n-15-07.pdf

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing.

This collection currently includes the publisher’s available advance-release directory. Historical bulletin renditions are discovered separately; an advance-release record alone does not certify the collection archive complete.

Relief for Certain Participants in § 414(d) Governmental Plans

Notice 2015-07

I. PURPOSE
The IRS and the Treasury Department anticipate issuing proposed regulations
under § 414(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to define the term “governmental
plan.” This document describes specific rules that the IRS and Treasury Department
are considering proposing that relate to whether a State or local retirement system that
covers employees of a charter school is a governmental plan within the meaning of
§ 414(d). Section III of this notice describes the guidance under consideration, which
would provide that employees of a public charter school may participate in a State or
local retirement system if certain conditions are satisfied. Section IV of this notice
discusses the potential for broader transition relief for governmental plans once final
regulations under § 414(d) are issued. Section V of this notice requests comments on
the guidance under consideration described in section III of this notice.
II. BACKGROUND
Section 414(d) of the Code provides that the term governmental plan generally
means “a plan established and maintained for its employees by the Government of the
United States, by the government of any State or political subdivision thereof, or by any
agency or instrumentality of any of the foregoing.” See sections 3(32) and 4021(b)(2) of

2
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) for definitions of the
term “governmental plan,” which govern for purposes of title I and title IV of ERISA,
respectively.
1

Currently, there are no regulations interpreting § 414(d) of the Code. Neither
§ 414(d) of the Code nor ERISA define key terms relating to governmental plans,
including the terms “established and maintained,” “political subdivision,” “agency,” and
“instrumentality.” Revenue Ruling 89-49, 1989-1 C.B. 117, provides guidance for
determining whether a retirement plan maintained by an organization is a governmental
plan within the meaning of § 414(d). The revenue ruling lists several factors for
determining whether a sponsoring organization or participating employer is an agency
or instrumentality of the United States or any State or political subdivision of a State.
The factors in Rev. Rul. 89-49 are similar to the factors listed in Rev. Rul. 57-128, 1957-
1 CB 31, which provides guidance on whether an entity is an instrumentality that is
wholly-owned by one or more States or political subdivisions of a State for purposes of
the exemption from employment taxes under §§ 3121(b)(7) and 3306(c)(7) of the Code.
Rev. Rul. 57-128 lists the following factors to be considered in determining
whether an organization is an instrumentality of one or more States or political
subdivisions thereof: (1) whether the organization is used for a governmental purpose

1
The definition of the term “governmental plan” also includes special rules relating to (a) plans to which
the Railroad Retirement Act of 1935 or 1937 (49 Stat. 967, as amended by 50 Stat. 307) applies, (b)
plans of an international organization that is exempt from taxation by reason of the International
Organizations Immunities Act (59 Stat. 669), and (c) certain plans that are established and maintained by
an Indian tribal government (as defined in § 7701(a)(40)), a subdivision of an Indian tribal government
(determined in accordance with § 7871(d)), or an agency or instrumentality of either.

3
and performs a governmental function; (2) whether performance of its function is on
behalf of one or more States or political subdivisions; (3) whether there are any private
interests involved, or whether the States or political subdivisions involved have the
powers and interests of an owner; (4) whether control and supervision of the
organization is vested in public authority or authorities; (5) whether express or implied
statutory authority or other authority is necessary for the creation and/or use of such an
instrumentality, and whether such authority exists; and (6) the degree of the
organization’s financial autonomy and the source of its operating expenses.
Rev. Rul. 89-49 focuses more on the degree of control that the Federal or State
government has over the organization’s everyday operations than Rev. Rul. 57-128.
Other factors considered in Rev. Rul. 89-49 include: whether there is specific legislation
creating the organization; the source of funds for the organization; the manner in which
the organization’s trustees or operating board are selected; and whether the applicable
government unit considers the employees of the organization to be employees of the
applicable government unit. Rev. Rul. 89-49 provides that satisfaction of one or all of
the factors is not necessarily determinative of whether an organization is a
governmental entity.
On November 8, 2011, the IRS and Treasury Department published an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) (REG-157714-06), relating to the definition of
a governmental plan under § 414(d) of the Code, in the Federal Register (76 FR
69172) (§ 414(d) ANPRM). The § 414(d) ANPRM describes guidance under
consideration that would set forth rules relating to the determination of whether a

4
retirement plan is a governmental plan within the meaning of § 414(d).
2
The guidance
under consideration would define key terms relating to governmental plans, including
“established and maintained,” “political subdivision,” and “agency or instrumentality.”
For purposes of determining whether an entity is an agency or instrumentality of
the United States or an agency or instrumentality of a State or political subdivision of a
State, the guidance under consideration described in the § 414(d) ANPRM would
provide a facts and circumstances analysis. The factors used in this analysis are drawn
from the factors historically used in governmental plan determinations, including the
factors set forth in Rev. Ruls. 57-128 and 89-49, as well as court decisions.
3
The
factors described in the anticipated guidance described in the § 414(d) ANPRM include
whether the entity’s governing board or body is controlled by a State or political
subdivision; whether the members of the entity’s governing board or body are publicly
nominated and elected; the extent to which a State has financial responsibility for the
general debts and other liabilities of entity; and the extent to which the entity is
delegated, pursuant to statute, the authority to exercise sovereign powers. For a
complete discussion of each of the factors in the guidance under consideration
described in the § 414(d) ANPRM, see the discussion under the heading “Definition of
agency or instrumentality of a State or a political subdivision of a State” in the

2
The IRS and Treasury Department also issued an ANPRM (REG-133223-08) relating to special rules for
ITGs on November 8, 2011 in the Federal Register (76 FR 69188).
3
For a discussion of court cases analyzing governmental entity status, see the discussion under the
heading, “Judicial Determinations of Governmental Entity Status” in the Appendix to the § 414(d)
ANPRM.

5
“Explanation of Provisions” section of the Appendix to the § 414(d) ANPRM.
The § 414(d) ANPRM requested comments from the public on the guidance
under consideration. With respect to this request, members of the public charter school
community submitted over 2,000 comments, which, together with all of the other
comment letters received, the IRS and Treasury Department continue to review.
Although the § 414(d) ANPRM does not change the law regarding or directly address
whether a charter school is a governmental entity or whether employees of charter
schools are permitted to participate in a governmental plan (such as a State or local
retirement system), comments from members of the charter school community raised
several concerns with the guidance under consideration. Mainly, the commenters
expressed concern that if the guidance described in the § 414(d) ANPRM were
published in its current form as a final regulation, the guidance would deter State or
local retirement systems from permitting charter school employee participation in their
retirement systems in order to retain their governmental plan status. Commenters
indicated that this, in turn, would jeopardize the retirement security of charter school
employees and adversely affect charter schools’ ability to attract and retain teachers.
Forty-two States and the District of Columbia have laws authorizing the
chartering of independent public schools of choice. These schools, often referred to as
public charter schools, are generally funded with public revenue on a per-pupil basis.
Public charter schools do not charge tuition, are open to all students within a specified
geographic boundary, and are viewed by States as part of the public school system.
However, public charter schools typically operate independently of the governance

6
structures that generally are in place for other public schools, such as a district board of
education.
In general, States that authorize public charter schools either require or permit
public charter school employees to participate in their State retirement systems. In
response to the § 414(d) ANPRM, commenters from the public charter school
community expressed concern that the autonomy granted to public charter schools
would mean that charter school employees would not be able to continue participation
in State or local retirement systems. Commenters argued that Congress intended
charter schools to be treated as public schools, but recognized that charter schools
were not subject to governmental control in the same manner as traditional public
schools.
4
Commenters requested that, when the guidance under consideration
described in the § 414(d) ANPRM is ultimately issued, the guidance permit participation
of public charter school employees in governmental plans. One request was that the
proposed regulations provide the use of a safe harbor to permit public charter school
employees to participate in State or local retirement systems. Other requests included
that the proposed regulations provide a revised set of factors, without distinction
between main factors and other factors, that a typical public charter school would more
clearly satisfy; that the proposed regulations include an example under the facts and
circumstances test showing that a typical public charter school is an agency or

4
See Part B of the Individuals with Disabilities Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et. seq., under which charter
schools are treated as public schools for purposes of eligibility for federal funding and 20 U.S.C.
§7221i(1)(A), under which a charter school is defined as a public school that “is exempt from significant
State or local rules that inhibit the flexible operation and management of public schools, . . .”

7
instrumentality of a State or political subdivision of a State; and that the proposed
regulations provide a grandfathering rule permitting current and future public charter
school employees to participate in a State or local retirement system.
III. GUIDANCE UNDER CONSIDERATION
After review and consideration of comments received with respect to the § 414(d)
ANPRM, the IRS and Treasury Department are considering issuing the guidance
described in section III.A of this notice relating to whether a State or local retirement
system that covers employees of a public charter school is a governmental plan within
the meaning of § 414(d). The guidance under consideration would take into account the
special and unique nature of public charter schools, the governance structure
associated with these schools, the structure of many public school systems that permit
or encourage public school teachers to move between public charter and traditional
public schools, and the relationship between public charter schools and the agencies
authorized by the State or political subdivision of the State (such as an authorized public
chartering agency as defined in 20 U.S.C. § 7721i(4)) that hold these schools
accountable for academic results. It is expected that the principles described in section
III.A of this notice would apply regardless of whether the retirement plan is a defined
benefit, defined contribution, § 403(b), or § 457(b) governmental plan. The IRS and
Treasury Department intend the guidance described in section III.A of this notice to
cover only employees of public charter schools and anticipate that the effect of
participation of employees of entities other than public charter schools in a State or local
retirement system on the system’s status as a governmental plan under § 414(d) of the

8
Code would be determined in accordance with the general rules set forth in the
regulations after final regulations under § 414(d) are issued.
A. Participation of a public charter school in a State or local retirement system
The IRS and Treasury Department are considering proposing regulations under
§ 414(d) specifying that a State or local retirement system that covers employees of a
public charter school will not fail to be a governmental plan within the meaning of
§ 414(d) if certain conditions are satisfied. Specifically, the guidance under
consideration would specify that a State or local retirement system will not fail to be a
governmental plan within the meaning of § 414(d) merely because the system permits
employees of an entity that satisfies the requirements listed in paragraphs (a) through
(e) below to participate in the system:
(a) The entity is a nonsectarian independent public school that serves a
governmental purpose by providing tuition-free elementary or secondary education, or
both.
(b) The entity is established and operated in accordance with a specific State
statute authorizing the granting of charters to create independent public schools or
authorizing the establishment of independent public schools.
(c) Participation in the State or local retirement system by the entity’s employees
is expressly required or permitted under applicable law.
(d) The entity satisfies either paragraph (d)(1) or (d)(2) below.
(1) The entity’s governing board or body is controlled by a State, political
subdivision of a State, or agency or instrumentality of a State or of a political subdivision

9
of a State. For this purpose, either (i) a State, political subdivision of a State, or an
agency or instrumentality of a State or political subdivision of a State must have the
power to nominate, appoint, remove, and replace a majority of the members of the
entity’s governing board or body, or (ii) a majority of the members of the entity’s
governing board or body must be publicly nominated and elected.
(2) In lieu of satisfying the requirements in paragraph (d)(1), the entity satisfies
the requirements in paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (d)(2)(iii) below.
(i) The primary source of the entity’s funding is from a State, political subdivision
of a State, or agency or instrumentality of a State or political subdivision of a State.
(ii) The rights of the entity’s employees to their accrued benefits under the State
or local retirement system are not dependent on whether the entity continues to
participate in the system and, in the event the entity ceases participation, a
governmental entity has responsibility for the accrued benefits of the entity’s employees,
including the continued funding of the accrued benefits, to no lesser extent than a
governmental entity has responsibility for the continued funding of the accrued benefits
of the employees of any other participating employer in the system in the event that
other employer were to cease to be a participating employer.
(iii) The entity is part of a local educational agency, as defined in 20 U.S.C.
7801(26) (or is its own local educational agency), and is subject to the significant
regulatory control and oversight by a State, political subdivision of a State, or agency or
instrumentality of a State or political subdivision of a State, as described in paragraphs
(d)(2)(iii)(1) and (d)(2)(iii)(2) below.

10
(1) The entity is held accountable by an authorized public chartering agency as
defined in 20 U.S.C. § 7221i(4), which has the power to approve, renew, and revoke the
charter of the entity. For this purpose, the authorized public chartering agency must be
authorized under State law to approve charters for the creation of independent public
schools and to hold the entity accountable for results.
(2) The entity is required to comply with health and safety standards, as well as
academic and financial accountability standards, that are similar to those that are
generally applicable to other public schools in the State.
(e) All financial interests of ownership in the entity are held by a State, political
subdivision of a State, or agency or instrumentality of a State or of a political subdivision
of a State. A State, political subdivision of a State, or agency or instrumentality of a
State or political subdivision of a State is not treated as holding all financial ownership
interests in an entity unless, upon dissolution or final liquidation of the entity, the entity’s
governing documents require the entity’s net assets to be distributed to another public
school that meets the requirements in (a) through (e) of this section III.A or to a State,
political subdivision of a State, or agency or instrumentality thereof.

B. Example
For purposes of illustrating the guidance under consideration described in section
III.A of this notice, the following example is provided.
1. Facts. Charter School A is an independent public school of choice (that is, a
public school in which parents have a choice in determining the school their children will
attend) established and operated in accordance with the laws of State X as a nonprofit

11
corporation under § 501(c)(3) of the Code. Charter School A is a nonsectarian
elementary school that provides tuition-free education.
Under the laws of State X, Charter School A has elected to be a participating
employer in State X’s Retirement System P, which is a defined benefit governmental
plan as described in § 414(d). Under the laws of State X, Charter School A is
responsible for making any employer contribution that otherwise would be the legal
responsibility of the school district, and the State X will be responsible for making
employer contributions to the same extent it would be legally responsible if the
employees of Charter School A were school district employees.

Charter School A is funded through appropriations of State X based on the
school’s average daily attendance. This funding mechanism is similar to the funding
mechanism for traditional public schools. Charter School A is controlled by an
independent board of directors elected by parents of children who are enrolled in the
charter school. Although subject to certain State X laws relating to education, Charter
School A is exempt from other State X laws that apply to traditional public schools, such
as laws relating to student transportation and purchasing and contracting. Charter
School A, like all public charter schools in State X, is overseen by the State X Board of
Education (which is the sole authorized public chartering agency in State X). For
example, Charter School A is subject to audit by the State X Board of Education, which
has the power to place the charter school on probation, not renew the charter contract,
or revoke the charter contract. Charter School A is also subject to the same health and
safety standards and state-level educational assessments used for accountability

12
purposes as traditional public schools in State X. In addition, Charter School A must
participate in the statewide testing programs of State X.
The board of directors for Charter School A is responsible for budgeting, staffing,
and other management of the school, but State X requires that Charter School A must
satisfy generally accepted accounting standards of fiscal management. Charter School
A’s charter provides that it will engage in an annual independent, outside audit by a
certified public accountant of its financial and administrative operations and will provide
a copy of the audit to the State X Board of Education. Charter School A must comply
with rules and implementing statutes that prescribe how appropriations of State X may
be spent.

Charter School A’s governing documents require that, upon closure, dissolution,
or final liquidation of the entity, Charter School A’s net assets would be distributed to
another public school that meets the requirements in (a) through (e) of section III.A of
this notice or to an agency or instrumentality of State X, such as a traditional public
school or the State X Board of Education.
2. Conclusion.
Based on the facts described in section III.B.1 of this notice, Charter School A
meets the requirements of the guidance under consideration described in section III.A of
this notice. Therefore, State X’s Retirement System P will not fail to be a governmental
plan within the meaning of § 414(d) merely because the system permits Charter School
A to participate in the system as a participating employer.
C. Coordination with other agencies

13
The IRS and Treasury Department, in developing the guidance under
consideration described in section III.A of this notice, consulted with the Department of
Labor (DOL) and Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) (the “Agencies”). As
was the case with the § 414(d) ANPRM, staff from the DOL and PBGC agreed that it
would be advantageous for the Agencies and the regulated community for there to be
coordinated criteria for determining whether a plan is a governmental plan within the
meaning of § 414(d) of the Code, section 3(32) of ERISA, and section 4021(b)(2) of
ERISA. With respect to this notice, the IRS and Treasury Department also consulted
with the Department of Education.
IV. TRANSITION RELIEF
A. Periods prior to the effective date of final regulations under § 414(d) of the
Code
The guidance under consideration in section III.A of this notice would first be
issued as part of the proposed regulations under § 414(d). The IRS and Treasury
Department anticipate that the proposed regulations will provide guidance under
§ 414(d), including the guidance under consideration described in section III.A of this
notice and the subject matter of the guidance under consideration described in the
§ 414(d) ANPRM. The proposed regulations will reflect consideration of comments
received in response to the comment requests in this notice and the § 414(d) ANPRM.
Before the proposed regulations are ultimately adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any written or electronic comments that are submitted to
the IRS in accordance with the comment request that will be included in the preamble to

14
the proposed regulations. The preamble to the proposed regulations will request
comments on all aspects of the proposed rules.
The IRS and Treasury Department anticipate that the final regulations under
§ 414(d) will apply prospectively and will include a delayed effective date. The IRS and
Treasury Department anticipate that the final regulations under § 414(d) will provide that
a State or local retirement system that covers employees of a public charter school that
meets the requirements of the guidance under consideration described in section III.A of
this notice for periods starting on and after the effective date of the final regulations will
not fail to be a governmental plan within the meaning of § 414(d), even if the plan
covered those employees for periods before the effective date of the final regulations
when the public charter school did not meet the requirements of the guidance under
consideration described in section III.A of this notice.
The guidance under consideration described in section III.A of this notice should
not be construed to create any inference concerning the proper interpretation of
§ 414(d) prior to the effective date of final regulations under § 414(d).
B. Broader transition relief
The § 414(d) ANPRM requested comments on whether safe harbors or transition
relief, including grandfathering, should be provided in the proposed regulations. Some
commenters suggested that the proposed regulations grandfather retirement plans that
have received § 414(d) private letter rulings from the IRS, while other commenters
advocated for full grandfathering for employees of any entity that has previously been a
participating employer in a governmental plan. Comments were also received

15
requesting that future guidance provide a de minimis exception, create safe and unsafe
harbors for governmental plan determinations, implement an extended period to come
into compliance with the requirements after final regulations under § 414(d) are issued,
and provide the ability to correct a § 414(d) governmental plan under the Employee
Plans Compliance Resolution System, Rev. Proc. 2013-12 (2013-4 IRB 313), if the plan
is not in compliance with final regulations under § 414(d). Commenters also pointed out
that, in at least some cases, state contractual or constitutional protections may serve to
restrict a state's ability to amend the plan provisions that apply to certain participants.
The IRS and Treasury Department are in the process of reviewing each of these
comments. It is expected that questions regarding broader transition relief will be
addressed when proposed regulations are issued under § 414(d) of the Code.

V. COMMENTS REQUESTED
Comments are requested regarding the guidance under consideration that is
described in III.A of this notice. Comments are also requested regarding whether the
requirements of the guidance under consideration described in section III.A of this
notice are sufficient to limit the guidance to participation of employees of public charter
schools in a State or local retirement system and, for example, to not cover participation
of employees of entities that provide management or other services to public charter
schools. Written comments should be submitted by May 11, 2015. Send submissions
to CC:PA:LPD:PR, (Notice 2015-07), Room 5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044. Comments may also be hand
delivered Monday through Friday between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to: Internal

16
Revenue Service, CC:PA:LPD:PR, (Notice 2015-07), Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington DC. Alternatively, comments
may be submitted via the Internet at notice.comments@irscounsel.treas.gov (Notice
2015-07). All comments will be available for public inspection.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this notice is Pamela R. Kinard of the Office of the
Division Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government Entities). For
further information regarding this notice, contact Ms. Kinard or Sarah Bolen at (202)
317-6799 (not a toll-free number).