us-irs-revenue-procedures-irb-2007-1-pdf•Internal Revenue Bulletin 2007-1 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Procedures
Internal Revenue Bulletin 2007-1 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue Procedures
us-irs-revenue-procedures-irb-2007-1-pdfInternal Revenue Bulletin 2007-1 (PDF rendition): IRS Revenue ProceduresGuidance
Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.
Bulletin No. 200 7-1 January 2, 2007 HIGHLIGHTS OF THIS ISSUE These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be relied upon as authoritative interpretations. EMPLOYEE PLANS Rev. Proc. 2007–4, page 118. Rulings and information letters; issuance procedures. Revised procedures are provided for furnishing ruling letters, information letters, etc., on matters related to sections of the Code currently under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Di- vision Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities. Rev. Proc. 2006–4 superseded. Rev. Proc . 2007–5, page 161. Technical advice.Revised procedures are provided for fur- nishing t echnical advice to area managers and appeals offices by the Off ice of the Division Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Governme nt Entities, regarding issues in the employee plans area (inc luding actuarial matters) and in the exempt organiza- tions are a. Rev. Proc. 2006–5 superseded. Rev. Proc. 2007–6, page 189. Employee plans determination letters.Revised proce- dures are provided for issuing determination letters on the qualified status of employee plans under sections 401(a), 403(a), 409, and 4975 of the Code. Rev. Proc. 2006–6 superseded. Rev. Proc. 2007–8, page 230. User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Up-to-date guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for letter rulings, deter- mination letters, etc., on matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Division Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Govern- ment Entities, is provided. Rev. Proc. 2006–8 superseded. EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS Rev. Proc. 2007–4, page 118. Rulings and information letters; issuance procedures. Revised procedures are provided for furnishing ruling letters, information letters, etc., on matters related to sections of the Code currently under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Di- vision Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities. Rev. Proc. 2006–4 superseded. Rev. Proc . 2007–5, page 161. Technical advice.Revised procedures are provided for fur- nishing t echnical advice to area managers and appeals offices by the Off ice of the Division Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Governme nt Entities, regarding issues in the employee plans area (inc luding actuarial matters) and in the exempt organiza- tions are a. Rev. Proc. 2006–5 superseded. Rev. Proc. 2007–8, page 230. User fees for employee plans and exempt organizations. Up-to-date guidance for complying with the user fee program of the Service as it pertains to requests for letter rulings, deter- mination letters, etc., on matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of the Division Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Govern- ment Entities, is provided. Rev. Proc. 2006–8 superseded. Announcement 2007–1, page 243. This announcement is a cumulative listing of names of orga- nizations that are challenging their revocations under section 7428 of the Code. (Continued on the next page) Cumulative List of Declaratory Judgment Proceedings Under Section 7428 for 2006 begins on page 243. Fi nding Lists begin on page ii. ADMINISTRATIVE Rev. Proc. 2007–1, page 1. Letter rulings, information letters, and determination let- ters.This procedure contains revised procedures for letter rulings and information letters issued by the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Insti- tutions and Products), Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), Associate Chief Counsel (International), Asso- ciate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), As- sociate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), and Di- vision Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Gov- ernment Entities). This procedure also contains revised pro- cedures for determination letters issued by the Large and Mid- Size Business Division, Small Business/Self-Employed Division, WageandInvestmentDivision,andTaxExemptandGovern- ment Entities Division. Rev. Proc. 2006–1 superseded. Rev. Proc. 2 007–2, page 88. Technical a dvice and technical expedited advice.This procedure e xplains when and how the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporat e), Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products) , Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Account- ing), Asso ciate Chief Counsel (International), Associate Chief Counsel (P assthroughs and Special Industries), Associate Chief Counsel (P rocedure and Administration), and Division Coun- sel/Asso ciate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Enti- ties) iss ue technical advice memoranda (TAMs) to a director or an appeal s area director. It also explains the rights a taxpayer has when a field office requests a TAM regarding a tax matter. Rev. Proc . 2006–2 superseded. Rev. Proc. 2007–3, page 108. Areas in which rulings will not be issued (domestic ar- eas).This procedure provides a revised list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of the Associates Chief Coun- sel (Corporate, Financial Institutions and Products, Income Tax and Accounting, Passthroughs and Special Industries, and Pro- cedure and Administration), and the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) relating to matters on which the Service will not issue rulings or determi- nation letters. Rev. Proc. 2006–3 superseded. Rev. Proc. 2007–7, page 227. Areas in which rulings will not be issued; Associate Chief Counsel (International).This procedure revises the list of those provisions of the Code under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (International) relating to matters where the Service will not issue rulings or determination letters. Rev. Proc. 2006–7 superseded. January 2, 20072007–1 I.R.B. The IRS Mission Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all. Introduction The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven- tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins, which are sold on a single-copy basis. It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub- stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod- ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin. All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi- cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man- agement are not published; however, statements of internal practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of taxpayers are published. Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory requirements. Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations, court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered, and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same. The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows: Part I.—19 86 Code. This part i ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of the Intern al Revenue Code of 1986. Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation. This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A, Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg- islation and Related Committee Reports. Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous. To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul- ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec- retary (Enforcement). Part IV .—Items of General Interest. This par t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar- ment an d suspension lists, and announcements. The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index for the matters published during the preceding months. These monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period. The c ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. 2007–1 I.R.B.January 2, 2007 January 2, 20072007–1 I.R.B. Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 2007–1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? ................................................ 5 .01Descriptionoftermsusedinthisrevenueprocedure................................................................ 5 .02Updatedannually.............................................................................................. 6 SECTION 2. WHAT IS THE FORM IN WHICH THE SERVICE PROVIDES ADVICE TO TAXPAYERS?........................ 6 .01Letterruling .................................................................................................. 6 .02Closingagreement............................................................................................. 6 .03Determinationletter............................................................................................ 7 .04Informationletter.............................................................................................. 7 .05OralAdvice .................................................................................................. 8 (1)Nooralrulingsandnowrittenrulingsinresponsetooralrequests. ............................................... 8 (2)Discussionpossibleonsubstantiveissues...................................................................... 8 SECTION 3. ON WHAT ISSUES MAY TAXPAYERS REQUEST WRITTEN ADVICE UNDER THIS PROCEDURE? .......................................................................................... 8 .01IssuesunderthejurisdictionoftheAssociateChiefCounsel(Corporate) ............................................. 8 .02IssuesunderthejurisdictionoftheAssociateChiefCounsel(FinancialInstitutionsandProducts) ....................... 8 .03IssuesunderthejurisdictionoftheAssociateChiefCounsel(IncomeTaxandAccounting)............................. 9 .04IssuesunderthejurisdictionoftheAssociateChiefCounsel(International)........................................... 9 .05IssuesunderthejurisdictionoftheAssociateChiefCounsel(PassthroughsandSpecialIndustries) ...................... 9 .06IssuesunderthejurisdictionoftheAssociateChiefCounsel(ProcedureandAdministration) ........................... 9 .07 Issues under the jurisdiction of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and GovernmentEntities) .......................................................................................... 9 SECTION 4. ON WHAT ISSUES MUST WRITTEN ADVICE BE REQUESTED UNDER DIFFERENT PROCEDURES? ......................................................................................... 9 .01 Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes............................................................................. 9 .02Employeeplansandexemptorganizations........................................................................ 9 SECTION 5. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DO THE ASSOCIATE OFFICES ISSUE LETTER RULINGS? ............................................................................................. 10 .01Inincomeandgifttaxmatters.................................................................................. 10 .02SpecialreliefforlateScorporationandrelatedelections .......................................................... 10 .03A§301.9100requestforextensionoftimeformakinganelectionorforotherrelief.................................. 10 .04Determinationsunder§999(d)oftheInternalRevenueCode ...................................................... 11 .05Inmattersinvolving§367..................................................................................... 11 .06Inestatetaxmatters........................................................................................... 11 .07Inmattersinvolvingadditionalestatetaxunder§2032A(c)........................................................ 12 .08Inmattersinvolvingqualifieddomestictrustsunder§2056A...................................................... 12 .09Ingeneration-skippingtransfertaxmatters....................................................................... 12 .10Inemploymentandexcisetaxmatters........................................................................... 12 .11Inadministrativeprovisionsmatters............................................................................. 12 .12InIndiantribalgovernmentmatters............................................................................. 12 .13Onconstructivesalespriceunder§4216(b)or§4218(c).......................................................... 13 .14Maybeissuedbeforetheissuanceofaregulationorotherpublishedguidance....................................... 13 SECTION 6. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES THE SERVICE NOT ISSUE LETTER RULINGS OR DETERMINATION LETTERS? ........................................................................... 13 .01Ordinarilynotiftherequestinvolvesanissueunderexamination,orconsideration,orinlitigation ..................... 13 .02 Ordinarily not in certain areas because of factual nature of the problem............................................. 14 .03Ordinarilynotonpartofanintegratedtransaction................................................................ 14 .04Ordinarilynotonwhichoftwoentitiesisacommonlawemployer................................................. 14 2007–1 I.R.B.1January 2, 2007 .05Generallynottobusinessassociationsorgroups.................................................................. 14 .06 Generally not where the request does not address the tax status, liability, or reporting obligations of therequester................................................................................................. 14 .07Generallynottoforeigngovernments........................................................................... 14 .08Ordinarilynotonfederaltaxconsequencesofproposedlegislation ................................................. 15 .09Notbeforeissuanceofaregulationorotherpublishedguidance.................................................... 15 .10Notonfrivolousissues........................................................................................ 15 .11No“comfort”letterrulings .................................................................................... 15 .12Notonalternativeplansorhypotheticalsituations................................................................ 16 .13Notonpropertyconversionafterreturnfiled .................................................................... 16 .14CircumstancesunderwhichdeterminationlettersarenotissuedbyaDirector........................................ 16 SECTION 7. WHAT ARE THE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUESTING LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS? ........................................................................... 16 .01Certaininformationrequiredinallrequests...................................................................... 16 (1)Completestatementoffactsandotherinformation ............................................................ 16 (2)Copiesofallcontracts,wills,deeds,agreements,instruments,otherdocuments,andforeignlaws................... 17 (3)Analysisofmaterialfacts .................................................................................. 17 (4)Statementregardingwhethersameissueisinanearlierreturn .................................................. 17 (5) Statement regarding whether same or similar issue was previously ruled on or requested, or is currentlypending ......................................................................................... 18 (6)Statementregardinginterpretationofasubstantiveprovisionofanincomeorestatetaxtreaty...................... 18 (7)LetterfromBureauofIndianAffairsrelatingtoIndiantribalgovernment ........................................ 18 (8)Statementofsupportingauthorities.......................................................................... 19 (9)Statementofcontraryauthorities. ........................................................................... 19 (10)Statementidentifyingpendinglegislation ................................................................... 19 (11) Statement identifying information to be deleted from copy of letter ruling or determination letter forpublicinspection....................................................................................... 19 (12)Signaturebytaxpayerorauthorizedrepresentative........................................................... 20 (13)Authorizedrepresentatives................................................................................ 20 (14)Powerofattorneyanddeclarationofrepresentative .......................................................... 21 (15)Penaltiesofperjurystatement ............................................................................. 22 (16)Numberofcopiesofrequesttobesubmitted ................................................................ 22 (17)Sampleformatforaletterrulingrequest .................................................................... 22 (18)Checklistforletterrulingrequests.......................................................................... 22 .02Additionalproceduralinformationrequiredwithrequest .......................................................... 23 (1)Torequestseparateletterrulingsformultipleissuesinasinglesituation ......................................... 23 (2) Power of attorney used to indicate recipient of a copy or copies of a letter ruling or a determinationletter ....................................................................................... 23 (3)Torequestaparticularconclusiononaproposedtransaction.................................................... 23 (4)Torequestexpeditedhandling .............................................................................. 24 (5) Taxpayer requests to receive any document related to the letter ruling request by facsimile transmission(fax)......................................................................................... 25 (6)Torequestaconference.................................................................................... 26 .03Addresstosendtherequest.................................................................................... 26 .04Pendingletterrulingrequests .................................................................................. 26 .05Whentoattachletterrulingtoreturn............................................................................ 27 .06Howtocheckonstatusofrequest .............................................................................. 27 .07RequestmaybewithdrawnorAssociateofficemaydeclinetoissueletterruling ..................................... 27 SECTION 8. HOW DO THE ASSOCIATE OFFICES HANDLE LETTER RULING REQUESTS?.............................. 28 .01 Docket, Records, and User Fee Branch receives,initially controls and refers the request to the appropriateAssociateoffice ................................................................................... 28 .02BranchrepresentativeoftheAssociateofficecontactstaxpayerwithin21days....................................... 28 .03Determinesiftransactioncanbemodifiedtoobtainfavorableletterruling........................................... 28 .04Isnotboundbyinformalopinionexpressed...................................................................... 29 .05Additionalinformation........................................................................................ 29 (1)Additionalinformationmustbesubmittedwithin21days...................................................... 29 January 2, 200722007–1 I.R.B. (2)Extensionofreplyperiodifjustifiedandapproved............................................................ 29 (3)Letterrulingrequestclosedifthetaxpayerdoesnottimelysubmitadditionalinformation.......................... 29 (4)Penaltiesofperjurystatement .............................................................................. 29 (5)Faxingrequestandadditionalinformation ................................................................... 30 (6)Addresstosendadditionalinformation ...................................................................... 30 (7)Identifyinginformation .................................................................................... 30 (8)Numberofcopies ......................................................................................... 31 .06 Near the completion of the rulingprocess, advises the taxpayer ofconclusions and, if the Associate officewillruleadversely,offersthetaxpayertheopportunitytowithdrawtheletterrulingrequest...................... 31 .07Mayrequestdraftofproposedletterrulingnearthecompletionoftherulingprocess.................................. 31 .08 Issues separate letter rulings for substantially identical letter rulings and generally issues a single letterrulingforrelated§301.9100letter......................................................................... 31 .09SendsacopyoftheletterrulingtoappropriateServiceofficial..................................................... 31 SECTION 9. WHAT ARE THE SPECIFIC AND ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES FOR A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING METHOD FROM THE ASSOCIATE OFFICES? .................................. 31 .01Automaticandadvanceconsentchangeinaccountingmethodrequests.............................................. 32 (1)Automaticchangeinaccountingmethod..................................................................... 32 (2) Advance consent change in accounting method............................................................... 32 .02 Ordinarily only one change in accounting method on a Form 3115 and a separate Form 3115 for each taxpayer and for each separate and distinct trade or business....................................................... 32 .03InformationrequiredwithaForm3115.......................................................................... 32 (1)FactsandotherinformationrequestedonForm3115andinapplicablerevenueprocedures......................... 32 (2)Statementofcontraryauthorities............................................................................ 33 (3)Copiesofallcontracts,agreements,andotherdocuments ...................................................... 33 (4)Analysisofmaterialfacts .................................................................................. 33 (5)Informationregardingwhethersameissueisinanearlierreturn................................................. 33 (6) Statement regarding prior requests for a change in accounting method and other pending requests................... 33 (7)Statementidentifyingpendinglegislation .................................................................... 34 (8)Authorizedrepresentatives ................................................................................. 34 (9)Powerofattorneyanddeclarationofrepresentative ........................................................... 34 (10)Penaltiesofperjurystatement ............................................................................. 34 .04Additionalproceduralinformationrequiredincertaincircumstances................................................ 35 (1)Recipientsoforiginalandcopyofcorrespondence ............................................................ 35 (2)Torequestexpeditedhandling .............................................................................. 35 (3) To receive the change in accounting method letterruling or any other correspondence related to a Form3115byfacsimiletransmission(fax) ................................................................... 35 (4)Torequestaconference.................................................................................... 35 .05AssociateofficeaddressforForms3115......................................................................... 35 .06AForm3115mustnotbesubmittedbyfax...................................................................... 37 .07Form3115controlledandreferredtotheappropriateAssociateoffice............................................... 37 .08Additionalinformation........................................................................................ 37 (1)IncompleteForm3115..................................................................................... 37 (2)Requestforextensionofreplyperiod........................................................................ 37 (3)Penaltiesofperjurystatement............................................................................... 38 (4)Identifyinginformation .................................................................................... 38 (5)Faxinginformationrequestandadditionalinformation......................................................... 38 (6)Addresstosendadditionalinformation....................................................................... 38 (7)Iftaxpayerdoesnottimelysubmitadditionalinformation...................................................... 39 .09CircumstancesinwhichthetaxpayermustnotifytheAssociateoffice............................................... 39 .10Determinesifproposedaccountingmethodcanbemodifiedtoobtainfavorableletterruling........................... 40 .11 Near the completion of processing the Form 3115,advises the taxpayer if the Associate office will ruleadverselyandoffersthetaxpayertheopportunitytowithdrawForm3115 ....................................... 40 .12 Advance consent Form 3115 may be withdrawn or Associateofficemaydeclinetoissueachangein accounting method letter ruling................................................................................. 40 .13HowtocheckstatusofapendingForm3115..................................................................... 40 .14Isnotboundbyinformalopinionexpressed...................................................................... 40 2007–1 I.R.B.3January 2, 2007 .15 Single letter ruling issued to a taxpayer or consolidated group for qualifying identical change in accounting method............................................................................................ 40 .16Letterrulingordinarilynotissuedforoneoftwoormoreinterrelateditemsorsubmethods............................ 41 .17ConsentAgreement........................................................................................... 41 .18 A copy of the change in accounting method letterruling is sent to appropriate Service official......................... 41 .19 Consent to change an accounting method may be relied on subject to limitations..................................... 41 .20Changeinaccountingmethodletterrulingwillnotapplytoanothertaxpayer ........................................ 41 .21 Associate office discretion to permit requested change in accounting method........................................ 41 .22 List of automatic change in accounting method request procedures................................................. 42 .23OthersectionsofthisrevenueprocedurethatareapplicabletoaForm3115.......................................... 45 SECTION 10. HOW ARE CONFERENCES FOR LETTER RULINGS SCHEDULED?........................................ 46 .01Schedulesaconferenceifrequestedbytaxpayer.................................................................. 46 .02Permitstaxpayeroneconferenceofright........................................................................ 46 .03Disallowsverbatimrecordingofconferences..................................................................... 47 .04Makestentativerecommendationsonsubstantiveissues........................................................... 47 .05Mayofferadditionalconferences............................................................................... 47 .06Requireswrittenconfirmationofinformationpresentedatconference............................................... 47 .07Mayscheduleapre-submissionconference...................................................................... 47 .08Mayscheduleaconferencetobeheldbytelephone............................................................... 49 SECTION 11. WHAT EFFECT WILL A LETTER RULING HAVE?....................................................... 49 .01Maybereliedonsubjecttolimitations.......................................................................... 49 .02Willnotapplytoanothertaxpayer.............................................................................. 49 .03Willbeusedbyafieldofficeinexaminingthetaxpayer’sreturn ................................................... 49 .04Mayberevokedormodifiediffoundtobeinerrorortherehasbeenachangeinlaw................................. 49 .05Letterrulingrevokedormodifiedbasedonmaterialchangeinfactsappliedretroactively.............................. 50 .06Nototherwisegenerallyrevokedormodifiedretroactively......................................................... 50 .07Retroactiveeffectofrevocationormodificationappliedtoaparticulartransaction.................................... 50 .08Retroactiveeffectofrevocationormodificationappliedtoacontinuingactionorseriesofactions...................... 51 .09Generallynotretroactivelyrevokedormodifiedifrelatedtosaleorleasesubjecttoexcisetax......................... 51 .10 May be retroactively revoked ormodified when transaction is entered into before the issuance of the letterruling.................................................................................................. 51 .11Taxpayermayrequestthatretroactivitybelimited................................................................ 51 (1)Requestforreliefunder§7805(b)mustbemadeinrequiredformat............................................. 51 (2)Taxpayermayrequestaconferenceonapplicationof§7805(b)................................................. 52 SECTION 12. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DO DIRECTORS ISSUE DETERMINATION LETTERS?................... 52 .01Inincomeandgifttaxmatters.................................................................................. 52 .02Inestatetaxmatters........................................................................................... 53 .03Ingeneration-skippingtransfertaxmatters....................................................................... 53 .04Inemploymentandexcisetaxmatters........................................................................... 53 .05Requestsconcerningincome,estate,orgifttaxreturns............................................................ 53 .06Attachacopyofdeterminationlettertotaxpayer’sreturn.......................................................... 53 .07Reviewofdeterminationletters ................................................................................ 53 .08Addressestosenddeterminationletterrequests................................................................... 53 SECTION 13. WHAT EFFECT WILL A DETERMINATION LETTER HAVE?.............................................. 53 .01Hassameeffectasaletterruling ............................................................................... 53 .02Taxpayermayrequestthatretroactiveeffectofrevocationormodificationbelimited................................. 54 (1)Requestforreliefunder§7805(b)mustbemadeinrequiredformat............................................. 54 (2)Taxpayermayrequestaconferenceonapplicationof§7805(b)................................................. 54 SECTION 14. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES ARE MATTERS REFERRED BETWEEN A DIRECTOR ANDANASSOCIATEOFFICE? .......................................................................... 54 .01Requestsfordeterminationletters .............................................................................. 54 .02No-ruleareas ................................................................................................ 54 .03Requestsforletterrulings ..................................................................................... 54 .04LetterrulingrequestmistakenlysenttoaDirector................................................................ 55 January 2, 200742007–1 I.R.B. SECTION 15. WHAT ARE THE USER FEE REQUIREMENTS FOR REQUESTS FOR LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS? ...................................................................... 55 .01Legislationauthorizinguserfees ............................................................................... 55 .02Requeststowhichauserfeeapplies ............................................................................ 55 .03Requeststowhichauserfeedoesnotapply...................................................................... 55 .04Exemptionsfromtheuserfeerequirements...................................................................... 55 .05Feeschedule................................................................................................. 56 .06 Applicable user fee for a request involving multiple offices, fee categories, issues, transactions, or entities...................................................................................................... 56 .07 Applicable user fee for requests for substantially identical letter rulings or identical accounting methodchanges.............................................................................................. 56 .08Methodofpayment........................................................................................... 58 .09Effectofnonpaymentorpaymentofincorrectamount ............................................................ 58 .10Refundsofuserfee........................................................................................... 59 .11Requestforreconsiderationofuserfee.......................................................................... 60 SECTION 16. WHAT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO REV. PROC. 2006–1?............................... 61 SECTION 17. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE ON OTHER DOCUMENTS?....................... 61 SECTION 18. WHAT IS THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE?...................................... 61 SECTION 19. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT........................................................................ 61 DRAFTING INFORMATION......................................................................................... 62 INDEX............................................................................................................ 63 APPENDIX A—SCHEDULE OF USER FEES........................................................................... 66 APPENDIX B—SAMPLE FORMAT FOR A LETTER RULING REQUEST................................................. 71 APPENDIX C—CHECKLIST FOR A LETTER RULING REQUEST....................................................... 74 APPENDIX D—LIST OF SMALL BUSINESS/SELF-EMPLOYED OPERATING DIVISION (SB/SE) OFFICES FOR REQUESTING DETERMINATION LETTERS ......................................................... 79 APPENDIX E—CHECKLISTS, GUIDELINE REVENUE PROCEDURES, NOTICES, SAFE HARBOR REVENUE PROCEDURES, AND AUTOMATIC CHANGE REVENUE PROCEDURES ........................... 81 .01Checklists,guidelinerevenueprocedures,andnotices............................................................. 81 .02Safeharborrevenueprocedures ................................................................................ 85 .03Automaticchangerevenueprocedures .......................................................................... 87 SECTION 1. WHA TISTHE PURPOSE OF THI S REVENUE PROCEDURE? This revenue p rocedure explains how the Service provides advice to taxpayers on issues un- der the jurisd iction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial In stitutions and Products), the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Account- ing), the Asso ciate Chief Counsel (International), the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special I ndustries), the Associate Chief Counsel(Procedure and Administration), and the Division Cou nsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exemptand Government Entities). It explains the forms of a dvice and the manner in which advice is requested by taxpayers and provided by the Service. A sample format of a request for a letter ruling is provided in Appendix B.See section 4 of t his revenue procedure for issues outside the scope of this revenue procedure. Description of terms used in this revenue procedure .01For purposes of this revenue procedure— (1) the term “Service” includesthe Internal Revenue Service, the four operating divisions of the Internal Revenue Service that are responsible for meeting the needs of the taxpayers they serve, and the Associate offices. The four operating divisions are: (a) Large and Mid-Size Business Division (LMSB), which generally serves corporations, including S corporations, and partnerships, with assets in excess of $10 million; Sec. 1.01 2007–1 I.R.B.5January 2, 2007 (b) Small Business/Self-Employed Division (SB/SE), which generally serves corporations, including S corporations, and partnerships, with assets less than or equal to $10 million; estates and trusts; individuals filing an individual federal income tax return with accompanying Sched- ule C (Profit or Loss From Business (Sole Proprietorship)), Schedule E (Supplemental Income and Loss), Schedule F (Profit or Loss From Farming), Form 2106,Employee Business Ex- penses, or Form 2106–EZ,Unreimbursed Employee Business Expenses; and individuals with international tax returns; (c) Wage and Investment Division (W&I), which generally serves individuals with wage and investment income only (and with no international tax returns) filing an individual federal income tax return without accompanying Schedule C, E, or F, or Form 2106 or Form 2106–EZ; and (d) Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division (TE/GE), which serves three distinct taxpayer segments: employee plans, exempt organizations, and government entities. (2) the term “Associate office” refers to the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), the Office of As- sociate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), or the Office of Divi- sion Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities), as appropriate. (3) the term “Director” refers to the Director, Field Operations, LMSB; the Area Director, Field Examination, SB/SE; Chief, Estate & Gift Tax Operations, SB/SE; Chief, Employment Tax Operations, SB/SE; Chief, Excise Tax Operations, SB/SE; or the Director, Compliance, W&I; the Deputy Commissioner, International,LMSB; the Director, Employee Plans Exami- nations; the Director, Exempt Organizations Examinations; the Director, Federal, State & Local Governments; the Director, Tax Exempt Bonds; or the Director, Indian Tribal Governments, as appropriate. (4) the term “field office” refers to the respective offices of the Directors, as appropriate. (5) the term “taxpayer” includes all persons subject to any provision of the Internal Revenue Code (including issuers of § 103 obligations) and, when appropriate, their representatives. Updated annually.02This revenue procedure is updated annually as the first revenue procedure of the year, but may be modified or amplified during the year. SECTION 2. WHAT IS THE FORM IN WHICH THE SERVICE PROVIDES ADVICE TO TAXPAYERS? The Service provides advice in the form of letter rulings, closing agreements, determination letters, information letters, and oral advice. Letter ruling.01A “letter ruling” is a written determination issued to a taxpayer by an Associate office in response to a written inquiry from an individual or an organization about its status for tax purposes or the tax effects of its acts or transactions, prior to the filing of returns or reports that are required by the revenue laws. A letter ruling interprets and applies the tax laws to the taxpayer’s specific set offacts and is given when appropriate in the interest of sound tax administration. A letter ruling includes the written permission or denial of permission by an Associate office to a request for a change ina taxpayer’s accounting method or accounting period. Once issued, a letter ruling may be revoked or modified for any number of reasons, as explained in section 11 (section 9.19 for a change in accounting method letter ruling) of this revenue procedure, unless it is accompanied by a “closing agreement.” Closing agreement.02A “closing agreement” is a final agreement between the Service and a taxpayer on a specific issue or liability. It is entered into under the authority in § 7121 and is final unless fraud, malfeasance, or misrepresentation of a material fact can be shown. Sec. 1.01 January 2, 200762007–1 I.R.B. A taxpayer may request a closing agreement with the letter ruling, or in lieu of a letter ruling, with respect to a transaction that would be eligible for a letter ruling. In such situations, the Associate Chief Counsel with subject matter jurisdiction signs the closing agreement on behalf of the Service. A closing agreement may be entered into when it is advantageous to have the matter perma- nently and conclusively closed or when a taxpayer can show that there are good reasons for an agreement and that making the agreement will not prejudice the interests of the Government. In appropriate cases, a taxpayer may be asked to enter into a closing agreement as a condition for the issuance of a letter ruling. If, in a single case, a closing agreement is requested for each person or entity in a class of taxpayers, separate agreements are entered into only if the class consists of 25 or fewer taxpay- ers. If the issue and holding are identical for theclass and there are more than 25 taxpayers in the class, a “mass closing agreement” will be entered into with the taxpayer who is authorized by the others to represent the class. Determination letter.03A “determination letter” is a written determination issued by a Director that applies the principles and precedents previously announcedby the Service to a specific set of facts. It is issued only when a determination can be made based on clearly established rules in a statute, a tax treaty, the regulations, a conclusion in a revenue ruling, or an opinion or court decision that represents the position of the Service. Information letter.04An “information letter” is a statement issuedeither by an Associate office or by a Direc- tor. It calls attention to a well-established interpretation or principle of tax law (including a tax treaty) without applying it to a specific set of facts. An information letter may be issued if the taxpayer’s inquiry indicates a need for generalinformation or if the taxpayer’s request does not meet the requirements of this revenue procedure and the Service thinks that general infor- mation will help the taxpayer. An information letter is advisory only and has no binding effect on the Service. If the Associate office issues an information letter in response to a request for a letter ruling that does not meet the requirements of this revenue procedure, the information letter is not a substitute for a letter ruling. The taxpayer should provide a daytime telephone number with the taxpayer’s request for an information letter. Information letters that are issued by the Associate offices to members of the public are made available to the public. Information letters that are issued by the field offices are not made available to the public. Because information letters do not constitute written determinations as defined in § 6110, they are not subject to public inspection under § 6110. The Service makes the information letters available to the public under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). Before any information letter is made available to the public, an Associate office will delete any name, address, and other identifying information as appropriate under the FOIA (for example, FOIA personal privacy exemption of 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6) and tax details exempt pursuant to § 6103, as incorporated into FOIAby 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3)). The following documents also will not be available for public inspection as part of this process: (1) transmittal letters in which the Service furnishes publications or other publicly available material to taxpayers, without any significant legal discussion; (2) responses to taxpayer or third party contacts that are inquiries with respect to a pending request for: a letter ruling, technical advicememorandum, or Chief Counsel Advice (which are subject to public inspection under § 6110 after their issuance); and (3) responses to taxpayer or third party communications with respect to any investigation, audit, litigation, or other enforcement action. Sec. 2.04 2007–1 I.R.B.7January 2, 2007 Oral Advice.05 (1) No oral rulings and no written rulings in response to oral requests. The Service does not orally issue letter rulings ordetermination letters, nor does it issue letter rulings or determination letters in response to oral requests from taxpayers. Service employees ordinarily will discuss with taxpayers or their representatives inquiries regarding whether the Service will rule on particular issues and questions relating to procedural matters about sub- mitting requests for letter rulings or determination letters for a particular case. (2) Discussion possible on substantive issues. At the discretion of the Service and as time permits, substantive issues also may be dis- cussed. Such a discussion will not be binding on the Service in general or on the Office of Chief Counsel in particular and cannot be relied upon as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). Substantive tax issues involving the taxpayerthat are under examination, in Appeals, or in litigation will not be discussed by Service employees not directly involved in the examination, appeal, or litigation of the issues unless the discussion is coordinated with those Service em- ployees who are directly involved in the examination, appeal, or litigation of the issues. The taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative ordinarily will be asked whether the oral request for advice or information relates to a matter pendingbefore another office of the Service or before a federal court. If a tax issue is not under examination, in appeals, or in litigation, the tax issue may be discussed even though the issue is affected by a nontax issue pending in litigation. A taxpayer may seek oral technical guidance from a taxpayer service representative in a field office or Service Center when preparing a return or report. Oral guidance is advisory only, and the Service is not bound to recognize it, for example, in the examination of the taxpayer’s return. The Service does not respond to letters seeking to confirm the substance of oral discussions and the absence of a response to such a letter is not a confirmation. SECTION3.ONWHATISSUES MAY TAXPAYERS REQUEST WRITTEN ADVICE UNDER THIS PROCEDURE? Taxpayers may request letter rulings, information letters, and closing agreements under this revenue procedure on issues within the jurisdiction of the Associate offices. Taxpayers uncer- tain as to whether an Associate has jurisdictionwith regard to a specific factual situation may call the telephone number for the Associate office listed in section 10.07(1) of this revenue procedure. Taxpayers also may request determination letters from the Director in the appropriate oper- ating division on subjects that relate to the Code sections under the jurisdiction of the respective Associate offices.Seesection 12.08 of this revenue procedure for information on where to send the requests for determination letters. Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) .01Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) include those that involve consolidated returns, corporate acquisitions, reorganizations, liquidations, redemptions, spinoffs, transfers to controlled corporations, distributions to shareholders, cor- porate bankruptcies, the effect of certain ownership changes on net operating loss carryovers and other tax attributes, debt vs. equity determinations, allocation of income and deductions among taxpayers, acquisitions made to evade or avoid income tax, and certain earnings and profits questions. Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products) .02Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products) include those that involve income taxes and accounting method changes of banks, savings and loan associations, real estate investment trusts (REITs), regulated investment com- panies (RICs), real estate mortgage investmentconduits (REMICs), insurance companies and products, and financial products. Sec. 2.05 January 2, 200782007–1 I.R.B. Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting) .03Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Account- ing) include those that involve recognition and timing of income and deductions of individuals and corporations, sales and exchanges, capital gains and losses, installment sales, equipment leasing, long-term contracts, inventories, the alternative minimum tax, net operating losses generally, including accounting method changes for these issues, and accounting periods. Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (International) .04Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Inte rnational) include the tax treatment of nonresident aliens and foreign corporations, withho lding of tax on nonresident aliens and foreign corporations, foreign tax credit, determination o f sources of income, income from sources without the United States, subpart F questions, domest ic international sales cor- porations (DISCs), foreign sales corporations (FSCs), exclusions under § 114 for extraterrito- rial income (ETI) pursuant to § 941(a)(5)(A), international boycot t determinations, treatment of certain passive foreign investment companies, income affected by treaty, and other matters relating to the activities of non-U.S. persons within the United St ates or U.S.-related persons outside the United States, and accounting method changes. For the procedures to obtain advance pricing agreements under § 482,seeRev. Proc. 2004–40, 2004–2 C.B. 50. For competent authority procedures related to bilateral and multilateral advance pricing agreements,seeRev. Proc. 2006–54, 2006–49 I.R.B. 1035. Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) .05Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) include those that involve incometaxes of S corporations (except accounting pe- riods and methods) and certain noncorporate taxpayers (including partnerships, common trust funds, and trusts), entity classification, estate, gift, generation-skipping transfer, and certain excise taxes, amortization, depreciation, depletion, and other engineering issues, accounting method changes for depreciation and amortization, cooperative housing corporations, farmers’ cooperatives (under § 521), thelow-income housing, disabled access, and qualified electric ve- hicle credits, research and experimental expenditures, shipowners’ protection and indemnity associations (under § 526), and certainhomeowners associations (under § 528). Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) .06Issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Admin- istration) include those that involve federal taxprocedure and administration, disclosure and privacy law, reporting and paying taxes, assessingand collecting taxes (including interest and penalties), abating, crediting, or refunding overassessments or overpayments of tax, and filing information returns. Issues under the juris diction of the Division Counsel/ Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exe mpt and Government Entities) .07Issues under the ju risdiction of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Ex- empt and Government En tities) include those that involve income tax and other tax aspects of executive compensati on and employee benefit programs, including accounting method changes for these issues (othe r than those within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entit ies Division), section 457 arrangements, employment taxes, taxes on self-employment inc ome, tax-exempt obligations, mortgage credit certificates, qualified zone academy bonds (QZABS ), and federal, state, local, and Indian tribal governments. SECTION4.ONWHATISSUES MUST WRITTEN ADVICE BE REQUESTED UNDER DIFFERENT PROCEDURES? Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes .01The procedures for obtaining letter rulings, etc., that apply to federal alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes under subtitle E of the Code are under the jurisdiction of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau of the Department of the Treasury. Employee plans and exempt organizations .02The procedures for obtainingletter rulings, determination letters, etc., on employee plans and exempt organizations are under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division.SeeRev. Proc. 2007–4, this Bulletin.See alsoRev. Proc. 2007–6, this Bulletin, for the procedures for issuing determination letters on the qualified sta- tus of pension, profit-sharing, stock bonus, annuity, and employee stock ownership plans under Sec. 4.02 2007–1 I.R.B.9January 2, 2007 §§ 401, 403(a), 409, and 4975(e)(7), and the status for exemption of any related trusts or cus- todial accounts under § 501(a). For the user fee requirements applicable to requests for letter rulings, determination letters, etc., under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Divi- sion,seeRev. Proc. 2007–8, this Bulletin. SECTION 5. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DO THE ASSOCIATE OFFICES ISSUE LETTER RULINGS? In income and gift tax matters.01In income and gift tax matters, an Associate office generally issues a letter ruling on a proposed transaction or on a completed transaction if the letter ruling request is submitted before the return is filed for the year inwhich the transaction is completed. Special relief for late S corporation and related elections .02In lieu of requesting a letter ruling under this revenue procedure, a taxpayer may obtain relief for certain late S corporation and related elections by followingthe procedures in Rev. Proc. 2004–49, 2004–2 C.B. 210; Rev. Proc. 2004–48, 2004–2 C.B. 172; Rev. Proc. 2003–43, 2003–1 C.B. 998, or Rev. Proc. 97–48, 1997–2 C.B. 521. These procedures, which are in lieu of the letter ruling process, do not require payment of any user fee.Seesection 4.04 of Rev. Proc. 2004–49, section 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2004–48, section 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2003–43, section 3 of Rev. Proc. 97–48, and section 15.03(3) of this revenue procedure. A § 301.9100 request for extension of time for making an election or for other relief .03An Associate office will consider a requestfor an extension of time for making an elec- tion or other application for relief under § 301.9100–3 of the Regulations on Procedure and Ad- ministration, even if submitted after the return covering the issue presented in the § 301.9100 request has been filed, an examination of the return has begun, or the issues in the return are being considered by Appeals or a federal court.A § 301.9100 request is a letter ruling request. Therefore, the § 301.9100 request should be submitted pursuant to this revenue procedure. An election made pursuant to § 301.9100–2 for an automatic extension of time is not a letter rul- ing request and does not require payment of any user fee.See§ 301.9100–2(d) and section 15.03(1) of this revenue procedure. (1)Formatofrequest.A § 301.9100 request (other than an election made pursuant to § 301.9100–2) must be in the general form of, and meet the general requirements for, a letter ruling request. These requirements are given in section 7 of this revenue procedure. In addi- tion, a § 301.9100 request must include the information required by § 301.9100–3(e). (2) Period of limitations.The running of any applicable period of limitations is not suspended for the period during which a § 301.9100 request has been filed.See § 301.9100–3(d)(2). If the period of limitation on assessment under § 6501(a) for the taxable year in which an election should have been made or any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made will expire before receipt of a § 301.9100 letter ruling, the Associate office ordinarily will not issue a § 301.9100 ruling. See§ 301.9100–3(c)(1)(ii). If, however, the taxpayer secures consent to extend the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(c)(4), the Associate office may issue the letter ruling. Note that the filing of a claim for refund under § 6511 does not extend the period of limitation on assessment. If § 301.9100 relief is granted, the Associate office may require the taxpayer to consent to an extension of the periodoflimitationonassessment.See§ 301.9100–3(d)(2). (3) Taxpayer must notify the Associate office if examination of its return begins while the request is pending.If the Service starts an examination of the taxpayer’s return for the taxableyearinwhichanelectionshouldhavebeen made or any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made while a § 301.9100 request is pending, the taxpayer must notify the Associate office. This notification must include the name and telephone number of the examining agent.See§ 301.9100–3(e)(4)(i) and section 7.04(1)(b) of this revenue procedure. Sec. 4.02 January 2, 2007102007–1 I.R.B. (4) Associate office will notify examination agents, appeals officer, or government coun- sel of a § 301.9100 request if the taxpayer’s return is being examined by a field office or is being considered by Appeals or a federal court.If the taxpayer’s return for the taxable year in which an election should have been made or any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made is beingexamined by a field office or considered by Appeals or a federal court, the Associate office will notify the appropriate examining agent, appeals officer, or government counsel that a§ 301.9100 request has been submitted to the As- sociate office. The examining officer, appeals officer, or government counsel is not authorized to deny consideration of a § 301.9100 request. The letter ruling will be mailed to the taxpayer and a copy will be sent to the appropriate Service official in the operating division that has examination jurisdiction of the taxpayer’s taxreturn, appeals officer, or government counsel. (5) Relief for late initial classification election.In lieu of requesting a letter ruling under § 301.9100–1 through § 301.9100–3 and this revenue procedure, an entity newly formed under local law may apply for late classification election relief under Rev. Proc. 2002–59, 2002–2 C.B. 615. Requests for such relief are not subject to user fees.Seesection 3 of Rev. Proc. 2002–59 and section 15.03(2) of this revenue procedure. Determinations under § 999(d) of the Internal Revenue Code .04As provided in Rev. Proc. 77–9, 1977–1 C.B. 542, the Associate Chief Counsel (Inter- national) issues determinations under § 999(d) that may deny certain benefits of the foreign tax credit, deferral of earnings of foreign subsidiaries and domesticinternational sales corpora tions (DISCs) to a person, if that person, is a member of a controlled group (within the meaning of § 993(a)(3)) that includes the person, or a foreign corporation of which a member of the con- trolled group is a United States shareholder, agrees to participate in, or cooperate with, an international boycott. The same principles shall apply with respect toexclusions under § 114 for exterritorial income (ETI) pursuant to § 941(a)(5)(A). Requests for determinations unde r Rev. Proc. 77–9 are letter ruling requests and, therefore, should be submitted to the Associa te office pursuant to this revenue procedure. In matters involving § 367.05Unlesstheissueiscoveredbysection6ofthis revenue procedure, the Associate Chief Counsel (International) may issue a letter ruling under § 367 even if the taxpayer does not request a letter ruling as to the characterization of the transaction under the reorganization provisions of the Code. The Associate office will determine the § 367 consequences of a trans- action based on the taxpayer’s characterization of the transaction but will indicate in the letter ruling that it expresses no opinion as to the characterization of the transaction under the reor- ganization. The Associate office may decline to issue a § 367 ruling in situations in which the taxpayer inappropriately characterizes the transaction under the reorganization provisions. In estate tax matters.06In general, the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) issues letter rulings on transactions affecting the estate tax on the prospective estate of a living person. TheAssociateofficewillnotissueletterrulingsfor prospective estateson computations of tax, actuarial factors, and factual matters. With respect to the transactions affecting the estate tax of the decedent’s estate, generally, the Associate office issues letter rulings before the decedent’s estate tax return is filed. If the taxpayer is requesting a letter ruling regarding a decedent’s estate tax and the estate tax return is due to be filed before the letter ruling is expected to be issued, the taxpayer should obtain an extension of time for filing the return and should notify the Associate office branch considering the letter ruling request that an extension has been obtained. If the return is filed before the letter ruling is received from the Associate office, the taxpayer must disclose on the return that a letter ruling has been requested, attach a copy of the pending letter ruling request to the return, and notify theAssociate office that the return has been filed. Seesection 7.04 of this revenue procedure. The Associate office will make every effort to issue the letter ruling within 3 months of the date the return was filed. If the taxpayer requests a letter ruling after the return is filed, but before the return is exam- ined, the taxpayer must notify the field office having jurisdiction over the return, that a letter ruling has been requested, attach a copy of thepending letter ruling request, and notify the Sec. 5.06 2007–1 I.R.B.11January 2, 2007 Associate office that a return has been filed.Seesection 7.04 of this revenue procedure. The Associate office will make every effort to issue the letter ruling within 3 months of the date the return has been filed. If the letter ruling cannot be issued within that 3-month period, the Associate office will notify the field office having jurisdictionover the return, who may, by memorandum to the Associate office, grant an additional period for the issuance of the letter ruling. In matters involving additional estate tax under § 2032A(c) .07In matters involving additional estate tax under § 2032A(c), the Associate Chief Coun- sel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) issues letter rulings onproposed transactions and on completed transactions that occurred before the return is filed. In matters involving qualified domestic trusts under § 2056A .08In matters involving qualified domestic trusts under § 2056A, the Associate Chief Coun- sel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) issues letter rulings onproposed transactions and on completed transactions that occurred before the return is filed. In generation-skipping transfer tax matters .09In general, the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) issues letter rulings on proposed transactions that affect the generation-skipping transfer tax and on completed transactions that occurred before the return is filed. In the case of a generation- skipping trust or trust equivalent, letter rulingsare issued either before or after the trust or trust equivalent has been established. In employment and excise tax matters .10In employment and excise tax matters, the Associate offices issue letter rulings on pro- posed transactions and on completed transactions either before or after the return is filed for those transactions. Requests regarding employment status (employer/employee relationship) from federal agencies and instrumentalities should be submitted directly to the Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). Requests regarding employment status from other taxpayers must first be submitted to the appropriate Service office listed on the current Form SS–8 (Rev. June 2003).Seesection 12.04 of this revenue procedure. Generally, the employer is the taxpayer and requests the letter ruling. If the worker asks for the letter ruling, both the worker and the employer are considered to be the taxpayer and both are entitled to the letter ruling. In administrative provisions matters .11The Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure andAdministration) issues letter rulings on matters arising under the Code and related statutes and regulations that involve— (1) the time, place, manner, and proceduresfor reporting and paying taxes; or (2) the filing of information returns. In Indian tribal governmen t matters .12Pursuant to Rev. Proc. 8 4–37, 1984–1 C.B. 513, as modified by Rev. Proc. 86–17, 1986–1 C.B. 550, and Rev. P roc. 2007–1, this revenue procedure, the Office of Division Coun- sel/Associate Chief Coun sel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) issues determinations rec- ognizing a tribal entity a s an Indian tribal government within the meaning of § 7701(a)(40) or as a political subdivisio n of an Indian tribal government under § 7871(d) if it determines, after consultation with the Sec retary of the Interior, that the entity satisfies the statutory definition of an Indian tribal governme nt or has been delegated governmental functions of an Indian tribal government. Requests fo r determinations under Rev. Proc. 84–37 are letter ruling requests, and, therefore, should b e submitted to the Office of DivisionCounsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Governme nt Entities) pursuant to this revenue procedure. (1) Definition of Indian tribal government.The term “Indian tribal government” is de- fined under § 7701(a)(40) to mean the governing body of any tribe, band, community, village or group of Indians, or (if applicable) Alaska Natives, that is determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, after consultation with the Secretary of the Interior, to exercise governmental functions. Section 7871(d) provides that, forpurposes of § 7871, a subdivision of an Indian tribal government shall be treated as a political subdivision of a state if the Secretary of the Treasury determines, after consultation with theSecretary of the Interior, that the subdivision Sec. 5.06 January 2, 2007122007–1 I.R.B. has been delegated the right to exercise one or more of the substantial governmental functions of the Indian tribal government. (2) Inclusion in list of tribal governments.Rev. Proc. 2002–64, 2002–2 C.B. 717, pro- vides a list of Indian tribal governments that aretreated similarly to states for certain federal tax purposes. Rev. Proc. 84–36, 1984–1 C.B. 510, as modified by Rev. Proc. 86–17, provides a list of political subdivisions of Indian tribalgovernments that are treated as political subdi- visions of states for certain federal tax purposes. Under Rev. Proc. 84–37, tribal governments or subdivisions recognized under § 7701(a)(40) or § 7871(d) will be included in the list of rec- ognized tribal government entities in revised versions of Rev. Proc. 2002–64 or Rev. Proc. 84–36. On constructive sales price under § 4216(b) or § 4218(c) .13The Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) will issue letter rul- ings in all cases on the determination of a constructive sales price under § 4216(b) or § 4218(c) and in all other cases on prospective transactionsif the law or regulations require a determina- tion of the effect of a proposed transaction for tax purposes. Maybeissuedbeforetheissuance of a regulation or other published guidance .14Unless the issue is covered by section 6 of this revenue procedure, Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin, or Rev. Proc. 2007–7, this Bulletin, a letter ruling may be issued before the issuance of a temporary or final regulation or other published guidance that interprets the pro- visions of any act. In such situations, an Associate office may issue letter rulings under the following condi- tions: (1) Answer is clear or is reasonably certain.If the letter ruling request presents an issue for which the answer seems clear by applying the statute to the facts or for which the answer seems reasonably certain butnot entirely free from doubt. (2) Answer is not reasonably certain.If the letter ruling request presents an issue for which the answer does not seem reasonably certain, the Associate office may issue the letter ruling, using its best efforts to arrive at a determination, if it is in the best interests of tax administration.But seesection 6.09 of this revenue procedure. SECTION 6. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES THE SERVICE NOT ISSUE LETTER RULINGS OR DETERMINATION LETTERS? Ordinarily not if the request involves an issue under examination, or consideration, or in litigation .01The Service ordinarily does not issue a letter ruling or a determination letter if, at the time of the request the identical issue is involvedinthetaxpayer’sreturn for an earlier period and that issue— (1) is being examined by a field office; (2) is being considered by Appeals; (3) is pending in litigation in a case involving the taxpayer o r a related taxpayer; (4) has been examined by a field office or considered by Appeals and the statutory period of limitations on assessment or on filing a claim for refund or credit of tax has not expired; or (5) has been examined by a field office or considered by Appeals anda closing agreement covering the issue or liability has not beenenteredintobyafieldofficeorbyAppeals. If a return dealing with an issue for a particular year is filed while a request for a letter ruling on that issue is pending, an Associate office will issue the letter ruling unless it is notified by the taxpayer or otherwise learns that an examination of that issue or the identical issue on an earlier year’s return has been started by a field office.Seesection 7.04 of this revenue procedure. In income and gift tax matters, even if an examination has begun, an Associate office ordinarily Sec. 6.01 2007–1 I.R.B.13January 2, 2007 will issue the letter ruling if the field office agrees, by memorandum, to the issuance of the letter ruling. Ordinarily not in certain areas because of factual nature of the problem .02The Service ordinarily does not issue letter rulings or determination letters in certain areas because of the factual nature of the problem involved or because of other reasons. Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin, and Rev. Proc. 2007–7, this Bulletin, provide a list of these areas. This list is not all-inclusive because the Service may decline to issue a letter ruling or a determination letter when appropriate in the interest of sound tax administration or on other grounds whenever warranted by the facts or circumstances of a particular case. Instead of issuing a letter ruling or determination letter, the Service may, when it is consid- ered appropriate and in the best interests of the Service and after consulting with the taxpayer to determine if taxpayer wishes to pay the user fee listed under section (A)(6) of Appendix A to this revenue procedure, issue an information letter calling attention to well-established principles of tax law. Ordinarilynotonpartofan integrated transaction .03An Associate office ordinarily will not issue a letter ruling on only part of an integrated transaction. If a part of a transaction falls under a no-rule area, a letter ruling on other parts of the transaction may be issued. Before preparing the letter ruling request, a taxpayer should call a branch having jurisdiction for the matters on which the taxpayer is seeking a letter ruling to discuss whether the Associate office will issue a letter ruling on part of the transaction. Ordinarily not on which of two entities is a common law employer .04The Service does not ordinarily issue a letter ruling or a determination letter on which of two entities, under common law rules applicable in determining the employer-employee relationship, is the employer, when one entity is treating the worker as an employee. Generally not to business associations or groups .05The Service does not issue letter rulings or determination letters to business, trade, or industrial associations or to similar groups concerning the application of the tax laws to mem- bers of the group. But groups and associationsmay submit suggestions of generic issues that could be appropriately addressed in revenue rulings.SeeRev. Proc. 89–14, 1989–1 C.B. 814, which states the objectives of, and standards for, the publication of revenue rulings and revenue procedures in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The Service may issue letter rulings or determination letters to groups or associations on their own tax status or liability if the request meets the requirements of this revenue procedure. Generally not where the request does not address the tax status, liability, or reporting obligations of the requester .06The Service generally does not issue letter rulings or determination letters regarding the tax consequences of a transaction for taxpayers who are not directly involved in the request if the requested letter ruling or determination letter would not address the tax status, liability, or reporting obligations of the requester. For example, a taxpayer may not request a letter ruling relating to the tax consequences of a transaction to a customer or client, if the tax status, liabil- ity or reporting obligations of the taxpayer would not be addressed in the ruling, because the customer or client is not directlyinvolved in the letter ruling request. The tax liability of each shareholder is, however, directly involved in a letter ruling on the reorganization of a corpora- tion. Accordingly, a corporate taxpayer could request a letter ruling that solely addressed the tax consequences to its shareholders of a proposed reorganization. Revenue Procedure 96–16, 1996–1 C.B. 630, sets forth rules for letter ruling requests in- volving state and local government obligations. Generally not to foreign governments .07The Service does not issue letter rulings or determination letters to foreign governments or their political subdivisions about the U.S. tax effects of their laws. The Associate offices also do not issue letter rulings on the effect of a tax treaty on the tax laws of a treaty country for purposes of determining the tax of the treaty country.Seesection 13.02 of Rev. Proc. 2006–54, 2006–49 I.R.B. 1035. Treaty partnerscan continue to address matters such as these under the provisions of the applicable tax treaty. In addition, the Associate offices may issue letter rulings to foreign governments or their political subdivisions on their own tax status or liability under U.S. law if the request meets the requirements of this revenue procedure. Sec. 6.01 January 2, 2007142007–1 I.R.B. Ordinarily not on federal tax consequences of proposed legislation .08The Associate offices ordinarily do not issue letter rulings on a matter involving the federal tax consequences of any proposed federal, state, local, municipal, or foreign legisla- tion. The Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) may issue letter rulings regarding the effect of proposed state, local, or municipal leg- islation upon an eligible deferred compensation plan under § 457(b) provided that the letter ruling request relating to the plan complies with the other requirements of this revenue proce- dure. The Associate offices also may provide general information in response to an inquiry. Not before issuance of a regulation or other published guidance .09Generally, the Service will not issue a letter ruling or a determination letter if the request presents an issue that cannot be readily resolved before a regulation or any other published guidance is issued. When the Service has closed a regulation project or any other published guidance project that might have answered the issue or decides not to open a regulation project or any other published guidance project, the Associate offices may consider all letter ruling requests unless the issue is covered by section 6 of this revenue procedure, Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin, or Rev. Proc. 2007–7, this Bulletin. Not on frivolous issues.10The Service will not issue a letter ruling or a determination letter on frivolous issues. A “frivolous issue” is one without basis in fact orlaw, or that espouses a position which has been held by the courts to be frivolous or groundless. Examples of frivolous or groundless issues include, but are not limited to: (1) frivolous “constitutional” claims, such as claims that the requirement t o file tax returns and pay taxes constitutes an unreasonable search barred by the Fourth Amend ment; violates Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment protections of due process; violates Thirt eenth Amendment protections against involuntary servitude; or is unenforceable because t he Sixteenth Amend- ment does not authorize nonapportioned direct taxes or because it was never ratified; (2) claims that income taxes are voluntary, that the term “income” is not defined in the Inter- nal Revenue Code, or that preparation and filing of income tax returns violates the Paperwork Reduction Act; (3) claims that tax may be imposed only on coins minted under a gold or silver standard or that receipt of Federal Reserve Notes does not cause an accretion to wealth; (4) claims that a person is not taxable on income because he or she falls within a class entitled to “reparation claims” or an extra-statutory class of individuals exempt from tax,e.g., “free-born” individuals; (5) claims that a taxpayer can refuse to pay taxes on the basis of opposition to certain gov- ernmental expenditures; (6) claims that taxes apply only to federal employees; only to residents of Puert oRico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the District of Columbia, or “federal enclaves ”; or that sections 861 through 865 or any other provision of the Code imposes taxes on U.S. citizen s and residents only on income derived from foreign based activities; (7) claims that wages or personal service income are not “income,” are “nontaxable re- ceipts,” or are a “nontaxable exchange for labor;” (8) claims that income tax withholding by an employer on wages is optional; or (9) other claims that the courts have characterized as frivolous or groundless. No “comfort” letter rulings.11Except as otherwise provided in Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin, (e.g., under section 3.01(33), where the Associate office already is rulingonasignificantissueinthesametrans- action), a letter ruling will not be issued with respect to an issue that is clearly and adequately addressed by statute, regulations, decisions of acourt, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices, or other authority published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. The Associate office may in its discretion determine to issue a letter ruling on such an issue if the Associate office is otherwise issuing a ruling to the taxpayer on another issue arising in the same transaction. Sec. 6.11 2007–1 I.R.B.15January 2, 2007 Not on alternative plans or hypothetical situations .12The Service will not issue a letter ruling or a determination letter on alternative plans of proposed transactions or on hypothetical situations. Not on property conversion after return filed .13An Associate office will not issue a letterruling on the replacement of involuntarily converted property, whether ornot the property has been replaced, if the taxpayer has already filed a return for the taxable year in which the property was converted. A Director may issue a determination letter in this case.Seesection 12.01 of this revenue procedure. Circumstances under which determination letters are not issued by a Director .14A Director will not issue a determination letter if— (1) it appears that the taxpayer has directed a similar inquiry to an Associate office; (2) the same issue, involving the same taxpayer or a related taxpayer, is pending in a case in litigation or before Appeals; (3) the request involves an industry-wide problem; (4) the specific employment tax question at issue in the request has been, or is being, con- sidered by the Central Office of the Social Security Administration or the Railroad Retirement Board for the same taxpayer or a related taxpayer; or (5) the request is for a determination of constructive sales price under § 4216(b) or § 4218(c), which deal with special provisions applicable tothe manufacturers excise tax. The Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) will, in certain circumstances, issue letter rulings in this area.Seesection 5.13 of this revenue procedure. SECTION 7. WHAT ARE THE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUESTING LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS? This section explains the general instructions for requesting letter rulings and determination letters.Seesection 9 of this revenue procedure for the specific and additional procedures for requesting a change in accounting method. Requests for letter rulings, closing agreements, and determination letters require the pay- ment of the applicable user fee listed in Appendix A of this revenue procedure. Certain changes in accounting methods under the automatic change request procedures (seesection 9.01(1) of this revenue procedure) and certain changes in accounting periodsmade under automatic change request procedures do not require payment of a user fee (seeAppendix E of this rev- enue procedure). For additional user fee requirements,seesection 15 of this revenue procedure. Specific and additional instructions also apply to requests for letter rulings and determina- tion letters on certain matters. Those matters are listed in Appendix E of this revenue procedure followed by a reference (usually to another revenue procedure) where more information can be obtained. Certain information required in all requests .01 Facts(1) Complete statement of facts and other information.Each request for a letter ruling or a determination letter must contain a complete statement of all facts relating to the transaction. These facts include— (a) names, addresses, telephone numbers, and taxpayer identification numbers of all inter- ested parties (the term “all interested parties”does not mean all shareholders of a widely held corporation requesting a letter ruling relating to a reorganization or all employees where a large number may be involved); (b) the annual accounting period, and the overall method of accounting (cash or accrual) for maintaining the accounting books and filing the federal income tax return, of all interested parties; (c) a description of the taxpayer’s business operations; (d) a complete statement of the business reasons for the transaction; and Sec. 6.12 January 2, 2007162007–1 I.R.B. (e) a detailed description of the transaction. Documents and foreign laws(2) Copies of all contracts, wills, deeds, agreements, instruments, other documents, and foreign laws. (a) Documents.True copies of all contracts, wills, deeds, agreements, instruments, trust documents, proposed disclaimers, and other documents pertinent to the transaction must be submitted with the request. If the request concerns a corporate distribution, reorganization, or similar transaction, the corporate balance sheet and profit and loss statement should also be submitted. If the request relates to a prospective transaction, the most recent balance sheet and profit and loss statement should be submitted. If any document, including any balance sheet and profit and loss statement, is in a language other than English, the taxpayer must also submit a certified English translation of the doc- ument, along with a true copy of the document.For guidelines on the acceptability of such documents,seeparagraph (c) of this section 7.01(2). Each document, other than the request, should be labeled and attached to the request in alphabetical sequence. Original documents, suchas contracts, wills, etc., should not be sub- mitted because they become part of the Service’s file and will not be returned. (b) Foreign laws.The taxpayer must submit with the request a copy of the relevant parts of all foreign laws, including statutes, regulations, administrative pronouncements, and any other relevant legal authority. The documents submitted must be in the official language of the country involved and must be copied from an official publication of the foreign government or another widely available, generally accepted publication. If English is not the official language of the country involved, the taxpayer must also submit a copy of an English language version of the relevant parts of all foreign laws. This translation must be: (i) from an official publication of the foreign government or another widely available, generally accepted publication; or (ii) a certified English translation submitted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section 7.01(2). The taxpayer must identify the title and date ofpublication, including updates, of any widely available, generally accepted publication that thetaxpayer (or the taxpayer’s qualified transla- tor) uses as a source for the relevant parts of the foreign law. (c) Standards for acceptability of submissions of documents in a language other than English and certified English translationsof laws in a language other than English.The taxpayer must submit with the request an accurateand complete certified English translation of the relevant parts of all contracts, wills, deeds, agreements, instruments, trust documents, proposed disclaimers, or other documents, which are in a language other than English. If the taxpayer chooses to submit certified English translations of foreign laws, those translations must be based on an official publication of the foreign government or another widely avail- able, generally accepted publication. In either case, the translation must be that of a qualified translator and must be attested to by the translator. The attestation must contain: (i) a state- ment that the translation submitted is a true and accurate translation of the foreign language document or law; (ii) a statement as to the attestant’s qualifications as a translator and as to that attestant’s qualificationsand knowledge regarding tax matters or foreign law if the law is not a tax law; and (iii) the attestant’s name and address. Analysis of material facts(3) Analysis of material facts.The request must be accompanied by an analysis of facts and their bearing on the issue or issues. If documents attached to a request contain material facts, they must be included in the taxpayer’s analysis of facts in the request rather than merely incorporated by reference. Sameissueinanearlierreturn(4)Statementregarding whether same issue is in an earlier return.The request must state whether, to the best of the knowledge of both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s represen- tatives, any return of the taxpayer (or any return of a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267 or of a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the Sec. 7.01 2007–1 I.R.B.17January 2, 2007 meaning of § 1504) that would be affected by the requested letter ruling or determination letter is under examination, before Appeals, or before a federal court. Same or similar issue previously submitted or currently pending (5) Statement regarding whether same or similar issue was previously ruled on or re- quested, or is currently pending.The request must state whether, to the best of the knowledge of both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s representatives— (a) the Service previously ruled on the same or a similar issue for the taxpayer (or a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267 or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504 (related taxpayer)) or a predecessor; (b) the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, a predecessor, or any representatives previously submit- ted a request (including an application for change in accounting method) involving the same or a similar issue to the Service but no letter ruling or determination letter was issued; (c) the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a predecessor previously submitted a request (includ- ing an application for change in accounting method) involving the same or a similar issue that is currently pending with the Service; or (d) at the same time as this request, the taxpayer or a related taxpayer is presently submitting another request (including an application for change in accounting method) involving the same or a similar issue to the Service. If the statement is affirmative for (a), (b), (c), or (d) of this section 7.01(5), the statement must give the date the request was submitted, the date the request was withdrawn or ruled on, if applicable, and other details of the Service’s consideration of the issue. Interpretation of a substantive provisionofanincomeorestate tax treaty (6) Statement regarding interpretation of asubstantive provision of an income or estate tax treaty.If the request involves the interpretation of a substantive provision of an income or estate tax treaty, the request must state whether— (a) the tax authority of the treaty jurisdiction has issued a ruling on the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer (within the meaning of § 267 or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504 (related taxpayer)), or any predecessor; (b) the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or any predecessor is being examined, or has been settled, by the tax authorityof the treaty jurisdiction or is otherwise the subject of a closing agreement in that jurisdiction; and (c) the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or any predecessor is being considered by the competent authority of the treaty jurisdiction. Letter from Bureau of Indian AffairsrelatingtoIndiantribal government (7) Letter from Bureau of Indian Affairs relating to a letter ruling request for recog- nition of Indian tribal government status or status as a political subdivision of an Indian tribal government.To facilitate prompt action on a letter ruling request for recognition of Indian tribal government status or status as a political subdivision of an Indian tribal govern- ment, the taxpayer must submit with the letter ruling request a letter from the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”), verifying that the tribe is recognized by BIA as an Indian tribe and that the tribal government exercises governmental functions or that the po- litical subdivision of the Indian tribal government has been delegated substantial governmental functions. A letter ruling request that does not contain this letter from BIA cannot be resolved until the Service obtains a letter from BIA regarding the tribe’s status. Sec. 7.01 January 2, 2007182007–1 I.R.B. The taxpayer should send a request to verify tribal status to the following address: Branch of Tribal Government & Alaska Division of Indian Affairs Office of the Solicitor, Room 6456 U. S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, NW Washington, DC 20240 Statement of authorities supporting taxpayer’s views (8) Statement of supporting authorities.If the taxpayer advocates a particular c onclusion, an explanation of the grounds for that conclusion and the relevant authorities to s upport it must be included. Even if not advocating a particular tax treatment of a proposed trans action, the taxpayer must still furnish views on the tax results of the proposed transaction a nd a statement of relevant authorities to support those views. In all events, the request must include a statement of whether the law in connection with the request is uncertain and whether the issue is adequately addressed by relevant authorities. Statement of authorities contrary to taxpayer’s views (9) Statement of contrary authorities.In order to avoid inevitable delay in the ruling process, contrary authorities should be broughtto the attention of the Service at the earliest possible opportunity. If there are significant contrary authorities, it is usually helpful to discuss them in a presubmission conference prior to submitting the ruling request. See section 10.07 of this revenue procedure as to presubmission conferences. The taxpayer is strongly encour- aged to inform the Service about, and discuss the implications of, any authority believed to be contrary to the position advanced, such as legislation, tax treaties, court decisions, regulations, notices, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, or announcements. If the taxpayer determines that there are no contrary authorities, a statement in the request to this effect would be helpful. If the taxpayer does not furnish either contrary authorities or a statement that none exists, the Service in complex cases or those presenting difficult or novel issues may request submission of contrary authorities or a statement that none exists. Failure to comply with this request may result in the Service’s refusal to issue a letter ruling or determination letter. Identifying and discussing contrary authorities will generally enable Service personnel to understand the issue and relevant authorities more quickly. When Service personnel receive the request, they will have before them the taxpayer’s thinking on the effect and applicability of contrary authorities. This information should make research easier and lead to earlier action by the Service. If the taxpayer does not disclose and distinguish significant contrary authorities, the Service may need to request additional information, which will delay action on the request. Statement identifying pending legislation (10) Statement identifying pending legislation.Atthetimeoffilingtherequest,thetax- payer must identify any pending legislation that may affect the proposed transaction. In addi- tion, if legislation is introduced after the requestis filed but before a letterrulingordetermi- nation letter is issued, the taxpayer must notify the Service. Deletion statement required by§6110 (11) Statement identifying information to be deletedfrom copy of letter ruling or de- termination letter for public inspection.The text of letter rulings and determination letters is open to public inspection under § 6110. The Service makes deletions from the text before it is made available for inspection. To help the Service make the deletions required by § 6110(c), a request for a letter ruling or determination letter must be accompanied by a statement indi- cating the deletions desired (“deletion statement”). If the deletion statement is not submitted with the request, a Service representative will tell the taxpayer that the request will be closed if the Service does not receive the deletion statement within 21 calendar days.Seesection 8.05 of this revenue procedure. (a)Formatofdeletionstatement.A taxpayer who wants only names, addresses, and iden- tifying numbers to be deleted should state this in the deletion statement. If the taxpayer wants more information deleted, the deletion statement must be accompanied by a copy of the request and supporting documents on which the taxpayer should bracket the material to be deleted. The deletion statement must include the statutorybasis under § 6110(c) for each proposed deletion. Sec. 7.01 2007–1 I.R.B.19January 2, 2007 If the taxpayer decides to ask for additional deletions before the letter ruling or determina- tion letter is issued, additional deletion statements may be submitted. (b)Locationofdeletionstatement.The deletion statement must not app ear in the request, but instead must be made in a separate document and placed on top of the req uest for a letter ruling or determination letter. (c) Signature.The deletion statement must be signed and dated by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative. A stampedsignature or faxed signature is not permitted. (d) Additional information.The taxpayer should follow the same procedures of this sec- tion 7.01(11) to propose deletions from any additional information submitted after the initial request. An additional deletion statement is not required with each submission of additional information if the taxpayer’s initial deletion statement requests that only names, addresses, and identifying numbers are to be deleted and the taxpayer wants only the same information deleted from the additional information. (e) Taxpayer may protest deletions not made.After receiving from the Service the notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to disclose the letter ruling or determination letter (including a copy of the version proposed to be open to public inspection and notation of third-party com- munications under § 6110(d)), the taxpayer may protest the disclosure of certain information in the letter ruling or determination letter. The taxpayer must send a written statement to the Service office indicated on the notice of intention to disclose, within 20 calendar days of the date the notice of intention to disclose is mailed to the taxpayer. The statement must identify those deletions that the Service has not made and that the taxpayer believes should have been made. The taxpayer must also submit a copy of the version of the letter ruling or determination letter and bracket the deletions proposed that have not been made by the Service. Generally, the Service will not consider deleting any material that the taxpayer did not propose to be deleted before the letter ruling or determination letter was issued. Within 20 calendar days after the Servicereceives the response to the notice under § 6110(f)(1), the Service will mail to the taxpayer its final administrative conclusion regarding the deletions to be made. The taxpayer does not have the right to a conference to resolve any disagreements concerningmaterial to be deleted from the text of the letter ruling or determination letter. These matters may be taken up at any conference that is otherwise scheduled regarding the request. (f) Taxpayer may request delay of public inspection.After receiving the notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intentio n to disclose, but within 60 calendar days after the date of notice, the taxpayer may send a writ ten request for delay of public inspection under either § 6110(g)(3) or (4). The request for del ay must be sent to the Service officeindicated on the notice of intention to disclose. A request f or delay under § 6110(g)(3) must contain the date on which it is expected that the underlying tr ansaction will be completed. The request for delay under § 6110(g)(4) must contain a stateme nt from which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) may determine whether there are good reasons for the delay. Signature on request(12) Signature by taxpayer or authorized representative.The request for a letter ruling or determination letter must be signed and dated by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative. A stamped signature or faxed signature is not permitted. Authorized representatives(13) (a) Authorized representatives.To sign the request or to appear before the Service in connection with the request, the taxpayer’s authorized representative (for rules on who may practice before the Service,seeTreasury Department Circular No. 230, 31 C.F.R. part 10, July 26, 2002) must be: Attorney(1) An attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of any state, possession, territory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia and who is not cur- rently under suspension or disbarment from practicebeforetheService.Heorshemustfilea written declaration with the Service showing current qualification as an attorney and current authorization to represent the taxpayer; Sec. 7.01 January 2, 2007202007–1 I.R.B. Certified public accountant(2) A certified public accountant who is duly qualified to practice in any state, possession, territory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia and who is not currently under suspen- sion or disbarment from practice before the Service. He or she must file awritten declaration with the Service showing current qualification as a certified public accountant and current au- thorization to represent the taxpayer; Enrolled agent(3) An enrolled agent who is a person, other than an attorney or certified public accountant, who is currently enrolled to practice before theService and who is not currently under suspen- sion or disbarment from practice before the Service. He or she must file awritten declaration with the Service showing current enrollment and authorization to represent the taxpayer. The enrollment number must be included in the declaration; Enrolled actuary(4) An enrolled actuary who is a person, other than an attorney or certified public accountant, who is currently enrolled as an actuary bythe Joint Board for the Enrollment of Act uaries pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1242 and who is not currently under suspension or disbarme nt from practice before the Service. He or she must file a written declaration with the Se rvice showing current qualification as an enrolled actuary and current authorization to re present the taxpayer. Practice before the Service as an enrolled actuary is limited to representati on with respect to issues involving §§ 401, 403(a), 404, 412, 413, 414, 419, 419A, 420, 4971, 4972 , 4976, 4980, 6057, 6058, 6059, 6652(e), 6652(f), 6692, and 7805(b); former § 405; and 29 U.S .C. § 1083; or A person with a “Letter of Authorization” (5) Any other person, including a foreign representative, who has received a “Letter of Authorization” from the Director of the Office of Professional Responsibility under section 10.7(d) of Treasury Department Circular No.230. A person may make a written request for a “Letter of Authorization” to: Office of Professional Responsibility, SE:OPR, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20224. Section 10.7(d) of Circular No. 230 authorizes the Commissioner to allow an individual who is not otherwise eligible to prac- tice before the Service to represent another person in a particular matter. Representative authorized based on relationship to taxpayer (b)A regular full-time employeerepresenting his or her employer; a general partner rep- resenting his or her partnership; abona fideofficer representing his or her corporation, asso- ciation, or organized group; a regular full-time employee representing a trust, receivership, guardianship, or estate; or an individual representing an immediate family member may sign the request or appear before the Service in connection with the request. Return preparer(c)A return preparer who is not described in 13(a) and 13(b) of this section may not sign the request, or appear before the Service, or represent a taxpayer in connection with a letter ruling or a determination letter.Seesection 10.7(c) of Treasury Department Circular No. 230. Foreign representative(d)A foreign representative, other than a person referred to in 13(a) and 13(b) of this section, is not authorized to practice before the Service within the United States and, therefore, must withdraw from representing a taxpayer in a request for a letter ruling or a determination letter. In this situation, the nonresident alien or foreign entity must submit the request for a letter ruling or a determination letter on the individual’s or the entity’s own behalf or through a person referred to in (13)(a) and (b) of this section. Power of attorney and declaration of representative (14) Power of attorney and declaration of representative.It is preferred that Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, be used to provide the representative’s authority(PartIofForm2848,Power of Attorney) and the representative’s qualification (Part II of Form 2848,Declaration of Representative). The name of the person signing Part I of Form 2848 should also be typed or printed on this form. A stamped signature is not permitted. An original, a copy, or a facsimile transmission (fax) of the power of attorney is acceptable so long as its authenticity is not reasonably disputed. For additional information regarding the power of attorney form,seesection 7.02(2) of this revenue procedure. The taxpayer’s authorized representative, whether or not enrolled, must comply with Trea- sury Department Circular No. 230, which provides the rules for practice before the Service. In situations where the Service believes that thetaxpayer’s representative is not in compliance Sec. 7.01 2007–1 I.R.B.21January 2, 2007 with Circular 230, the Service will bring the matter to the attention of the Office of Professional Responsibility. Penalties of perjury statement(15) Penalties of perjury statement. (a) Format of penalties of perjury statement.A request for a letter ruling or determina- tion letter and any change in the request submitted at a later time must be accompanied by the following declaration:“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined [Insert, as appropriate: this request or this modification to the request], including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, [Insert, as appropriate: the re- quest or the modification] contains all the relevant facts relating to the request, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.” Seesection 8.05(4) of this revenue procedure forthe penalties of perjury statement applica- ble for submissions of additional information. (b) Signature by taxpayer.The declaration must be signed and dated by the taxpayer, not the taxpayer’s representative. A stamped signature or faxed signature is not permitted. The person who signs for a corporate taxpayer must be an officer of the corporate taxpayer who has personal knowledge of the facts and whose duties are not limited to obtaining a letter ruling or determination letter from the Service. If the corporate taxpayer is a member of an affiliated group filing consolidated returns, a penalties of perjury statement must also be signed and submitted by an officer of the common parent of the group. The person signing for a trust, a state law partnership, or a limited liability company must be, respectively, a trustee, general partner, or member-manager who has personal knowledge of the facts. Number of copies of request to be submitted (16) Number of copies of request to be submitted.Generally, a taxpayer needs to submit the original and one copy of the request for a letter ruling or determination letter. If more than one issue is presented in the letter ruling request, the taxpayer is encouraged to submi t additional copies of the request. Further, the original and two copies of the request for a letter ruling or determination letter are required if— (a) the taxpayer is requesting separate letter rulings or determination letters on different issues as explained later under section 7.02(1) of this revenue procedure; or (b) the taxpayer is requesting deletions other than names, addresses, and identifying num- bers, as explained in section 7.01(11)(a) of this revenue procedure (one copy is the request for the letter ruling or determination letter andthe second copy is the deleted version of such request); or (c) a closing agreement (as defined in section 2.02 o f this revenue procedure) is being re- questedontheissuepresented. Sample format for a letter ruling request (17) Sample format for a letter ruling request.To assist a taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative in preparing a letter ruling request, a sample format for a letter ruling request is provided in Appendix B of this revenue procedure. This format is not required to be used by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative. Checklist(18) Checklist for letter ruling requests.AnAssociateofficewillbeabletorespondmore quickly to a taxpayer’s letter ruling request if the request is carefully prepared and complete. The checklist in Appendix C of this revenue procedure is designed to assist taxpayers in prepar- ing a request by reminding them of the essential information and documents to be furnished with the request. The checklist in Appendix C must be completed to the extent required by the instructions in the checklist, signed and dated by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative, and placed on top of the letter ruling request.If the checklist in Appendix C is not received, Sec. 7.01 January 2, 2007222007–1 I.R.B. a branch representative will ask the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative to submit the checklist; this may delay action on the letter ruling request. For letter ruling requests on certain matters,specific checklists supplement the checklist in Appendix C. These checklists are listed in section 1 of Appendix E of this revenue procedure and must also be completed and placed on top of the letter ruling request along with the check- list in Appendix C. Copies of the checklist in Appendix C can be obtained by calling (202) 622–7560 (not a toll- free call) or a copy can be obtained from this revenue procedure in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2007–1 on the IRS web site atwww.irs.govby accessing the Newsroom link, and then the IRS Guidance link, to obtain Internal Revenue Bulletin 2007–1. A photocopy of this checklist may be used. Additional procedural informationrequiredwithrequest .02 Multiple issues(1) To request separate letter rulings for multiple issues in a single situation.If more than one issue is presented in a request for a letter ruling, the Associate office generally will issue a single letter ruling covering all the issues. If the taxpayer requests separate letter rulings on any of the issues (because, for example, one letter ruling is needed sooner than another), the Associate office usually will comply with the request unless it is not feasible or not in the best interests of the Associate office to do so.A taxpayer who wants separate letter rulings on multiple issues should make this clear in the request and submit the original and two copies of the request. In issuing each letter ruling, the Associate office will state that it has issued separate letter rulings or that requests for other letter rulings are pending. Power of attorney used to indicate recipient of a copy or copies of a letter ruling or a determination letter (2) Power of attorney used to indicate recipient or recipients of a copy or copies of a letter ruling or a determination letter.Once the Service signs the letter ruling or determina- tion letter, it will send the original to the taxpayer. The Service will not send the original letter ruling or determination letter to the taxpayer’s representative. The Service may send copies of the letter ruling or determination letter to the taxpayer’s representative, but in no case to more than two representatives. Unless otherwise indicated by the taxpayer on the Form 2848, the Service will send a copy of the letter ruling or determination letter to thefirst representative listed on the Form 2848. If the taxpayer appoints more than one representative on the Form 2848 and checks the Box (a) on Line 7, an additional copy will be sent to the second representative listed on the Form 2848. The Service will not send a copy of the letter ruling or determination letter to any representative if the taxpayer checks the Box (b) on Line 7 on the Form 2848 indicating that notices or written communications from the Service should not be sent to the taxpayer’s representative. It is preferred that the taxpayers use the Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, to appoint representatives. If a taxpayer does not use Form 2848 to appoint a representative, a copy of the letter ruling or determination letter will be mailed to the first representative listed on the power of attorney, unless the taxpayer indicates that an additional copy of the letter ruling or determination letter should be mailed to a second representative, or that no copies of the letter ruling or determination letter should be mailed to the taxpayer’s representative. “Two-Part” letter ruling requests(3) To request a particular conclusion on a proposed transaction.A taxpayer who is requesting a particular conclusion on a proposed transaction may make the request for a letter ruling in two parts. This type of request is referred to as a “two-part” letter ruling request. The first part must include the complete statement of facts and related documents described in section 7.01 of this revenue procedure. The second part must include a summary statement of the facts the taxpayer believes to be controlling in reaching the conclusion requested. Sec. 7.02 2007–1 I.R.B.23January 2, 2007 If the Associate office accepts the taxpayer’s statement of controlling facts, it will base its letter ruling on these facts. Ordinarily, this statement will be incorporated into the letter ruling. The Associate office reserves the right to rule on the basis of a more complete statement of the facts and to seek more information in developing the facts and restating them. A taxpayer who chooses this two-part procedure has all the rights and responsibilities pro- vided in this revenue procedure. Taxpayers may not use the two-part procedure if it is inconsistent with other procedures, such as those dealing with requests for permission to changeaccounting methods or periods, applications for recognition of exempt status under § 521, or rulings on employment tax status. After the Associate office has resolved the issues presented by a letter ruling request, the Associate office representative may request that the taxpayer submit a proposed draft of the letter ruling to expedite the issuance of the ruling.Seesection 8.07 of this revenue procedure. Expedited handling(4) To request expedited handling.The Service ordinarily processes requests for letter rulings and determination letters in order of the date received. Expedited handling means that a request is processed ahead of the regular order. Expedited handling is granted only in rare and unusual cases, both out of fairness to other taxpayers and because the Service seeks to process all requests as expeditiously as possible and to give appropriate deference to normal business exigencies in all cases not involving expedited handling. Notwithstanding the previ- ous sentence, expedited handling may be available for certain transactions intended to qualify as reorganizations described in § 368 or distributions described in § 355, as provided below. A taxpayer who has a compelling need to have a request processed ahead of the regular order may request expedited handling. This requestmust explain in detail the need for expedited handling. The request must be made in writing,preferably in a separate letter with, or soon after filing, the request for the letter ruling ordetermination letter. If the request is not made in a separate letter, then the letter in which the letter ruling or determination letter request is made should say, at the top of the first page:“Expedited Handling Is Requested. See page of this letter.” A request for expedited handling will not be forwarded to a branch for action until the check for the user fee is received. Whether a request for expedited handling will begranted is within the Service’s discretion. The Service may grant the request when a factor outside a taxpayer’s control creates a real business need to obtain a letter ruling or determination letter before a certain time in order to avoid serious business consequences. Examples include situations in which a court or gov- ernmental agency has imposed a specific deadline for the completion of a transaction, or a transaction must be completedexpeditiously to avoid an imminent business emergency (such as the hostile takeover of a corporate taxpayer), provided that the taxpayer can demonstrate that the deadline or business emergency, and the need for expedited handling, resulted from circumstances that could not reasonably have been anticipated or controlled by the taxpayer. To qualify for expedited handling in such situations, the taxpayer must also demonstrate that the taxpayer submitted the request as promptly as possible after becoming aware of the dead- line or emergency. The extent to which the letter ruling or determination letter complies with all of the applicable requirements of this revenue procedure, and fully and clearly presents the issues, is a factor in determining whether expedited treatment will be granted. When the Ser- vice agrees to process a request out of order, itcannot give assurance that any letter ruling or determination letter will be processed by the time requested. The scheduling of a closing date for a transaction or a meeting of the board of directors or shareholders of a corporation, without regard for the time it may take to obtain a letter ruling or determination letter, will not be considered a sufficient reason to process a request ahead of its regular order. Also, the possible effect of fluctuation in the market price of stocks on a transaction will not be considered a sufficient reason to process a request out of order. Sec. 7.02 January 2, 2007242007–1 I.R.B. Because most requests for letter rulings and determination letters cannot be processed ahead of the regular order, the Service urges all taxpayers to submit their requests well in advance of the contemplated transaction. In addition, to facilitate prompt action on letter ruling requests, taxpayers are encouraged to ensure that their initial submissions comply with all of the require- ments of this revenue procedure (including the requirements of other applicable guidelines set forth in Appendix E of this revenue procedure), to prepare “two-part” requests described in section 7.02(3) of this revenue procedure when possible, and to provide any additional infor- mation requested by the Service promptly. EXPEDITED LETTER RULING PROCESS FOR REORGANIZATIONS AND FOR DIS- TRIBUTIONS UNDER SECTION 355: If a taxpayer requests a letter ruling on whether a transaction constitutes a reorganization under§ 368 or a distribution under § 355 and asks for expedited handling pursuant to this provision,the Service will grant expedited handling. If expedited handling is granted, the Service will endeavor to complete and issue the letter ruling subject to Section 3.01(33) of Rev. Proc. 2007–3 within ten weeks afterreceiving the ruling request. If the transaction involves an issue or issues not entirely within the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the letter ruling request will be processed in the usual manner, unless each Associate Chief Counsel having jurisdiction over an issue in the transac- tion agrees to process the letter ruling request on an expedited basis. To initiate this process, the taxpayer must (i) state at the top of the first page of the request letter: “Expedited Handling is Requested” and(ii) provide the Associate Chief Counsel (Cor- porate) with a copy of the request letter by facsimile transmission (fax), without attachments, when the formal request is submitted. The fax copy should be sent to (202) 622–7707, Attn: CC:CORP (Expedite); and shortly after thefax is sent receipt should be confirmed by call- ing the telephone number for the office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) that is in section 10.07(1)(a) of this revenue procedure.In due course, the taxpayer must also provide the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) with a draft ruling letter setting forth the relevant facts, applicable representations, and requested rulings in a manner consistent with the format used by the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)in similar cases. See section 7.02(3) of this revenue procedure. In addition, the taxpayer must ensure that the formal submission of its let- ter ruling request complies with all of the requirements of this revenue procedure (including the requirements of other applicable guidelines set forth in Appendix E of this revenue pro- cedure). See section 8.05(1) of this revenue procedure for a modified requirement regarding the submission of additional information. If the taxpayer does not satisfy the requirements of this paragraph, the letter ruling request will not be processed on an expedited basis, but instead will be processed in the usual manner.For further information regarding this EX- PEDITED LETTER RULING PROCESS FOR REORGANIZATIONS AND FOR DIS- TRIBUTIONS UNDER SECTION 355, call the telephone number provided in section 10.07(1)(a) of this revenue procedure for pre-submission conferences with the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate). Facsimile transmission (fax) to taxpayer or taxpayer’s authorized representative of any document related to the letter ruling request (5) Taxpayer requests to receive any document related to the letter ruling request by facsimile transmission (fax).If the taxpayer requests, the Associate office may fax a copy of any document related to the letter ruling request to the taxpayer or thetaxpayer’s authorized representative (for example, a request for additional information or the letter ruling). A request to fax a copy of any document related to the letter ruling request to the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative must be made in writing, either as part of the original letter ruling request or prior to the mailing, or with respect to the letter ruling prior to the signing, of the document. The request must contain the fax number of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative to whom the document is to be faxed. A document other than the letter ruling will befaxed by a branch representative. The letter ruling may be faxed by either a branch representative or the Disclosure and Litigation Support Branch of the Legal Processing Division (CC:PA:LPD:DLS). For purposes of § 301.6110–2(h), a letter ruling is not issued until the ruling is mailed. Sec. 7.02 2007–1 I.R.B.25January 2, 2007 Requesting a conference(6) To request a conference.A taxpayer who wants to have a conference on the issues involved should indicate this in writing when, or soon after, filing the request.See alsosections 10.01, 10.02, and 11.11(2) of this revenue procedure. Address to send the request.03 Original letter ruling requests must be sent tothe appropriate Associate office. The package should be marked: RULING REQUEST SUBMISSION. (1) Requests for letter rulings should be sent to the following address: Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU P.O. Box 7604 BenFranklinStation Washington, DC 20044 If a private delivery service is used, the address is: Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU, Room 5336 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 (2) Requests for letter rulings may also be hand delivered between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and4:00p.m.tothecourier’sdeskattheloadingdock(behindthe12 th Street security station) of 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,DC. A receipt will be given at the courier’s desk. The package should be addressed to: Courier’s Desk Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU, Room 5336 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 (3) Requests for letter rulings must not be submitted by fax. (But see section 7.02(4), above, regarding submissions of an initial fax in certain situations where expedited handling is re- quested.) Pending letter ruling requests.04 (1) Circumstances under which the taxpayer must notify the Associate office.The tax- payer must notify the Associate office if, after the letter ruling request is filed but before a letter ruling is issued, the taxpayer knows that— (a)anexaminationoftheissueortheidentical issue on an earlier year’s return has been started by a field office; (b) in the case of a § 301.9100 request, an examination of the return for the taxable year in which an election should have been made or any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made, has been started by a field office.See § 301.9100–3(e)(4)(i) and section 5.03(3) of this revenue procedure; (c) legislation that may affect the transaction has been introduced.Seesection 7.01(10) of this revenue procedure; or (d) another letter ruling request (including an application for change in accounting method) has been submitted by the taxpayer (or a related party within the meaning of § 267 or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504) involving the same or similar issue that is currently pending with the Service. Sec. 7.02 January 2, 2007262007–1 I.R.B. (2)TaxpayermustnotifytheAssociateofficeifareturnisfiledandmustattachthe request to the return.If the taxpayer files a return before a letter ruling is received from the Associate office concerningan issue in the return, the taxpayer must notify the Associate office that the return has been filed. The taxpayer must also attach a copy of the letter ruling request to the return to alert the field office and thereby avoid premature field action on the issue. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date of the letter ruling request and control number of the letter ruling. If, under the limited circumstances permitted in section 5 of this revenue procedure, the taxpayer requests a letter ruling after the return is filed, but before the return is examined, the taxpayer must notify the Associate office that the return has been filed. The taxpayer must also notify the field office having jurisdiction over the return and attach a copy of the letter ruling request to the notification to alert the field office and thereby avoid premature field action on the issue. Thissection7.04alsoappliestopendingrequests for a closing agreement on a transaction for which a letter ruling is not requested or issued. For purposes of this section 7.04, the term “return” includes the original return, amended return, and claim for refund. When to attach letter ruling to return .05A taxpayer who receives a letter ruling before filing a return about any transaction that is relevant to the return being filed must attach a copy of t he letter ruling to the return when it is filed. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling. For purposes of this section 7.05, the term “return” includes the original return, amended return, and claim for refund. How to check on status of request.06The taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative may obtain information regard- ing the status of a request by calling the person whose name and telephone number are shown on the acknowledgment of receipt of the requestor the appropriate branch representative who contacts the taxpayer as explained in section 8.02 of this revenue procedure. Request may be withdrawn or Associate office may decline to issueletterruling .07 (1) In general.A taxpayer may withdraw a request for a letter ruling or determination letter at any time before the letter ruling or determination letter is signed by the Service. Correspon- dence and exhibits related to a request that is withdrawn or related to a letter ruling request for which an Associate office declines to issue a letter ruling will not be returned to the taxpayer. Seesection 7.01(2) of this revenue procedure.In appropriate cases, an Associate office may publish its conclusions in a revenue ruling or revenue procedure. (2) Notification of appropriate Se rvice official. (a) Letter ruling requests.If a taxpayer withdraws a letter ruling request or if the Associate office declines to issue a letter ruling, the Associate office generally will notify, by memoran- dum, the appropriate Service official in the operating division that has examination jurisdiction of the taxpayer’s tax return and may give its views on the issues in the request to the Service official to consider in any later examination of the return. This section 7.07(2)(a) generally does not apply if the taxpayer withdraws the letter ruling request and submits a written state- ment that the transaction has been, or is being, abandoned and if the Associate office has not already formed an adverse opinion.See, in appropriate cases, section 7.07(1) above. (b) Notification of Service officialmay constitute Chief Counsel Advice.If the memo- randum to the Service official referred to in paragraph (a) of this section 7.07(2) provides more than the fact that the request was withdrawn and the Associate office was tentatively adverse, Sec. 7.07 2007–1 I.R.B.27January 2, 2007 or that the Associate office declines to issue a letter ruling, the memorandum may constitute Chief Counsel Advice, as defined in § 6110(i)(1), subject to disclosure under § 6110. (3) Refund of user fee.Ordinarily, the user fee will not be returned for a letter ruling request that is withdrawn. If the Associate office declines to issue a letter ruling on all of the issues in the request, the user fee will be returned. If theAssociate office issues a letter ruling on some, but not all, of the issues, the user fee will not be returned.Seesection 15.10 of this revenue procedure for additional informationregarding the refund of user fees. SECTION 8. HOW DO THE ASSOCIATE OFFICES HANDLE LETTER RULING REQUESTS? The Associate offices will issue letter rulings on the matters and under the circumstances explained in sections 3 and 5 of this revenue procedure and in the manner explained in this section and section 11 of this revenue procedure.Seesection 9 of this revenue procedure for procedures for change in accounting method requests. Docket, Records, and User Fee Branch receives, initially controls and refers the request to the appropriate Associate office .01All requests for letter rulings will be received and initially controlled by the Docket, Records, and User Fee Branch of the Legal Processing Division of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) (CC:PA:LPD:DRU). That office will process the incoming documents and the user fee, and will forward the file to the appropriate Associate office for assignment to a branch that has jurisdiction over the specific issue involved in the request. Branch representative of the Associate office contacts taxpayer within 21 days .02Within 21 calendar days after a letter ruling request has been received in the branch of the Associate office that has jurisdiction over the issue, a representative of the branch will discuss the procedural issues in the letter ruling request with the taxpayer or, if the request includes a properly executed power of attorney, with theauthorized representative unless the power of attorney provides otherwise. If the case is complex or a number of issues are involved, it may not be possible for the branch representative to discuss the substantive issues during this initial contact. When possible, for each issue within the branch’s jurisdiction, the branch representative will tell the taxpayer— (1) whether the branch representative will recommend that the Associate office rule as the taxpayer requested, rule adversely on the matter, or not rule; (2) whether the taxpayer should submit additional information to enable the Associate office to rule on the matter; (3) whether the letter ruling complies with all of the provisions of this revenue procedure, and if not, which requirements have not been met; or (4) whether, because of the nature of the transaction or the issue presented, a tentative con- clusion on the issue cannot be reached. If the letter ruling request involves matters within the jurisdiction of more than one branch or Associate office, a representative of the branch that received the original request will tell the taxpayer within the initial 21 days— (1) that the matters within the jurisdiction of another branch or Associate office have been referred to that branch or Associate office for consideration, and the date the referral was made, and (2) that a representative of that branch or Associate office will contact the taxpayer within 21 calendar days after receiving the referral to discuss informally the procedural and, to the extent possible, the substantive issues in the request. This section 8.02 applies to all matters except for cases involving a request for change in ac- counting method or accounting period and cases within the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products) concerning insurance issues requiring actuarial computations. Determines if transaction can be modified to obtain favorable letter ruling .03If less than a fully favorable letter ruling isindicated, the branch representative will tell the taxpayer whether minor changes in the transaction or adherence to certain published positions would bring about a favorable ruling. The branch representative may also tell the Sec. 7.07 January 2, 2007282007–1 I.R.B. taxpayer the facts that must be furnished in a document to comply with Service requirements. The branch representative will not suggest precise changes that would materially alter the form of the proposed transaction or materially alter a taxpayer’s proposed accounting period. If, at the end of this discussion, the branch representative determines that a meeting in the Associate office would be more helpful to develop or exchange informati on, a meeting will be offered and an early meeting date arranged. When offered, this meeting is in addition to the taxpayer’s conference of right that is described in section 10.02 of th is revenue procedure. Is not bound by informal opinion expressed .04The Service will not be bound by the informal opinion expressed by the branch repre- sentative or any other Service representative, and such an opinion cannot be relied upon as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). Additional information.05 Must be submitted within 21 calendar days (1) Additional information must be submitted within 21 days.If the request lacks es- sential information, which may include additional information needed to satisfy the procedural requirements of this revenue procedure as well as substantive changes to transactions or doc- uments needed from the taxpayer, the branch representative will tell the taxpayer during the initial contact, or subsequent contacts, that the request will be closed if the Associate office does not receive the information within 21 calendar days from the date of the request for addi- tional information, unless an extension of time is granted. To facilitate prompt action on letter ruling requests, taxpayers are encouraged to request that the Associate office request additional information by fax.Seesection 7.02(5) of this revenue procedure. Material facts furnished to the Associate office by telephone or fax, or orally at a confer- ence, must be promptly confirmedbylettertotheAssociateoffice. This confirmation and any additional information requested by the Associate office that is not part of the information re- quested during the initial contact must be furnished within 21 calendar days from the date the Associate office makes the request. The Service will not ende avor to process a ruling request on the expedited basis for requests regarding reorganizati ons and distributions under section 355 provided by section 7.02(4) of this revenue procedure, unless the branch representative in Associate Chief Counsel (Corpo- rate) receives all reque sted additional information within 10 calendar days from the date of the request for such additio nal information, unless an extension of time is granted. If the infor- mation is not provided w ithin 10 calendar days (with any extension) but is provided within 21 calendar days (with any extension), the letter ruling request will cease to be processed on an expedited basis and ins tead will be processed in the usual manner. Extension of reply period if justified and approved (2) Extension of reply period.An extension of the 21-day period for providing additional information will be granted only if justified in writing by the taxpayer and approved by the branch reviewer. A request for extension should be submitted before the end of the 21-day period. If unusual circumstances close to the end of the 21-day period make a written request impractical, the taxpayer should notify the Associate office within the 21-day period that there is a problem and that the written request for extension will be coming soon. The taxpayer will be told promptly of the approval or denial of the requested extension. If the extension request is denied, there is no right of appeal. Letter ruling request closed if the taxpayer does not submit additional information (3) Letter ruling request closed if the taxpayer does not submit additional informa- tion.If the taxpayer does not submit the information requested during the initial contact, or subsequent contacts, within the time provided, the letter ruling request will be closed and the taxpayer will be notified in writing.If the information is received after the request is closed, the request will be reopened and treated as a new request as of the date the information is received. The taxpayer must pay another user fee before the case can be reopened. Penalties of perjury statement for additional information (4) Penalties of perjury statement.Additional information submitted to the Service must be accompanied by the following declaration:“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this information, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information contains all the relevant facts relating to the Sec. 8.05 2007–1 I.R.B.29January 2, 2007 request for the information, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.”This declara- tion must be signed in accordance with the requirements in section 7.01(15)(b) of this revenue procedure. Faxing request and additional information (5) Faxing request and additional information.To facilitate prompt action on letter ruling requests, taxpayers are encouraged to request that the Associate office request additional infor- mation by fax.Seesection 7.02(5) of this revenue procedure. Taxpayers also are encouraged to submit additional information by fax as soon as the information is available. The Associate office representative who requests additional information can provide a telephone number to which the information can be faxed. The original of the faxed material and a signed perjury statement must be mailed or delivered to the Associate office. Address to send additional information (6) Address to send additional information. (a) If a private delivery service is not used, the additional information should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Attn: [Name, office symbols, and room number of the Associate office representative who requested the information] P. O. Box 7604 BenFranklinStation Washington, DC 20044 For cases involving a request for change in accounting method or period under the jurisdic- tion of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), or a § 301.9100 request for an extension of time on a request for change inaccounting method or period, the additional information should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Attn: [Name, office symbols, and room number of the Associate office representative who requested the information] P. O. Box 14095 BenFranklinStation Washington, DC 20044 (b) If a private delivery service is used, the additional information for all cases should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Attn: [Name, office symbols, and room number of the Associate office representative who requested the information] 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 Identifying information included in additional information (7) Identifying information.For all cases, the additional information should include the name, office symbols, and room number of the Associate office representative who requested the information, and the taxpayer’s name and the case control number, which the Associate office representative can provide. Sec. 8.05 January 2, 2007302007–1 I.R.B. Number of copiesof additional information to be submitted (8)Numberofcopies.Generally, a taxpayer needs only to submit one copy of the additional information, although in appropriate cases, the Associate office may request additional copies of the information. Near the completion of the ruling process, advises the taxpayer of conclusions and, if the Associate office will rule adversely, offer the taxpayer the opportunity to withdraw the letter ruling request .06Generally, after the conferenceofrightasdiscussedinsection10 of this revenue proce- dure is held but before the letter ruling is issued, the branch represen tative will orally inform the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative of the Associate office ’s conclusions. If the Asso- ciate office is going to rule adversely, the taxpayer will be offered th e opportunity to withdraw the letter ruling request. Unless an extension is granted, if the taxpa yer or the taxpayer’s repre- sentative does not notify the branch representative of a decision to withdraw the ruling request within 10 days of the notification, the adverse letter ruling will be issued. The user fee will not be refunded for a letter ruling request that is withdrawn.Seesec tion 15.10(1)(a) of this revenue procedure. Mayrequestdraftofproposed letter ruling near the completion of the ruling process .07To accelerate the issuance of letter rulings, in appropriate cases near the completion of the ruling process, the Associate office representative may request that the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative submit a proposed draft of the letter ruling on the basis of discussions of the issues. The taxpayer is not required to prepare a draft letter ruling to receive a letter ruling. The format of the submission should be discussed with the Associate office representative who requests the draft letter ruling. The representative usually can provide a sample format of a letter ruling and will discuss the facts, analysis, and letter ruling language to be included. Taxpayer may also submit draft on a computer disk In addition to a typed draft, taxpayers are encouraged to submit this draft on a computer disk in Microsoft Word to the Associate office. The typed draft will become part of the permanent files of the Associate office, and the computerdisk will not be returned. The proposed letter ruling (both typed draft and computer disk) should be sent to the same address as any additional information and contain in the transmittal the information that should be included with any additional information (for example, a penalties of perjury statement is required).Seesection 8.05(4) of this revenue procedure. Issues separate letter rulings for substantially identical letter rulings and generally issues a single letter ruling for related § 301.9100 letter .08 (1) Substantially iden tical letter rulings.For letter ruling requests qualifying for the user fee provided in paragra ph (A)(5)(a) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure for substantially identical letter rulin gs, a separate letter ruling generally will be issued for each entity with a common member or spons or, or for each member of a common entity. (2) Related § 301.9100 letter rulings.For a § 301.9100 letter ruling request for an exten- sion of time to file Form 3115 requesting an identical accounting method change for multiple separate and distinct trades or businesses (including a qualified subchapter S subsidiary or a single-member limited liability company of a taxpayer, multiple members of a consolidated group, or multiple eligible CFCs qualifying under section 15.07(4) for the user fee provided in paragraph (A)(5)(d) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure, the Associate office generally will issue a single letter on behalf of all separate and distinct trades or businesses of the tax- payer, all members of the consolidated group, or all eligible CFCs that are the subject of the request. Sends a copy of the letter ruling to appropriate Service official .09The Associate office will send a copy of the letter ruling, whether favorable or adverse, to the appropriate Service official in the operating division that has examination jurisdiction of the taxpayer’s tax return. SECTION 9. WHAT ARE THE SPECIFIC AND ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES FOR A REQUEST FOR A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING METHOD FROM THE ASSOCIATE OFFICES? This section provides the specific and additional procedures applicable to a request for a change in accounting method. A request for a change in accounting method is a specialized type of request for a letter ruling.Seesection 2.01 of this revenue procedure. Sec. 9 2007–1 I.R.B.31January 2, 2007 Automatic and advance consent change in accounting method requests .01 Automatic change in accounting method (1) Procedures for requesting an automatic change in accounting metho d.Certain changes in accounting methods may be made under automatic change reque st procedures. A change in accounting method provided in an automatic change request pr ocedure must be made using that automatic change request procedure if the taxpayer request ing the change is within the scope of the automatic change request procedure and the change is an automatic change for the requested year of the change. The Commissioner’s consent to a n otherwise qualifying automatic change in accounting method is granted only if the taxpaye r timely complies with the applicable automatic change request procedures.But seesectio n 9.19 of this revenue pro- cedure concerning review by an Associate office and a field office. Seesection 9.22 of this revenue procedure for a list of automatic change request procedures. See alsosection 9.23 of this revenue procedure for a list of sections, in addition to this section 9, and Appendices of this revenue procedure that apply to a request for an accounting method change. No user fee is required for a change made under an automatic change request proce- dure. Advance consent change in accounting method (2) Advance consent letter ruling requests.If a change in accounting method may not be made under an automatic change request procedure, the taxpayer may request an advance consent letter ruling by filing a current Form 3115,Application for Change in Accounting Method, under Rev. Proc. 97–27, 1997–1 C.B. 680, as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1 C.B. 696, and amplified and clarified by Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432 (or successors); and this revenue procedure (see section 9.23 for a list of the sections and Appendices of this revenue procedure in addition to this section 9 that apply to a request for an accounting method change). A Form 3115 filed under Rev. Proc. 97–27 and this revenue procedure is hereinafter referred to as an “advance consent Form 3115.” A taxpayer filing an advance consent Form 3115 must submit the required user fee with the completed Form 3115. Seesection 15 and Appendix A of this revenue procedure for information about user fees. Ordinarily only one change in accounting method on a Form 3115 and a separate Form 3115 for each taxpayer and for each separate and distinct trade or business .02 Ordinarily, a taxpayer may request onlyone change in accounting method on a Form 3115. If the taxpayer wants to request a change in accounting method for more than one unrelated item or submethod of accounting, the taxpayer must submit a separate Form 3115 for each unrelated item or submethod, except in certain situationsin which the Service specifically permits certain unrelated changes to be included on a single Form 3115 (for example,seesection5.05inthe Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2002–9, 2002–1 C.B. 327, or its successor). Further, a separate Fo rm 3115 (and, therefore, a separate user fee pursuant to section 15 and Appendix A of this rev enue procedure) must be submitted for each taxpayer and each separate trade or business of a taxpayer, including a qualified S subsidiary (QSUB) or a single-member limited liability co mpany (single member LLC), requesting a change in accounting method, except as specifical ly permitted or required in guidance published by the Service.See,for example, section 15. 07(4) of this revenue procedure. Information required with a Form 3115 .03 Facts and other information(1) Facts and other information requested on Form 3115 and in applicable revenue procedures.In general, a taxpayer requesting a change in accounting method must file a Form 3115, unless the procedures applicable to the specific typeof change in accounting method do not require a Form 3115 to be submitted. To be eligible for approval of the requestedaccounting method change, the taxpayer must provide all information requested on the Form 3115 and in its instructions and in either Rev. Proc. 97–27, 1997–1 C.B. 680, as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1 C.B. 696, and amplified and clarified by Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432 (or successors) Sec. 9.01 January 2, 2007322007–1 I.R.B. or the applicable automatic change request procedure. In addition, the taxpayer must provide all information requested in the applicable sections of this revenue procedure, including a de- tailed and complete description of the item being changed, the taxpayer’s present and proposed method for the item being changed, information regarding whether the taxpayer is under exam- ination, or before Appeals or a federal court, and a summary of the computation of the § 481(a) adjustment and an explanation of the methodology used to determine the adjustment. For an advance consent Form 3115, the taxpayer must also include a full explanation of the legal basis and relevant authorities supporting the proposed method, a detailed and com- plete description of the facts and explanation ofhow the law applies to the taxpayer’s situation, whether the law in connection with the request is uncertain or inadequately addresses the is- sue, statement of the applicant’s reasons for the proposed change, and copies of all documents related to the proposed change. The applicant must provide the requested information to be eligible for approval of the requested accounting method change. The taxpayer may be required to provide information specific to the requested accounting method change, such as an attached statement. The tax- payer must provide all information relevant tothe requested accounting method change, even if not specifically requested by the Form 3115. See alsosections 7.01(1) and 7.01(8) of this revenue procedure. Statement of authorities contrary to taxpayer’s views (2) Statement of contrary authorities.For an advance consent Form 3115, the taxpayer is encouraged to inform the Associate office about,and discuss the implications of, any authority believed to be contrary to the proposed change inaccounting method, such aslegislation, court decisions, regulations, notices, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, or announcements. If the taxpayer does not furnish either contrary authorities or a statement that none exists, the Associate office may request submission of contrary authorities or a statement that none exists. Failure to comply with this request may result in the Associate office’s refusal to issue a change in accounting method letter ruling. Documents(3) Copies of all contracts, agreements, and other documents.True copies of all contracts, agreements, and other documents pertinent to the requested change in accounting method must be submitted with an advance consent Form 3115. Original documents should not be submitted because they become part of the Associate office’s file and will not be returned. Analysis of material facts(4) Analysis of material facts.When submitting any document with a Form 3115 or in a supplemental letter, the taxpayer must explain and provide an analysis of all material facts in the document (rather than merely incorporating the document by reference). The analysis of the facts must include their bearing on the requested change in accounting method, specifying the provisions that apply. Same issue in an earlier return(5) Information regarding whether same issue is in an earlier return.AForm3115 must state whether, to the best of the knowledge of both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s repre- sentatives, any return of the taxpayer (or any return of a current or former consolidated group in which the taxpayer is or was a member) in which the taxpayer used the accounting method being changed is under examination, before Appeals, or before a federal court.SeeRev. Proc. 97–27 and Rev. Proc. 2002–9, both as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19. Issue previously submitted or currently pending (6) Statement regarding prior requests for a change in accounting method and other pending requests. (a) Other requests for a change in accounting method within the past five years.A Form 3115 must state, to the best of the knowledge of both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s representatives, whether the taxpayer (or a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267 or a member of a current or former affiliated group of which the taxpayer is or was a member within the meaning of § 1504) ora predecessor requested or made within the past five years Sec. 9.03 2007–1 I.R.B.33January 2, 2007 (including the year of the requested change), oris currently filing, any request for a change in accounting method. If the statement is affirmative, for each separate and distinct trade or business, give a de- scription of each request and the year of change and whether consent was obtained. If any application was withdrawn, not perfected, or denied, or if a Consent Agreement was sent to the taxpayer but was not signed and returned to the Associate office, or if the change was not made in the requested year of change, give an explanation. (b) Any other pending request(s).A Form 3115 must state, to the best of the knowledge of both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s representatives, whether the taxpayer (or a related tax- payer within the meaning of § 267 or a member of a current or former affiliated group of which the taxpayer is or was a member within the meaning of § 1504) or a predecessor currently have pending (including any concurrently filed request) any request for a private letter ruling, a change in accounting method, or a technical advice. If the statement is affirmative, for each request, give the name(s) of the taxpayer, identifi- cation number(s), the type of request (private letter ruling, request for change in accounting method, or request for technical advice), and the specific issues in the request. Statement identifying pending legislation (7) Statement identifying pending legislation.At the time the taxpayer files an advance consent Form 3115, the taxpayer must identify any pending legislation that may affect the proposed change in accounting method. In addition, if legislation is introduced after the request is filed but before a change in accounting method letter ruling is issued, the taxpayer must so notify the Associate office. Authorized representatives(8) Authorized representatives.To appear before the Service in connection with a request for a change in accounting method, the taxpayer’s authorized representative must be an attor- ney, a certified public accountant, an enrolled agent, an enrolled actuary, a person with a “Letter of Authorization,” an employee, general partner,bona fideofficer, administrator, trustee, etc., as described in section 7.01(13) of this revenue procedure. Power of attorney and declaration of representative (9) Power of attorney and declaration of representative.Any authorized representative, whether or not enrolled to practice, must comply with Treasury Department Circular No. 230, which provides the rules for practice before theService, and the conference and practice re- quirements of the Statement of Procedural Rules, which provide the rules for representing a taxpayer before the Service.Seesection 7.01(14) of this revenue procedure. It is preferred that Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative,beusedtoprovidethe representative’s authority. Penalties of perjury statement(10) Penalties of perjury statement. (a) Format of penalties of perjury statement.A Form 3115, and any change to a Form 3115 submitted at a later time, must be accompanied by the following declaration:“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this application, including accompa- nying schedules and statements, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the applica- tion contains all the relevant facts relating to the application, and it is true, correct, and complete.” Seesection 9.08(3) of this revenue procedure for the penalties of perjury statement required for submissions of additional information. (b) Signature by taxpayer.A Form 3115 must be signed by, or on behalf of, the taxpayer requesting the change by an individual with authority to bind the taxpayer in such matters. For example, an officer must sign on behalf of a corporation, a general partner on behalf of a state law partnership, a member-manager on behalf ofa limited liability company, a trustee on be- half of a trust, or an individual taxpayer on behalf of a sole proprietorship. If the taxpayer is a member of a consolidated group, a Form 3115 should be submitted on behalf of the taxpayer by the common parent and must be signed by a duly authorized officer of the common parent. Sec. 9.03 January 2, 2007342007–1 I.R.B. Refer to the signature requirements set forth in the instructions for the current Form 3115 re- garding those who are to sign.See alsosection 8.08 of Rev. Proc. 97–27 and section 6.02(5) of Rev. Proc. 2002–9. A stamped signature or faxed signature is not permitted. (c) Signature by preparer.Declaration of preparer (other than the taxpayer) is based on all information of which the preparer has any knowledge. Additional procedural information required in certain circumstances .04 Recipients of original and copy of correspondence (1) Recipients of original and copy of change in accounting method correspondence. The Service will send the signed original of the change in accounting method letter ruling and other related correspondence to the taxpayer, and copies to the taxpayer’s representative, if instructed on Form 2848.Seesection 7.02(2) of this revenue procedure for how to designate alternative routing of the copies of the letter ruling and other correspondence. Expedited handling(2) To request expedited handling.The Associate offices o rdinarily process advance con- sent Forms 3115 in order of the date received. A taxpayer who has a compelling need to have an advance consent Form 3115 processed on an expedited basi s, may request expedited han- dling.Seesection 7.02(4) of this revenue procedure for pr ocedures. Facsimile transmission (fax) of any document to the taxpayer or taxpayer’s authorized representative (3) To receive the change in accounting method letter ruling or any other correspon- dence related to a Form 3115 by facsimile transmission (fax).If the taxpayer wants a copy of the change in accounting method letter ruling or any other correspondence related to a Form 3115, such as a request for additional information, faxed to the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s au- thorized representative, the taxpayer must submit a written request to fax the letter ruling or related correspondence, preferably as part of the Form 3115. The request may be submitted at a later date, but must be received prior to the mailing of correspondenceother than the letter ruling and prior to the signing of the change in accounting method letter ruling. The request to have correspondence relating to the Form 3115 faxed to the taxpayer or tax- payer’s authorized representative must containthe fax number of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative to whom the correspondence is to be faxed. A document other than the change in accounting method letter ruling will be faxed by a branch representative. The change in accounting method letter ruling may be faxed by either a branch representative or the Disclosure and Litigation Support Branch of the Legal Pro- cessing Division of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) (CC:PA:LPD:DLS). For purposes of § 301.6110–2(h), a change in accounting method letter ruling is not issued until the change in accounting method letter ruling is mailed. Requesting a conference(4) To request a conference.The ta xpayer must complete the appropriate line on the Form 3115 to request a conference of rig ht, or request a conference in a later written communica- tion, if an adverse response is con templated by the Associate office.Seesection 8.10 of Rev. Proc. 97–27, section 10.03 of Rev. Proc. 2002–9, and sections 10.01, 10.02 of this revenue procedure. Associateofficeaddressfor Forms 3115 .05 Associate office address to send Forms 3115.Submit the original Form 3115, in the case of an advance consent Form 3115, or the national office copy of the Form 3115, in the case of an automatic change request, as follows: (a) Associate office mailing address if private delivery service is not used.If a private delivery service is not used, a taxpayer, other than an exempt organization, must send the orig- inal completed Form 3115 and the required user fee (in the case of an advance consent Form 3115) or the national office copy of the completed Form 3115 (in the case of an automatic change request) to: Sec. 9.05 2007–1 I.R.B.35January 2, 2007 Internal Revenue Service Attn: [insert either “CC:PA:LPD:DRU” for an advance consent Form 3115 or “CC:ITA — Automatic Ruling Branch” for an automatic change request] P.O. Box 7604 Benjamin Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 An exempt organization must send the originalcompleted Form 3115 and the required user fee (in the case of an advance consent Form 3115) or the national office copy of the completed Form 3115 (in the case of an automatic change Form 3115) to: Internal Revenue Service Tax Exempt & Government Entities Attn: TEGE:EO P.O. Box 27720 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 See Rev. Proc. 2007–8, this Bulletin, for the applicable user fee for exempt organization Forms 3115. (b) Mailing address if private delivery service is used.If a private delivery service is used, a taxpayer, other than an exempt organization, must send the original completed Form 3115 and the required user fee (in the case of an advance consent Form 3115) or the national office copy of the completed Form 3115 (in the case of an automatic change request) to: Internal Revenue Service Attn: [insert either “CC:PA:LPD:DRU” for an advance consent Form 3115 or “CC:ITA—Automatic Rulings Branch” for an automatic change request] Room 5336 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 If a private delivery service is used, an exempt organization must send the original com- pleted Form 3115 and the required user fee (in the case of an advance consent Form 3115) or the national office copy of the completed Form 3115 (in the case of an automatic change request) to: Internal Revenue Service Tax Exempt & Government Entities Attn: TEGE:EO 1750 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20038 See Rev. Proc. 2007–8, this Bulletin, for the applicable user fee for exempt organization Forms 3115. (c) Address if hand-delivered to the IRS Courier’s desk.For taxpayers other than an exempt organization, the original completed Form 3115 and the required user fee (in the case of an advance consent Form 3115) or the national office copy of the completed Form 3115 (in the case of an automatic change request), may be hand delivered between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to the courier’s desk at the loading dock (located behind the 12 th Sec. 9.05 January 2, 2007362007–1 I.R.B. Street security station) of 1111 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. A receipt will be given at the courier’s desk. The package should be addressed to: Courier’s Desk Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU, Room 5336 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 A Form 3115 must not be submitted by fax .06A completed Form 3115 must not be submitted by fax. Controls Form 3115 and refers it totheappropriateAssociateoffice .07An advance consent Form 3115 is received and controlled by the Docket, Records, and User Fee Branch, Legal Processing Division of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration)(CC:PA:LPD:DRU)iftherequired user fee is submitted with the Form 3115. Once controlled, the Form 3115 is forwarded to the appropriate Associateofficeforassignment and processing. Additional information.08 Incomplete Form 3115(1) Incomplete Form 3115. (a) Advance consent Form 3115 — 21-day rule.In general, for an advance consent Form 3115, additional information requested by the Associate office and additional information fur- nished to the Associate office by telephone or fax must be furnished in writing within 21 calen- dar days from the date of the information request. The Associate office may impose a shorter reply period for a request for additional information made after an initial request.Seesection 10.06 of this revenue procedure for the 21-day rule for submitting information after any con- ference. (b) Automatic change request — 30-day rule.In general, for an automatic change in accounting method request, additional information requested by the Associate office, and ad- ditional information furnished to the Associate office by telephone or fax, must be furnished in writing within 30 calendar days from the date of the information request. The Associate office may impose a shorter reply period for a request for additional information made after an initial request.Seesection 10.06 of this revenue procedure for the 21-day rule for submitting information after any conference with the Associate office. Extension of reply period(2) Request for extension of reply period. (a) Advance consent Form 3115.For an advance consent Form 3115, an additional period, not to exceed 15 days, to furnish information may be granted to a taxpayer. Any request for an extension of time must be made in writing and submitted before the end of the original 21-day period. If unusual circumstances close to the end of the 21-day period make a written request impractical, the taxpayer should notify the Associate office within the 21-day period that there is a problem and that the written request for extension will be coming soon. An extension of the 21-day period will be granted only if approved by a branch reviewer. An extension of the 21-day period ordinarily will not be granted to furnish information requested on Form 3115. The taxpayer will be told promptly, and later in writing, of the approval or denial of the requested extension. If the extension request is denied, there is no right of appeal. (b) Automatic change request.For an automatic change in accounting method request, an additional period, not to exceed 30 days, to furnish information may be granted to a taxpayer. Any request for an extension of time must be made in writing and submitted before the end of the original 30-day period. If unusual circumstances close to the end of the 30-day period make a written request impractical, the taxpayer should notify the Associate office within the 30-day period that there is a problem and that the written request for extension will be coming soon. An extension of the 30-day period will be granted only if approved by a branch reviewer. An extension of the 30-day period ordinarily willnot be granted to furnish information requested Sec. 9.08 2007–1 I.R.B.37January 2, 2007 on Form 3115. The taxpayer will be told promptly, and later in writing, of the approval or denial of the requested extension. If the extension request is denied, there is no right of appeal. Penalties of perjury statement for additional information (3) Penalties of perjury statement.Additional information submitted to the Associate office must be accompanied by the following declaration:“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this information, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information contains all the relevant facts relating to the request for the information, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.” This declaration must be signed in accordance with the requirements in section 9.03(10)(b) of this revenue procedure. Identifying information included in additional information (4) Identifying information.The additional information should also include the name, office symbols, and room number of the Associate office representative who requested the information, and the taxpayer’s name and the case control number, which the Associate office representative can provide. Faxing information request and additional information (5) Faxing information request and additional information.To facilitate prompt action on a change in accounting method ruling request, taxpayers are encouraged to request that the Associate office request additional information by fax.Seesection 9.04(3) of this revenue procedure. Taxpayers also are encouraged to submit additional information by fax as soon as the infor- mation is available. The Associate office representative who requests additional information can provide a telephone number to which the information can be faxed. A copy of the re- quested information and an original signed penalties of perjury statement also must be mailed or delivered to the Associate office. Address to send additional information (6) Address to send additional information. (a) Address if private delivery service not used.For a request for change in accounting method under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), if a private delivery service is not used, the additional information should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Attn: [Name, office symbols, and room number of the Associate office representative who requested the information] P.O. Box 14095 BenFranklinStation Washington, DC 20044 For a request for change in accounting method for an exempt organization, if a private de- livery service is not used, the additional information should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service Tax Exempt & Governmental Entities P.O. Box 27720 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 For any other request for change in accounting method, if a private delivery service is not used, the additional information should be sent to: Sec. 9.08 January 2, 2007382007–1 I.R.B. Internal Revenue Service ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Attn: [Name, office symbols, and room number of the Associate office representative who requested the information] P.O. Box 7604 BenFranklinStation Washington, DC 20044 (b) Address if private delivery service is used. For a request for a change in accounting method for other than an exempt organization, if a private delivery service is used, the additional information should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Attn: [Name, office symbols, and room number of the Associate office representative who requested the information] 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 For a request for change in accounting method for an exempt organization, if a private de- livery service is used the additional information should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service Tax Exempt & Governmental Entities 1750 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20038 Failure to timely submit additional information (7) If taxpayer does not timely submit additional information. (a) Advance consent Form 3115.In the case of an advance consent Form 3115, if the re- quired information is not furnished to the Associate office within the reply period, the Form 3115 will not be processed and the case will be closed. The taxpayer or authorized representa- tive will be so notified in writing. (b) Automatic change request.In the case of an automaticchange in accounting method request, if the required information is not furnished to the Associate office within the reply period, the request does not qualify for the automatic consent procedure. In such a case, the Associate office will notify the taxpayer that consent to make the change in accounting method is not granted. (c) Submitting the additional information at a later date.If the taxpayer wants to submit the additional information at a later date, the taxpayer must submit it with a new completed Form 3115 (and user fee, if applicable) for a year of change for which such new Form 3115 is timely filed under the applicable change in accounting method procedure. Circumstances in which the taxpayer must notify the Associate office .09 For an advance consent Form 3115, the taxpayer must promptly notify the Associate office if, after the Form 3115 is filed but before a change in accounting method letter ruling is issued, the taxpayer knows that— (1) an examination of the present or proposedaccounting method has been started by a field office; Sec. 9.09 2007–1 I.R.B.39January 2, 2007 (2) an examination of the proposed year ofchange has been started by a field office; (3) legislation that may affect the change in accounting method has been introduced,see section 9.03(7) of this revenue procedure; or (4) another letter ruling request (including another Form 3115) has been submitted by the taxpayer (or a related party within the meaning of § 267 or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is a member within the meaning of §1504). Determines if proposed accounting method can be modified to obtain favorable letter ruling .10If a less than fully favorable change inaccounting method letter ruling is indica ted, the branch representative will tell the taxpayer whether minor changes in the propose d accounting method would bring about a favorable ruling. The branch representative will not su ggest pre- cise changes that materially alter a taxpayer’s proposed accounting. Near the completion of processing the Form 3115, advises the taxpayer if the Associate office will rule adversely and offers the taxpayer the opportunity to withdraw Form 3115 .11Generally, after the conference of right is held (or offered, in the event no conference is held) and before issuing any change in accounting method letter ruling that is adverse to the requested change in accounting method, the taxpayer will be offered the opportunity to withdraw the Form 3115.Seesection 9.12 of this revenue procedure. Unless an extension is granted, if the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative does not notify the branch represen- tative of a decision to withdraw the Form 3115 within 10 days of the notification, the adverse change in accounting method letter ruling will be issued. Ordinarily, the user fee (in the case of an advance consent Form 3115) will not be refunded for a Form 3115 that is withdrawn. Advance consent Form 3115 may be withdrawn or Associate office may decline to issue a change in accounting method letter ruling .12 (1) In general.A taxpayer may withdraw an advance consent Form 3115 at any time before the change in accounting method letter ruling is signed by the Associate office. The Form 3115, correspondence, and any documents relating to the Form 3115 that is withdrawn or for which the Associate office declines to issue a letter ruling will not be returned to the taxpayer.See section 9.03(3) of this revenue procedure. In appropriate cases, the Service may publish its conclusions in a revenue ruling or revenue procedure. (2) Notification of appropriate Service official.If a taxpayer withdraws or the Associate office declines to grant (for any reason) a request to change from or to an improper accounting method, the Associate office will notify, in writing, the appropriate Service official in the oper- ating division that has examination jurisdiction of the taxpayer’s tax return and the Change in Method of Accounting TechnicalAdvisor, and may give its views on the issues in the request to the Service official to consider inany later examination of the return. If the memorandum to the Service official provides more than the fact that the request was withdrawn and the Associate office was tentatively adverse, or that the Associate office de- clines to grant a change in accounting method, the memorandum may constitute Chief Counsel Advice, as defined in § 6110(i)(1), subject to disclosure under § 6110. (3) Refund of user fee.Ordinarily, the user fee will not be returned for an advance consent Form 3115 that is withdrawn.Seesection 15.10 of this revenue procedure for information regarding refunds of user fees. How to check status of a pending Form 3115 .13The taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative may obtain information re- garding the status of an advance consent Form 3115 by calling the person whose name and telephone number are shown on the acknowledgement of receipt of the Form 3115. Is not bound by informal opinion expressed .14The Service will not be bound by any informal opinion expressed by the branch repre- sentative or any other Service representative, and such an opinion cannot be relied upon as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). Single letter ruling issued to a taxpayer or consolidated group for qualifying identical change in accounting method .15For an advance consent Form 3115 qualifying under section 15.07(4) for the user fee provided in paragraph (A)(5)(b) of Appendix Aof this revenue procedure for identical account- ing method changes, the Associate office generally will issue a single letter ruling on behalf of all affected separate and distinct trades or businesses of a taxpayer, all affected members of the consolidated group, or alleligible and affected CFCs. Sec. 9.09 January 2, 2007402007–1 I.R.B. Letter ruling ordinarily not issuedforoneoftwoormore interrelated items or submethods .16If two or more items or submethods of accounting are interrelated, the Associate office ordinarily will not issue a letter ruling on achange in accounting method involving only one of the items or submethods. Consent Agreement.17Ordinarily, for an advance consent Form 3115, the Commissioner’s permission to change a taxpayer’s accounting method is set forth in a letter ruling (original and a Consent Agreement copy). If the taxpayer agrees to the terms and conditions contained in the change in accounting method letter ruling, the taxpayer must sign and date the Consent Agreement copy of the letter ruling in the appropriate space. The Consent Agreement copy must not be signed by the taxpayer’s representative. The signed copy of the letter ruling will constitute an agreement (Consent Agreement) within the meaning of § 1.481–4(b) of the regulations. The signed Consent Agreement copy of the letter ruling must be returned to the Associate office within 45 days. In addition, a photocopy of the signed Consent Agreement copy of the letter ruling must be attached to the taxpayer’s income tax return for the year of change.Seesection 8.11 of Rev. Proc. 97–27. If the taxpayer has filed its income tax return for the year of change before the ruling has been received and the Consent Agreement has been signed and returned, the photocopy of the signed Consent Agreement copy of the letter ruling should be attached to the amended return for the year of change thatthe taxpayer files to implement the change in accounting method. A taxpayer must secure the consent of the Commissioner before changing a method of ac- counting for federal income tax purposes. Treas. Reg. section 1.446–1(e)(2)(i). For an advance consent accounting method change, a taxpayer has secured the consent of the Commissioner when it timely signs and returns the Consent Agreement copy of the letter ruling from the Asso- ciate office granting permission to make theaccounting method change. A taxpayer that timely files an advance consent accounting method change request and takes the change into account in its federal income tax return for the year of change (and any subsequent tax year) prior to receiving the letter ruling granting permission for the requested change, may nevertheless rely on the letter ruling received from the Associate office after it is received, as provided in section 9.19 of this revenue procedure. If, however, the requested change is modified or is withdra wn, denied, or similarly closed without the Associate office having granted consent, taxpaye rs are not relieved of any interest, penalties, or other adjustments resulting from the improper imple- mentation of the change. A copy of the change in accounting methodletter ruling is sent to appropriate Service official .18The Associate office will send a copy of eachchange in accounting method letter ruling, whether favorable or adverse, to the appropriateService official in the operating division that has examination jurisdictionof the taxpayer’s tax return. Consent to change an accounting method may be relied on subject to limitations .19A taxpayer may rely on a change in accounting method letter ruling received from the Associate office, subject to certain conditions and limitations.Seesections 9, 10, and 11 of Rev. Proc. 97–27, as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19. A qualifying taxpayer complying timely with an automatic change request procedure may rely on the consent of the Commissioner as provided in the automatic change request procedure to change the taxpayer’s accounting method, subject to certain conditions and limitations.See, in general, sections 6.01, 7 and 8 of Rev. Proc. 2002–9, as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19. An Associate office may review a Form 3115 filed under an automatic change request procedure and will notify the taxpayer ifadditional information is needed or if consent is not granted to the taxpayer for the requested change.Seesection 10 of Rev. Proc. 2002–9. Further, the field office that has jurisdiction over the taxpayer’s return may review the Form 3115.Seesection 9 of Rev. Proc. 2002–9. Change in accounting method letter ruling will not apply to another taxpayer .20A taxpayer may not rely on a change in accounting method letter ruling issued to another taxpayer.See§ 6110(k)(3). Associate office discretion to permit requested change in accounting method .21The Associate office reserves the right to decline to process any advance consent Form 3115 in situations in which it would not be in the best interest of sound tax administration to permit the requested change. In this regard,the Associate office will consider whether the Sec. 9.21 2007–1 I.R.B.41January 2, 2007 change in method of accounting would clearly and directly frustrate compliance efforts of the Service in administering the income tax laws.Seesection 8.01 of Rev. Proc. 97–27. List of automatic change in accounting method request procedures .22For procedures regarding requests for an automatic change in accounting method, refer to the following published automatic changerequest procedures. The Commissioner’s con- sent to an otherwise qualifying automatic change in accounting method is granted only if the taxpayer complies timely with the applicable automatic change request procedure. The automatic change request procedures for obtaining a change in accounting method in- clude: (1)Rev. Proc. 2002–9, 2002–1 C.B. 327, as modified and clarified by Announcement 2002–17, 2002–1 C.B. 561, as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2002–19, 2002–1 C.B. 696, as amplified, clarified and modified by Rev. Proc. 2002–54, 2002–2 C.B. 432, and as modified by Rev. Proc. 2003–45, 2003–2 C.B. 11, which, for most (but not all) types of changes provided therein, requires a completed Form 3115. Rev. Proc. 2002–9 applies to the accounting method changes described in the Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 involving §§ 56, 61, 77, 162, 166, 167, 168, 171, 174, 179B, 181, 197, 263, 263A, 267, 404, 446, 448, 451, 454, 455, 458, 460, 461, 471, 472, 475, 585, 832, 846, 861, 985, 1272, 1273, 1278, 1281, 1286, 1400I, 1400L, 1400N, and former § 168. (2)The following automatic change request procedures modify and amplify Rev. Proc. 2002–9 in that they add the following changesto the list of accounting method changes listed in the Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 or require certain automatic changes to be made using the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002–9: Rev. Rul. 2004–62, 2004–1 C.B. 1072 (section 162 — post-establishment fertilization of established timber stands); Notice 2006–47, 2006–20 I.R.B. 892 (section 167(g) — for property subject to the income forecast method and placed in service by the taxpayer after October 22, 2004, an election either to include in the adjusted basis of the property participations and residuals expected to be paid before the end of the tenth taxable year following the placed-in-service year of the property, or to exclude participationsand residuals from the adjusted basis of the property and deduct the participations and residuals in the taxable year in which paid); Rev. Proc. 2002–27, 2002–1 C.B. 802 (section 168 — depreciation of original and re- placement tires of certain vehicles); Rev. Rul. 2003–54, 2003–1 C.B. 982 (section 168 — depreciation of gas pump canopies); Rev. Rul. 2003–81, 2003–2 C.B. 126 (section 168 — depreciation of utility assets); Rev. Proc. 2003–63, 2003–2 C.B. 304 (section 168 — depreciation of cable TV fiber optics); Regs. § 1.168(i)–1(l)(2)(ii)(change in general asset account treatment due to a change in the use of MACRS property); Regs. § 1.168(i)–4(g)(2) (change in method of accounting for depreciation due to a change in the use of MACRS property); Regs. § 1.168(i)–6T(k)(2) (for a like-kind exchange or involuntary conversion of MACRS property for which the time of disposition, the time of replacement, or both, occurred on or before February 27, 2004, change in method ofaccounting for depreciation for relinquished MACRS property and replacement MACRS property); Rev. Proc. 2004–11, 2004–1 C.B. 311, (or its successor) (sections 56(a)(1), 56(g)(4)(A), 167, 168, 197, 1400I, and 1400L — revised sections 2.01 and 2.02 and 2B of the Appendix and added section 2.05 to the Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2002–9); Sec. 9.21 January 2, 2007422007–1 I.R.B. Rev. Proc. 2006–43, 2006–45 I.R.B. 849 (sections 168(k) and 1400L(b) — change in method of accounting to comply with the final regulations under § 1.168(k)–1 or § 1.1400L(b)–1); Notice 2006–47, 2006–20 I.R.B. 892 (section179B — election by a small business refiner to deduct 75 percent of qualified capital costs paid or incurred after December 31, 2002, in taxable years ending after that date); Notice 2006–47, 2006–20 I.R.B. 892 (section 181 — for any qualified film or television production for which the taxpayer begins principal photography after October 22, 2004, but first paid or incurred costs of the production before October 23, 2004, election to treat the costs of the production as an expense); Rev. Proc. 2005–9, 2005–1 C.B. 303, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2005–17, 2005–1 C.B. 797 (section 263 — amounts paid or incurred toacquire or create intangibles or to facilitate an acquisition of a trade or business, change in the capital structure of a business entity, and certain other transactions, for a taxpayer’s second taxable year ending on or after December 31, 2003); Rev. Rul. 2002–9, 2002–1 C.B. 614 (section 263A — impact fees incurred in connect ion with construction of a new residential rental building); Rev. Rul. 2004–18, 2004–1 C.B. 509 (section 263A — environmental remediation costs); Rev. Rul. 2005–42, 2005–2 C.B. 67 (section 263A — allocation of environmental reme- diation costs to production); Regs. § 1.263A–1T(k)(1) (section 263A— change in method of accounting for mixed service costs to comply with the temporary regulations); Regs. § 1.263A–2T(e)(1) (section 263A — change in method of accounting for addi- tional section 263A costs to comply with the temporary regulations); Rev. Proc. 2004–11, 2004–1 C.B. 311, (or its successor) (sections 56(a)(1), 56(g)(4)(A), 167, 168, 197, 1400I, and 1400L, and former section 168 – replacedsections 2.01 and 2.02 and 2B of the Appen- dix of Rev. Proc. 2002–9 and added section 2.05 to the Appendix of Rev. Proc 2002–9); Regs. § 1.280F–6(f)(2)(iv) (for certain qualified nonpersonal use vehicles placed in service before July 7, 2003, exclusion from limits on depreciation applicable to passenger automo- biles); Rev. Rul. 2002–46, 2002–2 C.B. 117, as modified by Rev. Rul. 2002–73, 2002–2 C.B. 805 (section 404 — grace period contributions); Rev. Proc. 2002–28, 2002–1 C.B. 815 (section 446 — certain small businesses who seek to change to the cash method and/or to a method of accounting for inventoriable items as materials and supplies that are not incidental); Rev. Proc. 2004–30, 2004–1 C.B. 950 (section 446 — inducement fees received in con- nection with becoming holders of noneconomic residual interests in Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduits); Rev. Proc. 2004–32, 2004–1 C.B. 988 (section 446 — credit card annual fees); Rev. Proc. 2004–36, 2004–1 C.B. 1063 (section 446 — safe harbor method of accounting for film producers’ treatment of certain creative property costs); Rev. Proc. 2002–36, 2002–1 C.B. 993 (section 451 — certain taxpayers who purchase vehicles subject to leases who seek to change to the capital cost reduction (CCR) method); Rev. Rul. 2003–3, 2003–1 C.B. 252 (section 451 — accrual method taxpayer with state or local income or franchise tax refund); Sec. 9.22 2007–1 I.R.B.43January 2, 2007 Rev. Proc. 2004–34, 2004–1 C.B. 991 (section 451 — certain advance payments); Rev. Proc. 2005–35, 2005–2 C.B. 76 (section 451 — up-front network upgrade payments made to utilities); Rev. Proc. 2002–17, 2002–1 C.B. 676 (section 472 — certain automobile dealers seeking to change to the replacement cost method for vehicle parts inventory); Rev. Proc. 2003–20, 2003–1 C.B. 445 (section 471 — valuation of remanufactured motor vehicle core parts); Rev. Proc. 2006–14, 2006–4 I.R.B. 350 (sections 471, 472, and 481 — change in method of accounting to adopt safe harbor method of accounting for heavy equipment parts inventory) Rev. Proc. 2002–46, 2002–2 C.B. 105 (section 832 — certain insurance companies seeking to change to safe harbor method for premium acquisition expenses); Rev. Proc. 2004–41, 2004–2 C.B. 90 (section 832 — insurance companies’ incentive payments to health care providers); Rev. Proc. 2002–74, 2002–2 C.B. 980 (section 846 — insurance companies other than life insurance companies computing discounted unpaid losses); Rev. Proc. 2004–33, 2004–1 C.B. 989 (section 1272 — credit card late fees); Rev. Proc. 2005–47, 2005–2 C.B. 269 (section 1273 — credit card cash advance fees); Rev. Proc. 2006–16, 2006–9 I.R.B. 539 (section 1400I — ele ction of commercial revi- talization deduction for a qualified revitalization bui lding that is placed in service by the taxpayer after December 31, 2001, in the area of a renewal c ommunity that was expanded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development a nd for which the taxpayer receives a retroactive commercial revitalization exp enditure allocation); Rev. Proc. 2005–43, 2005–2 C.B. 107 (section 1400L(c) — retroactive election to use the 5-year recovery period (or 9-year recovery period, if applicable) for qualified New York Liberty Zone leasehold improvement property placed in service after September 10, 2001, during the 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, or 2004 taxable year); and Notice 2006–77, 2006–40 I.R.B. 590 (section 1400N(d) — to claim the Gulf Opportunity (GO) Zone additional first year depreciation deduction for qualified GO Zone property that is placed in service by the taxpayer on or after August 28, 2005, during the taxable year beginning in 2004 or 2005, and is in a class of property for which the taxpayer did not claim the GO Zone additional first year depreciation deduction). (3)The following automatic change request procedures, which require a completed Form 3115, provide both the type ofaccounting method change that may be made automatically and the procedures under which such change must be made: Regs. § 1.166–2(d)(3) (bank conformity for bad debts); Regs. § 1.448–1 (to an overall accrual method for the taxpayer’s first taxable year it is subject to Code section 448); Regs. § 1.448–2T and Notice 88–51 (nonaccrual experience method); Regs. § 1.458–1 and –2 (exclusion for certain returned magazines, paperbacks, or records); Rev. Proc. 97–43, 1997–2 C.B. 494 (section 475 — electing out of certain exemptions from securities dealer status); and Rev. Proc. 91–51, 1991–2 C.B. 779 (section 1286 — certain taxpayers under examination that sell mortgages and retain rights to service the mortgages). Sec. 9.22 January 2, 2007442007–1 I.R.B. (4)The following automatic change request procedures, which do not require a completed Form 3115, provide the type of accounting method change that may be made automatically and also provide the procedures under which such change must be made: Notice 96–30, 1996–1 C.B. 378 (section 446 — change to comply with Statement of Fi- nancial Accounting Standards No. 116); Rev. Proc. 92–29, 1992–1 C.B. 748 (section 461 — change in real estate developer’s method for including costs of common improvements in the basis of property sold); Rev. Proc. 98–58, 1998–2 C.B. 710 (certain taxpayers seeking to change to the install- ment method of accounting under § 453 for alternative minimum tax purposes for certain deferred payment sales contracts relating to property used or produced in the trade or busi- ness of farming); Regs. § 1.472–2 (taxpayers changing to the last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory method); Code § 585(c) and Regs. §§ 1.585–6 and 1.585–7 (large bank changing from the reserve method of section 585); and Rev. Proc. 92–67, 1992–2 C.B. 429 (election under § 1278(b) to include market discount in income currently or election under § 1276(b) to use constant interest rate to determine accrued market discount). (5)SeeAppendix E for the list of revenue procedures for automatic changes in accounting period. Other sections of this revenue procedure that are applicable to a Form 3115 .23In addition to this section 9, the following sections of this revenue procedure are appli- cable to Forms 3115: 1 (purpose of Rev. Proc. 2007–1); 2.01 (definition of “letter ruling”); 2.02 (definition of “closing agreement”); 2.05 (oral guidance); 3.01 (issues under the jurisdiction of theAssociate Chief Counsel (Corporate)); 3.02 (issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products)); 3.03 (issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Ac- counting)); 3.04 (issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel(International)); 3.05 (issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Spe- cial Industries)) 3.07 (issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Gov- ernmental Entities)); 6.02 (letter rulings ordinarily not issued incertain areas because of the factual nature of the problem); 6.05 (letter rulings generally not issued to business associations or groups); 6.06 (letter rulings generally not issued where the request does not address the tax status, liability, or reporting obligations of the requester); Sec. 9.23 2007–1 I.R.B.45January 2, 2007 6.08 (letter rulings ordinarily not issued on federal tax consequences of proposed legisla- tion); 6.10 (letter rulings not issued on frivolous issues); 6.12 (letter rulings not issued on alternative plans or hypothetical situation); 7.01(1) (statement of facts and other information); 7.01(8) (statement of supporting authorities); 7.01(13) (authorized representatives); 7.01(14) (power of attorney and declaration of representative); 7.02(2) (power of attorney used to indicate recipient of a copy or copies of a letter ruling or a determination letter); 7.02(4) (expedited handling); 7.04(2) (notify Associate office if a return, amended return, or claim for refund is filed while request is pending and attach request to the return); 7.05 (attach letter ruling to the return, amended return or claim for refund); 10 (scheduling conferences); 15 (user fees); 16 (significant changes to Rev. Proc. 2006–1); 17 (effect of Rev. Proc. 2007–1 on other documents); 18 (effective date of this revenue procedure); Appendix A (schedule of user fees); and Appendix E (revenue procedures and notices regarding letter ruling requests relating to specific Code sections and subject matters). SECTION 10. HOW ARE CONFERENCES FOR LETTER RULINGS SCHEDULED? Schedules a conference if requested by taxpayer .01A taxpayer may request a conference regarding a letter ruling request. Normally, a conference is scheduled only when the Associate office considers it to be helpful in deciding the case or when an adverse decision is indicated. If conferences are being arranged for more than one request for a letter ruling involving the same taxpayer, they will be scheduled so as to cause the least inconvenience to the taxpayer. Asstated in sections 7.02(6) and 9.04(4) of this revenue procedure, a taxpayer who wants to have a conference on the issue or issues involved should indicate this in writing when, or soon after, filing the request. If a conference has been requested, the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s represen tative will be notified by telephone, if possible, of the time and place of the conference, whichmustthenbe held within 21 calendar days after this contact. Instructions for request ing an extension of the 21-day period and notifying the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representativ e of the Associate of- fice’s approval or denial of the request for extension are the same as those explained in section 8.05(2) (section 9.08(2)(a) for a change in accounting method request) of this revenue proce- dure regarding providing additional information. Permits taxpayer one conference of right .02A taxpayer is entitled, as a matter of right, to only one conference in the Associate office, except as explained under section 10.05of this revenue procedure. This conference is Sec. 9.23 January 2, 2007462007–1 I.R.B. normally held at the branch level and is attended by a person who has the authority to sign the letter ruling in his or her own name or for the branch chief. When more than one branch has taken an adverse position on an issue in a letter ruling request or when the position ultimately adopted by one branch will affect that adopted by an- other, a representative from each branch withthe authority to sign in his or her own name or for the branch chief will attend the conference.If more than one subject is to be discussed at the conference, the discussion will constitute a conference on each subject. To have a thorough and informed discussionof the issues, the conference usually will be held after the branch has had an opportunity to study the case. At the request of the taxpayer, the conference of right may be held earlier. No taxpayer has a right to appeal the action of abranch to an Associate Chief Counsel or to any other official of the Service.But seesection 10.05 of this revenue procedure for situations in which the Associate office may offer additional conferences. In employment tax matters, only the party entitled to the letter ruling is entitled to a confer- ence.Seesection 5.10 of this revenue procedure. Disallows verbatim recording of conferences .03Because conference procedures are informal, no tape, stenographic, or other verbatim recording of a conference may be made by any party Makes tentative recommendations on substantive issues .04The senior Associate office representative present at the conference ensures that the tax- payer has the opportunity to present views on all the issues in question. An Associate office representative explains the Associate office’s tentative decision on the substantive issues and the reasons for that decision. If the taxpayer asks the Associate office to limit the retroactive effect of any letter ruling or limit the revocation or modification of a prior letter ruling, an Associate office representative will discuss the recommendation concerning this issue and the reasons for the recommendation. The Associate office representatives will not make a com- mitment regarding the conclusion that the Associate office will finally adopt. May offer additional conferences.05The Associate office will offer the taxpayeran additional conference if, after the con- ference of right, an adverse holding is proposed, but on a new issue, or on the same issue but on different grounds from those discussed at the first conference. There is no right to another conference when a proposed holding is reversedat a higher level with a result less favorable to the taxpayer, if the grounds or arguments on which the reversal is based were discussed at the conference of right. The limit on the number of conferences to which a taxpayer is entitled does not prevent the Associate office from offering additional conferences, including conferences with an official higher than the branch level, if the Associate office decides they are needed. These confer- ences are not offered as a matter of course simply because the branch has reached an adverse decision. In general, conferences with higher level officials are offered only if the Associate office determines that the case presents significant issues of tax policy or tax administration and that the consideration of these issues would be enhanced by additional conferences with the taxpayer. Requires written confirmation of information presented at conference .06The taxpayer should furnish to the Associate office any additional data, reasoning, prece- dents, etc., that were proposed by the taxpayer and discussed at the conference but not previ- ously or adequately presented in writing. The taxpayer must furnish the additional information within 21 calendar days from the date of the conference. If the additional information is not re- ceived within that time, a letter ruling will be issued on the basis of the information on hand or, if appropriate, no ruling will be issued.Seesection 8.05 of this revenue procedure for instruc- tions on submission of additional information for a letter ruling request other than a change in accounting method request.Seesection 9.08 of this revenue procedure for instructions on submitting additional information for a change in accounting method request. May schedule a pre-submission conference .07Sometimes it will be advantageous to both the Associate office and the taxpayer to hold a conference before the taxpayer submits the letter ruling request to discuss substantive or pro- Sec. 10.07 2007–1 I.R.B.47January 2, 2007 cedural issues relating to a proposed transaction.These conferences are held only if the identity of the taxpayer is provided to the Associate office, only if the taxpayer actually intends to make a request, only if the request involves a matter on which a letter ruling is ordinarily issued, and only at the discretion of the Associate office and as time permits. For example, a pre-sub- mission conference will not be held on an incometaxissueif,atthetimethepre-submission conference is requested, the identical issue is involved in the taxpayer’s return for an earlier period and that issue is being examined by a field office.Seesection 6.01(1) of this revenue procedure. A letter ruling request submitted following a pre-submission conference will not necessarily be assigned to the branch that held the pre-submission conference. Also, when a letter ruling request is not submitted following a pre-submission conference, the Associate office may notify, by memorandum, the appropriate Service official inthe operating division that has examination jurisdiction of the taxpayer’s tax return and may give its views on the issues raised during the pre-submission conference. This memorandummay constitute Chief Counsel Advice, as defined in § 6110(i), subject to disclosure under § 6110. (1) Taxpayer may request a pre-submissionconference in writing or by telephone.A taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative may request a pre-submission conference in writing or by telephone. If the taxpayer’s representative is requesting the pre-submission conference, a power of attorney is required. It is preferred that Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Dec- laration of Representative, be used to provide the representative’s authority. If multiple tax- payers and/or their authorized representatives will attend or participate in the pre-submission conference, cross powers of attorney (or tax information authorizations) are required. If the taxpayer’s representative is requesting the pre-submission conference by telephone, the Asso- ciate office’s representative (see list of phone numbers below) will provide the fax number to send the power of attorney prior to scheduling the pre-submission conference. The request should identify the taxpayer and include a brief explanation of the primary issue so that an assignment to the appropriatebranch can be made. If submitted in writing, the request should also identify the Associate office expected to have jurisdiction over the request for a letter ruling. A written request for a pre-submission conference should be sent to the appropriate address listed in section 7.03 of this revenue procedure. To request a pre-submission conference by telephone, call: (a) (202) 622–7700 (not a toll-free call) for matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate); (b) (202) 622–3900 (not a toll-free call) for matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products); (c) (202) 622–4800 (not a toll-free call) for matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting); (d) (202) 622–3800 (not a toll-free call) for matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International); (e) (202) 622–3000 (not a toll-free call) for matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries); (f) (202) 622–3400 (not a toll-free call) for matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration); or (g) (202) 622–6000 (not a toll-free call) for matters under the jurisdiction of the Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). (2)Pre-submission conferences held in person or by telephone.Depending on the cir- cumstances, pre-submission conferences may be held in person at the Associate office or may be conducted by telephone. (3) Certain information required to be submitted to the Associate office prior to the pre-submission conference.Generally, the taxpayer will be asked to provide, at least three Sec. 10.07 January 2, 2007482007–1 I.R.B. business days before the scheduled pre-submission conference, a statement of whether the is- sueisanissueonwhichaletterrulingisordinarily issued, a draft of the letter ruling request or other detailed written statement of the proposed transaction, issue, and legal analysis. If the taxpayer’s authorized representative will attend or participate in the pre-submission con- ference, a power of attorney is required. (4) Discussion of substantive issues is not binding on the Service.Any discussion of substantive issues at a pre-submission conferenceis advisory only, is not binding on the Service in general or on the Office of Chief Counsel in particular, and cannot be relied upon as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). May schedule a conference to be held by telephone .08Depending on the circumstances, conferences, including conferences of right and pre- submission conferences, may be held by telephone. This may occur, for example, when a taxpayer wants a conference of right but believes that the issue involved does not warrant in- curring the expense of traveling to Washington, DC, or if it is believed that scheduling an in person conference of right will substantially delay the ruling process.If a taxpayer makes such a request, the branch reviewer will decide if itis appropriate in the particular case to hold a conference by telephone. If the request is approved, the taxpayer will be advised when to call the Associate office representatives (not a toll-free call). SECTION 11. WHAT EFFECT WILL A LETTER RULING HAVE? May be relied on subject to limitations .01A taxpayer ordinarily may rely on a letter ruling received from the Associate office subject to the conditions and limitations described in this section. Will not apply to another taxpayer.02A taxpayer may not rely on a letter ruling issued to another taxpayer.See§ 6110(k)(3). Will be used by a field office in examining the taxpayer’s return .03When determining a taxpayer’s liability, the field office must ascertain whether— (1) the conclusions stated in the letter ruling are properly reflected in the return; (2) the representations upon which the letter ruling was based reflected an accurate state- ment of the controlling facts; (3) the transaction was carried out substantially as proposed; and (4) there has been any change in the law that applies to the period during which the trans- action or continuing series of transactions were consummated. If, when determining the liability, the field office finds that a letter ruling should be revoked or modified, the findings and recommendations of the field office will be forwarded through the appropriate Director to the Associate office for consideration before further action is taken by the field office. Otherwise, the letter ruling is to be applied by the field office in the deter- mination of the taxpayer’s liability. Appropriate coordination with the Associate office must be undertaken if any field office having jurisdiction over a return or other matter proposes to reach a conclusion contrary to a letter ruling previously issued to the taxpayer. May be revoked or modified if found to be in error or there has been a change in law .04Unless it was part of a closing agreement as described in section 2.02 of this revenue procedure, a letter ruling found to be in error or not in accord with the current views of the Service may be revoked or modified. If a letter ruling is revoked or modified, the revocation or modification applies to all years open under theperiod of limitations unless the Service uses its discretionary authority under § 7805(b) to limit the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification. A letter ruling may be revoked or modified by — (1) a letter giving notice of revocation or modification to the taxpayer to whom the letter ruling was issued; Sec. 11.04 2007–1 I.R.B.49January 2, 2007 (2) the enactment of legislation or ratification of a tax treaty; (3) a decision of the United States Supreme Court; (4) the issuance of temporary or final regulations; or (5) the issuance of a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or other statement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Consistent with these provisions, if a letter ruling relates toa continuing action or aseries of actions, it ordinarily will be applied until any one of the events described above occurs or until it is specifically withdrawn. Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking will not affect the application of any letter ruling issued under this revenue procedure. Where a letter ruling is revoked or modified by a letter to the taxpayer, the letter will state whether the revocation or modification is retroactive. Where a letter ruling is revoked or mod- ified by the issuance of final or temporary regulations or by the publication of a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice or other statement in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, the document may contain a statement as to its retroactive effect on letter rulings. Letter ruling revoked or modified based on material change in facts applied retroactively .05An Associate office will revoke or modify a letter ruling and apply the revocation retroactively to the taxpayer for whom the letter ruling was issued or to a taxpayer whose tax liability was directly involved in the letter ruling if— (1) there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts; or (2) the facts at the time of the transaction are materially different from the controlling facts on which the letter ruling was based; or (3) if the transaction involves a continuing action or series of actions, the controlling facts change during the course of the transaction. Not otherwise generally revoked or modified retroactively .06Where the revocation or modification of a letter ruling is for reasons other than a change in facts as described in section 11.05 of this revenue procedure, it will generally not be applied retroactively to the taxpayer for whom the letter ruling was issued or to a taxpayer whose tax liability was directly involved in the letter ruling provided that— (1) there has been no change in the applicable law; (2) the letter ruling was originally issued for a proposed transaction; and (3) the taxpayer directly involved in the letter ruling acted in good faith in relying on the let- ter ruling, and revoking or modifying the letter ruling retroactively would be to the taxpayer’s detriment. For example, the tax liability ofeach shareholder is directly involved in a letter ruling on the reorganization of a corporation.The shareholders’ reliance on the letter ruling may, depending on all facts and circumstances, be in good faith. The tax liability of a member of an industry, however, is not directly involved in a letter ruling issued to another member of the same industry and, therefore, a nonretroactive revocation or modification of a letter ruling to one member of an industry will not extend to other members of the industry who have not received letter rulings. By the same reasoning, a tax practitioner may not extend to one client the nonretroactive application of a revocation or modification of a letter ruling previously is- sued to another client. If a letter ruling is revoked or modified by a letter with retroactive effect, the letter will, except in fraud cases, state the grounds on which the letter ruling is being revoked or modified and explain the reasons why it is being revoked or modified retroactively. Retroactive effect of revocation or modification applied to a particular transaction .07A letter ruling issued on a particular transaction represents a holding of the Service on that transaction only. It will not apply to a similar transaction in the same year or any other year. And, except in unusual circumstances, the applicationofthatletterrulingtothetransactionwill Sec. 11.04 January 2, 2007502007–1 I.R.B. not be affected by the later issuance of regulations (either temporary or final) if conditions (1) through (3) in section 11.06 of this revenue procedure are met. If a letter ruling on a transaction is later found to be in error or no longer in accord with the position of the Service, it will not protect a similar transaction of the taxpayer in the same year or later year. Retroactive effect of revocation or modification applied to a continuing action or series of actions .08If a letter ruling is issued covering a continuing action or series of actions and the letter ruling is later found to be in error or no longer in accord with the position of the Service, the appropriate Associate Chief Counsel or Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel ordinarily will limit the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification to a date that is not earlier than that on which the letter ruling is revoked or modified. For example, the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification of a letter ruling covering a continuing action or series of actions ordinarily would be limited in the following situations when the letter ruling is in error or no longer in accord with the position of the Service: (1) A taxpayer received a letter ruling that certain payments are excludable from gross in- come for federal income tax purposes. The taxpayer ordinarily would be protected only for the payment received after the letter ruling was issued and before the revocation or modification of the letter ruling. (2) A taxpayer rendered a service or provideda facility that is subject to the excise tax on services or facilities and, in relying on a letter ruling received, did not pass the tax on to the user of the service or the facility. (3) An employer incurred liability under theFederal Insurance Contributions Act but, in relying on a letter ruling received, neither collected the employee tax nor paid the employee and employer taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act. The retroactive effect would be limited for both the employer and employee tax. The limitation would be conditioned on the employer furnishing wage data, as may be required by § 31.6011(a)–1 of the Employment Tax Regulations. Generally not retroactively revoked or modified if related to sale or lease subject to excise tax .09A letter ruling holding that the sal e or lease of a particular article is subject to the manu- facturer’s excise tax or the retailer’ s excise tax may not retroactively revoke or modify an ear- lier letter ruling holding that the sal e or lease of such an article was not taxable if the taxpayer to whom the letter ruling was issued, in relying on the earlier letter ruling, gave up possession or ownership of the article without pa ssing the tax on to the customer. (Section 1108(b), Rev- enue Act of 1926.) May be retroactively revoked or modified when transaction is entered into before the issuance of the letter ruling .10A taxpayer is not protected against retroactive revocation or modification of a letter ruling involving a transaction completed beforethe issuance of the letter ruling or involving a continuing action or series of actions occurring before the issuance of the letter ruling because the taxpayer did not enter into the transaction relying on a letter ruling. Taxpayer may request that retroactivity be limited .11Under § 7805(b), the Service may prescribe any extent to which a revocation or modi- fication of a letter ruling will be applied without retroactive effect. A taxpayer to whom a letter ruling has been issued may request that the appropriate Asso- ciate Chief Counsel limit the retroactive effectof any revocation or modification of the letter ruling. Format of request(1) Request for relief under § 7805(b) must be made in required format. A request to limit the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification of a letter ruling must be in the general form of, and meet the general requirements for, a letter ruling request. These requirements are given in section 7 of thisrevenue procedure. Specifically, the request must also— (a) state that it is being made under § 7805(b); (b) state the relief sought; Sec. 11.11 2007–1 I.R.B.51January 2, 2007 (c) explain the reasons and arguments in support of the relief requested (including a discus- sion of section 11.05 of this revenue procedure and the three items listed in section 11.06 of this revenue procedure and any other factors as they relate to the taxpayer’s particular situation); and (d) include any documents bearing on the request. A request that the Service limit the retroactive effect of a revocation or modification of a letter ruling may be made in the form of a separate request for a letter ruling when, for example, a revenue ruling has the effect of modifying or revoking a letter ruling previously issued to the taxpayer or when the Service notifies the taxpayer of a change in position that will have the effect of revoking or modifying the letter ruling. When notice is given by the field office duringan examination of the taxpayer’s return or by Appeals, during consideration of the taxpayer’s return before Appeals, a request to limit retroactive effect must be made in the form of arequest for technical advice as explained in section 14.02 of Rev. Proc. 2007–2, this Bulletin. When germane to a pending letter ruling request, a request to limit the retroactive effect of a revocation or modification of a letter ruling may be made as part of the request for the letter ruling, either initially or at any time before the letter rul ing is issued. When a letter ruling that concerns a continuing transaction is revoked or modifi ed by, for example, a subsequent revenue ruling, a request to limit retroactive effect mus t be made before the examination of the return that contains the transaction that is the subject o f the letter ruling request. Request for conference(2) Taxpayer may request a conference on application of § 7805(b). A taxpayer who requests the application of § 7805(b) in a separate letter ruling request has the right to a conference in the Associate office as explained in sections 10.02, 10.04, and 10.05 of this revenue procedure. If the request is made initially as part of a pending letter ruling request or is made before the conference of right is held on the substantive issues, the § 7805(b) issue will be discussed at the taxpayer’s one conference of right as explained in section 10.02 of this revenue procedure. If the request for the application of § 7805(b) relief is made as part of a pending letter ruling request after a conference has been held on the substantive issue and the Associate office determines that there is justification for having delayed the request, the taxpayer is entitled to one conference of right concerning the application of § 7805(b), with the conference limited to discussion of this issue only. SECTION 12. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DO DIRECTORS ISSUE DETERMINATION LETTERS? Directors issue determination letters only ifthe question presented is specifically answered by a statute, tax treaty, or regulations, a conclusion stated in a revenue ruling, or an opinion or court decision that representsthe position of the Service. Under no circumstances will a Director issue a determination letter unless it is clearly shown that the request concerns a return that has been filed or is required to be filed and over which the Director has, or will have, examination jurisdiction. A determination letter does not inc lude assistance provided by the U.S. competent authority pursuant to the mutual agreement pr ocedure in tax treaties as setforth in Rev. Proc. 2006–54, 2006–49 I.R.B. 1035. In income and gift tax matters.01In income and gift tax matters, Directors issue determination letters in response to tax- payers’ written requests on completed transactions that affect returns over which they have examination jurisdiction. A determination letter usually is not issued for a question concern- ing a return to be filed by the taxpayer if the same question is involved in a return already filed. Normally, Directors do not issue determination letters on the tax consequences of proposed transactions. A Director may issue a determination letter on the replacement, even though not yet made, of involuntarily converted property under § 1033, if the taxpayer has filed an income tax return for the year in which the property was involuntarily converted. Sec. 11.11 January 2, 2007522007–1 I.R.B. In estate tax matters.02In estate tax matters, Directors issue determination letters in response to written re- quests affecting the estate tax returns over which they have examination jurisdiction. They do not issue determination letters on matters concerning the application of the estate tax to the prospective estate of a living person. In generation-skipping transfer tax matters .03In generation-skipping transfer tax matters, Directors issue determination letters in re- sponse to written requests affecting the generation-skipping transfer tax returns over which they have examination jurisdiction. They do not issue determination letters on matters concerning the application of the generation-skipping transfer tax before the distribution or termination takes place. In employment and excise tax matters .04In employment and excise tax matters, Directors issue determination letters in response to taxpayers’ written requests on completed transactions over which they have examination jurisdiction.See alsosection 5.10 of this revenue procedure. Requests concerning income, estate, or gift tax returns .05A request received by a Director on a question concerning an income, estate, or gift tax return already filed generally will be considered in connection with the examination of the return. If a response is made to the request before the return is examined, it will be considered a tentative finding inany later examination of that return. Attach a copy of determination letter to taxpayer’s return .06A taxpayer who, before filing a return, receives a determination letter about any trans- action that has been consummated and that is relevant to the return being filed should attach a copy of the determination letter to the return when it is filed. Review of determination letters.07Determination letters issued under sections 12.01 through 12.04 of this revenue proce- dure are not reviewed by the Associate officesbefore they are issued. If a taxpayer believes that a determination letter of this type is in error, the taxpayer may ask the Director to recon- sider the matter or to request technical advice from an Associate office as explained in Rev. Proc. 2007–2, this Bulletin. Addresses to send determination letter requests .08(a) For taxpayers under the jurisdiction of LMSB, send a request for a determination letter to the following address: Internal Revenue Service Attn: Manager, Office of Pre-Filing and Technical Services Large and Mid-Size Business Division SE:LM:PFT:PFTS Mint Building, 3rd Floor 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 (b) SB/SE and W&I taxpayers should send requests for determination letters to the appro- priate SB/SE office listed in Appendix D. (c) For a determination letter under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division,seeRev. Proc. 2007–4, this Bulletin. (d) For fees required with determination letter requests,seesection15andAppendixAof this revenue procedure. SECTION 13. WHAT EFFECT WILL A DETERMINATION LETTER HAVE? Has same effect as a letter ruling.01A determination letter issued by a Director has the same effect as a letter ruling issued to a taxpayer under section 11 of this revenue procedure. If a field office proposes to reach a conclusion contrary to that expressed in a determination letter, that office need not refer the matter to theAssociateofficeasisrequiredforaletter ruling found to be in error. The field office must, however, refer the matter to the Associate Sec. 13.01 2007–1 I.R.B.53January 2, 2007 office through the appropriate Director, if it desires to have the revocation or modification of the determination letter limited under § 7805(b). Taxpayer may request that retroactive effect of revocation or modification be limited .02Under § 7805(b), the Service may prescribe the extent to which a revocation or mod- ification of a determination letter will be applied without retroactive effect. A Director does not have authority under § 7805(b) to limit therevocation or modification of the determina- tion letter. Therefore, if the field office proposes to revoke or modify a determination letter, the taxpayer may request limitation of the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification by asking the Director that issued the determination letter to seek technical advice from the Associate office.Seesection 14.02 of Rev. Proc. 2007–2, this Bulletin. Format of request(1) Request for relief under § 7805(b) must be made in required format. A taxpayer’s request to limit the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification of the determination letter must be in the form of, and meet the general requirements for, a technical advice request.Seesection 14.02 of Rev. Proc. 2007–2, this Bulletin. The request must also— (a) state that it is being made under § 7805(b); (b) state the relief sought; (c) explain the reasons and arguments in support of the relief sought (including a discussion of section 11.05 of this revenue procedure andthe three items listed in section 11.06 of this revenue procedure and any other factors as they relate to the taxpayer’s particular situation); and (d) include any documents bearing on the request. Request for conference(2) Taxpayer may request a conference on application of § 7805(b). When technical advice is requested regardingthe application of § 7805(b), the taxpayer has the right to a conference with the Associate office to the same extent as does any taxpayer who is the subject of a technical advice request.Seesection 14.04 of Rev. Proc. 2007–2, this Bulletin. SECTION 14. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES ARE MATTERS REFERRED BETWEEN A DIRECTOR AND AN ASSOCIATE OFFICE? Requests for determination letters.01Requests for determination letters received by a Director w ith respect to which it may not issue a determination letter, under the provisions of this reve nue procedure, will be forwarded to an Associate office for reply. The field office will notify t he taxpayer that the matter has been referred. Directors will also refer to an Associate office any request for a determination letter that in their judgment should have the attention of the Associate office. No-rule areas.02If the request involves an issue on which the Service will not issue a letter ruling or determination letter, the request will not beforwarded to an Associate office. The Director will notify the taxpayer that the Service will not issue a letter ruling or a determination letter on the issue.Seesection 6 of this revenue procedure for a description of no-rule areas. Requests for letter rulings.03Requests for a letter ruling received by an Associate office that,under section 6 of this revenue procedure, may not be acted upon by the Associate office may, in the office’s dis- cretion, be forwarded to the field office that hasexamination jurisdiction over the taxpayer’s return. The taxpayer will be notified of this action. If the request is on an issue or in an area of the type discussed in section 6 of this revenue procedure and the Service decides not to issue a letter ruling or a determination letter, the Associate office will notify the taxpayer and will then forward the request to the appropriate fieldoffice for association with the related return. Sec. 13.01 January 2, 2007542007–1 I.R.B. Letter ruling request mistakenly sent to a Director .04A request for a letter ruling mistakenly sent to a Director will be returned by the Director to the taxpayer so that the taxpayer can send it to an Associate office. SECTION 15. WHAT ARE THE USER FEE REQUIREMENTS FOR REQUESTS FOR LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS? Legislation authorizing user fees.01Section 7528 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that the Secretary of the Trea- sury or delegate (the “Secretary”) shall establish a program requiring the payment of user fees for requests to the Service for letter rulings, opinion letters, determination letters, and similar requests. The fees apply to requests made through September 30, 2014. The fees charged un- der the program are to: (1) vary according to categories or subcategories established by the Secretary; (2) be determined after taking intoaccount the average time for, and difficulty of, complying with requests in each category and subcategory; and (3) be payable in advance. The Secretary is to provide for exemptions and reduced fees under the program as the Secretary de- termines to be appropriate, but the averagefee applicable to each category must not be less than the amount specified in § 7528. Requests to which a user fee applies .02In general, user fees apply to all requests for— (1) letter rulings (including advance consent Forms 3115), determination letters, informa- tion letters and advance pricing agreements; (2) closing agreements described in paragraph (A)(3)(d) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure and pre-filing agreements described in Rev. Proc. 2005–12, 2005–1 C.B. 311 or its successor; (3) renewal of advance pricing agreements; and (4) reconsideration of letter rulings or determination letters. Requests to which a user fee applies must be accompanied by the appropriate fee as deter- mined fro m the fee schedule provided in Appendix A of this revenue procedure. The fee may be refund ed as provided in section 15.10 of this revenue procedure. Requests to which a user fee does not apply .03User fees do not apply to— (1) elections made pursuant to § 301.9100–2, pertaining to automatic extension s of time (seesection 5.03 of this revenue procedure); (2) late initial classification elections made pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2002–59 (see section 5.03(5) of this revenue procedure); (3) late S corporation and related elections made pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2004–49, Rev. Proc. 2004–48, Rev. Proc. 2003–43 or Rev. Proc. 97–48 (seesection 5.02 of this revenue procedure); or (4) requests for a change in accounting period or accounting method permitted to be made by a published automatic change revenue procedure (seesection 9.01(1) of this revenue pro- cedure). Exemptions from the user fee requirements .04The user fee requirements do not apply to— (1) departments, agencies, or instrumentalities of the United States if they certify that they are seeking a letter ruling or determination letter on behalf of a program or activity funded by federal appropriations. The fact that a user fee is not charged does not have any bearing on whether an applicant is treated as an agency or instrumentality of the United States for purposes of any provision of the Code; or Sec. 15.04 2007–1 I.R.B.55January 2, 2007 (2) requests as to whether a worker is an employee for federal employment taxes and income tax withholding purposes (Subtitle C ofthe Code) submitted on Form SS–8,Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding,orits equivalent. Fee schedule.05The schedule of user fees is provided in Appendix A of this revenue procedure. For the user fee requirements applicable to— (1) requests for advance pricing agreementsor renewals of advance pricing agreements,see section 4.12 of Rev. Proc. 2004–40, 2004–2 C.B. 50; or 5.14 of Rev. Proc. 96–53, 1996–2 C.B. at 379; or (2) requests for letter rulings, determination letters, etc., under the jurisdiction of the Com- missioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division,seeRev. Proc. 2007–8, this Bul- letin. Applicable user fee for a request involving multiple offices, fee categories, issues, transactions, or entities .06 (1) Requests involving several offices.If a request dealing with only one transaction in- volves more than one of the offices within the Service (for example, one issue is under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) and another issue is under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Di- vision), only one fee applies, namely the highest fee that otherwise would apply to each of the offices involved.SeeRev. Proc. 2007–8, this Bulletin for the user fees applicable to issues under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. (2) Requests involving several fee categories.If a request dealing with only one trans- action involves more than one fee category, only one fee applies, namely the highest fee that otherwise would apply to each of the categories involved. (3) Requests involving several issues.If a request dealing with only one transaction in- volves several issues, a request for a change in accounting method dealing with only one item or submethod of accounting involves several issues, or a request for a change in accounting period dealing with only one item involves several issues, the request is treated as one re- quest. Therefore, only one fee applies, namelythe fee that applies to the particular category or subcategory involved. The addition of a new issue relating to the same transaction, item, or submethod will not result in anadditional fee, unless the issue places the transaction, item, or submethod in a higher fee category. (4) Requests involving several unrelated transactions.If a request involves several unre- lated transactions, a request for a change in accounting method involves several unrelated items or submethods of accounting, or a request for achange in accounting period involves several unrelated items, each transaction or item is treated as a separate request. As a result, a separate fee will apply for each unrelated transaction, item, or submethod. An additional fee will apply if the request is changed by the addition of an unrelated transaction, item, or submethod not contained in the initial request. An example of a request involving unrelated transactions is a request involving relief under § 301.9100–3 and the underlying issue. (5) Requests involving several en tities.Each entity involved in a transaction (for example, a reorganization) that desires a s eparate letter ruling in its own name must pay a separate fee regardless of whether the transac tion or transactions may be viewed as related.But seesection 15.07 of this revenue procedure. Applicable user fee for requests for substantiallyidentical letter rulings or identical accounting method changes .07 (1) In general.The user fees provided in paragraph (A)(5) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure apply to the situations described in sections 15.07(2) and 15.07(4) of this revenue procedure. To assist in the processing of these user fee requests, all letter ruling requests sub- mitted under this section 15.07 should— Sec. 15.04 January 2, 2007562007–1 I.R.B. (a) Except for advance consent Forms 3115, type or print at the top of the letter ruling re- quest: “REQUEST FOR USER FEE UNDER SECTION 15.07 OF REV. PROC. 2007–1”; (b) List on the first page of the submission all taxpayers and entities, and separate and distinct trades or businesses, including qualified subchapter S subsidiaries (QSUBs) or single member limited liability companies (single member LLCs), requesting a letter ruling (including the tax- payer identification number, and the amount of user fee submitted, for each taxpayer, entity, or separate and distinct trade or business); and (c) Submit one check to cover all user fees. If the Service determines that the letter ruling requests do not qualify for the use rfeepro- vided in paragraph (A)(5) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure, the Service will request the proper fee.Seesection 15.09 of this revenue procedure. (2) Substantially identical letter rulings.The user fee provided in paragraph (A)(5)(a) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure applies to ataxpayer that requests substantially iden- tical letter rulings (includingaccounting period, accounting method, and earnings and profits requests other than those submitted on Forms 1128, 2553, 3115, and 5452) for either multiple entities with a common member or sponsor, or multiple members of a common entity. To qual- ify for this user fee, all information and underlying documents must be substantially identical and all letter ruling requests must be submitted at the same time. In addition, the letter ruling requests must— (a) State that the letter ruling requests, and all information and underlying documents, are substantially identical; and (b) Specifically identify the extent to which theletter ruling requests, information, and un- derlying documents are not identical. (3) Substantially identical plans under section 25(c)(2)(B).The user fee provided in para- graph (A)(5)(b) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure shall apply to a taxpayer that submits substantially identical plans for administering the 95-percent requirement of section 143(d)(1) following the submission and approval of an initial plan for administering the requirement. The request for subsequent approvals of substantially identical plans must: (1) state that a prior plan was submitted and approved and include a copy of the prior plan and approval; (2) state that the subsequent plan is substantially identical to the approved plan; and (3) describe any differences between the approved plans and the subsequent plan. (4) Identical accounting method changes and related § 301.9100 letter rulings.T he following situations are eligible for the user fees provided in paragraphs (A)( 5)(b) and (d) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure: (i) A taxpayer requests an identical accounting method change on a single Form 3115, or an extension of time to file Form 3115 under § 301.9100–3 for the identical accounting method change, for two or more separate and distinct trades or businesses (for purposes of § 1.446–1(d)) of that taxpayer, including QSUBs and single member LLCs; (ii) A common parent requests the identical accounting method change on a single Form 3115, or an extension of time to file Form 3115 under § 301.9100–3 for the identical accounting method change, on behalf of two or moremembers of the consolidated group; (iii) A common parent requests the identical accounting method change on a single Form 3115, or an extension of time to file Form 3115 under § 301.9100–3 for the identical accounting method change, on behalf of two or more controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) that do not engage in a trade or business within the United States where all controlling U.S. shareholders of the CFCs are members of the consolidated group; or (iv) A taxpayer requests an identical accounting method change on a single Form 3115, or an extension of time to file Form 3115 under § 301.9100–3 for the identical accounting method Sec. 15.07 2007–1 I.R.B.57January 2, 2007 change, on behalf of two or more CFCs that donot engage in a trade or business within the United States for which the taxpayer is the sole controlling U.S. shareholder of the CFCs. To qualify as an identical accounting method change the multiple separate and distinct trades or businesses of a taxpayer, including QSUBs and single member LLCs, the multiple members of a consolidated group, or the multiple eligible CFCs must request to change from an identi- cal present method of accounting to an identical proposed method of accounting. All aspects of the requested accounting method change, including the present and proposed methods, the underlying facts and the authority for the request, must be identical, except for the § 481(a) adjustments for the year of change. If the Associate office determines that the requested ac- counting method changes are not identical, additional user fees will be required before any letter ruling is issued. The taxpayer or common parent must, for each separate and distinct trade or business (in- cluding a QSUB or single-member LLC) member of a consolidated group, or eligible CFC for which the accounting method change is being requested, attach to the Form 3115 a schedule providing the name, employer identification number (where applicable), and § 481(a) adjust- ment for the year of change. If the request is on behalf of eligible CFCs, the taxpayer or common parent must attach a statement that “[a]ll controlling U.S. shareholders (as defined in § 1.964–1(c)(5)) of all the CFCs to which the request relates are members of the common parent’s consolidated group” or that “[t]he taxpayer filing the request is the sole controlling U.S. shareholder (as defined in § 1.964–1(c)(5)) of the CFCs to which the request relates,” as applicable. In the case of a § 301.9100 request for an extension of time to file a Form 3115 requesting an identical accounting method change for multiple separate and distinct trades or businesses of a taxpayer (including QSUBs or single-member LLCs) multiple members of the consolidated group or multiple eligible CFCs, the taxpayer or common parent must submit the information required in the preceding paragraph in addition to theinformation required by section 5.03 of this revenue procedure. Method of payment.08Each request to the Service for a letter ruling, determination letter, information letter, advance pricing agreement, closing agreement described in paragraph (A)(3)(d) of Appendix A of this revenue procedure, or reconsideration of a letter rulingor determination letter must be accompanied by a check or money order in U.S.dollars, payable to the Internal Revenue Service, in the appropriate amount. (The user fee check or money order should not be attached to the Form 2553,Election by a Small Business Corporation, when it is filed at the Service Center. If on the Form 2553 an electing S corporation requests a ruling to use a fiscal year under section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 2002–39, 2002–1 C.B. 1046, the Service Center will forward the request to the Associate office. When the Associate office receives the Form 2553 from the Service Center, it will notify the taxpayerthat the fee is due.) Taxpayers should not send cash. Effect of nonpayment or payment of incorrect amount .09If a request is not accompanied by a properly completed check or money order or is accompanied by a check or money order for less than the correct amount, the respective office within the Service that is responsible for issuing the letter ruling, determination letter, informa- tion letter, advance pricing agreement, closing agreement, or reconsideration of a letter ruling or determination letter generally will exercise discretion in deciding whether to return imme- diately the request. If a request is not immediately returned, the taxpayer will be contacted and given a reasonable amount of time to submit the proper fee. If the proper fee is not received within a reasonable amount of time, the entire request will then be returned. The Service will usually defer substantive consideration of a request until proper payment has been received. The return of a request to the taxpayer may adversely affect substantive rights if the request is not perfected and resubmitted to the Service within 30 days of the date of the cover letter returning the request. If a request is accompanied by a check or money order for more than the correct amount, the request will be accepted and the amount of the excess payment will be returned to the taxpayer. Sec. 15.07 January 2, 2007582007–1 I.R.B. Refunds of user fee.10In general, the user fee will not be refundedunless the Service declines to rule on all issues for which a ruling is requested. (1) The following situations are examples of situations in which the user fee will not be refunded: (a) The request for a letter ruling, determination letter, etc., is withdrawn at any time sub- sequent to its receipt by the Service, unless the only reason for withdrawal is that the Service has advised the taxpayer that a higher user fee than was sent with the request is applicable and the taxpayer is unwilling to pay the higher fee. (b) The request is procedurally deficient, although accompanied by the proper fee or an overpayment, and is not timely perfected. When there is a failure to perfect timely the request, the case will be considered closed and the failure to perfect will be treated as a wit hdrawal for purposes of this revenue procedure.Seesection 8.05(3) of this revenue procedure . (c) The Associate office notifies the taxpayer that the Associate office will not issue the letter ruling and has closed the case as a result of the taxpayer’s failure to submit timely the additional information requested by the Associate office. The failure to submit the additional information will be treated as a withdrawal for purposes of this revenue procedure.Seesection 8.05(3) of this revenue procedure (section 9.08(7) for a request for a change in accounting method). (d) A letter ruling, determination letter, etc., is revoked in whole or in part at the initiative of the Service. The fee paid at the time the original letter ruling, determination letter, etc., was requested will not be refunded. (e) The request contains several issues, andthe Service rules on some, but not all, of the issues. The highest fee applicable to the issueson which the Service rules will not be refunded. (f) The taxpayer asserts that a letter ruling the taxpayer received covering a single issue is erroneous or not responsive (other than an issue on which the Associate office has declined to rule) and requests reconsideration. The Associate office, upon reconsideration, does not agree that the letter ruling is erroneous or is not responsive. The fee accompanying the request for reconsideration will not be refunded. (g) The situation is the same as described in paragraph (f) of this section 15.10(1 ) except that the letter ruling covered several unrelated transactions. The Associate office , upon reconsider- ation, does not agree with the taxpayer that the letter ruling is erroneous or is no t responsive for all of the transactions, but does agree that it is erroneous as to one transaction. The fee accom- panying the request for reconsideration will not be refunded except to the exten t applicable to the transaction for which the Associate office agrees the letter ruling was in er ror. (h) The request is for a supplemental letter ruling, determination letter, etc., concerning a change in facts (whether significant or not) relating to the transaction on which the Service ruled. (i) The request is for reconsideration of an adverse or partially adverse letter ruling or a final adverse determination letter, and the taxpayersubmits arguments and authorities not submitted before the original letter ruling or determination letter was issued. (2) The following situations are examples of situations in which the user fee will be refunded: (a) In a situation to which section 15.10(1)(i) of this revenue procedure does not apply, the taxpayer asserts that a letter ruling the taxpayer received covering a single issue is erroneous or is not responsive (other than an issue on which the Associate office declined to rule) and requests reconsideration. The Associate officeagrees, upon reconsideration, that the letter ruling is erroneous or is not responsive. The fee accompanying the taxpayer’s request for reconsideration will be refunded. Sec. 15.10 2007–1 I.R.B.59January 2, 2007 (b) In a situation to which section 15.10(1)(i) of this revenue procedure does not apply, the taxpayer requests a supplemental letter ruling, determination letter, etc., to correct a mistake that the Service agrees it made in the original letter ruling, determination letter, etc., such as a mistake in the statement of facts or in the citation of a Code section. Once the Service agrees that it made a mistake, the fee accompanying the request for the supplemental letter ruling, determination letter, etc., will be refunded. (c) The taxpayer requests and is granted relief under § 7805(b) in connection with the re- vocation in whole or in part, of a previously issued letter ruling, determination letter, etc. The fee accompanying the request for relief will be refunded. (d) In a situation to which section 15.10(1)(e) of this revenue procedure applies, the tax- payer requests reconsideration of the Service’s decision not to rule on an issue. Once the Service agrees to rule on the issue, the fee accompanying the request for reconsideration will be refunded. (e) The letter ruling is not issued and takin g into account all the facts and circumstances, in- cluding the Service’s resources devoted to the request, the responsible Associate Chief Counsel in his or her sole discretion decides a refun d is appropriate. Request for reconsideration of user fee .11A taxpayer that believes the user fee charged by the Service for its request for a letter ruling, determination letter, advance pricing agreement, or closing agreement is either inappli- cable or incorrect and wishes to receive a refund of all or part of the amount paid (seesection 15.10 of this revenue procedure) may request reconsideration and, if desired, the opportunity foranoraldiscussionbysendingalettertothe Service at the appropriate address given in section 7.03 in this revenue procedure. Both the incoming envelope and the letter requesting such reconsideration should be prominently marked “USER FEE RECONSIDERATION RE- QUEST.” No user fee is required for these requests. The request should be marked for the attention of: If the matter involves primarily:Mark for the attention of: Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) letter ruling requests Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate) Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products) letter ruling requests Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products) Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting) letter ruling requests Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting) Associate Chief Counsel (International) letter ruling and advance pricing agreement requests Associate Chief Counsel (International) Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) letter ruling requests Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) letter ruling requests Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) Sec. 15.10 January 2, 2007602007–1 I.R.B. If the matter involves primarily:Mark for the attention of: Division Coun sel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax E xempt and Government Entities) let ter ruling requests Assistant Chi ef Counsel ( ) (Complete by u sing whichever of the following designations applies: (Employee Benefits) or (Employment Tax/Exempt Organization s/Government Entities) Determination letter requests submitted pursuant to this revenue procedure by taxpayers under the jurisdiction of LMSB Manager, Office of Pre-Filing and Technical Services Determination letter requests submitted pursuant to this revenue procedure by taxpayers under the jurisdiction of SB/SE, W&I The appropriate SB/SE official listed in Appendix D Determina tion letter requests submitted pursuant to this revenue procedure by taxpay ers under the jurisdiction of TE/GE Director, Employee Plans Examinations Director , Exempt Organizations Examinations Director , Federal, State & Local Governments Director , Tax Exempt Bonds Director , Indian Tribal Governments (Add nam e of field office handling the request) SECTION 16. WHAT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO REV. PROC. 2006–1? .01Section9.17wasrevisedtoclarifytheprocedure for requesting consent for a chang ein accounting method. SECTION 17. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE ON OTHER DOCUMENTS? Rev. Proc. 2006–1, 2006–1 C.B. 1 is superseded. SECTION 18. WHAT IS THE EFFECTIVEDATEOFTHIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? This revenue procedure is effective January 2, 2007. SECTION 19. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The collections of information contained in this revenue procedure have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduc- tion Act (44 U.S.C. § 3507) under control number 1545–1522. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collec- tion of information unless the collection of information displays a valid control number. The collections of information in this revenue procedure are in sections 5.06, 7.01, 7.02, 7.03, 7.04, 7.05, 7.07, 8.02. 8.05, 8.07, 10.01, 10.06, 10.07, 11.11, 12.06, 13.02, 15.02, 15.07, 15.08, 15.09, 15.11, paragraph (B)(1) of Appendix A, Appendix C, and Appendix E (sub- ject matter—rate orders; regulatory agency; normalization). This information is required to evaluate and process the request for a letter ruling or determination letter. In addition, this in- formation will be used to help the Service deletecertain information from the text of the letter ruling or determination letter before it is made available for public inspection, as required by § 6110. The collections of information are required to obtain a letter ruling or determination letter. The likely respondents are business or other for-profit institutions. Sec. 19 2007–1 I.R.B.61January 2, 2007 The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is 305,140 hours. The estimated annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper varies from 1 to 200 hours, de- pending on individual circumstances, with an estimated average burden of 80.3 hours. The estimated number of respondentsand/or recordkeepers is 3,800. The estimated annual frequency of responses is on occasion. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by § 6103. DRAFTING INFORMATIONThe principal author of this revenue procedure is Matthew Howard of the Office of Asso- ciate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration). For further information regarding this revenue procedure for matters under the jurisdiction of— (1) the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), contact Richard Todd at (202) 622–7700 (not a toll-free call), (2) the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), contact Arturo Estrada at (202) 622–3900 (not a toll-free call), (3) the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), contact Brenda Wilson at (202) 622–4800 (not a toll-free call), (4) the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughsand Special Industries), contact Stephanie Bland at (202) 622–7830 (not a toll-free call), (5) the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), contact George Bowden or Henry Schneiderman at (202) 622–3400 (not a toll-free call), (6) the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities), contact Calder Robertson at (202) 622–6000 (not a toll-free call), or (7) the Associate Chief Counsel (International), contact Willard Yates at (202) 622–3164 (not a toll-free call). For further information regarding user fees, contact the Docket, Records, and User Fee Branch at (202) 622–7560 (not a toll-free call). Sec. 19 January 2, 2007622007–1 I.R.B. INDEX References are to sections in Rev. Proc. 2007–1 Additional Information —perjurystatementrequired .................................................................................... 8.05(4) —proposeddeletionsunder§6110.............................................................................. 7.01(11) —informationrequestedduringinitialandsubsequentcontacts.........................................................8.05 failuretosubmit......................................................................................... 8.05(3) subsequentinformationafterconference......................................................................10.06 —wheretosend ............................................................................................... 8.05(6) Changes in Accounting Method or Period — applicable sections of Rev. Proc. 2007–1 for accounting method changes.................................................9 — applicable sections of Rev. Proc. 2007–1 for accounting period...............................................AppendixE —automaticchangerevenueprocedures............................................................9.01,9.22,AppendixE — identical accounting method changes............................................................9.15,15.07,AppendixA —userfees................................................................................................AppendixA Checklist Required............................................................................... 7.01(18),AppendixC Conferences —offered .......................................................................................................10.02 afterconferenceofright ....................................................................................10.05 applicationof§6110..................................................................................7.01(11)(e) —requestingaconference....................................................................................... 7.02(6) —scheduling..............................................................................................10.01,10.02 applicationof§7805(b) .........................................................................11.11(2),13.02(2) pre-submissionconferences.................................................................................10.07 telephoneconferences......................................................................................10.08 Definitions —Associateoffice ............................................................................................. 1.01(2) —closingagreement ..............................................................................................2.02 —determinationletter.............................................................................................2.03 —Director .................................................................................................... 1.01(3) —fieldoffice.................................................................................................. 1.01(4) —informationletter...............................................................................................2.04 —letterruling ....................................................................................................2.01 —Service..................................................................................................... 1.01(1) —taxpayer.................................................................................................... 1.01(5) Determinations Under § 999(d)....................................................................................5.04 Discussions Not Binding on Service —atpre-submissionconference.................................................................................10.07(4) —informalopinionexpressed ......................................................................................8.04 —oraladvicetotaxpayers....................................................................................... 2.05(2) Employee Plans and Exempt Organizations —jurisdictionofCommissioner,TaxExemptandGovernmentEntitiesDivision..........................................4.02 —userfees.......................................................................................................4.02 Estate Tax Matters —issuanceofdeterminationletters...........................................................................12.02,12.05 —issuanceofletterrulings.........................................................................................5.06 under§2032A(c)...........................................................................................5.07 Expedited Handling of Letter Ruling and Determination Letter Requests......................................... 7.02(4) 2007–1 I.R.B.63January 2, 2007 INDEX References are to sections in Rev. Proc. 2007–1 Extension of Time —toscheduleconference .........................................................................................10.01 —tosubmitadditionalinformation............................................................................... 8.05(2) Fax Transmission — to receive letter ruling........................................................................................ 7.02(5) — to receive request for additional information.................................................................... 7.02(5) —tosubmitadditionalinformation............................................................................... 8.05(5) —letterrulingrequestsmustnotbesubmittedbyfax............................................................... 7.03(3) Hand Delivery of Letter Ruling Requests........................................................................ 7.03(2) No-Rule Areas.......................................................................................................6 Oral Advice to Taxpayers.........................................................................................2.05 Penalties of Perjury Statement —formforletterrulingrequest ...............................................................................7.01(15)(a) —formforsubmissionofadditionalinformation................................................................... 8.05(4) —requiredwithdraftletterruling...................................................................................8.07 —signaturerequirements ....................................................................................7.01(15)(b) Pending Letter Ruling Requests —whentoattachacopytoreturn................................................................................ 7.04(2) estatetaxmatters ...........................................................................................5.06 —whentonotifyAssociateoffice...................................................................................7.04 estatetaxmatters ...........................................................................................5.06 Power of Attorney —Form2848...................................................................................... 7.01(14)and7.02(2) originalsenttothetaxpayer............................................................................... 7.02(2) copysenttoarepresentative............................................................................... 7.02(2) copiessenttomultiplerepresentatives...................................................................... 7.02(2) nocopysenttorepresentatives ............................................................................ 7.02(2) —signaturerequirements ......................................................................................7.01(14) Public Disclosure of Information Letters...........................................................................2.04 Public Inspection Under § 6110................................................................................ 7.01(11) —signaturerequirements ....................................................................................7.01(11)(c) Representatives —compliancewithTreasuryDepartmentCircularNo.230.........................................................7.01(13) —powerofattorneyrequired...................................................................................7.01(14) —requirements...............................................................................................7.01(13) authorizedrepresentatives..............................................................................7.01(13)(a) authorizedbasedonrelationship........................................................................7.01(13)(b) returnpreparer........................................................................................7.01(13)(c) foreignrepresentative .................................................................................7.01(13)(d) Retroactive Revocation or Modification —ofdeterminationletter.............................................................................................13 requesttolimitretroactiveeffect.............................................................................13.02 —ofletterruling...........................................................................................11.05-11.10 requesttolimitretroactiveeffect.............................................................................11.11 January 2, 2007642007–1 I.R.B. INDEX References are to sections in Rev. Proc. 2007–1 Revenue Rulings —effectonaletterruling .........................................................................................11.04 —requesttolimitretroactiveeffect.................................................................................11.11 Sample of a Letter Ruling Request................................................................. 7.01(17),AppendixB Section 301.9100 Relief............................................................................................5.03 Section 367 Rulings...............................................................................................5.05 Status of Letter Ruling and Determination Letter Requests..........................................................7.06 Substantially Identical Letter Rulings..............................................................15.07(2),AppendixA Tax Exempt and Government Entities —jurisdictionofCommissioner,TaxExemptandGovernmentEntitiesDivision..........................................4.02 —userfees.......................................................................................................4.02 User Fees —scheduleofuserfees.....................................................................................AppendixA —userfeerequirements..............................................................................................15 toreopencase........................................................................................... 8.05(3) Where to Send —determinationletterrequest .....................................................................................12.08 —letterrulingrequest ........................................................................................7.03,9.05 additionalinformation.............................................................................8.05(6),9.08(6) handdelivery............................................................................................ 7.03(2) Withdrawal of Letter Ruling and Determination Letter Requests....................................................7.07 2007–1 I.R.B.65January 2, 2007 APPENDIX A SCHEDULE OF USER FEES NOTE: Checks or money orders must be in U.S. dollars. (A)FEE SCHEDULE CATEGORYUSER FEE (1) User fee for a request for a determination letter from a Director.The user fee for each determination letter request governed by Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this revenue procedure.$275 (2) User fee for a request for an advance pricing agreement or a renewal of an advance pricing agreement. Seesection 4.12 of Rev. Proc. 2006–9, 2006–2 I.R.B. 278 (3) User fee for a request for a letter ruling or closing agreement.Except for the user fees for advance pricing agreements and renewals, the reduced fees provided in paragraph (A)(4) of this appendix, the user fees provided in paragraph (A)(5) of this appendix, and the exemptions provided in section 15.04 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this revenue procedure, the user fee for each request for a letter ruling or closing agreement under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), the Associate Chief Counsel (International), the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), or the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) is as follows: (a)Accounting periods (i)Form 1128 (except as provided in paragraph (A)(4)(a) or (b) of this appendix)$1,500 (ii)Requests made on Part II of Form 2553 to use a fiscal year based on a business purpose (except as provided in paragraph (A)(4)(a) or (b) of this appendix)$1,500 (iii) Letter ruling requests for extensions of time to file Form 1128, Form 8716, or Part II of Form 2553 under § 301.9100–3 (except as provided in paragraph (A)(4)(a) or (b) of this appendix)$1,500 (b)Changes in Accounting Methods (i)Form 3115 (except as provided in paragraph (A)(4)(a) or (b), or (5)(b) of this appendix)$2,500 (ii)Letter ruling requests for extensions of time to file Form 3115 under § 301.9100–3 (except as provided in paragraph (A)(4)(a) or (b), or (5)(c) of this appendix)$2,500 NOTE: No user fee is required if the change in accounting period or accounting method is permitted to be made pursuant to a published automatic change request procedure.Seesection 9.22 and Appendix E of Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this revenue procedure, for the list of automatic change request procedures published and/or in effect as of December 31, 2006. (c)All other letter ruling requests (which includes accounting period and accounting method requests other than those properly submitted on Form 1128, Part II of Form 2553, or Form 3115) (except as provided in paragraph (A)(4)(a) or (b), or (5)(a) of this appendix)$10,000 January 2, 2007662007–1 I.R.B. CATEGORYUSER FEE (d)Requests for closing agreements on a proposed transaction or on a completed transaction before a return for the transaction has been filed in which a letter ruling on that transaction is not requested or issued (except as provided in paragraph (A)(4)(a) or (b) of this appendix)$10,000 NOTE: A taxpayer that receives relief under § 301.9100–3 (for example, an extension of time to file Form 3115) will be charged a separate user fee for the letter ruling request on the underlying issue (for example, the accounting period or accounting method application). (4) Reduced user fee for a request for aletter ruling or closing agreement.A reduced user fee is provided in the following situations if the person provides the certification described in paragraph (B)(1) of this appendix: (a)Request involves a personal or business tax issue from a person with gross income (as determined under paragraphs (B)(2) and (4) of this appendix) of less than $250,000$625 (b)Request involves a personal or business-related tax issue (for example, including home-office expenses, residential rental property issues) from a person with gross income (as determined under paragraphs (B)(3) and (4) of this appendix) of less than $1 million and more than $250,000.$2,500 (5) User fee for substantially identical letter ruling requests, identical accounting method changes, or plans from issuing authorities under section 25(c)(2)(B).If the requirements of section 15.07 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this revenueprocedure, are satisfied, the user fee for the following situations is as follows: (a)Substantially identicalletter rulings requested Situations in which a taxpayer requests substantially identical letter rulings for multiple entities with a common member or sponsor, or for multiple members of a common entity, or for two or more identical trusts or for multiple beneficiaries of a trust or a trust dividedinto identical subtrusts or for husband and wife making split gifts, for each additional letter ruling request after the $7,000 fee or reduced fee, as applicable, has been paid for the first letter ruling request$700 NOTE: Each entity or member that is entitled to the user fee under paragraph (A)(5)(a) of this appendix, that receives relief under § 301.9100–3 (for example, an extension of time to file anelection) will be charged a separate user fee for the letter ruling request on the underlying issue. (b)Identical accounting method change requested on a single Form 3115 Situations in which a common parent requests the identical accounting method change on a single Form 3115 on behalf of two or more members of a consolidated group or two or more eligible CFCs (see section 15.07(4)), or in which a taxpayer requests the identical accounting method change on a single Form 3115 for two or more eligible CFCs (see section 15.07(4)) or two or more separate and distinct trades or businesses, including qualified subchapter S subsidiaries (QSUBs) and single-member limited liability companies (single-member LLCs) (see§ 1.446–1(d) for what constitutes a separate and distinct trade or business), for each additional member of the group, eligible CFC, or separate and distinct trade or business of the taxpayer seeking the identical accounting method change on the same Form 3115 after the $1,500 fee or $625 reduced fee, as applicable, has been paid for the first member of the group, eligible CFC, or separate and distinct trade or business.$150 (c)Substantially identical plans under section 25(c)(2)(B) $700 2007–1 I.R.B.67January 2, 2007 CATEGORYUSER FEE Situations where an issuing authority under section 25 submits substantially identical plans for administering the 95-percent requirement of section 143(d)(1) following the submission of an initial plan that was approved. (d)Extension of time requested to fileForm 3115 for an identical accounting method change Situations in which a common parent requests an extension of time under § 301.9100–3 to file a single Form 3115 for the identical accounting method change on behalf of two or more members of a consolidated group or two or more eligible CFCs (see section 15.07(4)), or in which a taxpayer requests an extension of time under § 301.9100–3 to file a single Form 3115 for the identical accounting method change for two or more eligible CFCs (see section 15.07(4)) or two or more separate and distinct trades or businesses, including QSUBs and single-member LLCs (see§ 1.446–1(d) for what constitutes a separate and distinct trade or business), for each additional member of the group, eligible CFC or separate and distinct trade or business of the taxpayer seeking the identical accounting method change on the same Form 3115 after the $1,500 fee or $625 reduced fee as applicable, has been paid for the first member of the group, eligible CFC, or separate and distinct trade or business.$75 NOTE: When an extension of time to file Form 3115 is granted under § 301.9100–3 for multiple members of a consolidated group, eligible CFCs, or separate and distinct trades or businesses of a taxpayer, including QSUBs and single-member LLCs, a separate user fee will be charged for the accounting method change application, Form 3115. (6) User fee for information letter requests.$2,000 (7) User fee for pre-filing agreements$50,000 (B)PROCEDURAL MATTERS (1) Required certification.A person seeking a reduced user fee under paragraph (A)(4) of this appendix must provide the following certification in orderto obtain the reduced user fee: (a) If a person is seeking a reduced user fee under paragraph (A)(4)(a) of this appendix, the person must certify in the request that his, her, or its gross income, as definedunder paragraphs (B)(2) and (4) of this appendix, is less than $250,000 for the last full (12 months) taxable year ending before the date the request is filed. (b) If a person is seeking a reduced user fee under paragraph (A)(4)(b) of this appendix, the person must certify in the request that his, her, or its gross income, as defined under paragraphs (B)(3) and (4) of this appendix, is less than $1 million and more than $250,000 for the last full (12 months) taxable year ending before the date the request is filed. The c ertification must be attached aspart of the ruling request. (2) Gross income for a request involving a personal tax issue.For purposes of the reduced user fees provided in paragraphs (A)(4)(a) and (b) of this appendix of— (a) U.S. citizens and resident alien individuals, domestic trusts,and domestic estates, “gross income” is equal to “total income” as reported on their last federal income tax return (as amended) filed for a full (12 months) taxable year ending before the date the request is filed, plus any interest income not subject to tax under § 103 (interest on state and local bonds) for that period. “Total income” is a line item on federal tax returns. For example, if the 2004 Form 1040,U.S. Individual Income Tax Return,isthe most recent 12-month taxable year return filed by a U.S. citizen, “total income”on the Form 1040 is the amount entered on line 22. January 2, 2007682007–1 I.R.B. In the case of a request for a letter ruling or closing agreement from a domestic estate or trust that, at the time the request is filed, has not filed a federal income tax return for a full taxable year, thereduced user fee in paragraph (A)(4)(a) of this appendix will apply if the decedent’s or (in the case of an individualgrantor) the grantor’s total income as reported on the last federal income tax return filed for a full taxable year ending beforethe date of death or the date of the transfer,taking into account any additions required to be made to total income described in this paragraph (B)(2)(a), is less than $250,000. In this case, the executor or administrator of the decedent’s estate or the grantor must provide the certification required under paragraph (B)(1) of this appendix. (b) Nonresident alien individuals, foreign trusts, and foreign estates“gross income” is equal to “total effectively connected income” as reported on their last federal income tax return (as amended) filed for a full (12 months) taxable year ending before the date the request is filed, plus any income for the period from United States or foreign sources that is not taxable by the United States, whether by reason of § 103, an income tax treaty, § 871(h) (regarding portfolio interest), or otherwise, plus the total amount of any fixed or determinable annual or periodical income from United States sources, the United States tax liability for which is satisfied by withholding at the source. “Total effectively connected income” is a line item on federal tax returns. For example, if the 2004 Form 1040NR,U.S. Nonresident Alien Income Tax Return, is the most recent 12-month taxableyear return filed by a nonresident alien individual, “total effectively connected income” on the Form 1040NR is the amount entered on line 23. In the case of a request for a letter ruling or closing agreement from a foreign estate or trust that, at the time the request is filed, has not filed a federal income tax return for a full taxable year, the reduced user fee in paragraph (A)(4)(a) of this appendix will apply if the decedent’s or (in the case of an individual grantor) the grantor’s total incomeor total effectively connected income, as relevant, as reported on the last federal income tax return filed for a full taxable year ending before the date of death or the date of the transfer, taking into account any additions required to be made to total income or total effectively connected income described respectively in paragraph (B)(2)(a) of this appendix or in this paragraph (B)(2)(b), is less than $250,000. In this case, the executor or administrator of the decedent’s estate or thegrantor must provide the certification required under paragraph (B)(1) of this appendix. (3) Gross income for a request involving a business-related tax issue.For purposes of the reduced user fees provided in paragraphs (A)(4)(a) and (b) of this appendix of— (a) U.S. citizens and resident alien individuals, domestic trusts, and domestic estates, “gross income” is equal to gross income as defined under paragraph (B)(2)(a) of this appendix, plus “cost of goods sold” as reported on the same federal income tax return. (b) Nonresident alien individuals, foreign trusts, and foreign estates, “gross income” is equal to gross income as defined under paragraph (B)(2)(b) of this appendix, plus “cost of goods sold” as reported on the same federal income tax return. (c) Domestic partnerships and corporations,“gross income” is equal to “total income” as reported on their last federal income tax return (as amended) filed for a full (12 months) taxable year ending before the date the request is filed, plus “cost of goods sold” as reported on the same federal income tax return, plus any interest income not subject to tax under § 103 (interest on state and local bonds) for that period. If a domestic partnership or corporation is not subject to tax, “total income” and “cost of goods sold” are the amounts that the domestic partnership or corporation would have reported on the federal income tax return if the domestic partnership or corporation were subject to tax. “Cost of goods sold” and “total income” are line items on federal tax returns. For example, if the 2004 Form 1065,U.S. Return of Partnership Income, is the most recent 12-month taxable year return filed by a domestic partnership, “cost of goods sold” and “total income” on the Form 1065 are the amounts entered on lines 2 and 8, respectively, and if the 2004 Form 1120,U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return, is the most recent 12-month taxableyear return filed by a domestic corporation, “cost of goods sold” and “total income” on the Form 1120 are the amounts entered on lines 2 and 11, respectively. If, at the time the request is filed, a domestic partnership or corporation subject to tax has not filed a federal income tax return for a full taxable year, the reduced user fee in paragraph (A)(4)(b) of this appendix will apply if, in the aggregate, the partners’ or the shareholders’ gross income (as defined in paragraph (B)(3)(a), (b), (c), or (d) of this appendix, as applicable) is less than $1 million for the last full (12 months) taxable year ending before the date the request is filed. In this case, the partners or the shareholders must provide the certification required under paragraph (B)(1) of this appendix. (d) Organizations exempt from income tax under “Subchapter F-Exempt Organizations” of the Code, “gross income” is equal to the amount of gross receipts for the last full (12 months) taxable year ending before the date the request for a letter ruling or closing agreement is filed. 2007–1 I.R.B.69January 2, 2007 (e) Gross income of state, local, and Indian tribal government entities, “gross income” is equal to the annual operating revenue of the government requesting the ruling for its last fiscal year ending before the date of the ruling request. The annual operating revenue is to be determined at the government level and not at the level of the government entity or agency making the request. (4) Special rules for determining gross income.For purposes of paragraphs (B)(2) and (3) of this appendix, the following rules apply for determining gross income. (a) Gross income of individuals, trusts, and estates. (1) In the case of a request from a married individual, the gross incomes (as defined in paragraph (B)(2) or (3) of this appendix, as applicable) of the applicant and the applicant’s spouse must be combined. This rule does not apply to an individual who: (1) is legally separated from his or her spouse and (2) the spouse doesnot file a joint income tax return with his or her spouse; and (2) If there are two or more applicants filing the request, the gross incomes (as defined in paragraph (B)(2) or (3) of this appendix, as applicable) of the applicants must be combined. (b) Gross income of domestic partnerships and corporations. (1) In the case of a request from a domestic corporation, the gross income(as defined in paragraph (B)(3) of this appendix) of (i) all members of the applicant’s controlled group (as defined in § 1563(a)), and (ii) any related taxpayer that is involved in the transaction on which the letter ruling or closingagreement is requested, must be combined; and (2) In the case of a request from a domestic partnership, the gross income (as defined in paragraph (B)(3) of this appendix) of (i) the partnership, and (ii) any partner who owns, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more of the capital interest or profits interest in the partnership, must be combined. (c) Gross income of exempt organizations.If there are two or more organizations exempt from income tax under Subchapter F filing the request, the gross receipts (as defined in paragraph (B)(3)(d) of this appendix) of the applicants must be combined. January 2, 2007702007–1 I.R.B. APPENDIX B SAMPLE FORMAT FOR A LETTER RULING REQUEST INSTRUCTIONS To assist you in preparing a letter ruling request, the Service is providing this sample format. You are not required to use this sample format. If your request is not identical or similar to the sample format, the different format will not defer consideration of your request. (Insert the date of request) Internal Revenue Service Insert either: Associate Chief Counsel (Insert one of the following: Corporate, Financial Institutions and Products, Income Tax and Accounting, International, Passthroughs and Special Industries, or Procedure and Administration)orDivision Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU P.O. Box 7604 Ben Franklin Station Washington, DC 20044 Dear Sir or Madam: (Insert t he name of the taxpayer) requests a ruling on the proper treatment of (insert the subject matter of the letter ruling request) under section (insert the number) of the Internal Revenue Code.. [If the taxpayer is requesting expedited handling, a statementto that effect must be attached to, or contained in, the letter ruling request. The statement must explain the need for expedited handling.Seesection 7.02(4) of Rev. Proc. 2007–1, 2007–1 I.R.B. 1. Hereafter, all references are to Rev. Proc. 2007–1 unless otherwise noted.] A. STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. Taxp ayer Information [Provide the statements required by sections 7.01(1)(a) and (b).] 2. Description of Taxpayer’s Business Operations [Prov ide the statement required by section 7.01(1)(c).] 3. Facts Relating to Transaction [The ruling request must contain acomplete statement of the facts relating to the transaction that is the subject of the letter ruling request. This statement must include a detailed descriptionof the transaction, including material facts in any accompanying documents, and the business reasons for the transaction.Seesections 7.01(1)(d), 7.01(1)(e), and 7.01(2).] B. RU LING REQUESTED [The ruling request should contain a concise statement of the ruling requested by the taxpayer. It is preferred that the language of the requested ruling be exactly the same as that the taxpayer wishes to receive.] C. STATEMENT OF LAW [T he ruling request must contain a statement of the law in support of the taxpayer’s views or conclusion and identify any pe nding legislation that may affect the proposed transaction. The taxpayer also is strongly encouraged to identify and discuss an y authorities believed to be contrary to the position advanced in the ruling request.Seesections 7.01(6), 7.01(8), 7.01(9), an d 7.01(10).] 2007–1 I.R.B.71January 2, 2007 D. ANALYSIS [The ruling request must contain a discussion of the facts and ananalysis of the law. The taxpayer also is strongly encouraged to identify and discuss any authorities believed to be contrary to the position advanced in the ruling request.Seesections 7.01(3), 7.01(6), 7.01(8), 7.01(9), and 7.01(10).] E. CONCLUSION [The ruling request should contain a statement of thetaxpayer’s conclusion on the ruling requested.] F. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 1. Revenue Procedure 2007–1 Statements a. [Provide the statement required by section 7.01(4) regarding whether the same issue in the letter ruling request is in an earlier return of the taxpayer or in a return for any year of a related taxpayer.] b. [Provide the statement required by section 7.01(5)(a) regarding whether the Service previously ruled on the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a predecessor. Please further note that if a reduced user fee is being submitted, a certification of eligibility for the reduced fee must be included with the ruling request.] c. [Provide the statement required by section 7.01(5)(b) regarding whether the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, a predecessor, or any representatives previously submitted a request (including an application forchange in accounting method) involving the same or similar issue but withdrew the request before a letter ruling or determination letter was issued.] d. [Provide the statement required by section 7.01(5)(c) regarding whether the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a predecessor previously submitted a request (including an application for change in accounting method) involving the same or a similar issue that is currently pending with the Service.] e. [Provide the statement required by section 7.01(5)(d) regarding whether, at the same time as this request, the taxpayer or a related taxpayer is presently submitting another request (including an application for change in accounting method) involving the same or similar issue to the Service.] f. [If the letter ruling request involves the interpretation of a substantive provision of an income or estate tax treaty, provide the statement requiredbysection7.01(6)regardingwhetherthetax authority of the treaty jurisdiction has issued a ruling on the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a predecessor; whether the same or similar issue is being examined, or has been settled, by the tax authority of the treaty jurisdiction or is otherwise the subject of a closing agreement in that jurisdiction;and whether the same or similar issue is being considered by the competent authority of the treaty jurisdiction.] g. [Provide the statement required by section 7.01(8) regarding whether the law in connection with the letter ruling request is uncertain and whether the issue is adequately addressed by relevant authorities.] h. [If the taxpayer determines that there are no contrary authorities, a statement to that effect would be helpful.See section 7.01(9).] i. [If the taxpayer wants to have a conference on the issues involved in the letter ruling request, the ruling request should contain a statement to that effect.Seesection 7.02(6).] j. [If the taxpayer is requesting a copy of any document related to the letter ruling request to be sent by facsimile (fax) transmission, the ruling request should contain a statement to that effect.Seesection 7.02(5).] k. [If the taxpayer is requesting separate letter rulings on multiple issues, the letter ruling request should contain a statement to that effect.Seesection 7.02(1).] l. [If the taxpayer is seeking to obtain the user fee providedinparagraph(A)(5)(a)ofAppendix A for substantially identical letter rulings, the letter ruling request must contain the statements required by section 15.07.] January 2, 2007722007–1 I.R.B. 2. Administrative a. [The ruling request should state: “The deletion statementand checklist required by Rev. Proc. 2007–1 are enclosed.” Seesections 7.01(11) and 7.01(18).] b. [The ruling request should state: “The required user fee of $ (Insert the amount of the fee) is enclosed.” Please note that the check or money order must be in U.S. dollars and made payable to the Internal Revenue Service.Seesection 15 and Appendix A.] c. [If the taxpayer’s authorized representative is to sign the letter ruling request or is to appear before the Service in connection with the request, the ruling request should state: “A Power of Attorney is enclosed.”Seesections 7.01(13), 7.01(14), and 7.02(2).] Sincerely yours, (Insert the name of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative) By: SignatureDate Typed or printed name of person signing request DECLARATION: [See section 7.01(15).] Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this request, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request contains all the relevant facts relating to the request, and such facts are true, correct, and complete. (Insert the name of the taxpayer) By: SignatureTitleDate (must be signed by taxpayer, not by taxpayer’s representative, see section 7.01(15)(b)of this revenue procedure) Typed or printed name of person signing declaration [If the taxpayer is a corporation that is a member of an affiliated group filing consolidated returns, the above declaration must also be signed and dated by an officer of the common parent of the group.Seesection 7.01(15).] 2007–1 I.R.B.73January 2, 2007 APPENDIX C CHECKLIST IS YOUR LETTER RULING REQUEST COMPLETE? INSTRUCTIONS The Service will be able to respond more quickly to your letter ruling request if it is carefully prepared and complete. To ensure that your request is in order, use this checklist. Complete the four items of information requested before the checklist. Answer each question by circling “Yes,” “No,” or “N/A.” When a question contains a place for a page number, insert the page number (or numbers) of the request that gives the information called for by a yes answer to a question.Sign and date the checklist (as taxpayer or authorizedrepresentative) and place it on top of your request. If you are an authorized representative submitting a requestfor a taxpayer, you must include a completed checklist with the request, or the request will either be returned to you or substantive consideration of it will be deferred until a completed checklist is submitted.If you are a taxpayer preparing your own request without professional assistance, an incomplete checklist will not either cause the return of your request or defer substantive consideration of your request.You should still complete as much of the checklist as possibleand submit it with your request. TAXPAYER’S NAME TAXPAYER’S I.D. NO. ATTORNEY/P.O.A. PRIMARY CODE SECTION CIRCLE ONEITEM Yes No1. Does your request involve an issue under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), the Associate Chief Counsel (International), the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), theAssociate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), or the Division Coun- sel/Associate Chief Counsel (TaxExempt and Government Entities)?Seesection 3 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1, 2007–1 I.R.B. 1. For issues under the jurisdiction of other offices,seesection 4 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. (Hereafter, all references are to Rev. Proc. 2007–1 unless otherwise noted.) Yes No2. Have you read Rev. Proc. 2007–3, 2007–1 I.R.B. 108, and Rev. Proc. 2007–7, 2007–1 I.R.B. 227, to see if part or all of the request involves a matter on which letter rulings are not issued or are ordinarily not issued? Yes No N/A3. If your request involves a matter on which letter rulings are not ordinarily issued, have you given com- pelling reasons to justify the issuance of a letter ruling? Before preparing your request, you may want to call the branch in the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), or the Of- fice of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) responsible for substantive interpretations of the principal Internal Revenue Code section on which you are seeking a letter ruling to discuss the likelihood of an exception. For matters under the jurisdiction of— January 2, 2007742007–1 I.R.B. (a) the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), or the Office of Division Counsel/As- sociate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities), the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), the appropriate branch to call may be obtained by calling (202) 622–7560 (not a toll-free call); (b) the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International), the appropriate branch to call may be ob- tained by calling (202) 622–3800 (not a toll-free call). Yes No N/A Page 4. If the request deals with a completed transaction, have you filed the return for the year in which the transaction was completed?Seesection 5.01. Yes No5. Are you requesting the letter ruling on a hypothetical situation or question?Seesection 6.12. Yes No6. Are you requesting the letter ruling on alternative plans of a proposed transaction?Seesection 6.12. Yes No7. Are you requesting the letter ruling for only part of an integrated transaction?Seesections 6.03. Yes No8. Are you requesting the letter ruling for a business, trade, industrial association, or similar group concern- ing the application of tax law to its members?Seesection 6.05. Yes No9. Are you requesting the letter ruling fora foreign government or its political subdivision?Seesection 6.07. Yes No Pages 10. Have you included a complete statement ofall the facts relevant to the transaction?Seesection 7.01(1). Yes No N/A11. Have you submitted with the request true copies of all wills, deeds, and other documents relevant to the transaction, and labeled and attached them in alphabetical sequence?Seesection 7.01(2). Yes No N/A12. Have you submitted with the request a copy of all applicable foreign laws, and certified English trans- lations of documents that are in a language other thanEnglish or of foreign laws in cases where English is not the official language of the foreign country involved?Seesection 7.01(2). Yes No Page 13. Have you included an analysis of facts and their bearing on the issues? Have you included, rather than merely incorporated by reference, all material facts from the documents in the request?Seesection 7.01(3). Yes No Page 14. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the same issue in the letter ruling request is in an earlier return of the taxpayer or in a return for any year of a related taxpayer?Seesection 7.01(4). Yes No Page 15. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the Service previously ruled on the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a predecessor?Seesection 7.01(5)(a). Yes No Page 16. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, a predeces- sor, or any representatives previously submitted a request (including an application for change in accounting method) involving the same or similar issue but withdrew the request before the letter ruling or determina- tion letter was issued?Seesection 7.01(5)(b). 2007–1 I.R.B.75January 2, 2007 Yes No Page 17. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a prede- cessor previously submitted a request (including an application for change in accounting method) involving the same or similar issue that is currently pending with the Service?Seesection 7.01(5)(c). Yes No Page 18. Have you included the required statement regarding whether, at the same time as this request, the tax- payer or a related taxpayer is presently submitting another request (including an application for change in accounting method) involving the same or similar issue to the Service?Seesection 7.01(5)(d). Yes No N/A Page 19. If your request involves the interpretation of a substantive provision of an income or estate tax treaty, have you included the required statement regarding whether the tax authority of the treaty jurisdiction has issued a ruling on the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a predecessor; whether the same or similar issue is being examined, or has been settled, by the tax authority of the treaty jurisdiction or is otherwise the subject of a closing agreement in that jurisdiction; and whether the same or similar issue is being considered by the competent authority of the treaty jurisdiction?Seesection 7.01(6). Yes No N/A Page 20. If your request is for recognition of Indian tribal government status or status as a political subdivision of an Indian tribal government, does your request contain a letter from the Bureau of Indian Affairs regarding the tribe’s status?Seesection 7.01(7), which states that taxpayers are encouraged to submit this letter with the request and provides the address for the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Yes No Pages 21. Have you included the required statement of relevant authorities in support of your views?Seesection 7.01(8). Yes No Page 22. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the law in connection with the request is uncertain and whether the issue is adequately addressed by relevant authorities?Seesection 7.01(8). Yes No Pages 23. Does your request discuss the implications of any legislation, tax treaties, court decisions, regulations, notices, revenue rulings, or revenue procedures that youdeterminedtobecontraryto the position advanced? Seesection 7.01(9), which states that taxpayers are encouraged to inform the Service of such authorities. Yes No N/A Page 24. If you determined that there are no contrary authorities, have you included a statement to this effect in your request?Seesection 7.01(9). Yes No N/A Page 25. Have you included in your request a statement identifying any pending legislation that may affect the proposed transaction?Seesection 7.01(10). Yes No26. Is the request accompanied by the deletion statement required by § 6110?Seesection 7.01(11). Yes No Page 27. Have you (or your authorized representative) signed and dated the request?Seesection 7.01(12). Yes No N/A28. If the request is signed by your representative or if your representative will appear before the Service in connection with the request, is the request accompanied by a properly prepared and signed power of attorney with the signatory’s name typed or printed?Seesection 7.01(14). Yes No Page 29. Have you included, signed, and dated the penalties of perjury statement in the format required by section 7.01(15)? January 2, 2007762007–1 I.R.B. Yes No N/A30. Are you submitting your request in duplicate if necessary?Seesection 7.01(16). Yes No N/A Pages 31. If you are requesting separate letter rulings on different issues involving one factual situation, have you included a statement to that effect in each request?Seesection 7.02(1). Yes No N/A32. If you want copies of the letter ruling sent to a representative, does the power of attorney contain a statement to that effect?Seesection 7.02(2). Yes No N/A33. If you do not want a copy of the letter ruling to be sent to any representative, does the power of attorney contain a statement to that effect?Seesection 7.02(2). Yes No N/A34. If you are making a two-part letter ruling request, have you included a summary statement of the facts you believe to be controlling?Seesection 7.02(3). Yes No N/A Page 35. If you want your letter ruling request to be processed ahead of the regular order or by a specific date, have you requested expedited handling in the manner requiredbysection7.02(4)andstated a compelling need for such action in the request? But, a request dealing solely with a section 368 reorganization or a section 355 distribution may receive expedited treatment without stating a compelling need. Section 7.02(4) of this revenue procedure. Yes No N/A Page 36. If you are requesting a copy of any document relatedto the letter ruling request to be sent by facsimile (fax) transmission, have you included a statement to that effect?Seesection 7.02(5). Yes No N/A Page 37. If you want to have a conference on the issues involved in the request, have you included a request for conference in the letter ruling request?Seesection 7.02(6). Yes No38. Have you included the correct user fee with the request and is your check or money order in U.S. dollars and payable to the Internal Revenue Service?Seesection 15 and Appendix A to determine the correct amount. Yes No N/A Page 39. If your request involves a personal tax issue and you qualify for the reduced user fee when gross income is less than $250,000, have you included the required certification?Seeparagraphs (A)(4)(a) and (B)(1) of Appendix A. Yes No N/A Page 40. If your request involves a business-related tax issue and you qualify for the reduced user fee when gross income is less than $1 million, have you included the required certification?Seeparagraphs (A)(4)(b) and (B)(1) of Appendix A. Yes No N/A Page 41. If you qualify for the user fee for substantially identical letter rulings, have you included the required information?Seesection 15.07(2) and paragraph (A)(5)(a) of Appendix A. Yes No N/A Page 42. If you qualify for the user fee for a § 301.9100 request to extend the time for filing an identical ac- counting method change on a single Form 3115, have you included the required information?Seesection 15.07(4) and paragraph (A)(5)(d) of Appendix A. Yes No N/A 43. If your request is covered by any of the checklists, guideline revenue procedures, notices, safe harbor rev enue procedures, or other specialrequirements listed in Appendix E, have you complied with all of the req uirements of the applicable revenue procedure or notice? 2007–1 I.R.B.77January 2, 2007 Rev. Proc.List other applicable revenue procedures or notices, including checklists, used or relied upon in the prepa- ration of this letter ruling request (Cumulative Bulletin or Internal Revenue Bulletin citation not required). Yes No N/A Page 44. If you are requesting relief under § 7805(b) (regarding retroactive effect), have you complied with all of the requirements in section 11.11? Yes No45. Have you addressed your request to the attention of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the As- sociate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), the Associate Chief Counsel (International), the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), or the Division Coun- sel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities), as appropriate? The mailing address is: Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU P. O. Box 7604 BenFranklinStation Washington, DC 20044 Ifaprivatedeliveryserviceisused,theaddressis: Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU, Room 5336 1111 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20224 The package should be marked: RULING REQUEST SUBMISSION. Improperly addressed requests may be delayed (sometimes for over aweek) in reaching CC:PA:LPD:DRU for initial processing. SignatureTitle or AuthorityDate Typed or printed name of person signing checklist January 2, 2007782007–1 I.R.B. APPENDIX D LIST OF SMALL BUSINESS/SELF-EMPLOYED OPERATING DIVISION (SB/SE) OFFICES FOR REQUESTING DETERMINATION LETTERS Requests for determination letters under Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this revenue procedure, from SB/SE and W&I taxpayers, should be sent to the appropriate SB/SE office listed below based upon the type of tax involved. Both the request and the envelope in which it is sent should be marked “DETERMINATION LETTER REQUEST.” INCOME TAX Requests for determination letters regarding income tax (including requests from international taxpayers) should be sent to: Office of the Director, Technical Services Internal Revenue Service Attn: SE:S:E:TS Mail Stop 5000 24000 Avila Road Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES Requests for determination letters regarding estate and gift tax should be sent to: Chief, Estate & Gift Tax Operations Internal Revenue Service SE:S:SP:E&G 1222 Spruce Street M/S 1022STL St. Louis, MO 63103–2839 EMPLOYMENT TAXES Requests for determination letters regarding employment tax (except for requests for determination of worker status, which should be sent to the appropriate office listed in the instructions to Form SS–8) should be sent to: Chief, Employment Tax Operations Internal Revenue Service Attn: SE:S:SP:ET 5000 Ellin Road Room C9–202 Lanham, MD 20706 2007–1 I.R.B.79January 2, 2007 EXCISE TAXES Requests for determination letters regarding excise taxes should be sent to: Chief, Excise Tax Operations Internal Revenue Service Attn: SE:S:SP:EX 5000 Ellin Road Room C9–207 Lanham, MD 20706 January 2, 2007802007–1 I.R.B. APPENDIX E CHECKLISTS, GUIDELINE REVENUE PROCEDURES, NOTICES, SAFE HARBOR REVENUE PROCEDURES, AND AUTOMATIC CHANGE REVENUE PROCEDURES Specific revenue procedures and notices supplement the general instructions for requests explained in section 7 of this revenue procedure and apply to requests for letter rulings or determination letters regarding the Code sections and matters listed in this section. Checklists, guideline revenue procedures, and notices .01For requests relating to the following Codesections and subject matters, refer to the following checklists, guideline revenue procedures, and notices. CODE OR REGULATION SECTION REVENUE PROCEDURE AND NOTICE 103, 141–150, 7478, and 7871 Issuance of state or local obligations Rev. Proc. 96–16, 1996–1 C.B. 630 (for a reviewable ruling under § 7478 and a nonreview- able ruling); Rev. Proc. 88–31, 1988–1 C.B. 832 (for approval of areas of chronic economic distress); and Rev. Proc. 82–26, 1982–1 C.B. 476 (for “on behalf of” and similar issuers). For approval of areas of chronic economic distress, Rev. Proc. 88–31 explains how this re- quest for approval must be submitted to the Assistant Secretary for Housing/Federal Housing Commissioner of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1.166–2(d)(3) Uniform express determination letter for making election Rev. Proc. 92–84, 1992–2 C.B. 489. Subchapter C—(Corporate Distributions and Adjustments Rev. Proc. 77–37, 1977–2 C.B. 568, as modified by Rev. Proc. 89–30, 1989–1 C.B. 895, and as amplified by Rev. Proc. 77–41, 1977–2 C.B. 574, Rev. Proc. 83–81, 1983–2 C.B. 598 (see alsoRev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin), Rev. Proc. 84–42, 1984–1 C.B. 521 (superseded as to no-rule areas by Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin), Rev. Proc. 86–42, 1986–2 C.B. 722, and Rev. Proc. 89–50, 1989–2 C.B. 631.But seesection 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bul- letin, (corporate distributions, transfers, and reorganizations under §§ 332, 351, 368(a)(1)(A), 368(a)(1)(B), 368(a)(1)(C), 368(a)(1)(E), 368(a)(1)(F), and 1036), which describes certain corporate transactions where the Service will notissue letter rulings or determination letters. 301 Nonapplicability on sales of stock of employer to defined contribution plan Rev. Proc. 87–22, 1987–1 C.B. 718. 302, 311 Checklist questionnaire Rev. Proc. 86–18, 1986–1 C.B. 551; and Rev. Proc. 77–41, 1977–2 C.B. 574. 302(b)(4) Checklist questionnaire Rev. Proc. 81–42, 1981–2 C.B. 611. 311 Checklist questionnaire Rev. Proc. 86–16, 1986–1 C.B. 546. 332 Checklist questionnaire Rev. Proc. 90–52, 1990–2 C.B. 626.But seesection 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin, which describes certain corporate transactions where the Service will not issue letter rulings or determination letters. 338 Extension of time to make elections Rev. Proc. 2003–33, 2003–1 C.B. 803, provides guidance as to how an automatic extension of time under § 301.9100–3 of the Regulations on Procedure and Administration may be ob- tained to file elections under § 338. This revenue procedure also informs taxpayers who do not qualify for the automatic extension, of the information necessary to obtain a letter ruling. 2007–1 I.R.B.81January 2, 2007 351 Checklist questionnaire Rev. Proc. 83–59, 1983–2 C.B. 575.But seesection 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin, which describes certain transfers to controlled corporations where the Service will not issue letter rulings or determination letters. 355 Checklist questionnaire Rev. Proc. 96–30, 1996–1 C.B. 696, as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2003–48, 2003–2 C.B. 86. 368(a)(1)(E) Checklist questionnaire Rev. Proc. 81–60, 1981–2 C.B. 680.But seesection 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin, which describes circumstances under which the Service will not issue letter rulings or deter- mination letters as to whether a transaction constitutes a corporate recapitalization within the meaning of § 368(a)(1)(E) (or a transaction that also qualifies under § 1036). 461(h) Alternative method for the inclusion of common improvement costs in basis Rev. Proc. 92–29, 1992–1 C.B. 748. 482 Advance pricing agreements Rev. Proc. 96–53, 1996–2 C.B. 375, as modified by Notice 98–65, 1998–2 C.B. 803, and amplified by Rev. Proc. 2006–54, 2006–49 I.R.B. 1035. 521 Appeal procedure with regard to adverse determination letters and revocation or modification of exemption letter rulings and determination letters Rev. Proc. 90–27, 1990–1 C.B. 514. 1.817–5(a)(2) Issuer of a variable contract requesting relief Rev. Proc. 92–25, 1992–1 C.B. 741. 877, 2107, and 2501(a)(3) Individuals who lose U.S. citizenship or cease to be taxed as long-term U.S. residents with a principal purpose to avoid U.S. taxes Notice 97–19, 1997–1 C.B. 394, as modified by Notice 98–34, 1998–2 C.B. 29. 1362(b)(5) and 1362(f) Relief for late S corporation and related elections under certain circumstances Rev. Proc. 2004–49, 2004–2 C.B. 210; Rev. Proc. 2003–43, 2003–1 C.B. 998; Rev. Proc. 97–48, 1997–2 C.B. 521. 1362(b)(5) and 301.7701–3 Automatic extensions of time for late S corporation election and late corporate entity classification Rev. Proc. 2004–48, 2004–2 C.B. 172. January 2, 2007822007–1 I.R.B. 1.1502–13(e)(3) Consent to treat intercompany transactions on a separate entity basis and revocation of this consent Rev. Proc. 97–49, 1997–2 C.B. 523. 1.1502–76(a)(1) Consent to file a consolidated return where member(s) of the affiliated group use a 52–53 week taxable year Rev. Proc. 89–56, 1989–2 C.B. 643. 1504(a)(3)(A) and (B) Waiver of application of § 1504(a)(3)(A) for certain corporations Rev. Proc. 2002–32, 2002–1 C.B. 959. 1552 Consent to elect or change method of allocating affiliated group’s consolidated federal income tax liability Rev. Proc. 90–39, 1990–2 C.B. 365, as clarified by Rev. Proc. 90–39A, 1990–2 C.B. 367. 2642 Allocations of generation-skipping transfer tax exemption Rev. Proc. 2004–46, 2004–2 C.B. 142, provides analternative method for requesting relief to make a late allocation of the generation-skipping transfer tax exemption. This revenue procedure also informs taxpayers who are denied relief or who are outside the scope of the revenue procedure of the information necessary for obtaining a letter ruling. 2652(a)(3) Reverse qualified terminable interest property elections Rev. Proc. 2004–47, 2004–1, C.B. 169, provides an alternative method for certain taxpayers to obtain an extension of time to make a late reverse qualified terminable interest property election under § 2652(a)(3). This revenue procedure also informs taxpayers who are denied relief or who are outside the scope of the revenue procedure of the information necessary to obtain a letter ruling. 4980B Failure to satisfy continuation coverage requirements of group health plans Rev. Proc. 87–28, 1987–1 C.B. 770 (treating references to former § 162(k) as if they were references to § 4980B). 7701 Relief for a late initial classification election for a newly formed entity Rev. Proc. 2002–59, 2002–2 C.B. 615. 7701(a)(40) and 7871(d) Indian tribal governments and subdivision of Indian tribal governments Rev. Proc. 84–37, 1984–1 C.B. 513, as modified by Rev. Proc. 86–17, 1986–1 C.B. 550, and Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this revenue procedure, (provides guidelines for obtaining letter rulings recognizing Indian tribal government ortribal government subdivision status; also provides for inclusion in list of recognized tribal governments in revised versions of Rev. Proc. 2002–64, 2002–2 C.B. 717, or in list of recognized subdivisions of Indian tribal governments in revised versions of Rev. Proc. 84–36, 1984–1 C.B. 510, as modified and made permanent by Rev. Proc. 86–17). 2007–1 I.R.B.83January 2, 2007 301.7701–2(a) Classification of undivided fractional interests in rental real estate Rev. Proc. 2002–22, 2002–1 C.B. 733 (specifies the conditions under which the Service will consider a letter ruling requestthat an undivided fractional interest in rental real property (other than a mineral property as defined in § 614) is not an interest in a business entity). 301.7701–3 Automatic extensions of time for late S corporation election and late corporate entity classification Rev. Proc. 2004–48, 2004–2 C.B. 172. 301.9100–3 Extension of time to make entity classification election Rev. Proc. 2002–59, 2002–2 C.B. 615. 7702 Closing agreement for failed life insurance contracts Notice 99–48, 1999–2 C.B. 429; Rev. Rul. 91–17, 1991–1 C.B. 190. 7702A Relief for inadvertent non-egregious failure to comply with modified endowment contract rules Rev. Proc. 2001–42, 2001–2 C.B. 212. 7704(g) Revocation of election Notice 98–3, 1998–1 C.B. 333. SUBJECT MATTERSREVENUE PROCEDURE Accounting periods; changes in period Rev. Proc. 2002–39, 2002–1 C.B. 1046, as clarified and modified by Notice 2002–72, 2002–2 C.B. 843, and as modified by Rev. Proc. 2003–34, 2003–1 C.B. 856; and Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this revenue procedure, for which sections 1, 2.01, 2.02, 2.05, 3.03, 5.02, 6.03, 6.05, 6.07, 6.11, 7.01(1), 7.01(2), 7.01(3), 7.01(4), 7.01(5), 7.01(6), 7.01(8), 7.01(9), 7.01(10), 7.01(13), 7.01(14), 7.01(15), 7.02(2), 7.02(4), 7.02(5), 7.02(6), 7.03, 7.04, 7.05, 7.07, 8.01, 8.03, 8.04, 8.05, 8.06, 10, 11, 15, 17, 18, Appendix A, and Appendix E are applicable. Classification of liquidating trusts Rev. Proc. 82–58, 1982–2 C.B. 847, as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 94–45, 1994–2 C.B. 684, and as amplified by Rev. Proc. 91–15,1991–1 C.B. 484 (checklist questionnaire), as modified and amplified by Rev. Proc. 94–45. Earnings and profits determinations Rev. Proc. 75–17, 1975–1 C.B. 677; Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this revenue procedure, sections 2.05, 3.03, 7, 8, and 10.05; and Rev. Proc. 2007–3, this Bulletin, section 3.01. Estate, gift, and generation-skipping transfer tax issues Rev. Proc. 91–14, 1991–1 C.B. 482 (checklist questionnaire). Deferred intercompany transactions; election not to defer gain or loss Rev. Proc. 97–49, 1997–2 C.B. 523. Leveraged leasingRev. Proc. 2001–28, 2001–1 C.B. 1156, and Rev. Proc. 2001–29, 2001–1 C.B. 1160. January 2, 2007842007–1 I.R.B. A letter ruling request that involves a question of whether a rate order that is proposed or issued by a regulatory agency will meet the normalization requirements of § 168(f)(2) (pre- Tax Reform Act of 1986, § 168(e)(3)) and former §§ 46(f) and 167(l) ordinarily will not be considered unless the taxpayer states in the letter ruling request whether— (1) the regulatory authority responsible for establishing or approving the taxpayer’s rates has reviewed the request and believes that the request is adequate and complete; and (2) the taxpayer will permit the regulatory authority to participate in any Associate office conference concerning the request. Rate orders; regulatory agency; normalization If the taxpayer or the regulatory authority informs a consumer advocate of the request for a let- ter ruling and the advocate wishes to communicate with the Service regarding the request, any such communication should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration), Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044 (or, if a private deliveryservice is used: Internal Revenue Service, As- sociate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration), Attn: CC:PA:LPD:DRU, Room 5336, 1111 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20224). These communications will be treated as third party contacts for purposes of § 6110. Unfunded deferred compensation Rev. Proc. 71–19, 1971–1 C.B. 698, as amplified by Rev. Proc. 92–65, 1992–2 C.B. 428. SeeRev. Proc. 92–64, 1992–2 C.B. 422, as modified by Notice 2000–56, 2000–2 C.B. 393, for the model trust for use in Rabbi Trust Arrangements. Safe harbor revenue procedures.02For requests relating to the following Codesections and subject matters, refer to the following safe harbor revenue procedures. CODE OR REGULATION SECTION REVENUE PROCEDURE 103 and 141–150 Issuance of state or local obligations Rev. Proc. 93–17, 1993–1 C.B. 507 (change of use of proceeds); Rev. Proc. 97–13, 1997–1 C.B. 632, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2001–39, 2001–2 C.B. 38 (management contracts); and Rev. Proc. 97–14, 1997–1 C.B. 634 (research agreements). 61 Utility Cost Recovery Securitization Transactions Rev. Proc. 2005–62, 2005–2 C.B. 507. 162 Restaurant Small Wares Costs Rev. Proc. 2002–12, 2002–1 C.B. 374. 165 Casualty and theft losses from hurricanes Rev. Proc. 2006–32, 2006–28 I.R.B. 61. 168 Depreciation of original and replacement tires for certain vehicles Rev. Proc. 2002–27, 2002–1 C.B. 802. 168 Depreciation of fiber optic node and trunk line of a cable television distribution system Rev. Proc. 2003–63, 2003–2 C.B. 304. 2007–1 I.R.B.85January 2, 2007 280B Certain structural modifications to a building not treated as a demolition Rev. Proc. 95–27, 1995–1 C.B. 704. 446 Film producer’s treatment of certain creative property costs Rev. Proc. 2004–36, 2004–1 C.B. 1063. 451 Up-front network upgrade payments made to utilities Rev. Proc. 2005–35, 2005–2 C.B. 76. 471 Estimating inventory shrinkage Rev. Proc. 98–29, 1998–1 C.B. 857. 471 Valuation of remanufactured cores Rev. Proc. 2003–20, 2003–1 C.B. 445. 584(a) Qualification of a proposed common trust fund plan Rev. Proc. 92–51, 1992–1 C.B. 988. 642(c)(5) Qualification of trusts as pooled income funds Rev. Proc. 88–53, 1988–2 C.B. 712. 664 Charitable remainder trusts Rev. Proc. 2005–24, 2005–1 C.B. 909. 664(d)(1) Qualification of trusts as charitable remainder annuity trusts Rev. Proc. 2003–53, 2003–2 C.B. 230; Rev. Proc. 2003–54, 2003–2 C.B. 236; Rev. Proc. 2003–55, 2003–2 C.B. 242; Rev. Proc. 2003–56, 2003–2 C.B. 249; Rev. Proc. 2003–57, 2003–2 C.B. 257; Rev. Proc. 2003–58, 2003–2 C.B. 262; Rev. Proc. 2003–59, 2003–2 C.B. 268; Rev. Proc. 2003–60, 2003–2 C.B. 274. 664(d)(2) and (3) Qualification of trusts as charitable remainder unitrusts Rev. Proc. 2005–52, 2005–2 C.B. 326; Rev. Proc. 2005–53, 2005–2 C.B. 339; Rev. Proc. 2005–54, 2005–2 C.B. 353; Rev. Proc. 2005–55, 2005–2 C.B. 367; Rev. Proc. 2005–56, 2005–2 C.B. 383; Rev. Proc. 2005–57, 2005–2 C.B. 392; Rev. Proc. 2005–58, 2005–2 C.B. 402; Rev. Proc. 2005–59, 2005–2 C.B. 412. 856(c) Certain loans treated as real estate assets Rev. Proc. 2003–65, 2003–2 C.B. 336. 860H Transfers of ownership interests in Financial Asset Securitization Investment Trusts Rev. Proc. 2001–12, 2001–1 C.B. 335. 1031(a) Qualification as a qualified exchange accommodation arrangement Rev. Proc. 2000–37, 2000–2 C.B. 308. January 2, 2007862007–1 I.R.B. 1286 Determination of reasonable compensation under mortgage servicing contracts Rev. Proc. 91–50, 1991–2 C.B. 778. 1362(f) Automatic inadvertent termination relief to certain corporations Rev. Proc. 2003–43, 2003–1 C.B. 998. 2056A Qualified Domestic Trust Rev. Proc. 96–54, 1996–2 C.B. 386. 2702(a)(3)(A) and 25.2702–5(c) Qualified Personal Residence Trust Rev. Proc. 2003–42, 2003–1 C.B. 993. 4051(a)(2) Imposition of tax on heavy trucks and trailers sold at retail Rev. Proc. 2005–19, 2005–1 C.B. 832. 1.7704–2(d) New business activity of existing partnership is closely related to pre-existing business Rev. Proc. 92–101, 1992–2 C.B. 579. SUBJECT MATTERSREVENUE PROCEDURE Certain rent-to-own contracts treated as leases Rev. Proc. 95–38, 1995–2 C.B. 397. Automatic change in accounting period revenue procedures .03For requests for an automatic change in accounting period, refer to the following auto- matic change revenue procedures published and/or in effect as of December 31, 2006: Rev. Proc. 2002–37, 2002–1 C.B. 1030, as clarified and modified by Notice 2002–72, 2002–2 C.B. 843, and as modified by Rev. Proc. 2003–34, 2003–1 C.B. 856 (certain corpora- tions); Rev. Proc. 2002–38, 2002–2 C.B. 1037, as clarified and modified by Notice 2002–72, 2002–2 C.B. 843 (certain partnerships, S corporations, electing S corporations, or personal ser- vice corporations); and Rev. Proc. 2003–62, 2003–2 C.B. 299 (individual seeking a calendar year); and as clarified, modified, amplified, and superseded by Rev. Proc. 2006–45, 2006–45 I.R.B. 851 (corporations) and Rev. Proc. 2006–46, 2006–45 I.R.B. 859 (partnership and Sub- chapter S corporations) for changes in annualaccounting periods for which the first effective year ends after October 17, 2006. The Commissioner’s consent to an otherwise qualifying automatic change in accounting period is granted only if the taxpayer timely complies with the applicable automatic change revenue procedure. Rev. Proc. 2007–1, 2007–1 I.R.B. 1. 2007–1 I.R.B.87January 2, 2007 26 CFR 601.105: Examination of returns and claims for refund, credit or abatement; determination of correct tax liability. Rev. Proc. 2007–2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY ........................................................................... 90 .01Descriptionofpurpose........................................................................................ 90 .02Updatedannually ............................................................................................ 90 .03Delegationauthority.......................................................................................... 90 SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS......................................................................................... 90 .01Operatingdivision............................................................................................ 90 .02Director..................................................................................................... 90 .03Territorymanager ............................................................................................ 90 .04Appealsofficer............................................................................................... 91 .05Taxpayer.................................................................................................... 91 .06Associateoffice.............................................................................................. 91 .07Fieldoffice.................................................................................................. 91 .08Fieldcounsel................................................................................................. 91 SECTION 3. THE NATURE OF TECHNICAL ADVICE................................................................. 91 .01Whenadvicefurnished........................................................................................ 91 .02TAMmayberequestedevenifpreviousTAMonsamematterwasissued........................................... 91 .03TaxpayerParticipation ........................................................................................ 91 SECTION 4. TYPES OF ISSUES NOT SUBJECT TO THIS PROCEDURE.................................................. 91 .01 Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes............................................................................ 91 .02Taxexemptandgovernmententities............................................................................ 92 .03Farmers’cooperatives......................................................................................... 92 .04Issuesunder§301.9100....................................................................................... 92 .05Frivolousissues.............................................................................................. 92 .06Issuesinadocketedcase ...................................................................................... 92 .07Collectionissues ............................................................................................. 92 SECTION 5. INITIATING A REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE...................................................... 92 .01Initiatingarequestfortechnicaladvice ......................................................................... 92 .02Taxpayermayrequesttechnicaladvice ......................................................................... 92 .03AppealoffieldofficedenialofTAMrequest .................................................................... 93 .04ThedirectororLMSBterritorymanager’sdecisionmaybereviewedbutnotappealed................................ 93 SECTION 6. PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCE....................................................................... 93 .01Purpose ..................................................................................................... 93 .02Pre-submissionconferencesaremandatory ...................................................................... 93 .03Actionsbeforepre-submissionconference....................................................................... 93 .04Initiatingapre-submissionconference .......................................................................... 94 .05Manneroftransmittingpre-submissionmaterials................................................................. 94 .06Schedulingthepre-submissionconference....................................................................... 94 .07Pre-submissionconferencesmaybeconductedinperson.......................................................... 94 .08Pre-submissionconferencemaynotbetaped..................................................................... 94 .09DiscussionofsubstantiveissuesisnotbindingontheService...................................................... 94 .10Newissuesmayberaisedatpre-submissionconference........................................................... 95 SECTION 7. SUBMITTING THE REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE................................................. 95 .01Memorandumofissues,facts,law,andarguments................................................................ 95 .02Transactioninvolvingmultipletaxpayers........................................................................ 95 .03Foreignlawsanddocuments................................................................................... 95 .04Statementrecommendinginformationtobedeletedfrompublicinspection.......................................... 96 .05Preparationofthememorandum;resolutionofdisagreements...................................................... 96 January 2, 2007882007–1 I.R.B. .06TransmittalForm4463,RequestforTechnicalAdvice ............................................................ 97 .07Allsupportingandadditionaldocuments........................................................................ 97 .08Numberofcopiesofrequesttobesubmitted..................................................................... 97 .09Powerofattorney............................................................................................. 97 .10Servicenotbarredfromissuing30-dayletterwhileaTAMrequestispending........................................ 97 SECTION 8. INITIAL PROCESSING OF THE REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE BY THE ASSOCIATE OFFICE ............................................................................................... 98 .01AssignmentandinitialreviewbyAssociateofficeattorney........................................................ 98 .02Otherformsofguidance....................................................................................... 98 .03Initialacknowledgmentandprocessing.......................................................................... 98 .04Deficienciesinrequestleadingtoreturn......................................................................... 98 .05Initialdiscussion ............................................................................................. 98 .06Ifadditionalinformationrequested ............................................................................. 98 .07Taxpayerrequestforextensionoftimetosubmitadditionalinformation............................................. 99 .08Wheretosendrequestedadditionalinformation.................................................................. 99 .09Tentativeconclusions......................................................................................... 99 SECTION 9. TAXPAYER CONFERENCES............................................................................ 99 .01Notificationofconference..................................................................................... 99 .02Schedulingconference........................................................................................ 99 .03Taxpayersmayrequestextensions.............................................................................. 99 .04Oneconferenceofright ...................................................................................... 100 .05Additionalconferencesmaybeoffered......................................................................... 100 .06Additionalinformationsubmittedaftertheconference ........................................................... 100 .07Normallyconductedinperson................................................................................. 100 .08Servicemakesonlytentativerecommendations.................................................................. 100 .09Conferencemaynotbetaped ................................................................................. 100 SECTION 10. PREPARATION OF THE TECHNICAL ADVICE.......................................................... 100 .01Replyconsistsoftwoparts ................................................................................... 100 .02Statusofarequest........................................................................................... 101 .03Section6110................................................................................................ 101 .04Opportunityforfieldcounselreview........................................................................... 101 .05CopyofpreliminaryTAMtofieldofficeandfieldcounsel........................................................ 101 .06Routingofreply............................................................................................. 101 .07CopyoffinalTAMtofieldcounselandDivisionCounsel........................................................ 101 .08Reconsideration............................................................................................. 101 .09Discussingcontentswiththetaxpayer.......................................................................... 102 .10 TAM takes effect when taxpayer receives a copy................................................................ 102 .11Taxpayermayprotestdeletionsnotmade....................................................................... 102 .12 Public inspection of § 6104 applications for exemption and letter rulings issued to certain exempt organizations................................................................................................ 102 .13Publicinspectionincivilfraudorcriminalinvestigationcases .................................................... 102 SECTION 1 1. WITHDRAWAL OF REQUESTS FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE ............................ .................. 102 .01 Taxp ayernotified ......................................................................... .................. 102 .02 Ackn owledgmentofwithdrawal ............................................................ .................. 103 .03 Asso ciateofficemaydecidenottoissueaTAM .............................................. .................. 103 .04 Asso ciateofficemayprovideviews ......................................................... .................. 103 SECTION 12. USE OF THE TECHNICAL ADVICE.................................................................... 103 .01Generallyappliesadviceinprocessingthetaxpayer’scase ....................................................... 103 SECTION 13. RETROACTIVITY AND RELIANCE.................................................................... 103 .01Usuallyappliesretroactively ................................................................................. 103 .02RevocationormodificationofanearlierletterrulingorTAM .................................................... 103 .03Continuingactionorseriesofactions.......................................................................... 103 .04Othertaxpayers ............................................................................................. 104 2007–1 I.R.B.89January 2, 2007 SECTION 14. HOW MAY RETROACTIVE EFFECT BE LIMITED?..................................................... 104 .01Requestsforreliefunder§7805(b). ........................................................................... 104 .02Formofrequestforrelief—Ingeneral ........................................................................ 104 .03Formofrequestforrelief—continuingtransactionbeforeexaminationofreturn ................................... 104 .04Taxpayer’srighttoconference................................................................................ 104 .05Reconsiderationofrequestforreliefunder§7805(b) ............................................................ 104 SECTION 15. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES MADE TO REV. PROC. 2006–2................................................. 104 .01Overview .................................................................................................. 104 .02Requestregardingsametaxpayerortransaction................................................................. 105 .03RequestwhenissuependinginAppeals........................................................................ 105 .04Taxpayerparticipation ....................................................................................... 105 .05Additionalinformationrequestedfromtaxpayer ................................................................ 105 .06EliminationofTEAMprocedures ............................................................................. 105 SECTION 16. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS.................................................................... 105 SECTION 17. EFFECTIVE DATE................................................................................... 105 DRAFTING INFORMATION....................................................................................... 105 INDEX........................................................................................................... 106 SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY Description of purpose.01 Technical advice. This revenue procedure explains when and how the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), t he Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), the Associate Chief Counsel (Interna- tional), the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), the Associa te Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), andthe Division Counsel/Associate Chief Coun sel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) issuetechnical advice memoranda (TAMs) to a direc- tor or an appeals area director. It also explains the rights that a taxpayer has when a field office requests a TAM regarding a tax matter. Rev. Proc. 2006–2 superseded. Updated annually.02 This revenue procedure is updated annually as the second revenue procedure of the year, but may be modified during the year. Delegation authority.03 The provisions of this revenue procedure apply if the authority normally exercised by the director has been properly delegated to another official. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS Operating division.01 The term “operating division” means the (1) L arge and Mid-Size Business Division (LMSB); (2) the Small Business/Self-Employed D ivision (SB/SE); (3) the Wage and Invest- ment Division (W&I); (4) the Tax Exempt and Gover nment Entities Division (TE/GE). Director.02 The term “director” means (1) the Director, Field Operations (LMSB) for the taxpayer’s industry; (2) a Territory Manager, Field Compliance (SB/SE); (3) the Director, Compliance (W&I); (4) the Director, International (LMSB); (5) the Director, Employee Plans Examina- tions; (6) the Director, Exempt Organizations Examinations; (7) the Director, Federal, State & Local Governments; (8) the Director, Tax Exempt Bonds; (9) the Director, Indian Tribal Gov- ernments; (10) the Appeals Area Director; (11) any official to whom the authority normally exercised by a director has properly been delegated. Territory manager.03 The term “territory manager” means (1) a territory manager (LMSB); (2) a territory manager, examination (SB/SE); (3) a territorymanager, specialty (SB/SE); (4) the Director, Compliance (W&I); (5) the Employee Plans Examinations Area manager; (6) the Exempt Or- ganizations Examinations Area manager; (7) theEmployee Plans Determinations manager; (8) the Exempt Organizations Determinations manager; (9) the group manager, Federal, State & Sec. 1 January 2, 2007902007–1 I.R.B. Local Governments; (10) the manager, field operations, Tax Exempt Bonds; or (11) the group manager, Indian Tribal Governments. Appeals officer.04 The term “Appeals officer” means the appeals officer assigned to the taxpayer’s case and includes an Appeals Team Case Leader. Taxpayer.05 The term “taxpayer” means any person subject to any provision of the Internal Revenue Code, including an issuer of obligations the interest on which is excluded from gross income under § 103, and their representatives. Associate office.06 The term “Associate office” means (1) the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (C orpo- rate); (2) the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Pro ducts); (3) the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting); (4) the Office of A ssociate Chief Counsel (International); (5) the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Passt hroughs and Special Industries); (6) the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and A dministration); or (7) the Office of Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Go vernment Entities). Field office.07 The term “field office” means personnel in any examination or Appeals office. Field counsel.08 The term “field counsel” means any attorney assigned to the Division Counsel for an operating division who is not a member of Division Counsel Headquarters. SECTION 3. THE NATURE OF TECHNICAL ADVICE When advice furnished.01 Technical advice is advice furnished by an Associate office in a memorandum that re- sponds to any request, submitted under this revenue procedure, for assistance on any technical or procedural question that develops during any proceeding before the IRS. The field office may request a TAM when the application of the law to the facts involved is unclear. The ques- tion must be on the interpretation and proper application of tax laws, tax treaties, regulations, revenue rulings, notices, or other precedents to a specific set of facts that concerns the treatment of an item in a year under examination or appeal. A TAM may not be requested for prospec- tive or hypothetical transactions. Proceedings include: (1) the examination of a taxpayer’s return; (2) the consideration of a taxpayer’s claim for credit or refund; (3) any matter under examination or in Appeals pertaining to tax-exempt bonds, tax credit bonds, or mortgage credit certificates; and (4) any other matter involvinga specific taxpayer under the jurisdiction of a director. Technical advice doesnot include any oral legal advice or any written legal advice furnished to the field office that is not submitted and processed under this revenue procedure. TAM may be requested even if previous TAM on same matter was issued .02 A director may raise an issue in any tax period, even if a TAM was requested a nd fur- nished for the same or similar issue for another tax period. The field office m ay also request a TAM on an issue even if Appeals disposed of the same or similar issue for anoth er tax period of the same taxpayer. Taxpayer Participation.03 Taxpayers will be afforded an opportunityto participate in the TAM process. Taxpayer participation is preferred but not required in order to process a request for technical advice. A taxpayer’s failure to participate in stages that are identified as “material”, however, will constitute waiver of the right to the conference described in Section 9. Under no circumstances will a taxpayer be treated as having waived its right to see the issued TAMortohavewaiveditsrightsregardingdisclosure and deletions described in Section 10. SECTION 4. TYPES OF ISSUES NOT SUBJECT TO THIS PROCEDURE Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes .01 The procedures for obtainingtechnical advice specifically applicable to federal alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes undersubtitle E of the Code are currently under the jurisdiction of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau of the Treasury Department. Sec. 4.01 2007–1 I.R.B.91January 2, 2007 Tax exempt and government entities .02 The procedures for requesting technicaladvice on issues under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, are found inRev. Proc. 2007–5, this Bulletin. The procedures under Rev. Proc. 2007–2, however, must be followed to request technical advice on issues pertaining to tax-exempt bonds, Indian tribal governments, federal, state, or local governments, mortgagecredit certificates, anddeferred compensation plans under § 457. Farmers’ cooperatives.03 Even though the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries) has jurisdiction over issues arising under § 521, the procedures under Rev. Proc. 2007–5 of this Bulletin and Rev. Proc. 90–27, 1990–1 C.B. 514, must be followed. Issues under § 301.9100.04 A request for an extension of time for making an election or other application f or relief under § 301.9100–3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations is not submit ted as a request for technical advice. Instead, therequest is submitted as a request for a letter ruling, even if submitted after theexamination of the taxpayer’s return has begun or aft er the issues in the return are being considered in Appeals or a federal court. Therefore, a req uest under § 301.9100 should be submitted under Rev. Proc. 2007–1 (this Bulletin), and th epaymentof the applicable user fee is determined under Appendix A of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. Frivolous issues.05 Associate offices will not issue a TAM on frivolous issues. The field office will deny a taxpayer’s request for a TAM if it involves frivolous issues. For purposes of this revenue procedure, a “frivolous issue” is one without basis in fact or law or one espousing a position held by revenue ruling, case law, or any court to be frivolous or groundless. Examples of frivolous or groundless issues may be found in IRS publications (including but not limited to Section 6.10 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1 and I.R.M. Section 4.10.12.1.1) or guidance and are described on the IRS website atwww.irs.gov/pub/irs-utl/friv_tax.pdf Issues in a docketed case.06 A field office may not request technical advice on an issue if the same issue of the same taxpayer (or of a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267 or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504) is in a docketed case for any taxable year. If a case is docketed for an estate tax issue of a taxpayer while a request for technical advice on the same issueof the same taxpayer is pending, the Associate office may issue the TAM only if the appropriate Appeals officer and field counsel agree, by memorandum, to the issuance of the TAM. Collection issues.07 The Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) does not provide technical advice on matters arising under the Internal Revenue Code and related statutes and regulations that involve the collection of taxes (including interest and penalties). With respect to such mat- ters, the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration) may issue alternate forms of advice. SECTION 5. INITIATING A REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE Initiating a request for technical advice .01 Because technical advice is issued to assist field offices, it is the field office that deter- mines whether to request it. In determining whether to request technical advice, the field office should consider whether other forms of guidance,e.g., published guidance, generic advice, or some other form of advice, would be more appropriate. Before requesting technical advice, however, the field office must request assistance and a recommendation from field counsel. If the field office disagrees with that recommendation, the field office must seek reconciliation with field counsel through their respective supervisors. Any request for technical advice must be approved in writing by the director. Taxpayer may request technical advice .02 While a case is under the jurisdiction of a director, a taxpayer may request that an issue be referred to the Associate office for technical advice. The request may be oral or written and should be directed to the field office. If the field office decides that a taxpayer’s request for referral of an issue to the Associate office for a TAM is unwarranted, the field office will notify the taxpayer. A taxpayer’s request for referral of an issue for technical advice will not Sec. 4.02 January 2, 2007922007–1 I.R.B. be denied merely because the Associate officehas already provided legal advice other than a TAMtothefieldofficeonthematter. Appeal of field office denial of TAM request .03 The taxpayer may appeal the decision by submitting to the field office, within 30 cal- endar days after notification that the request was denied, a written statement of the reasons why the matter should be referred to the Associate office. The statement should include a de- scription of all pertinent facts (including any facts in dispute); a statement of the issue that the taxpayer would like to have addressed; a discussion of any relevant statutory or administrative provision, tax treaties, case law, or other authority; and an explanation of the taxpayer’s posi- tion and the need for technical advice. Any extensions of the 30-day period must be requested in writing and must be approved by the director or, for LMSB, the territory manager. Decisions by the director or LMSB territory manager are final and may not be appealed. Upon receipt, the field office will refer the taxpayer’s written statement, along with the field office’s statement of why the issue should not be referred to the Associate office for technical advice, to the director or, for LMSB, the territory manager, for decision. The director or LMSB territory manager will determine whether theissue should be referred for technical advice on the basis of the statements of the field office and the taxpayer. No conference will be held with the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative. If the director orLMSB territory manager determines that a TAM is not warranted, the taxpayer will be informed in writing of the pro- posed denial of the request and the reasons for the denial (unless doing so would prejudice the Government’s best interests). The director or LMSB territory manager’s decision may be reviewed but not appealed .04 The taxpayer may not appeal the decision ofthe director or LMSB territory manager not to request a TAM. If the taxpayer does not agree with the proposed denial, all data on the issue for which a TAM has been sought, including the taxpayer’s written request and statements, will be submitted for review to the director, LMSB;Examination Area Director, SB/SE; the Direc- tor, Compliance, W&I; the Director, Federal, State & Local Governments; the Director, Tax Exempt Bonds; the Director, Indian Tribal Governments or Appeals Director, Tax Policy and Procedure (Exam). Review of the proposed denialwillbebasedsolelyonthewrittenrecord; no conference will be held with the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative. The person re- sponsible for review may consult with the Associate office, if necessary, and will notify the field office whether the proposed denial of the taxpayer’s request is approved or denied within 45 days of receiving all information. The field office will then notify the taxpayer. While the matter is being reviewed, the field office willsuspend any final decision on the issue (except when the delay would prejudice the Government’s interests). If the TAM has been denied be- cause the issue is frivolous as described in 4.05 above, this review process is not available. SECTION 6. PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCES Purpose.01 A pre-submission conference helps the field office, field counsel, the taxpayer, and the Associate office agree on the appropriate scope of the request for technical advice and the factual information and documents that mustbe included in the request. A pre-submission conference is not an alternative procedure for addressing the merits of the substantive positions advanced by the field office or by the taxpayer. During the pre-submission conference, the parties should discuss the framing of the issues and the background information and documents that should be included in the formal submission of the request for technical advice. Pre-submissionconferences are mandatory .02 Pre-submission conferences include the taxpayer and representatives from the field of- fice, field counsel, and the Associate office.These conferences are mandatory because they promote expeditious processing of requests for technical advice. If a request for technical ad- vice is submitted without first holding a pre-submission conference, the Associate office will return the request for advice.Requests for technical advicecan proceed even if a taxpayer declines to participate in apre-submission conference. Actions before a pre-submission conference .03 Before requesting a pre-submission conference, the field office and the taxpayer must ex- change proposed statements of the pertinent facts and issues. The proposed statements should include any facts in dispute, the issues that the parties intend to discuss, any legal analysis and Sec. 6.03 2007–1 I.R.B.93January 2, 2007 supporting authorities, and any background documents that the parties believe would facilitate the Associate office’s understanding of the issues to be discussed during the conference. Prior to the scheduled pre-submission conference, the field office and the taxpayer must submit to the Associate office their respective statements of pertinent facts and issues. The legal anal- ysis provided in the parties’ statements should be sufficient to enable the Associate office to become reasonably informed about the subjectmatter. The field office or the taxpayer must ensure that the Associate office receives a copy ofany required power of attorney, preferably on Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative(Rev. March 2004). The assigned branch of the Associate office must receive the pre-submission materials at least 10 business days before the conference is held. Initiating a pre-submission conference .04 A request for a pre-submission conference must be submitted in writing by the field office, with the assistance of field counsel. The request should identify the Associate office expected to have jurisdiction over the request for a TAM and should include a brief explanation of the primary issue so that an assignment to the appropriate branch of an Associate can be made. If the request is submitted by Appeals, field counsel assignments will be subject to the ex parterules set forth in section 1001(a)(4) of the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. No. 105–206, and Rev. Proc. 2000–43, 2000–2 C.B. 404. If the request involves an issue under the office of the Director, ATAT Examination, SB/SE, an issue under the office of the Director, OTSA, LMSB, or an industry issue under the Office of Pre-Filing and Technical Guidance, LMSB, then the field office and field counsel should coordinate with the technical advisor and field counsel contact. If the request is from Appeals and involves a coordinated issue or emerging issue under the Appeals Technical Guidance or Appeals Coordinated Issue (ACI) Program, the Appeals officer must coordinate with the Appeals Technical GuidanceCoordinator/Specialist. Manner of transmitting pre-submission materials .05 To obtain the protection of taxpayer information offered by the Chief C ounsel Intranet firewall, the pre-submission materials must be electronically transmit ted by field counsel to the Technical Services Support Branch (TSS4510). TSS4510 will ensure delive ry of the pre-sub- mission materials to the appropriateAssociate office. The TSS4510 ema il box cannot accept encrypted mail. If documents are not electronically available, or if documents cannot reasonably be trans- mitted electronically, the request may be sent by fax to TSS4510 at 202–622–4817. If the documents are sent by fax, the director must also confirm the request in writing. Email or fax may be used to confirm the request. The Associate office will confirm receipt of the fax within one business day after receipt by the Associate office. Copies of the taxpayer’s statement of deletions, penalties of perjury statement, and Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative(Rev. March 2004) should be transmitted by fax to the Associate office at- torney assigned to the case. The field office should send the original of the materials sent by fax, and any supporting materials, to the Associate office attorney assigned to the case by express mail or private de- livery service in order to avoid any delays in regular mail. Scheduling the pre-submission conference .06 After the materials have been received, the branch of the Associate office responsible for conducting the pre-submission conference will contact the taxpayer, the field office, and field counsel to arrange a mutually convenient time for the parties to participate in the conference. The conference generally should be held within 15, but not more than 30, calendar days after the field office is contacted. Pre-submissionConferences may be conducted in person .07 Although pre-submission conferences are generally conducted by telephone, the parties may also choose to conduct the conference in person. Pre-submission conference may not be taped .08 No tape, stenographic, or other verbatimrecording of a conference may be made by any party. Discussion of substantive issues is not binding on the Service .09 Any discussion of substantive issues at a pre-submission conference is advisory only, is not binding on the Service or on the Office of Chief Counsel, and cannot be relied upon as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). Sec. 6.03 January 2, 2007942007–1 I.R.B. New issues may be raised at pre-submission conference .10 During the pre-submission conference, the Office of Chief Counsel may raise new issues in addition to those submitted by the field office and the taxpayer. SECTION 7. SUBMITTING THE REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE Memorandum of issues, facts, law, and arguments; submission of relevant foreign laws and documents in a language other than English; statement regarding interpretation of an income or estate tax treaty; deletions statement .01 Every request for technical advice must include a memorandum that describes the facts, issues, applicable law, and arguments supporting the taxpayer’s position on the issues and the field office’s position on the issues. The field office will prepare this statement with the assis- tance of field counsel. The memorandum must include a statement of all the facts and the issues. If the taxpayer and the field office disagree about ultimate findings of fact or about the rele- vance of facts, all of the facts should be included with an explanation that highlights the areas of disagreement. The memorandum must include anexplanation of the taxpayer’s position. This explanation must include a discussion of any relevant statutory provisions, tax treaties, court decisions, regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices, and any other authority supporting the taxpayer’s position. The memorandum must also include a similar explanation of the field office’s position. Both the field office and the taxpayer should comment on any existing or pending legislation, tax treaties, regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, or court decisions contrary to their respective positions. If either party determines that there are no authorities contrary to its position, thatstatement should be noted in the memorandum. Transaction involving multiple taxpayers .02 If the subject matter of the request involves a transaction among multiple taxpayers, the Associate office may issue a single TAM, but only if each taxpayer agrees to participate in the process. Foreign laws and documents.03 If applicable, the request for technical advice must include a copy of the relevant parts of all foreign laws, including statutes, regulations, administrative pronouncements, and any other relevant legal authority. This copy must be in theofficial language of the country involved and must be produced from an official publication of the foreign government or another widely available, generally accepted publication. If English is not the official language of the country involved, the submission must also include a copy of an English translation of the relevant parts of all foreign laws. The translation must be from an official publication of the foreign government or another widely available, generally accepted publication or from a certified English translation submitted in accordance with Section 7.03(2) of this revenue procedure. The taxpayer or the field office must identify thetitle and date of publication, including updates, of any widely available, generally accepted publication used by the taxpayer or its qualified translator as a source for the relevant parts of the foreign law. The taxpayer and the field office must inform the Associate office of the implications of any authority believed to interpret the foreign law, such as pending legislation, treaties, court decisions, notices, and administrative decisions. (1) If the interpretation of a foreign law or foreign document is a material fact, the Associate office, at its discretion, may refuse to issue a TAM. This section applies whether or not the field office and the taxpayer dispute the interpretation of a foreign law or foreign document. The interpretation of a foreign law or foreign document means making a judgment about the import or effect of the foreign law or document that goes beyond its plain meaning. (2) If applicable, a request for technical advice must include an accurate and complete cer- tified English translation of the relevant parts of all contracts, wills, deeds, agreements, instru- ments, trust documents, proposed disclaimers, or other documents in a language other than English. If the taxpayer or the field office chooses to submit certified English translations of foreign laws, those translations must be based on an official publication of the foreign govern- ment or another widely available, generally accepted publication. In either case, the translation must be that of a qualified translator and must be attested to by the translator. The attestation must contain: (1) the attestant’s name and address; (2) a statement that the translation sub- mitted is a true and accurate translation of theforeign language document or law; and (3) a statement about the attestant’s qualifications asa translator and that attestant’s qualifications and knowledge regarding tax matters or any foreign law translated if the law is not a tax law. Sec. 7.03 2007–1 I.R.B.95January 2, 2007 (3) A request for technical advice involving the interpretation of a substantive provision of an income or estate tax treaty must include a written statement addressing whether: (1) the tax authority of the treaty jurisdiction has issued a ruling on the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer (within the meaning of § 267 or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504 (related taxpayer)), or any predecessor; (2) the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or any predecessor is being examined, or has been settled, by the tax authority of the treaty jurisdiction or is otherwise the subject of a closing agreement in that jurisdiction; and (3) the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or any predecessor is being considered by the competent authority of the treaty jurisdiction. Statement recommending information to be deleted from public inspection .04 Every request for technical advice must include a statement of proposed deletions from public inspection. The text of TAMs are open to public inspection under § 6110(a). The Ser- vice deletes certain information from the text before it is made available to the public in order to protect the privacy of taxpayers. To help the Service make the necessary deletions, the tax- payer must provide a statement indicating thedeletions desired. A taxpayer who wants only names, addresses, and identifying numbers deleted should state this in the deletion statement. A taxpayer who wants more information deleted must provide a copy of the TAM request and supporting documents on which the taxpayerhas placed brackets around the material to be deleted plus a statement indicating the statutory basis under § 6110(c) for each proposed dele- tion. The deletion statement must not appear inthe memorandum described in Section 7.01 of this revenue procedure. Instead, the deletion statement must be made in a separate docu- ment that is signed and dated by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative. A stamped signature or faxed signature is not permitted. If the deletion statement is not submit- ted, the taxpayer will be notified and advised by the field office that the statement is required. If the deletion statement is not received within 10calendar days after the notification, the field office will use its best effort to provide the Associate office with an appropriate deletion state- ment. The taxpayer should follow this same process to propose deletions from any additional information submitted after the initial request for a TAM. An additional deletion statement is not required with each submissionof additional information if thetaxpayer’s initial deletion statement requests that only names, addresses, and identifying numbers are to be deleted and the taxpayer wants only the same information deleted from the additional information. Preparation of the memorandum; resolution of disagreements .05 The field office prepares the memorandum described in Section 7.01 of this revenue procedure with the assistance of field counseland sends it to the taxpayer by mail or fax trans- mission. The taxpayer then will have 5 calendar days from the date of mailing or fax transmis- sion to respond by providing a written statement specifying any disagreement on the facts and issues. A taxpayer who needs more than 5 calendar days must submit a written request for an extension of time, subject to the approval of the director. The director shall make a determina- tion on the request for extension as soon as reasonably possible. The request for extension shall be considered denied unless the director informs the taxpayer otherwise. The decision of the director on whether to approve an extension, and the length of any extension granted, is final and may not be appealed. After the taxpayer’s response has been received by the field office, the parties will have 10 calendar days to resolveremaining disagreements. If all disagreements about the statement of facts and issues are resolved, then the field office will prepare a single statement of those agreed facts and issues. If disagreements continue, both the taxpayer’s set of facts and issues and the field’s sets of facts and issues will be forwarded to the Associate office. The field office, with the assistance offield counsel, will prepare a memorandum for the Associate office highlighting the material factual differences, and provide a copy to the taxpayer. This memorandum will be forwarded with the initial request for technical advice. The taxpayer’s statement of facts and issuesmust be accompanied by the following declara- tion: “Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this information, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information con- tains all the relevant facts relating to the request for technical advice, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.” This declaration must be signed in accordance with the requirements in section 7.01(15)(b) of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. The field office must submit this declaration with the initial request for technical advice. Ifno agreement is reached regarding the facts, the Associate office may rely on the facts presented by the field office. Sec. 7.03 January 2, 2007962007–1 I.R.B. The field office will offer the taxpayer an opportunity to participate in the development of the TAM. If the taxpayer participates in the process, the field office will continue to offer the taxpayer the opportunity to participate. If the taxpayer does not participate in a material stage of the process after being offered an opportunity, the Associate office will nonetheless process the request, and the taxpayer will have waived the right to participate in the development and issuance of the TAM, including the right to the conference described in section 9. Under no circumstances will a taxpayer be treated as having waived its right to see the issued TAMortohavewaiveditsrightsregardingdisclosure and deletions described in Section 10. A taxpayer’s failure to participate in the development of the memorandum will be consid- ered a failure to participate in a material stage of the TAM process and result in a waiver of the right to the conference discussed in Section 9. Transmittal Form 4463,Request for Technical Advice .06 The field counsel, with whom the TAM request was coordinated, must use Form 4463, Request for Technical Advice, for submitting a request for a TAM through TSS4510 to the Associate office. While the field office is responsible for preparing Form 4463, field counsel must submit the Form 4463 for a TAM request to the TSS4510 email address. To the extent feasible, the accompanying documents should also be submitted to the TSS4510 email address, followed by hard copy upon the request of the assigned branch of the Associate office. All supporting and additional documents .07 Field counsel should send additional or supporting documents that are not available in electronic form by fax to TSS4510 at 202–622–4817 or by express mail or private delivery service to the following address to avoid any delays in regular mail: Internal Revenue Service Attn: CC:PA:LPD:TSS, Room 5329 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20224 Whenever possible, all documents should contain the case number and name of the Asso- ciate office attorney assigned to the pre-submission conference for the TAM request. The field office must indicate on the Form 4463 the proper mailing address of the director to whom the Associate office should mail a copyof its reply to the TAM request under Section 10.06 of this revenue procedure. Number of copies of request to be submitted .08 The field office must submit three paper copies of the request for a TAM to the address in Section 7.07 of this revenue procedure, one paper copy to the Division Counsel of the operating division that has jurisdiction of the taxpayer’stax return, and if the request is from an Appeals office, one paper copy to the Appeals Director, Technical Services. Power of attorney.09 Any authorized representative, as described in section 7.01(13) of Rev. Proc. 2007–1, whether or not enrolled to practice, must comply with Treasury Department Circular No. 230 (31 C.F.R. part 10 (2002)) and with the conference and practice requirements of the Statement of Procedural Rules (26 C.F.R. §§ 601.501–601.509 (2002)). Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative(Rev. March 2004), should be used. An original, a copy, or a fax transmission of the power of attorney isacceptable if its authenticity is not reasonably disputed. Service not barred from issuing 30-day letter while a TAM request is pending. .10 After consultation with Appeals, the Service may send the taxpayer a letter (Letter 950 (DO) or other letter from the 950 series, also known as a 30-day letter) notifying the taxpayer of the right to appeal the proposed changes within 30 days, while a request for technical advice is pending. Sec. 7.10 2007–1 I.R.B.97January 2, 2007 SECTION 8. INITIAL PROCESSING OF THE REQUEST FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE BY THE ASSOCIATE OFFICE Assignment and initial review by Associateofficeattorney .01 After a request for technical advice has beenreceived by the appropriate Associate of- fice, it will be assigned to an Associate office attorney within a branch. The Associate office attorney determines whether the request meets all procedural requirements of sections 4, 5, 6, and 7 of this revenue procedure and whether it raises issues that are appropriately addressed in aTAM. Other forms of guidance.02 If the assigned reviewer in the Associate office determines that guidance other than a TAM should be provided, the reviewer will immediately notify the Associate Chief Counsel. This other form of guidance may be published guidance, generic advice, or case-specific ad- vice. Although the reviewer should make this determination as soon as possible, it may be made at any time during the processing of the request for advice. To make this determination, the reviewer should consider whether the issue hasa broad application to similarly situated tax- payers or an industry and whether resolution of the issue is important to a clear understanding of the tax laws. The Associate Chief Counsel, after consultation with Division Counsel Head- quarters and the Operating Division, will decide whether to issue the TAM or issue guidance in another form. The Associate Chief Counselmay decide to issue the TAM as well as another type of guidance, if doing so would promote sound tax administration. Initial acknowledgment and processing .03 Upon receipt of a request for technical advice, the Associate office attorney who has been assigned as the primary attorney on the request should immediately contact the field of- fice. The purpose of this contact is only to acknowledge receipt of the request. Unless other- wise indicated, all references in this section to the Associate office or Associate office attorney are to the Associate office and attorney withprimary responsibility for the TAM request. Deficiencies in request leading to return .04 Within 7 calendar days afterassignment, the Associate office attorney will contact the field office and field counsel to discuss any deficiencies in the request and will work with the field office and field counsel to correct them. If they cannot be corrected within 7 calendar days, the request will be closed and returned to the field office. The request may be resubmitted when the deficiencies are corrected. If only minor procedural deficiencies exist, the Associate office attorney will request the additional information without returning the case. If substantial additional information is re- quired to resolve an issue or if major procedural problems cannot be resolved, the Associate office attorney will inform the field office and field counsel that the request for technical advice will be returned. If a request is returned, the field office should promptly notify the taxpayer of that decision and the reasons for the decision. Initial discussion.05 The Associate office attorney should contact the field office within 21 calendar days of receipt to discuss the procedural and substantive issues in the request. The Associate office attorney should also inform the field office about any matters referred to another Associate office or branch for assistance and provide points of contact for the other Associate offices or branches. If additional information requested .06 If additional information is needed, the Associate office attorney will obtain that infor- mation from the taxpayer, the director, or theAppeals Area Director in the most expeditious manner possible. Any additional information requested from the taxpayer by the Associate office must be submitted by letter with a penalties of perjury statement that conforms with the penalties of perjury statement set forth in Section 7.05 of this revenueprocedure within 10 cal- endar days after the request for information ismade. To facilitate prompt action, the Service and taxpayers are encouraged to use fax or email to exchange information whenever feasible. A taxpayer’s failure to submit the additional information requested will be considered failure to participate in a material stage of the TAM process and result in a waiver of the right to the conference discussed in Section 9. Sec. 8 January 2, 2007982007–1 I.R.B. Taxpayer request for extension of time to submit additional information .07 A taxpayer’s request for an extension of time to submit additional information must be made in writing and received by the Associate office within the 10-day period. It must provide compelling facts and circumstances to justify an extension. Only the Associate Chief Counsel of the primary office to which the case is assigned may determine whether to grant or deny the request for an extension. Except in rare and unusual circumstances, the Associate office will not agree to an extension of more than 10 calendar days beyond the end of the 10-day period. There is no right to appeal the denial of a request for an extension. Where to send additional information .08 Any additional information submitted by the taxpayer should be sent to the attention of the assigned Associate office attorney. Generally, only the original ofthe additional informa- tion is necessary. In appropriate cases, however, the Associate office may request additional copies of the information. The taxpayer must also send a copy of the additional information to the director for comment. Any comments by thedirector must be furnished within an agreed period of time to the Associate office with primary responsibility for the TAM request. If the director does not have any comments, he or she must notify the Associate office attorney promptly. When the director receives a copy of the additional information from the taxpayer, the director must provide field counsel with a copy. Tentative conclusions.09 The Associate office attorney will inform the field office and field counsel when all necessary substantive and procedural information has been received. If possible, the Associate office attorney will provide a tentative conclusion. If no tentative conclusion has been reached, the Associate office is encouraged to discuss the underlying complexities with the field office and field counsel. Because the Associate office attorney’s tentative conclusion may change during the preparation and review of the TAM, the tentative conclusion should not be consid- ered final. If the tentative conclusion is changed, the Associate office attorney will inform the field office and field counsel. Neither the Associate office, the field office, nor the field coun- sel should discuss the tentative conclusion and its underlying rationale with the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative until the Associate office is ready to issue a TAM that agrees with thetaxpayer’spositionorisreadytoholdanadverse conference. To afford taxpayers an ap- propriate opportunity to prepare and present their position at an adverse conference, however, the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative shall be told (by the Associate office attorney) the tentative conclusion when scheduling the adverse conference. Field counsel should be noti- fied and given the opportunity to participate in the notification to the taxpayer of the tentative conclusions and scheduling of the adverse conference. SECTION 9. TAXPAYER CONFERENCES Notification of conference.01 If the Associate office proposes to issue a TAM that will be adverse to the taxpayer, and if the taxpayer has not waived its right to a conference, the taxpayer will be informed of the time and place of the conference. Scheduling conference.02 The conference for a TAM must be held within 10 calendar days after the taxpayer is informed that an adverse TAM is proposed. The Associate office will notify the field office and field counsel of the scheduledconference and will offer the field office and field counsel the opportunity to participate in the conference. Taxpayers may request extensions.03 Only an Associate Chief Counsel may approve an extension of the 10-day period for holding a conference. Although extensions will be granted in appropriate circumstances in the discretion of the Associate Chief Counsel, taxpayers should not expect extensions to be rou- tinely granted. The taxpayer must submit a request for an extension in writing to the Associate Chief Counsel of the primary office to which thecase is assigned, and must immediately notify the field office and field counsel of the request. The request must contain a detailed justifica- tion for the extension and must be submitted sufficiently before the end of the 10-day period to allow the Associate Chief Counsel to consider,and either approve or deny, the request before the end of the 10-day period. If unusual circumstances near the end of the 10-day period make a timely written request impractical, the taxpayer may orally inform the assigned Associate office attorney or reviewer before the end of the 10-day period about the need for an extension and then promptly submit the written request. The Associate office attorney will inform the Sec. 9.03 2007–1 I.R.B.99January 2, 2007 taxpayer by telephone of the approval or denial of a requested extension. There is no right to appeal the denial of a request for extension. Oneconferenceofright.04 In general, a taxpayer who has not waived the right to a conference is e ntitled by right to only one conference with the Associate office. The conference is norma lly held at the branch level. A person who has authority to sign the transmittal memorandum in his or her own name, or on behalf of the branch chief, will participate. When more than one br anch of an Associate office has taken an adverse position on issues in the request or when the position ultimately adopted by one branch will affect another branch’s determination, a re presentative from each branch with authority to sign in his or her own name, or for the branch c hief, will participate in the conference. The conference is the conference of right for each subject discussed. Additional conferences may be offered .05 After the conference of right, the Service will offer the taxpayer an additional confer- ence of right only if an adverse holding is proposed on a new issue or on the same issue but on grounds different from those discussed at the first conference. If a tentative position is re- versed at a higher level with a result less favorable to the taxpayer, the taxpayer has no right to another conference if the grounds or arguments on which the reversal is based were discussed at the conference of right. The limitation on the number of conferences to which a taxpayer is entitled does not prevent the Associate office from inviting a taxpayer to participate in addi- tional conferences if that office determines thatadditional conferences would be useful. These additional conferences are not offered routinely following an adverse decision. Additional information submitted after the conference .06 In order to ensure that the conference of right is productive, the taxpayer should make a reasonable effort to supply all information, documents, and arguments in writing well before the conference. Sometimes, however, it becomes apparent that new information may be help- ful in resolving issues discussed at the conference. If the Associate office and the taxpayer agree that such information would be helpful, all such materials must be submitted and re- ceived within 10 calendar days after the conference. Any extension of the 10-day period must be requested by the taxpayer in writing and mustbe approved by the Associate Chief Counsel. Extensions will not be routinely granted. Taxpayers have no right to submit additional mate- rials after the conference, and are discouraged from providing additional copies or versions of materials already submitted. If the additional information is not received from the taxpayer within 10 calendar days plus any extensions granted by an Associate Chief Counsel, the TAM will be issued on the basis of the existing record. The taxpayer must also send a copy of the additional information to the director for com- ment. The director must provide a copy to the field counsel assigned to the request for technical advice. If the additional information has a significant impact on the facts in the request, the As- sociate office will ask the director for comments. The director will respond within the agreed period of time. If the director has no comments,he or she must notify the Associate office attorney promptly. Normally conducted in person.07 Conferences under this section are generally conducted in person, but may be conducted by telephone. Service makes only t entative recommendations .08 At the conclusio n of the conference, no commitment will be made about the conclusion that the Service wil l finally adopt for any issue, including the outcome of a request for relief under § 7805(b). Conference may not be taped.09 No tape, stenographic, or other verbatimrecording of a conference may be made by any party. SECTION 10. PREPARATION OF THE TECHNICAL ADVICE Reply consists of two parts.01 The Associate office prepares replies torequests for technical advice in two parts. Each part identifies the taxpayer by name, address, identification number, and year or years involved. The first part of the reply is a transmittal memorandum (Form M–6000). If the transmittal mem- orandum provides information not in the TAM, or the case is returned for further development, the transmittal memorandum may be Chief Counsel Advice, as defined in § 6110(i)(1), subject Sec. 9.03 January 2, 20071002007–1 I.R.B. to public inspection under § 6110. The second part is the TAM, which contains: (1) a statement of the issues; (2) the conclusions of the Associate office; (3) a statement of the facts pertinent to the issues; (4) a statement of the pertinent law, tax treaties, regulations, revenue rulings, and other precedents published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and court decisions; and (5) a discussion of the rationale supporting the conclusions reached by the Associate office. The conclusions give direct answers, whenever possible, to the specific issues raised by the field office. The Associate office is not bound by the issues as submitted by the taxpayer or by the field office and may reframe the issues to be answered in a TAM after consultation with the field office and field counsel. The discussionof the issues in a TAM will be in sufficient detail so that the field or Appeals officials will understand the reasoning underlying the conclusion. Status of a request.02 The taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative may obtain information on the status of the request by contacting the field office that requested the advice. The Associate office attorney or reviewer assigned to the TAM request will give frequent status updates to the field office and field counsel. Section 6110.03 Accompanying the TAM is a notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to disclose a TAM, including a copy of the version proposed to be open to public inspection and notations of third party communications under § 6110(d). Before issuing a TAM, the Associate office will inform the taxpayer orally or in writing of the material likely to appear in the TAM that the taxpayer proposed for deletion but that the Service has determined should not be deleted. If so informed, the taxpayer may submit within 10 calendar days any further information or arguments sup- porting the taxpayer’s proposed deletions. The Service attempts to resolve all disagreement s about proposed deletions before the Associate office issues a TAM. The taxpayer does not have the right to a conference to resolve any disagreements about material to be deleted from the text of the TAM. Opportunity for field counsel review .04 The Associate office attorney will inform the field counsel of the Associate office’s final conclusions before the TAM is issued. The field counsel will be offered a reasonable opportunity to review and informally discuss these conclusions before the TAM is issued. Copy of preliminary TAM to field office and field counsel .05 After the field counsel is given a reasonableopportunity to review the Associate office’s final conclusions but before the TAM is issued, the Associate Office attorney will provide a draft of the proposed final version of the TAM tothe field office and field counsel. If the field office or field counsel disagrees with the proposed final conclusions, normal reconciliation and reconsideration procedures will be followed to resolve the differing views Routing of reply.06 A TAM is generally addressed to the field office that requested it. A copy of the reply to a request from LMSB should be mailed simultaneously to the appropriate Industry Director. A reply to a request from Appeals should be addressed to the appropriate field office, through the Appeals Director, Technical Services, C:AP. Copy of final TAM to field counsel and Division Counsel .07TheAssociateofficewillprovideacopyof the reply to the request for technical advice (the final TAM) to the individual field counsel attorney who assisted the field office in sub- mitting the request and to that attorney’s Associate Area Counsel. The Associate office also will provide a copy of the final TAM to the Division Counsel for the operating division from which the request was initiated or that has jurisdiction over the particular matter in the TAM. The reply may be transmitted electronically if it is in .pdf format, or may be sent by mail or fax transmission. Reconsideration.08 The director may formally request reconsideration. Before formally requesting recon- sideration, the director must consult with field counsel. Requests for reconsideration must describe with specificity the errors in the analysis and conclusions. Requests should focus on points that the TAM overlooked or misconstrued rather than simply re-argue points raised in the initial request. The Associate office will give priority consideration to the request and should act on the request as expeditiously as possible. The Associate office may request further submissions from the field or the taxpayer, butthe parties should otherwise make no additional submissions. If a request for reconsideration fails to follow the procedures set forth in this sec- tion of this revenue procedure, or the request fails to raise issues or arguments different from Sec. 10.08 2007–1 I.R.B.101January 2, 2007 those asserted in the initial request for technical advice, the Associate office may return the request for reconsideration without ruling on the request for reconsideration. The taxpayer is not entitled to be informed that a request for reconsideration is being considered. Discussing contents with the taxpayer .09 The Associate office will not discuss thespecific contents of the TAM with the taxpayer until after the field office has given a copy of the TAM to the taxpayer. TAM takes effect when taxpayer receives a copy .10 After a TAM is sent to the director, the director gives the taxpayer a copy of the issued TAM, the notice of intention to disclose under §6110 (f)(1), and a copy of the version proposed to be open to public inspection, which includes notations of third party communications under § 6110. If a request for technical advice pertains to more than one taxpayer, the director will provide each pertinent taxpayer with a copy of the TAM and will notify the Associate office when this occurs. The requirement to give a taxpayer a copy of the TAM does not apply to a TAM involving civil fraud or a criminal investigation, relating to a civil fraud or criminal investigation, or involving a jeopardy or termination assessment. Taxpayer may protest deletions not made .11 Generally, the Associate office considersonly the deletion of material that the taxpayer has proposed for deletion or other deletions as required under § 6110(c) before the TAM is sent to the director. After receiving the notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to disclose the TAM, the taxpayer may protest the disclosure of certain information in it by submitting a written statement within 20 calendar days which identifies those deletions not made by the Service that the taxpayer believes should have been made. The taxpayer must also submit a copy of the version of the TAM proposed to be open to public inspection with brackets around the deletions proposed by the taxpayer that have not been made by the Associate office plus a statement indicating the statutory basisunder § 6110 for each proposed deletion. Within 20 calendar days after it receives the taxpayer’s response tothe notice under § 6110(f)(1), the Associate office must mail to the taxpayer its final administrative conclusion about the deletions to be made. Public inspection of § 6104 applications for exemption and letter rulings issued to certain exempt organizations .12 The public inspection provisions of § 6110, including taxpayer notification and deletion processes, do not apply to any document to which § 6104 applies. Public inspection in civil fraud or criminal investigation cases .13 The provisions of this section about referringissues upon the taxpayer’s request, telling the taxpayer about the referral of issues, giving the taxpayer a copy of the arguments submitted, submitting proposed deletions, granting conferences in the Associate office, or providing a copy of the TAM to the taxpayer do not apply to a TAM described in § 6110(g)(5)(A) that involves any matter that is the subject of a civil fraud or criminal investigation, is otherwise closely related to a civil fraud or criminal investigation, or involves a jeopardy or termination assessment. In these cases, a copy of the TAM may be given to the taxpayer only after all proceedings in the investigations or assessments are complete, but before the Commissioner mails the notice of intention to disclose the TAM under § 6110(f)(1). The taxpayer may then provide the statement of proposed deletions to the Associate office. SECTION 11. WITHDRAWAL OF REQUESTS FOR TECHNICAL ADVICE Taxpayer notified.01 Once a request for a TAM has been sent tothe Associate office, only a director may withdraw the request, but this must be done before the responding transmittal memorandum for the TAM is signed. To withdraw the request, the director must first notify the taxpayer of the intent to withdraw unless: (1) the period of limitations on assessment is about to expire and the taxpayer has declined to give written consent to extend the period or (2) the notification would be prejudicial to the best interests of the Government. If the taxpayer does not agree that the request should be withdrawn and wishes to request review of the decision, the procedures in Section 5.04 of this revenue procedure for review must be followed. Sec. 10.08 January 2, 20071022007–1 I.R.B. Acknowledgment of withdrawal.02 Acknowledgment of the withdrawal of a request submitted by a director or Appeals should be sent to the appropriate director or Appeals office, through the Appeals Director, Technical Services, C:AP. Associate office may decide not to issue a TAM .03 If the Associate office determines thataTAMshouldnotbeissued,itmayreturnthe TAM unanswered. This determination must be made on the basis of sound tax administration and must be approved by the Associate Chief Counsel. The decision not to issue a TAM should be an infrequent occurrence and should be made only after consultation with field counsel and the requesting field office. If field counsel disagrees with this determination, they may request reconsideration through existing reconciliation procedures. Associateofficemayprovideviews.04 If a request for technical advice is withdrawn or an Associate office decides n ot to issue a TAM, the Associate office may address the substantive issues through published guidance, such as a regulation or revenue ruling, bysome other form of legal advice, or throu gh generic advice. The decision to address the issuesthrough these other forms of guidance will be based on the general standards for issuing those types of guidance. SECTION 12. USE OF THE TECHNICAL ADVICE Generally applies advice in processing the taxpayer’s case After a TAM is issued, the director must process the taxpayer’s case on the basis of the con- clusions in the TAM. Specifically, if a TAM provides conclusions involving a § 103 obligation and the issuer of this obligation, the director must apply the conclusions to the issuer and any holder of the obligation, unless the holder also initiates a request for a TAM on the same issue addressed in the TAM involving the issuer, and the Associate office issues a TAM involving that issue and that holder. The Appeals Area Director may settle the issue under its existing settlement authority. SECTION 13. RETROACTIVITY AND RELIANCE Usually applies retroactively.01 The holdings in a TAM are applied retroactively, whether they are initial holdings or they are later holdings that modify or revoke holdings in a prior TAM. The Associate Chief Counsel with jurisdiction over the TAM, however, may exercise the discretionary authority under § 7805(b) to limit the retroactive effect ofany holding. This authority is exercised in rare and unusual circumstances. Revocation or modification of an earlierletterrulingorTAM .02 Generally, a TAM revoking or modifying a letter ruling or an earlier TAM will not be applied retroactively if: (1) the applicablelaw has not changed; (2) the taxpayer directly involved in the letter ruling or earlier TAM relied in good faith on it; and (3) revoking or modifying the letter ruling or earlier TAM would be detrimental to the taxpayer. The new TAM will be applied retroactively to the taxpayer whose tax liability was directly involved in the letter ruling or TAM if: (1) controlling facts have been misstated or omitted or (2) the facts at the time of the transaction are materially different from the controlling facts on which the letter ruling or earlier TAM was based. If a letter ruling or a TAM is modified or revoked with retroactive effect, the notice to the taxpayer,except in fraud cases, should set forth the grounds on which the modification or revocation is being made and the reason why the modification or revocation is being applied retroactively. Continuing action or series of actions .03 If a TAM relates to a continuing action or a series of actions, it is generally applied until it is withdrawn or until the conclusion is modified or revoked by a final decision in favor of the taxpayer with respect to the issue addressed by the TAM, the enactment of legislation, the ratification of a tax treaty, a decision of the United States Supreme Court, or the issuance of temporary regulations, final regulations, a revenue ruling, or other statement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking does not affect the application of a TAM. If a new holding in a TAM is less favorable to the taxpayer than the holding in an earlier TAM, the new holding is generally not applied to the period when the taxpayer relied on the earlier holding. It will be applied to that period, however, if material facts on which the earlier TAM was based have changed. Sec. 13.03 2007–1 I.R.B.103January 2, 2007 Other taxpayers.04 Under § 6110(k)(3), a taxpayer may not rely on a TAM issued by the Service for another taxpayer. In addition, retroactive or non-retroactive treatment to one member of an industry directly involved in a letter ruling or TAM does not extend to another member of that same industry, and retroactive or non-retroactive treatment to one client of a tax practitioner does not extend to another client of that same practitioner. SECTION 14. HOW MAY RETROACTIVE EFFECT BE LIMITED? Requests for relief under § 7805(b). .01 A taxpayer for whom a TAM was issued or for whom a TAM request is pending may request that the appropriate Associate Chief Counsel limit the retroactive effe ct of any holding in the TAM or of any subsequent modification or revocation of the TAM. For a pending request for technical advice, the taxpayer should make the request for relief under § 7805 (b) as part of the initial request for advice. The Associate office will consider a request f or relief under § 7805(b) made at a later time if there is justification for having delayed the req uest. Form of request for relief — In general .02 During the course of an examination of a taxpayer’s return by the director or during con- sideration of the taxpayer’s return by the Appeals Area Director, a taxpayer’s request to limit retroactivity must be made in the form of a request for a TAM. This includes recommendations by the director that an earlier letter ruling or TAM be modified or revoked. The request must meet the general requirements of a request for technical advice. It must also: (1) state that it is being made under § 7805(b); (2) state the relief sought; (3) explain the reasons and arguments in support of the relief sought; and (4) include any documents bearing on the request. The taxpayer’s request must be submitted to the director, who should then forward the request to the Associate office for consideration. Form of request for relief — continuing transaction before examination of return .03 A request for relief under § 7805(b) must be made in the form of a request for a letter ruling if (1) a TAM addressing a continuing transaction is modified or revoked by later pub- lished guidance and (2) the request for relief is submitted before an examination has begun covering those years for which relief is sought. The requirements for a letter ruling request are given in Rev. Proc. 2007–1 (this Bulletin). Taxpayer’s right to a conference.04 When a request for a TAM concerns onlythe application of § 7805(b), the taxpayer has the right to a conference with the Associate office in accordance with the provisions of Section 9 of this revenue procedure. If the request for application of § 7805(b) is included in the request for a TAM on the substantive issues or is made before the conference of right on the substantive issues, the § 7805(b) issues will be discussed at the taxpayer’s one conference of right. If the request for the application of § 7805(b) is made as part of a pending TAM request after a conference has been held on the substantive issues and the Service determines that there is justification for having delayed the request, then the taxpayer will have the right to one conference of right concerning the application of § 7805(b), with the conference limited to discussion of this issue only. Reconsideration of request for relief under § 7805(b) .05 When a TAM grants a taxpayer relief under § 7805(b), the director may not request reconsideration of the § 7805(b) issue unless thedirector determines there has been a misstate- ment or omission of controlling facts by the taxpayer in its request for § 7805(b) relief. SECTION 15. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES MADE TO REV. PROC. 2006–2 Overview.01 In 2006, the Office of Chief Counsel adopted certain changes to the process by which it provides legal advice to IRS operating divisions and to Appeals. Some of these changes affect the TAM process and are intended to improve the timeliness and usefulness of TAMs. This revenue procedure incorporates these changes, the most significant of which are listed in paragraphs .02 through .06 below. The Office ofChief Counsel will evaluate the effect these changes have on the TAM process and, if necessary, further modify these procedures in the future to ensure that the process results in the provision of timely and accurate legal advice and operates in a manner that is fair to taxpayers. Sec. 13.04 January 2, 20071042007–1 I.R.B. Request regarding same taxpayer or transaction .02 With respect to the same taxpayer or the same transaction, when the issue is under the jurisdiction of Appeals and the applicability of more than one kind of federal tax is dependent upon the resolution of that issue, a directormay now request technical advice on the applica- bility of any of the taxes involved. A case remains under the jurisdiction of the director even though Appeals has the identical issue under consideration for another taxpayer (not related within the meaning of § 267 or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is not also a member within the meaning of § 1504) in a different transaction. Request when issue pending in Appeals .03 A Director may request technical advice even though the issue is pending in Appeals for the same taxpayer. Taxpayer participation.04 Taxpayers are strongly encouraged to consistently and timely participate in the TAM process from the very beginning. A failure to participate in stages of the TAM process identi- fied as “material” will constitute a waiver of rights to a taxpayer conference regarding a pro- posed adverse ruling. Additional information requested from taxpayer .05 Additional information requested from the taxpayer must be submitted to the Associate office within 10 calendar days after the request for information is made. Elimination of TEAM procedures.06 TEAM procedures have been eliminated. SECTION 16. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS .01 Rev. Proc. 2006–2, 2006–1 I.R.B. 89, is superseded. SECTION 17. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective January 2, 2007. DRAFTING INFORMATIONThe principal author of this revenue procedure is Rosy Lor of the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration). For further information regarding this revenue proce- dure for matters under the jurisdiction of: (1) the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), contact Richard Todd at (202) 622–7700 (not a toll-free call); (2) the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), contact Arturo Estrada at (202) 622–3900 (not a toll-free call); (3) the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax and Accounting), contact Arlene Blume at (202) 622–4800 (not a toll-free call); (4) the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), contact Stephanie Bland at (202) 622–3110 (not a toll-free call); (5) the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), contact George Bowden or Henry Schneiderman at (202) 622–3400 (not a toll-free call); (6) the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities), contact Calder Robertson at (202) 622–6000 (not a toll-free call); (7) the Associate Chief Counsel (International), contact Bill Yates at 202 622–3164 (not a toll-free call); (8) the Commissioner (Large and Mid-Size Business Division), contact Shirley S. Lee at (202) 283–8417 (not a toll-free call); (9) the Commissioner (Small Business/Self-Employed Division), contact Ronald E. Hartman at (856) 414–6447 (not a toll-free call); (10) the Commissioner (Wage and Investment Division), contact Geoffrey Gerbore at (631) 447–4428 (not a toll-free call); or (11) the Chief Appeals, contact Sandy Cohen at (202) 435–5617 (not a toll-free call). 2007–1 I.R.B.105January 2, 2007 INDEX References are to sections in Rev. Proc. 2007–2 Additional Information —forpre-submissionconference ...................................................................................6.05 —initialprocessingofTAMrequest ................................................................................8.06 —afterconferenceofright.........................................................................................9.06 —proposeddeletionsunder§6110 ...........................................................................7.04,10.03 —Servicewillrequestadditionalinformationfromthetaxpayerbyfaxoremail ..........................................8.06 Appeal of decision to seek or not seek TAM.........................................................................5.03 —directororLMSBterritorymanager’sdecisioncannotbeappealed....................................................5.04 Civil fraud or criminal investigation cases........................................................................10.12 Conferences —offered .................................................................................................. 6,9,14.04 —afterconferenceofright.........................................................................................9.05 —scheduling................................................................................................6.06,9.02 requesttolimitretroactivity ................................................................................14.04 telephoneconferences .................................................................................6.07,9.07 Definitions —appealsofficer .................................................................................................2.04 —director .......................................................................................................2.02 —fieldoffice ....................................................................................................2.07 —fieldcounsel ...................................................................................................2.08 —frivolousissue .................................................................................................4.05 —taxpayer.......................................................................................................2.05 —technicaladvice ................................................................................................1.01 —territorymanager...............................................................................................2.03 Discussions with Taxpayers —contentsofTAM...............................................................................................10.08 —substantiveissuesatpre-submissionconference....................................................................6.09 —tentativeconclusioninTAM .....................................................................................8.09 Employee Plans and Exempt Organizations —applicationof§6104 ..........................................................................................10.11 —jurisdictionofCommissioner,TaxExemptandGovernmentEntitiesDivision ..........................................4.02 Extension of Time —toappealdecisionnottorequestaTAM...........................................................................5.03 —todisagreewithstatementoffactsintechnicaladvicerequest........................................................7.05 —toscheduleconference ..........................................................................................9.03 — to submit additional information requested by Associate office in initial processingofTAM..............................................................................................8.07 —tosubmitadditionalinformationafterconference ..................................................................9.06 Foreign laws and documents —certifiedEnglishtranslations.................................................................................. 7.03(1) —effectifinterpretationisamaterialfact ........................................................................ 7.03(2) —whenrequired .................................................................................................7.03 Issues Eligible for TAMs.............................................................................................3 Issues Not Eligible for TAMs.........................................................................................4 Penalties of Perjury Statement —form ..........................................................................................................7.05 —requiredwhennofactualagreement ..............................................................................7.05 January 2, 20071062007–1 I.R.B. INDEX References are to sections in Rev. Proc. 2007–2 —requiredwithadditionalinformation ..............................................................................8.06 —signaturerequirementfordeletionstatement .......................................................................7.04 Power of Attorney................................................................................................7.09 Pre-submission Conferences.........................................................................................6 Public Inspection Under § 6110 —deletionstatementrequired ......................................................................................7.04 exceptionwhen§6104applies ..............................................................................10.11 —noticeofintentiontodisclose ...................................................................................10.03 protestingdeletionsnotmade ...............................................................................10.10 Responsibility for Requesting Advice..............................................................................5.01 Retroactive Effect —requesttolimitretroactivity ....................................................................................14.01 formatofrequest ....................................................................................14.02,14.03 —righttoconference ............................................................................................14.04 Section 301.9100 Relief...........................................................................................4.04 Status of TAM..................................................................................................10.02 Taxpayer Participation...........................................................................................3.03 —consequencesoffailuretoparticipateinmaterialstage .........................................................7.05,8.06 What to Include in the Request for Advice —Statementofissues,facts,law,andarguments .....................................................................7.01 —Statementproposinginformationtobedeletedfrompublicinspection ................................................7.04 —TransmittalForm4463..........................................................................................7.06 —Numberofcopies ..............................................................................................7.08 —Powerofattorney ..............................................................................................7.09 Where to Send —informationrequiredpriortopre-submissionconference ............................................................6.05 —requestforaTAM ..............................................................................................5.02 Withdrawal of TAM Requests......................................................................................11 2007–1 I.R.B.107January 2, 2007 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 2007–3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND NATURE OF CHANGES .01 The purpose of this revenue pro- cedure is to update Rev. Proc. 2006–3, 2006–1 C.B. 122, by providing a revised list of those areas of the Internal Revenue Code under the jurisdiction of the Asso- ciate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Asso- ciate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), the Associate Chief Coun- sel (Income Tax and Accounting), the As- sociate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), and the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) relating to issues on which the Internal Revenue Service will not issue letter rulings or determination letters. For a list of areas under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Interna- tional) relating to international issues on which the Service will not issue letter rulings or determination letters, see Rev. Proc. 2007–7, this Bulletin. For a list of areas under the jurisdiction of the Com- missioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division relating to issues, plans or plan amendments on which the Service will not issue letter rulings and determi- nation letters, see, respectively, section 8 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4 (this Bulletin) and section 3.02 of Rev. Proc. 2007–6 (this Bulletin). .02 Changes. (1) New section 3.01(58) (Section 2601.—Tax Imposed. Exceptions: Re- tention of Trust’s Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Exempt Status in the Case of Modifications, Etc.) has been added. (2) New section 3.01(65) (Section 7704.—Certain Publicly Traded Partner- ships Treated as Corporations) has been added. (3) New section 5.03 (Sections 162 and 1502.—Trade or Business Expenses; Con- solidated Returns) has been added. (4) New section 5.04 (Sections 302 and 304.—Certain Redemptions) has been added. (5) New section 5.05 (Sections 351, 358 and 362(a).—Transfers to Corpora- tion Controlled by Transferors; Basis to Distributees; Basis to Corporations) has been added. (6) Old Section 5.10 (Sections 3121, 3306, and 3401.—Definitions; Employ- ment Taxes) has been deleted. (7) Section 6.07 (Sections 1502, 1504, and 1552.—Regulations; Definitions; Earnings and Profits) updated with cites to Rev. Proc. 2006–21, 2006–24 I.R.B. 1050. SECTION2. BACKGROUNDAND SCOPE OF APPLICATION .01 Background. Whenever appropriatein the interest of sound tax administration, it is the policy of the Service to answer inquiries of individu- als and organizations regarding their status for tax purposes and the tax effects of their acts or transactions, prior to the filing of returns or reports that are required by the revenue laws. There are, however, certain areas in which, because of the inherently factual nature of the problems involved, or for other reasons, the Service will not issue rulings or determination letters. These areas are set forth in four sections of this revenue procedure. Section 3 reflects those areas in which rulings and deter- minations will not be issued. Section 4 setsforththoseareasinwhichtheywill not ordinarily be issued. “Not ordinar- ily” means that unique and compelling reasons must be demonstrated to justify the issuance of a ruling or determination letter. Those sections reflect a number of specific questions and problems as well as general areas. Section 5 lists specific areas for which the Service is temporar- ily not issuing rulings and determinations because those matters are under study. Fi- nally, section 6 of this revenue procedure lists specific areas where the Service will not ordinarily issue rulings because the Service has provided automatic approval procedures for these matters. See Rev. Proc. 2007–1 (this Bulletin) particularly section 6 captioned “Under What Circumstances Does The Service Not Issue Letter Rulings Or Determina- tion Letters?” for general instructions and other situations in which the Service will not or ordinarily will not issue letter rul- ings or determination letters. With respect to the items listed, rev- enue rulings or revenue procedures may be published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin from time to time to provide general guide- lines regarding the position of the Service. Additions or deletions to this revenue procedure as well as restatements of items listed will be made by modification of this revenue procedure. Changes will be published as they occur throughout the year and will be incorporated annually in a new revenue procedure published as the third revenue procedure of the year. These lists should not be considered all-inclu- sive. Decisions not to rule on individual cases (as contrasted with those that present significant pattern issues) are not reported in this revenue procedure and will not be added to subsequent revisions. .02 Scope of Application. This revenue procedure does not pre- clude the submission of requests for tech- nical advice to the National Office from other offices of the Service. .03 No-Rule Issues Part of Larger Transactions. If it is impossible for the Service to de- termine the tax consequences of a larger transaction without knowing the resolu- tion of an issue on which the Service will not issue rulings and determinations under this revenue procedure involving a part of the transaction or a related transaction, the taxpayer must state in the request to the best of the taxpayer’s knowledge and be- lief the tax consequences of the no-rule is- sue. The Service’s ruling or determination letter will state that the Service did not con- sider, and no opinion is expressed upon, that issue. In appropriate cases the Service may decline to issue rulings or determina- tions on such larger transactions due to the relevance of the no-rule issue, despite the taxpayer’s representation. SECTION 3. AREAS IN WHICH RULINGS OR DETERMINATION LETTERS WILL NOT BE ISSUED .01 Specific questions and problems. (1) Section 61.—Gross Income De- fined.—Whether amounts voluntarily de- ferred by a taxpayer under a deferred-com- pensation plan maintained by an organ- ization described in § 501 (other than a plan maintained by an eligible employer Sec. 1 January 2, 20071082007–1 I.R.B. pursuant to the provisions of § 457) are currently includible in the taxpayer’s gross income. (2) Section 61.—Gross Income De- fined.—Whether a split-dollar life insur- ance arrangement is “materially modified” within the meaning of § 1.61–22(j)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations. (Also §§ 83, 301, 1401, 2501, 3121, 3231, 3306, 3401, and 7872.) (3) Sections 61, 451, and 1001.—Gross Income Defined; General Rule for Tax- able Year of Inclusion; Determination of Amount and Recognition of Gain or Loss.—Whether, under authorization by an appropriate State agency to recover cer- tain costs pursuant to State specified cost recovery legislations, any investor-owned utility company realizes income upon: (i) the creation of an intangible property right; (ii) the transfer of that intangible property right; or (iii) the securitization of the intangible property right. (4) Section 79.—Group-Term Life Insurance Purchased for Employ- ees.—Whether a group insurance plan for 10 or more employees qualifies as group-term insurance, if the amount of insurance is not computed under a for- mula that would meet the requirements of § 1.79–1(c)(2)(ii) of the regulations if the group consisted of fewer than 10 employ- ees. (5) Section 83.—Property Transferred in Connection with Performance of Ser- vices.—Whether a restriction constitutes a substantial risk of forfeiture, if the em- ployee is a controlling shareholder. Also, whether a transfer has occurred, if the amount paid for the property involves a nonrecourse obligation. (6) Section 83.—Property Transferred in Connection with Performance of Ser- vices.—Which corporation is entitled to the deduction under § 83(h) in cases where a corporation undergoes a corporate divi- sion if the facts are not similar to those de- scribed in Rev. Rul. 2002–1, 2002–1 C.B. 268. (7) Section 101.—Certain Death Ben- efits.—Whether there has been a transfer for value for purposes of § 101(a) in situa- tions involving a grantor and a trust when (i) substantially all of the trust corpus con- sists or will consist of insurance policies on the life of the grantor or the grantor’s spouse, (ii) the trustee or any other per- son has a power to apply the trust’s in- come or corpus to the payment of premi- ums on policies of insurance on the life of the grantor or the grantor’s spouse, (iii) the trustee or any other person has a power to use the trust’s assets to make loans to the grantor’s estate or to purchase assets from the grantor’s estate, and (iv) there is a right or power in any person that would cause the grantor to be treated as the owner of all or a portion of the trust under §§ 673 to 677. (8) Sections 101, 761, and 7701.—Def- initions.—Whether, in connection with the transfer of a life insurance policy to an un- incorporated organization, (i) the organi- zation will be treated as a partnership un- der §§ 761 and 7701, or (ii) the transfer of the life insurance policy to the organization will be exempt from the transfer for value rules of § 101, when substantially all of the organization’s assets consists or will con- sist of life insurance policies on the lives of the members. (9) Section 105(h).—Amount Paid to Highly Compensated Individuals Under Discriminatory Self-Insured Medical Ex- pense Reimbursement Plan.—Whether a self-insured medical reimbursement plan satisfies the requirements of § 105(h) for a plan year. (10) Section 107.—Rental Value of Par- sonages.—Whether amounts distributed to a retired minister from a pension or an- nuity plan should be excludible from the minister’s gross income as a parsonage al- lowance under § 107. (11) Section 107.—Rental Value of Parsonages.—Whether an individual is a “minister of the gospel” for Federal tax purposes. (Also §§ 1402(a)(8), (c)(4), and (e), 3121(b)(8)(A), and 3401(a)(9).) (12) Section 115.—Income of States, Municipalities, Etc.—The results of trans- actions pursuant to a plan or arrangement created by State statute a primary objec- tive of which is to enable participants to pay for the costs of a post-secondary edu- cation for themselvesor a designated ben- eficiary, including: (i) whether the plan or arrangement, itself, is an entity separate from a State and, if so, how the plan or arrangement is treated for Federal tax pur- poses; and (ii) whether any contract under the plan or arrangement is a debt instru- ment and, if so, how interest or original issue discount attributable to the contract is treated for Federal tax purposes. (Also §§ 61, 163, 1275, 2501, and 7701.) (13) Section 115.—Income of States, Municipalities, Etc.—Whether the income of membership organizations established by States exclusively to reimburse mem- bers for losses arising from workmen’s compensation claims is excluded from gross income under § 115. (14) Section 117.—Qualified Schol- arships.—Whether an employer-related scholarship or fellowship grant is excludi- ble from the employee’s gross income, if there is no intermediary private founda- tion distributing the grants, as there was in Rev. Proc. 76–47, 1976–2 C.B. 670. (15) Section 119.—Meals or Lodging Furnished for the Convenience of the Em- ployer.—Whether the value of meals or lodging is excludible from gross income by an employee who is a controlling share- holder of the employer. (16) Section 121.—Exclusion of Gain from Sale of Principal Resi- dence.—Whether property qualifies as the taxpayer’s principal residence. (17)Section125.—Cafeteria Plans.—Whether amounts used to provide group-term life insurance un- der § 79, accident and health benefits under §§ 105 and 106, and dependent care assistance programs under § 129 are includible in the gross income of participants and considered “wages” for purposes of §§ 3401, 3121, and 3306 when the benefits are offered through a cafeteria plan. (18) Section 162.—Trade or Business Expenses.—Whether compensation is rea- sonable in amount. (19) Section 163.—Interest.—The in- come tax consequences of transactions involving “shared appreciation mortgage” (SAM) loans in which a taxpayer, borrow- ing money to purchase real property, pays a fixed rate of interest on the mortgage loan below the prevailing market rate and will also pay the lender a percentage of the appreciation in value of the real property upon termination of the mortgage. This applies to all SAM arrangements where the loan proceeds are used for commercial or business activities, or where used to finance a personal residence, if the facts Sec. 3.01(19) 2007–1 I.R.B.109January 2, 2007 are not similar to those described in Rev. Rul. 83–51, 1983–1 C.B. 48. (Also §§ 61, 451, 461, 856, 1001, and 7701.) (20) Section 170.—Charitable, Etc., Contributions and Gifts.—Whether a taxpayer who advances funds to a char- itable organization and receives therefor a promissory note may deduct as contri- butions, in one taxable year or in each of several years, amounts forgiven by the taxpayer in each of several years by en- dorsement on the note. (21) Section 213.—Medical, Dental, Etc., Expenses.—Whether a capital ex- penditure for an item that is ordinarily used for personal, living, or family pur- poses, such as a swimming pool, has as its primary purpose the medical care of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s spouse or dependent, or is related directly to such medical care. (22)Section264(b).—Certain Amounts Paid in Connection with Insur- ance Contracts.—Whether “substantially all” the premiums of a contract of insur- ance are paid within a period of 4 years from the date on which the contract is purchased. Also, whether an amount de- posited is in payment of a “substantial number” of future premiums on such a contract. (23) Section 264(c)(1).—Certain Amounts Paid in Connection with In- surance Contracts.—Whether § 264(c)(1) applies. (24) Section 269.—Acquisitions Made to Evade or Avoid Income Tax.—Whether an acquisition is within the meaning of § 269. (25) Section 274.—Disallowance of Certain Entertainment, Etc., Ex- penses.—Whether a taxpayer who is trav- eling away from home on business may, in lieu of substantiating the actual cost of meals, deduct a fixed per-day amount for meal expenses that differs from the amount authorized by the revenue procedure pro- viding optional rules for substantiating the amount of travel expenses for the period in which the expense was paid or incurred. (26) Section 302.—Distributions in Redemption of Stock.—Whether § 302(b) applies when the consideration given in redemption by a corporation consists en- tirely or partly of its notes payable, and the shareholder’s stock is held in escrow or as security for payment of the notes with the possibility that the stock may or will be returned to the shareholder in the future, upon the happening of specific defaults by the corporation. (27) Section 302.—Distributions in Re- demption of Stock.—Whether § 302(b) ap- plies when the consideration given in re- demptionbyacorporationinexchangefor a shareholder’s stock consists entirely or partly of the corporation’s promise to pay an amount based on, or contingent on, fu- ture earnings of the corporation, when the promise to pay is contingent on working capital being maintained at a certain level, or any other similar contingency. (28) Section 302.—Distributions in Re- demption of Stock.—Whether § 302(b) ap- plies to a redemption of stock, if after the redemption the distributing corpora- tion uses property that is owned by the shareholder from whom the stock is re- deemed and the payments by the corpora- tion for the use of the property are depen- dent upon the corporation’s future earn- ings or are subordinate to the claims of the corporation’s generalcreditors. Payments for the use of property will not be consid- ered to be dependent upon future earnings merely because they are based on a fixed percentage of receipts or sales. (29) Section 302.—Distributions in Re- demption of Stock.—Whether the acqui- sition or disposition of stock described in § 302(c)(2)(B) has, or does not have, as one of its principal purposes the avoidance of Federal income taxes within the mean- ing of that section, unless the facts and circumstances are materially identical to those set forth in Rev. Rul. 85–19, 1985–1 C.B. 94; Rev. Rul. 79–67, 1979–1 C.B. 128; Rev. Rul. 77–293, 1977–2 C.B. 91; Rev. Rul. 57–387, 1957–2 C.B. 225; Rev. Rul. 56–584, 1956–2 C.B. 179; or Rev. Rul. 56–556, 1956–2 C.B. 177. (30) Section 302(b)(4) and (e).—Re- demption from Noncorporate Shareholder in Partial Liquidation; Partial Liquidation Defined.—The amount of working capi- tal attributable to a business or portion of a business terminated that may be dis- tributed in partial liquidation. (31) Section 312.—Effect on Earnings and Profits.—The determination of the amount of earnings and profits of a corpo- ration. (32) Sections 331, 453, and 1239.—The Tax Effects of Installment Sales of Prop- erty Between Entities with Common Own- ership.—The tax effects of a transaction in which there is a transfer of property by a corporation to a partnership or other non- corporate entity (or the transfer of stock to such entity followed by a liquidation of the corporation) when more than a nomi- nal amount of the stock of such corporation and the capital or beneficial interests in the purchasing entity (that is, more than 20 percent in value) is owned by the same per- sons, and the consideration to be received by the selling corporation or the selling shareholders includesan installment obli- gation of the purchasing entity. (33) Sections 332, 351, 368(a)(1)(A), (B), (C), (E) and (F), and 1036.—Com- plete Liquidations of Subsidiaries; Trans- fertoCorporationControlledbyTrans- feror; Definitions Relating to Corporate Reorganizations; and Stock for Stock of Same Corporation.—Whether a transac- tion qualifies under § 332, § 351 or § 1036 for nonrecognition treatment, or whether it constitutes a corporate reorganization within the meaning of § 368(a)(1)(A) (in- cluding a transaction that qualifies under § 368(a)(1)(A) by reason of § 368(a)(2)(D) or § 368(a)(2)(E)), § 368(a)(1)(B), § 368(a)(1)(C), § 368(a)(1)(E) or § 368(a)(1)(F), and whether various con- sequences (such as nonrecognition and basis) result from the application of that section, unless the Service determines that there is a significant issue that must be resolved in order to decide those mat- ters. If the Service determines that there is a significant issue, and to the extent thetransactionisnotdescribedinanother no-rule section, the Service will rule on the entire transaction, and not just the signifi- cant issue. Notwithstanding the preceding paragraph, the Service will rule on the application of § 351 to a controlled corpo- ration when the transaction is undertaken prior to the distribution of the stock of the controlled corporation in a transaction qualifying under § 355. SIGNIFICANT ISSUE: A significant issue is an issue of law that meets the three following tests: (1) the issue is not clearly and adequately addressed by a statute, reg- ulation, decision of a court, tax treaty, rev- enue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or other authority published in the Internal Sec. 3.01(19) January 2, 20071102007–1 I.R.B. Revenue Bulletin; (2) the resolution of the issue is not essentially free from doubt; and (3) the issue is legally significant and ger- mane to determining the major tax conse- quences of the transaction. An issue of law will be considered not clearly and ade- quately addressed by the authorities above, and its resolution will not be essentially free from doubt when, because of concern over a legal issue (as opposed to a factual issue), taxpayer’s counsel is unable to ren- der an unqualified opinion on what the tax consequences of the transaction will be. OBTAINING A RULING: To obtain a ruling on a transaction involving a signif- icant issue, the taxpayer must in its ruling request explain the significance of the is- sue, set forth the authorities most closely relatedtotheissue,andexplainwhythe issue is not resolved by these authorities. (34) Section 351.—See section 3.01(33), above. (35) Section 358.—Basis to Distribu- tees.—The acceptability of an estimation procedure or the acceptability of a specific sampling procedure to determine the ba- sis of stock acquired by an acquiring cor- poration in a reorganization described in § 368(a)(1)(B). (36) Section 368.—See section 3.01(33), above. (37) Section 424.—Substitution or Assumption of Incentive Stock Op- tions.—Whether the substitution of a new Incentive Stock Option (“ISO”) for an old ISO, or the assumption of an old ISO, by an employer by reason of a corporate trans- action constitutes a modification which results in the issuance of a new option by reason of failing to satisfy the spread test requirement of § 424(a)(1) or the ratio test requirement of § 1.425–1(a)(4). The Ser- vice will continue to rule on the issue of whether the new ISO or the assumption of the old ISO gives the employee additional benefits not present under the old option within the meaning of § 424(a)(2). (38) Section 451.—See section 3.01(3), above. (39) Section 451.—General Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion.—The tax con- sequences of a non-qualified unfunded deferred-compensation arrangement with respect to a controlling shareholder-em- ployee eligible to participate in the ar- rangement. (40) Section 451.—General Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion.—The tax con- sequences of unfunded deferred-compen- sation arrangements where the arrange- ments fail to meet the requirements of Rev. Proc. 92–65, 1992–2 C.B. 428; and Rev. Proc. 71–19, 1971–1 C.B. 698. (41) Sections 451 and 457.—Gen- eral Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion; Deferred Compensation Plans of State and Local Governments and Tax-Exempt Organizations.—The tax consequences to unidentified independent contractors in nonqualified unfunded deferred-com- pensation plans. This applies to plans established under § 451 by employers in the private sector and to plans of State and local governments and tax-exempt orga- nizations under § 457. However, a ruling with respect to a specific independent con- tractor’s participation in such a plan may be issued. (42) Section 453.—See section 3.01(32), above. (43) Section 457.—See section 3.01(41), above. (44) Section 641.—Imposition of Tax.—Whether the period of adminis- tration or settlement of an estate or a trust (other than a trust described in § 664) is reasonable or unduly prolonged. (45) Section 642(c).—Deduction for Amounts Paid or Permanently Set Aside for a Charitable Purpose.—Allowance of an unlimited deduction for amounts set aside by a trust or estate for charitable purposes when there is a possibility that the corpus of the trust or estate may be invaded. (46) Section 664.—Charitable Remain- der Trusts.—Whether the settlement of a charitable remainder trust upon the termi- nation of the noncharitable interest is made within a reasonable period of time. (47) Section 671.—Trust Income, Deductions, and Credits Attributable to Grantors and Others as Substantial Own- ers.—Whether the grantor will be consid- ered the owner of any portion of a trust when (i) substantially all of the trust cor- pus consists or will consist of insurance policies on the life of the grantor or the grantor’s spouse, (ii) the trustee or any other person has a power to apply the trust’s income or corpus to the payment of premiums on policies of insurance on the life of the grantor or the grantor’s spouse, (iii) the trustee or any other person has a power to use the trust’s assets to make loans to the grantor’s estate or to purchase assets from the grantor’s estate, and (iv) there is a right or power in any person that would cause the grantor to be treated as the owner of all or a portion of the trust under §§ 673 to 677. (48) Section 704(e).—Family Partner- ships.—Matters relating to the validity of a family partnership when capital is not a material income producing factor. (49) Section 761.—See section 3.01(8), above. (50) Section 856.—Definition of Real Estate Investment Trust.—Whether a cor- poration whose stock is “paired” with or “stapled” to stock of another corporation will qualify as a real estate investment trust under § 856, if the activities of the corpo- rations are integrated. (51) Section 1001.—See section 3.01(3), above. (52) Section 1036.—See section 3.01(33), above. (53) Section 1221.—Capital Asset De- fined.—Whether specialty stock allocated to an investment account by a registered specialist on a national securities exchange is a capital asset. (54) Section 1239.—See section 3.01(32), above. (55) Section 1551.—Disallowance of the Benefits of the Graduated Corpo- rate Rates and Accumulated Earnings Credit.—Whether a transfer is within § 1551. (56) Section 2031.—Definition of Gross Estate.—Actuarial factors for valu- ing interests in the prospective gross estate of a living person. (57) Section 2512.—Valuation of Gifts.—Actuarial factors for valuing prospective or hypothetical gifts of a donor. (58) Section 2601.—Tax Imposed. Exceptions: Retention of Trust’s Gen- eration-Skipping Transfer Tax Exempt Status in the Case of Modifications, Etc.—Whether a trust exempt from gen- eration-skipping transfer (GST) tax under § 26.2601–1(b)(1), (2), or (3) of the Gener- ation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations will retain its GST exempt status when Sec. 3.01(58) 2007–1 I.R.B.111January 2, 2007 there is a modification of a trust, change in the administration of a trust, or a distribu- tion from a trust in a factual scenario that is similar to a factual scenario set forth in one or more of the examples contained in § 26.2601–1(b)(4)(i)(E). (59) Sections 3121, 3306, and 3401.—Definitions.—For purposes of de- termining prospective employment status, whether an individual will be an employee or an independent contractor. A ruling with regard to prior employment status may be issued. (60) Sections 3121, 3306, and 3401.—Definitions;Employment Taxes.—Who is the employer of an “em- ployee-owner” as defined in § 269A(b)(2). (61) Sections 3121, 3306, and 3401.—Definitions.—For purposes of determining employment classification pursuant to the filing of Form SS–8,De- termination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding, whether a worker is a bona fidepartner and, therefore, not an employee of the business is at issue. (62) Section 4980B.—Failure to Satisfy Continuation Coverage Requirements of Group Health Plans.—Whether an action is “gross misconduct” within the meaning of § 4980B(f)(3)(B). (Seesection3.05of Rev. Proc. 87–28, 1987–1 C.B. 770, 771.) (63) Section 7701.—Definitions.—The classification of an instrument that has certain voting and liquidation rights in an issuing corporation but whose dividend rights are determined by reference to the earnings of a segregated portion of the issuing corporation’s assets, including as- sets held by a subsidiary. (64) Section 7701.—See section 3.01(8), above. (65) Section 7704.—Certain Publicly Traded Partnerships Treated as Corpora- tions.—Whether interests in a partnership that are not traded on an established se- curities market (within the meaning of § 7704(b) and § 1.7704–1(b)) are read- ily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof under § 1.7704–1(c)(1) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations. .02 General Areas. (1) The results of transactions that lack abona fidebusiness purpose or have as their principal purpose the reduction of Federal taxes. (2) A matter upon which a court deci- sion adverse to the Government has been handed down and the question of follow- ing the decision or litigating further has not yet been resolved. (3) A matter involving alternate plans of proposed transactions or involving hy- pothetical situations. (4) Whether under Subtitle F (Pro- cedure and Administration) reasonable cause, due diligence, good faith, clear and convincing evidence, or other similar terms that require a factual determination exist. (5) Whether a proposed transaction would subject the taxpayer to a criminal penalty. (6) A request that does not comply with the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2007–1 (this Bulletin). (7) Whether, under the common law rules applicable in determining the em- ployer-employee relationship, a profes- sional staffing corporation (loan-out cor- poration) or the subscriber is the employer of individuals, if: (i) the loan-out corporation hires em- ployees of the subscriber and assigns the employees back to the subscriber, or (ii) the loan-out corporation assigns in- dividuals to subscribers for more than a temporary period (1 year or longer). (8) Questions that the Service deter- mines, in its discretion, should not be an- swered in the general interests of tax ad- ministration. (9) Any frivolous issue, as that term isdefinedinsection6.10ofRev. Proc. 2007–1 (this Bulletin). SECTION 4. AREAS IN WHICH RULINGS OR DETERMINATION LETTERS WILL NOT ORDINARILY BE ISSUED .01 Specific questions and problems. (1) Sections 38, 39, 46, and 48.—Gen- eral Business Credit; Carryback and Car- ryforward of Unused Credits; Amount of Credit; Energy Credit; Reforestation Credit.—Application of these sections where the formal ownership of property is in a party other than the taxpayer, except when title is held merely as security. (2) Section 61.—Gross Income De- fined.—Determination as to who is the true owner of property in cases involving the sale of securities, or participation in- terests therein, where the purchaser has the contractual right to cause the securi- ties, or participation interests therein, to be purchased by either the seller or a third party. (3) Sections 61 and 163.—Gross In- come Defined; Interest.—Determinations as to who is the true owner of property or the true borrower of money in cases in which the formal ownership of the prop- erty, or the liability for the indebtedness, is in another party. (4) Sections 83 and 451.—Property Transferred in Connection with Perfor- mance of Services; General Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion.—When com- pensation is realized by a person who, in connection with the performance of services, is granted a nonstatutory option without a readily ascertainable fair market value to purchase stock at a price that is less than the fair market value of the stock on the date the option is granted. (5) Section 103.—Interest on State and Local Bonds.—Whether the interest on State or local bonds will be excludible from gross income under § 103(a), if the proceeds of issues of bonds (other than advance refunding issues) are placed in escrow or otherwise not expended for a governmental purpose for an extended period of time even though the proceeds are invested at a yield that will not exceed the yield on the State or local bonds prior to their expenditure. (6) Section 103.—Interest on State and Local Bonds.—Whether a State or local governmental obligation that does not meet the criteria of section 5 of Rev. Proc. 89–5, 1989–1 C.B. 774, is an “arbi- trage bond” within the meaning of former § 103(c)(2) solely by reason of the invest- ment of the bond proceeds in acquired non- purpose obligations at a materially higher yield more than 3 years after issuance of the bonds or 5 years after issuance of the bonds in the case of construction issues de- scribed in former § 1.103–13(a)(2)(ii)(E) or § 1.148–2(e)(2)(ii). Sec. 3.01(58) January 2, 20071122007–1 I.R.B. (7) Sections 104(a)(2) and 3121.—Compensation for Injuries or Sickness; Definitions.—Whether an allo- cation of the amount of a settlement award (including a lump sum award) between back pay, compensatory damages, puni- tive damages, etc., is a proper allocation for Federal tax purposes. (8) Section 141.—Private Activity Bond; Qualified Bond.—Whether State or local bonds will meet the “private busi- ness use test” and the “private security or payment test” under § 141(b)(1) and (2) in situations in which the proceeds are used to finance certain output facil- ities and, pursuant to a contract to take, or take or pay for, a nongovernmental person purchases 30 percent or more of the actual output of the facility but 10 percent or less of the: (i) subparagraph (5) output of the facility as defined in § 1.103–7(b)(5)(ii)(b) (issued under for- mer § 103(b)), or (ii) available output of the facility as defined in § 1.141–7(b)(1). In similar situations, the Service will not ordinarily issue rulings or determination letters concerning questions arising under paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) of § 141(b). (9) Sections 142 and 144.—Exempt Facility Bond; Qualified Small Issue Bond.—Whether an issue of private activ- ity bonds meets the requirements of § 142 or § 144(a), if the sum of— (i) the portion of the proceeds used to finance a facility in which an owner (or related person) or a lessee (or a related person) is a user of the facility both after the bonds are issued and at any time before the bonds were issued, and (ii) the portion used to pay issuance costs and non-qualified costs equals more than 5 percent of the net proceeds, as de- fined in § 150(a)(3). (10) Section 148.—Arbitrage.— Whether amounts received as proceeds from the sale of municipal bond financed property and pledged to the payment of debt service or pledged as collateral for the municipal bond issue are sinking fund proceeds within the meaning of for- mer § 1.103–13(g) (issued under former § 103(c)) or replaced proceeds described in § 148(a)(2) (or former § 103(c)(2)(B)). (11) Sections 162 and 262.—Trade or Business Expenses; Personal, Living, and Family Expenses.—Whether expenses are nondeductible commuting expenses, ex- cept for situations governed by Rev. Rul. 99–7, 1999–1 C.B. 361. (12) Section 163.—See section 4.01(3), above. (13) Section 167.—Depreciation. (i) Useful lives of assets. (ii) Depreciation rates. (iii) Salvage value of assets. (14) Sections 167 and 168.—Depre- ciation; AcceleratedCost Recovery Sys- tem.—Application of those sections where the formal ownership of property is in a party other than the taxpayer except when title is held merely as security. (15) Section 170.—Charitable, Etc., Contributions and Gifts.—Whether a transfer to a pooled income fund de- scribed in § 642(c)(5) qualifies for a charitable contribution deduction under § 170(f)(2)(A). (16) Section 170(c).—Charitable, Etc., Contributions and Gifts.—Whether a tax- payer who transfers property to a charita- ble organization and thereafter leases back all or a portion of the transferred property may deduct the fair market value of the property transferred and leased back as a charitable contribution. (17) Section 170.—Charitable, Etc., Contributions and Gifts.—Whether a transfer to a charitable remainder trust described in § 664 that provides for an- nuity or unitrust payments for one or two measuring lives qualifies for a charitable deduction under § 170(f)(2)(A). (18) Section 216.—Deduction of Taxes, Interest, and Business Depreciation by Cooperative Housing Corporation Ten- ant-Stockholder.—If a cooperative hous- ing corporation (CHC), as defined in § 216(b)(1), transfers an interest in real property to a corporation (not a CHC) in exchange for stock or securities of the transferee corporation, which engages in commercial activity with respect to the real property interesttransferred, whether (i) the income of the transferee corpora- tion derived from the commercial activity, and (ii) any cash or property (attributable to the real property interest transferred) distributed by the transferee corporation to the CHC will be considered as gross income of the CHC for the purpose of determining whether 80 percent or more of the gross income of the CHC is derived from tenant-stockholders within the mean- ing of § 216(b)(1)(D). (19) Section 262.—See section 4.01(11), above. (20) Section 265(a)(2).—Expenses and Interest Relating to Tax-Exempt In- come.—Whether indebtedness is incurred or continued to purchase or carry obli- gations the interest on which is wholly exempt from the taxes imposed by subtitle A. (21) Section 302.—Distributions in Re- demption of Stock.—The tax effect of the redemption of stock for notes, when the payments on the notes are to be made over a period in excess of 15 years from the date of issuance of such notes. (22) Section 302(b)(4) and (e).—Re- demption from Noncorporate Shareholder in Partial Liquidation; Partial Liquidation Defined.—Whether a distribution will qualify as a distribution in partial liqui- dation under § 302(b)(4) and (e)(1)(A), unless it results in a 20 percent or greater reduction in (i) gross revenue, (ii) net fair market value of assets, and (iii) employ- ees. (Partial liquidations that qualify as § 302(e)(2) business terminations are not subject to this provision.) (23) Sections 302(b)(4) and (e), 331, 332, and 346(a).—Effects on Recipients of Distributions in Corporate Liquida- tions.—The tax effect of the liquidation of a corporation preceded or followed by the transfer of all or a part of the business assets to another corporation (1) that is the alter ego of the liquidating corpora- tion, and (2) which, directly or indirectly, is owned more than 20 percent in value by persons holding directly or indirectly more than 20 percent in value of the liqui- dating corporation’s stock. For purposes of this section, ownership will be deter- mined by application of the constructive ownership rules of § 318(a) as modified by § 304(c)(3). (24) Section 306.—Dispositions of Cer- tain Stock.—Whether the distribution or disposition or redemption of “section 306 stock” in a closely held corporation is in pursuance of a plan having as one of its principal purposes the avoidance of Fed- Sec. 4.01(24) 2007–1 I.R.B.113January 2, 2007 eral income taxes within the meaning of § 306(b)(4). (25) Sections 331 and 332.—See sec- tion 4.01(23), above. (26) Sections 331 and 346(a).—Gain or Loss to Shareholders in Corporate Liqui- dations.—The tax effect of the liquidation of a corporation by a series of distributions, when the distributions in liquidation are to be made over a period in excess of 3 years from the adoption of the plan of liquida- tion. (27) Section 346(a).—See sections 4.01(23) and (26), above. (28) Section 351.—Transfer to Corporation Controlled by Trans- feror.—Whether § 351 applies to the transfer of an interest in real property by a cooperative housing corporation (as de- scribed in § 216(b)(1)) to a corporation in exchange for stock or securities of the transferee corporation, if the transferee en- gages in commercial activity with respect to the real property interest transferred. (29) Section 355.—Distribution of Stock and Securities of a Controlled Cor- poration.—Whether the active business requirement of § 355(b) is met when, within the 5-year period described in § 355(b)(2)(B), a distributing corporation acquired control of a controlled corpora- tion as a result of the distributing corpo- ration transferring cash or other liquid or inactive assets to the controlled corpora- tion in a transaction in which gain or loss was not recognized as a result of the trans- fer meeting the requirements of § 351(a) or § 368(a)(1)(D). (30) Section 441(i).—Taxable Year of Personal Service Corporations.—Whether the principal activity of the taxpayer dur- ing the testing period for the taxable year is the performance of personal services within the meaning of § 1.441–3(c)(1)(iii). (31) Section 448(d)(2)(A).—Limita- tion on Use of Cash Method of Account- ing; Qualified Personal Service Corpo- ration.—Whether 95 percent or more of the time spent by employees of the corpo- ration, serving in their capacity as such, is devoted to the performance of services within the meaning of § 1.448–1T(e)(4)(i). (32) Section 451.—General Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion.—The tax con- sequences of a nonqualified deferred com- pensation arrangement using a grantor trust where the trust fails to meet the re- quirements of Rev. Proc. 92–64, 1992–2 C.B. 422. (33) Section 451.—See section 4.01(4), above. (34) Section 451.—General Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion.—The income tax consequences as a result of being a ben- eficiary of a trust that an Indian tribe (as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 2703(5)) establishes to receive and investper capitapayments for its members who are minors or legal in- competents under the Indian Gaming Reg- ulatory Act (25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721), if the trust meets the requirements of section 5.02 of Rev. Proc. 2003–14, 2003–1 C.B. 319. (35) Section 584.—Common Trust Funds.—Whether a common trust fund plan meets the requirements of § 584. (For § 584 plan drafting guidance, see Rev. Proc. 92–51, 1992–1 C.B. 988.) (36) Section 642.—Special Rules for Credits and Deductions; Pooled Income Fund.—Whether a pooled income fund satisfies the requirements described in § 642(c)(5). (37) Section 664.—Charitable Remain- der Trusts.—Whether a charitable remain- der trust that provides for annuity or uni- trust payments for one or two measuring lives or for annuity or unitrust payments for a term of years satisfies the require- ments described in § 664. (38) Section 664.—Charitable Re- mainder Trusts.—Whether a trust that will calculate the unitrust amount under § 664(d)(3) qualifies as a § 664 charitable remainder trust when a grantor, a trustee, a beneficiary, or a person related or subordi- nate to a grantor, a trustee, or a beneficiary can control the timing of the trust’s receipt of trust income from a partnership or a de- ferred annuity contract to take advantage of the difference between trust income under § 643(b) and income for Federal income tax purposes for the benefit of the unitrust recipient. (39) Sections 671 to 679.—Grantors and Others Treated asSubstantial Own- ers.—In a nonqualified, unfunded deferred compensation arrangement described in Rev. Proc. 92–64, the tax consequences of the use of a trust, other than the model trust described in that revenue procedure. (40) Sections 671 to 679.—Grantors and Others Treated as Substantial Own- ers.—Whether an Indian tribe (as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 2703(5)) that establishes a trust to receive and investper capita payments for its members who are mi- nors or legal incompetents under the In- dian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721) is the grantor and owner of the trust, if the trust meets the requirements of section 5.02 of Rev. Proc. 2003–14, 2003–1 C.B. 319. (41) Section 1362.—Election; Re- vocation; Termination.—All situations in which the Service has provided an automatic approval procedure or admin- istrative procedure for an S corporation to obtain relief for late S corporation, qualified subchapter S subsidiary, quali- fied subchapter S trust, or electing small business trust elections. See Rev. Proc. 2003–43, 2003–1 C.B. 998; Rev. Proc. 2004–48, 2004–2 C.B. 172; and Rev. Proc. 2004–49, 2004–2 C.B. 210. (For instructions on how to seek this relief, see the preceding revenue procedures.) (42)Section1502.—Regula- tions.—Whether a parent cooperative housing corporation (as defined in §216(b)(1))willbepermittedtofilea consolidated income tax return with its transferee subsidiary, if the transferee en- gages in commercial activity with respect to the real property interest transferred to it by the parent. (43) Section 2055.—Transfers for Public, Charitable, and Religious Uses.—Whether a transfer to a pooled income fund described in § 642(c)(5) qualifies for a charitable deduction under § 2055(e)(2)(A). (44) Section 2055.—Transfers for Public, Charitable, and Religious Uses.—Whether a transfer to a charita- ble remainder trust described in § 664 that provides for annuity or unitrust payments for one or two measuring lives or a term of years qualifies for a charitable deduction under § 2055(e)(2)(A). (45)Section2503.—Taxable Gifts.—Whether the transfer of property to a trust will be a gift of a present interest in property when (i) the trust corpus consists or will consist substantially of insurance policies on the life of the grantor or the grantor’s spouse, (ii) the trustee or Sec. 4.01(24) January 2, 20071142007–1 I.R.B. any other person has a power to apply the trust’s income or corpus to the payment of premiums on policies of insurance on thelifeofthegrantororthegrantor’s spouse, (iii) the trustee or any other person has a power to use the trust’s assets to make loans to the grantor’s estate or to purchase assets from the grantor’s estate, (iv) the trust beneficiaries have the power to withdraw, on demand, any additional transfers made to thetrust, and (v) there is a right or power in any person that would cause the grantor to be treated as the owner of all or a portion of the trust under §§ 673 to 677. (46) Section 2514.—Powers of Ap- pointment.—If the beneficiaries of a trust permit a power of withdrawal to lapse, whether § 2514(e) will be applicable to each beneficiary in regard to the power when (i) the trust corpus consists or will consist substantially of insurance policies on the life of the grantor or the grantor’s spouse, (ii) the trustee or any other person has a power to apply the trust’s income or corpus to the payment of premiums on policies of insurance on the life of the grantor or the grantor’s spouse, (iii) the trustee or any other person has a power to use the trust’s assets to make loans to the grantor’s estate or to purchase assets from the grantor’s estate, (iv) the trust beneficiaries have the power to withdraw, on demand, any additional transfers made to the trust, and (v) there is a right or power in any person that would cause the grantor to be treated as the owner of all or a portion of the trust under §§ 673 to 677. (47) Section 2522.—Charitable and Similar Gifts.—Whether a transfer to a pooled income fund described in § 642(c)(5) qualifies for a charitable de- duction under § 2522(c)(2)(A). (48) Section 2522.—Charitable and Similar Gifts.—Whether a transfer to a charitable remainder trust described in § 664 that provides for annuity or unitrust payments for one or two measuring lives or a term of years qualifies for a charitable deduction under § 2522(c)(2)(A). (49) Section 2601.—Tax Im- posed.—Whether a trust that is ex- cepted from the application of the gen- eration-skipping transfer tax because it was irrevocable on September 25, 1985, will lose its excepted status if the situs of the trust is changed from the United States to a situs outside of the United States. (50) Section 2702.—Special Valuation Rules in Case of Transfers of Interests in Trusts.—Whether annuity interests are qualified annuity interests under § 2702 if the amount of the annuity payable annu- ally is more than 50 percent of the initial net fair market value of the property trans- ferred to the trust, or if the value of the remainder interest is less than 10 percent of the initial net fair market value of the property transferred to the trust. For pur- poses of the 10 percent test, the value of the remainder interest is the present value determined under § 7520 of the right to receive the trust corpus at the expiration of the term of the trust. The possibility that the grantor may die prior to the expiration of the specified term is not taken into ac- count, nor is the value of any reversion retained by the grantor or the grantor’s estate. (51) Section 2702.—Special Valuation Rules in Case of Transfers of Interests in Trusts.—Whether a trust with one term holder satisfies the requirements of § 2702(a)(3)(A) and § 25.2702–5(c) to be a qualified personal residence trust. (52) Section 3121.—Definitions.—De- terminations as to which of two entities, under common law rules applicable in determining the employer-employee rela- tionship, is the employer, when one entity is treating the worker as an employee. (53) Section 3121.—See section 4.01(7), above. .02 General areas. (1) Any matter in which the determina- tion requested is primarily one of fact,e.g., market value of property, or whether an in- terest in a corporation is to be treated as stock or indebtedness. (2) Situations where the requested rul- ing deals with only part of an integrated transaction. Generally, a letter ruling will not be issued on only part of an integrated transaction. If, however, a part of a trans- action falls under a no-rule area, a letter ruling on other parts of the transaction may be issued. Before preparing the letter rul- ing request, a taxpayer should call the Of- fice of the Associate Chief Counsel having jurisdiction for the matters on which the taxpayer is seeking a letter ruling to dis- cuss whether a letter ruling will be issued on part of the transaction. To determine which division has jurisdiction over a par- ticular issue see section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1 (this Bulletin). For a list of tele- phone numbers for the different divisions see section 10.07 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. (3) Situations where two or more items or sub-methods of accounting are interre- lated. If two or more items or sub-methods of accounting are interrelated, ordinarily a letter ruling will not be issued on a change in accounting method involving only one of the items or sub-methods. (4) The tax effect of any transaction to be consummated at some indefinite future time. (5) Any matter dealing with the ques- tion of whether property is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. (6) The tax effect of a transaction if any part of the transaction is involved in liti- gation among the parties affected by the transaction, except fortransactions involv- ing bankruptcy reorganizations. (7) (a) Situations where the taxpayer or a related party is domiciled or organized in a foreign jurisdiction with which the United States does not have an effective mechanism for obtaining tax information with respect to civil tax examinations and criminal tax investigations, which would preclude the Service from obtaining infor- mation located in such jurisdiction that is relevant to the analysis or examination of the tax issues involved in the ruling re- quest. (b) The provisions of subsection (a) above shall not apply if the taxpayer or affected related party (i) consents to the disclosure of all relevant information re- questedbytheServiceinprocessingthe ruling request or in the course of an exam- ination in order to verify the accuracy of the representationsmade and to otherwise analyze or examine the tax issues involved in the ruling request, and (ii) waives all claims to protection of bank or commer- cial secrecy laws in the foreign jurisdiction with respect to the information requested by the Service. In the event the taxpayer’s or related party’s consent to disclose rele- vant information or to waive protection of bank or commercial secrecy is determined by the Service to be ineffective or of no force and effect, then the Service may Sec. 4.02(7) 2007–1 I.R.B.115January 2, 2007 retroactively rescind any ruling rendered in reliance on such consent. (8) A matter involving the Federal tax consequences of any proposed Federal, State, local, municipal, or foreign legis- lation. The Service may provide general informationinresponsetoaninquiry. However, the Office of Division Coun- sel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) may issue letter rulings regarding the effect of proposed State, local, or municipal legislation upon an eligible deferred compensation plan under § 457(b) provided that the letter rul- ing request relating to the plan complies with the other requirements of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. (9) Except as otherwise provided in this revenue procedure (e.g., under section 3.01(33), where the Service already is ruling on a significant issue in the same transaction), a letter ruling will not ordi- narily be issued with respect to an issue that is clearly and adequately addressed by statute, regulations, decisions of a court, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, no- tices, or other authority published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. However, the Service may in its discretion determine toissuearulingonsuchanissueifthe Service otherwise is issuing a ruling on another issue arising in the same transac- tion. SECTION 5. AREAS UNDER STUDYINWHICHRULINGSOR DETERMINATION LETTERS WILL NOTBEISSUEDUNTILTHE SERVICE RESOLVES THE ISSUE THROUGH PUBLICATION OF A REVENUE RULING, REVENUE PROCEDURE, REGULATIONS OR OTHERWISE .01 Section 62(c).—Reimbursement Arrangements.—Whether amounts related to a salary reduction and paid under a pur- ported reimbursement or other expense allowance arrangement will be treated as paid under an “accountable plan” in accor- dance with § 1.62–2(c)(2). .02 Sections 101 and 7702.—Certain Death Benefits; Life Insurance Contract Defined.—Whether amounts received un- der an arrangement that is not regulated as an insurance company may be treated as received under a “life insurance contract” within the meaning of §§ 101(a) and 7702. .03 Sections 162 and 1502.—Trade or Business Expenses; Consolidated Re- turns.—Treatment of manufacturer incen- tive payments under the intercompany transaction regulations of § 1.1502–13. SeeT.D. 9261, 2006–21 I.R.B. 919. .04 Sections 302 and 304.—Certain Re- demptions.—Treatment of basis in a § 302 and/or a § 304 redemption. See Announce- ment 2006–30, 2006–19 I.R.B. 879. .05 Sections 351, 358 and 362(a).—Transfers to Corporation Controlled by Transferors; Basis to Distributees; Basis toCorporations.—The issues described as being under study in Rev. Rul. 2006–2, 2006–2 I.R.B. 261. .06 Section 409A.—Inclusion in Gross Income of Deferred Compensation Un- der Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.—Rulings on the tax consequences of arrangements described in § 409A, including rulings as to whether an ar- rangement is an arrangement described in § 409A, will not be issued until this subsection of this revenue procedure is revised. .07 Section 451.—General Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion.—The income tax consequences as a result of being a beneficiary of a trust that an Indian tribe (as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 2703(5)) es- tablishes to receive and investper capita payments for its members (regardless of whether they are minors or legal incompe- tents) under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721) if the trust does not meet the requirements of section 5.02 of Rev. Proc. 2003–14, 2003–1 C.B. 319. .08 Sections 671 to 679.—Grantors and Others Treated asSubstantial Own- ers.—Whether an Indian tribe (as defined in 25 U.S.C. § 2703(5)) that establishes a trust to receive and investper capita payments for its members (regardless of whether they are minors or legal incom- petents) under the Indian Gaming Regula- tory Act (25 U.S.C. §§ 2701–2721) is the grantor and owner of the trust if the trust does not meet the requirements of section 5.02 of Rev. Proc. 2003–14, 2003–1 C.B. 319. .09 Section 1361.—Definition of a Small Business Corporation.—Whether a State law limited partnership electing under § 301.7701–3 to be classified as an association taxable as a corporation has more than one class of stock for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(D). The Service will treat any request for a ruling on whether a State law limited partnership is eligible to elect S corporation status as a request for a rul- ing on whether the partnership complies with § 1361(b)(1)(D). .10 Section 2036.—Transfers with Re- tained Life Estate.—Whether the corpus of a trust will be included in a grantor’s es- tatewhenthetrusteeofthetrustisaprivate trust company owned partially or entirely by members of the grantor’s family. .11 Section 2038.—Revocable Trans- fers.—Whether the corpus of a trust will be included in a grantor’s estate when the trustee of the trust is a private trust com- pany owned partially or entirely by mem- bers of the grantor’s family. .12 Section 2041.—Powers of Appoint- ment.—Whether the corpus of a trust will be included in an individual’s estate when the trustee of the trust is a private trust company owned partially or entirely by members of the individual’s family. .13 Section 6050P.—Returns Relating to the Cancellation of Indebtedness by Cer- tain Entities.—Whether amounts reduced pursuant to the terms of a debt instrument are reportable under § 6050P and the reg- ulations. .14 Section 7702.—See section 5.02, above. SECTION 6. AREAS COVERED BY AUTOMATIC APPROVAL PROCEDURES IN WHICH RULINGS WILL NOT ORDINARILY BE ISSUED .01 Section 338.—Certain Stock Purchases Treated as Asset Acquisi- tions.—All requests for an extension of time under § 301.9100–3 within which to make an election under § 338(g) or (h)(10) where the Service has provided an admin- istrative procedure to seek an extension. See Rev. Proc. 2003–33, 2003–1 C.B. 803 (extension automatically granted to certain persons required to file Form 8023 to make a valid section 338 election that have not filed Form 8023 by its due date). .02 Section 442.—Change of Annual Accounting Period.—All requests for change in annual accounting period where the Service has provided an automatic change procedure for obtaining a change Sec. 4.02(7) January 2, 20071162007–1 I.R.B. in annual accounting period.SeeRev. Proc. 2002–39, 2002–1 C.B. 1046 (gen- eral procedures for prior approval), as clarified and modified by Notice 2002–72, 2002–2 C.B. 843, and modified by Rev. Proc. 2003–34, 2003–1 C.B. 856, and Rev. Proc. 2003–79, 2003–2 C.B. 1036; Rev. Proc. 2002–37, 2002–1 C.B. 1030 (certain corporations), as clarified and modified by Notice 2002–72 and modi- fied by Rev. Proc. 2003–34; Rev. Proc. 2002–38, 2002–1 C.B. 1037 (partnership, S corporation, or personal service corpora- tion seeking a natural business year or an ownership taxable year), as clarified and modified by Notice 2002–72 and modified by Rev. Proc. 2003–79; and Rev. Proc. 2003–62, 2003–2 C.B. 299 (individual seeking a calendar year). .03 Section 446.—General Rule for Methods of Accounting.—Except as oth- erwise specifically provided in applicable procedures published in the Internal Rev- enue Bulletin, all requests for change in method of accounting where the Service has provided an automatic change re- quest procedure for obtaining a change in method of accounting. See the automatic change request procedures listed in section 9.22 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1 (this Bulletin). .04 Section 461.—General Rule for Taxable Year of Deduction.—All requests for making or revoking an election under § 461 where the Service has provided an administrative procedure for making or re- voking an election under § 461.SeeRev. Proc. 92–29, 1992–1 C.B. 748 (dealing with the use of an alternative method for including in basis the estimated cost of certain common improvements in a real estate development). .05 Section 704(c).—Contributed Prop- erty.—Requests from Qualified Master Feeder Structures, as described in section 4.02 of Rev. Proc. 2001–36, 2001–1 C.B. 1326, for permission to aggregate built-in gains and losses from contributed qualified financial assets for purposes of making § 704(c) and reverse § 704(c) al- locations. .06 Section 1362.—Election; Revo- cation; Termination.—All situations in which an S corporation qualifies for auto- matic late S corporation relief under Rev. Proc. 97–48, 1997–2 C.B. 521. .07 Sections 1502, 1504, and 1552.—Regulations; Definitions; Earn- ings and Profits.—All requests for waivers or consents on consolidated return issues where the Service has provided an admin- istrative procedure for obtaining waivers or consents on consolidated return issues. SeeRev. Proc. 2002–32, 2002–1 C.B. 959, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2006–21, 2006–24 I.R.B. 1050 (certain corporations seeking reconsolidation within the 5-year period specified in § 1504(a)(3)(A)); Rev. Proc. 90–39, 1990–2 C.B. 365, as mod- ified by Rev. Proc. 2006–21, 2006–24 I.R.B. 1050, and as clarified by Rev. Proc. 90–39A, 1990–2 C.B. 367 (certain af- filiated groups of corporations seeking, for earnings and profits determinations, to make an election or a change in their method of allocating the group’s consol- idated Federal income tax liability); and Rev. Proc. 89–56, 1989–2 C.B. 643, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2006–21, 2006–24 I.R.B. 1050 (certain affiliated groups of corporations seeking to file a consolidated return where member(s) of the group use a 52–53 week taxable year). SECTION 7. EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE PROCEDURES Rev. Proc. 2006–3, 2006–1 C.B. 122, is superseded. SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective Jan- uary 2, 2007. SECTION 9. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The collections of information con- tained in this revenue procedure have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. § 3507) under control number 1545–1522. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid control number. The collections of information in this revenue procedure are in sections 2.03, 3.01(33), 3.02(1) and (3), and 4.02(7)(b). This information is required to evaluate whether the request for a letter ruling or determination letter is not covered by the provisions of this revenue procedure. The collections of information are required to obtain a letter ruling or determination let- ter. The likely respondents are business or other for-profit institutions. The estimated total annual reporting and/or recording burden is 90 hours. The estimated annual burden per re- spondent/recordkeeper varies from 15 minutes to 3 hours, depending on indi- vidual circumstances, with an estimated average burden of 2 hours. The estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeep- ersis45. The estimated annual frequency of re- sponses is on occasion. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by § 6103. DRAFTING INFORMATION The principal author of this revenue procedure is Michael Danbury of the Of- fice of the Associate Chief Counsel (Cor- porate). For further information about this revenue procedure, please contact Mr. Danbury at (202) 622–7550 (not a toll-free call), or call the division con- tacts listed in section 10.07 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1 (this Bulletin). To determine which division has jurisdiction over a par- ticular issue see section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. 2007–1 I.R.B.117January 2, 2007 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 2007–4 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? ............................................. 121 SECTION 2. WHAT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO REV. PROC. 2006–4?............................................ 121 SECTION 3. IN WHAT FORM IS GUIDANCE PROVIDED BY THE COMMISSIONER, TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES DIVISION? .................................................................. 121 .01Ingeneral .................................................................................................. 121 .02Letterruling ................................................................................................ 121 .03Closingagreement .......................................................................................... 122 .04Determinationletter ......................................................................................... 122 .05Opinionletter............................................................................................... 122 .06Informationletter ........................................................................................... 122 .07Revenueruling ............................................................................................. 122 .08Oralguidance .............................................................................................. 123 (1)Nooralrulingsandnowrittenrulingsinresponsetooralrequests.............................................. 123 (2)Discussionpossibleonsubstantiveissues ................................................................... 123 .09Nonbanktrusteerequests .................................................................................... 123 .10ComplianceStatement ....................................................................................... 124 SECTION 4. ON WHAT ISSUES MAY TAXPAYERS REQUEST WRITTEN GUIDANCE UNDER THIS PROCEDURE? ........................................................................................ 124 SECTION 5. ON WHAT ISSUES MUST WRITTEN GUIDANCE BE REQUESTED UNDER DIFFERENT PROCEDURES? ....................................................................................... 124 .01Determinationletters ........................................................................................ 124 .02Masterandprototypeplansandvolumesubmitterplans.......................................................... 124 .03ClosingagreementprogramfordefinedcontributionplansthatpurchasedGICsorGACs ............................ 124 .04EmployeePlansComplianceResolutionSystem ................................................................ 124 .05ChiefCounsel .............................................................................................. 125 .06 Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes.......................................................................... 125 SECTION 6. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES TE/GE ISSUE LETTER RULINGS?................................ 125 .01Inexemptorganizationsmatters .............................................................................. 125 .02Inemployeeplansmatters.................................................................................... 125 .03Inqualificationsmatters ..................................................................................... 126 .04 Request for extension of time for making an election or for other relief under § 301.9100–1 of the ProcedureandAdministrationRegulations ..................................................................... 126 .05Issuanceofaletterrulingbeforetheissuanceofaregulationorotherpublishedguidance ............................ 126 .06Issuesinpriorreturn ........................................................................................ 127 .07Generallynottobusinessassociationsorgroups ................................................................ 127 .08Generallynottoforeigngovernments ......................................................................... 127 .09Generallynotonfederaltaxconsequencesofproposedlegislation ................................................ 127 .10Notoncertainmattersunder§53.4958–6oftheFoundationandSimilarExciseTaxesRegulations ................... 127 .11Notonstockoptions......................................................................................... 127 .12GenerallynotonEOjointventurewithafor-profitorganization .................................................. 127 .13Notonqualificationofstaterunprogramsunder§529 .......................................................... 127 .14NotonUBITissuesinvolvingcertaininvestmentsofacharitableleadtrust......................................... 127 .15Notonissuesunder§4965................................................................................... 128 .16Notonissuesunder§§4966and4967 ......................................................................... 128 SECTION 7. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES EP OR EO DETERMINATIONS ISSUE DETERMINATION LETTERS? ......................................................................... 128 .01Circumstancesunderwhichdeterminationlettersareissued ...................................................... 128 .02Ingeneral .................................................................................................. 128 January 2, 20071182007–1 I.R.B. .03Inemployeeplansmatters.................................................................................... 128 .04Inexemptorganizationsmatters .............................................................................. 128 .05Circumstancesunderwhichdeterminationlettersarenotissued................................................... 129 .06Requestsinvolvingreturnsalreadyfiled ....................................................................... 129 .07Attachacopyofdeterminationlettertotaxpayer’sreturn ........................................................ 129 .08Reviewofdeterminationletters ............................................................................... 129 SECTION 8. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES THE SERVICE HAVE DISCRETION TO ISSUE LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS? .................................................. 130 .01 Ordinarily not in certain areas because of factual nature of the problem............................................ 130 .02No“comfort”letterrulings ................................................................................... 130 .03Notonalternativeplansorhypotheticalsituations............................................................... 130 .04Ordinarilynotonpartofanintegratedtransaction............................................................... 130 .05Notonpartialterminationsofemployeeplans .................................................................. 130 .06Lawrequiresletterruling..................................................................................... 130 .07IssuesunderconsiderationbyPBGCorDOL................................................................... 130 .08Cafeteriaplans.............................................................................................. 130 .09Determinationletters ........................................................................................ 130 .10Domicileinaforeignjurisdiction ............................................................................. 130 .11EmployeeStockOwnershipPlans............................................................................. 131 .12GovernmentalPlans ......................................................................................... 131 SECTION 9. WHAT ARE THE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUESTING LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS? ......................................................................... 131 .01Ingeneral .................................................................................................. 131 .02Certaininformationrequiredinallrequests .................................................................... 131 (1)Completestatementoffactsandotherinformation ........................................................... 131 (2) Copies of all contracts, wills, deeds, agreements, instruments, plan documents, and other documents............................................................................................... 131 (3)Analysisofmaterialfacts.................................................................................. 132 (4)Statementregardingwhethersameissueisinanearlierreturn.................................................. 132 (5) Statement regarding whether same or similar issue was previously ruled on or requested, or is currentlypending......................................................................................... 132 (6)Statementofsupportingauthorities. ........................................................................ 133 (7)Statementofcontraryauthorities. .......................................................................... 133 (8)Statementidentifyingpendinglegislation.................................................................... 133 (9) Statement identifying information to be deleted from copy of letter ruling or determination letter forpublicinspection...................................................................................... 133 (10)Signaturebytaxpayerorauthorizedrepresentative........................................................... 135 (11)Authorizedrepresentatives................................................................................ 135 (12)Powerofattorneyanddeclarationofrepresentative.......................................................... 136 (13)Penaltiesofperjurystatement............................................................................. 136 (14)Applicableuserfee...................................................................................... 136 (15)Numberofcopiesofrequesttobesubmitted................................................................ 136 (16)Sampleformatforaletterrulingrequest.................................................................... 137 (17)Checklistforletterrulingrequests......................................................................... 137 .03Additionalinformationrequiredincertaincircumstances ........................................................ 137 (1)Torequestseparateletterrulingsformultipleissuesinasinglesituation......................................... 137 (2)Recipientoforiginalofletterrulingordeterminationletter..................................................... 137 (3)Torequestexpeditedhandling.............................................................................. 138 (4) To receive a letter ruling or submit a request for aletter ruling by facsimile transmission (fax)..................... 139 (5)Torequestaconference................................................................................... 139 .04Addresstosendtherequest................................................................................... 139 (1)Requestsforletterrulings................................................................................. 139 (2)Requestsforinformationletters............................................................................ 139 (3)Requestsfordeterminationletters.......................................................................... 140 .05Pendingletterrulingrequests ................................................................................. 140 .06Whentoattachletterrulingtoreturn .......................................................................... 140 .07Howtocheckonstatusofrequest ............................................................................. 140 2007–1 I.R.B.119January 2, 2007 .08RequestmaybewithdrawnorEPorEOTechnicalmaydeclinetoissueletterruling ................................ 140 .09CompliancewithTreasuryDepartmentCircularNo.230......................................................... 141 SECTION 10. WHAT SPECIFIC, ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES APPLY TO CERTAIN REQUESTS?........................ 141 .01Ingeneral .................................................................................................. 141 .02ExemptOrganizations ....................................................................................... 141 .03EmployeePlans............................................................................................. 141 SECTION 11. HOW DOES EP OR EO TECHNICAL HANDLE LETTER RULING REQUESTS?............................. 142 .01Ingeneral .................................................................................................. 142 .02Isnotboundbyinformalopinionexpressed .................................................................... 142 .03Tellstaxpayerifrequestlacksessentialinformationduringinitialcontact .......................................... 142 .04Requirespromptsubmissionofadditionalinformationrequestedafterinitialcontact ................................ 142 .05 Near the completion of the ruling process, advises taxpayer of conclusions and, if the Service will ruleadversely,offersthetaxpayertheopportunitytowithdrawtheletterrulingrequest .............................. 143 .06Mayrequestdraftofproposedletterrulingnearthecompletionoftherulingprocess ................................ 143 SECTION 12. HOW ARE CONFERENCES SCHEDULED?............................................................. 143 .01Schedulesaconferenceifrequestedbytaxpayer ................................................................ 143 .02Permitstaxpayeroneconferenceofright....................................................................... 144 .03Disallowsverbatimrecordingofconferences ................................................................... 144 .04Makestentativerecommendationsonsubstantiveissues ......................................................... 144 .05Mayofferadditionalconferences ............................................................................. 144 .06Requireswrittenconfirmationofinformationpresentedatconference ............................................. 144 .07Mayscheduleapre-submissionconference..................................................................... 145 .08Underlimitedcircumstances,mayscheduleaconferencetobeheldbytelephone ................................... 145 SECTION 13. WHAT EFFECT WILL A LETTER RULING HAVE?...................................................... 145 .01Maybereliedonsubjecttolimitations......................................................................... 145 .02Willnotapplytoanothertaxpayer ............................................................................ 145 .03WillbeusedbyTE/GEinexaminingthetaxpayer’sreturn ....................................................... 145 .04Mayberevokedormodifiediffoundtobeinerror .............................................................. 146 .05Notgenerallyrevokedormodifiedretroactively ................................................................ 146 .06Retroactiveeffectofrevocationormodificationappliedonlytoaparticulartransaction.............................. 147 .07Retroactiveeffectofrevocationormodificationappliedtoacontinuingactionorseriesofactions .................... 147 .08 May be retroactively revoked or modified whentransaction is completed without reliance on the letterruling................................................................................................. 147 .09Taxpayermayrequestthatretroactivitybelimited............................................................... 147 (1)Requestforreliefunder§7805(b)mustbemadeinrequiredformat............................................. 147 (2)Taxpayermayrequestaconferenceonapplicationof§7805(b). ............................................... 148 SECTION 14. WHAT EFFECT WILL A DETERMINATION LETTER HAVE?............................................ 148 .01Hassameeffectasaletterruling .............................................................................. 148 .02Taxpayermayrequestthatretroactiveeffectofrevocationormodificationbelimited................................ 148 (1)Requestforreliefunder§7805(b)mustbemadeinrequiredformat............................................. 148 (2)Taxpayermayrequestaconferenceonapplicationof§7805(b). ............................................... 148 (3)Taxpayerstepsinexhaustingadministrativeremedies......................................................... 149 SECTION 15. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES ARE MATTERS R EFERRED BETWEEN DETERMINATIONS AND TECHNICAL? ................................................................ 149 .01Requestsfordeterminationletters ............................................................................. 149 .02No-ruleareas ............................................................................................... 149 .03Requestsforletterrulings .................................................................................... 149 SECTION 16. WHAT ARE THE GENERAL PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO INFORMATION LETTERS ISSUED BY THE HEADQUARTERS OFFICE? ............................................................ 149 .01Willbemadeavailabletothepublic ........................................................................... 149 .02DeletionsmadeundertheFreedomofInformationAct .......................................................... 150 .03Effectofinformationletters .................................................................................. 150 January 2, 20071202007–1 I.R.B. SECTION 17. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE ON OTHER DOCUMENTS?..................... 150 SECTION 18. EFFECTIVE DATE................................................................................... 150 SECTION 19. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT...................................................................... 150 DRAFTING INFORMATION....................................................................................... 151 INDEX........................................................................................................... 152 APPENDIX A—SAMPLE FORMAT FOR A LETTER RULING REQUEST................................................ 153 APPENDIX B—CHECKLIST FOR A LETTER RULING REQUEST...................................................... 155 APPENDIX C—ADDITIONAL CHECKLIST FOR ROTH IRA RECHARACTERIZATIONS................................. 158 APPENDIX D—ADDITIONAL CHECKLIST FOR GOVERNMENT PICK-UP PLANS...................................... 159 APPENDIX E—ADDITIONAL CHECKLIST FOR CHURCH PLANS..................................................... 160 SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? This revenue procedure explains how the Internal Revenue Service gives guidance to tax- payers on issues under the jurisdiction of theCommissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. It explains the kinds of guidance and the manner in which guidance is re- quested by taxpayers and provided by the Service. A sample format of a request for a letter ruling is provided in Appendix A. SECTION 2. WHAT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO REV. PROC. 2006–4? .01 This revenue procedure is a general update of Rev. Proc. 2006–4, 2006–1 I.R.B. 132, which contains the Service’s general procedures for employee plans and exempt organizations letter ruling requests. Most of the changes toRev. Proc. 2006–4 involve minor revisions, such as updating citations to other revenue procedures. .02 The Service has determined that letter rulings will not be issued with respect to indi- vidual cases under § 414(d), pending the issuance of general guidance that is currently being developed in coordination with the Department of Labor and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. Accordingly, section 6.02(1) isrevised to delete the reference to § 414(d) and section 8.12 is revised to clarify that EP Technical will no longer issue governmental plan rul- ings under § 414(d), including rulings involving plans of Indian tribal governments. .03 Additional no rule areas for EO Technical are added as section 6.14 and 6.16. .04 An additional no rule area for EP Technical and EO Technical is added as section 6.15. .05 Section 7.04(2) is clarified with respect tothe non-issuance of determination letters by EO Determinations on completed transactions. SECTION3.INWHATFORM IS GUIDANCE PROVIDED BY THE COMMISSIONER, TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES DIVISION? In general.01 The Service provides guidance in the form of letter rulings, closing agreements, com- pliance statements, determination letters, opinion letters, advisory letters, information letters, revenue rulings, and oral advice. Letter ruling.02 A “letter ruling” is a written statement issued to a taxpayer by the Service’s Employee Plans Technical office or Exempt Organizations Technical office that interprets and applies the tax laws or any nontax laws applicable to employee benefit plans and exempt organizations to the taxpayer’s specific set of facts. Once issued, a letter ruling may be revoked or modified for any number of reasons, as explained in section 13 of this revenue procedure, unless it is accompanied by a “closing agreement.” 2007–1 I.R.B.121January 2, 2007 Closing agreement.03 A closing agreement is a final agreement between the Service and a taxpayer on a spe- cific issue or liability. It is entered into under the authority in § 7121 and is final unless fraud, malfeasance, or misrepresentation of a material fact can be shown. A closing agreement prepared in an office under the responsibility of the Commissioner, TE/GE, may be based on a ruling that has beensigned by the Commissioner, TE/GE, or the Commissioner, TE/GE’s, delegate that says that a closing agreement will be entered into on thebasisoftherulingletter. A closing agreement may be entered into when it is advantageous to have the matter perma- nently and conclusively closed, or when a taxpayer can show that there are good reasons for an agreement and that making the agreement will not prejudice the interests of the Government. In appropriate cases, taxpayers may be askedto enter into a closing agreement as a condition to the issuance of a letter ruling. If, in a single case, a closing agreement is requested for each person in a class of taxpayers, separate agreements are entered into only if the class consists of 25 or fewer taxpayers. How- ever, if the issue and holding are identical for the class and there are more than 25 taxpayers in the class, a “mass closing agreement” will be entered into with the taxpayer who is authorized by the others to represent the class. In appropriate cases, a closing agreement may be made with sponsors of master and proto- type plans. A closing agreement may also be entered into with respect to retirement plan failures cor- rected under the Audit Closing Agreement Program of the Employee Plans Compliance Reso- lution System (EPCRS), as set forth inRev. Proc. 2006–27, 2006–22 I.R.B. 945. Determination letter.04 A “determination letter” is a written statement issued by the Manager, EP Determina- tions, or the Manager, EO Determinations that applies the principles and precedents previously announced to a specific set of facts. It is issued only when a determination can be made based on clearly established rules in the statute, a tax treaty, or the regulations, or based on a conclu- sion in a revenue ruling, opinion, or court decision published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin that specifically answers the questions presented. The Manager, EP Determinations, issues determination letters involving §§ 401, 403(a), 409, and 4975(e)(7) as provided in Rev. Proc. 2007–6, page 189, this Bulletin. Opinion letter.05 An “opinion letter” is a written statement issued by Employee Plans Rulings and Agree- ments to a sponsor as to the acceptability (for purposes of §§ 401 and 501(a)) of the form of a master or prototype plan and any related trustor custodial account under §§ 401, 403(a), and 501(a), or as to the conformance of a prototype trust, custodial account, or individual annuity with the requirements of § 408(a), (b), or (k), as applicable.SeeRev. Proc. 2005–16, 2005–1 C.B. 674.See alsoRev. Proc. 91–44, 1991–2 C.B. 733, and Rev. Proc. 92–38, 1992–1 C.B. 859. Information letter.06 An “information letter” is a statement issued either by the Director, Employee Plans Rulings and Agreements or the Director, Exempt Organizations Rulings and Agreements. It calls attention to a well-established interpretation or principle of tax law (including a tax treaty) without applying it to a specific set of facts.To the extent resources permit, an information letter may be issued if the taxpayer’s inquiry indicates a need for general information or if the taxpayer’s request does not meet the requirements of this revenue procedure and the Service thinks general information will help the taxpayer. The taxpayer should provide a daytime tele- phone number with the taxpayer’s request for an information letter. Requests for information letters should be sent to the address stated in section 9.04(2) of this revenue procedure. The requirements of section 9.02 of this revenue procedure are not applicable toinformation letters. An information letter is advisory onlyand has no binding effect on the Service. Revenue ruling.07 A “revenue ruling” is an interpretation by the Service that has been published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. It is the conclusion of the Service on how the law is applied to January 2, 20071222007–1 I.R.B. a specific set of facts. Revenue rulings are published for the information and guidance of taxpayers, Service personnel, and other interested parties. Because each revenue ruling represents the conclusion of the Service regarding the appli- cation of law to the entire statement of facts involved, taxpayers, Service personnel, and other concerned parties are cautioned against reaching the same conclusion in other cases unless the facts and circumstances are substantially the same. They should consider the effect of subse- quent legislation, regulations, court decisions,revenue rulings, notices, and announcements. SeeRev. Proc. 89–14, 1989–1 C.B. 814, which states the objectives of and standards for the publication of revenue rulingsand revenue procedures in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Oral guidance.08 (1) No oral rulings and no written rulings in response to oral requests. The Service does not orally issue letter rulings ordetermination letters, nor does it issue letter rulings or determination letters in response tooral requests from taxpayers. However, Service employees ordinarily will discuss with taxpayersor their representatives inquiries regarding whether the Service will rule on particular issues and questions relating to procedural matters about submitting requests for letter rulings, determination letters, and requests for recognition of exempt status for a particular organization. (2) Discussion possible on substantive issues. At the discretion of the Service, and as time permits, substantive issues may also be dis- cussed. However, such a discussion will not be binding on the Service, and cannot be relied on as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). Substantive tax issues involving the taxpayer that are under examination, in appeals, or in litigation will not be discussed by Service employees not directly involved in the examinat ion, appeal, or litigation of the issues unless the discussion is coordinated with those Service em- ployees who are directly involved in the examination, appeal, or litigation of the issues. T he taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative ordinarily will be asked whether the oral reques tfor guidance or information relates to a matter pending before another office of the Service. If a tax issue is not under examination, in appeals, or in litigation, the tax issue may be discussed even though the issue is affected by a nontax issue pending in litigation. A taxpayer may seek oral technical guidance from a taxpayer service representative in TE/GE Customer Account Services when preparing a return or report. Oral guidance is ad- visory only, and the Service is not bound to recognize it, for example, in the examination of the taxpayer’s return. The Service does not respond to letters seeking to confirm the substance of oral discussions, and the absence of a response to such a letter is not confirmation of the substance of the letter. Nonbank trustee requests.09 In order to receive approval to act as a nonbank c ustodian of plans qualified under § 401(a) or accounts described in § 403(b)(7), and a s a nonbank trustee or nonbank custodian for individual retirement arrangements (IRAs) es tablished under § 408(a), (b), or (h), or for a Coverdell educational savings account establis hed under § 530 or an Archer medical savings account established under § 220, or a Health Savin gs Account under § 223, a written appli- cation must be filed that demonstrates how the app licant complies with the requirements of § 1.408–2(e)(2) through (5) of the Income Tax Reg ulations. The Service must have clear and convincing proofin its files that the requirements of the reg- ulations are met. If there is a requirement that the applicant feels is not applicable, the applica- tion must provide clear and convincing proof that such requirement is not germane to the man- ner in which the applicant will administer any trust or custodial account.See§ 1.408–2(e)(6). The completed application should be sent to: 2007–1 I.R.B.123January 2, 2007 Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, TE/GE Attention: SE:T:EP:RA P.O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 Section 6.01(6) of Rev. Proc. 2007–8, page 230, this Bulletin, imposes a user’s fee for anyone applying for approval to become a nonbank trustee or custodian. Compliance Statement.10 A compliance statement is a binding written agreement between the Service and a tax- payer with respect to certain retirement plan failures identified by a taxpayer in a voluntary submission under the Voluntary Correction Program of the EPCRS (see Rev. Proc. 2006–27). The compliance statement addresses the failures identified in the VCP submission, the terms of correction, including any revision of administrative procedures, and the time period within which proposed corrections must be implemented. A compliance statement is conditioned on (i) there being no misstatement or omission of material facts in connection with the submission, and (ii) the implementation of the specific corrections and satisfaction of any other conditions in the compliance statement. SECTION4.ONWHATISSUES MAY TAXPAYERS REQUEST WRITTEN GUIDANCE UNDER THIS PROCEDURE? Taxpayers may request letter rulings, information letters and closing agreements on issues within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division under this revenue procedure. The Service issues letter rulingsto answer written inquiries of individuals and organizations about their status for tax purposes and the tax effects of their acts or transactions when appropriate in the interest of sound tax administration. Taxpayers also may request determination letters that relate to Code sections under the juris- diction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division.SeeRev. Proc. 2007–6, this Bulletin. SECTION5.ONWHATISSUES MUST WRITTEN GUIDANCE BE REQUESTED UNDER DIFFERENT PROCEDURES? Determination letters.01 The procedures for obtaining determination letters involving §§ 401, 403(a), 409, and 4975(e)(7), and the status forexemption of any related trusts or custodial accounts under § 501(a) are contained in Rev. Proc. 2007–6, this Bulletin. Master and prototype plans and volume submitter plans .02 The procedures for obtaining opinion letters for master and prototype plans and any re- lated trusts or custodial accounts under §§ 401(a), 403(a) and 501(a) and advisory letters for volume submitter plans are contained in Rev. Proc. 2005–16. The procedures for obtaining opinion letters for prototype trusts, custodial accounts or annuities under § 408(a) or (b) are con- tained in Rev. Proc. 87–50, as modified by Rev. Proc. 92–38 and Rev. Proc. 2002–10, 2002–1 C.B. 401. The procedures for obtaining opinion letters for prototype trusts under § 408(k) are contained in Rev. Proc. 87–50, as modified by Rev. Proc. 91–44 (as modified by Rev. Proc. 2007–8) and Rev. Proc. 2002–10. The proceduresfor obtaining opinion letters for SIMPLE IRAs under § 408(p) are contained in Rev. Proc. 97–29, 1997–1 C.B. 698. The procedures for obtaining opinion letters for Roth IRAs under § 408A are contained in Rev. Proc. 98–59, 1998–2 C.B. 727. Closing agreement program for defined contribution plans that purchased GICs or GACs .03 Rev. Proc. 95–52, 1995–1 C.B. 439, restates and extends for an indefinite period the closing agreement program for defined contribution plans that purchased guaranteed invest- ment contracts (GICs) or group annuity contracts (GACs) from troubled life insurance compa- nies. Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System .04 The procedures for obtaining compliance statements, etc., for certain failures of plans qualified under § 401(a), § 403(b) plans, SEPs and § 457 plans under the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) are contained in Rev. Proc. 2006–27. January 2, 20071242007–1 I.R.B. Chief Counsel.05 The procedures for obtaining rulings, closing agreements, and information letters on issues within the jurisdiction of the Chief Counsel are contained in Rev. Proc. 2007–1, page 1, this Bulletin, including tax issues involving interpreting or applying the federal tax laws and income tax treaties relating to international transactions. Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes .06 The procedures for obtaining letter rulings, etc., that apply to federal alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes under subtitle E of the Internal Revenue Code are under the jurisdiction of the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau within the Treasury Department. SECTION 6. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES TE/GE ISSUE LETTER RULINGS? In exempt organizations matters.01 In exempt organizations matters, the Exempt Organizations Technical Office issues let- ter rulings on proposed transactions and on completed transactions if the request is submitted before the return is filed for the year in which the transaction that is the subject of the request was completed. Exempt Organizations Technical issues letter rulings involving: (1) Organizations exempt from tax under § 501, including private foundations; (2) Organizations described in §170(b)(1)(A) (except clause (v)); (3) Political organizations described in § 527; (4) Qualified tuition programs described in § 529 other than state run programs; (5) Trusts described in § 4947(a); (6) Other matters including issues under §§ 501 through 514, 4911, 4912, 4940 through 4948, 4955, 4958, 4976, 6033, 6104, 6113, and 6115. In employee plans matters.02 In employee plans matters, the Employee Plans Technical Office issues letter rulings on proposed transactions and on completed transactions either before or after the return is filed. Employee Plans Technical issues letter rulings involving: (1) §§ 72, 101(d), 219, 381(c)(11), 402, 403(b), 404, 408, 408A, 412, 414(e), 419, 419A, 511 through 514, 4971, 4972, 4973, 4974, 4978, 4979, and 4980; (2) Waiver of the minimum funding standard (SeeRev. Proc. 2004–15, 2004–1 C.B. 490), and changes in funding methods and actuarial assumptions under § 412(c)(5); (3) Waiver of the liquidity shortfall (as that term is defined in § 412(m)(5)) excise tax under § 4971(f)(4); (4) Waiver under § 4980F(c)(4) of all or part of the excise tax imposed for failure to satisfy the notice requirements described in § 4980F(e); (5) Whether a plan amendment is reasonable and provides for onlyde minimisincreases in plan liabilities in accordance with §§ 401(a)(33) and412(f)(2)(A) of the Code (SeeRev. Proc. 79–62, 1979–2 C.B. 576); (6) A change in the plan year of an employee retirement plan and the trust year of a tax- exempt employees’ trust (SeeRev. Proc. 87–27, 1987–1 C.B. 769); (7) The tax consequences of prohibited transactions under §§ 503 and 4975; (8) Whether individual retirement accounts established by employers or associations of employees meet the requirements of § 408(c). (SeeRev. Proc. 87–50, as modified by Rev. Proc. 91–44 (as modified by Rev. Proc. 2007–8) and Rev. Proc. 92–38); 2007–1 I.R.B.125January 2, 2007 (9) With respect to employee stock ownership plans and tax credit employee stock own- ership plans, §§ 409(l), 409(m), and 4975(d)(3). Other subsections of §§ 409 and 4975(e)(7) involve qualification issues within the jurisdiction of EP Determinations. (10) Where the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division has author- ity to grant extensions of certain periods of time within which the taxpayer must perform cer- tain transactions (for example, the 90-day period for reinvesting in employer securities under § 1.46–8(e)(10) of the regulations), the taxpayer’s request for an extension of such time period must be postmarked (or received, if hand delivered to the headquarters office) no later than the expiration of the original time period. Thus, for example, a request for an extension of the 90-day period under § 1.46–8(e)(10) must be made before the expiration of this period. How- ever, see section 6.04 below with respect to elections under § 301.9100–1 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations. In qualifications matters.03 The Employee Plans Technicaloffice ordinarily will not issue letter rulings on matters involving a plan’s qualified status under §§ 401 through 420 and § 4975(e)(7). These matters are generally handled by the Employee Plans Determinations program as provided in Rev. Proc. 2007–6, this Bulletin, Rev. Proc. 93–10and Rev. Proc. 93–12. Although the Employee Plans Technical office will not ordinarily issue rulings on matters involving plan qualification, a ruling may be issued where, (1) the taxpayer has demonstrated to the Service’s satisfaction that the qualification issue involved is unique and requires immediate guidance, (2) as a practical matter, it is not likely that such issue will be addressed through the determination letter process, and (3) the Service determines that it is in the interest of good tax administration to provide guidance to the taxpayer with respect to such qualification issue. Request for extension of time for making an election or for other relief under § 301.9100–1 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations .04 Employee Plans Technical or Exempt Organizations Technical will consider a request for an extension of time for making an election or other application for relief under § 301.9100–1 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations even if submitted after the return covering the issue presented in the § 301.9100–1 request has been filed and even if submitted after an examination of the return has begun or after theissues in the return are being considered by an appeals office or a federal court. In such a case, EP or EO Technical will notify the Director, EP or EO Examinations. Except for those requests pertaining to applications for recognition of exemption, § 301.9100–1 requests, even those submitted after the examination of the taxpayer’s return has begun, are letter ruling requests and therefore should be submitted pursuant to this revenue procedure, and require payment of the applicable user fee, referenced in section 9.02(14) of this revenue procedure. In addition, the taxpayer must include the information required by § 301.9100–3(e). However, an election made pursuant to § 301.9100–2 is not a letter ruling and does not re- quire payment of any user fee.See§ 301.9100–2(d). Such an election pertains to an automatic extension of time under § 301.9100–1. Issuance of a letter ruling before the issuance of a regulation or other published guidance .05 Unless the issue is covered by section 8 ofthis procedure, a letter ruling may be issued before the issuance of a temporary or final regulation or other published guidance that interprets the provisions of any act under the following conditions: (1) Answer is clear or is reasonably certain.If the letter ruling request presents an issue for which the answer seems clear by applying the statute to the facts or for which the answer seems reasonably certain but not entirely free from doubt, a letter ruling will be issued. (2) Answer is not reasonably certain.The Service will consider all letter ruling requests and use its best efforts to issue a letter ruling even if the answer does not seem reasonably certain where the issuance of a letter ruling is in the best interest of tax administration. (3) Issue cannot be readily resolved beforea regulation or any other published guid- ance is issued.A letter ruling will not be issued if the letter ruling request presents an issue that cannot be readily resolved before a regulation or any other published guidance is issued. January 2, 20071262007–1 I.R.B. Issues in prior return.06 The Service ordinarily does not issue rulings if, at the time the ruling is requested, the identical issue is involved in the taxpayer’s return for an earlier period, and that issue— (1) is being examined by the Director, EP or EO Examinations, (2) is being considered by an appeals office, (3) is pending in litigation in a case involving the taxpayer or related taxpayer, or (4) has been examined by the Director, EP or EO Examinations or considered by an appeals office, and the statutory period of limitation has not expired for either assessment or filing a claim for a refund or a closing agreement covering the issue of liability has not been entered into by the Director, EP or EO Rulings and Agreements or by an appeals office. If a return dealing with an issue for a particular year is filed while a request for a ruling on that issue is pending, EP or EO Technical will issue the ruling unless it is notified by the taxpayer that an examination of that issue or the identical issue on an earlier year’s return has been started by the Director, EP or EO Examinations.Seesection 9.05. However, even if an examination has begun, EP or EO Technical ordinarily will issue the letter ruling if the Director, EP or EO Examinations agrees, by memorandum, to permit the ruling to be issued. Generally not to business associations or groups .07 EP or EO Technical does not issue letter rulings to business, trade, or industrial associ- ations or to similar groups concerning the application of the tax laws to members of the group. But groups and associations may submit suggestions of generic issues that would be appro- priately addressed in revenue rulings.SeeRev. Proc. 89–14, which states objectives of, and standards for, the publication of revenue rulingsand revenue procedures in the Internal Rev- enue Bulletin. EP or EO Technical, however, may issue letter rulings to groups or associations on their own tax status or liability if the request meets the requirements of this revenue procedure. Generally not to foreign governments .08 EP or EO Technical does not issue letter rulings to foreign governments or their political subdivisions about the U.S. tax effects of their laws. However, EP or EO Technical may issue letter rulings to foreign governments or their political subdivisions on their own tax status or liability under U.S. law if the request meets the requirements of this revenue procedure. Generally not on federal tax consequences of proposed legislation .09 EP or EO Technical does not issue letter rulings on a matter involving the federal tax consequences of any proposed federal, state, local, municipal, or foreign legislation. EP or EO Technical, however, may provide general information in response to an inquiry. Not on certain matters under § 53.4958–6 of the Foundation and Similar Excise Taxes Regulations .10 EO Technical does not issue letter rulingsas to whether a compensation or property transaction satisfies the rebuttable presumption that the transaction is not an excess benefit transaction as described in § 53.4958–6 of the Foundation and Similar Excise Taxes Regula- tions. Not on stock options.11 EP Technical does not issue letter rulings on the income tax (including unrelated busi- ness income tax) or excise tax consequences of the contribution of stock options to, or their subsequent exercise from, plans described in Part I of Subchapter D of Subtitle A of the Code. Generally not on EO joint venture with a for-profit organization .12 With the exception of when the issue is present in an initial application for recognition of exemption, EO Technical does not issue letter rulings as to whether a joint venture with a for-profit organization affects an organization’s exempt status or results in unrelated business income. Not on qualification of state run programs under § 529 .13 EO Technical will not issue letter rulings asto whether a state run tuition program qual- ifies under § 529. Not on UBIT issues involving certain investments of a charitable lead trust .14 EO Technical will not issue letter rulings pertaining to unrelated business income tax issues arising when charitable lead trust assetsare invested with charitable organizations. 2007–1 I.R.B.127January 2, 2007 Not on issues under § 4965.15 The Service will not issue letter rulings under § 4965, as added by section 516 of the Tax Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005, before the issuance of temporary or final regulations or other published guidance that interprets the provision. Not on issues under §§ 4966 and 4967 .16 EO Technical will not issue letter rulings under § 4966 or § 4967, as added by section 1231 of the Pension Protection Act of 2006, before the issuance of temporary or final regula- tions or other published guidance that interprets these provisions. SECTION 7. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES EP OR EO DETERMINATIONS ISSUE DETERMINATION LETTERS? Circumstances under which determination letters are issued .01 Employee Plans or Exempt Organizations Determinations issues determination letters only if the question presented is specifically answered by a statute, tax treaty, or regulation, or by a conclusion stated in a revenue ruling, opinion, or court decision published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In general.02 In employee plans and exempt organizations matters, the EP or EO Determinations of- fice issues determination letters in response totaxpayers’ written requests on completed tran s- actions. However, see section 13.08 of this revenue procedure. A determination letter usually is not issued for a question concerning a return to be filed by the taxpayer if the same question is involved in a return under examination. In situations involving continuing transactions, such as whether an ongoing activity is an unrelated trade or business, EP or EO Technical would issue a ruling covering future tax periods and periods for which a return had not yet been filed. EP or EO Determinations does not issue determination letters on the tax consequences of proposed transactions, except as provided in sections 7.03 and 7.04 below. Under no circumstances will EP or EO Determinations issue a determination letter unless it is clearly shown that the request concerns a return that has been filed or is required to be filed. In employee plans matters.03 In employee plans matters, the Employee Plans Determinations office issues determina- tion letters on the qualified status of employee plans under §§ 401, 403(a), 409 and 4975(e)(7), and the exempt status of any related trust under § 501.SeeRev. Proc. 2007–6, this Bulletin, Rev. Proc. 93–10 and Rev. Proc. 93–12. In exempt organizations matters.04 In exempt organizations matters, the Exempt Organizations Determinations office issues determination letters involving: (1) Initial qualification for exempt status oforganizations described in §§ 501 and 521 to the extent provided in Rev. Proc. 90–27, 1990–1 C.B. 514, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2007–8; (2) Updated exempt status letter to reflect changes to an organization’s name or address, or to replace a lost exempt status letter, but not to approve or disapprove any completed transaction or the effect of changes in activities on exempt status, except in the situations specifically listed in paragraphs (3) through (12) below; (3) Classification of private foundation status as provided in Rev. Proc. 76–34, 1976–2 C.B. 656; (4) Reclassification of private foundation status, including update of private foundation status at the end of an organization’s advance ruling period; (5) Recognition of unusual grants to certain organizations under §§ 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(2); January 2, 20071282007–1 I.R.B. (6) Requests for relief under § 301.9100–1 of the Procedure and Administration Regula- tions in connection with applications for recognition of exemption; (7) Advance approval of terminations under § 507(b)(1)(B); (8) Whether certain organizations qualify as exempt operating foundations described in § 4940(d); (9) Advance approval of certain set-asides described in § 4942(g)(2); (10) Advance approval under § 4945 of organizations’ grant making procedures; (11) Advance approval of voter registration activities described in § 4945(f); and (12) Whether an organization is exempt from filing annual information returns under § 6033 as provided in Rev. Procs. 83–23, 1983–1 C.B. 687, 95–48, 1995–2 C.B. 418, and 96–10, 1996–1 C.B. 577. Circumstances under which determination letters are not issued .05 EP or EO Determinations will not issue a determination letter in response to any request if— (1) it appears that the taxpayer has directed a similar inquiry to EP or EO Technical; (2) the same issue involving the same taxpayeror a related taxpayer is pending in a case in litigation or before an appeals office; (3) the determination letter is requested by an industry, trade association, or similar group on behalf of individual taxpayers within the group (other than subordinate organizations covered by a group exemption letter); or (4) the request involves an industry-wide problem. Requests involving returns already filed .06 A request received by the Service on a question concerning a return that is under exam- ination, will be, in general, considered in connection with the examination of the return. If a response is made to the request before the return is examined, it will be considered a tentative finding in any later examination of that return. Attach a copy of determination letter to taxpayer’s return .07 A taxpayer who, before filing a return, receives a determination letter about any trans- action that has been consummated and that is relevant to the return being filed should attach a copy of the determination letter to the return when it is filed. Review of determination letters.08 Determination letters issued under sections 7.02 through 7.04 of this revenue procedure are not reviewed by EP or EO Technical before they are issued. If a taxpayer believes that a determination letter of this type is in error, the taxpayer may ask EP or EO Determinations to reconsider the matter or to request technical advice from EP or EO Technical as explained in Rev. Proc. 2007–5, page 161, this Bulletin. (1) In employee plans matters, the procedures for review of determination letters relating to the qualification of employee plans involving §§ 401 and 403(a) are provided in Rev. Proc. 2007–6, Rev. Proc. 93–10 and Rev. Proc. 93–12. (2) In exempt organizations matters, the procedures for the review of determination letters relating to the exemption from federal income tax of certain organizations under §§ 501 and 521 are provided in Rev. Proc. 90–27, as modified by Rev. Proc. 2007–8. 2007–1 I.R.B.129January 2, 2007 SECTION 8. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES DOES THE SERVICEHAVEDISCRETION TO ISSUE LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS? Ordinarily not in certain areas because of factual nature of the problem .01 The Service ordinarily will not issue a letter ruling or determination letter in certain areas because of the factual nature of the problem involved or because of other reasons. The Service may decline to issue a letter ruling or a determination letter when appropriate in the interest of sound tax administration or on other grounds whenever warranted by the facts or circumstances of a particular case. No “comfort” letter rulings.02 No letter ruling will be issued with respect to an issue that is clearly and adequately addressed by statute, regulations, decision of a court of appropriate jurisdiction, revenue rul- ing, revenue procedure, notice or other authority published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Instead of issuing a letter ruling, the Service may, when it is considered appropriate and in the best interests of the Service, issue an information letter calling attention to well-established principles of tax law. Not on alternative plans or hypothetical situations .03 A letter ruling or a determination letter will not be issued on alternative plans of proposed transactions or on hypothetical situations. Ordinarilynotonpartofan integrated transaction .04 The Service ordinarily will not issue a letter ruling on only part of an integrated trans- action. If, however, a part of a transaction falls under a no-rule area, a letter ruling on other parts of the transaction may be issued. Before preparing the letter ruling request, a taxpayer should call the office having jurisdiction for the matters on which the taxpayer is seeking a letter ruling to discuss whether the Service will issue a letter ruling on part of the transaction. Not on partial terminations of employee plans .05 The Service will not issue a letter ruling on the partial termination of an employee plan. Determination letters involving the partial termination of an employee plan may be issued. Law requires ruling letter.06 The Service will issue rulings on prospective or future transactions if the law or regula- tions require a determination of the effectof a proposed transaction for tax purposes. Issues under consideration by PBGC or DOL .07 A letter ruling or determination letter relating to an issue that is being considered by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) or the Department of Labor (DOL), and involves the same taxpayer, shall be issued at the discretion of the Service. Cafeteria plans.08 The Service does not issue letter rulings ordetermination letters on whether a cafeteria plan satisfies the requirements of § 125.See alsoRev. Proc. 2007–3, also in this Bulletin, for areas under the jurisdiction of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) involving cafeteria plans in which advance rulings or determination letters will not be issued. Determination letters.09Seesection 3.02 of Rev. Proc. 2007–6 for employee plans matters on which determina- tion letters will not be issued. Domicile in a foreign jurisdiction.10 (1) The Service is ordinarily unwilling to rule in situations where a taxpayer or a related party is domiciled or organized in a foreign jurisdiction with which the United States does not have an effective mechanism for obtaining tax information with respect to civil tax examina- tions and criminal investigations, which would preclude the Service from obtaining informa- tion located in such jurisdiction that is relevant to the analysis or examination of the tax issues involved in the ruling request. (2) The provisions of subsection 8.10(1) above shall not apply if the taxpayer or affected related party (a) consents to the disclosure of all relevant information requested by the Service in processing the ruling requestor in the course of an examination to verify the accuracy of the representations made and to otherwise analyze or examine the tax issues involved in the ruling January 2, 20071302007–1 I.R.B. request, and (b) waives all claims to protection of bank and commercial secrecy laws in the foreign jurisdiction with respect to the information requested by the Service. In the event the taxpayer’s or related party’s consent to disclose relevant information or to waive protection of bank or commercial secrecy is determined by the Service to be ineffective or of no force and effect, then the Service may retroactively rescind any ruling rendered in reliance on such consent. Employee Stock Ownership Plans.11 (1) The Service does not issue a letter ruling on whether or not the renewal, extension or refinancing of an exempt loan satisfies the requirements of § 4975(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. ( 2) The Service does not issue a letter ruling on whether the pre-payment of ESOP loans s atisfies the requirements of §4975(d)(3) other than with respect to plan termination. Governmental Plans.12 The Service does not issue a letter ruling on whether or not a plan is a governmental plan under § 414(d). SECTION 9. WHAT ARE THE GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUESTING LETTER RULINGS AND DETERMINATION LETTERS? In general.01 This section explains the general instructions for requesting letter rulings and determi- nation letters on all matters. Requests for letterrulings and determination letters require the payment of the applicable user fee discussed in section 9.02(14) of this revenue procedure. Specific and additional instructions also apply to requests for letter rulings and determina- tion letters on certain matters. Those matters are listed in section 10 of this revenue procedure followed by a reference (usually to another revenue procedure) where more information can be obtained. Certain information required in all requests .02 Facts(1) Complete statement of facts and other information.Each request for a letter ruling or a determination letter must contain a complete statement of all facts relating to the transaction. These facts include— (a) names, addresses, telephone numbers, and taxpayer identification numbers of all in- terested parties. (The term “all interested parties” does not mean all shareholders of a widely held corporation requesting a letter ruling relating to a reorganization, or all employees where a large number may be involved.); (b) a complete statement of the business reasons for the transaction; and (c) a detailed description of the transaction. The Service will usually not rule on only one step of a larger integrated transaction.See section 8.04 of this revenue procedure. However,if such a letter ruling is requested, the facts, circumstances, true copies of relevant documents, etc., relating to the entire transaction must be submitted. Documents(2) Copies of all contracts, wills, deeds, agreements, instruments, plan documents, and other documents.True copies of all contracts, wills, deeds, agreements, instruments, plan documents, trust documents, proposed disclaimers, and other documents pertinent to the trans- action must be submitted with the request. 2007–1 I.R.B.131January 2, 2007 Each document, other than the request, should belabelled alphabetically and attached to the request in alphabetical order. Original documents, such as contracts, wills, etc., should not be submitted because they become part of the Service’s file and will not be returned. Analysis of material facts(3) Analysis of material facts.All material facts in documents must be included rather than merely incorporated by reference, in the taxpayer’s initial request or in supplemental let- ters. These facts must be accompanied by an analysis of their bearing on the issue or issues, specifying the provisions that apply. Sameissueinanearlierreturn(4)Statementregarding whether same issue is in an earlier return.The request must state whether, to the best of the knowledge of both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s represen- tatives, the same issue is in an earlier return of the taxpayer (or in a return for any year of a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267, or of a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504). If the statement is affirmative, it must specify whether the issue— (a) is being examined by the Service; (b) has been examined and if so, whether or not the statutory period of limitations has ex- pired for either assessing tax or filing a claim for refund or credit of tax; (c) has been examined and if so, whether or not a closing agreement coveri ngtheissueor liability has been entered into by the Service; (d) is being considered by an appeals office in connection with a return from an earlier period; (e) has been considered by an appeals office in connection with a return from an earlier pe- riod and if so, whether or not the statutory period of limitations has expired for either assessing tax or filing a claim for refund or credit of tax; (f) has been considered by an appeals office in connection with a return from an earlier period and whether or not a closing agreement covering the issue or liability has been entered into by an appeals office; (g) is pending in litigation in a case involving the taxpayer or a related taxpayer; or (h) in employee plans matters, is being considered by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corpo- ration or the Department of Labor. Same or similar issue previously submitted or currently pending (5) Statement regarding whether same or similar issue was previously ruled on or re- quested, or is currently pending.The request must also state whether, to the best of the knowledge of both the taxpayer and the taxpayer’s representatives— (a) the Service previously ruled on the same or similar issue for the taxpayer (or a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267, or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504) or a predecessor; (b) the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, a predecessor, or any representatives previously sub- mitted the same or similar issue to the Service but withdrew the request before a letter ruling or determination letter was issued; (c) the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a predecessor previously submitted a request involv- ing the same or a similar issue that is currently pending with the Service; or (d) at the same time as this request, the taxpayer or a related taxpayer is presently submitting another request involving the same or a similar issue to the Service. If the statement is affirmative for (a), (b), (c), or (d) of this section 9.02(5), the statement must give the date the request was submitted, the date the request was withdrawn or ruled on, if applicable, and other details of the Service’s consideration of the issue. January 2, 20071322007–1 I.R.B. Statement of authorities supporting taxpayer’s views (6) Statement of supporting authorities.If the taxpayer advocates a particular conclusion, an explanation of the grounds for that conclusion and the relevant authorities to support it must also be included. Even if not advocating a particular tax treatment of a proposed transaction, the taxpayer must still furnish views on the tax results of the proposed transaction and a statement of relevant authorities to support those views. In all events, the request must include a statement of whether the law in connection with the request is uncertain and whether the issue is adequately addressed by relevant authorities. Statement of authorities contrary to taxpayer’s views (7) Statement of contrary authorities.The taxpayer is also encouraged to inform the Ser- vice about, and discuss the implications of, any authority believed to be contrary to the position advanced, such as legislation (or pending legislation), tax treaties, court decisions, regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, noticesor announcements. If the taxpayer determines that there are no contrary authorities, a statement in the request to this effect would be helpful. If the taxpayer does not furnish either contrary authorities or a statement that none exists, the Service in complex cases or those presenting difficult or novel issues may request submission of contrary authorities or a statement that none exists. Failure to comply with this request may result in the Service’s refusal to issue a letter ruling or determination letter. Identifying and discussing contrary authorities will generally enable Service personnel to understand the issue and relevant authorities more quickly. When Service personnel receive the request, they will have before them the taxpayer’s thinking on the effect and applicability of contrary authorities. This information should make research easier and lead to earlier action by the Service. If the taxpayer does not disclose and distinguish significant contrary authorities, the Service may need to request additional information, which will delay action on the request. Statement identifying pending legislation (8) Statement identifying pending legislation.At the time of filing the request, the tax- payer must identify any pending legislation that may affect the proposed transaction. In addi- tion, if applicable legislation is introduced after the request is filed but before a letter ruling or determination letter is issued, the taxpayer must notify the Service. Deletions statement required by§6110 (9) Statement identifying information to be deleted from copy of letter ruling or de- termination letter for public inspection.The text of certain letter rulings and determination letters is open to public inspection under § 6110. The Service makes deletions from the text before it is made available for inspection. To help the Service make the deletions required by § 6110(c), a request for a letter ruling or determination letter must be accompanied by a state- ment indicating the deletions desired (“deletionsstatement”). If the deletions statement is not submitted with the request, a Service representative will tell the taxpayer that the request will be closed if the Service does not receive the deletions statement within 30 calendar days.See section 11.03 of this revenue procedure. (a) Format of deletions statement.A taxpayer who wants only names, addresses, and identifying numbers to be deleted should state this in the deletions statement. If the taxpayer wants more information deleted, the deletions statement must be accompanied by a copy of the request and supporting documents on which the taxpayer should bracket the material to be deleted. The deletions statement must indicate the statutory basis under § 6110(c) for each proposed deletion. If the taxpayer decides to ask for additional deletions before the letter ruling or determina- tion letter is issued, additional deletions statements may be submitted. (b) Location of deletions statement.The deletions statement must not appear in the re- quest, but instead must be made in a separatedocument and placed on top of the request for a letter ruling or determination letter. (c) Signature.The deletions statement must be signed and dated by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative. A stamped or faxed signature is not permitted. (d) Additional information.The taxpayer should follow the same procedures above to pro- pose deletions from any additional information submitted after the initial request. An additional 2007–1 I.R.B.133January 2, 2007 deletions statement, however, is not required with each submission of additional information if the taxpayer’s initial deletions statement requests that only names, addresses, and identifying numbers are to be deleted and the taxpayer wants only the same information deleted from the additional information. (e) Taxpayer may protest deletions not made.After receiving from the Service the notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to disclose the letter ruling or determination letter (including a copy of the version proposed to be open to public inspection and notation of third-party com- munications under § 6110(d)), the taxpayer may protest the disclosure of certain information in the letter ruling or determination letter. The taxpayer must send a written statement within 20 calendar days to the Service office indicated on the notice of intention to disclose. The statement must identify those deletions thatthe Service has not made and that the taxpayer believes should have been made. The taxpayer must also submit a copy of the version of the letter ruling or determination letter and bracket the deletionsproposed that have not been made by the Service. Generally, the Service will not consider deleting any material that the taxpayer did not propose to be deleted before the letter ruling or determination letter was issued. Within 20 calendar days after the Servicereceives the response to the notice under § 6110(f)(1), the Service will mail to the taxpayer its final administrative conclusion regarding the deletions to be made. The taxpayer does not have the right to a conference to resolve any disagreements concerningmaterial to be deleted from the text of the letter ruling or determination letter. However, these matters may be taken up at any conference that is otherwise scheduled regarding the request. (f) Taxpayer may request delay of public inspection.After receiving the notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to disclose, but within60 calendar days after the date of notice, the taxpayer may send a request for delay of public inspection under either § 6110(g)(3) or (4). The request for delay must be sent to the Serviceoffice indicated on thenotice of intention to disclose. A request for delay under § 6110(g)(3) must contain the date on which it is expected that the underlying transaction will be completed. The request for delay under § 6110(g)(4) must contain a statement from which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may determine that there are good reasons for the delay. Section 6110(l)(1) states that § 6110 disclosure provisions do not apply to any matter to which § 6104 applies. Therefore,letter rulings, determination letters, technical advice memo- randa, and related backgroundfile documents dealing with the following matters (covered by § 6104) are not subject to § 6110 disclosure provisions— (i) An approved application for exemption under § 501(a) asan organization described in § 501(c) or (d), or notice of status as a political organization under § 527, together with any papers submitted in support of such application or notice; (ii) An application for exemption under § 501(a) with respect to the qualification of a pen- sion, profit-sharing or stock bonus plan, or an individual retirement account described in § 408 or § 408A, whether the plan or account has more than 25 or less than 26 participants, or any application for exemption under § 501(a) by an organization forming part of such a plan or an account; (iii) Any document issued by the Internal Revenue Service in which the qualification or exempt status of a plan or account is granted, denied, or revoked or the portion of any document in which technical advice with respect thereto is given; (iv) Any application filed and any document issued by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the qualification or status of EP master and prototype plans; and (v) The portion of any document issued by the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the qualification or exempt status of a plan or account of a proposed transaction by such plan, or account. January 2, 20071342007–1 I.R.B. Signature on request(10) Signature by taxpayer or authorized representative.The request for a letter ruling or determination letter must be signed and dated by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative. Neither a stamped signature nor a faxed signature is permitted. Authorized representatives(11) Authorized representatives.To sign the request or to appear before the Service in connection with the request, the representative must be: Attorney(a) An attorney who is a member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of any state, possession, territory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia and who is not cur- rently under suspension or disbarment from practice before the Service. He or she must file a written declaration with the Service showing current qualification as an attorn ey and current authorization to represent the taxpayer; Certified public accountant(b) A certified public accountant who is qualifiedto practice in any state, possession, terri- tory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia and who is not currently under suspension or disbarment from practice before the Service. He or she must file a written declaration with the Service showing current qualification as a certified public accountant and current authorization to represent the taxpayer; Enrolled agent(c) An enrolled agent who is a person, other than an attorney or certified public accountant, that is currently enrolled to practice before the Service and is not currently under suspension or disbarment from practice before the Service, including a person enrolled to practice only for employee plans matters. He or she must file a written declaration with the Service showing current enrollment and authorization to represent the taxpayer. Either the enrollment number or the expiration date of the enrollment card must be included in the declaration. For the rules on who may practice before the Service, see Treasury Department Circular No. 230; Enrolled actuary(d) An enrolled actuary who is a person enrolled as an actuary by the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 1242 and qualified to practice in any state, possession, territory, commonwealth, or the District of Columbia and who is not currently un- der suspension or disbarment from practice before the Service. He or she must file a written declaration with the Service showing current qualification as an enrolled actuary and current authorization to represent the taxpayer. Practice as an enrolled actuary is limited to represen- tation with respect to issues involving the following statutory provisions: §§ 401, 403(a), 404, 412, 413, 414, 4971, 6057, 6058, 6059, 6652(d), 6652(e), 6692, 7805(b), and 29 U.S.C. 1083; A person with a “Letter of Authorization” (e) Any other person, including a foreign representative who has received a “Letter of Au- thorization” from the Director, Office of Professional Responsibility under section 10.7(d) of Treasury Department Circular No. 230. A person may make a written request for a “Letter of Authorization” to: Office of Director, Office of Professional Responsibility, Internal Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20224. Section 10.7(d) of Circular No. 230 authorizes the Commissioner to allow an individual who is not otherwise eligible to practice before the Service to represent another person in a particular matter. For additional information, see section 9.02(12) below. Employee, general partner, bona fideofficer, administrator, trustee, etc. (f) The above requirements do not apply to a regular full-time employee representing his or her employer, to a general partner representing his or her partnership, to abona fideoffi- cer representing his or her corporation, association, or organized group, to a trustee, receiver, guardian, personal representative, administrator, or executor representing a trust, receivership, guardianship, or estate, or to an individual representing his or her immediate family. A preparer of a return (other than a person referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of this section 9.02(11)) who is not a full-time employee, general partner, abona fideofficer, an administra- tor, trustee, etc., or an individual representing his or her immediate family may not represent a taxpayer in connection with a letter ruling, determination letter or a technical advice request. Seesection 10.7(c) of Treasury Department Circular No. 230. Foreign representative(g) A foreign representative (other than a person referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of this section 9.02(11)) is not authorizedto practice before the Service and, therefore, must withdraw from representing a taxpayer in arequest for a letter ruling or a determination letter. In this situation, the nonresident alien or foreign entity must submit the request for a 2007–1 I.R.B.135January 2, 2007 letter ruling or a determination letter on the individual’s or entity’s own behalf or through a person referred to in paragraph (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of this section 9.02(11). Power of attorney and declaration of representative (12) Power of attorney and declaration of representative.Any authorized representa- tive, whether or not enrolled to practice, must also comply with the conference and practice requirements of the Statement of Procedural Rules (26 C.F.R. § 601.501–601.509 (2005)), which provide the rules for representing a taxpayer before the Service. In addition, an unen- rolled preparer must file a Form 8821 (Rev. April 2004), Tax Information Authorization, for certain limited employee plans matters. Form 2848 (Rev. March 2004),Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative,must be used to provide the representative’s authorization (Part I of Form 2848,Power of Attorney) and the representative’s qualification (Part II of Form 2848,Declaration of Representative). The name of the person signing Part I of Form 2848 should also be typed or printed on this form. A stamped signature is not permitted. An original, a copy, or a facsimile transmission (fax) of the power of attorney is acceptable so long as its authenticity is not reasonably disputed. For additional information regarding the powerof attorney form, see section 9.03(2) of this revenue procedure. For the requirement regarding compliance with Treasury Department Circular No. 230, see section 9.09 of this revenue procedure. Penalties of perjury statement(13) Penalties of perjury statement. (a) Format of penalties of perjury statement.A request for a letter ruling or determination letter and any change in the request submitted at a later time must be accompanied by the following declaration:“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this request, or this modification to the request, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request or the modification contains all the relevant facts relating to the request, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.”See section 11.04 of this revenue procedure for the penalties of perjury statement applicable for submissions of additional information. (b) Signature by taxpayer.The declaration must be signed and dated by the taxpayer, not the taxpayer’s representative. Neither a stamped signature nor a faxed signature is permitted. The person who signs for a corporate taxpayer must be an officer of the corporate taxpayer who has personal knowledge of the facts, and whose duties are not limited to obtaining a letter ruling or determination letter from the Service. If the corporate taxpayer is a member of an affiliated group filing consolidated returns, a penalties of perjury statement must also be signed and submitted by an officer of the common parent of the group. The person signing for a trust, a state law partnership, or a limited liability company must be, respectively, a trustee, general partner, or member-manager who has personal knowledge of the facts. Applicable user fee(14) Applicable user fee.Section 7528 of the Code, as added by section 202 of the Tem- porary Assistance for Needy Families Block Grant Program and extended by section 690 of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 requirestaxpayers to pay user fees for requests for rulings, opinion letters, determination letters, and similar requests. Rev. Proc. 2007–8, page 230, this Bulletin, contains the schedule of fees for each type of request under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division and provides guidance for administering the user fee requirements. Iftwo or more taxpayers are parties to a transac- tion and each requests a letter ruling, each taxpayer must satisfy the rules herein and additional user fees may apply. Number of copies of request to be submitted (15) Number of copies of request to be submitted.Generally a taxpayer needs only to submit one copy of the request for a letter ruling or determination letter. If, however, more than one issue is presented in the letter ruling request, the taxpayer is encouraged to submit additional copies of the request. January 2, 20071362007–1 I.R.B. Further, two copies of the request for a letter ruling or determination letter are required if— (a) the taxpayer is requesting separate letter rulings or determination letters on different issues as explained later under section 9.03(1) of this revenue procedure; (b) the taxpayer is requesting deletions other than names, addresses, and identifying num- bers, as explained in section 9.02(9) of this revenue procedure. (One copy is the request for the letter ruling or determination letter and the second copy is the deleted version of such request.); or (c) a closing agreement (as defined in section 3.03 of this revenue procedure) is being re- questedontheissuepresented. Sample of a letter ruling request(16) Sample format for a letter ruling request.To assist a taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative in preparing a letter ruling request, a sample format for a letter ruling request is provided in Appendix A. This format is not required to be used by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative. If the letter ruling request is not identical or similar to the format in Appendix A, the different format will neither defer consideration of the letter ruling request nor be cause for returning the request to the taxpayer or taxpayer’s representative. Checklist(17) Checklist for letter ruling requests.The Service will be able to respond more quickly to a taxpayer’s letter ruling request if it is carefully prepared and complete. The checklist in Appendix B of this revenue procedure is designed to assist taxpayers in preparing a request by reminding them of the essential information and documents to be furnished with the request. The checklist in Appendix B must be completed to the extent required by the instructions in the checklist, signed and dated by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative, and placed on top of the letter ruling request. If the checklist in Appendix B is not received, a group representative will ask the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative to submit the checklist, which may delay action on the letter ruling request. A photocopy of this checklist may be used. Additional information required in certain circumstances .03 Multiple issues(1) To request separate letter rulings for multiple issues in a single situation.If more than one issue is presented in a request for a letter ruling, the Service generally will issue a single ruling letter covering all the issues. However, if the taxpayer requests separate letter rulings on any of the issues (because, for example, one letter ruling is needed sooner than another), the Service will usually comply with the request unless it is not feasible or not in the best interests of the Service to do so. A taxpayer who wants separate letter rulings on multiple issues should make this clear in the request and submit two copies of the request. Additional checklists are solely for thespecific issues designated. In issuing each letter ruling, the Service will state that it has issued separate letter rulings or that requests for other letter rulings are pending. Power of attorney(2) Recipient of original of letter ruling or determination letter.The Service will send the original of the letter ruling or determination letter to the taxpayer and a copy of the letter ruling or determination letter to the taxpayer’srepresentative. In this case, the letter ruling or determination letter is addressed to the taxpayer. A Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative(Rev. March 2004), must be used to provide the representative’s authorization except in certain employee plans matters.Seesection 9.02(12) of this revenue procedure. Copies of letter ruling or determination letter sent to multiple representatives (a) To have copies sent to multiple representatives.When a taxpayer has more than one representative, the Service will send the copy of the letter ruling or determination letter to the first representative named on the most recent power of attorney. If the taxpayer wants an additional copy of the letter ruling or determination letter sent to the second representative listed in the power of attorney, the taxpayer must check the appropriate box on Form 2848. If this form is not used, the taxpayer must state in the power of attorney that a copy of the letter ruling or determination letter is to be sent to the second representative listed in the power of 2007–1 I.R.B.137January 2, 2007 attorney. Copies of the letter ruling or determination letter, however, will be sent to no more than two representatives. Copy of letter ruling or determination letter sent to taxpayer’s representative (b) To have copy sent to taxpayer’s representative. A copy of the letter ruling or determination letter will be sent to the taxpayer’s representa- tive. If the taxpayer wants a copy of the letter ruling or determination letter sent to the taxpayer’s second representative, the taxpayer must check the appropriate box on Form 2848. No copy of letter ruling or determination letter sent to taxpayer’s representative (c) To have no copy sent to taxpayer’s representative.If a taxpayer does not want a copy of the letter ruling or determination letter sent to any representative, the taxpayer must check the appropriate box on Form 2848. Expedited handling(3) To request expedited handling.The Service ordinarily processes requests for letter rulings and determination letters in order of the date received. Expedited handling means that a request is processed ahead of the regular order.Expedited handling is granted only in rare and unusual cases, both out of fairness to other taxpayers and because the Service seeks to process all requests as expeditiously as possible and togive appropriate deference to normal business exigencies in all cases not involving expedited handling. A taxpayer who has a compelli ng need to have a request processed ahead of the regular order may request expedited hand ling. This request must explain in detail the need for expedited handling. The request must be made in writing, preferably ina separate letter with, or soon after filing, the request f or the letter ruling or determination letter. If the request is not made in a separate letter, then t he letter in which the letter ruling or determination letter request is made should say, at the top of the first page:“Expedited Handling Is Requested. See page ___ of this letter.” A request for expedited handling will not be forwarded to the appropriate group for action until the check or money order for the user fee in the correct amount is received. Whether the request will be granted is within the Service’s discretion. The Service may grant a request when a factor outside a taxpayer’s control creates a real business need to obtain a letter ruling or determination letter before acertain time in order to avoid serious business consequences. Examples include situations inwhich a court or governmental agency has im- posed a specific deadline for the completion of a transaction, or a transaction must be com- pleted expeditiously to avoid an imminent business emergency (such as the hostile takeover of a corporate taxpayer), provided that the taxpayer can demonstrate that the deadline or busi- ness emergency, and the need for expedited handling, resulted from circumstances that could not reasonably have been anticipated or controlled by the taxpayer. To qualify for expedited handling in such situations, the taxpayer must also demonstrate that the taxpayer submitted the request as promptly as possible after becoming aware of the deadline or emergency. The extent to which the letter ruling or determinationletter complies with all of the applicable re- quirements of this revenue procedure, and fullyand clearly presents the issues, is a factor in determining whether expedited treatment willbe granted. When the Service agrees to process a request out of order, it cannot give assurance that any letter ruling or determination letter will be processed by the time requested. The scheduling of a closing date for a transaction or a meeting of the board of directors or shareholders of a corporation, without regard for the time it may take to obtain a letter ruling or determination letter, will not be considered a sufficient reason to process a request ahead of its regular order. Also, the possible effect of fluctuation in the market price of stocks on a transaction will not be considered a sufficient reason to process a request out of order. Because most requests for letter rulings and determination letters cannot be processed ahead of their regular order, the Service urges all taxpayers to submit their requests well in advance of the contemplated transaction. In addition, in order to facilitate prompt action on letter ruling requests taxpayers are encouraged to ensure that their initial submissions comply with all of the requirements of this revenue procedure (including the requirements of other applicable January 2, 20071382007–1 I.R.B. guidelines set forth in section 10 of this revenue procedure), and to provide any additional information requested by the Service promptly. Facsimile transmission (fax)(4) To receive a letter ruling or submit a request for a letter ruling by facsimile trans- mission (fax). (a) To receive a letter ruling by fax.A letter ruling ordinarily is not sent by fax. However, if the taxpayer requests, a copy of a letter ruling may be faxed to the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative. A letter ruling, however, is not issued until the ruling is mailed.See § 301.6110–2(h). A request to fax a copy of the letter ruling to the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative must be made in writing, either as part of the original letter ruling request or prior to the approval of the letter ruling. The request must contain the fax number of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representativeto whom the letter ruling is to be faxed. In addition, because of the nature of a fax transmission, a statement containing a waiver of any disclosure violations resulting from the fax transmission must accompany the request. Nevertheless, the Service will take certain precautions to protect confidential information. For example, the Service will use a cover sheet that identifies the intended recipient of the fax and the number of pages transmitted. The cover sheet, if possible, will not identify the specific taxpayer by name, and it will be the first page covering the letter ruling being faxed. (b)Tosubmitarequestfor a letter ruling by fax.Original letter ruling requests sent by fax are discouraged because such requests must be treated in the same manner as requests by letter. For example, the faxed letter ruling request will not be forwarded to the applicable office for action until the check for the user fee is received. Requesting a conference(5) To request a conference.A taxpayer who wants to have a conference on the issues involved should indicate this in writing when, or soon after, filing the request.See alsosections 12.01, 12.02, and 13.09(2) of this revenue procedure. Address to send the request.04 Requests for letter rulings(1) Requests for letter rulings should be sent to the following offices (as appropriate): Internal Revenue Service Attention: EP Letter Rulings P.O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 Internal Revenue Service Attention: EO Letter Rulings P.O. Box 27720 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 Hand delivered requests must be marked RULING REQUEST SUBMISSION. The delivery should be made between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.; where a receipt will be given: Courier’s Desk Internal Revenue Service Attention: SE:T:EP:RA or SE:T:EO:RA 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW – PE Washington, DC 20224 Requests for information letters(2) Requests for information letters on either employee plans matters or exempt organiza- tions matters should be sent to Employee Plans or Exempt Organizations (as appropriate): 2007–1 I.R.B.139January 2, 2007 Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, TE/GE Attention: SE:T:EP:RA or SE:T:EO:RA 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW – PE Washington, DC 20224 Requests for determination letters(3) Requests for determination letters should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 192 Covington, KY 41012–0192 For fees required with determination letter requests, see section 6 of Rev. Proc. 2007–8. Pending letter ruling requests.05 (1) Circumstances under which the taxpayer must notify EP or EO Technical.The taxpayer must notify EP or EO Technical if, after the letter ruling request is filed but before a letter ruling is issued, the taxpayer knows that— (a)anexaminationoftheissueortheidentical issue on an earlier year’s return has been started by an EP or EO Examinations office; (b) in employee plans matters, the issue is being considered by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation or the Department of Labor; or (c) legislation that may affect the transaction has been introduced (seesection 9.02(8) of this revenue procedure). (2) Taxpayer must notify EP or EO Technical if return is filed and must attach request to return.If the taxpayer files a return before a letter ruling is received from EP or EO Techni- cal concerning the issue, the taxpayer must notify EP or EO Technical that the return has been filed. The taxpayer must also attach a copy of the letter ruling request to the return to alert the EP or EO Examinations office and thereby avoid premature EP or EO Examinations office action on the issue. When to attach letter ruling to return .06 A taxpayer who receives a letter ruling before filing a return about any transaction that is relevant to the return being filed must attach a copy of the letter ruling to the return when it is filed. How to check on status of request.07 The taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative may obtain information regard- ing the status of a request by calling the person whose name and telephone number are shown on the acknowledgement of receipt of the request. Req uest may be withdrawn or EP or E O Technical may decline to iss ue letter ruling .08 (1) In general.A taxpayer may withdraw a request for a letter ruling or determination letter at any time before the letter ruling or determination letter is signed by the Service. Correspon- dence and exhibits related to a request that is withdrawn or related to a letter ruling request for which the Service declines to issue a letter ruling will not be returned to the taxpayer.See section 9.02(2) of this revenue procedure. In appropriate cases, the Service may publish its conclusions in a revenue ruling or revenue procedure. A request for a letter ruling will not be suspended in EP or EO Technical at the request of a taxpayer. (2) Notification of Director, EP or EO Examinations.If a taxpayer withdraws a request for a letter ruling or if EP or EO Technical declines to issue a letter ruling, EP or EO Technical will notify the Director, EP or EO Examinations and may give its views on the issues in the request to the Director, EP or EO Examinationsto consider in any later examination of the return. January 2, 20071402007–1 I.R.B. (3) Refunds of user fee.The user fee will not be returned for a letter ruling request that is withdrawn. If the Service declines to issue a letter ruling on all of the issues in the request, the user fee will be returned. If the Service, however, issues a letter ruling on some, but not all, of the issues, the user fee will not be returned.Seesection 10 of Rev. Proc.2007–8 for additional information regarding refunds of user fees. Compliance with Treasury Department Circular No. 230 .09 The taxpayer’s authorized representative, whether or not enrolled, must comply with Treasury Department Circular No. 230, which provides the rules for practice before the Ser- vice. In those situations when EP or EO Technical believes that the taxpayer’s representative is not in compliance with Circular No. 230, EP or EO Technical will bring the matter to the attention of the Director, Office of Professional Responsibility. For the requirement regarding compliance with the conference and practice requirements, see section 9.02(12) of this revenue procedure. SECTION 10. WHAT SPECIFIC, ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES APPLY TO CERTAIN REQUESTS? In general.01 Specific revenue procedures supplement the general instructions for requests explained in section 9 of this revenue procedure and apply to requests for letter rulings or determination letters regarding the Code sections and matters listed in this section. Exempt Organizations.02 If the request is for the qualification of an organization for exemption from federal in- come tax under § 501 or 521, see Rev. Proc. 72–5, 1972–1 C.B. 709, regarding religious and apostolic organizations; Rev. Proc. 80–27, 1980–1 C.B. 677, concerning group exemptions; and Rev. Proc. 90–27, 1990–1 C.B. 514 (as modified by Rev. Proc. 2007–8), regarding appli- cations for recognition of exemption. Employee Plans.03 (1) For requests to obtain approval for a retroactive amendment described in § 412(c)(8) of the Code and section 302(c)(8) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) that reduces accrued benefits, see Rev. Proc. 94–42, 1994–1 C.B. 717. (2) For requests for a waiver of the minimum funding standard, see Rev. Proc. 2004–15. (3) For requests for a waiver of the 100 percent tax imposed under § 4971(b) of the Code on a pension plan that fails to meet the minimum funding standards of § 412, see Rev. Proc. 81–44, 1981–2 C.B. 618. (4) For requests for a determination that a plan amendment is reasonable and provides for onlyde minimisincreases in plan liabilities in accordance with §§ 401(a)(33) and 412(f)(2)(A), see Rev. Proc. 79–62, 1979–2 C.B. 576. (5) For requests to obtain approval for an extension of an amortization period of any un- funded liability in accordancewith § 412(e), see Rev. Proc. 2004–44, 2004–2 C.B. 134. (6) For requests by administrators or sponsors of a defined benefit plan to obtain approval for a change in funding method, see Rev. Proc. 2000–41, 2000–2 C.B. 371. (7) For requests for the return to the employer of certain nondeductible contributions, see Rev. Proc. 90–49, 1990–2 C.B. 620 (as modified by Rev. Proc. 2007–8). (8) For requests for determination letters for plans under §§ 401, 403(a), 409, and 4975(e)(7), and for the exempt status of any related trust under § 501, see Rev. Proc. 2007–6, Rev. Proc. 93–10 and Rev. Proc. 93–12. 2007–1 I.R.B.141January 2, 2007 SECTION 11. HOW DOES EP OR EO TECHNICAL HANDLE LETTER RULING REQUESTS? In general.01 The Service will issue letter rulings on the matters and under the circumstances explained in sections 4 and 6 of this revenue procedure and in the manner explained in this section and section 13 of this revenue procedure. Is not bound by informal opinion expressed .02 The Service will not be bound by the informal opinion expressed by the group rep- resentative or any other authorized Service representative under this procedure, and such an opinion cannot be relied upon as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). Tells taxpayer if request lacks essential information during initial contact .03 If a request for a letter ruling or determination letter does not comply with all the provi- sions of this revenue procedure, the request will be acknowledged and the Service representa- tive will tell the taxpayer during the initial contact which requirements have not been met. Information must be submitted within 30 calendar days If the request lacks essential information, which may include additional information needed to satisfy the procedural requirements of this revenue procedure, as well as substantive changes to transactions or documents needed from the taxpayer, the Service representative will tell the taxpayer during the initial contact that the request will be closed if the Service does not receive the information within 30 calendar days unless an extension of time is granted.See section 11.04 of this revenue procedure for information on extension of time and instructions on submissions of additional information. Letter ruling request mistakenly sent to EP or EO Determinations Processing A request for a letter ruling sent to EP/EO Determinations Processing that does not comply with the provisions of this revenue procedure will be returned by EP/EO Determinations Pro- cessing so that the taxpayer can make corrections before sending it to EP or EO Technical. Requires prompt submission of additional information requested after initial contact .04 Material facts furnished to the Service bytelephone or fax, or orally at a conference, must be promptly confirmed by letter to the Service. This confirmation and any additional information requested by the Service that is not part of the information requested during the initial contact must be furnished within 21 calendar days to be considered part of the request. Additional information submitted to the Service must be accompanied by the following declaration:“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this informa- tion, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information contains all the relevant facts relating to the request for the information, and such facts are true, correct, and complete.”This declaration must be signed in accor- dance with the requirements in section 9.02(13)(b) of this revenue procedure. A taxpayer who submits additional factual information on several occasions may provide one declaration sub- sequent to all submissions that refers to all submissions. Encourage use of fax(1) To facilitate prompt action on letter ruling requests, taxpayers are encouraged to submit additional information by fax as soon as the information is available. The Service represen- tative who requests additional information can provide a telephone number to which the in- formation can be faxed. A copy of this information and a signed perjury statement, however, must be mailed or delivered to the Service. Address to send additional information (2) Additional information should be sent to the same address as the original letter ruling request.Seesection 9.04. However, the additional information should include the name, office symbols, and room number of the Service representative who requested the information and the taxpayer’s name and the case control number (which the Service representative can provide). Number of copies of add itional information to be subm itted (3) Generally, a taxpa yer needs only to submit one copy of the additional information. How- ever, in appropriate c ases, the Service may request additional copies of the information. 30-day or 21-day period may be extended if justified and approved (4) An extension of the 30-day period under section 11.03 or the 21-day period under section 11.04, will be granted only if justified in writing by the taxpayer and approved by the manager of the group to which the case is assigned. A request for extension should be submitted before January 2, 20071422007–1 I.R.B. the end of the 30-day or 21-day period. If unusual circumstances close to the end of the 30-day or 21-day period make a written request impractical, the taxpayer should notify the Service within the 30-day or 21-day period that there is a problem and that the written request for extension will be coming soon. The taxpayer will be told promptly, and later in writing, of the approval or denial of the requested extension. Ifthe extension request is denied, there is no right of appeal. If taxpayer does not submit additional information (5) If the taxpayer does not follow the instructions for submitting add itional information or requesting an extension within the time provided, a letter ruling will be issued on the basis of the information on hand, or, if appropriate, no letter ruling will be issued. When the Service decides not to issue a letter ruling because essential information i s lacking, the case will be closed and the taxpayer notified in writing. If the Service receives the information after the letter ruling request is closed, the request may be reopened and tre ated as a new request. How- ever, the taxpayer must pay another user fee before the case can be re opened. Near the completion of the ruling process, advises taxpayer of conclusions and, if the Service will rule adversely, offers the taxpayer the opportunity to withdraw the letter ruling request .05 Generally, after the conference of right is held before the letter ruling is issued, the Service representative will inform the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative of the Service’s final conclusions. If the Service is going to rule adversely, the taxpayer will be offered the opportunity to withdraw the letter ruling request. If the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative does not promptly notify the Service representative of a decision to withdraw the ruling request, the adverse letter will be issued. The user fee will not be refunded for a letter ruling request that is withdrawn.Seesection 10 of Rev. Proc. 2007–8. Mayrequestdraftofproposed letter ruling near the completion of the ruling process .06 To accelerate issuance of letter rulings, inappropriate cases nearthe completion of the ruling process, the Service representative may request that the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s rep- resentative submit a proposed draft of the letter ruling on the basis of discussions of the issues. The taxpayer, however, is not required to prepare a draft letter ruling in order to receive a letter ruling. The format of the submission should be discussed with the Service representative who re- quests the draft letter ruling. The representative usually can provide a sample format of a letter ruling and will discuss the facts, analysis, and letter ruling language to be included. Taxpayer may also submit draft on a word processing disk In addition to a typed draft, taxpayers are encouraged to submit this draft on a disk in Rich Text Format. The typed draft will become part of the permanent files of the Service, and the word processing disk will not be returned. If theService representative requesting the draft letter ruling cannot answer specific questionsabout the format of the word processing disk, the questions can be directed to Frances Sloan at (202) 283–9626 (Employee Plans), or Ted Lieber at (202) 283–8999 (Exempt Organizations) (not toll-free calls). The proposed letter ru ling (both typed draft and word processing disk) should be sent to thesameaddressasany additional information and contain in the transmittal the information that should be includ ed with any additional information (for example, a penalties of perjury statement is require d).Seesection 11.04 of this revenue procedure. SECTION 12. HOW ARE CONFERENCES SCHEDULED? Schedules a conference if requested by taxpayer .01 A taxpayer may request a conference regarding a letter ruling request. Normally, a conference is scheduled only when the Service considers it to be helpful in deciding the case or when an adverse decision is indicated. If conferences are being arranged for more than one request for a letter ruling involving the same taxpayer, they will be scheduled so as to cause the least inconvenience to the taxpayer. As statedin section 9.03(5) of this revenue procedure, a taxpayer who wants to have a conference on the issue or issues involved should indicate this in writing when, or soon after, filing the request. If a conference has been requested, the taxpayer will be notified by telephone, if possible, of the time and place of the conference, which must then be held within 21 calendar days after this contact. Instructions for requesting an extension of the 21-day period and notifying the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative of the Service’s approval or denial of the request for 2007–1 I.R.B.143January 2, 2007 extension are the same as those explained in section 11.04 of this revenue procedure regarding providing additional information. Permits taxpayer one conference of right .02 A taxpayer is entitled, as a matter of right, to only one conference, except as explained under section 12.05 of this revenue procedure. This conference normally will be held at the group level and will be attended by a person who, atthe time of the conference, has the authority to sign the ruling letter in his or her own name or for the group manager. When more than one group has taken an adversepositiononanissueinaletterrulingre- quest, or when the position ultimately adopted byone group will affect that adopted by another, a representative from each group with the authority to sign in his or her own name or for the group manager will attend the conference. Ifmore than one subject is to be discussed at the conference, the discussion will constitute a conference on each subject. To have a thorough and informed discussionof the issues, the conference usually will be held after the group has had an opportunity to study the case. However, at the request of the taxpayer, the conference of right may be held earlier. No taxpayer has a right to appeal the action of a group to any other official of the Service. But see section 12.05 of this revenue procedure for situations in which the Service may offer additional conferences. Disallows verbatim recording of conferences .03 Because conference procedures are informal, no tape, stenographic, or other verbatim recording of a conference may be made by any party. Makes tentative recommendations on substantive issues .04 The senior Service representative present at the conference ensures that the taxpayer has the opportunity to present views on all the issuesin question. A Service representative explains the Service’s tentative decision on the substantive issues and the reasons for that decision. If the taxpayer asks the Service to limit the retroactive effect of any letter ruling or limit the revocation or modification of a prior letter ruling, a Service representative will discuss the recommendation concerning this issue and the reasons for the recommendation. The Service representatives will not make a commitment regarding the conclusionthat the Service will finally adopt. May offer additional conferences.05 The Service will offer the taxpayer an additional conference if, after the conference of right, an adverse holding is proposed, but on a new issue, or on the same issue but on different grounds from those discussed at the first conference. There is no right to another conference when a proposed holding is reversed at a higher level with a result less favorable to the taxpayer, if the grounds or arguments on which the reversal is based were discussed at the conference of right. The limit on the number of conferences to which a taxpayer is entitled does not prevent the Service from offering additional conferences, including conferences with an official higher than the group level, if the Service decides they are needed. Such conferences are not offered as a matter of course simply because the grouphas reached an adverse decision. In general, conferences with higher level officials are offered only if the Service determines that the case presents significant issues of tax policy or tax administration and that the consideration of these issues would be enhanced by additional conferences with the taxpayer. Requires written confirmation of information presented at conference .06 The taxpayer should furnish to the Service any additional data, reasoning, precedents, etc., that were proposed by the taxpayer and discussed at the conference but not previously or adequately presented in writing. The taxpayer must furnish the additional information within 21 calendar days from the date of the conference.Seesection 11.04 of this revenue procedure for instructions on submission of additional information. If the additional information is not received within that time, a ruling will be issued on the basis of the information on hand or, if appropriate, no ruling will be issued. Procedures for requesting an extension of the 21-day period and notifying the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative of the Service’s approval or denial of the requested extension January 2, 20071442007–1 I.R.B. are the same as those stated in section 11.04 of this revenue procedure regarding submitting additional information. May schedule a pre-submission conference .07 Sometimes it will be advantageous to both the Service and the taxpayer to hold a confer- ence before the taxpayer submits the letter ruling request to discuss substantive or procedural issues relating to a proposed transaction. These conferences are held only if the identity of the taxpayer is provided to the Service, only if the taxpayer actually intends to make a request, only if the request involves a matter on which a letter ruling is ordinarily issued, and only at the discretion of the Service and as time permits. For example, a pre-submission conference will not be held on an income tax issue if, at the time the pre-submission conference is re- quested, the identical issue is involved in the taxpayer’s return for an earlier period and that issue is being examined.Seesection 6 of this revenue procedure. Generally, the taxpayer will be asked to provide before the pre-submission conference a statement of whether the issue is an issue on which a letter ruling is ordinarily issued and a draft of the letter ruling request or other detailed written statement of the proposed transaction, issue, and legal analysis. If the taxpayer’s representative will attend the pre-submission conference, a power of attorney form is required. A Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative,mustbeused to provide the representative’s authorization. Any discussion of substantive issues at a pre-submission conference is advisory only, is not binding on the Service, and cannot be relied upon as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief un- der the provisions of § 7805(b). A letter ruling request submitted following a pre-submission conference will not necessarilybe assigned to the group that held the pre-submission confer- ence. Under limited circumstances, may schedule a conference to be held by telephone .08 A taxpayer may request that their conference of right be held by telephon e. This request may occur, for example, when a taxpayer wants a conference of right but beli eves that the issue involved does not warrant incurring the expense of traveling to Washingto n, DC. If a taxpayer makes such a request, the group manager will decide if it is appropriate in t he particular case to hold the conference of right by telephone. If the request is approved b y the group manager, the taxpayer will be advised when to call the Service representatives (n ot a toll-free call). SECTION 13. WHAT EFFECT WILL A LETTER RULING HAVE? May be relied on subject to limitations .01 A taxpayer ordinarily may rely on a letterruling received from the Service subject to the conditions and limitations described in this section. Will not apply to another taxpayer.02 A taxpayer may not rely on a letterruling issued to another taxpayer.See§ 6110(k)(3). Will be used by the Director, EP or EO Examinations in examining the taxpayer’s return .03 When determining a taxpayer’s liability, the Director, EP or EO Examinations must ascertain whether— (1) the conclusions stated in the letter ruling are properly reflected in th ereturn; (2) the representations upon which the letter ruling was based reflected an accurate state- ment of the material facts; (3) the transaction was carried out substantially as proposed; and (4) there has been any change in the law that applies to the period during which the trans- action or continuing series of transactions were consummated. If, when determining the liability, the Director, EP Examinations finds that a letter ruling should be revoked or modified, unless a waiver is obtained from EP Technical, the findings and recommendations of the Director, EP Examinations will be forwarded to EP Technical for consideration before furtheraction is taken by the Director, EP Examinations. Such a referral to EP Technical will be treated as a request for technical advice and the procedures of Rev. Proc. 2007–5 will be followed. Otherwise, the letter ruling is to be applied by the Director, EP 2007–1 I.R.B.145January 2, 2007 Examinations in determining the taxpayer’s liability. Appropriate coordination with EP Tech- nical will be undertaken if any field official having jurisdiction over a return or other matter proposes to reach a conclusion contrary to a letter ruling previously issued to the taxpayer. In certain exempt organizations cases, section 4.04 of Rev. Proc. 2007–5 provides that a request for a TAM is mandatory. May be revoked or modified if found to be in error .04 Unless it was part of a closing agreement as described in section 3.03 of this revenue procedure, a letter ruling found to be in error or not in accord with the current views of the Service may be revoked or modified. If a letter ruling is revoked or modified, the revocation or modification applies to all years open under the statute of limitations unless the Service uses its discretionary authority under § 7805(b) to limit the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification. A letter ruling may be revoked or modified due to— (1) a notice to the taxpayer to whom the letter ruling was issued; (2) the enactment of legislation or ratification of a tax treaty; (3) a decision of the United States Supreme Court; (4) the issuance of temporary or final regulations; or (5) the issuance of a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or other statement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Consistent with these provisions, if a letter ruling relates to a continuing action or a series of actions, it ordinarily will be applied untilany one of the events described above occurs or until it is specifically withdrawn. Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking will not affect the application of any letter ruling issued under this revenue procedure. Not generally revoked or modified retroactively .05 Except in rare or unusual circumstances, therevocation or modification of a letter ruling will not be applied retroactively to the taxpayer for whom the letter ruling was issued or to a taxpayer whose tax liability was directly involved in the letter ruling provided that— (1) there has been no misstatement or omission of material facts; (2) the facts at the time of the transaction are notmaterially different from the facts on which the letter ruling was based; (3) there has been no change in the applicable law; (4) the letter ruling was originally issued for a proposed transaction; and (5) the tax payer directly involved in the letter ruling acted in good faith in relying on the let- ter rulin g, and revoking or modifying the letter ruling retroactively would be to the taxpayer’s detrimen t. For example, the tax liability of each employee covered by a ruling relating to a qualifie d plan of an employer is directly involved in such ruling. However, the tax liability of amembero f an industry is not directly involved in a letter ruling issued to another member and, ther efore, the holding in a revocation or modification of a letter ruling to one member of an ind ustry may be retroactively applied to other members of the industry. By the same reasoni ng, a tax practitioner may not extend to one client the non-retroactive application of a revocat ion or modification of a letter ruling previously issued to another client. If a letter ruling is revoked or modified by letter with retroactive effect, the letter will, except in fraud cases, state the grounds on which the letter ruling is being revoked or modified and explain the reasons why it is being revoked or modified retroactively. January 2, 20071462007–1 I.R.B. Retroactive effect of revocation or modification applied only to a particular transaction .06 A letter ruling issued on a particular transaction represents a holding of the Service on that transaction only. It will not apply to a similar transaction in the same year or any other year. And, except in unusual circumstances, the applicationofthatletterrulingtothetransactionwill not be affected by the later issuance of regulations(either temporary or final), if conditions (1) through (5) in section 13.05 of this revenue procedure are met. However, if a letter ruling on a transaction is later found to be in error or no longer in accord with the position of the Service, it will not protect a similar transaction of the taxpayer in the same year or later year. Retroactive effect of revocation or modification applied to a continuing action or series of actions .07 If a letter ruling is issued covering a continuing action or series of actions and the letter ruling is later found to be in error or no longer in accord with the position of the Service, the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and GovernmentEntities Division, ordinarily will limit the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification to a date that is not earlier than that on which the letter ruling is revoked or modified. May be retroactively revoked or modified when transaction is completed without reliance on the letter ruling .08 A taxpayer is not protected against retroactive revocation or modificatio n of a letter ruling involving a completed transaction other than those described in sectio n 13.07 of this revenue procedure, because the taxpayer did not enter into the transaction re lying on a letter ruling. Taxpayer may request that retroactivity be limited .09 Under § 7805(b), the Service may prescribe any extent to which a revocation or modi- fication of a letter ruling or determination letter will be applied without retroactive effect. A taxpayer to whom a letter ruling or determination letter has been issued may request that the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, limit the retroactive effect of any revocation or modification of the letter ruling or determination letter. Format of request(1) Request for relief under § 7805(b) must be made in required format. A request to limit the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification of a letter ruling must be in the general form of, and meet the general requirements for, a letter ruling request. These requirements are given in section 9 of thisrevenue procedure. Specifically, the request must also— (a) state that it is being made under § 7805(b); (b) state the relief sought; (c) explain the reasons and arguments in support of the relief requested (including a discus- sion of the five items listed in section 13.05 ofthis revenue procedure and any other factors as they relate to the taxpayer’s particular situation); and (d) include any documents bearing on the request. A request that the Service limit the retroactive effect of a revocation or modification of a letter ruling may be made in the form of a separate request for a letter ruling when,for example, a revenue ruling has the effect of revoking or modifying a letter ruling previously issued to the taxpayer, or when the Service notifies the taxpayer of a change in position that will have the effect of revoking or modify- ing the letter ruling. However, when notice is given by the Director, EP or EO Examinations during an examination of the taxpayer’s return or by the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, or the Appeals Area Director, LMSB, during consideration of the taxpayer’s return before an appeals office, a request to limit retroactive effect must be made in the form of a request for technical advice as explained in section 19 of Rev. Proc. 2007–5. When germane to a pending letter ruling request, a request to limit the retroactive effect of a revocation or modification of a letter ruling may be made as part of the request for the letter ruling, either initially or at any time before the letter ruling is issued. When a letter ruling that concerns a continuing transaction is revoked or modified by, for example, a subsequent revenue ruling, a request to limit retroactive effect must be made before the examination of the return that contains the transaction that is the subject of the letter ruling request. 2007–1 I.R.B.147January 2, 2007 Consideration of relief under § 7805(b) will be included as one of the taxpayer’s steps in exhausting administrative remedies only if the taxpayer has requested such relief in the manner described in this revenue procedure. If the taxpayer does not complete the applicable steps, the taxpayer will not have exhausted the taxpayer’s administrative remedies as required by § 7428(b)(2) and § 7476(b)(3) and will, thus, be precluded from seeking a declaratory judgment under § 7428 or § 7476. Where the taxpayer has requested § 7805(b) relief, the taxpayer’s administrative remedies will not be consideredexhausted until the Service has had a reasonable time to act upon the request. Request for conference(2) Taxpayer may request a conference on application of § 7805(b). A taxpayer who requests the application of § 7805(b) in a separate letter ruling request has the right to a conference in EP or EO Technical as explained in sections 12.01, 12.02, 12.03, 12.04 and 12.05 of this revenue procedure. If the request is made initially as part of a pending letter ruling request or is made before the conference of right is held on the substantive issues, the § 7805(b) issue will be discussed at the taxpayer’s one conference of right as explained in section 12.02 of this revenue procedure. If the request for the application of § 7805(b) relief is made as part of a pending letter ruling request after a conference has been held on the substantive issue and the Service determines that there is justification for having delayed the request, the taxpayer is entitled to one conference of right concerning the application of § 7805(b), with the conference limited to discussion of this issue only. SECTION 14. WHAT EFFECT WILL A DETERMINATION LETTER HAVE? Has same effect as a letter ruling.01AdeterminationletterissuedbyEPorEODeterminations has the same effect as a letter ruling issued to a taxpayer under section 13 of this revenue procedure. If the Director, EP or EO Examinations proposes to reach a conclusion contrary to that expressed in a determination letter, he or she need not refer the matter to EP or EO Technical. However, the Director, EP or EO Examinations must refer the matter to EP or EO Technical if the Director, EP or EO Examinations desires to have the revocation or modification of the determination letter limited under § 7805(b). Taxpayer may request that retroactive effect of revocation or modification be limited .02 The Director, EP or EO Examinations doesnot have authority under § 7805(b) to limit the revocation or modification of the determination letter. Therefore, if the Director, EP or EO Examinations proposes to revoke or modify a determination letter, the taxpayer may request limitation of the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification by asking EP or EO De- terminations to seek technical advice from EP or EO Technical.Seesection 19 of Rev. Proc. 2007–5. Format of request(1) Request for relief under § 7805(b) must be made in required format. A taxpayer’s request to limit the retroactive effect of the revocation or modification of the determination letter must be in the form of, and meet the general requirements for, a technical advice request.Seesection 18.06 of Rev. Proc. 2007–5. The request must also— (a) state that it is being made under § 7805(b); (b) state the relief sought; (c) explain the reasons and arguments in support of the relief sought (including a discussion of the five items listed in section 13.05 of this revenue procedure and any other factors as they relate to the taxpayer’s particular situation); and (d) include any documents bearing on the request. Request for conference(2) Taxpayer may request a conference on application of § 7805(b). January 2, 20071482007–1 I.R.B. When technical advice is requested regardingthe application of § 7805(b), the taxpayer has the right to a conference in EP or EO Technical to the same extent as does any taxpayer who is the subject of a technical advice request.Seesection 11 of Rev. Proc. 2007–5. Exhaustion of administrative remedies (3) Taxpayer steps in exhausting administrative remedies. Consideration of relief under § 7805(b) will be included as one of the taxpayer’s steps in exhausting administrative remedies only if the taxpayer has requested such relief in the manner described in this revenue procedure. If the taxpayer does not complete the applicable steps, the taxpayer will not have exhausted the taxpayer’s administrative remedies as required by § 7428(b)(2) and § 7476(b)(3) and will, thus, be precluded from seeking a declaratory judgment under § 7428 or § 7476. Where the taxpayer has requested § 7805(b) relief, the taxpayer’s administrative remedies will not be consideredexhausted until the Service has had a reasonable time to act upon the request. SECTION 15. UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES ARE MATTERS REFERRED BETWEEN DETERMINATIONS AND TECHNICAL? Requests for determination letters.01 Requests for determination letters received by EP or EO Determinations that, under the provisions of this revenue procedure, may not be issued by EP or EO Determinations, will be forwarded to EP or EO Technical for reply. EP or EO Determinations will notify the taxpayer that the matter has been referred. EP or EO Determinations will also refer to EP or EO Technical any request for a determi- nation letter that in its judgment should have the attention of EP or EO Technical. No-rule areas.02 If the request involves an issue on which the Service will not issue a letter ruling or de- termination letter, the request will not be forwarded to EP or EO Technical. EP or EO Determi- nations will notify the taxpayer that the Service will not issue a letter ruling or a determination letter on the issue. See section 8 of this revenue procedure for a description of no-rule areas. Requests for letter rulings.03 Requests for letter rulings received by EP or EO Technical that, under section 6 of this revenue procedure, may not be acted upon by EP or EO Technical will be forwarded to the Director, EP or EO Examinations. The taxpayer will be notified of this action. If the request is on an issue or in an area of the type discussed in section 8 of this revenue procedure, and the Service decides not to issue a letter rulingor an information letter, EP or EO Technical will notify the taxpayer and will then forward the request to the Director, EP or EO Examinations for association with the related return. SECTION 16. WHAT ARE THE GENERAL PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO INFORMATION LETTERS ISSUED BY THE HEADQUARTERS OFFICE? Will be made available to the public .01 Information letters that are issued by the headquarters office to members of the public will be made available to the public. These documents provide general statements of well- defined law without applying them to a specific set of facts. See section 3.06 of this revenue procedure. Information letters that are issuedby the field, however, will not be made available to the public. The following document s also will not be available for public inspection as part of this process: (1) letters that merely transmit Service publications or other publicly available material, without significant legal discussion; 2007–1 I.R.B.149January 2, 2007 (2) responses to taxpayer or third party contacts that are inquiries with respect to a pending request for a letter ruling, technical advice memorandum, or Chief Counsel Advice (whose public inspection is subject to § 6110); and (3) responses to taxpayer or third party communications with respect to any investigation, audit, litigation, or other enforcement action. Deletions made under the Freedom of Information Act .02 Before any information letter is made available to the public, the headquarters office will delete any name, address, and other identifying information as appropriate under the Free- dom of Information Act (“FOIA”) (for example, FOIA personal privacy exemption of 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6) and tax details exempt pursuant to§ 6103, as incorporated into FOIA by 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3). Because information letters do not constitute written determinations (including Chief Counsel Advice) as defined in § 6110, these documents are not subject to public inspec- tion under § 6110. Effect of information letters.03 Information letters are advisory only and have no binding effect on the Service. See section 3.06 of this revenue procedure. If the headquarters office issues an information letter in response to a request for a letter ruling that does not meet the requirements of this revenue procedure, the information letter is not a substitute for a letter ruling. SECTION 17. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE ON OTHER DOCUMENTS? Rev. Proc. 2006–4 is superseded. SECTION 18. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective January 2, 2007. SECTION 19. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The collections of information contained in this revenue procedure have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduc- tion Act (44 U.S.C. § 3507) under control number 1545–1520. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collec- tion of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. The collections of information in this revenue procedure are in sections 7.07, 9.02, 9.03, 9.04, 9.05, 9.06, 10.02, 10.03, 11.03, 11.04(1)–(5), 11.06, 12.01, 12.06, 12.07, 13.09(1), 14.02(1), and in Appendices B, C, D and E. This information is required to evaluate and process the request for a letter ruling or determination letter. In addition, this information will be used to help the Service delete certain information from the text of the letter ruling or determination letter before it is made available for public inspection, as required by § 6110. The collections of information are required to obtain a letter ruling or determination letter. The likely respondents are businesses or other for-profit institutions. The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is 12,650 hours. The estimated annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper varies from 15 minutes to 16 hours, depending on individual circumstances and the type of request involved, with an esti- mated average burden of 6.01 hours. The estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeep- ers is 2,103. The estimated annual frequency of responses is one request per applicant, except that a taxpayer requesting a letter ruling may also request a presubmission conference. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by § 6103. January 2, 20071502007–1 I.R.B. DRAFTING INFORMATIONThe principal author of this revenue procedure is Ingrid Grinde of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding how this revenue procedure applies to employee plans matters, contact the Employee Plans Customer Assistance Service at 877–829–5500 (a toll-free call). Ms. Grinde’s telephone number is (202) 283–9888 (not a toll-free call). For exempt organization matters, please contact Mr. Ted Lieber at (202) 283–8999 or Mr. Wayne Hardesty (202) 283–8976 (not toll-free calls). 2007–1 I.R.B.151January 2, 2007 INDEX —additionalinformation...................................................................sec.9.02(9),9.03,11.03,11.04 —closingagreement ............................................................sec.3.03,6.06(4),9.02(4),9.02(15),13.04 —conference............................................................sec.9.02(9),9.03(5),12.01-.08,13.09(2),14.02(2) —disclose.................................................................................................sec.9.02(9) —exemptorganization.........................................................................................sec.6.01 —expeditioushandling.....................................................................................sec.9.03(3) —extension...........................................................................sec.6.02,6.04,11.04,12.01,12.06 —fax...............................................................................................sec.9.03(4),11.04 —fee........................................................................................... sec.9.02(14),11.04(5) —handdelivered............................................................................................... 9.04(1) —informationletter................................................................................sec.3.07,8.01,15.03 —norule ................................................................................................ sec.8,15.02 —perjurystatement...........................................................................sec.9.02(13),11.04,11.06 —powerofattorney............................................................................... sec.9.02(12),9.03(2) —reliance.................................................................................sec.3.09,11.02,12.07,13,14 —representatives ........................................................................sec.3.09,9.02(10)–(11),9.03(2) —retroactive.............................................................................sec.11.02,12.04,12.07,13,14 —revenueruling...............................................................................sec.3.07,13.04,13.09(1) —section6110.......................................................................................sec.9.02(9),13.02 —status......................................................................................................sec.9.07 —technicaladvice ..........................................................................sec.7.08,13.03,13.09(1),14 —telephone.............................................................................sec.9.02(1),11.04,12.01,12.08 —wheretosend ..............................................................................................sec.9.04 —withdraw ..................................................................................................sec.9.08 January 2, 20071522007–1 I.R.B. APPENDIX A SAMPLE FORMAT FOR A LETTER RULING REQUEST (Insertthedateofrequest) Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, TE/GE Attention: SE:T:EP:RA P.O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 Dear Sir or Madam: (Insert the name of the taxpayer) (the “Taxpayer”) requests a ruling on the proper treatment of (insert the subject matter of the letter ruling request)under§(insert the number)oftheInternalRevenueCode. [If the taxpayer is requesting expedited handling, the letter ruling request must contain a statement to that effect. This statement must explain the need for expeditious handling. See section 9.03(3).] A. STATEMENT OF FACTS 1. Taxpayer Information [Provide the statements required by sections 9.02(1)(a), (b), and (c) of Rev. Proc. 2007–4, 2007–1 I.R.B. 118. (Hereafter, all references are to Rev. Proc. 2007–4 unless otherwise noted.)] For example, a taxpayer that maintains a qualified employee retirement plan and files an annual Form 5500 series of returns may include the following statement to satisfy sections 9.02(1)(a), (b), and (c): The Taxpayer is a construction company with principal offices located at 100 Whatever Drive, Wherever, Maryland 12345, and its telephone number is (123) 456–7890. The Taxpayer’s federal employer identification number is 00–1234567. The Taxpayer uses the Form 5500 series of returns on a calendar year basis to report its qualified employee retirement plan and trust. 2. Detailed Description of the Transaction. [The ruling request must contain acomplete statement of the facts relating to the transaction that is the subject of the letter ruling request. This statement must include a detailed descriptionof the transaction, including material facts in any accompanying documents, and the business reasons for the transaction.See sections 9.02(1)(b), 9.02(1)(c), and 9.02(2).] B. RULING REQUESTED [The ruling request should contain a concise statement of the ruling requested by the taxpayer.] C. STATEMENT OF LAW [The ruling request must contain a statement of the law in support of the taxpayer’s views or conclusion, including any authorities believed to be contrary to the position advanced in the ruling request. This statement must also identify any pendinglegislation that may affect the proposed transaction. See sections 9.02(6), 9.02(7), and 9.02(8).] 2007–1 I.R.B.153January 2, 2007 D. ANALYSIS [The ruling request must contain a discussion of the facts and ananalysis of the law. See sections 9.02(3), 9.02(6), 9.02(7), and 9.02(8).] E. CONCLUSION [The ruling request should contain a statement of thetaxpayer’s conclusion on the ruling requested.] F. PROCEDURAL MATTERS 1. Rev. Proc. 2007–4 statements a. [The statement required by section 9.02(4).] b. [The statement required by section 9.02(5).] c. [The statement required by section 9.02(6) regarding whether the law in connection with the letter ruling request is uncertain and whether the issue is adequately addressed by relevant authorities.] d. [The statement required by section 9.02(7) when the taxpayer determines that there are no contrary authorities.] e. [If the taxpayer wants to have a conference on the issues involved in the letter ruling request, the ruling request should contain a statement to that effect. See section 9.03(5).] f.[If the taxpayer is requesting the letter ruling to be issued byfax, the ruling request shouldcontain a statement to that effect. This statement must also contain a waiver of any disclosure violations resulting from the fax transmission. See section 9.03(4).] g. [If the taxpayer is requesting separate letter rulings on multiple issues, the letter ruling request should contain a statement to that effect. See section 9.03(1).] 2. Administrative a. A Power of Attorney is enclosed. [See sections 9.02(12) and 9.03(2).] b. The deletions statement and checklist required by Rev. Proc. 2007–4 are enclosed. [See sections 9.02(9) and 9.02(17).] c. The required user fee is enclosed. [See section 9.02(14).] Very truly yours, (Insert the name of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative) By: SignatureDate Typed or printed name of person signing request DECLARATION: [See section 9.02(13).] Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined thisrequest, including accompanyingdocuments, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request contains all the relevant facts relating to the request and such facts are true, correct, and complete. (Insert the name of the taxpayer) By: SignatureTitleDate Typed or printed name of person signing declaration January 2, 20071542007–1 I.R.B. APPENDIX B CHECKLIST IS YOUR RULING REQUEST COMPLETE? INSTRUCTIONS The Service will be able to respond more quickly to your letter ruling request if it is carefully prepared and complete. To ensure that your request is in order, use this checklist. Complete the four items of information requested before the checklist. Answer each question by circling “Yes,” “No,” or “N/A.” When a question contains a place for a page number, insert the page number (or numbers) of the request that gives the information called for by a yes answer to a question.Sign and date the checklist (as taxpayer or authorizedrepresentative) and place it on top of your request. If you are an authorized representative submitting a request for a taxpayer, you must include a completed checklist with the request, or the request will either be returned to you or substantive consideration of it will be deferred until a completed checklist is submitted.If you are a taxpayer preparing your own request without professional assistance,an incomplete checklist will not be cause for returning your request or deferring substantive consideration of the request.However, you should still complete as much of the checklist as possible and submit it with your request. TAXPAYER’S NAME TAXPAYER’S I.D. No. ATTORNEY/P.O.A. PRIMARY CODE SECTION CIRCLE ONEITEM Yes No N/A1. Does your request involve an issue under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division? See section 5 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4, 2007–1 I.R.B. 118, for issues under the jurisdiction of other offices. (Hereafter, all references are to Rev. Proc. 2007–4 unless otherwise noted.) Yes No N/A2. If your request involves a matter on which letter rulings are not ordinarily issued, have you given compelling reasons to justify the issuance of a private letter ruling? Before preparing your request, you may want to call the office responsiblefor substantive interpretations of the principal Internal Revenue Code section on which you are seeking a letter ruling to discuss the likelihood of an exception. The appropriate office to call for this information may be obtained by calling (202) 283–9660 (Employee Plans matters), or (202) 283–2300 (Exempt Organizations matters) (not toll-free calls). Yes No N/A Page 3. If the request involves an employee plans qualification matter under § 401(a), § 409, or § 4975(e)(7), have you demonstrated that the request satisfies the three criteria in section 6.03 for a headquarters office ruling? Yes No N/A Page 4. If the request deals with a completed transaction, have you filed the return for the year in which the transaction was completed? See sections 6.01 and 6.02. Yes No5. Are you requesting a letter ruling on a hypothetical situation or question? See section 8.03. Yes No6. Are you requesting a letter ruling on alternative plans of a proposed transaction? See section 8.03. Yes No7. Are you requesting the letter ruling for only part of an integrated transaction? See section 8.04. Yes No8. Have you submitted another letter ruling request for the transaction covered by this request? Yes No9. Are you requesting the letter ruling for a business, trade, industrial association, or similar group concerning the application of tax law to its members? See section 6.07. 2007–1 I.R.B.155January 2, 2007 Yes No Pages 10. Have you included a complete statement of all the facts relevant to the transaction? See section 9.02(1). Yes No N/A11. Have you submitted with the request true copies of all wills, deeds, plan documents, and other documents relevant to the transaction, and labeled and attached them in alphabetical sequence? See section 9.02(2). Yes No Page 12. Have you included, rather than merely by reference, all material facts from the documents in the request? Are they accompanied by an analysis of their bearing on the issues that specifies the document provisions that apply? See section 9.02(3). Yes No Page 13. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the same issue in the letter ruling request is in an earlier return of the taxpayer or in a return for any year of a related taxpayer? See section 9.02(4). Yes No Page 14. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the Service previously ruled on the same or similar issue for the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, or a predecessor? See section 9.02(5). Yes No Page 15. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the taxpayer, a related taxpayer, a predecessor, or any representatives previously submitted the same or similar issue but withdrew it before the letter ruling was issued? See section 9.02(5). Yes No Page 16. Have you included the required statement regarding whether the law in connection with the request is uncertain and whether the issue is adequately addressed by relevant authorities? See section 9.02(6). Yes No Pages 17. Have you included the required statement of relevant authorities in support of your views? See section 9.02(6). Yes No N/A Pages 18. Does your request discuss the implications ofany legislation, tax treaties, court decisions, regulations, notices, revenue rulings, or revenueprocedures you determined to be contrary to the position advanced? See section 9.02(7), which states that taxpayers are encouraged to inform the Service of such authorities. Yes No N/A Page 19. If you determined that there are no contrary authorities, have you included a statement to this effect in your request? See section 9.02(7). Yes No N/A Page 20. Have you included in your request a statement identifying any pending legislation that may affect the proposed transaction? See section 9.02(8). Yes No21. Is the request accompanied by the deletions statement required by § 6110? See section 9.02(9). Yes No N/A Page 22. Have you (or your authorized representative) signed and dated the request? See section 9.02(10). Yes No N/A23. If the request is signed by your representative, or if your representative will appear before the Service in connection with the request, is the request accompanied by a properly prepared and signed power of attorney with the signatory’s name typed or printed? See section 9.02(12). Yes No N/A Page 24. Have you included, signed and dated, the penalties of perjury statement in the form required by section 9.02(13)? Yes No N/A25. Have you included the correct user fee with the request and made your check or money order payable to the United States Treasury? See section 9.02(14) and Rev. Proc. 2007–8, page 230, this Bulletin, for the correct amount and additional information on user fees. Yes No N/A26. Are you submitting your request in duplicate if necessary? See section 9.02(15). Yes No N/A Pages 27. If you are requesting separate letter rulings ondifferent issues involving one factual situation, have you included a statement to that effect in each request? See section 9.03(1). Yes No N/A28. If you do not want a copy of the letter ruling to be sent to any representative, does the power of attorney contain a statement to that effect? See section 9.03(2). Yes No N/A Page 29. If you have more than one representative, have you designated whether the second represen- tative listed on the power of attorney is to receive a copy of the letter ruling? See section 9.03(2). January 2, 20071562007–1 I.R.B. Yes No N/A Page 30. If you want your letter ruling request to be processed ahead of the regular order or by a specific date,haveyourequestedexpeditedhandlinginthe form required by section 9.03(3) and stated a compelling need for such action in the request? Yes No N/A Page 31. If you are requesting that a copy of the letter ruling be issued by facsimile (fax) transmission, have you included a statement containing a waiverof any disclosure violations resulting from the fax transmission? See section 9.03(4). Yes No N/A Page 32. If you want to have a conference on the issuesinvolved in the request, have you included a request for conference in the ruling request? See section 9.03(5). Yes No N/A33. If your request is covered by any of the guideline revenue procedures or other special require- ments listed in section 10 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4, have you complied with all of the requirements of the applicable revenue procedure? Yes No N/A Page 34. If you are requesting relief under § 7805(b) (regarding retroactive effect), have you complied with all of the requirements in section 13.09? Yes No N/A35. Have you addressed your request to the appropriate office listed in section 9.04? Improperly addressed requests may be delayed (sometimes for over a week) in reaching the appropriate office for initial processing. SignatureTitle or authorityDate Typed or printed name of person signing checklist 2007–1 I.R.B.157January 2, 2007 APPENDIX C Additional Checklist for Roth IRA Recharacterization Ruling Requests In order to assist EP Technical in processing a ruling request involving a Roth IRA recharacterization, in addition to the items in Appendix B, please check the following list. Yes No N/A Page 1. Did you include the name(s) of trustee and/or custodian of the traditional individual retirement account (IRA) (generally, a financial institution)? Yes No N/A Page 2. Is each IRA identification number present? Yes No N/A Page 3. If the ruling request involves Roth conversions both of a husband and wife, is the necessary information with respect to each IRA of each party present? Note: as long as husband and wife file a joint federal Form 1040, the Service can issue one ruling covering both parties. Furthermore, if a joint federal income tax return has been filed for the year or years in question, the Service only requires one user fee even if both husband and wife had failed conversions. Yes No N/A Page 4. If there was one or more attempted conversions, are the applicable dates on which the attempted IRA conversion(s) occurred included? Yes No N/A Page 5. If the reason that a conversion failed is that the taxpayer or related taxpayers relied upon advice of a tax professional such as a CPA, an attorney, or an enrolled actuary, is the name and occupation of that adviser included? Yes No N/A Page 6. Is certification that the taxpayer or taxpayers timely filed the relevant federal tax return(s) present? Yes No N/A Page 7. Is there a short statement of facts with respectto the conversion? For example, if the ruling request involves a conversion attempted in 1998, there should be a statement of the facts that in- cludes a representation of why the due date(s) found in Announcement 99–57 and Announcement 99–104 were not met. Yes No N/A Page 8. If the taxpayer recharacterized his/her Roth IRA to a traditional IRA prior to submitting a request for § 9100 relief, are the date(s) of the recharacterization(s), name(s) of trustees and/or custodians, and the identification numbers of the traditional IRA(s) present? Yes No N/A Page 9. Does the request include the type of contribution (i.e., regular or conversion) and amount of the contribution being recharacterized? January 2, 20071582007–1 I.R.B. APPENDIX D Additional Checklist for Government Pick-Up Plan Ruling Requests In order to assist EP Technical in processing a ruling request involving government pick-up plans, in addition to the items in Appendix B please check the following list. Yes No N/A Page 1. Is the plan qualified under § 401(a) of the Code? (Evidence of qualification or representation that the plan is qualified.) Yes No N/A Page 2. Is the organization that established the plana State or political subdivision thereof, or any agency or instrumentality of the foregoing? An example of this would be a representation that the organization that has established the plan is a political subdivision or municipality of the State. Yes No N/A Page 3. Is there specific information regarding who are the eligible participants? Yes No N/A Page 4. Are the contributions that are the subject of the ruling request mandatory employee contribu- tions? These contributions must be for a specified dollar amount or a specific percentage of the participant’s compensation and the dollar amount or percentage of compensation cannot be sub- ject to change. Yes No N/A Page 5. Does the plan provide that the participants do not have the election to opt in and/or out of the plan? Yes No N/A Page 6. Are copies of the enacting legislation providing that the contributions although designated as employee contributions are being paid by the employer in lieu of contributions by the employee included? Yes No N/A Page 7. Are copies of the specific enabling authorization that provides the employee must not have the option of choosing to receive the contributed amounts directly instead of having them paid by the employer to the plan included? For example, a resolution, ordinance, plan provision, or collective bargaining agreement couldspecify this information. 2007–1 I.R.B.159January 2, 2007 APPENDIX E Additional Checklist for Church Plan Ruling Requests In order to assist EP Technical in processing a church plan ruling request, in addition to the items in Appendix B, please check the following list. Yes No N/A Page 1. Is there specific information showing that the submission is on behalf of a plan established by a named church or convention or association of churches? The information must show how the sponsoring organization is controlled by, or associated with, the named church or convention or association of churches. For example, the sponsoring organization might be listed in the church’s official directory of related organizations whose mission is to further the objectives of the church. In order to be considered associated with a churchor convention or association of churches, the organization must share common religious bonds and convictions with that church or convention or association of churches. Yes No N/A Page 2. Is there specific information showing that theorganization that has established the plan is a tax-exempt organization as described in § 501 of the Code? Yes No N/A Page 3. Is there representation that the plan for which the ruling is being requested is qualified under § 401(a) of the Code or meets the requirements of § 403(b) of the Code? Yes No N/A Page 4. Does the ruling clearly state who are the eligible participants and the name of the employer of these eligible participants? Yes No N/A Page 5. Is there a representation that none of the eligibleparticipants are or canbe considered employed in connection with one or more unrelated trades or businesses within the meaning of § 513 of the Code? Yes No N/A Page 6. Is there a representation that all of the eligible participants are or will be employed by the named church or convention or association of churches, and will not include employees of for- profit entities? An example of an eligible employee includes a duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed minister of a church in the exercise of his or her ministry. Yes No N/A Page 7. Is there specific information showing an existing plan committee whose principal purpose or function is the administration or funding of the plan. This committee must be controlled by or associated with the named church or convention or association of churches? Yes No N/A Page 8. Is the composition of the committee stated? January 2, 20071602007–1 I.R.B. 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 2007–5 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? .............................................. 163 SECTION 2. WHAT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO REV. PROC. 2006–5?............................... 164 SECTION 3. WHAT IS A TECHNICAL ADVICE MEMORANDUM?..................................................... 164 SECTION 4. ON WHAT ISSUES MAY OR MUST TAMs BE REQUESTED UNDER THIS PROCEDURE?..................... 165 .01IssuesunderthejurisdictionoftheCommissioner,TaxExemptandGovernmentEntitiesDivision..................... 165 .02Farmers’cooperatives........................................................................................ 165 .03Basisforrequestingtechnicaladvice........................................................................... 165 .04Areasofmandatorytechnicaladvice........................................................................... 165 SECTION 5. ON WHAT ISSUES MUST TAMs BE REQUESTED UNDER DIFFERENT PROCEDURES?...................... 166 .01 Matters (other than farmers’ cooperatives) under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products),the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting), the Associate Chief Counsel (International), the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries), the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities) and the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration) ............................................................................................. 166 .02 Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes........................................................................... 166 .03Excisetaxes ................................................................................................ 166 SECTION 6. MAY A TAM BE REQUESTED FOR A § 301.9100–1 REQUEST DURING THE COURSE OF AN EXAMINATION? ...................................................................................... 166 .01A§301.9100–1requestisaletterrulingrequest................................................................. 166 .02Statuteoflimitations......................................................................................... 166 .03Addresstosenda§301.9100–1request........................................................................ 166 .04 If the return is being examined or considered by an appeals office or a federal court, the taxpayer must notify Employee Plans Technical or Exempt Organizations Technical who will notify the Employee Plans Examinations Area manager or the Exempt Organizations Examinations Area manager,theappealsofficeorgovernmentcounsel .............................................................. 167 SECTION 7. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REQUESTING TAMs?....................................................... 167 .01 An Employee Plans Examinations Area manager, Exempt Organizations Examinations Area manager, Employee Plans Determinations manager, Exempt Organizations Determinations manager, Appeals AreaDirector,Area4,orAppealsAreaDirector,LMSBdetermineswhethertorequestaTAM ....................... 167 .02TaxpayermayaskthatissuebereferredforaTAM.............................................................. 167 SECTION 8. WHEN SHOULD A TAM BE REQUESTED?............................................................... 168 .01Uniformityofpositionlacking ................................................................................ 168 .02WhenaTAMcanberequested................................................................................ 168 .03Attheearliestpossiblestage.................................................................................. 168 SECTION 9. HOW ARE PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCES SCHEDULED?............................................. 168 .01 Pre-submission conference generally is permitted when a request for a TAM is likely and all parties agreetorequesttheconference................................................................................ 168 .02Purposeofpre-submissionconference ......................................................................... 168 .03 Request for pre-submission conference must be submitted in writing by the EP or EO Examinations ortheEPorEODeterminationsortheappealsoffice............................................................. 169 .04 Group will contact the EP or EO Examinations orthe EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office toarrangethepre-submissionconference....................................................................... 169 .05Pre-submissionconferencegenerallyheldbytelephone .......................................................... 169 .06 Certain information required to be submitted to EP or EO Technical prior to the pre-submission conference.................................................................................................. 169 2007–1 I.R.B.161January 2, 2007 .07Mannerofsubmittingpre-submissionmaterials ................................................................. 169 .08Pre-submissionconferencemaynotbetaped.................................................................... 169 .09DiscussionofsubstantiveissuesisnotbindingontheService..................................................... 169 SECTION 10. WHAT MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE REQUEST FOR A TAM?............................................ 169 .01Statementofissues,facts,law,andarguments................................................................... 169 .02Generalprovisionsof§§6104and6110oftheInternalRevenueCode............................................. 170 .03Applicationof§6104........................................................................................ 170 .04Statementidentifyinginformationtobedeletedfrompublicinspection............................................. 170 .05TransmittalForm5565,RequestforTechnicalAdvice—EP/EO.................................................. 171 .06Powerofattorney............................................................................................ 172 SECTION 11. HOW ARE REQUESTS HANDLED?.................................................................... 172 .01Taxpayernotified............................................................................................ 172 .02Considerwhetherpublishedguidanceisappropriate ............................................................. 172 .03Conferenceoffered .......................................................................................... 172 .04IfthetaxpayerdisagreeswiththeService’sstatementoffacts..................................................... 172 .05IftheServicedisagreeswiththetaxpayer’sstatementoffacts..................................................... 173 .06Ifthetaxpayerhasnotsubmittedtherequireddeletionsstatement ................................................. 173 .07Criminalorcivilfraudcases.................................................................................. 173 SECTION 12. HOW DOES A TAXPAYER APPEAL AN EP OR EO MANAGER’S OR AN APPEALS AREA DIRECTOR’S DECISION NOT TO SEEK A TAM? ......................................................... 174 .01TaxpayernotifiedofdecisionnottoseekaTAM ................................................................ 174 .02TaxpayermayrequestreviewofdecisionnottoseekaTAM...................................................... 174 .03 EP or EO Examinations Area manager or EP or EO Determinations manager or the applicable AppealsofficedetermineswhetheraTAMwillbesought......................................................... 174 .04Managerorareadirector’sdecisionmaybereviewedbutnotappealed............................................. 174 SECTION 13. HOW ARE REQUESTS FOR TAMs WITHDRAWN?....................................................... 175 .01Taxpayernotified............................................................................................ 175 .02EPorEOTechnicalmayprovideviews ........................................................................ 175 SECTION 14. HOW ARE CONFERENCES SCHEDULED?.............................................................. 175 .01Ifrequested,offeredtothetaxpayerwhenadverseTAMproposed................................................. 175 .02Timeline.................................................................................................... 175 .0321-dayperiodmaybeextendedifjustifiedandapproved......................................................... 175 .04Denialofextensioncannotbeappealed......................................................................... 176 .05Entitledtooneconferenceofright............................................................................. 176 .06Conferencemaynotbetaped ................................................................................. 176 .07Conferencemaybedelayedtoaddressarequestforreliefunder§7805(b) ......................................... 176 .08Servicemakestentativerecommendations...................................................................... 176 .09Additionalconferencesmaybeoffered......................................................................... 177 .10Additionalinformationsubmittedaftertheconference ........................................................... 177 .11Normallyheldbytelephone................................................................................... 177 SECTION 15. HOW IS STATUS OF REQUEST OBTAINED?............................................................ 178 .01 Taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative may request status from the EP or EO Examinations or the EPorEODeterminationsortheappealsoffice.................................................................. 178 .02 EP or EO Technical will give status updates to the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO DeterminationsortheapplicableAppealsAreaDirector.......................................................... 178 SECTION 16. HOW DOES EP OR EO TECHNICAL PREPARE THE TAM?............................................... 178 .01Delegatesauthoritytogroupmanagers......................................................................... 178 .02Determineswhetherrequesthasbeenproperlymade............................................................. 178 .03 Contacts the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office to discuss issues ...................................................................................................... 178 .04 Informs the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office if any mattersintherequesthavebeenreferredtoanothergrouporoffice................................................ 179 January 2, 20071622007–1 I.R.B. .05 Informs the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office if additionalinformationisneeded............................................................................... 179 .06 Informs the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office of the tentativeconclusion.......................................................................................... 179 .07 If a tentative conclusion has not been reached, gives date estimated for tentative conclusion.......................... 179 .08 Advises the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office that tentativeconclusionisnotfinal................................................................................ 179 .09 Advises the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office of final conclusions................................................................................................. 179 .10Ifneeded,requestsadditionalinformation ...................................................................... 179 .11 Requests taxpayer to send additional information to EP or EO Technical and a copy to the EP or EO ExaminationsortheEPorEODeterminationsortheappealsoffice................................................ 180 .12Informsthetaxpayerwhenrequesteddeletionswillnotbemade................................................... 180 .13Preparesreplyintwoparts.................................................................................... 180 .14Routesrepliestoappropriateoffice............................................................................ 181 SECTION 17. HOW DOES EP OR EO EXAMINATIONS OR EP OR EO DETERMINATIONS OR AN APPEALS OFFICE USE THE TAM? ..................................................................... 182 .01Generallyappliesadviceinprocessingthetaxpayer’scase........................................................ 182 .02Reconsideration............................................................................................. 182 .03Discussionwiththetaxpayer.................................................................................. 182 .04Givescopytothetaxpayer.................................................................................... 182 .05Taxpayermayprotestdeletionsnotmade....................................................................... 183 .06Whennocopyisgiventothetaxpayer......................................................................... 183 SECTION 18. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF A TAM?.................................................................... 183 .01AppliesonlytothetaxpayerforwhomTAMwasrequested....................................................... 183 .02Usuallyappliesretroactively.................................................................................. 183 .03 Generally applied retroactively to modify or revoke prior TAM ................................. .................. 183 .04 Applies to continuing action or series of actions until sp ecifically withdrawn, modified or revoked . . .................. 183 .05 Applies to continuing action or series of actions until m aterialfactschange....................... .................. 183 .06Doesnotapplyretroactivelyundercertainconditions............................................................ 183 SECTION 19. HOW MAY RETROACTIVE EFFECT BE LIMITED?...................................................... 184 .01Commissionerhasdiscretionaryauthorityunder§7805(b) ....................................................... 184 .02TaxpayermayrequestCommissionertoexerciseauthority........................................................ 184 .03Formofrequesttolimitretroactivity—beforeanexamination..................................................... 184 .04Formofrequesttolimitretroactivity—duringcourseofexamination............................................... 184 .05 Form of request to limit retroactivity—technical advice that does not modify or revoke prior memorandum ............................................................................................... 185 .06Taxpayer’srighttoaconference............................................................................... 185 .07Exhaustionofadministrativeremedies—employeeplansdeterminationletterrequests.............................. 185 .08Exhaustionofadministrativeremedies—exemptorganizationmatters............................................. 185 SECTION 20. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE ON OTHER DOCUMENTS?...................... 185 SECTION 21. EFFECTIVE DATE.................................................................................... 185 SECTION 22. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT....................................................................... 185 INDEX........................................................................................................... 187 SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? .01 This revenue procedure explains when and how Employee Plans Technical or Exempt Organizations Technical issue technical advice memoranda (TAMs) to an Employee Plans (EP) Examinations Area manager, an Exempt Organizations (EO) Examinations Area manager, an Employee Plans (EP) Determinations manager,an Exempt Organizations (EO) Determinations manager, or an Appeals Area Director, Area 4, in the employee plans areas (including actuarial matters) and exempt organizations areas. It also explains the rights a taxpayer has when an EP or EO Examinations Area manager, an EP or EO Determinations manager, or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, requests a TAM regarding a taxmatter. Similarly, this revenue procedure Sec. 1 2007–1 I.R.B.163January 2, 2007 may be used by another Operating Division of the Service involved in an examination where EP Technical does not have audit jurisdiction buthas interpretive jurisdiction as enumerated in section 6.02 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4, page 118 of this Bulletin. .02 Although taxpayer participation during all stages of the process is preferred, it is not required in order to request technical advice. SECTION 2. WHAT SIGNIFICANT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO REV. PROC. 2006–5? .01 This revenue procedure is a general update of Rev. Proc. 2006–5, 2006–1 I.R.B. 174, which contains the general procedures for technical advice requests for matters within the ju- risdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. .02 Section 4.04 pertaining to mandatory technical advice is modified to reflect the enact- ment of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 on August 17, 2006, and a related change is made by the deletion of section 4.05. .03 The routing procedures for incoming TAMrequests by Appeals described in section 10.05 are altered. .04 In numerous places throughout this revenueprocedure, the references to technical ex- pedited advice memorandums (TEAMs) have been deleted. SECTION 3. WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF TECHNICAL ADVICE? “Technical advice” means adv ice or guidance in the form of a memorandum furnished by the Employee Plans Technica l or Exempt Organizations Technical office, (hereinafter referred to as “EP or EO Technical”), u pon the request of an EP or EO Examinations Area manager, an EP or EO Determinations man ager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, submitted in accor- dance with the provisions o f this revenue procedure in response to any technical or procedural question that develops dur ing any proceeding on the interpretation and proper application of tax law, tax treaties, regu lations, revenue rulings, notices or other precedents published by the headquarters office to a sp ecific set of facts. (The references in this revenue procedure to the Appeals Area Director, Ar ea 4, or an appeals office include, when appropriate, an Appeals Area Director, LMSB, a Deputy A ppeals Area Director, LMSB, a Deputy Appeals Area Director, Area 4, an Appeals Team Man ager and include in employee plans matters another Operating Division of the Service d escribed in the last sentence of section 1.01 above.) Such proceed- ings include (1) the exam ination of a taxpayer’s return, (2) consideration of a taxpayer’s claim for refund or credit, (3) a taxpayer’s request for a determination letter, (4) any other matter involving a specific tax payer under the jurisdiction of EP or EO Examinations, EP or EO De- terminations, or an app eals office or (5) processing and considering nondocketed cases of a taxpayerinanappealso ffice. However, they do not include cases in which the issue in the case is in a docketed cas e for any year. For purposes of TAMs, the term “taxpayer” includes all persons subject to any provision of the Internal Revenue Code (including tax-exempt entities such as governmental units which issue municipal bonds within the meaning of § 103), and when appropriate, their represen- tatives. However, the instructions and the provisions of this revenue procedure do not apply to requests for TAMs involving any matter pertaining to tax-exempt bonds or to § 457 plans maintained by state or local governments or tax-exempt organizations or to mortgage credit certificates. Instead, in those instances the procedures under Rev. Proc. 2007–2, page 88, this Bulletin, must be followed. TAMs help Service personnel resolve complex issues and help establish and maintain con- sistent holdings throughout the Internal Revenue Service. An EP or EO Examinations, an EP or EO Determinations or an appeals office mayraise an issue in any tax period, even though technical advice may have been requested and furnished for the same or similar issue for an- other tax period. Technical advice does not include oral or written legal advice furnished to the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office, other than advice furnished pursuant to this revenue procedure. In accordancewith section 12.01 of this revenue procedure, a taxpayer’s request for referral of an issue to the headquarters office for technical advice will not be denied merely because EP or EO Technical has already provided legal advice, other than Sec. 1 January 2, 20071642007–1 I.R.B. advice furnished pursuant to this revenue procedure, to the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office on the matter. Although taxpayer participation during all stages of the process is preferred, generally, it is not required in order to request a TAM. SECTION4.ONWHATISSUES MAYORMUSTTAMsBE REQUESTED UNDER THIS PROCEDURE? Issues under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division .01 Generally, the instructions of this revenue procedure apply to requests for TAMs on any issue under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. Farmers’ cooperatives.02 If an EP or EO Examinations, an EP or EO Determinations, an appeals office or a taxpayer requests technical advice on a determination letter under § 521 of the Code, the procedures under this revenue procedure, Rev. Proc. 90–27, 1990–1 C.B. 514, as well as § 601.201(n) of the Statement of Procedural Rules (26 CFR § 601.201(n) (2006)), must be followed. Basis for requesting TAMs.03 Requests for TAMs are encouraged on any technical or procedural questions arising in connection with any case of the type described in section 3 at any stage of the proceedings in an EP or EO Examinations, an EP or EO Determinations or an appeals office case that cannot be resolved on the basis of law, regulations, or a clearly applicable revenue ruling or other published precedent. Areas of mandatory technical advice .04 Requests for § 7805(b) relief are mandatory TAMs with respect to all exempt organiza- tions and employee plans matters. Regarding exempt organizations matters,EO Examinations, EO Determinations and ap- peals offices are required to request a TAM ontheir exempt organization cases concerning qualification for exemption or foundation status for which there is no published precedent or for which there is reason to believe that non-uniformity exists. (Exemption application cases handled in EO Technical in accordance with Rev. Procs. 72–5, 80–27,or 90–27 are not cov- ered by this provision.) A request for a TAM is not required if the Director, EO Examinations proposes to revoke or modify (1) a letter ruling found to be in error or not in accord with the current views of the Service, or (2) a letter recognizing tax-exempt status issued by the head- quarters office. Regarding employee plans matters, a request for a TAM is required in cases concerning (1) proposed adverse or proposed revocation letterson collectively-bargained plans, (2) plans for which the Service is proposing to issue a revocation letter because of certain fiduciary actions that violate the exclusive benefit rule of § 401(a) of the Code and are subject to Part 4 of Subtitle B of Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93–406, 1974–3 C.B. 1, 43, or (3) amendments to defined contribution plans pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2004–15, 2004–1 C.B. 490, in connection with a waiver of the minimum funding standard and a request for a determination letter (see section 15 of Rev. Proc. 2007–6, page 189, this Bulletin, and section 3.04 of Rev. Proc. 2004–15). Sec. 4.04 2007–1 I.R.B.165January 2, 2007 SECTION5.ONWHATISSUES MUST TAMS BE REQUESTED UNDER DIFFERENT PROCEDURES? Matters (other than farmers’ cooperatives) under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products),the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting), the Associate Chief Counsel (International) the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries), the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (TE/GE), and the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration) .01 All procedures for obtaining TAMs on issues (other than farmers’ cooperatives) under the interpretive jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products), the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting), the Associate Chief Counsel (International), the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries), or the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (TE/GE), and on certain issues under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Administration), including any matter pertaining to (1) tax-exempt bonds or mortgage credit certificates, (2) deferred compensation plans under § 457, (3) § 526 of the Code (shipowners’ protection and indemnity associations), (4) § 528 (certain homeowners’ associations), (5) Indian tribal governments, (6) federal, state or local governments, and (7) issues involving the interpretation or application of the federal income tax laws and income tax treaties relating to international transactions are contained in Rev. Proc. 2007–2. Alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes .02 The procedures for obtaining a TAM specifically applicable to federal alcohol, tobacco, and firearms taxes under subtitle E of the Code are currently under the jurisdiction of the Al- cohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureauwithin the Treasury Department. Excise taxes.03 A TAM regarding excise taxes (other than excise taxes imposed under Chapters 41, 42 and 43 of the Code), and employment taxes that employee plans and exempt organizations are subject to, is set forth in Rev. Proc. 2007–2. SECTION 6. MAY TAM UNDER § 301.9100–1 BE REQUESTED DURING THE COURSE OF AN EXAMINATION? A § 301.9100–1 request is a letter ruling request .01 Except with regard to exemption application matters involving §§ 505(c) and 508, a request for an extension of time for making anelection or other application for relief under § 301.9100–1 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations is not a request for a TAM; instead, the request is submitted as a letter ruling request even if the request is submitted after the examination of the taxpayer’s return has begun or after the issues in the return are being considered by an appeals office or a federal court. Therefore, a § 301.9100–1 request should be submitted pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2007–4, page 118, this Bulletin (including the payment of the applicable user fee listed in section 6 of Rev. Proc. 2007–8). Statute of limitations.02 The running of any applicable period of limitations is not suspended for the period dur- ing which a § 301.9100–1 request has been filed.See§ 301.9100–3(d)(2). If the period of limitations on an assessment under § 6501(a) for the taxable year in which an election should have been made, or any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made, will expire before receipt of a § 301.9100–1 letter ruling, the Service ordinarily will not issue a § 301.9100–1 ruling.See§ 301.9100–3(c)(1)(ii). Therefore, the taxpayer must secure a consent under § 6501(c)(4) to extend theperiod of limitations on assessment. Note that the filing of a protective claim for refund under § 6511 does not extend the period of lim- itations on assessment. If § 301.9100–1 relief is granted, the Service may require the taxpayer to consent to an extension of the period of limitations for assessment.See§ 301.9100–3(d)(2). Address to send a § 301.9100–1 request .03 Requests made under § 301.9100–1, pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2007–4, together with the appropriate user fee, must be submitted to the Internal Revenue Service by the taxpayer and addressed as follows: Sec. 5 January 2, 20071662007–1 I.R.B. Requests involving employee plans matters: Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Attn: SE:T:EP:RA P. O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 Requests involving exempt organization matters: Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Attn: SE:T:EO:RA P. O. Box 27720 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 A § 301.9100–1 request may also be hand delivered between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. where a receipt will be given at the Courier’s Desk. In each instance, the package should be marked RULING REQUEST SUBMISSION.SeeRev. Proc. 2007–8 for the appro- priate user fee. Deliver to: Courier’s Desk Internal Revenue Service Attn: SE:T:EP:RA or SE:T:EO:RA 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW – PE Washington, DC 20224 If return is being examined or considered by an appeals office or a federal court, the taxpayer must notify EP or EO Technical who will notify the EP or EO Examinations Area manager, Appeals Area Director, Area 4, or government counsel .04 If the taxpayer’s return for the taxable year in which an election should have been made or any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made is being examined by EP or EO Examinations or the issues in the return are being considered by an appeals office or a federal court, the taxpayer must notify EP or EO Technical.See § 301.9100–3(e)(4)(i) and section 6.04 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4. EP or EO Technical will notify the appropriate EP or EO Examinations Area manager or Appeals Area Director, Area 4, or government counsel considering the return that a request for § 301.9100–1 relief has been submitted. The EP or EO specialist, appeals officer or government counsel is not authorized to deny consideration of a request for § 301.9100–1 relief. The letter ruling will be mailed to the taxpayer and a copy will be sent to the appropriate EP or EO Examinations Area manager, or Appeals Area Director, Area 4, or government counsel. SECTION 7. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REQUESTING TAMs? EP or EO Examinations AreamanagerorEPorEO Determinations manager or Appeals Area Director, Area 4, determines whether to request the advice .01 The EP or EO Examinations Area manager, the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, determines whether to request a TAM on an issue. Each request must be submitted through proper channels and signed by a person who is authorized to sign for the EP or EO Examinations Area manager, the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. The mandatory technical advice described in section 4.04(3) of this revenue procedure, for cases concerning amendments to defined contribution plans in connection with a waiver of the minimum funding standard and a request for a deter- mination letter, is treated as if it had been a request for technical advice submitted by the EP Determinations manager.Seesection 15 of Rev. Proc. 2007–6 and section 3.04 of Rev. Proc. 2004–15 for the procedural rules applicable tothis particular mandatory technical advice. Taxpayer may ask that issue be referred for TAM .02 While a case is under the jurisdiction of EP or EO Examinations, EP or EO Determina- tions,ortheAppealsAreaDirector,Area4,ataxpayer may request that an issue be referred to the EP or EO Technical office for a TAM. Sec. 7.02 2007–1 I.R.B.167January 2, 2007 SECTION8.WHENSHOULDA TAM BE REQUESTED? Uniformity of position lacking.01 A TAM should be requested when there is a lack of uniformity regarding the disposition of an issue or when an issue is unusual or complex enough to warrant consideration by EP or EO Technical. When can a TAM be requested.02 Generally, except as provided in section 1.01, the provisions of this revenue procedure apply only to a case under the jurisdiction of EP or EO Examinations, EP or EO Determinations or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. A TAM may also be requested on issues considered in a prior appeals disposition, not based on mutual concessions for the same tax period of the same taxpayer, if the appeals office that had the case concurs in the request. (1) EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations may not request a TAM on an issue if an appeals office is currently considering an identical issue of the same taxpayer (or of a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267 or an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504). (2) A case remains under the jurisdiction of EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determi- nations even though an appeals office has the identical issue under consideration in the case of another taxpayer (not related within the meaning of § 267 or § 1504) in an entirely different transaction. With respect to the same taxpayer or the same transaction, when the issue is under the jurisdiction of an appeals office, and the applicability of more than one kind of federal tax is dependent upon the resolution of that issue, EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determi- nations may not request a TAM on the applicability of any of the taxes involved. (3) EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or an Appeals Area Director, Area 4, also may not request a TAM on an issue if the same issue of the same taxpayer (or of a related taxpayer within the meaning of § 267 or amember of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member within the meaning of § 1504) is in a docketed case for the same taxpayer (or for a related taxpayer or a member of an affiliated group of which the taxpayer is also a member) for any taxable year. At the earliest possible stage.03 Once an issue is identified, all requests for a TAM should be made at the earliest possible stage in the proceeding. The fact that the issue israised late in the examination, determination or appeals process should not influence, however, EP or EO Examinations’, EP or EO Deter- minations’ or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4’s, decision to request a TAM. SECTION 9. HOW ARE PRE-SUBMISSION CONFERENCES SCHEDULED? Pre-submission conference generally is permitted when a request for TAM is likely and all parties agree to request the conference .01 In an effort to promote expeditious processing of requests for a TAM, EP or EO Tech- nical generally will discuss the issue(s) with the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office and the taxpayer prior to the time any request for tech- nical advice is formally submitted to EP or EO Technical. In all cases, other than mandatory TAMswhicharedescribedinsection4.04,apre-submission conference is mandatory. A request for a pre-submission conferenceshould be made, however, only after the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinationsor the appeals office determines that it will likely request a TAM. If the request for a TAM wi ll involve more than one function, representatives from each function involved must p articipate in the pre-submission conference. Purpose of pre-submission conference .02 A pre-submission conference is intended tofacilitate agreement between the parties as to the appropriate scope of the request for a TAM or any collateral issues that either should or should not be included in the request for a TAM, and any other substantive or procedural considerations that will allow EP or EO Technical to provide the parties with a TAM as expe- ditiously as possible. Sec. 8 January 2, 20071682007–1 I.R.B. A pre-submission conference is not intendedto create an alternate procedure for determin- ing the merits of the substantive positions advocated by the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office or by the taxpayer. Rather, the conference is intended only to facilitate the overall process. Request for pre-submission conference must be submitted in writing by the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office .03 A request for a pre-submission conference must be submitted in writing by the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office. The request should identify the office expected to have jurisdiction over the request for a TAM. The request should include a brief explanation of the primary issue so that an assignment to the appropriate group can be made. Group will contact the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office to arrange the pre-submission conference .04 Within 5 working days after it receives the request, the group assigned responsibility for conducting the pre-submission conference will contact the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office to arrange a mutually convenient time for the parties to meet (generally by telephone) inthe EP or EO Technical office. The conference generally should be held within 30 calendar days after the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office is contacted. The EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office will be responsible for coordinating with the taxpayer as well as with any other Service personnel whose attendance the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office believes would be appropriate. Pre-submission conference generally held by telephone .05 Generally, pre-submission conferencesfor TAMs are held by telephone with EP or EO Technical unless the parties specifically request that the conference be held in person. Certain information required to be submitted to EP or EO Technical prior to the pre-submission conference .06 At least 10 working days before the scheduled pre-submission conference, the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office and the taxpayer should submit to EP or EO Technical a statement of the pertinent facts (including any facts in dispute), a statement of the issues that the parties would like to discuss, and any legal analysis, author- ities, or background documents that the parties believe would facilitate EP or EO Technical’s understanding of the issues to be discussed at the conference. The legal analysis provided for the pre-submission conference need not be as fully developed as the analysis that ultimately will accompany the request for a TAM, but itshould allow EP or EO Technical to become reasonably informed regarding the subject matter of the conference prior to the meeting. The EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office or the taxpayer should ensure that the EP or EO Technical office receives a copy of any required power of attorney, on Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative. Manner of submitting pre-submission materials .07 The pre-submission materials must be submitted electronically. In order to obtain the protection of taxpayer information offered by theService’s Intranet “firewall,” the pre-submis- sion materials must be electronically transmitted by the Service office assigned to the request. To the extent that supporting materials cannot be submitted electronically, such materials should be sent by fax or by express mail or privatedelivery service to the tax law specialist or actuary in Headquarters assigned to the request. In such cases, the appropriate provisions of section 10.05 should be followed. Pre-submission conference may not be taped .08 Because pre-submission conference procedures are informal, no tape, stenographic, or other verbatim recording of a conference may be made by any party. Discussion of substantive issues is not binding on the Service .09 Any discussion of substantive issues at a pre-submission conference is advisory only, is not binding on the Service, and cannot be relied upon as a basis for obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). SECTION 10. WHAT MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE REQUEST FORATAM? Statement of issues, facts, law, and arguments .01 Whether initiated by the taxpayer or by an EP or EO Examinations or an EP or EO Determinations or an appeals office, a request for a TAM must include the facts and the issues Sec. 10.01 2007–1 I.R.B.169January 2, 2007 for which the TAM is requested, and a written statement that clearly sets forth the applicable law and the arguments in support of both the Service’s and the taxpayer’s positions on the issue or issues. Taxpayer must submit statement if the taxpayer initiates request for a TAM (1) If the taxpayer initiates the request for a TAM, the taxpayer must submit to the EP or EO specialist or appeals office, at the time the taxpayer initiates the request, a written statement— (a) stating the facts and the issues; (b) explaining the taxpayer’s position; (c) discussing any relevant statutory provisions, tax treaties, court decisions, regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices, or any other authority supporting the taxpayer’s position; and (d) stating the reasons for requesting technical advice. If the EP or EO specialist or the appeals office determines that a TAM will be requested, the taxpayer’s statement will be forwarded to EP or EO Technical with the request for the TAM. Taxpayer is encouraged to submit statement if Service initiates request for a TAM (2) If the request for a TAM is initiated by an EP or EO Examinations office or by an EP or EO Determinations office or by an appeals office, the taxpayer is encouraged to submit the written statement described in section 10.01(1)of this revenue procedure. If the taxpayer’s statement is received after the request for theTAM has been forwarded to EP or EO Technical, the statement will be forwarded to EP or EO Technical for association with the TAM. Statement of authorities contrary to taxpayer’s position (3) Whether the request for a TAM is initiated by the taxpayer or by an EP or EO Exami- nations office or by an EP or EO Determinations office or by an appeals office, the taxpayer is encouraged to comment on any legislation, tax treaties, regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, or court decisions contrary to the taxpayer’s position. If the taxpayer determines that there are no contrary authorities, a statement to this effect would be helpful. If the tax- payer does not furnish either contrary authorities or a statement that none exists, the Service, in complex cases or those presenting difficult or novel issues, may request submission of contrary authorities or a statement that none exists. General provisions of §§ 6104 and 6110 .02 Generally, § 6104(a)(1)(B) provides that an application filed with respect to: (1) the qualification of a pension, profit-sharing, or stock bonus plan under § 401(a) or § 403(a) or an individual retirement arrangement under § 408(a) or § 408(b) will be open to public in- spection pursuant to regulations as will (2) any application filed for an exemption from tax under § 501(a) of an organization forming part of a plan or account described above. Gen- erally, § 6110(a) provides that except as provided otherwise, written determinations (defined in § 6110(b)(1) as rulings, determination letters, technical advice memorandums and Chief Counsel advice) and any related background file document will be open to public inspection pursuant to regulations. Application of § 6104.03 The requirements for submitting statements and other materials or proposed deletions in TAMs before public inspection is allowed do not apply to requests for any documents to the extent § 6104 applies. Statement identifying information to be deleted from public inspection .04 The text of a TAM subject to § 6110(a) may be open to public inspection. The Service deletes certain information from the text before it is made available for inspection. To help the Service make the deletions required by § 6110(c), the taxpayer must provide a statement indicating the deletions desired (“deletions statement”). If the taxpayer does not submit the deletions statement, the Service will follow the procedures in section 11.06 of this revenue procedure. A taxpayer who wants only names, addresses, and identifying numbers deleted should state this in the deletions statement. If the taxpayer wants more information deleted, the deletions statement must be accompanied by a copy ofthe TAM request and supporting documents on which the taxpayer should bracket the material to be deleted. The deletions statement must indicate the statutory basis, under § 6110(c) for each proposed deletion. Sec. 10.01 January 2, 20071702007–1 I.R.B. The taxpayer may submit additional deletions statements before the TAM is issued. The deletions statement must not appear in the request for a TAM but, instead, must be made in a separate document. The deletions statement must be signed and dated by the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s autho- rized representative. A stamped signature or a faxed signature is not permitted. The taxpayer should follow these same procedures to propose deletions from any additional information submitted after the initial request for a TAM. An additional deletions statement, however, is not required with each submission of additional information if the taxpayer’s initial deletions statement requests that only names, addresses, and identifying numbers are to be deleted and the taxpayer wants the same information deleted from the additional information. Transmittal Form 5565, Request for Technical Advice — EP/EO .05 The EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office (in- cluding another Operating Division of the Service involved in an examination where EP Tech- nical does not have audit jurisdiction but has interpretive jurisdiction as enumerated in section 6.02 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4) should use Form 5565,Request for Technical Advice — EP/EO, for transmitting a request for technical advice to EP or EO Technical. The appropriate office of the Service must submit electronically, the Form 5565 for a TAM request toDavid.W.Welty@irs.govfor EP matters andTheodore.R.Lieber@irs.govfor EO mat- ters. To the extent feasible, the accompanying documents should be submitted to the same e-mail address (followed by a hard copy if requested by the assigned group).Seesection 9.07 for additional information. The applicable office should submit additionaldocuments that are not available in electronic form by fax to 202–283–9654 for EP matters and 202–283–8858 for EO matters or by express mail or private delivery service to the address below. Whenever possible, all documents should contain the case number and name of the tax law specialist or actuary assigned to the pre-submission conference for the TAM request. Docu- ments that are being sent in hardcopy should be sent on the business day before the day that the request for a TAM is submitted via e-mail, so as not to delay the process. It is anticipated that most, if not all, such documents will be identified during the pre-submission conference. The field and the taxpayer are encouraged to provide electronic versions of a proposed TAM containing the taxpayer’s deletions and legends for EP Technical’s or EO Technical’s use. Address to send requests from EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations offices or another Operating Division Employee Plans Internal Revenue Service Attn: SE:T:EP:RA 1111 Constitution Ave., NW – PE Washington, DC 20224 Exempt Organizations Internal Revenue Service Attn: SE:T:EO:RA 1111 Constitution Ave., NW – PE Washington, DC 20224 If a request is from an Appeals office and is within EP/EO’s jurisdiction, the field office must send the request for a TAM to one of the above offices with a copy of the request to the Appeals Director, Technical Services at the address below. Sec. 10.05 2007–1 I.R.B.171January 2, 2007 Internal Revenue Service Director, Technical Services Attn: C:AP Franklin Court Building 1099 14 th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Power of attorney.06 Any authorized representative, as described in section 9.02 of Rev. P roc. 2007–4, whether or not enrolled to practice,must comply with Treasury Departmen t Circular No. 230, as revised, and with the conference and practice requirements of the St atement of Procedural Rules (26 CFR part 601). A Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration o f Representative, must be used with regard to requests for a TAM under this revenue procedu re. An original, a copy or a fax transmission of the power of attorney is acceptable so lon g as its authenticity is not reasonably disputed. SECTION 11. HOW ARE REQUESTS HANDLED? Taxpayer notified.01 Regardless of whether the taxpayer or the Service initiates the request for a TAM, the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office: (1) will notify the taxpayer that the TAM is being requested; and (2) at or before the time the request is submitted to EP or EO Technical, will give to the taxpayer acopy of the arguments that are being provided to EP or EO Technical in support of its position. If the EP or EO specialist or appeals office initiates the request for a TAM, he or she will give to the taxpayer a copy of the statement of the pertinent facts and the issues proposed for submission to EP or EO Technical. This section 11.01 does not apply to a TAM described in section 11.07 of this revenue pro- cedure. Consider whether publishe d guidance is appropriate .02 Whenever the assigned r eviewer suspects that general guidance should be published regarding the issue presen ted, the reviewer will notify the Manager, Technical who in turn will notify the Manager, T echnical Guidance and Quality Assurance. The Manager, Technical Guidance and Quality Assu rance will then determine if the issue meets publication standards. In general, except where p olicy issues and concerns regarding proper administration of the tax laws require otherwise, the TAM will be issued in advance of published guidance. Conference offered.03 When notifying the taxpayer that technical advice is being requested, the EP or EO specialist or appeals office will also tell the taxpayer about the right to a conference in EP or EO Technical if an adverse decision is indicated and will ask the taxpayer whether such a conference is desired. If the taxpayer disagrees with the Service’s statement of facts .04 If the EP or EO specialist or appeals office initiates the request for a TAM, the taxpayer has 10 calendar days after receiving the statement of facts and specific issues to submit to that specialist or office a written statement specifying any disagreement on the facts and issues. A taxpayer who needs more than 10 calendar days must justify, in writing, the request for an extension of time. The extension is subject to the approval of the EP or EO Examinations Area manager or the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. After receiving the taxpayer’s statement of the areas of disagreement, every effort should be made to reach agreement on the facts and the specific points at issue before the matter is referred to EP or EO Technical. If an agreement cannot be reached, the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office will notify the taxpayer in writing. Within 10 calendar days after receivingthe written notice, the taxpayer may submit a statement of the taxpayer’s understanding of the facts and the specific points at issue. A taxpayer who needs more than 10 calendar days to prepare the statement of understanding must justify, in writing, the request for an extension of time. The extension is subject to the approval of the EP or EO Examinations Area manager or the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. Both the statements of the taxpayer and the EP or EO Examinations or EP or Sec. 10.05 January 2, 20071722007–1 I.R.B. EO Determinations or appeals office will be forwarded to EP or EO Technical with the request for a TAM. When EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or the Appeals Area D irector, Area 4, and the taxpayer cannot agree on the material facts and the reques tforaTAMdoes not involve the issue of whether a letter ruling or determination letter should be modified or revoked, EP or EO Technical, at its discretion, may refuse to provide te chnical advice. If EP or EO Technical chooses to issue the TAM, it will base its advice on the fa cts provided by the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office. If a request for a TAM involves the issue of whether a letter ruling or determination letter should be modified or revoked, EP or EO Technical will issue the TAM. If the Service disagrees with the taxpayer’s statement of facts .05 If the taxpayer initiates the action to request a TAM, and the taxpayer’s statement of the facts and issues is not wholly acceptable to the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office, the Service will notify the taxpayer in writing of the areas of disagreement. The taxpayer has 10 calendar days after receiving the written notice to reply to it. A taxpayer who needs more than 10 calendar days must justify in writing the request for an extension of time. The extension is subjectto the approval of the EP or EO Examinations Area manager, or the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. If an agreement cannot be reached, both the statements of the taxpayer and the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations orappeals office will be forwarded to EP or EO Technical with the request for a TAM. When the disagreement involves material facts essential to the preliminary assessment of the case, the EP or EO Examinations Area manager, the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, may refuse to refer a taxpayer initiated request for the TAM to EP or EO Technical. If EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, submits a case involving a disagreement of material facts, EP or EO Technical, at its discretion, may refuse to provide the TAM. If EP or EO Technical chooses to issue the TAM, it will base its advice on the facts provided by the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office. If the taxpayer has not su bmitted the required deletions s tatement .06 When the EP or EO Exami nations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office initiates the request fo r a TAM, the taxpayer has 10 calendar days after receiving the statement of facts and issues to be submitted to EP or EO Technical to provide the deletions statement required under § 6110 if public inspection is permitted pursuant to § 6110 (seesection 10.05 of this revenue procedure ). In such a case, if the taxpayer does not submit the deletions statement, the EP or EO Examination s or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office, will tell the taxpayer that the state ment is required. When the taxpayer initiates the request for a TAM and does not submit with the request a deletions statement as required by § 6110, theEP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Deter- minations or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, will ask the taxpayer to submit the statement. If EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, does not receive the deletions statement within 10 calendar days after asking the taxpayer for it, EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, may decline to submit the request for the TAM. However, if EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or the Appeals Area Di- rector, Area 4, decides to request a TAM, whether initiated by the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or the appeals office or by the taxpayer, in a case in which the taxpayer has not submitted the deletions statement, EP or EO Technical will make those dele- tions that the Commissioner of Internal Revenue determines are required by § 6110(c). Criminal or civil fraud cases.07 The provisions of this section (about referring issues upon the taxpayer’s request, ob- taining the taxpayer’s statement of the areas ofdisagreement, telling the taxpayer about the referral of issues, giving the taxpayer a copy of the arguments submitted, submitting proposed deletions, and granting conferences in EP orEO Technical) do not apply to a TAM described Sec. 11.07 2007–1 I.R.B.173January 2, 2007 in § 6110(g)(5)(A) that involves a matter that is the subject of or is otherwise closely related to a criminal or civil fraud investigation, or a jeopardy or termination assessment. In these cases, a copy of the TAM is given to the taxpayer after all proceedings in the in- vestigations or assessments are complete, butbefore the Service mails the notice of intention to disclose the TAM under § 6110(f)(1). The taxpayer may then provide the statement of pro- posed deletions to EP or EO Technical. SECTION 12. HOW DOES A TAXPAYER APPEAL AN EP OR EO MANAGER’S OR AN APPEALS AREA DIRECTOR’S DECISION NOT TO SEEK TECHNICAL ADVICE? Taxpayer notified of decision nottoseekaTAM .01 If the EP or EO specialist’s or the appeal’s referral of an issue to EP or EO Technical for a TAM is not warranted, the EP or EO specialist or the appeals office will tell the taxpayer. A taxpayer’s request for such a referral will not be denied merely because EP or EO Technical provided legal advice, other than advice furnished pursuant to this revenue procedure, to the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office on the matter. Taxpayer may request review of decision not to seek a TAM .02 The taxpayer may request review of the decision of the EP or EO specialist or the ap- peals office not to request a TAM in all instances. To do so, the taxpayer must submit to that specialist or office, within 10 calendar days afterbeing told of the decision, a written statement of the facts, law, and arguments on the issue and the reasons why the taxpayer believes the matter should be referred to EP or EO Technical for a TAM. A taxpayer who needs more than 10 calendar days must justify in writing the request for an extension of time. The extension is subject to the approval of the EP or EO Examinations Area manager or the EP or EO Determi- nations manager or the appropriate appeals office. EP or EO Examinations AreamanagerorEPorEO Determinations manager or Appeals Area Director, Area 4, determines whether technical advice will be sought .03 The EP or EO specialist or the appeals office submits the taxpayer’s statement through proper channels to the EP or EO Examinations Area manager or the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, along with the EP or EO specialist’s or the appeals office’s statement of why the issue should not be referred to EP or EO Technical. The manager or chief determines, on the basis of the statements, whether a TAM will be requested. If the manager or chief determines that a TAM is not warranted and proposes to deny the request, the taxpayer is told in writing about the determination. In the letter to the taxpayer, the manager or chief states the reasons for the proposed denial (except in unusual situations when doing so would be prejudicial to the best interests of the Government). The taxpayer has 10 calendar days after receiving the letter to notify the manager or chief of agreement or disagreement with theproposed denial. Manager or area director’s decision may be reviewed but not appealed .04 The taxpayer may not appeal the decision of the EP or EO Examinations Area manager or the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, not to request a TAM from EP or EO Technical. However, if the taxpayer does not agree with the proposed de- nial, all data on the issue for which the TAM has been sought, including the taxpayer’s written request and statements, will be submitted tothe Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division or the Director, Appeals, Technical Services as appropriate. The Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Operating Division through the Director, Employee Plans, or the Director, Exempt Organizations or, if appropriate, the Chief, Appeals will review the proposed denial solely on the basis of the written record, and no confer- ence will be held with the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative. The appropriate Director or Chief or his or her representative may consult with EP or EO Technical and the Office of Chief Counsel, if necessary, and will notify the EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO De- terminations or the appeals office within 45 calendar days of receiving all the data regarding the request for a TAM whether the proposed denial is approved or disapproved. The EP or EO Examinations or the EP or EO Determinations or appeals office will then notify the taxpayer. Sec. 11.07 January 2, 20071742007–1 I.R.B. While the matter is being reviewed, the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office suspends action on the issue (except when the delay would prejudice the Government’s interest). The provisions of this revenue procedure regarding review of the proposed denial of a re- quest for a TAM continue to be applicable in those situations in which the authority normally exercised by the EP or EO Examinations Areamanager, the EP or EO Determinations man- ager, or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, has been delegated to another official. SECTION 13. HOW ARE REQUESTS FOR TAMS WITHDRAWN? Taxpayer notified.01 Once a request for a TAM has been sent to EP or EO Technical, only an EP or EO Ex- aminations Area manager, an EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, may withdraw that request for the TAM. He or she may ask to withdraw a request at any time before the responding transmittalmemorandum transmitting the TAM is signed. The EP or EO Examinations Area manager, the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, as appropriate, must notify the taxpayer in writing of an intent to withdraw the request for the TAM except— (1) when the period of limitations on assessment is about to expire and the taxpayer has declined to sign a consent to extend the period, or (2) when such notification would be preju dicial to the best interests of the Government. If the taxpayer does not agree that the request for a TAM should be withdrawn, the proce- dures in section 12 of this revenue procedure must be followed. EP or EO Technical may provide views .02 When a request for a TAM is withdrawn, EP or EO Technical may send its views to the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, when acknowledging the withdrawal request. In an appeals case, acknowl- edgment of the withdrawal request should be sent to the appropriate appeals office, through the Director, Technical Services, C:AP. In appropriate cases, the subject matter may be published as a revenue ruling or as a revenue procedure. SECTION 14. HOW ARE CONFERENCES SCHEDULED? If requested, offered to the taxpayer when adverse TAM proposed .01 If, after the TAM is analyzed, it appears that a TAM adverse to the taxpayer will be given, and if a conference has been requested, the taxpayer will be informed, by telephone if possible, of the time and place of the conference. Timeline.02 The conference for a TAM must be held within 21 calendar days after the taxpayer is contacted. If conferences are being arranged for more than one request for a TAM for the same tax- payer, they will be scheduled to cause the least inconvenience to the taxpayer. If considered appropriate, EP or EO Technical will notify the EP or EO specialist or the appeals office of the scheduled conference and will offer the EP or EO specialist or the appeals officer the op- portunity to attend the conference. The Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, the Chief, Appeals, the EP or EO Examinations Area manager, the EP or EO Deter- minations manager, or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, may designate other Service repre- sentatives to participate in the conference inlieu of, or in addition to, the EP or EO specialist or the appeals officer. 21-day period may be extended if justified and approved .03 An extension of the 21-day period will be granted only if the taxpayer justifies it in writ- ing, and the group manager (or his or her delegate) of the office to which the case is assigned approves it. No extension will be granted without the approval of the group manager (or his or her delegate). The taxpayer (or an authorizedrepresentative) must notify the EP Specialist Sec. 14.03 2007–1 I.R.B.175January 2, 2007 or the EO Specialist or the appeals office of the request for an extension. Except in rare and unusual circumstances, EP or EO Technical will not agree to an extension of more than 10 working days beyond the end of the 21-day period. The taxpayer’s request for an extension must be submitted before the end of the 21-day period, and should be submitted sufficiently before the end of this period to allow EP or EO Technical to consider, and either approve or deny, the request before the end of the 21-day period. If unusual circumstances near the endof the period make a timely written request impractical, the taxpayer (or anauthorized representative) should orally inform the assigned tax law specialist or actuary before the end ofthe period about the problem and about the forthcoming written request for an extension. The written request for an extension must be submitted to EP or EO Technical promptly after the oral request. The taxpayer will be told promptly (and later in writing) of the approval or denial of the requested extension. Denial of extension cannot be appealed .04 There is no right to appeal the denial of a request for an extension of a TAM. If EP or EO Technical is not advised of problems with meeting the 21-day period, or if the written request is not sent promptly after EP or EO Technical isnotified of problems with meeting the 21-day period, the TAM will be processed on the basis of the existing record. Entitled to one conference of right.05 A taxpayer is entitled by right to onlyone conference in EP or EO Technical except as provided in section 14.09 of this revenue procedure. This conference is normally held at the group level in EP Technical or EO Technical, whichever is appropriate. It is attended by a person who has authority to sign the transmittal memorandum discussed in section 16.13 on behalf of the group manager. When more than one group has taken an adverse position on an issue in the request, or when the position ultimately adopted by one group will affect another group’s determination, a representative from each group with authorityto sign for the group manager will attend the conference. If more than one subject is discussed at the conference, the discussion constitutes the conference of right for each subject discussed. To have a thorough and informed discussion of the issues, the conference usually is held after the group has had an opportunity to study the case. However, the taxpayer may request that the conference of right be held earlier in the consideration of the case than the Service would ordinarily designate. The taxpayer has no right to appeal the action of a group to any other Service official. But see section 14.09 for situations in which the Service may offer additional conferences. Conference may not be taped.06 Because conference procedures are informal, no tape, stenographic, or other verbatim recording of a conference may be made by any party. Conference may be delayed to address a request for relief under § 7805(b) .07 In the event of a tentative adverse determination, the taxpayer may request in writing a delay of the conference so that the taxpayercan prepare and submit a brief requesting re- lief under § 7805(b) (discussed in section 19 of this revenue procedure). The group manager (or his or her delegate) of the office to which the case is assigned will determine whether to grant or deny the request for delaying the conference. If such request is granted, the Service will schedule a conference on the tentatively adverse position and the § 7805(b) relief request within 10 days of receiving the taxpayer’s § 7805(b) request.Seesection 19.06 of this revenue procedure for the conference procedures if the § 7805(b) request is made after the conference on the substantive issues has been held. Service makes tentative recommendations .08 The senior Service representative at the conference ensures that the taxpayer has full opportunity to present views on all the issues inquestion. The Service representatives explain the tentative decision on the substantive issues. If the taxpayer requests relief under § 7805(b) (regarding limitation of retroactive effect), the Service representatives will discuss the tentative recommendation concerning the request for relief and the reason(s) for the tentative recommendation. Sec. 14.03 January 2, 20071762007–1 I.R.B. No commitment will be made as to the conclusion that the Service will finally adopt regard- ing any issue, including the outcome of the § 7805(b) request for relief. Additional conferences may be offered .09 The Service will offer the taxpayer an additional conference if, after the conference of right, an adverse holding is proposed on a new issue or on the same issue but on grounds different from those discussed at the first conference. When a proposed holding is reversed at a higher level with a result less favorable to the taxpayer, the taxpayer has no right to another conference if the grounds or arguments on which the reversal is based were discussed at the conference of right. The limitation on the number of conferences to which a taxpayer is entitled does not pre- vent EP or EO Technical from inviting a taxpayer to attend additional conferences, including conferences with an official higher than the group level, if EP or EO Technical personnel think they are necessary. Such conferences are not offered as a matter of course simply because the group has reached an adverse decision. In general, conferences with higher level officials are offered only if the Service determines that thecase presents significant issues of tax policy or tax administration and that the consideration of these issues would be enhanced by additional conferences with the taxpayer. In accordance with section 14.02 of this revenue procedure, the EP or EO specialist or the appeals office may be offered the opportunity to participate in any additional taxpayer’s con- ference, including a conferencewith an official higher than the group level. Section 14.02 of this revenue procedure also provides that other Service representatives are allowed to partici- pate in the conference. Additional information submitted after the conference .10 After the conference, the taxpayer must furnish to EP or EO Technical, whichever is applicable, any additional data, lines of reasoning, precedents, etc., thatthe taxpayer proposed and discussed at the conference but did not previously or adequately present in writing. This additional information must be submitted by letter with a penalties of perjury statement in the form described in section 16.10 of this revenue procedure. The taxpayer must also send a copy of the additional information to the EP or EO Exami- nations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, for comment. Any comments on additional information by Service personnel must be furnished promptly to the appropriate group in EP or EO Technical. If the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, does not have any comments, he or she must notify the group representative promptly. If the additional information has a significant impact on the facts in the request for a TAM, EP or EO Technical will ask EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or the Ap- peals Area Director, Area 4, for comments on the facts contained in the additional information submitted. The EP or EO Examinations officeor the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, will give the additional information prompt attention. If the additional information is not received from the taxpayer within 21 calendar days, the TAM will be issued on the basis of the existing record. An extension of the 21-day period for TAMs may be granted only if the taxpayer justifies it in writing, and the group manager (or his or her delegate) of the office to which the case is assigned approves the extension. Such extension will not be routinely granted. The procedures for requesting an extension of the 21-day period and notifying the taxpayer of the Service’s decision are the same as those in sections 14.03 and 14.04 of this revenue procedure. Normally held by telephone.11 The conference will be conducted by telephone, unless the taxpayer or the field requests that the conference be held in person. The taxpayer will be advised when to call the Service representatives (not a toll-free call). In no event will the conference be delayed to provide an in-person conference ratherthan a telephone conference. Sec. 14.11 2007–1 I.R.B.177January 2, 2007 In accordance with section 14.02 of this revenue procedure, the EP or EO specialist or ap- peals office will be offered the opportunity to participate in the telephone conference. Section 14.02 of this revenue procedure also provides that other Service representatives are allowed to participate in the conference. SECTION 15. HOW IS STATUS OF REQUEST OBTAINED? Taxpayer or taxpayer’s representative may request status from EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office .01 The taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative may obtain information on the status of the request for a TAM by contacting the EP or EOExaminations office or the EP or EO Deter- minations office or the appeals office that requested the TAM.Seesection 16.08 of this revenue procedure concerning the time for discussing the tentative conclusion with the taxpayer’s rep- resentative.Seesection 17.03 of this revenue procedure regarding discussions of the contents of the TAM with the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative. EP or EO Technical will give status updates to the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or Appeals Area Director, Area 4 .02 The group representative or manager to whom the TAM request is assigned will give status updates on the request once a month to the EP or EO Examination Area manager or the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. In addition, an EP or EO Examinations Area manager or an EP or EO Determinations manager or an Appeals Area Director, Area 4, may get current information on the status of the request for a TAM by calling the person whose name and telephone numberare shown on acknowledgment of receipt of the request for the TAM. Seesection 16.09 of this revenue procedure about discussing the final conclusions with the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations officeor the appeals office. Further, the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Ap- peals Area Director, Area 4, will be notified at the time the TAM is mailed. SECTION 16. HOW DOES EP OR EO TECHNICAL PREPARE THE TAM? Delegates authority to group managers .01 The authority to issue a TAM on issues under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Operating Division has largely been delegated to the man- agers of the Employee Plans Rulings & Agreements Technical and Actuarial groups, and the Technical Guidance and Quality Assurance group(collectively referred to as “EP Technical”); and of the Exempt Organizations Rulings & Agreements Technical groups and the Technical Guidance and Quality Assurance group (collectively referred to as “EO Technical”). Determines whether request has been properly made .02 A request for a TAM generally is given priority and processed expeditiously. As soon as the request for a TAM is assigned, the technical employee analyzes the file to see whether it meets all of the requirements of sections 7, 8, and 10 of this revenue procedure. However, if the request does not comply with the requirements of section 10.04 of this revenue procedure relating to the deletions statement, the Service will follow the procedure in section 11.06 of this revenue procedure. ContactstheEPorEO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office to discuss issues .03 Upon receipt of a request for a TAM, a representative of the group assigned the TAM will telephone the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office to acknowledge receipt of the TAM and to establish a point of contact. Within 21 calendar days from the receipt of a TAM, thetax law specialist or actuary should contact the EP or EO specialist or appeals office to discuss the procedural and substantive issues in the request that come within the group’s jurisdiction. Sec. 14.11 January 2, 20071782007–1 I.R.B. Informs the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office if any matters in the request have been referred to another group or office .04 If the technical advice request concerns matters within the jurisdiction of more than one group or office, a representative of the group thatreceived the original technical advice request generally informs the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office within 21 calendar days of receiving the request that— (1) the matters within the jurisdiction of another group or office have been referred to the other group or office for consideration, and (2) a representative of the other group or office will contact the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office about the referral of the technical advice request within 21 calendar days after receiving it in accordance with section 16.03 above. Informs the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office if additional information is needed .05 The group representative will inform the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office that the case is being returned if substantial addi- tional information is required to resolve an issue. Cases also should be returned for additional information when significant unresolved factual variances exist between the statement of facts submitted by the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office and the taxpayer. They shouldalso be returned if major procedural problems cannot be resolved by telephone. The EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Deter- minations office or the appeals office should promptly notify the taxpayer of the decision to return the case for further factual development or other reasons. If only minor procedural deficiencies exist, the group will request the additional information in the most expeditious mannerwithout returning the case. Informs the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office of the tentative conclusion .06 If all necessary information has been provided, the group representative informs the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office within 21 calendar days after receivingthe information for a TAM of his or her tentative conclusion. If a tentative conclusion has not been reached, gives date estimated for tentative conclusion .07 If a tentative conclusion has not been reached because of the complexity of the issue, the group representative informs the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office of the estimated date the tentative conclusion will be made. Advises the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office that preliminary conclusion not final .08 Because the group representative’s tentative conclusion may change during the prepara- tion and review of the TAM, the tentative conclusion should not be considered final. Therefore, neither the group representative nor the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Deter- minations or the appeals office should advise the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative of the tentative conclusion beforethe scheduling of the adverse conference or between the sched- uling and the commencement of the adverse conference. Advises the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals office of final conclusions .09 In all cases, the group representative should inform the EP or EO specialist or appeals office of EP or EO Technical’s final conclusions.The EP or EO specialist or the appeals office should be offered the opportunity to discuss theissues and EP or EO Technical’s final conclu- sions before the TAM is issued. If needed, requests additional information .10 If, following the initial contact referenced in section 16.03 of this revenue procedure, it is determined, after discussion with the appropriate group manager or reviewer, that addi- tional information is needed, a group representative will obtain the additional information from the taxpayer, the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, in the most expeditious manner possible. Any additional in- formation requested from the taxpayer by EP or EO Technical must be submitted by letter, accompanied by a penalties of perjury statement,within 21 calendar days after the request for information is made. Request for additional information by fax (1) To facilitate prompt action on TAM requests, the Service may request any additional information from the taxpayer by fax. Sec. 16.10 2007–1 I.R.B.179January 2, 2007 A request to fax a copy of additional information to the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative must be made in writing, either as part of the original TAM request or prior to the mailing of the request for additional information. The request to fax additional information must contain the fax number of the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s authorized representative to and from whom the document is to be faxed. Because of the unsecured nature of a fax transmission, the Service will take certain precau- tions to protect confidential information. For example, the Service will use a cover sheet that identifies the intended recipient of the fax andthe number of pages transmitted, that does not identify the taxpayer by name or tax identifying number and that contains a statement prohibit- ing unauthorized disclosure of the document if a recipient of the faxed document is not the intended recipient of the fax. Also, for example, the cover sheet should be faxed in an order in which it will become the first page covering the faxed document. Penalties of perjury statement(2) Additional information submitted to EP or EO Technical must be accompanied by the following declaration:“Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this information, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information contains all the relevant facts relating to the request for the infor- mation and such facts are true, correct, and complete.”This declaration must be signed and dated by the taxpayer, not the taxpayer’s representative. A stamped signature or a faxed signature is not permitted. (3) A written request for an extension of time to submit additional information must be received by EP or EO Technical within the 21-day period, giving compelling facts and circum- stances to justify the proposed extension. The group manager (or his or her delegate) of the office to which the case is assigned will determine whether to grant or deny the request for an extension. Except in rare and unusual circumstances, EP or EO Technical will not agree to an extension of more than 10 working days beyond the end of the 21-day period. There is no right to appeal the denial of a request for an extension. (4) If EP or EO Technical does not receive the additional information within 21 calendar days, plus any extensions granted by the appropriate group manager (or his or her delegate), EP or EO Technical will process the TAM based on the existing record. Requests taxpayer to send additional information to the EP or EO Technical and a copy to the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or Appeals Area Director, Area 4 .11 Whether or not requested by the Service,any additional information submitted by the taxpayer should be sent to the headquarters office. Generally, the taxpayer needs only to submit the original of the additional information to EP or EO Technical. However, in appropriate cases, EP or EO Technical may request additional copies of the information. Also, the taxpayer must send a copy to either the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, for comment. Any comments must be furnished promptly to the appropriate group in EP or EO Technical. If the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, does not have any comments, he or she mustnotify the group representative promptly. Informs the taxpayer when requested deletions will not be made .12 Generally, before replying to the request for a TAM, EP or EO Technical informs the taxpayer orally or in writing of the material likely to appear in the TAM that the taxpayer proposed be deleted but that the Service has determined should not be deleted. If so informed, the taxpayer may submit within 10 calendar days any further information or other arguments supporting the taxpayer’s proposed deletions. The Service will attempt to resolve all disagreements about proposed deletions before EP or EO Technical replies to the request for a TAM. However, the taxpayer does not have the right to a conference to resolve any disagreements about material to be deleted from the text of the TAM. These matters, however, may be considered at any conference otherwise scheduled for the request. Prepares reply in two parts.13 EP or EO Technical’s reply to a TAM request is in two parts. Each part identifies the taxpayer by name, address, identification number, and year or years involved. Sec. 16.10 January 2, 20071802007–1 I.R.B. The first part of the reply is a transmittal memorandum. In unusual cases, it is a way of giving the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office administrative or other information that under the nondisclosure statutes or for other reasons may not be discussed with the taxpayer. The second part is the TAM, which contains— (1) a statement of the issues; (2) a statement of the facts pertinent to the issues; (3) a statement of the pertinent law, tax treaties, regulations, revenue rulings, and other precedents published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and court decisions; (4) a discussion of the rationale underlyingthe conclusions reached by EP or EO Technical; and (5) the conclusions of EP or EO Technical. The conclusions give direct answers, whenever possible, to the specific issues raised by the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations officeor the appeals office. However, EP or EO Technical is not bound by the precise statement of the issues as submitted by the taxpayer or by the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office and may reframe the issuesto be answered in the TAM. The discussion in the TAM of the issues will be in sufficient detail so that the EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations or appeals officials will understand the reasoning underlying the conclusion. Accompanying a TAM subject to § 6110, is a notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to dis- close the TAM (including a copy of the versionproposed to be open to public inspection and notations of third party communications under § 6110(d)). Routes replies to appropriate office .14 Replies to requests for TAMs from EO Examinations Area managers and EO Determi- nations managers are addressed to: Internal Revenue Service Attn: EO Mandatory Review MC 4920 DAL 1100 Commerce Street Dallas, TX 75242 The EO Mandatory Review Staff will ensure that copies are forwarded to the EO Examina- tions Area manager or the EO Determinations manager. Replies to requests for TAMs from EP Examinations Area managers as well as replies to all requests for TAMs from other Operating Divisions of the Service involved in an examination where EP Technical does not have audit jurisdiction but has interpretive jurisdiction as enu- meratedinsection6.02ofRev.Proc. 2007–4, are addressed to: Internal Revenue Service Attn: EP Special Review – Room 1550 SE:T:EP:E:PR:SR:Technical Advice Coordinator P. O. Box 13163 Baltimore, MD 21203 The EP Special Review Staff will ensure thatcopies are forwarded to the applicable man- ager. Replies to requests for TAMs from EP Determinations managers, are addressed to: Sec. 16.14 2007–1 I.R.B.181January 2, 2007 Internal Revenue Service Attn: EP Determinations Quality Assurance P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45201 Replies to requests for TAMs from the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, are routed to the appropriate appeals office through Technical Services, C:AP. SECTION 17. HOW DOES AN EP OR EO EXAMINATIONS OR EP OR EO DETERMINATIONS OR AN APPEALS OFFICE USE THE TAMs? Generally applies advice in processing the taxpayer’s case .01 The EP or EO Examinations Area manager or the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, must process the taxpayer’s case on the basis of the conclusions in the TAM unless— (1) the EP or EO Examinations Area manager or the EP or EO Determinations manager or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, decides that the conclusions reached by EP or EO Technical in a TAM should be reconsidered (the reconsideration process may include a conference held with the EP or EO specialist or appeals office that requested the TAM and the tax law specialist or actuary who drafted the TAM), or (2) the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, in the case of a TAM unfavorable to the taxpayer, decides to settle the issue in the usual manner under existing authority. Subject to a request for reconsideration of the conclusions in a TAM, EP or EO Examina- tions or EP or EO Determinations must follow the conclusions in a TAM as to all issues and the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, must follow the conclusions in a TAM on issues of an organ- ization’s/plan’s status or qualification. Thus, if the TAM received by EP or EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations concerns an organization’s/plan’s status or qualification, the or- ganization/plan has no appeal to the appeals office on those specific issues. Reconsideration.02 The EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, has 30 calendar days after receipt of a TAM to either formally request reconsideration or give the adopted TAM to the taxpayer. Requests for TAM reconsideration must describe with specificity the errors in the TAM analysis and conclusions. Requests for reconsideration should not reargue points raised in the initial request, but should instead focus on points that the TAM overlooked or misconstrued in the arguments by the EP or EO Exam- inations office or the EP or EO Determinationsoffice or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, in support of their request. The Headquarters office may request further submissions from the field or the taxpayer, but the parties should make no additional submissions in the absence of such a request. If the field does not request reconsideration of a TAM, the TAM will take effect when the field provides a copy of the adopted TAM to the taxpayer, or at the end of the 30-day period following the issuance of the TAM to the field. Discussion with the taxpayer.03 EP or EO Technical will not discuss the contents of the TAM with the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s representative until the taxpayer has been given a copy by the EP or EO Examina- tions office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the appeals office. Gives copy to the taxpayer.04 The EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, only after adopting the TAM, gives the taxpayer (1) a copy of the TAM described in section 16.13, and (2) the notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to disclose the TAM (including a copy of the version proposed to be open to public inspection and notations of third party communications under § 6110(d)). Sec. 16.14 January 2, 20071822007–1 I.R.B. This requirement does not apply to a TAM involving a criminal or civil fraud investigation, or a jeopardy or termination assessment, as described in section 11.07 of this revenue proce- dure, or documents to which § 6104 (document open to public inspection) applies as described in section 10.03. Taxpayer may protest deletions not made .05 After receiving the notice under § 6110(f)(1) of intention to disclose the TAM, the tax- payer may protest the disclosure of certain information in it. The taxpayer must submit a written statement within 20 calendar days identifying those deletions not made by the Service that the taxpayer believes should have been made. The taxpayer must also submit a copy of the version of the TAM proposed to be open to public inspection with brackets around deletions proposed by the taxpayer that have not been made by EP or EO Technical. Generally, EP or EO Technical considers only thedeletion of material that the taxpayer has proposed be deleted or other deletions as required under § 6110(c) before the EP or EO Tech- nical reply is sent to the EP or EO Examinationsoffice or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4. Within 20calendar days after it receives the taxpayer’s response to the notice under § 6110(f)(1), EP or EO Technical must mail the taxpayer its final administrative conclusion about the deletions to be made. When no copy is given to the taxpayer .06 If EP or EO Technical tells the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Deter- minations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, that a copy of the TAM should not be given to the taxpayer and the taxpayer requests a copy, the EP or EO Examinations office or the EP or EO Determinations office or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, will tell the taxpayer that no copy will be given. SECTION 18. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF A TAM? Applies only to the taxpayer for whom TAM was requested .01 A taxpayer may not rely on a TAM issued by the Service for another taxpayer. Usually applies retroactively.02 Except when stated otherwise, a holding in a TAM is applied retroactively, unless the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division exercises discretionary author- ity under § 7805(b) to limit the retroactive effect of the holding. Section 18.06 below lists the criteria necessary for granting § 7805(b) relief, and section 18 of this revenue procedure describes the effect of § 7805(b) relief. Generally applied retroactively to modify or revoke prior TAM .03 A holding that modifies or revokes a holding in a prior TAM is applied retroactively, with one exception. If the new holding is less favorable to the taxpayer than the earlier one, it generally is not applied to the period when the taxpayer relied on the prior holding in situations involving continuing transactions. Applies to continuing action or series of actions until specifically withdrawn, modified or revoked .04 If a TAM relates to a continuing action or aseries of actions, ordinarily it is applied until specifically withdrawn or until the conclusion is modified or revoked by enactment of legislation, ratification of a tax treaty, a decision of the United States Supreme Court, or the issuance of regulations (temporary or final), a revenue ruling, or other statement published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking does not affect the application of a TAM. Applies to continuing action or series of actions until materia l facts change .05 A taxpayer is not protected a gainst retroactive modification or revocation of a TAM involving a continuing action o r a series of actions occurring after the material facts on which the TAM is based have changed. Does not apply retroactively under certain conditions .06 Generally, a TAM that modifies or revokesa letter ruling or another TAM or a determi- nation letter is not applied retroactively either to the taxpayer to whom or for whom the letter ruling or TAM or determination letter was originally issued, or to a taxpayer whose tax liability was directly involved in such letter ruling or TAM or determination letter if— (1) there has been no misstatement or omission of material facts; Sec. 18.06 2007–1 I.R.B.183January 2, 2007 (2) the facts at the time of the transaction are notmaterially different from the facts on which the letter ruling or TAM or determination letter was based; (3) there has been no change in the applicable law; (4) in the case of a letter ruling, it was originally issued on a prospective or proposed trans- action; and (5) the taxpayer directly involved in the letter ruling or TAM or determination letter acted in good faith in relying on the letter ruling or TAM or determination letter, and the retroactive modification or revocation would be to the taxpayer’s detriment. For example, the tax liability of each employee covered by a letter ruling or TAM ordetermination letter relating to a pension plan of an employer is directly involved in the letter ruling or TAM or determination letter. However, the tax liability of members of an industry is not directly involved in a letter ruling or TAM or determination letter issued to one of the members, and the holding in a modification or revocation of a letter ruling or TAM or determination letter to one member of an industry may be retroactively applied to other members of the industry. By the same reasoning, a tax practitioner may not obtain the nonretroactive application to one client of a modification or revocation of a letter ruling or TAM or determination letter previously issued to another client. When a letter ruling or determination letter to a taxpayer or a TAM involving a taxpayer is modified or revoked with retroactive effect, thenotice to the taxpayer, except in fraud cases, sets forth the grounds on which the modification or revocation is being made and the reason why the modification or revocation is being applied retroactively. In order for a TAM that modifies or revokes a letter ruling or another TAM or a determina- tion letter not to be applied retroactively either to the taxpayer to whom or for whom the letter ruling, TAM or determination letter was originally issued, or to a taxpayer whose tax liability was directly involved in such letter ruling, TAM or determination letter, such taxpayer gener- ally must request relief under § 7805(b) inthe manner described in section 19 below. SECTION 19. HOW MAY RETROACTIVE EFFECT BE LIMITED? Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 7805(b) .01 Under § 7805(b) the Commissioner or the Commissioner’s delegate has the discretion to prescribe the extent, if any, to which a TAMwill be applied without retroactive effect. Taxpayer may request Commissioner to exercise authority .02 A taxpayer who has received a TAM or for whom a TAM request is pending may request that the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s delegate, exercise the discretionary authority under § 7805(b) to limit the retroactive effect of any holding stated in the TAM, which may still be pending, which must have been issued, or to limit the retroactive effect of any subsequent modification or revocation of a TAM. Form of request to limit retroactivity—before an examination .03 When a TAM that concerns a continuing transaction is modified or revoked by, for ex- ample, a subsequent revenue ruling or final regulations, a request to limit the retroactive effect of the modification or revocation of the TAM must be made in the form of a request for a let- ter ruling if submitted before examination of the return that contains the transaction that is the subject of the request for the letter ruling.SeeRev. Proc. 2007–4. Form of request to limit retroactivity—during c ourse of an examination .04 When, during the cour se of an examination of a taxpayer’s return by EP or EO Exami- nations or consideratio n by the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, a taxpayer is informed that EP or EO Examinations or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, recommends that a TAM be modi- fied or revoked, a reque st to limit the retroactive application of the modification or revocation of the TAM must itself be made in the form of a request for a TAM.Seesections 7, 8 and 10 of this revenue procedu re and sections 19.07 and 19.08 below. The taxpayer must also submit a statement that the request is being made pursuant to § 7805(b). This statement must also indicate the relief requested and give the reasons and Sec. 18.06 January 2, 20071842007–1 I.R.B. arguments in support of the relief requested. It must also be accompanied by any documents bearing on the request. The explanation should discuss the five items listed in section 18.06 of this revenue procedure as they relate to the taxpayer’s situation. The taxpayer’s request, including the statement that the request is being made pursuant to § 7805(b), must be forwarded by EP or EO Examinations or the Appeals Area Director, Area 4, to EP or EO Technical for consideration. Form of request to limit retroactivity—technical advice that does not modify or revoke prior memorandum .05 A request to limit the retroactive effect of a holding in a TAM that does not modify or revoke a TAM may be made as part of that TAM request, either initially, or at any time before the TAM is issued by EP or EO Technical. In such a case, the taxpayer must also submit a statement in support of the application of § 7805(b), as described in section 19.04 above. Taxpayer’s right to a conference.06 When a request for a TAM concerns only the application of § 7805(b), the taxpaye rhas the right to a conference in EP or EO Technical in accordance with the provisions of section 14 of this revenue procedure. If the request for application of § 7805(b) is included in the request for a TAM on the sub- stantive issues or is made before the conference of right on the substantive issues, the § 7805(b) issues will be discussed at the taxpayer’s one conference of right. If the request for the application of § 7805(b) is made as part of a pending TAM request after a conference has been held on the substantive issues, and the Service determines that there is justification for having delayed the request, then the taxpayer will have the right to one conference of right concerning the application of § 7805(b), with the conference limited to discussion of this issue. Exhaustion of administrative remedies — employee plans determination letter requests .07 Where the applicant has requested EP Determinations to seek a TAM on the applica- bility of § 7805(b) relief to a qualification issue under § 401(a) pursuant to a determination letter request, the applicant’s administrative remedies will not be considered exhausted until EP Technical has a reasonable time to act on the request for a TAM. (Seesection20of Rev. Proc. 2007–6.) Exhaustion of administrative remedies — exempt organization matters .08 Where a TAM has been requested pursuant to an exempt organization’s request for § 7805(b) relief from the retroactive application of an adverse determination within the mean- ing of § 7428(a)(1), the exempt organization’s administrative remedies will not be considered exhausted, within the meaning of § 7428(b)(2),until EO Technical has a reasonable time to act on the request for a TAM. SECTION 20. WHAT IS THE EFFECT OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE ON OTHER DOCUMENTS? Rev. Proc. 2006–5 is superseded. SECTION 21. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective January 2, 2007. SECTION 22. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The collections of information contained in this revenue procedure have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduc- tion Act (44 U.S.C. § 3507) under control number 1545–1520. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collec- tion of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. The collections of information in this revenue procedure are in sections 6.03, 9, 10.01, 10.05, 11.04, 11.05, 11.06, 12.02, 12.03, 13.01, 14.03, 14.10, 16.10, 16.12, 17.05, 19.03, 19.04, and 19.05. This information is required to evaluate and process the request for a TAM. In addition, this information will be used to help the Service delete certain information from the text of the TAM before it is made available for public inspection, as required by § 6110. The collections of information are required to obtain a TAM. The likely respondents are businesses or other for-profit institutions and not-for-profit institutions. Sec. 22 2007–1 I.R.B.185January 2, 2007 The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is 1,950 hours. The estimated annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper varies from 4 hours to 60 hours, depending on individual circumstances, withan estimated average of 19.5 hours. The esti- mated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers is 100. The estimated annual frequency of responses is one request per applicant. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally, tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by § 6103. DRAFTING INFORMATIONThe principal author of this revenue procedure is Michael Rubin of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding how this revenue procedure applies to employee plans matters,please contact the Employee Plans Customer Assistance Service at 877–829–5500 (a toll-free number) between the hours of 8:30 am and 4:30 pm Eastern time, Monday through Friday. In the alternative, please contact Mr. Rubin at (202) 283–9888 (not a toll-free number). For exempt organizations matters, please contact Mr. Theodore Lieber at (202) 283–8999 or Mr. Wayne Hardesty at (202) 283–8976 (not toll- free numbers). Sec. 22 January 2, 20071862007–1 I.R.B. INDEX References are to sections in Rev. Proc. 2007–5 Additional Information —procedureforsubmission...................................................................sections16.02,16.05,16.10 afterconference ....................................................................................section14.10 —proposeddeletionsunder§6110..........................................................................section10.04 Chief Counsel —jurisdiction..............................................................................................section5.01 Conferences —offered ...................................................................................sections11.03,14.01,14.09 exceptions ............................................................................sections11.05,12.04,16.12 —pre-submission.............................................................................................section9 —scheduling................................................................................................section14 requesttolimitretroactivity.............................................................sections14.07,14.08,19.06 telephoneconferences...............................................................................section14.11 Definitions —technicaladvicememorandum ...............................................................................section3 Extension of Time —toappealdecisionnottorequest..........................................................................section12.02 —todisagreewithstatementoffacts .................................................................sections11.04,11.05 —toscheduleconference ...........................................................................sections14.03,14.05 —tosubmitadditionalinformation...................................................................sections14.10,16.10 Farmers’ Cooperatives...............................................................................sections4.02,5.01 Letter Ruling.............................................................................................section18.06 Mandatory Technical Advice.........................................................................sections4.04,7.01 Paperwork Reduction Act....................................................................................section22 Perjury Statement.................................................................................sections14.10,16.10 Power of Attorney........................................................................................section10.06 Public Disclosure under § 6110 —deletionstatementrequired...............................................................................section10.04 exceptionwhen§6104applies .......................................................................section10.03 failuretosubmit....................................................................................section11.06 —noticeofintentiontodisclose ............................................................................section17.04 protestingdeletionsnotmade..................................................................sections16.12,17.05 Representatives....................................................................................sections14.08,16.10 Retroactive Effect —ingeneral.........................................................................................sections18.02–.06 onletterruling......................................................................................section18.06 —requesttolimitretroactivity.................................................................................section19 employeeplansdeterminationletters..................................................................section19.07 exemptorganizationmatters..........................................................................section19.08 formatofrequest.............................................................................sections19.03,19.04 schedulingconference..................................................................sections14.07,14.09,19.06 2007–1 I.R.B.187January 2, 2007 INDEX References are to sections in Rev. Proc. 2007–5 Revenue Rulings —effectoncontinuingtransaction....................................................................sections18.04,18.05 requesttolimitretroactivity.....................................................................sections19.01–.05 Section 301.9100–1 Relief.....................................................................................section6 Status of TAM —toEPorEOExaminationsAreaorEPorEODeterminationsorappealsoffice..................................section15.02 —totaxpayer.............................................................................................section15.01 Where to Send —additionalinformation...................................................................................section16.10 —technicaladvicerequestfromappealsoffice................................................................section10.05 — technical advice request from EPor EO Examinations or EP or EO Determinations.........................................................................................section10.05 Withdrawal of TAM.........................................................................................section13 January 2, 20071882007–1 I.R.B. 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 2007–6 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THI S REVENUE PROCEDURE? ........................... .................. 192 .01Purposeofrevenueprocedure ................................................................................ 192 .02 Organization of revenue proce dure .......................................................... .................. 192 SECTION 2. WHAT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THIS PROCEDURE?............................................ 192 .01Ingeneral .................................................................................................. 192 .02Otherchanges .............................................................................................. 192 .03Otherguidance.............................................................................................. 193 PART I. PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINATION LETTER REQUESTS SECTION 3. ON WHAT ISSUES MAY TAXPAYERS REQUEST WRITTEN GUIDANCE UNDER THIS PROCEDURE? ........................................................................................ 194 .01Typesofrequests ........................................................................................... 194 .02Areasinwhichdeterminationletterswillnotbeissued .......................................................... 195 .03EGTRRA .................................................................................................. 195 SECTION 4. ON WHAT ISSUES MUST WRITTEN GUIDANCE BE REQUESTED UNDER DIFFERENT PROCEDURES? ....................................................................................... 196 .01TaxExemptandGovernmentEntities.......................................................................... 196 .02ChiefCounsel’srevenueprocedure............................................................................ 196 SECTION 5. WHAT IS THE GENERAL SCOPE OF A DETERMINATION LETTER?...................................... 196 .01Scopeofthissection ........................................................................................ 196 .02Scopeofdeterminationletters ................................................................................ 196 .03Nondiscriminationinamountrequirement ..................................................................... 197 .04Minimumcoverageand§401(a)(26)participationrequirements .................................................. 197 .05Nondiscriminatorycurrentavailabilityrequirement ............................................................. 197 .06Othernondiscriminationrequirements ......................................................................... 197 .07Relianceconditionedonretentionofinformation ............................................................... 197 .08Effectiveavailabilityrequirement ............................................................................. 197 .09Otherlimitsonscopeofdeterminationletter ................................................................... 197 .10Publication794 ............................................................................................. 197 SECTION 6. WHAT IS THE GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING DETERMINATION LETTERS?.................. 198 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 198 .02Qualifiedtrusteedplans...................................................................................... 198 .03Qualifiednontrusteedannuityplans ........................................................................... 198 .04Completeinformationrequired ............................................................................... 198 .05Completecopyofplanandtrustinstrumentrequired ............................................................ 198 .06Section9ofRev.Proc.2007–4applies......................................................................... 198 .07 Separate application for each single § 414(l) plan............................................................... 198 .08Coverageandnondiscriminationrequirements .................................................................. 198 .09Priorletters................................................................................................. 199 .10Userfees................................................................................................... 199 .11Interestedpartynotificationandcomment ...................................................................... 199 .12Contraryauthoritymustbedistinguished....................................................................... 199 .13Employer/employeerelationship .............................................................................. 199 .14Incompleteapplicationsreturned.............................................................................. 199 .15Effectoffailuretodisclosematerialfact ....................................................................... 199 .16Datarequirements........................................................................................... 199 .17Wheretofilerequests........................................................................................ 200 .18Submissionofrelatedplans................................................................................... 200 2007–1 I.R.B.189January 2, 2007 .19Submissionof30ormoreon-cycleapplicationsbyauthorizedrepresentative....................................... 200 .20Withdrawalofrequests....................................................................................... 200 .21Righttostatusconference .................................................................................... 201 .22Howtorequeststatusconference.............................................................................. 201 SECTION 7. INITIAL QUALIFICATION, ETC........................................................................ 201 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 201 .02Forms ..................................................................................................... 201 .03Applicationmustincludecopyofplanandamendments ......................................................... 202 .04Restatementsmayberequired ................................................................................ 202 .05Controlledgroups,etc. ...................................................................................... 202 SECTION 8. EMPLOYER RELIANCE ON M&P AND VOLUME SUBMITTER PLANS .................. .................. 203 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 203 .02Relianceequivalenttodeterminationletter...................................................................... 203 SECTION 9. DETERMINATION LETTER FILING PROCEDURES FOR M&P AND VOLUME SUBMITTER PLANS ............................................................................................... 203 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 203 .02Determinationletterforadoptionofvolumesubmitterplan....................................................... 203 .03DeterminationletterforadoptionofM&Pplan ................................................................. 204 .04Requiredinformation ........................................................................................ 204 .05Amendedplanistreatedasanindividually-designedplan ........................................................ 204 .06Requestsmadepriortotheissuanceofopinionletter ............................................................ 204 .07EGTRRA .................................................................................................. 204 SECTION 10. MULTIPLE EMPLOYER PLANS....................................................................... 205 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 205 .02Optiontofilefortheplanonlyorforboththeplanandemployersmaintainingtheplan.............................. 205 .03Wheretofile ............................................................................................... 205 .04 Determination letter sent to each employer who files Form 5300.................................................. 205 .05Additionofemployers ....................................................................................... 205 SECTION 11. MINOR AMENDMENT OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN............................................. 206 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 206 .02Form6406 ................................................................................................. 206 .03Additionalinformation ...................................................................................... 206 .04MinoramendmentproceduresmaynotbeusedforcomplexamendmentsorEGTRRAletter.......................... 206 .05 EP Determinations has discretion to determine whether use of minor amendment procedures is appropriate ................................................................................................. 206 SECTION 12. TERMINATION OR DISCONTINUANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS; NOTICE OF MERGERS, CONSOLIDATIONS, ETC. .............................................................................. 206 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 206 .02Forms ..................................................................................................... 206 .03Supplementalinformation.................................................................................... 207 .04Requireddemonstrationofnondiscriminationrequirements ...................................................... 207 .05CompliancewithTitleIVofERISA ........................................................................... 207 .06Terminationpriortotimeforamendingforchangeinlaw ........................................................ 208 .07Terminationpriortoendoftheon-cyclesubmissionperiod....................................................... 208 SECTION 13. GROUP TRUSTS..................................................................................... 208 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 208 .02Requiredinformation ........................................................................................ 208 SECTION 14. AFFILIATED SERVICE GROUPS; LEASED EMPLOYEES................................................ 208 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 208 .02Typesofrequestsunder§414(m)and§414(n).................................................................. 208 .03Employermustrequestthedeterminationunder§414(m)or§414(n) ............................................. 208 .04Forms ..................................................................................................... 208 January 2, 20071902007–1 I.R.B. .05Employerisresponsiblefordeterminingstatusunder§414(m)and§414(n) ....................................... 208 .06Omissionofmaterialfact..................................................................................... 209 .07Servicewillindicatewhether§414(m)or§414(n)wasconsidered ............................................... 209 .08M&Pplans ................................................................................................. 209 .09Requiredinformationfor§414(m)determination ............................................................... 209 .10Requiredinformationfor§414(n)determination................................................................ 210 SECTION 15. WAIVER OF MINIMUM FUNDING.................................................................... 210 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 210 .02ApplicabilityofRev.Proc.2004–15 .......................................................................... 210 .03WaiverrequestsubmittedtoEPTechnical...................................................................... 211 .04WaiveranddeterminationletterrequestsubmittedtoEPTechnical ................................................ 211 .05Handlingoftherequest ...................................................................................... 211 .06Whenwaiverrequestshouldbesubmitted...................................................................... 212 SECTION 16. SECTION 401(h) AND § 420 DETERMINATION LETTERS................................................ 212 .01Scope...................................................................................................... 212 .02Requiredinformationfor§401(h)determination................................................................ 212 .03Requiredinformationfor§420determination .................................................................. 212 PART II. INTERESTED PARTY NOTICE AND COMMENT SECTION 17. WHAT RIGHTS TO NOTICE AND COMMENT DO INTERESTED PARTIES HAVE?......................... 214 .01Rightsofinterestedparties ................................................................................... 214 .02Commentsbyinterestedparties ............................................................................... 214 .03RequestsforDOLtosubmitcomments ........................................................................ 215 .04RighttocommentifDOLdeclinestocomment ................................................................. 215 .05Confidentialityofcomments ................................................................................. 215 .06Availabilityofcomments .................................................................................... 216 .07Whencommentsaredeemedmade ............................................................................ 216 SECTION 18. WHAT ARE THE GENERAL RULES FOR NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES?............................ 216 .01Noticetointerestedparties ................................................................................... 216 .02Timewhennoticemustbegiven .............................................................................. 216 .03Contentofnotice............................................................................................ 216 .04Proceduresformakinginformationavailabletointerestedparties ................................................. 217 .05Informationtobeavailabletointerestedparties ................................................................. 217 .06Specialrulesiftherearelessthan26participants ............................................................... 217 .07Informationdescribedin§6104(a)(1)(D)shouldnotbeincluded ................................................. 218 .08Availabilityofadditionalinformationtointerestedparties........................................................ 218 .09Availabilityofnoticetointerestedparties ...................................................................... 218 PART III. PROCESSING DETERMINATION LETTER REQUESTS SECTION 19. HOW DOES THE SERVICE HANDLE DETERMINATION LETTER REQUESTS?............................ 218 .01Oraladvice................................................................................................. 218 .02Conferences ................................................................................................ 218 .03Determinationletterbasedsolelyonadministrativerecord ....................................................... 219 .04Noticeoffinaldetermination ................................................................................. 219 .05Issuanceofthenoticeoffinaldetermination.................................................................... 219 SECTION 20. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES....................................................... 220 .01Ingeneral .................................................................................................. 220 .02Stepsforexhaustingadministrativeremedies ................................................................... 220 .03Applicant’srequestfor§7805(b)relief ........................................................................ 220 .04Interestedparties............................................................................................ 220 .05Deemedexhaustionofadministrativeremedies ................................................................. 220 .06Servicemustactonappeal ................................................................................... 220 .07Servicemustacton§7805(b)request ......................................................................... 220 .08Effectoftechnicaladvicerequest ............................................................................. 221 2007–1 I.R.B.191January 2, 2007 SECTION 21. WHAT EFFECT WILL AN EMPLOYEE PLAN DETERMINATION LETTER HAVE?......................... 221 .01Scopeofrelianceondeterminationletter....................................................................... 221 .02Effectofdeterminationletteronminorplanamendment ......................................................... 221 .03Sections13and14ofRev.Proc.2007–4applicable............................................................. 221 .04Effectofsubsequentpublicationofrevenueruling,etc. .......................................................... 221 .05Determinationletterdoesnotapplytotaxabilityissues .......................................................... 221 SECTION 22. EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE PROCEDURES......................................................... 221 SECTION 23. EFFECTIVE DATE................................................................................... 222 SECTION 24. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT...................................................................... 222 DRAFTING INFORMATION........................................................................................ 222 EXHIBIT......................................................................................................... 223 APPENDIX §§ 401(h) AND 420 DETERMINATION LETTERS........................................................... 225 SECTION 1. WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVENUE PROCEDURE? Purpose of revenue procedure.01 This revenue procedure sets forth the procedures of the various offices of the Internal Revenue Service for issuing determination letters on the qualified status of pension, profit- sharing, stock bonus, annuity, and employee stock ownership plans (ESOPs) under §§ 401, 403(a), 409 and 4975(e)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and the status for exemption of any related trusts or custodial accounts under § 501(a). Also see Rev. Proc. 2005–66, 2005–2 C.B. 509, which contains a description ofthe determination letter program, including when to submit a request for a determination letter within the 5-year and 6-year staggered remedial amendment cycles, that apply to individually designed and pre-approved plans. Organization of revenue procedure .02 Part I of this revenue procedure contains instructions for requesting determination letters for various types of plans and transactions. Part II contains procedures for providing notice to interested parties and for interested parties to comment on determination letter requests. Part III contains procedures concerningthe processing of determination letter requests and describes the effect of a determination letter. SECTION 2. WHAT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THIS PROCEDURE? In general.01 This revenue procedure is a general update of Rev. Proc. 2006–6, 2006–1 I.R.B 204, which contains the Service’s general proceduresfor employee plans determination letter re- quests. Other changes.02 In addition to minor revisions, such as updating references, the following changes have been made: (1) Section 2.03 is revised to reference the 2006 Cumulative List, Notice 2007–3, 2007–2 I.R.B. (January 8, 2007). (2) Section 3.03 is revised to reference the first submission period for Cycle B individually designed plans and multiple employer plans. (3) Section 6.04 is revised to include EmployeePlans Compliance Resolution System doc- umentation when requesting a determination letter. (4) Section 6.19 is revised to change the pre-notification contact for authorized representa- tives submitting determination applications for 30 or more on-cycle plans. January 2, 20071922007–1 I.R.B. (5) Section 7.02 is revised to reference the first submission period for Cycle B individually designed plans and multiple employer plans. (6) Section 7.03 is revised to clarify the language regarding the inclusion of copies of plan amendments with determination letter applications. (7) Section 7.04 is revised to add languagefrom section 15.04 of Rev. Proc. 2005–66 regarding plan restatements. (8) Section 12.01 is revised to include Form 8905,CertificationofIntentToAdoptaPre- Approved Plan. (9) Section 12.07 is added to include that a plan that terminates prior to the end of an on-cyle submission period does not have to be restated. Other guidance.03 Other guidance affecting this revenue procedure: Rev. Proc. 2005–16, 2005–1 C.B. 674, describes the procedures for the “pre-approval” of plans under the master and prototype (M&P) program and the volume submitter (VS) pro- gram. Rev. Proc. 2005–66, 2005–2 C.B. 509, describes a new system of remedial amendment cycles that applies to pre-approved plans and individually designed plans, and the deadlines to submit applications for opinion, advisory and determination letters. The Service issues a Cumulative List every year identifying changes affecting plan qualification requirements to be used by plans whose remedial amendment cycle begins in the month of February following the publication of the Cumulative List. The 2004 Cumulative List is contained in Notice 2004–84, 2004–2 C.B. 1030, the 2005 Cumulative List is contained in Notice 2005–101, 2005–2 C.B. 1219, and the 2006 Cumulative List is contained in Notice 2007–3, 2007–2 I.R.B. (January 8, 2007). 2007–1 I.R.B.193January 2, 2007 PART I. PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINATION LETTER REQUESTS SECTION3.ONWHATISSUES MAY TAXPAYERS REQUEST WRITTEN GUIDANCE UNDER THIS PROCEDURE? Types of requests.01 Determination letters may be requested on completed and proposed transactions as set forth in the table below: TYPE OF REQUESTFORMS REV. PROC. SECTION 1. Initial Qualification, etc. a. Individually-Designed Plans (including collectively bargained plans) 5300, Schedule Q (optional) 7 b. ESOPs5300, 5309 Schedule Q (optional) 7 c. Adoptions of Master & Prototype Plans5307, Schedule Q (optional) 9 d. Adoptions of Volume Submitter Planss5307, Schedule Q (optional) 9 e. Multiple Employer Plans5300, Schedule Q (optional) 10 f.Group TrustsCover letter13 2. Minor Amendments640611 3. Termination a. In general5310, 6088 Schedule Q (optional) 12 b. Multiemployer plan covered by PBGC insurance 5300, 6088, Schedule Q (optional) 12 Note: Form 5310–A,Notice of Plan Merger, Consolidation, Spinoff, or Transfer of Plan Assets or Liabilities; Notice of Qualified Separate Lines of Business, generally must be filed not less than 30 days beforethe merger, consolidation or transfer of assets and liabilities. The filing of Form 5310–A will not result in the issuance of a determination letter. 4. Special Procedures a. Affiliated Service Group Status (§ 414(m)), Leased Employees (§ 414(n)) 5300, Schedule Q (optional) 14 b. Minimum Funding Waiver5300, Schedule Q (optional) 15 c. Section 401(h) Determination Letters5300, Schedule Q (optional) 16 d. Section 420 Determination Letters Including Other Matters Under § 401(a) 5300, Schedule Q (optional), Cover letter, Checklist 16 e. Section 420 Determination Letters Excluding Other Matters Under § 401(a) Cover letter, Checklist 16 January 2, 20071942007–1 I.R.B. Areas in which determination letters will not be issued .02 Determination letters issued in accordance with this revenue procedure do not include determinations on the following issues withinthe jurisdiction of the Commissioner, TE/GE: (1) Issues involving §§ 72, 79, 105, 125, 127, 129, 402, 403 (other than 403(a)), 404, 409(l), 409(m), 412, 457, 511 through 515, and 4975 (other than 4975(e)(7)), unless these determina- tion letters are authorized under section 7 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4, page 118, this Bulletin. (2) Plans or plan amendments for which automatic approval is granted pursuant to section 19.01 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16. (3) Plan amendments described below (these amendments will, to the extent provided, be deemed not to alter the qualified status of a plan under § 401(a)). (a) An amendment solely to permit a trust forming part of a plan to participate in a pooled fund arrangement described in Rev. Rul. 81–100, 1981–1 C.B. 326, as clarified and modified by Rev. Rul. 2004–67, 2004–2 C.B. 28; (b) An amendment that merely adjusts the maximum limitations under § 415 to reflect annual cost-of-living increases under § 415(d), other than an amendment that adds an automatic cost-of-living adjustment provision to the plan; and (c) An amendment solely to include language pursuant to § 403(c)(2) of Title I of the Em- ployee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974(ERISA) concerning the reversion of employer contributions made as a result of mistake of fact. (4) This section applies to determination letter requests with respect to plans that combine an ESOP (as defined in § 4975(e)(7) of the Code) with retiree medical benefit features described in § 401(h) (HSOPs). (a) In general, determination letters will not be issued with respect to plans that combine an ESOP with an HSOP with respect to: (i) whether the requirements of § 4975(e)(7) are satisfied; (ii) whether the requirements of § 401(h) are satisfied; or (iii) whether the combination of an ESOP with an HSOP in a plan adversely affects its qualification under § 401(a). (b) A plan is considered to combine an ESOP with an HSOP if it contains ESOP provisions and § 401(h) provisions. (c) However, an arrangement will not be considered covered by section 3.02(4) of this revenue procedure if, under the provisions of the plan, the following conditions are satisfied: (i) No individual accounts are maintained in the § 401(h) account (except as required by § 401(h)(6)); (ii) No employer securities are held in the § 401(h) account; (iii) The § 401(h) account does not contain the proceeds (directly or otherwise) of an exempt loan as defined in § 54.4975–7(b)(1)(iii) of the Pension Excise Tax Regulations; and (iv) The amount of actual contributions to provide § 401(h) benefits (when added to actual contributions for life insurance protection under the plan) does not exceed 25 percent of the sum of: (1) the amount of cash contributions actually allocated to participants’ accounts in the plan and (2) the amount of cash contributions used to repay principal with respect to the exempt loan, both determined on an aggregate basis since the inception of the § 401(h) arrangement. EGTRRA.03 On February 1, 2007, the Service will begin to accept applications for determination letters for some individually designed plans (depending on their cycle)and multiple employer 2007–1 I.R.B.195January 2, 2007 plans that take into account the qualification requirements of the Code as amended by EGTRRA, and other items identified on the 2006 Cumulative List in Notice 2007–3. This opening of the determination letter programfor the initial remedial amendment cycle (i.e., EGTRRA remedial amendment period) is for individually designed plans and multiple employer plans that fall within Cycle B, and the submission period for Cycle B plans ends on January 31, 2008. The cycles commence in different years for different plans within a staggered five-year period, so not all individually designed plans will have the same cycle or submission period. Further, the submission periods for pre-approved defined contribution and defined benefit plans are different than those that apply to individually designed plans.See Rev. Proc. 2005–16 and Rev. Proc. 2005–66 for details. SECTION4.ONWHATISSUES MUST WRITTEN GUIDANCE BE REQUESTED UNDER DIFFERENT PROCEDURES? TE/GE.01 Other procedures for obtaining rulings, determination letters, opinion letters, etc., on matters within the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, TE/GE are contained in the following revenue procedures: (1) Employee Plans Technical (EP Technical) letter rulings, information letters, etc.:See Rev. Proc. 2007–4, page 118, this Bulletin. (2) M&P and VS plans:SeeNotice 2001–42, 2001–2 C.B. 70, Notice 2001–57, 2001–2 C.B. 279, Rev. Proc. 2001–55, 2001–2 C.B. 552, Rev. Proc. 2002–29, 2002–1 C.B. 1176 (as modified by Rev. Proc. 2003–10, 2003–1 C.B. 259), Rev. Proc. 2002–73, 2002–2 C.B. 932, Rev. Proc. 2003–72, 2003–2 C.B. 578, Rev. Proc. 2004–25, 2004–1 C.B. 791, Notice 2004–84, 2004–2 C.B. 1030, Rev. Proc. 2005–16, and Rev. Proc. 2005–66. (3) Technical advice requests:SeeRev. Proc. 2007–5, page 161, this Bulletin. Chief Counsel’s revenue procedure .02 For the procedures for obtaining letter rulings, determination letters, etc., on matters within the jurisdiction of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Gov- ernment Entities), or within the jurisdiction of other offices of Chief Counsel, see Rev. Proc. 2007–1, page 1, this Bulletin. SECTION 5. WHAT IS THE GENERAL SCOPE OF A DETERMINATION LETTER? Scope of this section.01 This section delineates, generally, the scope of an employee plan determination letter. It identifies certain qualification requirements, relating to nondiscrimination, that are considered by the Service in its review of a plan only at theelection of the applicant. This section also identifies certain qualification requirements that are not considered by the Service in its review of a plan and with respect to which determinationletters do not provide reliance. This section applies to all determination letters other than letters issued in response to an application filed on Form 6406,Short Form Application for Determination for Minor Amendment of Employee Benefit Plan, letters relating to the qualified status of group trusts; and certain letters relating solely to the requirements of § 420, regarding the transfer of assets in a defined benefit plan to a health benefit account described in § 401(h). For additional information pertaining to the scope of reliance on a determination letter, see sections 8, 9 and 21 of this revenue procedure, and section 19 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16. Scope of determination letters.02 In general, employee plans are reviewed by the Service for compliance with the form requirements (that is, those plan provisions that are required as a condition of qualification under § 401(a)). In addition, as described below, certain nondiscrimination requirements are considered if the applicant specifically requests that they be considered. For terminating plans, the requirements are those that apply as of the date of termination. See Rev. Proc. 2005–66 for further details on the scope of the Service’s review of determination letter applications. January 2, 20071962007–1 I.R.B. Nondiscrimination in amount requirement .03 Unless the applicant elects otherwise, aplan will not be reviewed for, and a determina- tion letter may not be relied on with respect to, whether a plan satisfies one of the safe harbors or the general test for nondiscrimination in amount of contributions or benefits requirements under § 1.401(a)(4)–1(b)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations. Minimum coverage and § 401(a)(26) participation requirements .04 Unless the applicant elects otherwise, aplan will not be reviewed for, and a determina- tion letter may not be relied on with respect to, the minimum coverage requirements of § 410(b). If the applicant demonstrates that the plan satisfies the coverage requirements of § 410(b), the determination letter may also be relied on with respect to the participation requirements of § 401(a)(26). Nondiscriminatory current availability requirement .05 If the applicant demonstrates that the plan satisfies the coverage requirements of § 410(b), the determination letter may also be relied on as to whether the plan satisfies the nondiscriminatory current availability requirements of § 1.401(a)(4)–4(b) with respect to those benefits, rights, and features that are currently available (within the meaning of § 1.401(a)(4)–4(b)(2)) to all employees in the plan’s coverage group. The plan’s coverage group consists of those employees who are treated as currently benefiting under the plan (within the meaning of § 1.410(b)–3(a)) for purposes of demonstrating that the plan satisfies the minimum coverage requirements of § 410(b). Applications will not be reviewed as to, and determination letters may not be relied on with respect to, whether the plan satisfies the requirements of § 1.401(a)(4)–4(b) with respect to any benefit, right, or feature other than the ones described above, except those that arespecified by the applicant and for which the applicant has provided information relevant to the determination. Other nondiscrimination requirements .06 An applicant may also ask that the reviewof its plan consider certain other nondis- crimination requirements which are described in Schedule Q (Form 5300), such as whether a definition of compensation satisfies § 414(s). Reliance conditioned on retention of information .07 A favorable determination letter may be relied on with respect to whether a plan satisfies a coverage or nondiscrimination requirement only if the application, demonstrations and other information submitted to the Service in support of a favorable determination is retained by the applicant. Effective availability requirement.08 In no event will any plan be reviewed to determine, and a determination letter may not be relied on with respect to, whether any benefit, right, or feature under the plan satisfies the effective availability requirement of § 1.401(a)(4)–4(c). Other limits on scope of determination letter .09 Determination letters may generally be relied on with respect to whether the timing of a plan amendment (or series of amendments) satisfies the nondiscrimination requirements of § 1.401(a)(4)–5(a) of the regulations, unless the plan amendment is part of a pattern of amend- ments that significantly discriminates in favorof highly compensated employees. A favorable determination letter does not provide reliance for purposes of § 404 and § 412 with respect to whether an interest rate (or any other actuarial assumption) is reasonable. Furthermore, a favorable determination letter will not constitute a determination with respect to the use of the substantiation guidelines contained in Rev. Proc. 93–42, 1993–2 C.B. 540,e.g.,adeter- mination letter will not consider whether data submitted with an application is substantiation quality. Lastly, a favorable determination letter will not constitute a determination with respect to whether any requirements of § 414(r), relating to whether an employer is operating quali- fied separate lines of business, are satisfied. However, if an employer is relying on § 414(r) to satisfy the minimum coverage or § 401(a)(26) participation requirements, and the applicant so requests, a determination letter will take into account whether the plan satisfies the nondis- criminatory classification test of § 410(b)(5)(B). In this case, if the requirements of § 410(b) or § 401(a)(26) are to be applied on an employer-wide basis under the special rules for em- ployer-wide plans, a determination letter will take into account whether the requirements of the applicable special rule set forth in § 1.414(r)–1(c)(2)(ii) or § 1.414(r)–1(c)(3)(ii) are met. Publication 794.10 Publication 794,Favorable Determination Letter, contains other information regarding the scope of a determination letter, including the requirement that all information submitted 2007–1 I.R.B.197January 2, 2007 with the application be retained as a condition of reliance. In addition, the specific terms of each letter may further define its scope andthe extent to which it may be relied upon. SECTION 6. WHAT IS THE GENERAL PROCEDURE FOR REQUESTING DETERMINATION LETTERS? Scope.01 This section contains procedures that are generally applicable to all determination letter requests. Additional procedures for specific requests are contained in sections 7 through 16. Qualified trusteed plans.02 A trust created or organized in the United States and forming part of a pension, profit- sharing, stock bonus or annuity plan of an employer for the exclusive benefit of its employees or their beneficiaries that meets the requirementsof§401isaqualifiedtrustandisexempt from federal income tax under § 501(a) unlessthe exemption is denied under § 502, relating to feeder organizations, or § 503, relating to prohibited transactions, if, in the latter case, the plan is one describedin § 503(a)(1)(B). Qualified nontrusteed annuity plans .03 A nontrusteed annuity plan that meets theapplicable requirements of § 401 and other additional requirements as provided under § 403(a) and § 404(a)(2), (relating to deductions of employer contributions for the purchase of retirement annuities), qualifies for the special tax treatment under § 404(a)(2), and the other sections of the Code, if the additional provisions of such other sections are also met. Complete information required.04 An applicant requesting a determination letter must file the material required by this rev- enue procedure with the Employee Plans Determinations manager (EP Determinations) at the address in section 6.17. The filing of the application, when accompanied by all information and documents required by this revenue procedure, will generally serve to provide the Service with the information required to make the requested determination. However, in making the determination, the Service may require the submission of additional information. Information submitted to the Service in connection with an application for determination may be subject to public inspection to the extent provided by § 6104. The applicant should include Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System documentation, if any, (e.g., closing agreement or com- pliance statement) with the determination letter application. Complete copy of plan a nd trust instrument required .05 Except in the case o f applications involving master and prototype plans filed on Form 5307, minor amendment s described in section 11, or determination letters for volume submitter plans under section 9. 02(2)(d), a complete copy of the plan and trust instrument is required to be included with the d etermination letter application. The determination letter application must include a copy of the s igned and dated timely good faith EGTRRA amendments and other plan amendments (even if t hese amendments are dated earlier than a previous determination letter issued with respect t o the plan) to show that the conditions for eligibility for the EGTRRA remedial amendment period as set forth in Notice 2001–42 are satisfied. See sections 7.03 and 7.04 for what mus t be included with applications involving plan amendments that are not minor amendments. Section 9 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4 applies .06 Section 9 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4 is generally applicable to requests for determination letters under this revenue procedure. Separate application for each single § 414(l) plan .07 A separate application is required for eachsingle plan within the meaning of § 414(l). This requirement does not pertain to applicationsregarding the qualified status of group trusts. Coverage and nondiscrimination requirements .08 An applicant may request that the plan be reviewed to determine that the ratio percent- age test of § 410(b)(1) is satisfied or that the plan satisfies one of the design-based safe harbors under § 401(a)(4) by completing the appropriate elective lines on Form 5300 or Form 5307. Schedule Q (Form 5300) may be filed with the application, other than an application filed on Form 6406, to request consideration of the general test under § 401(a)(4), the average benefit test of § 410(b)(2), or any of the other requirements described on Schedule Q. The applicant must include with the application form the material and demonstrations called for in the in- structions to Form 5300 or Form 5307, and, if applicable, Schedule Q. January 2, 20071982007–1 I.R.B. Prior letters.09 If the plan has received a favorable determination letter in the past, the application must include a copy of the latest determination letter,if available. If the letter is not available, an explanation must be included with the application, and the employer must include a copy of the prior plan or adoption agreement, including the opinion or advisory letter, if applicable. User fees.10 The appropriate user fee, if applicable, must be paid according to the procedures of Rev. Proc. 2007–8, page 230, this Bulletin. Form 8717,User Fee for Employee Plan Determination Letter Request, must accompany each determination letter request. If the criteria for the user fee exemption are met in accordance with Notice 2003–49, 2003–2 C.B. 294,the certification on Form 8717 must be signed. Stamped signatures are not acceptable. Interested party notification and comment .11 Before filing an application, the applicant requesting a determination letter must satisfy the requirements of section 3001(a) of ERISA,and § 7476(b)(2) of the Code and the regulations thereunder, which provide that an applicant requesting a determination letter on the qualified status of certain retirement plans must notify interested parties of such application. The general rules of the Service with respect to notifying interested parties of requests for determination letters relating to the qualification of plans involving §§ 401 and 403(a) are set out below in sections 17 and 18 of this revenue procedure. Contrary authority must be distinguished .12 If the application for determination involves an issue where contrary authorities exist, failure to disclose or distinguish such significant contrary authorities may result in requests for additional information, which will delay action on the application. Employer/employee relationship.13 The Service ordinarily does not make determinations regarding the existence of an em- ployer-employee relationship as part of its determinationonthequalification of a plan, but relies on the applicant’s representations or assumptions, stated or implicit, regarding the exis- tence of such a relationship. The Service will, however, make a determination regarding the existence of an employer-employee relationship when so requested by the applicant. In such cases, the application with respect to the qualification of the plan should be filed in accordance with the provisions of this revenue procedure, contain the information and documents in the instructions to the application, and be accompanied by a completed Form SS–8,Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding,and any information and copies of documents the organization deems appropriate to establish its status. The Service may, in addition, require further information that it considers necessary to determine the employment status of the individuals involved or the qualification of the plan. After the employer-employee relationships have been determined, EP Determinations may is- sue a determination letter as to the qualification of the plan. Incomplete applications returned.14 If an applicant requesting adetermination letter does not comply with all the required provisions of this revenue procedure, EP Determinations, in its discretion, may return the ap- plication and point out to the applicant those provisions which have not been met. The failure to provide information required by an application, including any supplemental information re- quired by the instructions for the application,may result in the application being returned to the applicant as incomplete. The request may also be returned pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2007–8 if the correct user fee is not attached. If such a request is returned to the applicant, the 270-day period described in § 7476(b)(3) will not begin to run until such time as the provisions of this section have been satisfied. Effect of failure to disclose material fact .15 The Service may determine, based on the application form, the extent of review of the plan document. A failure to disclose a material fact or misrepresentation of a material fact on the application may adversely affect the reliance that would otherwise be obtained through issuance by the Service of a favorable determination letter. Similarly, failure to accurately provide any of the information called for on any form required by this revenue procedure may result in no reliance. Data requirements.16 The applicant is responsible for the accuracy of any factual representations and conclu- sions contained in the application. In some circumstances, applicants may not be able to use precise data in preparing demonstrations or schedules that may be required to be submitted 2007–1 I.R.B.199January 2, 2007 with the application. Therefore, the use of estimated data in these demonstrations and sched- ules is not prohibited. In addition, the data used may be for a prior plan year, provided the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the data is the most recent data available, (2) there is no misstatement or omission of material fact withrespect to such prior year’s data, (3) there has been no material change in the facts (including achange in the benefits provided under the plan and employee demographics) since such prior plan year, (4) the same data is used throughout the application, (5) the data is relevant to theoperational effect of the plan provisions that are under review, and (6) the applicant clearly discloses that prior year’s data is being submitted with the application. The use of estimated or prior year’s data is not a misrepresentation of material fact. A determination letter that is based on estimated or prior year’s data, however, may not be relied upon to the extent that such data does not satisfy the substantiation guide- lines in Rev. Proc. 93–42. Regardless of whether the data is actual or estimated, or whether it is for the current or a prior year, data that is presented in a determination letter application must reflect any changes in the law that are considered by the Service in its determination of the plan’s qualified status. Wheretofilerequests.17 Requests for determination letters are to be addressed to EP Determinations at the fol- lowing address: Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 192 Covington, KY 41012–0192 Requests shipped by Express Mail or adelivery service should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service 201 West Rivercenter Blvd. Attn: Extracting Stop 312 Covington, KY 41011 Determination letter applications will not be accepted via fax. Submission of related plans.18 If applications for two ormore plans of the same employer are submitted together, each application should include a cover letter that identifies the name of the employer and the plan numbers and employer identification numbersof all the related plans submitted together. Submissionof30ormoreon-cycle applications by authorized representative .19 An authorized representative who will be submitting determination letter applications for 30 or more on-cycle plans at one time should pre-notify the Service of the submissions so that the Service can endeavor to ensure that the applications will be reviewed in one area. The pre-notification should be e-mailed toDavid.J.Nelson@irs.govand should include the follow- ing information: the firm name, the names of the authorized representative(s) submitting the plans, the name and phone number of the contact person, the approximate number of submis- sions, and the expected date(s) of the submissions. Upon receipt of the e-mail, the representa- tive will be contacted and assigned a number that must be entered in green ink at the upper left hand corner of the applications. For further discussion, see the Spring/Summer 2002 edition of the Employee Plans Newsletter available atwww.irs.gov/retirement. Withdrawal of requests.20 The applicant’s request for a determination letter may be withdrawn by a written re- quest at any time prior to the issuance of a final adverse determination letter. If an appeal to a proposed adverse determination letter is filed, a request for a determination letter may be withdrawn at any time prior to the forwarding of the proposed adverse action to the Chief, Ap- peals Office. In the case of a withdrawal, theService will not issue a determination of any type. A failure to issue a determination letteras a result of a withdrawal will not be consid- ered a failure of the Secretary or his delegate to make a determination within the meaning of § 7476. However, the Service may consider the information submitted in connection with the withdrawn request in a subsequent examination. Generally, the user fee will not be refunded if the application is withdrawn. January 2, 20072002007–1 I.R.B. Right to status conference.21 An applicant for a determination letter has the right to a have a conference with the EP Determinations Manager concerning the status of the application if the application has been pending at least 270 days. The status conference may be by phone or in person, as mutually agreed upon. During the conference, any issues relevant to the processing of the application may be addressed, but the conference will not involve substantive discussion of technical is- sues. No tape, stenographic, or other verbatimrecording of a status conference may be made by any party. Subsequent status conferences may also be requested if at least 90 days have passed since the last preceding status conference. How to request status conference.22 A request for a status conference with the EP Determinations Manager is to be made in writing and is to be sent to the specialist assigned to review the application or, if the applicant does not know who is reviewing the application, to the EP Determinations Manager at the address in section 6.17. If, pursuant to section 15, the application for a determination letter has been submitted to Employee Plans Technical (EP Technical) together with a request for a waiver of minimum funding, the request for a status conference should be sent to the address in section 15.03. In this case, the right to a status conference will be with the EP Technical Manager or designee. SECTION 7. INITIAL QUALIFICATION, ETC. Scope.01 This section contains the proceduresfor requesting determination lett ers for individu- ally-designed defined contribution and defined benefit plans including e mployee stock owner- ship plans in the following circumstances: (1) Initial qualification. (2) Amendment (other than minor amendments described in section 11 below for which Form 6406 is appropriate). (3) Restatement of plan. (4) Qualification of a plan in the event of a partial termination. (5) Change in scope of determination letter.This means that the applicant has previously received a favorable determination letter for the plan and now wishes to modify the scope of the letter, for example, by requesting the Service to review the plan for certain nondiscrimination requirements that were not within the scope of the earlier letter. (6) Other circumstances (excluding plan termination) such as a change in the demographics of the employer or a change in the method of testing the plan that was used in a demonstration submitted in support of anearlier application. Forms.02 A determination letter request for the items listed in section 7.01 is made by filing the appropriate form according to the instructionsto the form and any prevailing revenue pro- cedures, notices, and announcements. In addition, all determination letter submissions must be submitted timely under the procedures set forth in Rev. Proc. 2005–66. The timing of the submission period for any particular individually designed plan within staggered remedial amendment cycles will depend on the plan’s particular cycle. The first submission period for Cycle B individually designed plans and multiple employer plans will begin February 1, 2007 and will end on January 31, 2008.SeeRev. Proc. 2005–66 for details. (1) Form 5300,Application for Determination for Employee Benefit Plan, must be filed to request a determination letter for individually designed plans, includingcollectively bargained plans. (2) Form 5309,Application for Determination of Employee Stock Ownership Plan,mustbe filed as an attachment with a Form 5300, in order to request a determination whether the plan is an ESOP under § 409 or § 4975(e)(7). 2007–1 I.R.B.201January 2, 2007 (3) Schedule Q, (Form 5300),Elective Determination Requests, may be filed as an attach- ment with Form 5300. Application must include copy of plan and amendments .03 Because a plan amendment, other than a minor amendment described in section 11, may affect other portions of a plan so as to cause plan disqualification, a determination letter issued on such an amendment to a plan will express an opinion on the entire plan, as amended. Therefore, the determination letter application must include a copy of the plan and trust instru- ment plus all plan amendments made to the date of the application. The application must also include a statement explaining how any amendments made since the last determination letter affect the plan or any other plan maintained by the employer. In addition, the applicant must send the Service any amendments that are adopted and/or proposed after the date of the deter- mination letter application and before the Serviceissues the determination letter. The applicant must submit a cover letter that references the date that the pending application was submitted, the identity of the employer and the plan, and any other helpful identifying information. The amendments must be attached to the letter. Sendthe cover letter and the attachments to: Inter- nal Revenue Service, TE/GE Correspondence Unit, P.O. Box 2508, Room 4024, Cincinnati, Ohio 45201. Although all such amendments must be provided to the Service, it is possible that the determination letter may not providereliance for all of these amendments.SeeRev. Proc. 2005–66 for the scope of the Service’s review with respect to a particular determination letter application. The Service will not consider amendments that predate a prior determination letter as part of a current determination letter application. Amendments that predate a prior determination letter are amendments that were adopted and/or proposed prior to the date a previous favorable determination letter was issued but that were not submitted as a part of that earlier determina- tion letter application. If that amended languageis part of the current restated plan document, that language may be considered in the current determination letter application, provided that Rev. Proc. 2005–66 is met regarding the scope of the Service’s review. In any event, the new determination letter will not provide reliance for the period prior to the effective date of that new letter. Restatements may be required.04 In general, individually designed plans must be restated when they are submitted for determination letter applications for the initial remedial amendment cycle (that is, EGTRRA remedial amendment period) and subsequent remedial amendment cycles. For this purpose, submission of a working copy of the plan in a restated format will suffice. A restated plan is required to be submitted if four or more amendments (excluding amend- ments making only non-substantive changes) have been made since the last restated plan was submitted. In addition, the Service may requirerestatement of a plan or submission of a work- ing copy of the plan in a restated format when considered necessary. Where a working copy is submitted with executed amendments integrated into the working copy, all such amendments must also be separately submitted. For example,restatementmayberequiredwhentherehave been major changes in law. A restated plan or a working copy of the plan in a restated format must be submitted for a plan that has not previously received a determination letter that takes into account all requirements of EGTRRA. Controlled groups, etc..05 For a controlled group of corporations as defined in § 414(b), trades or businesses un- der common control as defined in § 414(c), an affiliated service group within the meaning of § 414(m), and entities utilizing the services of leased employees within the meaning of § 414(n), the coverage items on the application forms referred to in this revenue procedure must be completed as though the controlled group, commonly controlled trades or businesses, affiliated service group, etc., constitutes a single entity. Leased employees within the mean- ing of § 414(n) must be included as employeesof the recipient entity (except in the case of a safe-harbor plan described in § 414(n)(5)). See sections 9 through 11 of Rev. Proc. 2005–66 for a discussion of the five-year remedial amendment cycle that applies in certain special cir- cumstances, including the cycle that applies to plans maintained by multiple members of a controlled group and to plans maintained by employers that are members of an affiliated ser- vice group under § 414(m). January 2, 20072022007–1 I.R.B. SECTION 8. EMPLOYER RELIANCE ON M&P AND VOLUME SUBMITTER PLANS Scope.01 The conditions under which, and the extent to which, adopting employers of M&P and volume submitter plans may rely on favorable opinion or advisory letters without having to request individual determination letters areset forth in section 19 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16. Rev. Proc. 2005–16 describes the requirements that apply to M&P and volume submitter plans and the procedures for requesting opinion letters and advisory letters on M&P and volume submitter plans. Section 9 of this revenue procedure describes the procedures for requesting determination letters on M&P and volume submitter plans for adopting employers who need to obtain a determination letter in order to have reliance or who otherwise wish to obtain a determination letter, for example to expand the scope of reliance. Reliance equivalent to determination letter .02 If an employer can rely on a favorable opinion or advisory letter pursuant to section 19 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16, the opinion or advisory letter shall be equivalent to a favorable determination letter. For example, the favorable opinion or advisory letter shall be treated as a favorable determination letter for purposes ofsection 21 of this revenue procedure, regard- ing the effect of a determination letter, and section 5.01(4) of Rev. Proc. 2006–27, 2006–22 I.R.B. 945, regarding the definition of “favorable letter” for purposes of the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System. SECTION 9. DETERMINATION LETTER FILING PROCEDURES FOR M&P AND VOLUME SUBMITTER PLANS Scope.01 This section contains procedures for requesting determination letters for adopting em- ployers of volume submitter plans and M&P plans. Determination letter for adoption of volume submitter plan .02 With respect to determination letters for adopting employers of volume submitter plans: (1) A request for a determination letter for an employer’s adoption of an approved volume submitter plan must be sent to the address provided in section 6.17. (2) The request for a determination letter must include the following: (a) Form 5307,Application for Determination for Adopters of Master or Prototype or Vol- ume Submitter Plans(Schedule Q is optional); (b) Form 2848,Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, or other written au- thorization allowing the volume submitter practitioner to act as a representative of the employer with respect to the request for a determination letter; (c) A copy of the advisory letter for the practitioner’s volume submitter specimen plan; (d) A copy of the plan and trust instrument or, if the employer has made no changes to the specimen plan and trust other than completing options permitted under the adoption agreement, a copy of the completed adoption agreement; (e) A written representation made by thevolume submitter practitioner which: (i) states whether the plan and trust instrument are word-for-word identical to the ap- proved specimen plan; (ii) if the plan and trust are not word-for-word identical to the approved specimen plan, explains how the plan and trust instrument differ from the approved specimen plan, describing the location, nature and effect of each deviation from the language of the approved specimen plan; and 2007–1 I.R.B.203January 2, 2007 (iii) if the latest advisory letter for the approved specimen plan does not consider all the changes made by GUST, states thatthe plan satisfies all requirements of GUST, including those first effective in plan years beginning after December 31, 1998, and identifies those deviations from the language of the approved specimen plan that are intended to satisfy specific GUST requirements; (f) A copy of the plan’s latest favorable determination letter, if applicable; and (g) Any other information or material that may be required by the Service. (3) Deviations from the language of the approved specimen plan will be evaluated based on the extent and complexities of the changes. If the changes are determined not to be compatible with the volume submitter program, the Service may require the applicant to file Form 5300 and pay the higher user fee. (4) An employer will not be treated as havingadopted a volume submitter plan if the em- ployer has signed or otherwise adopted the plan prior to the date on the volume submitter specimen plan’s advisory letter. In this case, the determination letter application for the em- ployer’s plan may not be filed on Form 5307 and will not be eligible for a reduced user fee. A determination letter application for a volume submitter plan must be based on the approved volume submitter specimen plan with any applicable modifications. (5) In addition, the practitioner will be able to file determination letter requests on behalf of employers adopting substantially similar plans who need a determination letter to have reliance or who otherwise desire a determination letter. Determination letter for adoption of M&P plan .03 Form 5307 must be filed to request a determination letter for the adoption of an M&P plan by an adopting employer. Schedule Q may be filed as an attachment to Form 5307. Required information.04 The determination letter request must include the following: (1) An adoption agreement showing which elections the employer is making with respect to the elective provisions contained in the plan; (2) A copy of the plan’s most recent opinion letter; and (3) In the case of a determination letter request for an M&P plan that uses a separate trust or custodial account, a copy of the employer’s trust or custodial account document. Amendedplanistreatedasan individually-designed plan .05 Except to the extent provided in section 5.02 and 19 .03 of Rev. Proc. 2005–16, an employer that amends any provision of an M&P plan or its adoption agreement (other than to choose among the options offered by the sponsor if th e plan permits or contemplates such options), or an employer that chooses to discontinue participation in such a plan as amended by its sponsor and does not substitute another appro vedplanreferredtointhissectioniscon- sidered to have adopted an individually-designed p lan. The requirements stated in this revenue procedure relating to theissuance of determinatio n letters for individually-designed plans will then apply to such plan. Also see section 19.01 of Rev . Proc. 2005–66. Requests made prior to the issuance of opinion letter .06Anapplicationsubmittedbyanemployerwith respect to an M&P plan will be treated as an application for an individually-designed plan if it is executed prior to the time the M&P plan is approved. Also see sections 5.11 and 19.03 ofRev. Proc. 2005–16 regarding the requirement that adopting employers sign new adoption agreements when M&P plans are restated. EGTRRA.07 In accordance with Part IV of Rev. Proc. 2005–66, adopting employers of M&P plans and volume submitter plans have a six-year remedial amendment cycle. The Service’s an- nounced deadline for an adopting employer to adopt the approved M&P or volume submitter plan will be the end of the plan’s remedial amendment cycle with respect to all disqualifying provisions for which the remedial amendmentperiod would otherwise end during the cycle. An adopting employer of a M&P plan or a volumesubmitter plan who must obtain a determi- nation letter for reliance under EGTRRA or who desires a determination letter for additional January 2, 20072042007–1 I.R.B. reliance under EGTRRA must not submit such determination letter application until the Ser- vice’s announced deadline for employers to adopt a pre-approvedplan and, if necessary, file a determination letter application, as described in Part IV of Rev. Proc. 2005–66. See section 17 of Rev. Proc. 2005–66 for the eligibility requirements that must be satisfied in order to be considered an adopting employer of a M&P plan or a volume submitter plan and thus eligible for the six-year remedial amendment cycle. SECTION 10. MULTIPLE EMPLOYER PLANS Scope.01 This section contains procedures for applications filed with respect to plans described in § 413(c). A plan is not described in § 413(c) if all the employers maintaining the plan are members of the same controlled group or affiliated service group under § 414(b), (c) or (m). Option to file for the plan only or for both the plan and employers maintaining the plan .02 A determination letter applicant for a multiple employer plan can request either (1) a letter for the plan in the name of the controlling member or (2) a letter for the plan and a letter for each employer maintaining the plan withrespect to whom a separate Form 5300 is filed. (1) An applicant requesting a letter for the plan submits one Form 5300 application for the plan in the name of the controlling member, omitting the optional minimum coverage questions and Schedule Q and either including or omitting the design-based safe harbor questions. The user fee for a single employer plan will apply.An employer maintaining a multiple employer plan can rely on a favorable determination letter issued for the plan without having to request its own determination letter except with respect tothe requirements of §§ 401(a)(4), 401(a)(26), 401(l), 410(b) and 414(s), and, if the employer maintains or has ever maintained another plan, §§ 415 and 416. (2) An applicant requesting a letter for theplan and an employer must submit the filing required in (1) above as well as a separate Form 5300 application, completed through line 8, and, if applicable, a completed adoption agreement, for each employer requesting a separate letter. Each employer may elect to respond to the Form 5300 questions regarding minimum coverage and design-based safe harbors and to file Schedule Q to request a determination on the average benefit test, the general test or any other nondiscrimination requirement addressed by the Schedule Q. The user fee for the application will be determined under the user fee schedules for multiple employer plans in section 6.07 of Rev. Proc. 2007–8, treating the entire application as a general test or average benefit test application if any employer requests a determination on either of these tests. (3)Rulessimilartothe rules in section 19 of Rev. Proc.2005–16 also apply in the case of an employer maintaini ng a multiple employer plan. See also Rev. Proc. 2005–66, including section 10. Where to file.03 The complete application, including allForms 5300 (and, if applicable, adoption agree- ments) for employers maintaining the plan who request separate letters must be filed as one package submission with EP Determinations. The application is to be sent to the address in section 6.17. Determination letter sent to each employer who files Form 5300 .04 The Service will mail a determination letter to each employer maintaining the plan for whom a separate Form 5300 has been filed. Addition of employers.05 An employer may continue to rely on a favorable determination letter after another em- ployer commences participation in the plan, regardless of whether the first employer’s reliance is based on its own letter or the letter issued for the plan and regardless of whether an applica- tion for a determination letter for the new employer is filed. An application for a determination letter that takes into account the addition of such other employer should include a completed Form 5300 for the plan in the name of the controlling member on the Form 5300 filed pur- suant to section 10.02 above, and a supplemental Form 5300 and optional Schedule Q (and, if applicable, adoption agreement) for each new employer who desires a separate determination letter. The Service will send the determinationletter only to the applicant and the new employ- ers. However, a new employer that joins a multiple employer plan after the existing multiple 2007–1 I.R.B.205January 2, 2007 employer plan was timely submitted in Cycle B (the applicable cycle as described in section 10 of Rev. Proc. 2005–66), will be subject to the rules under Rev. Proc. 2005–66, including the off-cycle filing rules under section 14 of that revenue procedure. SECTION 11. MINOR AMENDMENT OF PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN Scope.01 This section contains procedures for requesting determination letters on the effect of a minor plan amendment. Form 6406.02 Form 6406,Short Form Application for Determination for Minor Amendment of Em- ployee Benefit Plan, may be filed to request a determination letter on a minor plan amendment. This form may be used for minor amendments of individually-designed plans (including vol- ume submitter plans, multiemployer plans and multiple employer plans) or permitted changes to adoption agreement elections in master or prototype plans, provided the changes constitute minor amendments. The Service may also designate other specific amendments that may be submitted using Form 6406. Additional information.03 All applications must be accompanied by acopy of the new amendments, a statement as to how the amendments affect or change the plan or any other plan maintained by the employer, and a copy of the latest determination letter.In the case of a master or prototype or volume submitter plan, a copy of the opinion or advisory letter should also be included. A copy of the plan or trust instrument should not be filed with the Form 6406. Minor amendment procedures may not be used for complex amendments or EGTRRA letter .04 Since determination letters issued on minor amendments express an opinion only as to whether the amendments, in and of themselves, affect the qualification of employee plans un- der § 401 or 403(a), the minor amendment procedures cannot be used for complex amendments that may affect other portions of the plan so as to cause plan disqualification. Thus, the minor amendment procedures may not be used for an amendment to add a § 401(k) or an ESOP pro- vision to a plan, or to restate a plan. The minor amendment procedures also may not be used to obtain a determination letter on plan amendments involving plan mergers or consolidations, transfers of assets or liabilities, or plan terminations (including partial terminations). In ad- dition, the minor amendment procedures may not be used for an amendment that involves a significant change to plan benefits or coverage. The minor amendment procedures may not be used to obtain a EGTRRA determination letter. EP Determinations has discretion to determine whether use of minor amendment procedures is appropriate .05 EP Determinations has discretion to determine whether a plan amendment may be sub- mitted as a minor plan amendment and may requestadditional information, including the filing of a Form 5300 series application if it determines that the application and the attachments filed under the minor amendment procedures do not contain sufficient information, or that the Form 6406 is inappropriate. In addition, it is expected that this Form 6406 will be discontinued at a date to be announced by the Service in the future, due to its decreased utility under the new pro- grams for pre-approved and individually designed plans, as described in Rev. Proc. 2005–16 and Rev. Proc. 2005–66. SECTION 12. TERMINATION OR DISCONTINUANCE OF CONTRIBUTIONS; NOTICE OF MERGERS, CONSOLIDATIONS, ETC. Scope.01 This section contains procedures for requesting determination letters involving plan ter- mination or discontinuance of contributions. This section also contains procedures regarding required notice of merger, consolidation, or transfer of assets or liabilities. Forms.02 Required forms. January 2, 20072062007–1 I.R.B. (1) Form 5310,Application for Determination for Terminating Plan, is filed by plans other than multiemployer plans covered by the insurance program of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC). (2) Form 5300,Application for Determination of Employee Benefit Plan, is filed in the case of a multiemployer plan covered by PBGC insurance. (3) Schedule Q,Elective Determination Requests, may be filed as an attachment to Form 5310 or Form 5300. (4) Form 6088,Distributable Benefits From Employee Pension Benefit Plans,isalsore- quired of a sponsor or plan administrator of a defined benefit plan or anunderfunded defined contribution plan who files only an application for a determination letter regarding plan termi- nation. For collectively bargained plans, a Form 6088 is required only if the plan benefits em- ployees who are not collectively bargained employees within the meaning of § 1.410(b)–6(d). A separate Form 6088 is required for each employer employing such employees. (5) Form 5310–A,Notice of Plan Merger or Consolidation, Spinoff, or Transfer of Plan As- sets or Liabilities — Notice of Qualified Separate Lines of Business, if required, generally must be filed not later than 30 days before merger, consolidation or transfer of assets and liabilities. The filing of Form 5310–A will not result in the issuance of a determination letter. (6) Form 8905,Certification of Intent To Adopt a Pre-approved Plan, filed before the end of the employer’s 5-year remedial cycle as determined under Part III of Rev. Proc. 2005–66. Supplemental information.03 The application for a determination letterinvolving plan termination must also include any supplemental information or schedules required by the forms or form instructions. For ex- ample, the application must include copies of all records of actions taken to terminate the plan (such as a resolution of the board of directors) and a schedule providing certain information regarding employees who separated from vesting service with less than 100% vesting. Required demonstration of nondiscrimination requirements .04 An applicant requesting a determination letter upon termination may not decline to elec t that the plan be reviewed for the minimum coverage requirements or the nondiscrimination in amount requirement, as otherwise permitted, unless the following conditions are satisfie d: (1) With respect to the coverage requirements, in the year of termination the plan must use the average benefit test and the plan must have received a prior favorable determination letter that considered whether the plan satisfied the requirements of the test; (2) With respect to the nondiscrimination in amount requirement, in the year of termination the plan must use either a nondesign-based safe harbor or the general test for nondiscrimination in amount and the plan must have received a prior favorable determination letter that consid- ered whether the plan satisfied the requirementsof either a nondesign-based safe harbor or the general test; (3) The favorable determination letter was issued during the immediately preceding three plan years; and (4) There has been no material change in the facts (in cluding benefits provided under the plan and employee demographics) or law upon which t he determination was based. If these conditions are satisfied, but the prior determination letter does not state that the av- erage benefit test, general test or nondesign-based safe harbor (as applicable) was considered, the applicant must include a copy of the prior submission in order to decline to have the test or safe harbor considered in the review of the application for determination on plan termination. Compliance with Title IV of ERISA .05 In the case of plans subject to Title IV of ERISA, a favorable determination letter issued in connection with a plan’s termination is conditioned on approval that the termination is a valid termination under Title IV of ERISA. Notification by PBGC that a plan may not be terminated will be treated as a material change of fact. 2007–1 I.R.B.207January 2, 2007 Termination prior to time for amending for change in law .06 A plan that terminates after the effective date of a change in law, but prior to the date that amendments are otherwise required, mustbe amended to comply with the applicable pro- visions of law from the date on which such provisions become effective with respect to the plan. Because such a terminated plan would nolonger be in existence by the required amend- ment date and therefore could not be amended on that date, such plan must be amended in connection with the plan termination to comply with those provisions of law that become ef- fective with respect to the plan on or before the date of plan termination. (Such amendments include any amendments made after the date of plan termination that were required in order to obtain a favorable determination letter.) In addition, annuity contracts distributed from such terminated plans also must meet all the applicable provisions of any change in law. See also section 8 of Rev. Proc. 2005–66. Termination prior to end of the on-cycle submission period .07 A plan that terminates prior to the end of the on-cycle submission period does not have to be restated. However, see .06 above. SECTION 13. GROUP TRUSTS Scope.01 This section provides special proceduresfor requesting a determination letter on the qualified status of a group trust under Rev. Rul. 81–100, as clarified and modified by Rev. Rul 2004–67. Required information.02 A request for a determination letter on thestatus of a group trust as described in Rev. Rul. 81–100 is made by submitting a written request demonstrating how the group trust satis- fies the five criteria listed in Rev. Rul. 81–100, together with the trust instrument and related documents. Rev. Rul. 2004–67 extends the ability to participate in group trusts to eligible governmental plans under § 457(b) and clarifiesthe ability of certain individual retirement ac- counts under § 408 to participate. The revenue ruling provides model language, one for group trusts that have received favorable determination letters and the other for trusts that have re- ceived letter rulings. SECTION 14. AFFILIATED SERVICE GROUPS; LEASED EMPLOYEES Scope.01 This section provides procedures for determination letter requests on affiliated service group status under § 414(m), and the effect of leased employees on a plan’s qualified status. Types of requests under § 414(m) and § 414(n) .02 In accordance with section 7.01, an employer that is subject to § 414(m) or (n) may request a determination letter under the following circumstances: (1) with respect to the initial qualification of its plan, (2) on a plan amendment, and (3) in certain circumstances, even though the plan has not been amended (for example, where there has been a change in membership in the affiliated service group or where the employer did not previously have reliance). Employer must request the determination under § 414(m) or § 414(n) .03 Generally, a determination letter will cover § 414(m) or § 414(n) only if the employer requests such determination, and submits with the determination letter application the infor- mation specified in section 14.09 or section 14.10 below. Forms.04 Form 5300 (with Schedule Q optional) is submitted for a request on affiliated service group status or leased employee status. Form 5307 cannot be used for this purpose. Employer is responsible for determining status under §414(m)and§414(n) .05 An employer is responsible for determining at any particular time whether it is a member of an affiliated service group and, if so, whether its plan(s) continues to meet the requirements of § 401(a) after the effective date of § 414(m), including § 414(m)(5). An employer or plan administrator is also responsible for taking action relative to the employer’s qualified plan if that employer becomes, or ceases to be, a memberof an affiliated service group. An employer that is the recipient of services of leased employees within the meaning of § 414(n) is also responsible for determining at any particular time whether a leased employee is deemed to be an employee of the recipient for qualified plan purposes. January 2, 20072082007–1 I.R.B. Omission of material fact.06 Failure to properly indicate that there isor may be an affiliated service group and to provide the information specified in section 14.09 of this revenue procedure, or failure to prop- erly indicate that an employer is utilizing the services of leased employees and to provide the information specified in section 14.10, is an omission of a material fact. The failure of the employer to follow the procedures in this section will result in the employer being unable to rely on any favorable determination letter concerning the effect of § 414(m) or § 414(n) on the qualified status of the plan. Service will indicate whether § 414(m) or § 414(n) was considered .07 If the Service considers whether the plan of an employer satisfies the requirements of § 414(m) or § 414(n), the determination letter issued to the employer will state that questions arising under § 414(m) or § 414(n) have been considered, and that the plan satisfies qualifica- tion requirements relating to that section. Absent such a statement pertaining to § 414(m) or § 414(n), a determination letter does not apply to any qualification issue arising by reason of such provisions. M&P plans.08 An employer that has adopted an M&P plan (including a standardized plan) and wants a determination as to the effect of § 414(m) or § 414(n) on the qualified status of its plan must attach the information required by section 14.09 or section 14.10 of this revenue procedure to Form 5300 and submit the information, Form 5300, and any other materials necessary to make a determination. Required information for § 414(m) determination .09 A determination letter issued with respect to a plan’s qualification under § 401(a), 403(a), or 4975(e)(7) will be a determinationas to the effect of § 414(m) upon the plan’s qual- ified status only if the application includes: (1) A description of the nature of the business of the empl oyer, specifically whether it is a service organization or an organization whose princ ipal business is the performance of management functions for another organization, inclu ding the reasons therefor; (2) The identification of other members (or possible members) of the affiliated service group; (3) A description of the business of each member (or possible member) of the affiliated ser- vice group, describing the type of organization (corporation, partnership, etc.) and indicating whether the member is a service organization or an organization whose principal business is the performance of management functions for the other group member(s); (4) The ownership interests between the employer and the members (or possible members) of the affiliated service group (including ownership interests as describedin§414(m)(2)(B)(ii) or § 414(m)(6)(B)); (5) A description of services performed for the employer by the members (or possible mem- bers) of the affiliated service group, or vice versa (including the percentage of each member’s (or possible member’s) gross receipts and service receipts provided by such services, if avail- able, and data as to whether such services are asignificant portion of the member’s business) and whether, as of December 13, 1980, it was not unusual for the services to be performed by employees of organizations in that service field in the United States; (6) A description of how the employ er and the members (or possible members) of the af- filiated service group associate in performing services for other parties; (7) In the case of a management organization under § 414(m)(5): (a) A description of the management functions, if any, performed by the employer for the member(s) (or possible member(s)) of the affiliated service group, or received by the employer from any other members (or possible members) of the group (including data explaining whether the management functions are performed on a regular and continuous basis) and whether or not it is unusual for such management functions to be performed by employees of organizations in the employer’s business field in the United States; 2007–1 I.R.B.209January 2, 2007 (b) If management functions are performedby the employer for the member (or possible members) of the affiliated service group, a description of what part of the employer’s business constitutes the performance of management functions for the member (or possible member) of the group (including the percentage of gross receipts derived from management activities as compared to the gross receipts from other activities); (8) A brief description of any other plan(s) maintained by the members (or possible mem- bers) of the affiliated service group, if such other plan(s) is designated as a unit for qualification purposes with the plan for which a determination letter has been requested; (9) A description of how the plan(s) satisfies the coverage requirements of § 410(b) if the members (or possible members) of the affiliated service group are considered part of an affiliated service group with the employer; (10) A copy of any ruling issued by the headquarters office on whether the employer i san affiliated service group; a copy of any prior determination letter that considere d the effect of § 414(m) on the qualified status of the employer’s plan; and, if known, a copy of an ysuch ruling or determination letter issued to any other member (or possible member) of the same affiliated service group, accompanied by a statement as to whether the facts up on which the ruling or determination letter was based have changed. Required information for § 414(n) determination .10 Unless the plan provides that all leased employees within the meaning of § 414(n)(2) are treated as common law employees for all purposes under the plan, a determination letter issued with respect to the plan’s qualification under § 401(a), 403(a), or 4975(e)(7) will be a determination as to the effect of § 414(n) upon the plan’s qualified status only if the application includes: (1) A description of the nature of the business of the recipient organization; (2) A copy of the relevant leasing agreement(s); (3) A description of the function of all leased employees within the trade or business of the recipient organization (including data as to whether all leased employees are performing services on a substantially full-time basis); (4) A description of facts and circumstances relevant to a determination of whether such leased employees’ services are performedunder primary direction or control by t he recipient organization (including whether the leased employees are required to comply wit h instructions of the recipient about when, where, and how to perform the services, whether the s ervices must be performed by particular persons, whether the leased employees are subject to the supervi- sion of the recipient, and whether the leased employees must perform services in the order or sequence set by the recipient); and (5) If the recipient organization is relying onany qualified plan(s) maintained by the em- ployee leasing organization for purposes of qualification of the recipient organization’s plan, a description of such plan(s) (including a description of the contributions or benefits provided for all leased employees which are attributableto services performed for the recipient organi- zation, plan eligibility, and vesting). SECTION 15. WAIVER OF MINIMUM FUNDING Scope.01 This section provides procedures with respect to defined contribution plans for request- ing a waiver of the minimum funding standard account and requesting a determination letter on any plan amendment required for the waiver. Applicability of Rev. Proc. 2004–15 .02 The procedures in Rev. Proc. 2004–15, 2004–1 C.B. 490, apply to the request for a waiver of the minimum funding requirement. Section 2 of that revenue procedure contains the procedures for obtaining waivers of the minimum funding standards in the instance of defined benefit plans. In order to provide maximum flexibility in requesting a waiver for a defined January 2, 20072102007–1 I.R.B. contribution pension plan, section 3 of the revenue procedure contains three alternative meth- ods as described more fully in Rev. Proc. 2004–15. Waiver request submitted to EP Technical .03 The first two alternatives involve (1) a waiver ruling only, without submission of a plan amendment, and (2) a waiver ruling only, with submission of a plan amendment. Under these first two procedures, requests for waivers must be submitted to: Employee Plans Internal Revenue Service Commissioner, TE/GE Attention: SE:T:EP:RA P. O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 In both cases, the applicant must satisfythe requirements of section 2 of Rev. Proc. 2004–15, other than the parts applicable only to defined benefit plans. If a plan amendment is not submitted or is not already part of a plan, the Service will supply an amendment which will, if adopted, satisfy section 3 of Rev. Rul. 78–223, 1978–1 C.B. 125. The waiver will be conditioned upon the plan being amended by adoption of that amendment, within a reasonable period of time, and will contain a caveat stating that the ruling is not a ruling as to the effect the plan provision may have on the qualified status of the plan. The applicant may request reconsideration within 60 days of the date of the letter if the amendment is inappropriate, by submitting a letter to the above address. If the request for the waiver is submitted along with a plan amendment, the plan provisions necessary to satisfy section 3 of Rev. Rul. 78–223 must be included. All waivers issued pursuant to this alternative will contain a caveatindicating that the ruling is not a ruling as to the effect any plan provision may have on the qualified status of the plan. Waiver and determination letter request submitted to EP Technical .04 The third alternative is a request for a waiver ruling and a determination letter request. Both requests must be submitted by the applicant to EP Technical where it will be treated as if it had been submitted as a request for technicaladvice from the Determinations Manager. The request must: (1) satisfy all the procedural requirements of 3.03 of Rev. Proc. 2004–15; (2) include a completed Form 5300 and all necessary documents, plan amendments and information required by the Form 5300 and Rev. Proc. 2004–15 for approval; (3) indicate which Area Office has auditjurisdiction over the return; and (4) submit the user fee for both requests to EP Technical. In addition, the procedures for notice and comment by interest ed parties, contained in sec- tions 17, 18 and 19 of this revenue procedure, and the notice and comment procedures provided in section 2.02 of Rev. Proc. 2004–15 must be satisfied. Commen ts will be forwarded to the Determinations Office that is considering the determination letter request for the plan amend- ments. Handling of the request.05 The waiver request described in section 15.04 above will be handled by EP Technical as follows: (1) The waiver request and supporting documents will be forwarded to EP Technical, SE:T:EP:RA:T, which will treat the request asa technical advice on the qualification issue with respect to the plan provisions necessary to satisfy section 3 of Rev. Rul. 78–223. (2) The appropriate Determinations Officewill be notified of the request. In order not to delay the processing of the request, all materials relating to the determination letter request 2007–1 I.R.B.211January 2, 2007 will be forwarded by EP Technical to the Determinations Manager for consideration while the technical advice request is completed. (3) EP Technical will consider both issues. If a waiver is to be granted and if EP Technical believes that qualification of the plan is not adversely affected by the plan amendment, the mandatory technical advice memorandum will be issued to the Determinations Manager. The Determinations Manager must decide within 10 working days from the date of the technical advice memorandum either to furnish the applicant with the technical advice memorandum and with a favorable advance determination letter, or to ask for reconsideration of the technical advice memorandum. This request must be in writing. An initial written notice of intent to make this request may be submitted within 10 working days of the date of the technical advice memorandum and followed by a written request within 30 working days from the date of such written notice. If the Determinations Manager does not ask for reconsideration of the technical advice memorandum within 10 working days, EP Technical will issue the waiver ruling. This ruling will not contain the caveat described in section 3.02 of Rev. Proc. 2004–15. When waiver request should be submitted .06 In the case of a plan other than a multiemployer plan, all waiver requests must be submit- ted to the Service no later than the 15th day of the third month following the close of the plan year for which the waiver is requested. The Service may not extend this statutory deadline. A request for a waiver with respect to a multiemployer plan generally must be submitted no later than the close of the plan year following the plan year for which the waiver is requested. In seeking a waiver with respect to a plan year that has not yet ended, the applicant may have difficulty in furnishing sufficient current evidence in support of the request. For this reason it is generally advisable that such advance request be submitted no earlier than 180 days prior to the end of the plan year for which the waiver is requested. SECTION 16. SECTION 401(h) AND § 420 DETERMINATION LETTERS Scope.01 This section provides procedures for requesting determination letters (i) with respect to whether the requirements of § 401(h) are satisfied in a plan with retiree medical benefit features and (ii) on plan language that permits, pursuant to § 420, the transfer of assets in a defined benefit plan to a health benefit account described in § 401(h). Required information for § 401(h) determination .02 EP Determinations will issue a determination letter that considers whether the require- ments of § 401(h) are satisfied in a plan with retiree medical benefit features only if the plan sponsor’s application includes, in addition tothe application forms and any other material re- quired by this revenue procedure, a cover letterthat requests consideration of § 401(h). The cover letter must specifically state that consideration is being requested with regard to § 401(h) in addition to other matters under § 401(a) and must specifically state the location of plan pro- visions that satisfy the requirements of § 401(h). Part I of the checklist in the Appendix of this revenue procedure may be used to identify the location of relevant plan provisions. Form 6406 may not be used to request a determination letter that considers § 401(h). Required information for § 420 determination .03 EP Determinations will consider the qualified status of certain plan language designed to comply with § 420 only if the plan sponsor requests such consideration in a cover letter. The cover letter must specifically state (i) whether consideration is being requested only with re- gard to § 420, or (ii) whether consideration is being requested with regard to § 420 in addition to other matters under § 401(a). (If consideration of other matters under § 401(a) is being re- quested, the application forms and other material required by this revenue procedure must also be submitted. Form 6406 may not be used for thispurpose.) The cover letter must specifically state the location of plan provisions that satisfy each of the following requirements. Parts I and II of the checklist in the Appendix of this revenue procedure may be used to identify the location of relevant plan provisions. (1) The plan must include a health benefits account as described in § 401(h). January 2, 20072122007–1 I.R.B. (2) The plan must provide that transfers shall be limited to transfers of “excess assets” as defined in § 420(e)(2). (3) The plan must provide that only one transfer may be made in a taxable year. However, for purposes of determining whether the rulein the preceding sentence is met, a plan may provide that a transfer will not be taken into account if it is a transfer that: (a) Is made after the close of the taxable yearpreceding the employer’s first taxable year beginning after December 31, 1990, and before the earlier of (i) the due date (including exten- sions) for the filing of the return of tax for such preceding year, or (ii) the date such return is filed; and (b) Does not exceed the expenditures of the employer for qualified current retiree health liabilities for such preceding taxable year. (4) The plan must provide that the amount transferred shall not exceed the amount which is reasonably estimated to be the amount the employer will pay out (whether directly or through reimbursement) of the health benefit account during the taxable year of the transfer for “qual- ified current retiree health liabilities,” as defined in § 420(e)(1). (5) The plan must provide that no transfer will be made after December 31, 2013. (6) The plan must provide that any assets transferred, and any income allocable to such assets, shall be used only to pay qualified currentretiree health liabilities for the taxable year of transfer. (7) The plan must provide that any amounts transferred to a health benefits account (and income attributable to such amounts) which arenot used to pay qualified current retiree health liabilities shall be transferred back to the defined benefit portion of the plan. (8) The plan must provide that the amounts paid out of a health benefits account will be treated as paid first out of transferred assets and income attributable to those assets. (9) The plan must provide that the accrued pensionbenefits for participants and beneficiaries must become nonforfeitable as if the plan had terminated immediately prior to the transfer (or in the case of a participant who separated during the 1-year period ending on the date of transfer immediately before such separation). In the case of a transfer described in § 420(b)(4) that relates to a prior year, the plan must providethat the accrued benefit of a participant who separated from service during the taxable year towhich such transfer relates will be recomputed and treated as nonforfeitable immediately before such separation. (10) The plan must provide that a transfer will be permitted only if each group health plan or arrangement under which health benefits are provided contains provisions satisfying § 420(c)(3). The plan must define “applicableemployer cost”, “cost maintenance period”, and “benefit maintenance period”, as applicable, consistent with § 420(c)(3), as amended. If applicable, the provisions of the plan must also reflect the transition rule in § 535(c)(2) of the Tax Relief Extension Act of 1999 (TREA ’99). The plan may provide that § 420(c)(3) is satisfied separately with respect to individuals eligible for benefits under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act at any time during the taxable year and with respect to individuals not so eligible. (11) The plan must provide that transferred assets cannot be used for key employees (as defined in § 416(i)(1)). 2007–1 I.R.B.213January 2, 2007 PART II. INTERESTED PARTY NOTICE AND COMMENT SECTION 17. WHAT RIGHTS TO NOTICE AND COMMENT DO INTERESTED PARTIES HAVE? Rights of interested parties.01 Persons who qualify as interested parties under § 1.7476–1(b), have the following rights: (1) To receive notice, in accordance with section 18 below, that an application for an ad- vance determination will be filed regardingthe qualification of plans described in §§ 401, 403(a), 409 and/or 4975(e)(7); (2) To submit written comments with respect to the qualification of such plans to the Service; (3) To request the Department of Labor to submit a comment to the Service on behalf of the interested parties; and (4) To submit written comments to the Service on matters with respect to which the Depart- ment of Labor was requested to comment but declined. Comments by interested parties.02 Comments submitted by interested parties must be received by EP Determinations by the 45th day after the day on which the application for determination is received by EP Deter- minations. (However, see sections 17.03 and 17.04 for filing deadlines where the Department of Labor has been requested to comment.) Such comments must be in writing, signed by the interested parties or by an authorized representative of such parties (as provided in section 9.02(11) of Rev. Proc. 2007–4), addressed to EP Determinations at the address in section 6.17, and contain the following information: (1) The names of the interested parties making the comments; (2) The name and taxpayer identification number of the app licant for a determination; (3) The name of the plan, the plan identification number, and the name of the plan admin- istrator; (4) Whether the parties submitting the comment are: (a) Employees eligible to participate under the plan, (b) Employees with accrued benefits under theplan, or former employees with vested ben- efits under the plan, (c) Beneficiaries of deceased former employeeswho are eligible to receive or are currently receiving benefits under the plan, (d) Employees not eligible to participate under the plan. (5) The specific matters raised by the interested parties on the question of whether the plan meets the requirements for qualification involving §§ 401 and 403(a), and how such matters relate to the interests of the parties making the comment; and (6) The address of the interested party submitting the comment (or if a comment is sub- mitted jointly by more than one party, the name and address of a designated representative) to which all correspondence, including a notice of the Service’s final determination with respect to qualification, should be sent. (The address designated for notice by the Service will also be used by the Department of Labor in communicating with the parties submitting a request for comment.) The designated representative may be one of the interested parties submitting the comment or an authorized representative. If two or more interested parties submit a single comment and one person is not designated in thecomment as the representative for receipt of correspondence, a notice of determination mailedtoanyinterestedpartywhosubmittedthe January 2, 20072142007–1 I.R.B. comment shall be notice to all the interested parties who submitted the comment for purposes of § 7476(b)(5) of the Code. Requests for DOL to submit comments .03 A request to the Department of Labor to submit to EP Determinations a comment pur- suant to section 3001(b)(2) of ERISA must be made in accordance with the following proce- dures. (1) The request must be received by the Department of Labor by the 25th day after the day the application for determination is received by EP Determinations. However, if the parties requesting the Department to submit a comment wish to preserve the right to comment to EP Determinations in the event the Department declines to comment, the request must be received by the Department by the 15th day after the daythe application for determination is received by EP Determinations. (2) The request to the Department of Labor to submit a comment to EP Determinations must: (a) Be in writing; (b) Be signed as provided in section 17.02 above; (c) Contain the names of the interested parties requesting the Department to comment and the address of the interested party or designated representative to whom all correspondence with respect to the request should be sent. See also section 17.02(6) above; (d) Contain the information prescribed in section 17.02(2), (3), (4), (5) and (6) above; (e) Indicate that the application was or willbe submitted to EP Determinations at the ad- dress in section 6.17; (f) Contain a statement of thespecific matters upon which the Department’s comment is sought, as well as how such matters relate to the interested parties making the request; and (g) Be addressed as follows: Deputy Assistant Secretary Employee Benefits Security Administration U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210 Attention: 3001 Comment Request Right to comment if DOL declines to comment .04 If a request described in 17.03 is made andthe Department of Labor notifies the inter- ested parties making the request that it declines to comment on a matter concerning qualifi- cation of the plan which was raised in the request, the parties submitting the request may still submit a comment to EP Determinations on such matter. The comment must be received by the later of the 45th day after the day the application for determination is received by EP Deter- minations or the 15th day after the day on which notification is given by the Department that it declines to submit a comment on such matter. (See section 17.07 for the date of notification.) In no event may the comment be received later than the 60th day after the day the application for determination was received. Such a comment must comply with the requirements of sec- tion 17.02 and include a statement that the comment is being submitted on matters raised in a request to the Department upon which the Department declined to comment. Confidentiality of comments.05 For rules regarding the confidentiality of contents of written comments submitted by interested parties to the Service pursuant to section 17.02 or 17.04, see § 601.201(o)(5) of the Statement of Procedural Rules. 2007–1 I.R.B.215January 2, 2007 Availability of comments.06 For rules regarding the availability to the applicant of copies of all comments on the application submitted pursuant to section 17.01(1), (2), (3) and (4) of this revenue procedure, see § 601.201(o)(5) of the Statement of Procedural Rules. When comments are deemed made .07 An application for an advance determination, a comment to EP Determinations, or a request to the Department of Labor shall be deemed made when it is received by EP Deter- minations, or the Department. Notification by the Department that it declines to comment shall be deemed given when it is received by the interested party or designated representative. The notice described in section 18.01 below shall be deemed given when it is posted or sent to the person in the manner described in § 1.7476–2. In the case of an application, comment, request, notification, or notice that is sent by mail or a private delivery service that has been designated under § 7502(f), the date as of which it shall be deemed received will be determined under § 7502. However, if such an application, comment, request, notification, or notice is not received within a reasonable period from the date determined under § 7502, the immediately preceding sentence shall not apply. SECTION 18. WHAT ARE THE GENERAL RULES FOR NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES? Notice to interested parties.01 Notice that an application for an advance determination regarding the qua lification of a plan that is described in §§ 401, 403(a), 409 and 4975(e)(7) and that is subjec t to § 410 is to be made must be given to all interested parties in the manner prescribed in § 1.7 476–2(c) and in accordance with the requirements of this section. A notice to interested p arties is deemed to be provided in a manner that satisfies § 1.7476–2(c) if the notice is delivere d using an electronic medium under a system that satisfies the requirements of § 1.402(f)–1 Q&A– 5. Time when notice must be given.02 Notice must be given not less than 10 days nor more than 24 days prior to the day the application for a determination is made. If, however, an application is returned to the applicant for failure to adequately satisfy the notification requirements with respect to a particular group or class of interested parties, the applicant need not cause notice to be given to those groups or classes of interested parties with respect to which the notice requirement was already satisfied merely because, as a result of the resubmission ofthe application, the time limitations of this subsection would not be met. Contentofnotice.03 The notice referred to in section 18.01shall contain the following information: (1) A brief description identifying the classor classes of interested parties to whom the notice is addressed (e.g., all present employees of the employer, all present employees eligible to participate); (2) The name of the plan, the plan identification number, and the name of the plan admin- istrator; (3) The name and taxpayer identification number of the applicant for a determination; (4) That an application for a determination as to the qualified status of the plan is to be made to the Service at the address in section 6.17, and stating whether the application relates to an initial qualification, a plan amendment, termination, or a partial termination; (5) A description of the class of employees eligible to participate under the plan; (6) Whether or not the Service has issued a previous determination as to the qualified status of the plan; (7) A statement that any person to whom the notice is addressed is entitled to submit, or request the Department of Labor to submit, to EP Determinations, a comment on the question of whether the plan meets the requirements of § 401 or 403(a); that two or more such persons may join in a single comment or request; and that if such persons request the Department of Labor to submit a comment and the Department of Labor declines to do so with respect to one or more January 2, 20072162007–1 I.R.B. matters raised in the request, the persons may still submit a comment to EP Determinations with respect to the matters on which the Department declines to comment. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) may also submitcomments. In every instance where there is either a final adverse termination or a distress termination, the Service formally notifies the PBGC for comments; (8) The specific dates by which a comment to EP Determinations or a request to the De- partment of Labor must be received in order to preserve the right of comment (see section 17 above); (9) The number of interestedparties needed in order for the Department of Labor to com- ment; and (10) Except to the extent that the additional informational material required to b emade available by sections 18.05 through 18.09 are included in the notice, a descriptio n of a reason- able procedure whereby such additional informational material will be available to interested parties (see section 18.04). (Examples of notices setting forth the above infor mation, in a case in which the additional information required by sections 18.05 through 18.09 w ill be made available at places accessible to the interested parties, are set forth in the E xhibit attached to this revenue procedure.) Procedures for making information available to interested parties .04 The procedure referred to in section 18.03(10), whereby the additional informational material required by sections 18.05 through 18.09 will (to the extent not included in the no- tice) be made available to interested parties, may consist of making such material available for inspection and copying by interested partiesat a place or places reasonably accessible to such parties, or supplying such material by using a method of delivery or a combination thereof that is reasonably calculated to ensure that all interested parties will have access to the materials, provided such procedure is immediately available to all interested parties, is designed to sup- ply them with such additional informational material in time for them to pursue their rights within the time period prescribed, and is available until the earlier of: 1) the filing of a plead- ing commencing a declaratory judgment action under § 7476 with respect to the qualification of the plan; or 2) the 92nd day after the day the notice of final determination is mailed to the applicant. Reasonable charges to interested parties for copying and/or mailing such additional informational material are permissible. Informationtobeavailableto interested parties .05 Unless provided in the notice, or unless section 18.06 applies, there shall be made available to interested parties under a procedure described in section 18.04: (1) An updated copy of the plan and the related trust agreement (if any); and (2) The application for determination. Special rules if there are less than 26 participants .06 If there would be less than 26 participants in the plan, as described in the a pplication (including, as participants, former employees with vested benefits under t he plan, beneficiaries of deceased former employees currentlyreceiving benefits under the plan, a nd employees who would be eligible to participate upon making mandatory employee contributi ons, if any), then in lieu of making the materials described in section 18.05 available to inter ested parties who are not participants (as described above),there may be made available to such in terested parties a document containing the following information: (1) A description of the plan’s requirements respecting eligibility for participation and ben- efits and the plan’s benefit formula; (2) A description of the provisions providing for nonforfeitable benefits; (3) A description of the circumstances which may result in ineligibility, or denial or loss of benefits; (4) A description of the source of financing of the plan and the identity of any organization through which benefits are provided; 2007–1 I.R.B.217January 2, 2007 (5) A description of any optional forms of benefits described in § 411(d)(6) which have been reduced or eliminated by plan amendment; and (6) Any coverage schedule or other demonstration submitted with the application to show that the plan meets the requirements of §§ 401(a)(4) and 410(b). However, once an interested party or designated representative receives a notice of final de- termination, the applicant must, upon request, make available to such interested party (whether or not the plan has less than 26 participants) an updated copy of the plan and related trust agree- ment (if any) and the application for determination. Information described in § 6104(a)(1)(D) should not be included .07 Information of the type described in § 6104(a)(1)(D) should not be included in the application, plan, or related trust agreement submitted to the Service. Accordingly, such infor- mation should not be included in any of the materialrequiredbysection18.05or18.06tobe available to interested parties. Availability of additional information to interested parties .08 Unless provided in the notice, there shall bemade available to interested parties under a procedure described in section 18.04, any additional document dealing with the application which is submitted by or for the applicant to the Service, or furnished by the Service to the ap- plicant; provided, however, if there would be lessthan26participantsin the plan as described in the application (including, as participants, former employees with vested benefits under the plan, beneficiaries of deceased former employeescurrently receiving benefits under the plan, and employees who would be eligible to participate upon making mandatory employee con- tributions, if any), such additional documents need not be made available to interested parties who are not participants (as described above) until they, or their designated representative, re- ceive a notice of final determination. The applicant may also withhold from such inspection and copying information described in § 6104(a)(1)(C) and (D)which may be contained in such additional documents. Availability of notice to interested parties .09 Unless provided in the notice, there shallbe made available to all interested parties under a procedure described in section 18.04 the material described in sections 17.02 through 17.07 above. PART III. PROCESSING DETERMINATION LETTER REQUESTS SECTION 19. HOW DOES THE SERVICE HANDLE DETERMINATION LETTER REQUESTS? Oral advice.01 Oral advice. (1) The Service does not issue determination letters on oral requests. However, personnel in EP Determinations ordinarily will discuss withtaxpayers or their representatives inquiries regarding: substantive tax issues; whether the Service will issue a determination letter on par- ticular issues; and questions relating to procedural matters about submitting determination let- ter requests. Any discussion of substantive issues will be at the discretion of the Service on a time available basis, will not be binding on the Service, and cannot be relied upon as a basis of obtaining retroactive relief under the provisions of § 7805(b). A taxpayer may seek oral technical assistance from a taxpayer service representative when preparing a return or report, under established procedures. Oral advice is advisory only, and the Service is not bound to recognize it in the examination of the taxpayer’s return. (2) The advice or assistance furnished, whether requested by personal appearance, tele- phone, or correspondence will be limited to general procedures, or will direct the inquirer to source material, such as pertinent Code provisions, regulations, revenue procedures, and rev- enue rulings that may aid the inquirer in resolving the question or problem. Conferences.02 EP Determinations may grant a conference upon written request from a taxpayer or his representative, provided the request shows that a substantive plan, amendment, etc., has been January 2, 20072182007–1 I.R.B. developed for submission to the Service, but that special problems or issues are involved, and EP Determinations concludes that a conferencewould be warranted in the interest of facilitat- ing review and determination when the plan, etc., is formally submitted. See section 6.21 and 6.22 regarding the right to a status conference on applications pending for at least 270 days. Determination letter based solely on administrative record .03 Administrative Record (1) In the case of a request for a determination letter, the determination of EP Determinations or the appeals office on the qualification or non-qualification of the retirement plan shall be based solely upon the facts contained in the administrative record. The administrative record shall consist of the following: (a) The request for determination, the retirement plan and any related trust instruments, and any written modificationsor amendments made by the applicant during the proceedings within the Service; (b) All other documents submitted to the Service by, or on behalf of, the applicant with respect to the request for determination; (c) All written correspondence between the Service and the applicant with respect to the request for determination and any other documents issued to the applicant from the Service; (d) All written comments submitted to the Service pursuant to sections 17.01(2), (3), and (4) above, and all correspondence relating to comments submitted between the Service and per- sons (including PBGC and the Department of Labor) submitting comments pursuant to sections 17.01(2), (3), and (4) above; and (e) In any case in which the Service makes an investigation regarding the facts as repre- sented or alleged by the applicant in the request for determination or in comments submitted pursuant to sections 17.01(2), (3), and (4) above, a copy of the official report of such investi- gation. (2) The adm inistrative record shall be closed upon the earlier of the following events: (a) The date of mailing of a notice of final determination by the Service with respect to the application for determination; or (b) The filing of a petition with the United States Tax Court seeking a declaratory jud gment with respect to the retirement plan. (3) Any oral representation or modification of the facts as represented or alleged in the ap- plication for determination or in a comment filed by an interested party, which is not reduced to writing shall not become a part of the administrative record and shall not be taken into account in the determination of the qualified status ofthe retirement plan by EP Determinations or the appeals office. Notice of final determination.04 In the case of final determination, the notice of final determination: (1) Shall be the letter issued by EP Determinations or the appeals office which states that the applicant’s plan satisfies the qualification requirements of the Code. The favorable deter- mination letter will be sent by certified or registered mail where either an interested party, the Department of Labor, or the PBGC has commented on the application for determination. (2) Shall be the letter issued, by certified or registered mail, by EP Determinations or the appeals office subsequent to a letter of proposed determination, stating that the applicant’s plan fails to satisfy the qualification requirements of the Code. Issuance of the notice of final determination .05 EP Determinations or the appeals office will send the notice of final determination to the applicant, to the interested parties who have previously submitted comments on the application to the Service (or to the persons designated by them to receive such notice), to the Department 2007–1 I.R.B.219January 2, 2007 of Labor in the case of a comment submitted by the Department, and to PBGC if it has filed a comment. SECTION 20. EXHAUSTION OF ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES In general.01 For purposes of § 7476(b)(3), a petitioner shall be deemed to have exhausted the admin- istrative remedies available within the Service upon the completion of the steps described in sections 20.02, 20.03, 20.04, or 20.05 subject, however, to sections 20.06 and 20.07. If appli- cants, interested parties, or the PBGC do not complete the applicable steps described below, they will not have exhausted their respective available administrative remedies as required by § 7476(b)(3) and will, thus, be precluded fromseeking declaratory judgment under § 7476 ex- cept to the extent that section 20.05 or 20.08 applies. Steps for exhausting administrative remedies .02 In the case of an applicant, with respect to any matter relating to the qualification of a plan, the steps referred to in section 20.01 are: (1) Filing a completed application with EP Determinations pursuant to this revenue proce- dure; (2) Complying with the requirements pertaining to notice to interested parties as set forth in this revenue procedure and § 1.7476–2 of the regulations; and, (3) Appealing to the appropriate appeals office pursuant to paragraph 601.201(o)(6) of the Statement of Procedural Rules, in the event a notice of proposed adverse determination is is- sued by EP Determinations. Applicant’s request for § 7805(b) relief .03 Consideration of relief under § 7805(b) will be included as one of the applicant’s steps in exhausting administrative remedies only if the applicant requests EP Determinations to seek technical advice from EP Technical on the applicability of such relief. The applicant’s request must be made in writing according to the procedures for requesting technical advice (seesec- tion 19 of Rev. Proc. 2007–5). Interested parties.04 In the case of an interested party or the PBGC, the steps referred to in section 20.01 are, with respect to any matter relating to the qualification of the plan, submitting to EP Determina- tions a comment raising such matter in accordance with section 17.01(2) above, or requesting the Department of Labor to submit to EP Determinations a comment with respect to such mat- ter in accordance with section 17.01(3) and, ifthe Department of Labor declines to comment, submitting the comment in accordance with section 17.01(4) above, so that it may be consid- ered by the Service through the administrative process. Deemed exhaustion of administrative remedies .05 An applicant, an interested party, or the PBGC shall in no event be deemed to have exhausted administrative remedies prior to the earlier of: (1) The completion of those steps applicableto each as set forth in sections 20.01, 20.02, 20.03 or 20.04, which constitute their administrative remedies; or, (2) The expiration of the 270-day period described in § 7476(b)(3), which period shall be extended in a case where there has not been a completion of all the steps referred to in section 20.02 and the Service has proceeded with due diligence in processing the application for de- termination. Service must act on appeal.06 The step described in section 20.02(3) will not be considered completed until the Service has had a reasonable time to act upon the appeal. Service must act on § 7805(b) request .07 Where the applicant has requested EP Determinations to seek technical advice on the applicability of § 7805(b) relief, the applicant’s administrative remedies will not be considered exhausted until EP Technical has had a reasonable time to act upon the request for technical advice. January 2, 20072202007–1 I.R.B. Effect of technical advice request.08 The step described in section 20.02(3) will not be available or necessary with respect to any issue on which technical advicehas been obtained from EP Technical. SECTION 21. WHAT EFFECT WILL AN EMPLOYEE PLAN DETERMINATION LETTER HAVE? Scope of reliance on determination letter .01 A determination letter issued pursuant to this revenue procedure contains only the opin- ion of the Service as to the qualification of the particular plan involving the provisions of §§ 401 and 403(a) and the status of a related trust, if any, under § 501(a). Such a determination let- ter is based on the facts and demonstrations presented to the Service in connection with the application for the determination letter and may not be relied upon after a change in material fact or the effective date of a change in law, except as provided. The Service may determine, based on the application form, the extent of review of the plan document. Failure to disclose a material fact or misrepresentation of a material fact may adversely affect the reliance that would otherwise be obtained through the issuance by the Service of a favorable determination letter. Similarly, failure to accurately provide any of the information called for on any form required by this revenue procedure may result inno reliance. Applicants are advised to retain copies of all demonstrations and supporting data submitted with their applications. Failure to do so may limit the scope of reliance. Effect of determination letter on minor plan amendment .02 Determination letters issued on minor amendments to plans and trusts un der this revenue procedure will merely express an opinion whether the amendment, in and of it self, affects the existing status of the plan’s qualification and the exempt status of the re latedtrust.Innoevent should such a determination letter be construed as an opinion on the qualif ication of the plan as a whole and the exempt status of the related trust as a whole. Sections 13 and 14 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4 applicable .03 Except as otherwise provided in this section, determination letters referred to in sections 21.01 and 21.02 are governed, generally, by the provisions of sections 13 and 14 of Rev. Proc. 2007–4. Effect of subsequent publication of revenue ruling, etc. .04 The prior qualification of a plan as adopted by an employer will not be considered to be adversely affected by the publication of a revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, or an adminis- trative pronouncement within the meaning of § 1.6661–3(b)(2) of the regulations where: (1) The plan was the subject of a favorable determination letter and the request for that letter contained no misstatement or omission of material facts; (2) The facts subsequently developed are not materially different from the facts on which the determination letter was based; (3) There has been no change in the applicable law; and (4) The employer that established the plan acted in good faith in reliance on the determina- tion letter. However, all such plans must be amended to comply with the published guidance for sub- sequent years, in accordance with the rules set forth in Rev. Proc. 2005–66. See, in particular, Part II of that revenue procedure. Determination letter does not applytotaxabilityissues .05 While a favorable determination letter may serve as a basis for determining deductions for employer contributions thereunder, it is not to be taken as an indication that contributions are necessarily deductible as made. This latter determination can be made only upon an ex- amination of the employer’s taxreturn, in accordancewith the limitations, and subject to the conditions of, § 404. SECTION 22. EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE PROCEDURES Rev. Proc. 2006–6 is superseded. 2007–1 I.R.B.221January 2, 2007 SECTION 23. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective January 2, 2007. SECTION 24. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The collections of information contained in this revenue procedure have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accordance with the Paperwork Reduc- tion Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1545–1520. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collec- tion of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. The collections of information in this revenue procedure are in sections 6.16, 6.18, 6.19, 6.20, 7.04, 13, 14, 15, 16, 19.02, and 21.04. This information is required to determine plan qualification. This information will be used to determine whether a plan is entitled to favor- able tax treatment. The collections of information are mandatory. The likely respondents are businesses or other for-profit institutions. The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is 163,186 hours. The estimated annual burden per respondent/recordkeeper varies from 1 hour to 40 hours, depending on individual circumstances, withan estimated average of 2.02 hours. The esti- mated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers is 80,763. The estimated annual frequency of responses(used for reporting requirements only) is once every three years. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. DRAFTING INFORMATIONThe principal author of this revenue procedure is Angelique V. Carrington of the Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division. For further information regarding this revenue procedure, please contact the Employee Plans’ taxpayer assistance telephone service at 1–877–829–5500 (a toll-free number), between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday. Ms. Carrington may be reached at1–202–283–9888 (not a toll-free number). January 2, 20072222007–1 I.R.B. EXHIBIT: SAMPLE NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES The Exhibit set forth below, may be used to satisfy the requirements of section 18 of this revenue procedure. EXHIBIT: SAMPLE NOTICE TO INTERESTED PARTIES 1. Notice To: [describe class or classes of interested parties] An application is to be made to the InternalRevenue Service for an advance determination on the qualification of the following employee pension benefit plan: 2. (name of plan) 3. (plan number) 4. (name and address of applicant) 5. (applicant EIN) 6. (name and address of plan administrator) 7. The application will be filed on for an advance determination as to whether the plan meets the qualification requirements of § 401 or 403(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, with respect to the plan’s [initial qualification,amendment, termination, or partial termination]. The application will be filed with: EP Determinations Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 192 Covington, KY 41012–0192 8. The employees eligible to participate under the plan are: 9. The Internal Revenue Service [has/has not] previously issued a determination letter with respect to the qualification of this plan. RIGHTS OF INTERESTED PARTIES 10. You have the right to submit to EP Determinations, at the above address, either individually or jointly with other interested parties, your comments as to whether this plan meets the qualification requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. You may instead, individually or jointly with other interested parties, request the Department of Labor to submit, on your behalf, comments to EP Determinations regarding qualification of the plan. If the Department declines to comment on all or some of the matters you raise, you may, individually, or jointly if your request was made to the Department jointly, submit your comments on these matters directly to EP Determinations. 2007–1 I.R.B.223January 2, 2007 REQUESTS FOR COMMENTS BY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 11. The Department of Labor may not comment on behalf of interested parties unless requested to do so by the lesser of 10 employees or 10 percent of the employees who qualify as interested parties. The number of persons needed for the Department to comment with respect to this plan is . If you request the Department to comment, your request must be in writing and must specifythe matters upon which comments are requested, and must also include: (1) the information contained in items 2 through 5 of this Notice; and (2) the number of persons needed for the Department to comment. A request to the Department to comment should be addressed as follows: Deputy Assistant Secretary Employee Benefits Security Administration ATTN: 3001 Comment Request U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20210 COMMENTS TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 12. Comments submitted by you to EP Determinations must be in writing and received by it by . However, if there are matters that you request the Department of Labor to comment upon on your behalf, and the Department declines, you may submit comments on these matters to EP Determinations to be received by it within 15 days from the time the Department notifies you that it will not comment on a particular matter, or by , whichever is later, but not after . A request to the Department to comment on your behalf must be received by it by if you wish to preserve your right to comment on a matter upon which the Department declines to comment, or by if you wish to waive that right. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 13. Detailed instructions regarding the requirements for notification of interested parties maybe found in sections 17 and 18 of Rev. Proc. 2007–6. Additional information concerning this application (including, where applicable, an updated copy of the plan and related trust; the application for determination;any additional documents dealing with the application that have submitted to the Service; and copies of section 17 of Rev. Proc. 2007–6 are available at during the hours offor inspection and copying. (There is a nominal charge for copying and/or mailing.) January 2, 20072242007–1 I.R.B. APPENDIX ChecklistAs part of a § 401(h) or § 420 determination letter request described in section 16 of this revenue procedure the following checklist may be completed and attached to the determination letter request. If the request relates to § 401(h) but not to § 420, complete Part I only. If the request relates to § 420, complete Parts I and II. PART I CIRCLESECTION 1. Does the Plan contain a medical benefits account within the meaning of § 401(h) of the Code? If the medical benefits account is a new provision, items “a” through “h” should be completed. Yes No a.Does the medical benefits account specify the medical benefits that will be available and contain provisions for determining the amount that will be paid? Yes No b.Does the medical benefits account specify who will benefit?Yes No c.Does the medical benefits account indicate that such benefits, when added to any life insurance protection in the Plan, will be subordinate to retirement benefits? (This requirement will not be satisfied unless the amount of actual contributions to provide § 401(h) benefits (when added to actual contributions for life insurance protection under the Plan) does not exceed 25 percent of the total actual contributions to the Plan (other than contributions to fund past service credits), determined on an aggregate basis since the inception of the § 401(h) arrangement.) Yes No d.Does the medical benefits account maintain separate accounts with respect to contributions to key employees (as defined in § 416(i)(1) of the Code) to fund such benefits? Yes No e.Does the medical benefits accountstate that amounts contributed must be reasonable and ascertainable? Yes No f.Does the medical benefits account provide for the impossibility of diversion prior to satisfaction of liabilities (other than item “7” below)? Yes No g.Does the medical benefits account provide for reversion upon sat- isfaction of all liabilities (other than item “7” below)? Yes No h.Does the medical benefits account provide that forfeitures must be applied as soon as possible to reduce employer contributions to fund the medical benefits? Yes No PART II 2. Does the Plan limit transfers to “Excess Assets” as defined in § 420(e)(2) of the Code? Yes No 2007–1 I.R.B.225January 2, 2007 3. Does the Plan provide that only one transfer may be made in a taxable year (except with regard to transfersrelating to prior years pursuant to § 420(b)(4) of the Code)? Yes No 4. Does the Plan provide that the amount transferred shall not exceed the amount reasonably estimated to be paid for qualified current retiree health liabilities? Yes No 5. Does the Plan provide that no transfer will be made after December 31, 2013? Yes No 6. Does the Plan provide that transferred assets and income attributable to such assets shall be used only to pay qualifiedcurrent retiree health liabilities for the taxable year of transfer? Yes No 7. Does the Plan provide that any amounts transferred (plus income) that are not used to pay qualified current retiree health liabilities shall be transferred back to the defined benefit portion of the Plan? Yes No 8. Does the Plan provide that amounts paid out of a health benefits account will be treated as paid first out of transferred assets and income attributable to those assets? Yes No 9. Does the Plan provide that participants’ accrued benefits become nonfor- feitable on a termination basis (i) immediately prior to transfer, or (ii) in the case of a participant who separated within 1 year before the transfer, immediately before such separation? Yes No 10. In the case of transfers described in § 420(b)(4) of the Code relating to 1990, does the Plan provide that benefits will be recomputed and become nonforfeitable for participants whoseparated from service in such prior year as described in § 420(c)(2)? Yes No 11. Does the Plan provide that transfers will be permitted only if each group health plan or arrangement contains provisions satisfying § 420(c)(3) of the Code, as amended? Yes No 12. Does the Plan define “applicable employer cost”, “cost maintenance period” and” benefit maintenance period”, as needed, consistently with § 420(c)(3) of the Code, as amended? Yes No 13. Do the Plan’s provisions reflect the transition rule in section 535(c)(2) of TREA ’99, if applicable? Yes No 14. Does the Plan provide that transferred assets cannot be used for key em- ployees? Yes No January 2, 20072262007–1 I.R.B. 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 2007–7 SECTION 1. PURPOSE AND NATURE OF CHANGES .01 This revenue procedure updates Rev. Proc. 2006–7, 2006–1 C.B. 242, by providing a current list of those areas of the Internal Revenue Code under the jurisdiction of the Associate Chief Coun- sel (International) relating to matters on which the Internal Revenue Service will not issue letter rulings or determination letters. .02 Change (1) Section 4.01(29) dealing with the determination under section 7874 of whether, after the acquisition of the entity, the expanded affiliated group has substantial business activities in the for- eign country in which, or under the law of which, the acquiring foreign entity is cre- ated or organized, when compared to the total business activities of the expanded affiliated group, has been added. SECTION 2. BACKGROUND AND SCOPE OF APPLICATION .01 Background In the interest of sound tax administra- tion, the Service answers inquiries from in- dividuals and organizations regarding their status for tax purposes and the tax effects of their acts or transactions before the fil- ing of returns or reports that are required by the Internal Revenue Code. There are, however, areas where the Service will not issue letter rulings or determination let- ters, either because the issues are inher- ently factual or for other reasons. These areas are set forth in sections 3 and 4 of this revenue procedure. Section 3 lists areas in which letter rul- ings and determination letters will not be issued under any circumstances. Section 4 lists areas in which they will not ordinarily be issued; in these areas, unique and compelling reasons may jus- tify issuing a letter ruling or determination letter. A taxpayer who plans to request a letter ruling or determination letter in an area described in Section 4 should con- tact (by telephone or in writing) the Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International) (hereinafter “the Office”) prior to making such request and discuss with the Office the unique and compelling reasons that the taxpayer believes justify issuing such letter ruling or determination letter. While not required, a written submission is encour- aged since it will enable Office personnel to arrive more quickly at an understand- ing of the unique facts of each case. A taxpayer who contacts the Office by tele- phone may be requested to provide a writ- ten submission. The Service may provide a general information letter in response to inquiries in areas on either list. These lists are not all-inclusive. Fu- ture revenue procedures may add or delete items. The Service may also decline to rule on an individual case for reasons pe- culiar to that case, and such decision will not be announced in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. .02 Scope of Application This revenue procedure does not pre- clude the submission of requests for tech- nical advice to the Office from other of- fices of the Service. SECTION 3. AREAS IN WHICH RULING OR DETERMINATION LETTERS WILL NOT BE ISSUED .01 Specific Questions and Problems (1) Section 861.—Income from Sources Within the United States.—A method for determining the source of a pension payment to a nonresident alien in- dividual from a trust under a defined ben- efit plan that is qualified under § 401(a) if the proposed method is inconsistent with §§ 4.01, 4.02, and 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 2004–37, 2004–1 C.B. 1099. (2) Section 862.—Income from Sources Without the United States.—A method for determining the source of a pension payment to a nonresident alien in- dividual from a trust under a defined ben- efit plan that is qualified under § 401(a) if the proposed method is inconsistent with §§ 4.01, 4.02, and 4.03 of Rev. Proc. 2004–37, 2004–1 C.B. 1099. (3) Section 871(g).—Special Rules for Original Issue Discount.—Whether a debt instrument having original issue discount within the meaning of § 1273 is not an original issue discount obligation within the meaning of § 871(g)(1)(B)(i) when the instrument is payable 183 days or less from the date of original issue (without regard to the period held by the taxpayer). (4) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether a person that is a resi- dent of a foreign country and derives in- come from the United States is entitled to benefits under the United States income tax treaty with that foreign country pur- suant to the limitation on benefits article. However, the Service may rule regarding the legal interpretation of a particular pro- vision within the relevant limitation on benefits article. (5) Section 954.—Foreign Base Com- pany Income.—The effective rate of tax that a foreign country will impose on in- come. (6) Section 1503(d).—Dual Consoli- dated Loss.—Whether the conditions un- der the regulations for excepting a net op- erating loss of a dual resident corporation from the definition of a dual consolidated loss, or for rebutting the presumption that an event constitutes atriggering event for purposes of § 1.1503–2(g)(2)(iii)(B), are satisfied. (7) Section 7701(b).—Definition of Resident Alien and Nonresident Alien.—Whether an alien individual is a nonresident of the United States, in- cluding whether the individual has met the requirements of the substantial pres- ence test or exceptions to the substantial presence test. However, the Service may rule regarding the legal interpretation of a particular provision of § 7701(b) or the regulations thereunder. .02 General Areas. (1) The prospective application of the estate tax to the property or the estate of a living person, except that rulings may be issued on any international issues in a ruling request accepted pursuant to § 5.06 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. (2) Whether reasonable cause exists un- der Subtitle F (Procedure and Administra- tion) of the Code. (3) Whether a proposed transaction would subject a taxpayer to criminal penalties. (4) Any area where the ruling request does not comply with the requirements of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. (5) Any area where the same issue is the subject of the taxpayer’s pending request 2007–1 I.R.B.227January 2, 2007 for competent authority assistance under a United States tax treaty. (6) A “comfort” ruling will not be is- sued with respect to an issue that is clearly andadequatelyaddressedbystatute,reg- ulations, decisions of acourt, tax treaties, revenue rulings, or revenue procedures ab- sent extraordinary circumstances (e.g.,a request for a ruling required by a govern- mental regulatory authority in order to ef- fectuate the transaction.) (7) Any frivolous issue, as that term is defined in § 6.10 of Rev. Proc. 2007–1. SECTION 4. AREAS IN WHICH RULING OR DETERMINATION LETTERS WILL NOT ORDINARILY BE ISSUED .01 Specific Questions and Problems (1) Section 367(a).—Transfers of Prop- erty from the United States.—Whether an oil or gas working interest is transferred from the United States for use in the ac- tive conduct of a trade or business for purposes of § 367(a)(3); and whether any other property is so transferred, where the determination requires extensive factual inquiry. (2) Section 367(b).—Other Trans- fers.—Whether a foreign corporation is considered a corporation for purposes of any nonrecognition provision listed in § 367(b), and related issues, unless the ruling request presents a significant legal issue or subchapter C rulings are requested in the context of reorganizations or liqui- dations involving foreign corporations. (3) Section 864.—Definitions and Special Rules.—Whether a taxpayer is engaged in a trade or business within the United States, and whether income is effectively connected with the con- duct of a trade or business within the United States; whether an instrument is a security as defined in § 1.864–2(c)(2); whether a taxpayer effects transactions in the United States in stocks or securities under § 1.864–2(c)(2); whether an instru- ment or item is a commodity as defined in § 1.864–2(d)(3); and for purposes of § 1.864–2(d)(1) and (2), whether a com- modity is of a kind customarily dealt in on an organized commodity exchange, and whether a transaction is of a kind custom- arily consummated at such place. (4) Section 871.—Tax on Nonresident Alien Individuals.—Whether the income earned on contracts that do not qualify as annuities or life insurance contracts be- cause of the limitations imposed by § 72(s) and § 7702(a) is portfolio interest as de- fined in § 871(h). (5) Section 881.—Tax on Income of Foreign Corporations Not Connected with United States Business.—Whether the income earned on contracts that do not qualify as annuities or life insurance con- tracts because of the limitations imposed by § 72(s) and § 7702(a) is portfolio inter- est as defined in § 881(c). (6) Section 892.—Income of Foreign Governments and of International Organi- zations.—Whether income derived by for- eign governments and international orga- nizations from sources within the United States is excluded from gross income and exempt from taxation and any underlying issue related to that determination. (7) Section 893.—Compensation of Employees of Foreign Governments and International Organizations.—Whether wages, fees, or salary of an employee of a foreign government or of an international organization received as compensation for official services to such government or in- ternational organization is excluded from gross income and exempt from taxation and any underlying issue related to that determination. (8) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether the income received by an individual in respect of services ren- dered to a foreign government or a politi- cal subdivision or a local authority thereof is exempt from federal income tax or with- holding under any of the United States in- come tax treaties which contain provisions applicable to such individuals. (9) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether a taxpayer has a perma- nent establishment in the United States for purposes of any United States income tax treaty and whether income is attributable to a permanent establishment in the United States. (10) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether certain persons will be considered liable totax under the laws of a foreign country for purposes of determin- ing if such persons are residents within the meaning of any United States income tax treaty. But see Rev. Rul. 2000–59, 2000–2 C.B. 593. (11) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether the income received by a nonresident alien student or trainee for services performed for a university or other educational institution is exempt from federal income tax or withholding under any of the United States income tax treaties which contain provisions applica- ble to such nonresident alien students or trainees. (12) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether the income received by a nonresident alien performing research or teaching as personal services for a univer- sity, hospital or other research institution is exempt from federal income tax or with- holding under any of the United States in- come tax treaties which contain provisions applicable to such nonresident alien teach- ers or researchers. (13) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether a foreign recipient of payments made by a United States person is ineligible to receive the benefits of a United States tax treaty under the princi- ples of Rev. Rul. 89–110, 1989–2 C.B. 275. (14) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether a recipient of payments is or has been a resident of a country for purposes of any United States tax treaty. Pursuant to § 1.884–5(f), however, the Ser- vice may rule whether a corporation repre- senting that it is a resident of a country is a qualified resident thereof for purposes of §884. (15) Section 894.—Income Affected by Treaty.—Whether an entity is treated as fiscally transparent by a foreign jurisdic- tion for purposes of § 894(c) and the regu- lations thereunder. (16) Section 901.—Taxes of Foreign Countries and of Possessions of United States.—Whether a foreign levy meets the requirements of a creditable tax under §901. (17) Section 901.—Taxes of Foreign Countries and of Possessions of United States.—Whether a person claiming a credit has established, based on all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the amount (if any) paid by a dual capacity taxpayer under a qualifying levy that is not paid in exchange for a specific economic benefit. See § 1.901–2A(c)(2). (18) Section 903.—Credit for Taxes in Lieu of Income, Etc., Taxes.—Whether a foreign levy meets the requirements of a creditable tax under § 903. January 2, 20072282007–1 I.R.B. (19) Sections 927(a) (Repealed), 936(h)(5), 943(a) (Repealed), 954(d), 993(c).—ManufacturedProduct.— Whether a product is manufactured or produced for purposes of § 927(a) (Re- pealed), § 936(h)(5),§ 943(a) (Repealed), §954(d),and§993(c). (20)Section936.—PuertoRicoand Possession Tax Credit.—What constitutes a substantial line of business. (21) Section 956.—Investment of Earn- ings in United States Property.—Whether a pledge of the stock of a controlled for- eign corporation is an indirect pledge of the assets of that corporation. See § 1.956–2(c)(2). (22) Section 985.—Functional Cur- rency.—Whether a currency is the func- tional currency of a qualified business unit. (23) Section 989(a).—Qualified Busi- ness Unit.—Whether a unit of the tax- payer’s trade or business is a qualified business unit. (24)Section1058.—Transfers of Securities under Certain Agree- ments.—Whether the amount of any payment described in § 1058(b)(2) or the amount of any other payment made in connection with a transfer of securities describedin§1058isfromsourceswithin or without the United States; the character of such amounts; and whether the amounts constitute a particular kind of income for purposes of any United States income tax treaty. (25)Section1503(d).—Dual ConsolidatedLoss.—Whetheran eventpresumptivelyconstitutes a triggering event for purposes of § 1.1503–2(g)(2)(iii)(A)(1)–(7), apart from possible rebuttal of the presump- tion under § 1.1503–2(g)(2)(iii)(B). See § 3.01(6), Rev. Proc. 2007–7. (26) Section 2501.—Imposition of Tax.—Whether a partnership interest is intangible property for purposes of § 2501(a)(2) (dealing with transfers of intangible property by a nonresident not a citizen of the United States). (27)Section7701.—Defini- tions.—Whether an estate or trust is a foreign estate or trust for federal income tax purposes. (28)Section7701.—Defini- tions.—Whether an intermediate entity is a conduit entity under § 1.881–3(a)(4); whether a transaction is a financing trans- action under § 1.881–3(a)(ii); whether the participation of an intermediate entity in a financing arrangement is pursuant to a tax avoidance plan under § 1.881–3(b); whether an intermediate entity performs significant financing activities under § 1.881–3(b)(3)(ii); whether an unre- lated intermediate entity would not have participated in a financing arrangement on substantially the same terms under § 1.881–3(c). (29) Section 7874.—Expatriated Enti- ties and their Foreign Parents.—Whether, after the acquisition, the expanded affili- ated group has substantial business activi- ties in the foreign country in which, or un- der the law of which, the acquiring foreign entity is created or organized, when com- pared to the total business activities of the expanded affiliated group. .02 General Areas (1) Whether a taxpayer has a business purpose for a transaction or arrangement. (2) Whether a taxpayer uses a correct North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code or Standard Indus- trial Classification (SIC) code. (3) Any transaction or series of trans- actions that is designed to achieve a differ- ent tax consequence or classification under U.S. tax law (including tax treaties) and the tax law of a foreign country, where the results of that different tax consequence or classification are inconsistent with the purposes of U.S. tax law (including tax treaties). (4)(a) Situations where a taxpayer or a related party is domiciled or organized in a foreign jurisdiction with which the United States does not have an effective mecha- nism for obtaining tax information with re- spect to civil tax examinations and crim- inal tax investigations, which would pre- clude the Service from obtaining informa- tion located in such jurisdiction that is rel- evant to the analysis or examination of the tax issues involved in the ruling request. (b) The provisions of subsection 4.02(4)(a) above shall not apply if the taxpayer or affected related party (i) con- sents to the disclosure of all relevant information requested by the Service in processing the ruling request or in the course of an examination to verify the accuracy of the representations made and to otherwise analyze or examine the tax issues involved in the ruling request, and (ii) waives all claims to protection of bank or commercial secrecy laws in the foreign jurisdiction with respect to the information requested by the Service. In the event the taxpayer’s or related party’s consent to disclose relevant information or to waive protection of bank or commercial secrecy is determined by the Service to be inef- fective or of no force and effect, then the Service may retroactively rescind any rul- ing rendered in reliance on such consent. (5) The federal tax consequences of proposed federal, state, local, municipal, or foreign legislation. (6)(a) Situations involving the interpre- tation of foreign law or foreign documents. The interpretation of a foreign law or for- eign document means making a judgment about the import or effect of the foreign law or document that goes beyond its plain meaning. (b) The Service, at its discretion, may consider rulings that involve the interpre- tation of foreign laws or foreign docu- ments. In these cases, the Service may re- quest information in addition to that listed in §§ 7.01(2)(b) and (c) of Revenue Proce- dure 2007–1, including a discussion of the implications of any authority believed to interpret the foreign law or foreign docu- ment, such as pending legislation, treaties, court decisions, notices or administrative decisions. SECTION 5. EFFECT ON OTHER REVENUE PROCEDURE Rev. Proc. 2006–7 is superseded. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective Jan- uary 2, 2007. SECTION 7. DRAFTING INFORMATION This revenue procedure was compiled by Willard W. Yates of the Office of As- sociate Chief Counsel (International). For further information about this revenue pro- cedure, please contact Mr. Yates at (202) 622–3164 (not a toll-free number). 2007–1 I.R.B.229January 2, 2007 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. Rev. Proc. 2007–8 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. PURPOSE ............................................................................................ 231 SECTION 2. CHANGES........................................................................................... 231 .01Ingeneral................................................................................................... 231 .02Changestofeeschedules..................................................................................... 231 SECTION 3. BACKGROUND....................................................................................... 231 .01Legislationauthorizinguserfees .............................................................................. 231 .02Relatedrevenueprocedures................................................................................... 231 SECTION 4. SCOPE............................................................................................... 231 .01Requeststowhichuserfeesapply ............................................................................. 231 .02Requestsandotheractionsthatdonotrequirethepaymentofauserfee............................................ 231 .03Exemptionsfromtheuserfeerequirements..................................................................... 231 SECTION 5. DEFINITIONS........................................................................................ 232 SECTION 6. FEE SCHEDULE...................................................................................... 233 EMPLOYEEPLANSUSERFEES ............................................................................... 233 .01Letterrulingrequests......................................................................................... 233 .02Requestsforcertainadministrativeexemptions.................................................................. 233 .03 Administrative scrutiny determinations with respect to separate lines of busi ness. ................. .................. 233 .04 Opinion letters on prototype individual retirement accounts and/or annuitie s, simplified employee pensions,SIMPLEIRAs,SIMPLEIRAPlans,andRothIRAs..................................................... 234 .05Opinionlettersonmasterandprototypeplans. .................................................................. 234 .06Advisorylettersonvolumesubmitterplans. .................................................................... 235 .07Determinationletters......................................................................................... 235 EXEMPTORGANIZATIONSUSERFEES........................................................................ 236 .08Letterrulings................................................................................................ 236 .09Determinationlettersandrequestsforgroupexemptionletters.................................................... 237 .10Summaryofexemptorganizationfees.......................................................................... 237 SECTION 7. MAILING ADDRESS FOR REQUESTING LETTER RULINGS, DETERMINATION LETTERS, ETC. ................................................................................................. 238 .01MattershandledbyEPorEOTechnical........................................................................ 238 .02MattershandledbyEPorEODeterminations................................................................... 238 SECTION 8. REQUESTS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OFFICES, FEE CATEGORIES, ISSUES, TRANSACTIONS, OR ENTITIES ........................................................................ 239 .01Requestsinvolvingseveraloffices............................................................................. 239 .02Requestsinvolvingseveralfeecategories....................................................................... 239 .03Requestsinvolvingseveralissues.............................................................................. 239 .04Requestsinvolvingseveralunrelatedtransactions................................................................ 239 .05Requestsforseparateletterrulingsforseveralentities............................................................ 239 SECTION 9. PAYMENT OF FEE.................................................................................... 239 .01Methodofpayment.......................................................................................... 239 .02Transmittalforms............................................................................................ 239 .03Effectofnonpaymentorpaymentofincorrectamount............................................................ 239 SECTION 10. REFUNDS........................................................................................... 240 .01Generalrule ................................................................................................ 240 .02Examples................................................................................................... 240 January 2, 20072302007–1 I.R.B. SECTION 11. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF USER FEE..................................................... 240 SECTION 12. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS................................................................... 241 SECTION 13. EFFECTIVE DATE................................................................................... 241 SECTION 14. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT...................................................................... 241 APPENDIX....................................................................................................... 241 SECTION 1. PURPOSE This r evenue procedure provides guid- ance f or complying with the user fee progr am of the Internal Revenue Service as it p ertains to requests for letter rulings, dete rmination letters, etc., on matters un- der t he jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax E xempt and Government Entities Di- visi on; and requests for administrative scr utiny determinations under Rev. Proc. 93– 41, 1993–2 C.B. 536. SEC TION 2. CHANGES .01In general. This revenue procedure is a general update of Rev. Proc. 2006–8, 2006–1 I.R.B. 245. .02 Section 6.10 is revised to reflect sec- tion 507 termination cases now being han- dled by EO Determinations. .03 Section 10.01 is revised to include determination letters. .04 Section 10.02(1)(b) is clarified as to when a refund of user fees will not be issued. SECTION 3. BACKGROUND .01Legislation authorizing user fees. Section 7528 was added to the Code by section 202 of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Block Grant Program, Pub. L. No. 108–89, and was extended to September 30, 2014, by section 690 of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, Pub. L. No.108–357. Section 7528 of the Code directs the Secretary of the Treasury or delegate (the “Secretary”) to establish a program requiring the payment of user fees for requests to the Service for letter rul- ings, opinion letters, determination letters, and similar requests. The fees charged un- der the program (1) are to vary according to categories or subcategories established by the Secretary; (2) are to be determined after taking into account the average time for, and difficulty of, complying with re- quests in each category and subcategory; and (3) are payable in advance. Section 7528(b)(3) directs theSecretary to provide for exemptions and reduced fees under the program as the Secretary determines to be appropriate, but the average fee applicable to each category may not be less than the amount specified in § 7528. .02Related revenue procedures.The various revenue procedures that require payment of a user fee, or an administra- tive scrutiny determination user fee are described in the appendix to this revenue procedure. SEC TION 4. SCOPE .01Requests to which user fees apply. In general, user fees apply to all requests for letter rulings, opinion letters, determi- nation letters, and advisory letters submit- ted by or on behalf of taxpayers, sponsor- ing organizations or other entities as de- scribed in this revenue procedure. Fur- ther, administrative scrutiny determination user fees, described in Rev. Proc. 93–41, are collected through the user fee program described in this revenue procedure. Re- quests to which a user fee or an administra- tive scrutiny determination user fee is ap- plicable must be accompanied by the ap- propriate fee as determined from the fee schedule set forth in section 6 of this rev- enue procedure. The fee may be refunded in limited circumstances as set forth in sec- tion 10. .02Requests and other actions that do not require the payment of a user fee.Ac- tions which do not require the payment of a user fee include the following: (1) Requests for information letters as defined in Rev. Proc. 2007–4, page 118, this Bulletin. (2) Elections pertaining to automatic extensions of time under § 301.9100–1 of the Procedure and Administration regula- tions. (3) Use of forms which are not to be filed with the Service. For example, no user fee is required in connection with the use of Form 5305,Traditional Indi- vidual Retirement Trust Account,orForm 5305–A,Traditional Individual Retire- ment Custodial Account, in order to adopt an individual retirement account under § 408(a). (4) In general, plan amendments whereby sponsors amend their plans by adopting, word-for-word, the model lan- guage contained in a revenue procedure which states that the amendment should not be submitted to the Service and that the Service will not issue new opinion, advisory, ruling or determination letters for plans that are amended solely to add the model language. (5) Change in accounting period or ac- counting method permitted by a published revenue procedure that permits an auto- matic change without prior approval of the Commissioner. (6)Compliance and Correction Fees. Compliance fees and compliance cor- rection fees under the Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System are not described in this procedure because they are compliance fees or compliance cor- rection fees and not user fees. For further guidance, please see Rev. Proc. 2006–27, 2006–22 I.R.B. 945. .03Exemptions from the user fee re- quirements. The following exemptions ap- ply to the user fee requirements. These are the only exemptions that apply: (1) Departments, agencies, or instru- mentalities of the United States that cer- tify that they are seeking a letter ruling, determination letter, opinion letter or simi- lar letter on behalf of a program or activity funded by federal appropriations. The fact that a user fee is not charged has no bear- ing on whether an applicant is treated as an agency or instrumentality of the United States for purposes of any provision of the Code except for § 7528. (2) Requests as to whether a worker is an employee for federal employment taxes and federal income tax withhold- ing purposes (chapters 21, 22, 23, and 24 2007–1 I.R.B.231January 2, 2007 of subtitle C of the Code) submitted on Form SS–8,Determination of Worker Sta- tus for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding, or its equivalent. Such a request may be submit- tedinconnectionwithanapplicationfora determination on the qualification of a plan when it is necessary to determine whether an employer-employee relationship exists. See section 6.13 of Rev. Proc. 2007–6, page 189, this Bulletin. In that case, al- though no user fee applies to the request submitted on Form SS–8, the applicable user fee must be paid in connection with the application for determination on the plan’s qualification. SECTION 5. DEFINITIONS The following terms used in this revenue procedure are defined in the pertinent revenue procedures referred to below, which are described in the appendix: Administrative scrutiny determinationRev. Proc. 93–41 Adoption agreementRev. Proc. 2005–16 Advisory letterRev. Procs. 2005–16, 2007–6 Basic plan documentRev. Proc. 2005–16 Determination letterRev. Procs. 90–27, 2007–4 Dual-purpose IRARev. Proc. 98–59 Group exemption letterRev. Proc. 80–27 Information letterRev. Proc. 2007–4 Letter rulingRev. Proc. 2007–4 Mass submitterRev. Procs. 87–50, 2005–16 Mass submitter planRev. Proc. 2005–16 Master planRev. Proc. 2005–16 Minor modificationRev. Procs. 87–50, 2005–16 Opinion letterRev. Procs. 2005–16, 2007–4 Prototype planRev. Proc. 2005–16 Roth IRARev. Proc. 98–59 SIMPLE IRARev. Proc. 97–29 SIMPLE IRA PlanRev. Proc. 97–29 Plan SponsorRev. Proc. 2005–16 Sponsoring organizationRev. Procs. 87–50, Rev. Proc. 2005–16 Staggered Remedial Amendment PeriodRev. Proc. 2005–66 Volume submitter lead specimen planRev. Proc. 2005–16 Volume submitter planRev. Proc. 2005–16 Volume submitter specimen planRev. Proc. 2005–16 Word-for-word identical adoptionRev. Procs. 87–50, 2005–16 January 2, 20072322007–1 I.R.B. SECTION 6. FEE SCHEDULE The amount of the user fee payable with respect to each category or subcategory of submission is as set forth in the following schedule. CATEGORY EMPLOYEE PLANS USER FEES .01Letter ruling requests. (1) Computation of exclusion for annuitant under § 72 $380 (2) Change in plan year (Form 5308) $380 (3) Certain waivers of 60-day rollover period (a) Rollover less than $50,000$500 (b) Rollover equal to or greater than $50,000 and less than $100,000 $1,500 (c) Rollover equal to or greater than $100,000$3,000 Note:No user fee is required if the requested change is permitted to be made pursuant to the procedure for automatic approval set forth in Rev. Proc. 87–27, 1987–1 C.B. 769. In such a case, Form 5308 should not be submitted to the Service. (4) Change in funding method $2,800 (5) Letter ruling under Rev. Proc. 90–49, 1990–2 C.B. 620 $2,800 (6) Approval to become a nonbank trustee (see §1.408–2(e) of the Income Tax Regulations) $14,500 (7) Letter ruling involving the determination of the account limit under § 419A(c) $14,500 (8) Waiver of minimum funding standard or excise tax (§ 412(d), 4971(b) or 4971(f)) (a) Waiver of $1,000,000 or more$13,000 (b) Waiver of less than $1,000,000$6,100 (9) Individually designed simplified employee pension (SEP) $9,000 (10) All other letter rulings $9,000 .02Requests for certain administrative exemptions. Requests for administrative exemptions for participant-directed transactions that are in compliance with the regulations under § 404(c) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) but may result in prohibited transactions under § 4975 $2,570 .03Administrative scrutiny determinations with respect to separate lines of business. (1) For the first separate line of business for which a determination is requested $4,915 (2) For each additional separate line ofbusiness for which a determination is requested $1,580 2007–1 I.R.B.233January 2, 2007 .04Opinion letters on prototype individual retirement accounts and/or annuities, simplified employee pensions, SIMPLE IRAs, SIMPLE IRA Plans, and Roth IRAs. (1) Mass submission of a prototype IRA, SEP, SIMPLE IRA, SIMPLE IRA Plan, or Roth IRA, per plan document, new or amended $3,000 (2) Sponsoring organization’s nonmass submission of prototype IRA, SEP, SIMPLE IRA, SIMPLE IRA Plan, or Roth IRA, per plan document $3,000 (3) Sponsoring organization’s word-for-word identical adoption of mass submitter’s prototype IRA, SEP, SIMPLE IRA, SIMPLE IRA Plan, or Roth IRA, per plan document or an amendment thereof $200 Note:If a mass submitter submits, in any 12-month period ending January 31, more than 300 applications on behalf of word-for-word adopters of prototype IRAs with respect to a particular plan document, only the first 300 such applications will be subject to the fee;no fee will apply to those in excess of the first 300 such applications submitted within the 12-month period. (4) Sponsoring organization’s word-for-word identical adoption of mass submitter’s prototype dual-purpose IRA, per plan document or an amendment thereof $200 Note:If a mass submitter submits, in any 12-month period ending January 31, more than 300 applications on behalf of word-for-word adopters of prototype dual-purpose IRAs with respect to a particular plan document, only the first 300 such applications will be subject to the fee; no fee will apply to those in excess of the first 300 such applications submitted within the 12-month period. (5) Sponsoring organization’s minor modification of mass submitter’s prototype IRA, SEP, SIMPLE IRA, SIMPLE IRA Plan, or Roth IRA, per plan document $750 (6) Sponsoring organization’s minor modification of mass submitter’s prototype dual-purpose IRA, per plan document $750 (7) Opinion letters on dual-purpose (combined traditional and Roth) IRAs: (a) Mass submission of a prototype dual-purpose IRA, per plan document, new or amended $4,500 (b) Sponsoring organization’s nonmass submission of prototype dual-purpose IRA, per plan document $4,500 .05Opinion letters on master and prototype plans. (1) Mass submitter M & P plan, per basic plan document, new or amended, with one adoption agreement $9,000 (2) Nonmass submission (new or amended) by M & P sponsor, per adoption agreement $9,000 (3) Mass submitter M & P plan, per each additional adoption agreement $650 (4) Sponsor’s minor modification of M & P mass submitter’s plan document, per adoption agreement $650 (5) M & P mass submitter’s request for an advisory letter with respect to the addition of optional provisions following issuance of a favorable opinion letter (see section 12.031(c) of Rev. Proc. 2005–16), per basic plan document (regardless of the number of adoption agreements) $650 January 2, 20072342007–1 I.R.B. (6) M & P mass submitter’s addition of new adoption agreements after the basic plan document and associated adoption agreements have been approved, per adoption agreement $650 Note 1:Mass submitters that are sponsors in their own right are liable for this fee. Note 2:If a mass submitter submits, in any 12-month period ending January 31, more than 300 applications on behalf of word-for-word adopters with respect to a particular adoption agreement, only the first 300 such applications will be subject to the fee; no fee will apply to those in excess of the first 300 such applications submitted within the 12-month period. (7) Sponsor’s word-for-word identical adoption of M & P mass submitter’s basic plan document (or an amendment thereof), per adoption agreement $200 (8) Assumption of sponsorship of an approved M & P plan, without any amendment to the plan document, by a new entity, as evidenced by a change of employer identification number $200 (9) Mass submitter or sponsor per trust document in excess of 10 $650 .06Advisory letters on volume submitter plans. (1) Volume submitter specimen plans $9,000 (2) Volume submitter lead specimen plan $9,000 (3) Volume submitter specimen plan that is word-for-word identical to a lead specimen plan $200 .07Determination letters (1) If the plan is intended to satisfy a design-based or nondesign-based safe harbor, or if the applicant is not electing to receivea determination with respect to any of the general tests, and the applicant is not electing to receive a determination with respect to the average benefit test: (a) Form 5300(Application for Determination for Employee Benefit Plan) $1,000 (b) Form 5310(Application for Determination for Terminating Plan) $1,000 (c) Form 5307(Application for Determination for Adopters of Master or Prototype or Volume Submitter Plans) $300 (d) Form 6406(Short Form Application for Determination for Minor Amendment of Employee Benefit Plan) $300 (e) Multiple employer plans (Form 5300): (i) 2 to 10 Forms 5300 $1,500 (ii) 11 to 99 Forms 5300 $1,500 (iii) 100 to 499 Forms 5300 $10,000 (iv) Over 499 Forms 5300 $10,000 Note:In the case of a multiple employer plan that is adopted by other employers after the initial submission, the fee would be the same as in paragraph (1) above. (f) Multiple employer plans (Form 5310): (i) 2 to 10 employers $1,500 (ii) 11 to 99 employers $1,500 2007–1 I.R.B.235January 2, 2007 (iii) 100 to 499 employers $10,000 (iv) Over 499 employers $10,000 (2) If the applicant is electing to receive a determination with respect to the average benefit test and/or any of the general tests: (a) Form 5300(Application for Determination for Employee Benefit Plan) $1,800 (b) Form 5310(Application for Determination for Terminating Plan) $1,800 (c) Form 5307(Application for Determination for Adopters of Master or Prototype or Volume Submitter Plans) $1,000 (d) Multiple employer plans (Form 5300): (i) 2 to 10 Forms 5300 $2,300 (ii) 11 to 99 Forms 5300 $2,300 (iii) 100 to 499 Forms 5300 $15,000 (iv) Over 499 Forms 5300 $15,000 Note:In the case of a multiple employer plan that is adopted by other employers after the initial submission, the fee would be the same as in paragraph (2) above. (e) Multiple employer plans (Form 5310): (i) 2 to 10 employers $2,300 (ii) 11 to 99 employers $2,300 (iii) 100 to 499 employers $15,000 (iv) Over 499 employers $15,000 (3) Group trusts contemplated by Rev. Rul. 81–100, 1981–1 C.B. 326, and Rev. Rul. 2004–67, 2004–2 C.B. 28. $750 EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS USER FEES .08Letter rulings. (1) Applications with respect to change in accounting period (Form 1128) $350 Note:No user fee is charged if the procedure described in Rev. Proc. 85–58, 1985–2 C.B. 740, is used by timely filing the appropriate information return, or if the procedure described in Rev. Proc. 76–10, 1976–1 C.B. 548, for organizations with group exemptions is followed. (2) Applications with respect to change in accounting method (Form 3115) $275 Note:No user fee is charged if the method described in Rev. Proc. 2002–9, 2002–1 C.B. 327, is used. Taxpayers complying timely with Rev. Proc. 2002–9 will be deemed to have obtained the consent of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue tochange their method of accounting. (3) Request for approval of a qualified subsidiary related to a § 501(c)(25) organization. $900 (4) All other letter rulings $8,700 January 2, 20072362007–1 I.R.B. .09Determination letters and requests for group exemption letters (1) Initial application for exemption under § 501 or § 521 from organizations (other than pension, profit-sharing, and stock bonus plans described in § 401) that have had annual gross receipts averaging not more than $10,000 during the preceding four years, or new organizations that anticipate gross receipts averaging not more than $10,000 during their first four years $300 Note:Organizations seeking this reduced fee must sign a certification with their application that the receipts are or will be not more than the indicated amounts. (2) Initial application for exempt status from organizations otherwise described in paragraph (1) of this section 6.09 whose actual or anticipated gross receipts exceed the $10,000 average annually $750 Note:If an organization that is already recognized as exempt under § 501(c) seeks reclassification underanother subparagraph of § 501(c), a new user fee will be charged whether or not a new application is required. An additional fee applies to organizations that seek recognition of exemption under § 501(c)(4) (unless requested at the time of the § 501(c)(3) application) for a period for which they do not qualify for exemption under § 501(c)(3) becausetheir application was filed late and they do not qualify for relief under § 301.9100–1. (3) Group exemption letters $900 Note:An additional fee under (1) or (2) above is required when a central organization submits an initial application for exemption with its request for a group exemption letter. (4) Canadian registered charitiesnone In accordance with the income tax treaty between the United States and Canada, Canadian registered charities are automatically recognized as exempt under § 501(c)(3) without filing an application for exemption. For details, see Notice 99–47, 1999–2 C.B. 391. Therefore, no user fee is required when a Canadian registered charity submits all or part of a Form 1023 or other written request to be listed in Publication 78, or for a determination on its private foundation status. .10Summary of exempt organization fees This table summarizes the various types of exempt organization issues, indicates the office of jurisdiction for each type, and lists the applicable user fee. Reduced feesmay be applicable in certain instances. ISSUETECHNICAL OFFICEUSER FEE Accounting method changes $275 Accounting period changes $350 Qualified subsidiaries of § 501(c)(25) organizations $900 Section 514(b)(3) Neighborhood Land Use RuleNone Section 4943(c)(7) extensions of disposal period $8,700 2007–1 I.R.B.237January 2, 2007 ISSUEDETERMINATIONS OFFICEUSER FEE Application for recognition of exemption $750 Reduced fee described in section 6.09(1) $300 Advance ruling period inquiriesNone Confirmation of exemption (to replace lost exempt status letter, and to reflect name and address changes) None Reclassification of private foundation statusNone Regulations § 301.9100 relief in connection with applications for recognition of exemption None Section 507 terminations – advance ruling under § 507(b)(1)(B) and notice under § 507(a)(1) or 507(b)(1)(B) None Section 4940(d) exempt operating foundation statusNone Section 4942(g)(2) set asides – advance approvalNone Section 4945 advance approval of organization’s grant making procedures None Section 4945(f) advance approval of voter registration activities None Section 6033 annual information return filing requirements None Unusual grants to certain organizations under §§ 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and 509(a)(2) None SECTION 7. MAILING ADDRESS FOR REQUESTING LETTER RULINGS, DETERMINATION LETTERS, ETC. .01Matters handled by EP or EO Tech- nical. Requests should be mailed to the ap- propriate address set forth in this section 7.01. (1)Employee plans letter rulings under Rev. Procs. 79–62, 87–50, 90–49, 94–42, 2000–41, 2004–15, 2004–44 or 2007–4: Internal Revenue Service Attention: EP Letter Rulings P.O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 (2)Employee plans opinion letters un- der Rev. Procs. 87–50, 97–29, and 98–59: Internal Revenue Service Attention: EP Opinion Letter P.O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 (3)Employee plans administrative scrutiny determinations under Rev. Proc. 93–41: Internal Revenue Service Attention: Administrative Scrutiny P.O. Box 27063 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 (4)Exempt organizations letter rulings: Internal Revenue Service Attention: EO Letter Rulings P.O. Box 27720 McPherson Station Washington, DC 20038 Note:Hand delivered requests must be marked RULING REQUEST SUBMIS- SION. The delivery should be made: To the following address between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.; where a receipt will be given: Courier’s Desk Internal Revenue Service Attention: SE:T:EP [or SE:T:EO] 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW — PE Washington, DC 20224 .02Matters handled by EP or EO De- terminations Office. The following types of requests and applications are handled by the EP or EO Determinations Office and should be sent to the Internal Revenue Ser- vice Center in Covington, Kentucky, at the address shown below: requests for deter- mination letters on the qualified status of employee plans under §§ 401, 403(a), or 409, and the exempt status of any related trust under § 501; applications for recogni- tion of tax exemption on Form 1023, Form January 2, 20072382007–1 I.R.B. 1024 and Form 1028; and other applica- tions for recognition of qualification or ex- emption. The address is: Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 192 Covington, KY 41012–0192 The following types of requests and ap- plications are handled by the EP Determi- nations Office and should be sent to the Internal Revenue Service at the address shown below: requests for opinion letters and for volume submitter advisory letters on the form of employee plans under § 401 or 403(a) and the exempt status of any re- lated trust under § 501. The address is: Internal Revenue Service P.O. Box 2508 Rm. 5106 Cincinnati, OH 45201 Applications shipped by Express Mail or a delivery service should be sent to: Internal Revenue Service 201 West Rivercenter Blvd. Attn: Extracting Stop 312 Covington, KY 41011 SECTION 8. REQUESTS INVOLVING MULTIPLE OFFICES, FEE CATEGORIES, ISSUES, TRANSACTIONS, OR ENTITIES .01Requests involving several offices. If a request dealing with only one transac- tion involves more than one of the offices within Headquarters (for example, one issue is under the jurisdiction of the As- sociate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting) and another issue is under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Government Entities Divi- sion), only one fee applies, namely the highest fee that otherwise would apply to each of the offices involved. See Rev. Proc. 2007–1, this Bulletin, for the user fees applicable to issues under the juris- diction of the Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate), the Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions & Products), the Associate Chief Counsel (Income Tax & Accounting), the Associate Chief Coun- sel (Passthroughs & Special Industries), the Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and Administration), the Associate Chief Counsel (International) or the Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). .02Requests involving several fee cate- gories. If a request dealing with only one transaction involves more than one fee cat- egory, only one fee applies, namely the highest fee that otherwise would apply to each of the categories involved. .03Requests involving several issues.If a request dealing with only one transaction involves several issues, or a request for a change in accounting method dealing with only one item or sub-method of accounting involves several issues, or a request for a change in accounting period dealing with only one item involves several issues, the request is treated as one request. There- fore, only one fee applies, namely the fee that applies to the particular category or subcategory involved. The addition of a new issue relating to the same transaction will not result in an additional fee, unless the issue places the transaction in a higher fee category. .04Requests involving several un- related transactions.Ifarequestin- volves several unrelated transactions, or a request for a change in accounting method involves several unrelated items or sub-methods of accounting, or a request for a change in accounting period involves several unrelated items, each transaction or item is treated as a separate request. As a result, a separate fee will apply for each unrelated transaction or item. An additional fee will apply if the request is changed by the addition of an unrelated transaction or item not contained in the initial submission. .05Requests for separate letter rulings for several entities. Each entity involved in a transaction (for example, an exempt hospital reorganization) that desires a sep- arate letter ruling in its own name must pay a separate fee regardless of whether the transaction or transactions may be viewed as related. SECTION 9. PAYMENT OF FEE .01Method of payment. Each request to the Service for a letter ruling, determi- nation letter, opinion letter, etc., must be accompanied by a check or money order, payable to the United States Treasury, in the appropriate amount. Taxpayers should not send cash. .02Transmittal forms. Form 8717, User Fee for Employee Plan Determi- nation, Opinion, and Advisory Letter Request, and Form 8718,User Fee for Ex- empt Organization Determination Letter Request, are intended to be used as at- tachments to certain determination letter, opinion letter and advisory letter applica- tions. Space is reserved for the attachment of the applicable user fee check or money order. No similar form has been designed to be used in connection with requests for letter rulings or administrative scrutiny determinations. .03Effect of nonpayment or payment of incorrect amount. Itwillbethegeneral practice of the Service that: (1) The respective offices within the Service that are responsible for issuing let- ter rulings, determination letters, etc., will exercise discretion in deciding whether to immediately return submissions that are not accompanied by a properly completed check or money order or that are accom- panied by a check or money order for less than the correct amount. In those in- stances where the submission is not im- mediately returned, the requester will be contacted and given a reasonable amount of time to submit the proper fee. If the proper fee is not received within a reason- able amount of time, the entire submission will then be returned. However, the re- spective offices of the Service, in their dis- cretion, may defer substantive considera- tion of a submission until proper payment has been received. (2) An application for a determination letter will not be returned merely because Form 8717 or Form 8718 was not attached. (3) The return of a submission to the requester may adversely affect substantive rights if the submission is not perfected and resubmitted to the Service within 30 days of the date of the cover letter return- ing the submission. Examples of this are: (a) where an application for a determina- tion letter is submitted prior to the expi- ration of the remedial amendment period under § 401(b) and is returned because no user fee was attached, the submission will be timely if it is resubmitted by the expi- ration of the remedial amendment period or, if later, within 30 days after the appli- cation was returned; and (b) where an ap- plication for exemption under § 501(c)(3) is submitted before expiration of the pe- riod provided by § 1.508–1(a)(2) and is re- 2007–1 I.R.B.239January 2, 2007 turned because no user fee was attached, the submission will be timely if it is re- submitted before expiration of the period provided by § 1.508–1(a)(2) or within 30 days, whichever is later. (4) If a check or money order is for more than the correct amount, the submis- sion will be accepted and the amount of the excess payment will be returned to the re- quester. SECTION 10. REFUNDS .01General rule. In general, the fee will not be refunded unless the Service de- clines to rule or make a determination on all issues for which a ruling or determina- tion letter is requested. In the case of a re- quest for a letter ruling, if the case has been closed by the Service because essential in- formation has not been submitted timely, the request may be reopened and treated as a new request, but the taxpayer must pay another user fee before the case can be reopened.See, section 11.04(5) of Rev. Proc. 2007–4, page 118, this Bulletin. .02Examples. (1) The following are examples of situa- tions in which the fee will not be refunded: (a) The request for a letter ruling, de- termination letter, etc., is withdrawn at any time subsequent to its receipt by the Ser- vice, unless the only reason for withdrawal is that the Service has advised the requester that a higher user fee than was sent with the request is applicable and the requester is unwilling to pay the higher fee. For ex- ample, no fee will be refunded where the taxpayer has been advised that a proposed adverse ruling is contemplated and subse- quently withdraws its submission. (b) The request is procedurally defi- cient, although accompanied by the proper fee, if it is not timely perfected by the re- quester. When there is a failure to timely perfect the request, the case will be consid- ered closed and the failure to perfect will be treated as a withdrawal for purposes of this revenue procedure. An exemption ap- plication that is not substantially complete is considered a procedurally deficient re- quest for a letter ruling or a determination letter on exempt status. (c) A letter ruling, determination let- ter, etc., is revoked in whole or in part at the initiative of the Service. The fee paid at the time the original letter ruling, deter- mination letter, etc., was requested will not be refunded. (d) The request contains several issues and the Service rules on some, but not all, of the issues. The highest fee applicable to the issues on which the Service rules will not be refunded. (e) The taxpayer asserts that a letter ruling the taxpayer received covering a single issue is erroneous or not responsive (other than an issue on which the Service has declined to rule) and requests recon- sideration. The Service, upon reconsider- ation, does not agree that the letter ruling is erroneous or is not responsive. The fee accompanying the request for reconsidera- tion will not be refunded. (f) The situation is the same as de- scribed in subparagraph (e) of this section 10.02(1) except that the letter ruling cov- ered several unrelated transactions. The Service, upon reconsideration, does not agree with the taxpayer that the letter rul- ing is erroneous or is not responsive for all of the transactions, but does agree that it is erroneous as to one transaction. The fee accompanying the request for reconsidera- tion will not be refunded except to the ex- tent applicable to the transaction for which the Service agrees the letter ruling was in error. (g) The request is for a supplemental letter ruling, determination letter, etc., con- cerning a change in facts (whether signifi- cant or not) relating to the transaction ruled on. (h) The request is for reconsideration of an adverse or partially adverse letter rul- ing or a final adverse determination letter, and the taxpayer submits arguments and authorities not submitted before the origi- nal letter ruling or determination letter was issued. (2) The following are examples of situ- ations in which the fee will be refunded: (a) In a situation to which section 10.02(1)(h) of this revenue procedure does not apply, the taxpayer asserts that a letter ruling the taxpayer received cov- ering a single issue is erroneous or is not responsive (other than an issue on which the Service declined to rule) and requests reconsideration. The Service agrees, upon reconsideration, that the letter ruling is erroneous or is not responsive. The fee accompanying the taxpayer’s request for reconsideration will be refunded. (b) In a situation to which section 10.02(1)(h) of this revenue procedure does not apply, the requester requests a supplemental letter ruling, determination letter, etc., to correct a mistake that the Service agrees it made in the original let- ter ruling, determination letter, etc., such as a mistake in the statement of facts or in the citation of a Code section. Once the Service agrees that it made a mistake, the fee accompanyingthe request for the supplemental letter ruling, determination letter, etc., will be refunded. (c) The taxpayer requests and is granted relief under § 7805(b) in con- nection with the revocation in whole or in part, of a previously issued letter rul- ing, determination letter, etc. The fee accompanying the request for relief will be refunded. (d) In a situation to which section 10.02(1)(d) of this revenue procedure applied, the taxpayer requests reconsider- ation of the Service’s decision not to rule on an issue. Once the Service agrees to rule on the issue, the fee accompanying the request for reconsideration will be re- funded. SECTION 11. REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF USER FEE A taxpayer that believes the user fee charged by the Service for its request for a letter ruling, determination letter, etc., is either not applicable or incorrect and wishes to receive a refund of all or part of the amount paid (see section 10 of this rev- enue procedure) may request reconsidera- tion and, if desired, the opportunity for an oral discussion by sending a letter to the Internal Revenue Service at the applica- ble Post Office Box or other address given in section 7. Both the incoming enve- lope and the letter requesting such recon- sideration should be prominently marked “USER FEE RECONSIDERATION RE- QUEST.” No user fee is required for these January 2, 20072402007–1 I.R.B. requests. The request should be marked for the attention of: If the matter involves primarily:Mark for the attention of: Employee plans letter ruling requests and all other employee plans matters handled by EP Technical Employee Plans Technical Exempt organizations letter ruling requestsExempt Organizations Technical Employee plans determination letter requests and opinion letter and advisory letter requests pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2005–16 Manager, EP Determinations Quality Assurance Exempt organizations determination letter requestsManager, EO Determinations Quality Assurance SECTION 12. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUMENTS Rev. Proc. 2006–8 is superseded. SECT ION 13. EFFECTIVE DATE This revenue procedure is effective Jan- uary 2, 2007. SECTION 14. PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT The collections of information con- tained in this revenue procedure have been reviewed and approved by the Office of Management and Budget in accor- dance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507) under control number 1545–1520. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid OMB control number. The collections of information in this revenue procedure are in section 6.09. This information is required to substanti- ate that a taxpayer or an exempt organi- zation seeking to pay a reduced user fee with respect to a request for a determina- tion letter is entitled to pay the reduced fee; to identify the user fee category and corresponding fee required to be paid with respect to determination letter requests; to request reconsideration of the user fee charged by the Service and, in connection with such a request, to indicate whether an oral discussion is desired. This informa- tion will be used to enable the Service to determine whether the taxpayer or exempt organization is entitled to pay a reduced user fee, to ascertain whether reconsidera- tion of the user fee is being requested and, if it is being requested, whether an oral discussion is requested. The collections of information are voluntary, to obtain a benefit. The likely respondents are in- dividuals, businesses or other for-profit institutions, nonprofit institutions, and small businesses or organizations. The estimated total annual reporting and/or recordkeeping burden is 300 hours. The estimated annual burden per re- spondent/recordkeeper varies from one hour to ten hours, depending on individual circumstances, with an estimated average of three hours. The estimated number of respondents and/or recordkeepers is 90 (requests for reduced fees) and 10 (re- quests for reconsideration of fee). The estimated annual frequency of re- sponses is on occasion. Books or records relating to a collection of information must be retained as long as their contents may become material in the administration of any internal revenue law. Generally tax returns and tax return information are confidential, as required by 26 U.S.C. 6103. DRAFTING INFORMATION T he principal author of this revenue p rocedure is Michael Rubin of the Em- p loyee Plans, Tax Exempt and Govern- ment Entities Division. For further infor- mation regarding employee plans matters in this revenue procedure, please con- tact the Employee Plans’ taxpayer assis- tance telephone service 877–829–5500 (a toll-free number) between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through Friday. For employee plans matters, please contact Mr. Rubin at (202) 283–9888 (not a toll-free number). For exempt organization matters, please contact Mr. Ted Lieber at (202) 283–8999 or Mr. Wayne Hardesty at (202) 283–8976 (not toll-free numbers). APPENDIX Following is a list of revenue procedures requiring payment of a user fee or an ad- ministrative scrutiny determination user fee. A.Procedures applicable to both Employee Plans and Exempt Organizations Rev. Proc. 2007–4, this Bulletin, pro- vides procedures for issuing letter rulings, information letters, etc., on matters relat- ing to matters under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner, Tax Exempt and Govern- ment Entities Division. B.Procedures applicable to Employee Plans matters other than actuarial matters Rev. Proc. 75–26, 1975–1 C.B. 722, sets forth the general procedures of the Internal Revenue Service for the process- ing of applications for exemption under § 4975(c)(2) of the Code. Rev. Proc. 87–50, 1987–2 C.B. 647, as modified by Rev. Proc. 91–44, Rev. Proc. 92–38, and Rev. Proc. 2002–10, 2002–1 C.B. 401, sets forth the proce- dures of the Service relating to the issuance of rulings and opinion letters with respect to the establishment of individual retire- ment accounts and annuities (IRAs) un- der § 408, the entitlement to exemption of related trusts or custodial accounts under § 408(e), and the acceptability of the form of prototype simplified employee pension (SEP)agreementsunder§§408(k)and 415. Rev. Proc. 92–24, 1992–1 C.B. 739, provides procedures for requesting deter- mination letters on the effect on a plan’s 2007–1 I.R.B.241January 2, 2007 qualified status under § 401(a) of the Code of plan language that permits, pursuant to § 420, the transfer of assets in a defined benefit plan to a health benefits account described in § 401(h). Rev. Proc. 92–38, 1992–1 C.B. 859, provides notice that individual retirement arrangement trusts, custodial account agreements, and annuity contracts must be amended to provide for the required dis- tribution rules in § 408(a)(6) or (b)(3). In addition, Rev. Proc. 92–38 modifies the guidance in Rev. Proc. 87–50 with regard to opinion letters issued to sponsoring organizations, including mass submitters and sponsors of prototype IRAs. Rev. Proc. 93–41, 1993–2 C.B. 536, sets forth the procedures of the Service re- lating to the issuance of an administrative scrutiny determination as to whether a sep- arate line of business satisfies the require- ment of administrative scrutiny within the meaning of § 1.414(r)–6. Rev. Proc. 97–29, 1997–1 C.B. 698, describes model amendments for SIMPLE IRAs; guidance to drafters of prototype SIMPLE IRAs on obtaining opinion let- ters; permissive amendments to sponsors of nonSIMPLE IRAs; the opening of a pro- totype program for SIMPLE IRA Plans; and transitional relief for users of SIMPLE IRAs and SIMPLE IRA Plans that have not been approved by the Service. Rev. Proc. 98–59, 1998–2 C.B. 727, provides guidance on obtaining opinion letters to drafters of prototype Roth IRAs, and provides transitional relief for users of Roth IRAs that have not been approved by the Internal Revenue Service. Rev. Proc. 2003–16, 2003–1 C.B. 359, sets forth guidelines for the implementa- tion of the provision for a waiver of the 60-day rollover period described in section 644 of EGTRRA. Rev. Proc. 2005–16, 2005–1 C.B. 674, revises and combines the Service’s mas- ter and prototype (M&P) and volume sub- mitter program into a unified program for the pre-approval of pension, profit-sharing and annuity plans. Rev. Proc. 2005–66, 2005–2 C.B. 509, describes the Service’s procedure for issuing determination letters pursuant to § 401(a) of the Code under a staggered re- medial amendment system. Rev. Proc. 2007–6, this Bulletin, pro- vides procedures for issuing determination letters on the qualified status of employee plans under §§ 401(a), 403(a), 409, and 4975(e)(7). C.Procedures applicable to Employee Plans actuarial matters Rev. Proc. 79–62, 1979–2 C.B. 576, outlines the procedure by which a plan sponsor or administrator may request a determination that a plan amendment is reasonable and provides for onlyde min- imisincreases in plan liabilities in accor- dance with § 412(f)(2)(A) of the Code and § 304(b)(2)(A) of ERISA. Rev. Proc. 90–49, 1990–2 C.B. 620, modifies and replaces Rev. Proc. 89–35, 1989–1 C.B. 917, in order to extend the ef- fective date to contributions made for plan years beginning after December 31, 1989, to change the deadline for requesting rul- ings under the revenue procedure, to revise the information requirements for a ruling request made under the revenue proce- dure, to furnish a worksheet for actuarial computations, and to provide a special rule under which certainde minimisnon- deductible employer contributions to a qualified defined benefit plan may be re- turned to the taxpayer without a formal ruling or disallowance from the Service. Rev. Proc. 94–42, 1994–1 C.B. 717, sets forth a procedure for obtaining ap- proval of an amendment to a qualified plan that, under § 412(c)(8), reduces the ac- crued benefits of plan participants. Rev. Proc. 2000–41, 2000–2, C.B. 371, sets forth the procedure by which a plan administrator or plan sponsor may obtain approval of the Secretary of the Treasury for a change in funding method as pro- vided by § 412(c)(5) of the Code and sec- tion 302(c)(5) of ERISA. Rev. Proc. 2004–15, 2004–1 C.B. 490, sets forth procedures for requesting waivers of the minimum funding standard described in § 412(d) and the issuance of such waivers by the office of the Director, Employee Plans, Tax Exempt and Govern- ment Entities Division. Rev. Proc. 2004–44, 2004–2 C.B. 134, outlines the procedure by which a plan ad- ministrator or plan sponsor may request and obtain approval for an extension of an amortization period in accordance with § 412(e) of the Code and section 304(a) of ERISA. D.Procedures applicable to Exempt Organizations matters only Rev. Proc. 80–27, 1980–1 C.B. 677, as modified by Rev. Proc. 96–40, 1996–2 C.B. 301, provides procedures under which recognition of exemption from fed- eral income tax under § 501(c) may be obtained on a group basis for subordinate organizations affiliated with and under the general supervision or control of a cen- tral organization. This procedure relieves each of the subordinates covered by a group exemption letter from filing its own application for recognition of exemption. Rev. Proc. 90–27, 1990–1 C.B. 514, sets forth revised procedures with regard to applications for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under §§ 501 and 521. January 2, 20072422007–1 I.R.B. Part IV. Items of General Interest Cumulative List of Announcements Relating to Section 7428(c) Validation of Certain Contributions Made During Pendency of Declaratory Judgment Proceedings from January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2006 Announcement 2007–1 The following is a cumulative listing of names of organizations that are presently challenging, under section 7428 of the In- ternal Revenue Code, the revocation of their status as organizations entitled to re- ceive deductible contributions in declara- tory judgment suits in the Tax Court, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, or the United States Court of Federal Claims. The purpose of this an- nouncement is to inform potential donors to these organizations of the protection un- der 7428(c) for certain contributions made during the litigation period. Protection under section 7428(c) of the Code begins on the date that the notice of revocation is published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin and ends on the date on which a court first determines that an organization is not described in section 170(c)(2), as more particularly set forth in section 7428(c)(1). In the case of indi- vidual contributors, the maximum amount of contributions protected during this pe- riod is limited to $1,000.00, with a hus- band and wife being treated as one contrib- utor. This protection is not extended to any individual who was responsible, in whole or in part, for the acts or omissions of the organization that were the basis for the revocation. This protection also applies (but without limitation as to amount) to or- ganizations described in section 170(c)(2) which are exempt from tax under section 501(a). If the organization ultimately pre- vails in its declaratory judgment suit, de- ductibility of contributions would be sub- ject to the normal limitations set forth un- der section 170. I. The organizations listed below con- tinue to be involved in pending declara- tory judgment suits under section 7428 of the Code, challenging revocation of their status as eligible donees under sec- tion 170(c)(2). Protection under section 7428(c) begins on the date indicated. Michael and Laura Gallop FamilyFoundationAgoura Hills, CA (June 28, 2004) Rameses School of San Antonio, TexasSan Antonio, TX (January 30, 2005) II. The organization listed below is no longerdescribed in section 170(c)(2) and is not recognized as exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. South Community AssociationMiddletown, OH III. The organizations listed below continue to be described in section 170(c)(2) and are recognized as exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Fountainview at College Road, Inc.Monsey, NY Northern Manor Multicare, Inc.Monsey, NY Northern Metropolitan Foundationfor Healthcare, Inc.Monsey, NY Northern Metropolitan, Inc.Monsey, NY Northern Riverview, Inc.Monsey, NY Northern Services Group, Inc.Monsey, NY 2007–1 I.R.B.243January 2, 2007 Definition of Terms Revenue rulings and revenue procedures (hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that have an effect on previous rulings use the following defined terms to describe the ef- fect: Amplifieddescribes a situation where no change is being made in a prior pub- lished position, but the prior position is be- ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if an earlier ruling held that a principle ap- plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the same principle also applies to B, the earlier ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi- fied,below). Clarifiedis used in those instances where the language in a prior ruling is be- ing made clear because the language has caused, or may cause, some confusion. It is not used where a position in a prior ruling is being changed. Distinguisheddescribes a situation where a ruling mentions a previously pub- lished ruling and points out an essential difference between them. Modifiedis used where the substance of a previously published position is being changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a principle applied to A but not to B, and the new ruling holds that it applies to both A and B, the prior ruling is modified because it corrects a published position. (Compare withamplifiedandclarified, above). Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub- lished ruling that is not considered deter- minative with respect to future transac- tions. This term is most commonly used in a ruling that lists previously published rul- ings that are obsoleted because of changes in laws or regulations. A ruling may also be obsoleted because the substance has been included in regulations subsequently adopted. Revokeddescribes situations where the position in the previously published ruling is not correct and the correct position is beingstatedinanewruling. Supersededdescribes a situation where the new ruling does nothing more than re- state the substance and situation of a previ- ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus, the term is used to republish under the 1986 Code and regulations the same po- sition published under the 1939 Code and regulations. The term is also used when it is desired to republish in a single rul- ing a series of situations, names, etc., that were previously published over a period of time in separate rulings. If the new rul- ing does more than restate the substance of a prior ruling, a combination of terms is used. For example,modifiedandsu- persededdescribes a situation where the substance of a previously published ruling is being changed in part and is continued without change in part and it is desired to restate the valid portion of the previously published ruling in a new ruling that is self contained. In this case, the previously pub- lished ruling is first modified and then, as modified, is superseded. Supplementedis used in situations in which a list, such as a list of the names of countries, is published in a ruling and that list is expanded by adding further names in subsequent rulings. After the original rul- ing has been supplemented several times, a new ruling may be published that includes the list in the original ruling and the ad- ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in the series. Suspendedis used in rare situations to show that the previous published rul- ings will not be applied pending some future action such as the issuance of new or amended regulations, the outcome of cases in litigation, or the outcome of a Service study. Abbreviations The fol lowing abbreviations in current use and for merly used will appear in material publis hedintheBulletin. A—Individual. Acq.—A cquiescence. B—Individual. BE—Beneficiary. BK—Bank . B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals. C—Individual. C.B.—Cu mulative Bulletin. CFR—Code of Federal Regulations. CI—City. COOP—Coo perative. Ct.D.—Court Decision. CY—County. D—Decede nt. DC—Dummy Corporation. DE—Donee. Del. Order —Delegation Order. DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation. DR—Donor. E—Estate. EE—Employee. E.O.—Executive Order. ER—Emp loyer. ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act. EX—Executor. F—Fiduc iary. FC—Foreign Country. FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act. FISC—Fo reign International Sales Company. FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company. F.R.—Federal Register. FUTA—Fed eral Unemployment Tax Act. FX—Foreign corporation. G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum. GE—Grante e. GP—General Partner. GR—Grantor. IC—Insura nce Company. I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin. LE—Lessee. LP—Limited Partner. LR—Lessor. M—Minor. Nonacq.—No nacquiescence. O—Organization. P—Parent Corporation. PHC—Persona l Holding Company. PO—Possession of the U.S. PR—Partner. PRS—Pa rtnership. PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption. Pub. L.—Public Law. REIT—Re al Estate Investment Trust. Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure. Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling. S—Subsi diary. S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules. Stat.—Statutes at Large. T—Target Corporation. T.C.—Tax Court. T.D.—Treasury Decision. TFE—Trans feree. TFR—Transferor. T.I.R.—Technical Information Release. TP—Taxpay er. TR—Trust. TT—Trustee. U.S.C.—Uni ted States Code. X—Corporation. Y—Corporation. Z—Corporat ion. January 2, 2007i2007–1 I.R.B. Numerical Finding List 1 Bulletin 2007–1 Announcements: 2007-1, 2007-1 I.R.B.243 Revenue Procedures: 2007-1, 2007-1 I.R.B.1 2007-2, 2007-1 I.R.B.88 2007-3, 2007-1 I.R.B.108 2007-4, 2007-1 I.R.B.118 2007-5, 2007-1 I.R.B.161 2007-6, 2007-1 I.R.B.189 2007-7, 2007-1 I.R.B.227 2007-8, 2007-1 I.R.B.230 1 A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenue procedures, Treasury decisions, etc., published in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006–27 through 2006–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006–52, dated December 26, 2006. 2007–1 I.R.B.iiJanuary 2, 2007 Finding List of Current Actions on Previously Published Items 1 Bulletin 2007–1 Revenue Procedures: 2006-1 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2007-1, 2007-1 I.R.B.1 2006-2 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2007-2, 2007-1 I.R.B.88 2006-3 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2007-3, 2007-1 I.R.B.108 2006-4 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2007-4, 2007-1 I.R.B.118 2006-5 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2007-5, 2007-1 I.R.B.161 2006-6 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2007-6, 2007-1 I.R.B.189 2006-7 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2007-7, 2007-1 I.R.B.227 2006-8 Superseded by Rev. Proc. 2007-8, 2007-1 I.R.B.230 1 A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2006–27 through 2006–52 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2006–52, dated December 26, 2006. January 2, 2007iii2007–1 I.R.B. INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN The Introduction at the beginning of this issue describes the purpose and content of this publication. The weekly Internal Revenue Bulletin is sold on a yearly subscription basis by the Superintendent of Documents. Current subscribers are notified by the Superin- tendent of Documents when their subscriptions must be renewed. CUMULATIVE BULLETINS The contents of this weekly Bulletin are consolidated semiannually into a permanent, indexed, Cumulative Bulletin. These are sold on a single copy basis andare notincluded as part of the subscription to the Internal Revenue Bulletin. Subscribers to the weekly Bulletin are notified when copies of the Cumulative Bulletin are available. Certain issues of Cumulative Bulletins are out of print and are not available. Persons desiring available Cumulative Bulletins, which are listed on the reverse, may purchase them from the Superintendent of Documents. ACCESS THE INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETIN ON THE INTERNET You may view the Internal Revenue Bulletin on the Internet at www.irs.gov. Under information for: select Businesses. Under related topics, select More Topics. Then select Internal Revenue Bulletins. INTERNAL REVENUE BULLETINS ON CD-ROM Internal Revenue Bulletins are available annually as part ofPublication 1796 (Tax Products CD-ROM). The CD-ROM can be purchased from National Technical Information Service (NTIS) on the Internet at www.irs.gov/cdorders (discount for online orders) or by calling 1-877-233-6767. The first release is available in mid-December and the final release is available in late January. HOW TO ORDER Check the publications and/or subscription(s) desired on the reverse, complete the order blank, enclose the proper remittance, detach entire page, and mail to the Superintendent of Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh PA, 15250–7954. Please allow two to six weeks, plus mailing time, for delivery. WE WELCOME COMMENTS ABOUT THE INTERNAL REVENUE BUL LETIN If you have c omments concerning the format or production of the Internal Revenue Bulletin or suggestions for improving it, we would be p leased to hear from you. You can e-mail us your suggestions or comments through the IRS Internet Home Page (www.irs.g ov) or write to the IRS Bulletin Unit, SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, Washington, DC 20224 Internal Revenue Service W ashington,DC20224 Official B usiness Penalty for Private Use, $300
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.