signature(s), corporate seal, and other information in the same manner as for Surety above.] Bond premium: $_____ (c) Under the terms of the bond, the surety will become liable on the bond obligation when the owner or operator fails to perform as guaranteed by the bond. In all cases, the surety's liability is limited to the per-occurrence and annual aggregate penal sums. (d) The owner or operator who uses a surety bond to satisfy the requirements of §280.93 must establish a standby trust fund when the surety bond is acquired. Under the terms of the bond, all amounts paid by the surety under the bond will be deposited directly into the standby trust fund in accordance with instructions from the Director under §280.112. This standby trust fund must meet the requirements specified in §280.103. § 280.99 Letter of credit. (a) An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by obtaining an irrevocable standby letter of credit that conforms to the requirements of this section. The issuing institution must be an entity that has the authority to issue letters of credit in each state where used and whose letter-of-credit operations are regulated and examined by a federal or state agency. (b) The letter of credit must be worded as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit [Name and address of issuing institution]
[Name and address of Director(s) of state implementing agency(ies)] Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby establish our Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit No. ___ in your favor, at the request and for the account of [owner or operator name] of [address] up to the aggregate amount of [in words] U.S. dollars ($[insert dollar amount]), available upon presentation [insert, if more than one Director of a state implementing agency is a beneficiary, “by any one of you”] of (1) your sight draft, bearing reference to this letter of credit, No. ___, and (2) your signed statement reading as follows: “I certify that the amount of the draft is payable pursuant to regulations issued under authority of Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1976, as amended.” This letter of credit may be drawn on to cover [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”] arising from operating the underground storage tank(s) identified below in the amount of [in words] $[insert dollar amount] per occurrence and [in words] $[insert dollar amount] annual aggregate: [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR 280.22, or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility.] The letter of credit may not be drawn on to cover any of the following: (a) Any obligation of [insert owner or operator] under a workers' compensation, disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (b) Bodily injury to an employee of [insert owner or operator] arising from, and in the course of, employment by [insert owner or operator]; (c) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (d) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaned to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by [insert owner or operator] that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank; (e) Bodily injury or property damage for which [insert owner or operator] is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 280.93.
This letter of credit is effective as of [date] and shall expire on [date], but such expiration date shall be automatically extended for a period of [at least the length of the original term] on [expiration date] and on each successive expiration date, unless, at least 120 days before the current expiration date, we notify [owner or operator] by certified mail that we have decided not to extend this letter of credit beyond the current expiration date. In the event that [owner or operator] is so notified, any unused portion of the credit shall be available upon presentation of your sight draft for 120 days after the date of receipt by [owner or operator], as shown on the signed return receipt. Whenever this letter of credit is drawn on under and in compliance with the terms of this credit, we shall duly honor such draft upon presentation to us, and we shall deposit the amount of the draft directly into the standby trust fund of [owner or operator] in accordance with your instructions. We certify that the wording of this letter of credit is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR 280.99(b) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown immediately below. [Signature(s) and title(s) of official(s) of issuing institution] [Date] This credit is subject to [insert “the most recent edition of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits, published and copyrighted by the International Chamber of Commerce,” or “the Uniform Commercial Code”]. (c) An owner or operator who uses a letter of credit to satisfy the requirements of §280.93 must also establish a standby trust fund when the letter of credit is acquired. Under the terms of the letter of credit, all amounts paid pursuant to a draft by the Director of the implementing agency will be deposited by the issuing institution directly into the standby trust fund in accordance with instructions from the Director under §280.112. This standby trust fund must meet the requirements specified in §280.103. (d) The letter of credit must be irrevocable with a term specified by the issuing institution. The letter of credit must provide that credit be automatically renewed for the same term as the original term, unless, at least 120 days before the current expiration date, the issuing institution notifies the owner or operator by certified mail of its decision not to renew the letter of credit. Under the terms of the letter of credit, the 120 days will begin on the date when the owner or operator receives the notice, as evidenced by the return receipt. [53 FR 37194, Sept. 23, 1988, as amended at 59 FR 29960, June 10, 1994] § 280.100 Use of state-required mechanism. (a) For underground storage tanks located in a state that does not have an approved program, and where the state requires owners or operators of underground storage tanks to demonstrate financial responsibility for taking corrective action and/or for compensating third parties for
bodily injury and property damage, an owner or operator may use a state-required financial mechanism to meet the requirements of §280.93 if the Regional Administrator determines that the state mechanism is at least equivalent to the financial mechanisms specified in this rule. (b) The Regional Administrator will evaluate the equivalency of a state-required mechanism principally in terms of: certainty of the availability of funds for taking corrective action and/or for compensating third parties; the amount of funds that will be made available; and the types of costs covered. The Regional Administrator may also consider other factors as is necessary. (c) The state, an owner or operator, or any other interested party may submit to the Regional Administrator a written petition requesting that one or more of the state-required mechanisms be considered acceptable for meeting the requirements of §280.93. The submission must include copies of the appropriate state statutory and regulatory requirements and must show the amount of funds for corrective action and/or for compensating third parties assured by the mechanism(s). The Regional Administrator may require the petitioner to submit additional information as is deemed necessary to make this determination. (d) Any petition under this section may be submitted on behalf of all of the state's underground storage tank owners and operators. (e) The Regional Administrator will notify the petitioner of his determination regarding the mechanism's acceptability in lieu of financial mechanisms specified in this rule. Pending this determination, the owners and operators using such mechanisms will be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of §280.93 for underground storage tanks located in the state for the amounts and types of costs covered by such mechanisms. [53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988; 53 FR 51274, Dec. 21, 1988] § 280.101 State fund or other state assurance. (a) An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 for underground storage tanks located in a state, where EPA is administering the requirements of this rule, which assures that monies will be available from a state fund or state assurance program to cover costs up to the limits specified in §280.93 or otherwise assures that such costs will be paid if the Regional Administrator determines that the state's assurance is at least equivalent to the financial mechanisms specified in this rule. (b) The Regional Administrator will evaluate the equivalency of a state fund or other state assurance principally in terms of: Certainty of the availability of funds for taking corrective action and/or for compensating third parties; the amount of funds that will be made available; and the types of costs covered. The Regional Administrator may also consider other factors as is necessary. (c) The state must submit to the Regional Administrator a description of the state fund or other state assurance to be supplied as financial assurance, along with a list of the classes of underground storage tanks to which the funds may be applied. The Regional Administrator
may require the state to submit additional information as is deemed necessary to make a determination regarding the acceptability of the state fund or other state assurance. Pending the determination by the Regional Administrator, the owner or operator of a covered class of USTs will be deemed to be in compliance with the requirements of §280.93 for the amounts and types of costs covered by the state fund or other state assurance. (d) The Regional Administrator will notify the state of his determination regarding the acceptability of the state's fund or other assurance in lieu of financial mechanisms specified in this rule. Within 60 days after the Regional Administrator notifies a state that a state fund or other state assurance is acceptable, the state must provide to each owner or operator for which it is assuming financial responsibility a letter or certificate describing the nature of the state's assumption of responsibility. The letter or certificate from the state must include, or have attached to it, the following information: the facility's name and address and the amount of funds for corrective action and/or for compensating third parties that is assured by the state. The owner or operator must maintain this letter or certificate on file as proof of financial responsibility in accordance with §280.111(b)( 8). § 280.102 Trust fund. (a) An owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by establishing a trust fund that conforms to the requirements of this section. The trustee must be an entity that has the authority to act as a trustee and whose trust operations are regulated and examined by a federal agency or an agency of the state in which the fund is established. (b) The wording of the trust agreement must be identical to the wording specified in §280.103(b)(1), and must be accompanied by a formal certification of acknowledgement as specified in §280.103(b)(2). (c) The trust fund, when established, must be funded for the full required amount of coverage, or funded for part of the required amount of coverage and used in combination with other mechanism(s) that provide the remaining required coverage. (d) If the value of the trust fund is greater than the required amount of coverage, the owner or operator may submit a written request to the Director of the implementing agency for release of the excess. (e) If other financial assurance as specified in this rule is substituted for all or part of the trust fund, the owner or operator may submit a written request to the Director of the implementing agency for release of the excess. (f) Within 60 days after receiving a request from the owner or operator for release of funds as specified in paragraph (d) or (e) of this section, the Director of the implementing agency will instruct the trustee to release to the owner or operator such funds as the Director specifies in writing.
§ 280.103 Standby trust fund. (a) An owner or operator using any one of the mechanisms authorized by §§280.96, 280.98, or 280.99 must establish a standby trust fund when the mechanism is acquired. The trustee of the standby trust fund must be an entity that has the authority to act as a trustee and whose trust operations are regulated and examined by a Federal agency or an agency of the state in which the fund is established. (b)(1) The standby trust agreement, or trust agreement, must be worded as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Trust Agreement Trust agreement, the “Agreement,” entered into as of [date] by and between [name of the owner or operator], a [name of state] [insert “corporation,” “partnership,” “association,” or “proprietorship”], the “Grantor,” and [name of corporate trustee], [insert “Incorporated in the state of ___” or “a national bank”], the “Trustee.” Whereas, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, “EPA,” an agency of the United States Government, has established certain regulations applicable to the Grantor, requiring that an owner or operator of an underground storage tank shall provide assurance that funds will be available when needed for corrective action and third-party compensation for bodily injury and property damage caused by sudden and nonsudden accidental releases arising from the operation of the underground storage tank. The attached Schedule A lists the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located that are covered by the standpoint trust agreement. [Whereas, the Grantor has elected to establish [insert either “a guarantee,” “surety bond,” or “letter of credit”] to provide all or part of such financial assurance for the underground storage tanks identified herein and is required to establish a standby trust fund able to accept payments from the instrument (This paragraph is only applicable to the standby trust agreement.)]; Whereas, the Grantor, acting through its duly authorized officers, has selected the Trustee to be the trustee under this agreement, and the Trustee is willing to act as trustee; Now, therefore, the Grantor and the Trustee agree as follows: Section 1. Definitions As used in this Agreement: (a) The term “Grantor” means the owner or operator who enters into this Agreement and any successors or assigns of the Grantor.
(b) The term “Trustee” means the Trustee who enters into this Agreement and any successor Trustee. Section 2. Identification of the Financial Assurance Mechanism This Agreement pertains to the [identify the financial assurance mechanism, either a guarantee, surety bond, or letter of credit, from which the standby trust fund is established to receive payments (This paragraph is only applicable to the standby trust agreement.)]. Section 3. Establishment of Fund The Grantor and the Trustee hereby establish a trust fund, the “Fund,” for the benefit of [implementing agency]. The Grantor and the Trustee intend that no third party have access to the Fund except as herein provided. [The Fund is established initially as a standby to receive payments and shall not consist of any property.] Payments made by the provider of financial assurance pursuant to [the Director of the implementing agency's] instruction are transferred to the Trustee and are referred to as the Fund, together with all earnings and profits thereon, less any payments or distributions made by the Trustee pursuant to this Agreement. The Fund shall be held by the Trustee, IN TRUST, as hereinafter provided. The Trustee shall not be responsible nor shall it undertake any responsibility for the amount or adequacy of, nor any duty to collect from the Grantor as provider of financial assurance, any payments necessary to discharge any liability of the Grantor established by [the state implementing agency] Section 4. Payment for [“Corrective Action” and/or Third-Party Liability Claims”] The Trustee shall make payments from the Fund as [the Director of the implementing agency] shall direct, in writing, to provide for the payment of the costs of [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”] arising from operating the tanks covered by the financial assurance mechanism identified in this Agreement. The Fund may not be drawn upon to cover any of the following: (a) Any obligation of [insert owner or operator] under a workers' compensation, disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (b) Bodily injury to an employee of [insert owner or operator] arising from, and in the course of employment by [insert owner or operator]; (c) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (d) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaned to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by [insert owner or operator] that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank;
(e) Bodily injury or property damage for which [insert owner or operator] is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 280.93. The Trustee shall reimburse the Grantor, or other persons as specified by [the Director], from the Fund for corrective action expenditures and/or third-party liability claims in such amounts as [the Director] shall direct in writing. In addition, the Trustee shall refund to the Grantor such amounts as [the Director] specifies in writing. Upon refund, such funds shall no longer constitute part of the Fund as defined herein. Section 5. Payments Comprising the Fund Payments made to the Trustee for the Fund shall consist of cash and securities acceptable to the Trustee. Section 6. Trustee Management The Trustee shall invest and reinvest the principal and income of the Fund and keep the Fund invested as a single fund, without distinction between principal and income, in accordance with general investment policies and guidelines which the Grantor may communicate in writing to the Trustee from time to time, subject, however, to the provisions of this Section. In investing, reinvesting, exchanging, selling, and managing the Fund, the Trustee shall discharge his duties with respect to the trust fund solely in the interest of the beneficiaries and with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing which persons of prudence, acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters, would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims; except that: (i) Securities or other obligations of the Grantor, or any other owner or operator of the tanks, or any of their affiliates as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, 15 U.S.C. 80a–2(a), shall not be acquired or held, unless they are securities or other obligations of the federal or a state government; (ii) The Trustee is authorized to invest the Fund in time or demand deposits of the Trustee, to the extent insured by an agency of the federal or state government; and (iii) The Trustee is authorized to hold cash awaiting investment or distribution uninvested for a reasonable time and without liability for the payment of interest thereon. Section 7. Commingling and Investment The Trustee is expressly authorized in its discretion: (a) To transfer from time to time any or all of the assets of the Fund to any common, commingled, or collective trust fund created by the Trustee in which the Fund is eligible to participate, subject to all of the provisions thereof, to be commingled with the assets of other trusts participating therein; and
(b) To purchase shares in any investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq., including one which may be created, managed, underwritten, or to which investment advice is rendered or the shares of which are sold by the Trustee. The Trustee may vote such shares in its discretion. Section 8. Express Powers of Trustee Without in any way limiting the powers and discretions conferred upon the Trustee by the other provisions of this Agreement or by law, the Trustee is expressly authorized and empowered: (a) To sell, exchange, convey, transfer, or otherwise dispose of any property held by it, by public or private sale. No person dealing with the Trustee shall be bound to see to the application of the purchase money or to inquire into the validity or expediency of any such sale or other disposition; (b) To make, execute, acknowledge, and deliver any and all documents of transfer and conveyance and any and all other instruments that may be necessary or appropriate to carry out the powers herein granted; (c) To register any securities held in the Fund in its own name or in the name of a nominee and to hold any security in bearer form or in book entry, or to combine certificates representing such securities with certificates of the same issue held by the Trustee in other fiduciary capacities, or to deposit or arrange for the deposit of such securities in a qualified central depository even though, when so deposited, such securities may be merged and held in bulk in the name of the nominee of such depository with other securities deposited therein by another person, or to deposit or arrange for the deposit of any securities issued by the United States Government, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, with a Federal Reserve bank, but the books and records of the Trustee shall at all times show that all such securities are part of the Fund; (d) To deposit any cash in the Fund in interest-bearing accounts maintained or savings certificates issued by the Trustee, in its separate corporate capacity, or in any other banking institution affiliated with the Trustee, to the extent insured by an agency of the federal or state government; and (e) To compromise or otherwise adjust all claims in favor of or against the Fund. Section 9. Taxes and Expenses All taxes of any kind that may be assessed or levied against or in respect of the Fund and all brokerage commissions incurred by the Fund shall be paid from the Fund. All other expenses incurred by the Trustee in connection with the administration of this Trust, including fees for legal services rendered to the Trustee, the compensation of the Trustee to the extent not paid directly by the Grantor, and all other proper charges and disbursements of the Trustee shall be paid from the Fund.
Section 10. Advice of Counsel The Trustee may from time to time consult with counsel, who may be counsel to the Grantor, with respect to any questions arising as to the construction of this Agreement or any action to be taken hereunder. The Trustee shall be fully protected, to the extent permitted by law, in acting upon the advice of counsel. Section 11. Trustee Compensation The Trustee shall be entitled to reasonable compensation for its services as agreed upon in writing from time to time with the Grantor. Section 12. Successor Trustee The Trustee may resign or the Grantor may replace the Trustee, but such resignation or replacement shall not be effective until the Grantor has appointed a successor trustee and this successor accepts the appointment. The successor trustee shall have the same powers and duties as those conferred upon the Trustee hereunder. Upon the successor trustee's acceptance of the appointment, the Trustee shall assign, transfer, and pay over to the successor trustee the funds and properties then constituting the Fund. If for any reason the Grantor cannot or does not act in the event of the resignation of the Trustee, the Trustee may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction for the appointment of a successor trustee or for instructions. The successor trustee shall specify the date on which it assumes administration of the trust in writing sent to the Grantor and the present Trustee by certified mail 10 days before such change becomes effective. Any expenses incurred by the Trustee as a result of any of the acts contemplated by this Section shall be paid as provided in Section 9. Section 13. Instructions to the Trustee All orders, requests, and instructions by the Grantor to the Trustee shall be in writing, signed by such persons as are designated in the attached Schedule B or such other designees as the Grantor may designate by amendment to Schedule B. The Trustee shall be fully protected in acting without inquiry in accordance with the Grantor's orders, requests, and instructions. All orders, requests, and instructions by [the Director of the implementing agency] to the Trustee shall be in writing, signed by [the Director], and the Trustee shall act and shall be fully protected in acting in accordance with such orders, requests, and instructions. The Trustee shall have the right to assume, in the absence of written notice to the contrary, that no event constituting a change or a termination of the authority of any person to act on behalf of the Grantor or [the director] hereunder has occurred. The Trustee shall have no duty to act in the absence of such orders, requests, and instructions from the Grantor and/or [the Director], except as provided for herein. Section 14. Amendment of Agreement This Agreement may be amended by an instrument in writing executed by the Grantor and the Trustee, or by the Trustee and [the Director of the implementing agency] if the Grantor ceases to exist.
Section 15. Irrevocability and Termination Subject to the right of the parties to amend this Agreement as provided in Section 14, this Trust shall be irrevocable and shall continue until terminated at the written direction of the Grantor and the Trustee, or by the Trustee and [the Director of the implementing agency], if the Grantor ceases to exist. Upon termination of the Trust, all remaining trust property, less final trust administration expenses, shall be delivered to the Grantor. Section 16. Immunity and Indemnification The Trustee shall not incur personal liability of any nature in connection with any act or omission, made in good faith, in the administration of this Trust, or in carrying out any directions by the Grantor or [the Director of the implementing agency] issued in accordance with this Agreement. The Trustee shall be indemnified and saved harmless by the Grantor, from and against any personal liability to which the Trustee may be subjected by reason of any act or conduct in its official capacity, including all expenses reasonably incurred in its defense in the event the Grantor fails to provide such defense. Section 17. Choice of Law This Agreement shall be administered, construed, and enforced according to the laws of the state of [insert name of state], or the Comptroller of the Currency in the case of National Association banks. Section 18. Interpretation As used in this Agreement, words in the singular include the plural and words in the plural include the singular. The descriptive headings for each section of this Agreement shall not affect the interpretation or the legal efficacy of this Agreement. In Witness whereof the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers duly authorized and their corporate seals (if applicable) to be hereunto affixed and attested as of the date first above written. The parties below certify that the wording of this Agreement is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR 280.103(b)(1) as such regulations were constituted on the date written above. [Signature of Grantor] [Name of the Grantor] [Title] Attest: [Signature of Trustee]
[Name of the Trustee] [Title] [Seal] [Signature of Witness] [Name of the Witness] [Title] [Seal] (2) The standby trust agreement, or trust agreement must be accompanied by a formal certification of acknowledgement similar to the following. State requirements may differ on the proper content of this acknowledgment. State of____________________ County of____________________ On this [date], before me personally came [owner or operator] to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did depose and say that she/he resides at [address], that she/he is [title] of [corporation], the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that she/he knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to such instrument is such corporate seal; that it was so affixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation; and that she/he signed her/his name thereto by like order. [Signature of Notary Public] [Name of Notary Public] (c) The Director of the implementing agency will instruct the trustee to refund the balance of the standby trust fund to the provider of financial assurance if the Director determines that no additional corrective action costs or third-party liability claims will occur as a result of a release covered by the financial assurance mechanism for which the standby trust fund was established. (d) An owner or operator may establish one trust fund as the depository mechanism for all funds assured in compliance with this rule. [53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988; 53 FR 51274, Dec. 21, 1988] § 280.104 Local government bond rating test. (a) A general purpose local government owner or operator and/or local government serving as a guarantor may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by having a currently outstanding issue
or issues of general obligation bonds of $1 million or more, excluding refunded obligations, with a Moody's rating of Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa, or a Standard & Poor's rating of AAA, AA, A, or BBB. Where a local government has multiple outstanding issues, or where a local government's bonds are rated by both Moody's and Standard and Poor's, the lowest rating must be used to determine eligibility. Bonds that are backed by credit enhancement other than municipal bond insurance may not be considered in determining the amount of applicable bonds outstanding. (b) A local government owner or operator or local government serving as a guarantor that is not a general-purpose local government and does not have the legal authority to issue general obligation bonds may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by having a currently outstanding issue or issues of revenue bonds of $1 million or more, excluding refunded issues and by also having a Moody's rating of Aaa, A, A, or Baa, or a Standard & Poor's rating of AAA, AA, A, or BBB as the lowest rating for any rated revenue bond issued by the local government. Where bonds are rated by both Moody's and Standard & Poor's, the lower rating for each bond must be used to determine eligibility. Bonds that are backed by credit enhancement may not be considered in determining the amount of applicable bonds outstanding. (c) The local government owner or operator and/or guarantor must maintain a copy of its bond rating published within the last 12 months by Moody's or Standard & Poor's. (d) To demonstrate that it meets the local government bond rating test, the chief financial officer of a general purpose local government owner or operator and/or guarantor must sign a letter worded exactly as follows, except that the instructions in brackets are to be replaced by the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Letter from Chief Financial Officer I am the chief financial officer of [insert: name and address of local government owner or operator, or guarantor]. This letter is in support of the use of the bond rating test to demonstrate financial responsibility for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage”] caused by [insert: “sudden accidental releases” and/or “nonsudden accidental releases”] in the amount of at least [insert: dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate arising from operating (an) underground storage tank(s). Underground storage tanks at the following facilities are assured by this bond rating test: [List for each facility: the name and address of the facility where tanks are assured by the bond rating test]. The details of the issue date, maturity, outstanding amount, bond rating, and bond rating agency of all outstanding bond issues that are being used by [name of local government owner or operator, or guarantor] to demonstrate financial responsibility are as follows: [complete table] Issue date Maturity date Outstanding amount Bond rating Rating agency
[Moody's or Standard & Poor's] The total outstanding obligation of [insert amount], excluding refunded bond issues, exceeds the minimum amount of $1 million. All outstanding general obligation bonds issued by this government that have been rated by Moody's or Standard & Poor's are rated as at least investment grade (Moody's Baa or Standard & Poor's BBB) based on the most recent ratings published within the last 12 months. Neither rating service has provided notification within the last 12 months of downgrading of bond ratings below investment grade or of withdrawal of bond rating other than for repayment of outstanding bond issues. I hereby certify that the wording of this letter is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR Part 280.104(d) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown immediately below. [Date]____________________ [Signature]____________________ [Name]____________________ [Title]____________________ (e) To demonstrate that it meets the local government bond rating test, the chief financial officer of local government owner or operator and/or guarantor other than a general purpose government must sign a letter worded exactly as follows, except that the instructions in brackets are to be replaced by the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Letter from Chief Financial Officer I am the chief financial officer of [insert: name and address of local government owner or operator, or guarantor]. This letter is in support of the use of the bond rating test to demonstrate financial responsibility for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage”] caused by [insert : “sudden accidental releases” and/or “nonsudden accidental releases”] in the amount of at least [insert: dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate arising from operating (an) underground storage tank(s). This local government is not organized to provide general governmental services and does not have the legal authority under state law or constitutional provisions to issue general obligation debt. Underground storage tanks at the following facilities are assured by this bond rating test: [List for each facility: the name and address of the facility where tanks are assured by the bond rating test]. The details of the issue date, maturity, outstanding amount, bond rating, and bond rating agency of all outstanding revenue bond issues that are being used by [name of local government owner or operator, or guarantor] to demonstrate financial responsibility are as follows: [complete table] Issue date Maturity date Outstanding amount Bond rating Rating agency
[Moody's or Standard & Poor's] The total outstanding obligation of [insert amount], excluding refunded bond issues, exceeds the minimum amount of $1 million. All outstanding revenue bonds issued by this government that have been rated by Moody's or Standard & Poor's are rated as at least investment grade (Moody's Baa or Standard & Poor's BBB) based on the most recent ratings published within the last 12 months. The revenue bonds listed are not backed by third-party credit enhancement or are insured by a municipal bond insurance company. Neither rating service has provided notification within the last 12 months of downgrading of bond ratings below investment grade or of withdrawal of bond rating other than for repayment of outstanding bond issues. I hereby certify that the wording of this letter is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.104(e) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown immediately below. [Date]____________________ [Signature]____________________ [Name]____________________ [Title]____________________ (f) The Director of the implementing agency may require reports of financial condition at any time from the local government owner or operator, and/or local government guarantor. If the Director finds, on the basis of such reports or other information, that the local government owner or operator, and/or guarantor, no longer meets the local government bond rating test requirements of §280.104, the local government owner or operator must obtain alternative coverage within 30 days after notification of such a finding. (g) If a local government owner or operator using the bond rating test to provide financial assurance finds that it no longer meets the bond rating test requirements, the local government owner or operator must obtain alternative coverage within 150 days of the change in status. (h) If the local government owner or operator fails to obtain alternate assurance within 150 days of finding that it no longer meets the requirements of the bond rating test or within 30 days of notification by the Director of the implementing agency that it no longer meets the requirements of the bond rating test, the owner or operator must notify the Director of such failure within 10 days. [58 FR 9053, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.105 Local government financial test. (a) A local government owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by passing the financial test specified in this section. To be eligible to use the financial test, the local government owner or operator must have the ability and authority to assess and levy taxes or to freely establish fees and charges. To pass the local government financial test, the owner or operator must meet the criteria of paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this section based on year- end financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year.
(b)(1) The local government owner or operator must have the following information available, as shown in the year-end financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year: (i) Total revenues: Consists of the sum of general fund operating and non-operating revenues including net local taxes, licenses and permits, fines and forfeitures, revenues from use of money and property, charges for services, investment earnings, sales (property, publications, etc.), intergovernmental revenues (restricted and unrestricted), and total revenues from all other governmental funds including enterprise, debt service, capital projects, and special revenues, but excluding revenues to funds held in a trust or agency capacity. For purposes of this test, the calculation of total revenues shall exclude all transfers between funds under the direct control of the local government using the financial test (interfund transfers), liquidation of investments, and issuance of debt. (ii) Total expenditures: Consists of the sum of general fund operating and non-operating expenditures including public safety, public utilities, transportation, public works, environmental protection, cultural and recreational, community development, revenue sharing, employee benefits and compensation, office management, planning and zoning, capital projects, interest payments on debt, payments for retirement of debt principal, and total expenditures from all other governmental funds including enterprise, debt service, capital projects, and special revenues. For purposes of this test, the calculation of total expenditures shall exclude all transfers between funds under the direct control of the local government using the financial test (interfund transfers). (iii) Local revenues: Consists of total revenues (as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section) minus the sum of all transfers from other governmental entities, including all monies received from Federal, state, or local government sources. (iv) Debt service: Consists of the sum of all interest and principal payments on all long- term credit obligations and all interest-bearing short-term credit obligations. Includes interest and principal payments on general obligation bonds, revenue bonds, notes, mortgages, judgments, and interest bearing warrants. Excludes payments on non- interest-bearing short-term obligations, interfund obligations, amounts owed in a trust or agency capacity, and advances and contingent loans from other governments. (v) Total funds: Consists of the sum of cash and investment securities from all funds, including general, enterprise, debt service, capital projects, and special revenue funds, but excluding employee retirement funds, at the end of the local government's financial reporting year. Includes Federal securities, Federal agency securities, state and local government securities, and other securities such as bonds, notes and mortgages. For purposes of this test, the calculation of total funds shall exclude agency funds, private trust funds, accounts receivable, value of real property, and other non-security assets. (vi) Population consists of the number of people in the area served by the local government.
(2) The local government's year-end financial statements, if independently audited, cannot include an adverse auditor's opinion or a disclaimer of opinion. The local government cannot have outstanding issues of general obligation or revenue bonds that are rated as less than investment grade. (3) The local government owner or operator must have a letter signed by the chief financial officer worded as specified in paragraph (c) of this section. (c) To demonstrate that it meets the financial test under paragraph (b) of this section, the chief financial officer of the local government owner or operator, must sign, within 120 days of the close of each financial reporting year, as defined by the twelve-month period for which financial statements used to support the financial test are prepared, a letter worded exactly as follows, except that the instructions in brackets are to be replaced by the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Letter From Chief Financial Officer I am the chief financial officer of [insert: name and address of the owner or operator]. This letter is in support of the use of the local government financial test to demonstrate financial responsibility for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage”] caused by [insert: “sudden accidental releases” and/or “nonsudden accidental releases”] in the amount of at least [insert: dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate arising from operating [an] underground storage tank[s]. Underground storage tanks at the following facilities are assured by this financial test [List for each facility: the name and address of the facility where tanks assured by this financial test are located. If separate mechanisms or combinations of mechanisms are being used to assure any of the tanks at this facility, list each tank assured by this financial test by the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR Part 280.22 or the corresponding state requirements.] This owner or operator has not received an adverse opinion, or a disclaimer of opinion from an independent auditor on its financial statements for the latest completed fiscal year. Any outstanding issues of general obligation or revenue bonds, if rated, have a Moody's rating of Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa or a Standard and Poor's rating of AAA, AA, A, or BBB; if rated by both firms, the bonds have a Moody's rating of Aaa, Aa, A, or Baa and a Standard and Poor's rating of AAA, AA, A, or BBB. Worksheet for Municipal Financial Test Part I: Basic Information 1. Total Revenues a. Revenues (dollars) ______
Value of revenues excludes liquidation of investments and issuance of debt. Value includes all general fund operating and non-operating revenues, as well as all revenues from all other governmental funds including enterprise, debt service, capital projects, and special revenues, but excluding revenues to funds held in a trust or agency capacity. b. Subtract interfund transfers (dollars)______ c. Total Revenues (dollars)______ 2. Total Expenditures a. Expenditures (dollars) ______ Value consists of the sum of general fund operating and non-operating expenditures including interest payments on debt, payments for retirement of debt principal, and total expenditures from all other governmental funds including enterprise, debt service, capital projects, and special revenues. b. Subtract interfund transfers (dollars)______ c. Total Expenditures (dollars)______ 3. Local Revenues a. Total Revenues (from 1c) (dollars) ______ b. Subtract total intergovernmental transfers (dollars)______ c. Local Revenues (dollars)______ 4. Debt Service a. Interest and fiscal charges (dollars)______ b. Add debt retirement (dollars)______ c. Total Debt Service (dollars)______ 5. Total Funds (Dollars)______ (Sum of amounts held as cash and investment securities from all funds, excluding amounts held for employee retirement funds, agency funds, and trust funds) 6. Population (Persons)______ Part II: Application of Test
- Total Revenues to Population a. Total Revenues (from 1c)______ b. Population (from 6)______ c. Divide 7a by 7b ______ d. Subtract 417______ e. Divide by 5,212______ f. Multiply by 4.095______ 8. Total Expenses to Population a. Total Expenses (from 2c)______ b. Population (from 6)______ c. Divide 8a by 8b ______ d. Subtract 524 ______ e. Divide by 5,401______ f. Multiply by 4.095______ 9. Local Revenues to Total Revenues a. Local Revenues (from 3c)______ b. Total Revenues (from 1c)______ c. Divide 9a by 9b ______ d. Subtract .695______ e. Divide by .205______ f. Multiply by 2.840 ______ 10. Debt Service to Population a. Debt Service (from 4c) ______
b. Population (from 6)______ c. Divide 10a by 10b ______ d. Subtract 51 ______ e. Divide by 1,038______ f. Multiply by −1.866______ 11. Debt Service to Total Revenues a. Debt Service (from 4c)______ b. Total Revenues (from 1c)______ c. Divide 11a by 11b ______ d. Subtract .068 ______ e. Divide by .259 ______ f. Multiply by −3.533 ______ 12. Total Revenues to Total Expenses a. Total Revenues (from 1c)______ b. Total Expenses (from 2c)______ c. Divide 12a by 12b______ d. Subtract .910 ______ e. Divide by .899 ______ f. Multiply by 3.458 ______ 13. Funds Balance to Total Revenues a. Total Funds (from 5) ______ b. Total Revenues (from 1c)______ c. Divide 13a by 13b ______
d. Subtract .891 ______ e. Divide by 9.156______ f. Multiply by 3.270 ______ 14. Funds Balance to Total Expenses a. Total Funds (from 5)______ b. Total Expenses (from 2c)______ c. Divide 14a by 14b______ d. Subtract .866 ______ e. Divide by 6.409 ______ f. Multiply by 3.270 ______ 15. Total Funds to Population ______ a. Total Funds (from 5) ______ b. Population (from 6)______ c. Divide 15a by 15b ______ d. Subtract 270 ______ e. Divide by 4,548 ______ f. Multiply by 1.866 ______ 16. Add 7f + 8f + 9f + 10f + 11f + 12f + 13f + 14f + 15f + 4.937______ I hereby certify that the financial index shown on line 16 of the worksheet is greater than zero and that the wording of this letter is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.105(c) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown immediately below. [Date] [Signature] [Name]
[Title] (d) If a local government owner or operator using the test to provide financial assurance finds that it no longer meets the requirements of the financial test based on the year-end financial statements, the owner or operator must obtain alternative coverage within 150 days of the end of the year for which financial statements have been prepared. (e) The Director of the implementing agency may require reports of financial condition at any time from the local government owner or operator. If the Director finds, on the basis of such reports or other information, that the local government owner or operator no longer meets the financial test requirements of §280.105 (b) and (c), the owner or operator must obtain alternate coverage within 30 days after notification of such a finding. (f) If the local government owner or operator fails to obtain alternate assurance within 150 days of finding that it no longer meets the requirements of the financial test based on the year- end financial statements or within 30 days of notification by the Director of the implementing agency that it no longer meets the requirements of the financial test, the owner or operator must notify the Director of such failure within 10 days. [58 FR 9054, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.106 Local government guarantee. (a) A local government owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by obtaining a guarantee that conforms to the requirements of this section. The guarantor must be either the state in which the local government owner or operator is located or a local government having a “substantial governmental relationship” with the owner and operator and issuing the guarantee as an act incident to that relationship. A local government acting as the guarantor must: (1) demonstrate that it meets the bond rating test requirement of §280.104 and deliver a copy of the chief financial officer's letter as contained in §280.104(c) to the local government owner or operator; or (2) demonstrate that it meets the worksheet test requirements of §280.105 and deliver a copy of the chief financial officer's letter as contained in §280.105(c) to the local government owner or operator; or (3) demonstrate that it meets the local government fund requirements of §280.107(a), §280.107(b), or §280.107(c) and deliver a copy of the chief financial officer's letter as contained in §280.107 to the local government owner or operator. (b) If the local government guarantor is unable to demonstrate financial assurance under any of §§280.104, 280.105, 280.107(a), 280.107(b), or 280.107(c), at the end of the financial reporting year, the guarantor shall send by certified mail, before cancellation or non-renewal of the guarantee, notice to the owner or operator. The guarantee will terminate no less than
History
- Source: 53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988, unless otherwise noted.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 120 Rule 120
days after the date the owner or operator receives the notification, as evidenced by the return receipt. The owner or operator must obtain alternative coverage as specified in §280.114(c). (c) The guarantee agreement must be worded as specified in paragraph (d) or (e) of this section, depending on which of the following alternative guarantee arrangements is selected: (1) If, in the default or incapacity of the owner or operator, the guarantor guarantees to fund a standby trust as directed by the Director of the implementing agency, the guarantee shall be worded as specified in paragraph (d) of this section. (2) If, in the default or incapacity of the owner or operator, the guarantor guarantees to make payments as directed by the Director of the implementing agency for taking corrective action or compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage, the guarantee shall be worded as specified in paragraph (e) of this section. (d) If the guarantor is a state, the local government guarantee with standby trust must be worded exactly as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with relevant information and the brackets deleted: Local Government Guarantee With Standby Trust Made by a State Guarantee made this [date] by [name of state], herein referred to as guarantor, to [the state implementing agency] and to any and all third parties, and obliges, on behalf of [local government owner or operator]. Recitals (1) Guarantor is a state. (2) [Local government owner or operator] owns or operates the following underground storage tank(s) covered by this guarantee: [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR part 280 or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility.] This guarantee satisfies 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.8 requirements for assuring funding for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”; if coverage is different for different tanks or locations, indicate the type of coverage applicable to each tank or location] arising from operating the above-identified underground storage tank(s) in the amount of [insert dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert dollar amount] annual aggregate. (3) Guarantor guarantees to [implementing agency] and to any and all third parties that:
In the event that [local government owner or operator] fails to provide alternative coverage within 60 days after receipt of a notice of cancellation of this guarantee and the [Director of the implementing agency] has determined or suspects that a release has occurred at an underground storage tank covered by this guarantee, the guarantor, upon instructions from the [Director] shall fund a standby trust fund in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR part 280.112, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. In the event that the [Director] determines that [local government owner or operator] has failed to perform corrective action for releases arising out of the operation of the above- identified tank(s) in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.6, the guarantor upon written instructions from the [Director] shall fund a standby trust fund in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR part 280.112, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. If [owner or operator] fails to satisfy a judgment or award based on a determination of liability for bodily injury or property damage to third parties caused by [”sudden” and/or “non-sudden”] accidental releases arising from the operation of the above-identified tank(s), or fails to pay an amount agreed to in settlement of a claim arising from or alleged to arise from such injury or damage, the guarantor, upon written instructions from the [Director], shall fund a standby trust in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR part 280.112 to satisfy such judgment(s), award(s), or settlement agreement(s) up to the limits of coverage specified above. (4) Guarantor agrees to notify [owner or operator] by certified mail of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code naming guarantor as debtor, within 10 days after commencement of the proceeding. (5) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee notwithstanding any modification or alteration of any obligation of [owner or operator] pursuant to 40 CFR part 280. (6) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee for so long as [local government owner or operator] must comply with the applicable financial responsibility requirements of 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.8 for the above identified tank(s), except that guarantor may cancel this guarantee by sending notice by certified mail to [owner or operator], such cancellation to become effective no earlier than 120 days after receipt of such notice by [owner or operator], as evidenced by the return receipt. (7) The guarantor's obligation does not apply to any of the following: (i) Any obligation of [local government owner or operator] under a workers' compensation, disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (ii) Bodily injury to an employee of [insert: local government owner or operator] arising from, and in the course of, employment by [insert: local government owner or operator];
(iii)Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (iv) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaned to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by [insert: local government owner or operator] that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank; (v) Bodily damage or property damage for which [insert owner or operator] is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 280.93. (8) Guarantor expressly waives notice of acceptance of this guarantee by [the implementing agency], by any or all third parties, or by [local government owner or operator], I hereby certify that the wording of this guarantee is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.106(d) as such regulations were constituted on the effective date shown immediately below. Effective date:____________________ [Name of guarantor] [Authorized signature for guarantor] [Name of person signing] [Title of person signing] Signature of witness or notary: If the guarantor is a local government, the local government guarantee with standby trust must be worded exactly as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with relevant information and the brackets deleted: Local Government Guarantee With Standby Trust Made by a Local Government Guarantee made this [date] by [name of guaranteeing entity], a local government organized under the laws of [name of state], herein referred to as guarantor, to [the state implementing agency] and to any and all third parties, and obliges, on behalf of [local government owner or operator]. Recitals (i) Guarantor meets or exceeds [select one: the local government bond rating test requirements of 40 CFR part 280.104, the local government financial test
requirements of 40 CFR part 280.105, or the local government fund under 40 CFR part 280.107(a), 280.107(b), or 280.107(c)]. (ii) [Local government owner or operator] owns or operates the following underground storage tank(s) covered by this guarantee: [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR part 280 or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility.] This guarantee satisfies 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.8 requirements for assuring funding for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”; if coverage is different for different tanks or locations, indicate the type of coverage applicable to each tank or location] arising from operating the above-identified underground storage tank(s) in the amount of [insert dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate. (iii)Incident to our substantial governmental relationship with [local government owner or operator], guarantor guarantees to [implementing agency] and to any and all third parties that: (iv) In the event that [local government owner or operator] fails to provide alternative coverage within 60 days after receipt of a notice of cancellation of this guarantee and the [Director of the implementing agency] has determined or suspects that a release has occurred at an underground storage tank covered by this guarantee, the guarantor, upon instructions from the [Director] shall fund a standby trust fund in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR part 280.112, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. (v) In the event that the [Director] determines that [local government owner or operator] has failed to perform corrective action for releases arising out of the operation of the above-identified tank(s) in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.6F, the guarantor upon written instructions from the [Director] shall fund a standby trust fund in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR part 280.112, in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. (vi) If [owner or operator] fails to satisfy a judgment or award based on a determination of liability for bodily injury or property damage to third parties caused by [“sudden” and/or “nonsudden”] accidental releases arising from the operation of the above- identified tank(s), or fails to pay an amount agreed to in settlement of a claim arising from or alleged to arise from such injury or damage, the guarantor, upon written instructions from the [Director], shall fund a standby trust in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR part 280.112 to satisfy such judgment(s), award(s), or settlement agreement(s) up to the limits of coverage specified above. (vii) Guarantor agrees that, if at the end of any fiscal year before cancellation of this guarantee, the guarantor fails to meet or exceed the requirements of the financial responsibility mechanism specified in paragraph (1), guarantor shall send within
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 120 Rule 120
days of such failure, by certified mail, notice to [local government owner or operator], as evidenced by the return receipt. (viii) Guarantor agrees to notify [owner or operator] by certified mail of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code naming guarantor as debtor, within 10 days after commencement of the proceeding. (ix) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee notwithstanding any modification or alteration of any obligation of [owner or operator] pursuant to 40 CFR part 280. (x) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee for so long as [local government owner or operator] must comply with the applicable financial responsibility requirements of 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.8 for the above identified tank(s), except that guarantor may cancel this guarantee by sending notice by certified mail to [owner or operator], such cancellation to become effective no earlier than 120 days after receipt of such notice by [owner or operator], as evidenced by the return receipt. (xi) The guarantor's obligation does not apply to any of the following: (a) Any obligation of [local government owner or operator] under a workers' compensation, disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (b) Bodily injury to an employee of [insert: local government owner or operator] arising from, and in the course of, employment by [insert: local government owner or operator]; (c) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (d) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaned to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by [insert: local government owner or operator] that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank; (e) Bodily damage or property damage for which [insert: owner or operator] is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 280.93. (xii) Guarantor expressly waives notice of acceptance of this guarantee by [the implementing agency], by any or all third parties, or by [local government owner or operator]. I hereby certify that the wording of this guarantee is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.106(d) as such regulations were constituted on the effective date shown immediately below. Effective date:____________________
[Name of guarantor] [Authorized signature for guarantor] [Name of person signing] [Title of person signing] Signature of witness or notary: ____________________ If the guarantor is a state, the local government guarantee without standby trust must be worded exactly as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with relevant information and the brackets deleted: Local Government Guarantee Without Standby Trust Made by a State Guarantee made this [date] by [name of state], herein referred to as guarantor, to [the state implementing agency] and to any and all third parties, and obliges, on behalf of [local government owner or operator]. Recitals (i) Guarantor is a state. (ii) [Local government owner or operator] owns or operates the following underground storage tank(s) covered by this guarantee: [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR part 280 or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility.] This guarantee satisfies 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.8 requirements for assuring funding for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”; if coverage is different for different tanks or locations, indicate the type of coverage applicable to each tank or location] arising from operating the above-identified underground storage tank(s) in the amount of [insert: dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate. (iii)Guarantor guarantees to [implementing agency] and to any and all third parties and obliges that: In the event that [local government owner or operator] fails to provide alternative coverage within 60 days after receipt of a notice of cancellation of this guarantee and the [Director of the implementing agency] has determined or suspects that a release has occurred at an underground storage tank covered by this guarantee, the
guarantor, upon written instructions from the [Director] shall make funds available to pay for corrective actions and compensate third parties for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. In the event that the [Director] determines that [local government owner or operator] has failed to perform corrective action for releases arising out of the operation of the above-identified tank(s) in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.6F, the guarantor upon written instructions from the [Director] shall make funds available to pay for corrective actions in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. If [owner or operator] fails to satisfy a judgment or award based on a determination of liability for bodily injury or property damage to third parties caused by [“sudden” and/or “nonsudden”] accidental releases arising from the operation of the above-identified tank(s), or fails to pay an amount agreed to in settlement of a claim arising from or alleged to arise from such injury or damage, the guarantor, upon written instructions from the [Director], shall make funds available to compensate third parties for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. (iv) Guarantor agrees to notify [owner or operator] by certified mail of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code naming guarantor as debtor, within 10 days after commencement of the proceeding. (v) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee notwithstanding any modification or alteration of any obligation of [owner or operator] pursuant to 40 CFR part 280. (vi) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee for so long as [local government owner or operator] must comply with the applicable financial responsibility requirements of 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.8 for the above identified tank(s), except that guarantor may cancel this guarantee by sending notice by certified mail to [owner or operator], such cancellation to become effective no earlier than 120 days after receipt of such notice by [owner or operator], as evidenced by the return receipt. If notified of a probable release, the guarantor agrees to remain bound to the terms of this guarantee for all charges arising from the release, up to the coverage limits specified above, notwithstanding the cancellation of the guarantee with respect to future releases. (vii) The guarantor's obligation does not apply to any of the following: (a) Any obligation of [local government owner or operator] under a workers' compensation disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (b) Bodily injury to an employee of [insert local government owner or operator] arising from, and in the course of, employment by [insert: local government owner or operator];
(c) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (d) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaned to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by [insert: local government owner or operator] that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank; (e) Bodily damage or property damage for which [insert: owner or operator] is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 280.93. (8) Guarantor expressly waives notice of acceptance of this guarantee by [the implementing agency], by any or all third parties, or by [local government owner or operator]. I hereby certify that the wording of this guarantee is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.106(e) as such regulations were constituted on the effective date shown immediately below. Effective date:____________________ [Name of guarantor] [Authorized signature for guarantor] [Name of person signing] [Title of person signing] Signature of witness or notary: If the guarantor is a local government, the local government guarantee without standby trust must be worded exactly as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with relevant information and the brackets deleted: Local Government Guarantee Without Standby Trust Made by a Local Government Guarantee made this [date] by [name of guaranteeing entity], a local government organized under the laws of [name of state], herein referred to as guarantor, to [the state implementing agency] and to any and all third parties, and obliges, on behalf of [local government owner or operator]. Recitals (i) Guarantor meets or exceeds [select one: the local government bond rating test requirements of 40 CFR part 280.104, the local government financial test
requirements of 40 part CFR 280.105, the local government fund under 40 CFR part 280.107(a), 280.107(b), or 280.107(c). (ii) [Local government owner or operator] owns or operates the following underground storage tank(s) covered by this guarantee: [List the number of tanks at each facility and the name(s) and address(es) of the facility(ies) where the tanks are located. If more than one instrument is used to assure different tanks at any one facility, for each tank covered by this instrument, list the tank identification number provided in the notification submitted pursuant to 40 CFR part 280 or the corresponding state requirement, and the name and address of the facility.] This guarantee satisfies 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.8 requirements for assuring funding for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases”; if coverage is different for different tanks or locations, indicate the type of coverage applicable to each tank or location] arising from operating the above-identified underground storage tank(s) in the amount of [insert: dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate. (iii)Incident to our substantial governmental relationship with [local government owner or operator], guarantor guarantees to [implementing agency] and to any and all third parties and obliges that: In the event that [local government owner or operator] fails to provide alternative coverage within 60 days after receipt of a notice of cancellation of this guarantee and the [Director of the implementing agency] has determined or suspects that a release has occurred at an underground storage tank covered by this guarantee, the guarantor, upon written instructions from the [Director] shall make funds available to pay for corrective actions and compensate third parties for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. In the event that the [Director] determines that [local government owner or operator] has failed to perform corrective action for releases arising out of the operation of the above-identified tank(s) in accordance with 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.6, the guarantor upon written instructions from the [Director] shall make funds available to pay for corrective actions in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. If [owner or operator] fails to satisfy a judgment or award based on a determination of liability for bodily injury or property damage to third parties caused by [“sudden” and/or “nonsudden”] accidental releases arising from the operation of the above- identified tank(s), or fails to pay an amount agreed to in settlement of a claim arising from or alleged to arise from such injury or damage, the guarantor, upon written instructions from the [Director], shall make funds available to compensate third parties for bodily injury and property damage in an amount not to exceed the coverage limits specified above. (iv) Guarantor agrees that if at the end of any fiscal year before cancellation of this guarantee, the guarantor fails to meet or exceed the requirements of the financial
responsibility mechanism specified in paragraph (1), guarantor shall send within 120 days of such failure, by certified mail, notice to [local government owner or operator], as evidenced by the return receipt. (v) Guarantor agrees to notify [owner or operator] by certified mail of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code naming guarantor as debtor, within 10 days after commencement of the proceeding. (vi) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee notwithstanding any modification or alteration of any obligation of [owner or operator] pursuant to 40 CFR part 280. (vii) Guarantor agrees to remain bound under this guarantee for so long as [local government owner or operator] must comply with the applicable financial responsibility requirements of 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.8 for the above identified tank(s), except that guarantor may cancel this guarantee by sending notice by certified mail to [owner or operator], such cancellation to become effective no earlier than 120 days after receipt of such notice by [owner or operator], as evidenced by the return receipt. If notified of a probable release, the guarantor agrees to remain bound to the terms of this guarantee for all charges arising from the release, up to the coverage limits specified above, notwithstanding the cancellation of the guarantee with respect to future releases. (viii) The guarantor's obligation does not apply to any of the following: (A) Any obligation of [local government owner or operator] under a workers' compensation disability benefits, or unemployment compensation law or other similar law; (B) Bodily injury to an employee of [insert: local government owner or operator] arising from, and in the course of, employment by [insert: local government owner or operator]; (C) Bodily injury or property damage arising from the ownership, maintenance, use, or entrustment to others of any aircraft, motor vehicle, or watercraft; (D) Property damage to any property owned, rented, loaned to, in the care, custody, or control of, or occupied by [insert: local government owner or operator] that is not the direct result of a release from a petroleum underground storage tank; (E) Bodily damage or property damage for which [insert: owner or operator] is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement other than a contract or agreement entered into to meet the requirements of 40 CFR part 280.93. (ix) Guarantor expressly waives notice of acceptance of this guarantee by [the implementing agency], by any or all third parties, or by [local government owner or operator], I hereby certify that the wording of this guarantee is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR part 280.106(e) as such regulations were constituted on the effective date shown immediately below.
Effective date:____________________ [Name of guarantor] [Authorized signature for guarantor] [Name of person signing] [Title of person signing] Signature of witness or notary: [58 FR 9056, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.107 Local government fund. A local government owner or operator may satisfy the requirements of §280.93 by establishing a dedicated fund account that conforms to the requirements of this section. Except as specified in paragraph (b), a dedicated fund may not be commingled with other funds or otherwise used in normal operations. A dedicated fund will be considered eligible if it meets one of the following requirements: (a) The fund is dedicated by state constitutional provision, or local government statute, charter, ordinance, or order to pay for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks and is funded for the full amount of coverage required under §280.93, or funded for part of the required amount of coverage and used in combination with other mechanism(s) that provide the remaining coverage; or (b) The fund is dedicated by state constitutional provision, or local government statute, charter, ordinance, or order as a contingency fund for general emergencies, including taking corrective action and compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks, and is funded for five times the full amount of coverage required under §280.93, or funded for part of the required amount of coverage and used in combination with other mechanism(s) that provide the remaining coverage. If the fund is funded for less than five times the amount of coverage required under §280.93, the amount of financial responsibility demonstrated by the fund may not exceed one-fifth the amount in the fund; or (c) The fund is dedicated by state constitutional provision, or local government statute, charter, ordinance or order to pay for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks. A payment is made to the fund once every year for seven years until the fund is fully-funded. This seven year period is hereafter referred to as the “pay-in-period.” The amount of each payment must be determined by this formula:
Where TF is the total required financial assurance for the owner or operator, CF is the current amount in the fund, and Y is the number of years remaining in the pay-in-period, and; (1) The local government owner or operator has available bonding authority, approved through voter referendum (if such approval is necessary prior to the issuance of bonds), for an amount equal to the difference between the required amount of coverage and the amount held in the dedicated fund. This bonding authority shall be available for taking corrective action and for compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by accidental releases arising from the operation of petroleum underground storage tanks, or (2) The local government owner or operator has a letter signed by the appropriate state attorney general stating that the use of the bonding authority will not increase the local government's debt beyond the legal debt ceilings established by the relevant state laws. The letter must also state that prior voter approval is not necessary before use of the bonding authority. (d) To demonstrate that it meets the requirements of the local government fund, the chief financial officer of the local government owner or operator and/or guarantor must sign a letter worded exactly as follows, except that the instructions in brackets are to be replaced by the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Letter from Chief Financial Officer I am the chief financial officer of [insert: name and address of local government owner or operator, or guarantor]. This letter is in support of the use of the local government fund mechanism to demonstrate financial responsibility for [insert: “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage”] caused by [insert: “sudden accidental releases” and/or “non-sudden accidental releases”] in the amount of at least [insert: dollar amount] per occurrence and [insert: dollar amount] annual aggregate arising from operating (an) underground storage tank(s). Underground storage tanks at the following facilities are assured by this local government fund mechanism: [List for each facility: the name and address of the facility where tanks are assured by the local government fund]. [Insert: “The local government fund is funded for the full amount of coverage required under §280.93, or funded for part of the required amount of coverage and used in combination with other mechanism(s) that provide the remaining coverage.” or “The local government fund is funded for five times the full amount of coverage required under §280.93, or funded for part of the required amount of coverage and used in combination with other mechanisms(s) that provide the remaining coverage,” or “A payment is made to the fund once every year for seven years until the fund is fully-funded and [name of local government owner or operator]
has available bonding authority, approved through voter referendum, of an amount equal to the difference between the required amount of coverage and the amount held in the dedicated fund” or “A payment is made to the fund once every year for seven years until the fund is fully-funded and I have attached a letter signed by the State Attorney General stating that (1) the use of the bonding authority will not increase the local government's debt beyond the legal debt ceilings established by the relevant state laws and (2) that prior voter approval is not necessary before use of the bonding authority”]. The details of the local government fund are as follows: Amount in Fund (market value of fund at close of last fiscal year):____________________ [If fund balance is incrementally funded as specified in §280.107(c), insert: Amount added to fund in the most recently completed fiscal year:____________________ Number of years remaining in the pay-in period: ____] A copy of the state constitutional provision, or local government statute, charter, ordinance or order dedicating the fund is attached. I hereby certify that the wording of this letter is identical to the wording specified in 40 CFR 280.107(d) as such regulations were constituted on the date shown immediately below. [Date] [Signature] [Name] [Title] [58 FR 9059, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.108 Substitution of financial assurance mechanisms by owner or operator. (a) An owner or operator may substitute any alternate financial assurance mechanisms as specified in this rule, provided that at all times he maintains an effective financial assurance mechanism or combination of mechanisms that satisfies the requirements of §280.93. (b) After obtaining alternate financial assurance as specified in this rule, an owner or operator may cancel a financial assurance mechanism by providing notice to the provider of financial assurance. [53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988. Redesignated at 58 FR 9051, Feb. 18, 1993]
§ 280.109 Cancellation or nonrenewal by a provider of financial assurance. (a) Except as otherwise provided, a provider of financial assurance may cancel or fail to renew an assurance mechanism by sending a notice of termination by certified mail to the owner or operator. (1) Termination of a local government guarantee, a guarantee, a surety bond, or a letter of credit may not occur until 120 days after the date on which the owner or operator receives the notice of termination, as evidenced by the return receipt. (2) Termination of insurance or risk retention coverage, except for non-payment or misrepresentation by the insured, or state-funded assurance may not occur until 60 days after the date on which the owner or operator receives the notice of termination, as evidenced by the return receipt. Termination for non-payment of premium or misrepresentation by the insured may not occur until a minimum of 10 days after the date on which the owner or operator receives the notice of termination, as evidenced by the return receipt. (b) If a provider of financial responsibility cancels or fails to renew for reasons other than incapacity of the provider as specified in §280.114, the owner or operator must obtain alternate coverage as specified in this section within 60 days after receipt of the notice of termination. If the owner or operator fails to obtain alternate coverage within 60 days after receipt of the notice of termination, the owner or operator must notify the Director of the implementing agency of such failure and submit: (1) The name and address of the provider of financial assurance; (2) The effective date of termination; and (3) The evidence of the financial assistance mechanism subject to the termination maintained in accordance with §280.111(b). [58 FR 9051, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.110 Reporting by owner or operator. (a) An owner or operator must submit the appropriate forms listed in §280.111(b) documenting current evidence of financial responsibility to the Director of the implementing agency: (1) Within 30 days after the owner or operator identifies a release from an underground storage tank required to be reported under §280.53 or §280.61; (2) If the owner or operator fails to obtain alternate coverage as required by this rule, within 30 days after the owner or operator receives notice of:
(i) Commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code, naming a provider of financial assurance as a debtor, (ii) Suspension or revocation of the authority of a provider of financial assurance to issue a financial assurance mechanism, (iii) Failure of a guarantor to meet the requirements of the financial test, (iv) Other incapacity of a provider of financial assurance; or (3) As required by §280.95(g) and §280.109(b). (b) An owner or operator must certify compliance with the financial responsibility requirements of this part as specified in the new tank notification form when notifying the appropriate state or local agency of the installation of a new underground storage tank under §280.22. (c) The Director of the Implementing Agency may require an owner or operator to submit evidence of financial assurance as described in §280.111(b) or other information relevant to compliance with this rule at any time. [58 FR 9051, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.111 Recordkeeping. (a) Owners or operators must maintain evidence of all financial assurance mechanisms used to demonstrate financial responsibility under this rule for an underground storage tank until released from the requirements of this rule under §208.113. An owner or operator must maintain such evidence at the underground storage tank site or the owner's or operator's place of work. Records maintained off-site must be made available upon request of the implementing agency. (b) An owner or operator must maintain the following types of evidence of financial responsibility: (1) An owner or operator using an assurance mechanism specified in §§280.95 through 280.100 or §280.102 or §§280.104 through 280.107 must maintain a copy of the instrument worded as specified. (2) An owner or operator using a financial test or guarantee, or a local government financial test or a local government guarantee supported by the local government financial test must maintain a copy of the chief financial officer's letter based on year-end financial statements for the most recent completed financial reporting year. Such evidence must be on file no later than 120 days after the close of the financial reporting year.
(3) An owner or operator using a guarantee, surety bond, or letter of credit must maintain a copy of the signed standby trust fund agreement and copies of any amendments to the agreement. (4) A local government owner or operator using a local government guarantee under §280.106(d) must maintain a copy of the signed standby trust fund agreement and copies of any amendments to the agreement. (5) A local government owner or operator using the local government bond rating test under §280.104 must maintain a copy of its bond rating published within the last twelve months by Moody's or Standard & Poor's. (6) A local government owner or operator using the local government guarantee under §280.106, where the guarantor's demonstration of financial responsibility relies on the bond rating test under §280.104 must maintain a copy of the guarantor's bond rating published within the last twelve months by Moody's or Standard & Poor's. (7) An owner or operator using an insurance policy or risk retention group coverage must maintain a copy of the signed insurance policy or risk retention group coverage policy, with the endorsement or certificate of insurance and any amendments to the agreements. (8) An owner or operator covered by a state fund or other state assurance must maintain on file a copy of any evidence of coverage supplied by or required by the state under §280.101(d). (9) An owner or operator using a local government fund under §280.107 must maintain the following documents: (i) A copy of the state constitutional provision or local government statute, charter, ordinance, or order dedicating the fund, and (ii) Year-end financial statements for the most recent completed financial reporting year showing the amount in the fund. If the fund is established under §280.107(a)(3) using incremental funding backed by bonding authority, the financial statements must show the previous year's balance, the amount of funding during the year, and the closing balance in the fund. (iii) If the fund is established under §280.107using incremental funding backed by bonding authority, the owner or operator must also maintain documentation of the required bonding authority, including either the results of a voter referendum (under §280.107(c)(1)), or attestation by the State Attorney General as specified under §280.107(c)(2). (10) A local government owner or operator using the local government guarantee supported by the local government fund must maintain a copy of the guarantor's year-end
financial statements for the most recent completed financial reporting year showing the amount of the fund. (11) An owner or operator using an assurance mechanism specified in §§280.95 through 280.107 must maintain an updated copy of a certification of financial responsibility worded as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with the relevant information and the brackets deleted: Certification of Financial Responsibility [Owner or operator] hereby certifies that it is in compliance with the requirements of Rule 2.8of 40 CFR part 280. The financial assurance mechanism(s) used to demonstrate financial responsibility under Rule 2.8 of 40 CFR part 280 is (are) as follows: [For each mechanism, list the type of mechanism, name of issuer, mechanism number (if applicable), amount of coverage, effective period of coverage and whether the mechanism covers “taking corrective action” and/or “compensating third parties for bodily injury and property damage caused by” either “sudden accidental releases” or “nonsudden accidental releases” or “accidental releases.”] [Signature of owner or operator] [Name of owner or operator] [Title] [Date] [Signature of witness or notary] [Name of witness or notary] [Date] The owner or operator must update this certification whenever the financial assurance mechanism(s) used to demonstrate financial responsibility change(s). [58 FR 9051, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.112 Drawing on financial assurance mechanisms. (a) Except as specified in paragraph (d) of this section, the Director of the implementing agency shall require the guarantor, surety, or institution issuing a letter of credit to place the
amount of funds stipulated by the Director, up to the limit of funds provided by the financial assurance mechanism, into the standby trust if: (1)(i) The owner or operator fails to establish alternate financial assurance within 60 days after receiving notice of cancellation of the guarantee, surety bond, letter of credit, or, as applicable, other financial assurance mechanism; and (ii) The Director determines or suspects that a release from an underground storage tank covered by the mechanism has occurred and so notifies the owner or operator or the owner or operator has notified the Director pursuant to Rule 2.5 or 2.6 of a release from an underground storage tank covered by the mechanism; or (2) The conditions of paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) (i) or (ii) of this section are satisfied. (b) The Director of the implementing agency may draw on a standby trust fund when: (1) The Director makes a final determination that a release has occurred and immediate or long-term corrective action for the release is needed, and the owner or operator, after appropriate notice and opportunity to comply, has not conducted corrective action as required under 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.6; or (2) The Director has received either: (i) Certification from the owner or operator and the third-party liability claimant(s) and from attorneys representing the owner or operator and the third-party liability claimant(s) that a third-party liability claim should be paid. The certification must be worded as follows, except that instructions in brackets are to be replaced with the relevant information and the brackets deleted:
Certification of Valid Claim The undersigned, as principals and as legal representatives of [insert: owner or operator] and [insert: name and address of third-party claimant], hereby certify that the claim of bodily injury [and/or] property damage caused by an accidental release arising from operating [owner's or operator's] underground storage tank should be paid in the amount of $[______]. [Signatures] Owner or Operator Attorney for Owner or Operator (Notary)
Date [Signatures] Claimant(s) Attorney(s) for Claimant(s) (Notary) Date or (ii) A valid final court order establishing a judgment against the owner or operator for bodily injury or property damage caused by an accidental release from an underground storage tank covered by financial assurance under this rule and the Director determines that the owner or operator has not satisfied the judgment. (c) If the Director of the implementing agency determines that the amount of corrective action costs and third-party liability claims eligible for payment under paragraph (b) of this section may exceed the balance of the standby trust fund and the obligation of the provider of financial assurance, the first priority for payment shall be corrective action costs necessary to protect human health and the environment. The Director shall pay third-party liability claims in the order in which the Director receives certifications under paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, and valid court orders under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section. (d) A governmental entity acting as guarantor under §280.106(e), the local government guarantee without standby trust, shall make payments as directed by the Director under the circumstances described in §280.112 (a), (b), and (c). [58 FR 9052, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.113 Release from the requirements. An owner or operator is no longer required to maintain financial responsibility under this rule for an underground storage tank after the tank has been permanently closed or, if corrective action is required, after corrective action has been completed and the tank has been permanently closed as required by 40 CFR part 280, Rule 2.7. [53 FR 43370, Oct. 26, 1988. Redesignated at 58 FR 9051, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.114 Bankruptcy or other incapacity of owner or operator or provider of financial assurance. (a) Within 10 days after commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code, naming an owner or operator as debtor, the owner or operator must notify the Director of the implementing agency by certified mail of such commencement
and submit the appropriate forms listed in §280.111(b) documenting current financial responsibility. (b) Within 10 days after commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code, naming a guarantor providing financial assurance as debtor, such guarantor must notify the owner or operator by certified mail of such commencement as required under the terms of the guarantee specified in §280.96. (c) Within 10 days after commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code, naming a local government owner or operator as debtor, the local government owner or operator must notify the Director of the implementing agency by certified mail of such commencement and submit the appropriate forms listed in §280.111(b) documenting current financial responsibility. (d) Within 10 days after commencement of a voluntary or involuntary proceeding under Title 11 (Bankruptcy), U.S. Code, naming a guarantor providing a local government financial assurance as debtor, such guarantor must notify the local government owner or operator by certified mail of such commencement as required under the terms of the guarantee specified in §280.106. (e) An owner or operator who obtains financial assurance by a mechanism other than the financial test of self-insurance will be deemed to be without the required financial assurance in the event of a bankruptcy or incapacity of its provider of financial assurance, or a suspension or revocation of the authority of the provider of financial assurance to issue a guarantee, insurance policy, risk retention group coverage policy, surety bond, letter of credit, or state-required mechanism. The owner or operator must obtain alternate financial assurance as specified in this rule within 30 days after receiving notice of such an event. If the owner or operator does not obtain alternate coverage within 30 days after such notification, he must notify the Director of the implementing agency. (f) Within 30 days after receipt of notification that a state fund or other state assurance has become incapable of paying for assured corrective action or third-party compensation costs, the owner or operator must obtain alternate financial assurance. [58 FR 9053, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.115 Replenishment of guarantees, letters of credit, or surety bonds. (a) If at any time after a standby trust is funded upon the instruction of the Director of the implementing agency with funds drawn from a guarantee, local government guarantee with standby trust, letter of credit, or surety bond, and the amount in the standby trust is reduced below the full amount of coverage required, the owner or operator shall by the anniversary date of the financial mechanism from which the funds were drawn: (1) Replenish the value of financial assurance to equal the full amount of coverage required, or
(2) Acquire another financial assurance mechanism for the amount by which funds in the standby trust have been reduced. (b) For purposes of this section, the full amount of coverage required is the amount of coverage to be provided by §280.93 of this rule. If a combination of mechanisms was used to provide the assurance funds which were drawn upon, replenishment shall occur by the earliest anniversary date among the mechanisms. [58 FR 9053, Feb. 18, 1993] § 280.116 Suspension of enforcement. [Reserved]
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.9 Lender Liability
§280.120 Definitions. (a) UST technical standards, as used in this rule, refers to the UST preventative and operating requirements under Rule 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.7, and 2.10 of this part and §280.50.
(b) Petroleum production, refining, and marketing.
(1) Petroleum production means the production of crude oil or other forms of petroleum (as defined in §280.12) as well as the production of petroleum products from purchased materials.
(2) Petroleum refining means the cracking, distillation, separation, conversion, upgrading, and finishing of refined petroleum or petroleum products.
(3) Petroleum marketing means the distribution, transfer, or sale of petroleum or petroleum products for wholesale or retail purposes.
(c) Indicia of ownership means evidence of a secured interest, evidence of an interest in a security interest, or evidence of an interest in real or personal property securing a loan or other obligation, including any legal or equitable title or deed to real or personal property acquired through or incident to foreclosure. Evidence of such interests include, but are not limited to, mortgages, deeds of trust, liens, surety bonds and guarantees of obligations, title held pursuant to a lease financing transaction in which the lessor does not select initially the leased property (hereinafter “lease financing transaction”), and legal or equitable title obtained pursuant to foreclosure. Evidence of such interests also includes assignments, pledges, or other rights to or other forms of encumbrance against property that are held primarily to protect a security interest. A person is not required to hold title or a security interest in order to maintain indicia of ownership.
(d) A holder is a person who, upon the effective date of this regulation or in the future, maintains indicia of ownership (as defined in §280.200(c)) primarily to protect a security interest (as defined in §280.200(f)(1)) in a petroleum UST or UST system or facility or property on which a petroleum UST or UST system is located. A holder includes the initial
holder (such as a loan originator); any subsequent holder (such as a successor-in-interest or subsequent purchaser of the security interest on the secondary market); a guarantor of an obligation, surety, or any other person who holds ownership indicia primarily to protect a security interest; or a receiver or other person who acts on behalf or for the benefit of a holder.
(e) A borrower, debtor, or obligor is a person whose UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located is encumbered by a security interest. These terms may be used interchangeably.
(f) Primarily to protect a security interest means that the holder's indicia of ownership are held primarily for the purpose of securing payment or performance of an obligation.
(1) Security interest means an interest in a petroleum UST or UST system or in the facility or property on which a petroleum UST or UST system is located, created or established for the purpose of securing a loan or other obligation. Security interests include but are not limited to mortgages, deeds of trusts, liens, and title pursuant to lease financing transactions. Security interests may also arise from transactions such as sale and leasebacks, conditional sales, installment sales, trust receipt transactions, certain assignments, factoring agreements, accounts receivable financing arrangements, and consignments, if the transaction creates or establishes an interest in an UST or UST system or in the facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, for the purpose of securing a loan or other obligation.
(2) Primarily to protect a security interest, as used in this rule, does not include indicia of ownership held primarily for investment purposes, nor ownership indicia held primarily for purposes other than as protection for a security interest. A holder may have other, secondary reasons for maintaining indicia of ownership, but the primary reason why any ownership indicia are held must be as protection for a security interest.
(g) Operation means, for purposes of this rule, the use, storage, filling, or dispensing of petroleum contained in an UST or UST system.
§280.121 Participation in management. The term “participating in the management of an UST or UST system” means that, subsequent to the effective date of this rule, [INSERT EFFECTIVE DATE], the holder is engaging in decisionmaking control of, or activities related to, operation of the UST or UST system, as defined herein.
(a) Actions that are participation in management. (1) Participation in the management of an UST or UST system means, for purposes of this rule, actual participation by the holder in the management or control of decisionmaking related to the operation of an UST or UST system. Participation in management does not include the mere capacity or ability to influence or the unexercised right to control UST or UST system operations. A holder is participating in the management of the UST or UST system only if the holder either:
(i) Exercises decisionmaking control over the operational (as opposed to financial or administrative) aspects of the UST or UST system, such that the holder has undertaken responsibility for all or substantially all of the management of the UST or UST system; or
(ii) Exercises control at a level comparable to that of a manager of the borrower's enterprise, such that the holder has assumed or manifested responsibility for the overall management of the enterprise encompassing the day-to-day decisionmaking of the enterprise with respect to all, or substantially all, of the operational (as opposed to financial or administrative) aspects of the enterprise.
(2) Operational aspects of the enterprise relate to the use, storage, filling, or dispensing of petroleum contained in an UST or UST system, and include functions such as that of a facility or plant manager, operations manager, chief operating officer, or chief executive officer. Financial or administrative aspects include functions such as that of a credit manager, accounts payable/receivable manager, personnel manager, controller, chief financial officer, or similar functions. Operational aspects of the enterprise do not include the financial or administrative aspects of the enterprise, or actions associated with environmental compliance, or actions undertaken voluntarily to protect the environment in accordance with applicable requirements in this part or applicable state requirements in those states that have been delegated authority by EPA to administer the UST program pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and 40 CFR part 281.
(b) Actions that are not participation in management pre-foreclosure. (1) Actions at the inception of the loan or other transaction. No act or omission prior to the time that indicia of ownership are held primarily to protect a security interest constitutes evidence of participation in management within the meaning of this rule. A prospective holder who undertakes or requires an environmental investigation (which could include a site assessment, inspection, and/or audit) of the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located (in which indicia of ownership are to be held), or requires a prospective borrower to clean up contamination from the UST or UST system or to comply or come into compliance (whether prior or subsequent to the time that indicia of ownership are held primarily to protect a security interest) with any applicable law or regulation, is not by such action considered to be participating in the management of the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located.
(2) Loan policing and work out. Actions that are consistent with holding ownership indicia primarily to protect a security interest do not constitute participation in management for purposes of this rule. The authority for the holder to take such actions may, but need not, be contained in contractual or other documents specifying requirements for financial, environmental, and other warranties, covenants, conditions, representations or promises from the borrower. Loan policing and work out activities cover and include all such activities up to foreclosure, exclusive of any activities that constitute participation in management.
(i) Policing the security interest or loan.
(A) A holder who engages in policing activities prior to foreclosure will remain within the exemption provided that the holder does not together with other actions participate in the management of the UST or UST system as provided in §280.121(a). Such policing actions include, but are not limited to, requiring the borrower to clean up contamination from the UST or UST system during the term of the security interest; requiring the borrower to comply or come into compliance with applicable federal, state, and local environmental and other laws, rules, and regulations during the term of the security interest; securing or exercising authority to monitor or inspect the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located (including on-site inspections) in which indicia of ownership are maintained, or the borrower's business or financial condition during the term of the security interest; or taking other actions to adequately police the loan or security interest (such as requiring a borrower to comply with any warranties, covenants, conditions, representations, or promises from the borrower).
(B) Policing activities also include undertaking by the holder of UST environmental compliance actions and voluntary environmental actions taken in compliance with this part, provided that the holder does not otherwise participate in the management or daily operation of the UST or UST system as provided in §280.121(a) and §280.123. Such allowable actions include, but are not limited to, release detection and release reporting, release response and corrective action, temporary or permanent closure of an UST or UST system, UST upgrading or replacement, and maintenance of corrosion protection. A holder who undertakes these actions must do so in compliance with the applicable requirements in this part or applicable state requirements in those states that have been delegated authority by EPA to administer the UST program pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and 40 CFR part 281. A holder may directly oversee these environmental compliance actions and voluntary environmental actions, and directly hire contractors to perform the work, and is not by such action considered to be participating in the management of the UST or UST system.
(ii) Loan work out. A holder who engages in work out activities prior to foreclosure will remain within the exemption provided that the holder does not together with other actions participate in the management of the UST or UST system as provided in §280.121(a). For purposes of this rule, “work out” refers to those actions by which a holder, at any time prior to foreclosure, seeks to prevent, cure, or mitigate a default by the borrower or obligor; or to preserve, or prevent the diminution of, the value of the security. Work out activities include, but are not limited to, restructuring or renegotiating the terms of the security interest; requiring payment of additional rent or interest; exercising forbearance; requiring or exercising rights pursuant to an assignment of accounts or other amounts owing to an obligor; requiring or exercising rights pursuant to an escrow agreement pertaining to amounts owing to an obligor; providing specific or general financial or other advice, suggestions, counseling, or guidance; and exercising any right or remedy the holder is entitled to by law or under any warranties, covenants, conditions, representations, or promises from the borrower.
(c) Foreclosure on an UST or UST system or facility or property on which an UST or UST system is located, and participation in management activities post-foreclosure.
(1) Foreclosure. (i) Indicia of ownership that are held primarily to protect a security interest include legal or equitable title or deed to real or personal property acquired through or incident to foreclosure. For purposes of this rule, the term “foreclosure” means that legal, marketable or equitable title or deed has been issued, approved, and recorded, and that the holder has obtained access to the UST, UST system, UST facility, and property on which the UST or UST system is located, provided that the holder acted diligently to acquire marketable title or deed and to gain access to the UST, UST system, UST facility, and property on which the UST or UST system is located. The indicia of ownership held after foreclosure continue to be maintained primarily as protection for a security interest provided that the holder undertakes to sell, re-lease an UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, held pursuant to a lease financing transaction (whether by a new lease financing transaction or substitution of the lessee), or otherwise divest itself of the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, in a reasonably expeditious manner, using whatever commercially reasonable means are relevant or appropriate with respect to the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, taking all facts and circumstances into consideration, and provided that the holder does not participate in management (as defined in §280.121(a)) prior to or after foreclosure.
(ii) For purposes of establishing that a holder is seeking to sell, re-lease pursuant to a lease financing transaction (whether by a new lease financing transaction or substitution of the lessee), or divest in a reasonably expeditious manner an UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, the holder may use whatever commercially reasonable means as are relevant or appropriate with respect to the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, or may employ the means specified in §280.121(c)(2). A holder that outbids, rejects, or fails to act upon a written bona fide, firm offer of fair consideration for the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, as provided in §280.121(c)(2), is not considered to hold indicia of ownership primarily to protect a security interest.
(2) Holding foreclosed property for disposition and liquidation. A holder, who does not participate in management prior to or after foreclosure, may sell, re-lease, pursuant to a lease financing transaction (whether by a new lease financing transaction or substitution of the lessee), an UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, liquidate, wind up operations, and take measures, prior to sale or other disposition, to preserve, protect, or prepare the secured UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located. A holder may also arrange for an existing or new operator to continue or initiate operation of the UST or UST system. The holder may conduct these activities without voiding the security interest exemption, subject to the requirements of this rule.
(i) A holder establishes that the ownership indicia maintained after foreclosure continue to be held primarily to protect a security interest by, within 12 months following foreclosure, listing the UST or UST system or the facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, with a broker, dealer, or agent who deals with the type of property in question, or by advertising the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, as being for sale or disposition on at least a monthly basis in either a real estate publication or a trade or other publication suitable for the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, or a newspaper of general circulation (defined as one with a circulation over 10,000, or one suitable under any applicable federal, state, or local rules of court for publication required by court order or rules of civil procedure) covering the location of the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located. For purposes of this provision, the 12-month period begins to run from December 6, 1995 or from the date that the marketable title or deed has been issued, approved and recorded, and the holder has obtained access to the UST, UST system, UST facility and property on which the UST or UST system is located, whichever is later, provided that the holder acted diligently to acquire marketable title or deed and to obtain access to the UST, UST system, UST facility and property on which the UST or UST system is located. If the holder fails to act diligently to acquire marketable title or deed or to gain access to the UST or UST system, the 12-month period begins to run from December 6, 1995 or from the date on which the holder first acquires either title to or possession of the secured UST or UST system, or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, whichever is later.
(ii) A holder that outbids, rejects, or fails to act upon an offer of fair consideration for the UST or UST system or the facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, establishes by such outbidding, rejection, or failure to act, that the ownership indicia in the secured UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located are not held primarily to protect the security interest, unless the holder is required, in order to avoid liability under federal or state law, to make a higher bid, to obtain a higher offer, or to seek or obtain an offer in a different manner.
(A) Fair consideration, in the case of a holder maintaining indicia of ownership primarily to protect a senior security interest in the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, is the value of the security interest as defined in this section. The value of the security interest includes all debt and costs incurred by the security interest holder, and is calculated as an amount equal to or in excess of the sum of the outstanding principal (or comparable amount in the case of a lease that constitutes a security interest) owed to the holder immediately preceding the acquisition of full title (or possession in the case of a lease financing transaction) pursuant to foreclosure, plus any unpaid interest, rent, or penalties (whether arising before or after foreclosure). The value of the security interest also includes all reasonable and necessary costs, fees, or other charges incurred by the holder incident to work out, foreclosure, retention, preserving, protecting, and preparing, prior to sale, the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, re-lease, pursuant to a lease
financing transaction (whether by a new lease financing transaction or substitution of the lessee), of an UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, or other disposition. The value of the security interest also includes environmental investigation costs (which could include a site assessment, inspection, and/or audit of the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located), and corrective action costs incurred under §§280.51 through 280.67 or any other costs incurred as a result of reasonable efforts to comply with any other applicable federal, state or local law or regulation; less any amounts received by the holder in connection with any partial disposition of the property and any amounts paid by the borrower (if not already applied to the borrower's obligations) subsequent to the acquisition of full title (or possession in the case of a lease financing transaction) pursuant to foreclosure. In the case of a holder maintaining indicia of ownership primarily to protect a junior security interest, fair consideration is the value of all outstanding higher priority security interests plus the value of the security interest held by the junior holder, each calculated as set forth in this paragraph (c).
(B) Outbids, rejects, or fails to act upon an offer of fair consideration means that the holder outbids, rejects, or fails to act upon within 90 days of receipt, a written, bona fide, firm offer of fair consideration for the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located received at any time after six months following foreclosure, as defined in §280.121(c). A “written, bona fide, firm offer” means a legally enforceable, commercially reasonable, cash offer solely for the foreclosed UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, including all material terms of the transaction, from a ready, willing, and able purchaser who demonstrates to the holder's satisfaction the ability to perform. For purposes of this provision, the six-month period begins to run from December 6, 1995 or from the date that marketable title or deed has been issued, approved and recorded to the holder, and the holder has obtained access to the UST, UST system, UST facility and property on which the UST or UST system is located, whichever is later, provided that the holder was acting diligently to acquire marketable title or deed and to obtain access to the UST or UST system, UST facility and property on which the UST or UST system is located. If the holder fails to act diligently to acquire marketable title or deed or to gain access to the UST or UST system, the six-month period begins to run from December 6, 1995 or from the date on which the holder first acquires either title to or possession of the secured UST or UST system, or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, whichever is later.
(3) Actions that are not participation in management post-foreclosure. A holder is not considered to be participating in the management of an UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located when undertaking actions under this part, provided that the holder does not otherwise participate in the management or daily operation of the UST or UST system as provided in §280.121(a) and §280.123. Such allowable actions include, but are not limited to, release detection and release reporting, release response and corrective action, temporary or permanent closure of an UST or UST
system, UST upgrading or replacement, and maintenance of corrosion protection. A holder who undertakes these actions must do so in compliance with the applicable requirements in this part or applicable state requirements in those states that have been delegated authority by EPA to administer the UST program pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and 40 CFR part 281. A holder may directly oversee these environmental compliance actions and voluntary environmental actions, and directly hire contractors to perform the work, and is not by such action considered to be participating in the management of the UST or UST system.
§280.1220 Ownership of an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system or facility or property on which an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system is located. Ownership of an UST or UST system or facility or property on which an UST or UST system is located. A holder is not an “owner” of a petroleum UST or UST system or facility or property on which a petroleum UST or UST system is located for purposes of compliance with the UST technical standards as defined in §280.120(a), the UST corrective action requirements under §§280.51 through 280.67, and the UST financial responsibility requirements under §§280.90 through 280.111, provided the person:
(a) Does not participate in the management of the UST or UST system as defined in §280.121; and
(b) Does not engage in petroleum production, refining, and marketing as defined in §280.120(b).
§280.123 Operating an underground storage tank or underground storage tank system. (a) Operating an UST or UST system prior to foreclosure. A holder, prior to foreclosure, as defined in §280.121(c), is not an “operator” of a petroleum UST or UST system for purposes of compliance with the UST technical standards as defined in §280.120(a), the UST corrective action requirements under §§280.51 through 280.67, and the UST financial responsibility requirements under §§280.90 through 280.111, provided that, after December 6, 1995, the holder is not in control of or does not have responsibility for the daily operation of the UST or UST system.
(b) Operating an UST or UST system after foreclosure. The following provisions apply to a holder who, through foreclosure, as defined in §280.121(c), acquires a petroleum UST or UST system or facility or property on which a petroleum UST or UST system is located.
(1) A holder is not an “operator” of a petroleum UST or UST system for purposes of compliance with this part if there is an operator, other than the holder, who is in control of or has responsibility for the daily operation of the UST or UST system, and who can be held responsible for compliance with applicable requirements of this part or applicable state requirements in those states that have been delegated authority by EPA to administer the UST program pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and 40 CFR part 281.
(2) If another operator does not exist, as provided for under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, a holder is not an “operator” of the UST or UST system, for purposes of compliance with the UST technical standards as defined in §280.200(a), the UST corrective action requirements under §§280.51 through 280.67, and the UST financial responsibility requirements under §§280.90 through 280.111, provided that the holder:
(i) Empties all of its known USTs and UST systems within 60 calendar days after foreclosure or within 60 calendar days after December 6, 1995, whichever is later, or another reasonable time period specified by the implementing agency, so that no more than 2.5 centimeters (one inch) of residue, or 0.3 percent by weight of the total capacity of the UST system, remains in the system; leaves vent lines open and functioning; and caps and secures all other lines, pumps, manways, and ancillary equipment; and
(ii) Empties those USTs and UST systems that are discovered after foreclosure within 60 calendar days after discovery or within 60 calendar days after December 6, 1995, whichever is later, or another reasonable time period specified by the implementing agency, so that no more than 2.5 centimeters (one inch) of residue, or 0.3 percent by weight of the total capacity of the UST system, remains in the system; leaves vent lines open and functioning; and caps and secures all other lines, pumps, manways, and ancillary equipment.
(3) If another operator does not exist, as provided for under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, in addition to satisfying the conditions under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, the holder must either:
(i) Permanently close the UST or UST system in accordance with §§280.71 through 280.74, except §280.72(b); or
(ii) Temporarily close the UST or UST system in accordance with the following applicable provisions of §280.70:
(A) Continue operation and maintenance of corrosion protection in accordance with §280.31;
(B) Report suspected releases to the implementing agency; and
(C) Conduct a site assessment in accordance with §280.72(a) if the UST system is temporarily closed for more than 12 months and the UST system does not meet either the performance standards in §280.20 for new UST systems or the upgrading requirements in §280.21, except that the spill and overfill equipment requirements do not have to be met. The holder must report any suspected releases to the implementing agency. For purposes of this provision, the 12-month period begins to run from December 6, 1995 or from the date on which the UST system is emptied and secured under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, whichever is later.
(4) The UST system can remain in temporary closure until a subsequent purchaser has acquired marketable title to the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located. Once a subsequent purchaser acquires marketable title to the UST or UST system or facility or property on which the UST or UST system is located, the purchaser must decide whether to operate or close the UST or UST system in accordance with applicable requirements in this part or applicable state requirements in those states that have been delegated authority by EPA to administer the UST program pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 6991c and 40 CFR part 281.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 2.10 UST Systems with Field-Constructed Tanks and Airport Hydrant Fuel Distribution Systems
§280.130 Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following definitions apply: Airport hydrant fuel distribution system (also called airport hydrant system) means an UST system which fuels aircraft and operates under high pressure with large diameter piping that typically terminates into one or more hydrants (fill stands). The airport hydrant system begins where fuel enters one or more tanks from an external source such as a pipeline, barge, rail car, or other motor fuel carrier. Field-constructed tank means a tank constructed in the field. For example, a tank constructed of concrete that is poured in the field, or a steel or fiberglass tank primarily fabricated in the field is considered field-constructed. §280.131 General requirements. (a) Implementation of requirements. Owners and operators must comply with the requirements of this part for UST systems with field-constructed tanks and airport hydrant systems as follows: (1) For UST systems installed on or before October 5, 2018, the requirements are effective according to the following schedule: Requirement Effective date Upgrading UST systems; general operating requirements; and operator training October 5, 2021. Release detection October 5, 2021. Release reporting, response, and investigation; closure; financial responsibility and notification (except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section) October 5, 2018.
(2) For UST systems installed after October 5, 2018, the requirements apply at installation. (b) Not later than October 5, 2021, all owners of previously deferred UST systems must submit a one-time notice of tank system existence to the implementing agency, using a state form in accordance with §280.22(c). Owners and operators of UST systems in use as of October 13, 2015 must demonstrate financial responsibility at the time of submission of the notification form. (c) Except as provided in §280.132, owners and operators must comply with the requirements of Rule 2.1 through Rule 2.8 and Rule 2.9 of this part. (d) In addition to the codes of practice listed in §280.20, owners and operators may use military construction criteria, such as Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 3-460-01, Petroleum Fuel Facilities, when designing, constructing, and installing airport hydrant systems and UST systems with field-constructed tanks. §280.132 Additions, exceptions, and alternatives for UST systems with field-constructed tanks and airport hydrant systems. (a) Exception to piping secondary containment requirements. Owners and operators may use single walled piping when installing or replacing piping associated with UST systems with field- constructed tanks greater than 50,000 gallons and piping associated with airport hydrant systems. Piping associated with UST systems with field-constructed tanks less than or equal to 50,000 gallons not part of an airport hydrant system must meet the secondary containment requirement when installed or replaced. (b) Upgrade requirements. Not later than October 5, 2021, airport hydrant systems and UST systems with field-constructed tanks where installation commenced on or before October 5, 2018, must meet the following requirements or be permanently closed pursuant to Rule 2.7 of this part. (1) Corrosion protection. UST system components in contact with the ground thatroutinely contain regulated substances must meet one of the following: (i) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the new UST system performance standards for tanks at §280.20(a) and for piping at §280.20(b); or (ii) Be constructed of metal and cathodically protected according to a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory and meets the following: (A) Cathodic protection must meet the requirements of §280.20(a)(2)(ii), (iii), and (iv) for tanks, and §280.20(b)(2)(ii), (iii), and (iv) for piping. (B) Tanks greater than 10 years old without cathodic protection must be assessed to ensure the tank is structurally sound and free of corrosion holes prior to adding cathodic protection. The assessment must be by internal inspection or another
method determined by the implementing agency to adequately assess the tank for structural soundness and corrosion holes. (2) Spill and overfill prevention equipment. To prevent spilling and overfilling associated with product transfer to the UST system, all UST systems with field-constructed tanks and airport hydrant systems must comply with new UST system spill and overfill prevention equipment requirements specified in §280.20(c). (c) Walkthrough inspections. In addition to the walkthrough inspection requirements in §280.38, owners and operators must inspect the following additional areas for airport hydrant systems at least once every 30 days if confined space entry according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (see 29 CFR part 1910) is not required or at least annually if confined space entry is required and keep documentation of the inspection according to §280.36(b). (1) Hydrant pits—visually check for any damage; remove any liquid or debris; and check for any leaks, and (2) Hydrant piping vaults—check for any hydrant piping leaks. (d) Release detection. Owners and operators of UST systems with field-constructed tanks and airport hydrant systems must begin meeting the release detection requirements described in this rule not later than October 5, 2021. (1) Methods of release detection for field-constructed tanks. Owners and operators of field- constructed tanks with a capacity less than or equal to 50,000 gallons must meet the release detection requirements in Rule 2.4 of this part. Owners and operators of field- constructed tanks with a capacity greater than 50,000 gallons must meet either the requirements in Rule 2.4 (except §280.43(e) and (f) must be combined with inventory control as stated below) or use one or a combination of the following alternative methods of release detection: (i) Conduct an annual tank tightness test that can detect a 0.5 gallon per hour leak rate; (ii) Use an automatic tank gauging system to perform release detection at least every 30 days that can detect a leak rate less than or equal to one gallon per hour. This method must be combined with a tank tightness test that can detect a 0.2 gallon per hour leak rate performed at least every three years; (iii) Use an automatic tank gauging system to perform release detection at least every 30 days that can detect a leak rate less than or equal to two gallons per hour. This method must be combined with a tank tightness test that can detect a 0.2 gallon per hour leak rate performed at least every two years; (iv) Perform vapor monitoring (conducted in accordance with §280.43(e) for a tracer compound placed in the tank system) capable of detecting a 0.1 gallon per hour leak rate at least every two years;
(v) Perform inventory control (conducted in accordance with Department of Defense Directive 4140.25; ATA Airport Fuel Facility Operations and Maintenance Guidance Manual; or equivalent procedures) at least every 30 days that can detect a leak equal to or less than 0.5 percent of flow-through; and (A) Perform a tank tightness test that can detect a 0.5 gallon per hour leak rate at least every two years; or (B) Perform vapor monitoring or groundwater monitoring (conducted in accordance with §280.43(e) or (f), respectively, for the stored regulated substance) at least every 30 days; or (vi) Another method approved by the implementing agency if the owner and operator can demonstrate that the method can detect a release as effectively as any of the methods allowed in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (v) of this section. In comparing methods, the implementing agency shall consider the size of release that the method can detect and the frequency and reliability of detection. (2) Methods of release detection for piping. Owners and operators of underground piping associated with field-constructed tanks less than or equal to 50,000 gallons must meet the release detection requirements in Rule 2.4 of this part. Owners and operators of underground piping associated with airport hydrant systems and field-constructed tanks greater than 50,000 gallons must follow either the requirements in Rule 2.4 (except §280.43(e) and (f) must be combined with inventory control as stated below) or use one or a combination of the following alternative methods of release detection: (i) Perform a semiannual or annual line tightness test at or above the piping operating pressure in accordance with the table listed.
MAXIMUM LEAK DETECTION RATE PER TEST SECTION VOLUME Test section volume (gallons) Semiannual test—leak detection rate not to exceed (gallons per hour) Annual test—leak detection rate not to exceed (gallons per hour) <50,000 1.0 0.5 ≥50,000 to <75,000 1.5 0.75 ≥75,000 to <100,000 2.0 1.0 ≥100,000 3.0 1.5 (ii) Piping segment volumes ≥100,000 gallons not capable of meeting the maximum 3.0 gallon per hour leak rate for the semiannual test may be tested at a leak rate up to 6.0 gallons per hour according to the following schedule: PHASE IN FOR PIPING SEGMENTS ≥100,000 GALLONS IN VOLUME
First test Not later than October 5, 2021 (may use up to 6.0 gph leak rate). Second test Between October 5, 2021 and October 13, 2021 (may use up to 6.0 gph leak rate). Third test Between October 13, 2021 and October 13, 2022 (must use 3.0 gph for leak rate). Subsequent tests After October 13, 2022, begin using semiannual or annual line testing according to the Maximum Leak Detection Rate Per Test Section Volume table above. (iii)Perform vapor monitoring (conducted in accordance with §280.43(e) for a tracer compound placed in the tank system) capable of detecting a 0.1 gallon per hour leak rate at least every two years; (iv) Perform inventory control (conducted in accordance with Department of Defense Directive 4140.25; ATA Airport Fuel Facility Operations and Maintenance Guidance Manual; or equivalent procedures) at least every 30 days that can detect a leak equal to or less than 0.5 percent of flow-through; and (A) Perform a line tightness test (conducted in accordance with paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this section using the leak rates for the semiannual test) at least every two years; or (B) Perform vapor monitoring or groundwater monitoring (conducted in accordance with §280.43(e) or (f), respectively, for the stored regulated substance) at least every 30 days; or (v) Another method approved by the implementing agency if the owner and operator can demonstrate that the method can detect a release as effectively as any of the methods
allowed in paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section. In comparing methods, the implementing agency shall consider the size of release that the method can detect and the frequency and reliability of detection. (3) Recordkeeping for release detection. Owners and operators must maintain release detection records according to the recordkeeping requirements in §280.45. (e) Applicability of closure requirements to previously closed UST systems. When directed by MDEQ, the owner and operator of an UST system with field-constructed tanks or airport hydrant system permanently closed before October 13, 2015 must assess the excavation zone and close the UST system in accordance with Rule 2.7 of this part if releases from the UST may, in the judgment of the implementing agency, pose a current or potential threat to human health and the environment.
APPENDIX 280.1 - GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS
SECTION 1 – GENERAL 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................
SECTION 2 – REGULATIONS 2.1 Rules ............................................................................................................................
SECTION 3 – TYPES OF CATHODIC PROTECTION 3.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 3.2 Galvanic Systems ............................................................................................................ 3.3 Impressed Current Systems ...............................................................................................
SECTION 4 – QUALIFICATIONS TO TEST CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS 4.1 Qualifications ..................................................................................................................
SECTION 5 – INSTALLATION/REPAIR OF CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS 5.1 Galvanic Systems ............................................................................................................ 5.1.1 sti-P
® Tanks ................................................................................................................... 5.1.2 Factory Coated Metallic Piping ........................................................................................... 5.1.3 Non-factory Coated Metallic Piping ..................................................................................... 5.1.4 Metallic Piping Installation/Repair ........................................................................................ 5.2 Impressed Current Systems ............................................................................................... 5.2.1 Rectifier Adjustment .........................................................................................................
SECTION 6 – CATHODIC PROTECTION TESTING 6.1 Equipment ..................................................................................................................... 6.1.1 Voltmeter/Ammeter .......................................................................................................... 6.1.2 Reference Electrode ......................................................................................................... 6.1.3 Lead Wires/Test Probes/Miscellaneous ................................................................................ 6.2 Test Criteria ................................................................................................................... 6.3 Voltage (IR) Drops ........................................................................................................... 6.4 Stray Current .................................................................................................................. 6.5 Dissimilar Metals/Bimetallic Couples .................................................................................... 6.6 Other Test Considerations ................................................................................................. 6.7 Continuity Testing ............................................................................................................ 6.7.1 Continuity Testing of Galvanic Systems ............................................................................... 6.7.2 Continuity Testing of Impressed Current Systems .................................................................. 6.8 Reference Electrode Placement ........................................................................................ 6.8.1 General .......................................................................................................................... 6.8.2 Local Placement .............................................................................................................. 6.8.3 Remote Placement .......................................................................................................... 6.8.4 Galvanic Placement ......................................................................................................... 6.8.5 Impressed Current Placement ............................................................................................ 6.9 Soil Access .................................................................................................................... 6.10 Cathodic Protection Test Locations .................................................................................... 6.10.1 Galvanically Protected (sti-P
® ) Tanks ................................................................................. 6.10.2 Galvanically Protected Metallic Piping .................................................................................. 6.10.3 Tanks Protected by Impressed Current ................................................................................ 6.10.4 Piping Protected by Impressed Current ................................................................................ 6.10.5 “100 Foot Rule” for Piping ................................................................................................. TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION 7 – DOCUMENTATION OF EVALUATION 7.1 Documentation ................................................................................................................ 7.1.1 As Built Drawings ............................................................................................................. 7.1.2 Site Drawing ................................................................................................................... 7.1.3 MDEQ UST Cathodic Protection Evaluation Form .................................................................. 7.1.4 Pass/Fail/Inconclusive ...................................................................................................... 7.2 Corrosion Expert’s Evaluation ............................................................................................ 7.3 What if the Evaluation Result is Fail? ....................................................................................
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE 1 ILLUSTRATION OF REFERENCE ELECTRODE CALIBRATION ......................................
FIGURE 2 GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF VOLTAGE DROP IN “ON” POTENTIAL ......................
FIGURE 3 LOCAL REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR sti-P
® TANKS ............................
FIGURE 4 REMOTE EARTH REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT ..........................................
FIGURE 5 LOCAL REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR GALVANICALLY PROTECTED PIPING WHEN PIPING ANODES ARE AT TANKS ........................................................
FIGURE 6 LOCAL REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR GALVANICALLY PROTECTED PIPING WHEN PIPING ANODES ARE AT DISPENSERS ..............................................
FIGURE 7 LOCAL REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR GALVANICALLY PROTECTED PIPING WHEN PIPING ANODES ARE AT BOTH ENDS OF THE PIPING .........................
FIGURE 8 LOCAL REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR GALVANICALLY PROTECTED PIPING WHEN ANODES ARE INSTALLED AT CENTER OF PIPING OR LOCATION IS UNKNOWN .........................
FIGURE 9 REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR TANKS PROTECTED BY IMPRESSED CURRENT SYSTEM WHEN ANODES ARE EVENLY DISTRIBUTED ...............................
FIGURE 10 REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR TANKS PROTECTED BY IMPRESSED CURRENT SYSTEM WHEN ANODES ARE UNEVENLY DISTRIBUTED ...........................
FIGURE 11 REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT FOR METALLIC PIPING PROTECTED BY IMPRESSED CURRENT SYSTEM .............................................................................
FIGURE 12 “100 FOOT RULE” FOR METALLIC PIPING PROTECTED BY GALVANIC OR IMPRESSED CURRENT SYSTEM ...............................................................................................
FIGURE 13 EXAMPLE OF A SITE DRAWING CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF A UST SYSTEM CATHODIC PROTECTION SURVEY ..........................................................................
APPENDICES
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A Industry Codes/Standards, References and Regulations
APPENDIX B Glossary
APPENDIX C Interpretation of Structure-to-Soil Potential Measurements (Voltages) Obtained on Galvanic Cathodic Protection Systems
APPENDIX D Interpretation of Structure-to-Soil Potential Measurements (Voltages) Obtained on Impressed Current Cathodic Protection Systems
APPENDIX E Continuity Testing Procedure for Galvanic/Impressed Current Systems
APPENDIX F Structure-to-Soil Test Procedure for Galvanic Cathodic Protection Systems
APPENDIX G Structure-to-Soil Test Procedure for Impressed Current Cathodic Protection Systems
APPENDIX H Checklist for Galvanic Cathodic Protection System Survey
APPENDIX I Checklist for Impressed Current Cathodic Protection System Survey
APPENDIX J Typical Potentials of Selected Metals
APPENDIX K Galvanic (Sacrificial Anode) Cathodic Protection System Evaluation Form
APPENDIX L Impressed Current Cathodic Protection System Evaluation Form
APPENDIX M Impressed Current Cathodic Protection System 60 Day Record of Rectifier Operation
SECTION 1 - GENERAL 1.1 Introduction The purpose of this document is to establish the policy of this office regarding the evaluation of cathodic protection systems operating on underground storage tank (UST) systems in the State of Mississippi. While conducting structure-to-soil potential surveys is the primary means of testing cathodic protection systems, other aspects related to the evaluation, installation, operation and repair of cathodic protection systems are also addressed in this document where necessary. Evaluation of cathodic protection systems to ensure they are functioning as intended has proven to be one of the more problematic areas that has led to a great deal of confusion and various practices among individuals engaged in the field of cathodic protection. Because the applicable regulations contain no specific criteria and instead defer to industry standards, a large degree of latitude has historically been provided for interpretation of what constitutes an acceptable evaluation. Since there are many factors that can affect cathodic protection, there is understandably no standard test method or "cookie-cutter" approach that will work at every site that has a cathodic protection system in operation. Therefore, the primary intent of this policy is to create a level playing field in which everyone engaged in the field of UST system cathodic protection in the State of Mississippi understands what is expected. The second focus of this policy is to provide that documentation sufficient to reproduce the results generated by a cathodic protection tester must be established in order to conduct a valid cathodic protection evaluation. To this end, forms that must be utilized when evaluating cathodic protection are included in Appendix K and L of this document. It is further necessary to understand that the creation of this policy has necessitated a compromise to some degree. Every effort has been made so as not to place an unduly harsh burden on the tank owners and contractors who operate in the State of Mississippi. At the same time, it is necessary to be protective of human health and the environment to the degree required to achieve the charge of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). This document represents the best efforts of the MDEQ to assure that cathodic protection systems operate as intended and effectively mitigate corrosion while being mindful of the economic constraints that must be considered. Some of the more important points established with this guidance document are: > Access to the soil directly over the structure that is being tested must be provided. > Both "local" and "remote" structure-to-soil potentials must be obtained on galvanic systems. > "Instant off' potentials must be obtained on all impressed current systems. > Continuity/isolation must be established whenever a cathodic protection survey is conducted. > Under certain conditions a "corrosion expert" must evaluate the cathodic protection survey. > A person must meet certain minimum qualifications in order to conduct an effective evaluation.
Simply conducting a structure-to-soil potential survey does not adequately evaluate a cathodic protection system. Other considerations that may need to be addressed are outlined in the text of this document and include: continuity measurements; evaluation of rectifier operation; current distribution among an impressed current anode ground bed; consideration of voltage drops; assurance of wiring integrity; continuity bonds; as built drawings and others. This policy is not intended to replace any statute or regulatory requirement concerning the installation, repair, operation or testing of cathodic protection systems. Rather, it is intended to state the interpretation of the MDEQ with regard to the implementation of those rules and regulations applicable to UST cathodic protection systems. SECTION 2 - REGULATIONS 2.1 Rules Federal and state laws require that any component of a UST system that routinely contains product and is in contact with the soil must be protected from corrosion. If the UST component in question is of metallic construction and it is in contact with the soil and/or water, it must be cathodically protected. If it is cathodically protected it must also be coated with a suitable dielectric material if the metallic component in question was installed after December 22, 1988. The rules also require that all cathodic protection systems must be evaluated within six months of installation/repair and once every three years thereafter. Consideration should be given to evaluating impressed current systems on an annual basis since these types of systems are more susceptible to failure or may be in need of adjustment on a more frequent basis in order to provide adequate cathodic protection. The MDEQ UST regulations reference several industry codes and practices and a listing of these may be found in Appendix A of this document. Following are the pertinent paragraphs the UST rules that are related to cathodic protection: 280.12 Definitions "Cathodic Protection" is a technique to prevent corrosion of a metal surface by making that surface the cathode of an electrochemical cell. For example, a tank system can be cathodically protected through the application of either galvanic anodes or impressed current. "Cathodic protection tester" means a person who can demonstrate an understanding of the principles and measurements of all common types of cathodic protection systems as applied to buried or submerged metal piping and tank systems. At a minimum, such persons must have education and experience in soil resistivity, stray current, structure-to-soil potential, and component electrical isolation measurements of buried metal piping and tank systems.
"Corrosion expert" means a person who, by reason of thorough knowledge of the physical sciences and the principles of engineering and mathematics acquired by a professional education and related practical experience, is qualified to engage in the practice of corrosion control on buried or submerged metal piping systems and metal tanks. Such a person must be accredited or certified as being qualified by the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE) or be a registered professional engineer who has certification or licensing that includes education and experience in corrosion control of buried or submerged metal piping systems and metal tanks. Performance Standards for New UST Systems (a) (2) The tank is constructed of steel and cathodically protected in the following manner: (i) The tank is coated with a suitable dielectric material; (ii) Field-installed cathodic protection systems are designed by a corrosion expert; (iii) Impressed current systems are designed to allow determination of current operating status as required in 280.32 (c); and (iv) Cathodic protection systems are operated and maintained in accordance with 280.32. Operation and Maintenance of Corrosion Protection All corrosion protection systems must be operated and maintained to continuously provide corrosion protection to the metal components of that portion of the tank and piping that routinely contain regulated substances and are in contact with the ground. All UST systems equipped with cathodic protection systems must be inspected for proper operation by a qualified cathodic protection tester in accordance with the following requirements: (1) Frequency. All cathodic protection systems must be tested within 6 months of installation and at least every 3 years thereafter. (2) Inspection Criteria. The criteria that are used to determine that cathodic protection is adequate as required by this section must be in accordance with a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association.
(c) UST systems with impressed current cathodic protection systems must also be inspected every 60 days to ensure the equipment is running properly. (d) For UST systems using cathodic protection, records of the operation of the cathodic protection must be maintained (in accordance with 280.35) to demonstrate compliance with the performance standards in this section. These records must provide the following:
(1) The results of the last three inspections required in paragraph (c) above; (2) The results of testing from the last two inspections required in paragraph (b) above. 280.34 Repairs Allowed (e) Within 6 months following the repair of any cathodically protected UST system, the cathodic protection system must be tested in accordance with 280.32 (b) and (c) to ensure that it is operating properly.
SECTION 3 - TYPES OF CATHODIC PROTECTION 3.1 General The two types of cathodic protection that are typically installed on UST systems are galvanic (sacrificial anode) and impressed current systems. An attempt to explain the principles involved in the theory of cathodic protection is beyond the scope of this document and it is assumed the reader has a basic understanding of the subject. However, stated in the simplest terms, both of these types of cathodic protection attempt to reverse the flow of electric current away from the metal that is intended to be protected from corrosion. Both types of cathodic protection prevent electric current from leaving the protected structure by supplying an electrical charge in the form of DC power sufficient to overcome any current that would otherwise leave the structure. The way in which the required electrical current is provided is what distinguishes the two types of cathodic protection. 3.2 Galvanic Systems Galvanic systems are also known as sacrificial anode systems because an anode (usually zinc or magnesium) corrodes instead of the protected metal. Because the anode corrodes instead of the metal that it is protecting, the anode is said to sacrifice itself. Sacrificial anodes are connected directly to the structure to be protected by either welding or mechanical connection of lead wires. Galvanic systems are generally limited to those tank components that are well coated with a dielectric material (sti-P3® tanks or fusion bonded epoxy coated steel piping) because the available current output of these systems is low. Attempts to protect long runs of uncoated piping or uncoated tanks generally is not practical because the useful life of the anodes is too short or the number of anodes needed is too great. 3.3 Impressed Current Systems Impressed current systems are sometimes called rectifier systems because they utilize a device (a rectifier) to convert an external AC power source to the required DC power source. In this type of system, anodes are installed in the soil around the structure to be protected and the DC power is supplied to the anodes through buried wires. The power to the rectifier cannot be interrupted except when conducting maintenance or testing activities. Normally, a dedicated and protected circuit is provided for the impressed current system so that the power cannot be inadvertently cut off. In impressed current systems the protected structure is bonded to the DC power system to complete the electrical circuit. It is critical that the anodes are connected to the positive terminal and the protected structure to the negative terminal of the rectifier. Reversal of the lead wires will make the components of the tank system anodic and can cause a rapid failure of the tank system due to corrosion. In addition, it is critical that all wire connections and splices are well insulated. Any breaks in the wiring insulation will allow current to leave the wire at that point and a rapid failure of the wire can occur due to corrosion.
Impressed current systems are generally installed on those tank systems that were installed prior to the effective date of the UST regulations since these tanks usually do not have a good dielectric coating. The level of cathodic protection provided by an impressed current system can be adjusted since the voltage produced by the rectifier can be changed. Because conditions that affect the level of cathodic protection needed are likely to change over time, adjustment of the rectifier is frequently necessary. SECTION 4 - QUALIFICATIONS TO TEST CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS 4.1 Qualifications In order to test cathodic protection systems in the State of Mississippi, an individual must meet certain minimum qualifications. It is the intent of the MDEQ that those individuals who meet the minimum qualifications perform testing in a manner that is consistent with the policies of this guidance document. Should an individual who meets the minimum qualifications as described below not possess the knowledge and expertise needed to properly evaluate a cathodic protection system, that individual should not attempt to undertake such an evaluation. While it is not necessary to be an "expert" to test cathodic protection systems in most cases, it should be recognized that the proper evaluation of the two types of cathodic protection systems may require differing levels of expertise. Impressed current systems are inherently more involved and require a higher level of understanding than galvanic systems. In addition, certain circumstances and conditions may exist that would preclude an individual from making an effective evaluation of a cathodic protection system without the assistance of someone who is more qualified. Because the testing of impressed current systems is inherently more complicated, someone who is only minimally qualified as a "tester" should recognize that he may or may not be able to properly evaluate all such systems. Galvanic cathodic protection systems that are operating as designed are normally straightforward and a lesser degree of expertise is needed to properly evaluate such systems. However, troubleshooting and/or repair of such systems may require someone who has a higher level of expertise than a person who is only minimally qualified as a tester. Scenarios that require an expert to either conduct or evaluate the cathodic protection survey are listed in Section 7.2 of this document. It should be recognized that there might be other circumstances that require an expert although they may not be specifically listed. A listing of those individuals who meet the qualifications of an expert (certified as either as a "corrosion specialist" or a "cathodic protection specialist") can be found at the web site of NACE International (www.nace.org). Listed below are the minimum qualifications necessary to test cathodic protection: > Anyone who meets the definition of "cathodic protection tester" as found in 40 CFR 280.10 is recognized as qualified to test cathodic protection.
Anyone who holds a certification from NACE International which that organization recognizes at a minimum as qualifying that person as a cathodic protection tester. > Anyone who is certified by the MDEQ as a UST installer is recognized as being able to test cathodic protection systems provided they are familiar with the concepts involved and abide by the requirements contained within this guidance document. If a UST installer does not understand the basic concepts related to the testing, maintenance and operation of cathodic protection systems, that person should not attempt to evaluate such systems. Should it be determined that a MDEQ certified UST installer is conducting evaluations of UST cathodic protection systems in a manner that is not consistent with the intent of the MDEQ policy, they may be subject to penalty and/or revocation of their UST installer certification upon a determination of good cause by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality. SECTION 5 - INSTALLATION/REPAIR OF CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS 5.1 Galvanic Systems 5.1.1 sti-P
® Tanks Anyone who is a MDEQ certified UST installer may repair the cathodic protection system of a sti-P3® tank provided any provisions the tank manufacturer may have are also met. The design requirements for the installation of additional sacrificial anodes to a sti-P3® tank may be met without the need for a corrosion expert to design such, provided the provisions of the Steel Tank Institute "Recommended Practice for the Installation of Supplemental Anodes for sti-P3® UST's R-972-01" are followed. An evaluation of the cathodic protection system must be conducted within six months of the installation/repair in accordance with the requirements of this document. 5.1.2 Factory Coated Metallic Piping Installation of sacrificial anodes to factory coated (fusion bonded epoxy) metallic piping may be accomplished without the design of a corrosion expert provided the provisions of the Steel Tank Institute "Recommended Practice for Corrosion Protection of Underground Piping Networks Associated with Liquid Storage and Dispensing Systems R892-91" are followed. As an alternative, the practices as described in the Petroleum Equipment Institute "RP 100-2000 Recommended Practices for the Installation of Underground Liquid Storage Systems" may also be followed when installing sacrificial anodes on factory coated piping. 5.1.3 Non-factory Coated Metallic Piping The installation and/or repair of a galvanic cathodic protection system installed on metallic piping that is not factory coated with a dielectric material may be accomplished by anyone who is a MDEQ certified UST installer. However, the design of the galvanic cathodic protection system must be accomplished by a corrosion expert. In addition, an evaluation of the cathodic
protection system must be conducted within six months of the installation/repair in accordance with the requirements of this document. 5.1.4 Metallic Piping Repair/Installation Provided below are some general observations that are commonly applicable to questions that arise when attempting to meet the corrosion protection requirements on metallic piping and other metallic components of a typical UST system. Protected Components - Any metallic component of the piping system, including all metallic nipples, ells, tees, couplings, unions, ball valves, etc. must be protected from corrosion if they are in contact with the soil and/or water. Corrosion protection may be accomplished by either a) isolating the component in question from contact with the soil and/or water or b) coating/wrapping with a suitable dielectric material and cathodic protection. Any isolation boot or containment sump designed to isolate the metallic component from contact with the soil must also prevent water from contacting the component in question in order to eliminate the need for cathodic protection. If the metallic component in question is cathodically protected, it must also be coated/wrapped with a suitable dielectric material if it was installed after December 22, 1988. Unprotected Components - Metallic components of the UST system that do not require corrosion protection include: tank vent lines; any type of tank riser pipe; tank hold down straps; remote tank fill lines and submersible turbine pump (STP) heads. Although the pump head "routinely contains product", it is not required to meet the corrosion protection requirements and may be in contact with the soil or submerged in water without the need for cathodic protection. However, the pump head should remain visible (not buried) so that any obvious corrosion problems or leaks that may be present can be observed and appropriate action taken to prevent or repair any leaks. Repair - Some confusion exists over whether or not metallic piping that has failed can be repaired or must be replaced. "Repaired" as related to steel pipe involves the replacement of the section of pipe that has failed. The entire run of steel piping does not have to be replaced but the repair must consist of replacement of the section of pipe that has failed. Only steel pipe that is factory coated with a dielectric material (fusion bonded epoxy) can be used to replace the failed section of pipe regardless of whether the existing pipe is galvanized or coated steel. Under no circumstances is it allowable to install galvanized piping when it is intended to serve as a product transfer line. Because of the complexities that may be involved in the cathodic protection of galvanized steel piping, a corrosion expert must evaluate and/or conduct the cathodic protection survey after the repair. Electrical Continuity - Dielectric unions are normally not installed if the piping is protected by an impressed current system. It is essential that all metallic piping that is part of the UST system is bonded to the negative circuit of the impressed current system if it is buried. It is normally desirable to electrically isolate any metallic portion of the UST system that is not buried or submerged in water from that portion that is buried/submerged.
Electrical Isolation - If metallic piping is galvanically protected, it is critical that effective electrical isolation is provided. Failure to isolate the protected piping will result in premature failure of the sacrificial anodes. Isolation can be difficult to achieve where cathodically protected piping is present under dispensers that have shear valves present. This is due to the requirement that the shear valve must be properly anchored to the island form. Particular care should be exercised in these instances to assure proper isolation. If possible, the dielectric union should be installed below the shear valve so that anchoring does not cause a continuity problem. Screw Joints - Particular care should be taken when dealing with metallic piping that is mechanically coupled with threaded screw joints. Any threaded joint in a metallic piping material can serve as a break in the electrical continuity of the piping system. It has been established that threaded couple pipe joints can develop enough electrical resistivity over time to effectively isolate each section of a piping system. For obvious reasons, this is highly undesirable in a cathodic protection system and you should ensure that electrical continuity is present between any sections of piping that are intended to be protected. Jumper wires or welding may be necessary across each pipe couple in order to assure electrical continuity between each section of piping. Flex Connectors - Any metallic flexible connector (including stainless steel) that is utilized on a piping system must be protected from corrosion. The flex connector may be isolated from contact with soil/water or cathodically protected. If the flex connector is cathodically protected, it must also be coated/wrapped with a dielectric material if it was installed after December 22, 1988. Containment Sumps - If metallic components of a piping system are installed in a containment sump, the sump must be maintained dry. If a sump contains water and you are unable to keep the water out, the metallic components must be protected from corrosion. The metallic components may be protected by installing appropriate isolation boots (in the case of flex connectors) or sacrificial anodes. If cathodic protection is necessary, the sump may or may not be filled with clean sand to a depth adequate to bury the anode. Burial of the anode may help prevent an oxidation film from forming on the anode (and causing passivation) in the event that standing water is not always present in the sump. In either case, it is critical that the anode be installed within the containment sump. Do not place the anode outside of the sump. "Mixed" Piping - In those instances where fiberglass reinforced plastic or flexible piping is connected to an existing metallic pipe (e.g. to extend a fueling island), a cathodic protection test station or access to the soil where the two dissimilar materials are joined must be provided. This is necessary to effectively test the adequacy of cathodic protection operating on the metallic piping. 5.2 Impressed Current Systems Anyone who is a MDEQ certified UST installer may install and/or repair an impressed current cathodic protection system. However, the design of an impressed current system must be accomplished by a corrosion expert. If the repair of an impressed current cathodic protection
system results in the reconfiguration of any of the components of the system, then the reconfiguration must also be designed by a corrosion expert. If the repair only involves the replacement of existing components, a corrosion expert does not need to "sign-off on such work. However, after any repair/alteration of the impressed current system is made, an evaluation of the cathodic protection survey must be conducted within six months of the repair. If the repair/alteration results in any of the conditions found in Section 7.2 of this document being met, the cathodic protection survey must be conducted/evaluated by a corrosion expert. 5.2.1 Rectifier Adjustment Anyone who is considered qualified as a cathodic protection tester may adjust the rectifier output/voltage of an impressed current cathodic protection system. An evaluation of the cathodic protection system must be conducted whenever an adjustment to the rectifier is made. Before making any adjustments to the rectifier, the power must be turned off. Open both the AC and the DC circuit breakers. It should be recognized that increasing the rectifier output could cause an increase in the potential for stray current to be generated that may have a detrimental effect on other buried metallic structures at the facility. Excessive rectifier output can also significantly shorten the life of the anode ground bed since the anodes will be consumed more quickly than necessary. In addition, care should also be taken to ensure that components of the rectifier do not become overheated (causing a potential fire hazard) as a result of increasing the output. When evaluating the operation and output of a rectifier, it is important to make all measurements with a good quality multimeter. Do not rely on the output indicated by the voltmeter and/or ammeter that may be installed on the rectifier. Most rectifier gauges are adjustable and you should make any adjustment that may be indicated by measurement with the portable multimeter. The gauges that are commonly built into rectifiers are usually not accurate and may even be frozen in a fixed position. If the indicator needle is frozen on the rectifier voltmeter/ammeter and cannot be freed, you should replace the gauge. If replacement is not accomplished, you should note that the gauge is not functioning so that an observer will be able to discern that the gauge is inoperable. For the reasons given above and other considerations, a person qualified as a corrosion expert should be consulted whenever the output is adjusted or repairs are made to the rectifier. SECTION 6 - CATHODIC PROTECTION TESTING 6.1 Equipment Although the equipment required to test cathodic protection systems is relatively simple, it is very important that the equipment be maintained in good working order and is free of corrosion
and contamination. The basic equipment includes a voltmeter/ammeter (multimeter), reference electrode, wires, clips and test probes. It may also be necessary to have a current interrupter for impressed current systems when the power cannot be easily cut on and off at the rectifier. A clamp-on type ammeter can be useful when troubleshooting impressed current systems. Wire locators can help determine the location of buried anode lead wires and header cables. Hand tools to clean corrosion or dielectric coatings from the surface of the structure you are testing at the point of contact with lead wires/probes may also be necessary. 6.1.1 Voltmeter/Ammeter A good quality voltmeter/ammeter (multimeter) that has an adequate degree of accuracy is essential for testing cathodic protection due to the low voltage/current involved. Most "low end" voltmeters/ammeters are not capable of achieving results accurate enough to ensure reliable results and should therefore not be used. All testing of cathodic protection systems must be accomplished with a high internal resistance (impedance of 10 meg-ohms or greater) voltmeter that is properly maintained and periodically calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The voltmeter should be calibrated at least on an annual basis. It is important that the voltmeter has a high internal resistance in order to avoid introducing a large error when measuring structure-to-soil potentials. The voltmeter must have a high degree of sensitivity and must be placed in as low a scale as possible (normally the 2 volt DC scale works well) in order to accurately measure the small voltages associated with cathodic protection systems. All voltage measurements obtained should be recorded as millivolts (mV). For example, a reading of-1.23 volts should be recorded as - 1230 mV; a reading of-.85 volts should be recorded as -850 mV. Voltmeters that have a variable input resistance can be utilized to ensure that contact resistance between the reference electrode and the electrolyte has been evaluated as a source of error (voltage drop) in the observed structure-to-soil potential. This is accomplished by changing the input resistance and noting whether or not the voltage observed changes significantly. If no voltage change is observed when the input resistance is changed, it can be assumed that contact resistance is not causing an error in the structure-to-soil potential measurement. An ammeter that has a very low internal resistance is necessary when testing impressed current systems in order to accurately determine the current output of the rectifier and/or individual circuits in the system. Generally, amperage should only be measured where calibrated measurement shunts are present. Alternatively, a "clamp-on" type ammeter may be utilized in those cases where shunts are not present. The batteries in the portable multimeter must also be in good condition. Batteries that are in poor condition can cause unintended errors. If there is any question about the condition of the batteries in the multimeter, they must be replaced.
6.1.2 Reference Electrode A standard copper/copper sulfate reference electrode (also known as a half cell or reference cell) must be utilized in order to obtain structure-to-soil potentials. The reference electrode must be maintained in good working condition and must be placed in the soil in a vertical position when conducting a test. On those sti-Ps® tanks that have a PP4® test station, a reference electrode is permanently buried in the tank pit. Since it is generally not possible to determine where the permanent reference electrode was installed on these types of systems, it is also necessary to conduct structure-to-soil potential measurements in the conventional manner (i.e. with a portable reference electrode in the soil directly over the tank and at a remote placement). A tank may not be passed on the basis of a structure-to-soil potential obtained with a PP4® test station. Both the local and the remote potential obtained in the conventional manner must indicate that adequate cathodic protection has been provided regardless of what the PP4® test station indicates. Maintenance of the reference electrode is important for accurate results and includes: a. The copper-sulfate solution inside the reference electrode should be clear. If the solution appears cloudy, this may indicate that the solution has become contaminated and the reference electrode should be compared with the known standard as described in paragraph e below. Should it be necessary to replace the solution, only distilled water and new copper-sulfate crystals should be used. Excess copper-sulfate crystals must be present in order to assure a saturated solution. Under average conditions, it is usually a good idea to empty and replace the solution every 2 or 3 months. b. The porous ceramic tip must be maintained moist at all times. If the tip is allowed to dry out, it may lose its porosity and a good low resistivity contact with the soil will not be possible. Periodic replacement of the tip may be necessary. c. The copper rod inside the reference electrode should periodically be cleaned with non- metallic sandpaper. Do not use black metal oxide sandpaper, steel wool or any other metallic abrasive as this can cause the copper rod to become contaminated. If the copper rod becomes contaminated, it is best to replace the reference electrode. d. The copper-sulfate solution must be free of contamination or errors will be introduced in the readings you observe. If the reference electrode is submerged in water or placed in moist soils that are contaminated, it is likely that the solution will become contaminated. e. The reference electrode that is used in the field must be periodically calibrated. How often the reference electrode needs to be calibrated depends upon several different factors. Among the more important factors that should be considered are the frequency of use and the exposure of the reference electrode to contaminants. As a general rule, calibration should be checked once every week if the reference electrode is used daily. If the reference electrode is only periodically used, calibration should be checked prior to each use.
Calibration of the reference electrode is accomplished by comparing it with another reference electrode that has never been used. The unused reference electrode that is to act as the calibration standard should be properly set up (ready for use) and must not have ever been used in the field so that no chance of contamination exists. To calibrate the field electrode: 1. Place the voltmeter on the 2 volt DC scale (or lower) and connect the leads to the reference electrodes as shown in the illustration below. 2. Place both the field electrode and the standard electrode in a shallow nonmetallic container that has one to two inches of tap water in the bottom of it. Do not use distilled water. The reference electrodes must be placed vertically in the container with the ceramic tip of each submerged in the water. 3. Observe the potential measurement displayed on the voltmeter. If more than 10 mV potential exists between the two reference electrodes, the field reference electrode should be properly cleaned and refilled with new solution until the potential difference is 10 mV or less. If you are unable to achieve a 10 mV or less potential difference after cleaning/reconditioning, the field electrode must be replaced. 4. In order to lessen the chance of cross contaminating the calibration electrode, you should leave the calibration electrode in the water for the shortest time necessary to complete the test.
6.1.3 Lead Wires/Test Probes/Miscellaneous You should ensure that the insulation material of any lead wires is in good condition. Any clips or probes used to make contact with the structure to be tested must be clean and free of corrosion. A spool of suitable wire of sufficient length is necessary to conduct continuity and/or "remote earth" testing. It is usually necessary to have a probe that can be attached to the end of a tank gauging stick in order to contact the tank bottom since it is not uncommon for the test lead on sti-P3 tanks to either be missing or discontinuous with the tank shell. A pair of locking pliers can sometimes be useful when attempting to get a solid connection. 6.2 Test Criteria There are three test criteria that can be utilized to indicate if adequate cathodic protection is being provided to the structure being evaluated: 850 On - A structure-to-soil potential of-850 mV or more negative with the protective current applied. This is commonly referred to as "850 on" or the "on potential". This criterion is normally the only one available for galvanic systems since the protective current usually cannot be interrupted. Voltage drops (see Section 6.3) other than those across the structure to electrolyte boundary must be taken into consideration whenever this criterion is applied. Voltage drops may have a significant impact on the potentials observed when testing impressed current systems with the protective current applied. Therefore, the 850 on criterion is not applicable to impressed current systems. 850 Off- A structure-to-soil potential of-850 mV or more negative with the protective current temporarily interrupted. This is referred to variously as "850 off', "polarized potential" or "instant off potential". This criterion is applicable to impressed current and galvanic systems where the protective current can be interrupted. Caution must be exercised when testing impressed current systems to ensure that no active sacrificial anodes are also installed near the protected structure. If there are active anodes influencing the observed potential, the 850 off criterion is not applicable. The instant off potential is the 2 nd value that is observed on a digital voltmeter the instant the power is interrupted. The first number that appears immediately after power interruption must be disregarded. After the second number appears, a rapid decay (depolarization) of the structure will normally occur. In order to obtain instant off potentials, a current interrupter or a 2 nd person is necessary. If a current interrupter is not available, have the second person throw the power switch at the rectifier off for 3 seconds and then back on for 15 seconds. Repeat this procedure until you are sure an accurate instant off reading has been obtained. This criterion is considered by most to be the best indicator that adequate cathodic protection has been provided. Therefore, consideration should be given to adjusting the rectifier output upward until the 850 off criterion has been met if this is feasible.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 100 Rule 100
mV Polarization - A polarization voltage shift of at least 100 mV. Commonly referred to as "100 mV polarization" or "100 mV shift". This criterion is applicable to galvanic and impressed current systems where the protective current can be temporarily interrupted. Either
the formation or the decay of at least 100 mV polarization may be used to evaluate adequate cathodic protection. The "true" polarized potential may take a considerable length of time to effectively form on a structure that has had cathodic protection newly applied. If the protective current is interrupted on a metallic structure that has been under cathodic protection, the polarization will begin to decay nearly instantaneously. For this reason, it is important that the protective current not be interrupted for any significant length of time. Generally, not more than 24 hours should be allowed for the 100 mV depolarization to occur. On a well-coated structure complete depolarization may take as long as 60-90 days. Complete depolarization of uncoated structures will usually occur within 48 hours although it could take as long as 30 days. The base reading from which to begin the measurement of the voltage shift is the instant off potential. For example, a structure exhibits an on voltage of-835 mV. The instant off voltage is - 720mV. In order to meet the 100 mV polarization criteria, the structure-to-soil potential must decay to at least -620 mV (final voltage). The use of native potentials to demonstrate the formation of 100 mV polarization is generally only applicable when a system is initially energized or is re-energized after a complete depolarization has occurred. This is because it is necessary to leave the reference electrode undisturbed (or returned to the exact position) between the time the native and the final voltage are obtained. It is only necessary to conduct a 100 mV polarization test on that component of the UST system where the lowest (most positive) instant off structure-to-soil potential exists in order to demonstrate that the UST system meets this criterion. If the criterion is met at the test point where the potential is most positive, it can be assumed that it will be met at all other test locations. 6.3 Voltage (IR) Drops The effect voltage drops have must be considered whenever structure-to-soil potentials are obtained during the survey of a cathodic protection system. The concept of voltage drops is a difficult and controversial subject and a full discussion is beyond the scope of this document. However, stated in the simplest terms, a voltage drop may be thought of as any component of the total voltage measurement (potential) that causes an error.
The term IR drop is sometimes used and it is equivalent to voltage drop. IR drop is derived from Ohm's Law which states that V = I R. In this equation, V stands for voltage, I represents current (amperage) and R stands for resistance. Because the observed voltage is equal to the amperage (I) multiplied by the resistance (R) a voltage drop is commonly referred to as an IR drop. There are various sources of voltage drops and two of the more common are discussed below.
Current Flow - Whenever a current flows through a resistance, a voltage drop is necessarily created and will be included whenever a measurement of the electrical circuit is conducted. In order to effectively eliminate this voltage drop when testing impressed current systems, it is necessary to interrupt the protective current. The magnitude of the voltage drop obtained on impressed current systems is evaluated by conducting both on and instant off potential measurements.
To illustrate how this type of voltage drop contributes to the potential observed when measuring impressed current systems consider the following example. A potential of-950 mV is observed when the rectifier is on. A potential of -700mV is observed when the power is interrupted. Taking the absolute values (negative is dropped), the voltage drop component of the on potential is 250 mV (950 - 700 = 250). Figure 2 is a graphical representation of this voltage drop and also shows how the instant off potential will degrade over time until the native potential is reached.
Raised Earth - All active anodes will have a voltage gradient present in the soil around them producing a "raised earth effect". An abnormally high (more negative) potential will be observed if the reference electrode is within the voltage gradient of an active anode. The magnitude or area of influence of the voltage gradient is dependent predominantly on the voltage output of the anode and the resistance of the soil. Unfortunately, there is no "rule of thumb" guidance that can be given to determine how far away you must be from an anode in order to be outside the voltage gradient. If you suspect the potential you obtain may be affected by raised earth, you should take a remote reading and compare the two. Because of the raised earth effect, it is necessary to place the reference electrode as far away from any active anode (and still be directly over the structure) when obtaining local potentials on galvanic systems. Since the protective current can not typically be interrupted in galvanic systems, any effect this type of voltage drop may have is evaluated by placing the reference electrode remote. Placement of the reference electrode remote ensures that the reference electrode is not within the voltage gradient of an active anode. Since it is desirable to eliminate any effect voltage drops may have, it is necessary to obtain both local and remote structure-to- soil potentials on galvanic systems. Any effect raised earth may have when testing impressed current systems is eliminated by temporarily interrupting the power. 6.4 Stray Current An unintended current that is affecting the structure you are trying to protect is referred to as a stray current. Stray currents can cause rapid corrosion failure of a buried metallic structure and are caused by an electric current flowing through the earth in an unintended path. If the metallic object you are trying to cathodically protect is buried near the path of the stray current, the current may "jump-on" the protected structure because it offers a lower resistance path for the current to flow. The affected structure will be cathodic where the stray current enters but will be
highly anodic where the stray current returns to the earth. At the point where the current discharges, rapid corrosion of the structure intended to be protected will occur. Although stray currents are relatively rare on UST systems, common sources include: a) Railroad crossing signals (powered by batteries); b) Traffic signals that have induction type sensors buried in the pavement; c) Portable or fixed emergency power generators; d) Electrical railway systems such as streetcars or subways in urban areas; e) DC welding operations and other types of industrial machinery or processes that utilize DC power. If unsteady readings are observed on the protected structure and you have determined that it is not because of a bad electrical connection, you should suspect that stray current is affecting the protected structure. In some cases, a pattern can be seen in the potential whereby it alternates between two relatively stable readings. These patterns can sometimes help to identify the source of the stray current. If you suspect that stray current may be affecting the UST system, a thorough investigation must be conducted as soon as possible by a qualified corrosion expert since stray current can cause a rapid failure of the affected structure. Cathodic Interference - When the impressed current cathodic protection system operating on the structure you are trying to protect causes an unintended current on some other nearby structure, this type of stray current is referred to as "cathodic interference". Cathodic interference can cause a rapid failure of the water lines and other buried metallic structures at the facility where the cathodic protection system is operating. If you observe what you believe to be an abnormally high (more negative) potential on a buried metallic structure, you should suspect that the impressed current system operating on the UST system is causing cathodic interference. Instances where cathodic interference may be present include: a) copper water lines that are not bonded to the impressed current system and have a polarized potential of greater than -200 mV; b) metallic flex connectors associated with fiberglass reinforced plastic piping that have abnormally high (more negative) potentials and are not bonded to the impressed current system; c) sti-P3® tanks are buried at a facility where there is an impressed current system operating and are not bonded to the negative circuit. When the sti-P3® tanks have zinc anodes and a potential more negative than -1100 mV (more negative than -1600 mV in the case of magnesium anodes) is observed, it is likely that cathodic interference is occurring. Because of the potential for stray current to impact sti-P3® tanks, it is normally necessary to bond them into the impressed current system. A corrosion expert must be consulted whenever cathodic interference is suspected in order to properly investigate and make any repairs/modifications that may be necessary. 6.5 Dissimilar Metals/Bimetallic Couples The effect bimetallic couples may have must also be considered whenever structure-to-soil potentials are obtained during the survey of a cathodic protection system. The concept of dissimilar metals/bimetallic couples and the impact they can have on the proper evaluation of cathodic protection systems is a difficult and controversial subject and a full discussion is beyond the scope of this document. However, you should be aware that bimetallic couples may substantially influence the structure-to-soil potentials of a tank system to the extent that the 100 mV polarization criterion is not applicable. Because the validity of the 100 mV criterion may be suspect, consideration should be given to only utilizing the -850 mV instant off criterion when evaluating impressed current systems. A brief discussion follows.
Caution must be exercised when evaluating steel UST systems that have metals of lower electrochemical potential electrically connected to them. Typically, bimetallic couples are only of concern on impressed current systems since those steel components protected by galvanic systems are electrically isolated from other metallic structures. Copper is the metal of lower potential that is commonly of concern. Sources of copper at UST facilities include the water service lines and the grounding system of the electrical power grid. Since the AC power supply to the submersible turbine pump should be continuous with the electrical service grounding system, which may in turn be continuous with the water lines, a significant amount of copper may be coupled to the steel UST system. The effect this type of bimetallic couple has on the impressed current system can sometimes be clearly seen on those UST systems that store fuel for emergency power generators. Commonly these generator tank systems are installed with copper supply and return lines. When these tanks were retrofitted with an impressed current system, the copper lines were bonded into the cathodic protection system. In these instances, it is not uncommon to observe native structure-to-soil potentials on the UST system of-450 mV or more positive. If the native structure-to-soil potential of the UST system is substantially lower than what you would normally expect, it is likely that a significant amount of copper is electrically bonded to the UST system. Typically, the expected native potential of a steel UST system should not be more positive than -500 mV. To illustrate the effect of the copper-steel couple, consider the following example: A steel UST system that is coupled to copper has a native structure-to-soil potential of -300 mV with the bimetallic couple intact. If the copper couple is broken the UST system native potential is -600 mV. With the copper couple intact, the polarized (off) potential of the UST system -450 mV. Although the voltage shift satisfies the 100 mV polarization criterion (from -300 mV to -450 mV), it is likely that the steel UST system is not adequately protected. This is because the UST system is not polarized at least 100 mV beyond the native potential of the steel. Since the true native potential of the steel UST system in this example is -600 mV, you would need to reach a polarized (instant off) potential of-700 mV or more negative. Because the unaffected native potential of steel UST systems is generally not known, the application of the 100 mV polarization criterion would be inappropriate when there is a significant amount of copper (or other more noble metal) electrically continuous. For this reason, it is always desirable to demonstrate that the UST system satisfies the 850 off criterion when evaluating a cathodic protection system. 6.6 Other Test Considerations Various other factors can affect the accuracy of structure-to-soil potentials. Listed below are some of the more common factors that you should keep in mind: Contact Resistance - In order to obtain an accurate structure-to-soil potential, a good (low resistivity) contact between the reference electrode and the soil must be made. Sometimes, the soil at the surface is too dry and water needs to be added in order to lower the resistance between the reference electrode and the soil. In addition, if the porous ceramic tip of the reference electrode becomes clogged or contaminated it should be replaced since this in itself can cause a high contact resistance.
Contaminated Soil - You should ensure that the soil the reference electrode is placed in is free of contamination. Hydrocarbon contamination can cause a high resistance between the reference electrode and the soil. Current Requirement Testing - When a current requirement test is conducted on galvanically protected tanks (refer to STI R972-01 for a description of this test), the affected structure can exhibit an elevated (more negative) structure-to-soil potential during the test and for a period of time after the test is completed. This is due to a temporary polarization of the tested structure which will dissipate over a period of time ranging from a few minutes to perhaps a few days depending on several different factors. Therefore, time sufficient for the temporary polarization of the affected structure to "drain-off after a current requirement test is conducted must be allowed before an accurate structure-to-soil potential can be obtained. In addition, any potential measured with the battery connected should be disregarded as this measurement contains a large voltage drop. Only instant off voltages are meaningful when the battery is connected. Drought Conditions - On occasion, it has been observed that structure-to-soil potentials can be improved by running water into the backfill material of the tank bed when extended periods of no rain have occurred. This is commonly done by placing a water hose in one of the tank bed monitoring wells (or other access points) and allowing the water to run for a period of a few hours. This practice serves to lower the resistance of the backfill material. However, you should keep in mind that the resistivity of the soil is not appreciably lowered if the moisture content is 20% or higher. Electrical Shorts - When a substandard reading is observed on a galvanically protected system, it is common to find that some other metallic object is electrically connected to the protected structure. For instance, on sti-P3® tanks, the nylon bushings installed in the tank bungs were sometimes removed when the various risers and other tank system components were installed or an electrical conduit was buried in contact with the tank shell. Electromagnetic Interference - Overhead high voltage power lines, railroad crossing signals, airport radar systems and radio frequency transmitters (CB radios, cellular phones, etc.) can all cause an interference that will result in an inaccurate voltage reading. Galvanized Metals - Buried metals that have a high electrochemical potential can also influence the voltage observed if the reference electrode is placed in close proximity to such metals. For instance, the steel of some of the man ways that are installed to provide access to the tank appurtenances may be galvanized. If the reference electrode is placed in the soil of such a manway, an artificially high (more negative) potential may be observed. This is actually a raised earth effect although the galvanized metal is not acting to cathodically protect the buried structure of concern. Parallel Circuits - Care should be taken to ensure that the person conducting the structure-to- soil testing does not allow their person to come into contact with the electrical components of the testing equipment. If the person touches the electrical connections, an error may be introduced due to the creation of a parallel circuit. Pea Gravel - Because pea gravel or crushed stone typically has a very high electrical resistivity, it is necessary to ensure that it is saturated with water when attempting to measure structure-to- soil potentials with the reference electrode placed in the pea gravel. Evaluate any effect high
contact resistance may have by changing the input resistance of the voltmeter as described in Section 6.1.1. As an alternative way to evaluate the effect contact resistance may have, place the reference electrode remotely. If the remote reading is substantially more negative than the local, high resistance is indicated. Placement of a saturated sponge on the surface of the pea gravel may help overcome high contact resistance. Photovoltaic Effect - It is known that sunlight striking the viewing window of a reference electrode can have an effect (as much as 50 mV) on the voltages observed when conducting testing. You should ensure that the viewing window of the reference electrode is kept out of direct sunlight. As an alternative, the viewing window can be covered with black electrical tape in order to prevent any sunlight from reaching the copper-copper sulfate solution. Poor Connection - If the observed structure-to-soil potentials are unsteady and the voltmeter will not stabilize, you should suspect a bad connection somewhere. Ensure that all electrical connections are clean and tight and good contact is made between the test lead and the structure. Shielding - Sometimes, a buried metallic structure that is between the reference electrode and the structure you are attempting to test will cause the reference electrode to be unable to "see" the structure you are testing. Shielding is commonly cited when low potentials are observed with the reference electrode placed locally over sti-Pj tanks due to the various tank risers, pump heads, piping, electrical conduits and metallic manways that are typically located over the tank.
Temperature - The temperature of the reference electrode affects the voltages that are observed when conducting cathodic protection testing. You may need to make a correction to the observed potential in some extreme and/or marginal cases. The "standard" temperature is considered to be 77° F. For every degree less than 77 add 0.5 mV from the observed voltage. For every degree above 77 subtract 0.5 mV from the observed voltage. To illustrate this, consider the following (in order to simplify the calculation, the negative sign is dropped from the structure-to-soil potential): A voltage of 845 mV is observed when the temperature is 57° F. In this case the corrected voltage would then be 855 mV (20° X 0.5 mV = 10 mV. Therefore: 845 mV + 10 mV = 855 mV). 6.7 Continuity Testing When conducting an evaluation of a cathodic protection system, it is normally necessary to establish that the cathodically protected components of a UST system are either electrically isolated or electrically continuous depending on the type of cathodic protection system. Ohmmeters (continuity testers) such as those utilized to test automotive wiring circuits are not acceptable for use on buried metallic structures and should never be used for testing continuity of UST system components. The "fixed cell-moving ground" method and the "point-to-point" method are the two commonly utilized ways to test continuity and are discussed in more detail below. Fixed Cell - Moving Ground Method - The most commonly accepted method of conducting a continuity survey is referred to as fixed cell - moving ground. In this method, the reference electrode is placed at a location remote from any of the cathodically protected structures. Potentials of all the metallic structures present at the site are then measured without moving the reference electrode (refer to Appendix E for a more complete description). Because the conditions found at the reference electrode/electrolyte interface can change over a short period of
time (causing the observed potential to change), it is important to conduct this type of testing as quickly as possible. When determining whether electrical continuity or isolation is provided, the following guidelines are generally accepted for fixed cell - moving ground surveys: > If two or more structures exhibit potentials that vary by 2 m V or less, the structures are considered to be electrically continuous. > If two or more structures exhibit potentials that vary by 10 mV or greater, the structures are considered to be electrically isolated. > If two or more structures exhibit potentials that vary by more than 2 mV but less than 10 mV, the result is inconclusive and further testing (point-to-point) is necessary. Point-to-Point Method - An easier and usually more accurate way to test continuity is the "point-to-point" method. With this method, a reference electrode is not utilized. The two structures that are to be tested are simply touched with each lead of the voltmeter and the voltage difference (if any) is observed. For example, if you are trying to establish that electrical isolation exists between a tank and the fill riser associated with that tank, you would simply touch the fill riser with one of the voltmeter leads and the tank shell with the other voltmeter lead and observe the voltage difference. When conducting point-to-point testing, any current that is flowing through the UST components can cause an inaccurate test result. Impressed current systems must be turned off. When determining whether electrical continuity or isolation is provided, the following guidelines are generally accepted for point-to-point surveys: > If the voltage difference observed between the two structures is 1 mV or less, the two structures are considered to be electrically continuous with each other. > If the voltage difference observed between the two structures is 10 mV or greater, the two structures are considered to be electrically isolated from each other. > If the voltage difference observed between the two structures is greater than 1 mV but less than 10 mV, the result is inconclusive and further testing beyond the scope of this document is necessary. 6.7.1 Continuity Testing of Galvanic Systems In order for sacrificial anodes to function efficiently, the protected component must be electrically isolated from any other metallic structures that may be connected to or in contact with the protected structure. This is generally accomplished through the use of dielectric bushings and unions and by making sure that no additional metallic structures come into contact with the protected structure.
On those systems where adequate cathodic protection has not been achieved, it is common to find that some unintended metallic structure is electrically continuous with the protected structure. Frequently, an electrical conduit is in contact with a sti-P3® tank or the tank bung nylon bushings are missing or damaged. If metallic tank hold down straps were improperly installed, they will wear through the epoxy coating on the tank over time and cause premature anode failure. With metallic piping, the shear valve anchoring bracket usually provides an electrical bond with the dispenser cabinet and all of the other metal connected to it. When this is the case, the anodes are trying to protect much more metal than intended and the life of the anodes is shortened. 6.7.2 Continuity Testing of Impressed Current Systems All protected components of the UST system must be electrically continuous in an impressed current cathodic protection system. Various bonds may be required in order to ensure that continuity has been provided. Failure to establish continuity in an impressed current system can result in accelerated corrosion of the electrically isolated components.
Carefully check all bonds when evaluating an impressed current system as these are of critical importance. Commonly, tanks are bonded into the negative circuit by attachment to the tank vent lines above ground. Because of this, it is easy for the integrity of the bonds to be compromised. It is equally important to ensure that the positive lead wire(s) have continuity. Any break in the insulation or dielectric coating of the positive circuit will allow current to discharge from the break and cause rapid corrosion failure of the wire. This is why it is absolutely critical that all buried positive circuit splices are properly coated and insulated. 6.8 Reference Electrode Placement 6.8.1 General Where you place the reference electrode when taking structure-to-soil potential measurements is of critical importance. It is also essential that the exact location of the reference electrode placement is documented so that anyone could come back at a later date and reasonably duplicate the test. Reference electrode placement must be indicated by both written description and visually shown on a drawing of the tank system. The forms in Appendix K and L of this guidance document provide for both written and visual description of reference electrode placement. 6.8.2 Local Placement Placement of the reference electrode is considered local when it is in the soil directly over the structure that is being tested. As discussed in Section 6.3, consideration of any effect active anodes have (raised earth) must be considered when selecting the appropriate location for local placement. In addition, shielding of the reference electrode by other buried metallic components may also need to be considered. For instance, it is necessary to ensure that the tip of the reference electrode is below the metallic skirting found on most man ways. If the tip of the reference electrode is not below the metal skirt, it may be shielded from "seeing" the cathodic protection current.
Ideally, the tip of the reference electrode should be as close to the structure-to-soil interface as is practical in order to minimize the voltage drop present in the soil due to resistivity. In practice, about 6 inches of soil between the tip of the reference electrode and the structure being tested works well. 6.8.3 Remote Placement The remote potential represents the average potential of the entire surface of the protected structure. The purpose of remote placement is to eliminate any effect that raised earth may be contributing to the measurement of the structure-to-soil potential and to overcome any effects shielding may have. Placement of the reference electrode is considered remote when it is placed in the soil a certain distance away from the structure that is being tested. There are several different factors that
determine the distance necessary in order to reach remote earth and a full discussion is beyond the scope of this document. However, a remote condition can normally be achieved when the reference electrode is placed between 25 and 100 feet away from any protected structure. Depending on the conditions specific to the particular location where the cathodically protected structure is, the minimum distance to remote earth may be considerably more than 25 feet. Therefore, it is important that you establish that the reference electrode is truly remote when obtaining a structure-to-soil potential. In order to ensure that remote earth has been achieved, place the reference electrode at least 25 feet away from the protected structure and observe the potential. Move the reference electrode out away from the protected structure another 10 feet or so and observe the potential. If there is no significant difference in the two potentials, it can be assumed that remote earth has been achieved. If there is a significant difference, continue moving the reference electrode out away from the protected structure until no significant difference is observed.
When selecting a location to place the reference electrode to establish remote earth, it is essential that there are no other cathodically protected structures (e.g. natural gas lines) in proximity to the reference electrode. Foreign cathodically protected structures can cause an abnormally high (more negative) potential that is not indicative of the remote potential of the structure you are measuring. It is also important that there are no other buried metallic structures in the vicinity of the reference electrode. Any metallic structure that is buried near the reference electrode could possible affect the structure-to-soil potential that is observed on the protected structure. In addition to the above considerations, you should attempt to select the remote placement such that the reference electrode can "see" the structure you are testing. This means that there should not be any buried metallic structure between the remote reference electrode placement and the protected structure. If you suspect that shielding may be affecting the observed potential, place the reference electrode away from the protected structure in a different direction.
6.8.4 Galvanic Placement
All galvanic cathodic protection systems must be tested with the reference electrode placed both local and remote. In order to pass the structure-to-soil survey, both the local and the remote potentials must indicate that adequate cathodic protection has been provided. If neither the local or the remote potential satisfies one of the cathodic protection criteria, the structure fails the test. If one of the potentials indicates adequate cathodic protection but the other does not, the result of the test is inconclusive. If the test result is inconclusive, repairs must be made or a corrosion expert must evaluate the data and/or conduct further testing to declare either pass or fail.
6.8.5 Impressed Current Placement
Impressed current cathodic protection systems are only required to be tested with the reference electrode placed locally. In order to pass the survey, the potential obtained with the reference electrode placed locally must satisfy either the 850 off or the 100 mV polarization criteria. While only one test point is required, the tester should obtain structure to soil potentials from as manysoil access points along the structure as is practical. If any of the potentials indicate that adequate cathodic protection has not been provided, the structure should be failed. Although not required by this guidance, it may be useful to place the reference electrode remotely when testing an impressed current system. The remote potential may provide additional information by which to evaluate the cathodic protection system. However, the structure may not be passed based on the remote potential itself. In all circumstances, the potential obtained with the reference electrode placed locally must indicate that adequate cathodic protection has been provided.
Additionally, special circumstances may require that a remote potential be obtained when testing impressed current systems. For instance, if there are active sacrificial anodes buried in close proximity to the structure being tested, the local potential may be influenced by raised earth. The voltage drop caused by the sacrificial anodes would preclude the accurate measurement of the local structure-to-soil potential. If it is known that sacrificial anodes are impacting the potentials obtained locally, remote potentials must be obtained.
The remote potential obtained under these special circumstances must meet either the 850 off or the 100 mV polarization criteria in order for the tested structure to pass the survey. An explanation must be given in the "comments" of Section XVI of the MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection evaluation form as to why the remote potential must be considered. The remote potentials should be indicated on the form by designating remote in the location code column of Section XVI.
6.9 Soil Access
All structure-to-soil potentials that are intended to satisfy one of the three acceptable criteria found in Section 6.2 must be obtained with the reference electrode placed in the soil. Therefore, the person conducting the evaluation must either confirm that soil access is available or make prior arrangements with the owner of the UST system to secure access.
Under no circumstances is it allowable to place the reference electrode on concrete, asphalt, or any other paving material to achieve satisfactory structure-to-soil potentials. Likewise, the
practice of placing the reference electrode on a crack or expansion joint of a concrete or asphalt paving is not recognized as an acceptable method of obtaining satisfactory structure- to-soil potentials.
Placement of the reference electrode in an observation (monitoring) well to obtain a passing reading is also not allowed. While it may be useful to obtain data by placing the reference electrode on a crack in the pavement or in an observation well, the structure-to-soil potentials obtained by such placement are not in themselves acceptable to demonstrate adequate cathodic protection.
Access may be provided by drilling holes through the pavement or the installation of proper cathodic protection test stations. A practical way to provide soil access is to drill a V-i inch diameter hole in the pavement so that a "pencil" type reference electrode (3/8 inch diameter) can be inserted through the pavement and into the soil. Upon completion of the survey, the hole should be filled with a fuel resistant caulking material so that easy access can be provided at a later date. As an alternative, a two inch hole could be drilled to allow use of a standard reference electrode. A short length of PVC pipe could be epoxied in the hole and plugged with a threaded cap. Various cathodic protection test stations/man ways are available for installation. Whenever, a new tank system is installed or the pavement is reworked around an existing system, provisions for access to the soil must be made so that adequate cathodic protection testing may be accomplished.
6.10 Cathodic Protection Test Locations
Because there are many different possible tank and cathodic protection system configurations that may occur, it is not feasible to attempt to illustrate every situation that may exist and the examples given in the following sections are offered as representative of some typical scenarios to illustrate the general principles. It may sometimes be necessary for you to utilize judgement to apply the intent of this guidance document when circumstances arise that are not specifically addressed in this guidance document.
All galvanic cathodic protection systems must be tested with the reference electrode placed both locally and remotely. Impressed current systems are only required to be tested with the reference electrode placed locally.
6.10.1 Galvanically Protected (sti-P3*) Tanks
The measurement of both local and remote structure-to-soil potentials is necessary when evaluating sti-P3® tanks. The appropriate location to place the reference electrode locally would be in the soil at the middle of the tank (see Figure 3). However, if access to the soil is not available at the middle of the tank, the reference electrode may be placed at any point along the centerline of the tank but not directly over the anodes at each end of the tank.
Caution should be exercised to ensure that there are no sacrificial anodes installed in the soil around the submersible pump manway to protect any steel piping that may be associated with
the tank. If anodes are installed at the pump manway, the reference electrode must be placed in the soil near the opposite end of the tank.
In addition to the local potential described above, a remote potential must also be obtained. Remote generally means the reference electrode is placed in the soil at least 25 feet away and not more than 100 feet away from the tank you are measuring (See Figure 4). Refer to Section 6.8.3 for a more complete discussion of remote reference electrode placement. Care must be taken that the remote location is not in proximity to any other cathodically protected structure (e.g. natural gas lines) or directly over any other kind of buried metallic structure. The remote placement should be such that the reference electrode is aligned with the longitudinal axis of the tanks and can "see" the anodes. This orientation is desirable in order to prevent shielding.
6.10.2 Galvanically Protected Metallic Piping
Both local and remote potentials are required on all galvanically protected metallic piping. When metallic piping is protected by sacrificial anodes, several different possibilities exist as to where would be the appropriate location to place the reference electrode to obtain local potentials. Knowing where the anodes that are protecting the piping are installed is of critical importance. When obtaining local potentials, the reference electrode must be placed in the soil directly over the pipe to be evaluated at a point that is the most distant from any anode that may be along the pipe.
Because it is a common practice to bury piping anodes at the submersible pump manway of a tank, the appropriate location to place the reference electrode to obtain local potentials is at the dispensers (See Figure 5). Remote placement of the reference electrode is also necessary.
When the piping anodes are installed at the dispensers, the appropriate local reference electrode placement would be at the piping nearest the tanks (usually the submersible turbine pump manway) as shown in Figure 6. Remote placement of the reference electrode is also necessary.
When the piping anodes are located at both the tanks and the dispensers, the reference electrode must be placed at the approximate center of the piping run to obtain local potentials (See Figure 7). Remote placement of the reference electrode is also necessary.
When the anodes are installed at the center of the piping, or it is not known where the anodes are installed, the reference electrode must be placed at both the tank and the dispenser end of the piping to obtain local potentials (See Figure 8). Remote placement of the reference electrode is also necessary.
6.10.3 Tanks Protected by Impressed Current
With impressed current cathodic protection systems, tank potentials are required to be measured with the reference electrode placed locally. Where the location of the anodes is known and they are relatively evenly distributed about the tank bed, the appropriate location to place
the reference electrode would be in the soil at the middle of the tank (See Figure 9). However, if access to the soil is not available at the middle of the tank, the reference electrode may be placed in the soil at any point along the centerline of the tank similar to that described in Section 6.10.1.
As with the evaluation of any cathodic protection system, the location of the anodes in relation to reference electrode placement can be of critical importance. When selecting the appropriate local placement, it is necessary to place the reference electrode at the point over the structure that is the most distant from any active anode due to the effects of attenuation. Attenuation of the cathodic protection current may occur whereby effective protection is not achieved at some point along a UST system. For instance, if all of the active anodes are along one side of a tank bed, current distribution and attenuation may prevent sufficient protective current from reaching the side of the tanks away from the anodes. The preferred placement of the reference electrode would be along the centerline of the tanks at the end opposite to that where the anodes are installed (See Figure 10).
If it is not known where the anodes are installed, at least one measurement is required along the centerline of the tank. Testing should be conducted at as many locations along the centerline of the tank as are available. If soil access is available at each end of the tank and in the middle, all three structure-to-soil potentials should be recorded. If any one of the measured potentials does not meet one of the acceptable criteria, the structure should be failed.
In addition, if it is possible to measure the individual circuits in an impressed current system, a determination can be made as to which anodes are functional and how the current is distributed throughout the groundbed. How the current is distributed should be considered when choosing reference electrode placement when conducting a structure-to-soil potential survey. If for instance it is known that the majority of the rectifier output current is directed to only those anodes along one end of a tank bed, the reference electrode should be placed at the opposite end of the tank bed.
6.10.4 Piping Protected by Impressed Current
With impressed current cathodic protection systems, pipe potentials are required to be measured with the reference electrode placed locally. Just as with any other type of cathodic protection system, knowing where the anodes that are protecting the piping are installed is of critical importance. Due to the high degree of variability that exists in anode placement and piping configurations, structure-to-soil potentials must be obtained by placing the reference electrode at both the tank and dispenser end of any piping that is protected by impressed current (See Figure 11).
6.10.5 "100 Foot Rule" for Piping
For both galvanic and impressed current systems, if more than 100 feet of piping exists between any two anodes, the reference electrode must also be placed at the midpoint between the two anodes that are separated by more than 100 feet (see Figure 12). In addition, if it is not
known where the piping anodes are located, there can be no more than 100 feet of piping between any two test points. This midpoint placement is in addition to any other reference electrode placement that may be required as noted above in Sections 6.10.1 through 6.10.
SECTION 7 - DOCUMENTATION OF EVALUATION 7.1 Documentation As with any kind of testing or work that is being performed at a UST facility, it is critical that proper documentation be made of all activities and test procedures. Without proper documentation, the evaluation of a cathodic protection system through the application of a structure-to-soil potential survey is of little value. Although it has been previously stated, the exact location where the reference electrode was placed in order to obtain a passing structure-to-soil potential is of critical importance and cannot be overemphasized. For this reason, an exact description of where the reference electrode was placed for each structure-to-soil potential obtained during the survey is an absolute necessity. Failure to properly document reference electrode placement will result in the survey being deemed invalid. Additionally, in order to effectively evaluate the survey of a cathodic protection system it is essential to be able to clearly understand how the survey was conducted. Likewise, when a re- survey of an existing system is being conducted it is important that the tester understands how the previous survey was conducted. Various forms of documentation may be necessary in order to clearly convey the procedures and survey results. In the sections that follow, some of the more critical aspects of documentation are discussed in more detail. 7.1.1 As Built Drawings If any modification to the construction of the cathodic protection system is made (e.g. supplemental anodes) it is necessary to show the modification on the "as built" drawings. If no as built drawing is available, you must indicate the location of any anode addition on the site drawing that is constructed as part of the evaluation. As built drawings are required whenever a cathodic protection system is installed or substantially modified. The drawings should include: a) how many anodes were installed; b) what type of anodes were installed; c) where were the anodes installed; d) how deep were the anodes installed; e) what type of wire was used; 0 how were the wires bonded, etc. 7.1.2 Site Drawing Whenever a cathodic protection survey is conducted, a site drawing depicting the UST system, the cathodic protection system and any related features of the facility must be constructed. In addition, you must indicate on the drawing where the reference electrode was placed for each of the structure-to-soil potentials utilized to obtain a pass. Figure 13 is an example of a site drawing that shows the type of information that is necessary to properly complete the evaluation. While it is understood that you will not always know where all of the pertinent components of the cathodic protection system may be buried, all that is known must be indicated. It is very important to show where the anodes are located on the site drawing. If you do not know where
the anodes are buried, voltage gradients in the soil may help you determine the approximate location as described in the raised earth discussion of Section 6.3. Should any modifications to the cathodic protection system be made, it is very important that such modifications be both visually indicated on the site drawing and a written narrative made that describes the work conducted. If as built drawings are available, it is acceptable to utilize these drawings for the purposes of meeting the requirements of this rule. Any modifications or changes to the UST and/or cathodic protection systems that have been made since the construction of the as built drawings must be included.
7.1.3 MDEQ UST Cathodic Protection Evaluation Forms Whenever a cathodic protection survey is conducted in the State of Mississippi, the appropriate form (s) prescribed by the MDEQ (Appendix K and/or L) must be utilized to document the survey. However, use of the prescribed form(s) is not intended to limit other kinds of documentation that may be desirable in order to complete the evaluation. For instance, it may be
necessary to provide a written narrative describing various aspects of the evaluation or a repair/modification that are not captured by completion of the form(s) them selves.
7.1.4 Pass/Fail/Inconclusive In order to assure uniformity in the manner in which cathodic protection evaluations are documented, it is necessary to "make a call" as prescribed in the MDEQ cathodic protection evaluation form found in Appendix K and L of this document. The terms "pass", "fail" and "inconclusive" are utilized for this purpose. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify what these terms mean and their applicability as related to the evaluation of cathodic protection systems utilizing the MDEQ forms. An evaluation conducted by an individual who is only qualified as a cathodic protection tester must result in one of three conclusions, pass, fail or inconclusive. If the person conducting the evaluation is qualified as a corrosion expert, the evaluation must result in either pass or fail. Pass - The term "pass" as related to Section VI and Vll (tester's/corrosion expert's evaluation) of the MDEQ galvanic/impressed current cathodic protection system evaluation forms is taken to mean that the structure-to-soil potential survey indicates all of the protected structures at a facility meet at least one of the three accepted criteria. Pass as related to Section XIV and XVI (potential survey) of the respective MDEQ galvanic/impressed current cathodic protection system evaluation forms means that the individual structure that is being tested meets at least one of the accepted criteria. Fail - The term "fail" as related to Section VI and VII (tester's/corrosion expert's evaluation) of the MDEQ galvanic/impressed current cathodic protection system evaluation forms means that the structure-to-soil potential survey indicates that there are one or more protected structures at a facility that do not meet any of the accepted criteria. Fail as related to Section XIV and XVI (potential survey) of the respective MDEQ galvanic/impressed current cathodic protection system evaluation forms means that the individual structure that is being tested does not meet any of the accepted criteria. Inconclusive - The term "inconclusive" as related to Section VI (tester's evaluation) of the MDEQ galvanic/impressed current cathodic protection system evaluation forms means that a person qualified only as a tester is unable to conclusively evaluate the cathodic protection system and a corrosion expert must "make the call". A cathodic protection tester must indicate inconclusive whenever one or more of the conditions listed in Section 7.2 of this document are applicable. Inconclusive as related to Section XII and XV (continuity testing) of the respective MDEQ galvanic/impressed current cathodic protection system evaluation forms means that it cannot be
determined if the individual structure that is being tested is either electrically isolated in the case of galvanic systems or is electrically continuous in the case of impressed current systems. Inconclusive as related to Section XIV of the MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection system evaluation form is utilized when both the local and the remote potential measurements do not result in the same conclusion. If for instance the local potential was -900 mV but the remote was - 700 mV an inconclusive would result since the local indicates that adequate cathodic protection is provided but the remote does not.
7.2 Corrosion Expert's Evaluation Because the MDEQ has allowed those individuals who may only have minimal training in the principles of cathodic protection to conduct testing of such systems, it must be recognized that there will be instances where the expertise of someone who is more qualified and better understands the principles involved will be necessary. Some of the more obvious scenarios where a person with a level of expertise equivalent to a "corrosion expert" {as defined in Section 2.1 (280.12) of this document} are necessary are given below. If any of the conditions given below are met, a corrosion expert must evaluate the survey results obtained by a tester and/or conduct further testing and complete Section VII of the MDEQ cathodic protection system evaluation form(s). If the structure-to-soil potential survey is conducted by a person who is qualified as a corrosion expert, completion of Section VII of the MDEQ form(s) is all that is necessary. A corrosion expert is required to evaluate and/or conduct the survey when: 1. Supplemental anodes are added to a galvanic cathodic protection system and an accepted industry standard is not followed and/or properly documented. 2. Supplemental anodes or other changes in the construction of an impressed current system are made. 3. It is known or suspected that stray current may be affecting the protected structure. 4. The repair and/or addition of supplemental anodes to bare steel/galvanized piping that is galvanically protected (see Section 5.1.3). 5. An inconclusive was declared when testing a galvanically protected structure because both the local and the remote potentials did not indicate the same result (one indicated pass but the other indicated fail). Although not specifically listed above, it should be recognized that there might be additional circumstances that may arise that will require evaluation, and/or design by a corrosion expert.
7.3 What if the Evaluation Result is Fail? It is important to properly notify the tank owner if an evaluation of the cathodic protection system fails. Necessary repairs should be accomplished within 90 days of receipt of the "failed" evaluation. The tank owner is responsible for ensuring that the cathodic protection system is maintained in a manner that will provide adequate corrosion protection to the UST system. As it is recognized that many factors may cause a lower than desired voltage to be obtained during a structure-to-soil survey, there may be several different courses of action appropriate to resolve the "fail". For instance, it is not uncommon to simply retest a sti-P3® tank that has failed a cathodic protection survey at a later date and achieve a passing result. Therefore, a 90-day re-testing period is allowed whenever a fail is obtained during which no action is necessary to repair or modify the cathodic protection system. This applies only to those
galvanic and impressed current systems that appear to be in good working condition. If there are obvious problems with a system or you are unable to achieve a pass within the 90-day window, the tank owner must make any repairs and/or modifications that are necessary to achieve a pass. Repairs and/or modifications must be completed as soon as practical but no more than 90 days should be allowed after expiration of the "90 day window".
APPENDIX A - INDUSTRY CODES/STANDARDS, REFERENCES and REGULATIONS INDUSTRY CODES/STANDARDS American Petroleum Institute (API) RP1632 3 rd Edition "Cathodic Protection of Underground Petroleum Storage Tanks and Piping Systems". American Petroleum Institute (API) RP1615 5 lh Edition "Installation of Underground Petroleum Storage Systems". National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE International) RPO 169-96 "Control of External Corrosion on Underground or Submerged Metallic Piping Systems". National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE International) TM0101-2001 "Measurement Techniques Related to Criteria for Cathodic Protection on Underground or Submerged Metallic Tank Systems". National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE International) RP0285-2002 "Corrosion Control of Underground Storage Tank Systems by Cathodic Protection". Petroleum Equipment Institute (PEI) RP 100-2000 "Recommended Practices for Installation of Underground Liquid Storage Systems". Steel Tank Institute (STI) R892-91 "Recommended Practice for Corrosion Protection of Underground Piping Networks Associated with Liquid Storage and Dispensing Systems". Steel Tank Institute (STI) R972-01 "Recommended Practice for the Installation of Supplemental Anodes for sti-P
® UST's". REFERENCES Department of Defense MIL-HDBK-1136 "Maintenance and Operation of Cathodic Protection Systems". Department of Defense MIL-HDBK-1136/1 "Cathodic Protection Field Testing". REGULATIONS Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act published in the Code of Federal Regulations Chapter 40 Part 280 "Technical Standards and Corrective Action Requirements for Owners and Operators of Underground Storage Tank Systems".
APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY 100 mV POLARIZATION - One of the three criteria that are commonly accepted as indicating adequate cathodic protection has been achieved. It is typically measured by interrupting the protective current on an impressed current system. When the current is interrupted, an "instant off" potential is recorded and the structure under cathodic protection is then allowed to depolarize until a change of at least 100 mV in potential is observed. Not more than 24 hours should be allowed for the depolarization to occur when conducting this test. 850 ON - One of the three criteria that are commonly accepted as indicating adequate cathodic protection has been achieved. It is measured with the protective current applied and is typically the only measurement possible with galvanic systems since the anodes cannot be disconnected. This criterion is not applicable to impressed current systems since a large portion of the "on" measurement can be comprised of a voltage drop when the protective current is applied. 850 OFF - One of the three criteria that are commonly accepted as indicating adequate cathodic protection has been achieved. It is measured with the protective current interrupted (either the power is cut off to the rectifier or the sacrificial anodes are disconnected). This criterion is considered by most to be the best indicator that adequate cathodic protection has been provided. ANODE - The electrode of an electrochemical cell where oxidation (corrosion) occurs. With respect to cathodic protection, it can be thought of as the place where electrons leave the surface of a metal. Common galvanic anodes are zinc and magnesium. AMPERE (AMP) - The basic unit of current flow in an electric circuit. Amperage can be thought of as "gallons per minute" in a water system. AS BUILT DRAWINGS - Drawings that show how a system was actually installed in the field. Sometimes, unforeseen factors prevent the installation of a system as it was intended in the design drawings and this is why it is important to have detailed and accurate "as built" drawings. ATTENUATION - The protective effects of cathodic protection current diminish as you move away from the source of the protective current. To illustrate this, on an impressed current system where the ground bed is installed only on one side of the tank bed, the end of the tanks away from the ground bed will receive less protective current than the side of the tanks closest to the anodes. Attenuation of protective current applies to galvanic systems as well. CATHODE - The electrode of an electrochemical cell where reduction (and no corrosion) occurs. With respect to cathodic protection, it can be thought of as the place where current enters the surface of a metal. CATHODIC PROTECTION - The technique of causing the entire surface of a metallic structure to become a cathode with respect to its external environment (soil). This is
accomplished by supplying an electric current sufficient to overcome the tendency of naturally occurring electrical currents to leave the metallic structure. CATHODIC PROTECTION EVALUATION - The interpretation of whether or not a cathodic protection system is providing sufficient corrosion protection. An evaluation incorporates all cathodic protection testing, surveys, rectifier operation/output measurements, consideration of voltage drops, condition of dielectric coatings, continuity, bond integrity, circuit integrity and any other factors or site specific conditions that may have an influence on the operation and effectiveness of a cathodic protection system. CATHODIC PROTECTION SURVEY - Refers to the process whereby all of the structure-to- soil measurements necessary to contribute to the final evaluation of a system are obtained. CATHODIC PROTECTION TEST- Refers to the process whereby only a single structure-to- soil measurement is obtained. CONTINUITY - As related to cathodic protection, continuity means that two metallic structures are electrically continuous. With impressed current systems all protected structures must be continuous and this is normally accomplished through the use of wires referred to as continuity bonds. CORROSION - The deterioration of a material (usually a metal) caused by an electro-chemical reaction with its environment. Corrosion of metals involves the flow of electrons (current) between an anode and a cathode. Corrosion will occur where the electrons leave the surface of a metal. CURRENT TEST -A method of temporarily creating an impressed current cathodic protection system on a galvanically protected structure so that it can be determined how much protective current is necessary in order to achieve adequate cathodic protection. This is normally done by connecting a 12-volt battery to the structure to be tested and to a temporary anode. DIELECTRIC MATERIAL - A coating that does not conduct electricity. Various coatings are utilized and some examples are the "fusion-bonded epoxy" found on factory coated steel piping and coal tar epoxies commonly found on sti-P3® tanks. DISTRIBUTED GROUND BED - Used to describe an anode configuration in which the anodes are more or less equally distributed around the metallic structure that is intended to be protected. ELECTROLYTE - As related to UST cathodic protection systems, electrolyte refers to the soil and/or water surrounding the metallic structure that is under cathodic protection. ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERFERENCE - As related to corrosion protection, it is an external electrical current that causes an error in a voltmeter measurement. Sources are
commonly associated with high voltage AC power lines, radio frequency transmitters and airport radar systems. FAIL-See Section 7.1.4. FIELD INSTALLED - Refers to any impressed current system or sacrificial anode cathodic protection system that is installed at a pre-existing UST location or when sacrificial anodes are installed on new metallic pipe in the field. Any cathodic protection system except for those associated with unmodified sti-Pj® tanks may be thought of as "field installed". FINAL POTENTIAL (VOLTAGE) - The voltage that is observed at the end of the depolarization period associated with the measurement of "100 mV polarization". The final voltage must be at least 100 mV less than the "instant off' voltage in order to meet the 100 mV polarization criterion for adequate cathodic protection. "FIXED CELL - MOVING GROUND" - A technique for measuring continuity in a UST system whereby the reference electrode is placed in the soil at a location remote from the UST system and is left undisturbed (fixed cell) while potentials are measured on various parts of the UST system (moving ground). GALVANIC (SACRIFICIAL) ANODE - A metal of high electro-potential (see Appendix J) that is used to protect another metal. Zinc and magnesium are two metals that are commonly utilized in the protection of UST systems. GALVANIC CATHODIC PROTECTION - A cathodic protection system that utilizes sacrificial anodes to provide the protective current. The anode will corrode (sacrifice itself) instead of the metal it is intended to protect. The anode provides a protective current (reverses the electron flow) because it has a higher electrochemical potential than the metal it is intended to protect. Galvanic systems are normally limited to the protection of well coated structures because they have a very low driving potential. IMPRESSED CURRENT ANODE - A metal that is utilized to deliver the current from a rectifier to the soil in order to protect the intended metallic structure. Impressed current anodes are commonly made of graphite, high silicon cast iron and "mixed-metal oxides" because the metal must be highly resistant to corrosion in order to have an acceptably long life span. IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION - A cathodic protection system in which the protective current is supplied by an external source (rectifier). The level of protective current that is delivered to the structure is adjustable and is much higher than that associated with galvanic anodes. For this reason, impressed current systems are utilized on those UST systems that are uncoated or require a high amount of protective current. INCONCLUSIVE - See Section 7.1.4.
INSTANT OFF POTENTIAL (VOLTAGE) - The voltage that is observed momentarily after the power to an impressed current cathodic protection system is interrupted. It is used as the base line from which to begin calculating a "100 mV polarization". The second number that appears after the current is interrupted is considered the proper value to represent the instant off potential. ISOLATION - As related to cathodic protection, isolation means that two metallic structures are electrically discontinuous. With galvanic systems a protected structure must be electrically isolated and this is normally accomplished through the use of nylon bushings and dielectric unions. LOCAL POTENTIAL (VOLTAGE) - The structure-to-soil potential of a metallic structure that is measured with the reference electrode placed in the soil immediately over the protected structure. NACE INTERNATIONAL - Acronym for National Association of Corrosion Engineers International. NATIVE POTENTIAL (VOLTAGE) - The structure-to-soil potential exhibited before any cathodic protection is applied. ON POTENTIAL (VOLTAGE) - The structure-to-soil potential that is measured with the protective current applied. PARALLEL CIRCUIT - Can be caused by the person conducting the test making contact with a metallic part of the test leads, or reference electrode when conducting structure-to-soil potential measurements. The creation of parallel paths must be avoided since inadvertent errors can be introduced. PASS-See Section 7.1.4 PASSIVATION - When a metal undergoes passivation, an oxidation layer forms on the surface of the metal due to corrosion and can be defined as the loss of chemical reactivity. The oxidation layer acts as a coating and prevents or slows further corrosion of the metallic object since oxygen is prevented from reaching the underlying metal. PHOTOVOLTAIC EFFECT - Sunlight striking the electrolyte solution in a copper-copper sulfate reference electrode can cause an error in the observed structure-to-soil potential and must be avoided. "POINT-TO-POINT" - A technique for measuring continuity in a UST system whereby each lead of a voltmeter is connected to the two metallic structures of interest (negative lead to one structure and positive to the other). The voltage difference (if any) measured with the voltmeter connected in this manner indicates if continuity is present or not.
POLARIZATION - The change in the structure-to-soil potential of a metallic structure due to the application of a protective current. In this guidance document, polarization is considered to mean cathodic polarization - that is, the potential of the metal is shifted in the negative direction. POLARIZED POTENTIAL - The structure-to-soil potential of a metallic structure that is observed after the protective current is applied and sufficient time has elapsed for the structure to completely polarize. RAISED EARTH - Term used to describe the high voltage gradient found in the soil around an active impressed current or sacrificial anode. Placement of the reference electrode in proximity to an active anode will cause an abnormally high (more negative) structure-to-soil potential than would be present if the anode were not in close proximity. RECTIFIER - A device utilized in impressed current systems that changes AC power to DC power. REFERENCE ELECTRODE - Also referred to as a reference cell or a half-cell. A device whose electrochemical potential is constant that is used to measure the structure-to-soil potential of buried metallic structures. The potential that is observed on the buried metallic structure is relative to the potential of the reference electrode. The potential of a buried metallic structure would be zero if it were of the exact same composition as the reference electrode if all sources of measurement error were eliminated. RESISTANCE - A measurement of the tendency of a substance to inhibit the flow of electrical current. Resistance in UST cathodic protection systems is generally meant to refer to the electrical properties of the backfill materials (soil). REMOTE EARTH - The structure-to-soil potential of a metallic structure that is measured with the reference electrode placed in the soil at a point well away (remote) from the protected structure. Remote earth is generally thought of as at least 25 feet and not more than 100 feet away. Remote earth is established when the observed structure-to-soil potential does not significantly change no matter how far away the reference electrode is from the protected structure. SACRIFICIAL ANODE - See Galvanic Anode. SHIELDING - A structure that prevents or diverts an electrical current from reaching the desired location. Normally thought of as something that stops a reference electrode from being able to "see" the metallic structure that you trying to measure. sti-P3® TANK - A steel tank manufactured to the standard created by the Steel Tank Institute that comes from the factory with a "pre-engineered" cathodic protection system. The "P3" means that the steel tank is protected in three ways: 1) A protective dielectric coating is factory applied; 2) Sacrificial anodes (normally zinc) are factory installed on the tanks and 3) dielectric bushings are installed to facilitate electrical isolation of the tank.
STRAY CURRENT - An electrical current that travels along an unintended path. Normally thought of as a current from some external source that enters a protected metallic structure at one point that then exits at another point. The point where the stray current exits the protected structure can be subject to intense corrosion and failure may rapidly occur. STRUCTURE-TO-SOIL POTENTIAL - Also known as "pipe-to-soil potential' or "structure- to-electrolyte potential" - The difference in the potential of the surface of a buried metallic structure and the electrolyte (soil) that surrounds it with respect to a reference electrode in contact with the electrolyte (soil). Can be thought of as the voltage difference between a buried metallic structure and the soil that it is buried in. VOLTAGE - The basic unit of force in an electric circuit. Voltage is equivalent to pounds per square inch in a water system. VOLTAGE (IR) DROP - With respect to UST cathodic protection systems, voltage drops may be thought of as any voltage that causes an error in the observed structure-to-soil potential. Whenever a current is flowing through a resistance, a voltage drop is present and is part of the voltage measurement obtained.
GENERALIZED INTERPRETATION OF STRUCTURE-TO-SOIL POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS (VOLTAGES) OBTAINED ON GALVANIC CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS Listed in this table are some generalized observations that can be applied to the interpretation of structure-to-soil potentials. Depending on the specific site conditions and other factors, differing interpretations are possible. VOLTAGE (mV) “ON” GENERALIZED INTERPRETATION POSITIVE Test leads are reversed (negative should be connected to the reference electrode and the positive should contact the structure you are testing in order to observe negative voltages). Could indicate that stray current is affecting the structure (consult with a corrosion expert). 0 to -100 Usually occurs when you are attempting to measure a structure that has a test lead that is not continuous with the tank. Because you are measuring the potential of a copper wire with reference to the copper-copper sulfate half-cell, the potential is zero or very near it. Disregard test lead and make direct contact with the protected structure. -101 to -399 Try again – A reading in this range is not normally seen on an underground steel structure. Could indicate that steel structure is electrically connected to a significant amount of a more noble metal (e.g. copper). Very corroded low carbon steel may also be indicated. -400 to -599 Steel structure does not meet regulatory requirements. Usually means that the steel structure has no cathodic protection. Existing sacrificial anodes could be completely “burned-out” or were never there to begin with. -600 to -849 Steel structure does not meet regulatory requirements. Usually means that the steel structure has anodes but for whatever reason, something is causing a low reading that may indicate adequate cathodic protection has not been provided. The anodes may be trying to protect a structure that requires more current than they can produce. The protected steel structure may not be electrically isolated from all other metallic structures (conduct continuity testing). The environmental conditions may not be favorable at the time you are attempting to obtain the reading. Retest during the next 90 days to see if an acceptable reading can be obtained. -850 to -1100 Steel structure protected by zinc anodes meets regulatory requirements and cathodic protection is judged to be adequate. Readings in this range are what you would expect on most sti-P
® tanks that have not been modified and are reading “good” since nearly all come from the manufacturer with zinc anodes. -850 to -1600 Steel structure protected by magnesium anodes meets regulatory requirements and cathodic protection is judged to be adequate. Readings in this range are what you would typically expect on steel piping that is reading “good” since magnesium anodes are generally installed on piping. You may also find readings up to -1600 mV on a sti-P
® tank that has been retrofitted or was supplied at the factory with magnesium anodes. MORE NEGATIVE THAN -1100 WITH ZINC ANODES ONLY Voltages more negative than -1100 mV are theoretically not possible if there are only zinc anodes installed. If you have a reading more negative than -1100 mV and you are sure magnesium anodes are not present, you should suspect that stray current may be affecting the cathodically protected structure. A corrosion expert should be contacted immediately since stray current can cause a corrosion failure in a relatively short period of time. MORE NEGATIVE THAN -1600 Voltages more negative than -1600 mV are theoretically not possible with any sacrificial anode cathodic protection system. If you have a reading more negative than -1600 mV on any galvanic cathodic protection system, you should suspect that stray current may be affecting the cathodically protected structure. A corrosion expert should be contacted immediately since stray current can cause a corrosion failure in a relatively short period of time. VARIABLE If the voltmeter readings vary you should suspect that stray current may be affecting the cathodically protected structure. Sometimes, the stray current can cause a pattern to develop that is recognizable. An example would be the on/off pattern of a nearby DC powered welding operation. A corrosion expert should be contacted immediately since stray current can cause a corrosion failure in a relatively short period of time. RAPIDLY FLUCTUATING If the voltmeter will not stabilize, it usually means that there is a high electrical resistance somewhere. Check all lead wires and connections and make sure that you are making a solid and clean metal to metal connection. Soil where the reference electrode is placed could be too dry. Add water to the soil or wait until a heavy rain occurs and try again. Petroleum contaminated soils may cause a high contact resistance. The tip of the reference electrode may need to be cleaned or replaced. APPENDIX C
GENERALIZED INTERPRETATION OF STRUCTURE-TO-SOIL POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS (VOLTAGES) OBTAINED ON IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS Listed in this table are some generalized observations that can be applied to the interpretation of structure-to-soil potentials. Depending on the specific site conditions and other factors, differing interpretations are possible. VOLTAGE (mV) GENERALIZED INTERPRETATION ANY POSITIVE VOLTAGE OR 0 TO -100 “ON” or “OFF” Can indicate that the structure you are attempting to measure is not bonded to the impressed current system (conduct continuity testing). Stray current could be affecting the protected structure (consult a corrosion expert). Positive and negative wires could be reversed (negative must be to protected structure and positive to anode). Test leads are reversed (positive lead should contact structure and negative lead should be connected to reference electrode). Could indicate that you are measuring the potential of a copper wire. -101 to -399 “ON” or “OFF” Try again – A reading in this range is not normally seen on an underground steel structure. Could indicate that steel structure is electrically connected to a significant amount of a more noble metal (e.g. copper). Very corroded low carbon steel may also be indicated. -400 to -599 “ON” or “OFF” Usually means that the steel structure has no cathodic protection. Existing impressed current anodes could be completely “burned-out”. Continuity of anode lead wires (positive circuit) could be broken. Negative bonds on the protected structures may be broken or non-existent. -600 to -849 “ON” or “OFF” Usually means that the steel structure has some protection but for whatever reason, something is causing a low reading that may indicate adequate cathodic protection has not been provided. The impressed current system may be trying to protect a structure that requires more current than it can produce (rectifier output too small). The impressed current system may not be capable of effectively distributing the required current to all parts of the structure you are trying to protect (not enough anodes, anodes improperly installed, soil resistivity too high). The steel structure that is intended to be protected may not be electrically continuous with the other metallic structures under protection (conduct continuity testing). The environmental conditions may not be favorable at the time you are attempting to obtain the reading. Retest during the next 90 days. -850 or MORE NEGATIVE “ON” Steel structure may or may not be adequately protected. Usually indicates that the impressed current system is providing current to the structure although the reading normally includes a large voltage (IR) drop. Because the flow of current through the soil causes a voltage drop, the on potential cannot be used to indicate that adequate cathodic protection has been provided. Instant off potentials must be utilized to demonstrate cathodic protection. -850 or MORE NEGATIVE “OFF” Steel structure protected by impressed current system meets regulatory requirements and cathodic protection is judged to be adequate. A potential measurement of -850 mV or more negative with the protective current temporarily interrupted (850 off) is considered to be the best indicator that adequate cathodic protection has been provided. MORE NEGATIVE THAN -1220 mV “OFF” Instant off potentials more negative than -1220 mV are theoretically not possible. If you observe an instant off potential more negative than -1220 mV, you should suspect stray current is affecting the protected structure. Consult a corrosion expert immediately since stray current can cause a rapid corrosion failure of the protected structure. MORE NEGATIVE THAN -2000 “ON” Usually means that a high resistance exists in the ground bed that is causing a large voltage drop. This condition is normally evident by checking the rectifier output since the voltage is very high but the amperage is relatively low. However, you should be cautious when abnormally high voltages are observed since this can have a detrimental effect on cathodically protected structures or the anodes may be rapidly depleted. Stray current may also be generated that can adversely affect other buried metallic structures such as water lines and other utilities. Consult a corrosion expert whenever it is suspected that too much voltage is being generated. VARIABLE “ON” or “OFF” If the voltmeter readings vary, you should suspect that stray current may be affecting the cathodically protected structure. Sometimes, the stray current can cause a pattern to develop that is recognizable. An example would be the on/off pattern of a nearby DC powered welding operation. A corrosion expert should be contacted immediately since stray current can cause a corrosion failure in a relatively short period of time. RAPIDLY FLUCTUATING “ON” or “OFF” If the voltmeter will not stabilize, it usually means that there is a high electrical resistance somewhere. Check all lead wires and connections and make sure that you are making a solid and clean metal to metal connection. Soil where the reference electrode is placed could be too dry. Add water to the soil or wait until a heavy rain occurs and try again. Petroleum contaminated soils may cause a high contact resistance. The tip of the reference electrode may need to be cleaned or replaced. APPENDIX D
CONTINUITY TESTING PROCEDURE FOR GALVANIC/IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS
Fixed Cell – Moving Ground Continuity Test Procedure
- Place reference electrode in contact with the soil at a location remote (25 – 100 feet) from all cathodically protected structures. You must ensure that the remote reference electrode placement is not in proximity to any other cathodic protection systems (e.g. natural gas pipelines) or directly over any buried metallic structure in order to minimize the chances of unwanted interference. 2. Be sure that reference electrode is firmly placed in moist soil and is not in contact with any vegetation. 3. Connect reference electrode to the negative terminal of voltmeter using a long spool of suitable wire. 4. Connect positive lead wire to voltmeter. This lead wire should have a sharp test prod (scratch awl or similar) in order to assure good contact with the metallic structures under test. 5. Place voltmeter on 2 volt DC scale. 6. Contact each buried metallic structure with the positive test lead without moving the reference electrode. Typical items that would be tested during a continuity survey include: all tanks, tank risers, submersible pump heads, piping, flex connectors/swing joints, vent lines, electrical conduits, dispensers, utilities, etc. 7. Obtain voltage for each component and record on MDEQ continuity testing form. 8. Voltages for each component that is tested must be obtained as quickly as possible since the observed potential can change over time. This is because the conditions in the soil where the reference electrode is placed can change over a relatively short period of time. Fixed Cell – Moving Ground Data Interpretation If two or more structures exhibit potentials that vary by 2 mV or less, the structures are considered to be electrically continuous. If two or more structures exhibit potentials that vary by 10 mV or greater, the structures are considered to be electrically isolated. If two or more structures exhibit potentials that vary by more than 2 mV but less than 10 mV, the result is inconclusive and further testing (point-to-point) is necessary. Point-to-Point Continuity Test Procedure 1. Turn off power to rectifier if testing an impressed current system. This is necessary to obtain accurate results. 2. Connect test leads to voltmeter. Both test leads should have a sharp test prod or suitable clip lead in order to make good contact with tested structures. 3. Place voltmeter on 2 volt (or lower) DC scale. 4. Connect one voltmeter test lead to one of the structures for which continuity is being tested and connect the other voltmeter test lead to the other structure that is being tested. 5. Record voltages observed on each of the two structures that are being compared and record on MDEQ continuity testing form. Note: Testing with this method does not require a reference electrode. The two structures of interest are simply connected in parallel with the voltmeter and a determination made as to whether or not any potential difference exists between them. Point-to-Point Data Interpretation If the voltage difference observed between the two structures is 1 mV or less, this indicates that the two structures are considered to be electrically continuous with each other. If the voltage difference observed between the two structures is 10 mV or greater, this indicates that the two structures are considered to be electrically isolated from each other. If the voltage difference observed between the two structures is greater than 1mV but less than 10 mV, the result is inconclusive and further testing beyond the scope of this document is necessary.
APPENDIX E
STRUCTURE-TO-SOIL TEST PROCEDURE FOR GALVANIC CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS 1. Place voltmeter on 2 volt DC scale. 2. Connect voltmeter negative lead to reference electrode. 3. Place reference electrode in clean soil directly over the structure that is being tested to obtain local potential. At least one local potential is required for each tank - the preferred test point is at the approximate midpoint along the centerline of the tank. Piping may require measurement at each end of the pipe and at the middle depending upon anode configuration (see Section 6.10.2 of MDEQ guidance document). The reference electrode may not be placed on concrete or other paving materials. Ensure that the reference electrode is placed in a vertical position (tip down). Ensure that the soil where the reference electrode is placed is moist – add tap water if necessary. Ensure that the soil where the reference electrode is placed is not contaminated with hydrocarbons. Ensure that the reference electrode window is not exposed to direct sunlight. 4. Connect voltmeter positive lead to structure that is to be tested. If a test lead wire is utilized to make contact with the tested structure you must ensure that continuity exists between the test lead wire and the structure. This may be accomplished by conducting a point-to-point continuity test as described in Appendix E. Ensure that good metal-to-metal contact is made between the test lead clip/probe and the structure. Ensure that no corrosion exists where the test lead makes contact with the structure. Ensure that your body does not come into contact with the electrical connections. Ensure that test leads are not submerged in any standing water. Ensure that test lead insulation is in good condition. sti-P
tanks If the test lead wire is not continuous or is not present, contact with the inside bottom of the tank is necessary. This may be accomplished by connecting the voltmeter lead wire to a test prod mounted onto the bottom of a wooden gauging stick and lowering the stick into the tank fill riser. Be sure that firm contact is made with the tank bottom. Care should be taken to ensure that any drop tube that may be installed in the tank does not prohibit contact with the tank bottom. If a metallic probe bar is utilized to contact the tank bottom, ensure that the probe bar does not contact the fill riser or any other metallic component of the UST system. If a sti-P
tank is equipped with a PP4 test station, the PP4 test station is disregarded and potentials must be obtained with a portable reference electrode placed in the soil (both local and remote) as described in Section 6.10.1 of the MDEQ guidance document. 5. Obtain voltage and record in the local column on the MDEQ galvanic survey form. 6. Place reference electrode in clean soil remote from the protected structure. (Refer to Section 6.10.3 for a discussion of remote reference electrode placement.) 7. Obtain voltage and record in the remote column on the MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form. (Note: if the fixed cell-moving ground method was used to conduct continuity survey, the potential obtained during the continuity survey for each corresponding structure may be transposed to the appropriate column.) Data Interpretation (for a more complete discussion refer to Appendix C of this guidance document) If both the local and the remote potential are –850 mV or more negative, the 850 on criterion is satisfied and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has been provided. If either the local or the remote potential is more positive than –850 mV the test result is inconclusive and further testing and/or repairs are necessary. Alternatively, a person qualified as a corrosion expert could evaluate/conduct the survey and declare a pass or fail based on their interpretation and professional judgement.
APPENDIX F
STRUCTURE-TO-SOIL TEST PROCEDURE FOR IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEMS 1. Inspect rectifier for proper operation and document necessary information. This includes measurement of output voltage/amperage with a multimeter (do not rely on rectifier gauges) and measurement of individual anode circuits (if installation allows such). Record all necessary information under Section XI and XII of MDEQ impressed current form. 2. Place voltmeter on 2 volt DC scale. 3. Connect voltmeter negative lead to reference electrode. 4. Place reference electrode in clean soil directly over the structure that is being tested. At least one measurement must be taken for each tank - the preferred test point is usually the center of the tank. Piping normally requires measurement at each end of the pipe (see Section 6.10.3 and 6.10.4 of MDEQ guidance document for further explanation). The reference electrode may not be placed on concrete or other paving materials. Ensure that the reference electrode is placed in a vertical position (tip down). Ensure that the soil where the reference electrode is placed is moist – add tap water if necessary. Ensure that the soil where the reference electrode is placed is not contaminated with hydrocarbons. Ensure that the reference electrode window is not exposed to direct sunlight. 5. Connect voltmeter positive lead to structure that is to be tested. Ensure that good metal-to-metal contact is made between the test lead clip/probe and the structure. Ensure that no corrosion exists where the test lead makes contact with the structure. Ensure that your body does not come into contact with the electrical connections. Ensure that test leads are not submerged in any standing water. Ensure that test lead insulation is in good condition. 6. Obtain voltage potential with the protective current applied and record in the on column on the MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection evaluation form. 7. Without moving reference electrode from the position it was in during step 6 above, obtain voltage potential with the protective current temporarily interrupted and record in the instant off column on the MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form. The instant off potential is the 2 nd value that is observed on a digital voltmeter the instant the power is interrupted. The first number that appears immediately after power interruption must be disregarded. After the second number appears, a rapid decay (depolarization) of the structure will normally occur. In order to obtain instant off potentials, a current interrupter or a 2 nd person is necessary. If a current interrupter is not available, have the second person throw the power switch at the rectifier off for 3 seconds and then back on for 15 seconds. Repeat this procedure until you are sure an accurate instant off reading has been obtained. 8. Conduct 100 mV polarization decay if you are unable to obtain an instant off potential of -850 mV or more negative in step 7 above. (Note: While not a requirement of this guidance document, consideration should be given to adjusting the rectifier output until an instant off potential of -850 mV is achieved or the maximum safe output is reached.) It is only necessary to conduct 100 mV polarization where the lowest (most positive) instant off potential is observed on the UST system. 100 mV of polarization is determined by leaving the power interrupted on the structure until a change of at least 100 mV in the structure-to-soil potential is observed. In calculating the 100 mV decay, the instant off potential obtained in Step 7 above is utilized as the starting point (e.g. if instant off = -800 mV, power must be left off until decayed to -700 mV). Calculate voltage change by subtracting final (or ending) voltage from the instant off voltage and record these values in the appropriate columns on the MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection evaluation form. Data Interpretation (for a more complete discussion refer to Appendix D of this guidance document) If the instant off potential is -850 mV or more negative, the 850 off criterion is satisfied and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has been provided. If the instant off potential is more positive than -850 mV, the tank may or may not be adequately protected and a 100 mV polarization test is necessary. If the structure exhibits more than 100 mV polarization, the 100 mV polarization criterion is met and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has been provided. If you are unable to meet either the 850 instant off or the 100 mV polarization criteria, it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has not been provided and repairs/modification are indicated. Alternatively, a person qualified as a corrosion expert could evaluate/conduct the survey and determine that cathodic protection is adequate based on their interpretation. APPENDIX G
CHECKLIST FOR GALVANIC CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM SURVEY
Identified UST owner, UST facility, CP tester, tester’s qualifications and reason for survey (complete Sections I – V of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form). Described UST and cathodic protection system (complete Section X of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form). Constructed site drawing depicting all pertinent components of the UST and cathodic protection systems at the facility (complete Section XII of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form). Reviewed any previous cathodic protection design/repair/testing data that may be available. Ensured soil access was available directly over each cathodically protected component at the facility (see Section 6.9.2 of MDEQ cathodic protection guidance document for discussion). Conducted continuity testing of all pertinent metallic components at the UST facility by the fixed remote – moving ground and/or the point-to-point method (complete Section XII of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form). Obtained local structure-to-soil potentials on every cathodically protected structure with the reference electrode placed in the soil directly over the structure under test (complete Section XIV of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form). Obtained remote potentials or transposed remote potentials obtained during continuity testing for every cathodically protected structure to appropriate column in Section XIV of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form. Indicated location (by code or other means) of reference electrode placement on site drawing for each structure-to-soil potential that was obtained during the survey. Described any repairs and/or modifications that were made to the cathodic protection system (complete Section XI of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form). Indicated whether or not each protected structure met the –850mV on criteria for both the local and remote reference electrode placement by indicating pass/fail/inconclusive in the appropriate column in Section XVI of the MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form. If only qualified as a tester - indicated the results of the evaluation by marking either pass, fail or inconclusive in Section VI of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form. If only qualified as a tester - marked inconclusive if any of the conditions found in Section 7.2 of MDEQ cathodic protection guidance document were applicable to survey. If tester indicated inconclusive, either repairs were conducted or a corrosion expert evaluated/conducted the survey and completed Section VII of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form. If a corrosion expert conducted and/or evaluated the survey – indicated the results by marking either pass or fail in Section VII of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form. Indicated criteria that were applied to the evaluation by completion of Section VIII of the MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form. Indicated action required as a result of the survey by marking either none, retest or repair & retest in Section IX of MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form. Provided UST owner with any other type(s) of documentation that may be necessary in order to adequately describe the cathodic protection evaluation including the operating status and any repairs or recommendations and attached same to the MDEQ galvanic cathodic protection form.
APPENDIX H
CHECKLIST FOR IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM SURVEY Identified UST owner, UST facility, CP tester, tester’s qualifications and reason for survey (complete Sections I – V of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form). Described UST system and type of cathodic protection (complete Section X of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form). Constructed site drawing depicting all pertinent components of the UST and cathodic protection systems at the facility (complete Section XIV of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form). Reviewed any previous cathodic protection design/repair/testing data that may be available. Checked rectifier for proper operation and measured output voltage/amperage with portable multimeter and indicated all other pertinent information (complete Section XI of MDEQ impressed current form). Measured current output of all positive and negative circuits if the system was designed to allow for such (complete Section XII of the MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form). Ensured soil access was available directly over each cathodically protected component at the facility. Conducted continuity testing of all pertinent metallic components at the UST facility by the fixed remote – moving ground and/or point-to-point method (complete Section XV of MDEQ impressed current form). Recorded native structure-to-soil potentials in appropriate column in Section XVI of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form if this data was available or the system had been down long enough for complete depolarization to occur. Obtained structure-to-soil potential on every cathodically protected structure with the reference electrode placed in the soil directly over the structure under test with the protective current applied (on) and 0recorded voltages in appropriate column in Section XVI of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form. Obtained structure-to-soil potential on every cathodically protected structure without moving reference electrode from placement utilized to obtain on potential with the protective current temporarily interrupted (instant off) and recorded voltages in appropriate column in Section XVI of MDEQ impressed current form). Conducted 100 mV polarization test if all protected structures did not meet the -850 instant off criterion. Obtaining a 100 mV decay is only required on that component of the UST system that displays the lowest (most positive) instant off potential in order to demonstrate the criterion has been satisfied. Indicated location (by code or other means) of reference electrode placement on site drawing for each structure- to-soil potential that was obtained. Described any repairs and/or modifications that were made to the cathodic protection system (complete Section XIII of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form). Indicated whether or not each protected structure met the –850mV instant off criteria and/or the 100 mV polarization criteria by indicating pass/fail in the appropriate column in Section XVI of the MDEQ form. If only qualified as a tester - indicated the results of the evaluation by marking either pass, fail or inconclusive in Section VI of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form. If only qualified as a tester - marked inconclusive if any of the conditions found in Section 7.2 of MDEQ cathodic protection guidance document were applicable to survey. If it was necessary for the tester to indicate inconclusive, a corrosion expert evaluated the data obtained by a tester and/or conducted his own testing and completed Section VII of MDEQ impressed current form. If a corrosion expert conducted evaluation – indicated the results by marking either pass or fail in Section VII of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form. Indicated criteria that were applied to the evaluation by completion of Section VIII of the MDEQ form. Indicated action required as a result of the survey by marking either none, retest or repair & retest in Section IX of MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form. Provided UST owner with any other type(s) of documentation that may be necessary in order to adequately describe the cathodic protection evaluation including the operating status and any repairs or recommendations and attached same to the MDEQ impressed current cathodic protection form.
APPENDIX I
APPENDIX J
TYPICAL POTENTIAL OF SELECTED METALS The table below lists some common metals and their observed electrical potentials as measured with respect to a copper/copper sulfate reference electrode. METAL VOLTAGE (mV) Magnesium (commercially pure) -1750 Magnesium (alloy found in typical cathodic protection anode) -1600 Zinc (nearly 100% pure - as found in typical cathodic protection anode) -1100 Aluminum (5% zinc alloy) -1050 Aluminum (pure) -800 Low Carbon Steel (new – clean & shiny) -600 to -750 Low Carbon Steel (old – rusty) -500 to -600 Stainless Steel (active - unpassivated) -450 to -600 Cast Iron (not graphitized) -500 Lead -500 Low Carbon Steel in Concrete -200 Brass, Bronze -200 Stainless Steel (passivated) 50 to -250 Copper 0 to -200 High Silicone Cast Iron -200 Carbon, Graphite +300 Silver +500 Platinum +900 Gold +1200
APPENDIX K STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GALVANIC CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM EVALUATION APPENDIX L STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM EVALUATION APPENDIX M STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM 60 DAY RECORD OF OPERATION
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GALVANIC (SACRIFICIAL ANODE) CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM EVALUATION
This form must be utilized to evaluate underground storage tank (UST) cathodic protection systems in the State of Mississippi. Access to the soil directly over the cathodically protected structure that is being evaluated must be provided. A site drawing depicting the UST cathodic protection system and all reference electrode placements must be completed. I. UST OWNER II. UST FACILITY NAME: NAME: ID # ADDRESS: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: CITY: COUNTY: III. CP TESTER IV. CP TESTER’S QUALIFICATIONS TESTER’S NAME: NACE INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPANY NAME: MDEQ UST INSTALLER CERTIFICATION NUMBER: ADDRESS: OTHER (EXPLAIN):__________________________________________________________ CITY: STATE: __________________________________________________________________________ V. REASON SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED (mark only one) Routine - 3 year Routine – within 6 months of installation 90-day re-survey after fail Re-survey after repair/modification Date next cathodic protection survey must be conducted by _____________________ (required within 6 months of installation/repair & every 3 years thereafter). VI. CATHODIC PROTECTION TESTER’S EVALUATION (mark only one) All protected structures at this facility pass the cathodic protection survey and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has been provided to the UST system (indicate all criteria applicable by completion of Section VIII). One or more protected structures at this facility fail the cathodic protection survey and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has not been tection has not been provided to the UST system (complete Section IX). If the remote and the local do not both indicate the same test result on all protected structures (both pass or both fail), inconclusive is indi inconclusive is indicated and the survey must be evaluated and/or conducted by a corrosion expert (complete Section VII). CP TESTER’S SIGNATURE: DATE CP SURVEY PERFORMED: VII. CORROSION EXPERT’S EVALUATION (mark only one) The survey must be conducted and/or evaluated by a corrosion expert when: a) an inconclusive is indicated for any protected structure since both the local and the remote structure-to-soil potentials do not result in the same outcome (both pass or both fail); b) repairs to galvanized or uncoated steel piping are conducted or c) supplemental anodes are added to the tanks and/or piping without following an accepted industry code. All protected structures at this facility pass the cathodic protection survey and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has been provided to the UST system (indicate all criteria applicable by completion of Section VIII). One or more protected structures at this facility fail the cathodic protection survey and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has not been provided to the UST system (indicate what action is necessary by completion of Section IX). CORROSION EXPERT’S NAME: COMPANY NAME: NACE INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION: NACE INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION NUMBER: CORROSION EXPERT’S SIGNATURE: DATE: VIII. CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO EVALUATION (mark all that apply) Structure-to-soil potential more negative than –850 mV with respect to a Cu/CuSO
reference electrode with the protective current applied current applied ( ( (This criterion is applicable to any galvanically protected structure). Structure-to-soil potential more negative than –850 mV with respect to a Cu/CuSO
reference electrode with protective current temporarily interrupted interrupted (This criterion is applicable only to those galvanic systems where the anodes can be disconnected). Structure tested exhibits at least 100 mV of cathodic polarization (This criterion is applicable to galvanic systems where the anodes can be temporarily disconnected.) . IX. ACTION REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVALUATION (mark only one) NONE Cathodic protection is adequate. No further action is necessary at this time. Test again by no later than (see Section V). RETEST Cathodic protection may not be adequate. Retest during the next 90 days to determine if passing results can be achieved. REPAIR & RETEST Cathodic protection is not adequate. Repair/modification is necessary as soon as practical but within the next 90 days. PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08
INCONCLUSIVE PASS FAIL PASS FAIL
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 100 mV POLARIZATION 850 OFF 850 ON
X. DESCRIPTION OF UST SYSTEM TANK # PRODUCT CAPACITY TANKS PIPING FLEX CONNECTORS
XI. DESCRIPTION OF CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM REPAIRS AND/OR MODIFICATION
Complete if any repairs or modifications to the cathodic protection system are made or are necessary. Certain repairs/modifications as explained in the text of the MDEQ cathodic protection guidance document are required to be designed and/or evaluated by a corrosion expert (completion of Section VII required). Supplemental anodes for a sti-P
® tank (attach corrosion expert’s design or documention industry standard was followed). Supplemental anodes for metallic pipe (attach corrosion expert’s design or documention industry standard was followed). Galvanically protected tanks/piping not electrically isolated (explain in “Remarks/Other” below). Remarks/Other: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ XII. UST FACILITY SITE DRAWING Attach detailed drawing or use the space provided to draw a sketch of the UST and cathodic protection systems. Sufficient detail must be given in order to clearly indicate where the reference electrode was placed for each structure-to-soil potential that is recorded on the survey forms. Any pertinent data must also be included. At a minimum you should indicate the following: All tanks, piping and dispensers; All buildings and streets; All anodes and wires; Location of CP test stations; Each reference electrode placement must be indicated by a code (1,2, T-1,) corresponding with the appropriate line number in Section XIV of this form. AN EVALUATION OF THE CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM IS NOT COMPLETE WITHOUT AN ACCEPTABLE SITE DRAWING.
PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH
PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08
XIII. GALVANIC (SACRIFICIAL ANODE) CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM CONTINUITY SURVEY
This section may be utilized to conduct measurements of continuity on underground storage tank systems that are protected by cathodic protection systems. When conducting a fixed cell - moving ground survey, the reference electrode must be placed in the soil at a remote location and left undisturbed. Conduct point-to-point test between any two structures for which the fixed cell-moving ground survey is inconclusive or indicates possible continuity. For galvanic systems, the structure that is to be protected must be isolated from any other metallic structure in order to pass the continuity survey.
FACILITY NAME:
NOTE: The survey is not complete unless all applicable parts of Sections I-XIV are also completed DESCRIBE LOCATION OF “FIXED REMOTE” REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT:
STRUCTURE “A”
STRUCTURE “B”
STRUCTURE “A”
FIXED REMOTE VOLTAGE
STRUCTURE “B”
FIXED REMOTE VOLTAGE
POINT-TO-POINT
VOLTAGE DIFFERENCE
ISOLATED/
CONTINUOUS/ INCONCLUSIVE
(example) PREMIUM TANK BOTTOM (example) PREMIUM TANK FILL RISER (example) -921 mV (example) -915 mV
(example) INCONCLUSIVE (example) PREMIUM TANK BOTTOM (example) PREMIUM TANK FILL RISER
(example) 17 mV (example) ISOLATED
COMMENTS:
1 Describe the cathodically protected structure that you are attempting to demonstrate is isolated from unprotected structures (e.g. prem. tank). 2 Describe the unprotected structure that you are attempting to demonstrate is isolated from the protected structure (e.g. premium tank fill riser). 3 Record the measured structure-to-soil potential of the cathodically protected structure {“A”} in millivolts (e.g. –921 mV). 4 Record the measured structure-to-soil potential of the unprotected structure {“B”} in millivolts (e.g. –915 mV). 5 Record the voltage observed between the protected and the unprotected structures when conducting point-to-point testing (e.g. 17 mV). 6 Document whether the test (fixed cell and/or point to point) indicated the protected structure was isolated, continuous or inconclusive. PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08
XIV. GALVANIC (SACRIFICIAL ANODE) CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM SURVEY This section may be utilized to conduct a survey of a galvanic cathodic protection system by obtaining structure-to-soil potential measurements. The reference electrode must be placed in the soil directly over the tested structure (local) and 25-100 feet away from the structure (remote). Both the local and the remote voltage must be –850 mV or more negative, in order for the structure to pass. Inconclusive is indicated when both the local and the remote structure-to-soil potentials do not result in the same outcome (both pass or both fail). FACILITY NAME:
NOTE: The survey is not complete unless all applicable parts of sections I – XIV are also completed DESCRIBE LOCATION OF REMOTE REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT:
LOCATION
CODE
STRUCTURE
CONTACT POINT
LOCAL REFERENCE CELL PLACEMENT
LOCAL VOLTAGE
REMOTE VOLTAGE
PASS/FAIL/
INCONCLUSIV E (example)
(example) PLUS TANK (example) TANK BOTTOM (example) PLUS TANK STP MANWAY (example) -928 (example) -810 (example) INCONCLUSIVE
(example)
(example) PLUS PIPING (example) DISPENSER 5/6 (example) UNDER DISPENSER 5/6 (example) -890 (example) -885 (example) PASS
COMMENTS:
1 Designate numerically or by code on the site drawing each “local” reference electrode placement (e.g. 1,2,3... T-1, T-2, P-1, P-2...etc.). 2 Describe the structure that is being tested (e.g. plus tank; premium piping; diesel submersible pump flex connector; etc.). 3 Describe where contact with the structure that is being tested is made (e.g. plus tank @ test lead; diesel piping @ dispenser 5/6; tank test lead; pp4, etc).
4 Describe the exact location where reference electrode is placed for each “local” measurement (e.g. soil @ plus tank STP; soil @ dispenser 5/6; etc.)
5 Record the structure-to-soil potential measured with the reference electrode placed “local” in millivolts (e.g. –865 mV, -920 mV, etc.). 6 Record the structure-to-soil potential measured with the reference electrode placed “remote” (copy voltage that was obtained during continuity survey). 7 Indicate whether the tested structure passed or failed the –850 mV “on” criterion based on your interpretation of the test data.
PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM EVALUATION This form must be utilized to evaluate underground storage tank (UST) cathodic protection systems in the State of Mississippi. Access to the soil directly over the cathodically protected structure that is being evaluated must be provided. A site drawing depicting the UST cathodic protection system and all reference electrode placements must be completed. I. UST OWNER II. UST FACILITY NAME: NAME: ID # ADDRESS: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: CITY: COUNTY: III. CP TESTER IV. CP TESTER’S QUALIFICATIONS TESTER’S NAME: NACE INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION NUMBER: COMPANY NAME: MDEQ UST INSTALLER CERTIFICATION NUMBER: ADDRESS: OTHER (EXPLAIN):__________________________________________________________ CITY: STATE: __________________________________________________________________________ V. REASON SURVEY WAS CONDUCTED (mark only one) Routine - 3 year Routine – within 6 months of installation 90-day re-survey after fail Re-survey after repair/modification Date next cathodic protection survey must be conducted ______________________ (required within 6 months of installation/repair & every 3 years thereafter). VI. CATHODIC PROTECTION TESTER’S EVALUATION (mark only one) All protected structures at this facility pass the cathodic protection survey and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has been provided to the UST system (indicate all criteria applicable by completion of Section VIII). One or more protected structures at this facility fail the cathodic protection survey and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has not been provided to the UST system (complete Section IX). The cathodic protection survey of an impressed current system must be evaluated by a corrosion expert because one or more of the conditions listed in Section 7.1.5 of the MDEQ cathodic protection guidance document are applicable (complete Section VII). CP TESTER’S SIGNATURE: DATE CP SURVEY PERFORMED: VII. CORROSION EXPERT’S EVALUATION (mark only one) The survey must be conducted and/or evaluated by a corrosion expert when: a) supplemental anodes or other changes in the construction of the impressed current system are made; b) stray current may be affecting buried metallic structures or c) an inconclusive result was indicated in Section VI. All protected structures at this facility pass the cathodic protection survey and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has been provided to the UST system (indicate all criteria applicable by completion of Section VIII). One or more protected structures at this facility fail the cathodic protection survey and it is judged that adequate cathodic protection has not been provided to the UST system (indicate what action is necessary by completion of Section IX). CORROSION EXPERT’S NAME: COMPANY NAME: NACE INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION: NACE INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATION NUMBER: CORROSION EXPERT’S SIGNATURE: DATE: VIII. CRITERIA APPLICABLE TO EVALUATION (mark all that apply) Structure-to-soil potential more negative than –850 mV with respect to a Cu/CuSO
reference electrode with protective current temporarily interrupted current temporarily interrupted (instant-off). Structure(s) exhibit at least 100 m V of cathodic protection.
Structure(s) exhibit at least 100 mV of cathodic polarization. IX. ACTION REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVALUATION (mark only one) NONE Cathodic protection is adequate. No further action is necessary at this time. Test again by no later than (see Section V). RETEST Cathodic protection may not be adequate. Retest during the next 90 days to determine if passing results can be achieved. REPAIR & RETEST Cathodic protection is not adequate. Repair/modification is necessary as soon as practical but within the next 90 days. PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08
INCONCLUSIVE PASS FAIL PASS FAIL 850 OFF 100 mV POLARIZATION
X. DESCRIPTION OF UST SYSTEM TANK # PRODUCT CAPACITY TANK MATERIAL PIPING MATERIAL FLEX CONNECTORS
XI. IMPRESSED CURRENT RECTIFIER DATA (complete all applicable)
In order to conduct an effective evaluation of the cathodic protection system, a complete evaluation of rectifier operation is necessary. RECTIFIER MANUFACTURER: RATED DC OUTPUT: ____________ VOLTS ____________ AMPS RECTIFIER MODEL: RECTIFIER SERIAL NUMBER: RECTIFIER OUTPUT AS INITIALLY DESIGNED OR LASTLY RECOMMENDED (if available): __________ VOLTS __________ AMPS EVENT DATE COARSE FINE VOLTS AMPS HOUR METER COMMENTS “AS FOUND”
“AS LEFT”
XII. IMPRESSED CURRENT POSITIVE & NEGATIVE CIRCUIT MEASUREMENTS (output amperage)
Complete if the system is designed to allow such measurements (i.e. individual lead wires for each anode are installed and measurement shunts are present). CIRCUIT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TOTAL AMPS ANODE (+)
TANK (-)
XIII. DESCRIPTION OF CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM REPAIRS AND/OR MODIFICATION
Complete if any repairs or modifications to the cathodic protection system are made OR are necessary. Certain repairs/modifications as explained in the text of the MDEQ cathodic protection guidance document are required to be designed and/or evaluated by a corrosion expert (completion of Section VII required). Additional anodes for an impressed current system (attach corrosion expert’s design). Repairs or replacement of rectifer (explain in “Remarks/Other” below). Anode header cables repaired and/or replaced(explain in “Remarks/Other” below). Impressed current protected tanks/piping not electrically continuous (explain in “Remarks/Other” below). Remarks/Other: _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ XIV. UST FACILITY SITE DRAWING Attach detailed drawing of the UST and cathodic protection systems. Sufficient detail must be given in order to clearly indicate where the reference electrode was placed for each structure-to-soil potential that is recorded on the survey forms. Any pertinent data must also be included. At a minimum you should indicate the following: All tanks, piping and dispensers; All buildings and streets; All anodes and wires; Location of CP test stations; Each reference electrode placement must be indicated by a code (1,2,3 R-1, R-2, R-3...etc.) corresponding with the appropriate line number in Section XVI of this form. AN EVALUATION OF THE CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM IS NOT COMPLETE WITHOUT AN ACCEPTABLE SITE DRAWING.
PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08 TAP SETTINGS DC OUTPUT
XV. IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM CONTINUITY SURVEY
This section may be utilized to conduct measurements of continuity on underground storage tank systems that are protected by cathodic protection systems. When conducting a fixed cell - moving ground survey, the reference electrode must be placed in the soil at a remote location and left undisturbed. Conduct point-to-point test between any two structures for which the fixed cell - moving ground survey is inconclusive or indicates possible isolation. For impressed current systems, the protected structure must be continuous with all other protected structures in order to pass the continuity survey.
FACILITY NAME:
NOTE: The survey is not complete unless all applicable parts of sections I-XIV are also completed DESCRIBE LOCATION OF “FIXED REMOTE” REFERENCE ELECTRODE PLACEMENT:
STRUCTURE “A”
STRUCTURE “B”
STRUCTURE “A”
FIXED REMOTE INSTANT OFF VOLTAGE
STRUCTURE “B”
FIXED REMOTE INSTANT OFF VOLTAGE
POINT-TO- POINT
VOLTAGE DIFFERENCE
ISOLATED/
CONTINUOUS/ INCONCLUSIVE
(example) PLUS TANK BOTTOM (example) PLUS STEEL PRODUCT LINE @ STP (example) -915 mV (example) -908 mV
(example) INCONCLUSIVE (example) PLUS TANK BOTTOM (example) PLUS STEEL PRODUCT LINE @ STP
(example) 1 mV (example) CONTINUOUS
1 Describe the protected structure {“A”} that you are attempting to demonstrate is continuous (e.g. plus tank bottom). 2 Describe the “other” protected structure {“B”} that you are attempting to demonstrate is continuous (e.g. plus steel product line @ STP). 3 Record the fixed remote instant off structure-to-soil potential of the protected structure {“A”} in millivolts (e.g. –915 mV). 4 Record the fixed remote instant off structure-to-soil potential of the “other” protected structure {“B”} in millivolts (e.g. –908 mV). 5 Record the voltage difference observed between structure “A” and structure “B” when conducting “point-to-point” testing (e.g. 1mV). 6 Document whether the test (fixed cell and/or point to point) indicated the protected structure was isolated, continuous or inconclusive. PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08
XVI. IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM SURVEY This section may be utilized to conduct a survey of an impressed current cathodic protection system by obtaining structure-to-soil potential measurements. The reference electrode must be placed in the soil directly above the structure that is being tested and as far away from any active anode as practical to obtain a valid structure-to-soil potential (refer to the MDEQ cathodic protection evaluation guidance document for detailed discussion of electrode placement). Both on and instant off potentials must be measured for each structure that is intended to be under cathodic protection. The instant off potential must be -850 mV or more negative or the 100 mV polarization criterion must be satisfied in order to pass. FACILITY NAME:
NOTE: This survey is not complete unless all applicable parts of sections I – XIV are also completed LOCATION
CODE
STRUCTURE
CONTACT POINT
REFERENCE CELL PLACEMENT
ON
VOLTAGE INSTANT
OFF VOLTAGE ENDING
VOLTAGE VOLTAGE
CHANGE
PASS/ FAIL
(example)
(example) PLUS TANK (example) TANK BOTTOM (example) SOIL @ REG. TANK STP MANWAY (example) -1070mV (example) -875 mV
(example) PASS (example)
(example) DIESEL PIPE (example) DISPENSER 7/8 (example) SOIL @ DIESEL TANK STP MANWAY (example) -810 mV (example) -680 mV (example) -575 mV (example) 105 mV (example) PASS
COMMENTS:
1 Designate numerically or by code on the site drawing each local reference electrode placement (e.g. 1,2,3... T-1, T-2, P-1, P-2...etc.). 2 Describe the structure that is being tested (e.g. plus tank; diesel piping; flex connector, etc.). 3 Describe where the structure being tested is contacted by the test lead (e.g. plus tank bottom; diesel piping @ dispenser 7/8; etc.). 4 Describe the exact location where the reference electrode is placed for each measurement (e.g. soil @ regular tank STP manway; soil @ dispenser 2, etc.) 5 {Applies to all tests} Record the structure-to-soil potential (voltage) observed with the current applied (e.g. –1070 mV). 6 {Applies to all tests} Record the structure to soil potential (voltage) observed when the current is interrupted (e.g. 680 mV). 7 {Applies to 100 mV polarization test only} Record the voltage observed at the end of the test period (e.g. 575 mV). 8 {Applies to 100 mV polarization test only} Subtract the final voltage from the instant off voltage (e.g. 680 mV – 575 mV = 105 mV). 9 Indicate if the tested structure passed or failed one of the two acceptable criteria (850 instant off or 100 mV polarization) based on your interpretation of data. PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 100 mV POLARIZATION
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IMPRESSED CURRENT CATHODIC PROTECTION SYSTEM 60-DAY RECORD OF RECTIFER OPERATION This form may be utilized to document that the cathodic protection system rectifier is checked for operation at least once every 60 days. Checked for operation is taken to mean that it was confirmed the rectifier was receiving power and is “turned-on”. If your rectifier is so equipped, you should also record the output voltage, amperage and the number of hours indicated on the meter. Any significant variance should be reported to your corrosion professional so that any repairs and/or adjustments necessary can be made. UST OWNER UST FACILITY NAME: NAME: ID # ADDRESS: ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: CITY: COUNTY: IMPRESSED CURRENT RECTIFIER DATA Rectifier Manufacturer: Rated DC Output: ____________ VOLTS ___________AMPS Rectifier Model: Rectifier Serial Number: What is the ‘as designed’ or lastly recommended rectifier output? ____________ VOLTS ___________AMPS 60-DAY LOG OF RECTIFIER OPERATION DATE INSPECTED RECTIFIER TURNED ON? COARSE FINE VOLTS AMPS HOUR METER INSPECTOR INITIALS COMMENTS
PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08 TAP SETTINGS DC OUTPUT
APPENDIX 280.2 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SELF CERTIFICATION OF UST SYSTEM RETURN TO DELIVERY ELIGIBILITY
UST OWNER UST FACILITY Owner Name Facility Name Owner Address Facility Physical Street Address City State City State MS Phone County Tank Owner Contact Person MDEQ UST Facility I.D. Number
I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW THAT:
-
The underground storage tank facility referenced above has completed the repairs/modifications necessary to establish compliance and is eligible to receive product deliveries.
-
I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this submittal and any accompanying documents. This information, to the best of my knowledge, is true, accurate and complete.
-
I am aware that there are significant penalties for knowingly submitting false information.
UST OWNER MDEQ CERTIFIED UST INSTALLER Printed Name of Owner or Authorized Representative Printed Name of Certified UST Installer Owner’s Signature Installer’s Signature Date Date MDEQ Certification Number This form must be signed by both the UST owner and a MDEQ certified UST installer. MDEQ reserves the right to make the final determination of whether or not the UST facility has satisfactorily returned to compliance.
PRODUCED BY THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, OFFICE OF POLLUTION CONTROL, UST BRANCH PO BOX 2261, JACKSON, MS 39225 PHONE (601) 961-5171 FACSIMILE (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 7/08
APPENDIX 280.3 [Reserved]
APPENDIX 280.4 - GUIDELINES FOR THE PERMANENT CLOSURE OF PETROLEUM UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEMS
CONTENTS SECTION 1 -GENERAL 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................. SECTION 2 - PAPERWORK AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 2.1 Tank Registration ........................................................................................ 2.2 Notice of Intent to Permanently Close UST System(s) ................................. 2.3 Underground Storage Tank System Closure Report ................................... 2.4 Sample Chain-of-Custody ............................................................................. SECTION 3 - SAMPLING PROCEDURES 3.1 General Sampling Requirements ................................................................. 3.2 Soil Versus Groundwater Samples .............................................................. 3.3 Soil Sample Collection Procedures .............................................................. 3.4 Groundwater Sample Collection Procedures ............................................. SECTION 4 - SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR TANKS 4.1 General Requirements ................................................................................ 4.2 Removal of a Single Tank ........................................................................... 4.3 Removal of Two or More Tanks Within a Common Excavation .............. 4.4 Tank Closure in Place or Change in Service .............................................. SECTION 5 - SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR PIPING 5.1 General Requirements................................................................................ 5.2 Dispenser Islands ........................................................................................
5.3 Piping Trenches ......................................................................................... SECTION 6 - BACKFILL SAMPLING 6.1 General Requirements .............................................................................. 6.2 Backfill Handling Options ......................................................................... SECTION 7 - DEVIATIONS FROM MINIMUM SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS 7.1 Hazards or Obstructions ........................................................................... 7.2 Waiver of Sampling Requirements ............................................................ SECTION 8 - SAMPLE ANALYSIS 8.1 Tanks .......................................................................................................... 8.2 Dispenser Islands & Piping ........................................................................
APPENDICES Appendix A - "The Closure Cycle .................................................................... Appendix B - Permitted Solid Waste Landfills ................................................ Appendix C - "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close UST System(s)" ......... Appendix D - "UST System Closure Report" .................................................. Appendix E - Chain-of-Custody Record ........................................................... Appendix F - Industry Codes and Standards ................................................... Appendix G - Boring Log for UST System Closure in Place........................... Appendix H - Definitions ................................................................................
SECTION 1 - GENERAL 1.1 Introduction The purpose of this document is to provide guidance that explains what the policies of the Underground Storage Tank (UST) Branch are regarding the permanent closure of petroleum UST systems. If you are permanently closing a UST system that has contained a regulated substance other than petroleum, you must contact the UST Branch in order to determine what sampling requirements must be met. Any tank that was in use on or after December 22,1988, must be permanently closed if taken out of use for more than a 12-month period unless the tank meets the corrosion protection requirements. If a tank was taken out of use prior to December 22, 1988, and was closed in accordance with acceptable industry standards at that time, it is not required to be permanently closed in accordance with the present UST rules and regulations. Generally, the acceptable industry practice prior to December 22, 1988, was to simply empty the UST of product and in some instances, fill the tank with water. However, if a release is discovered at a tank that was closed prior to December 22, 1988, the release must be reported to the UST Branch and remediated just as if the release had occurred today. The UST regulations require that when a UST is permanently closed, the site must be sampled for the presence of a release where contamination is most likely to be present. Therefore, the sampling requirements in this guide are only the minimum necessary and are not intended to substitute for the specific conditions that may apply to an individual site. Additional sampling may be justified whenever obvious areas of contamination are found. No closure report will be accepted as complete without the minimum sampling data that is described herein. However, an allowance will be made where certain circumstances prohibit the collection of the minimum sampling points necessary such as when a tank is to be closed in place but one end of the tank is underneath a building. If it is necessary to deviate from the minimum sampling procedure, the tank owner must submit to the UST Branch an alternative sampling plan thirty (30) days prior to the closure to gain approval. A Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) certified contractor must supervise the permanent closure of any UST system that was in use on or after December 22, 1988. The certified contractor must ensure that all UST regulations and industry codes/practices (see Appendix F) relating to the closure are followed. To obtain a current listing of MDEQ certified contractors, contact the UST Branch at(601) 961-5171. The state Fire Marshall's office and/or local fire department may need to be contacted prior to performing UST closure. You may also be required to obtain city or local demolition permits.
All underground utilities must be identified and clearly marked prior to any excavation or drilling. Contact Mississippi One-Call System, Inc. at 1-601-362-4374 in order to have all underground utilities marked. Certain terms used in this document are defined in Appendix H for your reference.
SECTION 2 - PAPERWORK AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
2.1 Tank Registration Prior to performing a UST closure, the owner is to verify that the USTs are properly registered with the UST Branch. Any UST system that was in use on or after January 1,1974, must be registered. If it is determined that a UST system is not registered, the permanent closure will not be approved until the tanks are registered and any applicable annual tank regulatory fees are paid in full. Tanks may be registered by submittal of a "Notification for Underground Storage Tanks" form which may be obtained by contacting the UST Branch or may be downloaded from the Internet at www.deq.state.ms.us. 2.2.Notice of Intent to Permanently Close Underground Storage Tank System (s)
The owner of the UST system or his representative must submit the "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close Underground Storage Tank System(s)" form (Appendix C) at least 30 days prior to the closure. This form becomes invalid if the closure is not initiated within 120 days after submission. Any form submitted that does not have the owner's signature and the name of the certified contractor is not considered to be valid. Note that an owner may be subject to penalty if a Notice of Intent to Permanently Close UST System(s)" form is not filed with the UST Branch prior to performing a tank closure.
2.3 Underground Storage Tank System Closure Report The owner of the UST system or his representative must submit the "Underground Storage Tank System Closure Report" form (Appendix D) and all supporting documentation within 60 days of completing the UST closure. The form must be signed by the owner and the certified contractor to be valid. Supporting documentation that must be included with the submittal of the UST Closure Report form includes; a) copies of all analytical results of any and all samples; b) valid sample chain-of-custody; and c) site drawing. In addition, if the closure involves the disposal of contaminated soils and/or groundwater, a copy of the waste manifests must be included in the submittal. Failure to submit all of the documentation necessary to complete the closure will result in the return of the UST Closure Report form to the tank owner.
The site drawing must contain the following: general site layout showing tank locations and the substance(s) stored dispenser locations depth to groundwater (if encountered) dimensions of the excavation sample locations (sample identification on the drawing must match the labeling on each of the sample containers) depth at which each sample was collected.
2.4 Sample Chain-of-Custody A chain-of-custody record (Appendix E) shall accompany the sample from the time of sample collection to delivery to the lab. The possession or custody of samples must be traceable from the time they are collected until the time the sample is submitted to the laboratory for analysis. If chain-of-custody procedures are not followed, the integrity of the samples is compromised and the analysis is invalidated. A chain-of-custody record must be completed for all samples that will be analyzed by the laboratory. This record must be completed in the field at the time of sampling. Correct chain-of-custody must continue when the samples are transferred to the laboratory or to the person responsible for the delivery of the samples to the laboratory. Upon transfer of the samples, each person handling the samples must sign, date, and note the time each person received the samples. Completed chain-of-custody records must be submitted for all samples and included with the UST System Closure Report. A sample chain-of-custody form can be found at Appendix E or may be obtained from the laboratory. SECTION 3 - SAMPLING PROCEDURES 3.1 General Sampling Requirements Soil and/or groundwater samples must be collected to determine if a release has occurred. The importance of good sampling procedures is critical to the assessment of a site at a UST closure. Since gasoline and some other petroleum products consist largely of volatile organic compounds, special care in collecting samples is required. Special precautions must be taken to be certain that samples collected from each site are representative of the soil and/or groundwater at that location and that the sample is neither altered nor contaminated by the sampling and handling procedure. When collecting samples for Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene and Xylenes (BTEX) analysis, new disposable latex or nitrile gloves must be worn at each sample collection location. When collecting samples for Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) analysis, new disposable vinyl or nitrile gloves must be worn at each sample collection location. Latex is not a suitable glove material when collecting samples for PAH analysis since PAH's have an affinity for latex. The minimum number of sample containers (i.e. aliquots) that are stated in this document are only intended to be guidance. Always contact your laboratory to determine the sample size and aliquots that are required for a particular laboratory. All samples must be placed in proper containers immediately upon collection, properly packaged and labeled with the following minimum information: 1. facility name
-
sample location (e.g. NW corner of tank bed, Sample #1, etc.) 3. date and time samples were collected 4. depth samples were collected 5. person collecting samples 6. analytical test(s) required All samples must be placed on ice immediately after collection and shipped to the laboratory within 24 hours of collection. 3.2 Soil Versus Groundwater Samples Soil samples must be collected whenever evidence of soil contamination exists. However, if water is encountered, pump it out in accordance with all regulatory requirements and determine if the water in the tank excavation or borehole returns within 24 hours. If the water returns, assume that the water is true groundwater. If groundwater is present, water sample(s) must be collected. If groundwater is sampled, no soil sampling is required unless soil contamination is evident. If soil contamination is evident at either the tank excavation or the piping trench/dispenser island, soil samples must be collected in accordance with Sections 5-7 of this document in addition to any water samples. 3.3 Soil Sample Collection Procedures 3.3.1 Collecting Soil Samples for Gasoline (BTEX) Analysis For BTEX analysis, collect at least one 4-oz sample from each sampling point. The sampling procedure is as follows: 1. Use a stainless steel spoon, spatula or some other appropriate sampling device. NOTE: Sampling device must be decontaminated between each sampling location. 2. Soil samples should be tightly packed into the sample container using the stainless steel spoon or appropriate sampling device. 3. Completely fill sample container (4-oz widemouth amber glass container with a Teflon liner) so that no headspace is present. 4. Immediately store samples on ice and ship to the laboratory within 24 hours of collection. 3.3.2 Collecting Soil Samples for Diesel, Oil, Etc. (PAH) Analysis For PAH analysis, collect at least one 8-oz sample from each sampling point. The sampling procedure is as follows: 1. Use a stainless steel spoon, spatula or some other appropriate sampling device. NOTE: Sampling device must be decontaminated between each sampling location.
-
Soil samples should be tightly packed into the sample container using the stainless steel spoon or appropriate sampling device. 3. Completely fill sample container (8-oz widemouth amber glass container with a Teflon liner) so that no headspace is present. 4. Immediately store samples on ice and ship to the laboratory within 24 hours of col lection. 3.4 Groundwater Sample Collection Procedures 3.4.1.Collecting Groundwater Samples for Gasoline (BTEX) Analysis For BTEX groundwater analysis, collect at least three (3) 40-ml samples from each sampling point. 1. Sampling containers should be pre-labeled before any sample collection begins. 2. Decontaminate bailer and use clean new string/line. NOTE: In general, use a disposable bailer and not one that must be decontaminated between borings or wells in order to lessen the chance of cross-contamination. 3. Slowly lower the bailer into the water. Do not allow the bailer to free-fall. 4. Allow the bailer to go into the water as far as possible without touching the bottom of the boring and/or tank hole. 5. Remove the bailer from the water before it is completely immersed under the water. 6. Collect three aliquots: a. transfer the sample from the bailer to amber 40-ml glass vials with Teflon-lined septum cap, leaving no head space; b. each sample should be carefully poured down the inside of the vial to minimize turbulence; c. verify no headspace by inverting the vial and tapping it gently to check for trapped air bubbles. If any are present, a new sample must be collected; d. as a rule of thumb, it is best to gently pour the last few drops into the vial so that surface tension holds the water in a "convex meniscus". The cap is then placed on the vial and some overflow is lost, but air space in the bottle is eliminated; e. Immediately store samples on ice and ship to the laboratory within 24 hours of collection. 3.4.2.Collecting Groundwater Samples for Diesel, Oil, Etc. (PAH) Analysis For PAH analysis collect one water sample (1 liter) from each sampling point. 1. Sampling containers should be pre-labeled before any sample collection begins. 2. Transfer the sample from the bailer to a one liter widemouth glass sampling container with a Teflon liner. Completely fill container to the top.
-
Immediately store the samples on ice and ship to the laboratory within 24 hours of collection.
BTEX and PAH Sample Handling Requirements for Soil/Groundwater Samples Parameter Media Container BTEX (Gasoline) Soil One 4-oz (120-ml) amber glass with Teflon liner PAH (Diesel, Oil, etc.) Soil One 8-oz (250-ml) amber widemouth glass with Teflon liner BTEX (Gasoline) Water Three 40-ml amber vials with septum caps PAH (Diesel, Oil, etc.) Water One 1 liter widemouth glass with Teflon liner SECTION 4 - SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR TANKS 4.1 General Requirements The goal of sampling a tank excavation at closure is to represent the contamination which may exist in a manner that is as accurate as possible while at the same time minimizing the number of samples that are necessary to achieve the stated purpose. Although the sampling locations described in this document are the minimum necessary, they are not intended to substitute for the conditions which may exist at a particular location. Therefore, a certain amount of professional judgement is necessary in order to evaluate and properly assess the site conditions at a tank closure. When conducting sampling at a tank removal, all backfill materials must be removed from the excavation prior to sampling. Whether sampling the sidewalls or the floor of an excavation, all samples must be collected from a depth of at least one foot into the native soil. Soil samples shall be collected immediately after the removal of all backfill material. When closing tanks in place, the soil borings must be conducted in the native soil immediately surrounding the tank bed excavation. Soil samples shall be collected immediately after completion of the soil boring. No compositing of samples (including sampling of the backfill) is allowed and each sample that is collected must be analyzed separately.
If "true" groundwater (refer to Section 3.2) is encountered during excavation activities, a groundwater sample must be collected from the excavation. No soil sampling is required if a groundwater sample is collected unless soil contamination is evident. Any soils that appear to be contaminated must be sampled in addition to sampling of the groundwater. Follow the soil sampling requirements as described in Sections 5-7 of this document when soil sampling is necessary. 4.2 Removal of a Single Tank Prior to beginning any sampling activity, all backfill materials must be removed from the excavation. Sampling of the tank excavation may occur from the floor of the excavation only or from both the sidewalls and the floor, depending on the site conditions. A discussion of where to sample the excavation and the minimum number of samples that are necessary to satisfy the requirements of the UST Branch follows: 4.2.1 Removal of a Single Tank - No Sidewall Contamination Apparent If no contamination is apparent in the sidewalls, only floor sampling is required. Two samples must be collected from the floor of the excavation at a depth of one foot into the native soil. The samples must be collected from the areas of the floor that appear to be the most contaminated. However, you should also take into consideration the entire area of the excavation so that both of the floor samples are not collected from the same general area. If no area of the floor appears to be obviously contaminated, or the floor appears to be uniformly contaminated, the samples must be collected from each end of the excavation as shown in Figure 1.
4.2.2 Removal of a Single Tank - Sidewall Contamination Apparent
If any of the sidewalls appear to be contaminated, sidewall samples must be collected. As shown in Figure 2 below, a minimum of three samples are required to assess the excavation when the sidewalls are contaminated. Two samples must be collected from the sidewalls and one from the floor of the excavation.
The first sidewall sample must be collected from the sidewall of the excavation that appears to be the most contaminated. The second sample must be collected from one of the three remaining sidewalls that appears to have the greatest remaining contamination. If no other sidewall appears to be contaminated, the second sample must be collected from the wall opposite of the sidewall which appears to be the most contaminated. The third sample to be collected must come from the floor of the excavation. The floor sample must be collected from the area of the floor that appears to be the most contaminated. If no area of the floor appears contaminated or if it appears uniformly contaminated the sample must be collected from the center of the excavation.
4.3 Removal of Two or More Tanks Within a Common Excavation Prior to beginning any sampling activities, all backfill materials must be removed from the tank excavation. As will be discussed, sampling of the tank excavation may occur from the floor of the excavation only or from both the sidewalls and the floor, depending on the site conditions. 4.3.1 Removal of Two or More Tanks - No Sidewall Contamination Apparent If no contamination is apparent in the sidewalls, only floor sampling is required. When the excavation is 50 feet or less in all dimensions, four samples must be collected from the floor of the excavation at a depth of one foot into the native soil. The samples must be collected from the areas of the floor that appear to be the most contaminated. However, you should also take into consideration the entire area of the excavation so that no two of the samples are collected from the same general area. If no area of the floor appears to be obviously contaminated, or the floor
appears to be uniformly contaminated, the samples must be collected from each corner of the excavation as shown in Figure 3.
However, if the excavation is greater than 50 feet in any dimension, additional samples must be collected along each dimension of the excavation that is greater than 50 feet in length. The additional sample must be collected from the center of that dimension of the excavation as shown in Figure 4. Soil sampling must also be conducted in such a manner that no more than 50 feet exists between any two sampling points as measured along each dimension (side) of the excavation.
4.3.2 Removal of Two of More Tanks - Sidewall Contamination Apparent If any of the sidewalls appear to be contaminated, all of the sidewalls must be sampled. As shown in Figure 5 below, a minimum of five samples are required to assess the excavation when the sidewalls are contaminated. One sample must be collected from each of the four sidewalls and one from the floor of the excavation. The sidewall samples must be collected from the area of each sidewall that appears to be the most contaminated. If a wall appears to be clean, the sample for that uncontaminated wall must be collected from the same depth where the highest level of contamination appears in the most contaminated wall of the excavation. The fifth sample must come from the floor of the excavation. The floor sample must be collected from the area of the floor that appears to be the most contaminated. If no area of the floor appears contaminated or if it appears uniformly contaminated, the sample must be collected from the center of the excavation. Soil sampling must also be conducted in such a manner that no more than 50 feet exists between any two sampling locations along each wall of the excavation.
4.4 Tank Closure in Place or Change in Service Since potentially contaminated soils cannot be seen during closure in place activities as when removing tank systems, the sampling requirements for closure in place are more conservative. You must follow the exact guidelines given in this document unless special circumstances do not allow such. Any alternative sampling plan must be submitted to the UST Branch for approval at the same time the "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close UST System(s)" form is submitted. If "true" groundwater (refer to Section 3.2) is encountered during soil boring activities, groundwater samples must be collected from each boring that contains groundwater and each sample must be analyzed separately. Soil sampling must be
conducted from those borings that do not have groundwater. In addition, regardless of whatever soil and/or groundwater sampling that is conducted, one soil sample must be collected from the boring that exhibited the highest level of petroleum contamination during the field screening process (see Section 4.4.4). Tanks closed in place must be cleaned and filled with an inert solid material such as sand, concrete, virgin drilling mud or a "foam" material approved for such purposes. If virgin drilling mud is used, the mixture must consist of 25-30 pounds of bentonite per 42 gallon barrel of water and the pH must be between 6.5 and 8. All tank sludges removed during the cleaning process must be properly disposed of in accordance with all regulatory requirements. 4.4.1 Change in Service A change in service is when the contents of the tank are changed from a regulated substance (e.g. gasoline) to an unregulated substance (e.g. water). In order to accomplish a change in service, the same notification and sampling requirements for the permanent closure of a UST system must be followed. Sampling must be conducted in the same manner as tank closure in place and the interior of the tank properly cleaned. In addition, you must notify the UST Branch of the change in service by submittal of a "Notification for Underground Storage Tanks" form which indicates what unregulated substance is presently stored in the tank. 4.4.2 Closure in Place of a Single Tank Less Than or Equal to 25 Feet in Length Four borings are required when closing in place a single tank less than or equal to 25 feet in length. One borehole at each corner the tank bed must be advanced to a depth of at least one foot below the bottom of the tank and into the native soil as shown in Figure 6. In order to determine the appropriate sampling depth and number of samples to collect, conduct field screening of the soil column following the guidance Section 4.4.4.
4.4.3 Closure in Place of Two or More Tanks Within a Common Tank Bed For closure in place of two or more tanks within a common tank bed or a single tank that is greater than 25 feet in length, soil borings must be conducted at intervals of every 25 feet along the perimeter of the tank bed as shown in Figure 7. In order to determine the appropriate sampling depth and number of samples to collect, conduct field screening of the soil column following the guidance in Section 4.4.4.
4.4.4 Field Screening of Soils
In order to properly evaluate the appropriate depths to collect soil samples, conduct field screening in two foot intervals of the soil column in each boring. Field screening involves placing the soil in a container (normally a zipper-type plastic bag) and evaluating the headspace with a suitable hydrocarbon meter. Because soils must be relatively undisturbed to obtain accurate field screening results, any boring that is conducted during sample collection/screening must be accomplished in a manner that will produce a "core" of the soil column. Cuttings produced from rotary drilling equipment are not acceptable for either field screening or sample collection. In order for the field screening to be evaluated by UST staff, a boring log must be submitted along with the analytical results of sampling. The boring log must show
the type of soil encountered throughout the length of the boring. The boring log must also show hydrocarbon vapor levels in parts per million as determined by the field screening process for every two feet of the boring. Please refer to Appendix G for an example of an acceptable boring log. Soil samples must be conducted at the depth at which the highest levels of hydrocarbon vapors were detected during the field screening process. If no significant variations are found during field screening, samples must be collected from a depth of at least one foot below the bottom of the tanks into the native soil. If the field screening process reveals that all samples should be collected at less than maximum depths, at least one additional sample must be collected from the borehole that had the highest level of vapors found during the field screening process. This additional sample must be collected from a depth of one foot below the bottom of the tanks and into the native soil.
SECTION 5 - SAMPLING LOCATIONS FOR DISPENSER ISLANDS & PIPING 5.1 General Requirements When performing a UST system closure, all piping must be removed from the ground or properly closed in place. However, if new underground tanks are installed to replace the tanks being closed, the existing piping may be utilized provided it is constructed of non-corrodible materials or coated and cathodically protected steel. If aboveground tanks are being installed, the existing piping may be utilized if it meets the corrosion protection requirements and all soil/groundwater sampling required for a piping closure in place is accomplished. When closing piping in place, the goal is to render the piping unusable. Therefore, provided the piping is no longer usable, filling of all voids in the piping is not necessary. Pump a concrete slurry or other suitable inert solid material in the piping as full as practical and cap each end of the piping. Below are several procedure examples to follow when you are only replacing piping or abandoning a dispenser island. I am only abandoning an island - the facility will remain operating as a UST facility. In this case, you must submit the "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close a UST System" and indicate on the form that only piping is being closed. The section of piping that supplied the abandoned dispenser island must also be closed in accordance with the requirements of this document. I am only replacing the piping - the facility will remain operating as a UST facility and all of the new piping will utilize the existing trenches/dispenser islands. In this case, you must submit the "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close a UST System" and indicate on the form that only piping is being removed. All dispenser islands/piping trenches must be closed in accordance with the requirements of this document.
I am only replacing the tanks - the existing piping will be utilized. In this case, you must submit the "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close a UST System" and indicate on the form that only tanks are being closed. The tanks must be closed in accordance with the requirements of this document. I am only repairing the piping (please refer to Appendix H for the definition of "repair"). Repairs of piping are not subject to any of the UST closure requirements. However, if you discover contaminated soils and/or groundwater while conducting the repairs you must collect the appropriate soil and/or groundwater samples for laboratory analysis. 5.2 Dispenser Islands Sampling is required whenever a dispenser island is taken out of service or the piping associated with the island is closed or replaced. However, small changes to the piping system such as installation of new flex connectors or pipe nipples in order to set new dispensers are not subject to the sampling requirements. An island is considered to be any dispenser or series of dispensers that are oriented in a straight line. Therefore, several different dispense arrangements may exist that could be considered as one island. You should use your professional judgement to determine the most appropriate sampling scheme. If the dispensers are located directly above the tanks and the tanks are also being permanently closed, no discreet dispenser island samples are necessary provided all of the dispensers are located within the perimeter of the tank bed. 5.2.1 Removal of Dispenser Islands - No Sidewall Contamination Apparent Prior to beginning any sampling activity, all backfill materials must be removed from the excavation. If no contamination of the sidewalls is apparent, one soil sample must be collected from the floor of the excavation. The sample must be collected at a depth of one foot below the piping trench and into the native soil. The sample must be collected from the area of the floor that appears to be the most contaminated. If no area of the floor appears to be contaminated, the sample must be collected from the center of the excavation when the dispenser island is less than or equal to 50 feet in length as shown if Figure 8. Two soil samples must be taken below each dispenser island if the island is more than 50 feet in length. The samples must be collected from beneath the piping trench at least one foot into the native soil. The samples must be collected from the areas of the floor that appears to be contaminated although no more than 50 feet may exist between any two sample locations. If no area of the floor appears contaminated, the
sample locations must be spaced equally along the length of the island and such that no more than 50 feet exists between any two sampling locations as shown in Figure 8.
5.2.2 Removal of Dispenser Islands - Sidewall Contamination Apparent If any of the sidewalls of the excavation appear to be contaminated, the sidewalls must be sampled. At least two samples are required for dispenser islands less than 50 feet in length when sidewall sampling is necessary. One sample must be collected from the area of the sidewall that appears to be the most contaminated. The second sample must be collected from the floor of the excavation where the most contamination appears to be present. The second sample must be collected from the floor of the piping trench and at least one foot into the native soil. If no area of the floor appears contaminated or it appears uniformly contaminated, the sample must be collected as shown in Figure 8. If the dispenser island is greater than 50 feet in length and sidewall sampling is necessary, at least three samples are required. One of the samples must be collected from the area of the sidewall that appears to be the most contaminated. The other two samples must be collected from the floor of the excavation where the most contamination appears to be present. However, you should also take into consideration the entire area of the excavation so that both of the floor samples are not collected from the same general area. If no area of the floor appears contaminated or if it appears uniformly contaminated, collected floor samples as shown in Figure 8.
5.2.3 Dispenser Island Closure in Place Since potentially contaminated soils cannot be seen during closure in place activities as when excavating, the sampling requirements for closure in place are more conservative. You must follow the exact guidelines given in this document unless special circumstances do not allow such. Any alternative sampling plan must be submitted to the UST Branch for approval at the same time the "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close UST System(s)" form is submitted. Soil borings must be conducted at each end of the dispenser island and along the length of the island such that no more than 25 feet exists between any two borings as shown in Figure 9. The borings must extend to a depth of at least one foot below the bottom of the piping trench and into the native soil. Samples must be collected from each boring following the field screening practices as described in Section 4.4.4. If "true" groundwater (refer to Section 3.2) is encountered during soil boring activities, groundwater samples must be collected from each boring that contains groundwater and each sample must be analyzed separately. Soil sampling must be conducted from those borings that do not have groundwater. In addition, regardless of whatever soil and/or groundwater sampling that is conducted, one soil sample must be collected from the boring that exhibited the highest level of petroleum contamination during the field screening process.
5.3 Piping Trenches Sampling is required whenever a piping trench is taken out of service or piping is replaced. However, repairs (see definition in Appendix H) or small changes to the piping system such as installation of new flex connectors or unions are not subject to the sampling requirements. When both the tanks and piping are being removed and 50 feet or less of piping trench exists between the dispenser island sampling point and the nearest tank excavation sampling point, no additional sampling is required along the piping trench unless soil contamination along the piping trench is evident as shown in Figure 10.
5.3.1 Removal of Piping - No Sidewall Contamination Apparent Prior to beginning any sampling activity, all backfill materials must be removed from the piping trench excavation. If no contamination of the sidewalls is apparent, soil samples must be collected from the floor of the excavation. The samples must be collected from the floor of the piping trench at least one foot into the native soil. The samples must be collected from the areas of the floor that appears to be the most contaminated although no more than 50 feet may exist between any two sampling locations. If no area of the floor appears contaminated or if it is uniformly contaminated, the samples must be collected along the length of the piping trench such that no more than 50 feet exists between any two sampling locations as shown in Figure 11.
5.3.2 Removal of Piping - Sidewall Contamination Apparent If any of the sidewalls of the piping trench excavation appear to be contaminated, the sidewalls must be sampled. Samples must be collected from the areas of the sidewalls that appear to be the most contaminated. However, sampling must be conducted so that no more than 50 feet exists between any two sampling points. If the site conditions are such that the sidewalls are the appropriate locations for all samples, at least one of the samples must be collected from the floor of the piping trench excavation where the most contamination appears to be present. The sample must be collected at a depth of at least one foot below the piping trench and into the native soil. If no area of the floor appears contaminated or it appears uniformly contaminated, the sample must be collected at the midpoint of the piping trench. 5.3.3 Closure in Place of Piping Since potentially contaminated soils cannot be seen during closure in place activities as when excavating, the sampling requirements for closure in place are more conservative. All sampling schemes must follow the exact guidelines given in this document unless special circumstances do not allow such. Any alternative sampling plan must be submitted to the UST Branch for approval. When piping is to be closed in place, sampling along the piping trench is not required if the location of the dispenser island sample is within 25 feet of the nearest tank excavation sample. The 25 foot distance is measured in a straight line as depicted in Figure 12. If you are conducting a piping closure in place but the tanks are remaining active, the 25 foot distance referenced above has no significance. Under these circumstances, a sample must be collected from the dispenser island and from the end of the piping trench where it enters the tank bed. If there is more than 25 feet of piping trench located between these two sampling
points, additional samples must be collected such than no more than 25 feet exists between any two sample points.
If the distance between the dispenser island sample and the nearest tank bed sample is greater than 25 feet, soil samples must be collected along the piping trench such that no more than 25 feet of piping exists between any two sampling points as shown in Figure 13. This means that some excavation is required in order to locate the piping trench since sampling must occur underneath or immediately adjacent to the trench. All soil borings must extend to a depth of at least one foot below the bottom of the piping trench and into the native soil. Samples must be collected from each boring following the field screening practices as described in Section 4.4.4.
If "true" groundwater (refer to Section 3.2) is encountered during soil boring activities, groundwater samples must be collected from each boring that contains groundwater and each sample must be analyzed separately. Soil sampling must be conducted from those borings that do not have groundwater. In addition, regardless of whatever soil and/or groundwater sampling that is conducted, one soil sample must be collected from the boring that exhibited the highest level of petroleum contamination during the field screening process.
SECTION 6 - BACKFILL SAMPLING
6.1 General Requirements All excavated backfill material must be sampled unless it is disposed of in an approved sanitary landfill. This is because the soil samples collected from the native soil of the tank excavation may not be representative of the contamination levels of the backfill materials. A minimum of one soil sample is required to be collected for each 100 cubic yards of material. Sample the backfill material as soon as possible after stockpiling. The samples must be collected at a point at least one foot into the stockpile following the same sample collection procedures as for any other soil sampling. The backfill samples must be analyzed for the same constituents as the tank excavation samples. 6.2 Backfill Handling Options Typically, all backfill material is contaminated and should be handled as such until laboratory analysis proves otherwise. The following are the options allowed for handling the backfill material: a. Dispose of in an approved landfill (Appendix B).
Conduct any sampling that may be required by the landfill and receive permission from the landfill you wish to utilize. b. Stockpile on site and await the lab results of sampling. All backfill material should be placed on and covered with an impervious material (plastic sheeting). If the analytical results of the backfill material are below the action levels of the UST Branch, the backfill material may be placed back into the excavation. If the results are above our limits, your options are as described in paragraphs a, d or e of this rule. c. Sample the backfill material and return it to the excavation. The backfill material may be returned to the excavation before the analytical results are obtained with the understanding that the backfill material may have to be re-excavated if the analytical results arc above the action levels of the UST Branch. If the results are above the action levels of the UST Branch, your options are as described in paragraphs a, d or e of this rule.
d. Aerate the backfill material on site. If the analytical results indicate concentrations above the action levels of the UST Branch and the owner does not want to dispose of the backfill material in an approved sanitary landfill, the backfill material may be aerated on site. To aerate the backfill material, place the backfill material on an impervious material (plastic sheeting), spread the backfill material approximately one foot thick. Build a berm around the soil that will retain any rainwater and prevent any contamination from spreading. Cover the soil on rainy days; uncover the soil on sunny days. Disc or till the soil weekly. Contact a UST Branch Project Manager for instructions before initiating the aeration process. e. Stockpile the backfill material at a different location. Before this is done, approval must be obtained from the MDEQ Groundwater Division-Special Waste Section. SECTION 7 - DEVIATIONS FROM MINIMUM SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS 7.1 Hazards or Obstructions When circumstances do not allow the collection of samples from the locations required in this document, the owner must contact the UST Branch and receive prior approval of any alternative sampling plan. Draw a sketch of the facility that shows the tank system in relation to any obstacles and show the proposed sampling locations. 7.2 Waiver of Sampling Requirements While not generally a recommended practice, sampling requirements may be waived if the facility has monitoring wells as the method of leak detection and no evidence of a release has
been noted. The UST Branch generally will only consider groundwater monitoring to grant a waiver. In order to request a waiver, submit the previous twelve months of monitoring well records at the same time the "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close UST System(s)" form is submitted and indicate you wish to have the sampling requirements waived.
However, if evidence of petroleum contaminated soil and/or groundwater is found during closure activities, samples must then be collected from the appropriate locations and analyzed as described in this guidance document.
SECTION 8 -SAMPLE ANALYSIS 8.1
Tanks The samples must be analyzed for the product last stored in the UST (refer to the table below). However, if evidence of a leak from a previously stored product is found or it is known that the tank stored a different substance at one time, the samples must be analyzed for that substance also. For example, all of the tanks have stored gasoline for the past several years but it is known that one of the tanks was once used to store diesel fuel. Therefore, all samples collected from the tank excavation would have to be analyzed for both PAH and BTEX. In addition, if an excavation contained tanks that stored substances that require both BTEX and PAH analysis (i.e. gasoline and diesel fuel), all samples collected from the excavation must be analyzed for both BTEX and PAH. 8.2 Dispenser Islands and Piping Samples must be analyzed for the products last transferred in the piping. However, if evidence of a leak from a previously stored product is found or it is known that the piping transferred a different substance at one time, the samples must be analyzed for that substance also. In addition, if both diesel fuel and gasoline piping are in the same trench/dispenser island, all samples collected from the piping trench/dispenser island must be analyzed for both BTEX and PAH. REQUIRED SAMPLE ANALYSIS (TANKS & PIPING) Product Stored Sample Media Analysis
Gasoline Soil/Water BTEX*
Diesel Fuel, Used Oil Kerosene, Jet Fuel Soil/ Water PAH**
Hazardous or Other Substances Soil/Water *** * BTEX = The analysis for Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbcnzcne and Xylenes 802IB, 8260B EPA Methods
** PAH = The analysis for poly nuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (EPA Methods 8100, 8270C or 8310)
*** Analyze by approved method for the substance stored or contact the UST Branch for required analysis
APPENDIX A “The Closure Cycle”
UST OWNER
Decides to Close UST and Verifies USTs are Registered*
UST OWNER
Selects Certified Contractor and Submits Notice of Intent to Close
UST REMOVAL UST CLOSURE-IN-PLACE
UST BRANCH UST OWNER Collects Soil Samples and Submits Reviews Intent and Sends Lab Results and Intent to Close Owner Approval Letter** Form to UST Branch
UST OWNER UST BRANCH
Performs Closure in Accordance Reviews Lab Results and Sends with UST Branch Requirements Owner Approval Letter***
UST OWNER UST OWNER
Submits Closure Report and Performs Closure in Accordance Supporting Documentation**** with UST Branch Requirements
UST BRANCH UST OWNER
Reviews Report and Sends Submits Closure Report and Owner No Further Action Supporting Documentation**** Letter*****
- If the tanks are not registered, the Owner must submit a UST BRANCH Notification for Underground Storage Tanks. Reviews Report and Sends ** If the Notice of Intent to Permanently Close form is not Owner No Further Action completed satisfactorily, the form will not be accepted. Letter*****
*** The lab results must normally be below the limits established by the UST Branch in order for the Closure-in-Place to be approved.
**** Supporting documentation: a) lab results of any sampling; b) chain-of-custody; c) manifests for the disposal of any contaminated soils, waters, or tank sludges; d) site drawing.
***** If lab results are above UST Branch limits, Owner is notified of contamination and works with UST Branch to clean up site.
APPENDIX B
Adams County Plantation Oaks Landfill Operator – Waste Management, Inc. (601) 445-8459
Chickasaw County Prairie Bluff Landfill Operator – Waste Management, Inc. (662) 456-9560
Clay County Golden Triangle Regional Landfill Operator – Golden Triangle SW Mgt. Auth. (662) 324-7566
Harrison County Pecan Grove Landfill Operator – Waste Management, Inc. (228) 255-5553
Jefferson County Jefferson County Landfill Operator – Southern Landfill Mgt., Inc. (601) 786-9997
Kemper County Kemper County Landfill Operator - Kemper Co. Landfill Company, L.L.C. (601) 656-5411
Lauderdale County Pine Ridge Landfill Operator – Waste Management, Inc. (601) 483-0715
Leflore County Leflore County Sanitary Landfill Operator – County & Santek Envir. of MS (601) 453-8550
Madison County City of Canton Sanitary Landfill Operator – City of Canton (601) 859-3245
Madison County Little Dixie Landfill Operator – BFI Waste Systems (601) 982-9488
Pearl River County Central Landfill Operator – Transamerican Waste (601) 795-2500
Perry County Pine Belt Regional Landfill Operator – Pine Belt SW Auth. (601) 545-6676
Pontotoc County Three Rivers Regional Landfill Operator – Three Rivers SW Authority/ Santek Envir. of MS (662) 488-0444
Scott County Clearview Environmental Control Operator – Chambers/USA Waste (800) 832-2937
Tippah County Northeast Mississippi Regional Landfill Operator – Northeast Authority/ Waste Services, Inc. (662)223-5445
Tunica County Tunica County Landfill Operator – Trashhunters, Inc. (662) 363-2282
Washington County Big River Landfill Operator – BFI Waste Systems (662) 335-1014
Winston County City of Louisville Landfill Operator – City of Louisville (662) 773-9201
APPENDIX C Notice of Intent to Permanently Close Underground Storage Tank System(s) Return Completed Form To Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality Office of Pollution Control P. O. Box 2261 Jackson, MS 39225-2261
Facility I. D. Number: Date Received by MDEQ: Complete and return this form within thirty (30) days prior to permanently closing tank system
I. Location of Tank System II. Ownership of Tank System
Name: Address: City: County:
Name: Address: City: State: ZIP: III. Date of Scheduled Tank System Closure
Month: _____________________
Day: ________________________ Year: _______________________ IV. Type of Permanent Closure
Tank & Piping Removal Tank Removal Only Piping Removal Only
Tank & Piping Closure in Place Tank Closure in Place Only Piping Closure in Place Only
Sand Concrete Virgin Drilling Mud Approved "foam"
Will any new underground Tanks Piping be installed at this facility? V. Underground Storage Tank System Information
Tank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Date of Installation Tank Capacity Substance stored throughout history of the tank (check all that apply)
gasoline diesel used oil kerosene other
VI. Contractor Information
Name of Company Performing Closure: Name of Individual Certified by MDEQ to Permanently Close USTs: Mississippi DEQ UST Certification Number: Expiration Date:
VII. Sampling Requirements
All sampling must be performed in accordance with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality's Underground Storage Tank Guidelines for the Permanent Closure of Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks.
Product Stored in Tank Media Analysis to be Performed Gasoline Waste Oil, Diesel, Kerosene Other than above Soil or Groundwater Soil or Groundwater Soil or Groundwater BTEX (EPA Methods 8021B, 8260B) PAH (EPA Methods 8100, 8270C, 8310) Contact Office of Pollution Control VIII. Owner Agreement Oath: I certify that the information listed above is true and correct to the best of by belief and knowledge.
Owner's Name
Owner's Signature
Date Signed Produced by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Pollution Control, UST Branch P. O. Box 2261, Jackson, MS 39225-2261 601.961.5171 /fax 601.961.5093 / www.deq.state.ms.us
Type of fill material to be used for Closure in Place 4/08
APPENDIX D UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM CLOSURE REPORT Return Department of Environmental Quality Completed Office of Pollution Control Form PO Box 2261 To Jackson MS 39225-2261 Location of Tank System Ownership of Tank System
Name ________________________________________ Name _________________________________________ Address ______________________________________ Address ______________________________________ City _____________________ County ______________ City ___________________State ____ ZIP ____________
Tank and piping removal _____ Tank and piping closure in place _____ Were any new tanks installed? _____ Tank removal only _____ Tank closure in place only _____ Was any new piping installed? _____ Piping removal only _____ Piping closure in place only _____ Number of active tanks remaining _____ Description of Underground Storage Tanks (Complete for each closed tank at this location.) I. Tank Information Tank No.
Tank No. Tank No. Tank No. Tank No. Tank No. Estimated age of tank in years. Estimated total capacity in gallons. Substance stored in tank. II. Tank Closure Information
Date product was removed from tank/piping (mm/dd/yy). Date tank/piping was permanently closed (mm/dd/yy). If closed in place, list the inert material used (sand, concrete, drilling mud approved foam material).
Disposition of excavated backfill material . Disposed of in landfill _______ Returned to excavation _______ Stockpiled on site _______ Aerating on site _______ Aerating off site _______
III. Site Assessment Information Date samples were collected. (mm/dd/yy) ____________ Was groundwater encountered (yes/no) ____________ Was there any soil staining apparent? ____________ Depth to groundwater (feet) ____________ Was there any free product noted? ____________ Were visible holes in tanks/piping? _____________ To be completed by the tank owner: (Please print or type all but signature) Date: Oath: I certify that the information concerning closure is true to the best of my belief and knowledge. Owner’s Name:
Owner’s Signature: To be completed by person certified by MDEQ to Permanently Close: Date: Name of person certified by MDEQ to close/remove:
MDEQ Certified Contractor’s Signature: MDEQ Certified Contractor’s Company:
MDEQ Certification No.: Produced by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Pollution Control, UST Branch P O Box 2261, Jackson, MS 39225-2261 (601) 961-5171 Fax (601) 961-5093 www.deq.state.ms.us 4/08 Facility I.D. No. __________________________ Date Received by MDEQ __________________ Note: All backfill materials must be handled in accordance with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality’s (MDEQ) Guidelines for the Permanent Closure of UST Systems. TYPE OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SYSTEM CLOSURE Submit the following supporting documentation with this Closure Report: 1. Lab analytical results of sampling 2. Sample Chain-of-Custody 3. Site Drawing 4. Waste manifests if tank sludges, water or backfill materials are disposed.
APPENDIX E CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Company Name:
Address: Location Name:
Address: UST Facility I.D. Number::
Sampler Name: Sampler Signature:
Number of coolers: Required Due Date (mm-dd-yy): Collection Analysis Required Lab Number Sample Identification Type of Container No. of Containers
Date
Time
Initials
Comp-C Grab-B
Soil-S Water-W
REMARKS
Relinquished by:
Date/Time: Accepted by: Date/Time: Relinquished by: Date/Time: Accepted by: Date/Time: Relinquished by:
Date/Time: Accepted by: Date/Time: Relinquished by: Date/Time: Accepted by: Date/Time:
APPENDIX F Industry Codes and Standards for Underground Storage Tank Closure or Change in Service "Removal and Disposal of Used Underground Storage Tanks", American Petroleum Institute Recommended Practice 1604, 1220 L St., NW, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 682-8000. "Cleaning Petroleum Storage Tanks", American Petroleum Institute Publication 2015. "Interior Lining of Underground Storage Tanks", American Petroleum Institute Publication 1631. "Criteria for a Recommended Standard...Working in Confined Space", The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. "Tank Closure Without Tears: An Inspector's Safety Guide", New England Interstate Environmental Training Center, 2 Fort Road, South Portland, ME 04106 (207) 767-2539. "Excavation & Trenching Operations", Occupational Safety & Health Administration Publication 2226.
APPENDIX G
BORING LOG FOR UST SYSTEM CLOSURE IN PLACE
DEPTH SOIL HYDROCARBON (FEET) TYPE VAPORS (PPM)
- INDICATE LOCATION OF EACH BORING ON CLOSURE DRAWING AND NUMBER ACCORDINGLY.
Type of Instrument utilized for field screening_______________________
Manufacturer of instrument ______________________________________
Date last calibrated (mm/dd/yy)_____________ ______________________
NOTE: Boring Logs for each borehole and the laboratory analytical results of all sampling must be submitted at the same time the "Notice of Intent to Permanently Close Underground Storage Tank(s)" form is submitted in order for the closure in place to be approved by the UST Branch.
TOP SOIL CLAY SAND CLAY SAND
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 850 (SAMPLE COLLECTED FOR ANALYSIS)
BORE HOLE NUMBER 1 *
APPENDIX H - DEFINITIONS Aliquot- Part of the whole. One sampling location may require two or more discreet containers in order to qualify as an adequate sample. Each sample container is an aliquot. Aquifer - Underground bodies of sand or gravel which contains groundwater. Backfill - All of the soil which was placed in the excavation when the tank system was installed. In UST systems installed after 1988, the backfill is normally easy to determine since tank systems were required to be backfilled with clean sand or gravel and these materials are easily differentiated from the native soil. BTEX - Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylenes, the four major components of gasoline. Convex Meniscus - Curved or rounded like the outside of a circle. Decontamination - A process in which to clean and remove contaminants from sample equipment and devices with detergent wash following a series of rinses with distilled water. Groundwater - For the purposes of UST closures, it is the naturally occurring water that seeps into the tank excavation from the aquifer. Headspace - The air space between the sample and the top of the closed container. Holding time - The length of time allowed between sample collection and analysis by the laboratory. Native soil - Soil which has been undisturbed by activities of man. PAH - Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Preservative - A chemical added to a water and/or soil samples to prevent deterioration or to maintain the original characteristics. Repair - To restore a piping system. Repair as utilized in this document means that some minor component, such as a flex connector or a coupling/union, of the piping system has been replaced or simply tightened. Septum cap - A sample container cap that has a membrane for extracting water with a syringe. Stockpiling - Storing excavated materials on site. Correct stockpiling requires putting the excavated material on plastic at a height not greater than 3 feet. A berm should surround the stockpiled material in order to prevent rainwater run-off. Teflon lined - A synthetic liner used to line the sides and caps of sample containers to prevent samples from sticking. VOC - Volatile Organic Compounds - chemicals which readily vaporize under normal atmospheric conditions.
Part 5, Chapter: 3 Underground Storage Tank Regulations for the Certification of Persons Who Install, Alter, Test, and Permanently Close Underground Storage Tanks (Adopted January 24, 1990; Amended September 28, 1995; Last Amended August 23, 2018)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.1 General Intent Rule 3.2 Legal Authority Rule 3.3 Definitions Rule 3.4 Applicability
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.5 General Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.6 Certification Requirements
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.7 Testing
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.8 Certification
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.9 Rule 3.9
Certification Renewals Rule 3.10 Continuing Education Rule 3.11 Lapsed Certification Rule 3.12 Revocation, Denial, and Non-Renewal of Certificates
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.13 Enforcement and Appeals Process
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.14 Property Rights
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.1 General Intent
The purpose of these Regulations is to provide for the certification and regulation of persons installing, altering, testing, and permanently closing underground storage tank (UST) systems which contain regulated substances. These regulations are promulgated to assure that UST systems are being installed, altered, tested, and permanently closed in a manner which will not cause or contribute to releases of regulated substances as defined in Section 49-17-403, Mississippi Annotated Code of 1972, and will protect the environment, the public health, safety, and welfare.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.2 Legal Authority
These regulations are promulgated pursuant to the provisions of the Underground Storage Tank Act of 1988, particularly Section 49-17-429, Mississippi Code Annotated of 1972, requiring that beginning on July 1, 1990, all persons who install, alter, or permanently close underground storage tanks must be certified by the Commission on Environmental Quality. Pursuant to Section 49-17-429, beginning on (6 months from implementation of regulations), all persons who perform testing on underground storage tank components must be certified by the Commission on Environmental Quality. Authority to issue certifications is hereby delegated to the Department of Environmental Quality through these rules.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.3 Definitions
All the definitions found in Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Regulations, Section 49- 17-403, are incorporated in these regulations. The following definitions also apply to these regulations:
A. "Alter" or “Alteration” means the correction or modification of a UST system, including but not limited to the replacement and repair of piping, valves, tank risers, vents, and any repairs to the tank.
B. "Certified Installation Contractor" means a person who has been certified by the Department to install, alter, and test UST systems.
C. "Certified Removal Contractor" or “Certified Permanent Closure Contractor” means a person who has been certified by the Department to permanently close UST systems.
D. “Certified UST Technician” means a person who has been certified by the Department to perform testing and non-invasive repairs to UST systems.
E. “Certified Cathodic Protection Tester” means a person who has been certified by the Department to have successfully completed a Department approved 3 rd party examination to test Cathodic Protection on a UST system.
F. "Critical Junctures," means the steps taken to install, alter, permanently close, or test a UST system which cause the greatest risk of release.
(1) In the case of installation, critical junctures shall at a minimum, include:
(a) preparation of the excavation immediately prior to receiving backfill, tank(s) and piping;
(b) setting of the tank(s) and piping, including placement of any t a n k anchoring devices, backfilling, and strapping;
(c) any time the components of the piping below ground are disconnected or are being disconnected or connected;
(d) all pressure testing of the UST system performed during the installation; (e) completion of backfill and filling of the excavation. (2) In the case of alteration, critical juncture, shall, at a minimum, include:
(a) all steps listed in F(1) above;
(b) excavation of existing tank(s),piping, secondary containment sumps, tank risers, spill buckets, or vents;
(c) actual performance of the alteration to the tank(s), piping below ground, tank risers, or vents; and
(d) any time the components of the UST system below ground are disconnected or are being disconnected, connected, repaired, or replaced excluding repairs classified as non-invasive.
(3) In the case of a permanent closure, critical juncture, shall, at a minimum, include:
(a) any removal and excavation of cover material and surrounding soil; (b) removal of the tank(s) and/or piping in the case of physical removal; (c) filling of the tank(s) and/or piping with an inert material; (d) purging or inerting the tank; and (e) sampling. (4) In the case of testing, critical juncture, shall, at a minimum, include:
(a) testing of the UST system; and
(b) any non-invasive repair required to test a UST system component or to non-invasively repair a component that failed during testing.
G. "Department" means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality. H. “Employee" means any individual who installs, alters, permanently closes, or tests UST systems for their employer.
I. "Install" or "Installation" means the work involved in placing an underground storage tank system or any part thereof in the ground and preparing it to be placed in service.
J. “Non-Invasive repair” means any repair that does not require a critical juncture equivalent to classification as an “Installation” or “Alteration”. A non-invasive repair shall include removal or installation of: dispensers, line leak detectors, over fill devices, probes, sensors, or other UST components approved by the Department. A non-invasive repair shall include repair to existing: sump penetration fittings, anchoring of shear (impact) valves, spill buckets, or other UST components approved by the Department as a non- invasive repair. It shall not include removal or installation of submersible turbine pumps (STPs), shear (impact) valves, or any repair that requires excavation or drilling.
K. "Permanent closure" means the physical removal of an underground storage tank system or the closure of an underground storage tank system in place whereas the underground storage tank system is made in-operable.
L. "Remove or Removal" means permanent closure.
M. "Sampling" means taking samples during the temporary or permanent closure process according to sampling procedures found in guidelines established by the Department.
N. “Test” or “Testing” means any activity following manufactures specifications, Department guidelines, or a Department approved industry standard to confirm adequate functionality of a UST component. Some testing may require activity classified as a non- invasive repair.
O. "Underground Storage Tank" or "Underground Storage Tank System" shall have the same meaning as defined in Section 49-17 403(s) of the Mississippi Code Annotated of 1972.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.4 Applicability
A. These regulations apply to all persons who install, alter, test, or permanently close underground storage tank systems in this state, except as provided in Rule 3.4.B below.
B. The provisions of these regulations do not apply to the installation, alteration, testing, and permanent closure of any underground storage tank system exempt from regulation under 49-17-403, Mississippi Code of 1972, or exempt from these regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.5 General Requirements
A. Beginning on July 1, 1990, no person may install, alter, or permanently close underground storage tank systems in this state unless that person holds current certification
from the Department.
B. Beginning on (6 months from implementation of regulations), no person may test or perform non-invasive repairs to underground storage tank systems in this state unless that person holds current certification from the Department.
C. A certified individual shall exercise supervisory control and be physically present at the work site during all critical junctures.
D. The requirements of these regulations are in addition to and not in lieu of any other licensing and registration requirements imposed by the state or any other governing authority.
E. A certified individual shall install, alter, permanently close and test underground storage tank systems according to the Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Technical Regulations, industry standards, and follow all applicable manufacture requirements for UST equipment installed or altered and any UST equipment used to test UST systems.
F. A certified individual shall ensure any UST equipment used to test UST systems are maintained, calibrated, and repaired in accordance with manufacture requirements.
G. A certified individual shall exercise reasonable care in the installation, alteration, permanent closure, and testing of UST systems so as to prevent and detect releases of regulated substance into the environment.
H. A certified individual shall be responsible for all work performed under their certification.
I. A certified individual shall notify the owner/operator in writing of any testing of a UST system component that fails routine testing and notify the owner/operator of their reporting requirements according to the Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Technical Regulations.
J. A certified individual shall be responsible for maintaining and making available upon request by the Department all applicable Department certifications and all applicable certifications from the manufacture (s) of the UST equipment they are installing or using to test a UST system specified in Rule 3.8 G.
K. A certified individual shall follow all applicable manufacture requirements for UST equipment to be: installed, altered, non-invasively repaired, and/or used to test UST systems.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.6 Certification Requirements
A. To be a certified installation contractor, certified permanent closure contractor, or certified UST technician of underground storage tank systems, an applicant for certification must meet the following requirements:
(1) be at least 18 years of age;
(2) complete and submit an application provided by the Department;
(3) pass appropriate examination(s) developed and given by the Department, with a score of at least 75%; (4) submit and maintain during the certification period current proof of financial responsibility in one of the following two ways if installing, altering, permanently closing, or testing UST systems not owned by the applicant or company named on the certification application:
(a) Certificate of Insurance that must provide and reflect
(1) at least $50,000 coverage of contractor's general liability insurance; and
(2) a 30- or 60-day cancellation notice period; and
(3) the Department as the certificate holder; or,
(b) a Certificate of Responsibility from the Mississippi Board of Contractors;
(5) submit letter from their employer stating that the applicant is an employee of said company and the following conditions exist:
(a) applicant is an employee of company and not the owner;
(b) The applicant will install, alter, test, and/or permanently close UST systems other than those owned by the company.
(6) submit proof of experience with UST systems by letter of employer, W-2s, or Department approved equivalent to confirm the following:
(a) Two (2) years of experience under an MDEQ licensed Installation contractor to become certified to install or alter USTs, unless otherwise approved by the Department.
(b) Two (2) years of experience under an MDEQ licensed Removal contractor to become certified to permanently close USTs, unless otherwise approved by the Department.
(c) Six (6) months of experience under an MDEQ licensed Installation contractor or MDEQ licensed Technician to become certified to test and perform non- invasive repairs to USTs, unless otherwise approved by the Department.
(d) Six (6) months of experience under an MDEQ licensed Cathodic Protection
Tester to become certified to test Cathodic Protection on USTs, unless otherwise approved by the Department.
B. If applying for certification to permanently close USTs, an applicant must provide a certificate showing completion of eight (8) hours of Department approved permanent closure-related course work and meet the requirements in Rule 3.6.A and F. of this rule.
C. If applying for certification to install, alter, or test USTs, an applicant must provide a certificate showing completion of eight (8) hours of Department approved installation, alteration, or testing related course work and meet the requirements in subsections Rule 3.6.A. and F. of this rule.
D. If applying for certification to test USTs and perform non-invasive repairs, an applicant must provide a certificate showing completion of eight (8) hours of Department approved testing related course work and meet the requirements in subsections of Rule 3.6.A. and F. of this rule.
E. If applying for certification to test Cathodic Protection, an applicant must provide a certificate showing completion of a Department approved third party examination to test Cathodic Protection on a UST system and meet the requirements in A.1, A.2, A.5, A.6, and F of this rule.
F. Applicant must resolve any outstanding violations, applicable fees or penalties to be paid to the Department before certification or renewal certifications are issued by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.7 Testing
A. The Department shall prepare examinations to determine an applicant's knowledge, ability, and judgment.
B. Applicants must meet all of the certification requirements within six (6) months from the date of receiving a passing score to receive certification. After six (6) months, an applicant must meet the requirements in Rule 3.6 and Rule 3.7.
C. Examinations shall be held at places and times set by the Department.
D. An applicant who fails an examination must wait at least 30 days before being retested.
E. An applicant who fails three examinations within 12 months shall not be retested until at least one (1) year after the date of his last examination, unless otherwise approved by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.8 Certification
A. The Department shall issue certification to applicants who meet all certification requirements.
B. Certifications for Installation Contractors, Permanent Closure Contractors, and UST Technicians shall be issued for a period of two (2) years.
C. Certifications for Certified Cathodic Protection Testers shall be issued for a period not to exceed their corresponding Department approved third party Cathodic Protection licensure.
D. A certified individual who changes employers must submit a revised certification application and meet the requirements in A.4, A.5,and A.6 in Rule 3.6, before a revised certificate will be issued.
E. An individual certified to install alter UST systems will be considered to have met the requirements for classification as a certified UST Technician.
F. An individual certified to install, and alter UST systems before (date of implementation of regulations), will be classified as a Certified Cathodic Protection Tester for a period of 2 years. After (two years from date of implementation of regulations), the individual certified to install and alter UST systems must be certified by the Department as a Cathodic Protection Tester to test Cathodic Protection.
G. An individual certified by the Department as a “Certified Installation Contractor” or “Certified UST Technician” must maintain any applicable manufacture required certification and / or recertification of testing equipment, test procedure, installation methods or installation procedures.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.9 Certification Renewals
Certificates issued by the Department as a Certified Installation Contractor, Certified Permanent Closure Contractor, and Certified UST Technician must be renewed every two (2) years. Certificates issued by the Department as a Certified Cathodic Protection Tester must be renewed before the date of expiration. An applicant for renewal must submit the following to the Department prior to their certification expiration date:
A. a completed Certification Renewal Application provided by the Department;
B. proof that continuing education hours were taken during the current two-year certification period and meet the requirements found in Rule 3.10, if applicable, and
C. proof that certifications in Rule 3.8.G are current.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.10 Continuing Education
A. Individuals certified to install, alter, t e s t , and permanently close UST systems must receive at least sixteen (16) hours of related continuing education during the two (2) year certification period unless otherwise approved by the Department.
B. Individuals certified to only permanently close UST systems must receive at least eight (8) hours of related continuing education during the two (2) year certification period unless otherwise approved by the Department.
C. Individuals certified to only install, alter, and test UST systems must receive at least (8) hours of related continuing education during the two (2) year certification period unless otherwise approved by the Department.
D. Individuals certified to only test UST systems must receive at least eight (8) hours of related continuing education during the two (2) year certification period unless otherwise approved by the Department.
E. Individuals certified to only test Cathodic Protection Systems must be recertified by the Department approved third party before the date of expiration listed on the current certification issued by the Department.
F. Individuals will only receive credit for attending Department approved continuing education courses.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.11 Lapsed Certification
If a Certified Installation Contractor, Permanent Closure Contractor, UST Technician, or Cathodic Protection Tester wants to become certified after their certification expires, they must meet all of the certification requirements in:
A. Rule 3.6 A.2 – A.6, and F, and if applicable, B, C, D, or E in Rule 3.6,
B. Rule 3.7 and
C. Rule 3.8 G.,
unless otherwise approved by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.12 Revocation, Denial, and Non-renewal of Certificates
The Commission may penalize, revoke any certificate, and deny any application or renewal application for good cause. Good cause may include, but is not limited to:
A. fraud or deception;
B. failure to use reasonable care or judgement in the performance of duties; C. incompetence or inability to properly perform duties; D. failure to follow provisions of Rule 3.5;
E. failure to follow provisions of Rule 3.6 A.4, and F; and
F. other reasons as the Commission may deem appropriate.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17 401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.13 Enforcement and Appeals process
A. Any interested party, including the Department, may request a hearing before the Commission as provided in Sections 49-17-31, 49-17-33, 49-17-35, 49-17-37, or 49- 17-41 or other applicable provisions of law. Hearings may be requested regarding any of the provisions of these rules, including but not limited to:
(1) penalization of a certificate holder;
(2) revocation of a certificate;
(3) non-renewal of a certificate; and
(4) denial of an application for certification.
B. A person who violates any provision of these regulations or of State law is subject to any actions and remedies allowed under State law.
C. Enforcement and appeals shall be in accordance with the Mississippi Underground Storage Tank Act of 1988, 49-17-401, et seq., and the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law 49-17-1, et seq.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-31, 49-17-33, 49- 17-35, 49-17-37, 49-17-41, 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 5, R. 3.14 Rule 3.14
Property Rights A certification issued by the Department or Commission does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights nor any infringement of federal, state, or local law.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-429, 49-2-9(1)(b), 49-17-17(i), 49-17-31, 49-17-33, 49- 17-35, 49-17-37, 49-17-41, 49-17-401, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
Part 6 Wastewater Pollution Control Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 6, R. 896 Rule 896
$28,304 $0.7M $0.56M N/A N/A 157.8 Harrison Co. UA /MS0034436 Decommission of Eagle Point Lagoon (SLT-05) *
215,311 $59,613 $1.0M N/A N/A N/A 158.8 Ocean Springs, City of/MS0045446 Sewer rehab *
18,958 $85,266 $5.1M N/A N/A N/A 163.9
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 4: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Not Meeting Final Limits) – Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Priority Points Possible Funding FY Population Median Household Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions)1 Lake Lorman UD/ MS0043401 WWTF upgrades (Phase II Limits) *
N/A N/A $ 1.0 M N/A N/A N/A 164.9 Lake, Town of/ WWTF improvements and sewer rehab *
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 6, R. 453 $59,629 $2.9M N/A N/A N/A 167.8 Canton Municipal Utilities/
Collection System Rehab, PS and WWTF Upgrades *
11,277 $39,623 $7.3M N/A N/A N/A 175.1 Raymond, City of/
WWTF upgrades (E. Lagoon) and sewer rehab *
1,879 $67,535 $7.7M N/A N/A N/A 182.8 Fayette, City of/ MS0025984 MS0026239 MS0027766 Sewer rehab (Phase I) and new collection (Phase II) *
1,375 $28,963 $2.6M $2.08M N/A N/A 185.4 Guntown, City of/ MS0023655 Sewer rehab *
2,489 $79,620 $ 1.0 M N/A N/A N/A 186.4 Starkville, City of/ MS003145 Sewer rehab *
25,060 $42,244 $3.0M N/A N/A N/A 189.4
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 4: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Not Meeting Final Limits) – Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Priority Points Possible Funding FY Population Median Household Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Wiggins, City of/ Sewer rehab * 2027 4,254 $50,643 $3.7M N/A N/A N/A 193.1 Harrison Co. UA / MS0051756 WWTF Upgrade and Replacement * 2027 215,311 $59,613 $4.1M N/A N/A N/A 197.2 Moss Point, City of/ Wastewater System Improvements *
12,158 $53,052 $4.6M N/A N/A N/A 201.8 Waynesboro, City of/MS0024228 Phase I, Relocation of POTW’s Discharge * 2027 4,333 $35,620 $2.2M N/A N/A N/A 204.0
- Calculations of Priority Points are incomplete at the present time.
Category 6: New Collection – Existing Buildings
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Priority Points Unsewered Residences Served Requested Funding FY Population Median Household Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Harrison Co. UA/ MS0049298 New collection (SP-03) 300.5 625
215,311 $59,613 $1.3M N/A N/A N/A 205.3 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0027537 New collection (SP-05) 99.1 359
215,311 $59,613 $1.3M N/A N/A N/A 206.6
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 6: New Collection – Existing Buildings- Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Priority Points Unsewered Residences Served Requested Funding FY Population Median Household Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Harrison Co. UA/ MS0036854 New collection (SP- 07) 33.1 115
215,311 $59,613 $0.4M N/A N/A N/A 207.0 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0040169 New collection (SP- 09) 23.5 84
215,311 $59,613 $0.3M N/A N/A N/A 207.3 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0057011 New collection (SP-02) 4.5 30
215,311 $59,613 $0.2M N/A N/A N/A 207.5 Baldwyn, City of/ MS0020087 New Collection 3.0 112
3,075 $45,410 $ 4.2 M $3.36M N/A N/A 211.7 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0042200 New collection (SP-04) 1.8 30
215,311 $59,613 $0.5M N/A N/A N/A 212.2 W. Jackson Co. UD/ MS0045446 MSU085050 New collection (consolidate/abandon failing lines) 1.32 100
145,751 $71,246 $7.8M N/A N/A N/A 220.0
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 6: New Collection – Existing Buildings- Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Priority Points Unsewered Residences Served Requested Funding FY Population Median Household Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Harrison Co. UA/ MS0051845 New collection (SP-01) 1.1 30
215,311 $59,613 $0.8M N/A N/A N/A 220.8 Coldwater, Town of/ MS0024678 Phase 4 New collection 0.2 12
1,287 $39,335 $ 0.7 M $0.56 M N/A N/A 221.5 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0043141 New collection (SP-11)
0.1 6
215,311 $59,613 $0.3M N/A N/A N/A 221.8 Harrison Co. UA/ New collection (SP-05) .001 1
215,311 $59,613 $1.0M N/A N/A N/A 222.8 W. Harrison WSD/ New collection * 120
215,311 $59,613 $1.8M N/A N/A N/A 224.6 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0029513 Nolehoe Creek Interceptor * 20,740
190,869 $88,029 $8.0M N/A N/A N/A 232.6 Crawford, Town of/ New Sewer Connections, WWTF Rehab * 46
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 6, R. 390 $48,010 $1.7M $1.36M N/A N/A 234.3
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 6: New Collection – Existing Buildings - Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Priority Points Unsewered Residences Served Requested Funding FY Population Median Household Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentat ion Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Columbia, City of/ Phase II, New Sewer Lines, LSs, FM * 183 2027 6,638 $34,849 $3.8M N/A N/A N/A 238.1 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0057011 New PS, 16,000 LF of FM * N/A 2027 215,311 $59,613 $12.9M N/A N/A N/A 251.0 Harrison Co. UA / MS0052574 New PS, 28,000 LF Sewer Lines * N/A 2027 215,311 $59,613 $4.0M N/A N/A N/A 255.0 Harrison Co. UA / MS0043141 New Low Pressure Sewer Collection * 100 2027 215,311 $59,613 $1.3M N/A N/A N/A 256.3 Jackson County Utility Authority/ North Vancleave Expansion Phase I * 400 2027 145,751 $71,246 $2.0M N/A N/A N/A 258.3 Laurel, City of/MS00241
New Service Phase I * 255 2027 17,287 $39,780 $5.0M N/A N/A N/A 263.3 Laurel, City of/MS00241
New Service Phase II * 255 2027 17,287 $39,780 $4.8M N/A N/A N/A 268.1
- Calculations of Priority Points are incomplete at the present time.
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST - Continued
Category 7: Wastewater Overflow/Bypass Elimination Projects
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Requested Funding FY Median House- Hold Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Greenville, City of/ MS0020194 Sewer rehab (Sarullo) F&W 28,129
$39,694 $ 0.6 M N/A N/A N/A 268.7 Greenville, City of/ MS0020194 Sewer rehab (North Theobald) F&W 28,129
$39,694 $ 0.3 M N/A N/A N/A 269.0 Vicksburg, City of/MS0022381 Sewer rehab F&W 20,712
$46,734 $18.3M N/A N/A N/A 287.3 Mt Olive, Town of/ MS0020699 Sewer rehab/repl F&W 867
$55,153 $ 0.5 M $ 0.4 M N/A N/A 287.8 Jackson Co. UA/ MS0045446 PS upgrade (Old Fort Bayou Road) F&W 145,751
$71,246 $3.6M N/A N/A N/A 291.4 Jackson, City of/ MS0024295 MS0044059 MS0030295 Sewer rehab (Phases I-VII) F&W 141,741
$47,671 $196.5M N/A N/A N/A 487.9 Greenville, City of/ WWTP and sewer repairs F&W 28,129
$39,694 $111.0M N/A N/A N/A 598.9
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST - Continued
Category 7: Wastewater Overflow/Bypass Elimination Projects - Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Requested Funding FY Median House- Hold Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Jackson Co. UA/ MS0043010 Sewer Reroute Phase 3 F&W 145,751 2027 $71,246 $5.5M N/A N/A N/A 604.4 Bay St. Louis, City of/ Sewer System Improvements F&W 9,274 2027 $66,417 $5.0M N/A N/A N/A 609.4 Jackson, City of (JXN Water)/ MS0024295 Phase 4 Mill St Sewer Replacement F&W 141,741
$47,671 $4.9M N/A N/A N/A 614.3
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Bude, Town of/ Sewer system rehab and replacement Rec 744 $26,636
$3.9M $3.12M N/A N/A 618.2 Quitman, City of/ WWTF Improvements phase 2 Rec 1,956 $43,783
$4.6M $3.68M N/A N/A 622.8 Stonewall, Town of/ Sewer system rehab Rec 867 $40,658 2027 $2.9M N/A N/A N/A 625.7 Starkville, City of/ WWTF Rehab and Expansion F&W 25,060 $42,244 2027 $7.4M N/A N/A N/A 633.1 Greenville, City of/ MS0020194 Sewer Repair and/or replacement of existing collection system facilities (Balance from SRF Loan 12) F&W 28,129 $39,694
$45.1M N/A N/A N/A 678.2 DeSoto Co.RUA/ MS0061271 Johnson Creek Interceptor Ext F&W 190,869 $88,029 2027 $5.7M N/A N/A N/A 683.9
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Harrison Co. UA/ MS0023159
WWTF upgrade (East Biloxi/Keegan Bayou) (SP-14) Rec 215,311 $59,613 2027 $ 2.7 M N/A N/A N/A 686.6 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0030333
WWTF upgrade (West Biloxi headworks) (SP-15) Rec 215,311 $59,613 2027 $ 2.7 M N/A N/A N/A 689.3 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0061221
WWTF upgrade (North D'Iberville) (SP-17) Rec 215,311 $59,613 2027 $ 0.3 M N/A N/A N/A 689.6 Verona, Town of/MS0042048 Sewer Rehab F&W 2,692 $49,346 2027 $ 2.0 M $1.6M N/A N/A 691.6 Morton, Town of/ WWTF upgrade and sewer rehab and possible new collection F&W 3,577 $29,067 2027 $14.1M $4.0M N/A N/A 705.7 Clarksdale Public UC/
WWTF upgrade and sewer rehab F&W 13,793 $36,782 2027 $15.3M N/A N/A N/A 721.0 Brookhaven, City of/
WWTF upgrade and sewer rehab F&W 11,599 $41,281 2027 $19.0M N/A N/A N/A 740.0 Laurel, City of/ MS0024163 MS0020196 Sewer rehab, new collection, & pumps F&W 17,287 $39,780 2027 $2.4 M N/A N/A N/A 742.4
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Decatur, Town of/MS0028908 WWTF Improvements Phase 2 F&W 1,910 $47,550
$4.0M $3.2M N/A N/A 746.4 Union, Town of/MS0025744 WWTF Improvements and sewer rehab Phase
F&W 1,976 $46,689 2027 $6.2M $4.0M N/A N/A 752.6 Vicksburg, City of/MS0022381 Sewer rehab (Stouts Bayou & Riverside Interceptors & Dorsey St FM)???? F&W 20,712 $46,734 2027 $8.0M N/A N/A N/A 760.6 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0051756 Sewer rehab (North Gulfport WWTF) (SLT-07A) F&W 215,311 $59,613 2027 $ 11.0 M N/A N/A N/A 771.6 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0051756 Sewer rehab (South Gulfport WWTF) (SLT-08A) F&W 215,311 $59,613 2027 $ 11.0 M N/A N/A N/A 782.6 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0043141 WWTF upgrade (Long Beach/Pass Christian) (SP-20) F&W 215,311 $59,613 2027 $ 1.4 M N/A N/A N/A 784.0
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Harrison Co. UA/ MS0061204
WWTF upgrade (South Woolmarket) (SP-16) F&W 215,311 $59,613 2027 $0.2M N/A N/A N/A 784.2 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 WWTF upgrade to Short Fork [(8 to 12MGD) and Access Rd], and Ross Road F&W 190,869 $88,029 2027 $22.6M N/A N/A N/A 806.8 Walnut Grove, Town of/ MS0020982 Sewer rehab (Phase 2) F&W 511 $48,607 2027 $1.1M $ 0.88 M N/A N/A 807.9 Walnut Grove, Town of/ MS0020982 Sewer rehab (Phase 3) F&W 511 $48,607 2027 $1.0M $ 0.8 M N/A N/A 808.9 Jackson, City of (JXN Water)/ MS0024295 Phases 1West Bank Interceptor Rehab F&W 141,741 $47,671 2027 $16.9M N/A N/A N/A 825.8 Jackson, City of (JXN Water)/ MS0024295 Phase 2 WWTP Improvements F&W 141,741 $47,671 2027 $20.7M N/A N/A N/A 846.5 Jackson, City of (JXN Water)/ MS0024295 Phase 3 Storm Cell Dredging F&W 141,741 $47,671 2027 $8.8M N/A N/A N/A 855.3 Waynesboro, City of/MS0024228 Phase II, Upgrades, Rehab, New Collection & Expansion of the Sewer System F&W 4,333 $35,620 2027 $2.2M N/A N/A N/A 857.5
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Batesville, City of/MS0024627 WWTF upgrade (incl new office and lab bldg.) F&W 7,146 $45,918 2027 $3.3M N/A N/A N/A 860.8 Harrison Co. UA/ WWTF upgrade (North Gulfport) F&W 215,311 $59,613 2027 $9.4M N/A N/A N/A 870.2 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0029513 WWTF upgrade (Ross Road Equal. Basin) F&W 190,869 $88,029 2027 $2.7M N/A N/A N/A 872.9 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 MS0062227 WWTF upgrade (Short Fork Biosolids Handling) F&W 190,869 $88,029 2027 $10.5M N/A N/A N/A 883.4 Crystal Springs, City of/ MS0041874 WWTF upgrade (incl. generator), sewer rehab (incl. PS SCADA) and new collection F&W 4,640 $45,115 2027 $4.0M N/A N/A N/A 887.4 Madison Co. WWA/ MS0057517 WWTF PS/FM upgrade (including VFDs) F&W 113,921 $83,515 2027 $14.1M N/A N/A N/A 901.5 Clinton, City of/ WWTF upgrade, sewer rehab, and new collection F&W 26,476 $73,291 2027 $12.5M N/A N/A N/A 914.0 Utica, Town of/MS0020613 WWTF upgrade and sewer rehab F&W 566 $42,832 2027 $3.3M N/A N/A N/A 917.3
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Silver Creek, Town of/ Sewer system replacement and rehab F&W 162 $50,704
$0.3M $0.24M N/A N/A 917.6 Tylertown, Town of/ Sewer system replacement and rehab F&W 1,451 $29,179
$1.0M $0.8M N/A N/A 918.6 Petal, City of/ Sewer system piping rehab Phase I F&W 10,915 $69,914
$5.1M N/A N/A N/A 923.7 Petal, City of/ Sewer system piping rehab Phase II F&W 10,915 $69,914
$5.1M N/A N/A N/A 928.8 Monticello, Town of/ Sewer system rehab and replacement F&W 1,466 $36,663
$0.6M N/A N/A N/A 929.4 Bassfield, Town of/ Sewer system rehab F&W 183 $35,000
$1.4M $1.12M N/A N/A 930.8 Jackson, City of/ MS0024295 Savanna WWTF upgrade (Phase 2- Long Term) F&W 141,741 $47,671 2027 $325.0 M N/A N/A N/A 1,255.8
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Jackson Co. UA/ Installation of new pump stations F&W 145,751 $71,246 2027 $7.5M N/A N/A N/A 1,263.3 Jackson Co. UA/ MS0045446 MSU085050 New Headworks, Mechanical Plant, and Spray Irrigation Phase 2 F&W 145,751 $71,246 2027 $47.5M N/A N/A N/A 1,310.8 Jackson Co. UA/ MS0045446 MSU085050 New Headworks, Mechanical Plant, and Spray Irrigation Phase 3 F&W 145,751 $71,246 2027 $2.5M N/A N/A N/A 1,313.3 Jumpertown, Town of/ Sewer Collection Facilities Rehab F&W 416 $58,571 2027 $1.1M 0.88M N/A N/A 1,314.4
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Harrison Co. UA/ MS0030333 West Biloxi WWTP Upgrades Rec 215,311 $59,613 2027 $15.4M N/A N/A N/A 1,329.8 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0043141 Long Beach/Pass ChristianWWTP Upgrades F&W 215,311 $59,613 2027 $25.7M N/A N/A N/A 1,355.5 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0061191 New FM and Pump Upgrades F&W 215,311 $59,613 2027 $10.3M N/A N/A N/A 1,365.8 Lumberton, City of/ Wastewater Lagoon and Sewer Main Improvements F&W 1,615 $45,205 2027 $2.7M $2.16M N/A N/A 1,368.5 Brandon, City of/ Sewer Line Rehab F&W 24,996 $83,674 2027 $24.1M N/A N/A N/A 1,392.6 Corinth, City of/ MS0061328 Phase I WWTP & PS Improvements F&W 14,031 $44,209 2027 $5.1 M N/A N/A N/A 1,397.7 Corinth, City of/ MS0061328 Phase II WWTP & Lift Station Rehab F&W 14,031 $44,209 2027 $5.1 M N/A N/A N/A 1,402.8
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 8: Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits)-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Median House- Hold Income Requested Funding FY Loan Amount Requested Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Brandon, City of/ Sewer System Rehab F&W 24,996 $83,674 2027 $3.3M N/A N/A N/A 1,406.1 Pickens, Town of/ MS0021130 Sewer System Rehab F&W 868 $28,969 2027 $2.1M N/A N/A N/A 1,408.2 Stone County Utility Authority/ WWTF and Sewer System Rehab and Replacement F&W 18,921 $57,242 2027 $3.2M N/A N/A N/A 1,411.4 Byram, City of/ Replace Lift Station F&W 12,227 $73,408 2027 $0.6M N/A N/A N/A 1,412.0 Greenville, City of/ Collection System Rehab F&W 28,129 $39,694 2027 $4.8M $3.84M N/A N/A 1,416.8 Rawls Springs UD/ MS0022314 Rehab Sewer Mains and Lagoons F&W 1,235 $59,726 2027 $2.3M N/A N/A N/A 1,419.1 Magee, City of/ Rehab Sewer Mains F&W 3,975 $42,605 2027 $4.1M N/A N/A N/A 1,423.2 Hattiesburg, City of/ MS0020826 MS0020303 Hattiesburg High Sewer Rehab Phase 2 F&W 47,360 $45,235 2027 $1.9M N/A N/A N/A 1,425.1 Hattiesburg, City of/ MS0020826 MS0020303 Katie, John & Dabb’s Rehab F&W 47,360 $45,235 2027 $4.4 M N/A N/A N/A 1,429.5 Hattiesburg, City of/ MS0020826 MS0020303 East Jerusalem Sewer Rehab Phases 1, 2, 3 F&W 47,360 $45,235 2027 $7.2 M N/A N/A N/A 1,436.7
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST – Continued
Category 9: New Facilities (Developmental) Projects
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Requested Funding FY Median House- Hold Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Harrison Co. UA/ MS0023159 WWTF upgrade (East Biloxi) (SLT-03) Rec 215,311
$59,613 $0.3M N/A N/A N/A 1,437.0 Jackson Co. UA/ New WW transmission (to Gautier WWTF) F&W 145,751 2027 $71,246 $7.2M N/A N/A N/A 1,444.2 Harrison Co. UA/ MS0051756 New collection (SP-10) F&W 215,311 2027 $59,613 $0.8M N/A N/A N/A 1,445.0 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Dry Creek Interceptor F&W 190,869 2027 $88,029 $3.0M N/A N/A N/A 1,448.0 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Lower Camp Creek FM F&W 190,869 2027 $88,029 $3.1M N/A N/A N/A 1,451.1 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Twin Lakes Interceptor F&W 190,869 2027 $88,029 $6.6M N/A N/A N/A 1,457.7 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Middle Coldwater FM/PS/Int F&W 190,869 2027 $88,029 $25.4M N/A N/A N/A 1,483.1 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Upper Coldwater FM/PS F&W 190,869 2027 $88,029 $7.6M N/A N/A N/A 1,490.7
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST - Continued
Category 9: New Facilities (Developmental) Projects-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Strea m Class. Population Requested Funding FY Median House- Hold Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) Harrison Co. UA/ MS0051756 New collection (SP-10) F&W 215,311 2027 $59,613 $0.8M N/A N/A N/A 1,491.5 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Dry Creek Interceptor F&W 190,869 2027 $88,029 $3.0M N/A N/A N/A 1,494.5 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Lower Camp Creek FM F&W 190,869 2027 $88,029 $3.1M N/A N/A N/A 1,497.6 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Twin Lakes Interceptor F&W 190,869 2027 $88,029 $6.6M N/A N/A N/A 1,504.2 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Middle Coldwater FM/PS/Int F&W 190,869
$88,029 $25.4M N/A N/A N/A 1,529.6 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Upper Coldwater FM/PS F&W 190,869
$88,029 $7.6M N/A N/A N/A 1,537.2 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Byhalia Creek Interceptor F&W 190,869
$88,029 $3.0M N/A N/A N/A 1,540.2
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST - Continued
Category 9: New Facilities (Developmental) Projects-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Requested Funding FY Median House- Hold Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Duck Pond Bayou Interceptor F&W 190,869
$88,029 $4.6M N/A N/A N/A 1,544.8 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Wolf Creek PS F&W 190,869
$88,029 $0.7M N/A N/A N/A 1,545.5 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Cub Lake/ Wolf Creek FM F&W 190,869
$88,029 $3.3M N/A N/A N/A 1,548.8 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Panther Creek PS/FM/Int F&W 190,869
$88,029 $6.2M N/A N/A N/A 1,555.0 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Highway 61 PS/FM/Int F&W 190,869
$88,029 $7.3M N/A N/A N/A 1,562.3 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Blue Springs Lake FM/PS F&W 190,869
$88,029 $1.5M N/A N/A N/A 1,563.8 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Lower Coldwater PS/FM/Int F&W 190,869
$88,029 $23.9M N/A N/A N/A 1,587.7
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST - Continued
Category 9: New Facilities (Developmental) Projects-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Requested Funding FY Median House- Hold Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Cub Lake Bayou PS/FM F&W 190,869
$88,029 $2.5M N/A N/A N/A 1,590.2 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 White’s Creek PS/FM F&W 190,869
$88,029 $6.0M N/A N/A N/A 1,596.2 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Hurricane Creek FM/PS F&W 190,869
$88,029 $11.1M N/A N/A N/A 1,607.3 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0061271 Hurricane Creek Interceptor F&W 190,869
$88,029 $6.8M N/A N/A N/A 1,614.1 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Braybourne/ Pine Crest Interceptor F&W 190,869
$88,029 $6.1M N/A N/A N/A 1,620.2 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Nonconnah Creek FM/PS F&W 190,869
$88,029 $7.0M N/A N/A N/A 1,627.2 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Nonconnah Creek Interceptor F&W 190,869
$88,029 $9.5M N/A N/A N/A 1,636.7
FISCAL YEAR – 2027 AND AFTER PLANNING LIST - Continued
Category 9: New Facilities (Developmental) Projects-Continued
Project/ Permit Number Project Description Stream Class. Population Requested Funding FY Median House- Hold Income Loan Amount Requested $ (Millions) Eligible Small/Low Income Subsidy Amount $ (Millions) Estimated Green Project Reserve Eligibility $ (Millions) Green Project Reserve Category/ Documentation Statewide Cum. Loan $ (Millions) DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Upper Coldwater Int. (North) F&W 190,869
$88,029 $11.7M N/A N/A N/A 1,648.4 DeSoto Co. RUA/ MS0058483 Upper Coldwater Int. (South) F&W 190,869
$88,029 $4.2M N/A N/A N/A 1,652.6 Petal, City of/ Evelyn Gandy Parkway F&W 10,915
$69,914 $1.0M N/A N/A N/A 1,653.6 Jackson Co. UA/ PS 8 FM to PS24 F&W 145,751
$71,246 $5.5M N/A N/A N/A 1,659.1 Jackson Co. UA/ Upgrade PS20 Phase 2 F&W 145,751
$71,246 $5.6M N/A N/A N/A 1,664.7 Byram, City of/ New Sewer Collection F&W 12,534
$78,725 $4.7M N/A N/A N/A 1,669.4
Abbreviations/Definitions
Co. Bd. of Sup. = County Board of Supervisors
Coll = Wastewater collection sewers which receive wastewater directly from residences and businesses.
Cont. = Contract
Drainage Basin = A region of land where water from rain drains downhill into a body of water, such as a river, lake, dam, estuary, wetland, sea or ocean.
HWY = Highway
Int = Wastewater interceptor sewers, pump stations, and force mains.
Rehab = Sewer system rehabilitation to remove excessive infiltration and inflow and/or to remove overflows and bypasses of wastewater.
Replacement = Replacement of collection and interceptor lines
Segment = Segmented project, a project for which the allowable costs exceed, in a given fiscal year, the amount that the Department can provide.
Trt = Wastewater treatment facilities.
Priority System for FY-26 Projects
D. Water Pollution Control Revolving Loan Fund Program Ranking and Funding Rationale (EPA/SP/Outputs)
- Projects will be ranked on one of the following three Priority lists.
“Green Project Reserve” Priority List – To be ranked on this list a project must meet the definition of projects described in any of the WPCRLF Priority System Categories as outlined in Section IV.E, below; and, at least 25% of the scope of work must qualify as “green,” as determined by EPA’s 2012 CWSRF 10% Green Project Reserve: Guidance for Determining Project Eligibility.
To ensure that “green projects” have a dedicated source of loan funds and will not have to compete with “regular” projects for funding, the Department is setting aside $6.5 million* in available funds for “green” projects. Any funds not obligated for “green project reserve” projects by September 15, 2026, may be released and made available to any eligible loan recipient on the regular or subsidy priority list, or to any project on the FY-27 and After Planning List which is ready for loan award.
- This includes $3,648,900 carried forward from FY25, plus the $672,000 and $2,219,481 allotted through the FY26 Annual and Supplemental capitalization grants, respectively.
During its solicitation of projects for FY-26 funding the Department did not receive sufficient eligible applications for green infrastructure, water or energy efficiency improvements, or other environmentally innovative activities to be able to obligate the specified percentage of the FY-26 allotment to “green projects.” Green projects are solicited in all of the Department’s annual outreach efforts, which include funding notification mailout(s), joint CWSRF/DWSRF exhibits with MSDH at six (6) different stakeholder conferences/tradeshows, and numerous presentations at stakeholder meetings/trainings. Unfortunately, there appears to be little or no demand from CWSRF eligible applicants (only public entities in Mississippi) for loans to fund green projects. Some of the CWSRF projects funded each year certainly contain components which would qualify as “green” (Variable Frequency Drives, high-efficiency pumps, SCADA, etc.) but there has been no prior efforts to track down to that level of detail, primarily because such green components had no impact the project’s receipt of funding. The Department will explore the possibility and practicality of future component-level green tracking if doing so could impact the funding of affected projects. In an effort to meet the “Green Project Reserve” objective, the Department intends to continue pursuing “green” projects, and carry any unobligated FY-26 “green” funds over into FY-27 to be obligated in the FY-27 Intended Use Plan.
Subsidy Priority List – To be ranked on this list a project must meet the definition of projects described in one of the WPCRLF Priority System Categories Two (2) through Eight (8) as outlined in Section IV.E, below. This list consists of two tiers. To be ranked in the higher-priority Tier 1, the loan applicant’s “Service Area” must have a population of 4,000 or less, and a Median Household Income
(MHI) of $40,000 or less. Within Tier 1, each applicant’s Service Area will be scored based on six “Affordability Factors (AFs)” as outlined in Part 2, Section III.O, below. To be ranked in Tier 2, the loan applicant’s Service Area does not have to meet the Tier 1 population and MHI thresholds, but the proposed “Project Area” must score at least one AF point. Within Tier 2 each Project Area will be scored using the same six AFs. Projects will then be ranked in their respective tiers based first on highest to lowest total AF score, then on lowest to highest Service Area Median Household Income (MHI), then on lowest to highest Service Area Population (Pop).
For the purposes of this section, “Service Area” is generally defined as the entire geographic area within the applicant’s political boundaries to which the applicant provides, or is authorized to provide, service. For municipal applicants, this would include any/all areas outside the city/town limits to which service is currently provided, and/or to which service will be provided by the proposed project, if determined appropriate and reasonable by MDEQ. For county applicants, a clearly defined area within the county which is to be served by the proposed project, and which is not within the political boundaries/service area of any other entity within the county, may be considered the service area and/or project area if determined appropriate and reasonable by MDEQ. “Project Area” is defined as the geographic area within the applicant’s Service Area which will be served by the proposed project.
The demographic data used in making these determinations shall be the latest available at the time of ranking from the on-line ESRI Business Analyst service (the same objective, reliable source which previously published the Community Sourcebook of Zip Code Demographics, historically used for such determinations since inception of the WPCRLF Program).
Projects ranked on this Priority List will be eligible to receive loan subsidy in the form of “principal forgiveness” equal to 80% of the total loan amount. After bids are received the subsidy amount will be adjusted, to reflect 80% of the amount resulting from subtraction of any included construction contingency from the total as-bid loan amount, provided adequate subsidy remains available for any needed loan increases. Notwithstanding the above-described subsidy percentage, the cumulative subsidy provided to any single recipient for projects ranked on this Subsidy priority list shall not exceed $4,000,000.
To insure that the subsidy-eligible projects have a dedicated source of loan funds and will not have to compete with non-subsidy projects for funding, the Department is setting aside $40 million** in available subsidy funds and approximately $10 million in base funds for qualifying subsidy-eligible projects. However, subsidy fund availability for these projects will be limited as described in Section IV.D.6. Any subsidy funds in excess of the statutory minimum, which are not obligated for subsidy-eligible projects by September 15, 2026 may be released and made available as non-subsidy “base” loan funds to any eligible loan recipient on the Regular or Green Project Reserve priority list, or to any project on the FY-27 and After Planning List which is ready for loan award.
** This includes $24,341,853 carried forward from FY25, plus the $2,688,000 and $10,875,456 allotted through the FY26 Annual and Supplemental capitalization grants, respectively, plus approximately $2,100,000 from FY26 subsidy loan decreases to-date.
Regular WPCRLF Priority List – All other ranked projects that do not qualify for the “Green Project Reserve” Priority List or the Subsidy Priority List will be placed on the Regular WPCRLF Priority List.
- Projects will be placed on the applicable priority list according to priority ranking and will be awarded loans based upon each project’s readiness to award.
-
The order of project categories in this Priority System reflect the Department’s mission statement, “... to safeguard the health, safety and welfare of present and future generations of Mississippians by conserving and improving our environment and fostering wise economic growth through focused research and responsible regulation” which is also consistent with EPA’s Strategic Plan - Goal 5 “Ensure Clean and Safe Water for All Communities” and Objective 5.2 “Protect and Restore Waterbodies and Watersheds.” The Department’s intent in developing this priority system is to fund projects in the order of greatest benefit to the public health and the environment, and within certain categories to assist those communities that are least able to afford the needed environmental facilities without a low interest loan available through this program.
-
The term "ready to award" means that all loan application requirements established in the program regulations are met, and all documents necessary for loan award are approved. If a project cannot reasonably be expected to meet the Priority System deadlines, then the project will not be placed on the current year priority list, but rather will be placed on the planning list. Loans will be awarded for projects within the available funds in the following order:
a. Projects on the current year priority lists that meet all Priority System deadlines will be funded when they are ready to award.
b. Should any project on the current year priority lists fail to comply with any of the deadlines in this Priority System, the funds reserved for said project will be released and made available to projects on the current year priority list that are ready to award, on a first-come first-served basis.
c. If it becomes apparent that the projects on the current year’s priority lists will not utilize all assumed available funds by the end of the current fiscal year, projects on the planning list that are ready to award will be funded from these remaining funds on a first-come, first-served basis.
d. Should less than the assumed funds become available, projects shown for funding in the current fiscal year that are ready to award will be funded as described above within the available funds.
e. Should more than the assumed funds become available from loan decreases, early loan payoffs, or other sources, these funds may be used for loan increases, to increase project amounts shown for funding in the current fiscal year, and/or to fund projects on the planning list that are ready to award, as determined appropriate by the Department.
f. Subsidy projects will be ranked and funds will be awarded as described in Sections IV.D.1 and IV.D.6.
- Coordination With Mississippi Basin Management Approach
Recognizing that the health and welfare of Mississippians, wildlife, fish and other aquatic life are directly affected by the quality of Mississippi’s waters, the Department began implementing the Basin Management Approach (BMA) in 1998. The BMA is a collaborative, interagency initiative designed to improve and maintain the quality of our water resources through comprehensive long-range water quality planning and management strategies. The BMA includes planning, data gathering, data assessment, Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) development, development of watershed management plans, and watershed project implementation.
In order to support the worthwhile goals of the BMA, higher ranking will be given to projects identified by the Basin Management Branch that implement watershed management plans to address water body impairments. These high priority BMA projects will be ranked at the beginning of each Priority Category beginning with the Raw Discharge Category through the Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits) Category. If a Priority Category is divided into various subcategories, these projects will be ranked at the beginning of each subcategory.
If more than one high priority BMA project is ranked in a priority category, these projects will be moved to the beginning of that category and or subcategory and will be ranked in accordance with the Priority System.
- WPCRLF Loans to Match EPA Special Appropriations Projects (SPAPs)
On August 16, 2001 EPA issued a class deviation from the provisions of 40 CFR 35.3125(b)(1). This class deviation will allow the non-federal, non-state match WPCRLF funds to be used to provide loans that can be used as local match for SPAP grants awarded to construct water pollution control projects.
These non-federal, non-state match WPCRLF loan funds will be made available to eligible SPAP grant recipients that are on the current year priority list for use as local match funds for their SPAP grants, provided the SPAP grant is for WPCRLF loan eligible work. Such projects will be funded in accordance with the Priority System, and until all non-federal, non-state match monies have been obligated or demand for such funds has been met.
- Loan Increase Reserve
Beginning in FY-2001 the Department began making loan awards after approval of the facilities plan and loan application rather than after completion of design. This change in the loan award sequence increases the likelihood that bid overruns may be greater than the construction contingency included in the loan agreement, and that additional loan funds may be needed to ensure that these projects are completed. In order to provide needed loan increases to existing loans, the Commission intends to set aside the amounts identified in Appendix A for such loan increases to be awarded on a first- come, first-served basis. Any funds not obligated for this purpose by the end of the fiscal year may be made available for new loans ready for award on a first-come, first- served basis from either the Priority List(s) or the Planning List.
If these loan increase reserve funds are exhausted during the year, and additional funds are needed for loan increases to cover bid overruns or other project cost increases to ensure that on-going projects are completed, the Department may use funds recovered from loan decreases or other sources during the year to fund such needed loan increases.
- Subsidy Increase Reserve
Due to the limited nature of subsidy funding, the amount identified in Appendix A will be reserved until September 30, 2026, for making subsidy increases after bids to subsidy-eligible projects funded prior to FY-2026. The total amount of subsidy resulting from any such increase shall be limited as outlined in Section IV.D.1. Any available subsidy funds not reserved, or obligated for such increases by September 30, 2026, may be made available first for subsidy-eligible projects funded prior to FY- 2026 which did not already receive full subsidization, then for funding new subsidy- eligible projects in priority order on the FY-2026 Subsidy Priority List, as outlined in Section IV.D.1.
E. Priority System Categories
- The first category of projects on the Priority List will be the Segmented Projects. These projects include any remaining segments of projects that previously received funding for an integral portion of that project, and are necessary for the entire project to be functional. Projects will be funded under this category in order of their regular priority ranking provided they meet the deadlines established in Section F.
In order to maintain continuity, the Commission intends to make some amount of funds available for each ongoing-segmented project. Preference in the amount of funds to be provided will be given to the projects that received the earliest loan award for their initial segment.
- The second category of projects will be the Previous Year Standby Projects. This category of projects includes projects that were listed on the previous year’s Priority or Planning List and met all applicable requirements for loan award in the previous fiscal year, but were not funded because of a lack of WPCRLF funds or did not receive an assurance of CDBG, ARC, RUS, CIAP or other match funding in the previous fiscal
year. Within this category, these projects will be ranked according to the current Priority System.
- The third category of projects will be the Raw Discharge Correction Projects for communities with sewage collection systems but no treatment facilities. This is necessary to ensure that the water quality problems associated with continuous discharges of untreated sewage from these systems are addressed as required by the federal Clean Water Act. Projects within this category will be ranked in order of the highest estimated discharge flow rate.
If a project in this category is identified as a high priority BMA project, that project will be ranked at the beginning of the list within this category.
- The fourth category of projects will be the Existing Facilities Upgrade (Not Meeting Final Limits) Projects. The scope of these projects may include only the upgrade, expansion, replacement, rehabilitation, and repair (including infiltration/inflow removal) of existing wastewater transportation and treatment facilities, or drinking water sludge discharge treatment facilities, necessary to bring the existing treatment facility into compliance with final effluent limitations, or to eliminate existing facilities not meeting final limits. Projects will be funded under this category in order of priority points, provided they meet the deadlines established in the Priority System. The priority points will be determined as established in Section G of this Priority System. These projects will not be considered for funding if a Commission Order schedule requires construction of these projects substantially prior to the Priority System deadlines
If a project in this category is identified as a high priority BMA project, that project will be ranked at the beginning of the list within this category.
- The fifth category will be Non-Point Source and Storm Water Pollution Correction Projects which may include program costs, conservation easements, sedimentation basins, levees, canals and other structures for the purpose of correcting non-point and storm water sources of pollution.
These projects must be consistent with any applicable Section 319 Management Programs approved by the Department of Environmental Quality. The projects within this category will be ranked in order of the highest receiving stream classification that is being negatively impacted by these sources of pollution.
Receiving stream classifications will be ranked in the following order: Public Water Supply; Shellfish Harvesting; Recreation; Fish & Wildlife; and Ephemeral. Within each stream classification, projects will be ranked by the highest acreage of runoff that is contributing to the non-point and/or storm water sewer pollution problem, and that will be addressed by the project.
If a project in this category is identified as a high priority BMA project, that project will be ranked at the beginning of the list within the subcategory where the project is currently ranked.
- The sixth category will be the New Collection – Existing Buildings Projects that are necessary to construct eligible sewers and treatment facilities for existing (at the time of facilities plan submittal) residences, businesses and public buildings. Projects in this category may not include the construction of wastewater treatment or transportation facilities to serve areas that are not developed at the time of facilities plan submittal.
The system for ranking collection systems is designed to give highest ranking to those projects serving an individual drainage basin within the loan recipient’s political boundaries that: 1) will correct the most potential health problems (this is described below by the term “Residences Served”) and 2) are most cost effective (this is described below by the term "Residences Served/Total Eligible Cost for Entire Project"). Priority points will then be calculated as follows:
Priority Pts. = (Residences Served) x (Residences Served) x 1000 (Total Eligible Cost for Entire Project)
If ties occur in priority points those projects will be ranked according to the highest number of residences served. The term "residences served" includes businesses and public buildings.
The term "Total Eligible Cost for Entire Project" means the total eligible cost to construct the collection and interceptor system for an individual drainage basin within the loan recipient’s political boundaries and to cause the wastewater treatment facility to meet final effluent limits at the time the collection project is predicted for funding.
Except as allowed in Section IV.E.11, collection sewers will not be funded prior to funding of the treatment portion of a project necessary to cause the wastewater treatment facility to meet final effluent limits.
If a project in this category is identified as a high priority BMA project, that project will be ranked at the beginning of the list within this category.
- The seventh category of projects will be the Wastewater Overflow/Bypass Elimination Projects. The scope of these projects may include only the replacement, rehabilitation, and/or repair of existing transportation facilities that are necessary to eliminate documented bypasses and/or overflows of raw sewage from these transportation facilities for a 2-year, 24-hour rainfall event, as documented in the facilities plan for the project and approved by the Department.
To be eligible for this category the bypasses and/or overflows documented in the facilities plan must have been reported, by the deadline for submission of the facilities plan, to the Department in accordance with the requirements of the loan applicant’s NPDES permit.
These projects will be ranked in order of the highest receiving stream classification that will be negatively impacted by the bypass and/or overflow. Receiving stream classifications will be ranked in the following order:
Public Water Supply, Shellfish Harvesting, Recreation, Fish & Wildlife, and Ephemeral. Within each stream classification above, projects will be ranked from the lowest to the highest median household income as displayed in the publication “ESRI Business Analyst Demographic and Income Profile Report”.
If a project in this category is identified as a high priority BMA project, that project will be ranked at the beginning of the list within the subcategory the project is currently ranked.
- The eighth category of projects will be the Existing Facilities Upgrade (Meeting Final Limits) Projects. Included within the scope of these projects may be the upgrade, expansion, replacement, rehabilitation, and repair of existing wastewater treatment and transportation facilities, including the removal of infiltration/inflow. The scope of these projects may not include the construction of new wastewater treatment or transportation facilities if none now exists.
These projects will be ranked first in order of the highest receiving stream classification that would be negatively impacted by wastewater should the facilities to be upgraded fail. Receiving stream classifications will be ranked in the following order:
Public Water Supply, Shellfish Harvesting, Recreation, Fish & Wildlife, and Ephemeral. Within each stream classification above, projects will be ranked from the lowest to the highest median household income as displayed in the publication “ESRI Business Analyst Demographic and Income Profile Report”.
If a project in this category is identified as a high priority BMA project, that project will be ranked at the beginning of the list within the subcategory the project is currently ranked.
-
The ninth category will be New Facilities (Developmental) Projects. These projects may include the expansion or upgrade of existing wastewater treatment and transportation facilities and the construction of new wastewater treatment and transportation facilities to accommodate future growth within the design flow for the planning area to be served. Transportation facilities may include interceptors, pump stations, force mains, and collector lines. The projects within this category will be ranked from the lowest to the highest median household income for the community, as displayed in the publication "ERSI Business Analyst Demographic and Income Profile Report”.
-
The tenth and final category will be Industrial Projects. The facilities to be built or upgraded under this category must be owned and constructed by a WPCRLF loan eligible public entity and may include industrial wastewater treatment and transportation facilities. The projects within this category will be ranked from the lowest to the highest median household income for the community, or nearest community, as displayed in the publication "ERSI Business Analyst Demographic and Income Profile Report”.
-
New collection sewer projects will be funded only under the New Collection – Existing Buildings category or the New Facilities (Developmental Projects) category.
-
The complete treatment portion of a project, as necessary to cause the wastewater treatment facility to meet final limits, must be funded prior to or along with any other project portion, except in the case of a recently acquired facility that has or will be given interim limits with a schedule to meet the final limits. In such case other project portions may be funded first provided the facility complies with the schedule to meet final limits.
F. Priority System Deadlines
- By November 1, 2025*, the loan applicant must submit to MDEQ the complete WPCRLF facilities plan, prepared in accordance with the WPCRLF loan program regulations and the “Guidance For Water Pollution Control Revolving Loan Fund Projects Funded Beginning Federal FY 2025 (October 1, 2024 and After).” A complete WPCRLF facilities plan includes all IGR agency comments; a copy of the public notice for the proposed project; copies of any comments received from the public; and, a summary of how each comment was addressed. The loan applicant should also submit one copy of the facilities plan to the Rural Utilities Service (formerly Farmers Home Administration) if the loan applicant has existing debt with Rural Utilities Service, along with a request for their approval to incur this additional debt.
Any significant changes made to the facilities plan (i.e., changes in the chosen alternative, location of the facility, cost increases that substantially affect the financial capability of the loan recipient, etc.) after this date will be considered as a first submittal of the facilities plan. The loan applicant will then be considered to be in violation of this Priority System deadline and the project will be placed on the planning portion of the Priority List, or if the change is made after adoption of the Intended Use Plan, funds reserved for this project may be released and made available to other projects.
-
By March 1, 2026*, a completed WPCRLF loan application and all associated documents required by the WPCRLF regulations and the “Guidance For Water Pollution Control Revolving Loan Fund Projects Funded Beginning Federal FY 2025 (October 1, 2024 and After)” must be submitted to MDEQ. Prior to preparing these documents the loan recipient and/or consulting engineer should request and attend a pre-application conference.
-
By August 1, 2026, all approvable documents and responses to Department comments necessary for loan award must be submitted to the Department for review and approval. Projects on the Planning List or projects on the current year list that had their funds released should also meet this deadline in order to allow for Department reviews/approvals necessary for loan award prior to the end of the fiscal year.
-
By September 15, 2026, any “Green Project Reserve” funds or subsidy funds in excess of the statutory minimum, which have not been awarded to a project may be released and made available to any project that is ready for loan award on a first-come, first-served basis.
*Note: Due to adequate funds availability, projects qualifying for subsidy funds for which this deadline was not met, but which are anticipated to become ready for award before the end of the FY, have also been included on the FY-26 Subsidy
Priority List, provided that their inclusion did not adversely impact funding for any projects which met the deadline.
G. Priority Point Formula for Existing Facilities (Not Meeting Final Limits) Category Projects.
- Priority points for these projects will be calculated using the following formula for each stream classification impacted:
Priority Points = (Stream Classification Factor) X (Existing Water Quality Problem Factor) X (Achievement of Stream Use Factor)
Calculation of Factors:
a. Stream Classification Factor - Factors will be assigned as follows based on the type of stream that the present wastewater discharge impacts: Stream Classification Factor
Ephemeral 1 Fish & Wildlife (Q 10/7 > 0) 5 Recreation 15 Shellfish Harvesting 25 Public Water Supply 30
Stream classifications for all bodies of water within the State have been established and adopted by the Commission on Environmental Quality as part of the State Water Quality Standards.
Recreational waters are those which have been classified as such by the Commission.
b. Existing Water Quality Problem Factor - Factors will be assigned based on the extent of the water quality problem presently caused by the existing wastewater discharge. The Dissolved Oxygen Problem Factor, the Public Health/ Bacteria Problem Factor, the Ammonia Toxicity Problem Factor, and the Chlorine Toxicity Problem Factor will be added to arrive at the total Existing Water Quality Problem Factor.
Water Quality Problem Factor = D. O. Problem Factor + Public Health/Bacteria Problem Factor + Ammonia Toxicity Problem Factor + Chlorine Toxicity Problem Factor + 1 (if a minimum of secondary treatment is not presently provided).
i. Dissolved Oxygen Problem Factor - This factor will be determined by use of the BOD, and flow values specified in the present limitations
of the NPDES permit, unless significantly different from present effluent characteristics. These limitations will be entered into the standard wasteload allocation formula and a minimum dissolved oxygen concentration in the stream will be predicted for the existing wastewater discharge. The dissolved oxygen deficit is the difference between the dissolved oxygen standard, which is normally 5.0 mg/l, and the predicted minimum dissolved oxygen in the stream.
This dissolved oxygen deficit is then multiplied by the stream miles (or equivalent stream miles) which presently have a dissolved oxygen concentration below the designated standard to obtain the Dissolved Oxygen Problem Factor as shown below:
Dissolved Oxygen Problem Factor = (D.O. deficit) x (Stream or Equivalent Stream miles below standard)
In order to rank all projects (on both inland and estuary waters) together, it is necessary to develop a relationship between stream miles impacted and estuary waters impacted. The term "equivalent stream miles" has been developed for estuaries based on the premise that the surface area of a body of water most directly represents the value of the water body in terms of a fisheries resource, recreational use, etc. In calculation of "equivalent stream miles" it is assumed that a typical stream width is 50 feet. The area (in square feet) of the estuary impacted, as determined by the math model, is then divided by {50 feet x 5,280 feet/mile} to give the "equivalent stream miles". Equivalent stream miles will only be calculated for bay-like estuary segments. All other estuary segments will be measured in actual miles like freshwater streams.
For streams impacted by more than one discharge, the D.O. problem factor will be determined by using the difference between the D.O. factor with all discharges and the D.O. factor considering the discharge in question removed. If there is more than one discharge
from the same project on the same stream, miles impacted will only be counted once.
ii. Public Health/Bacteria Problem Factor - This factor will be determined based on whether or not the existing discharge has a bacterial impact on Recreational, Water Supply, Shellfish Harvesting or Fish & Wildlife waters. Discharges into Ephemeral waters are considered to have no bacterial impact, unless a public health problem can be documented in the receiving stream.
A discharge into Recreational, Water Supply, or Fish & Wildlife waters is considered to have a bacterial impact on such waters if the discharge is not disinfected, or if present disinfection facilities are inadequate. A discharge is considered to have a bacterial impact on Shellfish
harvesting waters if the National Shellfish Sanitation Program Criteria are not met in the waters impacted by the discharge or if present disinfection facilities are inadequate.
Factors will be assigned for the bacteria problem as follows:
No Impact - 0 Bacteria Impact - 20
iii. Ammonia Toxicity Problem Factor - This factor will be determined by use of the NH
, and flow values specified in the present limitations of the NPDES permit, unless significantly different from the present effluent characteristics. If an NH
limit is not present in the permit, an NH
concentration typical of the effluent from the current facility will be selected. As with the Dissolved Oxygen Problem Factor, these limitations will be entered into the standard wasteload allocation formula and an in-stream NH
concentration will be predicted for the existing wastewater discharge. The NH
exceedance is the difference between the predicted maximum NH
in the stream and the acceptable concentration (EPA Gold Book) protective of aquatic life.
This ammonia exceedance is then multiplied by the stream miles (or equivalent stream miles) which presently have an NH
concentration above the acceptable level to obtain the Ammonia Toxicity Problem Factor as shown below:
Ammonia Toxicity Problem Factor = (NH
exceedance) X (stream or equivalent Stream miles above acceptable concentration)
iv. Chlorine Toxicity Problem Factor - This factor will be determined by the difference in the previously allowed chlorine concentration in the NPDES permit (usually 1.0 mg/l) and the new maximum chlorine concentration allowed in the NPDES permit which will be multiplied by a factor of 20.
Chlorine Toxicity Problem Factor = (1.0 mg/l - the new maximum chlorine concentration allowed in the NPDES permit in mg/l) X (20)
c. Achievement of Stream Use Factor - If the proposed project, along with other proposed projects in the planning area, will cause achievement of all water quality criteria then a factor of 2 will be assigned; except that if a stream exception has been granted a factor of 1 will be assigned. Also, a factor of 1 will be assigned when all water quality criteria will not be met.
-
The projects in this category which eliminate existing discharges will receive the sum of the priority points assigned to the discharges to be eliminated.
-
All portions of these projects (such as pump stations, force mains, sewer rehabilitation, and interceptors) that are necessary to cause the environmental problem to be
eliminated will receive the same number of priority points as that calculated for the existing discharge(s), to which the project portion is connected.
- Project ties in priority points, which are calculated in accordance with Section B., will be broken by ranking in order of the following ratio:
lbs. BOD Removed by Project Total Eligible Cost for Project
- Projects in this category that are not meeting final limits, but for which zero priority points are calculated (i.e., suspended solids violations, percent removal, BOD violations, etc.), will receive a minimum of 1.0 priority point, and will then be ranked in order of the stream classification of the receiving stream.
V. Table I - FY-2026 Water Pollution Control (Clean Water) Revolving Loan Fund Project Detail Information (EPA/SP/Outcomes)
Projects/ Permit Number Project No. Comm. Served Project Schedule* Project Assistance Technical Information BCD CSD CCD Type Assist Loan/Sub Amount
Int. Rate Repay Period First Repay. Type Project** Needs Category + Priority Ranking Discharge Req. DCRUA/ MS0061271 2026-1 DeSoto County 09/30/26 01/08/28 01/08/30 Regular Loan $87.3M 0.8% 20 Yrs 05/08/30 212 II 1 N/A Caledonia, City of/ MS0024805 2026-2 Caledonia 09/30/26 07/01/27 07/01/28 Regular Loan $4.3M 0.8% 20 Yrs 01/01/29 212 IIIB
N/A Brandon, City of/ MS0061743 2026-3 Brandon 09/30/26 03/30/27 03/30/28 Regular Loan $2.3M 0.8% 20 Yrs 08/30/28 212 IIIA 3 N/A Brandon, City of/ MS0061743 2026-4 Brandon 09/30/26 03/30/27 03/30/28 Regular Loan $2.3M 0.8% 20 Yrs 08/30/28 212 IIIA 4 N/A Brandon, City of/ MS0061743 2026-5 Brandon 09/30/26 03/30/27 03/30/28 Regular Loan $2.3M 0.8% 20 Yrs 08/30/28 212 IIIA 5 N/A Crawford, Town of/ MS0039560 2026-6 Crawford 09/30/26 03/01/27 03/01/28 Subsidy Loan $2.0M/ $1.6M 0.8% 20 Yrs 07/01/28 212 IIIA 6 N/A Lampton SD/ MS0061379 2026-7 Lampton 09/30/26 03/30/27 03/30/28 Subsidy Loan $1.9M/ $1.52M 0.8% 20 Yrs 07/31/28 212 IVA 7 N/A Crawford, Town of/ MS0039560 2026-8 Crawford 09/30/26 01/23/27 06/07/28 Subsidy Loan $1.6M/ $1.28M 0.8% 20 Yrs 10/07/28 212 II 8 N/A Prentiss, Town of/ MS0029033 2026-9 Prentiss 09/30/26 01/23/28 11/18/28 Subsidy Loan $0.7M/ $0.56M 0.8% 20 Yrs 05/15/29 212 IIIA 9 N/A Magee, City of/ MS0024911 2026-
Magee 09/30/26 03/30/27 03/30/28 Subsidy Loan $4.1M/ $3.28M 0.8% 20 Yrs 06/30/28 212 IIIA 10 N/A Booneville, City of/ MS0042030 2026-
Booneville 09/30/26 04/01/27 03/26/28 Subsidy Loan $5.1M/ $2.0M 0.8% 20 Yrs 09/26/28 212 IIIB 11 N/A Hattiesburg, City of/MS0020826, MS0020303 2026-
Hattiesburg 09/30/26 02/06/28 01/22/29 Subsidy Loan $1.3M/ $1.04M 0.8% 20 Yrs 01/31/29 212 IIIA 12 N/A Nettleton, City of/ MS0047660 2026-
Nettleton 09/30/26 02/06/27 11/03/27 Subsidy Loan $5.1M/ $4.0M 0.8% 20 Yrs 12/03/27 212 IIIA 13 N/A Greenville, City of/ MS0020194 2026-
Greenville 09/30/26 03/30/27 03/30/28 Subsidy Loan $1.8M/ $1.44M 0.8% 20 Yrs 08/30/28 212 IIIA 14 N/A Hattiesburg, City of/MS0020826, MS0020303 2026-
Hattiesburg 09/30/26 02/06/28 01/22/29 Subsidy Loan $1.0M/ $0.8M 0.8% 20 Yrs 01/31/29 212 IIIA 15 N/A Booneville, City of/ MS0042030 2026-
Booneville 09/30/26 04/01/27 03/26/28 Subsidy Loan $5.1M/ $2.0M 0.8% 20 Yrs 09/26/28 212 IIIB 16 N/A Columbia, Town of/ MS0044164 2026-
Columbia 09/30/26 03/30/27 03/30/28 Subsidy Loan $3.7M/ $2.96M 0.8% 20 Yrs 07/30/28 212 IIIB 17 N/A
$131.9M/ $22.48M
Notes: + = Needs categories are defined in Federal regulations 40 CFR 35.2015. *BCD = Binding Commitment Date; CSD = Construction Start Date; CCD = Construction Completion Date **212 = Treatment works are defined in Section 212 of the Federal Clean Water Act; 319 = Best Management Practices are defined in Section 319 of the Federal Clean Water Act.
Loan amounts have been rounded up to the next $100,000. Subsidy amounts rounded up to the nearest $10,000.
Table II – Current Intended Equivalency-Subsidy Allocations (EPA/SP/Outcomes) –
Project/Permit Number Overall Total Project Cost Equivalency Subsidy Yr./Cap. Grant Amount Total Yr./Cap. Grant Amount Total FY2025 Annual Cap Grant Equivalency Allocation (Available FY25 Annual for Obligation) DeSoto Co. RUA/MS0061271 $ 87,300,000.00 25/Annual $ 5,324,360.00 $ 5,324,360.00 FY2026 Annual Cap Grant Equivalency Allocation DeSoto Co. RUA/MS0061271 $ 87,300,000.00 26/Annual $ 6,720,000.00 $ 6,720,000.00 FY26 Supplemental Cap Grant Equivalency Allocation DeSoto Co. RUA/MS061271 $ 87,300,000.00 26/IIJA $ 22,194,810.00 $ 22,194,810.00 Caledonia, City of/MS0024805 $ 4,300,000.00 N/A N/A N/A
Brandon, City of/MS0061743 $2,300,000.00 N/A N/A N/A Brandon, City of/MS0061743 $2,300,000.00 N/A N/A N/A Brandon, City of/MS0061743 $2,300,000.00 N/A N/A N/A FY Subsidy decreases available for FY26 obligation ($ 2,242,628.43) Crawford, Town of/MS0039560 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 1,600,000.00 $ 1,600,000.00 Lampton, Sewer District/MS0061379 $ 1,900,000.00 $ 642,628.43 $ 2,242,628.43 FY2024 IIJA Subsidy Allocation ($ 7,748,703.04) Lampton Sewer District/MS0061379 $ 1,900,000.00 24/IIJA $ 877,371.57 $ 877,371.57 Crawford, Town of/MS0039560 $ 1,600,000.00 24/IIJA $ 1,280,000.00 $ 2,157,371.57 Prentiss, Town of/MS0029033 $ 700,000.00 24/IIJA $560,000.00 $ 2,717,371.57 Magee, City of/MS0024911 $ 4,100,000.00 24/IIJA $ 3,280,000.00 $ 5,997,371.57 Boonville, City of/MS0042030 $ 5,100,000.00 24/IIJA $ 1,751,331.47 $ 7,748,703.04 FY2025 Annual Subsidy Allocation ($5,717,600.00) Boonville, city of/MS0042030 (Cont’d) $ 5,100,000.00 25/Annual $ 2,248,668.53 $ 2,248,668.53 Hattiesburg, City of/MS0020826, MS0020303) $ 1,300,000.00 25/Annual $ 1,040,000.00 $ 3,288,668.53 Nettleton, City of/MS0047660 $ 5,100,000.00 25/Annual $ 2,428,931.47 $ 5,717,600.00 FY2025 IIJA Subsidy Allocation ($10,875,550.00) Nettleton, City of/MS0047660 (Cont’d) $ 5,100,000.00 25/IIJA $ 1,571,068.53 $ 1,571,068.53 Greenville, City of/MS0020194 $ 1,800,000.00 25/IIJA $ 1,440,000.00 $ 3,011,068.53
Hattiesburg, City of/MS0020826, MS0020303 $ 1,000,000.00 25/IIJA $ 800,000.00 $ 3,811,068.53 Columbia, Town of/MS0044164 $ 3,700,000.00 25/IIJA $ 2,960,000.00 $ 6,771,068.53 Coldwater, Town of/MS0024678 $ 3,100,000.00 25/IIJA $ 2,480,000.00 $ 9,251,068.53 Coldwater, Town of MS0026934 $ 1,600,000.00 25/IIJA $ 1,280,000.00 $ 10,531,068.53 Coldwater, Town of/MS0026934 $ 1,300,000.00 25/IIJA $ 240,000.00 $ 10,771,068.53 Vaiden, City of $ 700,000.00 25/IIJA $ 104,481.47 $ 10,875,550.00 FY2026 Annual Subsidy Allocation ($ 2,668,000.00) Vaiden, City of (Cont’d) $ 700,000.00 26/Annual $ 455,518.53 $ 455,518.53 Fayette, City of/MS0025984, MS0026239, MS0027766 $ 2,600,000.00 26/Annual $ 2,080,000.00 $ 2,535,518.53 Baldwyn, City of/MS0020087 $ 4,200,000.00 26/Annual $ 152,481.47 $ 2,688,000.00 FY2026 IIJA Subsidy Allocation ($10,875,456.90) Baldwyn, City of/MS0020087 $ 4,200,000.00 26/IIJA $ 3,207,518.53 $ 3,207,518.53 Crawford, Town of $ 1,700,000.00 26/IIJA $ 1,120,000.00 $ 4,327,518.53 Mt. Olive, Town of/MS0020699 $ 500,000.00 26/IIJA $ 400,000.00 $ 4,727,518.53 Bude, Town of $ 3,900,000.00 26/IIJA $ 3,120,000.00 $ 7,847,518.53 Quitman, City of/ $ 4,600,000.00 26/IIJA $ 3,027,838.37 $ 10,875,456.90
VI. FY-2026 Assumed Available Funds
A. Federal Funds
In developing this Intended Use Plan the Department has assumed a FY-26 Title VI Clean Water SRF appropriations of $1,638,861,000 and FY-26 IIJA Supplemental General appropriation of $2,603,000,000, pending EPA’s allotment notification.
MDEQ has historically utilized the “standard” cash draw ratio of 83.3% federal funds and 16.7% state funds but in FY-24 implemented the alternate approach outlined in 40CFR35.3155(d)(5)(ii) where the entire amount of the required state match will be disbursed on eligible loan projects before any associated capitalization grant funds are drawn; then, the Federal proportional share drawn from the capitalization grant will be 100%. This approach is being applied, not only to FY-24 and after capitalization grants, but also, retroactively, to all prior capitalization grants that remain open and any associated match.
B. State Match Funds
The State normally receives its 20% state match from direct appropriation or state general obligation bonds appropriated by the state legislature, and from interest earnings on state match deposits. During the June 2025 special legislative session, the Legislature provided direct appropriations in the amount of $6,023,286 for match. These funds were used to match the remainder of the FY-25 Annual/Base capitalization grant, and $16,870,640 of the FY-25 IIJA Supplemental General capitalization grant. During the Spring 2026 regular legislative session, the Legislature provided direct appropriations in the amount of $6,868,000 for match. These funds will be used to match the remainder of the FY-25 IIJA Supplemental General capitalization grant, the FY-26 Annual/Base capitalization grant, and the FY-26 IIJA Supplemental General capitalization grant. The appropriated match funds are anticipated to be fully deposited and available for use by January 1, 2027.
If the State Legislature provides match in the form of state general obligation bonds, then it is anticipated that the Legislature will require that these state bonds be retired with the interest portion of loan repayments and interest earnings on the fund deposits. The Department will set aside a portion of the interest earnings from loan repayments and interest earnings on fund deposits and will use these funds to make semi-annual payments to the Mississippi State Treasurer’s Office. These semi-annual payments will be used to retire the bonds and pay interest on the outstanding bonds. The amounts of interest repayments and earnings set aside for this purpose will be shown on Appendix A – Assumed Available Funds in the FY-2026 IUP.
C. WPCRLF Loan Repayments
In FY-26 the Department plans to make available for obligation, projected WPCRLF loan repayments (from existing closed loans) through September 2028.
VII. Proposed Payment (Federal Letter of Credit {LOC}) Schedule for FY-2026. Clean Water SRF Cap. Grants, based upon Appendix A:
Payment Payment Payment Cumulative (LOC) (LOC) (LOC) (LOC) Number Date Amount Amount
FY-2025 Sup/Gen 2Q FY-2027 $ 5,324,360 $ 5,324,360 No. 1 of 1
FY-2026 Ann/Base 3Q FY-2027 $ 6,720,000 $ 12,044,360 No. 1 of 1
FY-2026 Sup/Gen 4Q FY-2027 $ 22,194,810 $ 34,239,170 No. 1 of 1
VIII. Projected Schedule of Drawdowns Against Federal Letter of Credit, based upon Appendix A:
For FY 2025 SRF Sup/Gen Cap Grant: (See Appendix B).
Outlay Federal Cumulative Quarter Outlay Amount Outlay Amount
2Q FY-27 $ 1,985,128 $ 1,985,128
3Q FY-27 $ 3,339,232 $ 5,324,360
For FY 2026 SRF Ann/Base Cap Grant: (See Appendix B).
Outlay Federal Cumulative Quarter Outlay Amount Outlay Amount
3Q FY-27 $ 4,566,768 $ 4,566,768
4Q FY-27 $ 2,153,232 $ 6,720,000
For FY 2026 SRF IIJA Sup Cap Grant: (See Appendix B).
Outlay Federal Cumulative Quarter Outlay Amount Outlay Amount
4Q FY-27 $ 4,657,806 $ 4,657,806
1Q FY-28 $ 11,100,000 $ 15,757,806
2Q FY-28 $ 6,437,004 $ 22,194,810
IX. Certifications
-
The State certifies that all treatment works for funding under this Intended Use Plan are or will be in compliance with Section 205(j), 319 and/or 320 planning and that all non-point source control and estuarine projects are or will be consistent with planning under Sections 319 and/or 320.
-
The State certifies that it will make an annual report to the Regional Administrator on the actual use of funds and how the State has met the goals and objectives for the previous fiscal year as identified in the IUP; and to annually have conducted an independent audit of the fund to be conducted in accordance with generally accepted government accounting standards.
-
The State certifies that this Intended Use Plan has been subjected to public review and comment prior to final submission to EPA. The review includes a public notice (30 days) which indicates that the draft IUP is available for viewing and downloading at www.mdeq.ms.gov/cwsrf. Written or verbal comments are solicited and can be submitted to the Construction Branch or in person at the public hearing that is held at the conclusion of the public review period. Any comments submitted, along with Agency responses, are collected and transcribed and provided to the Commission when the draft IUP is submitted for final adoption.
-
The State certifies that all wastewater facility projects in this Intended Use Plan are on the project Priority List developed pursuant to the requirements of Section 216, CWA.
-
The State certifies that it will enter into binding commitments for 120% of the amount of each payment (LOC) under the capitalization grant within one year after receipt of each payment (LOC).
-
The State certifies that it will expend all funds in the WPCRLF in an expeditious and timely manner.
-
The State certifies that all wastewater facilities in the State are in compliance with enforceable requirements or are making progress toward meeting those requirements.
-
The State certifies that it will conduct environmental reviews on treatment works projects in accordance with the State environmental review process.
-
The State certifies that all POTWs listed on the national Municipal Policy List are either in compliance with their final limits, have an enforcement action filed against them, or have a funding commitment during or prior to the first year covered by this IUP.
X. Expected Environmental Outcomes and Performance Measures (EPA/SP/Outcomes)
The objective of this program is to disperse all loan funds available in a timely manner in order to achieve the intended cost-effective environmental protection benefits, and to ensure compliance with loan agreements, as required by state and federal laws and regulations.
The State has historically entered data into the EPA CBR system and provided the one-page worksheet for all binding commitments, as requested by EPA to comply with EPA Order 5700.7. Though CBR no longer exists, the State now enters data for all binding commitments into the new EPA Data System and can provide related data if requested by EPA.
Part 7 Surface Water and Groundwater Use and Protection, Licensing of Water Well Contractors and Dam Safety Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.1 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.2 Permitting
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.3 Surface Water Diversions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.4 Groundwater Withdrawals
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.5 Confidential Information
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.6 Enforcement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.7 Correspondence and Adequacy Notice ________________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.1 Definitions
The words and phrases used in this regulation shall have the meanings set forth in this section.
A. Annular Space — the space between the borehole wall and the well casing or screen, or the space between a casing pipe and a liner pipe or between two strings of casing.
B. Applicant — any person who submits an application to obtain a permit to divert, store, or withdraw waters of the state.
C. Aquifer — a geologic formation, hydraulically connected group of formations, or part of a formation that can yield water to a well or spring
(1) Confined Aquifer (Commonly referred to as artesian aquifers) – a permeable geologic layer or zone saturated with groundwater isolated from the atmosphere by impermeable confining layers. The groundwater in confined aquifers is subjected to pressures higher than atmospheric pressure so that water in a well penetrating the aquifer will rise to some
level above the actual top of the aquifer.
(2) Unconfined Aquifer (Commonly referred to as water table aquifers) – a permeable geologic layer or zone saturated with groundwater at atmospheric pressure. These aquifers are generally not overlain by impermeable confining layers and may be vulnerable to contamination from surface activities or events that discharge pollutants on the ground.
D. Artesian —groundwater under sufficient hydrostatic pressure to rise above the aquifer containing it.
E. Beneficial use — the application of water, excluding waste of water, to a purpose that produces economic or other tangible or intangible benefits to the state and its citizens. Such uses include, but are not limited to, diversions or withdrawals for public, industrial, or agricultural use.
F. Commission – the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, or its designee.
G. Conjunctive use — the use of two (2) or more sources of water to provide the total supply of water needed for a proposed use.
H. Days — calendar days, unless specifically indicated otherwise in the body of this regulation.
I. Decommissioning — the complete and permanent sealing of a well bore to prevent contamination of the aquifer.
J. Diversion — the act of bringing surface water under control by means of a well, pump, dam or other man-made device for delivery and distribution for a proposed beneficial use.
K. Domestic use — the use of water for ordinary household purposes, the watering of noncommercial farm livestock, poultry, and domestic animals, and the irrigation of home gardens and lawns.
L. Established minimum flow — "Established minimum flow" means the minimum flow for a given stream at a given point thereon as determined and established by the commission when reasonably required for the purposes of this chapter. "Minimum flow" is the average streamflow rate over seven (7) consecutive days that may be expected to be reached as an annual minimum no more frequently than one (1) year in ten (10) years (7Q10), or any other streamflow rate that the commission may determine and establish using generally accepted scientific methodologies considering biological, hydrological and hydraulic factors.
M. Established average minimum lake level — "Established average minimum lake levels" means the average minimum lake levels for a given lake as determined and established by the commission when reasonably required for the purposes of this regulation. The "average minimum lake level" is that level which shall not be expected to be reached as
an average annual minimum no more frequently than one (1) year in ten (10) years, or such other minimum lake level that the commission may determine and establish using generally accepted scientific methodologies considering biological, hydrological and hydraulic factors.
N. Filter pack — smooth, uniform, clean sand or gravel placed in the annular space between the borehole wall and well screen to prevent sediments from entering the screen.
O. Fresh water — water having a Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentration of less than 1,000 parts per million (ppm).
P. Geotechnical boring — a hole constructed for the purpose of sampling, measuring, or testing for scientific, engineering, geological or regulatory purposes.
Q. Groundwater — water occurring beneath the surface of the ground.
R. Grout — a fluid mixture of cement and water, with additives such as sand, bentonite, or hydrated lime, or a mixture of bentonite and water, capable of producing a water-tight seal, that can be forced through a pipe or placed in an annular space, as required for sealing a well or an annular space to protect against intrusion of contamination.
S. Halliburton Method – a method of grouting casing whereby slurry is forced down and out the bottom of the casing into the annular space between the borehole wall and the casing. The grouting is continued until slurry returns are obtained at the ground surface.
T. Impoundment — a man-made dammed, leveed, or diked area designed to store liquids above water levels that would occur under natural conditions.
U. Landowner — the person, or persons, holding legal title to the surface of the land upon which a withdrawal or diversion of water is located.
V. MDEQ – the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
W. Mining of an Aquifer – the withdrawal of groundwater from hydrologically connected water-bearing formations at rates determined by the Commission to jeopardize the longterm viability of the aquifer as a source of water for existing and projected beneficial beneficial uses.
X. Municipal use — the use of water by a municipal government and the inhabitants thereof, primarily to promote the life, safety, health, comfort and business pursuits of the inhabitants. It does not include the irrigation of crops within the corporate boundaries.
Y. OLWR – the Office of Land and Water Resources of MDEQ.
Z. Permitted use and “Permittee”
(1) The use of a specific amount of water at a specific time and at a specific place,
authorized and allotted by the board for a designated beneficial purpose within the specific limits as to quantity, time, place and rate of diversion and withdrawal; or
(2) The right to the use of water as specified in the permit, subject to the provisions of Mississippi Code Annotated Section 51-3-5, including the construction of waterworks or other related facilities.
(3) "Permittee" means the person who obtains a permit from the board authorizing him to take possession by diversion or otherwise and to use and apply an allotted quantity of water for a designated beneficial use and who makes actual use of the water for such purpose, or his successor.
AA. Person — the state or other agency or institution thereof, any municipality, political subdivision, public or private corporation, individual, partnership, association or other entity, and including any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality, political subdivision, or public or private corporation, or the United States or any officer or employee thereof.
BB. Plugging — see ‘Decommissioning’.
CC. Potable Water — water that is suitable for human consumption and meets all primary drinking water standards (Maximum Contaminant Levels) set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
DD. Potential Sources of Contamination – sites or facilities that use, store, and/or dispose of substances (on site) that, due to their quantity, toxicity, and/or mobility, could impact the water quality of aquifers used for potable water supply. Examples of such sources include, but are not limited to, failing or inadequate individual sewage treatment and disposal systems, tanks used for bulk storage of petroleum products, Class V injection wells, container and drum storage sites, etc.
EE. Preliminary Assessment Report – a pre-construction assessment of the susceptibility of a public water system well or surface water intake to becoming contaminated by potential sources of contamination within a delineated protection area.
FF. Protection Area—an area delineated around a public water system wellhead that defines the groundwater capture zone of the well, or an area of concern delineated for a public surface water system intake. It corresponds to the area where efforts should be focused to identify potential sources of contamination that could impact the quality of the groundwater or surface water supply.
GG. Public Water System –a system for the provision to the public of water for human consumption through pipes or, after August 5, 1998, other conveyances if such system has at least fifteen service connections or regularly serves an average of at least twenty- five individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. Note: This duplicates a Mississippi State Department of Health definition. It is included in this regulation to serve as a reminder that wells exempted from regulation by MDEQ because the
surface casing diameter is less than six (6) inches, may still be regulated by the Mississippi State Department of Health if they are part of a Public Water System.
HH. Riparian — pertaining to the bank of a natural watercourse or lake.
II. Surface casing — that string of casing in any water well having the greatest outside diameter, regardless of whether the top of the casing is at or below ground level.
JJ. Surface water — water occurring on the surface of the ground
KK. Transmissive unit — a saturated permeable geologic unit that can transmit significant quantities of water under ordinary hydraulic gradients.
LL. Tremie pipe — a device, usually a small-diameter pipe, that carries grout or other material to the bottom of a borehole or casing and that allows pressure grouting from the bottom up without introduction of air pockets.
MM. Watercourse — any natural lake, river, creek, cut, or other natural body of fresh water or channel having definite banks and bed with visible evidence of the flow or occurrence of water, except such lakes without outlet to which only one (1) landowner is riparian.
NN. Water table or unconfined aquifer — the upper limit of the portion of the ground wholly saturated with water at atmospheric pressure.
OO. Waters of the state — all waters within the jurisdiction of this state, including all streams, lakes, ponds, impounding reservoirs, marshes, watercourses, waterways, wells, springs, and all other bodies or accumulations of water, surface and underground, natural or artificial, situated wholly or partly within or bordering the state; except lakes, ponds or other surface waters which are wholly landlocked and privately owned, and which are not regulated as waters of the United States under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
PP. Well or “water well” — a hole that is drilled, driven, bored, excavated, or otherwise penetrated into the ground to access, evaluate and/or withdraw ground water. For purposes of this regulation, this definition does not pertain to wells constructed for the purpose of disposal of fluids or other materials.
(1) Abandoned Well — a well that has not been used within the preceding twelve month period, or one that has had the pump disconnected and/or removed for reasons other than maintenance, repair, or replacement.
(2) Dewatering Well — a well used for temporary removal of surface water or groundwater to facilitate construction or mining operations, or for permanent protection of a structure or activity from the effects of surface water or groundwater.
(3) Monitoring Well — a well used to obtain data on the quality of water in an aquifer system or at specified depths and locations related to a potential source of
pollutant.
(4) Observation Well – a well used primarily for measuring the water level in an aquifer.
(5) Recovery Well — a well constructed for the purpose of recovering undesirable groundwater for treatment or removal of contaminants.
(6) Relief Well — a well constructed to provide pressure relief from an artesian aquifer or from excessive head differentials in water table aquifers.
(7) Replacement Well— a well drilled to replace an existing well that has become unusable, provided the new well meets the requirements set forth in these regulations.
(8) Standby Well – a well that can be placed in operation to withdraw water but is only used when water is temporarily unavailable from the primary source or sources because of mechanical failure, maintenance, or power failure.
(9) Test Well – a well drilled to explore for groundwater for a water supply well.
(10) Underground Discharge Well -- a well in which the casing terminates at a discharge head located below the frost line.
QQ. Well Completion — term used collectively to refer to both the drilling and developing phases of well construction. For the purpose of reporting requirements established in this regulation, a distinction is made between completion of drilling and completion of well development:
(1) Completion of drilling – the date that drilling is completed and the drill rig is no longer required at the site.
(2) Completion of well development – the date that the well is fully functional and ready to provide water for its designated beneficial use, including having met any applicable water testing requirements.
RR. Withdrawal – the act of bringing groundwater under control by means of a well, pump, or other man-made device for delivery and distribution for a proposed beneficial use.
History
- Source: Miss. Code. Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.2 Permitting
A. Scope and Applicability - All water, whether occurring on the surface of the ground or underneath the surface of the ground, has been declared by statute to be among the basic resources of this state and subject to this regulation governing control, development, and use of water for all beneficial purposes. No person who is not specifically exempted by
statute and this regulation shall initiate actions to use water without having first obtained a permit as provided herein and without having otherwise complied with the provisions of this regulation and any applicable permit conditions. Measures set forth in this regulation have been promulgated by the commission to effectively and efficiently conserve, manage, protect and utilize the water resources of Mississippi. In order to protect and preserve the groundwater resources of the state, the Commission may declare that mining of an aquifer is occurring in any area of the state where withdrawal of groundwater is adversely affecting the quality or quantity of water available for beneficial use; is adversely affecting other natural resources of the state that are either hydrologically interconnected with the aquifer, or are dependent upon discharges from the aquifer as a source of water; is posing a threat to the health, safety, or general welfare of the public by jeopardizing sustainable sources of water; or is posing a substantial threat to the long-term viability of the aquifer as a source of groundwater. The Commission may also designate and delineate “special water use areas” where water resources including surface water, groundwater, or both are inadequate to meet present or reasonably foreseeable needs. However, the lack of a specific Commission declaration, designation, or delineation of a “special water use area” will in no way diminish the authority of the Commission to issue necessary orders, or of the Permit Board to deny permits found to be contrary to the public interest, to attach conditions to issued permits as required, or to take any other action with regard to an individual permit or application for permit as set forth in other sections of this regulation. If the Permit Board takes such an action in the absence of a specific Commission declaration, designation, or delineation of a “special water use area,” the Permit Board will specify the scientific or other public policy basis for its action in the minutes of the Permit Board meeting and, where applicable, within the permit document itself.
B. Designation of Special Water Use Areas - The Commission shall issue a water use warning or declare and delineate a water use caution area for any area of the state where existing water resources, including surface water, groundwater, or both, are inadequate to meet present or reasonably foreseeable needs; or if mining of an aquifer is occurring. Under normal circumstances, the Commission will not designate a water use caution area without first attempting to address a problem through the water use warning procedure. The water use warning procedure generally involves the regulated public, stakeholders, and other interested parties and organizations in a collaborative effort to formulate a plan and timetable to resolve the problem and seeks a cooperative, voluntary approach to plan implementation. However, the decision whether to issue a water use warning or, instead, to declare a water use caution area, shall be made pursuant to the criterion stated in Miss. Code Ann. Section 51-3-11(2)(a) and (3)(a) as to whether time allows the development of a solution through the water use warning process or prompt and immediate action is required to protect the resource, thus requiring the declaration and delineation of a water use caution area.
(1) Water Use Warning Area – Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality monitors water levels and water quality parameters in aquifers at regular intervals and utilizes data from stream gaging stations, water quality monitoring stations, reports of other state and federal agencies, and historic stream flow records on surface waters to assess the quality and availability of water for present and projected beneficial uses in various regions of the state. The Commission may issue
a water use warning when analysis of available scientific data identifies unacceptable trends that may lead to possible adverse long-term conditions affecting the water resources of the state. Actions that may be taken after a water use warning is issued include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Coordinating with the permit holders, political subdivisions, and water management districts within the area to develop a plan and implementation schedule for alleviating or correcting the conditions, if possible, or to safeguard supplies of water for highest priority uses if necessary;
(b) Sending notice to all permit holders, political subdivisions, and water management districts within the affected area. The notice will describe the conditions that required the issuance of the warning, set forth the proposed corrective measures, request assistance from all recipients in implementing the identified corrective measures, and request voluntary compliance with the proposed corrective measures from the permit holders;
(c) Reducing permitted volumes of water through either voluntary permittee agreement to implement water conservation practices and a conjunctive use plan, or modification of existing permits to mandate such action by the permittee;
(d) Establishing a monitoring network to verify effectiveness of implementation of the plan; and
(e) Requiring metering and/or reporting for all water uses within the affected area, regardless of whether the use may have been previously exempted from regulation and reporting.
(2) Water Use Caution Area - The Commission may establish, after notice and hearing, a water use caution area when it is evident from analysis of available scientific data that the actions implemented through the water use warning process will not achieve the desired results in a timely manner; or when analysis of available scientific data indicates prompt and immediate action is required to protect the water resources. Actions that may be taken after a caution area is established include, but are not limited to, the following:
(a) Developing a plan, including an implementation schedule, to alleviate or correct the conditions;
(b) Declaring a moratorium on processing new applications for groundwater withdrawal or surface water diversion permits in the caution area;
(c) Reducing permitted volumes of water through modification of existing permits and issuance of orders by the Commission to restrict water usage in the affected area; and
(d) Requiring metering and water use reporting for all wells and/or diversion points in the area.
If the Commission orders the establishment of a water use caution area, the Commission shall, within one hundred twenty (120) days following entry of the order, adopt regulations consistent with Miss. Code Ann. Title 51, Chapter 3 and commensurate with the necessary degree of control pursuant to its regulatory authority in Miss. Code Ann. Section 51-3-25.
C. Basic Requirements - No person shall initiate the drilling of a groundwater well or the placement of a surface water intake until an appropriate groundwater or surface water use permit has been issued by the Permit Board, or its designee as required by Miss. Code Ann. Sections 51-3-5 and 51-3-7. Likewise, no person shall commence construction of a surface water impoundment until an appropriate surface water permit for storage or use of water from an impoundment as required by Miss. Code Ann. Section 51-3-39 paragraph (1)(c) has been issued by the Permit Board, or its designee. This requirement does not apply to properly authorized emergency situations discussed in Rule 1.2.K-Emergency Authorizations, to exempted surface water diversions discussed in Rule 1.3.A or to exempted groundwater withdrawals discussed in Rule 1.4.A Applications for use of groundwater or surface water must meet the following requirements in order to be considered for approval by the Permit Board: (1) The application must completely and accurately describe the purpose for the proposed use of water;
(2) Such use must not be prohibited by state or federal statutes or regulations; and
(3) The proposed source of water must be free of Commission-imposed restrictions that preclude processing of the application.
D. Content of Applications and Owner Responsibilities - The applicant shall submit a completed application to MDEQ, on forms prescribed by the Commission, for each separate withdrawal or diversion point. Where mobile pumps are proposed for use in the diversion of surface water, a separate permit will be required for each quarter-quarter section from which water is to be diverted. For irregularly shaped sections, MDEQ will determine on a case-by-case basis the number of permits required.
Applications shall be completed using maximum volume of water required, estimated dates for initial use of the water, and estimated values for withdrawal or diversion rates. MDEQ may request additional information from the landowner/applicant, if the submitted form lacks sufficient information for processing. All permit applications, including maps and aerial photographs shall become the property of MDEQ.
(1) Maps — Applications shall be accompanied by a suitable map.
(a) Submitted maps may be photocopies of United States Geological Survey quadrangle maps, photocopies of county maps, aerial photos, or other types of maps, provided sufficient detail is included. Details commonly
required include section lines, townships and ranges, and (if nearby), highways and county roads, large bodies of water such as rivers, streams, lakes, etc., utility rights-of-way, and communities. The map must be of suitable detail for locating the well / diversion point and any irrigated lands or ponds on a USGS quadrangle map.
(b) Maps must show location of well/diversion point applied for and, if applicable, all land being irrigated, in use as fish ponds, or flooded for wildlife habitat. One map may be used to indicate locations of several wells/diversion points and several tracts of land. However, the tracts of land must be designated on the map to indicate which well/diversion point supplies water to each tract. If two or more wells/diversion points provide water to the same tract of land, the overlapping area must be indicated, or an imaginary boundary line must be drawn to divide the tract into areas served by each well/diversion point.
(2) Fees – A fee of ten dollars ($10.00) must accompany each permit application. A separate application is required for each new well or diversion point. If more than one application is submitted at one time, a single check, money order, or electronic payment may be sent for the total amount of the application fees. DO NOT SEND CASH!
(3) Preliminary Assessment Report – For proposed regulated wells or surface water intakes that will be part of a public water supply system, MDEQ will be responsible for preparation of a Preliminary Assessment Report (PAR) addressing the suitability of the proposed well site or diversion point to supply a source of safe drinking water. The assessment will consider the inherent vulnerability of the intended source water aquifer or surface water body as well as the identification and proximity of potential sources of contamination, including any improperly abandoned (unplugged) wells, to the proposed site. Final approval of a groundwater withdrawal permit or surface water diversion permit by the Permit Board, or its designee, will be based upon the findings of the preliminary assessment as to the suitability of the site, without exposure to higher than normal risk, for a public water system well.
(4) Publication of Intent — When MDEQ accepts the completed application for a permit, MDEQ will furnish the landowner/applicant a prepared notice of intent to use waters of the state along with instructions for publishing the notice. The landowner/applicant shall publish the notice of intent one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the proposed well/diversion point will be located. The landowner/applicant must pay the expense of the publication and must direct the newspaper to forward a proof of publication to MDEQ.
E. Issuance or Denial - MDEQ may hold a public hearing regarding any application. The
application and results of the public hearing will then be presented to the Permit Board, or its designee. The Permit Board will either issue or deny the permit, and that decision will be effective as of the date the action is taken.
The Permit Board may deny a permit or issue a permit for less than the requested withdrawal rate or volume if, in the opinion of the Permit Board, the use is not for a beneficial purpose; or such use would adversely interfere with existing permitted uses; or such use would be in conflict with the public interest. Any permit issued may contain such conditions (Rule 1.2.J) as the Board deems necessary to assist MDEQ in management of the water resources of the state. If action authority for a permit application has been delegated by the Permit Board to MDEQ Staff, the permit action may be taken according to Permit Board regulations regarding delegation of permit action authority.
The Permit Board may issue a permit for a beneficial use that constitutes mining of an aquifer only if it finds that such use is essential to the safety of human life and property; or the landowner/applicant:
(1) Provides written assurance to the Permit Board that the requested use will be temporary,
(2) Submits a viable plan and acceptable time schedule for acquiring the required water from another source which will not result in mining of any other aquifer; and
(3) Submits an annual report, net worth statement, or other documentation, as may be required by the Permit Board, to demonstrate financial ability to develop the proposed alternate water supply. Once a permit is issued, MDEQ will provide the permittee a copy of the permit document, which shall constitute authorization to begin the use of the waters of the state.
F. Duration of Permit.
(1) Construction Period – For public water supply wells, construction must be initiated within two (2) years after the water use permit is issued or the permit will be null and void without further action by the Permit Board. For all other water uses, except as stated below, if well/diversion system construction has not begun within one year after a permit is issued by the Permit Board, the permit will be null and void without further action by the Permit Board. In such cases, the landowner/applicant will have to reapply and follow the same procedures required for the original application. The Permit Board may grant variances from this requirement, if the landowner/applicant can demonstrate to the Permit Board that mitigating circumstances dictate the need for delaying the onset of construction beyond the one year limit.
(2) Expiration –Water use permits normally will be issued for a period of ten (10) years. Longer terms may be permitted for certain public entities in order to assure
reasonable amortization of capital investment in water-related equipment. Such entities are limited to municipalities, counties or other governmental subdivisions, public utilities, or publicly regulated utilities. Shorter terms may be permitted when the Permit Board determines that such terms are necessary to protect the public interest.
(3) Reissuance –
(a) Notification – Six months prior to the expiration date of the permit, MDEQ will send, by certified mail to the address of record in the permit file, a notice to the landowner/permittee informing him of the requirement to re-apply in order to maintain the right to use water under the permit. An application form and instructions for submitting the application will be included with the notice. However, failure by MDEQ to provide such notice shall not relieve the landowner/permittee from the legal.
(b) Application – When MDEQ accepts a completed application for reissuance, the applicant must publish a notice of intent to continue the permitted use and assure that the publisher provides proof of publication to the MDEQ. The Permit Board will then reissue the permit, unless the Permit Board determines such continued use is contrary to the public interest. The Permit Board may change the conditions of the permit at reissuance upon finding that such a change would be in the public interest.
(c) Termination – If the permittee fails to submit an application for reissuance prior to the expiration of the permit, the right to use the water described in the permit shall automatically terminate upon the expiration date. If processing of a completed application received prior to the expiration date extends beyond the expiration date, the permit will remain in effect until a final decision on reissuance is made by the Permit Board.
G. Permit Modification –
(1) Actions Requiring Modification – A permit may be modified for any of the following reasons:
(a) Any change in the beneficial use of, and/or the volume of, water withdrawn from a well or diverted from a surface water body.
(b) Any change in location of a surface water diversion point.
(c) Any change in permit parameters requested by the landowner/permittee such as change of ownership, change of permittee, or change of mailing address.
(d) Any change in permit conditions.
(e) Any substantive errors in a permit that must be corrected.
(f) Legislative action or judicial decision.
(2) Procedures
(a) The landowner/permittee must provide MDEQ a written request for modification for proposed changes as identified in Rule 1.2.G.1.a. and b. above, or written notification of any proposed change in permit parameters as described in Rule 1.2.G.1.c. above.
(b) Modifications that result from changes in administrative information only, such as names and mailing addresses; or modifications that are required only to correct administrative errors will be presented to the Permit Board, or its designee, for immediate final action.
(c) The procedure for processing a requested modification for proposed changes in beneficial use, withdrawal volume, or location of diversion point will depend upon the nature and significance of the change:
(1) A requested modification that involves significant deviations from the conditions established under the original permit may be deemed by the Permit Board to constitute a new activity. If so, the request will be returned to the requestor with instructions to submit a new application.
(2) A requested modification may be deemed by the Permit Board to require advertisement of a notice of intent to modify the permit. If so, the requestor will be informed of the decision and provided a prepared notice for publication. The requestor shall publish the notice of intent one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the permitted well/diversion point is located. The landowner/applicant must pay the expense of the publication and must direct the newspaper to forward a proof of publication to MDEQ.
(3) A requested modification that proposes only minor changes in volume of withdrawal/diversion or location of a diversion point may be processed by the Permit Board, or its designee, without further action being required on the part of the requestor
(d) MDEQ may hold a public hearing regarding any request for modification. The request and results of the public hearing will then be presented to the Permit Board. The Permit Board will either approve the modification or deny the request, and that decision will be effective as of the date the action is taken.
H. Revocation. - The Board will normally give the permittee at least sixty (60) days written notice prior to taking any final action to revoke a permit unilaterally, unless such delay is deemed to be contrary to the public interest. Conditions which may lead to the revocation of a permit include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Noncompliance with any condition in the permit.
(2) Failure by the landowner/applicant to disclose all relevant facts during the application and permitting process, or misrepresentation of any relevant facts by the landowner/applicant/permittee, at any time.
(3) A determination by the Permit Board that the permit holder is using the water resources of the state in a manner deemed to be contrary to the public interest.
I. Hearings and Appeals - Any person aggrieved by any initial action of the Permit Board to issue, deny, transfer, modify or revoke a permit may request an evidentiary hearing before the Permit Board regarding the decision. Procedures for hearings and further appeals of Permit Board decisions are set forth in Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-17-29.
J. Special Conditions. The Permit Board may establish conditions on permits to require:
(1) Compliance schedules for the accomplishment of certain tasks deemed necessary and appropriate by the Permit Board.
(2) Compliance schedules for the cessation of use of groundwater for once-through, non-contact cooling purposes, which is subsequently discharged to the environment. NOTE: Facilities that are authorized use of less than 20,000 gallons per day (gpd), or such other small volume as may be approved by the Permit Board, for once-through non-contact cooling will be considered on a case- by-case basis and may not be required to cease such usage.
(3) Installation of flow metering or measuring devices.
(4) Installation and mandatory operation of flow restriction devices on flowing artesian wells.
(5) Future reductions in the volume of water withdrawn or diverted, provided the schedule for such reductions is explicitly outlined in a compliance schedule.
(6) Reports as necessary to provide data on the volume of water withdrawn or diverted.
(7) Any other conditions the Board determines to be necessary to protect the public interest.
K. Emergency Authorization - A written authorization for emergency use of water from a well or a surface water diversion point may be granted by the Permit Board, or its designee. An emergency authorization may be issued only when the Permit Board, or its designee, determines groundwater or surface water must be used to safeguard life, property, public safety, or other compelling public interests, and the exigency precludes waiting for the time required to process a normal permit application.
Emergency authorizations will remain in effect only for the time required to process a permit application for the use authorized under emergency conditions, and the written authorization will include a time limit for submittal of the required application. If a complete application is not received by MDEQ within the time limit specified in the emergency authorization, the authorization will automatically stand rescinded.
The emergency authorization does not guarantee that the Permit Board will ultimately issue a permit for such authorized use. If the Permit Board denies the permit, the emergency authorization is rescinded and the previously authorized water usage shall cease unless and until the decision of the Board is reversed or modified on appeal.
L. General Permits - The Permit Board may issue General Permits, following appropriate public notice and comment period. The Public Notice indicating the Permit Board’s intent to issue such a General Permit will describe the nature of activities to be covered under the permit, set forth any required notification procedures, and establish documentation requirements for individual projects that may be pursued under authority of the General Permit.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.3 Surface Water Diversions
All surface water diversions must meet the permitting requirements set forth in Rule 1.2, unless specifically exempted below.
A. Exemptions – Surface water diversions meeting the following conditions shall not be subject to the permitting requirements of this chapter:
(1) Diversions when the water is to be used for domestic single-residence purposes.
(2) Diversions from an existing impoundment not located on a continuous, free flowing watercourse. However, for proposed surface water impoundments, the person intending to acquire the right to store or use water from a reservoir formed by a dam shall obtain a permit for storage or use of water from the impoundment as required by Miss. Code Ann. Section 51-3-39 paragraph (1)(c), prior to commencement of construction of the dam.
B. Limiting Conditions for Permit Issuance – The intended use of state waters must be beneficial and consistent with the public interest. Surface water conditions which may limit or affect permit usage may include, but are not limited to, the following:
(1) Established Minimum Flow—Generally, a permittee may not divert a volume of surface water that will cause the watercourse to fall below its established minimum flow. If a watercourse falls below its established minimum flow, the permit holders affected that are consumptive users will be informed that their pumping must be stopped or modified until further notice. Affected permit holders that are municipalities or are non-consumptive users (users that return to the stream substantially the same amount of water that the user diverts, at substantially the same location) have the option of requesting a variance from the minimum flow requirements. The request must be made, in writing, to the Permit Board.
(a) Municipal Users – The Permit Board may authorize surface water diversions by municipal users resulting in less than the established minimum flow, provided:
(1) The landowner/applicant presents a study showing the potential effects of the proposed use on the watercourse; and
(2) The Permit Board determines that such uses will not violate the state’s water quality standards (including in-stream uses) or otherwise conflict with the public interest.
(b) Industrial Users – The Permit Board may authorize surface water diversions by industrial users when flows are at or less than the established minimum flow, provided the permittee:
(1) Returns water to the stream in substantially the same amount as that removed and the quality of the return water meets the requirements of the State’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program; and neither the diversion nor the return of water will cause or contribute to a violation of the state’s water quality standards; and
(2) Returns water in close enough proximity to the diversion point to avoid substantial detriment to water use rights of affected property owners or to the detriment of the public interest. The Permit Board may require the permittee to conduct such studies or to provide such information as it deems necessary to determine the potential effect of the proposed use on the affected ecosystem and on the public interest.
(c) Other Users – The Permit Board may authorize surface water diversions by other users when flows are at or less than the established minimum flow, provided the permittee:
(1) Provides written assurance that water will be returned to the stream in substantially the same amount as that removed and the quality of the return water will meet requirements of the State’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit Program; and neither the diversion nor the return of water will cause or contribute to a violation of the state’s water quality standards; and
(2) Places metering devices on both the intake and discharge devices to measure flow rates of water; and
(3) Reports to MDEQ, at time intervals to be established by the Permit Board, the volumes of water withdrawn and the volumes and water quality analyses of water discharged.
(2) Established Average Minimum Lake Level – The Permit Board may authorize any permittee to use water from a lake or reservoir that falls within the Permit Board’s jurisdiction only to the extent that the water level remains above the average minimum lake level, as established by the Commission. The Permit Board, upon affording a hearing to interested parties, may authorize use of such water below the established average minimum level provided the request for such authorization is accompanied by a study which details potential effects of the proposed use on the affected ecosystem and the public interest. The Permit Board may require such additional studies or other information as it deems necessary to protect the public interest.
(3) Pollution Control Regulations – The Permit Board will not authorize any surface water use that will cause a violation of water quality standards as set by the Commission through regulation.
(4) Navigability – The Permit Board will not authorize any surface water use that will impair the navigability of any watercourse identified as a “navigable waterway” under state or federal statute.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.4 Groundwater Withdrawals
All groundwater withdrawals must meet the permitting requirements set forth in Rule 1.2, unless specifically exempted below.
A. Exemptions – Wells for the purpose of groundwater withdrawal meeting the following conditions shall not be subject to the permitting requirements of this regulation:
(1) Wells used for domestic purposes and providing potable water to only one (1) household; or
(2) Wells with a surface casing diameter less than six inches, except as regulations govern prohibited uses specified in Rule 1.4.D and reporting requirements specified
in Rule 1.4.E.
(3) Relief wells installed to protect the integrity of a structure, such as a dam or levee.
Note: The fact that a well may be exempt under this regulation shall not relieve the owner of responsibility for complying with other applicable state or federal regulations ; e.g., wells, regardless of size, that are part of a Public Water System must comply with Mississippi State Department of Health Regulations.
B. Prioritization of Beneficial Uses – In areas where conflicts exist between competing interests or demands for surface water or groundwater supplies, or where there is a potential for such conflicts to arise in the future, the beneficial uses identified below will be given priority in permitting decisions, consistent with the provisions of Miss. Code Ann. Section 51-3-7, in the order listed:
(1) Public Supply [including municipal supplies, rural water systems, private water systems, private wells, and institutional uses (such as schools, churches, and military bases)] – Water permits for other beneficial uses may be denied or modified to insure that present and future public supply needs can be met.
(2) Industrial/Commercial (Including Agricultural and Commercial Livestock Uses) – Beneficial uses of water falling in this category will have equal standing in permit decisions with all other beneficial uses included in this category. Water use permits that are in place will not be modified to satisfy new or increased demands by other users who fall into this same category.
(a) Agricultural (including crop irrigation, fish culture, and similar uses.) – The applicant may be required to explore conjunctive use of surface water as an option and demonstrate efficient use of groundwater through implementation of practicable water conservation measures.
(b) Industrial (including water for all processes involved in the operation of an industrial plant or facility.) – The applicant may be required to explore conjunctive use options. Requests for industrial use must include a description of water quality needs as well as of water quantity needs. For requests without rigid water quality requirements, the landowner/applicant may be required to investigate alternative supplies (such as surface water, aquifers with poorer quality water, or treated effluent from wastewater treatment plants). Industrial users may be required to use the lowest quality water available that will meet quantity and quality requirements for the intended use.
(c) Livestock (including water for commercial cattle, hogs, and other animal operations.) – The applicant may be required to explore conjunctive use options.
(d) Commercial (including hotels, restaurants, water bottling companies,
campgrounds, and casinos.) – The applicant may be required to explore conjunctive use options.
(3) Enhancement of Wildlife Habitat and Other Recreational Uses (including water used to enhance an area for wildlife and/or waterfowl management; water used for irrigation of vegetation other than commercial crops; and other non-essential uses for leisure activities.) – Aquifers that provide the principal source of public supply in a region will generally not be considered acceptable sources of water for beneficial uses that fall into this category. Water use permits that are in place in this category of uses may be modified or revoked if necessary to satisfy higher priority demands.
(4) Other Uses – Uses not falling into one of the above categories will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and permitted, if the use is not otherwise prohibited by this regulation and water is available.
(5) Fire Protection – While considered a beneficial use of water, fire protection is not given a priority ranking. Since fire protection water is used infrequently and only for a short duration, permits for this use will be allowed in any area where water is available.
C. Well Spacing –
(1) When deemed appropriate, the Permit Board may require the spacing of new wells or replacement wells in accordance with the following guidelines to minimize interference issues between wells developed in confined aquifers. The well spacing distances in Table 1 are a function of the transmissivity (T) of an aquifer at a given site and the anticipated discharge or pumping rate (Q) of a proposed well, where the calculated drawdown in the well is limited to fifteen (15) feet of decline over a ten (10) year period of pumping and will be applied as follows, when the Permit Board determines such spacing is needed:
Table 1. Minimum acceptable spacing distances (r) for wells pumping at constant discharges (Q) for a 10-year timeframe with various transmissivity (T) ranges.
--- Signifies no spacing limitations (r < 50 feet)
- Scenarios that result in distances (r) greater than 10,000 feet are indications of inadequate aquifer transmissivity for the intended pumpage.
** The Permit Board should be consulted regarding minimum spacing recommendations for wells that will pump in excess of 1,500 gpm or 2.16 mgd.
Note: The following steps may prove helpful in using Table 1:
(a) To determine the minimum acceptable spacing distance between wells, locate the corresponding transmissivity (T) value of the aquifer in the left column of the table and then the anticipated discharge or pumping rate value across the top row of the table. The point in the shaded area of the table where the two values intersect indicates the acceptable spacing distance between wells in the same confined aquifer.
Example: A new 750 gallon per minute (gpm) well with a discharge rate of 1.08 million gallons per day (mgd) that is scheduled to pump from a confined aquifer with a transmissivity (T) of 9,000 squared feet per day (ft2/day) should be spaced at least 1,300 feet apart from another well using the same aquifer to avoid unacceptable interference.
(b) To determine the maximum acceptable discharge rate (mgd) or pumping rate (gpm) for a confined aquifer, consult the left column of Table 1 to find a comparable transmissivity (T) value for the aquifer being used and the body of the table to locate the distance (r) from the proposed well site to the nearest existing well in using the same aquifer. The corresponding discharge rate (mgd) and pumping rate (gpm) on the top of the appropriate column reflects the maximum acceptable pumpage for the well at the proposed location.
(2) The Permit Board will consider and may require spacing limitations for new wells or replacement wells using aquifers that are not confined under all conditions. Unconfined conditions also may exist in the recharge areas of confined aquifers.
(3) In cases where no feasible options appear to be available, applicants may make a written request for exemption from the well spacing requirements. The Board will consider such requests on a case-by-case basis and provide a written determination to the applicant.
D. Considerations and Limitations on Uses of Water
(1) Once-through, Non-contact Cooling Water – In general, the use of large volumes of groundwater for once-through, non-contact cooling purposes is not a beneficial use of groundwater resources and is contrary to principles of water conservation. Use of more than 20,000 gallons per day (gpd) for this purpose is prohibited, regardless of the size of the well or the source of the groundwater, unless approval is obtained from the Permit Board. Proposals to use less than 20,000 gpd will be considered by the Permit Board on a case-by-case basis.
(2) Uncontrolled Free-flowing Wells – Continuous uncontrolled discharge of groundwater from free-flowing wells is not a beneficial use of groundwater resources, is declared to be waste contrary to principles of water conservation, and may be prohibited by the Commission or the Permit Board, regardless of the size of the well or the source of the groundwater.
(3) Maintenance of Water Levels in Surface Water Impoundments for Aesthetic Purposes – A permit shall be required of any person in the business of developing real property for resale who desires to withdraw water from a well, regardless of surface casing diameter that is to be used for maintaining or enhancing an impoundment of surface water primarily for aesthetic purposes. In general, the withdrawal of groundwater to supply water to a surface impoundment that exists primarily for aesthetic purposes is discouraged. The Permit Board may, however, issue a permit for withdrawal of groundwater to supply water to a surface impoundment that is primarily for aesthetic purposes if the Permit Board finds that such use of the groundwater would be in the public interest and that the local availability of groundwater for higher priority uses, as specified in these regulations, would not be excessively adversely affected. In determining whether
such use of the groundwater would be in the public interest, the Permit Board shall consider, at a minimum, the following factors:
(a) The drainage area providing surface water run-off to the impoundment;
(b) The permeability of the soils that form the bottom of the impoundment;
(c) The volume of water required to fill the impoundment;
(d) The rate of groundwater withdrawal estimated to be required to maintain the level of water in the impoundment at the designed normal pool;
(e) The potential impacts of the requested groundwater withdrawal on the local availability of groundwater for higher priority uses, as specified in these regulations.
(4) Other Uses – The Permit Board may determine that other discharges/withdrawals of groundwater are not beneficial uses, constitute waste, and/or are prohibited to protect the public interest and may deny permits based on such determinations.
E. Reporting
(1) Within 30 days of the drilling completion date, data collected and/or received on the well must be filed with MDEQ by the water well contractor. This data includes, but is not limited to, the following:
(a) Any data that differs from the issued permit (i.e. depth, casing diameter, etc.);
(b) Copies of all borehole geophysical log(s);
(c) Driller’s log;
(d) Drill cuttings (If available)
(e) Pump test information. (If available); *
(f) Analysis of water. (If available). *
- If the well is not developed and completed immediately upon completion of drilling, the pump test information and water analysis shall be submitted by the owner or by the contractor who subsequently completes the well within thirty (30) days of receipt of final report.
(2) Owners and operators of all water wells, regardless of size or use, that produce in excess of 20,000 gallons per day may be required to file an annual report on the volume of groundwater withdrawn each calendar year, and such other requirements
as the Commission may deem necessary or appropriate for proper water management. If required, these water use reports shall be filed with MDEQ prior to March 30 of each year on forms prescribed by the Permit Board.
(3) The quantity of groundwater withdrawn must be determined by one of the following:
(a) Flow meters accurate to within ten percent (10%) of meter calibration;
(b) The rated capacity of the pump (for the normal head associated with the well) multiplied by the total time in operation as recorded by an hour meter, electric meter, or log;
(c) The rated capacity of a cooling system multiplied by the total time in operation.
(d) Any other method approved by MDEQ that will provide reliable groundwater withdrawal data.
(4) MDEQ may require the installation of flow meters if data obtained by other means is determined to be inadequate or unreliable.
F. Replacement Wells – A replacement well may be drilled to replace a properly authorized well that has become unusable.
(1) Qualifications – To qualify as a replacement well for any use other than irrigation, aquaculture, or wildlife enhancement the new well must meet all of the requirements set forth in paragraphs a. through d. below. Any proposed well not meeting these requirements will be treated as a new well, and the required application will be processed accordingly. Replacement wells for irrigation, aquaculture, or wildlife enhancement need only meet the requirements set forth in paragraphs (a) through (c)below provided the water will be applied to the same field or pond served by the original well.
(a) Will replace a well that will be properly plugged and abandoned within 180 days of completion of the replacement well, unless used by MDEQ for data collection in accordance with paragraph 3 below; and
(b) Will withdraw water from the same water-bearing formation as the old well; and
(c) Will supply water for the same beneficial use as the old well; and
(d) Will be located within a 250-foot radius of the old well.
(2) Procedure – Construction of a qualifying replacement well does not require prior approval from the Permit Board or its designee. However, the owner of the well to
be abandoned must provide MDEQ written notification of the replacement within five (5) calendar days after initiating construction of the replacement well. The notification must clearly state that the new well is a replacement well meeting the criteria set forth in Rule 1.4.F.1.; must include the permit number for the well being replaced; and must provide the name of the licensed water well contractor responsible for construction of the replacement well. The Permit Board, or its designee, will assign an identification number to the replacement well and modify the permit associated with the well to be plugged and abandoned to reflect the change. The identification number for the replacement well will be provided by MDEQ to both the owner/permittee and the water well contractor for use on all subsequent correspondence and reports related to the well. No public notice or fee will be associated with construction of a replacement well.
(3) Decommissioning of Replaced Well – The well being replaced must properly be decommissioned in accordance with Rule 1.4.G. of this regulation no later than 180 days from the date the replacement well is completed, unless the Executive Director of MDEQ, or his designee, determines that the old well is suitable for conversion to an observation well or monitoring well and the landowner/permittee agrees to retain the well for that use. If such use is determined to be beneficial, a locking cover, sealed plate or other method of securing the well approved by MDEQ shall be provided by the landowner/permittee. If use of the observation well or monitoring well is later discontinued, the landowner/permittee will be responsible for properly decommissioning the well within 180 days of notification by MDEQ that MDEQ’s use of the well is being discontinued.
G. Decommissioning Abandoned or Unused Water Wells and Holes
(1) Applicability – Except as stated in paragraph 2. below, the standards for decommissioning abandoned or unused water wells and boreholes apply to all abandoned water wells and to all boreholes that penetrate water bearing strata or are greater than twenty-five (25) feet in depth including potable water wells, agricultural wells, monitoring wells, observation wells, dewatering wells, relief wells, saline or brackish water withdrawal wells, contaminant recovery wells, heat pump water supply wells and closed-loop system holes, industrial supply wells, rig supply wells, geotechnical boreholes, cathodic protection wells and pilot boreholes.
All wells and boreholes that penetrate water bearing stratum with a depth of 25 feet, or greater, below land surface must properly be decommissioned by a water well contractor licensed by MDEQ. Water wells less than 25 feet in depth below land surface may be plugged by someone other than a licensed water well contractor. However, the same procedures and reporting requirements apply regardless of who plugs the well.
If approved in writing by MDEQ, properly cased and sealed wells may be provided with a locking cover capable of preventing the entrance of contaminants and used as monitoring wells or observation wells in lieu of abandonment. If the
use of an observation or monitoring well is later discontinued by MDEQ, the landowner/permittee shall be responsible for properly decommissioning the well.
(2) Exemptions – The following types of wells and boreholes are exempt from this paragraph G. Exemption under this regulation does not relieve the owner of the responsibility for identifying and complying with other applicable state and federal regulations.
(a) Saline water wells associated with enhanced oil and gas recovery operation, brine withdrawal wells, and other types of on-site oil and gas well holes, including Class II wells regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. Sections 6901, et seq.
(b) Class I, III, IV and V injection wells regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. Sections 6901, et seq. and
(c) Geotechnical boreholes drilled in planned roadbed construction areas where the natural overburden will be removed to within twenty-five (25) feet of the bottom of the hole.
(3) Types of Abandoned or Unused Wells – A water well may be considered by MDEQ to have been abandoned if its use has been permanently discontinued; if the well has not been used in the preceding 12 months (except for established rotations of pumping equipment between wells related to crop irrigation and instances where the owner has notified MDEQ of an anticipated longer period of nonuse after which the well will be placed back in service); if the pumping equipment has been removed (except for established rotations of pumping equipment between wells related to crop irrigation); or if the well cannot be repaired. Rig supply holes, geotechnical boreholes, pilot holes, and dewatering holes are considered abandoned immediately upon completion of the project phase for which they are drilled, unless the well is an integral part of the continued operation of the project, such as a pressure relief well or a permanently used dewatering well.
(4) Time Allowed for Plugging – Rig supply wells, pilot holes, and geotechnical boreholes shall be plugged within 30 days after abandonment or cessation of use. All other holes shall be plugged within 180 days after abandonment or cessation of use.
(5) Decommissioning Forms – Abandonment and plugging of water wells and boreholes shall be reported on a decommissioning form approved by and made available from MDEQ. The person or contractor who plugs an abandoned water well or borehole shall submit the decommissioning form to MDEQ within 30 days after completion of the plugging. For irrigation wells located in the MRVA, a copy of the form shall be submitted to YMD at the same time the original is submitted to MDEQ. Reporting the abandonment and plugging of multiple water
wells and/or boreholes on one form may be permissible, with prior approval from MDEQ, provided the same decommissioning procedure was used and the location of each water well and/or borehole is clearly identified.
(6) Decommissioning Procedures – The following procedures shall be adhered to in the decommissioning of any water well or borehole for which decommissioning is required under these regulations:
(a) Grout for all holes shall consist of neat cement, cement grout, cement- bentonite mixture (5-8% bentonite), or bentonite. Bentonite pellets may be added under free-fall conditions for depths not exceeding twenty-five (25) feet, providing pellets are placed in layers not more than five (5) feet deep and tamped into place after addition of each layer. Granulated or pelletized bentonite may be placed to greater depths if introduced through a tremie pipe. Free-fall addition of other types of grout from the surface is prohibited;
(b) Obstructions shall be removed from the well casing;
(c) If there is reason to question the physical integrity of the well casing because of the age of the well or the material used for the casing, or there are no records to indicate that the annular space was grouted properly during construction of the well, the driller shall consult with MDEQ before plugging the well. In such instances, MDEQ may require that the casing be perforated to allow the introduction of grout into cavities or voids that may have formed outside the casing; or may require that the casing be removed from the hole prior to grouting;
(d) For abandoned water wells in agricultural fields, the casing shall be cut off and removed down to a minimum depth of three feet below land surface. After plugging, the excavation shall be filled with compacted soil. In other areas, not regularly subjected to surface disturbance, the casing shall be cut off and removed at least down to the ground surface elevation;
(e) Abandoned water wells or boreholes shall be sealed from the bottom of the hole to ground surface or the top of the casing using a grout as described in paragraph 6.a. above.
(f) MDEQ may authorize alternate methods of abandonment and/or abandonment by other than a licensed water well contractor, provided the results will meet the intent of the regulations. Only detailed written requests to utilize an alternate method of abandonment or to abandon a well without utilizing a licensed water well contractor shall be considered for approval. If approved, MDEQ will provide written authorization to the requestor.
H. Installation of Control Devices on Flowing Wells - Control devices that are capable of stopping the waste of water are required on all wells that have a natural free-flowing condition above the ground surface, except for relief wells installed to protect the integrity of a structure.
MDEQ, upon receiving information about a free-flowing well, will send the landowner a written directive to install a control device on the well within a specified time limit and to operate the device in such a manner as to prevent waste of the water. The landowner shall provide MDEQ written notification when the control device has been installed and the waste of water has ceased. Failure to comply with a directive to install and operate a control device to stop the waste of water may result in enforcement action by the Commission.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.5 Confidential Information
Procedures for declaring submitted information confidential and for agency handling of such information are found in Miss. Code Ann. Section 49- 17-39, Section 51-3-44, and the Commission’s Regulations Regarding the Review and Reproduction of Public Records, Chapter 11, Part 1, Chapter 2.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.6 Enforcement
Enforcement of these regulations shall be governed by Miss. Code Ann. Section 51-3-49 through 51-3-55, and Sections 49-17-31 through 49-17-43.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 1.7 Correspondence and Adequacy of Notice
A. General – All permittees and licensees shall inform MDEQ of any address changes within fifteen (15) days of any change of address, and must readily accept all mail sent to them from the Commission, MDEQ, or the Permit Board.
B. Registered or certified mail – Registered or Certified Mail sent with proper postage and to the last address provided to MDEQ by the permittee or licensee shall be considered adequate notification of notice served if MDEQ is notified that the mail was delivered and accepted or if the mail is returned as rejected or unclaimed by the addressee.
C. Refusal to accept mail – Refusal to accept mail from the Commission, the Permit Board, the Department, or its designee, shall be considered a violation of this regulation.
Part 7, Chapter 2: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Licensing of Water Well Contractors Regulations
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.1 Definitions
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.2 Applicability
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.3 Minimum Requirements for Licensing
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.4 Examination
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.5 Fees
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.6 License Renewal
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.7 Continuing Education
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.8 Equipment
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.9 State Well Reports
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.10 Suspension/Revocation of License
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.11 Hearings and Appeals
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.12 Design Criteria and Construction Standards
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.13 Maintenance and Service Criteria for Public Water Wells
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.14 Decommissioning of Abandoned or Unused Water Wells and Boreholes
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.15 Enforcement
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.16 Correspondence and Adequacy of Notice
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.17 Confidential Information _______________________________
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.1 Definitions
The words and phrases used in this regulation, shall have the following meanings:
A. Annular Space - The space between the borehole wall and the well casing or screen, or the space between a casing pipe and a liner pipe or between two strings of casing.
B. Applicant - Any person who submits an application to obtain a water well contractor’s license.
C. Approved Education Provider – An organization that offers many educational courses for continuing education and has demonstrated, to the satisfaction of the Department, its qualifications to offer quality continuing education to water well contractors. Approved education providers are not required to submit every course they offer for Department approval.
D. Aquifer - a geologic formation, hydraulically connected group of formations, or part of a formation that can yield water to a well or spring.
(1) Confined Aquifer (Commonly referred to as artesian aquifers) – a permeable geologic layer or zone saturated with groundwater isolated from the atmosphere by impermeable confining layers. The ground water subjected to pressures higher than atmospheric pressure so that water in a well penetrating the aquifer will rise to some level above the actual top of the aquifer.
(2) Unconfined Aquifer (Commonly referred to as water table aquifers) a permeable geologic layer or zone saturated with groundwater at atmospheric pressure. These aquifers are generally not overlain by impermeable confining layers and may be vulnerable to contamination from surface activities or events that discharge pollutants on the ground.
E. Artesian - Groundwater under sufficient hydrostatic pressure to rise above the aquifer containing it.
F. Beneficial use - The application of water, excluding waste of water, to a purpose that produces economic or other tangible or intangible benefits to the state and its citizens. Such uses include, but are not limited to, diversions or withdrawals for public, industrial, or agricultural use.
G. Board or Permit Board – The Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board.
H. Certificate of Insurance – Proof of coverage under Contractors Liability Insurance.
I. Commission –The Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, or its designee.
J. Committee – The Water Well Driller’s Advisory Committee.
K. Continuing Education Course – A course which has been approved by the Department as meeting the requirements of the regulations for continuing education. Only courses approved by the Department are considered applicable to meeting continuing education requirements, unless the course is presented by an approved education provider.
L. Days - Calendar days, unless specifically indicated otherwise in the body of this regulation.
M. Decommissioning - The complete and permanent sealing of a well bore to prevent contamination of the aquifer.
N. Department or MDEQ – The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
O. Dewatering – The temporary lowering of the groundwater level to facilitate installation of underground utilities, construction of foundations, and various other purposes.
P. Domestic use - The use of water for ordinary household purposes, the watering of farm livestock, poultry, and domestic animals, and the irrigation of home gardens and lawns.
Q. Filter Pack - Smooth, uniform, clean sand or gravel placed in the annular space between the borehole wall and well screen to prevent sediments from entering the screen.
R. Fresh water - Water having a Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentration of less than 1,000 parts per million (ppm).
S. Geotechnical Boring - A hole constructed for the purpose of sampling, measuring, or testing the strata encountered for scientific, engineering, geological or regulatory purposes.
T. Groundwater - Water occurring beneath the surface of the ground.
U. Grout - A fluid mixture of neat cement and water, with additives such as sand, bentonite, or hydrated lime, or a mixture of bentonite and water, capable of producing a water-tight seal, that can be forced through a pipe or placed in an annular space, as required for sealing a well or an annular space to protect against intrusion of contamination.
V. Halliburton Method - A method of grouting casing in which the slurry is forced down the casing and into the annular space until slurry returns are obtained at the ground surface.
W. Inactive Status – The status assigned to a license by the Commission to indicate that the licensee may not practice well drilling and/or pump installation until the licensee has met the requirements of this regulation regarding renewal or reinstatement of the license.
X. Incompetency – An action or inaction by a licensee which demonstrates a general lack of knowledge or ability to practice water well drilling and/or pump installation.
Y. Landowner - The person, or entity, holding legal title to the surface of the land upon which a withdrawal or diversion of water is located.
Z. Licensee – Any individual who holds a valid Water Well Contractor’s License issued by the state, or any company or corporation engaged in the business of water well contracting under a license duly issued to a designated principal, or key employee, in the company or corporation. Licenses will only be issued to individuals, and a company will be deemed to be licensed only if it has a principal or key employee who is licensed.
(1) Restricted Licensee – An individual holding a specialty driller’s or pump installer’s license who is restricted to performance of only such activities as may be specified in the conditions of the license. Typically, restrictions will be placed on the licenses of individuals who:
(a) only engage in specialized well or borehole construction such as drilling geotechnical boreholes, constructing environmental monitoring wells, or constructing geo-thermal systems; or
(b) only engage in limited aspects of the water well construction business such as pump and well equipment installation and service.
(2) Unrestricted Licensee – An individual holding a Water Well Contractor’s License who is thereby authorized to engage, to the full extent allowed by this regulation, in the business of constructing, maintaining, and repairing water wells; installing and servicing pumps and related water well equipment; drilling special purpose boreholes; constructing monitoring wells; or any other work involving drilling, grouting, plugging, abandoning, or decommissioning water wells and boreholes. Companies, corporations, or other business entities, that are not individuals, will be deemed to have met the licensing requirement if a principal in the firm, or other key employee authorized to act for the firm, holds an unrestricted water well contractor’s license.
AA. Misconduct – A willful or intentional action or inaction by a licensee that is contrary to the standard or accepted practice of the industry that would be applied by competent professionals, under the same circumstances.
BB. Municipal use - The use of water by a municipal government to promote the life, safety, health, comfort, and business pursuits of its people. The term does not include irrigation of crops that may be planted within the corporate boundaries.
CC. Office or OLWR - the Office of Land and Water Resources of MDEQ.
DD. Permitted use -
(1) The use of a specific amount of water at a specific time and at a specific place, authorized and allotted by the Board for a designated beneficial use within specific limits as to quantity, time, place, and rate of diversion or withdrawal; or
(2) The right to the use of water as specified in the permit, subject to the provisions of Mississippi Code Annotated Section 51-3-5, including the construction of waterworks or other related facilities.
EE. Person - The state or other agency or institution thereof, any municipality, political subdivision, public or private corporation, individual, partnership, association or other entity, and including any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality,
political subdivision, or public or private corporation, or the United States or any officer or employee thereof.
FF. Plugging — See “Decommissioning”.
GG. Potable Water - Water that is suitable for human consumption and meets all primary drinking water standards (Primary Maximum Contaminant Levels) set by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
HH. Potential Sources of Contamination – Sites or facilities that use, store, and/or dispose of substances (on site) that, due to their quantity, toxicity, and/or mobility, could impact the water quality of aquifers used for potable water supply. Examples of such sources include, but are not limited to, failing or inadequate individual sewage treatment and disposal systems, tanks used for bulk storage of petroleum products, Class V injection wells, container and drum storage sites, etc.
II. Public Water System –A system that provides potable water to the public through pipes or, after August 5, 1998, other conveyances, if such system has at least fifteen service connections or regularly serves an average of at least twenty five (25) individuals daily at least 60 days out of the year. Note: This duplicates a Mississippi State Department of Health definition. It is included in this regulation to serve as a reminder that wells exempted from regulation by MDEQ because the surface casing diameter is less than six (6) inches, may still be regulated by the Mississippi State Department of Health if they are part of a Public Water System.
JJ. Pump Installation – The installation of pumps or pumping equipment for water wells, including the removal and re-installation of pumps or pumping equipment for service, repairs, or replacement.
KK. Pumps or Pumping Equipment – Any equipment or materials utilized or intended for use in withdrawing or obtaining water from water wells or surface water diversion points.
LL. Repair of Water Wells – Work on any water well involving re-drilling, deepening, changing casing and screen depths, re-screening, cleaning by use of chemicals, and re- development; or removing and re-installing pumps, pumping equipment, or any related equipment intended to draw water from the well.
MM. State Well Report – A report documenting information related to the drilling of a well or borehole and the development and completion of a water well together with any other data or information required by MDEQ, reported on forms provided by the MDEQ.
NN. Surface casing - That string of casing in any water well having the greatest outside diameter, regardless of whether it is located at or below ground level.
OO. Suspended Status – The status assigned to a license by the Commission to indicate that the licensee has willfully violated provisions of State law or of this regulation so as to endanger himself, others, the environment, and/or the public health.
PP. Test Boring and Coring – the removal and collection of soil samples from the earth by means of augers, core-barrels, spoons, wash casing and bailers for the purpose of obtaining geologic and hydrologic information.
QQ. Tremie pipe - a device, usually a small-diameter pipe, that carries grout or other material to the bottom of a borehole or casing and that allows pressure grouting from the bottom up without introduction of air pockets.
RR. Well or “water well” - a hole that is drilled, driven, bored, excavated, or otherwise penetrated into the ground to access, evaluate and/or withdraw groundwater. For purposes of this regulation, this definition does not pertain to wells constructed for the purpose of disposal of fluids or other materials, but does include:
(1) Abandoned Well - a well that has not been used within the preceding twelve month period, or one that has had the pump disconnected and/or removed for reasons other than maintenance, repair, or replacement.
(2) Dewatering Well - a well used for temporary removal of surface water or groundwater to facilitate construction or mining operations, or for permanent protection of a structure or activity from the effects of surface water or groundwater.
(3) Monitoring Well - a well used to obtain data on the quality of water in an aquifer system or at specified depths and locations related to a potential source of pollutant.
(4) Observation Well - a well used primarily for measuring the water level in an aquifer.
(5) Recovery Well - a well constructed for the purpose of recovering undesirable groundwater for treatment or removal of contaminants.
(6) Relief Well - a well constructed to provide pressure relief from an artesian aquifer or from excessive head differentials in water table aquifers.
(7) Replacement Well - a well drilled to replace an existing well that has become unusable, provided the new well meets the requirements set forth in these regulations.
(8) Standby Well – a well that can be placed in operation to withdraw water but is only used when water is temporarily unavailable from the primary source or sources because of mechanical failure, maintenance, or power failure.
(9) Test Well – a well drilled to explore for groundwater for a water supply well.
(10) Underground Discharge Well – a well in which the top of the casing terminates at a discharge head located below the frostline.
SS. Well Completion - term used collectively to refer to both the drilling and developing phases of well construction. For the purpose of reporting requirements established in this regulation, a distinction is made between completion of drilling and completion of well development:
(1) Completion of drilling – the date that drilling is completed and the drill rig is no longer required at the site.
(2) Completion of well development – the date that the well is fully functional and ready to provide water for its designated beneficial use, including having met any applicable water testing requirements.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.2 Applicability
A. Any person, or any company, corporation, or other business entity engaging in a business or occupation that involves drilling of water wells or drilling boreholes that may penetrate water bearing strata (including constructing water wells, constructing geo-thermal systems, constructing environmental monitoring wells, conducting geotechnical investigations, conducting seismic exploration, or similar activities) or installing pumps or other equipment in water wells must first obtain the appropriate license or license renewal required pursuant to this regulation. A license is not transferable or assignable, and MDEQ will maintain a current register of licensees. If the applicant is a company, corporation, or other business entity that is not an individual, the application shall include the name of the designated individual who will hold the license for the company. A company will be deemed to be licensed only if it has a designated principal or other key employee who is licensed. The application shall be accompanied by a notarized affidavit signed by the applicant certifying that the individual applicant or the company’s designee has a minimum of three (3) years qualifying experience in the practice for which the license is being sought.
B. Exemptions – For the purposes of these regulations, a person who owns or leases property in the state; or who otherwise owns a property interest allowing the drilling of a water well on, and the use of water under, property in the state may drill a water well on that property without having a Water Well Contractor’s license provided:
(1) The well will be used only to supply water for domestic use to a single family dwelling which is the owner’s or lessee’s permanent residence; and/or to water livestock on the owner’s or lessee’s farm and/or to supply water for irrigating crops on the owner’s or lessee’s farm (crop irrigation exemption in effect until July 1, 2011 in accordance with MS Code Annotated Section 51-5-1); and
(2) The owner or lessee complies with applicable well construction standards contained in this regulation and the applicable regulations promulgated by the Mississippi State Department of Health.
C. Either a licensed water well contractor or an employee certified by the licensee in accordance with Rule 2.2.D. of this regulation must be on site and personally supervising operations during all critical stages of the drilling and completion of a potable water well including, but not limited to, collecting sand samples, logging the hole, setting the casing, grouting the well, setting the screen, placing the filter pack, developing and testing the well, and installing the pump.
D. Licensed water well contractors who have the capability to conduct simultaneous operations on multiple construction sites within the state may certify the competency of employees who will be in responsible charge of all on-site operations in the absence of the licensee. Within sixty (60) days after the effective date of this regulation, the licensee shall furnish MDEQ a list of the designated employees and a written certification that the listed employees are competent to perform and supervise all critical stages of drilling and completion of potable water wells. The list shall be updated and recertified by the licensee annually and submitted to MDEQ with the annual request for license renewal.
E. Neither these regulations, nor any permit issued thereunder, creates or includes any property right in favor of the permittee.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.3 Minimum Requirements For Licensing
An applicant for a license, as defined in this regulation, must submit a completed application on the form provided by MDEQ; and meet or comply with the requirements set forth below:
A. Water Well Contractor (Unrestricted License)
(1) Be at least twenty-one (21) years of age; and
(2) Be of good moral character; and
(3) If not previously licensed by the state, or if seeking reinstatement of a license, demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Commission, a reasonable knowledge of state water laws, regulations, water well and borehole drilling practices, and pump and well equipment installation practices by passing such examinations as may be prescribed by the Commission, or its designee; and
(4) Provide proof that the applicant possesses, or has unrestricted access to, the necessary tools and equipment to engage in all aspects of the business of water well contracting;
(5) Provide evidence of at least three (3) years qualifying experience, i.e. experience in on-site supervision and being in responsible charge of all aspects of water well and borehole construction gained while working under the personal supervision of a water well contractor holding an unrestricted license, or its equivalent; and
(6) If not previously licensed by the state, provide notarized affidavits, as required by statute, from three (3) licensed water well contractors certifying that the applicant has the necessary qualifications and experience to meet the state’s licensing standards at the level for which he is applying.
B. Specialty Driller or Pump Installer (Restricted License)
(1) Be at least twenty-one (21) years of age; and
(2) Be of good moral character; and
(3) Demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Commission, a reasonable knowledge of state water laws, regulations, and the specific practices for which the restricted license is being sought by passing such examinations as may be prescribed by the Commission, or its designee;
(4) Provide written certification that they will only engage in the limited practice for which they are seeking the restricted license, such as constructing irrigation wells in the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer (MRVA), constructing domestic wells less than six (6) inches in diameter, drilling geotechnical boreholes, constructing environmental monitoring wells, constructing geo-thermal systems, or installing and servicing pumps and related well equipment;
(5) Provide evidence of at least three (3) years of qualifying experience, i.e. experience gained while working under the direct supervision of a licensee engaged in the business or practice for which the license is being sought; and
(6) If not previously licensed by the state, provide notarized affidavits, as required by statute, from three (3) licensed water well contractors certifying that the applicant has the necessary qualifications and experience to meet the state’s licensing standards at the level for which he is applying.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.4 Examination
A. A license applicant shall be required to take such examinations as may be prescribed by MDEQ. Examinations will normally be administered to test:
(1) general knowledge of groundwater resources and wells,
(2) specialized knowledge in equipment, techniques, and practices appropriate to the license being sought, and
(3) specific knowledge of state laws, regulations, and construction standards.
Upon receipt of a completed application form and supporting documentation as set forth in Rule 2.3, MDEQ will contact the applicant to schedule the examinations. At that time, MDEQ will advise the applicant as to the types of examinations that will be administered, the general content of the examinations, and the availability of study materials.
B. The examinations will be taken at a time and place designated by MDEQ.
C. If the applicant fails to pass the examination(s), the examination(s) may be taken again upon written request, but not sooner than 30 days after the previous examination. If the applicant does not request re-examination within one (1) year, the application for license will be nullified and discarded.
D. MDEQ may waive a portion of the examination requirement for an applicant with a valid license from another state having license requirements substantially the same as those contained in this regulation. However, all applicants will be required to pass the examination on state laws, regulations and construction standards.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq.; 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.5 Fees
A. License Fee – Upon passing the examination, the annual license fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) must be paid before the license will be issued. The fee must be paid by check, money order, or electronic payment directed to MDEQ. Do not send cash.
B. Renewal Fee - An annual renewal fee of one hundred dollars ($100.00) must be paid to MDEQ with the request for renewal of a license.
C. Late Fees – A late fee of ten dollars ($10.00) per month, or any fraction thereof, will be assessed for renewal or reinstatement requests received after the expiration date of the last valid license.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq.; 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.6 License Renewal
A. All licenses expire on June 30 and must be renewed annually. The licensee shall submit a completed renewal request form, provided by MDEQ, along with the appropriate fee to MDEQ prior to June 30. Re-examination is not required for timely renewal of a license.
B. Receipt of the renewal form and fee by MDEQ prior to June 30 shall have the effect of extending the old license until the new license and ID is issued, or until the applicant is notified that the request for renewal has been denied. If the request for renewal is not properly filed by June 30, the license will expire and the licensee shall cease all work for which a valid license is required until such time as the license has been reinstated.
C. A licensee may request that an expired license be re-instated by submitting to MDEQ the required renewal form and paying the appropriate fee plus accumulated late fees. Failure to request re-instatement within one (1) year after the expiration date may be deemed a forfeiture of the reinstatement option. Any request for reinstatement submitted thereafter may require submittal of a new application and be subject to the examination requirement.
D. Restricted licensees requesting renewal must submit a written certification that they will continue to work only in accordance with the conditions of the restricted license.
E. A completed continuing education form, provided by MDEQ, shall be submitted with the renewal form to MDEQ.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.7 Continuing Education
A. All licensees are required to complete a minimum of four (4) hours of continuing education annually and submit proof as required by MDEQ. Every two (2) years, one (1) of the hours of continuing education must be on state rules and regulations as presented by MDEQ.
B. A licensee may be exempted from the continuing education requirements one of the following reasons:
(1) New licensees who have obtained their license less than one (1) year before the June
th renewal deadline.
(2) Licensees who have experienced physical disability, serious illness, or other extenuating circumstances that prevent work for more than 180 days in a year. Supporting documentation must be furnished to MDEQ upon request.
(3) Licensees serving on temporary active duty in the armed forces of the United States for a period of time exceeding 180 days in a year. Supporting documentation must be furnished to MDEQ upon request.
C. Acceptable continuing education programs shall be designed to improve the license holder’s professional skills and knowledge in the ground water industry. Course content shall be related to subjects such as well and pump standards, geologic characteristics of the state, state groundwater laws and related regulations, well construction and pump installation practices and techniques, drilling and job site safety, protection of public health related to drinking water, environmental protection, technological advances, and business management.
D. Continuing education hours may be earned as follows:
(1) Attending conferences or training hosted by regional or national associations of the ground water industry.
(2) Successful completion of correspondence, video, or electronic short courses/tutorials presented by approved education providers.
(3) Instruction of approved continuing education courses.
(4) Successful completion of courses, seminars, workshops, or lectures given by accredited educational institutions
E. Approval of Continuing Education Programs
(1) Continuing education programs must be approved by MDEQ.
(2) Applications to approve continuing education programs must contain the following minimum information:
(a) Description of course(s)
(b) Length of course(s) in actual training hours
(c) Name and qualifications of instructor(s)
(3) Upon receiving approval of a continuing education course or program, the provider is entitled to state that the course has been approved by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality – Office of Land and Water Resources for continuing education credit under the Licensing of Water Well Contractors Title 11, Part 7, Chapter 2, Rule 2.1, et seq.; or, if the program is approved then the provider is entitled to state that they are an approved educational provider by the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality – Office of Land and Water Resources for continuing education under the Licensing of Water Well Contractors Title 11, Part 7, Chapter 2, Rule 2.1, et seq.
F. Proof of Continuing Education
(1) The license holder is responsible for the submission of proof of all approved training. Inability of the applicant to substantiate credit hours submitted is grounds for disallowance of the credits in question.
(2) Proof of continuing education will consist of:
(a) Official transcripts from an accredited educational institution
(b) A certificate of completion signed by the instructor or approved educational provider, containing the license holder’s name, date of training, name of course and number of hours of actual training
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.8 Equipment
All drilling rigs, water trucks, service vehicles and other vehicles used in the normal drilling, construction, completion, or reworking of wells and boreholes, and/or the installation of pumping equipment must have the name of the licensee (person, firm, or corporation), and the letters “MS Lic.” with the appropriate license number prominently and legibly displayed on both sides of the vehicle. The letters and numerals shall be not less than two (2) inches in height and be placed on a background of contrasting color. Drill rigs shall be registered with MDEQ, for identification purpose only, by completing and submitting forms provided by MDEQ for that purpose.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq.; 51-5-1, et seq.; 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.9 State Well Reports
The State Well Report will include sections for a driller’s log, a well completion report, and a well modification report. The driller’s log portion of the report shall be completed by the licensed contractor and submitted to MDEQ for all drilled wells and boreholes that penetrate water bearing strata. Water well contractors drilling irrigation wells into the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer (MRVA) shall furnish a copy of the driller’s log to the YMD Joint Water Management District (YMD) at the same time the original report is submitted to MDEQ. Driller’s logs will not be required for geotechnical boreholes less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth that do not encounter water bearing strata; environmental monitoring wells less than twenty-five (25) in depth that are regulated under other state and federal environmental programs; or small diameter wells or sampling holes less than fifty (50) feet in depth that are established with direct push (geo-probe) equipment. If a water well is developed and completed by a water well contractor immediately upon completion of drilling, both sections of the form shall be completed by the contractor and the report submitted to MDEQ within thirty (30) days after completion of the well. If for any reason a well is not developed and completed immediately upon completion of drilling, the following procedure shall be followed:
A. The driller’s log section of the well report form provided by MDEQ shall be completed by the water well contractor who constructed the well or borehole and submitted to MDEQ within thirty (30) days after completion of drilling. For all water wells and boreholes, the driller’s log section of the report must be signed by an appropriately licensed water well contractor. The driller’s log entries on the report form shall be true, accurate, and complete. Portions of the form that may not be applicable shall contain an entry to that effect. Incomplete or inaccurate submittals will be returned to the licensee for completion or correction, but the 30-day filing period will not be extended. If the properly-executed form is not on file with MDEQ by the end of the 30- day period, the licensee will be deemed to be in non-compliance and may be subject to penalties as prescribed by statute and this regulation. The water well contractor filing the report shall keep a copy of the submittal and provide a copy to the owner of the well or borehole. For geotechnical investigations, the licensee may submit boring logs generated
for a site report in lieu of the MDEQ form, provided the logs include all required information.
B. If a water well is completed by someone other than the water well contractor who constructed the well, the owner of the well shall be responsible for providing a copy of the state well report form containing the previously completed driller’s log to the licensee responsible for completion of the well.
C. The licensee who develops and completes the well shall fill out the well completion section of the well report on the copy of the form containing the previously submitted driller’s log and submit the completed report to MDEQ within thirty (30) days after completion of the well. For all water wells, the well completion section of the report must be signed by an appropriately licensed water well contractor. The entries on the report form relating to well completion shall be true, accurate, and complete. Portions of the form that may not be applicable shall contain an entry to that effect. Incomplete or inaccurate submittals will be returned to the responsible licensee for completion or correction, but the 30-day filing period will not be extended. If the properly-executed form is not on file with MDEQ by the end of the 30-day period, the licensee will be deemed to be in non-compliance and may be subject to penalties as prescribed by statute and this regulation. The water well contractor filing the report shall keep a copy of the submittal and provide a copy to the owner of the well.
D. The well modification report shall be filed with MDEQ by the licensed water well contractor within thirty (30) days after any major modification to, or rehabilitation of, an existing well six (6) inches or greater in diameter. The report shall include the water use permit number associated with the well and a detailed description of the work performed. When a well that does not comply with current construction standards requires major modifications or rehabilitation, the work shall include items necessary to bring the well up to current minimum standards set forth in Rule 2.12.A.1.b., c. and d.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.10 Suspension/Revocation of License
Grounds for the suspension or revocation of a license are as follows:
A. Providing false information in an application for a license or any affidavit required in the licensing process;
B. Violating any provision of Miss. Code Ann. Sections 51-5-1, et seq., or this regulation;
C. Attempting to obtain a license by fraud or misrepresentation;
D. Participating in fraudulent, deceptive, or dishonest business practices;
E. Demonstrated incompetency as a driller and/or pump installer;
F. Failure or refusal to file accurate and timely reports as required by this regulation; or
G. Failure to obey Orders, Rules and Regulations of the Commission, including refusal to accept or receive official correspondence from the Commission or its designee.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq.,49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.11 Hearings and Appeals
Procedures for hearings and appeals of Commission decisions are set forth in Miss. Code Annotated, Sections 51-5-7 and 51-5-9.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.12 Design Criteria And Construction Standards
The Licensee shall be responsible for compliance with all applicable state and federal statutes and regulations.
A. Water Wells and Boreholes Penetrating Aquifers In General Use For Domestic and Public Water Supply – The standards contained herein are the minimum construction standards considered necessary for the protection of the state’s high-quality groundwater resources. Other regulatory programs may be applicable and additional standards may be required for certain types of facilities, such as Mississippi State Department of Health regulations governing public supply wells. If a water well contractor encounters geologic formations or unusual circumstances that appear to dictate a deviation from the standards, the contractor shall consult with MDEQ staff regarding proposed construction procedures for the water well or borehole in question.
(1) Construction Standards – The following construction standards apply to wells and boreholes penetrating water bearing strata including but not limited to, potable water wells, irrigation wells, monitoring wells, observation wells, underground discharge wells, dewatering wells, saline or brackish water withdrawal wells, contaminant recovery wells, heat pump water supply holes and vertical closed- loop system holes, industrial supply wells, cathodic protection wells, rig supply wells and geotechnical boreholes:
(a) All water wells and boreholes covered under this section shall be constructed by a licensed water well contractor unless specifically exempted by statute.
(b) Well casing shall terminate not less than twelve (12) inches above natural ground elevation or, where practicable, above the 100-year flood elevation. However, if flood levels around the well routinely exceed a reasonable height for an extended casing above the twelve (12) inch minimum, then the well shall be fully sealed with a Braden Casing Head, or approved equivalent, to prevent the flow of flood waters into the casing. The casing head shall contain a screw-in plug with a minimum diameter of one-half (1/2) inch to provide access for water level measurements. If the casing is not covered with a recorder box or pump housing, then it must have a locked, overlapping cover or other suitable
cover capable of preventing unauthorized access to the casing head and access plug.
(c) Public water supply wells shall have the top of the well casing set at least one (1) foot above the 100-year flood level.
(d) All wells shall have a check valve installed in the discharge line to prevent the intentional or accidental introduction of contaminants into the well. All new unmetered wells larger than six (6) inches in diameter shall have a minimum of four (4) feet of straight pipe installed between the casing head and the check valve, and all other equipment, valves, pressure relief valves, vacuum breakers, and distribution systems shall be connected on the discharge side of the check valve.
(e) All wells, except approved underground discharge wells as specified in paragraph o. below, shall be constructed in such a manner that the finished ground elevations around the casing are sloped to drain away from the casing. Equipment such as engines, pressure tanks, or fuel tanks to be installed shall be placed on pre-cast concrete blocks or pads to prevent differential settlement that could result in damage to the pump and the well.
(f) The annular space on all wells covered by this section of the regulation shall be grouted from a depth of at least ten (10) feet below the surface to the surface, except as specified in paragraphs g, i, j, k, l, m, o, and p below.
(g) Wells located within one hundred (100) feet of a potential source of pollution such as sewers, septic tanks, landfills, and waste and raw material piles shall be grouted from a depth of at least fifty (50) feet below the land surface to the surface, except as specified in paragraphs h, i, j, k, l, n, and o below.
(h) Potable water wells shall not be constructed within 100 feet of any potential source of pollution.
(i) Wells located within one-quarter mile of a known existing area of contaminated aquifer shall be grouted from the top of the water bearing stratum to the ground surface, or the top of the casing for underground discharge wells.
(j) Outer casing for wells serving public water supply systems shall be grouted from the top of the target water bearing stratum to the ground surface.
(k) monitoring wells shall be grouted from the top of the seal or filter pack to the ground surface, unless a more stringent requirement is mandated by other applicable regulatory programs. Specifics of monitoring well construction shall follow the most stringent requirements of the applicable regulatory programs.
(l) Cathodic protection wells shall be grouted from a depth of fifty (50) feet below ground surface to the ground surface. Wells constructed with granular material such as gravel from the top of the anodes to near the surface are prohibited. If wells are no longer used, the vent pipe, casing or other non-grouted openings shall be grouted from a depth of at least ten (10) feet below the ground surface to the ground surface.
(m) For continuous lengths of grout not separated by multiple screens, grout shall be introduced in one continuous operation from the top of the water rearing stratum to the ground surface.
(n) Grout for all holes covered under this section shall consist of either neat cement, cement grout, cement-bentonite mixture (5-8% bentonite), or bentonite. Bentonite pellets or bentonite chips may be added under free-fall conditions for depths not exceeding twenty-five (25) feet. Free-fall addition of any other type grout from the surface is prohibited. Granulated or pelletized bentonite may be placed to greater depths only if introduced through a tremie pipe.
(o) All wells, regardless of size, which are drilled through or into aquifers containing chloride concentrations in excess of 250 milligrams per liter (mg/l) and/or total dissolved solids (TDS) concentrations in excess of 1000 milligrams per liter (mg/l), must be completed using metal casing. Furthermore, all such wells shall be completed using only the casing method of grouting (Halliburton method) to grout thoroughly the annular space from the bottom of the casing to ground surface or to the top of the casing for underground discharge wells.
(p) Outer casing for underground discharge domestic wells shall be grouted from a depth of at least ten (10) feet below the top of the casing at the underground discharge head, or pitless adapter, to the top of the casing.
(q) Public water supply wells shall be constructed in such a manner that any column/casing vents and blowoff valves are properly screened.
(2) Disinfection
(a) All water used in the drilling or construction process and in well development shall be clean and free of impurities that could contaminate water bearing sands penetrated by the well or borehole. For construction and development of a potable water well, water shall be obtained from a groundwater source of proven quality such as a domestic well or a public water supply system. If the water is obtained from a local public water supply distribution system, it need not have additional chlorine added during the drilling and/or construction process; otherwise, the water shall be chlorinated. A residual of free chlorine of not less than 5 parts per million (ppm) shall be maintained in any water used for well development.
(b) Gravel to be placed in potable water wells shall be disinfected with a solution of at least 50 mg/l free chlorine. (Clean pre-packaged gravel is exempt from this requirement.)
(c) Upon completion of drilling potable water wells, the well and adjacent aquifer shall be disinfected using a solution of at least 50 mg/l free chlorine applied for at least 24 hours. The procedure shall meet or exceed the American Water Works Association (AWWA) Standard current at the time of the activity.
(d) After disinfection, the potable water well shall be pumped until a chlorine free sample is collected from the well. The sample also must be free of coliform bacteria. Samples shall be collected, submitted, and analyzed in accordance with applicable Mississippi State Department of Health requirements.
B. Water Wells and Boreholes Constructed in the Mississippi River Valley Alluvial Aquifer (MRVA) – The MRVA is a uniquely situated shallow aquifer used almost exclusively for agricultural irrigation with very little potential of increased demand for domestic or public water supply. Because of the unconsolidated nature of the material and the predominant agricultural water use, the drilling technique in general use for large diameter irrigation wells in the MRVA is reverse circulation rotary drilling. Consequently the standards for construction and disinfection have been modified slightly to reflect the water usage and drilling practices in the MRVA. If a water well contractor encounters geologic formations or unusual circumstances that appear to dictate a deviation from the standards, the contractor shall consult with MDEQ staff regarding proposed construction procedures for the water well or borehole in question.
(1) Construction Standards – The following construction standards apply to irrigation wells screened and completed in the MRVA and to boreholes that do not penetrate the base of the MRVA, including but not limited to, irrigation wells, monitoring wells, observation wells, and geotechnical boreholes:
(a) All water wells and boreholes covered under this section shall be constructed by a licensed water well contractor unless specifically exempted by statute.
(b) Well casing shall terminate not less than twelve (12) inches above natural ground elevation or, where practicable, above the 100-year flood elevation. However, if flood levels around the well routinely exceed a reasonable height for an extended casing above the twelve (12) inch minimum, then the well shall be fully sealed with a Braden Casing Head, or approved equivalent, to prevent the flow of flood waters into the casing. The casing head shall contain a screw-in plug with a minimum diameter of one-half (1/2) inch to provide access for water level measurements. If the casing is not covered with a recorder box or pump housing, then it must have a locked, overlapping cover or other suitable cover capable of preventing unauthorized access to the casing head and access plug.
(c) All wells shall have a check valve installed in the discharge line to prevent the intentional or accidental introduction of contaminants into the well. All new unmetered wells larger than six (6) inches in diameter shall have a minimum of four (4) feet of straight pipe installed between the casing head and the check valve, and all other equipment, valves, pressure relief valves, vacuum breakers, and distribution systems shall be connected on the discharge side of the check valve.
(d) All wells, except approved underground discharge wells, shall be constructed in such a manner that the finished ground elevations around the casing are sloped to drain away from the casing. Equipment such as engines, pressure tanks, or fuel tanks to be installed shall be placed on pre-cast concrete blocks or pads to prevent differential settlement that could result in damage to the pump and the well.
(e) The annular space on all wells covered by this section of the regulation shall be grouted or sealed with bentonite from the lowest level of disturbed earth immediately adjacent to the casing down to a depth of at least ten (10) feet below that level, except as specified in paragraphs of. and g. below.
(f) Wells located within one hundred (100) feet of a potential source of pollution such as sewers, septic tanks, landfills, and waste and raw material piles shall be grouted from the lowest level of disturbed earth immediately adjacent to the casing down to a depth of at least fifty (50) feet below that level, except as specified in paragraph g. below.
(g) Wells located within one-quarter mile of a known existing area of
contaminated aquifer shall be grouted from the lowest level of disturbed earth immediately adjacent to the casing to the top of the water bearing stratum.
(h) Grout for all holes covered under this section shall consist of either neat cement, cement grout, cement-bentonite mixture (5-8% bentonite), or bentonite. Bentonite pellets or bentonite chips may be added under free-fall conditions for depths not exceeding twenty-five (25) feet. Freefall addition of any other type grout from the surface is prohibited. Granulated or pelletized bentonite may be placed to greater depths only if introduced through a tremie pipe.
(2) Drilling Fluids and Disinfection
(a) All water used in the drilling or construction process and in well development for non-potable water wells in the MRVA shall be dosed to a minimum concentration of fifty parts per million (50 ppm) of chlorine, i.e., two (2) gallons of sodium hypochlorite (laundry bleach, approximately five percent (5%) available chlorine) per one thousand (1000) gallons of drilling water.
(b) The licensee shall denote on the driller’s log portion of the State Well Report the location of the source of any surface water used as well as the method of dosing and the volume of chlorine used in the drilling and development of a non-potable water well in the MRVA.
(c) Equipment used in the transport, storage, or circulation of surface water during the drilling and development of a non-potable water well in the MRVA shall not be used thereafter in the drilling and development of a potable water well without having first been disinfected with a solution of at least fifty parts per million (50 ppm) free chlorine for a minimum contact time of twenty-four (24) hours.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.13 Maintenance and Service Criteria for Public Water Wells
A. General – Installation of pumps and well equipment shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation and this regulation. All pumps and well equipment shall be designed and installed so as to prevent contamination of the well.
(1) Licensing – Pump installation shall be performed either by a Water Well Contractor holding an unrestricted license or by a restricted licensee who specializes in pump installation and well service.
(2) Location of pressure tanks and switches – Pressure tanks and switches located above ground shall be on a concrete slab or preformed pad or blocks. Tanks and switches installed below grade shall be in a concrete pit or basement designed to be adequately drained, unless approved for direct burial. A pressure tank may be buried provided the tank is designed for that type installation. Tanks to be installed inside the bore of a water well must be designed for that purpose and approved by the Commission.
(3) Temporary seal – If the pump and well equipment are not installed immediately upon completion of drilling, all openings to the well must be closed to prevent pollution or vandalism. After pump installation, all open spaces must be sealed off to prevent contamination of the ground water.
(4) Drop pipe, wire, etc. – All drop pipe, wire, pumps, and other pumping equipment to be installed in the well shall either be new or be disinfected with a solution of at least 50 mg/l free chlorine; and it shall be installed in such a manner as to permit removal and repair of all equipment. If equipment or tools are lost in the well and not recovered, a statement describing the item or items lost shall be attached to the well completion report submitted to MDEQ.
(5) Prevention of contamination – Pumping equipment shall be installed in such a manner as to prevent the entrance of contamination into the ground water. Discharge pipes shall be fitted with devices which will prevent the entrance of small animals.
(6) Check valves – Pumping equipment installed and used in conjunction with Chemigation, which is the practice of injecting agricultural chemicals into irrigation lines in order to mix and distribute the chemicals with the water flowing through the irrigation system, shall have either two check valves, or other means of backflow prevention as may be approved by MDEQ, installed between the well head and the point of introduction of any chemicals.
B. Submersible pump installation
(1) Check valves – Submersible Pumps shall have no less than 2 check valves installed. One check valve must be installed above ground.
(2) Wire -- Wire shall be secured to the drop pipe in a manner which will support the weight of the wire and keep the wire close to the pipe.
(3) Clamps -- All clamps used shall be all stainless steel.
C. Jet pump installation
(1) Check valves -- Jet Pumps shall have a check valve installed on the discharge side of the pressure tank.
(2) Clamps - All clamps used shall be all stainless steel.
D. Turbine pump installation
(1) Steel column pipe for line shaft turbine pumps – Steel column pipe for turbine pump irrigation wells shall be standard weight flanged or threaded steel pipe.
(2) Plastic column pipe may be used for turbine pump installation provided the pipe is designed and manufactured for that purpose.
E. Pressure systems – All pressure systems will have a pressure relief valve installed between the well seal and pressure switch.
F. Power and control wiring - Licensees may run power and control wiring from a disconnect box to water well equipment. A license issued pursuant to this regulation does not authorize the licensee to alter the existing electrical service to any building or structure or perform any other electrical work covered by the National Electric Code (NEC) or local building codes.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.14 Decommissioning of Abandoned or Unused Water Wells and Boreholes
A. Applicability
(1) Except as stated in paragraph B. below, the standards for decommissioning abandoned or unused water wells and boreholes apply to all abandoned water wells and to all boreholes that penetrate water bearing strata or are greater than twenty-five (25) feet in depth including potable water wells, agricultural wells, monitoring wells, observation wells, dewatering wells, relief wells, saline or brackish water withdrawal wells, contaminant recovery wells, heat pump water supply wells and closed loop system holes, industrial supply wells, rig supply wells, geotechnical boreholes, cathodic protection wells and pilot boreholes.
(2) All wells and boreholes that penetrate water bearing stratum with a depth of 25 feet, or greater, below land surface must properly be decommissioned by a water well contractor licensed by MDEQ. Water wells less than 25 feet in depth below land surface may be plugged by someone other than a licensed water well contractor. However, the same procedures and reporting requirements apply regardless of who plugs the well.
(3) If approved and accepted in writing by MDEQ, properly cased and sealed wells may be provided with a locking cover capable of preventing the entrance of contaminants and used as monitoring wells or observation wells in lieu of abandonment. If the use of an observation or monitoring well is later discontinued by MDEQ, the landowner/permittee shall be
responsible for having the well properly decommissioned by a licensed water well contractor.
B. Exemptions - Exemption from this regulation does not relieve the owner of the responsibility for identifying and complying with other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. The following types of wells and boreholes are exempt from decommissioning requirements set forth in this regulation:
(1) Saline water wells associated with enhanced oil and gas recovery operation, brine withdrawal wells, and other types of on-site oil and gas well holes, including Class II wells regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. Sections 6901, et seq.;
(2) Class I, III, IV and V injection wells regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), 42 U.S.C. Sections 6901, et seq.; and
(3) Geotechnical boreholes less than twenty-five (25) feet in depth that do not penetrate water bearing strata and boreholes drilled in planned roadbed construction areas where the natural overburden will be removed to within twenty-five (25) feet of the bottom of the hole.
C. Types of Abandoned or Unused Wells – A water well may be considered by MDEQ to have been abandoned if its use has been permanently discontinued; if the well has not been used in the preceding 12 months (except for established rotations of pumping equipment between wells related to crop irrigation and instances where the owner has notified MDEQ of an anticipated longer period of nonuse after which the well will be placed back in service.); if the pumping equipment has been removed (except for established rotations of pumping equipment between wells related to crop irrigation); or if the well cannot be repaired. Rig supply holes, geotechnical boreholes, pilot holes, and dewatering holes are considered abandoned immediately upon completion of the project phase for which they are drilled, unless the well is an integral part of the continued operation of the project, such as a pressure relief well or a permanently used dewatering well.
D. Time allowed for plugging - Rig supply wells, pilot holes, and geotechnical boreholes shall be plugged within 30 days after abandonment or cessation of use. All other holes shall be plugged within 180 days after abandonment or cessation of use.
E. Decommissioning Forms -- Abandonment and plugging of water wells and boreholes shall be reported on a decommissioning form approved by and made available from MDEQ. The person or contractor who plugs an abandoned water well or borehole shall submit the decommissioning form to MDEQ within 30 days after completion of the plugging. For irrigation wells located in the MRVA, a
copy of the form shall be submitted to YMD at the same time the original is submitted to MDEQ. Reporting the abandonment and plugging of multiple water wells and/or boreholes on one form may be permissible, with prior approval from MDEQ, provided the same decommissioning procedure was used and the location of each water well and/or borehole is clearly identified.
F. Decommissioning Procedures – The following procedures shall be followed in the decommissioning of any water well or borehole for which decommissioning is required under this regulation:
(1) Grout for all holes shall consist of neat cement, cement grout, cement bentonite mixture (5-8% bentonite), or bentonite. Bentonite pellets may be added under free-fall conditions for depths not exceeding twenty-five (25) feet, providing pellets are placed in layers not more than five (5) feet deep and tamped into place after addition of each layer. Granulated or palletized bentonite may be placed to greater depths if introduced through a tremie pipe. Free-fall addition of other types of grout from the surface is prohibited;
(2) Obstructions shall be removed from the well casing;
(3) If there is reason to question the physical integrity of the well casing because of the age of the well or the material used for the casing, or there are no records to indicate that the annular space was grouted properly during construction of the well, the driller shall consult with MDEQ before plugging the well. In such instances, MDEQ may require that the casing be perforated to allow the introduction of grout into cavities or voids that may have formed outside the casing; or may require that the casing be removed from the hole prior to grouting;
(4) For abandoned water wells in agricultural fields, the casing shall be cut off and removed down to a minimum depth of three feet below land surface. After grouting, the excavation shall be filled with compacted soil. In other areas, the casing shall be cut off and removed at least down to the ground surface elevation. MDEQ may authorize alternate methods of abandonment and/or abandonment by other than a licensed water well contractor, provided the results will meet the intent of the regulations. Only detailed written requests to utilize an alternate method of abandonment or to abandon a well without utilizing a licensed water well contractor shall be considered for approval. If approved, MDEQ will provide written authorization to the requestor.
(5) Abandoned water wells or boreholes shall be sealed from the bottom of the hole to ground surface using a grout as described in paragraph 1 above.
(6) MDEQ may authorize alternate methods of abandonment and/or abandonment by other than a licensed water well contractor, provided the results will meet the intent of the regulations. Only detailed written
requests to utilize an alternate method of abandonment or to abandon a well without utilizing a licensed water well contractor shall be considered for approval. If approved, MDEQ will provide written authorization to the requestor.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.15 Enforcement
Enforcement of these regulations shall be governed by Miss. Code Ann. Sections 51-5-7 and 51-5-17, and Sections 49-17-31 through 49-17-43.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.16 Correspondence and Adequacy of Notice
A. General – All permittees and licensees shall inform MDEQ of any address changes within fifteen (15) days of any change of address, and must readily accept all mail sent to them from the Commission, MDEQ, or the Permit Board.
B. Registered or certified mail – Registered or Certified Mail sent with proper postage and to the last address provided to MDEQ by the permittee or licensee shall be considered adequate notification of notice served if MDEQ is notified that the mail was delivered and accepted or if the mail is returned as rejected or unclaimed by the addressee.
C. Refusal to accept mail – Refusal to accept mail from the Commission, the Permit Board, the Department, or its designee, shall be considered a violation of this regulation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 2.17 Confidential Information
Procedures for declaring submitted information confidential and for agency handling of such information are found in Miss. Code Ann. Section 49- 17-39, Section 51-3-44, and the Commission’s Regulations Regarding the Review and Reproduction of Public Records (Chapter 11, Part 1, Chapter 2).
Part 7, Chapter 3: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Dam Safety Regulations
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 51-5-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.1 Definitions
Rule 3.2. Permitting Applicability, Exceptions, and Limitations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.3 Application Content and Procedure Rule 3.4
Permitting Requirements Rule 3.5. Design and Maintenance Requirements Rule 3.6. Inspections, Breach Analysis, and Emergency Action Plans Rule 3.7 Confidential Information Rule 3.8. Compliance and Enforcement Rule 3.9. Correspondence and Adequacy of Notice Rule 3.10. Hearings and Appeals Appendix A Hydrologic Design Criteria
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.1 Definitions
The words and phrases used in this regulation shall have the meanings set forth in this section:
Alter or Repair - Any change in the surface or cross-section of existing dams and/or appurtenant works or any modification to appurtenant structures, other than minor grading and fill associated with routine slope and turf maintenance activities. Examples of alterations or repairs include such work as adding significant amounts of material to, or removing material from, the cross-section of a dam; changing the dimensions or elevations of an auxiliary (emergency) or overflow spillway; replacing pipe or in any other way altering a principal spillway; making any repairs of erosion or undermining associated with seepage through the dam; building a roadway on or across any part of a dam; burying pipelines; or in any way altering the approved operational features of a dam.
Appurtenant Works - This term includes, but is not limited to; spillways, either in the dam or separate there from; the reservoir and its rim or shoreline; low level outlet works; and water conduits such as tunnels, pipelines, or penstocks, either through the dam or its abutments.
Breach - Partial removal of a dam by creating a channel through the dam to the original stream bed elevation, so that no water is impounded by the breached structure.
Commission - The Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, or its designee.
Dam - Any artificial barrier, including appurtenant works, constructed to impound or divert water, waste water, liquid borne materials, or solids that may flow if saturated. All structures necessary to maintain the water level in an impoundment or to divert a stream from its course will be considered one dam.
Days - Calendar days including Saturdays, Sundays, and Holidays; unless specifically indicated otherwise in the body of this regulation.
Department or MDEQ - The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
Emergency Action Plan - A formal written document identifying the area that would be inundated in the event of a dam failure and setting forth the plans and procedures for notifying the individuals, agencies, and public officials that would mobilize resources to respond to the emergency.
Emergency -This term includes, but is not limited to, uncontrolled breach of a dam; or any conditions leading to, or causing, a breach, overtopping, or any other condition in the dam and/or its appurtenant works that may lead to failure of the dam or otherwise pose a threat to life or property.
Enlarge -Any change in, or addition to, an existing dam or reservoir, which raises, or may raise the water storage elevation or storage volume of the water, waste-water, or liquid- borne material impounded by the dam.
High Hazard-A class of dam in which failure may cause loss of life, serious damage to residential, industrial, or commercial buildings; or damage to, or disruption of, important public utilities or transportation facilities such as major highways or railroads. Dams which meet the statutory thresholds for regulation that are proposed for construction in established or proposed residential, commercial, or industrial areas will be assigned this classification, unless the applicant provides convincing evidence to the contrary.
Impoundment or Reservoir - A man-made dammed, leveed, or diked area or basin designed to store water or other liquids above surface levels that would occur under natural conditions.
Incremental Consequence Analysis – Incremental Consequence Analysis is an analysis to determine the flood above which there is a negligible increase in downstream water surface elevation, velocity, and/or consequences due to failure of the dam when compared to the same flood without dam failure.
Inflow Design Flood - the flood event used to determine the design dimensions for the dam and spillways
Low Hazard - A class of dam in which failure would at the most result in damage to agricultural land, farm buildings (excluding residences), or minor roads.
Permit - Official written authorization from the Board, or its designee, authorizing construction, enlargement, repair, or alteration of a dam; including any specified conditions or limitations under which the work is to be performed by the person to whom the approval is granted.
Permit Board or Board - The Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board.
Person - The state or other agency or institution thereof, any municipality, political subdivision, public or private corporation, individual, partnership, association or other entity, and including any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality, political subdivision, or public or private corporation, or the United States or any officer or employee thereof.
Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) - The rainfall event used for hydraulic design of dams and appurtenant spillways in Mississippi. The Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP) varies by location within the state and the event used in design shall be as defined for the proposed
construction location by Hydrometeorological Reports published by the Office of Hydrology, National Weather Service.
Professional Engineer— An engineer with a minimum of 5 years’ experience in the design and construction of dams who is registered with the State of Mississippi Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors.
Professional Geologist - A geologist with experience in determining and analyzing geologic conditions affecting the siting of dams who is registered with the Mississippi State Board of Registered Professional Geologists.
Removal - Complete elimination of the dam embankment or structure to restore the approximate original topographic contours of the area.
Significant Hazard - A class of dam in which failure poses no threat to life, but may cause significant damage to main roads, minor railroads, or cause interruption of use or service of public utilities.
Substantial Completion – Substantial completion means the dam is capable of impounding water
Sunny Day Top of Dam – A condition in which the water surface elevation in the lake is at the elevation of the low point on the crest of the dam and the downstream channel is considered dry prior to a failure of the dam.
Water Storage Elevation - The maximum surface elevation of water that can be maintained by a dam or reservoir.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.2 Permitting Applicability, Exceptions, and Limitations
A. Applicability
(1) Except as otherwise provided in this section, any person or entity proposing to construct, enlarge, repair, or alter a dam or reservoir in the state of Mississippi must obtain a permit from the Permit Board, or its designee, prior to commencement of any site work related to the project. Application for such permits shall be made on a form prescribed by the Board and will be processed by the Board in accordance with Mississippi Code Annotated, Section 49-17-29.
(2) The Board may require submittal of any information deemed necessary to
evaluate a proposal to construct, enlarge, repair, or alter a dam or reservoir. Once the Board has authorized the project, the applicant shall not modify the approved design, plans, specifications, or construction methods, or act according to such modified documents, without first obtaining a revised permit from the Permit Board.
(3) Any person intending to acquire the right to store or use water from a reservoir formed by a dam, regardless of whether or not a permit is required under this regulation, shall submit an application for a surface water use permit to MDEQ in accordance with Mississippi Code Annotated, Sections 51-3-5 and 51-3-7, and the regulations of the Commission promulgated thereunder.
B. Exceptions
(1) A permit is not required for emergency repairs to a dam which is in imminent danger of failing. However, the dam owner shall report such emergency repairs to MDEQ by close of business on the next business day following the incident and file a written report with MDEQ within five (5) days of the incident.
(2) A permit shall not be required for:
(a) a peripheral dam or barrier eight (8) feet or less in height, measured from the point of lowest elevation of its toe, regardless of the impounded storage volume; or
(b) a dam that impounds twenty-five (25) acre-feet or less at maximum storage volume; or
(c) a dam that does not impound a watercourse with a continuous flow of water, as determined by the Commission;
Any person or entity proposing to construct, enlarge, repair, or alter any dam or reservoir in reliance upon the provisions of Rule 3.2.B.2.a through c to exempt the project from the requirement to obtain a permit must submit a notification of the planned project to MDEQ prior to the onset of construction. If, upon review of such notification, the Commission determines that the proposed dam poses a potential threat to downstream lives and property; the person or entity proposing the project may be required to comply with design and safety requirements contained in Rule 3.4 of this regulation. The Commission may enforce compliance with such design and safety standards in the interest of public safety, notwithstanding the fact that a permit may not be required for the project. The pre- construction notification shall be submitted on a form prescribed by the Permit Board.
(3) Prior authorization is not required for recurring routine maintenance activities including but not limited to mowing, grading or filling ruts in roadways that cross the dam, filling ruts or repairing other surface damage caused by vehicles or animals on the slopes, filling eroded areas in the surface of an embankment to establish or maintain the turf, or other similar activities.
C. Limitations
(1) The Board's receipt, comment, or approval of any design, construction, or modification does not relieve the dam's owner, consulting engineer, consulting geologist, contractor, equipment supplier, attorney, or any other party of any liabilities or responsibilities. Board and/or MDEQ approval of, or comment on, any document does not establish or convey any liability or responsibility to the Board and/or MDEQ, nor does such approval or comment represent any assurances that the project will comply with any authorization requirements or otherwise perform as intended by the owner, consulting engineer, consulting geologist, contractor, equipment supplier, attorney or other parties. The dam owner and/or any person responsible for constructing, enlarging, repairing, or altering a dam or reservoir shall comply with all conditions of the Board's authorization to construct and ensure that all construction, operation, and maintenance activities achieve such compliance. It is the responsibility of the dam owner/applicant to obtain all other approvals, permits, clearances, easements, and/or agreements for the construction and/or operation of the dam which may be required by federal, state, or local law or regulation.
(2) Permits issued by the Board expire one (1) year from the date of issuance if work has not commenced on the project. If the work cannot be commenced within the one-year period, the dam owner or any other person responsible for the project must request a time extension from the Board, in writing, at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the one-year authorization period. The written request shall provide an explanation of project delays and an estimated construction commencement date. The Board will normally grant a time extension; unless the Board determines that circumstances surrounding the project have so changed that the construction and operation of the dam as originally proposed would violate state or federal laws or regulations. If the applicant allows the authorization to expire, a new application must be submitted and approved prior to the onset of construction.
(3) The hazard classification assigned to a dam by the Board is subject to change based on future developments that may increase the potential threat to life and property in the event of a dam failure. The dam owner and/or any person responsible for the construction and/or operation of a dam or reservoir assume all risks associated with designing and constructing the dam to meet less than the most stringent design criteria for high-hazard dams, including the risk of having to make modifications to the dam to meet future heightened
regulatory requirements associated with a change in classification.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, etseq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.3 Application Content and Procedure
A. Any person or entity proposing to construct, enlarge, repair, or alter a dam or reservoir shall submit either an application or a pre-construction notification (if the provisions of Rule 3.2 B. apply) to the Board, on forms prescribed by the Board, at least thirty (30) days prior to the anticipated commencement of construction. The submittal must have a United States Geologic Survey (USGS) topographic map, or portion thereof, attached to it showing the location of the proposed dam and reservoir including a clearly marked access route to the site and marked locations and general descriptions of all buildings, drainage structures or culverts, roads, railroads, bridges, and utility lines within two- miles downstream of the site of the proposed dam.
B. If the provisions of Rule 3.2. B. do not apply, or if the dam is classified as high or significant hazard as defined by these regulations, the application package also must include a complete set of design documents prepared in accordance with the following requirements:
(1) Engineering drawings, specifications, and engineering reports shall be prepared, signed, and sealed by a professional engineer. Engineering reports shall include, but not be limited to, hydrologic calculations, hydraulic calculations, geotechnical investigation, and provisions for internal drainage to address through-seepage and under-seepage. Portions of the investigation at the site of the dam and within the catchment area including, but not limited to, characterization of geologic formations, assessment of groundwater conditions, and/or other geologic conditions, factors, and processes which may impact the design of the dam may be performed by a professional geologist.
(2) Drawings shall be prepared to a scale that provides sufficient detail for review of all project components.
(3) Specifications shall include detailed descriptions of all work to be performed and materials to be used in the construction, including plans for diversion during construction and quality assurance and quality control.
(4) A geotechnical report showing the foundation conditions and material properties at the location of the dam as well as the classification and material properties of all borrow material must be submitted for the construction of all new high and significant hazard dams.
(5) For high and significant hazard dams a proposed construction schedule detailing the critical stages including but not limited to construction of the cutoff trench, spillways, and filters must be submitted prior to the commencement of
construction.
C. Application packages for a low hazard dam shall include, but not be limited to, a plan view of the dam (including all appurtenant works) and sections through the dam at the centerline of the principal spillway and at the centerline of the auxiliary (emergency) spillway.
D. The Board may require the applicant to supply any additional information necessary to evaluate an application, including the following:
(1) Whether the proposed dam will provide adequate safety for lives and property; and/or
(2) Whether the proposed dam will adversely affect riparian or other beneficial water uses, or plans for the proper utilization of the water resources of the state, and/or
(3) Any other information the Board deems appropriate.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.4 Permitting Requirements
A. No materials shall be placed in a watercourse that will impede or block the natural flow of water without first obtaining a permit from the Permit Board and other appropriate federal, state, and local authorities. Additionally, any activity involving the discharge of dredged or fill material or any other construction in any state waters that are also subject to federal regulation under Section 404 of the 1972 Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899 shall be conducted in accordance with appropriate provisions of those federal statutes.
B. A permit issued by the Permit Board does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, State, or local laws or regulations. No impoundment may be constructed that will adversely affect riparian or other beneficial water uses or plans for the proper utilization of state waters, or that will cause flooding of upstream property unless the owner of the proposed dam has legally acquired the right to do so.
C. Any dam that impounds a watercourse with a continuous flow shall be designed so that the established minimum flow for the stream (as established by the Commission) is maintained.
D. The owner and/or any person responsible for the construction, enlargement, repair, or alteration of a dam on a watercourse lying, in whole or in part, within a levee district duly constituted under the laws of the State of Mississippi, shall first obtain permission for the work from the board of the levee district and shall provide proof of such permission with
the application to the Board.
E. In addition to the general conditions contained herein, the Board may place special conditions on any authorization to construct or modify a dam.
F. A Surface Water Use Permit may also be required for any person to impound and store water behind a dam.
G. Within thirty (30) days after substantial completion of a high or significant hazard dam, the owner shall submit one complete set of as-built plans to the Board. The submittal also shall include a letter signed by the professional engineer responsible for the project, stating that the dam was constructed in accordance with the Board approved plans and specifications. For low hazard dams, the owner should submit a written notice of completion stating the dam was constructed in accordance with the approved application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.5 Design and Maintenance Requirements
A. Any modification, alteration, enlargement, or major repair of an existing dam, whether requested by the owner or directed by the Commission, will be subject to the current design standards for the appropriate hazard classification as set forth in this regulation.
B. High Hazard dams must be capable of safely passing the runoff from a 24 hour duration 100-year rainfall event through the principal spillway without activating the auxiliary (emergency) spillway. The 100- year rainfall event is established by the National Weather Service Atlas 14 and varies for different areas of the state. The runoff from one hundred percent (100%) of the 24 hour Probable Maximum Precipitation (PMP), as defined in Rule 3.1. of this regulation, must be passed through the principal and auxiliary (emergency) spillway and/or stored in the reservoir without overtopping the dam unless an incremental consequence analysis as defined in Rule 3.5 E. of this regulation indicates a lesser inflow design flood is applicable. The appropriate PMP for each county as obtained from NOAA HMR 51 and the hyetograph (Natural Resource Conservation Service Spillway Emergency Distribution) to be used in design routings are provided in Appendix A of this regulation.
C. Significant hazard dams must be capable of safely passing and /or storing the runoff from at least fifty percent (50%) of the 24 hour PMP without overtopping the dam unless an incremental consequence analysis as defined in Rule 3.5 E. of this regulation indicates a lesser inflow design flood is applicable. The owner and any other persons responsible for the construction and operation of the dam shall assume all risks for future costs to upgrade a dam in the event the hazard classification change.
D. Low hazard dams must be capable of safely passing and/or storing the runoff from either the 24 hour duration 100-year rainfall for the dam location according to NOAA Atlas 14 or thirty-five percent (35%) of the 24 hour PMP without overtopping the dam. The owner and any other persons responsible for the construction and operation of the dam shall assume all risks for future costs to upgrade a dam in the event the hazard classification changes.
E. An inflow design flood based on Incremental Consequence Analysis (ICA) may be developed and submitted to MDEQ. The analysis shall be conducted in accordance with MDEQ Acceptable Procedures for Conducting an Incremental Consequence Analysis; a copy of which may be obtained by contacting the MDEQ Dam Safety Division. MDEQ will review the ICA to determine whether the spillway design criteria for high and significant hazard dams, stated at Rule 3.5 B. and C. of these regulations, may be modified based on the ICA. The range of inflow design floods that can be considered as part of an ICA are as defined in the table below.
Hazard Classification ICA Inflow Design Flood High 50-100% PMP Significant 500 year - 50% PMP
Any future changes in downstream land use, development, or critical hydraulic structures will require a re-evaluation of the incremental consequences and could require additional increases in spillway capacity for the dam. The owner and any other persons responsible for the operation of the dam shall assume all risks for future costs to upgrade a dam in the event there is a change in incremental consequences. Consequences shall be re-evaluated when changes occur but no less frequently than once every 5 years during a formal inspection of the dam.
F. When a conduit is proposed to be used in a high or significant hazard dam, the professional engineer responsible for the project shall provide MDEQ with detailed hydraulic, hydrologic, and structural computations supporting selection of the size and type of pipe to be used. Detailed drawings and specifications relating to the installation of the pipe shall include, but not be limited to, construction measures that adequately address critical loading, bedding, backfill, compaction, and seepage precautions related to installation of the pipe.
G. All concrete structures shall be designed in accordance with the applicable design standards in place at the time of construction. Details, as necessary, shall be provided showing reinforcement, cut offs, under drains/filters, waterstops, construction joints, control joints, and any other details necessary to construct.
H. The use of corrugated metal pipe for any purpose is expressly prohibited for high and significant hazard dams, because corrugated metal pipe typically experiences severe
corrosion and fails long before its expected design life.
I. The use of geotextiles in filters is expressly prohibited for high and significant hazard dams, because, geotextiles will plug with native soil material and make the filter inoperable.
J. The soils in an earthen auxiliary (emergency) spillway shall be capable of withstanding the water velocities generated when the auxiliary (emergency) spillway is activated without experiencing excessive erosion. In order to demonstrate this a SITES Stability and Integrity Analysis shall be performed for all new earthen spillways proposed for high and significant hazard dams as well as all existing high and significant hazard dam earthen spillways where major modifications are proposed to any part of the dam.
K. Side slopes of all dams shall be a minimum of three horizontal to one vertical (3:1).
L. Seepage and slope stability analysis may be required at the discretion of MDEQ.
M. Wave wash protection must be provided along the upstream face of the dam or engineering justification proving it is not necessary must be provided for the construction of all new high and significant hazard dams.
N. Owners of high hazard or significant hazard dams will be required to prohibit livestock grazing on the dam in order to prevent damage to the turf and to prevent erosion associated with establishment of animal trails.
O. Owners of earthen dams covered under this regulation shall establish and maintain a healthy turf on the exposed faces of the dam to prevent erosion, and shall mow frequently enough to prevent the encroachment of woody vegetation into the slopes of the dam embankment or within the prescribed limits (generally 50 feet from the toe) set by MDEQ.
P. Operation and Maintenance manuals may be required for high and significant hazard dams at the discretion of MDEQ.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, etseq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.6 Inspections, Breach Analysis, and Emergency Action Plans
A. The owner and the operator of a dam shall be responsible for the proper operation and maintenance as well as the structural integrity of the dam. In order to fulfill this responsibility, the owner and/or the operator should perform a visual inspection of the dam at least every sixty (60) days and after every major rainfall event over the watershed. Any significant deficiencies observed during such visual inspections shall be immediately reported to MDEQ.
B. The owner or operator of a high hazard or significant hazard dam shall have a detailed formal inspection of the dam performed by a registered professional engineer with experience in the design and construction of dams at such recurring intervals as may be directed by MDEQ. In addition, annual owner’s inspections of the dam submitted by the owner may also be required. A checklist form prescribed and furnished by MDEQ shall be used to record observations during the inspection. Inspection reports shall be submitted to MDEQ no later than sixty (60) days after completion.
C. The owners or operators of high hazard or significant hazard dams shall maintain records and documents related to the original construction, recurring inspections, maintenance, repairs, and alterations of the dam for the life of the project. Such records shall be made available for inspection, or copies of such records furnished, upon request by MDEQ.
D. Dam breach analysis may be required by MDEQ to evaluate the hazard potential classification of a dam. For hazard classification purposes, the breach analysis is typically performed as a sunny day top of dam failure. MDEQ at its discretion may also require additional scenarios in certain circumstances.
The breach analysis shall extend downstream of the dam to a point where the depth of flooding outside the channel is no greater than 2 feet. All breach analysis models shall be digitally submitted to MDEQ.
E. The owner or operator of a high hazard dam shall develop an Emergency Action Plan (EAP) for the dam. MDEQ at its discretion may also direct the owner or operator of a significant hazard dam to develop an Emergency Action Plan (EAP). The EAP shall be submitted to MDEQ for approval. Once approved, a copy of the EAP will be maintained on file by MDEQ. The owner or operator of the dam shall review the EAP on an annual basis to assure that the information contained therein is current. Revisions to the EAP, as necessary, shall be furnished to MDEQ and all other persons involved in the implementation of the EAP. The owner or operator also shall be responsible for conducting or coordinating periodic training and exercises to assure that personnel involved in the implementation of the EAP are properly prepared to carry out their responsibilities in the event of an emergency.
F. MDEQ employees are authorized to make inspections at any time to evaluate the operation, maintenance, and structural integrity of dams and reservoirs. The owner or operator shall be required to perform, at the owner's or operator's expense, such work as may be necessary to correct deficiencies in maintenance and operation or accomplish necessary repairs identified by such inspections. If deficiencies are not corrected or repairs are not made as specified in the inspection report, the Commission may order owners or operators to take remedial action or remove the dam in order to safeguard lives and property.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.7 Confidential Information
Procedures for declaring submitted information confidential and for agency handling of such information are found in Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-17-39, Section 51-3-44, and the Commission's Regulations Regarding the Review and Reproduction of Public Records (Title 11, Part 1, Chapter 2).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.8 Compliance and Enforcement
A. If MDEQ or the Commission determines that:
(1) A dam was constructed without obtaining required prior authorization from the Permit Board;
(2) A dam was not constructed in accordance with the plans and specifications upon which MDEQ based its authorization;
(3) The dam may not provide adequate safety for lives and property;
(4) The dam may adversely affect riparian or other beneficial water uses, or plans for the proper utilization of the water resources of the state; or
(5) The owner and/or operator of the dam has allowed the dam to deteriorate and remain in an unsafe condition after having been ordered to make the necessary repairs or modifications.
MDEQ or the Commission may: (a) cause the dam to be removed or breached;
(b) require the owner and/or operator to take remedial action;
(c) revoke or modify any authorization pertaining thereto; or
(d) take other action the Commission deems appropriate, within its jurisdiction.
B. Enforcement of this regulation shall be governed by Miss. Code Ann. Sections 49-17-31, 49-17-33, 49-17-35, 49-17-37, 49-17-41, and Sections 51-3-49, 51-3-51, and 51-3-55.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.9 Correspondence and Adequacy of Notice
A. General - All regulated dam owners shall inform MDEQ of any address changes, changes in ownership, or changes in the designated agent of the owner within fifteen (15) days of
any such changes, and must readily accept all mail sent to them from the Commission, MDEQ, or the Permit Board.
B. Registered or certified mail - Registered or Certified Mail sent with proper postage and to the last address provided to MDEQ by the dam owner of record shall be considered adequate notification of notice served if MDEQ is notified that the mail was delivered and accepted or if the mail is returned as rejected or unclaimed by the addressee.
C. Refusal to accept mail - Refusal to accept mail from the Commission, the Permit Board, the Department, or its designee, shall be considered a violation of this regulation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 3.10 Hearings and Appeals
Any person aggrieved by any initial action of the Permit Board to issue, deny, transfer, modify or revoke a permit may request an evidentiary hearing before the Permit Board regarding the decision. Procedures for hearings and further appeals of Permit Board decisions are set forth in Mississippi Code Annotated Section 49-17-29.
APPENDIX A :
HYDROLOGIC DESIGN CRITERIA
PMP (24 hour duration) for MS Counties County PMP (in.) County PMP (in.) County PMP (in.) Adams 46.1 Itawamba 41.3 Perry 47.0 Alcorn 40.2 Jackson 47.8 Pike 46.9 Amite 46.7 Jasper 45.3 Pontotoc 41.5 Attala 43.4 Jefferson 45.7 Prentiss 40.7 Benton 40.4 Jeff Davis 46.1 Quitman 41.4 Bolivar 42.1 Jones 46.1 Rankin 44.8 Calhoun 42.0 Kemper 44.0 Scott 44.6 Carroll 42.8 Lafayette 41.2 Sharkey 43.6 Chickasaw 42.1 Lamar 46.8 Simpson 45.5 Choctaw 43.0 Lauderdale 44.6 Smith 45.3 Claiborne 45.3 Lawrence 46.2 Stone 47.6 Clarke 45.3 Leake 44.0 Sunflower 42.4 Clay 42.5 Lee 41.3 Tallahatchie 41.9 Coahoma 41.4 Leflore 42.6 Tate 40.7 Copiah 45.5 Lincoln 46.2 Tippah 40.4 Covington 46.1 Lowndes 42.8 Tishomingo 40.4 DeSoto 40.4 Madison 44.2 Tunica 40.7 Forrest 47.0 Marion 46.8 Union 41.0 Franklin 46.2 Marshall 40.5 Walthall 46.9 George 47.5 Monroe 42.1 Warren 44.6 Greene 46.9 Montgomery 42.7 Washington 43.0 Grenada 42.3 Neshoba 44.0 Wayne 46.0 Hancock 48.3 Newton 44.6 Webster 42.5 Harrison 48.0 Noxubee 43.4 Wilkinson 46.7 Hinds 44.7 Oktibbeha 42.8 Winston 43.4 Holmes 43.3 Panola 41.2 Yalobusha 41.8 Humphreys 43.3 Pearl River 47.6 Yazoo 43.8 Issaquena 43.8
SCS Emergency Spillway Distribution
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
Time (hrs) Fraction of Total Storm Depth
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 51-3-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 4.1 Definitions
In accordance with the definitions provided in Section 19 of H.B. 1730, passed and became law in Mississippi Regular Session of 2020, for the purposes of this chapter, the following terms shall have the meanings ascribed in this rule unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:
A. "Commission" means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
B. "Department" or “MDEQ” means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
C. "High hazard dam" means a class of dam in which failure may cause loss of life, serious damage to residential, industrial, or commercial buildings; or damage to, or disruption of, important public utilities or transportation facilities such as major highways or railroads.
History
- Source: Section 19 of H.B. 1730, passed and became law in Mississippi Regular Session of 2020
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 4.2 Mississippi Dam Safety Fund
A. Section 19 of H.B. 1730, Mississippi Regular Session of 2020, created in the State
Treasury a special fund to be designated as the "Mississippi Dam Safety Fund," which shall consist of funds made available by the Legislature in any manner and funds from any other source designated for deposit into such fund. Unexpended amounts remaining in the fund at the end of a fiscal year shall not lapse into the State General Fund, and any investment earnings or interest earned on amounts in the fund shall be deposited to the credit of the fund. Monies in the fund shall be used to make grants for the purposes provided hereafter.
B. Monies in the fund may be used to reimburse reasonable actual and necessary costs incurred by the department for the administration of the grant program. An accounting of actual costs incurred for which reimbursement is sought shall be maintained by the department. Reimbursement of reasonable actual and necessary costs shall not exceed three percent (3%) of the proceeds of bonds issued. Reimbursements shall satisfy any applicable federal tax law requirements.
History
- Source: Section 19 of H.B. 1730, passed and became law in Mississippi Regular Session of 2020
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 4.3 Dam Safety Grant Program
A. The department hereby establishes a grant program to make grants to owners of high hazard dams to provide funds to be used for the purposes of draining, repairing, rehabilitating, breaching, or removing high hazard dams in this state as necessary to protect downstream lives and property.
B. In cases where a high hazard dam has been determined by the MDEQ Dam Safety Division as having deficiencies preventing the dam from being in compliance with high hazard standards, the owner of the dam may apply for a grant with the Department. An application for a grant shall be submitted at such time, be in such form, and contain such information as the department prescribes.
C. If the department approves the application, it may provide a grant to the applicant. A permit application will also be required as provided in Miss. Code Ann. Section 51-3-39 for any alteration of a dam. The permit application must include detailed plans for review and approval by the department before commencement of any alteration of a dam, including those modified with funds provided by a grant. The department will employ a risk based system for ranking high hazard dams to establish priority for funding, as provided in the following rule.
History
- Source: Section 19 of H.B. 1730, passed and became law in Mississippi Regular Session of 2020
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 4.4 Risk-based system for use in ranking high hazard dams to establish priority
In its selection of projects to which award grants, subject to available funds, MDEQ shall rank and prioritize applications for Dam Safety Grants based on the potential to reduce risk to downstream lives and property in the event that the dam were to fail. Additional studies and information related to the condition of the dam will also be considered by MDEQ in ranking and prioritizing applications for Dam Safety Grants.
History
- Source: Section 19 of H.B. 1730, passed and became law in Mississippi Regular Session of 2020
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 7, R. 4.5 Grant agreements
A. Upon the department’s approval of an application for a grant, the department shall enter into a project grant agreement with each grantee to establish the terms of the grant and the project, including the amount of the grant.
B. The grant funds shall be used by grantees to address deficiencies defined by the Dam Safety Division of the department and may not be used to perform routine operation or maintenance of a dam, to modify a dam to produce hydroelectric power, to increase water supply storage capacity, nor to make any other modification to a dam that does not also improve the safety of the dam.
C. Grant funds will be disbursed to the grantees of the Dam Safety Grant program as reimbursement of eligible program activities performed in accordance with the approved grant application. Requests for reimbursement shall be submitted timely and in such form, and contain such information, as the department prescribes.
D. Any assistance provided for a project shall be subject to a grantee cost-sharing requirement of not less than thirty-five percent (35%). The grantee share may be provided in the form of eligible in-kind contributions.
E. As part of a project grant agreement, a grantee must provide an assurance with respect to the dam to be rehabilitated under the project that the owner of the dam has developed and will commit to utilizing an Operation and Maintenance Plan for maintenance of the dam during the expected life of the dam. Dam owner grantees may be required to provide financial assurance to assure the continuing proper maintenance for the dam.
History
- Source: Section 19 of H.B. 1730, passed and became law in Mississippi Regular Session of 2020
Part 8 Geology Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.1.1 Rule 1.1.1
Purpose and Scope of Regulations Rule 1.1.2 Definitions Rule 1.1.3 Awareness of the Act Rule 1.1.4 Computation of Time Rule 1.1.5 Inspection of Public Records Rule 1.1.6 Designation and Protection of Confidential Information Rule 1.1.7 Severability
Subchapter 2: Permitting Procedures
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.1 Rule 1.2.1
Applicability and Exemptions Rule 1.2.2 Permit Application Rule 1.2.3 General Permits Rule 1.2.4 Notification of Exempt Operations Rule 1.2.5 Processing of Permit Applications Rule 1.2.6 Review and Comment by the Public Rule 1.2.7 Permit Approval and Denial Rule 1.2.8 Amendments Rule 1.2.9 Certificate of Compliance Rule 1.2.10 Operator Requirements Rule 1.2.11 Permit Transfers, Revocations, Cancellations, Suspension, Rescissions and Reissuance Rule 1.2.12 Property Rights, All Rights
Subchapter 3: Performance Bonds
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.3.1 Rule 1.3.1
Purpose of the Bond Rule 1.3.2 Form of the Bond Rule 1.3.3 Duration of Liability Rule 1.3.4 Application for Release of the Bond
Subchapter 4: Lands Unsuitable for Mining
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.4.1 Rule 1.4.1
Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Mining Rule 1.4.2 Register of Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Mining Rule 1.4.3 Petition to Have Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Mining
Subchapter 5: Fees
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.5.1 Fees Rule 1.5.2 Surface Mine Worker Safety Training Fees
Subchapter 6: Inspections
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.6.1 Inspections
Subchapter 7: Reclamation
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.7.1 Rule 1.7.1
Reclamation Plan Rule 1.7.2 Reclamation of Lieu Lands Rule 1.7.3 Reclamation Standards Rule 1.7.4 Concurrent Reclamation Rule 1.7.5 Right of the Operator and the Department to Complete Reclamation
Subchapter 8: Violations and Penalties
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.8.1 Notification of Violations Rule 1.8.2 Violations and Penalties Rule 1.8.3 Cease and Desist Authority
Subchapter 9: Enforcement, Hearings, and Appeals
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.9.1 Enforcement and Appeals Rule 1.9.2 Place and Nature of Hearings Rule 1.9.3 Appeals of Final Decisions
Subchapter 10: Effective Date
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.10.1 Effective Date
Subchapter 1: General Procedural Rules
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.1.1 Purpose and Scope of Regulations
A. The purpose of these Regulations is to provide an orderly and efficient system of procedure by which the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, through the Mississippi Environmental Permit Board and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, shall administer the Mississippi Surface Mining and Reclamation Act as set forth in Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq. The Legislature, recognizing its duty and obligation to foster the economic well-being of the state and nation, to encourage the development of its natural resources, and to preserve the beauty of its lands, declares that the purpose of the Mississippi Surface Mining and Reclamation Act is to:
(1) Provide for the regulation and control of surface mining so as to minimize its injurious effects by requiring proper reclamation of surface-mined lands;
(2) Establish a regulatory system of permits and reclamation standards, supplemented by the knowledge, expertise and concerns of mining operators, landowners and the general public which is designed to achieve an acceptable, workable balance between the economic necessities of developing our natural resources and the public interest in protecting our birthright of natural beauty and a pristine environment; and
(3) Establish a regulatory system of uniform standards and procedures to govern the mining and reclamation of land, accepting the proposition that varied types of mining, varied types of materials being mined and varied geographical and ecological areas of this state may require variations in methods of surface mining and reclamation, but any variation shall be designed to restore the affected area to a useful, productive, and beneficial purpose.
B. Unless otherwise provided for by law, these Regulations shall govern the procedure for all notification, filing, permitting, hearing, and other procedures pertaining to the requirements of implementing the Mississippi Surface Mining and Reclamation Act.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.1.2 Rule 1.1.2
Definitions As used in these Regulations, the following terms have the specified meaning, except where otherwise indicated. A. Act means the Mississippi Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and any amendments thereto as codified in Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq.
B. Administratively complete application means an application for a permit, permit renewal, or the transfer or sale of permit rights, which the Department determines to contain sufficient information addressing each application requirement of the Act and these Regulations and to contain all information necessary to initiate formal processing and public review.
C. Affected area means any area from which any materials are removed or are to be removed in a surface mining operation and upon which any materials are to be deposited, handled or processed. The affected area includes all areas affected by the construction of new roads, or the improvement or use of existing roads other than public roads to gain access and to haul
materials.
D. Appeal means an appeal to an appropriate court of the state taken from a final decision of the Permit Board or Commission made after a formal hearing before that body.
E. Applicant means a person applying for a permit, coverage under a general permit, permit renewal, or the transfer or sale of permit rights from the Permit Board to conduct surface mining and reclamation operations.
F. Aquifer means a zone, stratum or group of strata that can store and transmit water in sufficient quantities for a specific use.
G. As recorded in the minutes of the Permit Board means the date of the Permit Board meeting at which the action concerned is taken by the Permit Board.
H. Cemetery means any area of land where human bodies are interred.
I. Commission means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
J. Department means the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
K. Director of the Office of Geology means the person charged with the direction and management of the activities and personnel of the Office of Geology.
L. Executive Director means the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
M. Exploration activity means the disturbance of the surface or subsurface for the purpose of determining the location, quantity, or quality of a deposit of any material, except the drilling of test holes or core holes of twelve (12) inches or less in diameter.
N. Formal hearing means a hearing on the record, as recorded and transcribed by a court reporter, before the Commission or Permit Board where all parties to the hearing are allowed to present witnesses, cross-examine witnesses and present evidence for inclusion into the record, as appropriate under rules promulgated by the Commission or Permit Board.
O. Fund means the Surface Mining and Reclamation Fund created by Miss. Code Ann. § 53-7- 69.
P. General Permit means a general permit as defined in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-5.
Q. Highwall means a wall created by mining having a slope steeper than two (2) vertical units to one (1) horizontal unit.
R. Impoundment means a closed basin, naturally formed or artificially built, which is dammed or excavated for the retention of water or sediment.
S. Interested party means an interested party as provided under Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29.
T. Intermittent stream means a stream or reach of a stream that flows only at certain times of the year. A stream that does not flow continuously as when water losses from evaporation or seepage
exceed the available streamflow.
U. Material means bentonite, metallic ore, mineral clay, dolomite, phosphate, sand, gravel, soil, clay, sand clay, clay gravel, stone, chalk, and any other materials designated by the Commission.
V. Nearest approximate original contour means that surface configuration achieved by backfilling and grading of the mined area so that the reclaimed area, including any terracing or access roads, closely resembles the general surface configuration of the land prior to mining and blends into and complements the drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain, with all highwalls and spoil piles eliminated. Permanent water impoundments may be permitted where the Permit Board determines the impoundments are in compliance with these Regulations.
W. Occupied dwelling means any building that is currently being used on a regular or temporary basis for human habitation.
X. Operator means the person that is to engage, or is engaged, or has been engaged in a surface mining operation, whether on a permanent, continuous basis, or for a limited period of time and for a specific or ancillary purpose, including any person whose permit or coverage under a general permit has expired or been suspended or revoked.
Y. Overburden means all materials which are removed to gain access to other materials in the process of surface mining, including the material before or after its removal by surface mining.
Z. Perennial stream means a stream or part of a stream that flows continuously during all of the calendar year as a result of ground-water discharge or runoff.
AA. Permit means a permit to conduct surface mining and reclamation operations pursuant to these Regulations and the Act.
BB. Permit area means all the area designated in the permit application or application for coverage under a general permit. It shall include all land to be affected by the surface mining operations during the term of the permit and may include any contiguous area which the operator proposes to surface mine thereafter.
CC. Permit Board means the Permit Board created by Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-28.
DD. Person means any individual, trust, firm, joint-stock company, public or private corporation, joint venture, partnership, association, cooperative, state, or any agency or institution thereof, municipality, commission, political subdivision of a state or any interstate body, and includes any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality, political subdivision, or the United States or any officer or employee of the United States.
EE. Public hearing means a public forum organized by the Commission, Department or Permit Board for the purpose of providing information to the public regarding a surface mining and reclamation operation and at which members of the public are allowed to make comments or ask questions or both of the Commission, Department or the Permit Board regarding a proposed operation or permit.
FF. Public road means a road which:
(1) has been designated as a public road pursuant to the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is located;
(2) is maintained with public funds in a manner similar to other public roads of the same classification within the jurisdiction;
(3) there is substantial (more than incidental) public use; and
(4) meets road construction standards for other public roads of the same classification within the jurisdiction.
GG. Reclamation means work necessary to restore an area of land affected by surface mining to a useful, productive, and beneficial purpose, the entire process being designed to restore the land to a useful, productive, and beneficial purpose, suitable and amenable to surrounding land and consistent with local environmental conditions in accordance with the standards set forth in these Regulations and the Act.
HH. Regulations mean the regulations promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Mississippi Surface Mining and Reclamation Act.
II. Sedimentation pond means an impoundment used to remove solids from water in order to meet water quality standards or effluent limitations before the water leaves the permit area.
JJ. Siltation structure means a sedimentation pond, a series of sedimentation ponds, or other treatment facility.
KK. Slope means the average inclination of a surface, measured from the horizontal, generally expressed as the ratio of a unit of vertical distance to a given number of units of horizontal distance (e.g., 1v:5h). It may also be expressed as a percent or in degrees.
LL. Spoil pile means the overburden and other mined waste material as it is piled or deposited in the process of surface mining.
MM. State means the State of Mississippi.
NN. Surface mining or mining means the extraction of materials from the ground or water or from waste or stock piles or from pits or banks or natural occurrences by methods including, but not limited to, strip, drift, open pit, contour or auger mining, dredging, placering, quarrying and leaching, and activities related thereto, which will alter the surface.
OO. Surface mining operation or operation means the activities conducted at a mining site, including extraction, storage, processing and shipping of materials and reclamation of the affected area. This term does not include the following: the dredging and removal of oyster shells from navigable bodies of water; the dredging and removal of any materials from the bed of navigable streams, when the activity is regulated and permitted under an individual permit by the United States Corps of Engineers; the extraction of hydrocarbons in a liquid or gaseous state by means of wells, pipe, or other on-site methods; the off-sit e transportation of materials; exploration activities; construction activities at a construction site; or any other exception set out in these Regulations.
PP. Topsoil means the organic or inorganic matter naturally present on the surface of the earth which has been subjected to and influenced by genetic and environmental factors of parent material, climate, macroorganisms and microorganisms, and topography, all acting over a period of time, and that is necessary for the growth and regeneration of vegetation on the surface of the earth.
QQ. Toxic material means any substance present in sufficient concentration or amount to cause significant injury or illness to plant, animal, aquatic, or human life.
RR. Transfer means a change in ownership or other effective control over the right to conduct surface mining operations under a permit issued by the Permit Board. The person to which the permit has been transferred shall have, at a minimum, as stated in these Regulations, the legal right to mine, a performance bond and liability insurance.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.1.3 Awareness of the Act
It shall be the duty and responsibility of all persons affected by the Mississippi Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and these Regulations to read and be cognizant of their content.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.1.4 Computation of Time
Time for any period prescribed or allowed by the Act and these Regulations shall be computed according to law.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.1.5 Inspection of Public Records
Requests for public documents generated or obtained by the Department under these Regulations or the Act shall be made pursuant to Title 11, Part 1, Chapter 2. Public records requests are managed by the Department’s Freedom of Information Administrator. As of the date of approval of these Regulations, the Department’s Freedom of Information Administrator may be contacted at Post Office Box 2261, Jackson, Mississippi 39225, by fax at (601) 354-6356, or by e-mail at freedomofinformationcontact@deq.state.ms.us .
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.1.6 Designation and Protection of Confidential Information
A. Information submitted to the Department, Commission, Permit Board or local Soil and Water Conservation District pertaining to the deposits of materials, trade secrets or privileged commercial or financial information relating to the competitive rights of the applicant and which is specifically identified as confidential, shall not be available for public examination and shall not be considered as a public record if:
(1) The applicant submits a written confidentiality claim to the Commission before submission of the information; and
(2) The Commission determines the confidentiality claim to be valid.
B. The confidentiality claim shall include a generic description of the nature of the information included in the submission. Any information for which a confidentiality claim is asserted shall not be disclosed pending the outcome of any formal hearing and all appeals.
C. Any person knowingly and willfully making unauthorized disclosures of any information determined to be confidential shall be liable for civil damages arising from the unauthorized disclosure and, upon conviction, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined a sum not to exceed One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) and dismissed from public office or employment.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.1.7 Severability
If any provision, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of any of these regulations, or the application of same to any person or set of circumstances, is for any reason challenged or held to be invalid or void, the validity of the remaining regulations and/or portions thereof or their application to other persons or sets of circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.1 Applicability and Exemptions
A. Any person engaging in surface mining or surface mining operations in the State of Mississippi shall be required to conform to and comply with all applicable provisions of the Act and these Regulations. B. Except as expressly provided, the Act and these Regulations shall not apply to: (1) Excavations made by the owner of land for the owner’s use and not for commercial purposes, where the materials removed do not exceed one thousand (1,000) cubic yards per year and where one (1) acre or less of land is affected.
(2) Excavations made by a public agency on a one-time basis for emergency use at an emergency site if: (a) the excavation lies in the vicinity of the emergency site and affects less than one-fourth (1/4) acre of mined surface area;
(b) the landowner has signed a statement giving approval for the removal of the materials; and
(c) the public agency notifies the Department as required by the Commission within two (2) working days of the removal of the materials. (3) Operations for any materials on any affected area conducted before April 15, 1978, unless it has been reclaimed, including natural vegetation. These Regulations shall apply
to any additional land which the operation extended to or encompassed after April 15, 1978.
(4) Operations for any materials that affect four (4) acres or less and are greater than one thousand three hundred and twenty (1320) feet from any other affected area if:
(a) the operation began before July 1, 2002; and
(b) the operator notified the Department of the commencement, expansion or resumption of the operation before July 1, 2002.
(5) Operations for any materials that affect four (4) acres or less, are greater than one thousand three hundred and twenty (1320) feet from any other affected area, and commenced after July 1, 2002, if the operator notifies the Department at least seven (7) calendar days before commencement or expansion of the operation. The seven day notice prior to mining requirement shall be waived and the operator may begin mining immediately after notifying the Department if:
(a) The operator agrees, in the notification, to reclaim the mine site in accordance with the minimum standards adopted by the Commission; or
(b) The exempted operation is conducted for Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT) projects or state aid road construction projects funded in whole or in part by public funds.
(6) Excavations made by the owner of land where the materials removed are transported to another location on that same land without using any public highway, road or street, and where the distance between the excavation and the location where the materials are deposited does not exceed five (5) miles; provided, that the owner of such land has the legal right to the materials.
C. If a landowner refuses to allow the operator to complete reclamation in accordance with minimum standards or interferes with or authorizes a third party to disturb or interfere with reclamation in accordance with minimum standards, the landowner shall assume the exempt notice and shall be responsible for any reclamation.
D. All operations exempted under Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 7(2)(d) and 53-7- 7(2)(e) of the Act and Rule 1.2.1.B(4) or (5) of these Regulations shall be subject to the prohibitions on mining in certain areas contained in Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 49 and 53-7- 51 and Rule 1.4.1, et seq. of these Regulations and may be subject to the penalties set forth in the Act and these Regulations.
E. Any operator conducting operations exempted under Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 7(2)(b) or 53-7- 7(2)(e) and Rule 1.2.1.B(2) or (5) of these Regulations, failing to notify the Department, may be subject to penalties provided in the Act and these Regulations. Any operator of an exempted surface mining operation who agrees in the notification to reclaim and fails to reclaim in accordance with that paragraph may be subject to penalties as provided in the Act and these Regulations.
F. The Department may investigate any mining, or mining operations, or suspected mining, to ensure compliance with the Act and these Regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.2 Permit Application
A. Unless exempted under Miss. Code Ann. § 53-7- 7 and Rule 1.2.1 of these Regulations, no person shall engage in surface mining without having first obtained coverage under a general permit, or having obtained from the Permit Board a permit for each operation.
B. Before commencing any operation for which a permit is required, each applicant for a permit shall submit to the Permit Board an application, a proposed initial reclamation plan and a performance bond in an amount proposed to be sufficient by the applicant to reclaim the permit area. The application shall be in the form prescribed by the Department and shall be deemed administratively complete if it contains:
(1) A legal description of the tract or tracts of land in the affected area and one or more maps or plats of adequate scale to clearly portray the location of the affected area. The description shall contain sufficient information so that the affected area may be located and distinguished from other lands and shall identify the access from the nearest public road. Said description of the tract shall be sufficient for the Department to define and locate the permit boundary;
(2) The approximate location and depth of the deposit in the permit area and the total number of acres in the permit area;
(3) The name, address and management officers of the permit applicant and any affiliated persons who shall be engaged in the operations;
(4) The name and address of any person holding legal and equitable interests of record, if reasonably ascertainable, in the surface estate of the permit area and in the surface estate of land located within five hundred (500) feet of the exterior limits of the permit area;
(5) The name and address of any person residing on the property of the permit area at the time of application;
(6) Current or previous surface mining permits held by the applicant, including any revocations, suspensions or bond forfeitures;
(7) The type and method of operation, the engineering techniques and the equipment that is proposed to be used, including mining schedules, the nature and expected amount of overburden to be removed, the depth of excavations, a description of the permit area, the anticipated hydrologic consequences of the mining operation, and the proposed use of explosives for blasting, including the nature of the explosive, the proposed location of the blasting and the expected effect of the blasting;
(8) A notarized statement, supported by sufficient documentation, showing the applicant's legal right to surface mine the affected area;
(9) All other approvals, permits, clearances, easements and/or agreements, for the construction and operation of the permit, which may be required;
(10) The names and locations of all lakes, rivers, reservoirs, streams, creeks and other bodies of water in the vicinity of the contemplated operations which may be affected by the
operations and the types of existing vegetative cover on the area affected thereby and on adjoining lands within five hundred (500) feet of the exterior limits of the affected area;
(11) A topographical survey map showing the surface drainage plan on and away from the permit area;
(12) The surface location and extent of all existing and proposed waste and spoil piles, cuts, pits, tailing dumps, ponds, borrow pits, evaporation and settling basins, roads, buildings, access ways, workings and installations sufficient to provide a reasonably clear and accurate portrayal of the existing surface conditions and the proposed mining operations;
(13) If the surface and mineral estates, or any part of those estates, in land covered by the application, have been severed and are owned by separate owners, the applicant shall provide a notarized statement subscribed to by each surface owner and lessee of those lands, unless the lease or other conveyance to the applicant specifically states the material to be mined by the operator granting consent for the applicant to initiate and conduct surface mining, exploration and reclamation activities on the land;
(14) A copy of a proposed initial reclamation plan prepared in accordance with the Act and these Regulations;
(15) The application fee as set forth in Subchapter 5 of these Regulations;
(16) The application form with all requested information provided;
(17) Any other applicable forms;
(18) Certificate of Insurance (see Rule 1.2.10.F);
(19) Any other information needed to clarify the required parts of the application as may be requested by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.3 General Permits
A. The Permit Board may issue general permits to cover those surface mining operations deemed appropriate by the Permit Board. Conditions in any general permit shall provide that no operation shall be conducted on lands designated as unsuitable for mining and that each operator shall submit a proposed initial reclamation plan and a performance bond in an amount sufficient to properly reclaim the permit area. The Permit Board may include other conditions to ensure compliance with these Regulations and the Act.
B. Before commencing any operation for which coverage under a general permit may be obtained, each applicant for coverage under a general permit shall submit to the Department an application, in the form prescribed by the Department, and containing the following:
(1) a copy of the proposed initial reclamation plan;
(2) a performance bond in an amount proposed by the applicant and approved by the Permit Board;
(3) an application fee in accordance with Rule 1.5.1 of these Regulations;
(4) any other information deemed necessary by the Department.
C. The Permit Board shall issue a general permit for surface mining operations having a permitted area of more than four (4) acres but less than ten (10) acres which are conducted for projects funded in whole or in part by public funds for the Mississippi Department of Transportation or the Division of State Aid Road Construction. The general permit issued under this subsection shall require that all materials obtained from an operation covered under such general permit shall be used exclusively on the Mississippi Department of Transportation or Division of State Aid Road Construction project and that no materials from an operation covered under such permit may be provided or sold for any other purpose. The Permit Board shall consult with the Mississippi Department of Transportation on the development of general permits issued under this subsection. An applicant for coverage under a general permit issued under this subsection shall submit an application for coverage and a proposed initial reclamation plan. The applicant may submit either a surface mining performance bond for the operation or a copy of the bond posted with the Mississippi Department of Transportation or the Division of State Aid Road Construction if the latter bond specifically covers the surface mining operation. If a copy of the bond posted with the Mississippi Department of Transportation or the Division of State Aid Road Construction is submitted, the Mississippi Department of Transportation or the Division of State Aid Road Construction shall not release the bond until all reclamation requirements of the general permit issued under this subsection have been met. The Permit Board may include other conditions in any general permit issued under this subsection to ensure compliance with these Regulations and the Act. The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality shall be responsible for inspecting the reclamation of the mining operation.
D. Within three (3) working days after receiving the application for coverage under a general permit, the Department shall review the application, determine if the proposed surface mining operation is eligible for coverage under a general permit, and notify the applicant in writing accordingly. Operations may commence at the mining site after the operator receives notice of coverage.
E. Any site and/or operator covered or eligible to be covered under a general permit may be required to obtain a surface mining permit at the discretion of the Permit Board. Any interested person may petition the Permit Board to take action under this paragraph.
F. Any site and/or operator covered by a general permit may request to be excluded from such coverage by applying for a surface mining permit. The applicability of the general permit is automatically terminated upon issuance of a surface mining permit.
G. Any site and/or operator excluded from coverage under a general permit solely because it is already covered under a surface mining permit may request that the surface mining permit be revoked and that it be covered by the general permit. Upon revocation of the surface mining permit by the Permit Board, the general permit shall apply to the site and/or operator.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.4 Notification of Exempt Operations
A. Any person wishing to conduct surface mining operations under the exempt status defined in Rule 1.2.1 of these Regulations shall notify the Department. The notification shall consist, at a minimum, of the following:
(1) the operator’s name, address, and telephone number;
(2) legal description of the affected area;
(3) number of acres to be mined;
(4) number of acres not actually mined, but involved with other aspects of the operation;
(5) date of commencement of the operation;
(6) expected life of the operation;
(7) a description of the reclamation plan: and
(8) other information as may be required by the Department.
B. The notification shall be sent to the Department in a form prescribed by the Department before the commencement of the operation occurs. Before the operation expands to a size where it will affect an area greater than four (4) acres, the operator shall be required to file an application to conduct surface mining operations and comply with all provisions of the Act and these Regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.5 Processing of Permit Applications
A. Applications for the issuance of any surface mining permit issued under this chapter shall be filed with the Department. The Department shall:
(1) conduct an initial review of a completed permit application within thirty (30) days following receipt of the complete application.
(2) make a recommendation to the Permit Board on the completed permit application no later than the next regularly scheduled Permit Board meeting following the thirty-day initial review period, unless a public hearing is held on the application or the applicant agrees in writing to an additional time frame. If a public hearing is held, the Department shall make its recommendation at the next regularly scheduled Permit Board meeting following the public hearing, if practicable.
(3) file a copy of each permit application for public inspection with the chancery clerk of the county where any portion of the operation is proposed to occur after deleting any confidential information according to Rule 1.1.6 of these Regulations.
(4) submit copies, excluding all confidential information, of the permit application as soon as possible to:
(a) the Mississippi Soil and Water Conservation Commission, Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Mississippi Forestry Commission, Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Mississippi Department of Transportation, Mississippi State Oil and Gas Board and Mississippi Department of Agriculture and Commerce, and any other state or federal agency whose jurisdiction the Department believes the particular mining operation may affect.
(b) any person who requests in writing a copy of the application; and
(c) the owner of the land.
(5) require payment of a reasonable fee established by the Department for reimbursement of the costs of reproducing and providing the copy.
(6) The Department shall notify the applicant if any part of the proposed operation lies within an area already designated as unsuitable for surface mining or for which a petition to have lands designated unsuitable for surface mining has been filed.
(7) The Department shall cause an initial site inspection of the proposed affected area to be made within 30 days following receipt of the completed application.
B. Each agency shall review the permit application and submit, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the application, any comments, recommendations and evaluations as the agency deems necessary and proper based only upon the effect of the proposed operation on matters within the agency's jurisdiction. The comments shall include a listing of permits or licenses required under the agency's jurisdiction. Comments and recommendations shall be made a part of the record and one (1) copy shall be furnished to the applicant. All comments and recommendations shall be considered by, but shall not be binding upon, the Permit Board. The failure of any agency to submit comments shall not preclude action by the Permit Board.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.6 Review and Comment by the Public
Persons reviewing a copy of a permit application or general permit application may make comments, recommendations, or evaluations to the Department. The deadline for such comments shall be the same as that for state agencies.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.7 Permit Approval and Denial
A. The Permit Board, consistent with the Act and these Regulations, may reissue, deny, modify, revoke, cancel, rescind, suspend or transfer a permit for a surface mining operation. The Director of the Office of Geology, as a member of the Permit Board, shall abstain in any action taken by the Permit Board pursuant to the Act or these Regulations.
B. Any permit approved by the Permit Board is not transferable to any person except after notice to and approval by the Permit Board.
C. The Permit Board shall issue a permit if the Permit Board determines that the applicant and completed application comply with the requirements of the Act and these Regulations.
D. The Permit Board may deny a permit if:
(1) The Permit Board finds that the reclamation as required by this chapter cannot be accomplished by means of the proposed reclamation plan;
(2) Any part of the proposed operation lies within an area designated as unsuitable for surface mining;
(3) The Permit Board finds that the proposed mining operation will cause pollution of any water of the state or of the ambient air of the state in violation of applicable state and federal laws and regulations;
(4) The applicant has had any other surface mining permit revoked, or any bond or deposit posted to comply with this chapter forfeited, and the conditions causing the permit to be revoked or the bond or deposit to be forfeited have not been corrected to the satisfaction of the Permit Board;
(5) The Permit Board determines that the proposed operation will endanger the health and safety of the public or will create imminent environmental harm;
(6) The operation will likely adversely affect any public highway or road unless the operation is intended to stabilize or repair the public road or highway; or
(7) The applicant is unable to meet the public liability insurance or performance bonding requirements of the Act and these Regulations.
E. The Permit Board shall deny a permit if the Permit Board finds by clear and convincing evidence on the basis of the information contained in the permit application or obtained by on-site inspection that the proposed operation cannot comply with the Act or these Regulations or that the proposed method of operation, road system construction, shaping or revegetation of the affected area cannot be carried out in a manner consistent with this chapter and applicable state and federal laws, rules and regulations.
F. The Department on behalf of the Permit Board may hold a public hearing to obtain comments from the public on its proposed action. If the Department on behalf of the Permit Board holds a public hearing, the Permit Board shall publish notice and conduct the hearing as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29.
G. The Permit Board may authorize the Executive Director, under any conditions the Permit Board may prescribe, to make decisions on permit issuance, reissuance, modification, rescission or cancellation. A decision by the Executive Director is a decision of the Permit Board and shall be subject to formal hearing and appeal as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29. The Executive Director shall report all permit decisions to the Permit Board at its next regularly scheduled meeting and those decisions shall be deemed as recorded in the minutes of the Permit Board at that time.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.8 Amendments
The Permit Board may modify any surface mining permit to increase or decrease the permit area and shall require an increase in the performance bond and a modified reclamation plan for any expanded area.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.9 Certificate of Compliance
Each operator who holds either a surface mining permit or a general permit shall file an annual certificate of compliance with the Department. The Department shall provide a form to the operator at least thirty (30) days before the anniversary date of each permit. The operator shall complete the form and declare under oath that he is following his approved mining and reclamation plan and is abiding by the provisions of the Act and these Regulations. The operator shall return the certificate of compliance together with a fee of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) and the operator’s annual report to the Department within five (5) days after the anniversary date of the period.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.10 Operator Requirements
A. Each operator holding a permit shall establish and maintain records, including:
(1) fees and bonds and penalties paid to the Department;
(2) all correspondence with the Department and its authorized representatives;
(3) reports, in writing, from authorized field inspectors;
(4) the results of readings, taken on a specified periodic basis, from any monitoring equipment installed pursuant to orders from the Commission or from the Permit Board.
B. Each permittee shall make a report to the Department annually. This report shall accompany the certificate of compliance and shall include, as a minimum:
(1) the name of the operator and the permit number;
(2) area of land, in acres, affected by the operation during the previous year, with an itemization, in acres, of how the area was affected (i.e., vegetation removed, overburden removed, material extracted, regrading, revegetation, etc.);
(3) estimation of acreage to be affected by the operation during the following year; and
(4) a description of reclamation procedures and their degree of success and any suggestions or ideas the operator has regarding reclamation.
C. Each permittee shall install, use and maintain any monitoring equipment required by the Commission or the Permit Board for the purpose of observing and determining relevant surface or subsurface effects of the mining operation or reclamation program. Before requiring the operator to install monitoring equipment, the Permit Board, or Department, shall discuss and describe proper installation, use, and design of equipment and the purpose for such devices.
D. Each permittee shall be required to post signs at the points of access to each operation adjacent to the nearest public highway or road. These signs shall be at least two (2) feet by four (4) feet, constructed of a durable material, and clearly identify the name and address of the operator and the number of his surface mining permit. Signs shall be maintained during the life of an operation, including periods of temporary suspension and reclamation activity.
E. Records required to be held under these Regulations shall be held for a period of three (3) years from the date of their submission to the Department, or from the date of their preparation if not required to be so submitted, or such shorter period as may now or hereafter be specifically permitted for individual records. The Department may, in the adoption of its forms, specify the retention period of that form thereon.
F. Except for governmental agencies, a certificate of insurance certifying that the applicant has in force a public liability insurance policy issued by an insurance company authorized to conduct business in the State of Mississippi covering all operations of the applicant in this state and affording bodily injury protection and property damage protection in an amount not less than the following:
(1) One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) for all damages because of bodily injury sustained by one (1) person as the result of any one (1) occurrence, and Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) for all damages because of bodily injury sustained by two (2) or more persons as the result of any one (1) occurrence; and
(2) One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) for all claims arising out of damage to property as the result of any one (1) occurrence including completed operations.
(3) The policy shall be maintained in full force and effect during the term of the permit, including the length of all reclamation operations.
G. Each permittee shall mark the permit boundary and place durable posts at the corners of the permit area. The posts shall be painted or flagged to be readily visible during the life of the operation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.11 Permit Transfers, Revocations, Cancellations, Suspension, Rescissions and Reissuance
A. The Permit Board may transfer, modify, revoke, cancel, rescind, suspend, or reissue a permit. Applications for the modification, transfer or reissuance of any surface mining permit issued under the Act and these Regulations may be filed with the Department on forms prescribed by the Department.
B. The Permit Board may cancel a permit at the request of the operator, if the operator does not commence operations under the permit by stripping, grubbing or mining any part of the permit area.
C. The Permit Board may rescind a permit, if because of a change in post-mining use of the land by the landowner, the completion of the approved reclamation plan by the operator is no longer feasible. If a permit is canceled or rescinded, the remaining portion of the bond or deposit required under the Act and these Regulations shall be returned to the operator.
D. Any permit issued under the Act and these Regulations shall carry with it the right of successive reissuance upon expiration for areas within the boundaries of the existing permit. The operator may apply for reissuance and that permit shall be reissued, except as provided in this subsection. On application for reissuance the burden of proving that the permit should not be reissued shall be on the opponents of reissuance or the Department. If the opponents to reissuance or the Department establish and the Permit Board finds, in writing, that the operator is not satisfactorily meeting the terms and conditions of the existing permit or the present surface mining and reclamation operation is not in compliance with the Act and these Regulations, the Permit Board shall not reissue the permit.
E. Any permit reissuance shall be for a term not to exceed the term of the original permit. Application for permit reissuance shall be filed with the Permit Board at least sixty (60) days before the expiration of the permit. If an application for reissuance is timely filed, the operator may continue surface mining operations under the existing permit until the Permit Board takes action on the reissuance application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.2.12 Property Rights, All Rights
A permit issued by the Permit Board does not convey any property rights in either real or personal property, or any exclusive privileges, nor does it authorize any injury to private property or any invasion of personal rights, nor any infringement of federal, State, or local laws or regulations.
Subchapter 3 Performance Bonds Rule 1.3.1 Purpose of the Bond The bond is a performance bond designed to insure that the operator satisfactorily performs all of the requirements of the Act, these Regulations, and the permit. The bond shall cover that area of land within the permit area upon which the operator will initiate and conduct surface mining and reclamation operations with the initial term of the permit.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.3.2 Form of the Bond
A. Before a permit is issued by the Permit Board, the applicant shall file with the Department, in the manner and form prescribed by the Department, a bond for performance payable to the Commission and conditioned on full and satisfactory performance of the requirements of this rule and the permit. The bond shall not be less than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) nor more than Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) for each estimated acre of the permit area of the respective operation. The Department shall make a recommendation to the Permit Board
as to the amount of the bond. The Permit Board shall make its decision based on the Department’s recommendation, topographical features of the proposed affected area, impact on the environment, and all other factors deemed appropriate by the Permit Board.
B. The bond is a performance bond designed to insure that the operator satisfactorily performs all of the requirements of the Act, these Regulations, and the permit. The bond shall cover that area of land within the permit area upon which the operator will initiate and conduct surface mining and reclamation operations within the initial term of the permit. Any operator who fails to comply with the Act, these Regulations, or the permit shall be declared by the Commission to be in violation, and the Commission may rule that he shall forfeit the bond, collateral, or deposit. Should the operator default, the bond shall be expended to reclaim, in accordance with the provisions of the Act and these Regulations, the lands with respect to which the bond, collateral, or deposit was filed. Any unused funds may be used to reclaim other unreclaimed lands.
C. The bond shall be executed by the applicant and a corporate surety licensed to do business in the state. The applicant may elect to deposit the following in lieu of the surety bond: cash, negotiable bonds of the United States government or the state, assignment of real or personal property, or a savings account acceptable to the Department, negotiable certificates of deposit or a letter of credit of any bank organized or transacting business in the state and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC) or a similar federal banking or savings and loan insurance organization. The cash deposit or market value of the securities shall be equal to or greater than the amount of the bond required for the permit area. Cash, negotiable bonds, negotiable certificates of deposit, letter of credit, assignment of real or personal property, or a savings account or other securities shall be deposited on the same terms as the terms on which surety bonds may be deposited.
D. The amount of the bond or deposit required and the terms of acceptance of the applicant's bond or deposit may be increased or decreased by the Permit Board from time to time to reflect changes in the cost of future reclamation of land mined or to be mined subject to the limitations on the amount of the bond set forth in this section.
E. All state agencies, political subdivisions of the state and local governing bodies shall be exempt from the bonding requirements of this rule.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.3.3 Duration of Liability
The operator is liable under the bond until such time as the reclamation operations are completed to the satisfaction of the Permit Board that all requirements of the Act, these Regulations, and the permit have been met.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.3.4 Application for Release of the Bond
A. Upon completion of the operation in the permit area, the operator may file an application with the Permit Board for the release of the performance bond or deposit. The application for performance bond release shall require a description of the results achieved in accordance with the operator's reclamation plan, which includes revegetation and end result plans, and any other information the Permit Board may require in accordance with this chapter. The Permit Board
shall file a copy of the performance bond release application for public inspection with the chancery clerk of the county where the majority of the surface mining operation is located and with the local Soil and Water Conservation District. The Permit Board shall give notice of the pending bond release application in the same manner as required for notice of permit application.
B. After receipt of the application for bond release, the Department shall, and the local Soil and Water District Commissioners may, within thirty (30) days, conduct an inspection and evaluation of the reclamation work involved. The evaluation shall consider, among other things, the occurrence of pollution of surface and subsurface water; the probability of continuance or future occurrence of pollution; the estimated cost of abating the pollution; whether grading or backfilling has been completed pursuant to the reclamation plan; whether trash, debris, and discarded equipment have been disposed of properly; and whether work on revegetation or other end use plan is progressing satisfactorily. Results of the evaluation and findings of the Department or the Soil and Water Commissioners, or both, shall be provided within thirty (30) days after the inspection to the operator and other interested parties making written request for the evaluation and findings. The evaluation and findings of the soil and water commissioners, if any shall be forwarded to the Department before the end of the thirty (30) days.
C. The Permit Board may release in whole or in part the performance bond or deposit if it is satisfied that reclamation covered by the performance bond or deposit or portion thereof has been accomplished as required by this chapter according to the following schedule:
(1) When the operator or surety completes proper trash, debris, and equipment disposal; required backfilling, regrading, and drainage control of a bonded area in accordance with the approved reclamation plan; and the work on revegetation or other end use plan is progressing satisfactorily, the Permit Board may release up to ninety percent (90%) of the performance bond or deposit for the applicable permit area. The amount of the unreleased portion of the performance bond or deposit shall not be less than the amount necessary to assure completion of the reclamation work by a third party in the event of default by the operator; and
(2) When the operator has successfully completed the remaining reclamation activities, but not before two (2) years beyond the date of the initial performance bond release, the Permit Board may release the remaining portion of the performance bond or deposit. No performance bond or deposit shall be fully released until all reclamation requirements of this chapter are fully met.
(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraphs C(1) and C(2) of this rule, the Permit Board may release one hundred percent (100%) of the performance bond or deposit to private contractors surface mining on areas provided to them by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The Permit Board may release the performance bond or deposit only if the contractors have completed the reclamation work required in paragraph C(1) of this rule and the Corps of Engineers furnishes written assurance to the Permit Board that it accepts responsibility for restoration of the mined areas in accordance with all applicable reclamation standards of this chapter.
D. If the Permit Board denies the application for release of the performance bond or deposit or portion thereof, it shall notify the operator, in writing, stating the reasons for denial and recommending corrective actions necessary to secure the release.
E. The Permit Board shall authorize the Executive Director under those conditions the Permit Board may prescribe to administratively release any performance bond or deposit provided by an operator for coverage under a general permit. A decision of the Executive Director is a decision of the Permit Board and shall be subject to review and appeal as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.4.1 Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Mining
A. To the extent that the Commission, the Permit Board and the Department may exercise jurisdiction over the areas specified in this rule, no surface mining operation shall be conducted on lands which are part of a national park, national monument, national historic landmark, any property listed on the national register of historic places, national forest, national wilderness area, national wildlife refuge, national wild or scenic river, state scenic stream, state park, state wildlife refuge, state forest, recorded state historical landmark, state historic site, state archaeological landmark or city or county park, forest or historical area. For good cause shown and after any public hearing the Commission may elect to hold, the Commission may make an exception to this rule.
B. With the assistance of the Mississippi Commission on Wildlife, Fisheries and Parks and the Mississippi Department of Marine Resources, the Commission shall identify and designate as unsuitable certain lands for all or certain types of surface mining. Prior to an action by the Commission to designate an area as unsuitable for surface mining, or prior to an action by the Commission to remove an area from the list of lands designated as unsuitable for surface mining, notice shall be given to prospective operators and other interested parties as required by Miss. Code Ann. § 25-43-7(1). The Commission may designate areas as unsuitable for surface mining lands if the Commission determines:
(1) The operations will result in significant damage to important areas of historic, cultural or archaeological value or to important natural systems;
(2) The operations will affect renewable resource lands resulting in a substantial loss or reduction of long-range productivity of water supply or food or fiber products, including aquifers and aquifer recharge areas;
(3) The operations are located in areas of unstable geological formations and may reasonably be expected to endanger life and property;
(4) The operations will damage ecologically sensitive areas;
(5) The operations will significantly and adversely affect any national park, national monument, national historic landmark, property listed on the national register of historic places, national forest, national wilderness area, national wildlife refuge, national wild or scenic river area, state scenic stream, state park, state wildlife refuge, state forest, recorded state historical landmark, state historic site, state archaeological landmark, or city or county park;
(6) The operations will endanger any public road, public building, cemetery, school, church
or similar structure or existing dwelling outside the permit area; or
(7) The operations and the affected area cannot be feasibly reclaimed under the requirements of this chapter.
C. Unless an operation is exempted under Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 7(2)(a) or 53-7- 7(2)(b) and Rule 1.2.1.B(1) and (2) of these Regulations, it is unlawful to conduct surface mining operations within an area designated as unsuitable for surface mining, or to conduct surface mining operations in rivers, lakes, bayous, intermittent or perennial streams or navigable waterways, natural or manmade, without a permit or coverage under a general permit issued or reissued consistent with these Regulations.
D. After the effective date of these regulations, no new surface mining operations shall be permitted to conduct mining:
(1) Within one hundred (100) feet of the outside right-of-way line of any public road, except where mine access roads or haul roads join such right-of-way line. However, the Permit Board may allow the area affected by mining to lie within one hundred (100) feet of such right-of-way line with written permission from the governmental entity having authority over the road.
(2) Within three hundred (300) feet of any occupied dwelling, unless waived by the owner or occupant thereof, nor within three hundred (300) feet of any public building, school, church, community or institutional building.
(3) Within one hundred (100) feet of a cemetery.
(4) Within the following distance from a permit boundary, where a highwall will be created:
Depth of excavation distance from permit boundary 1-5 feet 30 feet 6-10 feet 40 feet 11-15 feet 50 feet 16-25 feet 60 feet 26-30 feet 70 feet
Any excavation exceeding thirty feet in depth shall apply the following formula to determine the minimum distance of disturbance from the permit boundary:
Twenty- five (25) feet plus one and one half (1 ½) times the depth of the excavation.
The Permit Board will consider requests for exemptions to, or variances from, the requirements in Rule 1.4.1.D(1), (2), (3), and (4), upon sufficient proof that affected governmental entities, property owners, or occupants have had timely and sufficient notice of the proposed operation. Any comments received as a result of such notice shall be considered prior to any action upon any request for exceptions to, or variances from, the buffer zone requirements. The Permit Board may consider such factors as it deems appropriate in determining whether to grant a variance or exception.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.4.2 Register of Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Mining
The Department shall maintain and have available for public inspection in its office a register of all areas that have been designated as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface mining operations. This register shall include all areas for which petitions to have an area designated as unsuitable for surface mining have been submitted. The register will be in such a form that the locations of the lands may be readily identified; it will also contain all necessary information explaining the reasons why the land was designated as unsuitable for surface mining.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.4.3 Petition to Have Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Mining
A. The Commission, upon petition, may designate an area as unsuitable for mining or modify or terminate the designation of an area as unsuitable for surface mining. The Commission, upon its own motion, may terminate the designation of an area as unsuitable for surface mining. The Commission may conduct a public hearing on its proposed action in accordance with Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-33.
B. A petition shall contain allegations of facts with supporting evidence. The Commission shall make a determination based upon the validity of the facts contained in the petition, and may designate, modify or terminate the designation of the lands included in the petition as unsuitable for mining.
C. Any person aggrieved by an action of the Commission under this section may appeal as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-41.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.5.1 Fees
A. Each application for a surface mining permit, for a surface mining permit modification to add acreage, and for coverage under a general permit shall be accompanied by an application fee in the amount of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) plus Ten Dollars ($10.00) per acre. The maximum permit fee shall not exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00).
B. Each submission of the annual certificate of compliance as required in Rule 1.2.9 of these Regulations shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00).
C. State agencies, political subdivisions of the state, and local governing bodies shall be exempt from all fees.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.5.2 Surface Mine Worker Safety Training Fees
A. Recipients of Surface Mine Worker Safety Training given by the Department shall pay a fee. The fee shall be set by order of the Commission, and shall not exceed the cost of providing the training.
B. All monies collected under this section shall be deposited into the Surface Mine Worker Safety Training Program Operations Fund to be administered by the Executive Director of MDEQ.
C. The Commission delegates to the Department responsibility for the collection of fees under this section.
D. Any person required to pay a fee under this section who disagrees with the calculation or applicability of the fee may petition the Commission for a hearing in accordance with Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-33 and 49-17-35.
E. Monies in the special fund shall be utilized to pay reasonable direct and indirect costs associated with surface mine worker safety training provided by the Department including, but not limited to, matching funds for federal grants to meet federal grant requirements to pay a proportional share of the total cost of the training.
F. The special fund may receive monies from any available public or private source including, but not limited to, collection of fees, interest, grants, taxes, public and private donations, judicial actions and appropriated funds.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.6.1 Inspections
A. Authorized representatives of the Department, on presentation of appropriate credentials, may enter and inspect any operation or any premises in which records required to be maintained under these Regulations are located and may at reasonable times, and without delay, have access to and copy any records and inspect any monitoring equipment or method of operation required by these Regulations, the Act, or a permit.
B. Inspections of operations, with or without a permit, by the Department, shall occur at a frequency necessary to insure compliance with the Act and these Regulations and the terms and conditions of any permit. Inspections shall occur only during normal operating hours if practical, may occur without prior notice to the permittee or the agents or employees of the permittee, and shall include the filing of an inspection report. The Department shall make those reports part of the record and shall provide one (1) copy of the report to the operator. The Department shall, as practical, establish a system of rotation of field inspectors.
C. Each field inspector, on detection of each violation of the Act, these Regulations, or the permit for the operation, shall inform the operator or the operator's agent orally at the time of the inspection and subsequently in writing and shall report any violation in writing to the Commission.
D. Any representative of the local Soil and Water Conservation District, upon presentation of appropriate credentials may enter and inspect the operation for the purpose of making recommendations regarding reclamation activities. The representative shall make any
recommendations on the progress of reclamation activities in writing to the Department on behalf of the Permit Board.
E. The Department shall conduct an initial review of a completed permit application within thirty (30) days following receipt of the completed application. The Department shall make a recommendation to the Permit Board on the permit application no later than the next regularly scheduled Permit Board meeting following the thirty-day initial review period, unless a public hearing is held on the application or the applicant agrees in writing to an additional time frame. If a public hearing is held, the Department shall make its recommendation at the next regularly scheduled Permit Board meeting following the public hearing, if practicable.
F. An on-site inspection of the proposed affected area shall be made by the Department within the thirty-day time period specified in Rule 1.6.1.E of these Regulations, and before a permit is issued.
G. After receipt of the application for bond release, the Department shall conduct an inspection and evaluation of the reclamation work involved. The evaluation shall consider, among other things, the occurrence of pollution of surface and subsurface water, the probability of continuance or future occurrence of pollution, and the estimated cost of abating the pollution. Results of the evaluation and findings of the Department, and the local Soil and Water Commissioners if such evaluations and findings are so made, shall be provided within thirty (30) days after the inspection to the operator and other interested parties, making written request for the evaluation and findings.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.7.1 Reclamation Plan
A. A reclamation plan shall be developed in a manner consistent with local, physical, environmental and climatological conditions and current mining and reclamation technology. A proposed initial reclamation plan submitted as part of a permit application shall include the following information:
(1) The identification of the proposed affected area, accompanied by a detailed topographic map on a scale required by regulation showing:
(a) The proposed affected area, the location of any stream or standing body of water into which the area drains, the location of drainways and any planned siltation traps and other impoundments, and the location of access roads to be prepared or used by the operator in the mining operation;
(b) The location of any buildings, cemeteries, public highways, railroad tracks, gas and oil wells, publicly owned land, sanitary landfills, officially designated scenic areas, utility lines, underground mines, transmission lines or pipelines within the affected area or within five hundred (500) feet of the exterior limits of the affected area;
(c) The approximate location of the cuts or excavations to be made in the surface and the estimated location and height of spoil banks, and the total number of acres
involved in the affected area;
(d) The date the map was prepared and a statement of its accuracy by the person responsible for its preparation.
B. The condition of the land to be covered by the permit before any mining, including:
(1) The land use existing at the time of the application, and if the land has a history of previous mining, the land use, if reasonably ascertainable, which immediately preceded any mining; and
(2) The capability of the land before any mining to support a variety of uses, giving consideration to soil and foundation characteristics, topography and vegetative cover.
C. The capacity of the land to support its anticipated use following reclamation, including a discussion of the capacity of the reclaimed land to support alternative uses.
D. A description of how the proposed postmining land condition is to be achieved and the necessary support activities that may be needed to achieve the condition, including an estimate of the cost per acre of the reclamation.
E. The steps taken to comply with applicable air and water quality and water rights laws and regulations and any applicable health and safety standards, including copies of any pertinent permit applications.
F. A general timetable that the applicant estimates will be necessary for accomplishing the major events contained in the reclamation plan.
G. Any other information as the Permit Board shall determine to be reasonably necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Act and these Regulations.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.7.2 Reclamation of Lieu Lands
A. The Permit Board may, in its discretion, authorize the reclamation of lands in lieu of the lands included in the permit application. The acreage of the authorized lieu lands reclaimed shall not be less than the acreage of the lands in the permit application. Any applicant who proposes to reclaim lands in lieu of those lands included in the permit application shall state that fact in the application or subsequent or amended application and shall submit the reclamation plan accordingly. The Permit Board shall not authorize the reclamation of lieu lands unless the applicant submits with the reclamation plan a notarized statement of each surface owner and lessee of all lands included in the permit application. The statement shall contain the consent of each surface owner and lessee for the reclamation of the proposed lieu lands.
B. If the Permit Board does not authorize the reclamation of the lieu lands, the applicant shall submit a reclamation plan for the lands contained in the permit application.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.7.3 Reclamation Standards
A. Any permit issued under the Act and these Regulations shall require operations to comply with all applicable reclamation standards. Reclamation standards shall apply to all operations, exploration activities and reclamation operations covered by the Act and these Regulations and shall require the operator at a minimum to:
(1) Conduct operations in a manner consistent with prudent mining practice, so as to maximize the utilization and conservation of the resource being recovered; and, in keeping with the intent of maximizing the value of mined land, stockpiles of commercially valuable material may remain, if they are ecologically stable;
(2) Restore the affected area so that it may be used for a useful, productive and beneficial purpose, including an agricultural, grazing, commercial, residential or recreational purpose, including lakes, ponds, wetlands, wildlife habitat, or other natural or forested areas;
(3) Conduct water drainage and silt control for the affected area to strictly control soil erosion, damage to adjacent lands and pollution of waters of the state, both during and following the mining operations. Before, during and for a reasonable period after mining, all drainways for the affected area shall be protected with silt traps or dams of approved design as directed by law. The operator may impound water to provide wetlands, lakes or ponds of approved design for wildlife, recreational or water supply purposes, if it is a part of the approved reclamation plan;
(4) Remove or cover all metal, lumber and other refuse, except vegetation, resulting from the operation;
(5) Regrade the area to the nearest approximate original contour or rolling topography, and eliminate all highwalls and spoil piles, except as provided in an approved reclamation plan. Lakes, ponds or wetlands may be constructed, if part of an approved reclamation plan;
(6) Stabilize and protect all affected areas sufficiently to control erosion and attendant air and water pollution;
(7) Remove the topsoil, if any, from the affected area in a separate layer, and place it on any authorized lieu lands to be reclaimed or replace it on the backfill area. If not utilized immediately, the topsoil shall be segregated in a separate pile from other spoil. If the topsoil is not replaced on a backfill area of authorized lieu lands within a time short enough to avoid deterioration, the topsoil shall be protected by a successful cover of plants or by other means approved by the Permit Board. If topsoil is of insufficient quantity or of poor quality for sustaining vegetation and if other strata can be shown to be as suitable for vegetation requirements, then the operator may petition the Permit Board for permission to be exempt from the requirements for the removal, segregation and preservation of topsoil and to remove, segregate and preserve in a like manner other strata which are best able to support vegetation or to mix strata, if that mixing can be shown to be equally suitable for revegetation requirements;
(8) Replace, if required, available topsoil or the best available subsoil on top of the land to be reclaimed or on top of authorized lieu lands being reclaimed;
(9) Minimize the disturbances to the prevailing hydrologic balance at the mine site and in associated off-site areas and to the quality and quantity of water in surface and groundwater systems both during and after surface mining operations and during reclamation by:
(a) Avoiding acid or other toxic mine drainage by using measures such as, but not limited to:
(1) Preventing or removing water from contact with toxic- material producing deposits;
(2) Treating drainage to reduce toxic material content; and
(3) Casing, sealing or otherwise managing boreholes, shafts and wells to keep acid or other toxic material drainage from entering ground and surface waters;
(b) Conducting operations to prevent unreasonable additional levels of suspended solids to streamflow or runoff outside the permit area above natural levels under seasonal flow conditions;
(c) Removing temporary or large siltation structures from drainways, consistent with good water conservation practices, after disturbed areas are revegetated and stabilized;
(d) Performing any other actions as may be required by the Commission or Permit Board to ensure compliance with the Act or these Regulations;
(10) Stabilize any waste piles;
(11) Incorporate current engineering practices for the design and construction of water retention structures for the disposal of mine wastes, processing wastes or other liquid or solid wastes which, at a minimum, shall be compatible with the requirements of applicable state and federal laws and regulations, insure that leachate will not pollute surface or ground water, and locate water retention structures so as not to endanger public health and safety should failure occur;
(12) Insure that all debris, acid-forming materials, toxic materials or materials constituting a fire hazard are treated or disposed of in a manner designed to prevent contamination of ground or surface waters or combustion;
(13) Insure that construction, maintenance and postmining conditions of access roads into and across the permit area will minimize erosion and siltation, pollution of air and water, damage to fish or wildlife or their habitat, or public or private property. The Permit Board may authorize the retention after mining of certain access roads if compatible with the approved reclamation plan;
(14) Refrain from the construction of roads or other access ways up a stream bed or drainage channel or in proximity to a channel where the construction would seriously alter the normal flow of water;
(15) Revegetate the affected area with plants, approved by the Department, to attain a useful, productive and beneficial purpose, including an agricultural, grazing, industrial, commercial, residential or recreational purpose, including lakes, ponds, wetlands, wildlife habitat or other natural or forested areas;
(16) Assume responsibility for successful revegetation for a period of two (2) years beyond the date of initial bond release on any bond or deposit held by the Department;
(17) Assure with respect to permanent impoundments of water as part of the approved reclamation plan that:
(a) The size of the impoundment and the availability of water are adequate for its intended purpose;
(b) The impoundment dam construction will meet the requirements of applicable state and federal laws;
(c) The quality of impounded water will be suitable on a permanent basis for its intended use and the discharges from the impoundment will not degrade the water quality in the receiving stream;
(d) Final grading will provide adequate safety and access for anticipated water users;
(e) Water impoundments will not result in the diminution of the quality or quantity of water utilized by adjacent or surrounding landowners; and
(18) Protect off-site areas from slides or damage occurring during the surface mining and reclamation operations, and not deposit spoil material or locate any part of the operations or waste accumulations outside the permit area.
B. Reclamation is intended to cause the affected area to be restored to a useful, productive and beneficial purpose. A method of reclamation other than that provided in this section may be approved by the Permit Board if the Permit Board determines that the method of reclamation required by this section is not practical and that the alternative method will provide for the affected area to be restored to a useful, productive and beneficial purpose.
C. Each operator, except as authorized by the Permit Board, shall perform reclamation work concurrently with the conduct of the mining operation where practical. The fact that an operator will likely redisturb an area shall be cause for the Permit Board to grant an exception from the requirement of concurrent reclamation.
D. The operator and, in case of bond forfeiture, the Department or its designee, shall have the continuing right to enter and inspect the affected area in the reclamation plan and to perform any reclamation measures required properly to complete the reclamation plan.
E. (1) If the Commission finds that
(a) reclamation of the affected area is not proceeding in accordance with the reclamation plan and that the operator has failed within thirty (30) days after notice to commence corrective action or
(b) revegetation has not been properly completed in conformance with the reclamation plan within two (2) years or longer, if required by the Commission, after termination of mining operations or upon revocation of the permit, or
(c) if the Permit Board revokes a permit, the Commission may initiate proceedings against the bond or deposit filed by the operator.
The proceedings shall not be commenced with respect to a surety bond until the surety has been given sixty (60) days to commence and a reasonable opportunity to begin and complete corrective action.
(2) A forfeiture proceeding against any performance bond or deposit shall be commenced and conducted according to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-31 through 49-17-41.
(3) If the Commission orders forfeiture of any performance bond or deposit, the entire sum of the performance bond or deposit shall be forfeited to the Department. The funds from the forfeited performance bond or deposit shall be placed in the appropriate account in the fund and used to pay for reclamation of the permit area and remediation of any off- site damages resulting from the operation. Any surplus performance bond or deposit funds shall be refunded to the operator or corporate surety.
(4) Forfeiture proceedings shall be before the Commission and an order of the Commission under this subsection is a final order. If the Commission determines that forfeiture of the performance bond or deposit should be ordered, the Department shall have the immediate right to all funds of any performance bond or deposit, subject only to review and appeals allowed under Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-41.
(5) If the operator cannot be located, the Department shall send notice of the forfeiture proceeding, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the operator's last known address. The Department shall also publish notice of the forfeiture proceeding by publication once weekly for three (3) consecutive weeks in a newspaper having general circulation in the State of Mississippi and in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the operation is located. Any formal hearing on the bond forfeiture shall be set at least thirty (30) days after the last notice publication.
(6) If the performance bond or deposit is insufficient to cover the costs of reclamation of the permit area in accordance with the approved reclamation plan or remediation of any off- site damages, the Commission may initiate a civil action to recover the deficiency amount in the county in which the surface mining operation is located.
(7) If the Commission initiates a civil action under subsection (6) of this rule, the Commission shall be entitled to any sums necessary to complete reclamation of the permit area in accordance with the approved reclamation plan and remediate any off-site damages resulting from that operation.
F. If a landowner, upon termination or expiration of a lease, refuses to allow the operator to enter onto the property designated as the affected area to conduct or complete reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, or if the landowner interferes with or authorizes a third party to disturb or interfere with reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, the landowner shall assume the permit and shall file a reclamation plan and post a performance bond as required under these Regulations and the Act.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.7.4 Concurrent Reclamation
Each operator, except as authorized by the Permit Board, shall perform reclamation work concurrently with the conduct of the mining operation where practical. The fact that an operator will likely redisturb an area shall be cause for the Permit Board to grant an exception from the requirements of concurrent reclamation.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.7.5 Right of the Operator and the Department to Complete Reclamation
The operator and, in case of bond forfeiture, the Department, shall have the continuing right to enter the affected area included in the reclamation plan and to perform thereon the reclamation measures required properly to complete the reclamation plan.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.8.1 Notification of Violations
A. Each Department field inspector, on detection of each violation of any requirement of the Act, permit, or these Regulations, shall inform the operation supervisor orally at the time of the inspection and subsequently in writing and shall report in writing any such violation to the Commission.
B. Any operator found by the Department to be in noncompliance with any of the filing, reporting, notification, mining, or reclaiming provisions of the Act, the permit or these Regulations shall be notified in writing by the Department.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.8.2 Violations and Penalties
A. Any person who violates, or fails or refuses to comply with any rule or regulation or written order of the Commission or any condition of a permit or coverage under a general permit may be subject to a civil penalty to be assessed and levied by the Commission after notice and opportunity for a formal hearing. In addition to assessing civil penalties, the Commission may submit a written statement to the Permit Board recommending that the Permit Board revoke the permit for any operation which is subject to the maximum penalty of Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00). Appeals of any action or decision of the Commission may be taken as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-41.
B. Any civil penalty assessed against a permitted, covered or exempt operation and levied by the Commission shall not exceed Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for the first violation; for subsequent violations committed within three (3) years of the first violation the maximum penalties are: Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) for the second violation, Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) for the third violation and Twenty-five Thousand Dollars
($25,000.00) for the fourth and subsequent violations by the same operator. Multiple violations at a site during one (1) day shall not be cumulative. A separate penalty shall not be assessed for each violation and only one (1) penalty may be assessed for all violations occurring at a site during one (1) day. Each day of a continuing violation shall be a separate violation until corrective action is taken or the operator after notice of the violation is diligently pursuing efforts to achieve compliance in a timely manner. In assessing a penalty under this subsection, the Commission shall not consider offenses occurring before July 1, 2002. In addition to a civil penalty, the Commission may order an operator of a permitted, covered or exempt operation to reclaim the affected area.
C. Any civil penalty assessed against an operator for mining without a permit and levied by the Commission shall not exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) for the first violation, Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) for the second violation and Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) for the third and subsequent violations by an operator. In assessing a penalty under this subsection, the Commission shall not consider violations occurring before July 1, 2002.
D. In determining the amount of penalty, the Commission shall consider at a minimum:
(1) The willfulness of the violation;
(2) Any damage to air, water, land or other natural resources of the state or their uses;
(3) Costs of restoration and abatement;
(4) Economic benefit as a result of noncompliance;
(5) The seriousness of the violation, including any harm to the environment and any hazard to the health, safety and welfare of the public; and
(6) Past performance history.
E. The Commission may institute and maintain a civil action for relief, including a permanent or temporary injunction or any other appropriate order, in the chancery court of the county in which the majority of the surface mining operation is located. The chancery court shall have jurisdiction to provide relief as may be appropriate. Any relief granted by the court to enforce a written order of the Commission shall continue in effect until the completion of all proceedings for review of that order under this chapter, unless the chancery court granting the relief sets it aside or modifies it before that time.
F. Liability for the costs of cleanup, removal, remediation or abatement of any pollution, hazardous waste or solid waste shall be limited as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-42 and rules adopted under that section.
G. Any violation of the act and the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law or the Solid Wastes Disposal Law of 1974 shall be assessed a civil penalty under only one (1) of these laws.
H. Any person who knowingly makes any false statement, representation or certification, or knowingly fails to make any statement, representation or certification in any application, record, report, plan or other document filed or required to be maintained under the Act or these Regulations is guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction, may be subject to a fine of not more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00).
I. Any person who knowingly violates, or fails or refuses to comply with this chapter, any rule or regulation or written order of the Commission adopted or issued under this chapter, or any condition of a permit issued under this chapter, is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, may be subject to a fine of not more than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.8.3 Cease and Desist Authority
The Commission shall order the immediate cessation of any ongoing surface mining operation being conducted with or without a permit or coverage under a general permit if it finds that the operation endangers the health or safety of the public or creates imminent and significant environmental harm.
Subchapter 9 Enforcement, Hearings, and Appeals Rule 1.9.1 Enforcement and Appeals A, When an employee of the Department files a report alleging a violation or when any person files a complaint with the Commission alleging that any other person is in violation of any rule and regulation, or any condition of a permit, the Commission shall notify the alleged violator and conduct an investigation of the complaint. Upon finding a basis for the complaint, the Commission shall cause written notice of the complaint, specifying the section of law, rule, regulation or permit alleged to be violated and the facts of the alleged violations, to be served upon that person. The Commission may require the person to appear before the Commission at a time and place specified in the notice to answer the charges. The time of appearance before the Commission shall be not less than twenty (20) days from the date of the mailing or service of the complaint, whichever is earlier. If the Commission finds no basis for the complaint, the Commission shall dismiss the complaint.
B. The Commission shall afford an opportunity for a formal hearing to the alleged violator at the time and place specified in the notice or at another time or place agreed to in writing by both the Department and the alleged violator, and approved by the Commission. On the basis of the evidence produced at the formal hearing, the Commission may enter an order which in its opinion will best further the purposes of this chapter and shall give written notice of that order to the alleged violator and to any other persons which appeared at the formal hearing or made written request for notice of the order. The Commission may assess penalties as provided by law. Any formal hearing shall be of record.
C. Except as otherwise expressly provided, any notice or other instrument issued by or under authority of the Commission may be served on any affected person personally or by publication, and proof of that service may be made in the same manner as in case of service of a summons in a civil action. The proof of service shall be filed in the office of the Commission. Service may also be made by mailing a copy of the notice, order, or other instrument by certified mail, directed to the person affected at the person's last known post office address as shown by the files or records of the Commission. Proof of service may be made by the affidavit of the person who did the mailing and shall be filed in the office of the Commission.
D. Any person who participated as a party in the formal hearing may appeal a decision of the Commission under this rule as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-41.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.9.2 Place and Nature of Hearings
A. Unless otherwise expressly provided in these Regulations or the Act, any interested party aggrieved by any action of the Permit Board may request a formal hearing before the Permit Board as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29. Any person aggrieved by any action of the Commission may request a formal hearing before the Commission as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-41.
B. Any public hearing of the Permit Board provided for under these Regulations or the Act shall be deemed to be the same hearing as otherwise afforded to any interested party by the Permit Board under Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29. Any formal hearing of the Permit Board shall be deemed to be the same hearing as otherwise afforded to any interested party by the Permit Board under Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29.
C. Any public hearing of the Commission provided for under these Regulations or the Act shall be deemed to be the same hearing as afforded under Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-35. Any formal hearing of the Commission provided for under these Regulations or the Act shall be deemed to be the same hearing as afforded under Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17- 41.
D. (1) In conducting any formal hearing under these Regulations or the Act, the Permit Board shall have the same authority to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, examine witnesses under oath and conduct the hearing as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17- 29.
(2) In conducting any formal hearing under these Regulations or the Act, the Commission shall have the same authority to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths, examine witnesses under oath and conduct the hearing as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-41.
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.9.3 Appeals of Final Decisions
Any person who participated as a party in a formal hearing before the Permit Board may appeal from a final decision of the Permit Board as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-29. Any person who participated as a party in a formal hearing before the Commission may appeal from a final decision of the Commission as provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-41.
History
- Source: Miss. Cod e Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 1.10.1 Effective Date
These revisions to the Mississippi Surface Mining and Reclamation Rules and Regulations were adopted by the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality on December 10, 2009, and shall become effective on February 3, 2010.
Part 8, Chapter 2: Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality Regulations Governing Surface Coal Mining
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Subchapter 2.1 General Information
Rule 1. General
§ 101 Authority § 103 Responsibility § 105 Definitions § 107 Applicability § 109 Petitions to Initiate Rulemaking § 111 Notice of Citizen Suits § 113 Availability of Records § 115 Computation of Time
Rule 3. Permanent Regulatory Program
§ 301 Authority § 303 Applicability
Rule 4. Exemption for Coal Extraction of Other Minerals
§ 401 Scope § 403 Definitions § 405 Application Requirements and Procedures § 407 Contents for Application for Exemption § 409 Public Availability of Information § 411 Requirements for Exemptions § 413 Conditions of Exemption and Right of Inspection and Entry § 415 Stockpiling of Minerals § 417 Revocation and Enforcement § 419 Reporting Requirements
Rule 5. Restriction of Financial Interests of Employees
§ 501 Authority § 503 Responsibility § 505 Penalties § 507 Who Shall File § 509 When to File § 511 Where to File § 513 What to Report § 515 Gifts and Gratuities § 517 Resolving Prohibited Interests
§ 519 Appeals Procedure
Rule 7. Exemption for Coal Extraction Incident to Government-financed Highway or Other Construction
§ 701 Responsibility § 703 Applicability § 705 Information to be Maintained on Site
Subchapter 2.2 Areas Unsuitable for Mining
Rule 9. General
§ 901 Authority § 903 Responsibility
Rule 11. Areas Designated by Act of Congress
§ 1101 Authority § 1103 Responsibility § 1105 Areas Where Mining is Prohibited or Limited § 1106 Submission and Processing of Requests for Valid Existing Rights Determinations § 1107 Procedures
Rule 13. Criteria for Designating Lands as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations
§ 1301 Responsibility § 1303 Criteria for Designating Lands as Unsuitable § 1305 Land Exempt From Designation as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations § 1307 Exploration or Development on Land Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations
Rule 15. State Process for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations
§ 1501 Procedures: Petitions § 1503 Procedures: Initial Processing, Record Keeping, and Notification Requirements § 1505 Procedures: Hearing Requirements § 1507 Procedures: Decision § 1509 Data Base and Inventory System Requirements § 1511 Public Information § 1513 Responsibility for Implementation
Subchapter 2.3 Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations Permits and Coal Exploration and Development Procedures Systems
Rule 17. General Requirements for Permit or Exploration Procedure Systems
§ 1701 Responsibilities
§ 1703 Applicability § 1705 Coordination with Requirements Under Other Laws
Rule 19. General Requirements for Permits and Permit Applications
§ 1901 General Requirements for Permits: Operators § 1903 Compliance with Permits § 1905 Permit Filing Application Deadlines § 1907 Permit Applications: General Requirements for Format and Contents § 1909 Permit Fees § 1911 Verification of Application
Rule 21. Coal Exploration and Development
§ 2101 Notice Requirements for Exploration Removing 250 Tons of Coal or Less § 2103 Permit Requirements for Exploration Removing More than 250 Tons of Coal, or Occurring on Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations § 2105 Coal Exploration Compliance Duties § 2107 Commercial Use or Sale § 2109 Public Availability of Information
Rule 23. Surface Mining and Permit Applications: Minimum Requirements for Legal, Financial, Compliance and Related Information
§ 2301 Responsibility § 2303 Applicability § 2305 Identification of Interests § 2307 Compliance Information § 2309 Right of Entry and Operation Information § 2311 Relationship to Areas Designated Unsuitable for Mining § 2313 Permit Term Information § 2315 Personal Injury and Property Damage Insurance Information § 2317 Identification of Other Licenses and Permits § 2319 Identification of Location of Public Office for Filling of Application § 2321 Newspaper Advertisement and Proof of Publication § 2323 Facilities or Structures Used in Common § 2325 Additional Information
Rule 25. Surface Mining and Permit Applications: Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources
§ 2501 Responsibilities § 2503 General Requirements § 2505 General Environmental Resources Information § 2507 Description of Hydrology and Geology: General Requirements § 2509 Geology Description § 2511 Groundwater Information § 2513 Surface-water Information § 2515 Supplemental Information § 2517 Baseline Cumulative Impact Area Information
§ 2519 Modeling § 2521 Alternative Water Source Information § 2523 Probable Hydrologic Consequences Determination § 2525 Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment § 2527 Climatological Information § 2529 Vegetation Information § 2531 Soil Resources Information § 2533 Land Use Information § 2535 Maps: General Requirements § 2537 Cross-sections, Maps and Plans § 2539 Prime Farmland Investigation
Rule 27. Surface Mining Permit Applications: Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation
§ 2701 Responsibilities § 2703 Operation Plan: General Requirements § 2705 Operation Plan: Existing Structures § 2707 Operation Plan: Blasting § 2709 Operation Plan: Maps and Plans § 2711 Air Pollution Control Plan § 2713 Fish and Wildlife Plan § 2715 Reclamation Plan: General Requirements § 2717 Reclamation Plan: Protection of Hydrologic Balance § 2719 Groundwater Monitoring Plan § 2721 Surface-water Monitoring Plan § 2723 Reclamation Plan: Post-mining Land Uses § 2725 Reclamation Plan: Siltation Structures, Impoundments, Banks, Dams and Embankments § 2727 Reclamation Plan: Surface Mining near Underground Mining § 2729 Diversions § 2731 Protection of Public Parks and Historic Places § 2733 Relocation or Use of Public Roads § 2735 Disposal of Excess Spoil § 2737 Road Systems § 2739 Support Facilities
Rule 29. Requirements for Permits for Special Categories of Mining
§ 2901 Experimental Practices Mining § 2902 Lands Eligible for Remining § 2903 Steep Slope Mining § 2905 Permits Incorporating Alternatives from Approximate Original Contour Restoration Requirements for Steep Slope Mining § 2907 Prime Farmlands § 2909 Coal Processing Plants or Support Facilities Not Located Within the Permit Area of a Specified Mine § 2911 In Situ Processing Activities
Rule 31. Public Participation, Approval of Permit Applications and Permit Terms and Conditions
§ 3101 Responsibilities § 3102 Permit Eligibility Determination § 3103 Public Notices of Filing of Permit Applications § 3104 Revisions of Permits § 3105 Opportunity for Submission of Written Comments on Permit Applications § 3107 Right to File Written Objections § 3109 Public Hearings § 3111 Public Availability of Information in Permit Applications on File with the Office § 3112 Review of Permit Applications § 3113 Eligibility for Provisionally Issued Permits § 3114 Valid Existing Rights Review at Time of Permit Application Review § 3115 Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial § 3117 Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial: Existing Structures § 3119 Permit Approval or Denial Actions § 3121 Permit Terms § 3123 Conditions of Permits: General and Right of Entry § 3125 Conditions of Permits: Environmental, Public Health and Safety § 3127 Initial Review and Finding Requirements for Improvidently issued Permits § 3128 Notice Requirements for Improvidently Issued Permits § 3129 Suspension or Rescission Requirements for Improvidently Issued Permits § 3130 Unanticipated Events or Conditions at Remining Sites § 3131 Verification of Ownership or Control Application Information § 3133 Who May Challenge Ownership or Control Listings and Findings § 3135 How to Challenge an Ownership or Control Listing or Finding § 3136 Burden of Proof for Ownership or Control Challenges § 3137 Written Agency Decision on Challenges to Ownership or Control Listings or Findings § 3138 Post-Permit Issuance Requirements for Regulatory Authorities and Other Actions Based on Ownership, Control, and Violation Information § 3139 Post-Permit Issuance Requirements for Permittees
Rule 33. Administrative and Judicial Review of Permit Decisions
§ 3301 Formal Hearing § 3303 Judicial Review
Rule 35. Permit Reviews and Renewals, and Transfer, Sale and Assignment of Rights Granted under Permits
§ 3501 Responsibilities § 3503 Department Review of Outstanding Permits § 3505 Permit Modifications and Revisions § 3507 Permit Renewals: General Requirements § 3509 Permit Renewals: Completed Applications § 3511 Permit Renewals: Terms § 3513 Permit Renewals: Approval or Denial § 3515 Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights: General Requirements § 3517 Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights: Obtaining Approval
Rule 37. Small Operator Assistance
§ 3701 Authority § 3703 Responsibilities: General § 3705 Eligibility for Assistance § 3707 Filing for Assistance § 3709 Application Approval and Notice § 3711 Program Services and Data Requirements § 3713 Qualified Laboratories § 3715 Assistance Funding § 3717 Applicant Liability
Subchapter 2.4 Bond and Insurance Requirements for Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations
Rule 39. General Requirements of Bonding of Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations under Regulatory Program
§ 3901 Requirements to File a Bond § 3903 Requirements to File Certificate of Liability Insurance § 3905 Responsibilities
Rule 41. Amount and Duration of Performance Bond
§ 4101 Determination of Bond Amount § 4103 Minimum Amount § 4105 Period of Liability § 4107 Adjustment of Amount
Rule 43. Form, Conditions and Terms of Performance Bonds and Liability Insurance
§ 4301 Form and Performance of Bond § 4303 Terms and Condition of the Bond § 4305 Self Bonding § 4307 Replacement of Bonds § 4309 Terms and Conditions for Liability Insurance
Rule 45. Procedures, Criteria and Schedule for Release of Performance Bond
§ 4501 Procedures for Seeking Release of Performance Bond § 4503 Criteria and Schedule for Release of Performance Bond
Rule 47. Performance Bond Forfeiture Criteria and Procedures
§ 4701 General § 4703 Procedures § 4705 Criteria for Forfeiture § 4707 Determination of Forfeiture Amount
Subchapter 2.5 Permanent Program Performance Standard
Rule 49. Permanent Program Performance Standards: General Provisions
§ 4901 Responsibility
Rule 51. Permanent Program Performance Standard: Coal Exploration and Development Operations
§ 5101 General Responsibility of Persons Conducting Coal Exploration or Development § 5103 Required Documents § 5105 Performance Standards for Coal Exploration or Development
Rule 53. Permanent Program Performance Standards for Surface Mining Activities
§ 5301 Signs and Markers § 5303 Casing and Sealing of Drilled Holes: General Requirements § 5305 Casing and Sealing of Drilled Holes: Temporary § 5307 Casing and Sealing of Drilled Holes: Permanent § 5309 Topsoil: General Requirements § 5311 Topsoil and Subsoil § 5313 Hydrologic Balance: General Requirements § 5315 Hydrologic Balance: Water Quality Standards and Effluent Limitations § 5317 Hydrologic Balance: Diversions § 5319 Hydrologic Balance: Sediment Control Measures § 5321 Hydrologic Balance: Siltation Structures § 5323 Hydrologic Balance: Discharge Structures § 5325 Hydrologic Balance: Acid-forming and Toxic-forming Materials § 5327 Hydrologic Balance: Impoundments § 5329 Hydrologic Balance: Groundwater Protection § 5331 Hydrologic Balance: Surface-water Protection § 5333 Hydrologic Balance: Surface- and Ground-water Monitoring § 5335 Hydrologic Balance: Transfer of Wells § 5337 Hydrologic Balance: Water Rights and Replacement § 5339 Hydrologic Balance: Discharges into an Underground Mine § 5341 Hydrologic Balance: Post-mining Rehabilitation of Sedimentation Ponds, Diversions, Impoundments and Treatment Facilities § 5343 Hydrologic Balance: Stream Buffer Zones § 5345 Coal Recovery § 5347 Use of Explosives: General Requirements § 5349 Use of Explosives: Pre-blasting Survey § 5351 Use of Explosives: Blasting Schedule § 5353 Use of Explosives: Blasting Signs Warnings and Access Control § 5355 Use of Explosives: Control of Adverse Effects § 5357 Use of Explosives: Records of Blasting Operations § 5359 Disposal of Excess Spoil: General Requirements § 5361 Disposal of Excess Spoil: Valley Fills/head-of-hollow Fills § 5363 Disposal of Excess Spoil: Durable Rock Fills § 5365 Disposal of Excess Spoil: Preexisting Benches § 5367 Protection of Underground Mining § 5369 Coal Mine Waste: General Requirements § 5371 Coal Mine Waste: Refuse Piles § 5373 Coal Processing Waste: Burning and Burned Waste Utilization
§ 5375 Disposal of Noncoal Wastes § 5377 Coal Mine Waste: Impounding Structures § 5379 Stabilization of Surface Areas § 5381 Air Resources Protection § 5383 Protection of Fish, Wildlife and Related Environmental Values § 5385 Slides and Other Damages § 5387 Contemporaneous Reclamation § 5389 Backfilling and Grading: Time and Distance Requirements § 5391 Backfilling and Grading: General Grading Requirements § 5393 Backfilling and Grading: Thin Overburden § 5395 Backfilling and Grading: Thick Overburden § 5396 Backfilling and Grading: Previously Mined Areas § 5397 Revegetation: General Requirements § 5399 Revegetation: Timing § 53101 Revegetation: Mulching and Other Soil Stabilizing Practices § 53103 Revegetation: Standards for Success § 53105 Cessation of Operations: Temporary § 53107 Cessation of Operations: Permanent § 53109 Post-mining Land Use § 53111 Roads: General § 53113 Primary Roads § 53115 Utility Installations § 53117 Support Facilities
Rule 55. Special Permanent Program Performance Standards: Operations on Prime Farmland
§ 5501 Prime Farmland: Scope and Purpose § 5503 Prime Farmland: Soil Removal and Stockpiling § 5505 Prime Farmland: Soil Replacement § 5507 Prime Farmland: Revegetation and Restoration of Soil Productivity
Rule 57. Special Permanent Program Performance Standards: Operations on Steep Slopes
§ 5701 Applicability § 5703 Steep Slopes: Backfilling and Grading: Steep Slopes
Rule 59. Special Permanent Program Performance Standards: Coal Preparation Plants and Support Facilities Not Located at or near the Minesite or Not Within the Permit Area for a Mine
§ 5901 Applicability § 5903 Coal Plants: Performance Standards
Rule 61. Special Permanent Program Performance Standards: in Situ Processing
§ 6101 In Situ Processing: Performance Standards § 6103 In Situ Processing: Monitoring
Rule 63. Inspections
§ 6301 Inspections § 6303 Citizens’ Request for Inspections § 6305 Right of Entry § 6307 Review of Adequacy and Completeness of Inspection § 6309 Review of Decisions Not to Inspect or Enforce § 6311 Availability of Records
Rule 65. Enforcement
§ 6501 Cessation Orders § 6503 Notice of Violation § 6505 Suspension or Revocation of Permits § 6507 Service of Violation and Cessation Orders § 6509 Termination of Order § 6511 Formal Review of Citations § 6513 Failure to Give Notice and Lack of Information § 6515 Inability to Comply § 6517 Compliance Conference § 6519 Enforcement Actions at Abandoned Sites
Rule 67. Civil Penalties
§ 6701 How Assessments Are Made § 6703 When Penalty Will Be Assessed § 6705 Point System for Penalties § 6707 Determination of Amount of Penalty § 6709 Assessments of Separate Violations for Each Day § 6711 Waiver of Use of Formula to Determine Civil Penalty § 6713 Procedures for Assessment of Civil Penalties
Rule 69. Individual Civil Penalties
§ 6901 When an Individual Civil Penalty May Be Assessed § 6903 Amount of Individual Civil Penalty § 6905 Procedure for Assessment of Individual Civil Penalty § 6907 Payment of Penalty
Rule 71. Petitions for Award of Costs and Expenses
§ 7101 Who May File § 7103 Where to File: Time for Filing § 7105 Contents of Petition § 7107 Answer § 7109 Who May Receive an Award § 7111 Awards § 7113 Appeal
Rule 73. Alternative Enforcement
§ 7301 Scope
§ 7303 General Provisions § 7305 Criminal Penalties § 7307 Civil actions for relief
Amendment A. Revegetation Success Standards
Subchapter 2.1 General Information
Rule 1. General
§ 101. Authority
The Department is authorized to administer the requirements of the act and regulations promulgated thereunder.
§ 103. Responsibility
(a) The Commission is designated as the body to enforce the Act and these regulations including, but not limited to, the issuance of penalty orders, promulgation of regulations, designation of lands unsuitable for surface coal mining, and forfeiture of performance bonds.
(b) The Permit Board is designated as the body to issue, modify, revoke, transfer, suspend, and reissue permits and to require, modify or release performance bonds.
§ 105. Definitions
As used in these regulations, the following terms have the specified meaning, except where otherwise indicated.
Abandoned Site–a surface coal mining and reclamation operation for which the Department has found in writing that:
(a) all surface coal mining and reclamation activities at the site have ceased;
(b) the Department has issued at least one notice of violation, and either:
(1) is unable to serve the notice despite diligent efforts to do so; or
(2) the notice was served and has progressed to a failure-to-abate cessation order;
(c) the Department:
(1) is taking action to ensure that the permittee and operator, and owners and controllers of the permittee and operator, will be precluded from receiving future permits while violations continue at the site; and
(2) is taking action pursuant to these regulations and the act to ensure that abatement occurs or that there will not be a recurrence of the failure-to-abate, except where after evaluating the circumstances it concludes that further enforcement offers little or no likelihood of successfully compelling abatement or recovering any reclamation costs; and
(d) where the site is, or was, permitted or bonded:
(1) the permit has expired or been revoked, or permit revocation proceedings have
been initiated and are being pursued diligently; and
(2) the Department has initiated and is diligently pursuing forfeiture of, or the Commission has forfeited, the performance bond.
Acid Drainage–water with a pH value of less than 6.0, and in which total acidity exceeds total alkalinity, discharged from an active, inactive or abandoned surface coal mine and reclamation operation, or from an area affected by surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
Acid-Forming Materials–earth materials that contain sulfide minerals or other materials which, if exposed to air, water or weathering processes, form acids that may create acid drainage.
Acid Test Ratio–the relation of quick assets to current liabilities.
Act–the Mississippi Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Law codified at Sections 53-9- 1 et seq. of the Mississippi Code Annotated.
Adjacent Area–the area outside the permit area where a resource or resources, determined according to the context in which adjacent area is used, are or reasonably could be expected to be adversely impacted by proposed mining operations, including probable impacts from underground workings.
Affected Area–any land or water surface which is used to facilitate, or is physically altered by, surface coal mining and reclamation operations. The affected area includes: the disturbed area; any area upon which surface coal mining and reclamation operations are conducted; any adjacent lands the use of which is incidental to surface coal mining and reclamation operations; all areas covered by new or existing roads used to gain access to, or for hauling coal to or from, surface coal mining and reclamation operations; any area covered by surface excavations, workings, impoundments, dams, ventilation shafts, entryways, refuse banks, dumps, stockpiles, overburden piles, spoil banks, culm banks, tailings, holes or depressions, repair areas, storage areas or shipping areas; any areas upon which are sited structures, facilities or other property material on the surface resulting from, or incident to, surface coal mining and reclamation operations; and the area located above underground workings.
Agricultural Use–the use of any tract of land for the production of animal or vegetable life. The uses include, but are not limited to, the pasturing, grazing, and watering of livestock, and the cropping, cultivation, and harvesting of plants.
Appeal–an appeal to an appropriate court of the state taken from a final decision of the Permit Board or Commission made after a formal hearing before that body.
Applicant–a person applying for a permit, permit modification, permit renewal, or the transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights from the Permit Board to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations or, where required, seeking approval for coal exploration or development operations.
Applicant Violator System or AVS- means an automated information system of applicant, permittee, operator, violation and related data OSM maintains to assist in implementing the Act.
Application–the documents and other information filed with the Permit Board for the issuance of an exploration or surface mining and reclamation operations permit, permit modification, permit renewal, or the transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights for surface coal mining and reclamation operations or
where required, for coal exploration.
Approximate Original Contour–that surface configuration achieved by backfilling and grading of the mined area so that the reclaimed area, including any terracing or access roads, closely resembles the general surface configuration of the land prior to mining and blends into and complements the drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain, with all highwalls, spoil piles and coal refuse piles eliminated. Permanent water impoundments may be permitted where the Permit Board determines that they are in compliance with §§5327, 5341 and 53109.
Aquifer–a zone, stratum or group of strata that can store and transmit water in sufficient quantities for a specific use.
As recorded in the minutes of the Permit Board–the date of the Permit Board meeting at which the action concerned is taken by the Permit Board.
Asset Ratio–the relation of total assets to total liabilities.
Assets–cash and current assets that are reasonably expected to be realized in cash or sold or consumed within one year.
Auger Mining–a method of mining coal at a cliff or highwall by drilling holes into an exposed seam from the highwall and transporting the coal along an auger bit to the surface.
Best Technology Currently Available–equipment, devices, systems, methods or techniques which will:
(a) prevent, to the extent possible, additional contributions of suspended solids to stream flow or runoff outside the permit area, but in no event result in contributions of suspended solids in excess of requirements set by applicable state or federal laws; and
(b) minimize, to the extent possible, disturbances and adverse impacts on fish, wildlife and related environmental values, and achieve enhancement of those resources where practicable. The term includes equipment, devices, systems, methods or techniques which are currently available anywhere as determined by the Department, even if they are not in routine use. The term includes, but is not limited to, construction practices, siting requirements, vegetative selection and planting requirements, animal stocking requirements, scheduling of activities, and design of sedimentation ponds in accordance with § 5313-5327. Within the constraints of the permanent program, the Department shall have the discretion to determine the best technology currently available on a case-by-case basis.
Capital Assets–those assets such as lands, buildings and equipment held for use in the production and sale of other assets and services.
Cash–all cash items except cash restricted by an agreement, or described as earmarked for a particular purpose; and short term investments such as stocks, bonds, notes and certificates of deposit where the intent and ability to sell them in the near future is established by the operator.
Cemetery–any area of land where human bodies are interred.
Coal–combustible carbonaceous rock, classified as anthracite, bituminous, subbituminous, or lignite by the American Society of Testing and Materials under the title, Standard Specification for Classification of Coals by Rank, ASTM D 388-77.
Coal Exploration, or Exploration Operations–the drilling of test holes or core holes for the purpose of, or related to, the determining of the location, quantity or quality of a coal deposit under a permit to be issued by the Permit Board, and any other coal exploration operations that will substantially disturb the surface and are not otherwise covered by these regulations.
Coal Mine Waste–coal processing waste and underground development waste.
Coal Mining Operation–the business of developing, producing, preparing and loading bituminous coal, subbituminous coal, anthracite, or lignite, or of reclaiming the areas upon which such activities occur. This term applies solely to Rule 5 of these regulations.
Coal Preparation–chemical or physical processing and the cleaning, concentrating or other processing or preparation of coal.
Coal Preparation Plant–a facility where coal is subjected to chemical or physical processing or cleaning, concentrating or other processing or preparation. It includes facilities associated with coal preparation activities including, but not limited to, the following: loading facilities; storage and stockpile facilities; sheds, shops and other buildings; water-treatment and water-storage facilities; settling basins and impoundments; and coal processing and other waste disposal areas.
Coal Processing Waste–earth materials which are separated and wasted from the product coal during cleaning, concentrating or other processing or preparation of coal.
Collateral Bond–an indemnity agreement in a sum certain executed by the permittee as principal which is supported by the deposit with the Commission of one or more of the following:
(a) a cash account, which shall be the deposit of cash in one or more federally-insured or equivalently protected accounts, payable only to the Commission upon demand;
(b) negotiable bonds of the United States, a state or a municipality, endorsed to the order of, and placed in the possession of, the Commission;
(c) negotiable certificates of deposit, made payable or assigned to the Commission and placed in its possession or held by a federally-insured bank;
(d) an irrevocable letter of credit of any bank organized or authorized to transact business in the United States, payable only to the Commission upon presentation;
(e) other investment-grade rated securities having a rating of AAA, AA or A or an equivalent rating issued by a nationally recognized securities rating service, endorsed to the order of, and placed in the possession of, the Commission.
Combustible Material–organic material that is capable of burning, either by fire or through oxidation, accompanied by the evolution of heat and a significant temperature rise.
Commission–the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality.
Community or Institutional Building–any structure, other than a public building or an occupied dwelling, which is used primarily for meetings, gatherings or functions of local civic organizations or other community groups; functions as an educational, cultural, historic, religious, scientific, correctional,
mental health or physical health care facility; or is used for public services, including, but not limited to, water supply, power generation or sewage treatment.
Compaction–increasing the density of a material by reducing the voids between the particles, and generally accomplished by controlled placement and mechanical effort such as from repeated application of wheel, track or roller loads from heavy equipment.
Complete Application–an application for a permit, permit modification, permit renewal, or the transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights or, where necessary, for the approval of coal exploration operations, which the Department determines to contain information addressing each application requirement of the act and these regulations and to contain all information necessary to initiate formal processing and public review.
Complete and Accurate Application–an application for a permit, permit modification, permit renewal, or the transfer, assignment, or sale of permit rights or, where necessary, for the approval of coal exploration operations, which the Department determines to contain all information required under the act or these regulations that is necessary for the Permit Board to make its decision on permit issuance and for which all opportunity for public notice, comment and hearings required by the act or these regulations has been completed.
Cropland–land used for the production of adapted crops for harvest, alone or in a rotation with grasses and legumes, and includes row crops, small grain crops, hay crops, nursery crops, orchard crops and other similar specialty crops.
Cumulative Impact Area–the area, including the permit area, within which impacts resulting from the proposed operation may interact with the impacts of all anticipated mining on surface- and ground-water systems. Anticipated mining shall include, at a minimum, the entire projected lives through bond release of: the proposed operation; all existing operations; any operation for which a permit application has been submitted to the Permit Board; and all operations required to meet diligent development requirements for leased federal coal for which there is actual mine development information available.
Current Liabilities–debts or other obligations that must be paid or liquidated within a short period of time, usually a year. This shall also include dividends payable on preferred stock within one year.
Department–the Office of Geology of the Department of Environmental Quality.
Direct Financial Interest–ownership or part ownership by an employee of lands, stocks, bonds, debentures, warrants, partnership shares or other holdings and any other arrangement where the employee may benefit from his or her holdings in, or salary from, coal mining operations. Direct financial interests include employment, pensions, creditor, immovable property and other financial relationships.
Director–the director of the federal Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement.
Disturbed Area–an area where vegetation, topsoil or overburden is removed or upon which topsoil, spoil, coal processing waste or noncoal waste is placed by surface coal mining operations. Those areas are classified as disturbed until reclamation is completed and the performance bond or other assurance of performance required by Subchapter 2.4 is released.
Diversion–a channel, embankment or other man-made structure constructed to divert water from one area to another.
Drinking, domestic or Residential Water Supply–Water received from well or spring and any appurtenant delivery system that provides water for direct human consumption or household use. Wells and springs that serve only agricultural, commercial or industrial enterprises are not included except to the extent the water supply is for direct human consumption or human sanitation or domestic use.
Downslope–the land surface between the projected outcrop of the lowest coalbed being mined along each highwall and a valley floor.
Embankment–an artificial deposit of material that is raised above the natural surface of the land and used to contain, divert or store water, support roads or railways, or for other similar purposes.
Employee–any person employed by any Office of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality who performs any function or duty under the act, the Executive Director, and any member of the Commission or Permit Board.
Ephemeral Stream–a stream which flows only in direct response to precipitation in the immediate watershed or in response to the melting of a cover of snow and ice and which has a channel bottom that is always above the local water table.
Excess Spoil–spoil material disposed of in a location other than the mined-out area; provided, that spoil material used to achieve the approximate original contour or to blend the mined-out area with the surrounding terrain in accordance with §§ 5359-5365 and 5319(d) in non-steep slope areas shall not be considered excess spoil.
Executive Director–the Executive Director of the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, and the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board.
Existing Structure–a structure or a facility used in connection with or to facilitate surface coal mining and reclamation operations for which construction begins prior to the approval of a state program or implementation of a federal program or federal lands program, whichever occurs first.
Exploration Operations Permit–a permit issued by the Permit Board to an applicant to conduct coal exploration as that term is defined in these regulations.
Extraction of Coal as an Incidental Part–the extraction of coal which is necessary to enable the accomplishment of the government-funded highway project construction that is necessitating the extraction. For the purposes of Rule 7, only that coal extracted from within the right-of-way, in the case of a road, railroad, utility line or other such construction or within the boundaries of the area directly affected by other types of government-financed construction, may be considered incidental to that construction. Extraction of coal outside the right-of-way or boundary of the area directly affected by construction shall be subject to the requirements of the act and these regulations.
Federal Land Program–a program established by the secretary of interior pursuant to § 523 of SMCRA to regulate surface coal mining and reclamation operations on federal lands.
Federal Lands–any lands, including mineral interests, owned by the United States, without regard to how the United States acquired ownership of the lands or which agency manages the lands, but does not include Indian lands.
Federal Violation Notice–a violation notice issued by OSM or by another agency or instrumentality of the United States.
Federal Office–the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement established under Title II of the federal act.
Fixed Assets–plants and equipment, but does not include land or coal in place.
Formal hearing–a hearing on the record, as recorded and transcribed by a court reporter, before the Commission or Permit Board where all parties to the hearing are allowed to present witnesses, cross- examine witnesses and present evidence for inclusion into the record as appropriate under rules promulgated by the Commission or Permit Board.
Fragile Lands–geographic areas containing natural, ecologic, scientific or aesthetic resources that could be damaged or destroyed by surface coal mining operations. Examples of fragile lands include: valuable habitats for fish or wildlife, critical habitats for endangered or threatened species of animals or plants, uncommon geologic formations, paleontological sites, national natural landmark sites, areas where mining may cause flooding, environmental corridors containing a concentration of ecologic and aesthetic features, areas of recreational value due to high environmental quality and buffer zones adjacent to the boundaries of areas where surface coal mining operations are prohibited under the Act and these regulations.
Fugitive Dust–that particulate matter not emitted from a duct or stack which becomes airborne due to the forces of wind or surface coal mining and reclamation operations or both. During surface coal mining and reclamation operations it may include emissions from haulroads, wind erosion of exposed surfaces, storage piles, spoil piles, reclamation operations and other activities in which material is either removed, stored, transported or redistributed.
Fund–the Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund established pursuant to § 401 of SMCRA.
Government-Financed Construction–construction funded 50 percent or more by funds appropriated from a government financing agency's budget or obtained from general revenue bonds, but shall not mean government financing agency guarantees, insurance, loans, funds obtained through industrial revenue bonds or their equivalent or in kind payments.
Government Financing Agency–a federal, state, county municipal or local unit of government, or a Department, bureau, agency or office of the unit which directly, or through another unit of government, finances construction.
Ground Cover–the area of ground covered by the combined aerial parts of vegetation and the litter that is produced naturally on site, expressed as a percentage of the total area of measurement.
Groundwater–subsurface water that fills available openings in rock or soil materials to the extent that they are considered water-saturated.
Half-Shrub–a perennial plant with a woody base whose annually produced stems die back each year.
Head-of-Hollow Fill–a fill structure consisting of any material, other than coal-processing waste and organic material, placed in the uppermost reaches of a hollow where side slopes of the existing hollow measured at the steepest point are greater than 20 degrees or the average slope of the profile of the hollow from the toe of the fill to the top of the fill is greater than 10 degrees. In fills with less than
250,000 cubic yards of material, associated with contour mining, the top surface of the fill will be at the elevation of the coal seam. In all other head-of-hollow fills, the top surface of the fill, when completed, is at approximately the same elevation as the adjacent ridge line, and no significant area of natural drainage occurs above the fill draining into the fill area.
Higher or Better Uses–postmining land uses that have a higher economic value or nonmonetary benefit to the landowner or the community than the premining land uses.
Highwall–the face of exposed overburden and coal in an open cut of a surface coal mining activity or for entry to underground mining activities.
Historically Used for Cropland–
(a) lands that have been used for cropland for any five or more years out of the 10 years immediately preceding the acquisition, including purchase, lease or option of the land for the purpose of conducting or allowing through resale, lease or option the conduct of surface coal mining and reclamation operations;
(b) lands that the Department determines, on the basis of additional cropland history of the surrounding lands and the lands under consideration, that the permit area is clearly cropland but falls outside the specific five-year-in-10 criterion, in which case the regulations for prime farmland may be applied to include more years of cropland history only to increase the prime farmland acreage to be preserved; or
(c) lands that would likely have been used as cropland for any five out of the last 10 years immediately preceding such acquisition, but for the same fact of ownership or control of the land unrelated to the productivity of the land.
Historic Lands–historic or cultural districts, places, structures or objects, including archaeological sites, National Historic Landmark sites, sites listed on or eligible for listing on a State or National Register of Historic Places, sites having religious or cultural significance to Native Americans or religious groups or sites for which historic designation is pending.
Hydrologic Balance–the relationship between the quality and quantity of water inflow to, water outflow from and water storage in a hydrologic unit such as a drainage basin, aquifer, soil zone, lake or reservoir. It encompasses the dynamic relationships between precipitation, runoff, evaporation and changes in surface- and ground-water storage.
Hydrologic Regime–the entire state of water movement in a given area. It is a function of the climate and includes the phenomena by which water first occurs as atmospheric water vapor, passes into a liquid or solid form, falls as precipitation, moves along or into the ground surface and returns to the atmosphere as vapor by means of evaporation and transpiration.
Immediate Mining Area–as used in the definition of Road in this section, means an area of mining activity or pre-mining construction activity covered by a construction stormwater pollution prevention plan or, after construction is completed, situated so that surface water run-off will be routed to an approved water control structure such as a sedimentation pond. Routes of travel within the immediate mining area will be either: consumed by mining; reclaimed; or have design plans submitted for approval as permanent postmine features prior to Phase II bond release.
Imminent Danger to the Health and Safety of the Public–the existence of any condition or practice, or
any violation of a permit or other requirement of these regulations in a surface coal mining and reclamation operation, which condition, practice or violation could reasonably be expected to cause substantial physical harm to persons outside the permit area before such condition, practice or violation can be abated. A reasonable expectation of death or serious injury before abatement exists if a rational person, subjected to the same conditions or practices giving rise to the peril, would not expose himself or herself to the danger during the time necessary for abatement.
Impounding Structure–a dam, embankment or other structure used to impound water, slurry or other liquid or semi-liquid material.
Impoundment–a closed basin, naturally formed or artificially built, which is dammed or excavated for the retention of water, sediment or waste.
Indian Lands–all lands, including mineral interests, within the exterior boundaries of any federal Indian reservation, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way, and all lands including mineral interests held in trust for or supervised by an Indian tribe.
Indian Tribe–any Indian tribe, band, group or community located within the state of Mississippi having a governing body recognized by the secretary of interior.
Indirect Financial Interest–the same financial relationship as for direct ownership, but where the employee reaps the benefits of such interests, including interests held by his or her spouse, minor child and other relatives, including in-laws, residing in the employee's home. The employee will not be deemed to have an indirect financial interest if there is no relationship between the employee's functions or duties and the coal mining operation in which the spouse, minor children or other resident relatives hold a financial interest.
In Situ Processes–activities conducted on the surface or underground in connection with in-place processing of coal. The term includes, but is not limited to, in situ gasification, in situ leaching, slurry mining, solution mining, borehole mining and fluid recovery mining.
Interested Party–any person claiming an interest relating to the surface coal mining operation and who is so situated that the person may be affected by that operation, or in the matter of regulations promulgated by the Commission, any person who is so situated that the person may be affected by the action.
Intermittent Stream–a stream or reach of a stream that drains a watershed of at least one square mile or a stream or reach of a stream that is below the local water table for at least some part of the year and obtains its flow from surface runoff and groundwater discharge.
Irreparable Damage to the Environment–any damage to the environment that cannot be corrected by actions of the applicant.
Knowing or Knowingly–means that a person who authorized, ordered, or carried out an act or omission knew or had reason to know that the act or omission would result in either a violation or a failure to abate or correct a violation.
Land Use–specific use or management-related activity, rather than the vegetation or cover of the land. Land uses may be identified in combination when joint or seasonal uses occur. Changes of land use or uses from one of the following categories to another shall be considered as a change to an alternative land use which is subject to approval by the Permit Board:
(a) Cropland–land used for the production of adapted crops for harvest, alone or in a rotation with grasses and legumes, and includes row crops, small grain crops, hay crops, nursery crops, orchard crops and other similar specialty crops. Land used for facilities in support of cropland farming operations which is adjacent to or an integral part of these operations is also included for purposes of these land use categories.
(b) Pastureland or Land Occasionally Cut for Hay–land used primarily for the long-term production of adapted, domesticated forage plants to be grazed by livestock or occasionally cut and cured for livestock feed. Land used for facilities in support of pastureland or land occasionally cut for hay which is adjacent to or an integral part of these operations is also included.
(c) Grazing land–includes both grasslands and forest lands where the indigenous vegetation is actively managed for grazing, browsing or occasional hay production. Land used for facilities in support of ranching operations which is adjacent to or an integral part of these operations is also included.
(d) Forestry–land used or managed for the long-term production of wood, wood fiber or wood derived products. Land used for facilities in support of forest harvest and management operations which is adjacent to or an integral part of these operations is also included.
(e) Residential–includes single- and multiple-family housing, mobile home parks and other residential lodgings. Land used for facilities in support of residential operations which is adjacent to or an integral part of these operations is also included. Support facilities include, but are not limited to, vehicle parking and open space that directly relate to the residential use.
(f) Industrial/Commercial–land used for:
(1) extraction or transformation of materials for fabrication of products, wholesaling of products or for long-term storage of products. This includes all heavy and light manufacturing facilities such as lumber and wood processing, chemical manufacturing, petroleum refining and fabricated metal products manufacture. Land used for facilities in support of these operations which is adjacent to or an integral part of that operation is also included. Support facilities include, but are not limited to, all rail, road and other transportation facilities.
(2) retail or trade of goods or services, including hotels, motels, stores, restaurants and other commercial establishments. Land used for facilities in support of commercial operations which is adjacent to or an integral part of these operations is also included. Support facilities include, but are not limited to, parking, storage or shipping facilities.
(g) Recreation–land used for public or private leisure-time use, including developed recreation facilities such as parks, camps and amusement areas, as well as areas for less intensive uses such as hiking, canoeing and other undeveloped recreational uses.
(h) Fish and Wildlife Habitat–land dedicated wholly or partially to the production, protection or management of species of fish or wildlife.
(i) Developed Water Resources–land used for storing water for beneficial uses such as stock ponds, irrigation, fire protection, flood control and water supply.
(j) Undeveloped Land or No Current Use or Land Management–land that is undeveloped or, if previously developed, land that has been allowed to return naturally to an undeveloped state or has been allowed to return to forest through natural succession.
Liabilities–obligations to transfer assets or provide services to other entities in the future as a result of past transactions.
MSHA–the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration.
Modification–any change to a permit or reclamation plan that significantly changes, or has the reasonable potential significantly to change, the effect of the mining operation on either those persons impacted by the permitted operations or on the environment.
Moist Bulk Density–the weight of soil (oven dry) per unit volume. Volume is measured when the soil is at field moisture capacity (one third bar moisture tension). Weight is determined after drying the soil at 105° C.
Monitoring–as used in Rule 27, the collection of environmental data by either continuous or periodic sampling methods.
Mulch–vegetation residues or other suitable materials that aid in soil stabilization and soil moisture conservation, thus providing micro-climatic conditions suitable for germination and growth.
Natural Hazard Lands–geographic areas in which natural conditions exist which pose or, as a result of surface coal mining operations, may pose a threat to the health, safety or welfare of people, property or the environment, including areas subject to landslides, cave-ins, large or encroaching sand dunes, severe wind or soil erosion, frequent flooding, avalanches and areas of unstable geology.
Net Worth–total assets minus total liabilities; equivalent to owner's equity.
Net Profit–the bottom line of the income statement after taxes, including taxes based on income, adjustments, all extraordinary income and expense, but before preferred and common stock dividends.
Noxious Plants–species that have been included on official Mississippi state lists of noxious plants.
Occupied Dwelling–any building that is currently being used on a regular or temporary basis for human habitation.
Office of Geology–the Office of Geology and Energy Resources of the Department, as created by Miss. Code Ann. § 49-2- 7(a).
Operator–any person, partnership or corporation engaged in coal mining who removes or intends to remove more than 250 tons of coal from the earth by surface coal mining methods within 12 consecutive calendar months in any one location.
OSM or OSMRE–the federal Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, which was established to administer the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (pub. L. 95-87).
Other Treatment Facilities–any chemical treatments, such as flocculation or neutralization, or mechanical structures, such as clarifiers or precipitators, that have a point-source discharge and that are utilized to prevent additional contributions of dissolved or suspended solids to streamflow or runoff
outside the permit area, or to comply with all applicable state and federal water-quality laws and regulations.
Outslope–the face of the spoil or embankment sloping downward from the highest elevation to the toe.
Overburden–material of any nature, consolidated or unconsolidated, that overlies a coal deposit, excluding topsoil.
Owned or Controlled and Owns or Controls–any one or a combination of the relationships specified in a and b below.
(a) (1) being a permittee of a surface coal mining operation;
(2) based on instrument of ownership or voting securities, owning of record in excess of 50 percent of an entity; or
(3) having any other relationship which gives one person authority directly or indirectly to determine the manner in which an applicant, an operator or other entity conducts surface coal mining operations.
(b) The following relationships are presumed to constitute ownership or control unless a person can demonstrate that the person subject to the presumption does not in fact have the authority directly or indirectly to determine the manner in which the relevant surface coal mining operation is conducted:
(1) being an officer or director of an entity;
(2) being the operator of a surface coal mining operation;
(3) having the ability to commit the financial or real property assets or working resources of an entity;
(4) being a general partner in a partnership;
(5) based on the instruments of ownership or the voting securities of a corporate entity, owning of record 10 through 50 percent of the entity; or
(6) owning or controlling coal to be mined by another person under a lease, sublease or other contract and having the right to receive such coal after mining or having authority to determine the manner in which that person or another person conducts a surface coal mining operation.
Ownership or Control Link–any relationship included in the definition of "owned or controlled" or "owns or controls" or in the violations review provisions of § 3112(b). It includes any relationship presumed to constitute ownership or control under the definition of "owned or controlled" or "owns or controls," unless such presumption has been successfully rebutted under the provisions of §§ 3135 and 3137 or under the provisions of rule 33.
Parent Corporation–a corporation which owns or controls the applicant.
Perennial Stream–a stream or part of a stream that flows continuously during all of the calendar year as a result of ground-water discharge or surface runoff. The term does not include intermittent stream or ephemeral stream.
Performance Bond–a surety bond, collateral bond, letter or letters of credit, or self-bond, or a combination thereof, by which a permittee assures faithful performance of all the requirements of the act, these regulations, this program and the requirements of the permit and reclamation plan.
Permanent Diversion–a diversion remaining after surface coal mining and reclamation operations are completed which has been approved for retention by the Permit Board.
Permanent Impoundment–an impoundment which is approved by the Permit Board and, if required, by other state and federal agencies, for retention as part of the postmining land use.
Permit–a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations issued by the Permit Board. The term does not include exploration permits.
Permit Area–the area of land, indicated on the approved map submitted by the operator with his or her application, required to be covered by the operator's performance bond under these regulations and which shall include the area of land upon which the operator proposes to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations under the permit, including all disturbed areas; provided, that areas adequately bonded under another valid permit may be excluded from the permit area.
Permit Board–the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit Board created by Miss. Code Ann. § 49- 17-28.
Permittee–a person holding a permit or persons required to have a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
Person–an individual, partnership, association, society, joint venture, joint stock company, firm, company, corporation, cooperative or other business organization and any agency, unit, or instrumentality of federal, state or local government including any publicly owned utility or publicly owned corporation of federal state or local government.
Precipitation Event–a quantity of water resulting from drizzle, rain, snow, sleet or hail in a limited period of time. It may be expressed in terms of recurrence interval. As used in these regulations, precipitation event also includes that quantity of water emanating from snow cover as snow-melt in a limited period of time.
Previously mined area–land affected by surface coal mining operations prior to August 3, 1977, that has not been reclaimed to the standards of these regulations.
Prime Farmland–farmland as defined by the United States Secretary of Agriculture on the basis of factors such as moisture availability, temperature regime, chemical balance, permeability, surface layer composition, susceptibility to flooding and erosion characteristics, and which historically have been used for intensive agricultural purposes, and as published in the federal register.
Principal Shareholder–any person who is the record or beneficial owner of 10 percent or more of any class of voting stock.
Probable Cumulative Impacts–as used in Rule 25, the expected total qualitative and quantitative, direct
and indirect effects of mining and reclamation activities on the hydrologic regime.
Probable Hydrologic Consequence–as used in Rule 25, the projected result of proposed surface coal mining and reclamation operations which may reasonably be expected to change the quantity or quality of the surface water and ground water, the surface- or ground-water flow, timing and pattern, the stream channel conditions, and the aquatic habitat on the permit area and other affected areas.
Prohibited Financial Interest–any direct or indirect financial interest in any coal mining operation.
Property to be Mined–both the surface and subsurface areas underneath lands which are within the permit area.
Public Building–any structure that is owned by a public agency or used principally for public business, meetings or other group gatherings.
Public Hearing, informal hearing, or public meeting–a public forum organized by the Commission, Department or Permit Board for the purpose of providing information to the public regarding a surface coal mining and reclamation operation or regulations proposed by the Commission and at which members of the public are allowed to make comments or ask questions or both of the Commission, Department or Permit Board.
Public Office–a facility under the direction and control of a governmental entity which is open to public access on a regular basis during reasonable business hours.
Public Park–an area dedicated or designated by a federal, state or local agency for primarily public recreational use, whether or not such use is limited to certain times or days, including any land leased, reserved or held open to the public because of that use. The term also includes any publicly-owned park as defined in 30 CFR § 761.5.
Public Road–a road:
(a) which has been designated as a public road pursuant to the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is located;
(b) which is maintained with public funds in a manner similar to other public roads of the same classification within the jurisdiction;
(c) for which there is substantial (more than incidental) public use; and
(d) which meets road construction standards for other public roads of the same classification in the local jurisdiction.
Quick Assets–cash and current assets that can be quickly turned into cash.
Rangeland–land on which the natural potential (climax) plant cover is principally native grasses, forbs and shrubs valuable for forage. This land includes natural grasslands and savannahs, such as prairies, and juniper savannahs, such as brushlands. Except for brush control, management is primarily achieved by regulating the intensity of grazing and season of use.
Recharge Capacity–the ability of the soils and underlying materials to allow precipitation and runoff to infiltrate and reach the zone of saturation.
Reclamation–those actions taken to restore mined land as required by these regulations to a post-mining land use approved by the Permit Board.
Recurrence Interval–the interval of time in which a precipitation event is expected to occur once, on the average. For example, a 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event would be that 24-hour precipitation event expected to occur on the average once in 10 years.
Reference Area–a land unit maintained under appropriate management for the purpose of measuring vegetation ground cover, productivity and plant species diversity that are produced naturally by approved crop production methods. Reference areas must be representative of geology, soil, slope and vegetation in the permit area.
Refuse Pile–a surface deposit of coal mine waste that does not impound water, slurry or other liquid or semiliquid material.
Regional Director–a regional director of the federal office or a regional director's representative.
Registered Professional Engineer–shall mean a person who has met the qualifications as required under § 73-13-23(1) and who has been issued a certificate of registration by the Mississippi State Board of Registration for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors.
Registered Professional Geologist–means a geologist who has met the academic and experience qualifications established by the Mississippi Board of Professional Geologists and has been issued a certificate of registration as a registered professional geologist by the Mississippi Board of Professional Geologists pursuant to § 73-63 et sec.
Regulatory Authority–the Department or agency in each State which has primary responsibility at the State level for administering the initial regulatory program under Section 502 of SMCRA, or the State agency responsible for administering the State regulatory program, or the Secretary when the Secretary is directly administering the requirements of SMCRA, or the Secretary when administering a Federal program or Federal lands program or when enforcing a State program pursuant to section 521(b) of SMCRA.
Regulatory Program–any State or Federal program or, in a State with no approved State or Federal program and coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations are on Federal lands, the requirements of Subchapters A, F, G, J, K, L, M, and P of 30 CFR Chapter VII.
Renewable Resource Lands–aquifers and areas for the recharge of aquifers and other underground waters; areas for agricultural or silvicultural production of food and fiber; and grazing lands.
Replacement of Water Supply–with respect to protected water supplies contaminated, diminished, or interrupted by coal mining operations, provision of water supply on both a temporary and permanent basis equivalent to premining quantity and quality. Replacement includes provision of an equivalent water delivery system and payment of operation and maintenance costs in excess of customary and reasonable delivery costs for premining water supplies.
(a) upon agreement by the permittee and the water supply owner, the obligation to pay such operation and maintenance costs may be satisfied by a one-time payment in an amount which covers the present worth of the increased annual operation and maintenance costs for a period agreed to by the permittee and the water supply owner.
(b) if the affected water supply was not needed for the land use in existence at the time of loss, contamination, or diminution, and if the supply is not needed to achieve the postmining land use, replacement requirements may be satisfied by demonstrating that a suitable alternative water source is available and could feasibly be developed. If the latter approach is selected, written concurrence must be obtained from the water supply owner.
Retained Earnings–stockholder's equity that has arisen from retained assets from earnings in the business. This shall include only earnings from normal operations and not gains from such transactions as the sale of plant assets or investments.
Return on Investment–the relation of net profit for the last yearly period to ending net worth.
Revision–any change to the permit or reclamation plan that does not significantly change the effect of the mining operation on either those persons impacted by the permitted operations or on the environment, including, but not limited to, incidental boundary changes to the permit area or a departure from or change within the permit area, incidental changes in the mining method or incidental changes in the reclamation plan.
Road–a surface right-of-way for purposes of travel by land vehicles used in surface coal mining and reclamation operations, coal exploration, or development operations. A road consists of the entire area within the right-of-way, including the roadbed, shoulders, parking and side areas, approaches, structures, ditches and surface. The term includes access and haulroads constructed, used, reconstructed, improved or maintained for use in surface coal mining and reclamation operations, coal exploration, or development operations, including use by coal hauling vehicles to and from transfer, processing or storage areas. The term does not include ramps and routes of travel within the immediate mining area or within spoil or coal mine waste disposal areas.
Safety Factor–the ratio of the available shear strength to the developed shear stress, or the ratio of the sum of the resisting forces to the sum of the loading or driving forces, as determined by accepted engineering practices.
Secretary of Interior–the secretary of the United States Department of the Interior.
Sedimentation Pond–an impoundment used to remove solids from water in order to meet water quality standards or effluent limitations before the water leaves the permit area.
Self-Bond–an indemnity agreement in a sum certain payable to the Commission, with or without separate surety, and executed by the applicant or by the applicant and any corporate guarantor.
Significant Forest Cover–an existing plant community consisting predominantly of trees and other woody vegetation.
Significant, Imminent Environmental Harm to Land, Air or Water Resources–
(a) an environmental harm is an adverse impact on land, air or water resources which include plant and animal life;
(b) an environment harm is imminent, if a condition, practice or violation exists which is causing harm or may reasonably be expected to cause harm before the end of the reasonable abatement time that would be set under Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 69(1)(c)(i); or
(c) an environmental harm is significant if it is a harm which is appreciable and not immediately repairable.
Significant Recreational, Timber, Economic or Other Values Incompatible with Surface Coal Mining Operations–those values to be evaluated for their significance which could be damaged and are not capable of existing together with surface coal mining operations because of the undesirable effects mining would have on those values, either on the area included in the permit application or on other affected areas. Those values to be evaluated for their importance include:
(a) recreation, including hiking, boating, camping, skiing or other related outdoor activities;
(b) timber management and silviculture;
(c) agriculture, aquaculture or production of other natural, processed or manufactured products which enter commerce; and
(d) scenic, historic, archaeologic, esthetic, fish, wildlife, plants or cultural interests.
Siltation Structure–a sedimentation pond, a series of sedimentation ponds or other treatment facility.
Slope–the average inclination of a surface, measured from the horizontal, generally expressed as the ratio of a unit of vertical distance to a given number of units of horizontal distance (e.g., 1v:5h). It may also be expressed as a percent or in degrees.
SMCRA–the federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (Pub. L. 95-87), as amended.
Soil Horizons–contrasting layers of soil parallel or nearly parallel to the land surface. Soil horizons are differentiated on the basis of field characteristics and laboratory data. The four major soil horizons are:
(a) A Horizon–the uppermost mineral layer, often called the surface soil. It is the part of the soil in which organic matter is most abundant and leaching of soluble or suspended particles is typically the greatest.
(b) E Horizon - the layer commonly near the surface below an A horizon and above a B horizon. An E horizon is most commonly differentiated from an overlying A horizon by a lighter color and generally has measurably less organic matter than the A horizon. An E horizon is most commonly differentiated from an underlying B horizon in the same sequum by color of higher value or lower chrome, by coarser texture, or by a combination of these properties.
(c) B Horizon–the layer that typically is immediately beneath the E horizon and often called the subsoil. This middle layer commonly contains more clay, iron or aluminum than the A or C horizon.
(d) C Horizon–the deepest layer of the soil profile. It consists of loose material or weathered rock that is relatively unaffected by biologic activity.
Soil Survey–a field and other investigation, resulting in a map showing the different kinds of soils and an accompanying report that describes, classifies and interprets such soils for use. Soil surveys must meet the standards of the National Cooperative Soil Survey as incorporated by reference in § 2907 (a) (1).
Spoil–overburden that has been removed during surface coal mining operations.
Stabilize–to control movement of soil, spoil piles or areas of disturbed earth by modifying the geometry of the mass or by otherwise modifying physical or chemical properties, such as by providing a protective surface coating.
State Geologist–the head of the Office of Geology and Energy Resources of the Department.
State Regulatory Authority–the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality.
State Violation Notice–a violation notice issued by the Department, the Commission, the state regulatory authority of another state, or by another agency or instrumentality of State government.
Steep Slope–any slope of more than 20 degrees or such lesser slope as may be designated by the Department after consideration of soil, climate and other characteristics of a region.
Substantial Legal and Financial Commitments–significant investments that have been made on the basis of a long-term coal contract in power plants, railroads, coal-handling, preparation, extraction or storage facilities and other capital intensive activities. Costs of acquiring the coal in place or the right to mine it alone without other significant investments, as described above, are not sufficient to constitute substantial legal and financial commitments.
Substantially Disturb–for purposes of coal exploration, to significantly impact land or water resources by blasting; by removal of vegetation, topsoil or overburden; by construction of roads or other access routes; by placement of excavated earth or waste material on the natural land surface or by other such activities; or to remove more than 250 tons of coal.
Successor in Interest–any person who succeeds to rights granted under a permit by transfer, assignment or sale of those rights.
Surety Bond–an indemnity agreement in a sum certain payable to the Commission executed by the permittee which is supported by the performance guarantee of a corporation licensed to do business as a surety in this state.
Surface Coal Mining Operations–shall have the same definition provided in Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 7(z).
Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations–surface coal mining operations and all activities necessary or incidental to the reclamation of such operations. This term includes the term surface coal mining operations.
Surface Mining Activities–those surface coal mining and reclamation operations incident to the extraction of coal from the earth by removing the materials over a coal seam before recovering the coal, by auger coal mining or by recovery of coal from a deposit that is not in its original geologic location.
Suspended Solids or Nonfilterable Residue, Expressed as Milligrams per Liter–organic or inorganic materials carried or held in suspension in water which are retained by a standard glass fiber filter in the procedure outlined by the Environmental Protection Agency's regulations for waste water analyses (40 CFR 136).
Tangible Net Worth–net worth minus intangibles such as goodwill and rights to patents or royalties.
Temporary Diversion–a diversion of a stream or overland flow which is used during coal exploration or surface mining and reclamation operations and not approved by the Department to remain after reclamation as part of the approved post-mining land use.
Temporary Impoundment–an impoundment used during surface coal mining and reclamation operations, but not approved by the Department to remain as part of the approved postmining land use.
Ton–2,000 pounds avoirdupois (0.90718 metric ton).
Topsoil–the A and E soil horizon layers of the four master soil horizons.
Toxic-Forming Materials–earth minerals or wastes which, if acted upon by air, water, weathering or micro-biological processes, are likely to produce chemical or physical conditions in soils or water that are detrimental to biota or uses of water.
Toxic Mine Drainage–water that is discharged from active or abandoned mines or other areas affected by coal exploration or development operations or surface coal mining and reclamation operations, which contains a substance that through chemical action or physical effects is likely to kill, injure or impair biota commonly present in the area that might be exposed to it.
Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Rights–a change in ownership or other effective control over the right to conduct surface coal mining operations under a permit issued by the Permit Board.
Unanticipated event or condition–an event or condition related to prior mining activity which arises from a surface coal mining and reclamation operation on lands eligible for remining and was not contemplated by the applicable permit.
Unwarranted Failure to Comply–the failure of a permittee to prevent or abate the occurrence of any violation of his permit or any requirement of these regulations due to indifference, lack of diligence or lack of reasonable care.
Valid Rights–as used in § 53-9- 71(4) of the Act means Valid Existing Rights.
Valid Existing Rights–means a set of circumstances under which a person may, subject to Permit Board approval, conduct surface coal mining operations on lands where 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), 30 CFR § 761.11, Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations would otherwise prohibit such operations. Possession of valid existing rights only confers an exception from the prohibitions of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, and § 1105 of these regulations. A person seeking to exercise valid existing rights must comply with all other pertinent requirements of the SMCRA, the Act, federal regulations promulgated under SMCRA, and these regulations.
(a) Property rights demonstration. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this definition, a person claiming valid existing rights must demonstrate that a legally binding conveyance, lease, deed, contract, or other document vests that person, or a predecessor in interest, with the right to conduct the type of surface coal mining operations intended. This right must exist at the time that the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. § 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9-71, or § 1105 of these regulations. Applicable Mississippi law will govern interpretation of documents relied upon to establish property rights, unless Federal law provides otherwise. If no applicable Mississippi law exists, custom and generally accepted usage at the time and place that the documents came into existence will govern their interpretation.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this definition, a person claiming valid existing rights also must demonstrate compliance with one of the following standards:
(1) Good faith/all permits standard. All permits and other authorizations required to conduct surface coal mining operations had been obtained, or a good faith effort to obtain all necessary permits and authorizations had been made, before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations. At a minimum, an application must have been submitted for any permit required under the Act and these regulations.
(2) Needed for and adjacent standard. The land is needed for and immediately adjacent to a surface coal mining operation for which all permits and other authorizations required to conduct surface coal mining operations had been obtained, or a good faith attempt to obtain all permits and authorizations had been made, before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations. To meet this standard, a person must demonstrate that prohibiting expansion of the operation onto that land would unfairly impact the viability of the operation as originally planned before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations. Except for operations in existence before August 3, 1977, or for which a good faith effort to obtain all necessary permits had been made before August 3, 1977, this standard does not apply to lands already under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations when the regulatory authority approved the permit for the original operation or when the good faith effort to obtain all necessary permits for the original operation was made. In evaluating whether a person meets this standard, the Permit Board may consider factors such as:
(i) The extent to which coal supply contracts or other legal and business commitments that predate the time that the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 depend upon use of that land for surface coal mining operations;
(ii) The extent to which plans used to obtain financing for the operation before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations rely upon use of that land for surface coal mining operations;
(iii) The extent to which investments in the operation before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 rely upon use of that land for surface coal mining operations; and
(iv) Whether the land lies within the area identified on the life-of-mine map submitted pursuant to § 1907(f) before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105.
(c) Roads. A person who claims valid existing rights to use or construct a road across the surface of lands protected by 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 must demonstrate that one or more of the following circumstances exist if the road is included within the definition of "surface coal mining operations" in § 105 of these regulations:
(1) The road existed when the land upon which it is located came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105, and the person has a legal right to use the road for surface coal mining operations.
(2) A properly recorded right of way or easement for a road in that location existed when the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105, and, under the document creating the right of way or easement, and under subsequent conveyances, the person has a legal right to use or construct a road across the right of way or easement for surface coal mining operations.
(3) A valid permit for use or construction of a road in that location for surface coal mining operations existed when the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105.
(4) Valid existing rights exist under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this definition.
Valley Fill–a fill structure consisting of any material other than coal waste and organic material that is placed in a valley where side slopes of the existing valley measured at the steepest point are greater than 20 degrees or the average slope of the profile of the valley from the toe of the fill to the top of the fill is greater than 10 degrees.
Violation, Failure or Refusal–
(a) a violation of a condition of a permit issued pursuant to the act and these regulations; or
(b) a failure or refusal to comply with any order issued by the Commission.
Violation, when used in the context of the permit application information or permit eligibility requirements of these regulations, means–
(a) A failure to comply with an applicable provision of a Federal or State law or regulation pertaining to air or water environmental protection, as evidenced by a written notification from a governmental entity to the responsible person; or
(b) A noncompliance for which OSM has provided one or more of the following types of notice or a State regulatory authority has provided equivalent notice under corresponding provisions of a State regulatory program:
1 A notice of violation under these regulations.
2 A cessation order under these regulations.
3 A final order, bill, or demand letter pertaining to a delinquent civil penalty assessed under these regulations.
4 A bill or demand letter pertaining to a delinquent reclamation fees owed under these regulations.
5 A notice of bond forfeiture under these regulations when:
(i) One or more violations upon which the forfeiture was based have not been abated
or corrected.
(ii) The amount forfeited and collected is insufficient for full reclamation under these regulations, the regulatory authority orders reimbursement for additional reclamation costs, and the person has
(iii) The site is covered by an alternative bonding system approved under these regulations, that system requires reimbursement of any reclamation costs incurred by the system above those covered by any site-specific bond, and the person has not complied with the reimbursement requirement and paid any associated penalties.
Violation Notice–any written notification from a governmental entity, whether by letter, memorandum, judicial or administrative pleading, or other written communication, of a violation of the Act; any Federal rule or regulation promulgated pursuant thereto; a State program; or any Federal or State law, rule, or regulation pertaining to air or water environmental protection in connection with a surface coal mining operation. It includes, but is not limited to, a notice of violation; an imminent harm cessation order; a failure-to-abate cessation order; a final order, bill, or demand letter pertaining to a delinquent civil penalty; a bill or demand letter pertaining to delinquent abandoned mine reclamation fees; and a notice of bond forfeiture, where one or more violations upon which the forfeiture was based have not been corrected.
Water Table–the upper surface of a zone of saturation, where the body of ground water is not confined by an overlying impermeable zone.
Willfully–that a person acted: (1) either intentionally, voluntarily or consciously; and (2) with intentional disregard or plain indifference to legal requirements in authorizing, ordering or carrying out a corporate permittee's action or omission that constituted a violation, failure, refusal, or failure to abate or correct.
Willful Violation–an act or omission which violates the act, state or federal laws or regulations or individual permit conditions, committed by a person who intends the result which actually occurs.
Working Capital–the excess of the operator's current assets over its current liabilities.
§ 107. Applicability
(a) These regulations apply to all coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation operations, except:
(1) the extraction of coal by a landowner for his or her own noncommercial use from land owned or leased by the landowner. Noncommercial use does not include the extraction of coal by one unit of an integrated company or other business or nonprofit entity which uses the coal in its own manufacturing or power plants;
(2) the extraction of coal as an incidental part of federal, state or local government-financed highway or other construction in accordance with Rule 7 of these regulations;
(3) the extraction of coal not in connection with a surface coal mine and incidental to the extraction of other minerals where coal does not exceed 16
/3 percent of the total tonnage of coal and other minerals removed for purposes of commercial use or sale;
(4) the extraction of coal on Indian lands in accordance with 25 CFR 177, Subpart B;
(5) coal exploration on federal lands outside a permit area;
(b) The Permit Board may, on its own initiative and shall, within a reasonable time of a request from any person who intends to conduct surface coal mining operations, make a written determination whether the operation is exempt under this Section. The Permit Board shall give reasonable notice of the request to interested persons. Prior to the time a determination is made, any person may submit, and the Permit Board shall consider, any written information relevant to the determination. A person requesting that an operation be declared exempt shall have the burden of establishing the exemption. If a written determination that an operation is exempt is reversed through subsequent administrative or judicial action, any person who, in good faith, has made a complete and accurate request for an exemption and relied upon the determination, shall not be cited for violations which occurred prior to the date of the reversal.
(c) The Permit Board may terminate its jurisdiction under the regulatory program over the reclaimed site of a completed surface coal mining and reclamation operation, or increment thereof, when it determines in writing that under the permanent program all requirements imposed under the applicable regulatory program have been successfully completed or, where a performance bond was required, the Permit Board has made a final decision in accordance with Subchapter 2.4 to release the performance bond fully;
(d) Following a termination under § 107 (c), the Permit Board may reassert jurisdiction under the regulatory program over a site if it is demonstrated that the bond release or written determination referred to in § 107 (c) was based upon fraud, collusion or misrepresentation of a material fact.
§ 109. Petitions to Initiate Rulemaking
(a) Any person may petition the Commission to initiate a proceeding for the issuance, amendment or repeal of any regulation under the act. The petition shall be submitted to the State Geologist.
(b) The petition shall be a concise statement of facts, technical justification and the law which require issuance, amendment or repeal of a regulation under the act and shall indicate whether the petitioner desires a public hearing.
(c) Upon receipt of the petition, the Commission shall determine if the petition sets forth facts, technical justification or law which may provide a reasonable basis for issuance, amendment or repeal of a regulation. Facts, technical justification or law previously considered in a petition or rulemaking on the same issue shall not provide a reasonable basis. If the Commission determines that the petition has a reasonable basis, a notice shall be published seeking comments from the public on the proposed change. The Commission may hold a public hearing, may conduct an investigation or take other action to determine whether the petition should be granted.
(d) Within 90 days from receipt of the petition, the Commission shall issue a written decision either granting or denying the petition.
-
If the petition is granted, the Commission shall initiate a rulemaking proceeding in accordance with Mississippi law.
-
If the petition is denied, the Commission shall notify the petitioner in writing, setting forth the reasons for denial.
(e) The petitioners may request a formal hearing on the Commission’s denial of the petition pursuant to § 53-9- 77.
§ 111. Notice of Citizen Suits
(a) A person who intends to initiate a civil action on his or her own behalf under § 53-9- 67 shall give notice of intent to do so, in accordance with this Section.
(b) Notice shall be given by certified mail to the Executive Director, chief legal counsel of the Department, and the Attorney General in all cases. A copy of the notice shall also be sent by first class mail to the regional director of the federal Office of Surface Mining if the complaint involves or relates to surface coal mining and reclamation operations in a specific region of the federal office.
(c) Notice shall be given by certified mail to the alleged violator, if the complaint alleges a violation of the act or any regulation, order, or permit issued under the act.
(d) Service of notice under this Section is complete upon receipt by the Executive Director, chief legal counsel, and the Attorney General. Service is complete on the alleged violator by mailing to the most recent address of the person being notified, as reflected in the records of the Department.
(e) A person giving notice regarding an alleged violation shall state, to the extent known:
-
sufficient information to identify the provision of the act, regulation, order or permit allegedly violated;
-
the act or omission alleged to constitute a violation;
-
the name, address and telephone numbers of the person or persons responsible for the alleged violation;
-
the date, time and location of the alleged violation;
-
the name, address and telephone number of the person giving notice; and
-
the name, address and telephone number of legal counsel, if any, of the person giving notice.
(f) A person giving notice of an alleged failure by the state, a state instrumentality, or a state agency to perform a mandatory act or duty under the act shall state, to the extent known:
-
the provision of the act containing the mandatory act or duty allegedly not performed;
-
sufficient information to identify the omission alleged to constitute the failure to perform a mandatory act or duty under the act;
-
the name, address and telephone number of the person giving notice; and
-
the name, address and telephone number of legal counsel, if any, of the person giving
notice.
§ 113. Availability of Records
Records required by the act to be made available to the public by the Department, the Commission, or the Permit Board shall be retained at the Department.
§ 115. Computation of Time
(a) Except as otherwise provided, computation of time under these regulations is based on calendar days.
(b) In computing any period of prescribed time, the day on which the designated period of time begins is not included. The last day of the period is included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday on which the Department is not open for business, in which event the period runs until the end of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday.
(c) Intermediate Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays are excluded from the computation when the period of prescribed time is seven days or less.
Rule 3. Permanent Regulatory Program
§ 301. Authority
The Department is authorized to administer the requirements of the permanent regulatory program.
§ 303. Applicability
(a) No person shall open, develop, engage in, carry out or continue on lands within the state any new or existing surface coal mining operations without a permit issued by the Permit Board.
(b) The requirements of these regulations shall be effective and shall apply to each surface coal mining and reclamation operation which is required to obtain a permit under the act, on the earliest date upon which these regulations require a permit to be obtained, except as is provided in § 303 (c).
(c) Exemptions to § 303 (b).
(1) Each structure used in connection with or to facilitate a coal exploration, development or surface coal mining and reclamation operation shall comply with the performance standards and the design requirements of these regulations.
(A) A structure which existed on the date an application for a surface mining and reclamation permit became complete and which meets the performance standards of these regulations but does not meet the design requirements of these regulations may be exempted from meeting those design requirements by the Permit Board. The Permit Board may grant this exemption on non-Indian and non-federal lands only as part of the permit application process after obtaining the information required by § 2705 and after making the findings required in § 3117.
(B) A structure which existed on the date of application for a surface mining and reclamation permit became complete and which meets the performance standards of Subchapter B of 30 CFR Chapter VII, which are at least as stringent as the comparable standard of Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations, may be exempted by the Permit Board from meeting the design requirements of these regulations. The Permit Board may grant this exemption on non-Indian and non-federal lands only as part of the permit application process after obtaining the information required by § 2705 and after making the findings required in § 3117.
(C) A structure which existed on the date of application for a surface mining and reclamation permit became complete and which meets a performance standard of Subchapter B of 30 CFR Chapter VII which is less stringent than the comparable performance standards of Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations, or which does not meet a performance standard of Subchapter 2.5 for which there was no equivalent performance standard in Subchapter B of 30 CFR Chapter VII shall be modified or reconstructed to meet the design standard of these regulations pursuant to a compliance plan approved by the Department on non-Indian and non-federal lands only as part of the permit application as required in § 2705 and according to the findings required by § 3117.
(D) A structure which existed on the date an application for a surface mining and reclamation permit became complete and which does not meet the performance standards of Subchapter B of 30 CFR Chapter VII and which the applicant proposes to use in connection with or to facilitate exploration, development or surface coal mining and reclamation operations shall be modified or reconstructed to meet the design standards of these regulations prior to issuance of the permit.
(2) The exemptions provided in § 303 (c) (1) (A) and (B) shall not apply to:
(A) the requirements for existing and new coal mine waste disposal facilities used either temporarily or permanently as dams or embankments;
(B) the requirements to restore the approximate original contour of the land.
(d) The Act and these regulations shall not apply to:
(A) the extraction of coal by a landowner for that landowner’s own noncommercial use from land owned or leased by the landowner; or
(B) the extraction of coal as an incidental part of federal, state or local financed highways or other construction. (e) (1) Any person conducting coal exploration operations on non-federal and non-Indian lands on or after the date on which the Mississippi state program is approved shall file either an application for the necessary permit or a notice of intention to explore or develop and obtain approval as required by the Act and Rule 21.
(2) Coal exploration performance standards in these regulations shall apply to coal exploration or development operations on non-federal and non-Indian lands which substantially disturb the natural land surface.
Rule 4. Exemption for Coal Extraction Incidental to the Extraction of Other Minerals
§ 401. Scope
This Rule implements the exemption concerning the extraction of coal not in connection with a surface coal mine and incidental to the extraction of other minerals.
§ 403. Definitions
As used in this Rule, the following terms have the meaning specified, except where otherwise indicated:
(a) Cumulative Measurement Period–the period of time over which both cumulative production and cumulative revenue are measured.
(1) For purposes of determining the beginning of the cumulative measurement period, subject to approval by the Department, the operator must select and consistently use one of the following:
(A) for mining areas where coal or other minerals were extracted prior to August 3, 1977, the date extraction of coal or other minerals commenced at that mining area or August 3, 1977, or
(B) for mining areas where extraction of coal or other minerals commenced on or after August 3, 1977, the date extraction of coal or other minerals commenced at that mining area, whichever is earlier.
(2) For annual reporting purposes pursuant to § 419, the end of the period for which cumulative production and revenue is calculated is either:
(A) for mining areas where coal or other minerals were extracted prior to April 1, 1990, March 31, 1990, and every March 31 thereafter, or
(B) for mining areas where extraction of coal or other minerals commenced on or after April 1, 1990, the last day of the calendar quarter during which coal extraction commenced, and each anniversary of that day thereafter.
(b) Cumulative Production–the total tonnage of coal or other minerals extracted from a mining area during the cumulative measurement period. The inclusion of stockpiled coal and other mineral tonnages in this total is governed by § 415.
(c) Cumulative Revenue–the total revenue derived from the sale of coal or other minerals and the fair market value of coal or other minerals transferred or used, but not sold, during the cumulative measurement period.
(d) Mining Area–an individual excavation site or pit from which coal, other minerals and overburden are removed.
(e) Other Minerals–any commercially valuable substance mined for its mineral value, excluding coal, topsoil, waste and fill material.
§ 405. Application Requirements and Procedures
(a) Incidental mining exemption and approval process.
(1) Any person who plans to commence or continue coal extraction after the effective date of these regulations in reliance on the incidental mining exemption shall file a complete application for exemption with the Permit Board for each mining area.
(2) Following incorporation of an exemption application approval process into the regulatory program, a person may not commence coal extraction based upon the exemption until the Permit Board approves such application except as provided in § 405 (e) (3).
(b) Existing Operations. Any person who has commenced coal extraction at a mining area in reliance upon the incidental mining exemption prior to the effective date of these regulations may continue mining operations for 60 days after such effective date. Coal extraction may not continue after such 60-day period unless that person files an administratively complete application for exemption with the Permit Board. If an administratively complete application is filed within 60 days, the person may continue extracting coal in reliance on the exemption beyond the 60-day period until the Permit Board makes an administrative decision on such application.
(c) Additional Information. The Permit Board shall notify the applicant if the application for exemption is incomplete and may at any time require submittal of additional information.
(d) Public Comment Period. Following publication of the newspaper notice required by § 407 (b) (7), the Permit Board shall provide a period of no less than 30 days during which time any person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected by a decision on the application may submit written comments or objections.
(e) Exemption Determination
(1) No later than 90 days after filing of an administratively complete application, the Permit Board shall make a written determination whether, and under what conditions, the persons claiming the exemption are exempt under this Rule, and shall notify the applicant and persons submitting comments on the application of the determination and the basis for the determination.
(2) The determination of exemption shall be based upon information contained in the application and any other information available to the Permit Board at that time.
(3) If the Permit Board fails to provide an applicant with the determination as specified in § 405 (e) (1), an applicant who has not begun may commence coal extraction pending a determination on the application unless the Permit Board issues an interim finding, together with reasons therefore, that the applicant may not begin coal extraction.
(f) Administrative Review
(1) The applicant or any other interested party aggrieved by the Permit Board’s decision may
request a formal hearing pursuant to § 53-9-77 within 30 days of the notification of such determination in accordance with procedures established under § 3301.
(2) A request for a formal hearing filed under § 3301 shall not suspend the effect of a determination under § 405 (e).
§ 407. Contents of Application for Exemption
An application for exemption shall include at a minimum:
(a) the name and address of the applicant;
(b) a list of the minerals sought to be extracted;
(c) estimates of annual production of coal and the other minerals within each mining area over the anticipated life of the mining operation;
(d) estimated annual revenues to be derived from bonafide sales of coal and other minerals to be extracted within the mining area;
(e) where coal or other minerals are to be used rather than sold, estimated annual fair market values at the time of projected use of the coal and other minerals to be extracted from the mining area;
(f) the basis for all annual production, revenue, and fair market value estimates;
(g) a description, including county, township if any, and boundaries of the land, of sufficient certainty that the mining areas may be located and distinguished from other mining areas;
(h) an estimate to the nearest acre of the number of acres that will compose the mining area over the anticipated life of the mining operation;
(i) evidence of publication, in a newspaper of general circulation in the county of the mining area, of a public notice that an application for exemption has been filed with the Permit Board (The public notice must identify the persons claiming the exemption and must contain a description of the proposed operation and its locality that is sufficient for interested persons to identify the operation);
(j) representative stratigraphic cross-section(s) based on test borings or other information identifying and showing the relative position, approximate thickness and density of the coal and each other mineral to be extracted for commercial use or sale and the relative position and thickness of any material, not classified as other minerals, that will also be extracted during the conduct of mining activities;
(k) a map of appropriate scale which clearly identifies the mining area;
(l) a general description of mining and mineral processing activities for the mining area;
(m) a summary of sales commitments and agreements for future delivery, if any, which the applicant has received for other minerals to be extracted from the mining area, or a description of potential markets for such minerals;
(n) if the other minerals are to be commercially used by the applicant, a description specifying the use;
(o) for operations having extracted coal or other minerals prior to filing an application for exemption, in addition to the information required above, the following information must also be submitted:
(1) any relevant documents the operator has received from the Department or Permit Board documenting its exemption from the requirements of the act;
(2) the cumulative production of the coal and other minerals from the mining area; and
(3) estimated tonnages of stockpiled coal and other minerals; and
(p) any other information pertinent to the qualification of the operation as exempt.
§ 409. Public Availability of Information
(a) Except as provided in § 409 (b), all information submitted to the Department or Permit Board under this Rule shall be made immediately available for public inspection and copying at the Department until at least three years after expiration of the period during which the subject mining area is active.
(b) Information submitted to the Department under this Rule may be kept confidential, to the extent allowed by § 49-17-39 and any regulations promulgated thereunder, if the person submitting it requests in writing, at the time of submission, that it be kept confidential and the information concerns trade secrets or is privileged commercial or financial information of the persons intending to conduct operations under this Rule.
(c) Information requested to be held as confidential under § 409(b) shall not be made publicly available until after notice and opportunity to be heard is afforded persons both seeking and opposing disclosure of the information.
§ 411. Requirements for Exemption
(a) Activities are exempt from the requirements of the act if all of the following are satisfied:
(1) The cumulative production of coal extracted from the mining area determined annually as described in this Section does not exceed 16
/3 percent of the total cumulative production of coal and other minerals removed during such period for purposes of bone fide sale or reasonable commercial use.
(2) Coal is produced from a geological stratum lying above or immediately below the deepest stratum from which other minerals are extracted for purposes of bona fide sale or reasonable commercial use.
(3) The cumulative revenue derived from the coal extracted from the mining area determined annually shall not exceed 50 percent of the total cumulative revenue derived from the coal and other minerals removed for purposes of bona fide sale or reasonable commercial use. If the coal extracted or the minerals removed are used by the operator or transferred to a related entity for use instead of being sold in a bona fide sale, then the fair market
value of the coal or other minerals shall be calculated at the time of use or transfer and shall be considered rather than revenue.
(b) Persons seeking or that have obtained an exemption from the requirements of the act shall comply with the following:
(1) Each other mineral upon which an exemption under this Rule is based must be a commercially valuable mineral for which a market exists or which is mined in bona fide anticipation that a market will exist for the mineral in the reasonable foreseeable future, not to exceed 12 months from the end of the current period for which cumulative production is calculated. A legally binding agreement for the future sale of other minerals is sufficient to demonstrate the above standard.
(2) If either coal or other minerals are transferred or sold by the operator to a related entity for its use or sale, the transaction must be made for legitimate business purposes.
§ 413. Conditions of Exemption and Right of Inspection and Entry
A person conducting activities covered by this Rule shall:
(a) maintain on-site or at other locations available to authorized representatives of the Department and the secretary of interior information necessary to verify the exemption including, but not limited to, commercial use and sales information, extraction tonnages, and a copy of the exemption application and exemption approved by the Department;
(b) notify the Department upon the completion of the mining operation or permanent cessation of all coal extraction activities; and
(c) conduct operations in accordance with the approved application or when authorized to extract coal under § 405(b) or (e)(3) prior to submittal or approval of an exemption application, in accordance with the standards of this Rule.
(d) Authorized representatives of the Department and the secretary of interior shall have the right to conduct inspections of operations claiming exemption under this Rule.
(e) Each authorized representative of the Department and the secretary of interior conducting an inspection under this Rule:
(1) shall have a right of entry to, upon, and through any mining and reclamation operations without advance notice or a search warrant, upon presentation of appropriate credentials;
(2) may, at reasonable times and without delay have access to and copy any records relevant to the exemptions; and
(3) shall have a right to gather physical and photographic evidence to document conditions, practices or violations at a site.
(f) No search warrant shall be required with respect to any activity under § 413(d) or (e) except that a search warrant may be required for entry into a building.
§ 415. Stockpiling of Minerals
(a) Coal. Coal extracted and stockpiled may be excluded from the calculation of cumulative production until the time of its sale, transfer to a related entity or use:
(1) up to an amount equaling a 12-month supply of the coal required for future sale, transfer or use as calculated based upon the average annual sales, transfer and use from the mining area over the two preceding years; or
(2) for a mining area where coal has been extracted for a period of less than two years, up to an amount that would represent a 12-month supply of the coal required for future sales, transfer or use as calculated based on the average amount of coal sold, transferred or used each month.
(b) Other Minerals
(1) The Department shall disallow all or part of an operator's tonnages of stockpiled other minerals for purposes of meeting the requirements of this Rule if the operator fails to maintain adequate and verifiable records of the mining area of origin, the disposition of stockpiles or if the disposition of the stockpiles indicates the lack of commercial use or market for the minerals.
(2) The Department may only allow an operator to utilize tonnages of stockpiled other minerals for purposes of meeting the requirements of this Rule if:
(A) the stockpiling is necessary to meet market conditions or is consistent with generally accepted industry practices; and
(B) except as provided in § 415(b)(3), the stockpiled other minerals do not exceed a 12-month supply of the mineral required for future sales as approved by the Department on the basis of the exemption application.
(3) The Department may allow an operator to utilize tonnages of stockpiled other minerals beyond the 12-month limit established in § 415(b)(2) if the operator can demonstrate to the Department's satisfaction that the additional tonnage is required to meet future business obligations of the operator, such as may be demonstrated by a legally binding agreement for future delivery of the minerals.
(4) The Department may periodically revise the other mineral stockpile tonnage limits in accordance with the criteria established by § 415(b)(2) and (3) based on additional information available to the Department.
§ 417. Revocation and Enforcement
(a) Regulatory Authority Responsibility. The Department shall conduct an annual compliance review of the mining area, utilizing the annual report submitted pursuant to § 419, an on-site inspection and any other information available to the Department.
(b) If the Department has reason to believe that a specific mining area was not exempt under the provisions of this Rule at the end of the previous reporting period, is not exempt, or will be unable to satisfy the exemption criteria at the end of the current reporting period, the Department shall notify the operator that the exemption may be revoked and the reason(s) therefore. The
exemption will be revoked by the Permit Board unless the operator demonstrates to the Department or Permit Board within 30 days that the mining area in question should continue to be exempt.
(c) (1) If the Permit Board finds that an operator has not demonstrated that activities conducted in the mining area qualify for the exemption, the Permit Board shall revoke the exemption and immediately notify the operator and intervenors. If a decision is made not to revoke an exemption, the Department shall immediately notify the operator and intervenors.
(2) Any adversely affected person may request administrative review of a decision whether to revoke an exemption within 30 days of the notification of such decision in accordance with procedures established under § 3301.
(3) A petition for administrative review shall not suspend the effect of a decision whether to revoke an exemption.
(d) Direct Enforcement
(1) An operator mining in accordance with the terms of an approved exemption shall not be cited for violations of the regulatory program which occurred prior to the revocation of the exemption.
(2) An operator who does not conduct activities in accordance with the terms of an approved exemption and knows or should know such activities are not in accordance with the approved exemption shall be subject to direct enforcement action for violations of the regulatory program which occur during the period of such activities.
(3) Upon revocation of an exemption or denial of an exemption application, an operator shall stop conducting surface coal mining operations until a permit is obtained and shall comply with the reclamation standards of the applicable regulatory program with regard to conditions, areas and activities existing at the time of revocation or denial.
§ 419. Reporting Requirements
(a) General.
(1) Following approval by the Permit Board of an exemption for a mining area, the person receiving the exemption shall, for each mining area, file a written report annually with the Department containing the information specified in § 419(b).
(2) The report shall be filed no later than 30 days after the end of the 12-month period as determined in accordance with the definition of cumulative measurement period in § 403.
(3) The information in the report shall cover:
(A) annual production of coal and other minerals and annual revenue derived from coal and other minerals during the preceding 12-month period, and
(B) the cumulative production of coal and other minerals and the cumulative revenue
derived from coal and other minerals.
(b) For each period and mining area covered by the report, the report shall specify:
(1) the number of tons of extracted coal sold in bona fide sales and total revenue derived from such sales;
(2) the number of tons of coal extracted and used or transferred by the operator or related entity and the estimated total fair market value of such coal;
(3) the number of tons of coal stockpiled;
(4) the number of tons of other commercially valuable minerals extracted and sold in bona fide sales and total revenue derived from such sales;
(5) the number of tons of other commercially valuable minerals extracted and used or transferred by the operator or related entity and the estimated total fair market value of such minerals; and
(6) The number of tons of other commercially valuable minerals removed and stockpiled by the operator.
Rule 5. Restriction of Financial Interests of Employees
§ 501. Authority
The Commission is authorized to establish, monitor, and enforce the regulations contained in this Rule.
§ 503. Responsibility
(a) The Department shall:
(1) provide advice, assistance and guidance to all state employees required to file statements pursuant to § 507;
(2) promptly review the statement of employment and financial interests and supplements, if any, filed by each employee, to determine if the employee has correctly identified those listed employment and financial interests which constitute a direct or indirect financial interest in any surface coal mining operation or underground mining operation;
(3) resolve prohibited financial interest situations by ordering or initiating remedial action or by reporting the violations to the director who is responsible for initiating action to impose the penalties of the federal act;
(4) certify on each statement that review has been made, that prohibited financial interests, if any, have been resolved and that no other prohibited interests have been identified from the statement;
(5) submit to the Director such statistics and information as he or she may request to enable
preparation of the required annual report to Congress;
(6) submit to the Director the initial listing and the subsequent annual listings of positions as required by 30 CFR 705.11(b), (c) and (d);
(A) furnish a blank statement 45 days in advance of the filing date established by § 509(a) to each state employee required to file a statement; and
(B) inform annually each state employee required to file a statement with the Commission of the name, address and telephone number of the person whom they may contact for advice and counseling.
(b) Department employees performing any duties or functions under the act shall:
(1) have no direct or indirect financial interest in coal mining operations;
(2) file a fully completed statement of employment and financial interest 120 days after these regulations become effective or upon entrance to duty and annually thereafter on the specified filing date; and
(3) comply with directives issued by persons responsible for approving each statement and comply with directives issued by those persons responsible for ordering remedial action.
(c) Members of public bodies established in accordance with Mississippi laws or regulations to represent multiple interests, who perform a function or duty under the Act, shall recuse themselves from proceedings which may affect their direct or indirect financial interests.
§ 505. Penalties
(a) Criminal penalties are imposed by Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9-19. Section 53-9- 19 prohibits each employee of the Department who performs any function or duty under the act from having a direct or indirect financial interest in any surface or underground coal mining operation. The act provides that whoever knowingly violates the provisions of § 53-9- 19 shall, upon conviction, be punished by a fine of not more than $2,500 or by imprisonment of not more than one year or both.
(b) Regulatory penalties are imposed by this Rule. The provisions in § 53-9- 19 of the act make compliance with the financial interest requirements a condition of employment for employees of the Department who perform any functions or duties under the act. Accordingly, an employee who fails to file the required statement will be considered in violation of the intended employment provisions of § 53-9- 19 and will be subject to removal from his or her position.
§ 507. Who Shall File
(a) Any employee who performs any function or duty under the act is required to file a statement of employment and financial interests. Members of public bodies which may be established in accordance with Mississippi laws or regulations to represent multiple interests, who perform a function or duty under the Act, must file a statement of employment and financial interests. An employee who occupies a position which has been determined by the Department not to involve performance of any function or duty under the act or who is no longer employed by the Department at the time a filing is due is not required to file a statement.
(b) The Department shall prepare a list of those positions within the Department that do not involve performance of any functions or duties under the act. Only those employees who are employed in a listed organizational unit or who occupy a listed position will be exempted from the filing requirements of § 53-9- 19 of the act.
(c) The Department shall prepare and submit to the Director an initial listing of positions that do not involve performance of any functions or duties under the act within 60 days of the effective date of these regulations.
(d) The Department shall annually review and update this listing. For monitoring and reporting reasons, the listing must be submitted to the Director and must contain a written justification for inclusion of the provisions listed. Proposed revisions or a certification that revision is not required shall be submitted to the director by no later than September 30 of each year. The Department may revise the listing by the addition or deletion of positions at any time it determines such revisions are required to carry out the purpose of the law or the regulations of this Rule. Additions to and deletions from the listing of positions are effective upon notification to the incumbents of the positions added or deleted.
§ 509. When to File
(a) Employees and members of public bodies performing functions or duties under the act shall file within 120 days of the effective date of these regulations; and annually on February 1 of each year, or at such other date as may be agreed to by the director, provided that such alternative date will allow sufficient time to obtain information needed by the director for his or her annual report to Congress.
(b) New employees and new members of public bodies representing multiple interests hired, appointed or transferred to perform functions or duties under the act will be required to file at the time of entrance to duty.
(c) New employees and new members of public bodies representing multiple interests are not required to file an annual statement on the subsequent annual filing date if this date occurs within two months after their initial statement was filed. For example, an employee entering duty on December 1, 1988, would file a statement on that date. Because December 1 is within two months of February 1, the employee would not be required to file his or her next statement until February 1, 1990.
§ 511. Where to File
The Executive Director of the Department shall file his or her statement with the Director. All other employees and members of public bodies representing multiple interests, as provided in § 507, shall file their statement with the Executive Director.
§ 513. What to Report
(a) Each employee shall report all information required on the statement of employment and financial interests of the employee, his or her spouse, minor children, or other relatives who are full-time residents of the employee's home. The report shall be on forms as provided by the Department. The statement consists of three major parts: (1) a listing of all financial interests, including employment, security, real property, creditor and other financial interests held during
the course of the preceding year; (2) a certification that none of the listed financial interests represent a direct or indirect financial interest in any surface coal mining operation or underground mining operation except as specifically identified and described by the employee as part of the certificate; and (3) a certification by the reviewer that the form was reviewed, that prohibited interests have been resolved, and that no other prohibited interests have been identified from the statement.
(b) Listing of All Financial Interests. The statement will set forth the following information regarding any financial interest:
(1) Employment. Any continuing financial interests in business entities and nonprofit organizations through a pension or retirement plan, shared income, salary or other income arrangement as a result of prior or current employment. The employee, his or her spouse or other resident relative is not required to report a retirement plan from which he or she will receive a guaranteed income. A guaranteed income is one which is unlikely to be changed as a result of actions taken by the Department.
(2) Securities. Any financial interest in business entities and nonprofit organizations through ownership of stock, stock options, bonds, securities or other arrangements including trusts. An employee is not required to report holdings in widely diversified mutual funds, investments clubs or regulated investment companies not specializing in surface or underground coal mining operations.
(3) Real Property. Ownership, lease, royalty or other interests or rights in land or minerals. Employees are not required to report lands developed and occupied for a personal residence.
(4) Creditors. Debts owed to business entities and nonprofit organizations. Employees are not required to report debts owed to financial institutions (banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions and the like) which are chartered to provide commercial or personal credit. Also excluded are charge accounts and similar short term debts for current and ordinary household and living expenses.
(c) Employee Certification and, if Applicable, a Listing of Exceptions
(1) The statement will provide for a signed certification by the employee that, to the best of his or her knowledge: none of the listed financial interests represent an interest in an underground or surface coal mining operation except as specifically identified and described as exceptions by the employee as part of the certificate; and the information shown on the statement is true, correct and complete.
(2) An employee is expected to: have complete knowledge of his or her personal involvement in business enterprises such as a sole proprietorship or partnership, his or her outside employment and the outside employment of the spouse and other covered relatives; and be aware of the information contained in the annual financial statement or other corporate or business reports routinely circulated to investors or routinely made available to the public.
(3) The exceptions shown in the employee certification of the form must provide enough information for the Executive Director to determine the existence of a direct or indirect financial interest. Accordingly, the exceptions should: list the financial interests; show
the number of shares, estimated value or annual income of the financial interests; and include any other information which the employee believes should be considered in determining whether or not the interest represents a prohibited interest.
(4) Employees are cautioned to give serious consideration to their direct and indirect financial interests before signing the statement of certification. Signing the certification without listing known prohibited financial interests may be cause for imposing the penalties prescribed in § 505(a).
§ 515. Gifts and Gratuities
(a) Except as provided in § 515(b), employees shall not solicit nor accept, directly or indirectly, any gift, gratuity, favor, entertainment, loan or any other thing of monetary value from a coal company which:
(1) conducts or is seeking to conduct operations or activities that are regulated by the Department: or
(2) has interests that may be substantially affected by the performance or non- performance of the employee's official duty.
(b) The prohibitions in § 515(a) do not apply in the context of obvious family or personal relationships, such as those between the parents, children or spouse of the employee and the employee, when the circumstances make it clear that it is those relationships rather than the business of the person concerned which are the motivating factors. An employee may accept:
(1) food and refreshments of nominal value on infrequent occasions in the ordinary course of a luncheon, dinner or other meeting where an employee may properly be in attendance; and
(2) unsolicited advertising or promotional material, such as pens, pencils, note pads, calendars and other items of nominal value.
(c) Employees found guilty of violating the provisions of this Section will be subject to administrative remedies in accordance with existing or adopted state regulations or policies.
§ 517. Resolving Prohibited Interests
(a) Actions to be taken by the Executive Director:
(1) Remedial Action to Effect Resolution. If an employee has a prohibited financial interest, the Executive Director shall promptly advise the employee that remedial action which will resolve the prohibited interest is required within 90 days.
(2) Remedial action may include: reassignment of the employee to a position which performs no function or duty under the act; divestiture of the prohibited financial interest; other appropriate action which either eliminates the prohibited interest or eliminates the situation which creates the conflict.
(3) Reports of Noncompliance. If, 90 days after an employee is notified to take remedial action, that employee is not in compliance with the requirements of the act and these
regulations, the Executive Director of the Department shall notify the Director of his determination and shall provide a report to the Director, including the original or a certified true copy of the employee's statement and any other pertinent information.
(b) Actions to be taken by the Governor:
(1) Remedial Action to Effect Resolution. Violations of the regulations in this Rule by the Executive Director or a member of the Commission on Environmental Quality will be cause for remedial action by the Governor or other appropriate state official based on recommendations from the Director on behalf of the Secretary. The Governor or other appropriate state official shall promptly advise the Executive Director or Commissioner that remedial action which will resolve the prohibited interest is required within 90 days.
(2) Remedial action should be consistent with the procedures prescribed for other state employees by § 517(a)(2).
(3) Reports of Noncompliance. If, 90 days after the Governor is notified to take remedial action, the Governor or other appropriate state official notifies the director that the Executive Director or Commissioner is not in compliance with the act and these regulations, the Director shall take such action as may be appropriate under federal law.
§ 519. Appeals Procedure
Employees have the right to appeal an order for remedial action under § 517 and shall have 30 days to exercise this right before disciplinary action is initiated.
(a) Employees other than the Executive Director of the Department or a member of the Commission on Environmental Quality may file their appeal, in writing, through procedures established by the Department.
(b) The Executive Director or a member of the Commission on Environmental Quality may file his or her appeal of a federal remedial action, in writing, with the Director who will refer it to the Conflict of Interest Appeals Board within the United States Department of the Interior or may file his or her appeal of a remedial action taken by the Governor under procedures established by the Office of the Governor or the Mississippi State Personnel Board.
Rule 7. Exemption for Coal Extraction Incident to Government-Financed Highway or Other Construction
§ 701. Responsibility
(a) The Department is responsible for enforcing the requirements of this Rule.
(b) Any person conducting coal extraction as an incidental part of government-financed construction is responsible for possessing, on the site of the extraction operation, the documentation required by § 705.
§ 703. Applicability
(a) Coal extraction which is an incidental part of government-financed construction is exempt from the act and these regulations. This exclusion shall in no way lessen the requirement of any facility, owner, or operator to comply with other federal or Mississippi laws applicable to the facility, owner, operator, or activity
(b) Any person who conducts or intends to conduct coal extraction which does not satisfy § 703(a) shall not proceed until a permit has been obtained from the Department.
§ 705. Information to be Maintained on Site
Any person extracting coal incident to government-financed highway or other construction who extracts more than 250 tons of coal or affects more than two acres shall maintain, on the site of the extraction operation and available for inspection, documents which show:
(a) a description of the construction project;
(b) the exact location of the construction, right-of-way or the boundaries of the area which will be directly affected by the construction; and
(c) the government agency which is providing the financing and the kind and amount of public financing, including the percentage of the entire construction costs represented by the government financing.
Subchapter 2.2 Areas Unsuitable for Mining
Rule 9. General
§ 901. Authority
(a) The Commission is authorized, under § 53-9- 71 of the Act, to establish a planning process enabling objective decisions based upon competent and scientifically sound data and information as to which, if any, land areas of the state are unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations under the standards set forth in § 53-9- 71(1)(b) and (c) and these regulations.
(b) The completion of any planning process undertaken under this Rule of the regulations shall not be deemed a prerequisite to the Permit Board’s issuance of surface coal mining permits or surface coal exploration permits. Rather, the planning process shall proceed supplementally to any individual permitting process.
§ 903. Responsibility
(a) The Commission shall establish a process that includes a data base and inventory system for designating lands unsuitable for surface coal mining operations which shall be available to the public.
(b) The Commission shall integrate as closely as possible decisions to designate lands as unsuitable
for surface coal mining operations with present and future land-use planning and regulatory processes at the federal, state and local levels.
(c) The Commission shall establish a process that allows any person, having an interest which is or may be adversely affected, to petition to have an area designated as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations or to have a designation terminated.
(d) The Commission shall prohibit or limit surface coal mining operations on certain lands and in certain locations designated by Congress in SMCRA § 522(e), 30 U.S.C. 1272(e).
Rule 11. Areas Designated by Act of Congress
§ 1101. Authority
The Commission is authorized by § 53-9- 71(4) of the Act to prohibit or limit surface coal mining operations on or near certain private, federal and other public lands, subject to valid rights.
§ 1103. Responsibility
The Permit Board shall comply with Rules 17 to 37 and determine whether an application for a permit must be denied because surface coal mining operations on those lands are prohibited or limited by § 522(e) of SMCRA, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), a valid existing rights determination made by OSM, § 53-9-71, these regulations, or a designation of the Commission.
§ 1105. Areas Where Mining is Prohibited or Limited
Subject to valid existing rights as defined in § 105, no surface coal mining operations shall be conducted on the following lands unless you have valid existing rights as determined under § 1106 or qualify for the exception for existing operations under paragraph (h) of this section:
(a) on any lands within the boundaries of the National Park System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National System of Trails, the National Wilderness Preservation System, the Wild and Scenic Rivers System, including study rivers designated under § 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, 16 U.S.C. 1276(a), or study rivers or study river corridors as established in any guidelines pursuant to that Act, and National Recreation Areas designated by Act of Congress;
(b) on any federal lands within the boundaries of any national forest unless the United States Secretary of Agriculture or his or her designee finds that there are no significant recreational, timber, economic or other values which may be incompatible with surface coal mining operations or the surface operations and impacts incident to an underground coal mine;
(c) on any lands which will adversely affect any publicly owned park or any place included on the National Register of Historic Places, unless approved jointly by the Permit Board and the federal, state or local agency with jurisdiction over the park or place;
(d) within 100 feet measured horizontally of the outside right-of-way line of any public road, except:
(1) where mine access roads or haulage roads join such right-of-way line;
(2) where the Permit Board and the local governmental entity with authority over the road approves the closure or relocation of the public road; or
(3) the Permit Board expressly approves the area to be affected within 100 feet of such road, after public notice and opportunity for a public hearing in accordance with1107(d), and after making a written finding that the interests of the affected public and landowners will be protected;
(e) within 300 feet measured horizontally from any occupied dwelling, unless the owner thereof has provided a written waiver consenting to surface coal mining operations closer than 300 feet; or the part of the mining operation which is within 300 feet of the dwelling is a haul road or access road which connects with an existing public road on the side of the public road opposite the dwelling;
(f) within 300 feet measured horizontally of any public building, school, church, community or institutional building or public park;
(g) within 100 feet measured horizontally of a cemetery. Cemeteries may be relocated if authorized by applicable State law or regulations.
(h) The prohibitions and limitations of this section do not apply to surface coal mining operations for which a valid permit, issued pursuant to these regulations, exists when the land comes under the protection of this section, 30 U.S.C. § 1272(e), or 30 CFR § 761.11. This exception applies only to lands within the permit area as it exists when the land comes under the protection of this section, 30 U.S.C. § 1272(e), or 30 CFR § 761.11.
§ 1106. Submission and Processing of Requests for Valid Existing Rights Determinations
(a) The Permit Board shall have the authority to determine valid existing rights for non-federal lands listed in 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9-71, or § 1105 of these regulations. Pursuant to federal law, OSM retains the authority to determine valid existing rights for federal lands described listed in 30 U.S.C. § 1272(e)(1) and (2) and 30 CFR § 761.11(a) and (b), and the Permit Board will use the valid existing rights determination of OSM in considering permit issuance for operations that would affect those federal lands.
(b) What you must submit as part of a request for a valid existing rights determination. You must submit a request for a valid existing rights determination to the appropriate agency under paragraph (a) of this section if you intend to conduct surface coal mining operations on the basis of valid existing rights or wish to confirm the right to do so.
(c) When the Permit Board is the appropriate agency under paragraph (a), you may submit this request before preparing and submitting an application for a permit or boundary revision for the land with a request that the Permit Board make a valid rights determination prior to receiving a complete application to conduct surface mining operations or to issue a permit revision or modification. Unless you request that the valid existing rights determination be made prior to the receipt of a complete application, the valid existing rights determination will be made by the permit board after the receipt of a complete application pursuant to § 1107(a) of these regulations.
(1) Requirements for property rights demonstration. You must provide a property rights demonstration under paragraph (a) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105 if
your request relies upon the good faith/all permits standard or the needed for and adjacent standard in paragraph (b) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105. This demonstration must include the following items:
(i) A legal description of the land to which your request pertains.
(ii) Complete documentation of the character and extent of your current interests in the surface and mineral estates of the land to which your request pertains.
(iii) A complete chain of title for the surface and mineral estates of the land to which your request pertains.
(iv) A description of the nature and effect of each title instrument that forms the basis for your request, including any provision pertaining to the type or method of mining or mining-related surface disturbances and facilities.
(v) A description of the type and extent of surface coal mining operations that you claim the right to conduct, including the method of mining, any mining-related surface activities and facilities, and an explanation of how those operations would be consistent with Mississippi property law.
(vi) Complete documentation of the nature and ownership, as of the date that the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations, of all property rights for the surface and mineral estates of the land to which your request pertains.
(vii) Names and addresses of the current owners of the surface and mineral estates of the land to which your request pertains.
(viii) If the coal interests have been severed from other property interests, documentation that you have notified and provided reasonable opportunity for the owners of other property interests in the land to which your request pertains to comment on the validity of your property rights claims.
(ix) Any comments that you receive in response to the notification provided under paragraph (b)(1)(viii) of this section.
(2) Requirements for good faith/all permits standard. If your request relies upon the good faith/all permits standard in paragraph (b)(1) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105, you must submit the information required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section. You also must submit the following information about permits, licenses, and authorizations for surface coal mining operations on the land to which your request pertains:
(i) Approval and issuance dates and identification numbers for any permits, licenses, and authorizations that you or a predecessor in interest obtained before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations.
(ii) Application dates and identification numbers for any permits, licenses, and authorizations for which you or a predecessor in interest submitted an application
before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations.
(iii) An explanation of any other good faith effort that you or a predecessor in interest made to obtain the necessary permits, licenses, and authorizations as of the date that the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations.
(3) Requirements for needed for and adjacent standard. If your request relies upon the needed for and adjacent standard in paragraph (b)(2) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105, you must submit the information required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section. In addition, you must explain how and why the land is needed for and immediately adjacent to the operation upon which your request is based, including a demonstration that prohibiting expansion of the operation onto that land would unfairly impact the viability of the operation as originally planned before the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations.
(4) Requirements for standards for mine roads. If your request relies upon one of the standards for roads in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(3) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105, you must submit satisfactory documentation that:
(i) The road existed when the land upon which it is located came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations, and you have a legal right to use the road for surface coal mining operations;
(ii) A properly recorded right of way or easement for a road in that location existed when the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations, and, under the document creating the right of way or easement, and under any subsequent conveyances, you have a legal right to use or construct a road across that right of way or easement to conduct surface coal mining operations; or
(iii) A valid permit for use or construction of a road in that location for surface coal mining operations existed when the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations.
(d) Initial review of request.
(1) The Department, acting as staff of the Permit Board, must conduct an initial review to determine whether your request includes all applicable components of the submission requirements of paragraph (c) of this section. This review pertains only to the completeness of the request, not the legal or technical adequacy of the materials submitted.
(2) If your request does not include all applicable components of the submission requirements of paragraph (c) of this section, the Department must notify you and establish a reasonable time for submission of the missing information.
(3 When your request includes all applicable components of the submission requirements of paragraph (c) of this section, the Department must implement the notice and comment requirements of paragraph (e) of this section.
(4) If you do not provide information that the Department requests under paragraph (d)(2) of this section within the time specified or as subsequently extended, the Permit Board must issue a determination that you have not demonstrated valid existing rights, as provided in paragraph (f)(4) of this section.
(e) Notice and comment requirements and procedures.
(1) When your request satisfies the completeness requirements of paragraph (d) of this section, the Department must publish a notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the land is located. This notice must invite comment on the merits of the request. Alternatively, the Department may require that you publish this notice and provide the agency with a copy of the published notice. Each notice must include:
(i) The location of the land to which the request pertains.
(ii) A description of the type of surface coal mining operations planned.
(iii) A reference to and brief description of the applicable standard(s) under the definition of valid existing rights in § 105.
(A) If your request relies upon the good faith/all permits standard or the needed for and adjacent standard in paragraph (b) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105, the notice also must include a description of the property rights that you claim and the basis for your claim.
(B) If your request relies upon the standard in paragraph (c)(1) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105, the notice also must include a description of the basis for your claim that the road existed when the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations. In addition, the notice must include a description of the basis for your claim that you have a legal right to use that road for surface coal mining operations.
(C) If your request relies upon the standard in paragraph (c)(2) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105, the notice also must include a description of the basis for your claim that a properly recorded right of way or easement for a road in that location existed when the land came under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations. In addition, the notice must include a description of the basis for your claim that, under the document creating the right of way or easement, and under any subsequent conveyances, you have a legal right to use or construct a road across the right of way or easement to conduct surface coal mining operations.
(iv) If your request relies upon one or more of the standards in paragraphs (b), (c)(1), and (c)(2) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105, a statement that the Permit Board will not make a decision on the merits of your request if, by the
close of the comment period under this notice or the notice required by paragraph (e)(3) of this section, a person with a legal interest in the land initiates appropriate legal action in the proper venue to resolve any differences concerning the validity or interpretation of the deed, lease, easement, or other documents that form the basis of your claim.
(v) A description of the procedures that the Department will follow in processing your request.
(vi) The closing date of the comment period, which must be a minimum of 30 days after the publication date of the notice.
(vii) A statement that interested persons may obtain a 30-day extension of the comment period upon request.
(viii) The name and address of the Department office where a copy of the request is available for public inspection and to which comments and requests for extension of the comment period should be sent.
(2) The Department must promptly provide a copy of the notice required under paragraph (e)(1) of this section to:
(i) All reasonably locatable owners of surface and mineral estates in the land included in your request.
(ii) The owner of the feature causing the land to come under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations, and, when applicable, the agency with primary jurisdiction over the feature with respect to the values causing the land to come under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations. For example, both the landowner and the State Historic Preservation Officer must be notified if surface coal mining operations would adversely impact any site listed on the National Register of Historic Places. As another example, both the surface owner and the National Park Service must be notified if the request includes non-Federal lands within the authorized boundaries of a unit of the National Park System.
(3) The letter transmitting the notice required under paragraph (e)(2) of this section must provide a 30-day comment period, starting from the date of service of the letter, and specify that another 30 days is available upon request. At its discretion, the Department or Permit Board may grant additional time for good cause upon request. The Permit Board need not necessarily consider comments received after the closing date of the comment period.
(f) How a decision will be made.
(1) The Permit Board must review the materials submitted under paragraph (c) of this section, comments received under paragraph (e) of this section, and any other relevant, reasonably available information to determine whether the record is sufficiently complete and adequate to support a decision on the merits of the request. If not, the Permit Board or Department must notify you in writing, explaining the inadequacy of the record and
requesting submittal, within a specified reasonable time, of any additional information that the Permit Board deems necessary to remedy the inadequacy.
(2) Once the record is complete and adequate, the Permit Board must determine whether you have demonstrated valid existing rights. The decision document must explain how you have or have not satisfied all applicable elements of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105. The decision document must contain findings of fact and conclusions, and it must specify the reasons for the conclusions.
(3) Impact of property rights disagreements. This paragraph applies only when your request relies upon one or more of the standards in paragraphs (b), (c)(1), and (c)(2) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105.
(i) The Permit Board must issue a determination that you have not demonstrated valid existing rights if your property rights claims are the subject of pending litigation in a court or administrative body with jurisdiction over the property rights in question. The Permit Board will make this determination without prejudice, meaning that you may refile the request once the property rights dispute is finally adjudicated. This paragraph applies only to situations in which legal action has been initiated as of the closing date of the comment period under paragraph (e)(1) or (e)(3) of this section.
(ii) If the record indicates disagreement as to the accuracy of your property rights claims, but this disagreement is not the subject of pending litigation in a court or administrative agency of competent jurisdiction, the Permit Board must evaluate the merits of the information in the record and determine whether you have demonstrated that the requisite property rights exist under paragraph (a), (c)(1), or (c)(2) of the definition of valid existing rights in § 105, as appropriate. The Permit Board must then proceed with the decision process under paragraph (f)(2) of this section.
(4) The Permit Board must issue a determination that you have not demonstrated valid existing rights if you do not submit information that the Department or Permit Board requests under paragraph (d)(2) or (f)(1) of this section within the time specified or as subsequently extended. The Permit Board will make this determination without prejudice, meaning that you may refile a revised request at any time.
(5) After making a determination, the Permit Board must:
(i) Provide a copy of the determination, together with an explanation of appeal rights and procedures, to you, to the owner or owners of the land to which the determination applies, to the owner of the feature causing the land to come under the protection of 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations, and, when applicable, to the agency with primary jurisdiction over the feature with respect to the values that caused the land to come under the protection of § 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations.
(ii) Publish notice of the determination in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the land is located. Alternatively, the Permit Board may require that you publish this notice and provide a copy of the published notice to the
agency. OSM will publish the determination, together with an explanation of appeal rights and procedures, in the Federal Register if your request includes Federal lands within an area listed in 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations.
(g) Administrative and judicial review. A determination that valid existing rights do or do not exist is subject to administrative and judicial review under Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 77.
(h) Availability of records. The Department or Permit Board must make a copy of the existing valid rights request available to the public in the same manner as the Department or Permit Board must make permit applications available to the public under § 3111 of these regulations. In addition, the Department or Permit Board must make records associated with that request, and any subsequent determination under paragraph (f) of this section, available to the public in accordance with the requirements and procedures of § 6311 of these regulations.
§ 1107. Procedures
(a) Upon receipt of a complete application for a surface coal mining and reclamation operation permit, or earlier, if properly requested under § 1106, the Permit Board shall review the application to determine whether surface coal mining operations are limited or prohibited under § 1105 on the lands which would be disturbed by the proposed operation.
(b) Where the proposed operation would be located on any lands listed in § 1105, the Permit Board shall deny the permit if the applicant has no valid existing rights for the area. If the Department is unable to determine whether the proposed operation is located within the boundaries of any of the lands in § 1105(a) or closer than the limits provided in § 1105(f) or (g), the Department shall transmit a copy of the relevant portions of the permit application to the appropriate federal, state or local government agency for a determination or clarification of the relevant boundaries or distances, with a notice to the appropriate agency that it must respond within 30 days of receipt of the request. The National Park Service or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall be notified of any request for a determination of valid existing rights pertaining to areas within the boundaries of areas under their jurisdiction and shall have 30 days from receipt of the notification in which to respond. The Department, upon request by the appropriate agency, shall grant an extension to the 30-day period of an additional 30 days. If no response is received within the 30-day period or within the extended period granted, the Permit Board may make the necessary determination based on the information it has available.
(c) Where the proposed operation would include Federal lands within the boundaries of any national forest, and the applicant seeks a determination that mining is permissible under § 1105(b), the applicant shall submit a permit application to the Permit Board and the Director for processing pursuant to 30 CFR pt. 740. Before acting on the permit application, the Permit Board shall ensure that the Secretary of the Interior’s determination has been received and that all findings required by the Act and SMCRA have been made.
(d) Where the mining operation is proposed to be conducted within 100 feet, measured horizontally, of the outside right-of-way line of any public road (except as provided in § 1105(d)(1) or (2) or where the applicant proposes to relocate or close any public road, the Permit Board or local governmental entity with authority over the public road designated by the Permit Board shall:
(1) require the applicant to obtain necessary approvals of the authority with jurisdiction over the public road;
(2) provide an opportunity for a public hearing in the locality of the proposed mining operation for the purpose of determining whether the interests of the public and affected landowners will be protected;
(3) if a public hearing is requested, provide appropriate advance notice of the public hearing, to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the affected locale at least 2 weeks prior to the hearing; and
(4) make a written finding based upon information received at the public hearing within 30 days after completion of the hearing, or after any public comment period ends if no hearing is held, as to whether the interests of the public and affected landowners will be protected from the proposed mining operation. No mining shall be allowed within 100 feet of the outside right-of-way line of a road, nor may a road be relocated or closed, unless the Permit Board or public road authority determines that the interests of the public and affected landowners will be protected.
(e) (1) Where the proposed surface coal mining operations would be conducted within 300 feet, measured horizontally, of any occupied dwelling, the applicant shall submit with the application a written waiver by lease, deed or other conveyance from the owner of the dwelling clarifying that the owner and signatory had the legal right to deny mining and knowingly waived that right. The waiver shall act as consent to such operations within a closer distance of the dwelling as specified.
(2) Where the applicant for a permit after August 3, 1977, had obtained a valid waiver prior to August 3, 1977, from the owner of an occupied dwelling to mine within 300 feet of such dwelling, a new waiver shall not be required.
(3) (A) Where the applicant for a permit after August 3, 1977, had obtained a valid waiver from the owner of an occupied dwelling, that waiver shall remain effective against subsequent purchasers who had actual or constructive knowledge of the existing waiver at the time of purchase.
(B) A subsequent purchaser shall be deemed to have constructive knowledge if the waiver has been properly filed in public-property records pursuant to state laws or if the mining has proceeded to within the 300-foot limit prior to the date of purchase.
(f) Where the Permit Board determines that the proposed surface coal mining operation will adversely affect any publicly owned park or any place included in the National Register of Historic Places, the Permit Board shall follow the procedure required by § 3114(d).
(g) If the proposed surface coal mining operation is not prohibited under § 53-9- 71(4) and this Rule, the Commission may, nevertheless, pursuant to appropriate petitions, designate such lands as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations pursuant to § 53-9- 71, and Rules 13 or 15 of these regulations.
Rule 13. Criteria for Designating Lands as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations
§ 1301. Responsibility
The Commission shall use the criteria in this Rule for the evaluation of each petition for the designation of areas as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations.
§ 1303. Criteria for Designating Lands as Unsuitable
(a) Upon petition pursuant to § 53-9- 71(2) an area shall be designated as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations, if the Commission determines that reclamation is not technologically and economically feasible under the Act or these regulations.
(b) Upon petition an area may be, but is not required to be, designated as unsuitable for certain types of surface coal mining operations, if the operations will:
(1) be incompatible with existing state or local land use plans or programs;
(2) affect fragile or historic lands in which the operations could result in significant damage to important historic, cultural, scientific or aesthetic values or natural systems;
(3) affect renewable resource lands in which the operations could result in a substantial loss or reduction of long-range productivity of water supply or of food or fiber products;
(4) affect natural hazard lands in which the operations could substantially endanger life and property, such lands to include areas subject to frequent flooding and areas of unstable geology.
§ 1305. Land Exempt from Designation as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining.Operations
The requirements of this Rule do not apply to lands covered by a permit issued under the Act.
§ 1307. Exploration or Development on Land Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations
Designation of any area as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations pursuant to § 53-9- 71 and regulations of this Subchapter does not prohibit coal exploration operations in the area, if conducted in accordance with that section, these regulations and other applicable requirements. Exploration on any lands designated unsuitable for surface coal mining operations must be approved by the Permit Board under Rule 21, to insure that exploration does not interfere with any value for which the area has been designated unsuitable for surface coal mining.
Rule 15. State Process for Designating Areas Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations
§ 1501. Procedures: Petitions
(a) Right to Petition. Any interested party which is or may be adversely affected has the right to petition the Commission to have an area designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations, or to have an existing designation terminated. For the purpose of this Rule, an
interested party is a person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected by surface coal mining in the area at issue in his or her petition who is able to demonstrate to the Commission that he or she meets an “injury in fact” test by describing the actual or potential injury to his or her specific affected interests and demonstrating how he or she is or would be among the injured.
(b) Designation. The petitioner must provide: identification of the petitioned area, including its location and size, and a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map outlining the perimeter of the petitioned area; allegations of facts and supporting evidence which would tend to establish that the area is unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations; a description of how mining of the area has affected or may adversely affect people, land, air, water or other resources; the petitioner's name, address, telephone number and notarized signature; and identification of the petitioner's interest which is or may be adversely affected, including a statement demonstrating how the petitioner satisfies the requirements of § 1505(a) and any additional information deemed necessary by the Commission.
(c) Termination. The petitioner must provide the following information in support of a petition to terminate a designation:
(1) identification of the petitioned area, including its location and size, and a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map outlining the perimeter of the petitioned area to which the termination petition applies.
(2) allegations of facts, with supporting evidence, not contained in the record of the proceeding in which the area was designated unsuitable, which would tend to establish the statements or allegations, and which statements or allegations indicate that the designation should be terminated based on:
(A) the nature or abundance of the protected resource or condition or other basis of the designation if the designation was based on criteria found in § 1303(b);
(B) reclamation now being technologically and economically feasible, if the designation was based on the criteria found in § 1303(a); or
(C) the resources or condition not being affected by surface coal mining operations, or in the case of land use plans, not being incompatible with surface coal mining operations during and after mining, if the designation was based on the criteria found in § 1303(b);
(3) the petitioner's name, address, telephone number and notarized signature;
(4) identification of the petitioner's interest which is or may be adversely affected by the continuation of the designation, including a statement demonstrating how the petitioner satisfies the requirements of § 1505(a), and
(5) any additional information deemed necessary by the Commission.
§ 1503. Procedures: Initial Processing, Record keeping, and Notification Requirements
(a) (1) Within 30 days of receipt of a petition, the Department shall notify the petitioner by
certified mail whether or not the petition is complete under § 1505(b) or (c).
(2) The State Geologist shall determine whether any identified coal resources exist in the area covered by the petition, without requiring any showing from the petitioner. If the State Geologist finds there are not any identified coal resources in that area, the State Geologist shall recommend to the Commission that the Petition to Designate Lands unsuitable be denied without prejudice, subject to the discovery of information indicating that coal resources do exist in the area covered by the petition. If the State Geologist determines that identified coal resources do exist in the area covered by the petition, he or she will consider all available information, including, without limitation, the information required by this Rule to be submitted in support of the petition, and will make a recommendation to the Commission for action at the conclusion of his or her review.
(3) The Commission may deny petitions for designations or terminations of designations which are incomplete, frivolous, or if the petitioner does not meet the requirements of § 1505(a). A frivolous petition is one in which the allegations of harm lack serious merit. Once the requirements of § 1505 are met, no party shall bear any burden of proof, but each accepted petition shall be considered and acted upon by the Commission pursuant to the procedures of this Rule.
(4) When considering a petition for an area which was previously and unsuccessfully proposed for designation, the Commission shall determine if the new petition presents new allegations of fact. If the petition does not contain new allegations of fact, the Commission shall deny the petition, with a statement of its findings and a reference to the record of the previous designation proceedings where the facts were considered.
(5) If the Commission determines that the petition is incomplete or frivolous, it shall deny the petition, with a written statement of the reasons for the determination and the categories of information needed to make the petition complete.
(6) The Commission shall notify the person who submits a petition of any application for a permit received which proposes to include any area covered by the petition, unless the Commission has denied the petition prior to the receipt of the application.
(7) The Commission may determine, in deference to Permit Board procedures stated in the act and these regulations, not to process any petition received, or a part of a petition, that pertains to lands for which a complete permit application has been filed and the first newspaper notice has been published. Based upon such a determination, the Permit Board may issue a decision on a complete and accurate permit application, and the Commission shall inform the petitioner why it has determined not to consider the part of the petition pertaining to the proposed permit area.
(b) (1) Promptly after a petition is received, the Commission shall notify the general public of the receipt of the petition by a newspaper advertisement placed in the locale of the area covered by the petition, and in the newspaper providing broadest circulation in the region of the petitioned area. The Commission shall make copies of the petition available to the public and shall provide copies of the petition to other interested governmental agencies, intervenors, persons with an ownership interest of record in the property, and other persons known to the Commission to have an interest in the property. Proper notice to persons with an ownership interest of record in the property shall comply with the
requirements of applicable State law.
(2) The Commission may provide for a hearing or a period of written comments on completeness of petitions. If a hearing or comment period on completeness is provided, the Commission shall inform interested governmental agencies, intervenors, persons with an ownership interest of record in the property, and other persons known to the Commission to have an interest in the property of the opportunity to request to participate in such a hearing or provide written comments. Proper notice to persons with an ownership interest of record in the property shall comply with the requirements of the Act. Notice of such a hearing shall be made by a newspaper advertisement placed in the locale of the area covered by the petition, and in the newspaper providing broadest circulation in the region of the petitioned area. The Commission shall notify the petitioner of such a hearing by certified mail. On the basis of a Commission review as well as consideration of all comments, the Commission shall determine whether the petition is complete.
(3) Within twenty days after the determination that a petition is complete, the Commission shall circulate copies of the petition to, and request submissions of relevant information from, other interested government agencies, the petitioner, intervenors, persons with an ownership interest of record in the property and other persons known to the Commission to have an interest in the property. For purposes of this Rule, a complete petition shall be defined in the same way that a complete application is defined in § 105.
(4) Within twenty days after the determination that a petition is complete, the Commission shall notify the general public of the receipt of the petition and request submissions of relevant information by a newspaper advertisement placed once a week for two consecutive weeks in the locale of the area covered by the petition, in the newspaper of largest circulation in the state and in any official state register of public notices.
(c) Any person may provide written or oral comment for consideration by the Commission during a public hearing conducted pursuant to § 1509.
(d) Beginning immediately after a complete petition is filed, the Commission shall compile and maintain a record consisting of all documents relating to the petition filed with or prepared by the Commission. The Commission shall make the record available for public inspection free of charge and copying at reasonable cost during all normal business hours at a central location of the county or multi county area in which the land petition is located and at the Commission.
(e) After an interested party has filed a petition, but before the public hearing is held pursuant to § 1509 of these regulations, any other interested party may intervene by filing a petition that complies with § 1505. An intervenor may adopt by reference all or part of a petition previously filed by another party.
§ 1505. Procedures: Hearing Requirements
(a) Within 6 months after receipt of a complete petition, the Commission shall hold a public hearing in the locality of the area covered by the petition. The Commission shall make a transcript of the hearing.
(b) (1) The Commission shall give notice of the date, time and location of the hearing to:
(A) local, state and federal agencies which may have an interest in the decision on the petition;
(B) the petitioner; and
(C) any person known by the Commission to have a property interest in the petitioned area.
(2) Notice of the hearing shall be sent by certified mail to the petitioner and by regular mail to local, state and federal agencies, and property owners and postmarked not less than 30 days before the scheduled date of the hearing.
(c) The Commission shall notify the general public of the date, time and location of the hearing by placing a newspaper advertisement once a week for two consecutive weeks in the locale of the area covered by the petition and once during the week prior to the scheduled date of the public hearing. The consecutive weekly advertisement must begin between four and five weeks before the scheduled date of the public hearing.
(d) The Commission may consolidate in a single hearing the hearings required for each of several petitions which relate to areas in the same locale.
(e) Prior to designating any land areas as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations, the Commission shall prepare a detailed statement, using existing and available information on the potential coal resources of the area, the demand for coal resources and the impact of such designation on the environment, the economy and the supply of coal.
§ 1507. Procedures: Decision
(a) In reaching its decision, the Commission shall use:
(1) the information contained in the data base and inventory system;
(2) information provided by other governmental agencies;
(3) the detailed statement prepared under § 1509(e); and
(4) any other relevant information submitted during the comment period.
(b) A final written decision shall be issued by the Commission, including a statement of reasons, within 60 days of completion of the public hearing. The Commission shall simultaneously send the decision by certified mail to the petitioner and to persons who submitted written comments concerning the application during the public comment period and who provided the Department or Commission with a complete mailing address.
(c) Any person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected as defined in § 1505(a) and who is aggrieved by a decision of the Commission or by the failure of the Commission to act within the time limits set forth in this section may request a formal hearing as provided in § 53-9- 77.
(d) Any person who participated as a party in the formal hearing may appeal the final decision of the
Commission as provided in § 53-9- 77. All relevant portions of the data base, inventory system, and public comments received during the public comment period set by the Commission shall be included in the record of the administrative proceeding.
§ 1509. Data Base and Inventory System Requirements
(a) The State Geologist shall be responsible for surface coal mining land review and shall assist the Commission in developing a data base and inventory system which will permit evaluation of whether reclamation is feasible in areas covered by petitions.
(b) The Commission shall include in the system information relevant to the criteria in § 1303 including, but not limited to, information received from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the state historic preservation officer and the agency administering § 127 of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7470 et seq.).
(c) The Commission shall add to the data base and inventory system information:
(1) on potential coal resources of the state, demand for those resources, the environment, the economy and the supply of coal sufficient to enable the Commission to prepare the statements required by § 1509(e); and
(2) that becomes available from petitions, publications, experiments, permit applications, mining and reclamation operations and other sources.
§ 1511. Public Information
The Department shall:
(a) make the information in the data base and inventory system developed under § 1513 available to the public for inspection free of charge and for copying at reasonable cost, except that specific information relating to location of properties proposed to be nominated to, or listed in, the National Register of Historic Places need not be disclosed if the Commission determines that the disclosure of such information would create a risk of destruction or harm to such properties.
(b) provide information to the public, on request, on the petition procedures necessary to have an area designated as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations or to have designations terminated and describe how the inventory and data base system can be used.
§ 1513. Responsibility for Implementation
(a) The Permit Board shall not issue permits which are inconsistent with designations made pursuant to Rules 9, 11, 13 or 15.
(b) The Department shall maintain a map of areas designated as unsuitable for all or certain types of surface coal mining operations.
(c) The Department shall make available to any person any information within its control regarding designations, including mineral or elemental content which is potentially toxic in the environment except for proprietary information on the chemical and physical properties of the coal.
Subchapter 2.3 Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations Permits and Coal Exploration Procedures Systems
Rule 17. General Requirements for Permit or Exploration Procedure Systems
§ 1701. Responsibilities
(a) Persons seeking to engage in surface coal mining and reclamation operations must submit an application for and obtain a permit for those operations in accordance with this Subchapter. Persons seeking to conduct coal exploration operations must first file the notice of intention or obtain approval of the Permit Board as required under Rule 21.
(b) The Permit Board shall review each application for exploration approval and for a permit, approve or disapprove each permit application or exploration application, and issue, deny, modify, suspend or revoke exploration approval, permits, renewals or revised permits.
§ 1703. Applicability
This Subchapter applies to each person who applies for a permit for surface coal mining and reclamation operations or conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations pursuant to a permit under these regulations and to persons who seek to conduct coal exploration operations under these regulations.
§ 1705. Coordination with Requirements Under Other Laws
The Department shall provide for the coordination of review of permit applications for surface coal mining and reclamation operations. These shall include but not be limited to applicable requirements of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.); the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.); the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.); the Bald Eagle Protection Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 668a); and Executive Order 11593 to the extent that each of these acts or orders is applicable to the activities of the Department, Commission, or Permit Board in executing the authority and duty granted to those entities by the Act.
Rule 19. General Requirements for Permits and Permit Applications
§ 1901. General Requirements for Permits: Operators
No person shall engage in or carry out surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-federal or non-Indian lands within the state, unless that person has first obtained a valid permit issued by the Permit Board. A permittee need not renew the permit if no surface coal mining operations will be conducted under the permit and solely reclamation activities remain to be done. Obligations established under a permit continue until completion of surface coal mining and reclamation operations, regardless of whether the authorization to conduct surface coal mining operations has expired or has been terminated, revoked, or suspended.
§ 1903. Compliance with Permits
All persons shall conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations under permits issued pursuant to the act and these regulations and shall comply with the terms and conditions of the permit and the requirements of the act and these regulations.
§ 1905. Permit Application Filing Deadlines
(a) Reissuance of Valid Permits. An application for reissuance of a permit shall be filed with the Permit Board at least 180 days before the expiration of the permit involved. If an application for reissuance is timely filed, the operator may continue surface coal mining operations under the existing permit until the Permit Board takes action on the reissuance application.
(b) Revisions of Permits.
(1) During the term of the permit, the permittee may submit an application for a revision of the permit to the State Geologist, who shall make a recommendation to the Executive Director regarding whether the revision should be allowed. An application for a revision shall not be approved unless the Executive Director finds that reclamation can be accomplished under the revised reclamation plan. On receipt of an application for a revision, the State Geologist shall determine whether the application is a request for a revision or for a modification.
(2) If the request is deemed a modification, the application will be processed as a modification to the permit pursuant to the act and these regulations. A revision shall not be considered a modification. The Executive Director is not required to provide public notice or a public hearing prior to granting or denying the request for a revision. The revision shall be granted or denied by the Executive Director within fourteen days of receipt of the request by the State Geologist, unless the State Geologist or Executive Director request additional information from the applicant regarding the request. If a request for additional information is made, the Executive Director shall grant or deny the request within fourteen days of his or her receipt of the additional information.
(3) No request for a revision shall be approved unless:
(A) Applicable requirements under § 3115, which are pertinent to the revision, are met; and
(B) The application for a revision complies with all requirements of the act and the regulatory program.
(4) A decision by the Executive Director to grant or deny a revision shall be subject to formal hearing and appeal as would an initial decision of the Permit Board under § 53-9- 77.
(5) Any extension or addition to the area covered by the permit except incidental boundary revisions must be made by application for a new permit or a permit modification.
(c) A successor in interest to a permittee who applies for a new permit within thirty (30) days of succeeding to that interest, and who is able to obtain the bond coverage of the original permittee, may continue surface coal mining and reclamation operations according to the approved mining
and reclamation plan of the original permittee until the Permit Board takes action on the successor’s application.
§ 1907. Permit Applications: General Requirements for Format and Contents
(a) Applications for permits to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations shall be filed in the format required by the Department. The application shall be complete and include, at a minimum: for surface mining activities, all the applicable information required under § 53-9- 25 and Rules 23, 25, and 27; and, for special types of surface coal mining and reclamation operations, all applicable information required under the Act and Rule 29.
(b) Information set forth in the application shall be current, presented clearly and concisely, and supported by appropriate references to technical and other written material available to the Department.
(c) All technical data submitted in the application shall be accompanied by: names of persons or organizations which collected and analyzed such data; dates of the collection and analyses; and descriptions of methodology used to collect and analyze the data.
(d) Technical analyses shall be planned by or under the direction of a professional qualified in the subject to be analyzed.
(e) The application shall state the name, address and position of officials of each private or academic research organization or governmental agency consulted by the applicant in preparation of the application for information on land uses, soils geology, vegetation, fish and wildlife quantity and quality, air quality, and archaeological, cultural and historic features.
(f) Maps and plans: General Requirements
(1) Maps submitted with the application shall be presented in a consolidated format, to the extent possible, and shall include all the types of information that are set forth on topographic maps of the United States Geological Survey of the 1:24,000 scale series. Maps of the permit area shall be at a scale of 1:6,000 or larger. Maps of the adjacent areas shall clearly show the lands and waters within those areas and be in a scale determined by the Department, but in no event smaller than 1:24,000.
(2) All maps and plans submitted with the application shall distinguish among each of the phases during which surface coal mining operations were or will be conducted at any place during the life of operations.
§ 1909. Permit Fees
(a) The Commission shall assess and collect a permit fee for reviewing the permit application and administering and enforcing a surface coal mining and reclamation permit. The Commission may set permit fees for the transfer, modification or reissuance of a surface coal mining and reclamation permit. These fees shall be set by order of the Commission in accordance with § 53- 9- 28.
(b) The Commission may also establish a permit fee for the issuance, reissuance, transfer or modification of a coal exploration permit and a reasonable fee for a copy of a transcript of a formal hearing held under these regulations. These fees shall be set by order of the Commission
in accordance with § 53-9- 28.
§ 1911. Verification of Application Applications for permits, revisions of permits, renewals, or transfers, sales or assignment of permit rights shall be verified under oath, by a responsible official of the applicant, that the information contained in the application is true and correct to the best of the official's information and belief.
Rule 21. Coal Exploration and Development
§ 2101. Notice Requirements for Exploration Removing 250 Tons of Coal or Less
(a) Any person who intends to conduct coal exploration operations outside a permit area during which 250 tons or less of coal will be removed and which shall not substantially disturb the natural land surface shall, before conducting the exploration, file with the Department a written notice of intention to explore, except that exploration which will take place on lands designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations under Rules 5, 11, 13 and 15 of these regulations shall be subject to the permitting requirements of § 2103. Exploration conducted under a notice of intent shall not require a permit but shall be subject to the requirements prescribed under § 2105.
(b) The notice shall include -
(1) The name, address and telephone number of the person seeking to explore;
(2) The name, address and telephone number of the person’s representative who will be present at, and responsible for, conducting the exploration activities;
(3) A narrative describing the proposed exploration area or a map at a scale of 1:24,000, or greater, showing the proposed area of exploration and the general location of drill holes and trenches, existing and proposed roads, occupied dwellings, topographic features, bodies of surface water, and pipelines;
(4) A statement of the period of intended exploration; and
(5) A description of the method of exploration to be used and the practices that will be followed to protect the environment and to reclaim the area from adverse impacts of the exploration activities in accordance with the applicable requirements of Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations, permanent program performance standards.
§ 2103. Permit Requirements for Exploration Removing More Than 250 Tons of Coal, or Occurring on Lands Designated as Unsuitable for Surface Coal Mining Operations
(a) Exploration permit. Any person who intends to conduct coal exploration outside a permit area during which more than 250 tons of coal will be removed or which will substantially disturb the natural land surface, or which will take place on lands designated as unsuitable for surface mining, shall, before conducting the exploration, submit an application and obtain written approval from the Permit Board in an exploration permit. Such exploration shall be subject to the requirements prescribed under § 2105 and § 2107.
(b) Application information. Each application for an exploration permit shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
(1) The name, address and telephone number of the applicant;
(2) The name, address and telephone number of the applicant’s representative who will be present at, and responsible for, conducting the exploration activities.
(3) A narrative describing the proposed exploration area.
(4) A narrative description of the methods and equipment to be used to conduct the exploration and reclamation.
(5) An estimated timetable for conducting and completing each phase of the exploration and reclamation.
(6) The estimated amount of coal to be removed and a description of the methods to be used to determine the amount.
(7) A statement of why extraction of more than 250 tons of coal is necessary for exploration.
(8) A description of :
(A) Cultural or historical resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places;
(B) Cultural or historical resources known to be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places; and
(C) Known archeological resources located within the proposed exploration area.
(D) Any other information which the Permit Board may require regarding known or unknown historic or archeological resources.
(9) A description of any endangered or threatened species listed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) identified within the proposed exploration area.
(10) A description of the measures to be used to comply with the applicable requirements of Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations.
(11) The name and address of the owner of record of the surface land and of the subsurface mineral estate of the area to be explored.
(12) A map or maps at a scale of 1:24,000, or larger, showing the areas of land to be disturbed by the proposed exploration and reclamation. The map shall specifically show existing roads, occupied dwellings, topographic and drainage features, bodies of surface water, and pipelines; proposed locations of trenches, roads and other access routes and structures to be constructed; the location of proposed land excavations; the location of exploration holes or other drill holes or underground openings; the location of excavated earth or waste-material disposal areas; and the location of critical habitats of any
endangered or threatened species listed pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
(13) If the surface is owned by a person other than the applicant, a description of the basis upon which the applicant claims the right to enter that land for the purposes of conducting exploration and reclamation.
(14) For any lands listed in § 1105 of this Rule, a demonstration that, to the extent technologically and economically feasible, the proposed exploration activities have been designed to minimize interference with the values for which those lands were designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations. The application must include documentation of consultation with the owner of the feature causing the land to come under the protection of § 1105 of this Rule, and, when applicable, with the agency with primary jurisdiction over the feature with respect to the values that caused the land to come under the protection of § 1105 of this Rule.
(c) Public notice and opportunity to comment. Public notice of the application and opportunity to comment shall be provided as follows:
(1) The applicant shall provide public notice of the filing of complete application with the Department by publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the county of the proposed exploration area within ten days of the filing of a complete application.
(2) The public notice shall state the name and address of the person seeking approval, the filing date of the application, the address of the Department, the closing date of the comment period, and a description of the area of exploration.
(3) Any person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected shall have the right to file written comments on the application within reasonable time limits as set by the Department and stated in the published public notice.
(d) Decisions on applications for exploration.
(1) The Permit Board shall act upon an administratively complete application for a coal exploration permit and any written comments within a reasonable period of time. The approval of a coal exploration permit may be based only on a complete and accurate application.
(2) The Permit Board shall approve a complete and accurate application for a coal exploration permit filed in accordance with this Rule if it finds, in writing, that the applicant has demonstrated that the exploration and reclamation described in the application will:
(i) Be conducted in accordance with this Rule, Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations, and any other applicable provision of the regulatory program;
(ii) Not jeopardize the continued existence of an endangered or threatened species listed pursuant to section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533) or result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat of those species; and
(iii) Not adversely affect any cultural or historical resources listed on the National Register of Historic Places, pursuant to the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. Sec. 470 et seq., 1976, Supp. V), unless the proposed exploration has been approved by both the Permit Board and the agency with jurisdiction over such matters.
(iv) With respect to exploration activities on any lands protected under § 1105 of these regulations, minimize interference, to the extent technologically and economically feasible, with the values for which those lands were designated as unsuitable for surface coal mining operations. Before making this finding, the Permit Board must provide reasonable opportunity to the owner of the feature causing the land to come under the protection of § 1105 of these regulations, and, when applicable, to the agency with primary jurisdiction over the feature with respect to the values that caused the land to come under the protection of § 1105 of these regulations, to comment on whether the finding is appropriate.
(e) Terms of approval issued by the Permit Board shall contain conditions necessary to ensure that the exploration and reclamation will be conducted in compliance with this Rule, Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations, and any other applicable provisions of the regulatory program.
(f) Notice and hearing.
(1) The Permit Board shall notify the applicant, the appropriate local government officials, and other commentors on the application, in writing, of its decision on the application. If the application is disapproved, the notice to the applicant shall include a statement of the reason for disapproval. Public notice of the decision on each application shall be posted by the Department at a public office in the vicinity of the proposed exploration operations.
(2) Any person having an interest which is or may be adversely affected by a decision of the Permit Board pursuant to paragraph (d) of this section shall have the opportunity for administrative and judicial review as set forth in § 53-9- 77.
§ 2105. Coal Exploration Compliance Duties
(a) All coal exploration and reclamation activities that substantially disturb the natural land surface shall be conducted in accordance with the coal exploration requirements of this Rule, Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations, any other applicable provisions of the Permit Board, and any exploration permit term or condition imposed by the Permit Board.
(b) Any person who conducts any coal exploration in violation of the provisions of this Rule, Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations, any other applicable provisions of the regulatory program, or any exploration permit term or condition imposed by the Permit Board, shall be subject to the provisions of § 53-9- 55, Rules 63 through 71 of these regulations, and the applicable inspection and enforcement provisions of the regulatory program.
§ 2107. Commercial Use or Sale
(a) Except as provided under § 2107(b), any person who intends to commercially use or sell coal extracted during coal exploration operations under an exploration permit shall first obtain a permit to conduct surface coal mining operations.
(b) With the prior written approval of the Executive Director, no permit to conduct surface coal mining operations is required for the sale or commercial use of coal extracted during exploration operations if such sale or commercial use is for coal testing purposes only. The person conducting the exploration shall file an application in the form of a letter requesting such approval with the Executive Director. The application shall demonstrate that the coal testing is necessary for the development of a surface coal mining and reclamation operation for which a surface coal mining operations permit application is to be submitted in the near future, and that the proposed commercial use or sale of coal extracted during exploration operations is solely for the purpose of testing the coal. The application shall contain the following:
(1) The name of the testing firm and the locations at which the coal will be tested.
(2) If the coal will be sold directly to, or commercially used directly by, the intended end user, a statement from the intended end user, or if the coal is sold indirectly to the intended end user through an agent or broker, a statement from the agent or broker. The statement shall include:
(A) The specific reason for the test, including why the coal may be so different from the intended user’s other coal supplies as to require testing;
(B) The amount of coal necessary for the test and why a lesser amount is not sufficient; and
(C) A description of the specific tests that will be conducted.
(3) Evidence that sufficient reserves of coal are available to the person conducting exploration or its principals for future commercial use or sale to the intended end user, or agent or broker of such user identified above, to demonstrate that the amount of coal to be removed is not the total reserve, but is a sampling of a larger reserve.
(4) An explanation as to why other means of exploration, such as core drilling, are not adequate to determine the quality of the coal and/or the feasibility of developing a surface coal mining operation.
§ 2109. Public Availability of Information
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all information submitted to the Department under this Rule shall be made available for public inspection and copying at the offices of the Department in Jackson.
(b) The Department shall keep information confidential if the person submitting it complies with § 53-9- 43 and obtains a finding of confidentiality from the Commission in accordance with § 49- 17-39.
(c) Information requested to be held as confidential under § 2109(b) of this section shall not be made publicly available until after notice and opportunity to be heard before the Commission is afforded persons both seeking and opposing disclosure of the information.
Rule 23. Surface Mining Permit Applications: Minimum Requirements for Legal, Financial, Compliance and Related Information
§ 2301. Responsibility
It is the responsibility of the permit applicant to provide to the Permit Board all of the information required by this Rule.
§ 2303. Applicability
This Rule applies to any person who applies for a permit to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
§ 2305. Identification of Interests
An application shall contain the following information, except that the submission of a social security number is voluntary:
(a) A statement as to whether the applicant, or operator, is a corporation, partnership, single proprietorship, association or other business entity.
(b) The name, address, telephone number, social security number and employer identification number of the:
(1) applicant;
(2) applicant's resident agent;
(3) person who will pay the abandoned mine land reclamation fee;
(4) any operator, if different from the applicant;
(5) person(s) responsible for submitting the Coal Reclamation Fee Report; and
(6) each business entity in the applicant's and operator's organizational structure, up to and including the ultimate parent entity of the applicant and operator; for every such business entity, you must also provide the required information for every president, chief executive officer, and director (or persons in similar positions), and every person who owns, of record, 10 percent or more of the entity.
(c) If the applicant has previously applied for a permit and the required information is already in AVS, then the applicant may update the information as shown in the following table:
If: then the applicant: (1) All or part of the information already in AVS is accurate and complete
(2) Part of the information in AVS is missing or incorrect may certify to the Department by swearing or affirming, under oath and in writing, that the relevant information in AVS is accurate, complete, and up to date.
must submit to the Department the necessary information or corrections and swear or affirm,
(3) The applicant can neither certify that the data in AVS is accurate and complete nor make needed corrections under oath and in writing, that the information submitted is accurate and correct.
must include in the permit application the information required under this section.
(d) The applicant must swear or affirm, under oath and in writing, that all the information provided in an application is accurate and complete.
(e) The Department may establish a central file to house the applicant’s identity information, rather than place duplicate information in each of the applicant’s permit files. The Department will make the information available to the public upon request.
(f) For the applicant and operator,:
(1) for every:
(A) Officer,
(B) Partner,
(C) Member,
(D) Director,
(E) Person performing a function similar to a Director, or
(F) Person who owns, of record 10 percent or more of the applicant or operator:
(1). the person's name, address, social security number and employer identification number;
(2). the person's ownership or control relationship to the applicant, including percentage of ownership and location in organizational structure;
(3). the title of the person's position, date position was assumed and, when submitted under § 3123(f), date of departure from the position;
(4). for the applicant and each partner or principal shareholder of the applicant, each additional name and identifying number, including employer identification number, federal or state permit number, and MSHA number with date of issuance, under which the person owns or controls, or previously owned or controlled, a surface coal mining and reclamation operation in the United States within the five years preceding the date of the application; and
(5). the application number or other identifier of, and the regulatory authority for, any other pending surface coal mining operation permit application filed by the applicant in any state in the United States.
(g) For any surface coal mining operation owned or controlled by either the applicant or by any person who owns or controls the applicant under the definition of owned or controlled and owns or controls in § 105, the operation's:
(1) name, address, identifying numbers, including employer identification number, federal or state permit number and MSHA number, the date of issuance of the MSHA number, and regulatory authority; and
(2) ownership or control relationship to the applicant, including percentage of ownership and location in organizational structure.
(h) The name and address of each legal or equitable owner of record of the surface and mineral property to be mined, each holder of record of any leasehold interest in the property to be mined, and any purchaser of record under a real estate contract for the property to be mined.
(i) The name and address of each owner of record of all property (surface and subsurface) contiguous to any part of the proposed permit area.
(j) The MSHA numbers for all mine-associated structures that require MSHA approval;
(k) A statement of all lands, interest in lands, options or pending bids on interests held or made by the applicant for lands contiguous to the area described in the permit application. Any claim of confidentiality for this information must be presented to the Commission prior to the submission of the information pursuant to § 53-9- 43.
(l) After an applicant is notified that his or her application is approved, but before the permit is issued, the applicant shall, as applicable, update, correct or indicate that no change has occurred in the information previously submitted under § 2305 or §2307.
(m) The applicant shall submit the information required by this Section and by §2307 in any form required by the Department.
(n) The Department need not make a finding as provided for under § 3138 (g) before entering into AVS the information required to be disclosed under this section; however, the mere listing in AVS of a person identified in paragraph (b) or (f) of this section does not create a presumption or constitute a determination that such person owns or controls a surface coal mining operation.
§ 2307. Compliance Information
Each application shall contain:
(a) a statement of whether the applicant, any subsidiary, affiliate or persons controlled by or under common control with the applicant has had a federal or state mining permit suspended or revoked in the five years preceding the date of submission of the application; or forfeited a performance bond or similar security deposited in lieu of bond;
(b) if any such suspension, revocation or forfeiture has occurred, a brief explanation of the facts involved if any such suspension, revocation, or forfeiture referred to in § 2307 (a), including:
(1) identification number and date of issuance of the permit, and the date and amount of bond or similar security;
(2) identification of the authority that suspended or revoked the permit or forfeited the bond and the stated reasons for that action;
(3) the current status of the permit, bond or similar security involved;
(4) the date, location and type of any administrative or judicial proceedings initiated concerning the suspension, revocation or forfeiture; and
(5) the current status of the proceedings.
The applicant shall submit the information required by this section and in a form required by the Department.
(c) A list of all violation notices received by the applicant during the three-year period preceding the application date, and a list of all outstanding violation notices received prior to the date of the application by any surface coal mining operation that is deemed or presumed to be owned or controlled by either the applicant or any person who is deemed or presumed to own or control the applicant under the definition of "owned or controlled" and "owns or controls" in § 105. For each notice of violation issued pursuant to § 6503 or under a federal or state program for which the abatement period has not expired, the applicant shall certify that such notice of violation is in the process of being corrected to the satisfaction of the agency with jurisdiction over the violation. For each violation notice reported, the list shall include the following information, as applicable:
(1) any identifying numbers for the operation, including the federal or state permit number and MSHA number, the dates of issuances of the violation notice and MSHA number, the name of the person to whom the violation notice was issued, and the name of the issuing regulatory authority, Department or agency;
(2) a brief description of the particular violation alleged in the notice;
(3) the date, location and type of any administrative or judicial proceedings initiated concerning the violation including, but not limited to, proceedings initiated by the applicant to obtain administrative or judicial review of the violations;
(4) the current status of the proceedings and of the violation notice; and
(5) the actions, if any, taken by the applicant to abate the violation;
(d) After an applicant is notified that his or her application is approved, but before the permit is issued, the applicant shall, as applicable, update, correct or indicate that no change has occurred in the information previously submitted under this Section.
§ 2309. Right of Entry and Operation Information
(a) Each application shall contain a description of the documents upon which the applicant bases his or her legal right to enter and begin surface mining and reclamation operation activities in the permit area and whether that right is the subject of pending litigation. The description shall identify those documents by type and date of execution, identify the specific lands to which the document pertains, and explain the legal rights claimed by the applicant.
(b) Where the private mineral estate has been severed from the private surface estate, where such severance is authorized under Mississippi law, the application shall also provide for lands within the permit area:
(1) a copy of the written consent of the surface owner to the extraction of coal by surface mining methods; or
(2) a copy of the document of conveyance that expressly grants or reserves the right to extract the coal by surface mining methods; or
(3) if the conveyance does not expressly grant the right to extract the coal by surface mining methods, documentation that, under the applicable state law, the applicant has the legal authority to extract the coal by these methods.
(c) Nothing in this Section shall be construed to afford the Commission or Permit Board the authority to adjudicate property title disputes.
§ 2311. Relationship to Areas Designated Unsuitable for Mining
(a) Each application shall contain a statement of available information on whether the proposed permit area is within an area designated unsuitable for surface mining activities under Rules 11, 13 and 15 or under study for designation in an administrative proceeding under those Rules.
(b) If an applicant proposes to conduct surface mining activities within 300 feet of an occupied dwelling, the application shall contain the waiver of the owner of the dwelling as required by § 1107(e).
(c) If an applicant proposes to conduct surface mining activities with 100 feet of a public road, the application shall contain the necessary information and meet the requirements of § 1107(d).
§ 2313. Permit Term Information
(a) Each application shall state the anticipated or actual starting and termination date of each phase of the surface coal mining and reclamation operations and the anticipated number of acres of land to be affected for each phase of mining and over the total life of the mine.
(b) If the applicant proposes to conduct the surface coal mining and reclamation operations in excess of five years, the application shall contain the information needed for the showing required under § 3121(a).
§ 2315. Personal Injury and Property Damage Insurance Information
Each permit application shall contain either a certificate of liability insurance or evidence that the self- insurance requirements in § 4309 are satisfied.
§ 2317. Identification of Other Licenses and Permits
Each application shall contain a list of all other licenses and permits needed by the applicant to conduct the proposed surface mining activities. This list shall identify each license and permit by:
(a) type of permit or license;
(b) name and address of issuing authority;
(c) identification numbers of applications for those permits or licenses or, if issued, the identification numbers of the permits or licenses;
(d) if a decision has been made, the date of approval or disapproval by each issuing authority.
§ 2319. Identification of Location of Public Office for Filing of Application
Each application shall identify, by name and address, the chancery clerk’s office where the applicant will simultaneously file a copy of the complete application for public inspection under § 3103.
§ 2321. Newspaper Advertisement and Proof of Publication
A copy of the newspaper advertisement of the application and proof of publication of the advertisement shall be filed with the Department and made a part of the complete application, not later than four weeks after the last date of publication required under § 53-9- 37 and § 3103.
§ 2323. Facilities or structures used in common
The plans of a facility or structure that is to be shared by two or more separately permitted mining operations may be included in one permit application and referenced in the other applications. In accordance with Rule 39, each permittee shall bond the facility or structure unless the permittees sharing it agree to another arrangement for assuming their respective responsibilities. If such agreement is reached, then the application shall include a copy of the agreement between or among the parties setting forth the respective bonding responsibilities of each party for the facility or structure. The agreement shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Permit Board that all responsibilities under the regulations for the facility or structure will be met.
§ 2325. Additional Information
The Permit Board may require additional information of the applicant if the Permit Board determines that the additional information is necessary to be considered in the Permit Board’s decision-making process concerning the issuance, denial, modification or revocation of a permit.
Rule 25. Surface Mining Permit Applications: Minimum Requirements for Information on Environmental Resources
§ 2501. Responsibilities
a. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide, except where specifically exempted in this Rule, all information required by this Rule in the application.
b. It is the responsibility of the Department to provide information for applications as specifically required by this Rule.
§ 2503. General Requirements
Each permit application shall include a description of the existing, premining environmental resources within the proposed permit area and adjacent areas that may be affected or impacted by the proposed surface mining activities.
§ 2505. General Environmental Resources Information
Each application shall describe and identify:
(a) the size, sequence and timing of the subareas for which it is anticipated that individual permits for mining will be requested and the lands subject to surface coal mining operations over the estimated total life of the proposed surface mining activities;
(b) the nature of cultural, historic and archaeological resources listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and known archaeological features within the proposed permit and adjacent areas. The description shall be based on all available information including, but not limited to, data of state and local archaeological, historical and cultural preservation agencies.
(c) The Permit Board may require the applicant to identify and evaluate important historic and archeological resources that may be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, through
(1) collection of additional information,
(2) conduct of field investigation, or
(3) other appropriate analyses.
§ 2507. Description of Hydrology and Geology: General Requirements
Each application shall contain a description, provided by, or under the direction of, a qualified Registered Professional Geologist or Registered Professional Engineer as required by the Department, of the geology, hydrology, and water quality and quantity of all lands within the proposed permit area, the adjacent area and the cumulative impact area. The description shall include information on the characteristics of all surface water and groundwater within the cumulative impact area, and any water which will flow into or receive discharges of water from the cumulative impact area. The description shall be prepared according to this Rule and conform to the following:
(a) Sampling and analysis methodology.
(1) Information on hydrology, water quality and quantity, and geology related to hydrology of areas outside the proposed permit area and within the cumulative impact area shall be provided by the Department, to the extent that this data is available from an appropriate federal or state agency.
(2) Sampling and Analysis Methodology. All water quality analyses performed to meet the requirements of this Section shall be conducted according to the methodology in the 15th edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater,” which is incorporated by reference, or the methodology in 40 CFR Parts 136 and 434. Water quality sampling performed to meet the requirements of this Section shall be conducted
according to either methodology listed above when feasible. "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" is a joint publication of the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association, and the Water Pollution Control Federation and is available from the American Public Health Association, 1015 15th Street, NW., Washington, D.C. 20036. This document is also available for inspection at the Office of the Federal Register, Room 700, 800 N. Capitol Street, NW., Washington, D.C.; at the Office of Surface Mining, Administrative Record, U.S. Department of the Interior, Room 210, 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C.; at the OSM Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center, U.S. Department of the Interior, 501 Belle Street, Alton, IL; at the OSM Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center, U.S. Department of the Interior, Building, Parkway Center, Pittsburgh, PA.; and at the OSM Western Regional Coordinating Center, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1999 Broadway, Suite 3320, Denver, CO.
(b) If this information is not available from those agencies, the applicant may gather and submit this information to the Department as part of the permit application.
(c) The permit shall not be approved by the Permit Board until this information is made available in the application.
(d) Additionally, the Department may require the following, or equivalent information, to be included in the application or otherwise provided to the Department:
(1) Copies of all original field data collection notes and/or forms. Originals shall be maintained by the permit applicant as records subject to inspection pursuant to § 6305.
(2) Copies of all original data reduction calculations. The copies shall include, but not be limited to, calculations, graphs, charts, and computer models.
(3) An explanation of or reference for any methodology used for sampling and analysis, data reduction, or calculations for any information value provided.
(4) A Quality Assurance Quality Control (QA/QC) manual to the Department for any division, company, party and/or subcontractor utilized to collect information on hydrogeology, water quality and quantity, or geology required for the permit sought.
(5) A work plan providing the procedure of how any testing, analysis, methodology and/or any other manner for collecting and analyzing information required in this Rule and Rules 27 and 29, submitted to the Department for approval prior to conducting such effort.
(e) The use of modeling techniques may be included as part of the permit application, but the same surface and ground-water information may be required for each site as when models are not used.
§ 2509. Geology Description
(a) General. Each application shall include geologic information provided by, or under the direction of, a qualified Registered Professional Geologist in sufficient detail to assist in determining:
(1) the probable hydrologic consequences of the operation upon the quality and quantity of
surface water and ground water in the permit and adjacent areas, including the extent to which surface- and ground-water monitoring is necessary;
(2) all potentially acid- or toxic-forming strata down to and including the stratum immediately below the lowest coal seam to be mined; and
(3) whether reclamation as required by this Rule can be accomplished and whether the proposed operation has been designed to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area.
(b) Geologic information shall include, at a minimum, the following:
(1) a description of the geology of the proposed permit and adjacent areas down to and including the deeper of either the stratum immediately below the lowest coal seam to be mined or any aquifer below the lowest coal seam to be mined which may be adversely impacted by mining. The description shall include the areal and structural geology of the permit and adjacent areas and other parameters which influence the required reclamation, and the occurrence, availability, movement, quantity and quality of potentially impacted surface and ground waters. It shall be based on:
(A) the cross-sections, maps and plans required by § 2537;
(B) the information obtained under § 2509(b) and (c); and
(C) geologic literature and practices;
(2) analyses of samples collected from test borings, drill cores, or fresh, unweathered, uncontaminated samples from rock outcrops from the permit area, down to and including the deeper of either the stratum immediately below the lowest coal seam to be mined or any aquifer below the lowest seam to be mined which may be adversely impacted by mining. The analyses shall result in the following:
(A) logs showing the lithologic characteristics including physical properties and thickness of each stratum and location of ground water where occurring;
(B) chemical analyses identifying those strata that may contain acid- or toxic-forming or alkalinity-producing materials and determining their content, except that the Department may find that the analysis for alkalinity-producing materials is unnecessary; and
(C) chemical analyses of the coal seam for acid- or toxic-forming materials, including the total sulfur and pyritic sulfur, except that the Department may find that the analysis of pyritic sulfur content is unnecessary;
(D) a statement of the result of test borings or core sampling from the permit area. The statement shall include logs of the drill holes, the thickness of the coal seam found, and an analysis of the chemical properties of the coal. The sulphur content of any coal seam, chemical analysis of potentially acid or toxic forming sections of the overburden and a chemical analysis of the stratum lying immediately underneath the coal to be mined, except that the Permit Board may find by a written determination that this requirement is unnecessary.
(c) If determined to be necessary to protect the hydrologic balance or to meet the performance standards of these regulations, the Department may require the collection, analysis and description of geologic information in addition to that required by § 2509(b).
(d) An applicant may request the Permit Board to waive in whole or in part the requirements of § 2509(b)(2). The waiver may be granted only if the Permit Board finds in writing that the collection and analysis of such data are unnecessary because other equivalent information is available to the Permit Board in a satisfactory form pursuant to § 53-9- 25(c) of the Act.
§ 2511. Groundwater Information
(a) Ground-water information shall be provided by, or under the direction of, a qualified Registered Professional Geologist. The application shall include the location and ownership for the permit and adjacent areas of existing wells, springs and other ground-water resources, seasonal quality and quantity of ground water, and usage. Water quality descriptions shall include, at a minimum, total dissolved solids or specific conductance corrected to 25° C, pH, total iron and total manganese. Ground-water quantity descriptions shall include, at a minimum, approximate rates of discharge or usage and depth to the water in the coal seam, and each water-bearing stratum above and potentially impacted stratum below the coal seam.
(b) The Department also may require the applicant to provide a well location inventory for the permit and adjacent areas to identify any permitted or non-permitted wells, including information regarding the following:
(1) Specific location;
(2) ownership;
(3) well specifications such as construction, depth, diameter, screened interval, date constructed, status, use, etc.;
(4) geologic logs and ground water information; and
(5) permit number, if applicable.
§ 2513. Surface-Water Information
The application shall include the name, location, ownership and description of all surface-water bodies such as streams, lakes and impoundments, the location of any discharge into any surface-water body in the proposed permit and adjacent areas, and information on surface-water quality and quantity sufficient to demonstrate seasonal variation and water usage. Water quality descriptions shall include, at a minimum, baseline information on total suspended solids, total dissolved solids or specific conductance corrected to 25° C, pH, total iron and total manganese. Baseline acidity and alkalinity information shall be provided if there is a potential for acid drainage from the proposed mining operation. Water quantity descriptions shall include, at a minimum, baseline information on seasonal flow rates.
§ 2515. Supplemental Information
If the determination of the probable hydrologic consequences (PHC) required by § 2523 indicates that adverse impacts on or off the proposed permit area may occur to the hydrologic balance, or that acid-
forming or toxic-forming material is present that may result in the contamination of surface- or ground- water supplies, then information supplemental to that required under §§ 2511 and 2513 shall be provided to evaluate such probable hydrologic consequences and to plan remedial and reclamation activities. Such supplemental information may be based upon drilling, aquifer tests, hydrogeologic analysis of the water-bearing strata, flood flows, or analysis of other water quality or quantity characteristics which shall be prepared by, or under the direction of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist or Registered Professional Engineer as required by the Department.
§ 2517. Baseline Cumulative Impact Area Information
(a) Hydrologic and geologic information for the cumulative impact area necessary to assess the probable cumulative hydrologic impacts of the proposed operation and all anticipated mining on surface- and ground-water systems as required by § 2525 shall be obtained by the Department if available from appropriate federal or state agencies, provided this information is derived from data provided by or under the supervision of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist or Registered Professional Engineer as required by the Department.
(b) If the information is not available from such agencies, then the applicant may gather and submit this information to the Department as part of the permit application, provided this information is derived from data provided by or under the supervision of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist or Registered Professional Engineer as required by the Department.
(c) The permit shall not be approved until the necessary hydrologic and geologic information prepared by, or under the supervision of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist or Registered Professional Engineer as required by the Department, is available to the Permit Board.
§ 2519. Modeling
The use of modeling techniques, interpolation or statistical techniques may be included as part of the permit application, but actual surface- and ground-water information may be required by the Department for each site even when such techniques are used.
§ 2521. Alternative Water Source Information
If the PHC determination required by § 2523 indicates that the proposed mining operation may proximately result in contamination, diminution or interruption of an underground or surface source of water within the proposed permit or adjacent areas which is used for domestic, agricultural, industrial or other legitimate purpose, then the application shall contain information on water availability and alternative water sources, including the suitability of alternative water sources for existing premining uses and approved postmining land uses.
§ 2523. Probable Hydrologic Consequences Determination
(a) The application shall contain a determination of the probable hydrologic consequences (PHC) of all anticipated mining within the permit area upon the quality and quantity of surface water and ground water under seasonal flow conditions for the proposed permit and adjacent areas.
(b) The PHC determination shall be based on baseline hydrologic, geologic and other information collected for the permit application and may include data statistically representative of the site. The baseline hydrologic, geologic and other information provided in § 2523 shall have been
acquired, assimilated, or derived by, or under the supervision of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist.
(c) The PHC determination shall include findings on:
(1) whether adverse impacts may occur to the hydrologic balance;
(2) whether acid- or toxic-forming materials are present that could result in the contamination of surface-water or ground-water supplies;
(3) whether the proposed operation may proximately result in contamination, diminution or interruption of an underground or surface source of water within the proposed permit or adjacent areas which is used for domestic, agricultural, industrial or other legitimate purpose; and
(4) what impact the proposed operation will have on:
(A) sediment yield from the disturbed area;
(B) acidity, total suspended and dissolved solids and other important water quality parameters of local impact;
(C) flooding or streamflow alteration;
(D) ground- and surface-water availability; and
(E) other characteristics as required by the Department.
d. An application for a permit modification shall be reviewed by the Department to determine whether a new or updated PHC determination shall be required.
§ 2525. Cumulative Hydrologic Impact Assessment
(a) The Department shall provide an assessment of the probable cumulative hydrologic impacts (CHIA) of the proposed operation and all anticipated mining upon surface- and ground-water systems in the cumulative impact area. The CHIA shall be sufficient to determine, for purposes of permit approval, whether the proposed operation has been designed to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area. The Department may allow the applicant to submit data and analyses relevant to the CHIA with the permit application.
(b) An application for a permit modification shall be reviewed by the Department to determine whether a new or updated CHIA shall be required.
§ 2527. Climatological Information
(a) When requested by the Department, the application shall contain a statement of the climatological factors that are representative of the proposed permit area, including:
(1) the average seasonal precipitation;
(2) the average direction and velocity of prevailing winds; and
(3) seasonal temperature ranges.
(b) The Department may request such additional data as deemed necessary to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Subchapter.
§ 2529. Vegetation Information
(a) The permit application shall contain a map that delineates existing vegetative types and a description of the plant communities within the proposed permit area and within any proposed reference area. This description shall include information adequate to predict the potential for reestablishing vegetation.
(b) Sufficient adjacent areas shall be included on the map or aerial photograph to allow evaluation of vegetation as important habitat for fish and wildlife for those species of fish and wildlife identified under § 2713.
§ 2531. Soil Resources Information
(a) The applicant shall provide adequate soil survey information of the permit area consisting of the following: a map delineating different soils; soil identification; soil description; and present and potential productivity of existing soils.
(b) Where the applicant proposes to use selected overburden materials as a supplement or substitute for topsoil, the application shall provide results of the analyses, trials and tests required under § 5311.
§ 2533. Land Use Information
The application shall contain a statement of the condition, capability and productivity of the land within the proposed permit area, including:
(a) a map and supporting narrative of the uses of the land existing at the time of the filing of the application. If the premining use of the land was changed within five years before the anticipated date of beginning the proposed operations, the historic use of the land shall also be described. In the case of previously mined land, the use of the land prior to any mining shall also be described to the extent such information is available.
(b) a narrative of land capability and productivity, which analyzes the land-use description under § 2533(a) in conjunction with other environmental resources information required under this Rule. The narrative shall provide analyses of:
(1) the capability of the land before any mining to support a variety of uses, giving consideration to soil and foundation characteristics, topography, vegetative cover and the hydrology of the proposed permit area; and
(2) the productivity of the proposed permit area before mining, expressed as average yield of food, fiber, forage or wood products from such lands obtained under high levels of management. The productivity shall be determined by yield data or estimates for similar sites based on current data from the United States Department of Agriculture, state agricultural universities or appropriate state natural resource or agricultural agencies.
§ 2535. Maps: General Requirements
The permit application shall include maps showing:
(a) all boundaries of lands and names of present owners of record of those lands, both surface and subsurface, included in or contiguous to the permit area;
(b) the boundaries of land within the proposed permit area upon which the applicant has the legal right to enter and begin surface mining activities;
(c) the boundaries of all areas proposed to be affected over the estimated total life of the proposed surface mining activities, with a description of size, sequence and timing of the mining of subareas for which it is anticipated that additional permits will be sought;
(d) the location of all buildings on and within 1,000 feet of the proposed permit area, with identification of the current use of the buildings;
(e) the location of surface and subsurface man-made features within, passing through or passing over the proposed permit area including, but not limited to, major electric transmission lines, pipelines and agricultural drainage tile fields;
(f) the location and boundaries of any proposed reference areas for determining the success of revegetation;
(g) the locations of water supply intakes for current users of water flowing into, out of, and within a hydrologic area defined by the Department, and those surface waters which will receive discharges from affected areas in the proposed permit area;
(h) each public road located in or within 100 feet of the proposed permit area;
(i) the boundaries of any public park and locations of any cultural or historical resources listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and known archaeological sites within the permit or adjacent areas;
(j) each public or private cemetery or Indian burial ground located in or within 100 feet of the proposed permit area;
(k) any land within the proposed permit area and adjacent area which is within the boundaries of any units of the National System of Trails or the Wild and Scenic Rivers System, including study rivers designated under § 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act; and
(l) other relevant information required by the Department.
§ 2537. Cross-Sections, Maps and Plans
(a) The application shall include cross-sections, maps and plans showing:
(1) elevations and locations of test borings and core sampling;
(2) elevations and locations of monitoring stations used to gather data for water quality and
quantity, fish and wildlife, and air quality, if required, in preparation of the application;
(3) nature, depth and thickness of the coal seams to be mined, any coal or rider seams above the seam to be mined, each stratum of the overburden, and the stratum immediately below the lowest coal seam to be mined;
(4) all coal crop lines and the strike and dip of the coal to be mined within the proposed permit area;
(5) location and extent of known workings of active, inactive or abandoned underground mines, including mine openings to the surface within the proposed permit and adjacent areas;
(6) location and extent of subsurface water, if encountered, within the proposed permit or adjacent areas;
(7) location of surface-water bodies such as streams, lakes, ponds, springs, constructed or natural drains and irrigation ditches within the proposed permit and adjacent areas;
(8) location and extent of existing or previously surface-mined areas within the proposed permit area;
(9) location and dimensions of existing areas of spoil, waste and non-coal waste disposal, dams, embankments, other impoundments, and water treatment and air pollution control facilities within the proposed permit area;
(10) location, and depth if available, of gas and oil wells within the proposed permit area and water wells in the permit area and adjacent area;
(b) Geologic maps, plans and cross-sections included in a permit application which are required by this section shall be prepared by or under the direction of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist. Other maps, plans and cross-sections included in a permit application which are required by this Section shall be prepared by or under the direction of and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer and/or registered professional geologist, with assistance from experts in related fields such as land surveying and landscape architecture and shall be updated as required by the Department.
§ 2539. Prime Farmland Investigation
(a) All permit applications, whether or not prime farmland is present, shall include the results of a reconnaissance inspection of the proposed permit area to indicate whether prime farmland exists. The Department, in consultation with the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service, shall determine the nature and extent of the required reconnaissance inspection.
(b) Land shall not be considered prime farmland where the applicant can demonstrate one of the following:
(1) the land has not been historically used as cropland;
(2) the slope of the land is 10 percent or greater;
(3) other factors exist, such as a very rocky surface, or the land is frequently flooded during the growing season, more often than once in two years, and the flooding has reduced crop yields;
(4) on the basis of a soil survey of lands within the permit area, there are no soil map units that have been designated prime farmland by the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service.
(c) If the reconnaissance inspection establishes that no land within the proposed permit area is prime farmland historically used for cropland, the applicant shall submit a statement that no prime farmland is present. The statement shall identify the basis upon which such a conclusion was reached.
(d) If the investigation indicates that lands within the proposed permit area may be prime farmlands, the applicant shall contact the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service to determine if a soil survey exists for those lands and whether the applicable soil map units have been designated as prime farmlands. If no soil survey has been made for the lands within the proposed permit area, the applicant shall cause such a survey to be made:
(1) when a soil survey of lands within the proposed permit area contains soil map units which have been designated as prime farmlands, the applicant shall submit an application in accordance with § 2907 for such designated land;
(2) when a soil survey for lands within the proposed permit area contains soil map units which have not been designated as prime farmland after review by the United States Natural Resources Conservation Service, the applicant shall submit a request for negative determination for non-designated land with the permit application establishing compliance with § 2539(b).
Rule 27. Surface Mining Permit Applications: Minimum Requirements for Reclamation and Operation Plan
§ 2701. Responsibilities
It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide to the Department the information required by this Rule, except where specifically exempted in this Rule.
§ 2703. Operation Plan: General Requirements
Each application shall contain a description of the mining operations proposed to be conducted during the life of the mine within the proposed permit area including, at a minimum, the following:
(a) a narrative description of the type and method of coal mining procedures and proposed engineering techniques, anticipated annual and total production of coal, by tonnage, and the major equipment to be used for all aspects of those operations.
(b) a narrative explaining the construction, modification, use, maintenance, and removal of the following facilities (unless retention of such facilities is necessary for postmining land use as specified in § 53109):
(1) dams, embankments and other impoundments;
(2) overburden and topsoil handling and storage areas and structures;
(3) coal removal, handling, storage, cleaning, and transportation areas and structures;
(4) spoil, coal processing waste, and non-coal waste removal, handling, storage, transportation, and disposal areas and structures;
(5) mine facilities; and
(6) water and air pollution control facilities.
§ 2705. Operation Plan: Existing Structures
(a) Each application shall contain a description of each existing structure proposed to be used in connection with or to facilitate the surface coal mining and reclamation operation. The description shall include:
(1) location;
(2) plans of the structure which describe its current condition;
(3) approximate dates on which construction of the existing structure was begun and completed; and
(4) a showing, including relevant monitoring data or other evidence, whether the structure meets the performance standards of Subchapter 2.5 (Permanent Program Standards).
(b) Each application shall contain a compliance plan for each existing structure proposed to be modified or reconstructed for use in connection with or to facilitate the surface coal mining and reclamation operation. The compliance plan shall include:
(1) design specifications for the modification or reconstruction of the structure to meet the design and performance standards of Subchapter 2.5;
(2) a construction schedule which shows dates for beginning and completing interim steps and final reconstruction;
(3) provisions for monitoring the structure during and after modification or reconstruction to ensure that the performance standards of Subchapter 2.5 are met; and
(4) a showing that the risk of harm to the environment or to public health or safety is not significant during the period of modification or reconstruction.
§ 2707. Operation Plan: Blasting
Each application shall contain a blasting plan for the proposed permit area explaining how the applicant intends to comply with the requirements of §§ 5347-5357 and including the following:
(a) information setting forth the limitations the operator will meet with regard to ground vibration and airblast, the bases for those limitations, and the methods to be applied in controlling the adverse effects of blasting operations;
(b) types and approximate amounts of explosives to be used for each type of blasting operation to be conducted;
(c) description of procedures and plans for recording and retention of information on the following during blasting:
(1) drilling patterns, including size, number, depths and spacing of holes;
(2) charge and packing of holes;
(3) types of fuses and detonation controls; and
(4) sequence and timing of firing holes;
(d) description of blasting warning and site access control equipment and procedures;
(e) description of types, capabilities, sensitivities and locations of use of any blast monitoring equipment and procedures proposed to be used;
(f) description of plans for recording and reporting to the Department the results of preblasting surveys, if required;
(g) description of unavoidable hazardous conditions for which deviations from the blasting schedule will be needed under § 5351(a)(3);
(h) blasting operations within 500 feet of active underground mines require approval of the state and federal regulatory authorities concerned with the health and safety of underground miners.
§ 2709. Operation Plan: Maps and Plans
Each application shall contain maps and plans of the proposed permit and adjacent areas as follows:
(a) The maps and plans shall show the lands proposed to be affected throughout the operation and any change in a facility or feature to be caused by the proposed operations, if the facility or feature was shown under §§ 2535-2537.
(b) The following shall be shown for the proposed permit area:
(1) buildings, utility corridors and facilities to be used;
(2) the area of land to be affected within the proposed permit area, according to the sequence of mining and reclamation;
(3) each area of land for which a performance bond or other equivalent guarantee will be posted under Subchapter 2.4;
(4) each coal storage, cleaning and loading area;
(5) each topsoil, spoil, coal waste and non-coal waste storage area;
(6) each water diversion, collection, conveyance, treatment, storage and discharge facility to be used;
(7) each air pollution collection and control facility;
(8) each source of waste and each waste disposal facility relating to coal processing or pollution control;
(9) each facility to be used to protect and enhance fish and wildlife and related environmental values;
(10) each explosive storage and handling facility; and
(11) location of each sedimentation pond, permanent water impoundment, coal processing waste bank, and coal processing waste dam and embankment, in accordance with § 2725, and fill area for the disposal of excess spoil in accordance with § 2735.
(c) Maps, plans and cross-sections required under § 2709(b)(4),(5),(6),(10) and (11) shall be prepared by, or under the direction of, and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer and/or qualified registered professional geologist, with assistance from experts in related fields such as land surveying and landscape architecture, except that maps, plans and cross-sections for sedimentation ponds and spoil disposal facilities may only be prepared by a qualified registered professional engineer and/or registered professional geologist.
§ 2711. Air Pollution Control Plan
The application shall contain an air pollution control plan which includes the following:
(a) an air quality monitoring program, if required by the Department, to provide sufficient data to evaluate the effectiveness of the fugitive dust control practices under § 2711(b) to comply with applicable federal and state air quality standards;
(b) a plan for fugitive dust control practices, as required under § 5381.
§ 2713. Fish and Wildlife Plan
(a) Resource Information. Each application shall include fish and wildlife resource information for the permit area and adjacent area.
(1) The scope and level of detail for such information shall be determined by the Department in consultation with state and federal agencies with responsibilities for fish and wildlife and shall be sufficient to design the protection and enhancement plan required under § 2713(b).
(2) Site-specific resource information necessary to address the respective species or habitats shall be required when the permit area or adjacent area is likely to include:
(A) listed or proposed endangered or threatened species of plants or animals or their
critical habitats listed by the secretary under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), or those species or habitats protected by similar state statutes;
(B) habitats of unusually high value for fish and wildlife such as important streams, wetlands, riparian areas, cliffs supporting raptors, areas offering special shelter or protection, migration routes, or reproduction and wintering areas; or
(C) other species or habitats identified through agency consultation as requiring special protection under state or federal law.
(b) Protection and Enhancement Plan. Each application shall include a description of how, to the extent possible using the best technology currently available, the operator will minimize disturbances and adverse impacts on fish and wildlife and related environmental values, including compliance with the Endangered Species Act, during the surface coal mining and reclamation operations and how enhancement of these resources will be achieved where practicable. This description shall:
(1) be consistent with the requirements of § 5383;
(2) apply, at a minimum, to species and habitats identified under § 2713(a); and
(3) include:
(A) protective measures that will be used during the active mining phase of operation. Such measures may include the establishment of buffer zones, the selective location and special design of haul roads and powerlines, and the monitoring of surface water quality and quantity;
(B) enhancement measures that will be used during the reclamation and postmining phase of operation to develop aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Such measures may include restoration of streams and other wetlands, retention of ponds and impoundments, establishment of vegetation for wildlife food and cover, and the replacement of perches and nest boxes. Where the plan does not include enhancement measures, a statement shall be given explaining why enhancement is not practicable.
(c) Fish and Wildlife Service Review. Upon request, the Department shall provide the resource information required under § 2713(a) and the protection and enhancement plan required under § 2713(b) to the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Regional or Field Office for their review. This information shall be provided within 10 days of receipt of the request from the Service.
§ 2715. Reclamation Plan: General Requirements
(a) Each application shall contain a plan for reclamation of the lands within the proposed permit area, showing how the applicant will comply with § 53-9- 45 of the act, Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations, and the environmental protection performance standards of the regulatory program. The plan shall include, at a minimum, all information required under Rule 27.
(b) Each plan shall contain the following information for the proposed permit area:
(1) a detailed timetable for the completion of each major step in the reclamation plan;
(2) a detailed estimate of the cost of reclamation of the proposed operations required to be covered by a performance bond under Sub chapter 2.4 with supporting calculations for the estimates;
(3) a plan for backfilling, soil stabilization, compacting and grading, with contour maps or cross-sections that show the anticipated final surface configuration of the proposed permit area, in accordance with §§ 5389-5395;
(4) a plan for removal, storage, and redistribution of topsoil, subsoil, and other material to meet the requirements of §§ 5309 and 5311. A demonstration of the suitability of topsoil substitutes or supplements under § 5311(b) of this Rule shall be based upon analysis of the thickness of soil horizons, total depth, texture, percent coarse fragments, pH, and areal extent of the different kinds of soils. The Department may require other chemical and physical analyses, field-site trials, or greenhouse tests if determined to be necessary or desirable to demonstrate the suitability of the topsoil substitutes or supplements.
(5) a plan for revegetation as required in §§ 5397-53103, including, but not limited to, descriptions of the:
(A) schedule of revegetation;
(B) species and amounts per acre of seeds and seedlings to be used;
(C) methods to be used in planting and seeding;
(D) mulching techniques;
(E) irrigation, if appropriate, and pest and disease control measures, if any;
(F) measures proposed to be used to determine the success of revegetation as required in § 53103; and
(G) a soil testing plan for evaluation of the results of topsoil handling and reclamation procedures related to revegetation.
(6) a description of the measures to be used to maximize the use and conservation of the coal resource as required in § 5345;
(7) a description of measures to be employed to ensure that all debris, acid-forming and toxic-forming materials, and materials constituting a fire hazard are disposed of in accordance with §§ 5375 and 5391, and a description of the contingency plans which have been developed to preclude sustained combustion of such materials;
(8) a description, including appropriate cross-sections and maps, of the measures to be used to seal or manage mine openings. Further, a description, including appropriate cross sections and maps, of the measures to be used to seal or plug, case or manage exploration holes, other bore holes, wells and other openings within the proposed permit area shall be prepared by, or under the direction of, a qualified registered professional geologist
pursuant to §§ 5303 and 5307; and
(9) a description of steps to be taken to comply with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. Sec. 7401 et seq.), the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.), and other applicable air and water quality laws and regulations and health and safety standards.
(10) any other information required by § 53-9- 29 of the Act.
§ 2717. Reclamation Plan: Protection of Hydrologic Balance
The application shall include a plan, with maps and descriptions, indicating how the relevant requirements of Rule 53, including §§ 5313-5343, will be met. The plan shall be specific to the local hydrologic conditions. It shall contain the steps to be taken during mining and reclamation through bond release to minimize disturbances to the hydrologic balance within the permit and adjacent areas; to prevent material damage outside the permit area; to meet applicable federal and state water quality laws and regulations; and to protect the rights of present water users. The plan shall include the measures to be taken to: avoid acid or toxic drainage; prevent, to the extent possible using the best technology currently available, additional contributions of suspended solids to streamflow; provide water-treatment facilities when needed; control drainage; restore approximate premining recharge capacity; and protect or replace rights of present water users. The plan shall specifically address any potential adverse hydrologic consequences identified in the PHC determination prepared under § 2523 and shall include preventive and remedial measures.
§ 2719. Groundwater Monitoring Plan
(a) The application shall include a ground-water monitoring plan based upon the PHC determination required under § 2523 and the analysis of all baseline hydrologic, geologic and other information in the permit application. The plan shall provide for the monitoring of parameters that relate to the suitability of the ground water for current and approved postmining land uses and to the objectives for protection of the hydrologic balance set forth in § 2717. It shall identify the quantity and quality parameters to be monitored, sampling frequency and site locations. It shall describe how the data may be used to determine the impacts of the operation upon the hydrologic balance. At a minimum, total dissolved solids or specific conductance corrected to 25° C, pH, total iron, total manganese and water levels shall be monitored and data submitted to the Department at least every three months for each monitoring location. The Department may require additional monitoring.
(b) If an applicant can demonstrate by the use of the PHC determination and other available information that a particular water-bearing stratum in the proposed permit and adjacent areas is not one which serves as an aquifer which significantly ensures the hydrologic balance within the cumulative impact area, then monitoring of that stratum may be waived by the Permit Board.
§ 2721. Surface-Water Monitoring Plan
(a) The application shall include a surface-water monitoring plan based upon the PHC determination required under § 2523 and the analysis of all baseline hydrologic, geologic, and other information in the permit application. The plan shall provide for the monitoring of parameters that relate to the suitability of the surface water for current and approved postmine land uses and to the objectives for protection of the hydrologic balance as set forth in § 2717, as well as the effluent limitations found at 40 CFR Part 434.
(b) The plan shall identify the surface-water quantity and quality parameters to be monitored, sampling frequency and site locations. It shall describe how the data may be used to determine the impacts of the operation upon the hydrologic balance.
(1) At all monitoring locations in the surface-water bodies such as streams, lakes and impoundments that are potentially impacted or into which water will be discharged and at upstream monitoring locations, the total dissolved solids or specific conductance corrected to 25° C, total suspended solids, pH, total iron, total manganese and flow shall be monitored.
(2) For point-source discharges, monitoring shall be conducted in accordance with 40 CFR Parts 122, 123 and 434 and as required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting authority Department’s Office of Pollution Control.
(c) The monitoring reports shall be submitted to the Department every three months. The Department may require additional monitoring.
§ 2723. Reclamation Plan: Post-Mining Land Uses
(a) Each plan shall contain a detailed description of the proposed use, following reclamation of the land within the proposed permit area, including a discussion of the utility and capacity of the reclaimed land to support a variety of alternative uses, and the relationship of the proposed use to existing land use policies and plans. This description shall explain:
(1) how the proposed postmining land use is to be achieved and the necessary support activities which may be needed to achieve the proposed land use;
(2) where a land use different from the pre-mining land use is proposed, all materials needed for approval of the alternative use under § 53109;
(3) the consideration which has been given to making all of the proposed surface mining activities consistent with surface owner plans and applicable state and local land use plans and programs.
(b) The description shall be accompanied by a copy of the comments concerning the proposed use by the legal or equitable owner of record of the surface of the proposed permit area and the state and local government agencies which would have to initiate, implement, approve or authorize the proposed use of the land following reclamation.
§ 2725. Reclamation Plan: Siltation Structures, Impoundments, Banks, Dams and Embankments
(a) General. Each application shall include a general plan and a detailed design plan for each proposed siltation structure, water impoundment, and coal processing waste bank, dam or embankment within the proposed permit area.
(1) Each general plan shall:
(A) be prepared by, or under the direction of, and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer, and a registered professional geologist with assistance from
experts in related fields such as land surveying and landscape architecture;
(B) contain a description, map and cross-section of the structure and its location;
(C) contain preliminary hydrologic and geologic information prepared by, or under the direction of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist as required to assess the hydrologic impact of the structure;
(D) contain a survey describing the potential effect on the structure from subsidence of the subsurface strata resulting from past underground mining operations if underground mining has occurred; and
(E) contain a certification statement which includes a schedule setting forth the dates that any detailed design plans for structures that are not submitted with the general plan will be submitted to the Department. The detailed design plan for a structure must be approved by the Department before construction of the structure begins.
(2) Impoundments meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Technical Release No. 60 (210-VI-TR60, Oct. 1985), "Earth Dams and Reservoirs," Technical Release No. 60 (TR-60) shall comply with the requirements of this section for structures that meet or exceed the size of other criteria of the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). The technical release is hereby incorporated by reference. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Part 51. Copies may be obtained from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161, order No. PB 87-157509/AS. Copies can be inspected at the OSM Headquarters Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Administrative Record, Room 210, 1951 Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(3) Each detailed design plan for a structure that meets or exceeds the size or other criteria of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, 30 CFR 77.216(a), shall:
(A) be prepared by, or under the direction of, and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer, experienced in the design of similar earth and waste structures, with assistance from experts in related fields such as geology, land surveying and landscape architecture;
(B) include any geotechnical investigation, design and construction requirements for the structure;
(C) describe the operation and maintenance requirements for each structure; and
(D) describe the timetable and plans to remove each structure, if appropriate.
(4) Each detailed design plan for a structure not included in § 2725(a)(2) or § 2725(a)(3) shall:
(A) be prepared by, or under the direction of, and certified by a qualified registered
professional engineer, experienced in the design of similar earth and waste structures;
(B) include any design and construction requirements for the structure, including any required geotechnical information;
(C) describe the operation and maintenance requirements for each structure; and
(D) describe the timetable and plans to remove each structure, if appropriate.
(b) Siltation Structures. Siltation structures, whether temporary or permanent, shall be designed in compliance with the requirements of § 5321. Any siltation structure or earthen structure which will remain on the proposed permit area as a permanent water impoundment shall also be designed to comply with the requirements of § 5327. Each plan shall, at a minimum, comply with the requirements of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, 30 CFR 77.216-1 and 77.216-2.
(c) Permanent and Temporary Impoundments. Permanent and temporary impoundments shall be designed to comply with the requirements of § 5327. Each plan shall comply with the requirements of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, 30 CFR 77.216-1 and 77.216-2. The plan required to be submitted to the District Manager of MSHA under 30 CFR 77.216 shall be submitted to the Department as part of the permit application in accordance with § 2725(a).
(d) Coal Processing Waste Banks. Coal processing waste banks shall be designed to comply with the requirements of §§ 5369-5377.
(e) Coal Processing Waste Dams and Embankments. Coal processing waste dams and embankments shall be designed to comply with the requirements of §§ 5369-5377. Each plan shall comply with the requirements of the Mine Safety and Health Administration, 30 CFR 77.216-1 and 77.216-2, and shall contain the results of a geotechnical investigation of the proposed dam or embankment foundation area, to determine the structural competence of the foundation which will support the proposed dam or embankment structure and the impounded material. The geotechnical investigation shall be planned and supervised by a registered professional engineer or registered professional geologist, according to the following:
(1) the number, location and depth of borings and test pits shall be determined using current prudent engineering practice for the size of the dam or embankment, quantity of material to be impounded, and subsurface conditions;
(2) the character of the overburden and bedrock, the proposed abutment sites, and any adverse geotechnical conditions which may affect the particular dam, embankment or reservoir site shall be considered and reviewed by both a qualified, registered professional engineer and registered professional geologist;
(3) all springs, seepage, and ground-water flow observed or anticipated during wet periods in the area of the proposed dam or embankment shall be identified on each plan;
(4) consideration shall be provided by both a qualified, registered professional engineer and registered professional geologist with respect to the possibility of mudflows, rock-debris falls or other landslides into the dam, embankment or impounded material.
(f) If the structure meets the Class B or C criteria for dams in TR-60 or meets the size or other criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a), each plan under § § 2725(b),(c) and (e) shall include a stability analysis of each structure. The stability analysis shall include, but not be limited to, strength parameters, pore pressures and long-term seepage conditions. The plan shall also contain a description of each engineering design assumption and calculation with a discussion of each alternative considered in selecting the specific design parameters and construction methods.
§ 2727. Reclamation Plan: Surface Mining Near Underground Mining
For surface mining activities within the proposed permit area to be conducted within 500 feet of an underground mine, the application shall describe the measures to be used to comply with § 5367.
§ 2729. Diversions
Each application shall contain descriptions, including maps and cross-sections, of stream channel diversions and other diversions to be constructed within the proposed permit area to achieve compliance with § 5317.
§ 2731. Protection of Public Parks and Historic Places
(a) For any publicly owned parks or any places listed on the National Register of Historic Places that may be adversely affected by the proposed operation, each plan shall describe the measures to be used:
(1) to prevent adverse impacts, or
(2) if valid existing rights exist or joint agency approval is to be obtained under § 3114(d), to minimize adverse impacts.
(b) The Permit Board may require the applicant to protect historic or archeological properties listed on or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places through appropriate mitigation and treatment measures. Appropriate mitigation and treatment measures may be required to be taken after permit issuance provided that the required measures are completed before the properties are affected by any mining operation.
§ 2733. Relocation or Use of Public Roads
Each application shall describe, with appropriate maps and cross-sections, the measures to be used to ensure that the interests of the public and landowners affected are protected if, under § 1107(d), the applicant seeks to have the Permit Board approve conduction of the proposed surface mining activities within 100 feet of the right-of-way line of any public road, except where mine access or haul roads join that right-of-way, or seeks approval for relocating a public road.
§ 2735. Disposal of Excess Spoil
(a) Each application shall contain descriptions, including appropriate maps and cross-sections, of the proposed disposal site and design of the spoil disposal structures according to §§ 5359-5365. These plans shall describe the geotechnical investigation, design, construction, operation, maintenance and removal, if appropriate, of the site and structures.
(b) Each application shall contain the results of a geotechnical investigation of the proposed disposal site, including the following:
(1) the character of bedrock and any adverse geologic conditions in the disposal area;
(2) a survey identifying all springs, seepage, and ground-water flow observed or anticipated during wet periods in the area of the disposal site;
(3) a survey of the potential effects of subsidence of the subsurface strata due to past and future mining operations;
(4) a technical description of the rock materials to be utilized in the construction of those disposal structures containing rock chimney cores or underlain by a rock drainage blanket; and
(5) a stability analysis including, but not limited to, strength parameters, pore parameters, pore pressures and long-term seepage conditions. These data shall be accompanied by a description of all engineering design assumptions and calculations and the alternatives considered in selecting the specific design specifications and methods.
(c) If, under § 5359(d), rock-toe buttresses or key-way cuts are required, the application shall include the following:
(1) the number, location and depth of borings or test pits which shall be determined with respect to the size of the spoil disposal structure and subsurface conditions; and
(2) engineering specifications utilized to design the rock-toe buttress or key-way cuts which shall be determined in accordance with § 2735(b)(5).
§ 2737. Road Systems
(a) Plans and Drawings. Each applicant for a surface coal mining and reclamation permit shall submit plans and drawings for each road, as defined in § 105, to be constructed, used or maintained within the proposed permit area in accordance with §§ 5313-5343, § 53111 and § 53113. The plans and drawings shall:
(1) include a map, appropriate cross-sections, design drawings and specifications for road widths, gradients, surfacing materials, cuts, fill embankments, culverts, bridges, drainage ditches, low-water crossings and drainage structures;
(2) contain the drawings and specifications of each proposed road that is located in the channel of an intermittent or perennial stream, as necessary for approval of the road by the Permit Board in accordance with §§ 5313-5345, § 53111, and § 53113;
(3) contain the drawings and specifications for each proposed ford of perennial or intermittent streams that is used as a temporary route, as necessary for approval of the ford by the Permit Board in accordance with §§ 5313-5343 and § 53113;
(4) contain a description of measures to be taken to obtain approval of the Permit Board for alteration or relocation of a natural stream channel under § 5317 and § 53113;
(5) contain the drawings and specifications for each low-water crossing of perennial or intermittent stream channels so that the Permit Board can maximize the protection of the stream in accordance with §§ 5313-5343; and
(6) describe the plans to remove and reclaim each road that would not be retained under an approved postmining land use, and the schedule for this removal and reclamation.
(b) Primary Road Certification. The plans and drawings for each primary road shall be prepared by, or under the direction of, and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer as meeting the requirements of this Rule; current, prudent engineering practices; and any design criteria established by the Department.
(c) Standard Design Plans. The Department may establish engineering design standards for primary roads through the state program approval process, in lieu of engineering tests, to establish compliance with the minimum static safety factor of 1.3 for all embankments specified in § 53113.
§ 2739. Support Facilities
Each applicant for a surface coal mining and reclamation permit shall submit a description, plans and drawings for each support facility to be constructed, used or maintained within the proposed permit area. The plans and drawings shall include a map, appropriate cross-sections, design drawings and specifications sufficient to demonstrate compliance with § 53117 for each facility.
Rule 29. Requirements for Permits for Special Categories of Mining
§ 2901. Experimental Practices Mining
(a) Experimental practices provide a variance from environmental protection performance standards of the act, Subchapter 2.5, and the regulatory program for experimental or research purposes, or to allow an alternative postmining land use, and may be undertaken if they are approved by the Commission and the director of the Office of Surface Mining and if they are incorporated in a permit or permit modification issued by the Permit Board in accordance with the requirements of Subchapter 2.3.
(b) An application for an experimental practice shall contain descriptions, maps, plans and data which show:
(1) the nature of the experimental practice, including a description of the performance standards for which variances are requested, the duration of the experimental practice, and any special monitoring which will be conducted;
(2) how use of the experimental practice encourages advances in mining and reclamation technology or allows a postmining land use for industrial, commercial, residential or public use (including recreation facilities) on an experimental basis;
(3) that the experimental practice:
(A) is at least as environmentally protective during and after mining operations as
those required by these regulations;
(B) the mining operations approved for particular land-use or other purposes are not larger or more numerous than necessary to determine the effectiveness and economic feasibility of the experimental practices;
(C) do not reduce the protection afforded public health and safety below that provided by these regulations.
(4) that the applicant will conduct monitoring of the effects of the experimental practice. The monitoring program shall ensure the collection, analysis and reporting of reliable data that are sufficient to enable the Department and the director of the Office of Surface Mining to:
(A) evaluate the effectiveness of the experimental practice; and
(B) identify, at the earliest possible time, potential risk to the environment and public health and safety which may be caused by the experimental practice during and after mining.
(c) Applications for experimental practices shall comply with the public notice requirements of § 53-9- 27 and § 53-9-37 of the Act and §§ 3103-3111.
(d) No application for an experimental practice under this Section shall be approved until the Commission first finds in writing and the director of the Office of Surface Mining then concurs that:
(1) the experimental practice encourages advances in mining and reclamation technology or allows a postmining land use for industrial, commercial, residential or public use (including recreational facilities) on an experimental basis;
(2) the experimental practice is potentially more, or at least as, environmentally protective, during and after mining operations, as would otherwise be required by standards promulgated under Subchapter 2.5;
(3) the mining operations approved for a particular land use or other purpose are not larger or more numerous than necessary to determine the effectiveness and economic feasibility of the experimental practice; and
(4) the experimental practice does not reduce the protection afforded public health and safety below that provided by standards promulgated under Subchapter 2.5.
(e) Experimental practices granting variances from the special environmental protection performances standards of §§ 53-9- 45 and 53-9- 47 of the act applicable to prime farmland shall be approved only after consultation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service.
(f) Each person undertaking an experimental practice shall conduct the periodic monitoring, recording and reporting program set forth in the application, and shall satisfy such additional requirements as the Permit Board or the director may impose to ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environment.
(g) Each experimental practice shall be reviewed by the Department at a frequency set forth in the approved permit, but no less frequently than every 2
/2 years. After review, the Permit Board may require such reasonable modifications of the experimental practice as are necessary to ensure that the activities fully protect the environment and the public health and safety. Copies of the decision of the Permit Board shall be sent to the permittee and shall be subject to the provisions for administrative and judicial review of Rule 33 and § 53-9- 77 of the Act.
(h) Revisions or modifications to an experimental practice shall be processed in accordance with the requirements of § 3505. Any modification which proposes significant alterations in the experimental practice shall, at a minimum, be subject to the notice, hearing and public participation requirements of §§ 3103-3111, § 53-9- 37 of the Act and concurrence by the director of the Office of Surface Mining. Revisions shall not require concurrence by the director of the Office of Surface Mining, public notice, hearing, or public participation.
§ 2902. Lands Eligible for Remining
(a) This section contains permitting requirements to implement § 3130. Any person who submits a permit application to conduct a surface coal mining operation on lands eligible for remining must comply with this section.
(b) Any application for a permit under this section shall be made according to all requirements of these regulations applicable to surface coal mining and reclamation operations. In addition, the application shall:
(1) To the extent not otherwise addressed in the permit application, identify potential environmental and safety problems related to prior mining activity at the site and that could be reasonably anticipated to occur. This identification shall be based on a due diligence investigation which shall include visual observations at the site, a record review of past mining at the site, and environmental sampling tailored to current site conditions.
(2) With regard to potential environmental and safety problems referred to in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, describe the mitigative measures that will be taken to ensure that the applicable reclamation requirements of this regulatory program can be met.
§ 2903. Steep Slope Mining
(a) This Section applies to any person who conducts or intends to conduct steep slope surface coal mining and reclamation operations, except:
(1) where an operator proposes to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations on flat or gently rolling terrain, leaving a plain or predominantly flat area, but on which an occasional steep slope is encountered as the mining operation proceeds; or
(2) to the extent that a person obtains a permit incorporating alternative requirements under § 2905.
(b) Any application for a permit for surface coal mining and reclamation operations covered by this Section shall contain sufficient information to establish that the operations will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of § 53-9- 45(3) and § 5703.
(c) No permit shall be issued for any operations covered by this Section, unless the Permit Board finds, in writing, that in addition to meeting all other requirements of this Subchapter, the operation will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of § 5703.
§ 2905. Permits Incorporating Alternatives from Approximate Original Contour Restoration Requirements for Steep Slope Mining
(a) This Section applies to steep slope surface coal mining and reclamation operations under a regulatory program where the operation is not to be reclaimed to achieve the approximate original contour required by §§ 5389-5395 and § 5703.
(b) The objective of this Section is to allow for an alternative to approximate original contour restoration pursuant to § 53-9- 45 (4) requirements on steep slopes for surface coal mining and reclamation operations to:
(1) improve watershed control of lands within the permit area and on adjacent lands; and
(2) make land within the permit area, after reclamation, suitable for an industrial, commercial, residential or public use, including recreational facilities.
(c) The Permit Board may issue a permit for surface mining activities incorporating an alternative to the requirement for restoration of the affected lands to their approximate original contour only if it first finds, in writing, on the basis of a complete application, that all of the following requirements and the applicable requirements of § 53-9- 45 are met:
(1) the applicant has demonstrated that the purpose of the request for an alternative is to make the lands to be affected within the permit area suitable for an industrial, commercial, residential or public postmining land use;
(2) the proposed use, after consultation with the appropriate land-use planning agencies, if any, constitutes an equal or better economic or public use;
(3) the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the requirements for acceptable alternative postmining land uses of § 53109;
(4) the applicant has demonstrated that the watershed of lands within the proposed permit area and adjacent areas will be improved by the operations. The watershed will only be deemed improved if:
(A) there will be a reduction in the amount of total suspended solids or other pollutants discharged to ground water or surface water from the permit area as compared to such discharges prior to mining, so as to improve public or private uses or the ecology of such waters; or, there will be reduced flood hazards within the watershed containing the permit area by reduction of the peak flow discharges from precipitation events or thaws;
(B) the total volume of flows from the proposed permit area, during every season of the year, will not vary in a way that adversely affects the ecology of any surface water or any existing or planned use of surface water or ground water;
(C) the Department’s Office of Pollution Control approves the plan;
(5) the applicant has demonstrated that the owner of the surface of the lands within the permit area has knowingly requested, in writing, as part of the application, that an alternative requirement be allowed. The request shall be made separately from any surface owner consent given for the operations under § 2309 and shall show an understanding that the alternative requirement could not be allowed without the surface owner's request;
(6) the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed operations will be conducted in compliance with the requirements of § 53109(d);
(7) after notification of appropriate federal, state and local governmental agencies providing an opportunity to comment on the proposed use and consultation with the appropriate land use planning agencies, if any, the proposed postmining use of the affected land is deemed by the Permit Board to constitute an equal or better economic or public use of the land as compared with the premining use;
(8) the proposed postmining land use is compatible with adjacent land uses and state and local land use planning, economically practical for the proposed use and designed and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer in conformance with professional standards established to assure the stability, drainage and configuration necessary for the intended use of the site;
(9) the watershed of the affected land is improved;
(10) the permittee shall place only the necessary amount of spoil off the mine bench to achieve the planned postmining land use and insure stability of the spoil retained on the bench.
(11) all other requirements of the act and these regulations will be met by the proposed operations.
(d) If an alternative requirement is allowed under this Section:
(1) the requirements of § 53109(d) shall be made a specific condition of the permit;
(2) the permit shall be specifically marked as containing an alternative requirement from approximate original contour.
(e) Any permits allowing an alternative requirement issued under this Section shall be reviewed by the Department to evaluate the progress and development of the mining activities, to establish that the operator is proceeding in accordance with the terms of the alternative requirement:
(1) within the sixth month preceding the third year from the date of its issuance;
(2) before each permit renewal; and
(3) not later than the middle of each permit term.
(f) If the permittee demonstrates to the Department at any of the times specified in § 2905(e) that the operations involved have been and continue to be conducted in compliance with the terms
and conditions of the permit, the requirements of the act and these regulations, the review required at that time need not be held.
(g) The terms and conditions of a permit allowing an alternative requirement under this Section may be modified at any time by the Permit Board, if it determines that more stringent measures are necessary to ensure that the operations involved are conducted in compliance with the requirements of the act and these regulations.
§ 2907. Prime Farmlands
This section applies to any person who conducts or intends to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime farmlands historically used for cropland.
(a) Application Contents for Prime Farmland. If land within the proposed permit area is identified as prime farmland under § 2539, the applicant shall submit a plan for the mining and restoration of the land. Each plan shall contain, as a minimum:
(1) a soil survey of the permit area according to the standards of the National Cooperative Soil Survey and in accordance with the procedures set forth in U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436 "Soil Taxonomy" (U.S. Soil Conservation Service, 1975), as amended on March 22, 1982, and October 5, 1982, and Handbook 18, "Soil Survey Manual" (U.S. Soil Conservation Service, 1951), as amended on December 18, 1979, May 7, 1980, May 9, 1980, September 11, 1980, June 9, 1981, June 29, 1981, and November 16, 1982. The U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service establishes the standards of the National Cooperative Soil Survey and maintains a National Soils Handbook which gives current acceptable procedures for conducting soil surveys. This National Soils Handbook is available for review at area and state NRCS offices;
(A) U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbooks 436 and 18 are incorporated by reference as they exist on the date of adoption of this Section. Notices of changes made to these publications will be periodically published by OSM in the Federal Register. The handbooks are on file and available for inspection at the OSM Central Office, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1951 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C., at each OSM Regional Coordinating Center and Field Office, and at the Department. Copies of these documents are also available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C. 20402, Stock Nos. 001-000-04612-8 and 001-000-04611-0, respectively. In addition, these documents are available for inspection at the national, state and area offices of the Natural Resource Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, suite 700, Washington, D.C. Incorporation by reference provisions were approved by the director of the Federal Register on June 29, 1981;
(B) the soil survey shall include a description of soil mapping units and a representative soil profile as determined by the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service, including, but not limited to, soil-horizon depths, pH, and the range of soil densities for each prime farmland soil unit within the permit area. Other representative soil-profile descriptions from the locality, prepared according to the standards of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, may be used if their use is approved by the State Conservationist, U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service;
(2) a plan for soil reconstruction, replacement, and stabilization for the purpose of establishing the technological capability of the mine operator to comply with the requirements of Rule 55;
(3) the moist bulk density of each major horizon of each prime farmland soil in the permit area. The moist bulk density shall be determined by laboratory tests of samples taken from within the permit area according to procedures set forth in "Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedures for Collecting Soil Samples" (Soil Survey Investigations Report No. 1, United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1972). Other standard on-site methods of estimating moist bulk density may be used where these methods correct for particle size distribution and moisture content and are approved by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. In lieu of laboratory data from samples taken within the permit area, the Department may permit use of moist bulk density values representing the soil series where such values have been established by the Natural Resources Conservation Service;
(A) the location of areas to be used for the separate stockpiling of the soil and plans for soil stabilization before redistribution;
(B) if applicable, documentation, such as agricultural school studies or other specific data from comparable areas, that supports the use of other suitable material, instead of the A, B or C soil horizon, to obtain on the restored area equivalent or higher levels of yield as on non-mined prime farmlands in the surrounding area under equivalent levels of management;
(C) plans for seeding or cropping the final graded disturbed land and the conservation practices to be used to adequately control erosion and sedimentation and restoration of an adequate soil moisture regime, during the period from completion of regrading until release of the performance bond or equivalent guarantee under Subchapter 2.4. Proper adjustments for seasons must be proposed so that final graded land is not exposed to erosion during seasons when vegetation or conservation practices cannot be established due to weather conditions;
(D) available agricultural school studies or other scientific data for areas with comparable soils, climate and management (including water management) that demonstrate that the proposed method of reclamation will achieve, within a reasonable time, equivalent or higher levels of yield after mining as existed before mining;
(E) the productivity prior to mining, including the average yield of food, fiber, forage or wood products obtained under a high level of management;
(F) in all cases, soil productivity for prime farmlands shall be returned to equivalent levels of yield as non-mined prime farmland of the same soil type in the surrounding area under equivalent management practices as determined from the soil survey performed pursuant to § 2907(a)(1).
(b) Consultation with Secretary of Agriculture.
(1) Before any permit is issued for areas that include prime farmlands, the Department shall consult with the State Conservationist of the U. S. Natural Resources Conservation Service.
(2) The Department shall obtain a list of prime farmland soils, their location, physical and chemical characteristics, crop yields, and associated data necessary to support adequate prime farmland soil descriptions.
(3) The Department shall request the assistance of the State Conservationist in describing the nature and extent of the reconnaissance inspection required in § 2539.
(4) The Department shall submit to the State Conservationist for review and comment on, the proposed method of soil reconstruction in the plan submitted under § 2907(a). If the State Conservationist considers those methods to be inadequate, he or she may suggest revisions to the Department which result in more complete and adequate reconstruction.
(c) Issuance of Permit. A permit for the mining and reclamation of prime farmland may be granted by the Permit Board, if it first finds, in writing, upon the basis of a complete application, that:
(1) the approved proposed postmining land use of these prime farmlands will be cropland;
(2) the permit incorporates as specific conditions the contents of the plan submitted under § 2907(a), after consideration of any revisions to that plan suggested by the secretary of agriculture under § 2907(b);
(3) the applicant has the technological capability to restore the prime farmland, within a reasonable time, to equivalent or higher levels of yield as non-mined prime farmland in the surrounding area under equivalent levels of management;
(4) the proposed operations will be conducted in compliance with the requirements of Rule 55 and other environmental protection performance and reclamation standards for mining and reclamation of prime farmland of the regulatory program.
(5) the aggregate total prime farmland acreage shall not be decreased from that which existed prior to mining. Water bodies, if any, to be constructed during mining and reclamation operations must be located within the post-reclamation non-prime farmland portions of the permit area. The creation of any such water bodies must be approved by the Permit Board and the consent of all affected property owners within the permit area must be obtained.
§ 2909. Coal Processing Plants or Support Facilities Not Located Within the Permit Area of a Specified Mine
(a) This Section applies to any person who operates or intends to operate a coal preparation plant in connection with a coal mine but outside the permit area for a specific mine. Any person who operates such a preparation plant shall obtain a permit from the Permit Board in accordance with the requirements of this Section.
(b) Any application for a permit for operations covered by this Section shall contain in the mining and reclamation plan specific plans, including descriptions, maps and cross-sections, of the construction, operation, maintenance and removal of the processing plants and associated
support facilities. The plan shall demonstrate that those operations will be conducted in compliance with Rule 59.
(c) No permit shall be issued for any operation covered by this Section, unless the Permit Board finds, in writing, that, in addition to meeting all other applicable requirements of this Subchapter, the operations will be conducted in compliance with the requirements of Rule 59.
§ 2911. In Situ Processing Activities
(a) This Section applies to any person who conducts or intends to conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations utilizing in situ processing activities.
(b) An application for a permit for operations covered by this Section shall be made according to all requirements of 30 CFR Subchapter G applicable to underground mining activities, which are, for the specific and limited purposes of this Section, hereby adopted and made a part hereof. In addition, the mining and reclamation operations plan for operations involving in situ processing activities shall contain information establishing how those operations will be conducted in compliance with the requirements of Rule 61, including:
(1) delineation of proposed holes and wells and production zone for approval of the Permit Board;
(2) specification of drill holes and casings proposed to be used;
(3) a plan for treatment, confinement or disposal of all acid-forming, toxic-forming, or radioactive gases, solids or liquids constituting a fire, health, safety or environmental hazard caused by the mining and recovery process; and
(4) plans for monitoring surface water and ground water and air quality, as required by the Permit Board.
(c) No permit shall be issued for operations covered by this Section, unless the Permit Board first finds, in writing, upon the basis of a complete application made in accordance with § 2911(b), that the operation will be conducted in compliance with all requirements of 30 CFR Subchapter G relating to underground mining activities, Rule 61, and 30 CFR Part 817, which is, for the specific and limited purposes of this section, hereby adopted and made a part hereof.
Rule 31. Public Participation, Approval of Permit Applications and Permit Terms and Conditions
§ 3101. Responsibilities
(a) The Permit Board has the responsibility to approve or disapprove permits. The Department has the responsibility to review permit applications and to recommend to the Permit Board whether each application is complete and accurate and fulfills the requirements of the act and these regulations.
(b) The Department and the Permit Board and persons applying for permits under regulatory programs shall involve the public throughout the permit process of regulatory programs.
(c) The Commission shall assure implementation and enforcement of the requirements of this Rule.
(d) The applicant shall provide all information in a complete permit application for review by the Department and action by the Permit Board in accordance with this Rule.
§ 3102. Permit Eligibility Determination
Based on the reviews required under this chapter, the Department will determine whether the applicant is eligible for a permit under these regulations.
(a) Except as provided for in § 3130 and § 3113, the applicant is not eligible for a permit if the Department finds that any surface coal mining operation that:
-
The applicant directly owns or controls has an unabated or uncorrected violation;
-
The applicant or its operator indirectly own or control, regardless of when the ownership or control began, has an unabated or uncorrected violation cited after November 2, 1988; or
-
The applicant or its operator indirectly own or control has an unabated or uncorrected violation, regardless of the date the violation was cited, and the applicant’s ownership or control was established after November 2, 1988.
(b) The applicant is eligible to receive a permit under these regulations if any surface coal mining operation the applicant or its operator indirectly own or control has an unabated or uncorrected violation and both the violation and the applicant’s assumption of ownership or control occurred on or before November 2, 1988. However, the applicant is not eligible to receive a permit if there was an established legal basis, independent of authority under § 3121 of these regulations, to deny the permit at the time the applicant or its operator assumed indirect ownership or control or at the time the violation was cited, whichever is earlier.
(c) The Permit Board will not issue the applicant a permit if the applicant or its operator are permanently ineligible to receive a permit because:
-
The applicant controls or has controlled surface coal mining and reclamation operations with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations, and
-
The violations are of such nature and duration with such resulting irreparable damage to the environment as to indicate the applicant’s intent not to comply with the Act, its implementing regulations, the regulatory program, or the permit.
(d) After the applicant’s permit is approved under § 3115, it will not be issued until the applicant complies with the information update and certification requirement of § 2305(1). After the applicant completes that requirement, the Department will again request a compliance history report from AVS to determine if there are any unabated or uncorrected violations which affect the applicant’s permit eligibility under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. The Department will request this AVS report no more than five business days before permit issuance under § 3119.
(e) If the applicant is found ineligible for a permit under this section, the Department will send the
applicant written notification of the Permit Board’s decision. The notification will tell the applicant why it is ineligible and include notice of the applicant’s appeal rights under §§ 3301 and 3303.
§ 3103. Public Notices of Filing of Permit Applications
(a) Upon submission of a complete application for a permit, modification of an existing permit, or renewal of a permit under the act and these regulations, the applicant shall submit to the Permit Board a copy of the applicant’s advertisement of the ownership, precise location and boundaries of the land to be affected. At the time of submission, the applicant shall place the advertisement for publication at least once a week for four (4) consecutive weeks in a local newspaper and in a regional newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the proposed surface coal mine is to be located. If no local newspaper of general circulation in the county is published, notice shall be published once a week for four (4) consecutive weeks in a regional newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the proposed surface coal mine is to be located and in a newspaper of general statewide circulation published in Jackson. The applicant shall place the advertisement in the newspaper within thirty (30) days of the Department’s notification to the applicant that the application is complete. The advertisement shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
(1) the name and address of the applicant;
(2) a map or description which shall:
(A) clearly show or describe towns, rivers, streams or other bodies of water, local landmarks, and any other information, including routes, streets or roads and accurate distance measurements, necessary to allow local residents to readily identify the proposed permit area;
(B) clearly show or describe the exact location and boundaries of the proposed permit area;
(C) state the name of the United States Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle map(s) which contains the area shown or described; and
(D) if a map is used, indicate the north point;
(3) the location where a copy of the application is available for public inspection under § 3103(d);
(4) the name and address of the Department in order that written comments, objections, or requests for informal conferences on the application may be submitted under §§ 3105- 3109;
(5) if an applicant seeks a permit to mine within 100 feet of the outside right-of-way of a public road or to relocate or close a public road, except where public notice and hearing have previously been provided for this particular part of the road in accordance with § 1107(d), a concise statement describing the public road, the particular part to be relocated or closed, and the approximate timing and duration of the relocation or closing;
(6) if the application includes a request for an experimental practice under § 2901, a
statement indicating that an experimental practice is requested and identifying the regulatory provisions for which a variance is requested.
(b) Upon receipt of a complete application for a permit, a modification of a permit, or a renewal of a permit, the Permit Board shall issue written notification of:
(1) the applicant's intention to surface mine a particularly described tract of land;
(2) the application number;
(3) where a copy of the application may be inspected; and
(4) where comments on the application may be submitted under § 3105.
(c) The Permit Board’s written notifications shall be sent to:
(1) federal, state and local government agencies with jurisdiction over or an interest in the area of the proposed operations including, but not limited to, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service district office, the local U.S. Army Corps of Engineers district engineer, the National Park Service, state and federal fish and wildlife agencies, and the state historic preservation officer;
(2) local governmental agencies with jurisdiction to act with regard to land use, air or water quality planning in the area of the proposed operations;
(3) sewage and water treatment authorities and water companies, either providing sewage or water services to users in the area of the proposed operations or having water sources or collection, treatment or distribution facilities located in these areas; and
(4) the federal or state governmental agencies with authority to issue all other permits and licenses needed by the applicant in connection with operations proposed in the application.
(5) regional planning agencies.
(d) (1) Each applicant for a permit, modification of a permit, or renewal of a permit shall file, within ten (10) days after filing with the Permit Board, a copy of its application for public inspection with the clerk of the chancery court of the county or judicial district where the mining is to occur and where real property contiguous to the surface coal mining and reclamation operation is located, if that property is located in more than one (1) county or judicial district. Information determined to be confidential by the Commission pursuant to § 53-9- 43 shall be omitted. This copy of the application need not include confidential information exempt from disclosure under § 53-9- 43 and § 3111.
(2) The applicant shall file any subsequent revision of the application with the clerk of the chancery court at the same time the revision is submitted to the Department.
§ 3104. Revisions of Permits
An application for a revision of a permit shall not be approved unless the executive director finds that
reclamation as required by the act and these regulations can be accomplished under the revised reclamation plan. The revision shall be granted or denied by the executive director. A decision by the executive director to grant or deny a revision of a permit shall be subject to formal hearing and appeal as would an initial decision of the Permit Board under § 49-17-29. A revision shall not be considered a modification.
§ 3105. Opportunity for Submission of Written Comments on Permit Applications
(a) Written comments or objections on the permit, modification of a permit, or renewal of a permit applications may be submitted to the Permit Board by the public entities to whom notification is provided under § 53-9- 37 and § 3103(b) and (c). with respect to the effects of the proposed mining operations on the environment within their area of responsibility.
(b) These comments shall be submitted to the Permit Board in written form within 30 days of notice.
(c) The Permit Board shall immediately transmit a copy of all such comments for filing and public inspection at the chancery clerk’s office where the applicant filed a copy of the application for permit under § 53-9- 27 of the Act and § 3103(d). A copy shall also be transmitted to the applicant.
§ 3107. Right to File Written Objections
(a) Any interested party or an officer or head of any federal, state, or local government agency or authority shall have the right to file written comments or objections to an initial or revised application for a permit, modification of a permit, or renewal of a permit with the Permit Board, within 30 days after the last publication of the newspaper notice required by § 53-9- 37(1) and § 3103(a).
(b) The Permit Board shall, immediately upon receipt of any written objections:
(1) transmit a copy of them to the applicant;
(2) file a copy for public inspection at the clerk of the chancery court where the applicant filed a copy of the application for permit under § 53-9- 27 and § 3103(d).
§ 3109. Public Hearings
(a) Procedure for Requests. Any interested party, or the officer or head of any federal, state or local government agency or authority may, in writing, request that the Permit Board hold a public hearing on any application for a permit, modification to a permit, or renewal of a permit. The request shall:
(1) briefly summarize the issues to be raised by the requestor at the hearing;
(2) be filed with the Permit Board not later than 45 days after the last publication of the newspaper advertisement placed by the applicant under § 53-9- 37(1) and § 3103(a).
(3) The Permit Board shall conduct a public hearing prior to issuing a permit allowing a new surface coal mining and reclamation operation. The Permit Board may conduct a public hearing prior to issuing a permit modification or reissuing an existing permit, but shall hold a public hearing if requested under § 53-9- 37(2)(b).
(b) The Permit Board shall hold a public hearing within ninety (90) days following the receipt of the request. The Public Hearing shall be conducted according to the following:
(1) if requested under § 53-9-37(2)(b) and § 3109(a)(2), it shall be held in the locality of the proposed mining and reclamation;
(2) a notice including the date, time, subject matter and location of the public hearing shall be sent to the applicant and all parties who requested a public hearing and advertised by the Permit Board pursuant to § 53-9- 37(2)(b);
(3) The Permit Board shall arrange with the applicant, upon request by an interested party requesting a public hearing, reasonable access to the area of the proposed surface coal mining and reclamation operation for the purpose of gathering information relevant to the proceeding before the public hearing. If such request is made less than one (1) week before the scheduled date of the public hearing, access may not be provided before the public hearing;
(4) The public hearing shall be conducted by a representative of the Permit Board, who may accept oral or written statements and any other relevant information from any participant. An electronic or stenographic record shall be made of the public hearing. The record shall be maintained and shall be accessible to the applicant and to the public until final release of the applicant's performance bond or other collateral.
(c) If all persons requesting the public hearing stipulate agreement before the requested public hearing and withdraw their request, the public hearing may be canceled at the discretion of the Permit Board. This paragraph does not apply to mandatory public hearings for new surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
(d) Public hearings held in accordance with this Section may be used by the Permit Board as the public hearing required under the act and § 1107(d) on the proposed uses or relocation of public roads.
(e) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the Permit Board on its own motion from conducting public hearings to obtain information from the public regarding the proposed surface coal mining operations.
§ 3111. Public Availability of Information in Permit Applications on File with the Office
(a) General Availability. Except as provided in § 53-9- 43 and §§ 3111(b), all applications for permits, modifications of a permit, revisions, renewal of a permit, and transfers, assignments or sales of permit rights, information pertaining to coal seams, test borings, core sampling or soil samples in an application on file with the Permit Board shall be available, at reasonable times, for public inspection and copying.
(b) (1) Information submitted to the Department, Commission or Permit Board in an application and concerning trade secrets or privileged commercial or financial information relating to the competitive rights of an applicant and which is specifically identified as confidential, shall not be available for public examination and shall not be considered as a public record if:
(A) The applicant submits a written confidentiality claim to the Commission before the submission of the information; and
(B) The Commission determines the confidentiality claim to be valid in accordance with § 3111(b)(2).
(2) Only the following types of information submitted in an application may be held confidential:
(A) Information that pertains only to the analysis of the chemical and physical properties of the coal to be mined, except information on components of such coal which are potentially toxic in the environment;
(B) Information required under §§ 2715-2727 that is not otherwise on public file pursuant to state law; and
(C) Information on the nature and location of archeological resources on public land and Indian land as required under the Archeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-95, 93 Stat.721, 16 U.S.C. 470).
(3) The confidentiality claim shall include a generic description of the nature of the information included in the submission. Any information for which a confidentiality claim is asserted shall not be disclosed pending the outcome of any formal hearing and all appeals concerning the confidentiality of the information.
(4) Information on the nature and location of archaeological resources on public land and Indian land as required under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-95, 93 Stat. 721, 16 U.S.C. 470) shall be treated by the Commission, Permit Board and Department as required under these Acts.
§ 3112. Review of Permit Applications
(a) Process
(1) The applicant for a permit or modification of a permit shall have the burden of establishing that his application is in compliance with all the requirements of these regulations.
(2) The Permit Board shall review the complete application for a permit, modification, or renewal; written comments and written objections submitted; and records of any public hearing held under § 53-9- 37 and §§ 3105-3109 of these regulations.
(b) Review of Violations: Based on a review of all reasonably available information concerning violation notices and ownership or control links involving the applicant, including information obtained pursuant to §§ 3131, 3138, 2305, and 2307, the Permit Board shall not issue the permit if any surface coal mining and reclamation operation owned or controlled by either the applicant or by any person who owns or controls the applicant is currently in violation of the Act, Federal Act, any state or federal rule or regulation promulgated pursuant thereto, a state program, or any federal or state law, rule, or regulation pertaining to air or water environmental protection. If this compliance determination initially is made prior to the determination that the application is
complete and accurate, the Permit Board shall reconsider the compliance review prior to issuing, modifying, or renewing a permit. The reconsideration shall be based on any new information submitted pursuant to § 2307(d).
(c) In the absence of a failure-to-abate cessation order, the Permit Board may presume that a notice of violation issued pursuant to § 53-9- 55 and § 6503 or under a federal or state program is being corrected to the satisfaction of the agency with jurisdiction over the violation where the abatement period for such notice of violation has not yet expired and where, as part of the violation information provided pursuant to § 2307, the applicant has provided certification that such violation is in the process of being so corrected. Such presumption shall not apply where evidence to the contrary is set forth in the permit application, or where the notice of violation is issued for nonpayment of abandoned mine land reclamation fees or civil penalties.
(d) If a current violation exists, the Permit Board shall require the applicant or person who owns or controls the applicant, before the issuance of the permit, to either:
(1) submit to the Permit Board proof that the current violation has been or is in the process of being corrected to the satisfaction of the agency that has jurisdiction over the violation; or
(2) establish for the Permit Board that the applicant, or any person owned or controlled by either the applicant or any person who owns or controls the applicant, has filed and is presently pursuing, in good faith, a direct administrative or judicial appeal to contest the validity of the current violation. If the initial judicial review authority affirms the violation, then the applicant shall within 30 days of the judicial action submit the proof required under § 3112 (b) and (c).
(e) Any permit that is issued on the basis of a presumption supported by certification under the Act and § 2307 that a violation is in the process of being corrected, on the basis of proof submitted under § 3112(c) that a violation is in the process of being corrected, or pending the outcome of an appeal described in § 3112 (d)(2), shall be conditionally issued.
(f) After an initial determination by the Permit Board to deny a permit, modification, or renewal application because the applicant, anyone who owns or controls the applicant, or the operator specified in the application, controls or has controlled surface coal mining and reclamation operations with a demonstrated pattern of willful violation of the act of such nature and duration, and with such resulting irreparable damage to the environment that indicates an intent not to comply with the provisions of the act, the applicant or operator shall be afforded an opportunity for a formal hearing on the determination. Such hearing shall be conducted pursuant to § 53-9- 77(1) of the act and § 3301.
§ 3113. Eligibility for Provisionally Issued Permits
(a) This section applies to any applicant who owns or controls a surface coal mining and reclamation operation with:
(1) A notice of violation issued under § 6503 for which the abatement period has not yet expired; or
(2) A violation that is unabated or uncorrected beyond the abatement or correction period.
(b) The Permit Board will find the applicant eligible for a provisionally issued permit under this
section if the applicant demonstrates that one or more of the following circumstances exist with respect to all violations listed in paragraph (a) of this section:
(1) For violations meeting the criteria of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the applicant certifies that the violation is being abated to the satisfaction of the regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the violation, and the Department has no evidence to the contrary.
(2) As applicable to the applicant, the applicant’s operator, and operations that the applicant or the applicant’s operator own or control are in compliance with the terms of any abatement plan (or, for delinquent fees or penalties, a payment schedule) approved by the agency with jurisdiction over the violation.
(3) The applicant is pursuing a good faith:
(i) Challenge to all pertinent ownership or control listings or findings under §§ 3133 and 3136; or
(ii) Administrative or judicial appeal of all pertinent ownership or control listings or findings, unless there is an initial judicial decision affirming the listing or finding and that decision remains in force.
(4) The violation is the subject of a good faith administrative or judicial appeal contesting the validity of the violation, unless there is an initial judicial decision affirming the violation and that decision remains in force.
(c) The Department will consider a provisionally issued permit to be improvidently issued, and must immediately initiate procedures under §§ 3128 and 3129 to suspend or rescind that permit, if:
(1) Violations included in paragraph (b)(1) of this section are not abated within the specified abatement period;
(2) The applicant, the applicant’s operator, or operations that the applicant, or the applicant’s operator own or control do not comply with the terms of an abatement plan or payment schedule mentioned in paragraph (b)(2) of this section;
(3) In the absence of a request for judicial review, the disposition of a challenge and any subsequent administrative review referenced in paragraph (b)(3) or (4) of this section affirms the validity of the violation or the ownership or control listing or finding; or
(4) The initial judicial review decision referenced in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) or (4) of this section affirms the validity of the violation or ownership or control listing or finding.
§ 3114. Valid Existing Rights Review at Time of Permit Application Review
(a) Upon receipt of an administratively complete application for a permit for a surface coal mining operation, or an administratively complete application for revision or modification of the boundaries of a surface coal mining operation permit, the Department or Permit Board must review the application to determine whether the proposed surface coal mining operation would be located on any lands protected under 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations.
(b) The Permit Board must reject any portion of the application that would locate surface coal mining operations on land protected under 30 CFR § 761.11, 30 U.S.C. 1272(e), Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71, or § 1105 of these regulations unless:
(1) The site qualifies for the exception for existing operations under § 1105(h);
(2) A person has valid existing rights for the land, as determined under § 1106;
(3) The applicant obtains a waiver or exception from the prohibitions of § 1105 in accordance with 30 CFR § 761.13 or § 1107(d) or § 1107(e) of these regulations; or
(4) For lands protected by § 1105(c), both the Permit Board and the agency with jurisdiction over the park or place jointly approve the proposed operation in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
(c) Location verification. If the Department or Permit Board has difficulty determining whether an application includes land within an area specified in § 1105(a) or within the specified distance from a structure or feature listed in § 1105(f) or (g), the Department or Permit Board must request that the Federal, State, or local governmental agency with jurisdiction over the protected land, structure, or feature verify the location.
(1) The request for location verification must:
(i) Include relevant portions of the permit application.
(ii) Provide the agency with 30 days after receipt to respond, with a notice that another 30 days is available upon request.
(iii) Specify that the Permit Board will not necessarily consider a response received after the comment period provided under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section.
(2) If the agency does not respond in a timely manner, the Permit Board may make the necessary determination based on available information.
(d) Procedures for joint approval of surface coal mining operations that will adversely affect publicly owned parks or historic places.
(1) If the Department or Permit Board determines that the proposed surface coal mining operation will adversely affect any publicly owned park or any place included in the National Register of Historic Places, the Department or Permit Board must request that the Federal, State, or local agency with jurisdiction over the park or place either approve or object to the proposed operation. The request must:
(i) Include a copy of applicable parts of the permit application.
(ii) Provide the agency with 30 days after receipt to respond, with a notice that another 30 days is available upon request.
(iii) State that failure to interpose an objection within the time specified under paragraph (d)(1)(ii) of this section will constitute approval of the proposed operation.
(2) The Permit Board may not issue a permit for a proposed operation subject to paragraph (d)(1) of this section unless all affected agencies jointly approve.
(3) Paragraphs (d)(1) and (d)(2) of this section do not apply to:
(i) Lands for which a person has valid existing rights, as determined under 30 CFR § 761.16 or § 1106 of these regulations.
(ii) Lands within the scope of the exception for existing operations in § 1105(h).
§ 3115. Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial
No permit, modification, or reissuance shall be approved, unless the application affirmatively demonstrates and the Permit Board finds, in writing, on the basis of information set forth in the application, or from information otherwise available, which is documented in the approval and made available to the applicant, that:
(a) the permit application is accurate and complete and that all requirements of the act and these regulations have been complied with;
(b) the applicant has demonstrated that surface coal mining and reclamation operations, as required by the act and these regulations, can be accomplished under the mining and reclamation operations plan contained in the application;
(c) the assessment of the probable cumulative impacts of all anticipated coal mining in the cumulative impact area on the hydrologic balance, as described in § 53-9- 25 and § 2525, has been made by the Department and the operations proposed under the application have been designed to prevent damage to the hydrologic balance outside the proposed permit area;
(d) the proposed permit area is:
(1) not included within an area designated unsuitable for surface coal mining operations under § 53-9- 71, Chapter 11, Chapter 13, or Chapter 15; or
(2) Not within an area that is the subject of a petition to designate lands unsuitable for mining, unless the applicant demonstrates that, before January 4, 1977, he or she made substantial legal and financial commitments in relation to the operation for which he or she is applying for a permit; or that is the subject of such a petition but for which consideration has been deferred by the Commission pursuant to § 1507(a)(7); or
(3) not on any lands subject to the prohibitions or limitations of § 1105(a),(b),(f) or (g); or
(4) not within 100 feet of the outside right-of-way line of any public road, except as provided for in § 1107(d); or
(5) not within 300 feet from any occupied dwelling, except as provided for in the act and § 1107(e);
(e) the proposed operations will not adversely affect any publicly-owned parks or places included on the National Register of Historic Places, except as provided for in § 1105(c) or (d);
(f) for operations involving the surface mining of coal where the private mineral estate to be mined has been severed from the private surface estate, the applicant has submitted to the Department the documentation required under § 53-9-33 and § 2309(b);
(1) The written consent of the surface owners to the extraction of coal by surface mining methods; or
(2) A conveyance that expressly grants or reserves the right to extract the coal by surface mining methods.
(g) the applicant has submitted proof that all reclamation fees from previous and existing operations as required by 30 CFR subchapter R have been paid;
(h) the applicant will submit the performance bond or other collateral required under § 53-9- 31 and Subpart IV prior to the issuance of the permit;
(i) the applicant has satisfied the applicable requirements of Chapter 29;
(j) the applicant has, if applicable, satisfied the requirements for approval of a long-term, intensive agricultural postmining land use, in accordance with the requirements of § 53-9- 45 and § 53-9- 47 and § 53109;
(k) the Permit Board has found that the activities would not affect the continued existence of endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitats as determined under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. Sec. 1531 et seq.);
(l) the Permit Board has taken into account the effect of the proposed permitting action on properties listed on and eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. This finding may be supported in part by inclusion of appropriate permit conditions or changes in the operation plan protecting historic resources, or a documented decision that the Permit Board has determined that no additional protection measures are necessary.
(m) Final compliance review. After an application is approved, but before the permit is issued, the Department shall reconsider its decision to approve the application, based on the compliance review required by § 3112 in light of any new information submitted under § 3102(d) and § 2307 (d).
(n) For a proposed remining operation where the applicant intends to reclaim in accordance with the requirements of § 5396, the site of the operation is a previously mined area as defined in § 105.
(o) For permits to be issued under § 2902, the permit application must contain:
(1) Lands eligible for remining;
(2) An identification of the potential environmental and safety problems related to prior mining activity which could reasonably be anticipated to occur at the site; and
(3) Mitigation plans to sufficiently address these potential environmental and safety problems so that reclamation as required by the applicable requirements of these
regulations can be accomplished.
§ 3117. Criteria for Permit Approval or Denial: Existing Structures
No permit, modification, or renewal of a permit shall be issued unless the applicant has demonstrated that any existing structure will comply with § 303(c)(1) and the applicable performance standards of Subchapter 2.5.
§ 3119. Permit Approval or Denial Actions
(a) The Permit Board pursuant to the act and these regulations, shall approve, modify, reissue or deny all applications for permits under the Act and these regulations on the basis of:
(1) complete applications for permits, modifications or reissuance and revisions thereof;
(2) public participation as provided for in the act and this Subchapter;
(3) compliance with any applicable provisions of the act and Rule 29;
(4) processing and review of applications as required by the act and this Rule .
(b) Upon the basis of a complete application for permit or a complete application for modification or reissuance of a permit, including public notification and an opportunity for public hearing as required by § 53-9- 37, the Permit Board shall issue, deny or modify the permit within the time required under § 53-9- 37 and shall notify the applicant in writing of its action within the time required under § 53-9- 39. The Permit Board shall take action as required under this section, within the following times:
(1) Except as provided for in § 3119(b)(1)(A) or (B), a complete application submitted to the Department shall be processed by the Department, so that an application is approved or denied by the Permit Board within the following times:
(A) if a public hearing has been held under the act and § 3109, the Permit Board shall act upon a complete permit application within sixty (60) days after the date of the public hearing. This time frame may be extended if agreed in writing by the Department, the applicant, and the interested party or parties, if any, that requested the public hearing.
(B) if no public hearing has been held under the act and § 3109, the Permit Board shall act within sixty (60) days after the last publication of the notice described in § 53-9- 37 (1). The time frames may be extended if agreed in writing by the Department and the applicant. Further the Permit Board may allow additional time for processing, taking into account:
(i) the time needed for proper investigation of the proposed permit and adjacent areas;
(ii) the complexity of the application; and
(iii) whether written objections to or comments on the complete application have been filed with the Permit Board.
(2) Notwithstanding any of the foregoing provisions of this Section, no time limit under the act or this Section requiring the Permit Board to act shall be considered expired from the time the Permit Board requests further information under § 3113(d) until the final decision of the Permit Board.
(c) If the application is approved, the permit shall be issued upon submittal of a performance bond in accordance with Rules 39, 41, and 43. If the application is disapproved, specific reasons therefore shall be set forth in the notification required by § 3119(d).
(d) Within fourteen (14) days after issuing or denying a permit or granting or denying a modification to an existing permit, as recorded in the minutes of the Permit Board, the Permit Board shall notify by mail to the last-known address, the following:
(1) the permit applicant;
(2) the mayor of each municipality and the president of the board of supervisors of each county in which the permit area is located;
(3) persons who submitted written comments concerning the application in the time, manner and form as provided by regulation, if those persons provided the Permit Board with a complete address; and
(4) persons who requested the public hearing, if a public hearing was held, if those persons provided the Permit Board with a complete address; and
(5) the local OSMRE office.
(e) Permit application approval shall apply to those lands that are specifically designated as the permit area on the maps submitted with the application and for which the application is complete and accurate. Any valid permit issued in accordance with § 3119(a) shall carry with it a right of successive renewal, within the approved boundaries of the existing permit, upon expiration of the term of the permit, in accordance with Rule 35.
§ 3121. Permit Terms
(a) Each permit shall be issued for a fixed term not to exceed five years, unless the requirements of § 3121(c) are met.
(b) Each application shall state the anticipated or actual starting and termination date of each phase of the surface coal mining and reclamation operation and the anticipated number of acres of land to be affected during each phase of mining over the life of the mine.
(c) If the applicant requires an initial permit term in excess of five years in order to obtain necessary financing for equipment and the opening of the operation, the longer fixed permit term may be granted by the Permit Board, if:
(1) the application is complete and accurate for the specified longer term;
(2) the applicant shows that a specified longer term is reasonably needed to allow the applicant to obtain necessary financing of equipment and the opening of the operation,
and this need is confirmed, in writing, by the applicant's proposed source for the financing.
(d) Termination, Extension
(1) A permit shall terminate if the permittee has not begun the surface coal mining and reclamation operation covered by the permit within three years of the issuance of the permit.
(2) The Permit Board may grant reasonable extensions of time for commencement of these operations, upon receipt of a written statement showing that such extensions of time are necessary, if litigation precludes the commencement or threatens substantial economic loss to the permittee, or there are conditions beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the permittee.
(3) With respect to coal to be mined for use in a synthetic fuel facility or specified major electric generating facility, the permittee shall be deemed to have commenced surface mining operations at the time that the construction of the synthetic fuel or generating facility is initiated.
(4) Extensions of time granted by the Permit Board under this Subsection shall be treated as modifications to the permit, triggering the public notice requirements in § 53-9- 37 and § 3103.
(e) Permits may be suspended, revoked or modified by the Permit Board, in accordance with the act and §§ 2901, 2905, and 3503.
§ 3123. Conditions of Permits: General and Right of Entry
Each permit issued by the Permit Board shall ensure that:
(a) except to the extent that the Permit Board otherwise directs in the permit that specific actions be taken, the permittee shall conduct all surface coal mining and reclamation operations as described in the complete application;
(b) the permittee shall allow the authorized representatives of the Secretary of Interior, including, but not limited to, inspectors and fee compliance officers, and the Department, without advance notice or a search warrant, upon presentation of appropriate credentials, and without delay, to have the rights of entry provided for in § 53-9- 51 of the act, and § 6305, and be accompanied by private persons for the purpose of conducting an inspection in accordance with the act and Rule 63, when the inspection is in response to an alleged violation reported to the Department or OSM by the private person;
(c) the permittee shall conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations only on those lands specifically designated on the maps submitted under the act and Rules 25-27 and approved for the term of the permit and which are subject to the performance bond or other collateral in effect pursuant to the act and Subchapter 2.4;
(d) the operator shall pay all reclamation fees required by the act and Subchapter R of 30 CFR Chapter VII for coal produced under the permit for sale, transfer or use, in the manner required by that Subchapter;
(e) the Permit Board shall require in the permit that adequate bond coverage be in effect at all times;
(f) within 30 days after a cessation order is issued under § 53-9- 69, 30 CFR 843.11 or § 6501 for operations conducted under the permit, except where a stay of the cessation order is granted and remains in effect, the permittee shall either submit to the Department the following information, current to the date the cessation order was issued, or notify the Department in writing that there has been no change since the immediately preceding submittal of such information:
(1) any new information needed to correct or update the information previously submitted to the Department by the permittee under the act and § 2305(c); or
(2) if not previously submitted, the information required from a permit applicant by the act and § 2305(c).
(g) The permittee shall comply with the terms and conditions of the permit, all applicable performance standards of the Act, the Federal Act, and the requirements of these regulations.
(h) As applicable, the permittee shall comply with the act and § 303(B) and Subchapter 2.5 for compliance, modification, or abandonment of existing structures.
§ 3125. Conditions of Permits: Environment, Public Health and Safety
Each permit issued by the Permit Board shall ensure and contain specific conditions requiring that the:
(a) permittee shall operate in accordance with the general environmental protection standards promulgated under § 53-9- 45. Permittee shall take all possible steps to minimize any adverse impact to the environment or public health and safety resulting from noncompliance with any term or condition of the permit, including, but not limited to:
(1) any accelerated or additional monitoring necessary to determine the nature and extent of noncompliance and the results of the noncompliance;
(2) immediate implementation of measures necessary to comply;
(3) warning, as soon as possible after learning of such noncompliance, any person whose health and safety is in imminent danger due to the noncompliance;
§ 3127. Initial Review and Finding Requirements for Improvidently Issued Permits (a) If the Permit Board has reason to believe that it improvidently issued a permit, it must review the circumstances under which the permit was issued. The Permit Board will make a preliminary finding that the permit was improvidently issued if, under the permit eligibility criteria of the applicable regulations implementing section 510(c) of the federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act in effect at the time of permit issuance, the permit should not have been issued because the permittee or the operator owned or controlled a surface coal mining and reclamation operation with an unabated or uncorrected violation. (b) The Permit Board will make a finding under paragraph (a) of this section only if the permittee or the permittee’s operator:
(1) Continue to own or control the operation with the unabated or uncorrected violation; (2) The violation remains unabated or uncorrected; and (3) The violation would cause the permittee to be ineligible under the permit eligibility criteria in our current regulations. (c) When the Permit Board makes a preliminary finding under paragraph (a) of this section, it must serve the permittee with a written notice of the preliminary finding, which must be based on evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case that the permit was improvidently issued. (d) Within 30 days of receiving a notice under paragraph (c) of this section, the permittee may challenge the preliminary finding by providing the Permit Board with evidence as to why the permit was not improvidently issued under the criteria in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section. (e) The provisions of §§ 3133, 3135, and 3136 of these regulations apply when a challenge under paragraph (d) of this section concerns a preliminary finding under paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) of this section that the permittee or the operator currently own or control, or owned or controlled, a surface coal mining operation. § 3128. Notice Requirements for Improvidently Issued Permits. (a) The Department must serve the permittee with a written notice of proposed suspension or rescission, together with a statement of the reasons for the proposed suspension or rescission, if: (1) After considering any evidence submitted under § 3127(d), the Department finds that a permit was improvidently issued under the criteria in paragraphs (a) and (b) of § 3127; or (2) A permit was provisionally issued under § 3113(b) and one or more of the conditions in § 3113(c)(1) through (4) exists. (b) If the Department proposes to suspend a permit, it will provide 60 days notice. (c) If the Department proposes to rescind a permit, it will provide 120 days notice. (d) If the permittee decides to appeal the notice, the permittee must exhaust administrative remedies under the procedures at Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 69(d) and (e). (e) After the Department serves the permittee with a notice of proposed suspension or rescission under this section, it will take action under § 3129 of these regulations. (f) The regulations for service at § 6507 of these regulations will govern service under this section. (g) The times specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section will apply unless the permittee obtains temporary relief under the procedures at Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 69(d) and (e).
§ 3129. Suspension or Rescission Requirements for Improvidently Issued Permits (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section the Permit Board must suspend or rescind a permit upon expiration of the time specified in § 3128(b) or (c) of this part unless the permittee submits evidence and the board finds that: (1) The violation has been abated or corrected to the satisfaction of the agency with jurisdiction over the violation; (2) The permittee or the permittee’s operator no longer own or control the relevant operation; (3) The Permit Board’s finding for suspension or rescission was in error; (4) The violation is the subject of a good faith administrative or judicial appeal (unless there is an initial judicial decision affirming the violation, and that decision remains in force); (5) The violation is the subject of an abatement plan or payment schedule that is being met to the satisfaction of the agency with jurisdiction over the violation; or (6) The permittee is pursuing a good faith challenge or administrative or judicial appeal of the relevant ownership or control listing or finding (unless there is an initial judicial decision affirming the listing or finding, and that decision remains in force). (b) If the permittee has requested administrative review of a notice of proposed suspension or rescission under § 3128(d) of these regulations, the Permit Board will not suspend or rescind the permit unless and until the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality affirms the finding that your permit was improvidently issued. (c) When the Permit Board suspends or rescinds a permit under this section, it must: (1) Issue the permittee a written notice requiring the permittee to cease all surface coal mining operations under the permit; and (2) Post the notice at the office of the Department of Environmental Quality. (d) If the Permit Board suspends or rescinds a permit under this section, the permittee may request administrative review of the notice under the procedures at Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 69(d) and (e). Alternatively, the permittee may seek judicial review of the notice.
§3130. Unanticipated Events or Conditions at Remining Sites
(a) Applicants are eligible for a permit under § 3102 if an unabated violation:
(1) Occurred after October 24, 1992; and
(2) Resulted from an unanticipated event or condition at a surface coal mining and reclamation operation on lands that are eligible for remining under a permit that was held by the person applying for the new permit.
(b) For permits issued under § 2902, an event or condition is presumed to be unanticipated for the purpose of this section if it:
(1) Arose after permit issuance;
(2) Was related to prior mining; and
(3) Was not identified in the permit application.
§ 3131. Verification of Ownership or Control Application Information
(a) In accordance with § 3115, prior to the issuance of a permit, the Department shall review the information in the application provided pursuant to § 2305 to determine that such information, including the identification of the operator and all owners and controllers of the operator, is complete. In making such determination, the Department shall compare the information provided in the application with information from other reasonably available sources, including-
(1) manual data sources within Mississippi, including:
(A) the Department's inspection and enforcement records, and
(B) State Corporation Commission or tax records, to the extent they contain information concerning ownership or control links; and
(2) automated data sources, including:
(A) the Department's own computer systems, and
(B) the Applicant/Violator System.
(b) If it appears from the information provided in the application pursuant to § 2305(f) and (g) that either the applicant or the operator do not have any previous mining experience, the Department shall inquire of the applicant and investigate to determine whether any person other than those identified in the application will own or control the operation (as either an operator or other owner or controller). If the Department identifies such a person, the Department must:
(1) Issue a written finding to the person and the applicant or permittee describing the nature and extent of ownership and control; and
(2) Enter the finding under this section into AVS; and
(3) Require the person to:
(A) Disclose their identity; and
(B) Certify they are a controller, if appropriate.
(c) If, as a result of the review conducted under § 3131(a) and (b), the Department identifies any potential omission, inaccuracy, or inconsistency in the ownership or control information provided in the application, it shall, prior to making a final determination with regard to the application, contact the applicant and require that the matter be resolved through submission of:
(1) an amendment to the application, or
(2) a satisfactory explanation which includes credible information sufficient to demonstrate that no actual omission, inaccuracy, or inconsistency exists.
(d) Upon completion of the review conducted under this section, the Department shall promptly enter into or update all ownership or control information on AVS.
§ 3133. Who May Challenge Ownership or Control Listings and Findings Anyone may challenge a listing or finding of ownership or control using the provisions under §§ 3135 and 3136 of these regulations if that person is: (a) Listed in a permit application or AVS as an owner or controller of an entire surface coal mining operation, or any portion or aspect thereof: (b) Found to be an owner or controller of an entire surface coal mining operation, or any portion or aspect thereof, under §§ 3127 or 3138(g) of these regulations; or (c) An applicant or permittee affected by an ownership or control listing or finding. § 3135. How to Challenge an Ownership or Control Listing or Finding This section applies to anyone who challenges an ownership or control listing or finding. (a) To challenge an ownership or control listing or finding, the person making the challenge must submit a written explanation of the basis for the challenge, along with any evidence or explanatory materials that person wishes to provide under § 3136(b) of these regulations, to the Department, as identified in the following table. If the challenge concerns: Then the challenger must submit a written explanation to: (1) a pending State or Federal permit application the regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the application. (2) your ownership or control of a surface coal mining operation, and you are not currently seeking a permit the regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the surface coal mining operation. (b) The provisions of this section and of §§ 3136 and 3137 of these regulations apply only to challenges to ownership or control listings or findings. No one may use these provisions to challenge their liability or responsibility under any other provision of the Act or its implementing regulations. (c) When the challenge concerns a violation under the jurisdiction of a different regulatory authority, the regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the permit application or permit must consult the regulatory authority with jurisdiction over the violation and the AVS Office to obtain additional information.
(d) A regulatory authority responsible for deciding a challenge under paragraph (a) of this section may request an investigation by the AVS Office. (e) At any time, anyone listed in AVS as an owner or controller of a surface coal mining operation, may request an informal explanation from the AVS Office as to the reason that person is shown in AVS in an ownership or control capacity. Within 14 days of your request, the AVS Office will provide a response describing why you are listed in AVS. § 3136. Burden of Proof for Ownership or Control Challenges This section applies to anyone who challenges their ownership or control listing or finding. (a) When anyone challenges a listing of ownership or control, or a finding of ownership or control made under § 3138(g) of this chapter, that person must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that they either: (1) Do not own or control the entire surface coal mining operation or relevant portion or aspect thereof; or (2) Did not own or control the entire surface coal mining operation or relevant portion or aspect thereof during the relevant time period. (b) In meeting the burden of proof, the challenger must present reliable, credible, and substantial evidence and any explanatory materials to the Department. The materials presented in connection with the challenge will become part of the permit file, an investigation file, or another public file. If the person making the challenge so requests, the Department will hold as confidential any information the challenger submits under this paragraph which is not required to be made available to the public under Miss. Code Ann §§ 25-61-1 et seq. or 49-17-39; and § 409 of these Regulations. (c) Materials which may be submitted in response to the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section include, but are not limited to: (1) Notarized affidavits containing specific facts concerning the duties that the person making the challenge performed for the relevant operation, the beginning and ending dates of the challenger’s ownership or control of the operation, and the nature and details of any transaction creating or severing the challenger’s ownership or control of the operation. (2) Certified copies of corporate minutes, stock ledgers, contracts, purchase and sale agreements, leases, correspondence, or other relevant company records. (3) Certified copies of documents filed with or issued by any State, municipal, or Federal governmental agency. (4) An opinion of counsel, when supported by: (A) Evidentiary materials; (B) A statement by counsel that he or she is qualified to render the opinion; and
(C) A statement that counsel has personally and diligently investigated the facts of the matter. § 3137. Written Agency Decision on Challenges to Ownership or Control Listings or Findings (a) Within 60 days of receipt of a challenge under § 3135(a) of these regulations, the Permit Board will review and investigate the evidence and explanatory materials submitted and any other reasonably available information bearing on the challenge and issue a written Order. The Permit Board’s decision must state whether the person submitting the challenge owns or controls the relevant surface coal mining operation, or owned or controlled the operation, during the relevant time period. (b) The Permit Board will promptly provide the person making the challenge with a copy of its decision by either: (1) Certified mail, return receipt requested; or (2) Any means consistent with the rules governing service of a summons and complaint under Rule 4 of the Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure. (c) Service of the decision on the person making the challenge is complete upon delivery and is not incomplete if that person refuses to accept delivery. (d) The Permit board will post all decisions made under this section on AVS. (e) Any person who receives a written decision under this section, and who wishes to appeal that decision, must exhaust administrative remedies under the procedures at Miss. Code Ann. 49-17- 41 before seeking judicial review. (f) Following the Permit Board’s written decision or any decision by a reviewing administrative or judicial tribunal, the Permit Board must review the information in AVS to determine if it is consistent with the decision. If it is not, the Permit Board must promptly revise the information in AVS to reflect the decision. § 3138. Post-Permit Issuance Requirements for Regulatory Authorities and Other Actions Based on Ownership, Control, and Violation Information
(a) For the purposes of future permit eligibility determinations and enforcement actions, the Department must enter into AVS the data shown in the following table.
The Department must ensure entry into AVS of all: within 30 days after: (1) permit records
(2) unabated or uncorrected violations
(3) changes to information initially required to be provided by an applicant under § 2305 the permit is issued or subsequent changes are made
the abatement or correction period for a violation expires
receiving notice of a change
(4) changes in violation status
abatement, correction, or termination of a violation, or a decision from an administrative or judicial tribunal
(b) If, at any time, the Department discovers that any person owns or controls an operation with an unabated or uncorrected violation, the Department will determine whether enforcement action is appropriate under rules 65, 69, and 73 of these regulations. The Department must ensure entry of the results of each enforcement action, including administrative and judicial decisions, into AVS.
(c) The Department must serve a preliminary finding of permanent permit ineligibility under § 510(c) of the federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act on an applicant or operator if the criteria in paragraphs (c) (1) and (2) are met. In making a finding under this paragraph, the Department will only consider control relationships and violations which would make, or would have made, an applicant or operator ineligible for a permit under § 3102 (a) and (c). The Department must make a preliminary finding of permanent permit ineligibility if it finds that:
(1) The applicant or operator controls or has controlled surface coal mining and reclamation operations with a demonstrated pattern of willful violations under § 510(c) of the federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act: and
(2) The violations are of such nature and duration with such resulting irreparable damage to the environment as to indicate the applicant’s or operator’s intent not to comply with the Act, its implementing regulations, the regulatory program, or the permittee’s permit.
(d) The permittee may request a hearing on a preliminary finding of permanent permit ineligibility under Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 77.
(e) Entry into AVS.
(1) If the applicant or operator does not request a hearing, and the time for seeking a hearing has expired, the Department will enter its finding into AVS.
(2) If the applicant or operator does request a hearing, the Department will enter its finding into AVS only if that finding is upheld on administrative appeal.
(f) At any time, the Department may identify any person who owns or controls an entire operation or any relevant portion or aspect thereof. If the Department identifies such a person, it must issue a written preliminary finding to the person and the applicant or permittee describing the nature and extent of ownership or control. The Department’s written preliminary finding must be based on evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case of ownership or control.
(g) After the Department issues a written preliminary finding, under paragraph (f) of this section, the Department will allow the person subject to the preliminary finding 30 days in which to submit any information tending to demonstrate that person’s lack of ownership or control. If, after reviewing any information that person submits, the Department is persuaded that person is not an owner or controller, it will serve that person a written notice to that effect. If, after reviewing any information that person submits, the Department still finds that person is an owner or controller, or if that person does not submit any information within the 30-day period, it will issue a written finding and enter its finding into AVS.
(h) If the Department identifies a person as an owner or controller under paragraph (g) of this section, that person may challenge the finding using the provisions of §§ 3133, 3135 and 3136.
§ 3139. Post-Permit Issuance Requirements for Permittees
(a) Within 30 days after the issuance of a cessation order under § 6501, the permittee must provide or update all the information required under § 2305.
(b) The permittee does not have to submit information under paragraph (a) of this section if a court of competent jurisdiction grants a stay of the cessation order and the stay remains in effect.
(c) Within 60 days of any addition, departure, or change in position of any person identified in § 2305(f), the permittee must provide:
(1) the information required under § 2305 (f)(1)(F)(1)-(4); and
(2) the date of any departure.
Rule 33. Administrative and Judicial Review of Permit Decisions
§ 3301. Formal Hearing
(a) Within forty-five (45) days after the action of the Permit Board, as recorded in the minutes of the Permit Board, the applicant or any other interested party may request a formal hearing concerning the action. The Permit Board shall commence the hearing within 60 days after receipt of the first request for a formal hearing. This hearing shall be of record, adjudicatory in nature, and no person who presided at public hearing under § 53-9-37 of the act and § 3109 shall either preside at the hearing, or participate in the decision following the hearing, or in any administrative appeal therefrom. The Permit Board shall have the burden of going forward to present a prima facie case of the validity of the decision. The person filing the request for review shall have the ultimate burden of persuasion by a preponderance of the evidence that the decision is in error.
(b) Any party may file a petition for temporary relief from the Permit Board’s action in conjunction with the filing of the request for a formal hearing or at any time before a final decision is issued by the Permit Board after a formal hearing.
(1) The petition for temporary relief shall be filed with the Executive Director. The petition for temporary relief shall include:
(A) A statement of the specific relief requested;
(B) A detailed statement of why temporary relief should be granted, including:
(i) A showing that there is a substantial likelihood that the petitioner will prevail on the merits, and
(ii) A showing that the relief sought will not adversely affect the public health or safety or cause significant, imminent environmental harm to land, air or water resources; and
(C) A statement whether the petitioner requests a formal hearing regarding the petition for temporary relief.
(2) Any party may file a response to the petition no later than 5 days after it was served and may request a formal hearing on the petition for temporary relief even if the petitioner has not done so.
(3) The Permit Board may hold a formal hearing on any issue raised by the petition within 10 days of the filing of responses to the petition, and shall do so if a hearing is requested by any party. The Permit Board shall issue an order or decision granting or denying the petition for temporary relief within 5 days of the date of a hearing on the petition or, if no hearing is held, of service of the responses to the petition on all parties.
(4) The Permit Board may grant temporary relief only if:
(A) All parties to the proceeding have been notified of the petition and have had an opportunity to respond and a hearing has been held if requested;
(B) The petitioner has demonstrated a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits;
(C) Temporary relief will not adversely affect public health or safety or cause significant, imminent harm to land, air or water resources, and
(D) The relief sought is not the issuance of a permit where a permit has been denied, in whole or in part, by the Permit Board, except that continuation under an existing permit may be allowed where the operation has a valid permit issued under the Act.
(5) Any party may seek judicial review of the Permit Board’s decision regarding temporary relief as allowed by § 53-9- 77 for final decisions of the Permit Board.
(c) For the purpose of a formal hearing, the Permit Board may administer oaths and affirmations, subpoena witnesses and written or printed materials, compel attendance of witnesses or production of those materials, and take evidence including, but not limited to, site inspections of the land to be affected and other surface coal mining and reclamation operations carried on by the applicant in the general vicinity of the proposed operations.
(d) A verbatim record of each formal hearing required by this Section shall be made, and a transcript made available on the request of any party pursuant to the Mississippi Public Records Act.
(e) Ex parte contacts between interested parties or their representatives, who are not employees of the Department, and Permit Board members authorized to vote on the issue(s) of the formal hearing and/or an appointed hearing officer shall be prohibited.
(f) Except as provided in§ 3301(b)(3), at the conclusion of the formal hearing or within thirty (30) days after the formal hearing, the Permit Board shall enter in its minutes a final decision
affirming, modifying, or reversing its prior decision to issue, modify, revoke or deny the permit. The Permit Board shall mail within seven (7) days after its final decision as recorded in the minutes of the Permit Board, notice of that decision to the applicant and all persons who participated as a party in the formal hearing. The deadlines in this subsection may be extended by written agreement of the parties.
§ 3303. Judicial Review
(a) Any applicant or any person who participated as a party in the formal hearing and who is aggrieved by the final action of the Permit Board may appeal that action in accordance with § 53-9- 77.
Rule 35. Permit Reviews and Renewals, and Transfer, Sale and Assignment of Rights Granted Under Permits
§ 3501. Responsibilities
The Department shall:
(a) recommend the modification of permits, or the denial of applications therefor, and shall administratively process revisions to permits prior to changes in surface coal mining and reclamation operations;
(b) ensure that all permits are regularly reviewed to determine that surface coal mining and reclamation operations under these permits are conducted in compliance with the act and these regulations;
(c) effectively review applications to renew existing permits, in a timely manner, to ensure that surface coal mining and reclamation operations continue, if they comply with the act and these regulations;
(d) ensure that no person conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations through the transfer, sale or assignment of rights granted under permits without the prior approval of the Permit Board.
§ 3503. Department Review of Outstanding Permits
(a) The Department shall review each permit issued and outstanding under an approved regulatory program during the term of the permit. This review shall occur not later than the middle of the permit term and as required by §§ 2901 and 2905. For permits of longer than five year terms, a review of the permit shall be no less frequent than the permit midterm or every five years, whichever is more frequent.
(b) After the Department’s review, the Department may recommend to the Permit Board, reasonable modifications of the permit provisions or revocation of a permit to ensure compliance with the act and these regulations.
§ 3505. Permit Modifications and Revisions
(a) Applications for permit modifications, as defined in these regulations, shall be made and reviewed in accordance with Rules 31 and 35 of these regulations. Public participation and review shall be as stated in Rule 31 of these regulations.
(b) An application for a revision of a permit, as defined in these regulations, shall be submitted on forms or in a form as determined by the Department. The application shall include all information requested by the Department, and shall not be approved unless the Executive Director finds the reclamation as required by the act these regulations can be accomplished under the revised reclamation plan and revision complies with all requirements of the act and these regulations. The revision shall be granted or denied by the executive director within ten (10) days of receipt by the Department of a complete application for the revision. A decision by the executive director to grant or deny a revision of a permit shall be subject to formal hearing and appeal as would an initial decision of the Permit Board under § 49-17-29.
(c) Any extensions to the area covered by the permit, except for incidental boundary revisions, must be made by application for a new permit and shall not be approved under § 53-9- 35 of the act nor this Rule. A revision shall not be considered a modification.
(d) In the event that an approved permit is modified in accordance with this Section, the Permit Board shall review the bond for adequacy and, if necessary, shall require adjustment of the bond to conform to the permit as modified.
§ 3507. Permit Renewals: General Requirements
(a) Any valid, existing permit issued pursuant to a regulatory program shall carry with it the right of successive renewal upon expiration of the term of the permit, in accordance with § 53-9- 23 of the act and §§ 3507-3513. Successive renewal shall be available only for those areas which were specifically approved by the Permit Board on the application for the existing permit as within the boundaries of the permit.
(b) Permit renewal shall not be available for conducting surface coal mining and reclamation operations on the lands beyond the boundaries of the permit area approved under the existing permit. If an application for reissuance of a permit includes a proposal to extend the surface coal mining operation beyond the boundaries authorized in the existing permit, the portion of the application for reissuance of the permit which addresses any new land areas shall be subject to the requirements applicable to new applications under the act and these regulations.
(c) Application for permit reissuance shall be filed at least one hundred and eighty (180) days before the expiration of the permit. If an application for reissuance is timely filed, the operator may continue surface coal mining operations under the existing permit until the Permit Board takes action on the reissuance application.
§ 3509. Permit Renewals: Completed Applications
(a) Contents. Complete applications for renewals of a permit shall be made within the time prescribed by the act, §§ 1905 and 3507(c). Renewal applications shall be in a form and with contents required by the Department and in accordance with the act and § 3509(b)(2) including, at a minimum, the following:
(1) a statement of the name and address of the permittee, the term of the renewal requested, the permit number, and a description of any changes to the matters set forth in the
original application for a permit or prior renewal;
(2) a copy of the newspaper notice and proof of publication of same under § 53-9- 37 of the act and § 3103(a);
(3) sufficient evidence that the performance bond or any additional collateral the Permit Board may require under § 53-9- 31, which is in effect for the operation in question, will continue in full force and effect for any period of reissuance requested in the application; and
(4) evidence that a liability insurance policy or adequate self-insurance under § 4309 will be provided by the applicant for the proposed period of renewal.
(b) Processing and Review
(1) complete applications for renewal shall be subject to the requirements of public notification and participation contained in § 53-9- 37 and § 53-9- 39 of the act and §§ 3103-3109;
(2) before issuing the permit renewal, the Permit Board shall require any additional performance bond needed by the permittee to comply with the requirements of § 53-9- 31 of the act and § 3513(a)(5) to be filed with the Department.
(3) If an application for renewal includes any proposed modifications to the permit, such modifications shall be identified and subject to the requirements of § 3505.
(4) the bond value of collateral may be evaluated at any time, but it shall be evaluated as part of permit renewal and, if necessary, the performance bond amount increased or decreased. In no case shall the bond value of collateral exceed the market value of that collateral.
§ 3511. Permit Renewals: Terms
Any permit renewal shall be for a term not to exceed five (5) years.
§ 3513. Permit Renewals: Approval or Denial
(a) The permit shall be reissued after meeting the public notice requirements of § 53-9- 37, unless it is established by the opponents to reissuance or the Department, and written findings are made by the Permit Board stating that:
(1) the permittee is not satisfactorily meeting the terms and conditions of the existing permit;
(2) the present surface coal mining and reclamation operation is not in compliance with the environmental protection standards under the act and these regulations applicable to the existing permit;
(3) the requested reissuance substantially jeopardizes the operator's continuing responsibility to comply with the act and these regulations on existing permit areas;
(4) the operator has not provided evidence of having liability insurance or self-insurance as
required in under § 53-9- 25(2)(b) and § 4309;
(5) the operator has not provided evidence that the performance bond, or any additional bond the Permit Board may require under § 53-9- 31 of the act and Subchapter 2.4, which is in effect for the operation in question, will continue in full force and effect for any period of reissuance requested in the application; or
(6) the operator has failed to provide any additional revised or updated information required by the Department or Permit Board.
(b) In determining whether to approve or deny a renewal, the burden of proving that the permit should not be reissued shall be on the opponents of reissuance or the Department. If the Department determines that a condition exists which will prevent the Department from recommending permit reissuance to the Permit Board, the Department shall immediately provide the applicant with notice of such condition and provide the applicant an opportunity to initiate action to correct the condition. A violation of the act, these regulations, or a permit condition shall not be cause for denial of a permit renewal if the Permit Board determines that the violation:
(1) has been corrected; or
(2) is in the process of being corrected; or
(3) the applicant has filed and is presently pursuing, in good faith, a direct administrative or judicial appeal to contest the validity of that violation.
(c) The Permit Board shall send copies of its decision to the applicant and to any interested party who requested a public hearing or filed written objections or comments to the renewal, if the interested party provided the Permit Board with a complete address and to OSM.
(d) Any interested party shall have the right to formal hearing and judicial review set forth in § 53-9- 39, § 53-9- 77 and Rule 33.
§ 3515. Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights: General Requirements
No transfer, assignment, or sale of the rights granted under any permit issued pursuant to this regulatory program shall be made without the prior written approval of the Permit Board in the form of a new permit issued in the name of the transferee, in accordance with § 53-9- 21 of the act and §§ 3515-3517.
§ 3517. Transfer, Assignment or Sale of Permit Rights: Obtaining Approval
(a) A successor in interest to a permittee who applies for a new permit within thirty (30) days of succeeding to that interest, and who is able to obtain the bond coverage of the original permittee, pursuant to § 53-9- 31 of the act and Subchapter 2.4, may continue surface coal mining and reclamation operations according to the approved mining and reclamation plan of the original permittee until the Permit Board takes action on the successor’s application. Any person seeking to succeed by transfer, assignment or sale to the rights granted by a permit issued under this regulatory program shall, prior to the date of such transfer, assignment or sale:
(1) obtain appropriate performance bond coverage in an amount sufficient to cover the
proposed operations, as required under Subchapter 2.4;
(2) provide the Permit Board with an application for approval of such proposed transfer, assignment or sale, including:
(A) the name and address of the existing permittee and permit number;
(B) a brief description of the proposed action requiring approval;
(C) for surface mining activities, the same information as is required by the act and §§ 2305, 2307, 2309, 2311(b), 2315 and 2317 for applications for new permits for those activities; and
(3) obtain the written approval of the Permit Board for transfer, assignment or sale of rights, according to the act and § 3517(c).
(b) (1) The person applying for approval of such transfer, assignment or sale of rights granted by a permit shall advertise the filing of the application as required for a new application under § 53-9- 37.
(2) Any interested party including, but not limited to, the head of any local, state or federal government agency may submit written comments on the application for approval to the Permit Board, within the thirty (30) days of the final date of publication required by § 3517(b)(1).
(c) The Permit Board may, upon the basis of the applicant's compliance with the requirements of § 3517(a) and (b), grant written approval for the transfer, sale or assignment of rights under a permit, if it first finds, in writing, that:
(1) the applicant is eligible to receive a permit in accordance with §§ 3113 and 3115;
(2) the applicant has, in accordance with § 3517(a)(1), submitted a performance bond or other collateral as required by Subchapter 2.4 and at least equivalent to the bond or other collateral of the original permittee;
(3) the applicant will continue to conduct the operations involved in full compliance with the terms and conditions of the original permit, unless and until it has obtained a new permit in accordance with this Subchapter and as required in § 53-9- 21; and
(4) the applicant and application meet any other requirements specified by the Department.
(d) Notification
(1) the Permit Board shall notify the permittee, the successor, commentors, and OSM, of its findings;
(2) the successor shall immediately provide notice to the Permit Board of the consummation of the transfer, assignment or sale of permit rights.
Rule 37. Small Operator Assistance
§ 3701. Authority
The Department shall provide financial and other assistance under § 53-9- 26 of the act subject to the availability of federal or other special funds for that purpose.
§ 3703. Responsibilities: General
The State Geologist shall:
(a) review requests for assistance and determine qualified operators;
(b) develop and maintain a list of qualified laboratories, and select and pay laboratories for services rendered;
(c) conduct periodic on-site evaluations of the Mississippi surface mining program activities with the appropriate small operator; and
(d) participate with the Office of Surface Mining in data coordination activities with the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and other appropriate agencies or institutions.
§ 3705. Eligibility for Assistance
An applicant is eligible for assistance if he or she:
(a) intends to apply for a permit pursuant to the act;
(b) establishes that his or her probable total attributed annual production from all locations on which the operator is issued the surface coal mining and reclamation permit will not exceed 300,000 tons. Production from the following operations shall be attributed to the applicant:
(1) the pro rata share, based upon percentage of ownership of the applicant, of coal produced by operations in which the applicant owns more than a 10 percent interest;
(2) the pro rata share, based upon percentage of ownership of the applicant, of coal produced in other operations by persons who own more than 10 percent of the applicant's operation;
(3) all coal produced by operations owned by persons who directly or indirectly control the applicant by reason of direction of the management; and
(4) all coal produced by operations owned by members of the applicant's family and the applicant's relatives, unless it is established that there is no direct or indirect business relationship between or among them;
(c) is not restricted in any manner from receiving a permit under the permanent regulatory program; and
(d) does not organize or reorganize his or her company solely for the purpose of obtaining assistance under the Small Operator Assistance Program.
§ 3707. Filing for Assistance
Each applicant shall submit the following information to the State Geologist at any time after initiation of the Small Operator Assistance Program within the state:
(a) a statement of intent to file permit applications;
(b) the names and addresses of:
(1) the potential permit applicant; and
(2) the potential operator if different from the applicant.
(c) a schedule of the estimated total production of coal from the proposed permit area and all other locations from which production is attributed to the applicant under § 3705. The schedule shall include for each location:
(1) the name under which coal is or will be mined;
(2) the permit number and Mining Health and Safety Administration identification number;
(3) the actual coal production for the year preceding the application for assistance and that portion of the production attributed to the applicant; and
(4) the estimated coal production for each year of the proposed permit and that portion attributed to the applicant;
(d) a description of:
(1) the method of surface coal mining operations proposed;
(2) the anticipated starting and termination date of mining operations;
(3) the number of acres of land to be affected by the proposed mining; and
(4) a general statement on the probable depth and thickness of the coal resource including a statement of reserves in the permit area and the method by which they were calculated;
(e) a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map of 1:24,000 scale or larger or other topographic map of equivalent detail which clearly shows:
(1) the area of land to be affected and the natural drainage above and below the affected area;
(2) the names of property owners in the area to be affected and of adjacent lands;
(3) the location of existing structures and developed water sources within the area to be affected and on adjacent lands;
(4) the location of existing and proposed test boring or core sampling; and
(5) the location and extent of known working of any underground mines;
(f) copies of documents which show that:
(1) the applicant has a legal right to enter and commence mining within the permit area; and
(2) a legal right of entry has been obtained for the Department to inspect the lands to be mined and adjacent lands which may be affected to collect environmental data or install necessary instruments.
§ 3709. Application Approval and Notice
(a) If the State Geologist determines that the applicant is eligible, he or she shall so recommend to the Commission, and shall inform the applicant in writing of his or her determination. The State Geologist will place the application on the agenda of a future Commission meeting for the Commission’s consideration, and shall inform the applicant of the time and place of the Commission meeting. The Commission shall then determine the eligibility of the applicant.
(b) If the State Geologist finds the applicant ineligible, he or she shall inform the applicant in writing that the application is denied and shall state the reasons for denial. The determination of the State Geologist to deny the application shall be subject to review by the Commission at the request of the applicant.
§ 3711. Program Services and Data Requirements
(a) To the extent possible with available funds, the State Geologist shall select and pay a qualified laboratory to make the determination and statement and provide other services referenced in § 3711(b) for eligible operators who request assistance.
(b) The State Geologist shall determine the data needed for each applicant or group of applicants. Data collected and the results provided to the State Geologist and the Department shall be sufficient to satisfy the requirements for:
(1) the determination of the probable hydrologic consequences of the surface mining and reclamation operations in the proposed permit area and adjacent areas, including the engineering analyses and designs necessary for the determination in accordance with § 2523, and any other applicable provisions of these regulations; and
(2) the drilling and statement of the results of test borings or core samplings for the proposed permit area in accordance with § 2509(b) and any other applicable regulations.
(3) the development of cross-section maps and plans required by § 2537;
(4) the collection of archaeological and historic information and related plans required by §§ 2505 and 2731 and any other archaeological and historic information required by the Department;
(5) pre-blast surveys required by § 2707; and
(6) the collection of site-specific resources information, the production of protection and enhancement plans for fish and wildlife habitats required by § 2713, and information and plans for any other environmental values required by the Department under the act.
(c) Data collection and analysis may proceed concurrently with the development of mining and reclamation plans by the operator.
(d) Data collected under this program shall be made publicly available in accordance with § 3111. The State Geologist shall develop procedures for interstate coordination and exchange of data.
§ 3713. Qualified Laboratories
(a) General
As used in this Rule, qualified laboratory means a designated public agency, private firm, institution, or analytical laboratory that can provide the required determination of probable hydrologic consequences or statement of results of test borings or core samplings or other services as specified at § 3711 under the Small Operator Assistance Program and that meets the standards of § 3713(b).
(b) Basic Qualifications
(1) To qualify for designation, the laboratory shall demonstrate to the State Geologist that it:
(A) is staffed with experienced, professional or technical personnel in the fields of hydrology, mining engineering, aquatic biology, geology or chemistry applicable to the work to be performed;
(B) is capable of competently collecting necessary field data and samples;
(C) has adequate space for material preparation, cleaning and sterilizing necessary equipment, and has stationary equipment, storage and space to accommodate periods of peak work loads;
(D) meets the requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act or the equivalent state safety and health program;
(E) has the financial capability and business organization necessary to perform the work required.
(F) has analytical, monitoring and measuring equipment capable of meeting the applicable standards; and
(G) has the capability of making hydrologic field measurements and analytical laboratory determinations by acceptable hydrologic, geologic, or analytical methods in accordance with the requirements of §§ 2507 and 2509 and any other applicable provisions of these regulations. Other appropriate methods or guidelines for data acquisition may be approved by the State Geologist.
(2) The qualified laboratory must be capable of performing either the determination or statement under § 3711.B. Subcontractors may be used to provide the services required provided their use is identified at the time a determination is made that a firm is qualified
and they meet requirements specified by the State Geologist.
(3) The qualified laboratory must have a Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Program with a designated QA/QC officer. The qualified laboratory must submit their QA/QC information to the Department prior to conducting their services.
(4) The qualified laboratory must co-operate in an EPA, U.S.G.S. or similar Standard Performance Program under the guidance of the Department, if required.
§ 3715. Assistance Funding
(a) Use of Funds. Funds authorized for this program shall be used to provide the services specified in § 3711 and shall not be used to cover administrative expenses.
(b) Allocation of Funds. The State Geologist shall to the extent practicable establish a formula for allocating funds among eligible small operators if available funds are less than those required to provide the services pursuant to this Rule. This formula shall include such factors as the applicant's:
(1) anticipated date of filing a permit application;
(2) anticipated date for commencing mining; and
(3) performance history.
§ 3717. Applicant Liability
(a) The applicant shall reimburse the Department for the cost of the services performed pursuant to this Rule if:
(1) the applicant submits false information, fails to submit a permit application within one year from the date of receipt of the approved laboratory report, or fails to mine after obtaining a permit;
(2) the Commission finds that the operator's actual and attributed annual production of coal for all locations exceeds 300,000 tons during the 12 months immediately following the date on which the operator is issued the surface coal mining and reclamation permit; or
(3) the permit is sold, transferred, or assigned to another person and the transferee's total actual and attributed production exceeds the 300,000 ton production limit during the 12 months immediately following the date on which the permit was originally issued. Under this Paragraph the applicant and its successor are jointly and severally obligated to reimburse the Department.
(b) The Commission may waive the reimbursement obligation if it finds that the applicant at all times acted in good faith.
Subchapter 2.4 Bond and Insurance Requirements for Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations
Rule 39. General Requirements for Bonding of Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations Under Regulatory Program
§ 3901. Requirement to File a Bond
(a) Before a permit is issued, the applicant shall file with the Department, on a form prescribed and furnished by the Department, a bond or bonds for performance made payable to the Commission and conditioned upon the faithful performance of all the requirements of the act, the regulatory program, the permit and the reclamation plan. “Bond” as used in this Subchapter includes other forms of collateral as approved by the Permit Board consistent with § 53-9- 31(2).
(b) An operator shall not disturb surface acreage or extend any operations prior to receipt of approval from the Permit Board of the performance bond covering the surface acreage to be affected.
(1) The bond or bonds shall cover that area of land within the permit area upon which the operator will initiate and conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations during the initial term of the permit.
(2) As surface coal mining and reclamation operations on succeeding increments are initiated and conducted within the permit area, the permittee shall file with the Department an additional bond or bonds to cover those increments in accordance with § 53-9- 31 and this Section.
(3) The operator shall identify the initial and successive areas or increments for bonding on the permit application map submitted for approval as provided in the application and shall specify the bond amount to be provided for each area or increment.
(4) Independent increments shall be of sufficient size and configuration to provide for efficient reclamation operations should reclamation by the Department become necessary pursuant to this act and Rule 47.
(c) An operator shall not disturb any surface areas, succeeding increments, or extend any underground shafts, tunnels or operations prior to approval by the Permit Board of the required performance bond.
(d) The applicant shall file, with the approval of the Permit Board, a bond or bonds under one of the following schemes to cover the bond amounts for the permit area as determined in accordance with § 4101:
(1) a performance bond or bonds for the entire permit area;
(2) a cumulative bond schedule and the performance bond required for full reclamation of the initial area to be disturbed; or
(3) an incremental-bond schedule and the performance bond required for the first increment in the schedule.
(e) The amount, duration, form, conditions and terms of the performance bond shall conform to
Rules 41 and 43.
§ 3903. Requirement to File a Certificate of Liability Insurance
Each applicant for a permit shall submit to the Department, as part of the permit application:
(a) a certificate issued by an insurance company authorized to do business in the United States certifying that the applicant has a public liability insurance policy in force for the surface coal mining and reclamation operations for which the permit is sought; the amount, duration, form, conditions and terms of this insurance shall conform to § 53-9- 25(2) and § 4309; or
(b) evidence that the applicant has satisfied other state or federal self-insurance requirements pursuant to § 53-9- 25(2) and § 4309.
§ 3905. Responsibilities
(a) The Department shall prescribe and furnish the form for filing a performance bond.
(b) The Permit Board shall determine the amount of the performance bond required for the permit area, including adjustments to the initial amount from time-to-time as land acreage in the permit area are revised, or when other relevant conditions change according to the minimum requirements of § 4107.
(c) The Permit Board may not accept a self-bond in lieu of a surety or collateral bond, unless the permittee meets the requirements of § 4305 and any additional requirements in the program.
(d) The Permit Board shall release the permittee from his bond and insurance requirements consistent with Rule 45.
(e) If the conditions specified in Rule 47 occur, the Commission shall cause all or part of a bond to be forfeited consistent with Rule 47.
(f) The Permit Board shall require in the permit that adequate bond coverage be in effect at all times. Except as provided in § 4303(e)(6)(C), operating without a bond is a violation of a condition upon which the permit is issued.
Rule 41. Amount and Duration of Performance Bond
§ 4101. Determination of Bond Amount
The standard applied by the Permit Board in determining the amount of performance bond shall be the estimated cost to the Department if it had to perform the reclamation, restoration and abatement work of a person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations under the act, these regulations and the permit, and such additional work as would be required to achieve compliance with the general standards for revegetation in § 53103(a)(5) in the event the permittee fails to implement an approved alternative postmining land use plan within the two years required by § 53103. This amount shall be based on, but not be limited to:
(a) the estimated costs submitted by the permittee in accordance with § 2715;
(b) the additional estimated costs to the Department which may arise from applicable public contracting requirements or the need to bring personnel and equipment to the permit area after its abandonment by the permittee to perform reclamation, restoration and abatement work;
(c) all additional estimated costs necessary, expedient and incident to the satisfactory completion of the requirements identified in this Section;
(d) an additional amount based on factors of cost changes during the preceding five years for the types of activities associated with the reclamation to be performed;
(e) such other cost information as may be required by or available to the Permit Board.
§ 4103. Minimum Amount
The amount of the bond for surface coal mining and reclamation operations shall be $10,000, at a minimum, for the entire area under one permit and be sufficient to assure performance of reclamation, restoration and abatement work required of a person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations under the act, these regulations and the provisions of the permit, if the work had to be performed by the Department in the event of forfeiture.
§ 4105. Period of Liability
(a) Liability under performance bond(s) applicable to a permit shall continue until all reclamation, restoration and abatement work required of persons who conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations under requirements of the act, these regulations, the regulatory program and the provisions of the permit has been completed, and the permit terminated by release of the permittee from any further liability in accordance with Rule 45.
(b) In addition to the period necessary to achieve compliance with all requirements of the act, these regulations, the regulatory program and the permit, including the standards for the success of revegetation as required by § 53103, the period of liability under performance bond shall continue for a minimum period beginning with the last year of augmented seeding, fertilizing, irrigation or other work. The minimum period of liability shall continue for not less than five full years. The period of liability shall begin again whenever augmented seeding, fertilizing, irrigation or other work is required or conducted on the site prior to bond release.
(c) If the Permit Board approves a long-term intensive agricultural post-mining land use, in accordance with § 53109, the applicable five-year period of liability shall commence at the date of initial planting for such long-term intensive agricultural land use.
(d) With the approval of the Permit Board, a bond may be posted and approved to guarantee specific phases of reclamation within the permit area provided the sum of phase bonds posted equals or exceeds the total amount required under §§ 4103 and 4107. The scope of work to be guaranteed and the liability assumed under each phase bond shall be specified in detail.
(e) Isolated and clearly defined portions of the permit area requiring extended liability may be separated from the original area and bonded separately with the approval of the Permit Board. Such areas shall be limited in extent and not constitute a scattered, intermittent, or checkerboard pattern of failure. Access to the separated areas for remedial work may be included in the area under extended liability if deemed necessary by the Department.
(f) The bond liability of the permittee shall include only those actions which he or she is obligated to take under the permit, including completion of the reclamation plan, so that the land will be capable of supporting the postmining land use approved under § 53109.
(g) Implementation of an alternative postmining land use approved under § 53109(c) which is beyond the control of the permittee need not be covered by the bond. Bond liability for prime farmland shall be as specified in § 4503(b).
§ 4107. Adjustment of Amount
(a) The amount of the performance bond liability applicable to a permit shall be adjusted by the Permit Board as the acreage in the permit area is modified, methods of mining operation change, standards of reclamation change or when the cost of future reclamation, restoration or abatement work changes. The Department shall notify the permittee, the surety and any person with a property interest in collateral posted as bond of any proposed bond adjustment and provide the permittee an opportunity to review and discuss the adjustment with the Department prior to the Permit Board’s decision regarding the adjustment. The Department shall review each outstanding performance bond at the time that permit reviews are conducted under § 3503, and re-evaluate those performance bonds in accordance with the standards in § 4101.
(b) A permittee may request reduction of the required performance bond amount upon submission of evidence to the Permit Board proving that the permittee’s method of operation or other circumstances will reduce the maximum estimated cost to the department to complete the reclamation responsibilities and therefore warrant a reduction of the bond amount. Bond adjustments which involve undisturbed land or revision of the cost estimate of reclamation are not considered bond release subject to procedures of Rule 45.
(c) In the event that an approved permit is modified or revised in accordance with § 3505, the Permit Board shall review the bond for adequacy and, if necessary, shall require adjustment of the bond to conform to the permit as modified.
Source Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 31 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
Rule 43. Form, Conditions and Terms of Performance Bonds and Liability Insurance
§ 4301. Form of the Performance Bond
The form for the performance bond shall be prescribed by the Department in accordance with this Rule. The Permit Board shall allow for either:
(1) a surety bond,
(2) a collateral bond,
(3) a self-bond,
(4) a letter or letters of credit, or
(5) a combination of any of these bonding methods.
§ 4303. Terms and Conditions of the Bond
(a) The performance bond shall be in an amount determined by the permit board as provided in §§ 4101 and 4103.
(b) The performance bond shall be payable to the Commission.
(c) The performance bond shall be conditioned upon faithful performance of all of the requirements of the act, these regulations and the conditions of the permit, and shall cover the entire permit area or an identified increment of land within the permit area upon which the operator will initiate and conduct surface coal mining and reclamation operations during the initial term of the permit.
(d) The duration of the bond shall be for the time period provided in § 4105.
(e) Surety bonds shall be subject to the following conditions.
(1) The Permit Board shall not approve the bond of a surety company unless the bond shall not be cancelable by the surety at any time for any reason including, but not limited to, nonpayment of premium or bankruptcy of the permittee during the period of liability. Surety bond coverage for permitted lands not disturbed may be canceled with the consent of the Permit Board; provided, the surety gives at least 60 days notice to both the permittee and the Permit Board of the intent to cancel prior to cancellation. Such notice shall be by certified mail and shall not be effective until received by both the permittee and Permit Board. Cancellation shall not be effective for lands subject to bond coverage which are disturbed after receipt of notice, but prior to approval by the Permit Board. The Permit Board may approve such cancellation only if a replacement bond is filed by the permittee prior to the cancellation date, or the permit is amended so that the surface coal mining operations approved under the permit are reduced to the degree necessary to cover all the costs attributable to the completion of reclamation operations on the reduced permit area in accordance with Rule 41 and the remaining performance bond liability.
(2) The Permit Board shall not accept surety bonds in excess of 10 percent of the surety company's capital surplus account as shown on the balance sheet certified by a certified public accountant, unless otherwise provided by law.
(3) The Permit Board shall not accept surety bonds from a surety company for any person, on all permits held by that person, in excess of three times the company's maximum single obligation as provided by state law, or, in the absence of state law, as provided in § 4303(e)(2).
(4) The Permit Board may provide in the bond that the amount shall be confessed to judgment upon forfeiture.
(5) The bond shall provide that the surety and the permittee shall be liable jointly and severally.
(6) The bond shall provide that:
(A) the surety will give prompt notice to the permittee and the Permit Board of any notice received or action filed alleging the insolvency or bankruptcy of the surety
or the permittee, or alleging any violations of regulatory requirements which could result in suspension or revocation of the surety's license to do business;
(B) in the event the surety becomes unable to fulfill its obligations under the bond for any reason, notice shall be given immediately to the permittee and the Permit Board;
(C) upon the incapacity of a surety company by reason of bankruptcy, insolvency, or suspension or revocation of a charter or license, the permittee shall be deemed to be without bond coverage and shall promptly notify the Permit Board. The Permit Board, upon notification received through the procedures of § 4303(e)(6)(A) or from the permittee, shall, in writing, notify the operator who is without bond coverage and specify a reasonable period, not to exceed 90 days, to replace bond coverage. If an adequate bond is not posted by the end of the period allowed, the operator shall cease coal extraction and shall comply with the provisions of § 53107 and shall immediately begin to conduct reclamation operations in accordance with the reclamation plan. Mining operations shall not resume until the Permit Board has determined that an acceptable bond has been posted.
(7) A surety bond shall be executed by the operator and a corporate surety licensed to do business in Mississippi.
(f) Collateral bonds, except for letters of credit and cash accounts, shall be subject to the following conditions.
(1) The Department shall obtain possession of and keep in custody all collateral deposited by the applicant, until authorized for release or replacement as provided in this Subchapter.
(2) The Permit Board shall value collateral at their current market value, not face value.
(3) The Permit Board shall require that all collateral bonds comply with the provisions of § 105. Collateral Bond.
(4) The Permit Board shall require that certificates of deposit be assigned to the Commission, in writing, and upon the books of the bank issuing such certificates.
(5) The Permit Board shall not accept an individual certificate of deposit for a denomination in excess of $100,000 or maximum insurable amount as determined by FDIC and FSLIC.
(6) The Permit Board shall require the banks issuing certificates of deposit to waive all rights of set off or liens which it has or might have against those certificates.
(7) The Permit Board shall only accept automatically renewable certificates of deposit.
(8) The Permit Board shall value certificates of deposit for full or partial fulfillment of the bonding requirement at the certificate’s face value and shall not allow future accrued interest to be considered in that valuation.
(9) The estimated bond value of all collateral posted as assurance under this Section shall be subject to a margin which is the ratio of bond value to market value, as determined by the
Permit Board. The margin shall reflect legal and liquidation fees, as well as value depreciation, marketability and fluctuations which might affect the net cash available to the Department to complete reclamation.
(10) The bond value of collateral may be evaluated at any time, but it shall be evaluated as part of permit renewal and, if necessary, the performance bond amount increased or decreased. In no case shall the bond value of collateral exceed the market value.
(11) Persons with an interest in collateral posted as a bond, and who desire notification of actions pursuant to the bond, shall request the notification in writing to the Department at the time collateral is offered.
(g) Letters of credit shall be subject to the following conditions.
(1) The letter may only be issued by a bank organized or authorized to do business in the United States.
(2) Letters of credit shall be irrevocable during their term. A letter of credit used as security in areas requiring continuous bond coverage shall be forfeited and shall be collected by the Commission if not replaced by other suitable bond or letter of credit at least 30 days before its expiration date.
(3) The letter must be payable only to the Commission in part or in full upon demand and receipt from the Commission of a notice of forfeiture issued in accordance with Rule 47.
(4) The Permit Board shall not accept a letter of credit in excess of 10 percent of the bank's capital surplus account as shown on a balance sheet certified by a certified public accountant.
(5) The Permit Board shall not accept letters of credit from a bank for any person, on all permits held by that person, in excess of three times the company's maximum single obligation as provided by state law or, in the absence of state law, as provided in § 4303(g)(4).
(6) The Permit Board may provide in the letter of credit that the amount shall be confessed to judgment upon forfeiture.
(7) The letter of credit shall provide that:
(A) the bank will give prompt notice to the permittee and the Department of any notice received or action filed alleging the insolvency or bankruptcy of the bank, or alleging any violations of regulatory requirements which could result in suspension or revocation of the bank's charter or license to do business;
(B) in the event the bank becomes unable to fulfill its obligations under the letter of credit for any reason, notice shall be given immediately to the permittee and the Department;
(C) upon the incapacity of a bank by reason of bankruptcy, insolvency, or suspension or revocation of a charter or license, the permittee shall be deemed to be without bond coverage and shall promptly notify the Department. The Department, upon
notification received through the procedures of § 4303(g)(7)(A) or from the permittee, shall, in writing, notify the operator who is without bond coverage and specify a reasonable period, not to exceed 90 days, to replace bond coverage. If an adequate bond is not posted by the end of the period allowed, the operator shall cease coal extraction and shall comply with the provisions of § 53107 and shall immediately begin to conduct reclamation operations in accordance with the reclamation plan. Mining operations shall not resume until the Permit Board has determined that an acceptable bond has been posted.
(8) Persons with an interest in the letter of credit, and who desire notification of actions pursuant to the letter, shall request the notification in writing to the Department at the time the letter is offered.
(h) Cash accounts shall be subject to the following conditions:
(1) The Permit Board may authorize the operator to supplement the bond through the establishment of a cash account in one or more federally-insured or equivalently protected accounts made payable upon demand to, or deposited directly with, the Commission. The total bond including the cash account shall not be less than the amount required under terms of performance bonds including any adjustments, less amounts released in accordance with Rule 45.
(2) Any interest paid on a cash account shall be retained in the account and applied to the bond value of the account unless the Permit Board has approved the payment of interest to the operator.
(3) Certificates of deposit may be substituted for a cash account with the approval of the Permit Board.
(4) The Permit Board shall not accept an individual cash account in an amount in excess of $100,000 or the maximum insurable amount as determined by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation.
§ 4305. Self-bonding
(a) The Permit Board may accept a self-bond from an applicant for a permit if all of the following conditions are met by the applicant or its parent corporation guarantor:
(1) The applicant designates with the Mississippi Secretary of State a suitable agent to receive service of process in the state of Mississippi.
(2) The applicant has been in continuous operation as a business entity for a period of not less than five years. Continuous operation shall mean that business was conducted over a period of five years immediately preceding the time of application.
(A) The Permit Board may allow a joint venture or syndicate with less than five years of continuous operation to qualify under this requirement, if each member of the joint venture or syndicate has been in continuous operation for at least five years immediately preceding the time of application.
(B) When calculating the period of continuous operation, the Permit Board may
exclude past periods of interruption to the operation of the business entity that were beyond the applicant's control and that do not affect the applicant's likelihood of remaining in business during the proposed surface coal mining and reclamation operations.
(3) The applicant submits financial information in sufficient detail to show that the applicant meets one of the following criteria:
(A) the applicant has a current rating for its most recent bond issuance of "A" or higher as issued by either Moody's Investor Service or Standard and Poor's Corporation;
(B) the applicant has a tangible net worth of at least $10 million, a ratio of total liabilities to net worth of 2.5 times or less, and a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.2 times or greater; or
(C) the applicant's fixed assets in the United States total at least $20 million, and the applicant has a ratio of total liabilities to net worth of 2.5 times or less, and a ratio of current assets to current liabilities of 1.2 times or greater.
(4) The applicant submits:
(A) financial statements for the most recently completed fiscal year accompanied by a report prepared by an independent certified public accountant in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and containing the accountant's audit opinion or review opinion of the financial statements with no adverse opinion;
(B) unaudited financial statements for completed quarters in the current fiscal year; and
(C) additional unaudited information as requested by the Department.
(b) The Permit Board may accept a written guarantee for an applicant's self-bond from a parent corporation guarantor, if the guarantor meets the conditions of § 4305(a)(1)-(4) as if it were the applicant. Such a written guarantee shall be referred to as a "corporate guarantee". The terms of the corporate guarantee shall provide for the following:
(1) if the applicants fails to complete the reclamation plan, the guarantor shall do so or the guarantor shall be liable under the indemnity agreement to provide funds to the Commission sufficient to complete the reclamation plan, but not to exceed the bond amount;
(2) the corporate guarantee shall remain in force unless the guarantor sends notice of cancellation by certified mail to the applicant and to the Department at least 90 days in advance of the cancellation date, and the Permit Board accepts the cancellation;
(3) the cancellation may be accepted by the Permit Board if the applicant obtains suitable replacement bond before the cancellation date or if the lands for which the self-bond, or portion thereof, was accepted have not been disturbed;
(4) the Permit Board may accept a written guarantee for an applicant's self-bond from any
corporate guarantor, whenever the applicant meets the conditions of § 4305(a)(1)-(2) and (4), and the guarantor meets the conditions of § 4305(a)(1)-(4). Such a written guarantee shall be referred to as a "non-parent corporate guarantee." The terms of this guarantee shall provide for compliance with the conditions of § 4305(b)(1)-(4). The Department or Permit Board may require the applicant to submit any information specified in § 4305(a)(3) in order to determine the financial capabilities of the applicant.
(c) For the Permit Board to accept an applicant's self-bond, the total amount of the outstanding and proposed self-bonds of the applicant for surface coal mining and reclamation operations shall not exceed 25 percent of the applicant's tangible net worth in the United States. For the Permit Board to accept a corporate guarantee, the total amount of the parent corporation guarantor's present and proposed self-bonds and guaranteed self-bonds for surface coal mining and reclamation operations shall not exceed 25 percent of the guarantor's tangible net worth in the United States. For the Permit Board to accept a non-parent corporate guarantee, the total amount of the non-parent corporate guarantor's present and proposed self-bonds and guaranteed self- bonds shall not exceed 25 percent of the guarantor's tangible net worth in the United States.
(d) If the Permit Board accepts an applicant's self-bond, an indemnity agreement shall be submitted subject to the following requirements.
(1) The indemnity agreement shall be executed by all persons and parties who are to be bound by it, including the parent corporation guarantor, and shall bind each jointly and severally.
(2) Corporations applying for a self-bond, and parent and non-parent corporations guaranteeing an applicant's self-bond, shall submit an indemnity agreement signed by two corporate officers who are authorized to bind their corporations. A copy of such authorization shall be provided to the of Department along with an affidavit certifying that such an agreement is valid under all applicable federal and state laws. In addition, the guarantor shall provide a copy of the corporate authorization demonstrating that the corporation may guarantee the self-bond and execute the indemnity agreement.
(3) If the applicant is a partnership, joint venture or syndicate, the agreement shall bind each partner or party who has a beneficial interest, directly or indirectly, in the applicant.
(4) Pursuant to Rule 47, the applicant, parent or non-parent corporate guarantor shall be required to complete the approved reclamation plan for the lands in default or to pay to the Commission an amount necessary to complete the approved reclamation plan, not to exceed the bond amount. If permitted under state law, the indemnity agreement when under forfeiture shall operate as a judgment against those parties liable under the indemnity agreement.
(e) The Department may require self-bonded applicants, parent and non-parent corporate guarantors to submit an update of the information required under § 4305(a)(3) and (4) within 90 days after the close of each fiscal year following the issuance of the self-bond or corporate guarantee.
(f) If at any time during the period when a self-bond is posted, the financial conditions of the applicant, parent or non-parent corporate guarantor change so that the criteria of § 4305(a)(3) and (c) are not satisfied, the permittee shall notify the Department immediately and shall within 90 days post an alternate form of bond in the same amount as the self-bond. Should the permittee fail to post an adequate substitute bond, the provisions of § 4303(e)(6) shall apply.
§ 4307. Replacement of Bonds
(a) The Permit Board may allow permittees to replace existing surety or collateral bonds with other surety or collateral bonds, if the liability which has accrued against the permittee on the permit area is transferred to such replacement bonds.
(b) The Permit Board may allow the permittee to replace existing surety or collateral bonds with a self-bond, provided that the permittee meets the requirements of self-bonding as provided in § 4305.
(c) The Permit Board shall not release existing performance bonds until the permittee has submitted and the Permit Board has approved acceptable replacement performance bonds. A replacement of performance bonds pursuant to this Section shall not constitute a release of bond under Rule 45.
§ 4309. Terms and Conditions for Liability Insurance
(a) The Department shall require the applicant to submit at the time of permit application a certificate issued by an insurance company authorized to do business in the United States certifying that the applicant has a public liability insurance policy in force for the surface coal mining and reclamation operation for which the permit is sought. The policy shall provide for personal injury and property damage protection in an amount adequate to compensate all persons injured or property damaged as a result of surface coal mining and reclamation operations, including use of explosives and damage to water wells, and entitled to compensation under the applicable provisions of state law. Minimum insurance coverage for bodily injury shall be $300,000 for each occurrence and $500,000 aggregate; and minimum insurance coverage for property damage shall be $300,000 for each occurrence and $500,000 aggregate.
(b) The policy shall be maintained in full force during the life of the permit or any renewal thereof, including completion of all reclamation operations under these regulations.
(c) The policy shall include a rider requiring that the insurer notify the Department whenever substantive changes are made in the policy, including any termination or failure to renew.
(d) The Department may accept from the applicant, in lieu of a certificate for public liability insurance policy, satisfactory evidence from the applicant that it satisfies applicable state self- insurance requirements. This subsection will become effective only upon the promulgation of regulations by the Commission or other appropriate state agency regarding self-insurance requirements of the state of Mississippi and approval of these regulations by the Secretary of the Interior.
Rule 45. Procedures, Criteria and Schedule for Release of Performance Bond
§ 4501. Procedures for Seeking Release of Performance Bond
(a) Bond Release Application and Contents. The permittee or any person authorized to act on his behalf may file an application with the Permit Board for release of all or part of the performance bond.
(1) Applications may only be filed at times or seasons that allow the Department to evaluate properly the reclamation operations alleged to have been completed. The times or seasons appropriate for the evaluation of certain types of reclamation shall be identified in the mining and reclamation operations plan required in Subchapter 2.3 of these regulations and approved by the Permit Board.
(2) The application shall include copies of letters sent to adjoining property owners, surface owners, local government bodies, planning agencies, and sewage and water treatment facilities or water companies in the locality of the permit area notifying them of the permittee's intention to seek release of performance bond(s). These letters shall be sent before the permittee files the application for release. These letters shall be sent certified mail to all listed public entities.
(3) Within 30 days after filing the application for release, the permittee shall submit proof of publication of the advertisement required by § 4501(b). Such proof of publication shall be considered part of the bond release application.
(4) The permittee shall include in the application for bond release a notarized statement which certifies that all applicable reclamation activities have been accomplished in accordance with the requirements of the act, the regulatory program, and the approved reclamation plan. Such certification shall be submitted for each application or phase of bond release.
(b) Newspaper Advertisement of Application. At the time of filing an application under this Section, the permittee shall advertise the filing of the application in a local newspaper and in a regional newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall:
(1) be placed in the newspaper at least once a week for four consecutive weeks;
(2) show the name of the permittee, including the number and date of issuance or renewal of the permit;
(3) show the precise location and the number of acres of the lands subject to the application;
(4) show the total amount of bond in effect for the permit area and the amount for which release is sought;
(5) summarize the reclamation, restoration or abatement work done including, but not limited to, backstowing or mine sealing, if applicable, and give the dates of completion of that work;
(6) describe the reclamation results achieved, as they relate to compliance with the act, these regulations, and the approved mining and reclamation plan and permit; and
(7) state that written comments, objections and requests for a public hearing may be submitted to the Department; provide the address of the Department; and provide the closing date by which comments, objections and requests must be received.
(c) Objections and Requests for Hearing. Written objections to the proposed bond release and requests for a public hearing may be filed with the Department within thirty (30) days following
the last advertisement of the filing of the application. Written objections and requests for public hearings may be filed by any interested party or any Federal, State, or local governmental agency which has jurisdiction or special expertise with respect to any environmental, social or economic impact involved in the operation or which is authorized to develop and enforce environmental standards. If requested, the Permit Board shall hold a public hearing. The Permit Board on its own motion may hold a public hearing concerning the bond release application.
(d) Inspection by Department. Upon receipt of the bond release application the Department shall, within 30 days, or as soon thereafter as weather conditions permit, conduct an inspection and evaluation of the reclamation work involved. The evaluation shall consider, among other factors, the degree of difficulty to complete any remaining reclamation, whether pollution of surface water or ground water is occurring, the probability of future occurrence of such pollution and the estimated cost of abating such pollution. The surface owner, agent or lessee shall be given notice of such inspection and may participate with the Department in making the bond release inspection. The Department may arrange with the permittee to allow access to the permit area, upon request by any person with an interest in bond release, for the purpose of gathering information relevant to the proceeding.
(e) Public Hearing. The Permit Board shall schedule a public hearing if a hearing is requested, within sixty (60) days of the receipt of the request. The hearing shall be held in the locality of the permit area for which bond release is sought.
(1) The date, time and location of the public hearing shall be advertised by the Permit Board in the same manner as provided for the publication of notice for advertisement of land ownership under § 53-9-37. The last public hearing notice shall be published at least seven (7) days, but no more than fourteen (14) days before the scheduled public hearing date.
(2) If all persons requesting the public hearing stipulate agreement before the requested public hearing, the public hearing may be canceled at the discretion of the Permit Board.
(3) An electronic or stenographic record shall be made of the hearing and the record maintained for access by the parties pursuant to the Mississippi Public Records Act.
(4) The Department shall, in response to a specific request therefor, arrange with the applicant for reasonable public access to the area which forms the subject of the hearing. Such access shall be made available at a specific date and time at least one week before the date of the hearing. Information regarding this right to request access shall be included with the notice of public hearing. Any member of the public who enters upon the subject area in accordance with this Section shall comply with all state and federal laws and regulations regarding health and safety on a mine site including, but not limited to, regulations promulgated by the Commission, the Office of Surface Mining, the Mine Safety and Health Administration and the Occupational Health and Safety Administration. The applicant will have available, in various sizes, any special equipment to be worn under the foregoing laws and regulations including, but not limited to, mandated types of headgear, footgear and eyewear.
(f) Department Review and Decision
(1) The Permit Board shall consider in making its decision:
(A) whether the permittee has met the criteria for release of the bond under § 4503;
(B) the degree of difficulty in completing any remaining reclamation, restoration or abatement work; and
(C) whether pollution of surface water or ground water is occurring, the probability of future pollution or the continuance of any present pollution, and the estimated cost of abating any pollution.
(2) Within 60 days from the filing of the bond release application, if no public hearing is held pursuant to Rule 45 or within 30 days after a public hearing has been held pursuant to Rule 45, the Permit Board shall act on the bond release application and shall promptly notify in writing the permittee, the surety or other persons with an interest in bond collateral who have requested notification under § 4303, and the persons who filed objections or written comments, if any regarding the performance bond.
(3) The notice of the decision shall state the reasons for the decision, recommend any corrective actions necessary to secure the release, and notify the permittee and all interested parties of their right to request a formal hearing in accordance with § 53-9- 77 and § 4501.
(4) If the Permit Board disapproves the application for release of the bond or portion thereof, the Permit Board shall notify the permittee, the surety, and any person with an interest in collateral as provided for in § 4303(f)(11) and (g)(8), in writing, stating the reasons for disapproval and recommending corrective actions necessary to secure the release and allowing an opportunity for a formal hearing.
(5) The Permit Board shall not release the bond until the right to request a formal hearing pursuant to § 4501 has not been exercised, or a final decision by the hearing authority approving the release has been issued pursuant to § 4501.
(6) When an application for total or partial bond release is filed with the Department, the Department shall notify the local government in which the surface coal mining operation is located by certified mail at least thirty (30) days prior to the release of all or portion of the bond.
(g) Formal Hearings. The applicant or any interested party to the bond release decision may request a formal hearing pursuant to § 53-9- 65(4) within thirty (30) days of Permit Board action.
§ 4503. Criteria and Schedule for Release of Performance Bond
(a) The Permit Board may release all or part of the bond for the entire permit area or incremental area if the Permit Board is satisfied that all the reclamation or a phase of the reclamation covered by the bond or portion thereof has been accomplished in accordance with the following schedules for reclamation of Phases I, II and III:
(1) At the completion of Phase I, after the operator completes the backfilling, regrading (which may include the replacement of topsoil) and drainage control of a bonded area in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, 60 percent of the bond or collateral for the applicable area.
(2) At the completion of Phase II, after revegetation has been established on the regraded mined lands in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, an additional amount of bond. When determining the amount of bond to be released after successful revegetation has been established, the Permit Board shall retain that amount of bond for the revegetated area which would be sufficient to cover the cost of reestablishing revegetation if completed by a third party and for the period specified for operator responsibility in § 53-9- 45 for reestablishing revegetation. No part of the bond or deposit shall be released under this paragraph so long as the lands to which the release would be applicable are contributing suspended solids to streamflow or runoff outside the permit area in excess of the requirements set by Subchapter 2.V of these regulations or until soil productivity for prime farmlands has returned to the equivalent levels of yield as nonmined land of the same soil type in the surrounding area under equivalent management practices as determined from the soil survey performed pursuant to § 2539 of these regulations. Where a silt dam is to be retained as a permanent impoundment pursuant to Subchapter 2, the Phase II portion of the bond may be released under this paragraph so long as provisions for sound future maintenance by the operator or the landowner have been made with the regulatory authority.
(3) At the completion of Phase III, after the operator has completed successfully all surface coal mining and reclamation activities, the release of the remaining portion of the bond, but not before the expiration of the period specified for operator responsibility in § 53-9- 45 and these regulations. However, no bond shall be fully released under provisions of this section until reclamation requirements of the Act and the permit are fully met.
(b) For the purposes of this Rule:
(1) reclamation phase I shall be deemed to have been completed when the permittee completes backfilling, topsoil replacement, regrading and drainage control in accordance with the approved reclamation plan;
(2) reclamation phase II shall be deemed to have been completed when:
(A) revegetation has been established in accordance with the approved reclamation plan and the standards for the success of revegetation are met;
(B) the lands are not contributing suspended solids to stream flow or runoff outside the permit area in excess of the requirements of Subchapter 2.5 of these regulations or the permit;
(C) with respect to prime farmlands, soil productivity has been returned to the level of yield as required by § 2907 and Rule 55 when compared with non-mined prime farmland in the surrounding area as determined from the soil survey performed under and the plan approved under § 2539;
(D) the provisions of a plan approved by the Permit Board for the sound future management of any permanent impoundment by the permittee or landowner have been implemented to the satisfaction of the office.
(3) reclamation phase III will be deemed to have been completed when the permittee has successfully completed all surface coal mining and reclamation operations in accordance with the approved reclamation plan, including the implementation of any alternative land
use plan approved pursuant to § 53109, and has achieved compliance with the requirements of the act, these regulations, the regulatory program, and the permit, and the applicable liability period under § 4105 of this Subchapter has expired.
Rule 47. Performance Bond Forfeiture Criteria and Procedures
§ 4701. General
(a) Except as in compliance with § 4701(b), the Commission shall proceed to cause the forfeiture of all or part of a bond or other collateral accepted pursuant to Rule 43 for any permit where required or authorized by § 4705.
(b) The Commission may withhold forfeiture, if the permittee and surety, if applicable, agree to a compliance schedule to comply with the violations of the permit or bond conditions.
§ 4703. Procedures
(a) (1) If a surface coal mining and reclamation operation is not proceeding in accordance with the act or the permit, the operation represents an imminent threat to the public health, welfare and the environment, and the operator has failed, within thirty (30) days after written notice to the operator and opportunity for a formal hearing, to take appropriate corrective action, a forfeiture proceeding may be commenced by the Commission against the operator for any performance bond or other collateral posted by the operator.
(2) A forfeiture proceeding against any performance bond or other collateral shall be commenced and conducted according to §§ 49-17-31 through 49-17-41.
(3) If the Commission orders forfeiture of any performance bond or other collateral, the entire sum of the performance bond or other collateral, the entire sum of the performance bond or other collateral shall be forfeited by the Department. The funds from the forfeited performance bond or other collateral shall be used to pay for reclamation of the permit area and remediation of any offsite damages resulting from the operation. Any surplus performance bond or other collateral funds shall be refunded to the operator or corporate surety.
(4) Forfeiture proceedings shall be before the Commission and an order of the Commission under this subsection shall be a final order. If the Commission determines that forfeiture of the performance bond or other collateral should be ordered, the Department shall have the immediate right to all funds of any performance bond or other collateral, subject only to review and appeals allowed under § 49-17-41.
(5) If the operator cannot be located for purposes of notice, the Department shall send notice of the forfeiture proceeding, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the permittee’s, surety’s, and operator’s last known address. The Department shall also publish notice of the forfeiture proceeding in the same manner as provided for the publication of notice for the advertisement of land ownership under § 53-9- 37. Any formal hearing on the bond forfeiture shall be set at least thirty (30) days after the last notice publication.
(6) At least ten (10) days prior to commencement of a forfeiture proceeding, the Department shall notify the permittee and surety, if applicable, of the conditions under which forfeiture may be avoided. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to:
(A) agreement by the permittee or another party to an order of the Commission requiring that party to perform reclamation operations in accordance with a compliance schedule which meets the conditions of the permit, the reclamation plan and the regulatory program and to provide a demonstration that such party has the ability to satisfy the conditions; or
(B) the Commission may allow a surety to complete the reclamation plan, or the portion of the reclamation plan applicable to the bonded phase or increment, if the surety can demonstrate an ability to complete the reclamation in accordance with the approved reclamation plan. Except where the Permit Board may approve partial release authorized under Rule 45, no surety liability shall be released until successful completion of all reclamation under the terms of the permit, including the applicable liability periods of § 4105;
(7) The Commission may proceed in an action for collection on the bond as provided by § 53-9- 65(g) for the collection of defaulted bonds or other debts.
(8) The Commission may use funds collected from bond forfeiture to complete the reclamation plan, or portion thereof, on the permit area or increment, to which bond coverage applies.
(b) The Commission may forfeit any or all bond deposited for an entire permit area, in order to satisfy § 4701-4707. Liability under any bond, including separate bond increments or indemnity agreements applicable to a single operation, shall extend to the entire permit area.
(c) If the performance bond or other collateral is insufficient to cover the costs of reclamation of the permit area or remediation of any offsite damages, the Commission may initiate a civil action to recover the deficiency amount in the county in which the surface coal mining operation is located. If the Commission initiates a civil action, the Commission shall be entitled to any sums necessary to complete reclamation of the permit area and remediate any offsite damages resulting from that operation, and attorneys’ fees.
(1) The Department may complete, or authorize completion of, reclamation of the bonded area and may recover from the operator all costs of reclamation in excess of the amount forfeited.
(2) In the event the amount of performance bond forfeited was more than the amount necessary to complete reclamation, the unused funds shall be returned by the Commission to the party from whom they were collected.
§ 4705. Criteria for Forfeiture
(a) A bond shall be forfeited if the Commission finds that:
(1) the permittee has violated any of the terms or conditions of the bond; or
(2) the permittee has failed to conduct the surface mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the act, the conditions of the permit or these regulations within the time required by the act, these regulations and the permit; or
(3) the permit for the area under bond has been revoked, unless the operator assumes liability for completion of reclamation work; or
(4) the permittee has failed to comply with a compliance schedule approved pursuant to § 4701(b).
(b) A bond may be forfeited if the Commission finds that:
(1) the permittee has become insolvent, failed in business, been adjudicated a bankrupt, filed a petition in bankruptcy or for a receiver or had a receiver appointed by any court; or a creditor of the permittee has attached or executed a judgment against the permittee's equipment, materials, facilities at the permit area or on the collateral pledged to the Commission;
(2) the permittee cannot demonstrate or prove the ability to continue to operate in compliance with the act, these regulations and the permit.
§ 4707. Determination of Forfeiture Amount
The Commission shall either:
(a) determine the amount of the bond to be forfeited on the basis of the estimated cost to the Department or its contractor to complete the reclamation plan and other regulatory requirements in accordance with the act, these regulations and the requirements of the permit; or
(b) forfeit the entire amount of the bond for which liability is outstanding and deposit the proceeds thereof in an interest-bearing escrow account for use in the payment of all costs and administrative expenses associated with the conduct of reclamation, restoration or abatement activities by the Department. In the event the amount of performance bond forfeited was more than the amount necessary to complete reclamation, the unused funds shall be returned by the Commission to the party from whom they were collected.
Subchapter 2.5 Permanent Program Performance Standards
Rule 49. Permanent Program Performance Standards: General Provisions
§ 4901. Responsibility
(a) The Commission shall ensure that performance standards and design requirements are implemented and enforced.
(b) Each person conducting coal exploration, development operations or surface coal mining and reclamation operations is responsible for complying with performance standards and design requirements.
Rule 51. Permanent Program Performance Standards: Coal Exploration and Development Operations
§ 5101. General Responsibility of Persons Conducting Coal Exploration or Development
(a) Each person who conducts coal exploration which does not substantially disturbs the natural land surface and in which 250 tons or less of coal are removed shall file a notice of intent in accord with Rule 21 and shall comply with § 5105.
(b) Each person who conducts coal exploration which substantially disturb the natural land surface or in which more than 250 tons of coal are removed in the area described by the exploration permit required by Rule 21 shall comply with the procedures described in the exploration permit, Rule 21, and § 5105.
§ 5103. Required Documents
Each person who conducts coal exploration which substantially disturbs the natural land surface shall, while in the exploration area, possess written approval of the Permit Board for the activities approved under Rule 21. The permit shall be available for review by the authorized representative of the Department upon request.
§ 5105. Performance Standards for Coal Exploration or Development
The performance standards in this Section are applicable to coal exploration which substantially disturbs the land surface.
(a) Habitats of unique or unusually high value for fish, wildlife and other related environmental values and critical habitats of threatened or endangered species identified pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) shall not be disturbed during coal exploration.
(b) The person who conducts coal exploration shall, to the extent practicable, measure important environmental characteristics of the exploration area during the operations to minimize environmental damage to the area and to provide supportive information for any permit application that person may submit under Subchapter 2.3.
(c) All roads or other transportation facilities used for coal exploration shall comply with the applicable provisions of §§ 53111 and 53115- 53117.
(d) If excavations, artificial flat areas or embankments are created during exploration, these areas shall be returned to the approximate original contour promptly after such features are no longer needed for coal exploration.
(e) Topsoil shall be separately removed, stored and redistributed on disturbed areas as necessary to assure successful revegetation or as required by the Permit Board.
(f) Revegetation of areas disturbed by coal exploration operations shall be performed by the person who conducts the exploration, or his or her agent. All areas disturbed by coal exploration
activities shall be revegetated in a manner that encourages prompt revegetation and recovery of a diverse, effective and permanent vegetative cover. Revegetation shall be accomplished in accordance with the following:
(1) All disturbed lands shall be seeded or planted to the same seasonal variety native to the disturbed area. If both the pre-exploration or pre-development and post-exploration or post-development land uses are intensive agriculture, planting of the crops normally grown will meet the requirements of this Subsection.
(2) The vegetative cover shall be capable of stabilizing the soil surface against erosion.
(g) Diversions of overland flows and ephemeral, perennial or intermittent streams shall be made in accordance with § 5317.
(h) Each exploration hole, borehole, well or other exposed underground opening created during exploration must meet the requirements of §§ 5303, 5305, and 5307.
(i) All facilities and equipment shall be removed from the exploration area promptly when they are no longer needed for exploration, except for those facilities and equipment that the Permit Board determines may remain to:
(1) provide additional environmental quality data;
(2) reduce or control the on- and off-site effects of the exploration activities; or
(3) facilitate future surface mining and reclamation operations by the person conducting the exploration, under an approved permit.
(j) Coal exploration shall be conducted in a manner which minimizes disturbance of the prevailing hydrologic balance, in accordance with §§ 5317-5343. The Permit Board may specify additional measures which shall be followed by the person engaged in coal exploration.
(k) Toxic- or acid-forming materials shall be handled and disposed of in accordance with §§ 5325, 5329, 5331, and 5391(e). If specified by the Permit Board, additional measures shall be followed by the person engaged in coal exploration.
Rule 53. Permanent Program Performance Standards Surface Mining Activities
§ 5301. Signs and Markers
(a) Each permittee shall conspicuously maintain at the entrance to the surface coal mining and reclamation operation a clearly visible sign. Signs and markers required under § 53-9- 53 and this Rule shall:
(1) be posted and maintained by the person who conducts the surface mining activities;
(2) be of a uniform design throughout the operation that can be easily seen and read;
(3) be made of durable material; and
(4) conform to local ordinances and codes.
(b) Duration of Maintenance. Signs and markers shall be maintained during the conduct of all activities to which they pertain.
(c) Mine and Permit Identification Signs
(1) Identification signs shall be displayed at each point of access to the permit area from public roads.
(2) Signs shall show the name, business address and telephone number of the permittee and the permit number of the current permit authorizing surface mining and reclamation activities. The signs shall also state that questions and complaints regarding the surface coal mining and reclamation operations may be directed to the Department and shall provide the Department’s telephone number.
(3) Signs shall be retained and maintained until after the release of all bonds for the permit area.
(d) Perimeter Markers. The perimeter of a permit area shall be clearly marked before the beginning of surface mining activities.
(e) Buffer Zone Markers. Buffer zones shall be marked along their boundaries as required under § 5343.
(f) Blasting Signs. If blasting is conducted incident to surface mining activities, the person who conducts these activities shall:
(1) conspicuously display signs reading "Blasting Area" along the edge of any blasting area that comes within 50 feet of any road within the permit area, or within 100 feet of any public road right of way;
(2) conspicuously flag, or post within the blasting area, the immediate vicinity of charged holes as required by § 5353(a);
(3) place at all entrances to the permit area from public roads or highways conspicuous signs which state "Warning -- Explosives in Use", which clearly explain the blast warning and all clear signals that are in use and which explain the marking of blast areas and charged holes within the permit area.
(g) Topsoil Markers. Where topsoil or other vegetation-supporting material is segregated and stockpiled as required under § 5311 (c), the stockpiled material shall be clearly marked.
§ 5303. Casing and Sealing of Drilled Holes: General Requirements
Each exploration hole, other drill or borehole, well or other exposed underground opening shall be cased, sealed or otherwise managed, under the direction of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist or Registered Professional Engineer and as required by the Department, to prevent acid or other toxic drainage from entering the ground water or surface water, to minimize disturbance to the prevailing hydrologic balance and to ensure the safety of people, livestock, fish and wildlife, and machinery in the
permit and adjacent area. If these openings are uncovered or exposed by surface mining activities within the permit area, they shall be permanently closed, unless approved for water monitoring, or otherwise managed in a manner approved by the Department. Use of a drilled hole, borehole or monitoring well as a water well must meet the provisions of §§ 5313, 5329, and 5333(a). This Section does not apply to holes solely drilled and used for blasting.
§ 5305. Casing and Sealing of Drilled Holes: Temporary
Each exploration hole, other drill or borehole, well or other exposed underground opening which has been identified in the approved permit application for use to return coal processing waste or water to underground workings, or to be used to monitor ground-water conditions, shall be temporarily sealed before use and protected during use by barricades, fences or other protective devices under the direction of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist or Registered Professional Engineer and as approved by the Department. These devices shall be periodically inspected and maintained in good operating condition by the person who conducts the surface mining activities.
§ 5307. Casing and Sealing of Drilled Holes: Permanent
When no longer needed for monitoring or other use approved by the Department upon a finding of no adverse environmental or health and safety effect, or unless approved for transfer as a water well under § 5335, each exploration hole, other drill or borehole, well or other exposed underground opening shall be capped, sealed, backfilled or otherwise properly managed, under the direction of a qualified Registered Professional Geologist or Registered Professional Engineer and as required by the Department, under § 5303 and consistent with 30 CFR 75.1711. Permanent closure measures shall be designed to prevent access to the mine workings by people, livestock, fish and wildlife, and machinery, and to keep acid or other toxic drainage from entering the ground water or surface water.
§ 5309. Topsoil: General Requirements
(a) Before disturbance of an area, topsoil and subsoils to be saved under § 5311 shall be separately removed and segregated from other material.
(b) After removal, topsoil shall either be immediately redistributed as required under § 5311 or stockpiled pending redistribution as required under § 5311.
§ 5311. Topsoil and Subsoil.
(a) Removal.
(1) (A) All topsoil shall be removed as a separate layer from the area to be disturbed, and segregated.
(B) Where the topsoil is of insufficient quantity or poor quality for sustaining vegetation, the materials approved by the Department in accordance with § 5311(b) of this section shall be removed as a separate layer from the area to be disturbed, and segregated.
(2) If topsoil is less than 6 inches thick, the operator may remove the topsoil and the unconsolidated materials immediately below the topsoil and treat the mixture as topsoil.
(3) The Department may choose not to require the removal of topsoil for minor disturbances which:
(A) Occur at the site of small structures, such as power poles, signs, or fence lines; or
(B) Will not destroy the existing vegetation and will not cause erosion.
(4) Timing. All material to be removed under this section shall be removed after the vegetative cover that would interfere with its salvage is cleared from the area to be disturbed, but before any drilling, blasting, mining, or other surface disturbance takes place.
(b) Substitutes and supplements. Selected overburden materials may be substituted for, or used as a supplement to topsoil if the operator demonstrates to the Department that the resulting soil medium is equal to, or more suitable for sustaining vegetation than, the existing topsoil, and the resulting soil medium is the best available in the permit area to support revegetation.
(c) Storage.
(1) Materials removed under § 5311(a) of this section shall be segregated and stockpiled when it is impractical to redistribute such materials promptly on regraded areas.
(2) Stockpiled materials shall:
(A) Be selectively placed on a stable site within the permit area;
(B) Be protected from contaminants and unnecessary compaction that would interfere with revegetation.
(C) Be protected from wind and water erosion through prompt establishment and maintenance of an effective, quick growing vegetative cover or through other measures approved by the Department; and
(D) Not be moved until required for redistribution unless approved by the Department.
(3) Where long-term surface disturbances will result from facilities such as support facilities and preparation plants and where stockpiling of materials removed under § 5311(a)(1) of this section would be detrimental to the quality or quantity of those materials, the Department may approve the temporary distribution of the soil materials so removed to an approved site within the permit area to enhance the current use of that site until needed for later reclamation, provided that -
(A) Such action will not permanently diminish the capability of the topsoil of the host site; and
(B) The material will be retained in a condition more suitable for redistribution than if stockpiled.
(d) Redistribution.
(1) Topsoil materials removed under § 5311(a) of this section shall be redistributed in a manner that:
(A) Achieves an approximately uniform, stable thickness consistent with the approved postmining land use, contours, and surface-water drainage systems;
(B) Prevents excess compaction of the materials; and
(C) Protects the materials from wind and water erosion before and after seeding and planting.
(2) Before redistribution of the material removed under § 5311(a) of this section the regraded land shall be treated if necessary to reduce potential slippage of the redistributed material and to promote root penetration. If no harm will be caused to the redistributed material and reestablished vegetation, such treatment may be conducted after such material is replaced.
(3) The Department may choose not to require the redistribution of topsoil or topsoil substitutes on the approved postmining embankments of permanent impoundments or of roads if it determines that:
(A) Placement of topsoil or topsoil substitutes on such embankments is inconsistent with the requirement to use the best technology currently available to prevent sedimentation, and
(B) Such embankments will be otherwise stabilized.
(4) Nutrients and soil amendments. Nutrients and soil amendments shall be applied to the initially redistributed material when necessary to establish the vegetative cover.
(e) Subsoil segregation. The Department may require that the B horizon, C horizon, or other underlying strata, or portions thereof, be removed and segregated, stockpiled, and redistributed as subsoil in accordance with the requirements of §§ 5311(c) and (d) of this section if it finds that such subsoil layers are necessary to comply with the revegetation requirements of §§ 5397- 53103, and 5507.
§ 5313. Hydrologic Balance: General Requirements
(a) Surface mining activities shall be planned and conducted to minimize disturbance of the hydrologic balance within the permit and adjacent areas and to prevent material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area, to assure the protection or replacement of water rights, and to support approved postmining land uses in accordance with the terms and conditions of the approved permit and the performance standards of these regulations. The Permit Board may require additional preventative, remedial, or monitoring measures to assure that material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area is prevented. Mining and reclamation practices that minimize water pollution and changes in flow shall be used in preference to water treatment.
(b) Changes in water quality and quantity, in the depth to ground water, and in the location of surface-water drainage channels shall be minimized so that the approved post-mining land use of the permit area is not adversely affected.
(c) Operations shall be conducted to minimize water pollution and, where necessary, treatment methods shall be used to control water pollution. Water pollution control methods required by the Permit Board shall be recommended by the Office of Geology in consultation with the Office of Pollution Control. The person who conducts surface mining activities shall operate and maintain the necessary water treatment facilities for as long as treatment is required under this Rule.
§ 5315. Hydrologic Balance: Water Quality Standards and Effluent Limitations
Discharges of water from areas disturbed by surface mining activities shall be made in compliance with all applicable state and federal water quality laws and regulations and with the effluent limitations for coal mining promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency set forth in 40 CFR Part 434.
§ 5317. Hydrologic Balance: Diversions
(a) General Requirements
(1) With the approval of the Permit Board, any flow from mined areas abandoned before May 3, 1978, and any flow from undisturbed areas or reclaimed areas, after meeting the criteria of § 5321 for siltation structure removal, may be diverted from disturbed areas by means of temporary or permanent diversions. All diversions shall be designed to minimize adverse impacts to the hydrologic balance within the permit and adjacent areas, to prevent material damage outside the permit area and to assure the safety of the public. Diversions shall not be used to divert water into underground mines without approval of the Permit Board under § 5339.
(2) The diversion and its appurtenant structures shall be designed, located, constructed, maintained and used to:
(A) be stable;
(B) provide protection against flooding and resultant damage to life and property;
(C) prevent, to the extent possible using the best technology currently available, additional contributions of suspended solids to streamflow outside the permit area; and
(D) comply with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations.
(3) Temporary diversions shall be removed promptly when no longer needed to achieve the purpose for which they were authorized. The land disturbed by the removal process shall be restored in accordance with this Rule. Before diversions are removed, downstream water-treatment facilities previously protected by the diversion shall be modified or removed, as necessary, to prevent overtopping or failure of the facilities. This requirement shall not relieve the operator from maintaining water-treatment facilities as otherwise required. A permanent diversion or a stream channel reclaimed after the removal of a temporary diversion shall be designed and constructed so as to restore or approximate the premining characteristics of the original stream channel including the natural riparian vegetation to promote the recovery and the enhancement of the aquatic habitat.
(4) The Department may specify design criteria for diversions to meet the requirements of this Section.
(b) Diversion of Perennial and Intermittent Streams
(1) Diversion of perennial and intermittent streams within the permit area may be approved by the Permit Board after making the finding relating to stream buffer zones that the diversion will not adversely affect the water quantity and quality and related environmental resources of the stream.
(2) The design capacity of channels for temporary and permanent stream channel diversions shall be at least equal to the capacity of the unmodified stream channel immediately upstream and downstream from the diversion.
(3) The requirements of § 5317(a)(2)(b) shall be met when the temporary and permanent diversions for perennial and intermittent streams are designed so that the combination of channel, bank and floodplain configuration is adequate to pass safely the peak runoff of a 10-year, six-hour precipitation event for a temporary diversion and a 100-year, six-hour precipitation event for a permanent diversion.
(4) The design and construction of all stream channel diversions of perennial and intermittent streams shall be certified by a qualified registered professional engineer as meeting the performance standards of this Rule and any design criteria set by the Department.
(c) Diversion of Miscellaneous Flows
(1) Miscellaneous flows, which consist of all flows except for perennial and intermittent streams, may be diverted away from disturbed areas if required or approved by the Permit Board. Miscellaneous flows shall include ground-water discharges and ephemeral streams.
(2) The design, location, construction, maintenance and removal of diversions of miscellaneous flows shall meet all of the performance standards set forth in § 5317(a).
(3) The requirements of § 5317(a)(2)(B) shall be met when the temporary and permanent diversions for miscellaneous flows are designed so that the combination of channel, bank and floodplain configuration is adequate to pass safely the peak runoff of a two-year, six- hour precipitation event for a temporary diversion and a 10-year, six-hour precipitation event for a permanent diversion.
(4) The design and construction of all stream channel diversions of miscellaneous flows shall be certified by a qualified registered professional engineer as meeting the performance standards of this Rule and any design criteria set by the Department.
§ 5319. Hydrologic Balance: Sediment Control Measures
(a) Appropriate sediment control measures shall be designed, constructed and maintained using the best technology currently available to:
(1) prevent, to the extent possible, additional contributions of sediment to streamflow or to
runoff outside the permit area;
(2) meet the more stringent of applicable state or federal effluent limitations;
(3) minimize erosion to the extent possible.
(b) Sediment control measures include practices carried out within and adjacent to the disturbed area. The sedimentation storage capacity of practices in and downstream from the disturbed area shall reflect the degree to which successful mining and reclamation techniques are applied to reduce erosion and control sediment. Sediment control measures consist of the utilization of proper mining and reclamation methods and sediment control practices, singly or in combination. Sediment control methods include but are not limited to:
(1) disturbing the smallest practicable area at any one time during the mining operation through progressive backfilling, grading, and prompt revegetation as required in §§ 5389- 53103, and 5507;
(2) stabilizing the backfill material to promote a reduction in the rate and volume of runoff, in accordance with the requirements of §§ 5389-53103, and 5507;
(3) retaining sediment within disturbed areas;
(4) diverting runoff away from disturbed areas;
(5) diverting runoff using protected channels or pipes through disturbed areas so as to not cause additional erosion;
(6) using straw dikes, riprap, check dams, mulches, vegetative sediment filters, dugout ponds and other measures that reduce overland flow velocity, reduce runoff volume or trap sediment;
(7) treating with chemicals.
§ 5321. Hydrologic Balance: Siltation Structures
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this Section only:
Disturbed Area–shall not include those areas:
(1) in which the only surface mining activities include diversion ditches, siltation structures or roads that are designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with this Rule; and
(2) for which the upstream area is not otherwise disturbed by the operator.
(b) General Requirements
(1) Additional contributions of suspended solids sediment to streamflow or runoff outside the permit area shall be prevented to the extent possible using the best technology currently available.
(2) Siltation structures for an area shall be constructed before beginning any surface mining
activities in that area and, upon construction, shall be certified by a qualified registered professional engineer to be constructed as designed and as approved in the reclamation plan.
(3) Any siltation structure which impounds water shall be designed, constructed, and maintained in accordance with § 5327
(4) Siltation structures shall be maintained until removal is authorized by the Permit Board and the disturbed area has been stabilized and revegetated. In no case shall the structure be removed sooner than two years after the last augmented seeding.
(5) When a siltation structure is removed, the land on which the siltation structure was located shall be regraded and revegetated in accordance with the reclamation plan and §§ 5397-53103, and 5507. Sedimentation ponds approved by the Permit Board for retention as permanent impoundments may be exempted from this requirement.
(c) Sedimentation Ponds
(1) When used, sedimentation ponds shall:
(A) be used individually or in series;
(B) be located as near as possible to the disturbed area and out of perennial streams unless approved by the Permit Board; and
(C) be designed, constructed and maintained to:
(i) provide adequate sediment storage volume;
(ii) provide adequate detention time to allow the effluent from the ponds to meet state and federal effluent limitations;
(iii) contain or treat the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event ("design event") unless a lesser design event is approved by the Permit Board based on terrain, climate, other site-specific conditions, and on a demonstration by the operator that the effluent limitations of § 5315 will be met;
(iv) provide a nonclogging dewatering device adequate to maintain the detention time required under § 5321(c)(1)(C)(ii);
(v) minimize, to the extent possible, short circuiting;
(vi) provide periodic sediment removal sufficient to maintain adequate volume for the design event;
(vii) ensure against excessive settlement;
(viii) be free of sod, large roots, frozen soil, and acid- or toxic-forming coal- processing waste; and
(ix) be compacted properly.
(2) A sedimentation pond shall include either a combination of principal and emergency spillways or single spillway configured as specified in § 5327.
(d) Other Treatment Facilities
(1) Other treatment facilities shall be designed to treat the 10-year, 24-hour precipitation event unless a lesser design event is approved by the Permit Board based on terrain, climate, other site-specific conditions, and a demonstration by the operator that the effluent limitations of § 5315 will be met.
(2) Other treatment facilities shall be designed in accordance with the applicable requirements of § 5321.
(e) Exemptions. Exemptions to the requirements of this Section may be granted by the Permit Board if:
(1) the disturbed drainage area within the total disturbed area is small; and
(2) the operator demonstrates that siltation structures and alternate sediment control measures are not necessary for drainage from the disturbed area to meet the effluent limitations under § 5315 and the applicable state and federal water quality standards for the receiving waters.
§ 5323. Hydrologic Balance: Discharge Structures
Discharge from sedimentation ponds, permanent and temporary impoundments, coal processing waste dams and embankments, and diversions shall be controlled by energy dissipaters, riprap channels and other devices, where necessary, to reduce erosion, to prevent deepening or enlargement of stream channels and to minimize disturbance of the hydrologic balance. Discharge structures shall be designed according to standard engineering-design procedures.
§ 5325. Hydrologic Balance: Acid-Forming and Toxic-Forming Materials
Drainage from acid-forming and toxic-forming materials into ground water and surface water shall be avoided by:
(a) identifying, burying and treating, where necessary, materials which, in the judgment of the Department, may be detrimental to vegetation or to public health and safety or may adversely affect water quality if not treated or buried;
(b) preventing water from coming into contact with acid-forming and toxic-forming materials in accordance with § 53-9- 45 and § 5391(f), and other measures as required by the Department;
(c) burying or otherwise treating all acid-forming or toxic-forming materials within 30 days after it is first exposed on the mine site, or within a lesser period required by the Department. Temporary storage of the materials may be approved by the Department upon a finding that burial or treatment within 30 days is not feasible and will not result in any material risk or water pollution or other environmental damage. Storage shall be limited to the period until burial or treatment first becomes feasible. Acid-forming or toxic-forming materials to be stored shall be placed on impermeable material and protected from erosion and contact with surface water.
§ 5327. Hydrologic Balance: Impoundments
(a) General Requirements. The requirements of this Subsection apply to both temporary and permanent impoundments.
(1) Impoundments meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service Technical Release No. 60 (210-VI-TR60, Oct. 1985), "Earth Dams and Reservoirs," 1985 shall comply with "Minimum Emergency Spillway Hydrologic Criteria" table in TR-60 and the requirements of this section. The technical release is hereby incorporated by reference. Copies may be obtained from the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161, order No. PB 87-157509/AS. Copies can be inspected at the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1951 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
(2) Impoundments meeting the criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a) shall comply with the requirements of 30 CFR 77.216, § 53-9- 45, and this Section.
(3) Design Certification. The design of impoundments shall be certified in accordance with § 2725(a) as designed to meet the requirements of this Rule using current prudent engineering practices and any design criteria established by the Department. The qualified registered professional engineer shall be experienced in the design and construction of impoundments.
(4) Stability.
(A) Impoundments meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in TR-60, or the size or other criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a) shall have a minimum static safety factor of 1.5 for a normal pool with steady state seepage saturation conditions, and a seismic safety factor of at least 1.2.
(B) Impoundments not included in § 5327(a)(4)(A), except for a coal mine waste impounding structure, shall have a minimum static safety factor of 1.3 for a normal pool with steady state seepage saturation conditions.
(5) Freeboard. Impoundments shall have adequate freeboard to resist overtopping by waves and by sudden increases in storage volume. Impoundments meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in TR-60 shall comply with the freeboard hydrograph criteria in the "Minimum Emergency Spillway Hydrologic Criteria" table in TR-60.
(6) Foundation
(A) Foundation and abutments for the impounding structure shall be designed to be stable under all phases of construction and operation of the impoundment. For an impoundment meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in TR-60, or the size or other criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a), sufficient foundation investigations and laboratory testing shall be performed in order to determine the design requirements for foundation stability.
(B) All vegetative and organic materials shall be removed and foundations excavated and prepared to resist failure. Cutoff trenches shall be installed if necessary to ensure stability.
(7) Slope protection shall be provided to protect against surface erosion at the site and to protect against sudden drawdown.
(8) Faces of embankments and surrounding areas shall be vegetated, except that faces where water is impounded may be riprapped or otherwise stabilized in accordance with accepted design practices.
(9) Spillways. An impoundment shall include either a combination of principal and emergency spillways or a single spillway configured as specified in § 5327(a)(9)(A), designed and constructed to safely pass the applicable design precipitation event specified in § 5327(a)(9)(B), except as set forth in § 5327(c)(2).
(A) The Permit Board may approve a single open-channel spillway that is:
(i) Of nonerodible construction and designed to carry sustained flows; or
(ii) Earth- or grass-lined and designed to carry short-term, infrequent flows at non-erosive velocities where sustained flows are not expected.
(B) Except as specified in § 5327(c)(2), the required design precipitation event for an impoundment meeting the spillway requirements of § 5327(a)(9) is:
(i) For an impoundment meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in TR-60, the emergency spillway hydrograph criteria in the "Minimum Emergency Spillway Hydrologic Criteria" table in TR-60, or greater event as specified by the Permit Board.
(ii) For an impoundment meeting or exceeding the size or other criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a), a 100-year 6-hour event, or greater event as specified by the Permit Board.
(iii) For an impoundment not included in § 5327(a)(9)(B)(i) and (ii), a 25-year 6- hour or greater event as specified by the Permit Board.
(10) The vertical portion of any remaining highwall shall be located far enough below the low-water line along the full extent of the highwall to provide adequate safety and access for the proposed water users.
(11) Inspections. A qualified registered professional engineer, shall inspect the impoundment. The registered professional engineer shall be experienced in the construction of impoundments.
(A) Inspections shall be made regularly during construction, upon completion of construction, and at least yearly until removal of the structure or release of the performance bond.
(B) The qualified registered professional engineer, upon completion of construction,
shall promptly provide to the Department a certified report that the impoundment has been constructed as designed and in accordance with the approved plan and these regulations. In addition, the qualified registered professional engineer shall, after each annual inspection, promptly provide to the Department a certified report that the impoundment has been maintained in accordance with the approved plan and these regulations. Each such report shall include discussion of any appearances of instability, structural weakness or other hazardous conditions, depth and elevation of any impounded waters, existing storage capacity, any existing or required monitoring procedures and instrumentation, and any other aspects of the structure affecting stability.
(C) A copy of the report shall be retained at or near the minesite.
(12) Impoundments meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in TR-60, or the size or other criteria of 30 CFR 77.216 must be examined in accordance with 30 CFR 77.216-3. Impoundments not meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in TR-60, or subject to 30 CFR 77.216, shall be examined at least quarterly. A qualified person designated by the operator shall examine impoundments for the appearance of structural weakness and other hazardous conditions.
(13) Emergency Procedures. If any examination or inspection discloses that a potential hazard exists, the person who examined the impoundment shall promptly inform the Department of the finding and of the emergency procedures formulated for public protection and remedial action. If adequate procedures cannot be formulated or implemented, the Department shall be notified immediately. The Department shall then notify the appropriate agencies that other emergency procedures are required to protect the public.
(b) Permanent Impoundments. A permanent impoundment of water may be created, if authorized by the Permit Board in the approved permit, based upon the following demonstration:
(1) the size and configuration of such impoundment will be adequate for its intended purposes;
(2) the quality of impounded water will be suitable on a permanent basis for its intended use and, after reclamation, will meet applicable state and federal water quality standards, and discharges from the impoundment will meet applicable effluent limitations and will not degrade the quality of receiving water below applicable state and federal water quality standards;
(3) the water level will be sufficiently stable and be capable of supporting the intended use;
(4) final grading will provide for adequate safety and access for proposed water users;
(5) the impoundment will not result in the diminution of the quality and quantity of water utilized by adjacent or surrounding landowners for agricultural, industrial, recreational or domestic uses;
(6) the impoundment will be suitable for the approved post-mining land use;
(c) Temporary Impoundments
(1) The Permit Board may authorize the construction of temporary impoundments as part of a surface coal mining operation.
(2) In lieu of meeting the requirements in § 5327(a)(9), the Permit Board may approve an impoundment that relies primarily on storage to control the runoff from the design precipitation event when it is demonstrated by the operator and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer that the impoundment will safely control the design precipitation event, the water from which shall be safely removed in accordance with current, prudent, engineering practices. Such an impoundment shall be located where failure would not be expected to cause loss of life or serious property damage, except where:
(A) Impoundments meeting the Class B or C criteria for dams in TR-60, or the size or other criteria of 30 CFR 77.216(a) shall be precipitation of a 6-hour event, or greater event specified by the Department.
(B) Impoundments not included in § 5327(c)(2)(A) shall be designed to control the precipitation of the 100-year 6-hour event, or greater event specified by the Department.
§ 5329. Hydrologic Balance: Groundwater Protection
In order to protect the hydrologic balance, surface mining activities shall be conducted according to the plan approved under § 2717 and the following:
(a) Groundwater quality shall be protected by handling earth materials and runoff in a manner that minimizes acidic, toxic, or other harmful infiltration to ground-water systems and by managing excavations and other disturbances to prevent or control the discharge of pollutants into the ground-water.
(b) Groundwater quantity shall be protected by handling earth materials and runoff in a manner that will restore the approximate premining recharge capacity of the reclaimed area as a whole, excluding coal mine waste disposal areas and fills, so as to allow the movement of water to the ground-water system.
§ 5331. Hydrologic Balance: Surface-Water Protection
In order to protect the hydrologic balance, surface mining activities shall be conducted according to the plan approved under § 2717 and the following:
(a) Surface-water quality shall be protected by handling earth materials, ground-water discharges, and runoff in a manner that minimizes the formation of acidic or toxic drainage; prevents, to the extent possible using the best technology currently available, additional contribution of suspended solids to streamflow outside the permit area; and otherwise prevents water pollution. If drainage control, restabilization and revegetation of disturbed areas, diversion of runoff, mulching, or other reclamation and remedial practices are not adequate to meet the requirements of this Section and § 5315, the operator shall use and maintain the necessary water-treatment facilities or water quality controls.
(b) Surface-water quality and flow rates shall be protected by handling earth materials and runoff in accordance with the steps outlined in the plan approved under § 2717.
§ 5333. Hydrologic Balance: Surface- and Ground-Water Monitoring.
(a) Ground-Water Monitoring
(1) Groundwater monitoring shall be conducted according to the ground-water monitoring plan approved under § 2719. The Permit Board may require additional monitoring when necessary.
(2) Groundwater monitoring data shall be submitted every 3 months to the Department or more frequently as prescribed by the Permit Board. Monitoring reports shall include analytical results from each sample taken during the reporting period. When the analysis of any ground-water sample indicates noncompliance with the permit conditions, the operator provided for in §§ 2717 and 3125.
(3) Groundwater monitoring shall proceed through mining and continue during reclamation until bond release. The Permit Board may revise or modify the monitoring requirements, including the parameters covered and the sampling frequency, if the operator demonstrates, using the monitoring data obtained under this Paragraph, that:
(A) the operator has minimized disturbance to the hydrologic balance in the permit and adjacent areas and prevented material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area; water quantity and quality are suitable to support approved post-mining land uses; and the water rights of other users have been protected or replaced; or
(B) monitoring is no longer necessary to achieve the purposes set forth in the monitoring plan approved under § 2719.
(4) Equipment, structures and other devices used in conjunction with monitoring the quality and quantity of ground water onsite and offsite shall be properly installed, maintained and operated and shall be removed by the operator when no longer needed.
(b) Surface-Water Monitoring
(1) Surface-water monitoring shall be conducted according to the surface-water monitoring plan approved under § 2721. The Permit Board may require additional monitoring when necessary.
(2) Surface-water monitoring data shall be submitted every 3 months to the Department or more frequently as prescribed by the Permit Board under § 53-9- 51. Monitoring reports shall include analytical results from each sample taken during the reporting period. When the analysis of any surface-water sample indicates noncompliance with the permit conditions, the operator shall promptly notify the Department and immediately take the actions provided for in §§ 2717 and 3125. The reporting requirements of this Paragraph do not exempt the operator from meeting any National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) reporting requirements.
(3) Surface-water monitoring shall proceed through mining and continue during reclamation until bond release. The office may modify the monitoring requirements, except those required by the NPDES permitting authority, including the parameters covered and
sampling frequency if the operator demonstrates, using the monitoring data obtained under this Paragraph, that:
(A) The operation has minimized disturbance to the hydrologic balance in the permit and adjacent areas and prevented material damage to the hydrologic balance outside the permit area; water quantity and quality are suitable to support approved postmining land uses, and the water rights of other users have been protected or replaced, or
(B) Monitoring is no longer necessary to achieve the purposes set forth in the monitoring plan approved under Rule 25 of these regulations.
(4) Equipment, structures, and other devices used in conjunction with monitoring the quality and quantity of surface water onsite and offsite shall be properly installed, maintained, and operated and shall be removed by the operator when no longer needed.
§ 5335. Hydrologic Balance: Transfer of Wells
(a) An exploratory or monitoring well may only be transferred by the person who conducts surface mining activities for further use as a water well with the prior approval of the Permit Board. That person and the surface owner of the lands where the well is located shall jointly submit a written request to the Office of Land and Water Resources of the Department for processing and presentation to the Permit Board.
(b) Upon an approved transfer of a well, the transferee shall:
(1) assume primary liability for damages to persons or property from the well;
(2) plug the well when necessary, but in no case later than abandonment of the well; and
(3) assume primary responsibility for compliance with §§ 5303-5307 with respect to the well.
(c) Upon an approved transfer of a well, the transferor shall be secondarily liable for the transferee's obligations under § 5335(b) until release of the bond or other collateral required by Subchapter 2.4 for the area in which the well is located.
§ 5337. Hydrologic Balance: Water Rights and Replacement
Any person who conducts surface mining activities shall replace the water supply of an owner of interest in real property who obtains all or part of his or her supply of water for domestic, agricultural, industrial or other legitimate use from an underground or surface source, where the water supply has been affected by contamination, diminution or interruption proximately resulting from the surface mining activities. Baseline hydrologic information required in Rule 25 shall be used to determine the extent of the impact of mining upon ground water and surface water.
§ 5339. Hydrologic Balance: Discharges into an Underground Mine
(a) Discharges into an underground mine.
(1) Discharges into an underground mine are prohibited, unless specifically approved by the
Permit Board after a demonstration that the discharge will:
(A) Minimize disturbance to the hydrologic balance on the permit area, prevent material damage outside the permit area and otherwise eliminate public hazards resulting from surface mining activities;
(B) Not result in a violation of applicable water quality standards or effluent limitations;
(C) Be at a known rate and quality which shall meet the effluent limitations of § 5315 for pH and total suspended solids, except that the pH and total suspended-solids limitations may be exceeded, if approved by the Permit Board; and
(D) Meet with the approval of the Mine Safety and Health Administration.
(2) Discharges shall be limited to the following:
(A) Water;
(B) Coal processing waste;
(C) Fly ash from a coal-fired facility;
(D) Sludge from an acid-mine-drainage treatment facility;
(E) Flue-gas desulfurization sludge;
(F) Inert materials used for stabilizing underground mines; and
(G) Underground mine development wastes.
§ 5341. Hydrologic Balance: Post-mining Rehabilitation of Sedimentation Ponds, Diversions, Impoundments and Treatment Facilities
Before abandoning a permit area or seeking bond release, the operator shall ensure that all temporary structures are removed and reclaimed, and that all permanent sedimentation ponds, diversions, impoundments and treatment facilities meet the requirements of this Rule for permanent structures and impoundments. The operator shall renovate such structures if necessary to meet the requirements of this Rule and to conform to the approved reclamation plan.
§ 5343. Hydrologic Balance: Stream Buffer Zones
(a) No land within 150 feet of a perennial stream or 100 feet of an intermittent stream shall be disturbed by surface mining activities, unless the Permit Board specifically authorizes surface mining activities closer to, or through, such a stream. The Permit Board may authorize such activities only upon finding:
(1) surface mining activities will not cause or contribute to the violation of applicable state or federal water quality standards, and will not adversely affect the water quantity and quality or other environmental resources of the stream; or
(2) if there will be a temporary or permanent stream-channel diversion, it will comply with § 5317.
(b) The area not to be disturbed shall be designated as a buffer zone and the operator shall mark it as specified in § 5301.
§ 5345. Coal Recovery
Surface mining activities shall be conducted so as to maximize the utilization and conservation of the coal, while utilizing the best appropriate technology currently available to maintain environmental integrity, so that reaffecting the land in the future through surface coal mining operations is minimized.
§ 5347. Use of Explosives: General Requirements
(a) Each operator shall comply with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations in the use of explosives.
(b) Blasts that use more than five pounds of explosive or blasting agent shall be conducted according to the schedule required under § 5351.
(c) Blasters
(1) All blasting operations in the state shall be conducted under the direction of a certified blaster and in accordance with Policy Statement No. PS-1 entitled "Blasters Certification Requirements, Surface Coal Mining and Reclamation Operations". All such blasting operations in the state shall be conducted by competent, experienced persons who understand the hazards involved.
(2) Certificates of blaster certification shall be carried by blasters or shall be on file at the permit area during blasting operations.
(3) A blaster and at least one other person shall be present at the firing of a blast.
(4) Any blaster who is responsible for conducting blasting operations at a blasting site shall:
(A) be familiar with the blasting plan and site-specific performance standards; and
(B) give direction and on-the-job training to persons who are not certified and who are assigned to the blasting crew or assist in the use of explosives.
(d) Blast Design
(1) An anticipated blast design shall be submitted if blasting operations will be conducted within:
(A) 1,000 feet of any building used as a dwelling, public building, school, church, community or institutional building outside the permit area; or
(B) 500 feet of an active or abandoned underground mine.
(2) The blast design may be presented as part of a permit application or at a time, before the
blast, approved by the Department.
(3) The blast design shall contain sketches of the drill patterns, delay periods and decking and shall indicate the type and amount of explosives to be used, critical dimensions, and the location and general description of structures to be protected, as well as a discussion of design factors to be used, which protect the public and meet the applicable airblast, flyrock and ground-vibration standards in § 5355.
(4) The blast design shall be prepared and signed by a certified blaster.
(5) The Department may require changes to the design submitted.
(6) No blasting shall occur until the blast design is approved in writing by the Department. No blast design shall be approved by the Department unless it fulfills the requirements of § 53-9- 25 and the blast plan is previously approved by the Permit Board.
§ 5349. Use of Explosives: Pre-Blasting Survey
(a) At least 30 days before initiation of blasting the operator shall notify, in writing, all residents or owners of dwellings or other structures located within one-half mile of the blast area how to request a preblasting survey.
(b) A resident or owner of a dwelling or structure within one-half mile of any part of the permit area may request a preblasting survey. This request shall be made, in writing, directly to the operator or to the Department, who shall promptly notify the operator. The operator shall promptly conduct a preblasting survey of the dwelling or structure and promptly prepare a written report of the survey. An updated survey of any additions, modifications or renovations shall be performed by the operator if requested by the resident or owner.
(c) The operator shall determine the condition of the dwelling or structure and shall document any preblasting damage and other physical factors that could reasonably be affected by the blasting. Structures such as pipelines, cables, transmission lines, and cisterns, wells and other water systems warrant special attention. However, the assessment of these structures may be limited to surface conditions and other readily available data.
(d) The written report of the survey shall be signed by the person who conducted the survey. Copies of the report shall be promptly provided to the Department and to the person requesting the survey. If the person requesting the survey disagrees with the contents and/or recommendations contained therein, he or she may submit to both the operator and the Department a detailed description of the specific areas of disagreement.
(e) Any surveys requested more than 10 days before the planned initiation of blasting shall be completed by the operator before the initiation of blasting.
§ 5351. Use of Explosives: Blasting Schedule
(a) General Requirements
(1) The operator shall conduct blasting operations at times approved by the Department and announced in the blasting schedule. The Department may limit the area covered, timing, and sequence of blasting as listed in the schedule, if such limitations are necessary and
reasonable in order to protect the public health and safety or welfare.
(2) All blasting shall be conducted between sunrise and sunset, unless nighttime blasting is approved by the Department based upon a showing by the operator that the public will be protected from adverse noise and other impacts. The Department may specify more restrictive time periods for blasting.
(3) Unscheduled blasts may be conducted only where public or operator health and safety so require and for emergency blasting actions. When an operator conducts an unscheduled blast, the operator, using audible signals, shall notify residents within one-half mile of the blasting site and document the reason for the unscheduled blast in accordance with § 5357(p).
(b) Blasting Schedule Publication and Distribution
(1) The operator shall publish the blasting schedule in a newspaper of general circulation in the locality of the blasting site at least 10 days, but not more than 30 days, before beginning a blasting program.
(2) The operator shall distribute copies of the schedule to local governments and public utilities and to each local residence within one-half mile of the proposed blasting site described in the schedule.
(3) The operator shall republish and redistribute the schedule at least every 12 months and revise and republish the schedule at least 10 days, but not more than 30 days, before blasting whenever the area covered by the schedule changes or actual time periods for blasting significantly differ from the prior announcement.
(c) Blasting Schedule Contents. The blasting schedule shall contain, at a minimum:
(1) name, address and telephone number of operator;
(2) identification of the specific areas in which blasting will take place;
(3) dates and time periods when explosives are to be detonated;
(4) methods to be used to control access to the blasting area; and
(5) type and patterns of audible warning and all-clear signals to be used before and after blasting.
§ 5353. Use of Explosives: Blasting Signs, Warnings and Access Control
(a) Blasting Signs. Blasting signs shall meet the specifications of § 5301. The operator shall:
(1) conspicuously place signs reading "Blasting Area" along the edge of any blasting area that comes within 100 feet of any public road right-of-way, and at the point where any other road provides access to the blasting area; and
(2) at all entrances to the permit area from public roads or highways, place conspicuous signs which state "Warning! Explosives in Use", which clearly list and describe the meaning
of the audible blast warning and all-clear signals that are in use, and which explain the marking of blasting areas and charged holes awaiting firing within the permit area.
(b) Warnings. Warning and all-clear signals of different character or pattern that are audible within a range of one-half mile from the point of the blast shall be given. Each person within the permit area and each person who resides or regularly works within one-half mile of the permit area shall be notified of the meaning of the signals in the blasting schedule.
(c) Access Control. Access within the blasting area shall be controlled to prevent presence of livestock or unauthorized persons during blasting and until an authorized representative of the operator has reasonably determined that:
(1) no unusual hazards, such as imminent slides or undetonated charges, exist; and
(2) access to and travel within the blasting area can be safely resumed.
§ 5355. Use of Explosives: Control of Adverse Effects
(a) General Requirements. Blasting shall be conducted to prevent injury to persons, damage to public or private property outside the permit area, adverse impacts on any underground mine, and change in the course, channel or availability of surface water or ground water outside the permit area.
(b) Airblast
(1) Limits
(A) Airblast shall not exceed the maximum limits listed below at the location of any dwelling, public building, school, church, community or institutional building outside the permit area, except as provided in § 5355(e).
Lower Frequency Limit Of Measuring System, Maximum Level In Hz (+/- 3 dB) (in dB) 0.1 Hz or lower--flat response
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-7- 1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq., and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 7, 53-9- 9, 53-9-11, 53-9- 12 and 53-9-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 45 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 11 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 19 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 75, 53-9- 81 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 71 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 71 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 71 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 71 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 41 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 25, 53-9- 28 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 41, 53-9- 43 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 21, 53-9- 25, 53-9- 27, 53-9- 33 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 25, 53-9- 33 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 25, 53-9- 29, 53-9- 47, 53-9- 85 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 33, 53-9- 45, 53-9- 49 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 25, 53-9- 27, 53-9- 35, 53-9- 37, 53-9- 39, 53-9- 77 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 33, 53-9- 37, 53-9- 77 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 21, 53-9- 23, 53-9- 35 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 26, 53-9- 89 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 31 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 31 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 65 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 65 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 134 Rule 134
peak. 2 Hz or lower--flat response 133 peak. 6 Hz or lower--flat response 129 peak. C-weighted--slow response n
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 105 peak dBC
Only when approved by the Permit Board.
(B) If necessary to prevent damage, the Permit Board shall specify lower maximum allowable airblast levels than those of § 5355(b)(1)(A) for use in the vicinity of a specific blasting operation.
(2) Monitoring
(A) The operator shall conduct periodic monitoring to ensure compliance with the airblast standards. The Permit Board may require airblast measurement of any or all blasts and may specify the locations at which such measurements are taken.
(B) The measuring systems shall have an upper-end flat-frequency response of at least 200 Hz.
(c) Flyrock. Flyrock traveling in the air or along the ground shall not be cast from the blasting site:
(1) more than one-half the distance to the nearest dwelling or other occupied structure;
(2) beyond the area of control required under § 5353(c); or
(3) beyond the permit boundary.
(d) Ground Vibration
(1) General. In all blasting operations, except as otherwise authorized in §5355(e), the maximum ground vibration shall not exceed the values approved in the blasting plan required under § 2707. The maximum ground vibration for protected structures listed in § 5355(d)(2)(A) shall be established in accordance with either the maximum peak- particle-velocity limits of § 5355(d)(2), the scaled-distance equation of § 5355(d)(3), the blasting-level chart of §5355(d)(4), or by the Permit Board under § 5355(d)(5). All structures in the vicinity of the blasting area not listed in § 5355(d)(2)(A), such as water towers, pipelines and other utilities, tunnels, dams, impoundments and underground mines, shall be protected from damage by establishment of a maximum allowable limit on the ground vibration, submitted by the operator in the blasting plan and approved by the Permit Board.
(2) Maximum Peak Particle Velocity
(A) The maximum ground vibration shall not exceed the following limits at the location of any dwelling, public building, school, church, community or institutional building outside the permit area:
Maximum Allowable Scaled-Distance Distance (D) Peak Particle Velocity Factor to be From the Blasting (V max) for Ground Applied without Site, in Feet Vibration, in in/sec
Seismic Monitoring
to 300 1.25 50 301 to 5,000 1.00 55 5,001 and beyond 0.75 6
Ground vibration shall be measured as the particle velocity. Particle velocity shall be recorded in three mutually perpendicular directions. The maximum allowable peak particle velocity shall apply to each of the three measurements.
Applicable to the scaled-distance equation of §5355(d)(3)(A).
(B) A seismographic record shall be provided for each blast.
(3) Scaled-Distance Equation
(A) An operator may use the scaled-distance equation, W = (D/Ds)
, to determine the allowable charge weight of explosives to be detonated in any 8-millisecond period, without seismic monitoring; where W = the maximum weight of explosives, in pounds; D = the distance, in feet, from the blasting site to the nearest protected structure; and Ds = the scaled-distance factor, which may initially be approved by the Permit Board using the values for scaled-distance factor listed in § 5355(d)(2)(A).
(B) The development of a modified scaled-distance factor may be authorized by the Permit Board on receipt of a written request by the operator, supported by seismographic records of blasting at the minesite. The modified scaled-distance factor shall be determined such that the particle velocity of the predicted ground vibration will not exceed the prescribed maximum allowable peak particle velocity of § 5355(d)(2)(A), at a 95-percent confidence level.
(4) Blasting-Level Chart.
(A) An operator may use the ground-vibration limits in Figure 1 to determine the maximum allowable ground vibration.
Figure 1. Alternative blasting level criteria. (Source: Modified from figure B-1, Bureau of Mines R18507)
(B) If the Figure 1 limits are used, a seismographic record including both particle velocity and vibration-frequency levels shall be provided for each blast. The method for the analysis of the predominant frequency contained in the blasting records shall be approved by the Permit Board before application of this alternative blasting criterion.
(5) The maximum allowable ground vibration shall be reduced by the Permit Board beyond the limits otherwise provided by this Section, if determined necessary to provide damage protection.
(6) The Permit Board may require an operator to conduct seismic monitoring of any or all blasts or may specify the location at which the measurements are taken and the degree of
detail necessary in the measurement.
(e) The maximum airblast and ground-vibration standards of § 5355(b) and (d) shall not apply at the following locations:
(1) at structures owned by the permittee and not leased to another person; or
(2) at structures owned by the permittee and leased to another person, if a written waiver by the lessee is submitted to the Department before blasting.
§ 5357. Use of Explosives: Records of Blasting Operations
The operator shall retain a record of all blasts for at least three years. Upon request, copies of these records shall be made available to the Department and to the public for inspection. Such records shall contain the following data:
(a) name of the operator conducting the blast;
(b) location, date and time of the blast;
(c) name, signature and certification number of the blaster conducting the blast;
(d) identification, direction and distance, in feet, from the nearest blast hole to the nearest dwelling, public building, school, church, community or institutional building outside the permit area, except those described in § 5355(e);
(e) weather conditions, including those which may cause possible adverse blasting effects;
(f) type of material blasted;
(g) sketches of the blast pattern including number of holes, burden, spacing, decks and delay pattern;
(h) diameter and depth of holes;
(i) types of explosives used;
(j) total weight of explosives used per hole;
(k) the maximum weight of explosives detonated in an 8-millisecond period;
(l) initiation system;
(m) type and length of stemming;
(n) mats or other protections used;
(o) seismographic and airblast records, if required, which shall include:
(1) type of instrument, sensitivity and calibration signal or certification of annual calibration;
(2) exact location of instrument and the date, time and distance from the blast;
(3) name of the person and firm taking the reading;
(4) name of the person and firm analyzing the seismographic record; and
(5) the vibration and/or airblast level recorded;
(p) reasons and conditions for each unscheduled blast.
§ 5359. Disposal of Excess Spoil: General Requirements
(a) General. Excess spoil shall be placed in designated disposal areas within the permit area, in a controlled manner to
(1) Minimize the adverse effects of leachate and surface water runoff from the fill on surface and ground waters;
(2) Ensure mass stability and prevent mass movement during and after construction; and
(3) Ensure that the final fill is suitable for reclamation and revegetation compatible with the natural surroundings and the approved postmining land use.
(b) Design certification.
(1) The fill and appurtenant structures shall be designed using current, prudent engineering practices and shall meet any design criteria established by the Department. A qualified registered professional engineer experienced in the design of the earth and rock fills shall certify the design of the file and appurtenant structures.
(2) The fill shall be designed to attain a minimum long-term static safety factor of 1.5. The foundation and abutments of the fill must be stable under all conditions of construction.
(c) Location. The disposal area shall be located on the most moderately sloping and naturally stable areas available, as approved by the Department, and shall be placed, where possible, upon or above a natural terrace, bench, or berm, if such placement provides additional stability and prevents mass movement.
(d) Foundation
(1) Sufficient foundation investigations, as well as any necessary laboratory testing of foundation material, shall be performed in order to determine the design requirements for foundation stability. The analyses of foundation conditions shall take into consideration the effect of underground mine workings, if any, upon the stability of the fill and appurtenant structures.
(2) Where the slope in the disposal area is in excess of 2.8h:1v (36 percent), or such lesser slope as may be designated by the Department based on local conditions, keyway cuts (excavations to stable bedrock) or rock toe buttresses shall be constructed to ensure stability of the fill. Where the toe of the spoil rests on a downslope, stability and analyses shall be performed in accordance with § 2735 (c) to determine the size of rock toe buttresses and keyway cuts.
(e) Placement of Excess Spoil.
(1) All vegetative and organic materials shall be removed from the disposal area prior to placement of the excess spoil. Topsoil shall be removed, segregated and stored or redistributed in accordance with § 5311. If approved by the Department, organic material may be used as mulch or may be included in the topsoil to control erosion, promote growth of vegetation or increase the moisture retention of the soil.
(2) Excess spoil shall be transported and placed in a controlled manner in horizontal lifts not exceeding 4 feet in thickness; concurrently compacted as necessary to ensure mass stability and to prevent mass movement during and after construction; graded so that surface and subsurface drainage is compatible with the natural surroundings; and covered with topsoil or substitute material in accordance with § 5311 of this Rule. The Department may approve a design which incorporates placement of excess spoil in horizontal lifts other than 4 feet in thickness when it is demonstrated by the operator and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer that the design will ensure the stability of the fill and will meet all other applicable requirements.
(3) The final configuration of the fill shall be suitable for the approved postmining land use. Terraces may be constructed on the outslope of the fill if required for stability, control of erosion, to conserve soil moisture, or to facilitate the approved postmining land use. The grade of the outslope between terrace benches shall not be steeper than 2h:1v (50 percent).
(4) No permanent impoundments are allowed on the completed fill. Small depressions may be allowed by the Department if they are needed to retain moisture, minimize erosion, create and enhance wildlife habitat, or assist revegetation; and if they are not incompatible with the stability of the fill.
(5) Excess spoil that is acidic- or toxic- forming or combustible shall be adequately covered with nonacidic, nontoxic and noncombustible material, or treated, to control the impact on surface and groundwater in accordance with § 5325, to prevent sustained combustion, and to minimize adverse effects on plant growth and the approved postmining land use.
(f) Drainage control.
(1) If the disposal area contains springs, natural or manmade water courses, or wet weather seeps, the fill design shall include diversions and underdrains as necessary to control erosion, prevent water infiltration into the fill, and ensure stability.
(2) Diversions shall comply with the requirements of § 5317.
(3) Underdrains shall consist of durable rock or pipe, be designed and constructed using current, prudent engineering practices and meet any design criteria established by the Department. The underdrain system shall be designed to carry the anticipated seepage of water due to rainfall away from the excess spoil fill and from seeps and springs in the foundation of the disposal area and shall be protected from piping and contamination by an adequate filter. Rock underdrains shall be constructed of durable, nonacid-, nontoxic- forming rock (e.g., natural sand and gravel, sandstone, limestone, or other durable rock) that does not slake in water or degrade to soil material, and which is free of coal, clay or
other nondurable material. Perforated pipe underdrains shall be corrosion resistant and shall have characteristics consistent with the long-term life of the fill.
(g) Surface area stabilization. Slope protection shall be provided to minimize surface erosion at the site. All disturbed areas, including diversion channels that are not riprapped or otherwise protected, shall be revegetated upon completion of construction.
(h) Inspections. A qualified registered professional engineer, or other qualified professional specialist under the direction of the registered professional engineer, shall periodically inspect the fill during construction. The registered professional engineer or specialist shall be experienced in the construction of earth and rock fills.
(1) Such inspections shall be made at least quarterly throughout construction and during critical construction periods. Critical construction periods shall include at a minimum:
(A) Foundation preparation, including the removal of all organic material and topsoil;
(B) placement of underdrains and protective filter systems;
(C) installation of final surface drainage systems; and
(D) the final graded and revegetated fill. Regular inspections by the registered professional engineer or specialist shall also be conducted during placement and compaction of fill materials.
(2) The qualified registered professional engineer shall provide a certified report to the Department promptly after each inspection that the fill has been constructed and maintained as designed and in accordance with the approved plan and this Rule. The report shall include appearances of instability, structural weakness, and other hazardous conditions.
(3) (A) The certified report on the drainage system and protective filters shall include color photographs taken during and after construction, but before underdrains are covered with excess spoil. If the underdrain system is constructed in phases, each phase shall be certified separately.
(B) Where excess durable rock spoil is placed in single or multiple lifts such that the underdrain system is constructed simultaneously with excess spoil placement by the natural segregation of dumped materials, in accordance with § 5363, color photographs shall be taken of the underdrain as the underdrain system is being formed.
(C) The photographs accompanying each certified report shall be taken in adequate size and number with enough terrain or other physical features of the site shown to provide a relative scale to the photographs and to specifically and clearly identify the site.
(4) A copy of each inspection report shall be retained at or near the mine site.
(A) Coal mine waste. Coal mine waste may be disposed of in excess spoil fills if
approved by the Department and, if such waste is —
(i) Placed in accordance with § 5371;
(ii) Nontoxic and nonacid forming; and
(iii) Of the proper characteristics to be consistent with the design stability of the fill.
(i) Underground disposal. Excess spoil may be disposed of in underground mine workings, but only in accordance with a plan approved by the Department and MSHA under 30 CFR § 784.25.
§ 5361. Disposal of Excess Spoil: Valley Fills/Head-of-Hollow Fills.
Valley fills and head-of-hollow fills shall meet the requirements of § 5359 and the additional requirements of this section.
(a) Drainage control.
(1) The top surface of the completed fill shall be graded such that the final slope after settlement will be toward properly designed drainage channels. Uncontrolled surface drainage may not be directed over the outslope of the fill.
(2) Runoff from areas above the fill and runoff from the surface of the fill shall be diverted into stabilized diversion channels designed to meet the requirements of § 5317 and, in addition, to safely pass the runoff from a 100-year, 6-hour precipitation event.
(b) Rock-core chimney drains. A rock-core chimney drain may be used in a head-of-hollow fill, instead of the underdrain and surface diversion system normally required, as long as the fill is not located in an area containing intermittent or perennial streams. A rock-core chimney drain may be used in a valley fill if the fill does not exceed 250,000 cubic yards of material and upstream drainage is diverted around the fill. The alternative rock-core chimney drain system shall be incorporated into the design and construction of the fill as follows:
(1) The fill shall have, along the vertical projection of the main buried stream channel or rill, a vertical core of durable rock at least 16 feet thick which shall extend from the toe of the fill to the head of the fill, and from the base of the fill to the surface of the fill. A system of lateral rock underdrains shall connect this rock core to each area of potential drainage or seepage in the disposal area. The underdrain system and rock core shall be designed to carry the anticipated seepage of water due to rainfall away from the excess spoil fill and seeps and springs in the foundation of the disposal area. Rocks used in the rock core and underdrains shall meet the requirements of § 5359(f).
(2) A filter system to ensure the proper long-term functioning of the rock core shall be designed and constructed using current, prudent engineering practices.
(3) Grading may drain surface water away from the outslope of the fill and toward the rock core. In no case, however, may intermittent or perennial streams be diverted into the rock core. The maximum slope of the top of the fill shall be 33h:1v (3 percent). A drainage pocket may be maintained at the head of the fill during and after construction, to intercept surface runoff and discharge the runoff through or over the rock drain, if stability of the
fill is not impaired. In no case shall this pocket or sump have a potential capacity for impounding more than 10,000 cubic feet of water. Terraces on the fill shall be graded with a 3 to 5 percent grade toward the fill and a 1 percent slope toward the rock core.
§ 5363. Disposal of Excess Spoil: Durable Rock Fills
The Department may approve the alternative method of disposal of excess durable rock spoil by gravity placement in single or multiple lifts, provided the following conditions are met:
(a) Except as provided in this section, the requirements of § 5359 are met.
(b) The excess spoil consists of at least 80 percent, by volume, durable, nonacid- and nontoxic- forming rock (e.g., sandstone or limestone) that does not slake in water and will not degrade to soil material. Where used, noncemented clay shale, clay spoil, soil or other nondurable excess spoil materials shall be mixed with excess durable rock spoil in a controlled manner such that no more than 20 percent of the fill volume, as determined by tests performed by a registered professional engineer and approved by the Department, is not durable rock.
(c) A qualified registered professional engineer certifies that the design will ensure the stability of the fill and meet all other applicable requirements.
(d) The fill is designed to attain a minimum long-term static safety factor of 1.5, and an earthquake safety factor of 1.1.
(e) The underdrain system may be constructed simultaneously with excess spoil placement by the natural segregation of dumped materials, provided the resulting underdrain system is capable of carrying anticipated seepage of water due to rainfall away from the excess spoil fill and from seeps and springs in the foundation of the disposal area and the other requirements for drainage control are met.
(f) Surface water runoff from areas adjacent to and above the fill is not allowed to flow onto the fill and is diverted into stabilized diversion channels designed to meet the requirements of § 5317 and to safely pass the runoff from a 100-year, 6-hour precipitation event.
§ 5365. Disposal of excess spoil: Preexisting benches.
(a) The Permit Board may approve the disposal of excess spoil through placement on a preexisting bench if the affected portion of the preexisting bench is permitted and the standards set forth in §§ 5391(c), 5391(e) through 5391(h), and 5391 (j) and the requirements of this section are met.
(b) All vegetation and organic materials shall be removed from the affected portion of the preexisting bench prior to placement of the excess spoil. Any available topsoil on the bench shall be removed, stored and redistributed in accordance with § 5311. Substitute or supplemental materials may be used in accordance with § 5311(b).
(c) The fill shall be designed and constructed using current, prudent engineering practices. The design will be certified by a registered professional engineer. The spoil shall be placed on the solid portion of the bench in a controlled manner and concurrently compacted as necessary to attain a long term static safety factor of 1.3 for all portions of the fill. Any spoil deposited on any fill portion of the bench will be treated as excess spoil fill under § 5359.
(d) The preexisting bench shall be backfilled and graded to:
(1) Achieve the most moderate slope possible which does not exceed the angle of repose;
(2) Eliminate the highwall to the maximum extent technically practical;
(3) Minimize erosion and water pollution both on and off the site; and
(4) If the disposal area contains springs, natural or manmade water courses, or wet weather seeps, the fill design shall include diversions and underdrains as necessary to control erosion, prevent water infiltration into the fill, and ensure stability.
(e) All disturbed areas, including diversion channels that are not riprapped or otherwise protected, shall be revegetated upon completion of construction.
(f) Permanent impoundments may not be constructed on preexisting benches backfilled with excess spoil under this regulation.
(g) Final configuration of the backfill must be compatible with the natural drainage patterns and the surrounding area, and support the approved postmining land use.
(h) Disposal of excess spoil from an upper actively mined bench to a lower preexisting bench by means of gravity transport may be approved by the Department provided that--
(1) The gravity transport courses are determined on a site-specific basis by the operator as part of the permit application and approved by the Permit Board to minimize hazards to health and safety and to ensure that damage will be minimized between the benches, outside the set course, and downslope of the lower bench should excess spoil accidentally move;
(2) All gravity transported excess spoil, including that excess spoil immediately below the gravity transport courses and any preexisting spoil that is disturbed, is rehandled and placed in horizontal lifts in a controlled manner, concurrently compacted as necessary to ensure mass stability and to prevent mass movement, and graded to allow surface and subsurface drainage to be compatible with the natural surroundings and to ensure a minimum long-term static safety factor of 1.3. Excess spoil on the bench prior to the current mining operation that is not disturbed need not be rehandled except where necessary to ensure stability of the fill;
(3) A safety berm is constructed on the solid portion of the lower bench prior to gravity transport of the excess spoil. Where there is insufficient material on the lower bench to construct a safety berm, only that amount of excess spoil necessary for the construction of the berm may be gravity transported to the lower bench prior to construction of the berm.
(4) Excess spoil shall not be allowed on the downslope below the upper bench except on designated gravity transport courses properly prepared according to §§ 5309-5311. Upon completion of the fill, no excess spoil shall be allowed to remain on the designated gravity transport course between the two benches and each transport course shall be reclaimed in accordance with the requirements of this Rule.
§ 5367. Protection of Underground Mining
No surface mining activities shall be conducted closer than 500 feet to any point of either an active or abandoned underground mine, except to the extent that -
(a) The activities result in improved resource recovery, abatement of water pollution, or elimination of hazards to the health and safety of the public; and
(b) The nature, timing, and sequence of the activities that propose to mine closer than 500 feet to an active underground mine are jointly approved by the Department, the Mine Safety and Health Administration, and the State agency, if any, responsible for the safety of underground mine workers.
§ 5369. Coal Mine Waste: General Requirements
(a) General. All coal mine waste disposed of in an area other than the mine workings or excavations shall be placed in new or existing disposal areas within a permit area, which are approved by the Department for this purpose. Coal mine waste shall be hauled or conveyed and placed for final placement in a controlled manner to:
(1) Minimize adverse effects of leachate and surface-water runoff on surface and ground water quality and quantity;
(2) Ensure mass stability and prevent mass movement during and after construction;
(3) Ensure that the final disposal facility is suitable for reclamation and revegetation compatible with the natural surroundings and the approved postmining land use;
(4) Not create a public hazard; and
(5) Prevent combustion.
(b) Coal mine waste material from activities located outside a permit area may be disposed of in the permit area only if approved by the Department. Approval shall be based upon a showing that such disposal will be in accordance with the standards of this section.
(c) Design certification.
(1) The disposal facility shall be designed using current, prudent engineering practices and shall meet any design criteria established by the Department. A qualified registered professional engineer, experienced in the design of similar earth and waste structures, shall certify the design of the disposal facility.
(2) The disposal facility shall be designed to attain a minimum long-term static safety factor of 1.5. The foundation and abutments must be stable under all conditions of construction.
(d) Foundation. Sufficient foundation investigations, as well as any necessary laboratory testing of foundation material, shall be performed in order to determine the design requirements for foundation stability. The analyses of the foundation conditions shall take into consideration the effect of underground mine workings, if any, upon the stability of the disposal facility.
(e) Emergency procedures. If any examination or inspection discloses that a potential hazard exists, the Department shall be informed promptly of the finding and of the emergency procedures formulated for public protection and remedial action. If adequate procedures cannot be formulated or implemented, the Department shall be notified immediately. The Department shall then notify the appropriate agencies that other emergency procedures are required to protect the public.
(f) Underground disposal. Coal mine waste may be disposed of in underground mine workings, but only in accordance with a plan approved by the Department and MSHA under 30 CFR § 784.25.
§ 5371. Coal mine Waste: Refuse Piles.
Refuse piles shall meet the requirements of § 5369, the additional requirements of this section, and the requirements of 30 CFR §§ 77.214 and 77.215.
(a) Drainage control.
(1) If the disposal area contains springs, natural or manmade water courses, or wet weather seeps, the design shall include diversions and underdrains as necessary to control erosion, prevent water infiltration into the disposal facility and ensure stability.
(2) Uncontrolled surface drainage may not be diverted over the outslope of the refuse piles. Runoff from the areas above the refuse pile and runoff from the surface of the refuse pile shall be diverted into stabilized diversion channels designed to meet the requirements of § 5317 to safely pass the runoff from a 100-year, 6-hour precipitation event. Runoff diverted from undisturbed areas need not be commingled with runoff from the surface of the refuse pile.
(3) Underdrains shall comply with the requirements of § 5359(f)(3).
(b) Surface area stabilization. Slope protection shall be provided to minimize surface erosion at the site. All disturbed areas, including diversion channels that are not riprapped or otherwise protected, shall be revegetated upon completion of construction.
(c) Placement.
(1) All vegetative and organic materials shall be removed from the disposal area prior to placement of coal mine waste. Topsoil shall be removed, segregated and stored or redistributed in accordance with § 5309 and § 5311. If approved by the Permit Board, organic material may be used as mulch, or may be included in the topsoil to control erosion, promote growth of vegetation or increase the moisture retention of the soil.
(2) The final configuration of the refuse pile shall be suitable for the approved postmining land use. Terraces may be constructed on the outslope of the refuse pile if required for stability, control of erosion, conservation of soil moisture, or facilitation of the approved postmining land use. The grade of the outslope between terrace benches shall not be steeper than 2h:1v (50 percent).
(3) No permanent impoundments shall be allowed on the completed refuse pile. Small depressions may be allowed by the Department if they are needed to retain moisture, minimize erosion, create and enhance wildlife habitat, or assist revegetation, and if they
are not incompatible with stability of the refuse pile.
(4) Following final grading of the refuse pile, the coal mine waste shall be covered with a minimum of 4 feet of the best available, nontoxic and noncombustible material, in a manner that does not impede drainage from the underdrains. The Department may allow less than 4 feet of cover material based on physical and chemical analyses which show that the requirements of §§ 5389-53103 will be met.
(d) Inspections. A qualified Registered Professional Engineer, or other qualified professional specialist under the direction of a registered professional engineer shall inspect the refuse pile during construction. The registered professional engineer or specialist shall be experienced in the construction of similar earth and waste structures.
(1) Such inspections shall be made at least quarterly throughout construction and during critical construction periods. Critical construction periods shall include at a minimum:
(A) Foundation preparation including the removal of all organic material and topsoil;
(B) placement of underdrains and protective filter systems;
(C) installation of final surface drainage systems; and
(D) the final graded and revegetated facility. Regular inspections by the registered professional engineer or specialist shall also be conducted during placement and compaction of coal mine waste materials. More frequent inspections shall be conducted if a danger of harm exists to the public health and safety or the environment. Inspections shall continue until the refuse pile has been finally graded and revegetated or until a later time as required by the Department.
(2) The qualified registered professional engineer shall provide a certified report to the Department promptly after each inspection that the refuse pile has been constructed and maintained as designed and in accordance with the approved plan and this Rule. The report shall include appearances of instability, structural weakness, and other hazardous conditions.
(3) The certified report on the drainage system and protective filters shall include color photographs taken during and after construction, but before underdrains are covered with coal mine waste. If the underdrain system is constructed in phases, each phase shall be certified separately. The photographs accompanying each certified report shall be taken in adequate size and number with enough terrain or other physical features of the site shown to provide a relative scale to the photographs and to specifically and clearly identify the site.
(4) A copy of each inspection report shall be retained at or near the minesite.
§ 5373. Coal Processing Waste: Burning and Burned Waste Utilization
(a) Coal processing waste fires shall be extinguished by the person who conducts the surface mining activities in accordance with a plan approved by the Permit Board and the Mine Safety and Health Administration. The plan shall contain, at a minimum, provisions to ensure that only those persons authorized by the operator, and who have an understanding of the procedures to be
used, shall be involved in the extinguishing operations.
(b) No burning or burned coal mine waste shall be removed from a permitted disposal area without a removal plan approved by the Permit Board. Consideration shall be given to potential hazards to persons working or living in the vicinity of the structure.
§ 5375. Disposal of Noncoal Wastes
(a) Noncoal wastes including, but not limited to, grease, lubricants, paints, flammable liquids, garbage, abandoned mining machinery, lumber and other combustibles generated during surface mining activities shall be placed and stored in a controlled manner in a designated portion of the permit area. Placement and storage shall insure that leachate and surface runoff do not degrade surface water or ground water, that fires are prevented, and that the area remains stable and suitable for reclamation and revegetation compatible with the natural surroundings.
(b) Final disposal of noncoal wastes shall be in a designated disposal site in the permit area or a State-approved solid waste disposal area. Disposal sites in the permit area shall be designed and constructed with appropriate water barriers on the bottom and sides of the designated site to ensure that leachate and drainage from the noncoal mine waste area does not degrade surface or underground water. Wastes shall be routinely compacted and covered to prevent combustion and wind-borne waste. When the disposal is completed, a minimum of two feet of soil cover shall be placed over the site, slopes stabilized, and revegetation accomplished in accordance with §§ 5389-53103. Operation of the disposal site shall be conducted in accordance with all local, state and federal requirements. Nothing in these regulations shall exempt a permittee from compliance with the Mississippi Nonhazardous Waste Management Regulations.
(c) At no time shall any solid waste material be deposited at refuse embankments or impoundment sites, nor shall any excavation for solid waste disposal be located within eight feet of any coal outcrop or coal storage area.
§ 5377. Coal Mine Waste: Impounding Structures.
New and existing impounding structures constructed of coal mine waste or intended to impound coal mine waste shall meet the requirements of § 5369.
(a) Coal mine waste shall not be used for construction of impounding structures unless it has been demonstrated to the Department that the stability of such a structure conforms to the requirements of this part and the use of coal mine waste will not have a detrimental effect on downstream water quality or the environment due to acid seepage through the impounding structure. The stability of the structure and the potential impact of acid mine seepage through the impounding structure shall be discussed in detail in the design plan submitted to the Department in accordance with § 2725.
(b) (1) Each impounding structure constructed of coal mine waste or intended to impound coal mine waste shall be designed, constructed and maintained in accordance with § 5327(a) and (c). Such structures may not be retained permanently as part of the approved postmining land use.
(2) Each impounding structure constructed of coal mine waste or intended to impound coal mine waste that meets the criteria of 30 CFR § 77.216(a) shall have sufficient spillway
capacity to safely pass, adequate storage capacity to safely contain, or a combination of storage capacity and spillway capacity to safely control, the probable maximum precipitation of a 6-hour precipitation event, or greater event as specified by the Department.
(c) Spillways and outlet works shall be designed to provide adequate protection against erosion and corrosion. Inlets shall be protected against blockage.
(d) Drainage control. Runoff from areas above the disposal facility or runoff from surface of the facility that may cause instability or erosion of the impounding structure shall be diverted into stabilized diversion channels designed to meet the requirements of § 5317 and designed to safely pass the round off from a 100-year, 6-hour design precipitation event.
(e) Impounding structures constructed of or impounding coal mine waste shall be designed so that at least 90 percent of the water stored during the design precipitation event can be removed within a 10-day period.
(f) For an impounding structure constructed of or impounding coal mine waste, at least 90 percent of the water stored during the design precipitation event shall be removed within the 10-day period following the design precipitation event.
§ 5379. Stabilization of Surface Areas.
(a) All exposed surface areas shall be protected and stabilized to effectively control erosion and air pollution attendant to erosion.
(b) Rills and gullies which form in areas that have been regraded and topsoiled and which either disrupt the approved postmining land use or the reestablishment of the vegetative cover or cause or contribute to a violation of water-quality standards for receiving streams shall be filled, regraded, or otherwise stabilized; topsoil shall be replaced; and the areas shall be reseeded or replanted.
§ 5381. Air Resources Protection
(a) Fugitive Dust. Each person who conducts surface mining activities shall plan and employ fugitive dust control measures as an integral part of site preparation, coal mining and reclamation operations. The Department shall approve the control measures appropriate for use in planning, according to applicable federal and state air quality standards, climate, existing air quality in the area affected by mining, and the available control technology.
(b) Control Measures. The fugitive dust control measures to be used, depending on applicable federal and state air quality standards, climate, existing air quality, size of operation and type of operation, shall include, as necessary, but not be limited to:
(1) periodic watering of unpaved roads, with the minimum frequency of watering approved by the Department;
(2) chemical stabilization of unpaved roads with proper application of nontoxic soil cement or dust palliatives;
(3) paving of roads;
(4) prompt removal of coal, rock, soil and other dust-forming debris from roads and frequent scraping and compaction of unpaved roads to stabilize the road surface;
(5) restricting the speed of vehicles to reduce fugitive dust caused by travel;
(6) revegetating, mulching or otherwise stabilizing the surface of all areas adjoining roads that are sources of fugitive dust;
(7) restricting the travel of unauthorized vehicles on other than established roads;
(A) enclosing, covering, watering or otherwise treating loaded haul trucks and railroad cars to reduce loss of material to wind and spillage;
(B) substituting conveyor systems for haul trucks and covering conveyor systems when conveyed loads are subjected to wind erosion;
(C) minimizing the area of disturbed land;
(D) prompt revegetation of regraded lands;
(E) use of alternatives for coal handling methods, restriction of dumping procedures, wetting of disturbed materials during handling, and compaction of disturbed areas;
(F) planting of special windbreak vegetation at critical points in the permit area;
(G) control of dust from drilling using water sprays, hoods, dust collectors or other controls;
(H) restricting the areas to be blasted at any one time;
(I) restricting activities causing fugitive dust during periods of air stagnation;
(J) extinguishing any areas of burning or smoldering coal and periodically inspecting for burning areas whenever the potential for spontaneous combustion is high;
(K) reducing the period of time between initially disturbing the soil and revegetating or other surface stabilization;
(L) restricting fugitive dust at spoil and coal transfer and loading points with water sprays, negative pressure systems and baghouse filters, chemicals or other practices.
(c) Additional Measures. Where the Department determines that application of fugitive dust control measures listed in § 5381(b) is inadequate, the Department may require additional measures and practices as necessary. Nothing in these regulations will lessen the responsibility of a surface coal mining and reclamation operation to comply with the air pollution control regulations promulgated by the Commission and enforced through the Office of Pollution Control.
(d) Monitoring. Air monitoring equipment shall be installed and monitoring shall be conducted in
accordance with the air monitoring plan required under § 2711 and approved by the office.
§ 5383. Protection of Fish, Wildlife and Related Environmental Values
(a) Any person conducting surface mining activities shall, to the extent possible using the best technology currently available, minimize disturbances and adverse impact of the activities on fish, wildlife and related environmental values, and achieve enhancement of such resources where practicable.
(b) Endangered and Threatened Species. No surface mining activity shall be conducted which is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of endangered or threatened species listed by the secretary of interior or which is likely to result in the destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitats of such species in violation of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). The operator shall promptly report to the Department any state- or federally-listed endangered or threatened species within the permit area of which the operator becomes aware. Upon notification, the Department shall consult with appropriate state and federal fish and wildlife agencies and, after consultation, shall identify whether, and under what conditions, the operator may proceed.
(c) Bald and Golden Eagles. No surface mining activity shall be conducted in a manner which would result in the unlawful taking of a bald or golden eagle, its nest or any of its eggs. The operator shall promptly report to the Department any golden or bald eagle nest within the permit area of which the operator becomes aware. Upon notification, the Department shall consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and also, where appropriate, the state fish and wildlife agency and, after consultation, shall identify whether, and under what conditions, the operator may proceed.
(d) Nothing in these regulations shall authorize the taking of an endangered or threatened species or a bald or golden eagle, its nest or any of its eggs in violation of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 1537 et seq.), or the Bald Eagle Protection Act, as amended, (16 U.S.C. 668 et seq.).
(e) Each operator shall, to the extent possible using the best technology currently available -
(1) Ensure that electric powerlines and other transmission facilities used for, or incidental to, surface mining activities on the permit area are designed and constructed to minimize electrocution hazards to raptors, except where the Department determines that such requirements are unnecessary;
(2) Locate and operate haul and access roads so as to avoid or minimize impacts on important fish and wildlife species or other species protected by State or Federal law;
(3) Design fences, overland conveyors, and other potential barriers to permit passage for large mammals, except where the Department determines that such requirements are unnecessary; and
(4) Fence, cover, or use other appropriate methods to exclude wildlife from ponds which contain hazardous concentrations of toxic-forming materials.
(f) Wetlands and habitats of unusually high value for fish and wildlife. The operator conducting surface mining activities shall avoid disturbances to, enhance where practicable, restore, or
replace, wetlands, and riparian vegetation along rivers and streams and bordering ponds and lakes. Surface mining activities shall avoid disturbances to, enhance where practicable, or restore, habitats of unusually high value for fish and wildlife.
(g) Where fish and wildlife habitat is to be a postmining land use, the plant species to be used on reclaimed areas shall be selected on the basis of the following criteria:
(1) Their proven nutritional value for fish or wildlife.
(2) Their use as cover for fish or wildlife.
(3) Their ability to support and enhance fish or wildlife habitat after the release of performance bonds. The selected plants shall be grouped and distributed in a manner which optimizes edge effect, cover, and other benefits to fish and wildlife.
(h) Where cropland is to be the postmining land use, and where appropriate for wildlife- and crop- management practices, the operator shall intersperse the fields with trees, hedges, or fence rows throughout the harvested area to break up large blocks of monoculture and to diversify habitat types for birds and other animals.
(i) Where residential, public service, or industrial uses are to be the postmining land use, and where consistent with the approved postmining land use, the operator shall intersperse reclaimed lands with greenbelts utilizing species of grass, shrubs, and trees useful as food and cover for wildlife.
§ 5385. Slides and Other Damage
(a) An undisturbed natural barrier shall be provided beginning at the elevation of the lowest coal seam to be mined and extending from the outslope for such distance as may be determined by the Permit Board as is needed to assure stability. The barrier shall be retained in place to prevent slides and erosion.
(b) At any time a slide occurs which may have a potential adverse affect on public property, health, safety or the environment, the person who conducts the surface mining activities shall notify the Department by the fastest available means and comply with any remedial measures required by the Department or the Commission.
§ 5387. Contemporaneous Reclamation
Reclamation efforts, including but not limited to backfilling, grading, topsoil replacement, and revegetation, on all land that is disturbed by surface mining activities shall occur as contemporaneously as practicable with mining operations.
§ 5389. Backfilling and Grading: Time and Distance Requirements.
(a) Except as provided in § 5389(b) of this section, rough backfilling and grading for surface mining activities shall be completed according to one of the following schedules:
(1) Contour mining. Within 60 days or 1,500 linear feet following coal removal; or
(2) Area mining. Within 180 days following coal removal, and not more than four spoil ridges behind the pit being worked, the spoil from the active pit constituting the first
ridge.
(3) Other Surface Mining Methods. Rough backfilling and grading shall occur in accordance with the time schedule approved by the Permit Board, on the basis of the materials submitted under § 2715, which shall specifically establish in stated increments the period between surface mining activities and completion of back filling and grading.
(b) The Department may extend the time allowed for rough back-filling and grading for the entire permit area or for a specified portion of the permit area if the permittee demonstrates in accordance with § 2715 that additional time is necessary.
§ 5391. Backfilling and Grading: General Grading Requirements
(a) Disturbed areas shall be backfilled and graded to:
(1) Achieve the approximate original contour, except as provided in § 5391(k);
(2) Eliminate all highwalls, spoil piles, and depressions, except as provided in § 5391(h) (small depressions) and in § 5391(k)(3)(iii) (previously mined highwalls) of this section;
(3) Achieve a postmining slope that does not exceed either the angle of repose or such lesser slope as is necessary to achieve a minimum long-term static safety factor of 1.3 and to prevent slides;
(4) Minimize erosion and water pollution both on and off the site; and
(5) Support the approved postmining land use.
(b) Spoil, except excess spoil disposed of in accordance with §§ 5359 through 5365, shall be returned to the mined-out area.
(c) Spoil and waste materials shall be compacted where advisable to ensure stability or to prevent leaching of toxic materials.
(d) Spoil may be placed on the area outside the mined-out area in nonsteep slope areas to restore the approximate original contour by blending the spoil into the surrounding terrain if the following requirements are met:
(1) All vegetative and organic material shall be removed from the area.
(2) The topsoil on the area shall be removed, segregated, stored, and redistributed in accordance with § 5311.
(3) The spoil shall be backfilled and graded on the area in accordance with the requirements of this section.
(e) Disposal of coal processing waste and underground development waste in the mined-out area shall be in accordance with §§ 5369-5373, except that a long-term static safety factor of 1.3 shall be achieved.
(f) Exposed coal seams, acid- and toxic-forming materials, and combustible materials exposed,
used, or produced during mining shall be adequately covered with nontoxic and non-combustible material, or treated, to control the impact on surface and ground water in accordance with §§ 5313 and 5325-5343, to prevent sustained combustion, and to minimize adverse effects on plant growth and the approved postmining land use.
(g) Cut-and-fill terraces may be allowed by the Department where:
(1) Needed to conserve soil moisture, ensure stability, and control erosion on final-graded slopes, and control erosion on final-graded slopes, if the terraces are compatible with the approved postmining land use; or
(2) Specialized grading, foundation conditions, or roads are required for the approved postmining land use, in which case the final grading may include a terrace of adequate width to ensure the safety, stability, and erosion control necessary to implement the postmining land-use plan.
(h) Small depressions may be constructed if they are needed to retain moisture, minimize erosion, create and enhance wildlife habitat, or assist revegetation.
(i) Permanent impoundments may be approved if they meet the requirements of §§ 5327 and 5341 and if they are suitable for the approved postmining land use.
(j) Preparation of final-graded surfaces shall be conducted in a manner that minimizes erosion and provides a surface for replacement of topsoil that will minimize slippage.
(k) The postmining slope may vary from the approximate original contour when:
(1) The standards for thin overburden in § 5393 are met;
(2) The standards for thick overburden in § 5395 are met; or
(3) Approval is obtained from the Department for —
(A) Mountaintop removal operations in accordance with 30 CFR § 785.14, which is adopted by reference for this purpose;
(B) A variance from approximate original contour requirements in accordance with § 2905; or
(C) Incomplete elimination of highwalls in previously mined areas in accordance with 30 CFR § 816.106.
§ 5393. Backfilling and Grading: Thin Overburden
(a) Definition. Thin overburden means insufficient spoil and other waste materials available from the entire permit area to restore the disturbed area to its approximate original contour. Insufficient spoil and other waste materials occur where the overburden thickness times the swell factor, plus the thickness of other available waste materials, is less than the combined thickness of the overburden and coal bed prior to removing the coal, so that after backfilling and grading the surface configuration of the reclaimed area would not:
(1) Closely resemble the surface configuration of the land prior to mining; or
(2) Blend into and complement the drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain.
(b) Performance standards. Where thin overburden occurs within the permit area, the permittee at a minimum shall;
(1) Use all spoil and other waste materials available from the entire permit area to attain the lowest practicable grade, but not more than the angle of repose; and
(2) Meet the requirements of § 5391(a)(2)-(j) of this Rule.
§ 5395. Backfilling and Grading: Thick Overburden
(a) Definition. Thick overburden means more than sufficient spoil and other waste materials available from the entire permit area to restore the disturbed area to its approximate original contour. More than sufficient spoil and other waste materials occur where the overburden thickness times the swell factor exceeds the combined thickness of the overburden and coal bed prior to removing the coal, so that after backfilling and grading the surface configuration of the reclaimed area would not:
(1) Closely resemble the surface configuration of the land prior to mining; or
(2) Blend into and complement the drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain.
The provisions of this Section apply only when surface mining activities cannot be carried out to comply with § 5391 to achieve the approximate original contour.
(b) Performance standards. Where thick overburden occurs within the permit area, the permittee at a minimum shall:
(1) Restore the approximate original contour and then use the remaining spoil and other waste materials to attain the lowest practicable grade, but not more than the angle of repose;
(2) Meet the requirements of § 5391 (a)(2) through (j) of this Rule; and
(3) Dispose of any excess spoil in accordance with §§ 5359-5365.
§ 5396. Backfilling and Grading: Previously Mined Areas
(a) Remining operations on previously mined areas that contain a preexisting highwall shall comply with § 5391 through § 5396 and § 5703, except as provided in this section.
(b) The requirements of § 5391(a)(1) and (2) requiring the elimination of highwalls shall not apply to remining operations where the volume of all reasonably available spoil is demonstrated in writing to the Department to be insufficient to completely backfill the reaffected or enlarged highwall, The highwall shall be eliminated to the maximum extent technically practical in accordance with the following criteria:
(1) All spoil generated by the remining operation and any other reasonably available spoil
shall be used to backfill the area. Reasonably available spoil in the immediate vicinity of the remining operation shall be included within the permit area.
(2) The backfill shall be graded to a slope which is compatible with the approved postmining land use and which provides adequate drainage and long-term stability.
(3) Any highwall remnant shall be stable and not pose a hazard to the public health and safety or to the environment. The operator shall demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the Department, that the highwall remnant is stable.
(4) Spoil placed on the outslope during previous mining operations shall not be disturbed if such disturbance shall cause instability of the remaining spoil or otherwise increase the hazard to the public health and safety or to the environment.
§ 5397. Revegetation: General Requirements
(a) Each person who conducts surface mining activities shall establish on regraded areas and on all other disturbed areas, except water areas and surface areas of roads that are approved as part of the post-mining land use, a vegetative cover that is in accordance with the approved permit and reclamation plan and that is:
(1) diverse, effective and permanent;
(2) comprised of species native to the area, or of introduced species where desirable and necessary to achieve the approved post-mining land use and approved by the Permit Board;
(3) at least equal in extent of cover to the natural vegetation of the area; and
(4) capable of stabilizing the soil surface from erosion.
(b) The reestablished plant species shall:
(1) be compatible with the approved post-mining land use;
(2) have the same seasonal characteristics of growth as the original vegetation;
(3) be capable of self-regeneration and plant succession;
(4) be compatible with the plant and animal species of the area;
(5) meet the requirements of applicable state and federal seed, poisonous and noxious plant, and introduced species laws or regulations; and
(6) not be Kudzu, Pueraria lobata or any vine of the Kudzu family.
(c) The Permit Board may grant exception to the requirements of §§ 5397(b)(2)-(3) when the species are necessary to achieve a quick-growing, temporary, stabilizing cover, and measures to establish permanent vegetation are included in the approved permit and reclamation plan.
(d) When the Permit Board approves a cropland post-mining land use, the Permit Board may grant
exception to the requirements of § 5397(a)(1) and (3) and § 5397(b)(2) and (3). In addition, the requirements of Rule 55 apply to areas identified as prime farmland.
§ 5399. Revegetation: Timing
Disturbed areas shall be planted during the first normal period for favorable planting conditions after replacement of the plant-growth medium. The normal period for favorable planting is that planting time generally accepted locally for the type of plant materials selected. When necessary to effectively control erosion, any disturbed area shall be seeded and planted, as contemporaneously as practicable with the completion of backfilling and grading, with a temporary cover of small grains, grasses or legumes until a permanent cover is established.
§ 53101. Revegetation: Mulching and Other Soil Stabilizing Practices
(a) Suitable mulch and other soil stabilizing practices shall be used on all regraded and topsoiled areas to control erosion, promote germination of seeds, or increase the moisture retention capacity of the soil. The Permit Board may waive this requirement if seasonal, soil, or slope factors result in a condition where mulch and other soil stabilizing practices are not necessary to control erosion and to promptly establish an effective vegetative cover.
(b) When required by the Permit Board, mulches shall be mechanically or chemically anchored to the soil surface to assure effective protection of the soil and vegetation.
(c) Annual grasses and grains may be used alone, as in situ mulch, or in conjunction with another mulch, when the Permit Board determines that they will provide adequate soil erosion control and will later be replaced by perennial species approved for the post-mining land use.
(d) Chemical soil stabilizers alone, or in combination with appropriate mulches, may be used in conjunction with vegetative covers approved for the post-mining land use.
§ 53103. Revegetation: Standards for Success
(a) Success of revegetation shall be judged on the effectiveness of the vegetation for the approved post-mining land use, the extent of perennial cover compared to the cover occurring in natural vegetation of the area, the general requirements of §§ 5397-53103, and the specific requirements of Appendix A, “ Revegetation Success Standards”, where specific standards for the designated postmining land use are stated in Appendix A. Appendix A is incorporated by reference into these regulations as if set out fully herein, and the provisions of Appendix A are enforceable provisions of these regulations. If a postmining land use is selected and approved by the Permit Board for which standards are not specified in Appendix A, or to the extent that Appendix A does not specify a more specific standard of success for a postmining land use, the following general standards of success shall apply.
(b) (1) Standards for success shall include criteria representative of unmined lands in the area being reclaimed to evaluate the appropriate vegetation parameters of ground cover, production, or stocking. Ground cover, production, or stocking shall be considered equal to the approved success standard when they are not less than 90 percent of the success standard. The sampling techniques for measuring success shall use a 90-percent statistical confidence interval (i.e., one-sided test with a 0.10 alpha error).
(2) The period of extended responsibility for successful revegetation shall begin after the last year of augmented seeding, fertilizing, irrigation, or other work, excluding husbandry practices that are approved by the Department in accordance with § 53103 (b)(3) of this section.
(3) In areas of more than 26.0 inches of annual average precipitation, the period of responsibility shall continue for a period of not less than:
(A) Five full years, except as provided in § 53103(b)(2)(B) of this section. The vegetation parameters identified in paragraph § 53103(b) of this section for grazing land, pasture land, or cropland shall equal or exceed the approved success standard during the growing season of any 2 years of the responsibility period, except the first year. Areas approved for the other uses identified in § 53103(b) of this section shall be equal or exceed the applicable success standard during the growing season of the last year of the responsibility period.
(B) Two full years for lands eligible for remining included in permits issued before September 30, 2004, or any renewals thereof. To the extent that the success standards are established by § 53103(a) of this section, the lands shall equal or exceed the standards during the growing season of the last year of the responsibility period.
(4) The Permit Board may approve selective husbandry practices, excluding augmented seeding, fertilization, or irrigation, provided it obtains prior approval from the Director in accordance with 30 CFR § 732.17 that the practices are normal husbandry practices, without extending the period of responsibility for revegetation success and bond liability, if such practices can be expected to continue as part of the postmining land use or if discontinuance of the practices after the liability period expires will not reduce the probability of permanent revegetation success. Approved practices shall be normal husbandry practices within the region for unmined lands having land uses similar to the approved postmining land use of the disturbed area, including such practices as disease, pest, and vermin control; and any pruning, reseeding, and transplanting specifically necessitated by such actions.
§ 53105. Cessation of Operations: Temporary
(a) Each person who conducts surface mining activities shall effectively secure surface facilities in areas in which there are no current operations, but in which operations are to be resumed under an approved permit. Temporary abandonment shall not relieve a person of his, her, or its obligation to comply with any provisions of the approved permit.
(b) Before temporary cessation of mining and reclamation operations for a period of 30 days or more, or as soon as it is known that a temporary cessation will extend beyond 30 days, persons who conduct surface mining activities shall submit to the Department a notice of intention to cease or abandon mining and reclamation operations. This notice shall include a statement of the exact number of acres which will have been affected in the permit area prior to such temporary cessation, the extent and kind of reclamation of those areas which will have been accomplished and identification of the backfilling, regrading, revegetation, environmental monitoring and water treatment activities that will continue during the temporary cessation.
§ 53107. Cessation of Operations: Permanent
(a) Persons who cease surface mining activities permanently shall close, backfill or otherwise permanently reclaim all affected areas, in accordance with these regulations and the permit approved by the Permit Board.
(b) All underground openings, equipment, structures or other facilities not required for monitoring, unless approved by the Permit Board as suitable for the post-mining land use or environmental monitoring, shall be removed and the affected land reclaimed.
§ 53109. Post-Mining Land Use
(a) General. All affected areas shall be restored in a timely manner to conditions that are capable of supporting the uses which they were capable of supporting before any mining, or to higher or better uses achievable under the criteria and procedures of this Section.
(b) Determining Premining Use of Land. The premining uses of land to which the post-mining land use is compared shall be those uses which the land previously supported, if the land has not been previously mined and has been properly managed. The post-mining land use for land that has been previously mined and not reclaimed shall be judged on the basis of the land use that existed prior to any mining, provided that, if the land cannot be reclaimed to the land use that existed prior to any mining because of the previously mined condition, the post-mining land use shall be judged on the basis of the highest and best use that can be achieved which is compatible with surrounding areas and does not require the disturbance of areas previously unaffected by mining.
(c) Criteria for alternative postmining land uses. Higher or better uses may be approved by the Permit Board as alternative postmining land uses after consultation with the landowner or the land management agency having jurisdiction over the lands, if the proposed uses meet the following criteria:
(1) There is a reasonable likelihood for achievement of the use.
(2) The use does not present any actual or probable hazard to public health or safety, or threat of water diminution or pollution.
(3) The use will not--
(A) Be impractical or unreasonable;
(B) Be inconsistent with applicable land use policies or plans;
(C) Involve unreasonable delay in implementation; or
(D) Cause or contribute to violation of Federal, State, or local law.
(d) Approximate original contour: Criteria for variance. Surface coal mining operations that meet the requirements of this Paragraph may be conducted under a variance from the requirement to restore disturbed areas to their approximate original contour, if the following requirements are satisfied:
(1) The Permit Board grants the variance under a permit issued in accordance with § 2905.
(2) The alternative postmining land use requirements of § 53109(c) are met.
(3) All applicable requirements of the Act and the regulatory program, other than the requirement to restore disturbed areas to their approximate original contour, are met.
(4) After consultation with the appropriate land use planning agencies, if any, the potential use is shown to constitute an equal or better economic or public use.
(5) The proposed use is designed and certified by a qualified registered professional engineer in conformance with professional standards established to assure the stability, drainage, and configuration necessary for the intended use of the site.
(6) The watershed of the permit and adjacent areas is shown to be improved.
(7) The highwall is completely backfilled with spoil material, in a manner which results in a static factor of safety of at least 1.3, using standard geotechnical analysis.
(8) Only the amount of spoil as is necessary to achieve the postmining land use, ensure the stability of spoil retained on the bench, and meet all other requirements of the Mississippi program is placed off the mine bench. All spoil not retained on the bench shall be placed in accordance with §§ 5359-5365.
(9) The surface landowner of the permit area has knowingly requested, in writing, that a variance be granted, so as to render the land, after reclamation, suitable for an industrial, commercial, residential, or public use (including recreational facilities).
(10) Federal, State, and local government agencies with an interest in the proposed land use have an adequate period in which to review and comment on the proposed use.
§ 53111. Roads: General
(a) Road Classification System
(1) Each road, as defined in § 105, shall be classified as either a primary road or an ancillary road.
(2) A primary road is any road which is:
(A) used for transporting coal or spoil;
(B) frequently used for access or other purposes for a period in excess of six months; or
(C) to be retained for an approved post-mining land use.
(3) An ancillary road is any road not classified as a primary road.
(4) A limited use vehicular pathway is not classified as a road if it meets all the following:
(i) the pathway has no improved roadbed, which means it has no constructed crown, compacted base, roadway ditches, or surface material added to enhance use as a
pathway which precludes vegetation;
(ii) the pathway has no bridges or other cross-drainage structures;
(iii) the pathway is not located in and/or does not cross or ford any channel of an intermittent or perennial stream;
(iv) the pathway has only limited clearing, if any, of woody vegetation, typically wide enough only for the safe passage of one vehicle;
(v) the pathway is located so as to control erosion and siltation; and
(vi) maintenance of the pathway is limited to maintenance consisting only of the occasional filling of potholes and ruts in order to remain passable.
(5) A limited use vehicular pathway:
(i) shall be reclaimed with vegetation sufficient to prevent erosion prior to phase II bond release;
(ii) along with the area it disturbs, is a mining related activity and must be covered by an appropriate reclamation bond;
(iii) will be reclassified as a road if upgraded by construction activities such as blading, construction, placement of a compacted surface, cut and fill of the natural grade, construction of drainage ditches or low water crossings, or installation of drainage structures. The submittal and approval of plans and drawings required by these regulations must be completed prior to the upgrading of a limited use vehicular pathway.
(b) Performance Standards. Each road shall be located, designed, constructed, reconstructed, used, maintained and reclaimed so as to:
(1) control or prevent erosion, siltation, and the air pollution attendant to erosion, including road dust as well as dust occurring on other exposed surfaces, by measures such as vegetating, watering, using chemical or other dust suppressants, or otherwise stabilizing all exposed surfaces in accordance with current, prudent engineering practices;
(2) control or prevent damage to fish, wildlife or their habitat and related environmental values;
(3) control or prevent additional contributions of suspended solids to stream flow or runoff outside the permit area;
(4) neither cause nor contribute to, directly or indirectly, the violation of state or federal water quality standards applicable to receiving waters;
(5) refrain from seriously altering the normal flow of water in streambeds or drainage channels;
(6) prevent or control damage to public or private property, including the prevention or
mitigation of adverse effects on lands within the boundaries of units of the National Park System, the National Wildlife Refuge System, the National System of Trails, the National Wilderness Preservation System, the Wild and Scenic Rivers System, including designated study rivers, and National Recreation Areas designated by act of Congress; and
(7) use nonacid- and nontoxic-forming substances in road surfacing.
(c) Design and Construction Limits and Establishment of Design Criteria. To ensure environmental protection appropriate for their planned duration and use, including consideration of the type and size of equipment used, the design and construction or reconstruction of roads shall incorporate appropriate limits for grade, width, surface materials, surface drainage control, culvert placement and culvert size, in accordance with current, prudent engineering practices, and any necessary design criteria established by the Department.
(d) Location
(1) No part of any road shall be located in the channel of an intermittent or perennial stream unless specifically approved by the Permit Board in accordance with applicable §§ 5313 - 5343.
(2) Roads shall be located to minimize downstream sedimentation and flooding.
(e) Maintenance
(1) A road shall be maintained to meet the performance standards of this Section and any additional criteria specified by the Permit Board.
(2) A road damaged by a catastrophic event, such as a flood or earthquake, shall be repaired as soon as is practicable after the damage has occurred.
(f) Reclamation. A road not to be retained under an approved post-mining land use shall be reclaimed in accordance with the approved reclamation plan as soon as practicable after it is no longer needed for mining and reclamation operations. This reclamation shall include:
(1) closing the road to traffic;
(2) removing all bridges and culverts unless approved as part of the post-mining land use;
(3) removing or otherwise disposing of road-surfacing materials that are incompatible with the post-mining land use and revegetation requirements;
(4) reshaping cut and fill slopes as necessary to be compatible with the post-mining land use and to complement the natural drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain;
(5) protecting the natural drainage patterns by installing dikes or cross drains as necessary to control surface runoff and erosion; and
(6) scarifying or ripping the roadbed; replacing topsoil or substitute material, and revegetating disturbed surfaces in accordance with §§ 5309-5311 and 5397-53103.
§ 53113. Primary Roads
Primary roads shall meet the requirements of § 53111 and the additional requirements of this Section.
(a) Certification. The construction or reconstruction of primary roads shall be certified in a report to the Department by a qualified, registered professional engineer. The report shall indicate that the primary road has been constructed or reconstructed as designed and in accordance with the approved plan.
(b) Safety Factor. Each primary road embankment shall have a minimum static factor of 1.3 or meet the requirements established under § 2737(c).
(c) Location
(1) To minimize erosion, a primary road shall be located, insofar as is practicable, on the most stable available surface.
(2) Fords of perennial or intermittent streams by primary roads are prohibited unless they are specifically approved by the Permit Board as temporary routes during periods of road construction.
(d) Drainage Control. In accordance with the approved plan:
(1) Each primary road shall be constructed, or reconstructed, and maintained to have adequate drainage control, using structures such as, but not limited to, bridges, ditches, cross drains and ditch relief drains. The drainage control system shall be designed to safely pass the peak runoff from a 10-year, six-hour precipitation event, or greater event as specified by the Permit Board.
(2) Drainage pipes and culverts shall be installed as designed, and maintained in a free and operating condition and to prevent or control erosion at inlets and outlets.
(3) Drainage ditches shall be constructed and maintained to prevent uncontrolled drainage over the road surface and embankment.
(4) Culverts shall be installed and maintained to sustain the vertical soil pressure, the passive resistance of the foundation, and the weight of vehicles using the road.
(5) Natural stream channels shall not be altered or relocated without the prior approval of the Permit Board in accordance with applicable §§ 5313 - 5343.
(6) Except as provided in § 53113(c)(2), structures for perennial or intermittent stream channel crossings shall be made using bridges, culverts, low-water crossings, or other structures designed, constructed and maintained using current, prudent engineering practices. The Permit Board shall ensure that low-water crossings are designed, constructed and maintained to prevent erosion of the structure or streambed and additional contributions of suspended solids to streamflow.
(e) Surfacing. Primary roads shall be surfaced with material approved by the Permit Board as being sufficiently durable for the anticipated volume of traffic and the weight and speed of vehicles using the road.
§ 53115. Utility Installations
All surface coal mining operations shall be conducted in a manner which minimizes damage, destruction, or disruption of services provided by oil, gas, and water wells; oil, gas, and coal-slurry pipelines; railroads; electric and telephone lines; and water and sewage lines which pass over, under, or through the permit area, unless otherwise approved by the owner of those facilities and the Permit Board.
§ 53117. Support Facilities
(a) Support facilities shall be operated in accordance with a permit issued for the mine or coal preparation operation to which it is incident or from which its operation results.
(b) In addition to the other provisions of this part, support facilities shall be located, maintained, and used in a manner that--
(1) Prevents or controls erosion and siltation, water pollution, and damage to public or private property; and
(2) To the extent possible using the best technology currently available--
(A) Minimizes damage to fish, wildlife, and related environmental values; and
(B) Minimizes additional contributions of suspended solids to streamflow or runoff outside the permit area. Any such contributions shall not be in excess of limitations of State or Federal law.
Rule 55. Special Permanent Program Performance Standards: Operations on Prime Farmland
§ 5501. Prime Farmland: Scope and Purpose.
This part sets forth special environmental protection performance, reclamation, and design standards for surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime farmland.
§ 5503. Prime Farmland: Soil Removal and Stockpiling.
(a) Prime farmland soils shall be removed from the areas to be disturbed before drilling, blasting, or mining.
(b) The minimum depth of soil and soil materials to be removed and stored for use in the reconstruction of prime farmland shall be sufficient to meet the requirements of § 5311 and § 5507 of this Rule.
(c) Soil removal and stockpiling operations on prime farmland shall be conducted to:
(1) Separately remove the topsoil, or remove other suitable soil materials where such other
soil materials will create a final soil having a greater productive capacity than that which existed prior to mining. If not utilized immediately, this material shall be placed in stockpiles separate from the spoil and all other excavated materials; and
(2) Separately remove the B or C soil horizon or other suitable soil material to provide the thickness of suitable soil required by § 5311 and § 5507 of this Rule, except as approved by the Department where the B or C soil horizons would not otherwise be removed and where soil capabilities can be retained. If not utilized immediately, each horizon or other material shall be stockpiled separately from the spoil and all other excavated materials. Where combinations of such soil materials created by mixing have been shown to be equally or more favorable for plant growth than the B horizon, separate handling is not necessary.
(d) Stockpiles shall be placed within the permit area where they will not be disturbed or be subject to excessive erosion. If left in place for more than 30 days, stockpiles shall meet the requirements of § 5311 and § 5507 of this Rule.
§ 5505. Prime Farmland: Soil Replacement
Surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime farmland shall be conducted according to the following:
(a) The minimum depth of soil and substitute soil material to be reconstructed shall be 48 inches, or a lesser depth equal to the depth to a subsurface horizon in the natural soil that inhibits or prevents root penetration, or a greater depth if determined necessary to restore the original soil productive capacity. Soil horizons shall be considered as inhibiting or preventing root penetration if their physical or chemical properties or water-supplying capacities cause them to restrict or prevent penetration by roots of plants common to the vicinity of the permit area and if these properties or capacities have little or no beneficial effect on soil productivity capacity.
(b) Replace soil material only on land which has been first returned to final grade and scarified according to §§ 5389-5395 unless site-specific evidence is provided and approved by the Permit Board showing that scarification will not enhance the capability of the reconstructed soil to achieve equivalent or higher levels of yield.
(c) Replace and regrade the soil horizons or other suitable soil material with proper compaction and uniform depth.
(d) Replace the B horizon, C horizon, or other suitable material specified in § 5503 (c) to the thickness needed to meet the requirements of § 5505 (a). In those areas where the B or C horizons were not removed but may have been compacted or otherwise damaged during the mining operation, the operator shall engage in deep tilling or other appropriate means to restore pre-mining capabilities.
(e) The operator shall replace the topsoil or other suitable soil materials specified in § 5503 (c) (1) as the final surface soil layer. This surface soil layer shall equal or exceed the thickness of the original surface soil layer, as determined by the soil survey.
(f) Apply nutrients and soil amendments as needed to quickly establish vegetative growth.
§ 5507. Prime Farmland: Revegetation and Restoration of Soil Productivity
(a) Following prime farmland soil replacement, the soil surface shall be stabilized with a vegetative cover or other means that effectively controls soil loss by wind and water erosion.
(b) Each person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations on prime farmland shall meet the following revegetation requirements during reclamation:
(1) Prime farmland soil productivity shall be restored in accordance with the following provisions:
(A) Measurement of soil productivity shall be initiated within 10 years after completion of soil replacement.
(B) Soil productivity shall be measured on a representative sample or on all of the mined and reclaimed prime farmland area using the reference crop determined under § 5507(b)(1)(F). A statistically valid sampling technique at a 90-percent or greater statistical confidence level shall be used as approved by the Permit Board in consultation with the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service.
(C) The measurement period for determining average annual crop production (yield) shall be a minimum of three crop years prior to release of the operator's performance bond.
(D) The level of management applied during the measurement period shall be the same as the level of management used on nonmined prime farmland in the surrounding area.
(E) Restoration of soil productivity shall be considered achieved when the average yield during the measurement period equals or exceeds the average yield of the reference crop established for the same period for nonmined soils of the same or similar texture or slope phase of the soil series in the surrounding area under equivalent management practices.
(F) The reference crop on which restoration of soil productivity is proven shall be selected from the crops most commonly produced on the surrounding prime farmland. Where row crops are the dominant crops grown on prime farmland in the area, the row crop requiring the greatest rooting depth shall be chosen as one of the reference crops.
(G) Reference crop yields for a given crop season are to be determined from:
(i) the current yield records of representative local farms in the surrounding area, with concurrence by the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service; or
(ii) the average county yields recognized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which have been adjusted by the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service for local yield variation within the county that is associated with differences between non-mined prime farmland soil and all other soils that produce the reference crop.
(H) Under either procedure in § 5507(b)(1)(G), the average reference crop yield may be adjusted, with the concurrence of the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service, for:
(i) disease, pest and weather-induced seasonal variations; or
(ii) differences in specific management practices where the overall management practices of the crops being compared are equivalent; or
(iii) differences in annual precipitation.
Rule 57. Special Permanent Program Performance Standards: Operations on Steep Slopes
§ 5701. Applicability
(a) Any surface coal mining and reclamation operations on steep slopes shall meet the requirements of this Rule.
(b) The standards of this Rule do not apply to mining conducted on a flat or gently rolling terrain with an occasional steep slope through which the mining proceeds and leaves a plain or predominantly flat area.
§ 5703. Steep Slopes: Backfilling and Grading: Steep Slopes
(a) Surface mining activities on steep slopes shall be conducted so as to meet the requirements of §§ 5389-5395, and the requirements of this section except where mining is conducted on flat or gently rolling terrain with an occasional steep slope through which the mining proceeds and leaves a plain or predominantly flat area.
(b) The following materials shall not be placed on the downslope:
(1) Spoil.
(2) Waste materials of any type.
(3) Debris, including that from clearing and grubbing.
(4) Abandoned or disabled equipment.
(c) Land above the highwall shall not be disturbed unless the Department finds that this disturbance will facilitate compliance with the environmental protection standards of this Subchapter.
(d) Woody materials shall not be buried in the backfilled area unless the Department determines that the proposed method for placing woody material within the backfill will not deteriorate the stable condition of the backfilled areas.
Rule 59. Special Permanent Program Performance Standards: Coal Preparation Plants and
Support Facilities Not Located At or Near the Minesite or Not Within the Permit Area for a Mine
§ 5901. Applicability
Each person who conducts surface coal mining and reclamation operations, which includes the operation of a coal preparation plant which is not located within the permit area for a specific mine, shall obtain a permit in accordance with § 2909 to conduct those operations, obtain a bond in accordance with Subchapter 2.4, and comply with § 5903.
§ 5903. Coal Preparation Plants: Performance Standards
The construction, operation, maintenance, modification, reclamation, and removal activities at coal preparation plants shall comply with the following:
(a) Signs and markers for the coal preparation plant, coal processing waste disposal area, and water- treatment facilities shall comply with § 5301.
(b) Any stream channel diversion shall comply with § 5317.
(c) Drainage from any disturbed area related to the coal preparation plant shall comply with §§ 5319-5325, and all discharges from these areas shall meet the requirements of §§ 5313 and 5315 and any other applicable State or Federal law.
(d) Permanent impoundments associated with coal preparation plants shall meet the requirements of §§ 5327 and 5341 of this Rule. Dams constructed of, or impounding, coal processing waste shall comply with § 5377.
(e) Disposal of coal processing waste, noncoal mine waste, and excess spoil shall comply with §§ 5359-5365 and 5369-5377.
(f) Fish, wildlife, and related environmental values shall be protected in accordance with § 5383.
(g) Support facilities related to the coal preparation plant shall comply with § 53117.
(h) Roads shall comply with §§ 53111 and 53113.
(i) Cessation of operations shall be in accordance with §§ 53105 and 53107.
(j) Erosion and air pollution attendant to erosion shall be controlled in accordance with § 5379.
(k) Adverse effects upon, or resulting from, nearby underground coal mining activities shall be minimized by appropriate measures including, but not limited to, compliance with § 5367.
(l) Reclamation shall follow proper topsoil handling, backfilling and grading, revegetation, and postmining land use procedures in accordance with §§ 5309, 5311, 5387, 5389, 5391, 5393, 5397-53103, and 53109.
Rule 61. Special Permanent Program Performance Standards: In Situ Processing
§ 6101. In Situ Processing: Performance Standards
(a) The person who conducts in situ processing activities shall comply with Rule 53.
(b) In situ processing activities shall be planned and conducted to minimize disturbance to the prevailing hydrologic balance by:
(1) avoiding discharge of fluids into holes or wells, other than as approved by the Permit Board;
(2) injecting process recovery fluids only into geologic zones or intervals approved as production zones by the Permit Board;
(3) avoiding annular injection between the wall of the drill hole and the casing; and
(4) preventing discharge of process fluid into surface waters.
(c) Each person who conducts in situ processing activities shall submit for approval as part of the application for permit under § 2911, and follow after approval, a plan that ensures that all acid- forming, toxic-forming, or radioactive gases, solids or liquids constituting a fire, health, safety or environmental hazard and caused by the mining and recovery process are promptly treated, confined or disposed of in a manner that prevents contamination of ground water and surface water, damage to fish, wildlife and related environmental values, and threats to the public health and safety.
(d) Each person who conducts in situ processing activities shall prevent flow of the process recovery fluid:
(1) horizontally beyond the affected area identified in the permit; and
(2) vertically into overlying or underlying aquifers.
(e) Each person who conducts in situ processing activities shall restore the quality of affected ground water in the permit and adjacent area, including ground water above and below the production zone, to the approximate premining levels or better, to ensure that the potential for use of the ground water is not diminished.
§ 6103. In Situ Processing: Monitoring
(a) Each person who conducts in situ processing activities shall monitor the quality and quantity of surface water and ground water and the subsurface flow and storage characteristics, in a manner approved by the Permit Board under § 5333, to measure changes in the quantity and quality of water in surface- and ground-water systems in the mine plan and in adjacent areas.
(b) Air and water quality monitoring shall be conducted in accordance with monitoring programs approved by the Permit Board as necessary according to appropriate federal and state air and water quality standards.
Rule 63. Inspections
§ 6301. Inspections
(a) Authorized representatives of the Executive Director may conduct inspections of surface coal mining and reclamation operations as necessary to enforce the provisions of the act, these regulations and any permit, and to determine whether any notice of violation or cessation order issued during an inspection authorized under this Section has been complied with.
(b) Basis for Inspections
(1) An authorized representative of the Executive Director shall immediately conduct an inspection to enforce any requirement of the act, these regulations, or any condition of a permit or an exploration or development operations approval imposed under the act or these regulations, when the authorized representative has reason to believe, on the basis of information available to him or her (other than information resulting from a previous inspection), that there exists a violation of the act, these regulations, or any condition of a permit or an exploration or development operations approval, or that there exists any condition, practice or violation which creates an imminent danger to the health or safety of the public or is causing or can reasonably be expected to cause a significant, imminent environmental harm to land, air or water resources. This paragraph does not limit the routine inspections to be performed under § 6301(c).
(2) An authorized representative shall have reason to believe that a violation, condition or practice exists if the facts alleged by the informant or facts indicated by the representative’s personal knowledge would, if true, constitute a condition, practice or violation referred to in § 6301(b)(1).
(c) The Department shall conduct inspections of all coal exploration, development operations and surface coal mining and reclamation operations under its jurisdiction. These inspections shall average at least:
(1) one partial inspection per month of each surface coal mining and reclamation operation, and shall conduct such partial inspections of each inactive surface coal mining and reclamation operation as are necessary to ensure effective enforcement of these regulations. A partial inspection is an onsite or aerial review of a person's compliance with some of the permit conditions and requirements imposed under these regulations, during which the inspector collects evidence with respect to every violation of any such condition or requirement observed;
(2) one complete inspection per calendar quarter of each active or inactive surface coal mining and reclamation operation. A complete inspection is an onsite review of a person's compliance with all permit conditions and requirements imposed under these regulations within the entire area disturbed or affected by surface coal mining and reclamation operations, including the collection of evidence with respect to every violation of any such condition or requirement;
(3) periodic inspections of all coal exploration operations required to comply in whole or part with the act, or these regulations, including the collection of evidence with respect to every violation of any condition of the exploration or development operations approval, or any requirement of the act or these regulations;
(4) (A) Aerial inspections shall be conducted in a manner which reasonably ensures the identification and documentation of conditions at each surface coal mining and reclamation site inspected;
(B) Any potential violation observed during an aerial inspection shall be investigated on-site within three days, provided, that any indication of condition, practice, or violation constituting cause for the issuance of a cessation order under § 6501 shall be investigated on-site immediately, and provided further that an on-site investigation of a potential violation observed during an aerial inspection shall not be considered to be an additional partial or complete inspection for the purposes of § 6301(c)(1) and (2).
(d) The inspections required under § 6301(c) shall:
(1) be carried out on an irregular basis so as to monitor compliance at all operations, including those which operate nights, weekends or holidays;
(2) occur without prior notice to the person being inspected or any of his agents or employees, except for necessary onsite meetings; and
(3) include the prompt filing of inspection reports adequate to enforce the requirements of, and to carry out the terms and purposes of the act and these regulations.
(e) For the purposes of § 6301, an inactive surface coal mining and reclamation operation is one for which:
(1) the Department has secured from the permittee the written notice provided for under § 53105 or 53107.
(2) Reclamation Phase II as defined at Rule 45 has been completed and the liability of the permittee has been reduced by the Commission in accordance with these regulations.
(f) For the purposes § 6301, an abandoned site is as defined at § 105.
(g) In lieu of the inspection frequency established § 6301(c)(1) and (2), the Department shall inspect each abandoned site on a set frequency commensurate with the public health and safety and environmental considerations present at each specific site, but in no case shall the inspection frequency be set at less than one complete inspection per calendar year.
(1) In selecting an alternate inspection frequency authorized under § 6301(g), the Department shall first conduct a complete inspection of the abandoned site and provide public notice under § 6301(g)(2). Following the inspection and public notice, the Department shall prepare and maintain for public review a written finding justifying the alternative inspection frequency selected. This written finding shall justify the new inspection frequency by affirmatively addressing in detail all of the following criteria:
(A) How the site meets each of the criteria under the definition of an abandoned site under § 105 and thereby qualifies for a reduction in inspection frequency;
(B) Whether, and to what extent, there exist on the site impoundments, earthen structures or other conditions that pose, or may reasonably be expected to ripen into, imminent dangers to the health or safety of the public or significant environmental harms to land, air, or water resources;
(C) The extent to which existing impoundments or earthen structures were constructed and certified in accordance with prudent engineering designs approved in the permit;
(D) The degree to which erosion and sediment control is present and functioning;
(E) The extent to which the site is located near or above urbanized areas, communities, occupied dwellings, schools and other public or commercial buildings and facilities;
(F) The extent of reclamation completed prior to abandonment and the degree of stability of unreclaimed areas, taking into consideration the physical characteristics of the land mined and the extent of settlement or revegetation that has occurred naturally with them; and
(G) Based on a review of the complete and partial inspection report record for the site during at least the last two consecutive years, the rate at which adverse environmental or public health and safety conditions have and can be expected to progressively deteriorate.
(2) The public notice and opportunity to comment required under § 6301(g)(1) shall be provided as follows:
(A) The Department shall place a notice in the newspaper with the broadest circulation in the locality of the abandoned site providing the public with a 30-day period in which to submit written comments.
(B) The public notice shall contain the permittee's name, the permit number, the precise location of the land affected, the inspection frequency proposed, the general reasons for reducing the inspection frequency, the bond status of the permit, the telephone number and address of the Department where written comments on the reduced inspection frequency may be submitted, and the closing date of the comment period.
§ 6303. Citizens' Requests for Inspections
(a) A citizen may request an inspection under § 6301(b) by furnishing to an authorized representative of the Executive Director a signed, written statement, or an oral report followed by a signed, written statement, giving the authorized representative reason to believe that a violation, condition or practice referred to in § 6301(b)(1) exists and setting forth a phone number and address where the citizen can be contacted.
(b) The identity of any person supplying information to the Department relating to a possible violation or imminent danger or harm shall remain confidential with the Department, if requested by that person, unless that person elects to accompany the inspector on the inspection, or unless disclosure is required under other state law.
(c) If an inspection is conducted as a result of information provided to the Department by a citizen as described in § 6303(a), the citizen shall be notified as far in advance as practicable as to when the inspection is to occur and shall be allowed to accompany the authorized representative of the Executive Director during the inspection. Such person has a right of entry to, upon and through the coal exploration, development or surface coal mining and reclamation operation about which he or she supplied information, but only if he or she is in the presence of and is under the control, direction and supervision of the authorized representative while on the mine property. Such right of entry does not include a right to enter buildings without consent of the person in control of the building or without a search warrant.
(d) Within 10 days of the inspection or, if there is no inspection, within 15 days of receipt of the citizen's written statement, the Department shall send the citizen the following:
(1) if an inspection was made, a description of the enforcement action taken, which may consist of copies of the inspection report and all notices of violation and cessation orders issued as a result of the inspection or an explanation of why no enforcement action was taken;
(2) if no inspection was conducted, an explanation of the reason why;
(3) an explanation of the citizen's right, if any, to review of the action or inaction of the Department under § 6309.
(e) The Department shall give copies of all materials in § 6303(d)(1) and (2) within the time limits specified in those Paragraphs to the person alleged to be in violation, except that the name of the citizen shall be removed unless disclosure of the citizen's identity is permitted under § 6303(b).
§ 6305. Right of Entry
(a) Each authorized representative of the Executive Director conducting an inspection under § 6301:
(1) shall have a right of entry to, upon and through any coal exploration, development or surface coal mining and reclamation operation, without advance notice or a search warrant, upon presentation of appropriate credentials;
(2) may, at reasonable times and without delay, have access to and copy any records and inspect any monitoring equipment or method of operation required under the act, these regulations, or any condition of an exploration or development operations approval or permit imposed under the act or these regulations.
(3) shall have a right to gather physical and photographic evidence to document conditions, practices, or violations at the site.
§ 6307. Review of Adequacy and Completeness of Inspection
Any person who is or may be adversely affected by a surface coal mining and reclamation operation or a coal exploration or development operation may notify the Executive Director in writing of any alleged failure on the part of the Department to make adequate complete or periodic inspections as provided in § 6301(b)(1), (c) and (d). The notification shall include sufficient information to create a reasonable belief that § 6301(b)(1), (c) and (d) are not being complied with and to demonstrate that the person is or may
be adversely affected. The Executive Director shall within 15 days of receipt of the notification determine whether § 6301(b)(1), (c) and (d) are being complied with and, if not, shall immediately order an inspection to remedy the noncompliance. The Executive Director shall also furnish the complainant with a written statement of the reasons for such determination and the actions, if any, taken to remedy the noncompliance.
§ 6309. Review of Decision Not to Inspect or Enforce
(a) Any person who is or may be adversely affected by a coal exploration, development or surface coal mining and reclamation operation may ask the Commission to review the decision of the Executive Director or his authorized representative not to inspect or take appropriate enforcement action with respect to any violation alleged by that person in a request for inspection under § 6303. The request for review shall be in writing and include a statement of how the person is or may be adversely affected and why the decision merits review.
(b) The Commission shall conduct the review and inform the person, in writing, of the results of the review within 30 days of his or her receipt of the request. The person alleged to be in violation shall also be given a copy of the results of the review, except that the name of the citizen shall not be disclosed unless confidentiality has been waived or disclosure is required under applicable state law. If the person bringing the matter before the Commission is aggrieved by the action or inaction of the Commission in the matter, he or she may appeal the Commission’s action pursuant to § 53-9- 77.
(c) Review under this Section shall not affect any right to a citizen's suit under § 53-9- 67.
§ 6311. Availability of Records
(a) Copies of all records, reports, inspection materials or information obtained by the Department under the act or these regulations shall be made immediately available to the public in the area of mining so that they are conveniently available to residents of that area, except that the Department may refuse to make available:
(1) investigatory records compiled for civil or criminal law enforcement purposes; and
(2) information not required to be made available under §§ 2109 or 3111.
(b) The Department shall ensure compliance with § 6311(a) by either:
(1) making copies of all records, reports, inspection materials and other subject information available for public inspection at a federal, state or local government office or library in the county where the mining is occurring or proposed to occur; or
(2) at the Department's option and expense, providing copies of subject information promptly by mail at the request of any resident of the area where the mining is occurring or is proposed to occur, provided, that the Department shall maintain for public inspection, at a federal, state or local government office or library in the county where the mining is occurring or proposed to occur, a description of the information available for mailing and the procedure for obtaining such information.
(c) The Department and the Director may enter into agreements regarding procedures for the special handling of investigative and enforcement reports and other such materials.
(d) The Department shall make available to the Director, upon request, copies of all documents relating to applications for and approvals of existing, new, or revised coal exploration approvals or surface coal mining and reclamation operations permits and all documents relating to inspection and enforcement actions.
Rule 65. Enforcement
§ 6501. Cessation Orders
(a) (1) The executive director or his or her authorized representative shall immediately order a cessation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations or of the relevant portion thereof, if he or she finds, on the basis of any inspection, any condition or practice, or any violation of the Act, these regulations, or any condition of an exploration or development operations approval or permit imposed under any such program, the Act or these regulations, which:
(A) creates an imminent danger to the health or safety of the public; or
(B) is causing or can reasonably be expected to cause significant, imminent environmental harm to land, air or water resources.
(2) Surface coal mining and reclamation operations conducted by any person without a valid surface coal mining permit constitute a condition or practice which causes or can reasonably be expected to cause significant, imminent environmental harm to land, air or water resources, unless such operations:
(A) are an integral, uninterrupted extension of previously permitted operations, and the person conducting such operations has filed a timely and complete application for a permit to conduct such operations; or
(B) were conducted lawfully without a permit under the interim regulatory program because no permit has been required for such operations by the state.
(3) If the cessation ordered under § 6501(a)(1) will not completely abate the imminent danger or harm in the most expeditious manner physically possible, the authorized representative shall impose affirmative obligations on the person to whom it is issued to abate the condition, practice or violation. The order shall specify the time by which abatement shall be accomplished and may require, among other things, the use of existing or additional personnel and equipment.
(b) (1) The executive director or his or her authorized representative shall immediately order a cessation of coal exploration, development or surface coal mining and reclamation operations, or of the relevant portion thereof, when a notice of violation has been issued under § 6503(a) and the person to whom it was issued fails to abate the violation within the abatement period fixed or subsequently extended by the authorized representative.
(2) A cessation order issued under this Paragraph shall require the person to whom it is issued to take all steps the authorized representative deems necessary to abate the violations covered by the order in the most expeditious manner physically possible.
(c) A cessation order issued under § 6501(a) or (b) shall be in writing, signed by the executive director or his or her authorized representative who issues it, and shall set forth with reasonable specificity:
(1) the nature of the condition, practice, or violation;
(2) the remedial action of affirmative obligation required, if any, including interim steps, if appropriate;
(3) the time established for abatement, if appropriate, including the time for meeting any interim steps; and
(4) a reasonable description of the portion of the coal exploration, development or surface coal mining and reclamation operation to which it applies. The order shall remain in effect until the condition, practice or violation has been abated or until vacated, modified or terminated in writing by the executive director or is or her authorized representative or until the order expires pursuant to § 6509.
(d) Reclamation operations and other activities intended to protect public health and safety and the environment shall continue during the period of any order unless otherwise provided in the order.
(e) The executive director or his or her authorized representative may modify, terminate or vacate a cessation order for good cause, and may extend the time for abatement if the failure to abate within the time previously set was not caused by lack of diligence on the part of the person to whom it was issued.
(f) The executive director or his or her authorized representative shall terminate a cessation order, by written notice to the person to whom the order was issued, when he or she determines that all conditions, practices, or violations listed in the order have been abated. Termination shall not affect the right of the Commission to assess civil penalties for those violations under Rule 67or 69.
(g) Within 60 days after issuing a cessation order, the Department shall notify in writing any person who has been identified under §§ 3123(f) and 2305(c) as owning or controlling the permittee that the cessation order was issued and that the person has been identified as an owner or controller.
§ 6503. Notice of Violation
(a) The executive director or his or her authorized representative shall issue a notice of violation if, on the basis of an inspection he finds a violation of the Act, these regulations, or any condition of a permit or an exploration or development operations approval imposed under the Act or these regulations which does not create an imminent danger or harm for which a cessation order must be issued under § 6501.
(b) A notice of violation issued under this Section shall be in writing, signed by the authorized representative who issues it, and shall set forth with reasonable specificity:
(1) the nature of the violation;
(2) the remedial action required, which may include interim steps;
(3) a reasonable description of the portion of the coal exploration, development operation, or surface coal mining and reclamation operation to which it applies; and
(4) a reasonable time for abatement which may include time for accomplishment of interim steps.
(c) The executive director or his or her authorized representative may extend the time set for abatement or for accomplishment of an interim step, if the failure to meet the time previously set was not caused by lack of diligence on the part of the person to whom it was issued. The total time for abatement under a notice of violation, including all extensions, shall not exceed 90 days from the date of issuance, except upon a showing by the permittee that it is not feasible to abate the violation within 90 calendar days due to one or more of the circumstances in § 6503(f). An extended abatement date pursuant to this Section shall not be granted when the permittee's failure to abate within 90 days has been caused by a lack of diligence or intentional delay by the permittee in completing the remedial action required.
(d) If the person to whom the notice was issued fails to meet any time set for abatement or for accomplishment of an interim step, the authorized representative shall issue a cessation order under § 6501(b).
(e) The executive director or his or her authorized representative shall terminate a notice of violation by written notice to the person to whom it was issued, when he or she determines that all violations listed in the notice of violation have been abated. Termination shall not affect the right of the Commission to assess civil penalties for those violations under Rule 67 or 69.
(f) Circumstances which may qualify a surface coal mining operation for an abatement period of more than 90 days are:
(1) where the permittee of an ongoing permitted operation has timely applied for and diligently pursued a permit renewal or other necessary approval of designs or plans but such permit or approval has not been or will not be issued within days after a valid permit expires or is required, for reasons not within the control of the permittee;
(2) where there is a valid judicial order precluding abatement within 90 days as to which the permittee has diligently pursued all rights of appeal and as to which he or she has no other effective legal remedy;
(3) where the permittee cannot abate within 90 days due to a labor strike;
(4) where climatic conditions preclude abatement within 90 days, or where, due to climatic conditions, abatement within 90 days clearly would cause more environmental harm than it would prevent; or
(5) where abatement within 90 days requires action that would violate safety standards established by statute or regulation under the Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.
(g) Whenever an abatement time in excess of 90 days is permitted, interim abatement measures shall
be imposed to the extent necessary to minimize harm to the public or the environment.
(h) If any of the conditions in § 6503(f) exists, the permittee may request the executive director to grant an abatement period exceeding 90 days. The abatement period granted shall not exceed the shortest possible time necessary to abate the violation. The permittee shall have the burden of establishing by clear and convincing proof that he or she is entitled to an extension under the provisions of § 6503(c) and (f). In determining whether or not to grant an abatement period exceeding 90 days, the executive director may consider any relevant written or oral information from the permittee or any other source. The executive director shall promptly and fully document in the file his or her reasons for granting or denying the request.
(i) Any determination made under 6503(h) shall contain a right of appeal to the Commission in accordance with § 53-9- 69(e).
(j) No extension granted under § 6503(h) may exceed 90 days in length. Where the condition or circumstance which prevented abatement within 90 days exists at the expiration of any such extension, the permittee may request a further extension in accordance with the procedures of § 6503(h).
§ 6505. Suspension or Revocation of Permits
(a) (1) When, on the basis of an inspection, the executive director has reason to believe that a pattern of violations of this Rule, any regulation promulgated under this Rule or any condition of a permit exists or has existed, and if the executive director also finds that the violations are caused by the unwarranted failure of the permittee to comply with this Rule, any regulation promulgated under this Rule or any condition of a permit, or that the violations are willfully caused by the permittee, the executive director shall issue an order to the permittee to show cause as to why the permit should not be suspended or revoked by the permit board. If the permittee files a written response to the show cause order and requests an informal conference, the Executive Director or his designee shall conduct an informal conference in an open meeting at the mine site or at a nearby convenient location. The Executive Director shall give thirty (30) days written notice of the date, time and place of the informal conference to the permittee and to any interested party who has notified the Executive Director that he or she wishes to present information at the informal conference. Upon issuance of the notice, the Executive Director shall publish it in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the surface coal mining and reclamation operations, and shall post it at the State or field office closest to those operations. Upon the permittee’s failure to show cause to the satisfaction of the executive director or the executive director’s authorized representative as to why the permit should not be suspended or revoked, the executive director or the executive director’s authorized representative shall present this information to the permit board and request that the permit board suspend or revoke the permit. The permit board shall decide the executive director’s request under the procedures of Section 49-17-29(4) and (5). Any request by an interested party for a formal hearing regarding the permit board’s initial decision on suspension or revocation of the permit or any appeal of the final decision following the formal hearing by any person who participated as a party in the formal hearing may be taken as provided under Section 49-17-29(4) and (5).
(2) The Executive Director or Permit Board may determine that a pattern of violations exists or has existed, based on two or more inspections of the permit area within any 12-month
period, after considering the circumstances, including:
(A) the number of violations, cited on more than one occasion, of the same or related requirements of the Act, these regulations or the permit;
(B) the number of violations, cited on more than one occasion, of different requirements of the Act, these regulations or the permit; and
(C) the extent to which the violations were isolated departures from lawful conduct.
(3) The Executive Director shall promptly review the history of violations of any permittee who has been cited for violations of the same or related requirements of the act, these regulations, or the permit during three or more inspections of the permit area within any 12-month period. If, after such review, the Executive Director determines that a pattern of violations exists or has existed, he shall issue an order to show cause as provided in § 6505(a)(1).
(b) Within 60 days after the formal hearing, the Permit Board shall issue a written determination as to whether a pattern of violations exists and, if appropriate, shall revoke or suspend the permit. If the Permit Board revokes or suspends the permit and the permittee's right to mine under the Act, the permittee shall immediately cease surface coal mining operations on the permit area and shall:
(1) if the permit and the right to mine under the Act are revoked, complete reclamation within the time specified in the order;
(2) if the permit and the right to mine under the Act are suspended, complete all affirmative obligations to abate all conditions, practices or violations, as specified in the order.
(c) Whenever a permittee fails to abate a violation contained in a notice of violation or cessation order within the abatement period set in the notice or order or as subsequently extended, the Executive Director shall review the permittee's history of violations to determine whether a pattern of violations exists pursuant to this Section, and shall issue an order to show cause as appropriate pursuant to § 6505(a)(1).
§ 6507. Service of Notices of Violation and Cessation Orders
(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided, any notice or other instrument issued by or under authority of the Commission, the Executive Director, or the Permit Board may be served on any affected person personally or by publication, and proof of that service may be made in the same manner as in case of service of a summons in a civil action. The proof of service shall be filed in the office of the Commission. Service may also be made by mailing a copy of the notice, order, or other instrument by certified mail, directed to the person affected at the person’s last known post-office address as shown by the files or records of the Commission. Proof of service may be made by the affidavit of the person who did the mailing and shall be filed in the office of the Executive Director.
(b) Designation by any person of an agent for service of process, notices and orders shall be made in writing to the Department.
§ 6509. Termination of Order
(a) Except as provided in this section, a notice of violation or cessation order which requires cessation of mining, expressly or by necessary implication, shall expire within thirty (30) days after it is served unless a formal hearing has been held within that time. The hearing shall be held at or reasonably close to the mine site, so that the site may be viewed during the hearing, or at any other location acceptable to the Commission and the person to whom the notice or order was issued. Expiration of a notice or order shall not affect the Commission’s right to assess civil penalties with respect to the period during which the notice or order was in effect. No hearing will be required where the condition, practice, or violation in question has been abated or the hearing has been waived. For purposes of this section only, “mining” includes (1) extracting coal from the earth or from coal waste piles and transporting it within or from the permit area, and (2) the processing, cleaning, concentrating, preparing or loading of coal where such operations occur at a place other than at a mine site.
(b) A notice of violation or cessation order shall not expire as provided in paragraph (a) of this section if the formal hearing has been waived, or if, with the consent of the person to whom the notice or order was issued, the formal hearing is held later than thirty (30) days after the notice or order was served. For purposes of this subsection:
(1) The formal hearing will be deemed waived if the person to whom the notice or order was issued:
(A) is informed, by written notice served in the manner provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, that he or she will be deemed to have waived a formal hearing unless he or she requests one within 30 days after service of the notice; and
(B) fails to request a formal hearing within that time.
(2) The written notice referred to in paragraph (b)(1)(A) of this section shall be delivered to such person by an authorized representative or sent by certified mail to such person no later than 5 days after the notice or order is served on such person.
(3) The person to whom the notice or order is issued shall be deemed to have consented to an extension of the time for holding the formal hearing if his or her request for a formal hearing is received on or after the 21st day after service of the notice or order. The extension of time shall be equal to the number of days elapsed after the 21st day.
(c) The Commission shall give as much advance notice as is practicable of the time, place, and subject matter of the formal hearing to:
(1) the person to whom the notice or order was issued; and
(2) any person who filed a report which led to that notice or order.
(d) The Commission shall also post notice of the hearing at the State or field office closest to the mine site and, where practicable, publish it in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the mine.
(e) Within five days after the close of the formal hearing, the Commission shall affirm, modify, or vacate the notice or order in writing. The decision shall be sent to:
(1) the person to whom the notice or order was issued; and
(2) any person who filed a report which led to the notice or order.
(f) The Commission shall determine whether the mine site should be viewed during the hearing. In making this determination the only consideration shall be whether a view of the mine site will assist the Commission in reviewing the appropriateness of the enforcement action or of the required remedial action.
§ 6511. Formal Review of Citations
(a) Any interested party aggrieved by an action of the Commission, Executive Director or Executive Director’s authorized representative taken pursuant to the Act or these regulations may request a formal hearing before the Commission as provided in §§ 53-9- 77 and 49-17-41. A request for formal review must be filed within thirty days of the date the Commission, the Executive Director, or the Executive Director’s authorized representative took the action to be contested during the formal review. The Commission, through the Department, shall notify the parties in writing of the time and place of the hearing at least five working days prior to the hearing date. Any person who participated as a party in a formal hearing before the Commission may appeal from a final decision of the Commission made under the Act and these regulations as provided in §§ 53-9- 77 and 49-17-41.
(b) The filing of an application for review and request for a hearing under this Section shall not operate as a stay of any notice or order, or of any modification, termination or vacation of either.
(c) Temporary Relief From Notices Of Violation and Cessation Orders. Any party to a proceeding that is the result of the issuance of a notice of violation or cessation order, including, but not limited to, the person to whom a notice of violation or cessation order is directed, may apply to the Commission for temporary relief from the notice or cessation order. The application shall be filed with the office of the Executive Director, and a copy shall be filed at the same time with the State Geologist and the General Counsel of the Department.
(d) The application for temporary relief shall include:
(1) A detailed written statement setting forth the reasons why relief should be granted;
(2) A showing that there is a substantial likelihood that the findings and decisions of the Commission in the matters to which the application relates will be favorable to the applicant;
(3) A statement that the relief sought will not adversely affect the health or safety of the public or cause significant, imminent environmental harm to land, air, or water resources;
(4) If the application relates to an order of cessation, a statement of whether the requirement of § 6511(f) for decision on the application within 5 days is waived; and
(5) A statement of the specific relief requested.
(e) Except as provided in § 6511(f), all parties to the proceeding to which the application relates shall have 5 days from the date of their receipt of the application to file a written response. Except as provided in § 6511(f), the Commission may hold a hearing on any issue raised by the
application. The Commission may designate a hearing officer to conduct any proceedings necessary under this section. The Commission may designate the Executive Director as a hearing officer. Where the application seeks temporary relief from a notice of violation, the Commission shall expeditiously issue an order granting or denying such relief.
(f) If the application seeks temporary relief from a cessation order, the order granting or denying the request shall be issued within 5 days of its receipt by the Commission. If the 5-day requirement is waived by the applicant, the Commission shall expeditiously conduct a hearing and render a decision on the application. If the applicant does not waive the 5-day requirement, the following special rules of procedure shall apply:
(1) The 5-day period shall not begin to run until the application is filed in the office of the Executive Director, or a copy is received in the office of the General Counsel of the Department, or a copy is received in the office of the State Geologist, whichever is later.
(2) Prior to or at the hearing on the application, the applicant shall file with the Commission an affidavit stating the date upon which the application was filed with the Executive Director and the copies were delivered to the General Counsel of the Department and the State Geologist. In the alternative, the applicant may make an oral statement on the record at the hearing setting forth that information.
(3) In addition to the service requirements of paragraph (c), the applicant shall serve any other parties with a copy of the application simultaneously with the filing of the application. If service is accomplished by mail, the applicant shall inform such other parties by telephone at the time of mailing that an application is being filed, the contents of the application, and with whom the application was filed.
(4) The Department, through the General Counsel, his designee, and all other parties may indicate their objection to the application by communicating such objection to the Commission and the applicant in person or by telephone through the Executive Director. The Department and all other parties shall simultaneously reduce their objections to writing. The written objections must be immediately filed with the Commission and immediately served upon the applicant.
(5) Upon receipt of communication that there is an objection to the request, the Commission shall immediately order a location, time, and date for the hearing by communicating such information to the General Counsel of the Department, the State Geologist, all other parties, and the applicant by telephone or facsimile transmission. The Commission also shall post notice of the hearing as required by the Mississippi Open Meetings Law. The Commission shall reduce the communications to the parties and the applicant to writing and shall attach the writing to the minutes of the hearing, along with the notice posted pursuant to the Mississippi Open Meetings Law.
(6) If a hearing is held -
(i) The Commission may require the parties to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law at the hearing which may be orally supplemented on the record at the hearing. Where written proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law have been submitted at the hearing, they may be orally presented for the record at the hearing.
(ii) The Commission shall either rule from the bench on the application, orally stating the reasons for its decision, or it shall within 24 hours of completion of the hearing reconvene to issue its decision. The decision shall be memorialized as written findings of fact and conclusions of law either issued by the Commission at its next meeting or issued by the Executive Director in the interim. If the Commission makes an oral ruling, its approval of the record of the hearing, combined with any order memorializing the decision, shall constitute its written findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(7) The order or decision of the Commission shall be issued within 5 working days of the receipt of the application for temporary relief.
(8) If at any time after the initiation of this expedited procedure, the applicant requests a delay or acts in a manner so as to frustrate the expeditious nature of this proceeding or fails to supply the information required by § 6511(d), such action shall constitute a waiver of the 5-day requirement.
(g) Any party desiring to appeal a decision of the Commission granting or denying temporary relief may appeal to and seek relief from the appropriate chancery court pursuant to § 53-9- 77.
(h) An application for expedited review of an order of cessation may be filed under this section, whenever temporary relief has not been granted under this section, by the following:
(1) A permittee who has been issued an order of cessation by the Commission; or
(2) Any interested party to the cessation order.
Except as provided in this section, expedited review of a cessation order shall be conducted by the Commission, and a decision made on the application, within 30 days of receipt of the complete application for expedited review from a party entitled to expedited review. A permittee or other interested party waives his or her right to expedited review upon being granted temporary relief pursuant to this section. The application for expedited review shall be filed in the same manner as that described in § 6511(c). If the party filing the application was served with the cessation order, the application must be filed within 30 days of receipt of the order. If the party filing the application was not served with the order, the party must file the application within 40 days of issuance of the order. Prior to filing the application, a person who was served with the cessation order must notify the General Counsel of the Department within 15 days of receipt of the order of his or her intent to file an application. If the applicant was not served with the order, he or she must so notify the General Counsel of the Department within 20 days of issuance of the order.
(i) Any person filing an application for expedited review under this section shall incorporate the following in that application regarding each claim for relief:
(1) A statement of facts entitling that person to administrative relief;
(2) A request for specific relief;
(3) A specific statement which delineates each issue to be addressed by the applicant during the expedited proceeding;
(4) A copy of the order to be reviewed;
(5) A list identifying each of the applicant’s witnesses by name, address, and place of employment, including expert witnesses and the area of expertise to which they will address themselves at the hearing, and a detailed summary of each witness’s expected testimony;
(6) Copies of all exhibits and other documentary evidence that the applicant intends to introduce as evidence at the hearing and descriptions of all physical exhibits and evidence which is not capable of being copied or attached; and
(7) Any other relevant information.
(j) If the applicant for expedited review fails to comply with all the requirements of § 6511(i), the Commission may find that the applicant has waived the 30-day decision requirement or the Commission shall order that the application be perfected and the application shall not be considered filed for purposes of the 30-day decision until perfected. Failure to timely comply with the Commission’s order shall constitute a waiver of the 30-day decision requirement.
(k) In computing the 30-day time period for an expedited decision, intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and State of Mississippi legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation.
(l) Any person qualified to receive a 30-day decision may waive that right:
(1) by filing an application pursuant to § 6511(a);
(2) by failing to comply with all the requirements of § 6511(h) and (i); or
(3) in accordance with § 6511(n)(8).
(m) Any person qualified to receive a 30-day decision shall waive that right:
(1) by obtaining temporary relief pursuant to § 6511(c) - (f);
(2) by failing to perfect an application for expedited review pursuant to § 6511(h) and (i); or
(3) in accordance with § 6511(n)(7).
(n) If the applicant does not waive the 30-day requirement, the following special rules shall apply:
(1) The applicant shall serve all known parties with a copy of the application simultaneously with the filing of the application with the General Counsel of the Department. If service is accomplished by mail, the applicant shall inform all known parties by telephone at the time of mailing that an application is being filed and shall inform the Commission, through the Executive Director, that such notice has been given.
(2) Any party desiring to file a response to the application for review shall file a written response within 5 working days of service of the application.
(3) If the applicant has requested a hearing, the Commission, through the Executive Director,
shall act immediately upon receipt of the application to notify the parties of the time and place of the hearing at least 5 working days prior to the hearing date.
(4) The Commission may require the parties to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law at the hearing which may be orally supplemented on the record at the hearing. Where written proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law have been submitted at the hearing, they may be orally presented for the record at the hearing.
(5) The Commission shall either rule from the bench on the application, orally stating the reasons for its decision, or it shall within 30 days of the filing of the perfected application reconvene to issue its decision. The decision shall be memorialized as written findings of fact and conclusions of law either issued by the Commission at its next meeting or issued by the Executive Director under the authority of the Commission in the interim. If the Commission makes an oral ruling, its approval of the record of the hearing in combination with any subsequent order memorializing the decision shall constitute its written findings of fact and conclusions of law.
(6) If all parties waive the opportunity for a hearing and the Commission, either en banc or through the Executive Director, determines that a hearing is not necessary, but the applicant does not waive the 30-day decision requirement, the Commission shall issue an initial decision on the application within 30 days of receipt of the perfected application. The decision shall contain findings of fact and an order disposing of the application. The decision shall be served upon all the parties.
(7) If at any time after the initiation of this expedited procedure, the applicant requests a delay or acts in a manner so as to frustrate the expeditious nature of this proceeding or fails to supply the information required by § 6511(i), such action shall constitute a waiver of the 30-day requirement.
(8) If the applicant seeks to offer witnesses, exhibits, or testimony at the hearing in addition to those identified, submitted, described, or summarized in the application for expedited review perfected in accordance with the requirements of § 6511(i), upon objection by an opposing party to such offer, the Commission may allow such objecting party additional time in order to prepare for cross-examination of unidentified witnesses or to identify and prepare rebuttal evidence or otherwise uncover any additional prejudice which may result to such party. The Commission may rule that the running of the 30-day time for decision is stayed for the period of any additional time allowed pursuant to this subsection or may determine that the applicant has waived his right to the 30-day decision.
(9) Any party desiring to appeal a decision of the Commission granting or denying an application for expedited review may appeal to and seek relief from the appropriate chancery court pursuant to § 53-9- 77.
(o) Any hearing held under this section before the Commission shall be deemed the formal hearing allowed by §§ 53-9- 77, 49-17-41, or 49-17-29 concerning the issues addressed by the Commission’s decision stemming from that hearing. The Commission shall not be required to conduct any additional public or formal hearings on those matters. A hearing regarding temporary relief will be deemed the only hearing before the Commission regarding temporary relief due the applicant for relief, but the Commission shall conduct an additional hearing on the merits of the notice of violation or cessation order as is necessary for the full adjudication of all issues raised in a timely manner by the person on whom the notice or order is served or any other
interested party.
§ 6513. Failure to Give Notice and Lack of Information
No notice of violation, cessation order, show cause order or order revoking or suspending a permit may be vacated because it is subsequently determined that the Executive Director or his authorized representative did not have information sufficient, under § 6301(b)(1) and (2), to justify an inspection.
§ 6515. Inability to Comply
(a) No cessation order or notice of violation issued under this Rule may be vacated because of inability to comply.
(b) Inability to comply may not be considered in determining whether a pattern of violations exists.
(c) Unless caused by lack of diligence, inability to comply may be considered only in mitigation of the amount of civil penalty under Rule 67 and of the duration of the suspension of a permit under § 6505 (b).
§ 6517. Compliance Conference
(a) A permittee may request an on-site compliance conference with an authorized representative of the Executive Director to review the compliance status of any condition or practice proposed at any coal exploration, development operation, or surface coal mining and reclamation operation. Any such conference shall not constitute an inspection within the meaning § 6301.
(b) The Executive Director or his authorized representative may accept or refuse any request to conduct a compliance conference under § 6517(a).
(c) The authorized representative at any compliance conference shall review such proposed conditions and practices in order to advise whether any such condition or practice may become a violation of any requirement of the Act, these regulations, or any applicable permit, development, or exploration approval.
(d) Neither the holding of a compliance conference under this section nor any opinion given by the Executive Director or his authorized representative at such a conference shall affect:
(1) Any rights or obligations of the Executive Director, his authorized representative, the Department or of the permittee with respect to any inspection, notice of violation or cessation order, whether prior or subsequent to such compliance conference; or
(2) The validity of any notice of violation or cessation order issued with respect to any condition or practice reviewed at the compliance conference.
§ 6519. Enforcement Actions at Abandoned Sites
The Executive Director or his authorized representative may refrain from issuing a notice of violation or cessation order for a violation at an abandoned site, as defined in § 105, if abatement of the violation is required under any previously issued notice or order.
Rule 67. Civil Penalties
§ 6701. How Assessments are Made
The Commission shall review each notice of violation and cessation order in accordance with the assessment procedures described in §§ 6703, 6705, 6707, 6709 and 6711 to determine whether a civil penalty will be assessed, the amount of the penalty, and whether each day of a continuing violation will be deemed a separate violation for purposes of the total penalty assessed.
§ 6703. When Penalty will be Assessed
(a) The Commission shall assess a penalty for each cessation order.
(b) The Commission shall assess a penalty for each notice of violation, if the violation is assigned 31 points or more under the point system described in § 6705.
(c) The Commission may assess a penalty for each notice of violation assigned 30 points or less under the point system described in § 6705. In determining whether to assess a penalty, the Commission shall consider the factors listed in § 6705(b).
§ 6705. Point System for Penalties
(a) The Commission shall use the point system described in this Section to determine the amount of the penalty and, in the case of notices of violation, whether a mandatory penalty should be assessed as provided in § 6703(b).
(b) Points shall be assigned as follows:
(1) History of Previous Violations. The Commission shall assign up to 30 points based on the history of previous violations. One point shall be assigned for each past violation contained in a notice of violation. Five points shall be assigned for each past violation (but not a condition or practice) contained in a cessation order. The history of previous violations, for the purpose of assigning points, shall be determined and the points assigned with respect to a particular coal exploration, development or surface coal mining operation. Points shall be assigned as follows:
(A) A violation shall not be counted if the notice or order is the subject of pending administrative or judicial review or if the time to request such review or to appeal any administrative or judicial decision has not expired, and thereafter it shall be counted for only one year.
(B) No violation for which the notice or order has been vacated shall be counted.
(C) Each violation shall be counted without regard to whether it led to a civil penalty assessment.
(2) Seriousness. The Commission shall assign up to 30 points based on the seriousness of the violation, as follows:
(A) Probability of Occurrence. The Commission shall assign up to 15 points based on
the probability of the occurrence of the event which a violated standard is designed to prevent. Points shall be assessed according to the following schedule:
Probability of Occurrence Points None 0 Insignificant 1- 4 Unlikely 5- 9 Likely 10-14 Occurred 15
(B) Extent of Potential or Actual Damage. The Commission shall assign up to 15 points based on the extent of the potential or actual damage, in terms of area and impact on the public or environment, as follows:
(i) If the damage or impact which the violated standard is designed to prevent would remain within the coal exploration, development or permit area, the Commission shall assign zero to seven points, depending on the duration and extent of the damage or impact.
(ii) If the damage or impact which the violated standard is designed to prevent would extend outside the coal exploration, development or permit area, the Commission shall assign eight to 15 points, depending on the duration and extent of the damage or impact.
(C) Alternative. In the case of violation of an administrative requirement, such as a requirement to keep records, the Commission shall, in lieu of § 6705(b)(2)(A) and (B), assign up to 15 points for seriousness, based upon the extent to which enforcement is obstructed by the violation.
(3) Negligence
(A) The Commission shall assign up to 25 points based on the degree of fault of the person to whom the notice or order was issued in causing or failing to correct the violation, condition or practice which led to the notice or order either through act or omission. Points shall be assessed as follows:
(i) A violation which occurs through no negligence shall be assigned no penalty points for negligence.
(ii) A violation which is caused by negligence shall be assigned 12 points or less, depending on the degree of negligence.
(iii) A violation which occurs through a greater degree of fault than negligence shall be assigned 13 to 25 points, depending on the degree of fault.
(B) In determining the degree of negligence involved in a violation and the number of points to be assigned, the following definitions apply:
(i) No Negligence–an inadvertent violation which was unavoidable by the exercise of reasonable care.
(ii) Negligence–the failure of a permittee to prevent the occurrence of any violation of his or her permit or any requirement of the act or these regulations due to indifference, lack of diligence, or lack of reasonable care, or the failure to abate any violation of such permit or the act due to indifference, lack of diligence or lack of reasonable care.
(iii) A Greater Degree of Fault than Negligence–reckless, knowing or intentional conduct.
(C) In calculating points to be assigned for negligence, the acts of all persons working on the coal exploration, development or surface coal mining and reclamation site shall be attributed to the person to whom the notice or order was issued, unless that person establishes that they were acts of deliberate sabotage.
(4) Good Faith in Attempting to Achieve Compliance
(A) The Commission shall add points on the degree of good faith of the person to whom the notice or order was issued in attempting to achieve rapid compliance after notification of the violation. Points shall be assigned as follows:
Degrees of Good Faith Points Rapid Compliance -1 to -10 Normal Compliance 0
(B) The following definitions shall apply under § 6705(b)(4)(A):
(i) Rapid Compliance–that the person to whom the notice or order was issued took extraordinary measures to abate the violation in the shortest possible time and that abatement was achieved before the time set for abatement.
(ii) Normal Compliance–the person to whom the notice or order was issued abated the violation within the time given for abatement.
(C) If the consideration of this criterion is impractical because of the length of the abatement period, the assessment may be made without considering this criterion and may be reassessed after the violation has been abated.
§ 6707. Determination of Amount of Penalty
The Commission shall determine the minimum amount of any civil penalty by converting the total number of points assigned under § 6905 to a dollar amount, according to the following schedule:
Points Dollars Points Dollars
1 20 36 1,600 2 40 37 1,700 3 60 38 1,800 4 80 39 1,900 5 100 40 2,000
6 120 41 2,100 7 140 42 2,200 8 160 43 2,300 9 180 44 2,400 10 200 45 2,500 11 220 46 2,600 12 240 47 2,700 13 260 48 2,800 14 280 49 2,900 15 300 50 3,000 16 320 51 3,100 17 340 52 3,200 18 360 53 3,300 19 380 54 3,400 20 400 55 3,500 21 420 56 3,600 21 440 57 3,700 23 460 58 3,800 24 480 59 3,900 25 500 60 4,000 26 600 61 4,100 27 700 62 4,200 28 800 63 4,300 29 900 64 4,400 30 1000 65 4,500 31 1,100 66 4,600 32 1,200 67 4,700 33 1,300 68 4,800 34 1,400 69 4,900 35 1,500 70 (and above)5,000
§ 6709. Assessment of Separate Violations for Each Day
(a) The Commission may assess separately a civil penalty for each day from the date of issuance of the notice of violation or cessation order to the date set for abatement of the violation. In determining whether to make such an assessment, the Commission shall consider the factors listed in § 6705 and may consider the extent to which the person to whom the notice or order was issued gained any economic benefits as a result of a failure to comply. For any violation which continues for two or more days and which is assigned more than 70 points under § 6705(b), the Commission shall assess a civil penalty for a minimum of two separate days.
(b) Whenever a violation contained in a notice of violation or cessation order has not been abated within the abatement period set in the notice or order or as subsequently extended under section 53-9- 69(1) of the act, a civil penalty of not less than $750 shall be assessed for each day during which such failure continues, except that, if the person to whom the notice or order was issued initiates review proceedings with respect to the violation, the abatement period shall be extended as follows:
(1) If suspension of the abatement requirements of the notice or order is ordered in a temporary relief proceeding, after a determination that the person to whom the notice or
order was issued will suffer irreparable loss or damage from the application of the requirements, the Commission shall modify the abatement order to state that the period permitted for abatement shall not end until the date on which the Commission issues a final order with respect to the violation in question.
(2) If the person to whom the notice or order was issued initiates review proceedings under § 53-9- 69(1)(e) with respect to the violation, in which the obligations to abate are suspended by the Commission or a court subsequently reviewing the Commission’s actions, the daily assessment of a penalty shall not be made for any period before entry of a final order by the court.
(3) Such penalty for the failure to abate the violation shall not be assessed for more than 30 days for each such violation. If the permittee has not abated the violation within the 30- day period, the Commission shall take appropriate action pursuant to §§ 53-9- 55 (4), 53- 9- 57, 53-9- 69 (1)(d), and 53-9- 69 (4) within 30 days to ensure that abatement occurs or to ensure that there will not be a reoccurrence of the failure to abate.
§ 6711. Waiver of Use of Formula to Determine Civil Penalty
(a) The Commission, upon its own initiative, at the request of the Department, or upon written request received within 15 days of issuance of a notice of violation or a cessation order, may waive the use of the formula contained in §§ 6705 and 6707 to set the civil penalty, if the Commission determines that, taking into account exceptional factors present in the particular case, the penalty is demonstrably excessive or inadequate. Cause for waiving the formula in order to increase the penalty may include, solely by way of example and without limitation, a demonstration that the violation occurred in willful and knowing disregard of any law, regulation, order, or permit condition, a demonstration that the violation caused significant harm to human health and/or the environment, or a demonstration that the violator incurred significant economic benefit as a result of the noncompliance. However, the Commission shall not waive the use of the formula or reduce the proposed assessment on the basis of an argument that a reduction in the proposed penalty could be used to abate violations of the act, these regulations, or any condition of any permit or exploration approval. The basis for every waiver shall be fully explained and documented in the records of the case.
(b) If the Commission waives the use of the formula, it shall use the criteria set forth in § 6705(b) and in § 49-17-43 to determine the appropriate penalty. When the Commission has elected to waive the use of the formula, it shall give a written explanation of the basis for the assessment made to the person to whom the notice or order was issued.
§ 6713. Procedures for Assessment of Civil Penalties
(a) Within 15 days of service of a notice or order, the person to whom it was issued may submit written information about the violation to the Department and to the inspector who issued the notice of violation or cessation order. The Commission shall consider any information so submitted in determining the facts surrounding the violation and the amount of the penalty.
(b) The Department shall serve a copy of the proposed assessment and of the worksheet showing the computation of the proposed assessment on the person to whom the notice or order was issued, by certified mail, within 30 days of the issuance of the notice or order. If the mail is tendered at the address of that person set forth in the sign required under § 5301, or at any address at which that person is in fact located, and he or she refuses to accept delivery of or to collect such mail,
the requirements of this Subsection shall be deemed to have been complied with upon such tender.
(c) Failure by the Department to serve any proposed assessment within 30 days shall not be grounds for dismissal of all or part of such assessment unless the person against whom the proposed penalty has been assessed:
(1) proves actual prejudice as a result of the delay; and
(2) makes a timely objection to the delay. An objection shall be timely only if made in the normal course of administrative review.
(d) Unless the Department and the permittee reach agreement on the amount of the penalty, the Department shall issue a complaint letter pursuant to § 53-9-55(1) and (2) scheduling the matter for a formal hearing before the Commission.
(e) The order of the Commission in the matter shall determine the penalty, if any, shall state the Commission’s findings of fact and conclusions of law used as a basis for assessing the penalty, if any, and shall determine the date the penalty is due to be paid by the permittee.
(f) Any party aggrieved by the decision of the Commission may appeal the matter pursuant to §§ 53-9- 77 and 53-9- 55(3). Upon the issuance of an order finding that a violation has occurred, the person found to be in violation shall have thirty (30) days to pay the proposed penalty in full or, if the person wishes to appeal either the amount of the penalty or the fact of the violation or both, to forward the proposed amount as a penalty payment bond to the executive director for placement in as escrow account. The executive director shall forward any money submitted for placement in an escrow account that is a fully insured interest-bearing account. If, through administrative or judicial review of the violation or proposed penalty, the Commission or a court of appropriate jurisdiction determines that no violation occurred or that the amount of the penalty should be reduced, the executive director shall within thirty (30) days remit the appropriate amount to the person with any interest earned on the money while in escrow. The rate of interest shall be the prevailing Department of Treasury rate. Failure to forward the proposed penalty amount to the executive director within thirty (30) days shall result in a waiver of all legal rights to contest the violation or the amount of the penalty.
Rule 69. Individual Civil Penalties
§ 6901. When an Individual Civil Penalty May Be Assessed
The Commission may assess an individual civil penalty against any corporate director, officer or agent of a corporate permittee who knowingly and willfully authorized, ordered or carried out a violation, failure or refusal. The Commission shall not assess an individual civil penalty in situations resulting from a permit violation by a corporate permittee until a cessation order has been issued by the Commission to the corporate permittee for the violation, and the cessation order has remained unabated for thirty (30) days.
§ 6903. Amount of Individual Civil Penalty
(a) In determining the amount of an individual civil penalty assessed under § 6901, the Commission shall consider the criteria specified in § 49-17-43 and § 53-9- 55 (2), as well as the following:
(1) the individual's history of authorizing, ordering or carrying out previous violations, failures or refusals at the particular surface coal mining operation;
(2) the seriousness of the violation, failure or refusal (as indicated by the extent of damage and/or the cost of reclamation), including any irreparable harm to the environment and any hazard to the health or safety of the public; and
(3) the demonstrated good faith of the individual charged in attempting to achieve rapid compliance after notice of the violation, failure or refusal.
(b) The penalty shall not exceed $25,000 for each violation. Each day of a continuing violation may be deemed a separate violation and the Commission may assess a separate individual civil penalty for each day the violation, failure or refusal continues, from the date of service of the underlying notice of violation, cessation order or other order incorporated in a final decision issued by the Commission until abatement or compliance is achieved.
§ 6905. Procedure for Assessment of Individual Civil Penalty
The Department and Commission shall follow the procedure set forth in § 6713 in the assessment of the individual civil penalty.
§ 6907. Payment of Penalty
(a) If an individual does not appeal the Commission’s order imposing an individual civil penalty, the penalty shall be due ten (10) day from the issuance of the order.
(b) If an individual named in a notice of proposed individual civil penalty assessment files a petition for review, the penalty shall be due ten (10) days after issuance by the reviewing court of a judgment affirming the penalty.
Rule 71. Petitions for Award of Costs and Expenses
§ 7101. Who May File
Any person may file a petition for award of costs and expenses including attorney's fees reasonably incurred as a result of that person's participation in any administrative proceeding under the act which results in a final order being issued by the Commission or in a permit action or bond release action being taken by the Permit Board.
§ 7103. Where to File; Time for Filing
The petition for an award of costs and expenses including attorneys' fees must be filed with the Commission or Permit Board within 45 days of receipt of such order or of notice of such permit action or bond release action. Failure to make a timely filing of the petition may constitute a waiver of the right to such an award.
§ 7105. Contents of Petition
(a) A petition filed under this Section shall include the name of the person from whom costs and expenses are sought and the following shall be submitted in support of the petition:
(1) an affidavit setting forth in detail all costs and expenses including attorneys' fees reasonably incurred for, or in connection with, the person's participation in the proceeding;
(2) receipts or other evidence of such costs and expenses; and
(3) where attorneys' fees are claimed, evidence concerning the hours expended on the case, the customary commercial rate of payment for such services in the area, and the experience, reputation and ability of the individual or individuals performing the services.
§ 7107. Answer
Any person served with a copy of the petition shall have 30 days from service of the petition within which to file an answer to such petition.
§ 7109. Who May Receive an Award
Appropriate costs and expenses including attorneys' fees may be awarded:
(a) to any person from the permittee, if the person initiates any administrative proceedings reviewing enforcement actions, upon a finding that a violation of the act, regulations or permit has occurred, or that an imminent hazard existed, or to any person who participates in an enforcement proceeding where such a finding is made if the Commission determines that the person made a substantial contribution to the full and fair determination of the issues and that prior to the person’s involvement, the Department had not commenced or was not diligently pursuing an administrative or civil enforcement action regarding the matter, which may include an inspection of the surface coal mining and reclamation operation in response to a complaint;
(b) to any person other than a permittee or his representative from the Department, if the person initiates or participates in any proceeding under the act, upon a finding by the Commission or Permit Board, as appropriate, that the person made a substantial contribution to a full and fair determination of the issues and that the person substantially prevailed in the proceeding;
(c) to a permittee from the Department when the permittee demonstrates and the Commission finds that the Department issued or recommended that the Commission issue an order of cessation, a notice of violation, or an order to show cause why a permit should not be suspended or revoked, in bad faith and for the purpose of harassing or embarrassing the permittee;
(d) to a permittee from any person where the permittee demonstrates that the person initiated an administrative proceeding under the act or participated in such a proceeding in bad faith for the purpose of harassing or embarrassing the permittee; or
(e) to the Department where it demonstrates that any person applied for administrative or judicial review of a Department, Permit Board, or Commission decision made under the act or that any party participated in such a proceeding in bad faith and for the purpose of harassing or embarrassing the government.
§ 7111. Awards
An award under these Sections may include:
(a) all costs and expenses including attorneys' fees and expert witness fees, reasonably incurred as a result of initiation and/or participation in a proceeding under the act; and
(b) all costs and expenses, including attorneys' fees and expert witness fees, reasonably incurred in seeking the award.
§ 7113. Appeal
Any person aggrieved by a decision concerning the award of costs and expenses in an administrative proceeding under this act may appeal such award pursuant to § 53-9- 77.
Rule 73. Alternative Enforcement
§ 7301 Scope This part governs the use of measures provided in §§ 53-9- 57, 53-9- 61, and 53-9- 69 of the Act for criminal penalties to compel compliance with provisions of the Act. § 7303 General Provisions. (a) Whenever a court of competent jurisdiction enters a judgment against or convicts a person under these provisions, the Department must update AVS to reflect the judgment or conviction. (b) The existence of a performance bond or bond forfeiture cannot be used as the sole basis for determining that an alternative enforcement action is unwarranted. (c) Nothing in this part eliminates or limits any additional enforcement rights or procedures available under Federal or State law. § 7305 Criminal Penalties. Under §§ 53-9- 57 and 53-9- 61 of the Act, we, the regulatory authority, may request the State Attorney General to pursue criminal penalties against any person who— (a) Willfully and knowingly violates a condition of the permit; (b) Willfully and knowingly fails or refuses to comply with any order issued under § 53-9- 69 of the Act; or (c) Knowingly makes any false statement, representation, or certification, or knowingly fails to make any statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, report, plan, or other document filed or required to be maintained under these regulations or any written order of the Commission issued under the Act.
§ 7307 Civil actions for relief. (a) Under Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-43(2) and 49-2-21, the Department may institute a civil action for relief and/or may request the state Attorney General to institute a civil action for relief whenever the permittee, or permittee’s agent— (1) Violate or fail or refuse to comply with any order or decision that we issue under the Act or regulatory program; (2) Interfere with, hinder, or delay us in carrying out the provisions of the Act or its implementing regulations; (3) Refuse to admit our authorized representatives onto the site of a surface coal mining and reclamation operation; (4) Refuse to allow our authorized representatives to inspect a surface coal mining and reclamation operation; (5) Refuse to furnish any information or report that we request under the Act or regulatory program; or (6) Refuse to allow access to, or copying of, those records that we determine necessary to carry out the provisions of the Act and its implementing regulations. (b) A civil action for relief includes a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order, or any other appropriate order by a district court of the United States for the district in which the surface coal mining and reclamation operation is located or in which you have your principal office. (c) Temporary restraining orders will be issued in accordance with Rule 65 of the Mississippi rules of Civil Procedure. (d) Any relief the court grants to enforce an order under paragraph (b) of this section will continue in effect until completion or final termination of all proceedings for review of that order under the Act or its implementing regulations unless, beforehand, the district court granting the relief sets aside or modifies the order.
APPENDIX A
To The
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 25, 53-9- 47, 53-9- 51, 53-9- 53, 53-9- 85, 53-9- 87 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 11 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 11 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 51, 53-9- 69 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 55, 53-9- 69 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 55, 53-9- 67 and 53-9- 1, et seq .
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 55, 53-9- 67 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 53-9- 11, 53-9- 55, 53-9- 67 and 53-9- 1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. § 53-9- 1, et seq.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 16 (extend as needed)
n = 훴x =
mean (0) = ∑x/n =
Rules 1,3,4,5,6,7,8 Addendum C, Part 2 Cover Line Point Transect Sheet Example of Format for Recording Line Point Transect Information:
Page ___ of _____
Company name _________________________ Permit no.___________________________
Land use _____________________________________________________________________
Date of sampling Line point transect # _______________________
accept or Point # unaccept
accept or Point # unaccept
accept or Point # unaccept
accept or Point # unaccept
species % stand % cover = 훴accept =
% accept/not approved (a/na) = 훴 a/na =
Rules 2,5 Addendum D
Data Form for Row Crop Production Data Page of _______
Company name Permit no. __________________________
Check one: Reclaimed area Reference area: if reference area, indicate permit to
which data will be compared. _____________________________________________________
Land use _____________________________________________________________________
Acres in sampling area (a) ___________
Date of sampling __________________
weight tickets/ (reference area) pounds unadjusted (reclaimed area) adjusted for differing or bushels weight or moisture adjusted soil series strip no. yield/acre weight or yield/acre weight or yield/acre
Refer to Addendum R to calculate the moisture adjusted yield per acre.
Rules 1,7,8 Addendum E
Statistical Analysis on Ground Cover Measurements
In performing statistical comparisons for ground cover, results of randomly assigned line-point transects will be compared to the success standard of seventy percent ground cover at a ninety percent confidence interval, as illustrated in the following example:
Null hypothesis: ground cover on release area ≥ 70% ground cover
Alternate hypothesis: ground cover on release area < 70% ground cover
release area sample results (x) ground cover standard x
Assume that it 41% 70% took 10 samples 72% to achieve sample 89% adequacy 42% 69% 80% 42% 57% 77% 89% ∑x = 658% ∑ x
= 46,574
훴x
ground cover mean (0) = n = 10 = 65.8
____________ _______________ standard deviation (s) = √∑ x
- (∑ x)
= √ 46,574 – 432,964 = n 10 n-1 9
__________________ ________ ________ √ 46,574 – 43,296.4 = √ 3277.6 = √ 364.178 = 19.08 9 9 number of samples (n) = 10 t table 0.10 a d.f. (10-1) = 1.38
t calculated = |ground cover mean of release area-target ground cover| = |65.8-70| = 4.2 s 19.08 6.03 √n √ 10
= 6.95
Since .695 < 1.38, the null hypothesis is not rejected. It can then be determined that the ground cover on the release area is greater than or equal to the target ground cover.
Rules 1,7,8 Addendum F, Part 1 Density Sampling Circles Summary Sheet
Example of format for summarizing sampling circles information.
Page _____ of _____
Company name ________________________________________________________________
Permit no. ____________________________________________________________________
Land use ____________________________________________________________________
Date(s) of sampling ____________________________________________________________
Acres in release area ___________________________________________________________
Area of each sampling circle in acres ______________________________________________
No. of sampling circles used (n) __________________________________________________ Total no. of countable trees tallied (∋x) ____________________________________________ Total no. of countable trees 3 years or older (∋3 years) _______________________________ % of trees 3 years or older = ∋3 years/∋x = This figure must equal (from or exceed 80% to be Sampling successful for final Circles bond release. Data Sheet(s) total number of countable trees per acre (∋x) x 50 = n
Target number of trees per acre from approved Phase III Release Plan =
Rules 2,7,8 Addendum F, Part 2 Density Sampling Circles Data Sheet
Example of format for recording sampling circles information.
Page _____ of _____
Company name Permit no. ________________________
Land use ______________________________________________________________________
Date of sampling _______________________________________________________________
number of sampling countable countable trees circle no. (n) trees (x) 3 years or older (3 years)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- (extend as needed)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_____________ ___________ _______________ ∑n = ∑x = ∑3 years =
All Rules Addendum G Values with a one-tailed t distribution for various degrees of freedom (d.f.)
d.f. t = 0.1
1 3.078 2 1.886 3 1.638 4 1.533 5 1.476 6 1.440 7 1.415 8 1.397 9 1.383 10 1.372 11 1.363 Note: for the sample adequacy 12 1.356 calculations and 1 tail 13 1.350 productivity comparisons, use 14 1.345 column t = 0.1 15 1.341 16 1.337 17 1.333 18 1.330 19 1.328 20 1.325 21 1.323 22 1.321 23 1.319 24 1.318 25 1.316 26 1.315 27 1.314 28 1.313 29 1.311 30 1.310 40 1.303 60 1.296 120 1.289 ∞ 1.282
____________________________________________________________________________ From: Chambers, Jeanne C., and Ray W. Brown, 1983, Methods for vegetation sampling and analysis on revegetated mined lands, General Technical Report INT-151. Ogden, UT: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 57p.
Rules 1,7 Addendum H Statistical Analysis on Tree and Shrub Stocking Measurements
This example assumes that eighty percent of the trees are more than three years old. If they are not, there is no reason to proceed with this analysis.
In performing statistical comparisons for tree and shrub stocking, results of randomly assigned sampling circles will be compared to the success standard, hypothetically 500 trees or shrubs/acre at a ninety percent confidence statistical interval, as illustrated in the following example:
Null hypothesis: Sample stocking rate on release area > 450 trees and shrubs.
Alternate hypothesis: Sample stocking rate on release area < 450 trees and shrubs.
release area sample results (x) Target release stocking rate
Assume that it 10 450 trees and shrubs took 10 samples 9 to achieve sample 5 (90% of 500) adequacy 8 = 9.0 trees/plot (1/50 acre sampling circle area)
∑ x = 84 sample stocking rate mean (0) = 훴 x = 84 = 8.4 n 10
If the sample stocking rate mean, 0, is > the Target release stocking rate (9.0 in this example), then the sample stocking rate of the release area is greater than the Target release stocking rate and is successful. If, as in this example, the sample stocking rate mean, 0, is lower than the target release stocking rate, you must proceed with the t test as follows: _________ _________ ________ _______ ____ standard deviation (s) = ∑x
– (∑x)
= 722 – 7056 = 722 – 7056 = 722-7056 = 16.4 = _____n ____10 9 9 9 n-1 10-1 _____ √1.822 = 1.350; number of samples (n) =10
t calculated = |stocking rate of release area-target stocking rate| = |8.4-9.0| = .6 = _ .6 = .405 _s 1.350 1.350 .427 √ n √ 10 3.162
t table: 0.10 df (10-1) = 1.383. Since 1.4.5 ≥ 1.383, the null hypothesis is rejected. It can then be determined that the sample stocking rate of the release area is not greater than or equal to the target release stocking rate. The sample stocking rate fails.
Rules 1,4,6,7,8 Addendum I Example Use of Sample Adequacy Formula for Ground Cover Measurement
In this example, the permittee has taken an initial group of samples from ten randomly located line- point transects. The results of this sampling are as follows:
- Calculating the variance:
acceptable points (out of 100) transect no. (n) x x
1 86 7,396 2 90 8,100 3 76 5,776 4 82 6,724 5 40 1,600 6 76 5,776 7 40 1,600 8 82 6,724 9 86 7,396 10 90 8,100
∑ x = 748 ∑x
= 59,192
now we need to calculate the variance, s
number of transects (n) = 10
(훴 x)
s
=
훴 x
- n
n-1
or, put into words: square of sum of sum of all squared values s
= values added # of values (number of values - 1)
from the data in the above example, we calculate:
(748)
s
= 59,192 - 10 = 59,192 - 55,950.4 = 3241.6 = 360.18 9 9 9
Addendum I, Page 2
- Determining sample adequacy:
from the t table, we find t for a sample size of 10
n-1 = degrees of freedom
10-1 = 9 degrees of freedom for our example
from the t table, locate the t statistic for 9 degrees of freedom = 1.383
the sample adequacy formula is:
n = (t
)(s
) (0.10)
where:
0 = the sample mean
n = the number of samples which will need to be taken
t
= t table value, squared
s
= variance
plugging these values into the sample adequacy formula, we get:
n = (1.383
)(360.18) = 688.91 = 12.31 or 13 (7.48)
55.95
Since we already have taken 10 samples and the sample adequacy formula tells us we need 13, we need to take an additional 3 transects (13 - 10 = 3).
When those 3 additional transects have been taken, a new variance must be calculated and the sample adequacy formula recalculated. This is to ascertain that the 3 additional transects didn't somehow increase the variance and, therefore, require still more transects. If this happens, the additional transects must be taken and the variance recalculated to determine sample adequacy.
The sample adequacy requirements must be fulfilled before a comparison to the standard can be made.
Rules 2, 4, 5 Addendum J
Example Use of Sample Adequacy Formula for Hay Production Measurements
In this example, the permittee has taken an initial group of ten randomly located sampling frames. The results of the sampling are as follows:
oven dry weight per sampling frame no. (n) frame x x
1 72.2 5,212.84 2 80.0 6,400.00 3 22.0 484.00 4 96.5 9,312.25 5 100.2 10,040.04 6 25.0 625.00 7 81.0 6,561.00 8 96.0 9,216.00 9 100.9 10,180.81 10 51.0 2,601.00
n=10 ∑x = 724.8 ∑ x
= 60,632.94
now we need to calculate the variance, s
number of sampling frames (n) = 10
(훴 x)
s
=
훴 x
- n
n-1
or, put into words:
square of sum of sum of all all squared values variance = values # of frames (number of frames - 1)
Addendum J, Page 2
from the data in the above example, we calculate:
(724.8)
s
= 60,632.94 - 10 = 899.94
- Determining sample adequacy:
from the t table, we find t for a sample size of 10
n-1 = degrees of freedom
10-1 = 9 degrees of freedom for our example
from the t table, locate the t statistic for 9 degrees of freedom = 1.383
the sample adequacy formula is : n = (t
)(s
) (0.10)
where:
(0.10)
= 10% of mean squared. 10% of 72.48 = 7.248, so (7.248)
= 52.53
훴 x mean (0) = n
n = the number of samples which will need to be taken
t
= t table value, squared (see Addendum G)
s
= variance
plugging these values into the sample adequacy formula, we get:
n = (1.383
)(899.94) = 32.76 = 33 samples needed 52.53
Since we already have taken 10 samples and the sample adequacy formula tells us we need a total of 33, an additional 23 samples will need to be taken.
When the 23 additional samples have been taken, a new variance must be calculated and the sample adequacy formula recalculated. This is to ascertain that the additional samples didn't somehow increase the variance and, therefore, require still more samples. If this happens, the additional samples must be taken and the variance recalculated to determine sample adequacy.
Rules 1,7,8 Addendum K Example Use of Sample Adequacy Formula for Tree and Shrub Counts
In this example, the permittee has taken an initial group of ten randomly located sampling circles. The results of this sampling are as follows:
countable sampling trees/acre circle no. (n) x x
1 7 49 2 10 100 3 4 16 4 5 25 5 10 100 6 11 121 7 3 9 8 7 49 9 10 100 10 10
∑ x = 77 ∑ (x
) = 669
now we need to calculate the variance, s
number of sampling circles (n) = 10
(훴 x)
s
=
훴 x
- n
n-1
or, put into words:
square of sum of all sum of squared values s
= values added # of values (number of values - 1)
from the data in the above example, we calculate:
(77)
s
= 669 - 10 = 8.46
Addendum K, Page 2
- Determining sample adequacy:
from the t table, we find t for a sample size of 10
n-1 = degrees of freedom
10-1 = 9 degrees of freedom for our example
from the t table, locate the t statistic for 9 degrees of freedom = 1.383
the sample adequacy formula is:
n = (t
)(s
) (0.10)
where:
훴x mean (0) = n
n = the number of samples which will need to be taken
t
= t table value, squared
s
= variance
plugging these values into the sample adequacy formula, we get:
n = (1.383
)(8.46) = 27.4 = 28 samples needed 0.59
Since we already have taken 10 samples and the sample adequacy formula tells us we need a total of 28, the sample adequacy requirements have not been met.
When the 18 additional samples have been taken, a new variance must be calculated and the sample adequacy formula recalculated. This is to ascertain that the additional samples didn't somehow increase the variance and, therefore, require still more samples. If this happens, the additional samples must be taken and the variance recalculated to determine sample adequacy.
In this example, it would have been wise to have taken an initial sample of 15 or 20. Whenever large variation is noted, initial sample size should be increased.
The sample adequacy requirements must be fulfilled before proceeding with comparison to the standard.
Rules 3,4,6 Addendum L Statistical Analysis on Ground Cover Measurements
In performing statistical comparisons for ground cover, results of randomly assigned line-point transects will be compared to the success standard (seventy percent ground cover at a ninety percent confidence statistical interval), as illustrated in the following example:
Null hypothesis: ground cover on release area > 70% ground cover.
Alternate hypothesis: ground cover on release area < 70% ground cover.
release area sample results (x) x
ground cover standard assume that it 41% 1681 70% took 10 samples (n) 72% 5184 to achieve sample 89% 7921 adequacy 42% 1764 69% 4761 80% 6400 42% 1764 57% 3249 77% 5929 89%
∑ x = 658% ∑x
= 46,574
ground cover mean (0) = 훴 x = 658 = 65.8 n 10 ____________ _______________ standard deviation (s) = √∑ x
- (∑ x)
= √ 46,574 – 432,964 = n 10 n-1 9 __________________ ________ ________ √ 46,574 – 43,296.4 = √ 3277.6 = √ 364.178 = 19.08 9 9
number of samples (n) = 10; t table 0.10 a df (10-1) = 1.38
t calculated = |ground cover mean of release area-target ground cover| = |65.8-70| = 4.2 s 19.08 6.03 √n √ 10 = 6.95
Since 0.7 < 1.38, the null hypothesis is accepted; and it is accepted that the ground cover on the release area is greater than or equal to the target ground cover.
Rules 7, 8 Addendum M Statistical Analysis on Tree and Shrub Stocking Measurements
This example assumes that 80% of the trees are more than three years old. If they are not, there is no reason to proceed with this analysis.
In performing statistical comparisons for tree and shrub stocking, results of randomly assigned sampling circles will be compared to the success standard, 250 trees or shrubs/acre hypothetically in this example, at a ninety percent confidence statistical interval, as illustrated in the following example:
Null hypothesis: Sample stocking rate on release area > the Target release stocking rate of trees and shrubs.
Alternate hypothesis: Sample stocking rate on release area < the Target release stocking rate of trees and shrubs.
release area sample results (x) Target release stocking rate
assume that it 4 225 trees and shrubs took 10 samples (n) 4 (90% of 250) to achieve sample 4 = 4.5 trees/plot (1/50 acre adequacy 4 sampling circle area
∑ x = 42 sample stocking rate mean(0 ) = 훴 x = 42 = 4.2 n 10 If the sample stocking rate mean, 0, is > the Target release stocking rate, (4.5 in this example) then the sample stocking rate of the release area is greater than the Target release stocking rate and is successful. If, as in this example, the sample stocking rate mean, 0, is lower than the Target release stocking rate, you must proceed with the t test as follows: ____________ __________ __ standard deviation (s) = √∑ x
- (훴 x)
= √ 180 – 1764 = 3.6 = √.4 = .632 n 10 9 n-1 10-1
number of samples (n) = 10; t table 0.10 d.f. (10-1) = 1.383
t calculated = |stocking rate of release area-target ground cover| = |4.2 – 4.5| = .3 = .3 = 1.5 s .632 _.632 .200 √n √ 10 3.162 Since 1.5 ≥ 1.383, the null hypothesis is rejected. It can be determined that the sample stocking rate of the release area is not greater than or equal to the Target stocking rate. The stocking rate fails
Rules 2,4,5 Addendum N Statistical Analysis on Sampling Frame Data
In performing statistical comparisons for hay production when sample areas are harvested, harvest results of the randomly assigned sample areas will be compared using a t-test to ninety percent of the target or reference yield with a ninety percent confidence interval. The hypotheses should be set up as follows:
Null hypothesis: hay yield on release area > 90% of target yield.
Alternate hypothesis: hay yield on release area < 90% of target yield.
If USDA/NRCS target yield is used as a standard, the tonnage of forage produced must be divided by 22,687.5 to convert it to sample frame weights.
Rules 2,4,5 Addendum O Data Form for Forage Crop Production Data Harvested as Baled Hay
Page of ________
Company name: Permit: _________________________
Check one: reference area: test area: if reference area, indicate permit to which
data will be compared. ____________________________________________________________
Land use: ______________________________________________________________________
Acres in harvested area: Plot or area number:____________________________
Number of bales harvested (b): Number of bales weighed (n): __________
*bale *bale bale *bale weight (x) weight (x) weight (x) weight (x)
mean (0) = 훴 x = n
test-area production per acre = b0 = a
reference-area production per acre = b0 = a
If the test area production per acre is equal to or greater than the reference production per acre, the test passes. If the test area production is less than the reference, the statistical analysis needs to be run. Refer to Addendum P.
*bale weight must be adjusted as per Addendum Q for differing soil series productivity.
Rules 2,4,5 Addendum P Statistical Analysis on Whole Release Area Harvesting
In performing statistical comparisons for hay production when a whole field is harvested, the weights of either ten percent or fifteen small bales, whichever is greater; or ten percent or fifteen round bales whichever is greater; are converted to lbs./ac. and compared to one hundred percent of the reference or target yield, using a ninety percent or greater statistical confidence level as approved by the Permit Board in consultation with the USDA/NRCS. Release area harvest data must be compared to 100% of the reference or target yield for prime farmland and to 90% of the reference area or target yield for all other land uses. See the following example.
Null hypothesis: hay yield on release area > 100% reference or target yield
Alternate hypothesis: hay yield on release area < 100% reference or target yield
Example: size of release area: 40 acres number of bales harvested: 125 number of bales weighed: 15
Release Area Harvest Data * weight per 100% reference area round bale (x) x
__ or target yield -lbs- 1,100 1,210,000 1,000 1,000,000 3,200 lbs/ac 975 950,625 900 810,000 1,000 1,000,000 1,100 1,210,000 1,000 1,000,000 900 810,000 1,025 1,050,625 1,000 1,000,000 875 765,625 975 950,625 1,000 1,000,000 1,100 1,210,000 1,150 1,322,500 ∑x = 15,100 ∑x
= 15,290,000
mean (0) = 훴 x = 15,100 = 1006.7 x 125 ÷ 40 acres = 3,145.9 = 3,146 n 15 ____________ _____________________ standard deviation (s) = √∑ x
- (훴 x)
= √ 15,290,000 – 228,010,000 = ____n ____ __________ 15,100 n-1 14
- adjusted for differing soil series as per Addendum Q.
Addendum P, Page 2
_______ ________ √190,000 = √ 13,571.4 = 116.5
to determine the t-value, refer to Addendum G.
the degree of freedom is the number of samples (n) - 1
we had 15 samples, subtracting 1 = 14.
fourteen (14) degrees of freedom = 1.345 from column t. = .10
therefore, the formula to calculate t value from the harvest data is:
|0|
- 0
| = |3,146 - 3,200| = 1.79 s
116.5 √ n √ 15
Since 1.79 is greater than 1.345, the null hypothesis is rejected. Crop yield data from the test area is different from the yield from the reference area.
Rules 2,4,5 Addendum Q Yield Adjustments for Release Areas Due to Differing Soil Series
When test plots and reference plots fall on different soil series, adjustments must be made to compensate for the productivity difference. Section II of the NRCS Field Office Technical Guide shall be used for this purpose. For ease of calculation, this adjustment shall always be made to the reference area yield.
Example 1: productivity index area soil series (PI) _______
test plot Barzo Sil 2-5% 76 reference area Zoko Sil 1-4% 60
In this situation, the test plot has a 26.6% higher productivity index than the reference plot, so the reference plot yield is adjusted upward by 26.6%.
Example 2: Productivity Index area soil series (PI) _______
test plot Zoko Sil 1-4% 60 reference area Barzo Sil 2-5% 76
In this situation, the test plot has a 21.0% lower Productivity Index than the reference plot, so the reference plot yield is adjusted downward by 21.0%.
These adjusted reference yields become the standard against which the test plot yields are compared.
In the case where several soil series are mixed during reclamation, or a reference plot contains more than one soil series, a weighted average productivity index must be determined. Weighted average productivity indices should be calculated as described in the following example:
soil acreage in Productivity reference or Premine Soil Mapping Units Index release area Barco loam, 2-5% slopes 60 15 Barco loam, 2-5% slopes, eroded 50 25 Deepwater silt loam, 2-5% slopes 84
total acreage 50
(15/50)(60) + (25/50)(50) + (10/50)(84) = 59.8 (weighted ave. prod. index)
The adjusted release area yield is determined by multiplying actual release area yield by percent yield adjustment.
Rules 2,5 Addendum R Yield Adjustment for Moisture
Schedule of adjusted moisture contents for some crops:
Corn 18.0% at 56 lbs/bushel Hay Air dry Sorghum 18.0% at 56 lbs/bushel Soybeans 18.0% at 60 lbs/bushel Wheat 18.0% at 60 lbs/bushel
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 100 - m
ya = 100 - a x y
where
m = moisture content of harvested grain determined before drying
a = adjusted moisture content, for example, 18.0% for corn
y = crop yield before moisture adjustment
ya = crop yield adjusted for moisture
Example: given- 8,000 lbs. of corn from 1.5 acre field, moisture content 22%
100-22 to determine adjusted yield: 100-18.0 X 8,000 lbs. = 7,609.76 lbs.
to determine number of bushels: 7,609.76 lbs. = 135.89 bu. 56 lbs./bu.
to determine bushels per acre: 135.89 bu. = 90.59 bu./acre 1.5 acres
Rules 2,5 Addendum S Crop Surveyor’s Affidavit of Qualifications and Crop Production Yields
Name Profession ______________________
Company name and business address _______________________________________________
Telephone _____________________________________________________________________
Certification
I have sufficient education and/or experience in agriculture to evaluate crop activities employed in
the production of farm crops. I was present during the harvest, and I concur with the yield results
presented in this report. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false
information and making of false statements, representations, or certifications in this document and
in attachments to this document.
__________________________________________ Signature
__________________________________________ Printed Name STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ) ) SS COUNTY OF )
Appeared before me this day of , 20
, to me known to be the person
described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she executed the above as his/her free act and deed.
_________________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires:
All Rules Addendum T FEDERAL NOXIOUS WEED LIST
The Federal Noxious Weed List shall be the most current list found at:
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/bats/fnwsbycat-e.html
Literature
Composite List of Weeds, Revised 1989. Available from WSSA, 309 West Clark Street, Champaign, IL 61820.
Important Weeds of the World, 1983. Publ. Agrochem. Div. Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Federal Republic of Germany. 711 pp.
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 8, R. 454 Rule 454
grams/pound = number of bolls needed to produce one pound of cotton. average weight/boll
- Determine the number of pounds of lint needed to produce one bale of cotton. a. Only 35% of seedcotton (cotton newly picked) is considered lint. b. It takes 480 pounds of lint to make one bale of cotton.
calculate: 480 pounds of lint/bale = pounds of seedcotton to make one bale of cotton 35% seedcotton
- Determine the number of bolls per plant needed to produce one bale of seedcotton.
calculate: (number of bolls per pound of seedcotton)(pounds of seedcotton per bale) = Total number of plants per acre
Number of bolls per plant needed to produce one bale of seedcotton per acre.
Rules 4,7 Addendum V Summary Data Form for Line-Point Transects
Example of format for summarizing line point transect data
Page of _______
Company Name Permit No. _____________________
Check one: Reclaimed area Reference area: if reference area, indicate permit to
which data will be compared. _______________________________________________________
Land use _______________________________________________________________________
Acres in sampling release area No. of transects used (n) _________
Date of sampling ______________________
acceptable points found (out of 100) transect no. (n) (x) I
∑n = ∑x ______
mean (0 ) = ∑x/∑n =
Rules 2,4,5 Addendum W Pastureland and Grazing Land Forage Production Standards For Post Mined Soils
The purpose of this document is to identify plant species suitable to control soil erosion and sustain the original expected forage production for coal mining sites in Choctaw County, Mississippi. Selected plant species are based on soil suitability and adaptation to the conditions of the selected site.
To provide proper treatment, an adequate supply of nutrients must be available for plant use. An adequate supply of nutrients will be applied according to a soil test.
Below are some plant species that are well suitable for the area disturbed:
Bahiagrass Common Bermuda Hybrid Bermuda Kobe Lespedeza White Clover Crimson Clover
Site Preparation. The site will be smoothed and shaped, where needed, to permit the use of conventional equipment for establishment and maintenance of needed vegetation. Graded slopes in the area will not be greater than 6:1. Strip and stockpile topsoil and spread evenly over the treated area prior to seedbed preparation.
Seedbed Preparation. The soil will be thoroughly pulverized a minimum of 4 inches deep and harrowed to a uniform, smooth surface. Lime and fertilizer will be incorporated during seedbed preparation. Cultipack before and after planting.
Fertilizer and Lime. Apply lime and fertilizer according to a soil test or make an initial application of 78 pounds of actual N – P – K and maintain a level of 65 pounds of actual N, P, and K per acre each year and pH at 6.0 to 7.0 for best results. For grass-legume mixture, apply about ½ the amount for nitrogen.
Table 1. Planting Recommendation
Plant species Planting date Seeding rate in lbs. pure live seed per acre Seed depth (inches) alone mix Bahia grass March-June 30 20 1/4 Common Bermuda grass March-May 8 3 1/4 Hybrid Bermuda grass March-July 1/ 1/ 2-3 Kobe Lespedeza 2/ March-May 15 1/4 White Clover 2/ Sept.-November 15 3 1/4 Crimson Clover 2/ Sept.-October 25 1/4
Addendum W, Page 2
1/ Plant 25,000 sprigs when planting alone and 20,000 when planting with a legume mixture.
2/ Legume seed will be inoculated with proper inoculant.
Management. Do not cut annual lespedeza more than once a year. Make the cutting early enough to allow plant to mature seed after hay is harvested. For grasses and grass-legume mixtures, make the last cutting at least one month prior to the end of the growing season. For warm season grasses with winter legumes, apply P and K in September. Make first application of nitrogen in June; second application, if needed, in mid- July.
Table 2. Pasture and Hayland Management
Plant Species Growth stage to begin Minimum height
cutting grazing cutting grazing Bahia grass Boot to flower 5" 2" 3”
Common Bermuda Boot to flower 5" 2" 3"
Hybrid Bermuda Boot to flower 6" 3" 4"
Kobe Lespedeza Bloom 6" 3" 3"
Grass-Legume mixture ½ bloom of legume 5" 4" 3"
Tall Fescue Boot 6" 3" 3"
Apply N – P – K immediately after growth begins.
Note: Grazing should be done in keeping with the minimum heights given in Table 2 on minimum cutting height above.
Note: AUM (Animal-Unit-Month) from Table 5.--Land Capability and Yield per Acre of Crops and Pasture, of the Soil Survey of Choctaw (or any other) County must be converted to tons per acre. One AUM equals 780 pounds of dry matter forage.
For example. 2000 = 2.56
For common Bermuda on Aerial soil type, the expected yield under a high level of management is 9.0 AUM
9.0 x 2.56 = 23.04 tons per acre
All Rules Addendum X References
Bonham, Charles D., 1989, Measurements for Terrestrial Vegetation: Wiley, New York, 338p.
Chambers, Jeanne C., and Ray W. Brown, 1983, Methods for vegetation sampling and analysis on revegetated mined lands, General Technical Report INT-151. Ogden, UT: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 57p.
Natural Resources Conservation Service and Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service, no date, NRCS Field Office Technical Guide: Natural Resources Conservation Service in cooperation with the Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service, variously paginated.
Part 9 Part 9: Pollution Emergency Response Regulations
11 Miss. Admin. Code Pt. 9, R. 1.1 Definitions
The words and phrases used in this Chapter shall have the meanings set forth in this rule.
A. “Air pollution” means the presence in the outdoor atmosphere of one or more air contaminants in quantities, of characteristic, and of a duration which are materially injurious or can be reasonably expected to become materially injurious to human, plant or animal life or to property, or which unreasonably interfere with enjoyment of life or use of property throughout the state or throughout such area of the state as shall be affected thereby.
B. “Commission” means the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality acting through the Office of Pollution Control of the Department of Environmental Quality.
C. “Facility” means any and all sources that may cause pollution of the air or any waters of the state or may cause any wastes or other products or substances to be placed in a location where they are likely to cause pollution of the air or any waters of the state, including any building, structure, installation, house, business, vehicle, car, truck, train, bus, boat, ship, airplane, or any other means of transportation for persons or property.
D. “Person” means the state or other agency or institution thereof, any municipality, political subdivision, public or private corporation, individual, partnership, association or other entity, and includes any officer or governing or managing body of any municipality, political subdivision, or public or private corporation, or the United States or any officer or employee thereof.
E. “Pollution” means air pollution and/or water pollution and/or placing or causing to be placed any wastes in a location where they are likely to cause pollution of any waters of the state.
F. “Pollution Emergency Fund” means the fund established under Miss. Code Ann. Section 49-17-68.
G. “Responsible Party” or “RP” means the owner or operator of a facility that causes pollution necessitating immediate remedial or clean-up action.
H. “Wastes” means sewage, industrial wastes, oil field wastes, and all other liquid, gaseous, solid, radioactive, or other substances which may pollute or tend to pollute any waters of the state.
I. “Water Pollution” means such contamination, or other alteration of the physical, chemical or biological properties, of any waters of the state, including change in temperature, taste, color, turbidity, or odor of the waters, or such discharge of any liquid, gaseous, solid, radioactive, or other substance or leak into any waters of the state unless in compliance with a valid permit issued therefor by the Permit Board.
J. “Waters of the state” means all waters within the jurisdiction of this state, including all streams, lakes, ponds, impounding reservoirs, marshes, watercourses, waterways, wells, springs, irrigation systems, drainage systems, and all other bodies or accumulations of water, surface and underground, natural or artificial, situated wholly or partly within or bordering upon the state, and such coastal waters as are within the jurisdiction of the state, except lakes, ponds or other surface waters which are wholly landlocked and privately owned, and which are not regulated under the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq).
Rule 1.2
The Pollution Emergency Fund, created pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-68, may be used by the commission for the purpose of mitigation, abatement, clean-up, or other remedial actions and related technical investigations involving the introduction of pollutants upon or into the land, air or waters of this state and for related purposes. When funds from the Pollution Emergency Fund are used for such purposes, Responsible Parties are required to reimburse such costs to the Pollution Emergency Fund in accordance with the following statutory authority. The Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-1 through 49-17- 43, provides a mechanism for ensuring that immediate remedial or clean-up action be completed when a party causes pollution requiring immediate remedial or clean-up action. Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-43 (4) states the following: Any person who owns or operates facilities which, through misadventure, happenstance or otherwise, cause pollution necessitating immediate remedial or clean-up action shall be liable for the cost of such remedial or clean-up action and the commission may recover the cost of same by a civil action brought in the circuit court of the county in which venue may lie. This penalty may be recovered in lieu of or in addition to the penalties provided in subsections (1), (2) and (3) of this section. In the event of the necessity for immediate remedial or clean-up action, the commission may contract for same and advance funds from the Pollution Emergency Fund to pay the costs thereof, such advancements to be repaid to the Pollution Emergency Fund upon recovery by the commission as provided above.
Rule 1.3
The Mississippi Solid Wastes Disposal Law of 1974, Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., provides essentially the same mechanism for ensuring that immediate remedial or clean-up action be completed when a party causes an immediate necessity for remedial or clean-up action involving solid waste. Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-29 (4) states the following: Any person creating, or responsible for creating, through misadventure, happenstance, or otherwise, an immediate necessity for remedial or clean- up action involving solid waste shall be liable for the cost of such remedial or clean-up action and the commission may recover the cost of same by a civil action brought in the circuit court of the county in which venue may lie. This penalty may be recovered in lieu of or in addition to the penalties provided in subsections (1), (2) and (3) of this section. In the event of the necessity for immediate remedial or clean-up action, the commission may contract for same and advance funds from the Pollution Emergency Fund to pay the costs thereof, such advancements to be repaid to the Pollution Emergency Fund upon recovery by the commission as provided herein.
Rule 1.4
In accordance with the above cited statutes, any person who owns or operates a facility which, through misadventure, happenstance or otherwise, causes pollution necessitating immediate remedial or clean-up action shall be liable for the cost of such remedial or clean-up action and the commission may recover the cost of same by a civil action brought in the circuit court of the county in which venue may lie.
Rule 1.5
If the Responsible Party (“RP”) is available at the site of a pollution event, or if MDEQ is able to communicate via telephone with the RP, then the RP shall make arrangements to pay the response contractor directly for necessary remedial or clean-up actions. If the RP is not available and if MDEQ is unable to contact the RP during the remedial or clean-up actions, then MDEQ will contract with the response contractor and advance funds from the Pollution Emergency Fund to pay the costs thereof. The RP shall pay the costs of the remedial or clean-up actions to MDEQ within 30 days of being invoiced for such remedial or clean-up actions by MDEQ. Upon receipt of such reimbursed funds from the RP, MDEQ will deposit the funds back into the Pollution Emergency Fund. If the RP is unwilling to assume responsibility for the pollution event and will not pay the invoice(s), MDEQ may seek cost recovery, penalties and an additional amount for the death of wildlife, if applicable, consistent with Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-29 (3) and (4) and 49-17-43 (3) and (4) and the above Rule 1.3 and Rule 1.4. MDEQ may seek injunctive relief pursuant to Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-29(1), 49-17-27 and 49-17-43(2).
History
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
- Source: Miss. Code Ann. §§ 17-17-1, et seq., 49-2-1, et seq. and 49-17-1, et seq.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.