Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005-38 (PDF rendition): IRS Announcements

Preserve advance releases and the authoritative Internal Revenue Bulletin rendition; directory timestamps are file-publication metadata, not legal effective dates. HTML bulletins begin June 2003; earlier available issues require full PDF parsing. Whole bulletin rendition: numbered items are identified below; other legal material and publisher context remain included. This is not a new standalone advance release.

Bulletin No. 200
5-38
September 19, 20
05
HIGHLIGHTS
OF THIS ISSUE
These synopses are intended only as aids to the reader in
identifying the subject matter covered. They may not be
relied upon as authoritative interpretations.
INCOME TAX
Rev. Rul. 2005–61, page 538.
Fringe benefits aircraft valuation formula.The Standard
Industry Fare Level (SIFL) cents-per-mile rates and terminal
charges in effect for the second half of 2005 are set forth for
purposes of determining the value of noncommercial flights
on employer-provided aircraft under section 1.61–21(g) of the
regulations.
Rev. Rul.
2005–62, page 557.
Interest r
ates; underpayments and overpayments.The
rate of in
terest determined under section 6621 of the Code for
the calen
dar quarter beginning October 1, 2005, will be 7 per-
cent for o
verpayments (6 percent in the case of a corporation),
7percent
for underpayments, and 9 percent for large corpo-
rate unde
rpayments. The rate of interest paid on the portion of
acorpor
ate overpayment exceeding $10,000 will be 4.5 per-
cent.
Rev. Proc. 2005–65, page 564.
Specifications are set forth for the private printing of paper and
laser-printed substitutes for tax year 2005 Form W-2,Wage
and Tax Statement,andFormW-3,Tr a n s m i t t a l o f Wa g e a n d
Tax Statements. Rev. Proc. 2004–54 superseded.
EMPLOY
EE PLANS
T.D. 92
19, page 538.
Final r
egulations under section 411(d)(6) of the Code provide
guidan
ce relating to the anti-cutback rules and the notification
requir
ements under section 4980F.
REG–156518–04, page 582.
Proposed regulations under section 411(d)(6) of the Code pro-
vide guidance relating to the anti-cutback rules. A public hear-
ing is scheduled for December 6, 2005.
EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS
Announcement 2005–65, page 587.
A list is provided of organizations now classified as private foun-
dations.
EMPLOYMENT TAX
Rev. Proc. 2005–65, page 564.
Specifications are set forth for the private printing of paper and
laser-printed substitutes for tax year 2005 Form W-2,Wage
and Tax Statement,andFormW-3,Tr a n s m i t t a l o f Wa g e a n d
Tax Statements. Rev. Proc. 2004–54 superseded.
Fi
nding Lists begin on page ii.

The IRS Mission
Provide America’s taxpayers top quality service by helping
them understand and meet their tax responsibilities and by
applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.
Introduction
The Internal Revenue Bulletin is the authoritative instrument of
the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for announcing official
rulings and procedures of the Internal Revenue Service and for
publishing Treasury Decisions, Executive Orders, Tax Conven-
tions, legislation, court decisions, and other items of general
interest. It is published weekly and may be obtained from the
Superintendent of Documents on a subscription basis. Bulletin
contents are compiled semiannually into Cumulative Bulletins,
which are sold on a single-copy basis.
It is the policy of the Service to publish in the Bulletin all sub-
stantive rulings necessary to promote a uniform application of
the tax laws, including all rulings that supersede, revoke, mod-
ify, or amend any of those previously published in the Bulletin.
All published rulings apply retroactively unless otherwise indi-
cated. Procedures relating solely to matters of internal man-
agement are not published; however, statements of internal
practices and procedures that affect the rights and duties of
taxpayers are published.
Revenue rulings represent the conclusions of the Service on the
application of the law to the pivotal facts stated in the revenue
ruling. In those based on positions taken in rulings to taxpayers
or technical advice to Service field offices, identifying details
and information of a confidential nature are deleted to prevent
unwarranted invasions of privacy and to comply with statutory
requirements.
Rulings and procedures reported in the Bulletin do not have the
force and effect of Treasury Department Regulations, but they
may be used as precedents. Unpublished rulings will not be
relied on, used, or cited as precedents by Service personnel in
the disposition of other cases. In applying published rulings and
procedures, the effect of subsequent legislation, regulations,
court decisions, rulings, and procedures must be considered,
and Service personnel and others concerned are cautioned
against reaching the same conclusions in other cases unless
the facts and circumstances are substantially the same.
The Bulletin is divided into four parts as follows:
Part I.—19
86 Code.
This part i
ncludes rulings and decisions based on provisions of
the Intern
al Revenue Code of 1986.
Part II.—Treaties and Tax Legislation.
This part is divided into two subparts as follows: Subpart A,
Tax Conventions and Other Related Items, and Subpart B, Leg-
islation and Related Committee Reports.
Part III.—Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous.
To the extent practicable, pertinent cross references to these
subjects are contained in the other Parts and Subparts. Also
included in this part are Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rul-
ings. Bank Secrecy Act Administrative Rulings are issued by
the Department of the Treasury’s Office of the Assistant Sec-
retary (Enforcement).
Part IV
.—Items of General Interest.
This par
t includes notices of proposed rulemakings, disbar-
ment an
d suspension lists, and announcements.
The last Bulletin for each month includes a cumulative index
for the matters published during the preceding months. These
monthly indexes are cumulated on a semiannual basis, and are
published in the last Bulletin of each semiannual period.
The c
ontents of this publication are not copyrighted and may be reprinted freely. A citation of the Internal Revenue Bulletin as the source would be appropriate.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S.Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402.
September 19, 20052005–38 I.R.B.

Part I. Rulings and Decisions Under the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986
Section 61.—Gross Income
Defined
26 CFR 1.61–21: Taxation of fringe benefits.
Fringe benefits aircraft valuation for-
mula.The Standard Industry Fare Level
(SIFL) cents-per-mile rates and terminal
charges in effect for the second half of
2005 are set forth for purposes of deter-
mining the value of noncommercial flights
on employer-provided aircraft under sec-
tion 1.61–21(g) of the regulations.
Rev. Rul. 2005–61
For purposes of the taxation of fringe
benefits under section 61 of the Inter-
nal Revenue Code, section 1.61–21(g) of
the Income Tax Regulations provides a
rule for valuing noncommercial flights
on employer-provided aircraft. Section
1.61–21(g)(5) provides an aircraft valua-
tion formula to determine the value of such
flights. The value of a flight is determined
under the base aircraft valuation formula
(also known as the Standard Industry Fare
Level formula or SIFL) by multiplying
the SIFL cents-per-mile rates applicable
for the period during which the flight was
taken by the appropriate aircraft multiple
provided in section 1.61–21(g)(7) and then
adding the applicable terminal charge. The
SIFL cents-per-mile rates in the formula
and the terminal charge are calculated by
the Department of Transportation and are
reviewed semi-annually.
The following chart sets forth the termi-
nal charges and SIFL mileage rates:
Period During Which
the Flight Is Taken
Terminal
Charge
SIFL Mileage
Rates
7/1/05 – 12/31/05
$35.21
Up to 500 miles
= $.1926 per mile
501–1500 miles
= $.1468 per mile
Over 1500 miles
= $.1412 per mile
D
RAFTING INFORMATION
T
he principal author of this revenue
r
uling is Kathleen Edmondson of the
O
ffice of Division Counsel/Associate
C
hief Counsel (Tax Exempt and Govern-
ment Entities). For further information
regarding this revenue ruling, contact
Ms. Edmondson at (202) 622–0047 (not a
toll-free call).
Section 411.—Minimum
Vesting Standards
26 CFR 1.411(d)–3: Section 411(d)(6) protected ben-
efits.
T.D. 9219
DEPARTMENT OF
THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 54
Section 411(d)(6) Protected
Benefits
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
A
CTION: Final regulation.
S
UMMARY: This document contains final
r
egulations providing guidance regarding
t
he anti-cutback rules of section 411(d)(6)
o
f the Internal Revenue Code, which gen-
erally protect accrued benefits, early re-
tirement benefits, retirement-type subsi-
dies, and optional forms of benefit un-
der qualified retirement plans. The regu-
lations address the limited circumstances
under which a qualified retirement plan
is permitted to be amended to eliminate
or reduce early retirement benefits, retire-
ment-type subsidies, or optional forms of
benefit. The final regulations also pro-
vide related guidance concerning the no-
tice requirements of section 4980F. These
final regulations generally affect sponsors
of, and participants in, qualified retirement
plans.
DATES:Effective date: These regulations
are effective on August 12, 2005.
Applicability date: For dates of ap-
plicability of these regulations, see
§1.411(d)–3(j) of these regulations.
F
OR FURTHER INFORMATION
C
ONTACT: Pamela R. Kinard at (202)
6
22–6060 (not a toll-free number).
S
UPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
B
ackground
T
his document contains amendments
t
o 26 CFR parts 1 and 54 under sec-
t
ions 411(d)(6) and 4980F of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code). This Treasury
Decision amends §1.411(d)–3 of the Trea-
sury regulations to reflect changes to
section 411(d)(6) made by the Economic
Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation
Act of 2001, Public Law 107–16 (155
Stat. 38) (EGTRRA). In addition, this
Treasury Decision includes rules relating
to changes to section 411(d)(6) made by
the Retirement Equity Act of 1984, Pub-
lic Law 98–397 (98 Stat. 1426) (REA)
and makes conforming amendments to
§1.411(d)–4. This Treasury Decision
also amends §54.4980F–1(b), relating
to the notice requirement for certain plan
amendments that eliminate or significantly
reduce early retirement benefits or retire-
ment-type subsidies.
2005–38 I.R.B.538September 19, 2005

Section 401(a)(7) provides that a trust
does not constitute a qualified trust unless
its related plan satisfies the requirements
of section 411 (relating to minimum vest-
ing standards). Section 411(d)(6)(A) pro-
vides that a plan is treated as not satisfying
the requirements of section 411 if the ac-
crued benefit of a participant is decreased
by an amendment of the plan, other than an
amendment described in section 412(c)(8)
oftheCodeorsection4281oftheEm-
ployee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974 (ERISA), as amended.
Section 411(a)(7)(A) defines the term
accrued benefit. For a defined contribu-
tion plan, a participant’s accrued benefit
is the balance of the participant’s account.
For a defined benefit plan, a participant’s
accrued benefit is the participant’s benefit
under the terms of the plan expressed in
the form of an annual benefit commencing
at normal retirement age. Under section
411(c)(3), if a participant’s accrued benefit
under a defined benefit plan is to be deter-
mined as an amount other than an annual
benefit commencing at normal retirement
age, the participant’saccrued benefit is the
actuarial equivalent of such benefit.
Section 301(a) of REA amended Code
section 411(d)(6) to add subparagraph
(B), which provides that a plan amend-
ment that has the effect of eliminating or
reducing an early retirement benefit or a
retirement-type subsidy, or eliminating an
optional form of benefit, with respect to
benefits attributable to service before the
amendment is treated as impermissibly
reducing accrued benefits. For a retire-
ment-type subsidy, this protection applies
only with respect to an employee who
satisfies the preamendment conditions
for the subsidy (either before or after the
amendment). Section 411(d)(6)(B) also
authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to
provide, through regulations, that section
411(d)(6)(B) does not apply to any plan
amendment that eliminates optional forms
of benefit (other than a plan amendment
that has the effect of eliminating or re-
ducing an early retirement benefit or a
retirement-type subsidy).
On July 11, 1988, final regulations
(T.D. 8212, 1988–2 C.B. 83) under section
411(d)(6) were published in theFederal
Register(53 FR 26050) (the 1988 regu-
lations). Under those regulations, section
411(d)(6) protects certain benefits, to the
extent they have accrued, so that such
benefits cannot be reduced or eliminated
by plan amendment, except to the extent
permitted by regulations (see §1.411(d)–4,
Q&A–1(a)). Section 1.411(d)–4 speci-
fies circumstances under which a plan
ispermittedtobeamendedtoreduceor
eliminate an optional form of benefit.
Section 645(b)(1) of EGTRRA
amended section 411(d)(6)(B) of the Code
to direct the Secretary to issue regulations
providing that the requirements of section
411(d)(6)(B) do not apply to any amend-
ment that reduces or eliminates early
retirement benefits or retirement-type
subsidies that create significant burdens
or complexities for the plan and plan
participants unless such amendment ad-
versely affects the rights of any participant
inamorethande minimismanner. As
amended by EGTRRA, section 4980F of
the Code and section 204(h) of ERISA
each require that a plan administrator give
notice of a plan amendment to affected
plan participants and beneficiaries when
the plan amendment provides for a signif-
icant reduction in the rate of future benefit
accrual or the elimination or significant
reduction of an early retirement benefit or
a retirement-type subsidy.
Section204(g)ofERISA contains par-
allel rules to Code section 411(d)(6), in-
cluding a similar directive to the Secretary
of the Treasury to issue regulations pro-
viding that section 204(g) does not apply
to any amendment that reduces or elim-
inates early retirement benefits or retire-
ment-type subsidies that create significant
burdens or complexities for the plan and
plan participants unless such amendment
adversely affects the rights of any partic-
ipant in a more thande minimismanner.
Under section 101 of Reorganization Plan
No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 47713) and sec-
tion 204(g) of ERISA, the Secretary of the
Treasury has interpretive jurisdiction over
the subject matter addressed in these reg-
ulations for purposes of ERISA, as well
as the Code. Thus, these final regula-
tions issued under sections 411(d)(6) of the
Code apply as well for purposes of section
204(g) of ERISA.
On March 24, 2004, proposed regu-
lations (REG–128309–03, 2004–1 C.B.
800) under sections 411(d)(6) and 4980F
of the Code were published in theFed-
eral Register(69 FR 13769). On June
24,2004,theIRSheldapublichear-
ing on the proposed regulations. Written
comments responding to the notice of
proposed rulemaking were also received.
After consideration of all the comments,
the proposed regulations are adopted, as
amended by this Treasury Decision. The
revisions are discussed below.
Explanation of Provisions
I.Overview
These regulations respond to the
EGTRRA directive for purposes of both
section 411(d)(6) of the Code and sec-
tion 204(g) of ERISA by specifying the
circumstances under which a plan may
be amended to reduce or eliminate early
retirement benefits, retirement-type subsi-
dies, and optional forms of benefit (section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits). The cir-
cumstances specified in the regulations
are designed to implement the statutory
directive to permit reduction or elimi-
nation of section 411(d)(6)(B) protected
benefits that create significant burdens or
complexities for the plan and its partici-
pants, but only if the elimination does not
adversely affect the rights of any partic-
ipant in a more thande minimismanner.
These provisions relating to the permis-
sible elimination of benefits protected by
section 411(d)(6)(B) are in addition to the
rules permitting a plan to be amended to
eliminate optional forms of benefit under
§1.411(d)–4.
These regulations provide 2 permitted
methods for eliminating or reducing sec-
tion 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits un-
der the EGTRRA directive: elimination
of redundant optional forms of benefit and
elimination of noncore optional forms of
benefits where core options are offered.
Either of these 2 alternative methods can
be applied with respect to any optional
form of benefit. A plan sponsor may deter-
mine that one method of elimination works
for some plan participants or some op-
tional forms of benefit, but not for the re-
maining plan participants or other optional
forms of benefit. However, a plan must
satisfy all of the requirements of the appli-
cable method with respect to any optional
form of benefit being eliminated.
These final regulations also include
general guidance on section 411(d)(6),
including the meaning of the terms
used therein, the scope of the section
411(d)(6)(A) protection against plan
September 19, 20055392005–38 I.R.B.

amendments decreasing a participant’s
accrued benefit, and the scope of section
411(d)(6)(B) protection for early retire-
ment benefits, retirement-type subsidies,
and optional forms of benefit. This Trea-
sury Decision also makes conforming
amendments to §1.411(d)–4, including
amendments to the definition of optional
form of benefit and the multiple amend-
ment rule described in this preamble (un-
der the headingMultiple amendment rule).
This Treasury Decision completely
replaces the provisions in former
§1.411(d)–3. However, the rules in for-
mer §1.411(d)–3 generally have been
carried over to this Treasury Decision,
except to the extent needed to reflect
statutory changes (such as the elimination
of class-year vesting and the enactment of
section 411(d)(6)(B)).
II.Scope of Section 411(d)(6) Protections
A.General rules under section 411(d)(6)
These final regulations take into ac-
count and respond tojudicial decisions
interpreting section 411(d)(6) (or its
parallel provision at section 204(g) of
ERISA).
1
For example, the regulations
provide that section 411(d)(6) protection
applies to a participant’s entire accrued
benefit as of the applicable amendment
date, without regard to whether the entire
accrued benefit was accrued before a par-
ticipant’s severance from employment, or
whether some portion of the accrued ben-
efit was the result of an increase pursuant
to a plan amendment adopted after the par-
ticipant’s severance from employment.
2
The regulations generally retain the
rules from former §1.411(d)–3. Thus, for
purposes of determining whether or not
any participant’s accrued benefit is de-
creased, all plan amendments affecting,
directly or indirectly, the computation of
accrued benefits are taken into account
and, in determining whether a reduction
has occurred, all plan amendments with
the same applicable amendment date (the
later of the adoption date or the effec-
tive date of the amendment) are treated
as one amendment. The regulations also
provide that these rules apply to section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits. Thus, for
example, if there are 2 amendments with
the same applicable amendment date, one
of which increases accrued benefits and
the other of which decreases the early re-
tirement factors that are used to determine
the early retirement annuity, the 2 amend-
ments are treated as one amendment and
only violate section 411(d)(6) if, after the
2 amendments, the net dollar amount of
any early retirement annuity, with respect
to the accrued benefit of any participant
as of the applicable amendment date, is
lower on that applicable amendment date
than it would have been without the 2
amendments.
3
B.Definitions of section 411(d)(6)
protected benefits
The legislative history of REA provides
that:
[T]he term ‘retirement-type subsidy’ is
to be defined by Treasury regulations.
The committee intends that under these
regulations, a subsidy that continues
after retirement is generally to be con-
sidered a retirement-type subsidy. The
committee expects, however, that a
qualified disability benefit, a medical
benefit, a social security supplement, a
death benefit (including life insurance),
or a plant shutdown benefit (that does
not continue after retirement age) will
not be considered a retirement-type
subsidy. The committee expects that
Treasury regulations will prevent the
recharacterization of retirement-type
benefits as benefits that are not pro-
tected [under section 411(d)(6)].
4
These final regulations reflect the rules
in the 1988 regulations (see §1.411(d)–4,
Q&A–1(d)) that ancillary benefits and
other rights or features are not protected
under section 411(d)(6). In addition,
taking the REA legislative history into
account, these regulations define the
termsearly retirement benefit,retire-
ment-type benefit,andretirement-type
subsidy. These definitions differ in several
respects from the proposed regulations.
The definition of the termancil-
lary benefitin these regulations reflects
changes from the proposed regulations
regarding death benefits. Because the ac-
count balance is the accrued benefit in a
defined contribution plan, the payment of
the account balance upon the death of a
participant is the payment of the accrued
benefit rather than an ancillary benefit.
Therefore, in contrast to the proposed
regulations, the final regulations do not
categorize a right to a death benefit under
a defined contribution plan as an ancillary
benefit, and this right is protected under
section 411(d)(6). For a defined bene-
fit plan, these regulations provide that a
death benefit that is not part of an optional
form of benefit is an ancillary benefit and,
therefore, is not protected under section
411(d)(6), even if paid after retirement.
The regulations also clarify when a death
benefit under a defined benefit plan is part
of an optional form of benefit. The defini-
tion ofoptional form of benefitis defined in
§1.411(d)–3(g)(6)(ii) of these final regu-
lations and in §1.411(d)–4, Q&A–1(b)(1),
which has been revised by this Treasury
Decision to coordinate with the definition
ofoptional form of benefitin these final
regulations.
The regulations also include changes to
the definitions ofancillary benefitandre-
tirement-type benefit, relating to benefits
that are not permitted to be in a qual-
ified plan. These changes are relevant
for purposes of applying section 204(g)
of ERISA (the parallel rule to section
411(d)(6)), which applies to both qualified
and nonqualified plans. The final regu-
lations provide that, in addition to social
security supplements,disability benefits,
life insurance benefits, medical benefits
under section 401(h),and certain death
benefits, the only other ancillary bene-
1
SeeBellas v. CBS, Inc., 221 F.3d 517 (3
rd
Cir. 2000),cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1104 (2001) (holding early retirement benefit that is more valuable than actuarially reduced normal retirement
benefit and that is payable on occurrence of unpredictable contingent event is retirement-type subsidy, and therefore is protected under section 204(g)),Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal
Workers’ National Pension Fund v. C.I.R., 318 F.3d 599 (4
th
Cir. 2003) (stating provision for automatic cost-of-living adjustments granted by plan amendment is not accrued benefit for
participants who retired before effective date of amendment and, thus, holding subsequent plan amendment eliminating future adjustments did not violate anti-cutback rule of section 411(d)(6)),
andMichael v. Riverside Cement, 266 F.3d 1023 (9
th
Cir. 2001) (holding plan amendment providing for actuarial offsetof early retirement benefits previously received by rehire upon
subsequent retirement violates ERISA section 204(g), even though net effect of amendment is increase in retirement benefit of participant).
2
This is contrary to the analysis inBoard of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers’ National Pension Fund v. C.I.R..
3
This is contrary to the analysis inMichael v. Riverside Cement.
4
S. Rep. 98–575, at 30 (1984).
2005–38 I.R.B.540September 19, 2005

fits are plant shutdown benefits and other
similar benefits that do not continue past
retirement age, do not affect the payment
of the accrued benefit, and are permitted to
be in a qualified pension plan. These regu-
lations also provide that a retirement-type
benefit is either the payment of a distribu-
tion alternative with respect to an accrued
benefit or the payment of any other benefit
under a defined benefit plan (including
a QSUPP as defined in §1.401(a)(4)–12)
that is permitted to be in a qualified pen-
sion plan, continues after retirement, and
is not an ancillary benefit.
These regulations include a num-
ber of clarifications regarding section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits that were
included in the proposed regulations with
minor modifications. The regulations clar-
ify that if, after a plan amendment, there is
another optional form of benefit available
to a participant under the plan that is of
inherently equal or greater value, the plan
amendment is not treated as eliminating
an optional form of benefit, or eliminating
or reducing an early retirement benefit or
a retirement-type subsidy. For example,
a change in the method of calculating a
joint and survivor annuity from using a
90% adjustment factor on account of the
survivorship payment at particular ages
for a participant and a spouse to using a
91% adjustment factor at the same ages is
treated as not eliminating an optional form
of benefit.
C.Multiple amendment rule
Under the proposed regulations, a plan
amendment would violate the require-
ments of section 411(d)(6) if it is one
of a series of plan amendments made at
different times that, when taken together,
have the effect of reducing or eliminat-
ing a section 411(d)(6) protected benefit
in a manner that would be prohibited
under section 411(d)(6) if accomplished
through a single amendment. The 1988
regulations contained a similar rule under
which a plan amendment that modified
an optional form of benefit with respect
to benefits already accrued was evalu-
ated in light of previous amendments (see
§1.411(d)–4, Q&A–2(c), as in effect prior
to amendment by these regulations).
Commentators raised concerns about
the multiple amendment rule in the pro-
posed regulations, including its complex-
ity and the uncertainty as to when the rule
would apply. In response to these com-
ments, this multiple amendment rule has
been revised to add an objective rule that
generally only combines plan amendments
adopted within a 3-year period. The final
regulations also retain an application of
the multiple amendment rule from the pro-
posed regulations relating to restrictions
against creating burdens or complexities.
Under this rule, if a plan is amended to
add a retirement-type subsidy in order to
eliminate another retirement-type subsidy
within 3 years, the plan amendment elim-
inating the retirement-type subsidy will
not be treated as reducing or eliminating
burdens and complexities for the plan and
its participants, evenif the elimination of
the subsidy would not adversely affect the
rights of any plan participant in a more
thande minimismanner.
These final regulations also make
a conforming change to §1.411(d)–4,
Q&A–2(c), by replacing the serial amend-
ment rule under those regulations with a
revised version of the multiple amendment
rule. These regulations do not modify the
rule in §1.411(d)–4, Q&A–1(c)(1), which
provides that if an employer establishes
a pattern of repeated plan amendments
providing for similar benefits in similar
situations for substantially consecutive,
limited periods of time, then those similar
benefits will be treated as provided under
the terms of the plan, without regard to the
limited period of time, to the extent neces-
sary to carry out the purposes of sections
411(d)(6) and, where applicable, the defi-
nitely determinable requirement of section
401(a), including section 401(a)(25).
D.Application of section 411(d)(6)
to certain amendments eliminating
impermissible benefits
Commentators suggested that the final
regulations clarify that a plan is permit-
ted under section 411(d)(6) to eliminate
an optional form of benefit that is incon-
sistent with the plan qualification require-
ments of section 401(a) (e.g., the require-
ments of section 401(a)(9)). In general,
section 411(d)(6) does not permit the elim-
ination or reduction of a section 411(d)(6)
protected benefit solely because that ben-
efit violates the planqualification require-
ments. However, in the past, the IRS has
exercised its authority to issue guidance
that, in certain situations, permit certain
plan amendments that eliminate or reduce
certain optional forms of benefit that vi-
olate the plan qualification requirements.
For example, §1.401(a)(9)–8, Q&A–12,
provides that a plan will not fail to satisfy
section 411(d)(6) merely because the plan
is amended to eliminate the availability of
an optional form of benefit to the extent
that the optional form does not satisfy sec-
tion 401(a)(9).
5
III.Elimination of Benefits of De Minimis
Value Under EGTRRA
A.Elimination of redundant optional
forms of benefit
These regulations generally retain the
rule from the proposed regulations that a
plan is permitted to be amended to elimi-
nate an optional form of benefit for a par-
ticipant with respect to benefits accrued
before the applicable amendment date if
the optional form of benefit is redundant
with respect to a retained optional form of
benefit and certain conditions are satisfied.
An optional form of benefit is considered
redundant with respect to a retained op-
tional form of benefit if the retained op-
tional form of benefit is in the same family
of optional forms of benefit as the optional
form of benefit being eliminated and the
participant’s rights with respect to the re-
tained optional form of benefit are not sub-
ject to materially greater restrictions than
those that applied to the optional form of
benefit being eliminated.
These regulations also contain new ter-
minology to facilitate the application of
certain rules. Various rules in these fi-
nal regulations use the termannuity com-
mencement dateinstead of the terman-
nuity starting date, thereby accommodat-
ing the elimination of an optional form of
benefit that includes a retroactive annuity
starting date. The final regulations also
define the termgeneralized optional form,
which means a group of optional forms
of benefit that are identical except for dif-
ferences due to the actuarial factors that
5
See also §1.401(a)(9)–1, Q&A–3, providing that, notwithstanding any other plan provision, a plan is not permitted to distribute benefits under any optional form of benefit that does not
satisfy section 401(a)(9).
September 19, 20055412005–38 I.R.B.

are used to determine the amount of the
distributions under those optional forms
of benefit and the annuity starting dates.
The concept of a generalized optional form
is used in several places in these regula-
tions, including the redundancy rule and
the rules concerning burdensome andde
minimisbenefits.
Under the proposed regulations, among
the conditions for eliminating a section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit under the
redundancy rule is that the plan amend-
ment not apply to an optional form of ben-
efit with an annuity starting date that is ear-
lier than 90 days after the date the amend-
ment is adopted. This 90-day waiting pe-
riod is based on a rule relating to the tim-
ing for the written explanation of a quali-
fied joint and survivor annuity under sec-
tion 417(a)(3). Under that rule, the ex-
planation cannot be provided more than
90 days before the annuity starting date.
See §1.417(e)–1(b)(3)(ii). A commenta-
tor suggested that the regulations be re-
vised to increase the waiting period be-
fore the elimination of a redundant op-
tional form of benefit from 90 days after
the amendment is adopted to 180 days af-
ter the amendment is adopted. The com-
mentator reasoned that this increase would
give participants more time to adjust to the
elimination of the optional form of bene-
fit and, thus, participants would have more
time to select from among the preamend-
ment optional forms of benefit. The com-
mentator also noted that proposed legis-
lation had been introduced that would in-
crease the number of days before the an-
nuity starting date that a QJSA explana-
tion can be provided (the maximum QJSA
explanation period) from 90 days to 180
days.
In light of this comment, the final reg-
ulations explicitly link the waiting period
before the elimination of a redundant op-
tional form of benefit with the maximum
QJSA explanation period, which is cur-
rently a 90-day period. Thus, these reg-
ulations provide that, for purposes of the
redundancy rule, a plan amendment can-
not be applicable with respect to an op-
tional form of benefit with an annuity com-
mencement date for which a written expla-
nationrelatingtoaQJSAwouldhavesat-
isfied the timing requirements of section
417(a)(3) had it been provided on or before
the date that the amendment is adopted.
This ensures that no participant will re-
ceive a QJSA explanation describing an
optional form of benefit which could be
eliminated before the election has been
made. The waiting period before the elim-
ination of a redundant optional form of
benefit under these final regulations would
change automatically if, at any future date,
the maximum QJSA explanation period
were to be altered.
B.Permissible elimination of noncore
optional forms of benefit where core
options are offered
The final regulations retain the rule
from the proposed regulations under which
aplanispermittedtobeamendedtoelim-
inate an optional form of benefit for plan
participants with respect to benefits ac-
crued before the applicable amendment
date if, after the amendment, the plan of-
fers a designated set of core options to
plan participants with respect to benefits
accrued both before and after the amend-
ment. The core options are defined as
a straight life annuity, a 75% joint and
contingent annuity, a 10-year term certain
and life annuity, and the most valuable
option for a participant with a short life
expectancy. As under the proposed regu-
lations, the final regulations do not permit
a plan amendment to apply to optional
forms of benefit with annuity commence-
ment dates that are earlier than 4 years
after the date the amendment is adopted.
In addition, the final regulations retain
the rule that a plan may not be amended
to eliminate an optional form of benefit
that includes a single-sum distribution that
applies with respect to at least 25% of a
participant’s accrued benefit as of the date
the optional form of benefit is eliminated.
Several commentators suggested that
the 75% joint and contingent annuity core
option be replaced with a 50% joint and
contingent annuity core option. One com-
mentator argued that if the 50% joint and
contingent annuity option is not available
to participants, the higher actuarial charge
associated with the 75% joint and con-
tingent annuity option might discourage
participants from electing any joint and
contingent annuity option. Other com-
mentators pointed out that §1.411(d)–4,
Q&A–2(b)(2)(ii), allows a plan that pro-
vides a range of 3 or more actuarially
equivalent joint and survivor annuity op-
tionstobeamendedtoeliminateany
of such options, other than the options
with the largest and smallest optional sur-
vivor payment percentages (the bookends
rule) and argued that the 75% joint and
contingent annuity core option rule would
require plans to add back the 75% joint and
contingent annuity option that was elimi-
nated under the bookends rule. In light of
these comments and to accommodate the
bookends rule, the final regulations retain
the 75% joint and contingent annuity as a
core option, but provide a special rule that
a plan is permitted to treat both the 50%
and 100% joint and contingent annuity
options as core options for purposes of the
core options rule (in lieu of offering a 75%
joint and contingent annuity) if the plan
otherwise satisfies the requirements of the
core options rule.
As stated above, these regulations re-
tain in the list of core options the most
valuable option for a participant with a
short life expectancy. This core option
is defined as the optional form of ben-
efit that is reasonably expected to result
in payments that have the largest actu-
arial present value in the case of a par-
ticipant who dies shortly after the annu-
ity starting date. Like the proposed reg-
ulations, these regulations provide a safe
harbor method for determining which op-
tional form of benefit under the plan is
the most valuable option for a participant
with a short life expectancy. Under this
safe harbor method, a plan is permitted to
treat a single-sum distribution option with
an actuarial present value that is not less
than the actuarial present value of any op-
tional form of benefit being eliminated as
the most valuable option for a participant
with a short life expectancy. If a plan does
not offer such a single-sum distribution op-
tion, the plan is permitted to treat a joint
and contingent annuity as the most valu-
able option for a participant with a short
life expectancy if the continuation percent-
age under the amendment is at least 75%
and is at least as great as the highest con-
tinuation percentage available before the
amendment. In the event a plan has neither
a single-sum distribution option nor a joint
and contingent annuity with a continuation
percentage of at least 75%, the plan is per-
mitted to treat a term certain and life an-
nuity with a term certain period of at least
15 years as the most valuable option for a
participant with a short life expectancy.
2005–38 I.R.B.542September 19, 2005

Similar rules were in the proposed regu-
lations, and a commentator argued that the
rules would overprotect single-sum distri-
bution options by providing 2 levels of
protection: first, by not treating an amend-
ment as satisfying the core options rule if it
eliminates an optional form of benefit that
includes a single-sum distribution that ap-
plies with respect to at least 25% of the par-
ticipant’s accrued benefit as of the date the
optional form of benefit is eliminated; and,
second, by providing that a plan is permit-
ted to treat a single-sum distribution option
with an actuarial present value that is not
less than the actuarial present value of any
optional form of benefit eliminated by the
plan amendment as the most valuable op-
tion for a participant with a short life ex-
pectancy. This comment is based on the
assumption that a single-sum distribution
option will always be the most valuable
option for a participant with a short life
expectancy. However, as illustrated in an
example in these regulations, a single-sum
option is not always the most valuable op-
tion for a participant with a short life ex-
pectancy,e.g., where the single-sum distri-
bution does not take into account an early
retirement subsidy available in another op-
tional form of benefit (see §1.411(d)–3(h),
Example 4). Accordingly, the final regula-
tions retain the separate protection for sin-
gle sum-distributions and the most valu-
able option for a participant with a short
life expectancy. However, the final regu-
lations clarify that the safe harbor hierar-
chy method for determining the most valu-
able option for a participant with a short
life expectancy is available only if the sin-
gle-sum distribution, joint and contingent
annuity, or term certainand life annuity op-
tional forms satisfy the conditions set forth
in that rule at all relevant ages. Thus, when
the safe harbor hierarchy rule applies, the
most valuable option for a participant with
a short life expectancy will be the general-
ized optional form for all participants.
These regulations also retain the re-
quirement in the proposed regulations
under which an amendment to eliminate
an optional form of benefit under the core
options rule cannot apply to an optional
form of benefit with an annuity com-
mencement date that is earlier than 4 years
after the date the amendment is adopted.
Several commentators argued that the
waiting period before elimination of a
noncore optional form of benefit be short-
ened, with one commentator suggesting 90
days, similar to the waiting period before
the elimination of a redundant optional
form of benefit. Other commentators ar-
gued that the waiting period before the
elimination of a noncore optional form of
benefit be increased to 5 years, similar to
the 5-year cliff vesting rule. However, no
commentator provided evidence that par-
ticipants evaluate benefit choices over a
shorter or longer period. Treasury and the
IRS believe that the 4-year waiting period
before elimination of a noncore optional
form of benefit strikes the right balance
between protecting participants’ expecta-
tions about the various benefit choices in
their plans in coordination with decisions
relating to retirement planning, while re-
ducing burdens on plans. Thus, the 4-year
waiting period before the elimination of a
noncore optional form of benefit has been
retained in these regulations.
As stated earlier under the headingMul-
tiple amendment rule, the final regulations
provide that a plan amendment violates
section 411(d)(6) if it is one of a series
of plan amendments that, when taken to-
gether, have the effect of reducing or elim-
inating section 411(d)(6) protected bene-
fits in a manner that would violate section
411(d)(6) if accomplished through a sin-
gle amendment. These final regulations
add a rule that, for purposes of the mul-
tiple amendment rule, only plan amend-
ments made within a 3-year period are gen-
erally taken into account. Notwithstanding
this 3-year rule, the final regulations also
add a rule that if a plan is amended to elim-
inate an optional form of benefit using the
core option rule, the employer must wait
3 years after the first annuity commence-
ment date for which the optional form of
benefit is no longer available before reduc-
ing or eliminating any core options offered
under the plan.
C.Elimination of early retirement benefits
and retirement-type subsidies that are of
de minimis value
The final regulations retain from the
proposed regulations the additional re-
quirements that a plan amendment must
satisfy if the retained optional form of
benefit or each core option offered under
the plan does not have the same annu-
ity starting date or has a lower actuarial
present value than the optional form of
benefit being eliminated. In such a case,
the plan amendment is only permitted to
reduce or eliminate a section 411(d)(6)(B)
protected benefit that creates significant
burdens or complexities for the plan and
its participants, but only if elimination
does not adversely affect the rights of
any participant in more than ade minimis
manner.
The regulations generally retain the rule
in the proposed regulations which provides
that a reduction in actuarial present value is
of no more than ade minimisamount if the
reduction does not exceed the greater of
2% of the present value of the retirement-
type subsidy under the eliminated optional
form of benefit (if any) prior to the amend-
ment or 1% of the participant’s compensa-
tion for the prior plan year (as defined in
section 415(c)(3)). Several commentators
offered suggestions to change thisde min-
imisvalue test. Some commentators sug-
gested that the 2% threshold be increased
in order to make the ability to eliminate
the subsidy more meaningful. The com-
mentators suggested an increase up to 5%
of the retirement-type subsidy. In addi-
tion, other commentators argued that 2%
threshold should be changed from a per-
centage of the retirement-type subsidy to a
percentage of the eliminated optional form
of benefit. Under this suggestion, the mar-
gin of difference would be permitted to
be significantly greater. Other commenta-
tors argued that the 2% threshold should
be lowered in order to reflect Congres-
sional intent in the examples illustratingde
minimisreductions in the EGTRRA con-
ference report.
6
These suggestions ranged
from 1.5% to 1% of the retirement-type
subsidy. These commentators also recom-
mended that the 1% of compensationde
minimisthreshold be reduced. In addition,
some commentators suggested that a plan
amendment eliminating a retirement-type
subsidy should be required to satisfy both
tests, instead of the 2 tests being alterna-
tives.
These final regulations do not adopt
these suggestions. The examples in the
EGTRRA conference report are explicitly
expressed as examples, not rules. The per-
6
H.R. Conf. Rep. 107–84, at 254 (2001).
September 19, 20055432005–38 I.R.B.

centage thresholds in thede minimisvalue
test are rounded percentages based on the
dollar amounts in the EGTRRA confer-
ence report, and, thus, they accurately re-
flect the intent of EGTRRA and the leg-
islative history. Accordingly, the final reg-
ulations retain the percentage thresholds
from the proposed regulations.
Several commentators also noted that
the 1% of compensation test would have
no application to terminated vested partic-
ipants because terminated participants fre-
quently have no current or prior year com-
pensation from the employer. Other com-
mentators argued that the 1% of compen-
sation test does not accurately reflect all
employment situations, such as those par-
ticipants who may take a leave of absence
or begin a reduced work schedule. In light
of these comments, the regulations provide
that the 1% of compensation test is applied
using the greater of the participant’s com-
pensation (within the meaning of section
415(c)(3)) for the prior plan year or the
participant’s average compensation for his
or her high 3 years (within the meaning of
section 415(b)(1)(B) and (b)(3)).
These regulations retain the rule in
the proposed regulations under which a
facts and circumstances analysis applies
to determine whether a plan amendment
eliminates section 411(d)(6)(B) protected
benefits that create significant burdens and
complexities for a plan and its participants.
Under this rule, for a plan amendment
eliminating a retirement-type subsidy
or changing actuarialfactors, the facts
and circumstances to consider include
the number of different retirement-type
subsidies and other actuarial factors avail-
able under the plan, whether the terms
and conditions applicable to the plan’s
retirement-type subsidies are difficult to
summarize in a manner that is concise and
readily understandable to the average plan
participant, whether those different retire-
ment-type subsidies and other actuarial
factors were added to the plan as a result
of mergers, acquisitions, or other business
transactions, and whether the effect of the
plan amendment is to reduce the number
of categories of retirement-type subsidies
or other actuarial factors.
Several commentators stated that this
facts and circumstances standard is vague
and subjective. The commentators sug-
gested that the standard should be revised
to provide for more objective criteria to de-
termine the circumstances under which a
plan amendment is permitted to eliminate a
section 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit that
creates significant burdens or complexities
for a plan and its participants. The com-
mentators also suggested that the final reg-
ulations include examples of the standard.
In light of these comments, the final
regulations add 2 new factors to the facts
and circumstances analysis for retire-
ment-type subsidies and actuarial factors.
These new factors are whether the plan
amendment eliminates one or more gen-
eralized optional forms and whether the
plan amendment replaces a complex op-
tional form of benefit with a simpler form.
An example has been added to the final
regulations to illustrate this facts and cir-
cumstances analysis.
Like the proposed regulations, the fi-
nal regulations provide a rebuttable pre-
sumption for plan amendments that elimi-
nate a set of actuarial factors under the plan
that, considered in the aggregate, are bur-
densome or complex. If this is the case,
then the elimination of any set of actu-
arial factors is presumed to eliminate sec-
tion 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits that
create significant burdens or complexities
for the plan and its participants. How-
ever, the regulations also provide that if the
effect of a plan amendment with respect
to an optional form of benefit is merely
to substitute one set of actuarial factors
for another set of actuarial factors, with-
out any reduction in the number of dif-
ferent actuarial factors, the plan amend-
ment would not be permitted. Commen-
tators stated that this “no substitution” rule
in the proposed regulations would offer no
relief to plans that wish merely to update
their plans with actuarial assumptions that
reflect more recent experience. Another
commentator similarly suggested that the
regulations should permit a plan to update
its mortality tables. In response to these
comments, the final regulations provide
an exception to the “no substitution” rule
for situations in which a plan is changing
actuarial factors for determining optional
forms of benefit with new actuarial factors
that are based on more accurate mortal-
ity experience or more appropriate interest
rates (e.g., interest rates that reflect more
recent rates of returns).
IV.Other Issues
A.Contingent event benefits
In Notice 2003–10, 2003–1 C.B. 369,
Treasury and the IRS announced that reg-
ulations would be proposed that would
provide guidance on benefits that are
treated as early retirement benefits and
retirement-type subsidies for purposes
of section 411(d)(6)(B). Notice 2003–10
also provided that the regulations will be
prospective and the IRS will not treat a
plan as failing to satisfy the requirements
of section 401 merely because of a plan
amendment that eliminates or reduces
an early retirement benefit or a retire-
ment-type subsidy that is conditioned on
the occurrence of an unpredictable contin-
gent event (within the meaning of section
412(l)) if the amendment is adopted and
effective prior to the occurrence of the
contingent event and prior to the publica-
tion of the final regulations in theFederal
Register.
These final regulations generally retain
the rule in the proposed regulations which
provided that benefits that are contingent
on the occurrence of certain events, such
as a plant shutdown or involuntary sepa-
ration, and that continue after retirement
are retirement-type subsidies that are pro-
tected under section 411(d)(6)(B), both be-
fore and after the occurrence of the contin-
gency.
7
However, as noted above under the
headingDefinitions of section 411(d)(6)
protected benefits, this rule is limited to
benefits under a defined benefit plan that
are permitted to be in a qualified plan. This
rule applies to amendments adopted after
December 31, 2005. For an amendment
adopted before January 1, 2006, the IRS
will not treat a plan as failing to be tax
qualified under section 401(a) merely be-
cause the plan amendment eliminates or
reduces an early retirement benefit or a re-
tirement-type subsidy that is conditioned
on the occurrence of an unpredictable con-
tingent event (within the meaning of sec-
tion 412(l)) if the amendment is adopted
and effective prior to the occurrence of the
contingent event.
7
This rule follows the analysis inBellas v. CBS, Inc..
2005–38 I.R.B.544September 19, 2005

B.Effect of Central Laborers’ decision
Since the issuance of the proposed reg-
ulations on March 24, 2004, the Supreme
Court issued its opinion inCentral Labor-
ers’ Pension Fund v. Heinz,541U.S.749
(June 7, 2004). This case addressed an
issue that was reserved in the proposed
regulations, pending the final decision in
Central Laborers’, namely the interaction
of the vesting rules in section 411(a) with
the anti-cutback rules in section 411(d)(6).
This topic is reserved in these final reg-
ulations and addressed in proposed regu-
lations (REG–156518–04) that are being
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Bulletin.
C.Utilization test
Comments were made prior to the
issuance of the proposed regulations re-
questing relief from section 411(d)(6) to
enable plans to eliminate optional forms
of benefit that participants rarely use.
The preamble to the proposed regulations
noted the difficulty in applying a utiliza-
tion standard for plans where there are few
retirements. However, comments on the
proposed regulations asked Treasury and
the IRS to consider adding a utilization
test to the regulations as an acceptable
method of eliminating optional forms of
benefit, early retirement benefits, and
retirement-type subsidies that are rarely
used. The commentators argued that rarely
used optional formscreate a burden both
for plans and their participants and that
utilization of an optional form of benefit is
a good measure of a benefit’s value to par-
ticipants in a plan. In light of these com-
ments, Treasury and IRS are proposing a
utilization standard, which is included in
proposed regulations (REG–156518–04)
being published elsewhere in this issue
of the Bulletin. Accordingly, these final
regulations provide a reserved paragraph
for such a utilization test.
Effective Dates
These final regulations apply to amend-
ments adopted and effective after August
12, 2005. However, there is a special ef-
fective date for certain plan amendments
as described above (under the heading
Contingent Event Benefits). Plan amend-
ments adopted before August 12, 2005,
are to be evaluated in light of the appli-
cable authorities without regard to these
regulations. No implication is intended
concerning whether or not a rule adopted
prospectively in these regulations is appli-
cable law before the effective date in these
regulations.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that this Trea-
sury Decision is not a significant regula-
tory action as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory assessment
is not required. It has also been determined
that section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5) does
not apply to these regulations. In addition,
because no collection of information is im-
posed on small entities, the provisions of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) do not apply, and therefore, a
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not re-
quired. Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Code, the notice of proposed rulemaking
preceding these regulations was submitted
to the Small Business Administration for
comment on its impact on small business.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regula-
tions is Pamela R. Kinard of the Office
of the Division Counsel/Associate Chief
Counsel (Tax Exempt and Government
Entities), Internal Revenue Service. How-
ever, personnel from other offices of the
Internal Revenue Service and Treasury
Department participated in their develop-
ment.
*****
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 54 are
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 is amended by adding an entry to
read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
§1.411(d)–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 411(d)(6) and section 645(b) of
the Economic Growth and Tax Relief
Reconciliation Act of 2001, Public Law
107–16 (115 Stat. 38).* * *
Par. 2. Section 1.411(d)–3 is revised to
read as follows:
§1.411(d)–3 Section 411(d)(6) protected
benefits.
(a)Protection of accrued benefits—(1)
General rule. Under section 411(d)(6)(A),
a plan is not a qualified plan (and a trust
forming a part of such plan is not a qual-
ified trust) if a plan amendment decreases
the accrued benefit of any plan participant,
except as provided in section 412(c)(8),
section 4281 of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 as amended
(ERISA), or other applicable law (e.g., sec-
tion 1541(a)(2) of the Taxpayer Relief Act
of 1997, Public Law 105–34 (111 Stat.
788, 1085)). For purposes of this section,
a plan amendment includes any changes
to the terms of a plan, including changes
resulting from a merger, consolidation, or
transfer (as defined in section 414(l)) or a
plan termination. The protection of section
411(d)(6) applies to a participant’s entire
accrued benefit under the plan as of the ap-
plicable amendment date, without regard
to whether the entire accrued benefit was
accrued before a participant’s severance
from employment or whether any portion
was the result of an increase in the accrued
benefit of the participant pursuant to a plan
amendment adopted after the participant’s
severance from employment.
(2)Plan provisions taken into ac-
count—(i)Direct or indirect reduction in
accrued benefit. For purposes of deter-
mining whether a participant’s accrued
benefit is decreased, all of the amend-
ments to the provisions of a plan affecting,
directly or indirectly, the computation of
accrued benefits are taken into account.
Plan provisions indirectly affecting the
computation of accrued benefits include,
for example, provisions relating to years
of service and compensation.
(ii)Amendments effective with the same
applicable amendment date. In determin-
ing whether a reduction in a participant’s
accrued benefit has occurred, all plan
amendments with the same applicable
amendment date are treated as one amend-
ment. Thus, if two amendments have the
same applicable amendment date and one
amendment, standing alone, increases par-
ticipants’ accrued benefits and the other
amendment, standing alone, decreases
participants’ accrued benefits, the amend-
ments are treated as one amendment and
will only violate section 411(d)(6) if, for
any participant, the net effect is to de-
September 19, 20055452005–38 I.R.B.

crease participants’ accrued benefit as of
that applicable amendment date.
(iii)Multiple amendments—(A)Gen-
eral rule. A plan amendment violates the
requirements of section 411(d)(6) if it is
one of a series of plan amendments that,
when taken together, have the effect of re-
ducing or eliminatingasection411(d)(6)
protected benefit in a manner that would be
prohibited by section 411(d)(6) if accom-
plished through a single amendment.
(B)Determination of the time period
for combining plan amendments. For pur-
poses of applying the rule in paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(A) of this section, generally only
plan amendments adopted within a 3-year
period are taken into account.
(3)Application of section 411(a) non-
forfeitability provisions with respect to
section 411(d)(6) protected benefits.[Re-
served].
(4)Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of this paragraph
(a):
Example 1.(i)Facts. Plan A provides an annual
benefit of 2% of career average pay times years of ser-
vice commencing at normal retirement age (age 65).
Plan A is amended on November 1, 2006, effective as
of January 1, 2007, to provide for an annual benefit
of 1.3% of final pay times years of service, with final
pay computed as the average of a participant’s high-
est 3 consecutive years of compensation. As of Jan-
uary 1, 2007, Participant M has 16 years of service,
M’s career average pay is $37,500, and the average
of M’s highest 3 consecutive years of compensation
is $67,308. Thus, Participant M’s accrued benefit as
of the applicable amendment date is increased from
$12,000 per year at normal retirement age (2% times
$37,500 times 16 years of service) to $14,000 per year
at normal retirement age (1.3% times $67,308 times
16 years of service). As of January 1, 2007, Partic-
ipant N has 6 years of service, N’s career average
pay is $50,000, and the average of N’s highest 3 con-
secutive years of compensation is $51,282. Partici-
pant N’s accrued benefit asof the applicable amend-
ment date is decreased from $6,000 per year at nor-
mal retirement age (2% times $50,000 times 6 years
of service) to $4,000 per year at normal retirement
age (1.3% times $51,282 times 6 years of service).
(ii)Conclusion. While the plan amendment in-
creases the accrued benefit of Participant M, the plan
amendment fails to satisfy the requirements of sec-
tion 411(d)(6)(A) becausethe amendment decreases
the accrued benefit of Participant N below the level
of the accrued benefit of Participant N immediately
before the applicable amendment date.
Example 2.(i)Facts. The facts are the same as
Example 1, except that Plan A includes a provision
under which Participant N’saccrued benefit cannot
be less than what it was immediately before the ap-
plicable amendment date (so that Participant N’s ac-
crued benefit could not be less than $6,000 per year
at normal retirement age).
(ii)Conclusion. The amendment does not violate
the requirements of section 411(d)(6)(A) with respect
to Participant M (whose accrued benefit has been in-
creased) or with respect to Participant N (although
Participant N would not accrue any benefits until the
point in time at which the new formula amount would
exceed the amount payable under the minimum pro-
vision, approximately 3 years after the amendment
becomes effective).
(b)Protection of section 411(d)(6)(B)
protected benefits—(1)General rule—(i)
Prohibition against plan amend-
ments eliminating or reducing section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits. Except as
provided in this section, a plan is treated
as decreasing an accrued benefit if it is
amended to eliminate or reduce a section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit as defined
in paragraph (g)(15) of this section. This
paragraph (b)(1) applies to participants
who satisfy (either before or after the plan
amendment) the preamendment condi-
tions for a section 411(d)(6)(B) protected
benefit.
(ii)Contingent benefits.Therulesof
paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section apply
to participants who satisfy (either be-
fore or after the plan amendment) the
preamendment conditions for the section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit even if the
condition on which the eligibility for the
section 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit de-
pends is an unpredictable contingent event
(e.g., a plant shutdown).
(iii)Application of general rules in
paragraph (a) of this section to section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits. For pur-
poses of determining whether a partic-
ipant’s section 411(d)(6)(B) protected
benefit is eliminated or reduced, the rules
of paragraph (a) of this section apply to
section 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits in
the same manner as they apply to accrued
benefits described in section 411(d)(6)(A).
As an example of the application of para-
graph (a)(2)(ii) of this section to section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits, if there
are two amendments with the same appli-
cable amendment date and one amendment
increases accrued benefits and the other
amendment decreases the early retirement
factors that are used to determine the early
retirement annuity, the amendments are
treated as one amendment and only vi-
olate section 411(d)(6) if, after the two
amendments, the net dollar amount of
any early retirement annuity with respect
to the accrued benefit of any participant
as of the applicable amendment date is
lower than it would have been without the
two amendments. As an example of the
application of paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this
section to section 411(d)(6)(B) protected
benefits, a series of amendments made
within a 3-year period that, when taken
together, have the effect of reducing or
eliminating early retirement benefits or
retirement-type subsidies in a manner that
adversely affects the rights of any partic-
ipant in a more thande minimismanner
violates section 411(d)(6)(B) even if each
amendment would be permissible pur-
suant to paragraphs (c), (d), or (f) of this
section.
(2)Permissible elimination of section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits—(i)In
general. A plan is permitted to be amended
to eliminate a section 411(d)(6)(B) pro-
tected benefit if the elimination is in ac-
cordance with this section or §1.411(d)–4.
(ii)Increases in payment amounts do
not eliminate an optional form of benefit.
An amendment is not treated as elim-
inating an optional form of benefit or
eliminating or reducing an early retire-
ment benefit or retirement-type subsidy
under the plan, if, effective after the plan
amendment, there is another optional form
of benefit available to the participant un-
der the plan that is of inherently equal
or greater value (within the meaning of
§1.401(a)(4)–4(d)(4)(i)(A)). Thus, for
example, a change in the method of cal-
culating a joint and survivor annuity from
using a 90% adjustment factor on account
of the survivorship payment at particular
ages for a participant and a spouse to us-
ing a 91% adjustment factor at the same
ages is not treated as an elimination of
an optional form of benefit. Similarly,
a plan that offers a subsidized qualified
joint and survivor annuity option for mar-
ried participants under which the amount
payable during the participant’s lifetime is
not less than the amount payable under the
plan’s straight life annuity is permitted to
be amended to eliminate the straight life
annuity option for married participants.
(3)Permissible elimination of benefits
that are not section 411(d)(6) protected
benefits—(i)In general. Section 411(d)(6)
does not provide protection for benefits
that are ancillary benefits, other rights
and features, or any other benefits that are
not described in section 411(d)(6). See
§1.411(d)–4, Q&A–1(d). However, a plan
may not be amended to recharacterize
2005–38 I.R.B.546September 19, 2005

a retirement-type benefit as an ancillary
benefit. Thus, for example, a plan amend-
ment to recharacterize any portion of an
early retirement subsidy as a social secu-
rity supplement that is an ancillary benefit
violates section 411(d)(6).
(ii)No protection for future benefit ac-
cruals. Section 411(d)(6) only protects
benefits that accrue before the applicable
amendment date. Thus, a plan is permitted
to be amended to eliminate or reduce an
early retirement benefit, a retirement-type
subsidy, or an optional form of benefit
with respect to benefits that accrue after
the applicable amendment date without
violating section 411(d)(6). However,
section 4980F(e) of the Internal Revenue
Code and section 204(h) of ERISA require
notice of an amendment to an applica-
ble pension plan that either provides for
a significant reduction in the rate of fu-
ture benefit accrual or that eliminates or
significantly reducesan early retirement
benefit or a retirement-type subsidy. See
§54.4980F–1 of this chapter generally,
and see §54.4980F–1, Q&A–7(b) and
Q&A–8(c) of this chapter, with respect
to the circumstances under which such
notice is required for a reduction in an
early retirement benefit or retirement-type
subsidy.
(4)Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of this paragraph
(b):
Example 1.(i)Facts involving amendments to an
early retirement subsidy. Plan A provides an annual
benefit of 2% of career average pay times years of ser-
vice commencing at normal retirement age (age 65).
Plan A is amended on November 1, 2006, effective as
of January 1, 2007, to provide for an annual benefit
of 1.3% of final pay times years of service, with final
pay computed as the average of a participant’s high-
est 3 consecutive years of compensation. Participant
M is age 50, M has 16 years of service, M’s career
average pay is $37,500, and the average of M’s high-
est 3 consecutive years of compensation is $67,308.
Thus, M’s accrued benefit as of the effective date of
the amendment is increased from $12,000 per year at
normal retirement age (2% times $37,500 times 16
years of service) to $14,000 per year at normal re-
tirement age (1.3% times $67,308 times 16 years of
service). (These facts are similar to the facts inEx-
ample 1in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.) Before
the amendment, Plan A permitted a former employee
to commence distribution of benefits as early as age
55 and, for a participant with at least 15 years of ser-
vice, actuarially reduced the amount payable in the
form of a straight life annuity commencing before
normal retirement age by 3% per year from age 60
to age 65 and by 7% per year from age 55 through
age 59. Thus, before the amendment, the amount of
M’s early retirement benefit that would be payable
for commencement at age 55 was $6,000 per year
($12,000 per year minus 3% for 5 years and minus
7% for 5 more years). The amendment also alters
the actuarial reduction factor so that, for a participant
with at least 15 years of service, the amount payable
in a straight life annuity commencing before normal
retirement age is reduced by 6% per year. As a re-
sult, the amount of M’s early retirement benefit at
age 55 becomes $5,600 per year after the amendment
($14,000 minus 6% for 10 years).
(ii)Conclusion. The straight life annuity payable
under Plan A at age 55 is an optional form of bene-
fit that includes an early retirement subsidy. The plan
amendment fails to satisfy the requirements of sec-
tion 411(d)(6)(B) because the amendment decreases
the optional form of benefit payable to Participant
M below the level that Participant M was entitled to
receive immediately before the effective date of the
amendment. If instead Plan A had included a pro-
vision under which M’s straight life annuity payable
at any age could not be less than what it was imme-
diately before the amendment (so that M’s straight
life annuity payable at age 55 could not be less than
$6,000 per year), then the amendment would not fail
to satisfy the requirements of section 411(d)(6)(B)
with respect to M’s straight life annuity payable at
age 55 (although the straight life annuity payable to M
at age 55 would not increase until the point in time at
which the new formula amount with the new actuarial
reduction factors exceeds the amount payable under
the minimum provision, approximately 14 months af-
ter the amendment becomes effective).
Example 2.(i)Facts involving plant shutdown
benefits. Plan B permits participants who have a sev-
erance from employment before normal retirement
age (age 65) to commence distributions at any time
after age 55 with the amount payable to be actuari-
ally reduced using reasonable actuarial assumptions
regarding interest and mortality specified in the plan,
but provides that the annual reduction for any partic-
ipant who has at least 20 years of service and who
has a severance from employment after age 55 is only
3% per year (which is a smaller reduction than would
apply under reasonable actuarial reductions). Plan B
also provides two plant shutdown benefits to partic-
ipants who have a severance of employment as a re-
sult of a plant shutdown. First, the favorable 3% per
year actuarial reduction applies for commencement
of benefits after age 55 and before age 65 for any
participant who has at least 10 years of service and
who has a severance from employment as a result of
a plant shutdown. Second, all participants who have
at least 20 years of service and who have a sever-
ance from employment after age 55 (and before nor-
mal retirement age at age 65) as a result of a plant
shutdown will receive supplemental payments. Un-
der the supplemental payments, an additional amount
equal to the participant’s estimated old-age insurance
benefit under the Social Security Act is payable un-
til age 65. The supplemental payments are not a
QSUPP, as defined in §1.401(a)(4)–12, because the
plan’s terms do not state that the supplement is treated
as an early retirement benefit that is protected under
section 411(d)(6).
(ii)Conclusion with respect to plant shutdown
benefits. The benefits payable with the 3% annual
reduction are retirement-type benefits. The excess
of the actuarial present value of the early retirement
benefit using the 3% annual reduction over the actu-
arial present value of the normal retirement benefit is
a retirement-type subsidy and the right to receive pay-
ments of the benefit at age 55 is an early retirement
benefit. These conclusions apply not only with re-
spect to the rights that apply to participants who have
at least 20 years of service, but also to participants
with at least 10 years of service who have a sever-
ance from employment as a result of a plant shut-
down. Thus, the right to receive benefits based on
a 3% annual reduction for participants with at least
10 years of service at the time of a plant shutdown
is an early retirement benefit that provides a retire-
ment-type subsidy and is a section 411(d)(6)(B) pro-
tected benefit (even though no plant shutdown has oc-
curred). Therefore, a plan amendment cannot elimi-
nate this benefit with respect to benefits accrued be-
fore the applicable amendment date, even before the
occurrence of the plant shutdown. Because the plan
provides that the supplemental payments cannot ex-
ceed the OASDI benefit under the Social Security
Act, the supplemental payments constitute a social
security supplement (but not a QSUPP as defined in
§1.401(a)(4)–12), which is an ancillary benefit that
is not a section 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit and
accordingly is not taken into account in determining
whether a prohibited reduction has occurred.
(c)Permissible elimination of optional
forms of benefit that are redundant—(1)
General rule. Except as otherwise pro-
vided in paragraph (c)(5) of this section, a
plan is permitted to be amended to elimi-
nate an optional form of benefit for a par-
ticipant with respect to benefits accrued
before the applicable amendment date if—
(i) The optional form of benefit is re-
dundant with respect to a retained optional
form of benefit, within the meaning of
paragraph (c)(2) of this section;
(ii) The plan amendment is not applica-
ble with respect to an optional form of ben-
efit with an annuity commencement date
that is earlier than the number of days
in the maximum QJSA explanation pe-
riod (as defined in paragraph (g)(9) of this
section) after the date the amendment is
adopted; and
(iii) The requirements of paragraph (e)
of this section are satisfied in any case in
which either:
(A) The retained optional form of ben-
efit for the participant does not commence
on the same annuity commencement date
as the optional form of benefit that is be-
ing eliminated, or
(B) As of the date the amendment is
adopted, the actuarialpresent value of the
retained optional form of benefit for the
participant is less than the actuarial present
value of the optional form of benefit that is
being eliminated.
(2)Similar types of optional forms of
benefit are redundant—(i)General rule.
An optional form of benefit is redundant
September 19, 20055472005–38 I.R.B.

with respect to a retained optional form of
benefit if, after the amendment becomes
applicable—
(A) There is a retained optional form of
benefit available to the participant that is in
the same family of optional forms of bene-
fit, within the meaning of paragraphs (c)(3)
and (4) of this section, as the optional form
of benefit beingeliminated; and
(B) The participant’s rights with respect
to the retained optional form of benefit are
not subject to materially greater restric-
tions (such as conditions relating to eligi-
bility, restrictions on a participant’s ability
to designate the person who is entitled to
benefits following the participant’s death,
or restrictions on a participant’s right to re-
ceive an in-kind distribution) than applied
to the optional form of benefit being elim-
inated.
(ii)Special rule for core options.An
optional form of benefit that is a core
option as defined in paragraph (g)(5) of
this section may not be eliminated as a
redundant benefit under the rules of this
paragraph (c) unless the retained optional
form of benefit and the eliminated core
option are identical except for differences
described in paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this
section. Thus, for example, a particular
10-year term certain and life annuity may
not be eliminated by plan amendment un-
less the retained optional form of benefit
is another 10-year term certain and life
annuity.
(3)Family of optional forms of bene-
fit—(i)In general. Paragraph (c)(4) of this
section describes certain families of op-
tional forms of benefits. Not every op-
tional form of benefit that is offered un-
der a plan necessarily fits within a family
of optional forms of benefit as described
in paragraph (c)(4) of this section. Each
optional form of benefit that is not in-
cluded in any particular family of optional
forms of benefit listed in paragraph (c)(4)
of this section is in a separate family of op-
tional forms of benefit with other optional
forms of benefit that would be identical to
that optional form of benefit but for differ-
ences that are disregarded under paragraph
(c)(3)(ii) of this section.
(ii)Certain differences among optional
forms of benefit—(A)Differences in ac-
tuarial factors and annuity starting dates.
The determination of whether two optional
forms of benefit are within a family of op-
tional forms of benefit is made without re-
gard to actuarial factors or annuity start-
ing dates. Thus, any optional forms of
benefit that are part of the same gener-
alized optional form (within the meaning
of paragraph (g)(8) of this section) are in
the same family of optional forms of ben-
efit. For example, if a plan has a sin-
gle-sum distribution option for some par-
ticipants that is calculated using a 5% inter-
est rate and a specific mortality table (but
no less than the minimum present value
as determined under section 417(e)) and
another single-sum distribution option for
other participants that is calculated using
the applicable interest rate as defined in
section 417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(II) and the appli-
cable mortality table as defined in section
417(e)(3)(A)(ii)(I),both single-sum distri-
bution options are part of the same gener-
alized optional form and thus in the same
family of optional forms of benefit under
the rules of paragraph (c)(3)(i) of this sec-
tion. However, differences in actuarial fac-
tors and annuity starting dates are taken
into account for purposes of the require-
ments in paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
(B)Differences in pop-up provisions
and cash refund features for joint and
contingent options. The determination of
whether two optional forms of benefit are
within a family of optional forms of bene-
fit relating to joint and contingent families
(as described in paragraph (c)(4)(i) and
(ii) of this section) is made without regard
to the following features—
(1) Pop-up provisions (under which
payments increase upon the death of the
beneficiary or another event that causes
the beneficiary not to be entitled to a sur-
vivor annuity);
(2) Cash refund features (under which
payment is provided upon the death of
the last annuitant in an amount that is not
greater than the excess of the present value
of the annuity at the annuity starting date
over the total of payments before the death
of the last annuitant); or
(3) Term-certain provisions for optional
forms of benefit within a joint and contin-
gent family.
(C)Differences in social security lev-
eling features, refund of employee contri-
butions features, and retroactive annuity
starting date features. The determination
of whether two optional forms of benefit
are within a family of optional forms of
benefit is made without regard to social
security leveling features, refund of em-
ployee contributions features, or retroac-
tive annuity starting date features. But see
paragraph (c)(5) of this section for spe-
cial rules relating to social security level-
ing, refund of employee contributions, and
retroactive annuity starting date features in
optional forms of benefit.
(4)List of families. The following are
families of optional forms of benefit for
purposes of this paragraph (c):
(i)Joint and contingent options with
continuation percentages of 50% to 100%.
An optional form of benefit is within the
50% or more joint and contingent family if
it provides a life annuity to the participant
and a survivor annuity to an individual that
is at least 50% and no more than 100% of
the annuity payable during the joint lives
of the participant and the participant’s sur-
vivor.
(ii)Joint and contingent options with
continuation percentages less than 50%.
An optional form of benefit is within the
less than 50% joint and contingent fam-
ily if it provides a life annuity to the par-
ticipantandasurvivorannuitytoanindi-
vidual that is less than 50% of the annuity
payable during the joint lives of the partic-
ipant and the participant’s survivor.
(iii)Term certain and life annuity op-
tions with a term of 10 years or less.An
optional form of benefit is within the 10
years or less term certain and life family
if it is a life annuity with a guarantee that
payments will continue to the participant’s
beneficiary for the remainder of a fixed pe-
riod that is 10 years or less if the participant
dies before the end of the fixed period.
(iv)Term certain and life annuity op-
tions with a term longer than 10 years.
An optional form of benefit is within the
longer than 10 years term certain and life
family if it is a life annuity with a guaran-
tee that payments will continue to the par-
ticipant’s beneficiary for the remainder of
a fixed period that is in excess of 10 years
if the participant dies before the end of the
fixed period.
(v)Level installment payment options
over a period of 10 years or less. An op-
tional form of benefit is within the 10 years
or less installment family if it provides for
substantially level payments to the partici-
pant for a fixed period of at least two years
and not in excess of 10 years with a guaran-
tee that payments will continue to the par-
ticipant’s beneficiary for the remainder of
2005–38 I.R.B.548September 19, 2005

the fixed period if the participant dies be-
fore the end of the fixed period.
(vi)Level installment payment options
over a period of more than 10 years.An
optional form of benefit is within the more
than 10 years installment family if it pro-
vides for substantially level payments to
the participant for a fixed period that is in
excess of 10 years with a guarantee that
payments will continue to the participant’s
beneficiary for the remainder of the fixed
period if the participant dies before the end
of the fixed period.
(5)Special rules for certain features in-
cluded in optional forms of benefit.For
purposes of applying this paragraph (c), to
the extent an optional form of benefit that
is being eliminated includes either a social
security leveling feature or a refund of em-
ployee contributions feature, the retained
optional form of benefit must also include
that feature, and, to the extent that the op-
tional form of benefit that is being elim-
inated does not include a social security
leveling feature or a refund of employee
contributions feature,the retained optional
form of benefit must not include that fea-
ture. For purposes of applying this para-
graph (c), to the extent an optional form
of benefit that is being eliminated does not
include a retroactive annuity starting date
feature, the retained optional form of ben-
efit must not include the feature.
(d)Permissible elimination of noncore
optional forms of benefit where core op-
tions are offered—(1)General rule.Ex-
cept as otherwise provided in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section, a plan is permitted to
be amended to eliminate an optional form
of benefit for a participant with respect
to benefits accrued before the applicable
amendment date if—
(i) After the amendment becomes appli-
cable, each of the core options described in
paragraph (g)(5) of this section is available
to the participant with respect to benefits
accrued before and after the amendment;
(ii) The plan amendment is not applica-
ble with respect to an optional form of ben-
efit with an annuity commencement date
that is earlier than 4 years after the date the
amendment is adopted; and
(iii) The requirements of paragraph (e)
of this section are satisfied in any case in
which either:
(A) One or more of the core options are
not available commencing on the same an-
nuity commencement date as the optional
form of benefit that is being eliminated, or
(B) As of the date the amendment is
adopted, the actuarial present value of the
benefit payable under any core option with
the same annuity commencement date is
less than the actuarial present value of ben-
efits payable under the optional form of
benefit that is being eliminated.
(2)Special rules—(i)Treatment of cer-
tain features included in optional forms of
benefit. For purposes of applying this para-
graph (d), to the extent an optional form of
benefit that is being eliminated includes ei-
ther a social security leveling feature or a
refund of employee contributions feature,
at least one of the core options must also be
available with that feature, and, to the ex-
tent that the optional form of benefit that
is being eliminated does not include a so-
cial security leveling feature or a refund
of employee contributions feature, each of
the core options must be available with-
out that feature. For purposes of apply-
ing this paragraph (d), to the extent an op-
tional form of benefit that is being elimi-
nated does not include a retroactive annu-
ity starting date feature, each of the core
options must be available without that fea-
ture.
(ii)Eliminating the most valuable op-
tion for a participant with a short life
expectancy. For purposes of applying this
paragraph (d), if the most valuable op-
tion for a participant with a short life
expectancy (as defined in paragraph
(g)(5)(iii) of this section) is eliminated,
then, after the plan amendment, an op-
tional form of benefit that is identical,
except for differences described in para-
graph (c)(3)(ii) of this section, must be
available to the participant. However,
such a plan amendment cannot eliminate a
refund of employee contributions feature
from the most valuable option for a partic-
ipant with a short life expectancy.
(iii)Single-sum distributions.Aplan
amendment is not treated as satisfying this
paragraph (d) if it eliminates an optional
form of benefit that includes a single-sum
distribution that applies with respect to at
least 25% of the participant’s accrued ben-
efit as of the date the optional form of ben-
efit is eliminated. But see §1.411(d)–4,
Q&A–2(b)(2)(v), relating to involuntary
single-sum distributions for benefits with
a present value not in excess of the maxi-
mum dollar amount in section 411(a)(11).
(iv)Application of multiple amendment
rule to core option rule. Notwithstand-
ing paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(B) of this section,
if a plan is amended to eliminate an op-
tional form of benefit using the core op-
tions rule in this paragraph (d), then the
employer must wait 3 years after the first
annuity commencement date for which the
optional form of benefit is no longer avail-
able before making any changes to the core
options offered under the plan (other than
a change that is not treated as an elimina-
tion under paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this sec-
tion). Thus, for example, if a plan amend-
ment eliminates an optional form of bene-
fit for a participant using the core options
rule under this paragraph (d), with an adop-
tion date of January 1, 2006 and an ef-
fective date of January 1, 2010, the plan
would not be permitted to be amended to
make changes to the core options offered
under the plan (and the core options would
continue to apply with respect to the par-
ticipant’s accrued benefit) until January 1,
2013.
(v)Special rule for joint and contin-
gent annuity core option. If a plan of-
fers joint and contingent annuities under
which a participant is entitled to a life an-
nuity with a survivor annuity for the in-
dividual designated bythe participant (in-
cluding a non-spousal contingent annui-
tant) with continuation percentage options
of both 50% and 100% (after adjustments
permitted under paragraph (g)(5)(ii) of this
sectiontocomplywithapplicablelaw),the
plan is permitted to treat both of these op-
tions as core options for purposes of this
paragraph (d), in lieu of a 75% joint and
contingent annuity. Thus, such a plan is
permitted to use the rules of this paragraph
(d) if the plan satisfies all of the require-
ments of this paragraph (d) (taking into ac-
count the modification rule in paragraph
(g)(5)(ii) of this section) other than the re-
quirement of offering a 75% joint and con-
tingent annuity as described in paragraph
(g)(5)(i)(B) of this section.
(e)Permissible plan amendments under
paragraphs (c) and (d) eliminating or re-
ducing section 411(d)(6)(B) protected ben-
efits that are burdensome and of de min-
imis value—(1)In general. A plan amend-
ment that, pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(iii)
or (d)(1)(iii) of this section, is required
to satisfy this paragraph (e) satisfies this
paragraph (e) if—
September 19, 20055492005–38 I.R.B.

(i) The amendment eliminates section
411(d)(6)(B) protectedbenefits that create
significant burdens or complexities for the
plan and its participants as described in
paragraph (e)(2) of this section; and
(ii) The amendment does not adversely
affect the rights of any participant in a
more thande minimismanner as described
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
(2)Plan amendments eliminating sec-
tion 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits that
create significant burdens and complexi-
ties—(i)Facts and circumstances analy-
sis—(A)In general. The determination of
whether a plan amendment eliminates sec-
tion 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits that
create significant burdens or complexities
for the plan and its participants is based on
facts and circumstances.
(B)Early retirement benefits.Inthe
case of an amendment that eliminates an
early retirement benefit, relevant factors
include whether the annuity starting dates
under the plan considered in the aggregate
are burdensome or complex (e.g., the num-
ber of categories of early retirement bene-
fits, whether the terms and conditions ap-
plicable to the plan’s early retirement ben-
efits are difficult to summarize in a man-
ner that is concise and readily understand-
able to the average plan participant, and
whether those different early retirement
benefits were added to the plan as a re-
sult of a plan merger, transfer, or consol-
idation), and whether the effect of the plan
amendment is to reduce the number of cat-
egories of early retirement benefits.
(C)Retirement-type subsidies and ac-
tuarial factors. In the case of a plan
amendment eliminating a retirement-type
subsidy or changing the actuarial factors
used to determine optional forms of ben-
efit, relevant factors include whether the
actuarial factors used for determining op-
tional forms of benefit available under
the plan considered in the aggregate are
burdensome or complex (e.g.,thenumber
of different retirement-type subsidies and
other actuarial factors available under the
plan, whether the terms and conditions
applicable to the plan’s retirement-type
subsidies are difficult to summarize in a
manner that is concise and readily under-
standable to the average plan participant,
whether the plan is eliminating one or
more generalized optional forms, whether
the plan is replacing a complex optional
form of benefit that contains a retire-
ment-type subsidy with a simpler form,
and whether the different retirement-type
subsidies and other actuarial factors were
added to the plan as a result of a plan
merger, transfer, or consolidation), and
whether the effect of the plan amendment
is to reduce the number of categories of re-
tirement-type subsidies or other actuarial
factors.
(D)Example. The following example
illustrates the application of this paragraph
(e)(2)(i):
Example.(i)Facts. Plan A is a defined benefit
plan under which employees may select a distribution
in the form of a straight life annuity, a straight life an-
nuity with cost-of-living increases, a 50% qualified
joint and survivor annuity with a pop-up provision,
or a 10-year term certain and life annuity. On Jan-
uary 15, 2007, Plan A is amended, effective June 1,
2007, to eliminate the 50% qualified joint and sur-
vivor annuity with a pop-up provision as described
in paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(B)(1)ofthissectionandre-
place it with a 50% qualified joint and survivor annu-
ity without the pop-up provision (and using the same
actuarial factor).
(ii)Conclusion. Plan A satisfies the requirements
of paragraph (e)(2)(i)(B) of this section because,
based on the relevant facts and circumstances (e.g.,
the amendment replaces a complex optional form
of benefit with a simpler form), the amendment
eliminates section 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits
that create significant burdens and complexities.
Accordingly, the plan amendment is permitted to
eliminate the pop-up provision, provided that the
plan amendment satisfies all the other applicable
requirements in paragraph (c) or (d) of this section.
For example, the plan amendment must not eliminate
the most valuable option for a participant with a short
life expectancy (as defined in paragraph (g)(5)(iii)
of this section) and the plan amendment must not
adversely affect the rights of any participant in a
more thande minimismanner, taking into account
the actuarial factors for the joint and survivor annuity
with the pop-up provision and the joint and survivor
annuity without the pop-up provision, as described
in paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
(ii)Presumptions for certain amend-
ments—(A)Presumption for amendments
eliminating certain annuity starting dates.
If the annuity starting dates under the plan
considered in the aggregate are burden-
some or complex, then elimination of any
one of the annuity starting dates is pre-
sumed to eliminate section 411(d)(6)(B)
protected benefits that create significant
burdens or complexities for the plan and
its participants. However, if the effect of
a plan amendment with respect to a set of
optional forms of benefit is merely to sub-
stitute one set of annuity starting dates for
another set of annuity starting dates, with-
out any reduction in the number of differ-
ent annuity starting dates, then the plan
amendment does not satisfy the require-
ments of this paragraph (e)(2).
(B)Presumption for amendments
changing certain actuarial factors.If
the actuarial factors used for determin-
ing benefit distributions available under a
generalized optional form considered in
the aggregate are burdensome or complex,
then replacing some of the actuarial factors
for the generalized optional form is pre-
sumedtoeliminatesection411(d)(6)(B)
protected benefits that create significant
burdens or complexities for the plan and
its participants. However, if the effect is
merely to substitute one set of actuarial
factors for another set of actuarial factors,
without any reduction in the number of dif-
ferent actuarial factors or the complexity
of those factors, then the plan amendment
does not satisfy the requirements of this
paragraph (e)(2) unless the change of ac-
tuarial factors is merely to replace one or
more of the plan’s actuarial factors for
determining optional forms of benefit with
new actuarial factors that are more accu-
rate (e.g., reflecting more recent mortality
experience or more recent market rates of
interest).
(iii)Restrictions against creating bur-
dens or complexities. See paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii) and (b)(1)(iii) of this section
for general rules applicable to multiple
amendments. In accordance with these
rules, a plan amendment does not elim-
inate a section 411(d)(6)(B) protected
benefit that creates burdens and complex-
ities for a plan and its participants if, less
than 3 years earlier, a plan was previously
amended to add another retirement-type
subsidy in order to facilitate the elim-
ination of the original retirement-type
subsidy, even if the elimination of the
other subsidy would not adversely affect
the rights of any plan participant in a more
thande minimismanner as provided in
paragraph (e)(3) of this section.
(3)Elimination of early retirement ben-
efits or retirement-type subsidies that are
de minimis—(i)Rules for retained op-
tional forms of benefit under paragraph
(c) of this section. For purposes of para-
graph (c) of this section, the elimination
of an optional form of benefit does not ad-
versely affect the rights of any participant
inamorethande minimismanner if—
(A) The retained optional form of ben-
efit described in paragraph (c) of this
section has substantially the same annuity
2005–38 I.R.B.550September 19, 2005

commencement date as the optional form
of benefit that is being eliminated, as de-
scribed in paragraph (e)(4) of this section;
and
(B) Either the actuarial present value of
the benefit payable in the optional form
of benefit that is being eliminated does
not exceed the actuarial present value of
the benefit payable in the retained optional
form of benefit by more than ade minimis
amount, as describedin paragraph (e)(5)
of this section, or the amendment satisfies
the requirements of paragraph (e)(6) of this
section relating to a delayed effective date.
(ii)Rules for core options under para-
graph (d) of this section. For purposes of
paragraph (d) of this section, the elimina-
tion of an optional form of benefit does not
adversely affect the rights of any partici-
pant in a more thande minimismanner if,
with respect to each of the core options—
(A) The core option is available after
the amendment with substantially the same
annuity commencement date as the op-
tional form of benefit that is being elimi-
nated, as described in paragraph (e)(4) of
this section; and
(B) Either the actuarial present value of
the benefit payable in the optional form of
benefit that is being eliminated does not
exceed the actuarial present value of the
benefit payable under the core option by
more than ade minimisamount, as de-
scribed in paragraph (e)(5) of this section,
or the amendment satisfies the require-
ments of paragraph (e)(6) of this section.
(4)Definition of substantially the same
annuity starting dates. For purposes of ap-
plying paragraphs (e)(3)(i)(A) and (ii)(A)
of this section, annuity starting dates are
considered substantially the same if they
are within 6 months of each other.
(5)Definition of de minimis difference
in actuarial present value. For purposes of
applying paragraph (e)(3)(i)(B) and (ii)(B)
of this section, a difference in actuarial
present value between the optional form of
benefit being eliminated and the retained
optional form of benefit or core option is
not more than ade minimisamount if, as of
the date the amendment is adopted, the dif-
ference between the actuarial present value
of the eliminated optional form of benefit
and the actuarial present value of the re-
tained optional form of benefit or core op-
tion is not more thanthe greater of—
(i) 2% of the present value of the retire-
ment-type subsidy (if any) under the elim-
inated optional form of benefit prior to the
amendment; or
(ii) 1% of the greater of the partici-
pant’s compensation (as defined in section
415(c)(3)) for the prior plan year or the par-
ticipant’s average compensation for his or
her high 3 years (within the meaning of
section 415(b)(1)(B) and (b)(3)).
(6)Delayed effective date—(i)General
rule. For purposes of applying paragraph
(e)(3)(i)(B) and (ii)(B) of this section, an
amendment that eliminates an optional
form of benefit satisfies the requirements
of this paragraph (e)(6) if the elimination
of the optional form of benefit is not appli-
cable to any annuity commencement date
before the end of the expected transition
period for that optional form of benefit.
(ii)Determination of expected tran-
sition period—(A)General rule.The
expected transition period for a plan
amendment eliminating an optional form
of benefit is the period that begins when
the amendment is adopted and ends when
it is reasonable to expect, with respect to
a section 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit
(i.e., not taking into account benefits that
accrue in the future), that the form being
eliminated would be subsumed by another
optional form of benefit after taking into
account expected future benefit accruals.
(B)Determination of expected transi-
tion period using conservative actuarial
assumptions. The expected transition
period for a plan amendment eliminat-
ing an optional form of benefit must be
determined in accordance with actuarial
assumptions that are reasonable at the time
of the amendment and that are conserva-
tive (i.e., reasonable actuarial assumptions
that are likely to result in the longest pe-
riod of time until the eliminated optional
form of benefit would be subsumed). For
this purpose, actuarialassumptions are not
treated as conservative unless they include
assumptions that a participant’s compen-
sation will not increase and that future
benefit accruals will not exceed accruals
in recent periods.
(C)Effect of subsequent amendments
reducing future benefit accruals on the ex-
pected transition period. If, during the ex-
pected transition period for a plan amend-
ment eliminating an optional form of ben-
efit, the plan is subsequently amended to
reduce the rate of future benefit accrual (or
otherwise to lengthen the expected tran-
sition period), thus that subsequent plan
amendment must provide that the elimina-
tion of the optional form of benefit is void
or must provide for the effective date for
elimination of the optional form of ben-
efit to be further extended to a new ex-
pected transition period that satisfies this
paragraph (e)(6) taking into account the
subsequent amendment.
(iii)Applicability of the delayed effec-
tive date rule limited to employees who
continue to accrue benefits through the end
of expected transition period. An amend-
ment eliminating an optional form of bene-
fit under this paragraph (e)(6) must be lim-
ited to participants who continue to accrue
benefits under the plan through the end
of the expected transition period. Thus,
for example, the plan amendment may not
apply to any participant who has a sev-
erance from employment during the ex-
pected transition period.
(iv)Special rule for section 204(h) no-
tice. See §54.4980F–1(b), Q&A–8(c) of
this chapter for a special rule relating to
this paragraph (e)(6).
(f)Utilization test. [Reserved].
(g)Definitions and use of terms.The
definitions in this paragraph (g) apply for
purposes of this section.
(1)Actuarial present value.Theterm
actuarial present valuemeans actuarial
present value (within the meaning of
§1.401(a)(4)–12) determined using rea-
sonable actuarial assumptions.
(2)Ancillary benefit.Thetermancil-
lary benefitmeans—
(i) A social securitysupplement under a
defined benefit plan (other than a QSUPP
as defined in §1.401(a)(4)–12);
(ii) A benefit payable under a defined
benefit plan in the event of disability (to
the extent that the benefit exceeds the ben-
efit otherwise payable), but only if the to-
tal benefit payable in the event of disabil-
ity does not exceed the maximum quali-
fied disability benefit, as defined in section
411(a)(9);
(iii) A life insurance benefit;
(iv) A medical benefit described in sec-
tion 401(h);
(v) A death benefit under a defined ben-
efit plan other than a death benefit which is
a part of an optional form of benefit; or
(vi) A plant shutdown benefit or other
similar benefit in a defined benefit plan
that does not continue past retirement age
and does not affect the payment of the ac-
crued benefit, but only to the extent that
September 19, 20055512005–38 I.R.B.

such plant shutdown benefit, or other sim-
ilar benefit (if any), is permitted in a qual-
ified pension plan (see §1.401–1(b)(1)(i)).
(3)Annuity commencement date.The
termannuity commencement dategener-
ally means the annuity starting date, except
that, in the case of a retroactive annuity
starting date under section 417(a)(7),an-
nuity commencement datemeans the date
of the first payment of benefits pursuant
to a participant election of a retroac-
tive annuity starting date, as defined in
§1.417(e)–1(b)(3)(iv).
(4)Applicable amendment date.The
termapplicable amendment date,withre-
spect to a plan amendment, means the later
of the effective date of the amendment or
the date the amendment is adopted.
(5)Core options—(i)General rule.
With respect to a plan, the termcore op-
tionsmeans—
(A) A straight life annuity generalized
optional form under which the partici-
pant is entitled to a level life annuity with
no benefit payable after the participant’s
death;
(B) A 75% joint and contingent annu-
ity generalized optional form under which
the participant is entitled to a life annuity
with a survivor annuity for any individual
designated by the participant (including a
non-spousal contingent annuitant) that is
75% of the amount payable during the par-
ticipant’s life (but see paragraph (d)(2)(v)
of this section for a special rule relating to
the joint and contingent annuity core op-
tion);
(C) A 10-year term certain and life
annuity generalized optional form under
which the participant is entitled to a life
annuity with a guarantee that payments
will continue to any person designated by
theparticipantfortheremainderofafixed
period of 10 years if the participant dies
before the end of the 10-year period; and
(D) The most valuable option for a par-
ticipant with a short life expectancy (as de-
fined in paragraph (g)(5)(iii) of this sec-
tion).
(ii)Modification of core options to sat-
isfy other requirements. An annuity does
notfailtobeacoreoption(e.g., a joint and
contingent annuity described in paragraph
(g)(5)(i)(B) of this section or a 10-year
term certain and life annuity described in
paragraph (g)(5)(i)(C) of this section) as a
result of differences to comply with appli-
cable law, such as limitations on death ben-
efits to comply with the incidental benefit
requirement of §1.401–1(b)(1)(i) or on ac-
count of the spousal consent rules of sec-
tion 417.
(iii)Most valuable option for a par-
ticipant with a short life expectancy—(A)
General definition. Except as provided
in paragraph (g)(5)(iii)(B) of this section,
most valuable option for a participant with
a short life expectancymeans, for an an-
nuity starting date, the optional form of
benefit that is reasonably expected to re-
sult in payments that have the largest ac-
tuarial present value in the case of a par-
ticipant who dies shortly after the annuity
starting date, taking into account both pay-
ments due to the participant prior to the
participant’s death and any payments due
after the participant’s death. For this pur-
pose, a plan is permitted to assume that the
spouse of the participant is the same age as
the participant. In addition, a plan is per-
mitted to assume that the optional form of
benefit that is the most valuable option for
a participant with a short life expectancy
when the participant is age 70
1
/2also is the
most valuable option for a participant with
a short life expectancy at all older ages, and
that the most valuable option for a partici-
pant with a short life expectancy at age 55
is the most valuable option for a participant
with a short life expectancy at all younger
ages.
(B)Safe harbor hierarchy—(1)Aplan
is permitted to treat a single-sum distribu-
tion option with an actuarial present value
that is not less than the actuarial present
value of any optional form of benefit elim-
inated by the plan amendment as the most
valuable option for a participant with a
short life expectancy for all of a partici-
pant’s annuity starting dates if such sin-
gle-sum distribution option is available at
all such dates, without regard to whether
the option was available before the plan
amendment.
(2) If the plan before the amendment
does not offer a single-sum distribu-
tion option as described in paragraph
(g)(5)(iii)(B)(1)ofthissection,aplanis
permitted to treat a joint and contingent
annuity with a continuation percentage
that is at least 75% and that is at least as
great as the highest continuation percent-
age available before the amendment as
the most valuable option for a participant
with a short life expectancy for all of a
participant’s annuity starting dates if such
joint and contingent annuity is available at
all such dates, without regard to whether
the option was available before the plan
amendment.
(3) If the plan before the amend-
ment offers neither a single-sum distri-
bution option as described in paragraph
(g)(5)(iii)(B)(1) of this section nor a joint
and contingent annuity with a continua-
tion percentage as described in paragraph
(g)(5)(iii)(B)(2) of this section, a plan
is permitted to treat a term certain and
life annuity with a term certain period no
less than 15 years as the most valuable
option for a participant with a short life
expectancy for each annuity starting date
if such 15-year term certain and life annu-
ity is available at all annuity starting dates,
without regard to whether the option was
available before the plan amendment.
(6)Definitions of types of section
411(d)(6)(B) protected benefits—(i)Early
retirement benefit.Thetermearly retire-
ment benefitmeans the right, under the
terms of a plan, to commence distribution
of a retirement-type benefit at a particular
date after severance from employment
with the employer and before normal re-
tirement age. Different early retirement
benefits result from differences in terms
relating to timing.
(ii)Optional form of benefit—(A)In
general.Thetermoptional form of ben-
efitmeans a distribution alternative (in-
cluding the normal form of benefit) that
is available under the plan with respect
to an accrued benefit or a distribution al-
ternative with respect to a retirement-type
benefit. Different optional forms of bene-
fit exist if a distribution alternative is not
payable on substantially the same terms as
another distribution alternative. The rele-
vant terms include all terms affecting the
value of the optional form, such as the
method of benefit calculation and the actu-
arial factors or assumptions used to deter-
mine the amount distributed. Thus, for ex-
ample, different optional forms of benefit
may result from differences in terms relat-
ing to the payment schedule, timing, com-
mencement, medium of distribution (e.g.,
in cash or in kind), election rights, dif-
ferences in eligibility requirements, or the
portion of the benefit to which the distribu-
tion alternative applies. Likewise, differ-
ences in the normal retirement ages of em-
ployees or in the form in which the accrued
benefit of employees is payable at normal
2005–38 I.R.B.552September 19, 2005

retirement age under a plan are taken into
account in determining whether a distribu-
tion alternative constitutes one or more op-
tional forms of benefit.
(B)Death benefits. If a death benefit
is payable after the annuity starting date
for a specific optional form of benefit and
the same death benefit would not be pro-
vided if another optional form of bene-
fit were elected by a participant, then that
death benefit is part ofthe specific optional
form of benefit and is thus protected un-
der section 411(d)(6). A death benefit is
not treated as part ofaspecificoptional
form of benefit merely because the same
benefit is not provided to a participant who
has received his or her entire accrued ben-
efit prior to death. For example, a $5,000
death benefit that is payable to all partic-
ipants except any participant who has re-
ceived his or her accrued benefit in a sin-
gle-sum distribution is not part of a spe-
cific optional form of benefit.
(iii)Retirement-type benefit.Theterm
retirement-type benefitmeans—
(A) The payment of a distribution alter-
native with respect to an accrued benefit;
or
(B) The payment of any other bene-
fit under a defined benefit plan (including
a QSUPP as defined in §1.401(a)(4)–12)
that is permitted to be in a qualified pen-
sion plan, continues after retirement, and
is not an ancillary benefit.
(iv)Retirement-type subsidy.Theterm
retirement-type subsidymeans the excess,
if any, of the actuarial present value of a
retirement-type benefit over the actuarial
present value of theaccrued benefit com-
mencing at normal retirement age or at
actual commencement date, if later, with
both such actuarial present values deter-
mined as of the date the retirement-type
benefit commences. Examples of retire-
ment-type subsidies include a subsidized
early retirement benefit and a subsidized
qualified joint and survivor annuity.
(v)Subsidized early retirement benefit
or early retirement subsidy.Theterms
subsidized early retirement benefitorearly
retirement subsidymean the right, under
the terms of a plan, to commence distri-
bution of a retirement-type benefit at a
particular date after severance from em-
ployment with the employer and before
normal retirement age where the actuarial
present value of the optional forms of ben-
efit available to the participant under the
plan at that annuity starting date exceeds
the actuarial present value of the accrued
benefitcommencingatnormalretirement
age (with such actuarial present values de-
termined as of the annuity starting date).
Thus, an early retirement subsidy is an
early retirement benefit that provides a re-
tirement-type subsidy.
(7)Eliminate; elimination; reduce; re-
duction.Thetermseliminateorelimina-
tionwhen used in connection with a sec-
tion 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit mean
to eliminate or the elimination of an op-
tional form of benefit or an early retire-
ment benefit and to reduce or a reduction
in a retirement-type subsidy. The termsre-
duceorreductionwhen used in connection
with a retirement-type subsidy mean to re-
duce or a reduction in the amount of the
subsidy. For purposes of this section, an
eliminationincludes areductionand are-
ductionincludes anelimination.
(8)Generalized optional form.The
termgeneralized optional formmeans a
group of optional forms of benefit that are
identical except for differences due to the
actuarial factors that are used to determine
the amount of the distributions under those
optional forms of benefit and the annuity
starting dates.
(9)Maximum QJSA explanation pe-
riod.Thetermmaximum QJSA explana-
tion periodmeans the maximum number
of days before an annuity starting date for
a qualified joint and survivor annuity for
which a written explanation relating to the
qualified joint and survivor annuity would
satisfy the timing requirements of section
417(a)(3) and §1.417(e)–1(b)(3)(ii).
(10)Other right and feature.Theterm
other right or featurehas the meaning set
forth at §1.401(a)(4)–4(e)(3)(ii).
(11)Refund of employee contributions
feature.Thetermrefund of employee con-
tributions featuresmeans a feature with re-
spect to an optional form of benefit that
provides for employee contributions and
interest thereon to be paid in a single sum
at the annuity starting date with the re-
mainder to be paid in another form begin-
ning on that date.
(12)Retirement; retirement age.For
purposes of this section, the date ofre-
tirementmeans the annuity starting date.
Thus,retirement agemeans a participant’s
age at the annuity starting date.
(13)Retroactive annuity starting date
feature.Thetermretroactive annuity
starting date featuremeans a feature with
respect to an optional form of benefit un-
der which the annuity starting date for the
distribution occurs on or before the date
the written explanationrequiredbysection
417(a)(3) is provided to the participant.
(14)Section 411(d)(6) protected bene-
fit.Thetermsection 411(d)(6) protected
benefitmeans the accrued benefit of a par-
ticipant as of the applicable amendment
date described in section 411(d)(6)(A) and
any section 411(d)(6)(B) protected benefit.
(15)Section 411(d)(6)(B) protected
benefit.Thetermsection 411(d)(6)(B)
protected benefitmeans the portion of an
early retirement benefit, a retirement-type
subsidy, or an optional form of benefit
attributable to benefits accrued before the
applicable amendment date.
(16)Social security leveling feature.
The termsocial security leveling feature
means a feature with respect to an optional
form of benefit commencing prior to a
participant’s expected commencement of
social security benefits that provides for
a temporary period of higher payments
whichisdesignedtoresultinanapproxi-
mately level amount of income when the
participant’s estimated old age benefits
from Social Security are taken into ac-
count.
(h)Examples. The following examples
illustrate the application of paragraphs (c)
through(g)ofthissection:
Example 1.(i)Facts involving elimination of op-
tional forms of benefit as redundant. Plan C is a de-
fined benefit plan under which employees may elect
to commence distributions at any time after the later
of termination of employment or attainment of age
55. At each potential annuity commencement date,
Plan C permits employees to select, with spousal con-
sent where required, a straight life annuity or any of a
number of actuarially equivalent alternative forms of
payment, including a straight life annuity with cost-
of-living increases and a joint and contingent annu-
ity with the participant having the right to select any
beneficiary and any continuation percentage from 1%
to 100%, subject to modification to the extent neces-
sary to satisfy the requirements of the incidental ben-
efit requirement of §1.401–1(b)(1)(i). The amount of
any alternative payment is determined as the actuarial
equivalent of the straight life annuity payable at the
same age using reasonable actuarial assumptions. On
June 2, 2006, Plan C is amended to delete all con-
tinuation percentages for joint and contingent options
other than 25%, 50%, 75%, or 100%, effective with
respect to annuity commencement dates that are on or
after January 1, 2007.
(ii)Conclusion—(A)Categorization of family
members under the redundancy rule. The optional
forms of benefit described in paragraph (i) of this
Example 1are members of 4 families: a straight life
annuity; a straight life annuity with cost-of-living
September 19, 20055532005–38 I.R.B.

increases; joint and contingent options with contin-
uation percentages of less than 50%; and joint and
contingent options with continuation percentages of
50% or more. The amendment does not affect either
of the first two families, but affects the two families
relating to joint and contingent options.
(B)Conclusion for elimination of optional forms
of benefit as redundant. The amendment satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (c) of this section. First,
the eliminated optional forms of benefit are redundant
with respect to the retained optional forms of benefit
because each eliminated joint and contingent annu-
ity option with a continuation percentage of less than
50% is redundant with respect to the 25% continua-
tion option and each eliminated joint and contingent
annuity option with a continuation percentage of 50%
or higher is redundant with respect to any one of the
retained 50%, 75%, or 100% continuation options. In
addition, to the extent that the optional form of benefit
that is being eliminated does not include a social se-
curity leveling feature, return of employee contribu-
tion feature, or retroactive annuity starting date fea-
ture, the retained optional form of benefit does not in-
clude that feature. Second, the amendment is not ef-
fective with respect to annuity commencement dates
before September 1, 2006, as required under para-
graph (c)(1)(ii) of this section. Third, the plan amend-
ment does not eliminate any available core option,
including the most valuable option for a participant
with a short life expectancy, treating a joint and con-
tingent annuity with a 100% continuation percentage
as this optional form of benefit pursuant to paragraph
(g)(5)(iii)(B)(2) of this section. Finally, the amend-
ment need not satisfy the requirements of paragraph
(e) of this section because the retained optional forms
of benefit are available on the same annuity com-
mencement dates and have the same actuarial present
value as the optional formsof benefit that are being
eliminated.
Example 2.(i)Facts involving elimination of op-
tional forms of benefit as redundant if additional re-
strictions are imposed.ThefactsarethesameasEx-
ample 1, except that the plan amendment also restricts
the class of beneficiaries that may be elected under
the 4 retained joint and contingent annuities to the
employee’s spouse.
(ii)Conclusion. The amendment fails to satisfy
the requirements of paragraph (c)(2)(i)(B) of this sec-
tion because the retained joint and contingent annu-
ities have materially greater restrictions on the bene-
ficiary designation than did the eliminated joint and
contingent annuities. Thus, the joint and contingent
annuities being eliminated are not redundant with re-
spect to the retained joint and contingent annuities. In
addition, the amendment fails to satisfy the require-
ments of the core option rules in paragraph (d) of
this section because the amendment fails to be lim-
ited to annuity commencement dates that are at least
4 years after the date the amendment is adopted, the
amendment fails to include the core option in para-
graph (g)(5)(i)(B) of this section because the partic-
ipant does not have the right to designate any ben-
eficiary, and the amendment fails to include the core
option described in paragraph (g)(5)(i)(C) of this sec-
tion because the plan does not provide a 10-year term
certain and life annuity.
Example 3.(i)Facts involving elimination of a
social security leveling feature and a period certain
annuity as redundant. Plan D is a defined benefit
plan under which participants may elect to commence
distributions in the following actuarially equivalent
forms, with spousal consent if applicable: a straight
life annuity; a 50%, 75%, or 100% joint and contin-
gent annuity; a 5-year, 10-year, or a 15-year term cer-
tain and life annuity; and an installment refund annu-
ity (i.e., an optional form of benefit that provides a pe-
riod certain, the duration of which is based on the par-
ticipant’s age), with the participant having the right to
select any beneficiary. In addition, each annuity of-
fered under the plan, if payable to a participant who
is less than age 65, is available both with and without
a social security leveling feature. The social security
leveling feature provides for an assumed commence-
ment of social security benefits at any age selected
by the participant between age 62 and 65. Plan D is
amended on June 2, 2006, effective as of January 1,
2007, to eliminate the installment refund form of ben-
efit and to restrict the social security leveling feature
to an assumed social security commencement age of
65.
(ii)Conclusion. The amendment satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (c) of this section. First,
the installment refund annuity option is redundant
with respect to the 15-year certain and life annuity
(except for advanced ageswhere, because of shorter
life expectancies, the installment refund annuity
option is redundant with respect to the 5-year certain
and life annuity and also redundant with respect to
the 10-year certain and life annuity). Second, with
respect to restricting the social security leveling
feature to an assumed social security commence-
ment age of 65, under paragraph (c)(3)(ii)(C) of this
section, straight life annuities with social security
leveling features that havedifferent social security
commencement ages are treated as members of the
same family as straight life annuities without social
security leveling features. To the extent an optional
form of benefit that is being eliminated includes a
social security leveling feature, the retained optional
form of benefit must also include that feature, but it
is permitted to have a different assumed age for com-
mencement of social security benefits. Third, to the
extent that the optional form of benefit that is being
eliminated does not include a social security leveling
feature, a return of employee contribution feature, or
retroactive annuity starting date feature, the retained
optional form of benefit must not include that feature.
Fourth, the plan amendment does not eliminate any
available core option, including the most valuable
option for a participant with a short life expectancy,
treating a joint and contingent annuity with a 100%
continuation percentage as this optional form of
benefit pursuant to paragraph (g)(5)(iii)(B)(2)of
this section. Fifth, the amendment is not effective
with respect to annuity commencement dates before
September 1, 2006, as required under paragraph
(c)(1)(ii) of this section. The amendment need not
satisfy the requirements of paragraph (e) of this sec-
tion because the retained optional forms of benefit
are available on the same annuity commencement
dates and have the same actuarial present value as the
optional forms of benefit that are being eliminated.
Example 4.(i)Facts involving elimination of non-
core options. Employer N sponsors Plan E, a de-
fined benefit plan that permits every participant to
elect payment in the following actuarially equivalent
optional forms of benefit (Plan E’s uniformly avail-
able options), with spousal consent if applicable: a
straight life annuity; a 50%, 75%, or 100% joint and
contingent annuity with no restrictions on designation
of beneficiaries; and a 5-, 10-, or 15-year term cer-
tain and life annuity. In addition, each can be elected
in conjunction with a social security leveling feature,
with the participant permitted to select a social se-
curity commencement age from age 62 to age 67.
None of Plan E’s uniformly available options include
a single-sum distribution. The plan has been in exis-
tence for over 30 years, during which time Employer
N has acquired a large number of other businesses,
including merging over 20 defined benefit plans of
acquired entities into Plan E. Many of the merged
plans offered optional forms of benefit that were not
among Plan E’s uniformly available options, includ-
ing some plans funded through insurance products,
often offering all of the insurance annuities that the
insurance carrier offers, and with some of the merged
plans offering single-sum distributions. In particu-
lar, under the XYZ acquisition that occurred in 1990,
the XYZ acquired plan offered a single-sum distribu-
tion option that was frozen at the time of the acquisi-
tion. On April 1, 2006, each single-sum distribution
option applies to less than 25% of the XYZ partici-
pants’ accrued benefits. Employer N has generally,
but not uniformly, followed the practice of limiting
the optional forms of benefit for an acquired unit to
an employee’s service before the date of the merger,
and has uniformly followed this practice with respect
to each of the early retirement subsidies in the ac-
quired unit’s plan. As a result, as of April 1, 2007,
Plan E includes a large number of generalized op-
tional forms which are not members of families of op-
tional forms of benefit identified in paragraph (c)(4)
of this section, but there are no participants who are
entitled to any early retirement subsidies because any
subsidies have been subsumed by the actuarially re-
duced accrued benefit. Plan E is amended in April of
2007 to eliminate all of the optional forms of bene-
fit that Plan E offers other than Plan E’s uniformly
available options, except that the amendment does
not eliminate any single-sum distribution option ex-
cept with respect to XYZ participants and permits any
commencement date that was permitted under Plan
E before the amendment. Plan E also eliminates the
single-sum distribution option for XYZ participants.
Further, each of Plan E’s uniformly available options
has an actuarial present value that is not less than the
actuarial present value of any optional form of benefit
offered before the amendment. The amendment is ef-
fective with respect to annuity commencement dates
that are on or after May 1, 2011.
(ii)Conclusion. The amendment satisfies the
requirements of paragraph (d) of this section. First,
Plan E, as amended, does not eliminate any sin-
gle-sum distribution option as provided in paragraph
(d)(2)(iii) of this section except for single-sum distri-
bution options that apply to less than 25% of a plan
participant’s accrued benefit as of the date the op-
tion is eliminated (May 1, 2011). Second, Plan E, as
amended, includes each of the core options as defined
in paragraph (g)(5) of this section, including offering
the most valuable option for a participant with a
short life expectancy (treating the 100% joint and
contingent annuity as this benefit, under paragraph
(g)(5)(iii)(B)(2) of this section). The 100% joint and
contingent annuity option (and not the grandfathered
single-sum distribution option) is the most valuable
option for a participant with a short life expectancy
2005–38 I.R.B.554September 19, 2005

because the grandfathered single-sum distribution
option is not available with respect to a participant’s
entire accrued benefit. In addition, as required under
paragraph (d)(2) of this section, to the extent an
optional form of benefit that is being eliminated
includes either a social security leveling feature or
a refund of employee contributions feature, at least
one of the core options is available with that feature
and, to the extent that the optional form of benefit
that is being eliminated does not include a social
security leveling feature or a refund of employee
contributions feature, each of the core options is
available without that feature. Third, the amendment
is not effective with respect to annuity commence-
ment dates that are less than 4 years after the date the
amendment is adopted. Finally, the amendment need
not satisfy the requirements of paragraph (e) of this
section because the retained optional forms of benefit
are available on the same annuity commencement
date and have the same actuarial present value as the
optional forms of benefit that are being eliminated.
The conclusion that the amendment satisfies the re-
quirements of paragraph (d) of this section assumes
that no amendments are made to change the core
options before May 1, 2014.
Example 5.(i)Facts involving reductions in ac-
tuarial present value. (A) Plan F is a defined benefit
plan providing an accrued benefit of 1% of the aver-
age of a participant’s highest 3 consecutive years’ pay
times years of service, payable as a straight life annu-
ity beginning at the normal retirement age at age 65.
Plan F permits employees to elect to commence actu-
arially reduced distributions at any time after the later
of termination of employment or attainment of age
55. At each potential annuity commencement date,
Plan F permits employees to select, with spousal con-
sent, either a straight life annuity, a joint and contin-
gent annuity with the participant having the right to
select any beneficiary and acontinuation percentage
of 50%, 66 2/3%, 75%, or 100%, or a 10-year certain
and life annuity with the participant having the right
to select any beneficiary, subject to modification to
the extent necessary to satisfy the requirements of the
incidental benefit requirement of §1.401–1(b)(1)(i).
The amount of any joint and contingent annuity and
the 10-year certain and life annuity is determined as
the actuarial equivalent of the straight life annuity
payable at the same age using reasonable actuarial
assumptions. The plan covers employees at 4 divi-
sions, one of which, Division X, was acquired on Jan-
uary 1, 1999. The plan provides for distributions be-
fore normal retirement age to be actuarially reduced,
but, if a participant retires after attainment of age 55
and completion of 10 years of service, the applicable
early retirement reduction factor is 3% per year for
the years between age 65 and 62 and 6% per year for
the ages from 62 to 55 for all employees at any divi-
sion, except for employees who were in Division X
on January 1, 1999, for whom the early retirement
reduction factor for retirement after age 55 and 10
years of service is 5% for each year before age 65.
On June 2, 2006, effective January 1, 2007, Plan F is
amended to change the early retirement reduction fac-
tors for all employees of Division X to be the same as
for other employees, effective with respect to annu-
ity commencement dates that are on or after January
1, 2008, but only with respect to participants who are
employees on or after January 1, 2008, and only if
Plan F continues accruals at the current rate through
January 1, 2008 (or the effective date of the change
in reduction factors is delayed to reflect the change
in the accrual rate). For purposes of thisExample 5,
it is assumed that an actuarially equivalent early re-
tirement factor would have a reduction shown in col-
umn 4 of the following table, which compares the re-
duction factors for Division X before and after the
amendment:
1234 5
Age
Old Division X Factor
(as a %)
New Factor
(as a %)
Actuarially Equivalent
Factor
(as a %)
Column 3 minus
Column 2
65
NANANANA
64
95
9791.1+2
63909483.2+4
62
85
9176.1
+5
6180
85
69.8
+5
60
75
7964.1+4
59
7073
59.0
+3
5865
67
54.3
+2
57
6061
50.1
+1
565555
46.30
5550
4942.8-1
(B) On January 1, 2007, the employee with the
l
argest number of years of service is Employee E,
who is age 54 and has 20 years of service. For 2006,
Employee E’s compensation is $80,000 and E’s high-
est 3 consecutive years of pay on January 1, 2007 is
$75,000. Employee E’s accrued benefit as of the Jan-
uary 1, 2007 effective date of the amendment is a life
annuity of $15,000 per year at normal retirement age
(1% times $75,000 times 20 years of service) and E’s
early retirement benefit commencing at age 55 has a
present value of $91,397 as of January 1, 2007. It is
assumed for purposes of this example that the longest
expected transition period for any active employee
does not exceed 5 months (20 years and 5 months,
times 1% times 49% exceeds 20 years times 1% times
50%). Finally, it is assumed for purposes of this ex-
ample that the amendment reduces optional forms of
benefit which are burdensome or complex.
(ii)Conclusion concerning application of section
4
11(d)(6)(B). The amendment reducing the early re-
tirement factors has the effect of eliminating the ex-
isting optional forms of benefit (where the amount
of the benefit is based on preamendment early retire-
ment factors in any case where the new factors re-
sult in a smaller amount payable) and adding new op-
tional forms of benefit (where the amount of bene-
fit is based on the different early retirement factors).
Accordingly, the elimination must satisfy the require-
mentsofparagraph(c)or(d)ofthissectionifthe
amount payable at any date is less than would have
been payable under the plan before the amendment.
(iii)Conclusion concerning application of redun-
dancy rules. The amendment satisfies the require-
ments of paragraph (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section
(see paragraphs (iv) through (vi) of thisExample 5
below for the requirements of paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of
this section). First, with respect to each eliminated
o
ptional form of benefit (i.e., with respect to each op-
tional form of benefit with the Old Division X Fac-
tor), after the amendment there is a retained optional
form of benefit that is in the same family of optional
forms of benefit (i.e., the optional form of benefit with
the New Factor). Second, the amendment is not effec-
tive with respect to annuity commencement dates that
are less than the time period required under paragraph
(c)(1)(ii) of this section. Third, to the extent that the
plan amendment eliminatesthe most valuable option
for a participant with a short life expectancy, the re-
tained optional form of benefit is identical except for
differences in actuarial factors.
(iv)Conclusion concerning application of the
requirements under paragraph (e) of this section.
The plan amendment must satisfy the requirements
of paragraph (e) of this section because, as of the
September 19, 20055552005–38 I.R.B.

December 2, 2006 adoption date, the actuarial present
value of the early retirement subsidy is less than the
actuarial present value of the early retirement subsidy
being eliminated. The plan amendment satisfies the
requirements under paragraph (e)(1)(i) and (2) of this
section because the amendment eliminates optional
forms of benefit that create significant burdens or
complexities for the plan and its participants. See be-
low for thede minimisrequirement under paragraph
(e)(1)(ii) and (3) of this section.
(v)Conclusion concerning application of de
minimis rules under paragraph (e)(5) of this section.
In order to satisfy the requirements under paragraph
(e)(1)(ii) and (3) of this section, the amendment must
satisfy the requirements of either paragraph (e)(5)
or paragraph (e)(6) of this section. The amendment
does not satisfy the requirements of paragraph (e)(5)
of this section because the reduction in the actuarial
present value is more than ade minimisamount
under paragraph (e)(5) of this section. For example,
for Employee E, the amount of the joint and con-
tingent annuity payable at age 55 is reduced from
$7,500 (50% of $15,000) to $7,350 (49% of $15,000)
and the reduction in present value as a result of the
amendment is $1,828 ($91,397 - $89,569). In this
case, the retirement-type subsidy at age 55 is the
excess of the present value of the 50% early retire-
ment benefit over the present value of the deferred
payment of the accrued benefit, or $13,921 ($97,269
- $83,348) and the present value at age 54 of the
retirement-type subsidy is $13,081. The reduction in
present value is more than the greater of 2% of the
present value of the retirement-type subsidy and 1%
of E’s compensation because the reduction in present
value exceeds $800 (the greater of $262, which is 2%
of the present value of the retirement-type subsidy
for the benefit being eliminated, and $800, which is
1% of E’s compensation of $80,000).
(vi)Conclusion involving application of de min-
imis rules under paragraph (e)(6) of this section re-
lating to expected transition period. The amendment
satisfies the requirements of paragraph (e)(6) of this
section and, thus, satisfies the requirements of para-
graph (c) of this section, including the requirement
in paragraph (c)(1)(iii) of this section that paragraph
(e) of this section be satisfied. First, as assumed
under the facts above, the amendment reduces op-
tional forms of benefit that are burdensome or com-
plex. Second, the plan amendment is not effective
for annuity commencement dates before January 1,
2008, and that date is not earlier than the longest ex-
pected transition period for any participant in Plan F
on the date of the amendment. Third, the amendment
does not apply to any participant who has a sever-
ance from employment during the transition period.
If, however, a later plan amendment reduces accru-
als under Plan F, the initial plan amendment will no
longer satisfy the requirements of paragraph (e)(6) of
this section (and must be voided) unless, as part of
the later amendment, the expected transition period
is extended to reflect the reduction in accruals under
Plan F.
(i) [RESERVED].
(j)Effective dates—(1)General effec-
tive date. Except as otherwise provided in
this paragraph (j), the rules of this section
applytoamendmentsadoptedonorafter
August 12, 2005.
(2)Effective date for rules relating
to contingent event benefits. Paragraph
(b)(1)(ii) of this section applies to amend-
ments adopted after December 31, 2005.
§1.411(a)–4 [
Amended]
Par. 3. Section 1.411(a)–4 is amended
by removing paragraph (b)(4)(ii) and re-
designating paragraph (b)(4)(iii) as para-
graph (b)(4)(ii).
Par. 4. Section 1.411(d)–4 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (a)(2) of
Q&A–1.
2. Revising paragraph (b)(1) of
Q&A–1.
3. Amending paragraph (b)(2) of
Q&A–1 to removeExample 2and redes-
ignateExample 3through11asExample
2through10.
4. Revising the first sentence of para-
graph (a)(1) of Q&A–2.
5. Revising paragraph (c) of Q&A–2.
The revisions read as follows:
§1.411(d)–4 Section 411(d)(6) protected
benefits.
*****
A–1. (a) * * *
(2) Early retirement benefits (as de-
fined in §1.411(d)–3(g)(6)(i)) and re-
tirement-type subsidies (as defined in
§1.411(d)–3(g)(6)(iv)), and
***
(b)Optional forms of benefit—(1)
In general.Thetermoptional form
of benefithas the same meaning as in
§1.411(d)–3(g)(6)(ii). Under this defini-
tion, different optional forms of benefit
exist if a distribution alternative is not
payable on substantially the same terms as
another distribution alternative. Thus, for
example, different optional forms of ben-
efit may result from differences in terms
relating to the payment schedule, timing,
commencement, medium of distribution
(e.g.,incashorinkind),electionrights,
differences in eligibility requirements, or
the portion of the benefit to which the
distribution alternative applies.
*****
A–2***
(a)Reduction or elimination of section
411(d)(6) protected benefits—(1)In gen-
eral. A plan is not permitted to be amended
to eliminate or reduce a section 411(d)(6)
protected benefit that has already accrued,
except as provided in §1.411(d)–3 or this
section. * * *
*****
(c)Multiple amendments—(1)General
rule. A plan amendment violates the re-
quirements of section 411(d)(6) if it is one
of a series of plan amendments that, when
taken together, have the effect of reduc-
ing or eliminating a section 411(d)(6) pro-
tected benefit in a manner that would be
prohibited by section 411(d)(6) if accom-
plished through a single amendment.
(2)Determination of time period for
combining plan amendments.Forpur-
poses of paragraph (c)(1) of this Q&A–2,
generally only plan amendments adopted
within a 3-year period are taken into
account. But see Q&A–1(c)(1) of this
section for rules relating to repeated plan
amendments.
*****
PART 54—
PENSION EXCISE TAXES
Par. 5. The authority citation for part
54 continues to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 6. Section 54.4980F–1 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (b) of Q&A–7.
2. Revising paragraph (c) of Q&A–8.
3. Revising paragraph (d) of Q&A–8.
The revisions read as follows:
§54.4980F–1 Notice requirements
for certain pension plan amendments
significantly reducing the rate of future
benefit accrual.
*****
A–7. ***
(b)Plan provisions not taken into ac-
count. Plan provisions that do not affect
the rate of future benefit accrual of par-
ticipants or alternate payees are not taken
into account in determining whether there
has been a reduction in the rate of future
benefit accrual. Further, any benefit that
is not a section 411(d)(6) protected bene-
fit as described in §§1.411(d)–3(g)(14) and
1.411(d)–4, Q&A–1(d) of this chapter, or
that is a section 411(d)(6) protected benefit
that may be eliminated or reduced as per-
mitted under §1.411(d)–3 or §1.411(d)–4,
Q&A–2(a), or (b) of this chapter, is not
taken into account in determining whether
2005–38 I.R.B.556September 19, 2005

an amendment is a section 204(h) amend-
ment. Thus, for example, provisions relat-
ing to the right to make after-tax deferrals
are not taken into account.
*****
A–8. * * *
(c)Application to certain amendments
reducing early retirement benefits or re-
tirement-type subsidies. Section 204(h)
notice is not required for an amendment
that reduces an early retirement benefit or
retirement-type subsidy if the amendment
is permitted under the third sentence of
section 411(d)(6)(B) of the Internal Rev-
enue Code and paragraphs (c), (d), and (f)
of §1.411(d)–3 of this chapter (relating to
the elimination or reduction of benefits or
subsidies which create significant burdens
or complexities for the plan and plan par-
ticipants unless the amendment adversely
affects the rights of any participant in a
more thande minimismanner). However,
in determining whether an amendment re-
ducing a retirement-type subsidy consti-
tutes a significant reduction because it re-
duces a retirement-type subsidy as permit-
ted under §1.411(d)–3(e)(6) of this chap-
ter, the amendment is treated in the same
manner as an amendment that limits the re-
tirement-type subsidy to benefits that ac-
crue before the applicable amendment date
(as defined at §1.411(d)–3(g)(4) of this
chapter) with respect to each participant or
alternate payee to whom the reduction is
reasonably expected to apply.
(d)Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules in this Q&A–8:
Example 1.(i)Facts. Pension Plan A is a defined
benefit plan that provides a rate of benefit accrual of
1% of highest–5 years pay multiplied by years of ser-
vice, payable annually for life commencing at normal
retirement age (or at actual retirement age, if later).
An amendment to Plan A is adopted on August 1,
2009, effective January 1, 2010, to provide that any
participant who separates from service after Decem-
ber 31, 2009, and before January 1, 2015, will have
the same number of years of service he or she would
have had if his or her service continued to December
31, 2014.
(ii)Conclusion. In this example, the effective
date of the plan amendment is January 1, 2010. While
the amendment will result in a reduction in the annual
rate of future benefit accrual from 2011 through 2014
(because, under the amendment, benefits based upon
an additional 5 years of service accrue on January 1,
2010, and no additional service is credited after Jan-
uary 1, 2010 until January 1, 2015), the amendment
does not result in a reduction that is significant be-
cause the amount of the annual benefit commencing
at normal retirement age (or at actual retirement age,
if later) under the terms of the plan as amended is not
under any conditions less than the amount of the an-
nual benefit commencing at normal retirement age (or
at actual retirement age, if later) to which any partic-
ipant would have been entitled under the terms of the
plan had the amendment not been made.
Example 2.(i)Facts.Thefactsarethesameas
inExample 1, except that the 2009 amendment does
not alter the plan provisions relating to a participant’s
number of years of service, but instead amends the
plan’s provisions relating to early retirement benefits.
Before the amendment, the plan provides for distribu-
tions before normal retirement age to be actuarially
reduced, but, if a participant retires after attainment
of age 55 and completion of 10 years of service, the
applicable early retirement reduction factor is 3% per
year for the years between the ages 65 and 62 and
6% per year for the ages from 62 to 55. The amend-
ment changes these provisions so that an actuarial re-
duction applies in all cases, but, in accordance with
section 411(d)(6)(B), provides that no participant’s
early retirement benefit will be less than the amount
provided under the plan as in effect on December 31,
2009 with respect to service before January 1, 2010.
For participant X, the reduction is significant.
(ii)Conclusion. The amendment will result in a
reduction in a retirement-type subsidy provided un-
der Plan A (i.e., Plan A’s early retirement subsidy).
Section 204(h) notice must be provided to participant
X and any other participant for whom the reduction
is significant and the notice must be provided at least
45 days before January 1, 2010 (or by such other date
as may apply under Q&A–9 of this section).
Example 3.(i)Facts. The facts are the same as in
Example 2, except that, for participant X, the change
does not go into effect for any annuity commence-
ment date before January 1, 2011. Participant X con-
tinues employment through January 1, 2011.
(ii)Conclusion. The conclusion is the same as in
Example 2. Taking into account the rule in the second
sentence of Q&A–8(c) of this section, the reduction
that occurs for participant X on January 1, 2011, is
treated as the same reduction that occurs underEx-
ample 2. Accordingly, assuming that the reduction
is significant, section 204(h) notice must be provided
to participant X at least 45 days before the January
1, 2010 effective date of the amendment (or by such
other date as may apply under Q&A–9 of this sec-
tion).
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
Approved August 1, 2005.
Eric Solomon,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 11,
2005, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 12, 2005, 70 F.R. 47109)
Section 6621.—Determina-
tion of Rate of Interest
26 CFR 301.6621–1: Interest rate.
Interest rates; underpayments and
overpayments.The rate of interest deter-
mined under section 6621 of the Code for
the calendar quarter beginning October 1,
2005, will be 7 percent for overpayments
(6 percent in the case of a corporation), 7
percent for underpayments, and 9 percent
for large corporate underpayments. The
rate of interest paid on the portion of a
corporate overpayment exceeding $10,000
will be 4.5 percent.
Rev. Rul. 2005–62
Section 6621 of the Internal Revenue
Code establishes the rates for interest
on tax overpayments and tax underpay-
ments. Under section 6621(a)(1), the
overpayment rate is the sum of the federal
short-term rate plus 3 percentage points (2
percentage points in the case of a corpo-
ration), except the rate for the portion of
a corporate overpayment of tax exceeding
$10,000 for a taxable period is the sum of
the federal short-term rate plus 0.5 of a
percentage point for interest computations
made after December 31, 1994. Under
section 6621(a)(2), the underpayment rate
is the sum of the federal short-term rate
plus 3 percentage points.
Section 6621(c) provides that for pur-
poses of interest payable under section
6601 on any large corporate underpay-
ment, the underpayment rate under section
6621(a)(2) is determined by substituting
“5 percentage points” for “3 percentage
points.” See section 6621(c) and section
301.6621–3 of the Regulations on Proce-
dure and Administration for the definition
of a large corporate underpayment and
for the rules for determining the appli-
cable date. Section 6621(c) and section
301.6621–3 are generally effective for
periods after December 31, 1990.
Section 6621(b)(1) provides that the
Secretary will determine the federal
short-term rate for the first month in each
calendar quarter.
Section 6621(b)(2)(A) provides that the
federal short-term rate determined under
section 6621(b)(1) for any month applies
during the first calendar quarter beginning
after such month.
September 19, 20055572005–38 I.R.B.

Section 6621(b)(3) provides that the
federal short-term rate for any month is
the federal short-term rate determined
during such month by the Secretary in
accordance with § 1274(d), rounded to the
nearest full percent (or, if a multiple of
1
/2
of 1 percent, the rate is increased to the
next highest full percent).
Notice 88–59, 1988–1 C.B. 546, an-
nounced that, in determining the quarterly
interest rates to be used for overpayments
and underpayments of tax under section
6621, the Internal Revenue Service will
use the federal short-term rate based on
daily compounding because that rate is
most consistent with section 6621 which,
pursuant to section 6622, is subject to daily
compounding.
Rounded to the nearest full percent, the
federal short-term rate based on daily com-
pounding determined during the month of
July 2005 is 4 percent. Accordingly, an
overpayment rate of 7 percent (6 percent
in the case of a corporation) and an under-
payment rate of 7 percent are established
for the calendar quarter beginning October
1, 2005. The overpayment rate for the por-
tion of a corporate overpayment exceeding
$10,000 for the calendar quarter beginning
October 1, 2005, is 4.5 percent. The un-
derpayment rate for large corporate under-
payments for the calendar quarter begin-
ning October 1, 2005, is 9 percent. These
rates apply to amounts bearing interest dur-
ing that calendar quarter.
Interest factors for daily compound in-
terest for annual rates of 4.5 percent, 6 per-
cent, 7 percent, and 9 percent are published
in Tables 14, 17, 19, and 23 of Rev. Proc.
95–17, 1995–1 C.B. 556, 568, 571, 573,
and 577.
Annual interest rates to be compounded
daily pursuant to section 6622 that apply
for prior periods are set forth in the tables
accompanying this revenue ruling.
DRAFTING INFORMATION
The principal author of this revenue rul-
ing is Crystal Foster of the Office of Asso-
ciate Chief Counsel (Procedure & Admin-
istration). For further information regard-
ing this revenue ruling, contact Ms. Foster
at (202) 622–7198 (not a toll-free call).
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES
PERIODS BEFORE JUL. 1, 1975 — PERIODS ENDING DEC. 31, 1986
OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
PERIODRATE
In 1995–1 C.B.
DAILY RATE TABLE
Before Jul. 1, 19756%Table 2, pg. 557
Jul. 1, 1975—Jan. 31, 19769%Table 4, pg. 559
Feb. 1, 1976—Jan. 31, 19787%Table 3, pg. 558
Feb. 1, 1978—Jan. 31, 19806%Table 2, pg. 557
Feb. 1, 1980—Jan. 31, 198212%Table 5, pg. 560
Feb. 1, 1982—Dec. 31, 198220%Table 6, pg. 560
Jan. 1, 1983—Jun. 30, 198316%Table 37, pg. 591
Jul. 1, 1983—Dec. 31, 198311%Table 27, pg. 581
Jan. 1, 1984—Jun. 30, 198411%Table 75, pg. 629
Jul. 1, 1984—Dec. 31, 198411%Table 75, pg. 629
Jan. 1, 1985—Jun. 30, 198513%Table 31, pg. 585
Jul. 1, 1985—Dec. 31, 198511%Table 27, pg. 581
Jan. 1, 1986—Jun. 30, 198610%Table 25, pg. 579
Jul. 1, 1986—Dec. 31, 19869%Table 23, pg. 577
2005–38 I.R.B.558September 19, 2005

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES
FROM JAN. 1, 1987 — Dec. 31, 1998
OVERPAYMENTSUNDERPAYMENTS
1995–1 C.B.1995–1 C.B.
RATE TABLEPGRATE TABLEPG
Jan. 1, 1987—
Mar. 31, 1987
8%215759%23577
Apr. 1, 1987—Jun. 30, 19878%215759%23577
Jul. 1, 1987—Sep. 30, 19878%215759%23577
Oct. 1, 1987
—Dec. 31, 1987
9%2357710%25579
Jan. 1, 1988—Mar. 31, 198810%7362711%75629
Apr. 1, 1988—Jun. 30, 19889%7162510%73627
Jul. 1, 198
8—Sep. 30, 1988
9%7162510%73627
Oct. 1, 1988—Dec. 31, 198810%7362711%75629
Jan. 1, 1989—Mar. 31, 198910%2557911%27581
Apr. 1, 19
89—Jun. 30, 1989
11%2758112%29583
Jul. 1, 1989—Sep. 30, 198911%2758112%29583
Oct. 1, 1989—Dec. 31, 198910%2557911%27581
Jan. 1, 19
90—Mar. 31, 1990
10%2557911%27581
Apr. 1, 1990—Jun. 30, 199010%2557911%27581
Jul. 1, 1990—Sep. 30, 199010%2557911%27581
Oct. 1, 1
990—Dec. 31, 1990
10%2557911%27581
Jan. 1, 1991—Mar. 31, 199110%2557911%27581
Apr. 1, 1991—Jun. 30, 19919%2357710%25579
Jul. 1,
1991—Sep. 30, 1991
9%2357710%25579
Oct. 1, 1991—Dec. 31, 19919%2357710%25579
Jan. 1, 1992—Mar. 31, 19928%696239%71625
Apr. 1
, 1992—Jun. 30, 1992
7%676218%69623
Jul. 1, 1992—Sep. 30, 19927%676218%69623
Oct. 1, 1992—Dec. 31, 19926%656197%67621
Jan.
1, 1993—Mar. 31, 1993
6%175717%19573
Apr. 1, 1993—Jun. 30, 19936%175717%19573
Jul. 1, 1993—Sep. 30, 19936%175717%19573
Oct
. 1, 1993—Dec. 31, 1993
6%175717%19573
Jan. 1, 1994—Mar. 31, 19946%175717%19573
Apr. 1, 1994—Jun. 30, 19946%175717%19573
Ju
l. 1, 1994—Sep. 30, 1994
7%1957
3
8%2157
5
Oct. 1, 1994—Dec. 31, 19948%215759%23577
Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 19958%215759%23577
Ap
r. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 1995
9%2357
7
10%2557
9
Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 19958%215759%23577
Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 19958%215759%23577
J
an. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 1996
8
%
6
9
6
23
9
%
7
1
6
25
Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 19967%676218%69623
Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 19968%696239%71625
Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 19968%696239%71625
Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 19978%215759%23577
Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 19978%215759%23577
Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 19978%215759%23577
Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 19978%215759%23577
Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 19988%215759%23577
Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 19987%195738%21575
Jul. 1, 1998—Sep. 30, 19987%195738%21575
Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 19987%195738%21575
September 19, 20055592005–38 I.R.B.

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES
FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 — PRESENT
NONCORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
1995–1 C.B.
RATETABLEPG
Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 19997%19573
Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 19998%21575
Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 19998%21575
Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 19998%21575
Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 20008%69623
Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 20009%71625
Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 20009%71625
Oct. 1, 2000—Dec. 31, 20009%71625
Jan. 1, 2001—Mar. 31, 20019%23577
Apr. 1, 2001—Jun. 30, 20018%21575
Jul. 1, 2001—Sep. 30, 20017%19573
Oct. 1, 2001—Dec. 31, 20017%19573
Jan. 1, 2002—Mar. 31, 20026%17571
Apr. 1, 2002—Jun. 30, 20026%17571
Jul. 1, 2002—Sep. 30, 20026%17571
Oct. 1, 2002—Dec. 31, 20026%17571
Jan. 1, 2003—Mar. 31, 20035%15569
Apr. 1, 2003—Jun. 30, 20035%15569
Jul. 1, 2003—Sep. 30, 20035%15569
Oct. 1, 2003—Dec. 31, 20034%13567
Jan. 1, 2004—Mar. 31, 20044%61615
Apr. 1, 2004—Jun. 30, 20045%63617
Jul. 1, 2004—Sep. 30, 20044%61615
Oct. 1, 2004—Dec. 31, 20045%63617
Jan. 1, 2005—Mar. 31, 20055%15569
Apr. 1, 2005—Jun. 30, 20056%17571
Jul. 1, 2005—Sep. 30, 20056%17571
Oct. 1, 2005—Dec. 31, 20057%19573
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES
FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 — PRESENT
CORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
OVERPAYMENTSUNDERPAYMENTS
1995–1 C.B.1995–1 C.B.
RATE TABLEPGRATE TABLEPG
Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 19996%175717%19573
Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 19997%195738%21575
Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 19997%195738%21575
Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 19997%195738%21575
Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 20007%676218%69623
Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 20008%696239%71625
Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 20008%696239%71625
Oct. 1, 2000—Dec. 31, 20008%696239%71625
Jan. 1, 2001—Mar. 31, 20018%215759%23577
Apr. 1, 2001—Jun. 30, 20017%195738%21575
Jul. 1, 2001—Sep. 30, 20016%175717%19573
Oct. 1, 2001—Dec. 31, 20016%175717%19573
Jan. 1, 2002—Mar. 31, 20025%155696%17571
Apr. 1, 2002—Jun. 30, 20025%155696%17571
Jul. 1, 2002—Sep. 30, 20025%155696%17571
Oct. 1, 2002—Dec. 31, 20025%155696%17571
2005–38 I.R.B.560September 19, 2005

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES
FROM JANUARY 1, 1999 — PRESENT — Continued
CORPORATE OVERPAYMENTS AND UNDERPAYMENTS
OVERPAYMENTSUNDERPAYMENTS
1995–1 C.B.1995–1 C.B.
RATE TABLEPGRATE TABLEPG
Jan. 1, 2003—Mar. 31, 20034%135675%15569
Apr. 1, 2003—Jun. 30, 20034%135675%15569
Jul. 1, 2003
—Sep. 30, 2003
4%135675%15569
Oct. 1, 2003—Dec. 31, 20033%115654%13567
Jan. 1, 2004—Mar. 31, 20043%596134%61615
Apr. 1, 2004
—Jun. 30, 2004
4%616155%63617
Jul. 1, 2004—Sep. 30, 20043%596134%61615
Oct. 1, 2004—Dec. 31, 20044%616155%63617
Jan. 1, 200
5—Mar. 31, 2005
4%135675%15569
Apr. 1, 2005—Jun. 30, 20055%155696%17571
Jul. 1, 2005—Sep. 30, 20055%155696%17571
Oct. 1, 20
05—Dec. 31, 2005
6%175717%19573
TABLE OF
INTEREST RATES FOR
LARGE CORPORATE UNDERPAYMENTS
FROM JANUARY 1, 1991 — PRESENT
1995–1 C.B.
RATETABLEPG
Jan. 1, 1991—Mar. 31, 199113%31585
Apr. 1, 1991—Jun. 30, 199112%29583
Jul. 1, 1991—Sep. 30, 199112%29583
Oct. 1, 1991—Dec. 31, 199112%29583
Jan. 1, 1992—Mar. 31, 199211%75629
Apr. 1, 1992—Jun. 30, 199210%73627
Jul. 1, 1992—Sep. 30, 199210%73627
Oct. 1, 1992—Dec. 31, 19929%71625
Jan. 1, 1993—Mar. 31, 19939%23577
Apr. 1, 1993—Jun. 30, 19939%23577
Jul. 1, 1993—Sep. 30, 19939%23577
Oct. 1, 1993—Dec. 31, 19939%23577
Jan. 1, 1994—Mar. 31, 19949%23577
Apr. 1, 1994—Jun. 30, 19949%23577
Jul. 1, 1994—Sep. 30, 199410%25579
Oct. 1, 1994—Dec. 31, 199411%27581
Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 199511%27581
Apr. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 199512%29583
Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 199511%27581
Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 199511%27581
Jan. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 199611%75629
Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 199610%73627
Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 199611%75629
Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 199611%75629
Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 199711%27581
Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 199711%27581
Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 199711%27581
Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 199711%27581
Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 199811%27581
Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 199810%25579
Jul. 1, 1998—Sep. 30, 199810%25579
Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 199810%25579
Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 19999%23577
September 19, 20055612005–38 I.R.B.

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR
LARGE CORPORAT
E UNDERPAYMENTS
FROM JANUARY 1, 1991 — PRESENT — Continued
1995–1 C.B.
RATETABLEPG
Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 199910%25579
Jul. 1, 1999—
Sep. 30, 1999
10%25579
Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 199910%25579
Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 200010%73627
Apr. 1, 2000
—Jun. 30, 2000
11%75629
Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 200011%75629
Oct. 1, 2000—Dec. 31, 200011%75629
Jan. 1, 200
1—Mar. 31, 2001
11%27581
Apr. 1, 2001—Jun. 30, 200110%25579
Jul. 1, 2001—Sep. 30, 20019%23577
Oct. 1, 20
01—Dec. 31, 2001
9%23577
Jan. 1, 2002—Mar. 31, 20028%21575
Apr. 1, 2002—Jun. 30, 20028%21575
Jul. 1, 2
002—Sep. 30, 2002
8%21575
Oct. 1, 2002—Dec. 30, 20028%21575
Jan. 1, 2003—Mar. 31, 20037%19573
Apr. 1,
2003—Jun. 30, 2003
7%19573
Jul. 1, 2003—Sep. 30, 20037%19573
Oct. 1, 2003—Dec. 31, 20036%17571
Jan. 1,
2004—Mar. 31, 2004
6%65619
Apr. 1, 2004—Jun. 30, 20047%67621
Jul. 1, 2004—Sep. 30, 20046%65619
Oct. 1
, 2004—Dec. 31, 2004
7%67621
Jan. 1, 2005—Mar. 31, 20057%19573
Apr. 1, 2005—Jun. 30, 20058%21575
Jul.
1, 2005—Sep. 30, 2005
8%21575
Oct. 1, 2005—Dec. 31, 20059%23577
TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR CORPORATE
OVERPAYMENTS EXCEEDING $10,000
FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 — PRESENT
1995–1 C.B.
RA
TE
TA
BLE
PG
Jan. 1, 1995—Mar. 31, 19956.5%18572
A
pr. 1, 1995—Jun. 30, 1995
7
.5%
2
0
5
74
Jul. 1, 1995—Sep. 30, 19956.5%18572
Oct. 1, 1995—Dec. 31, 19956.5%18572
J
an. 1, 1996—Mar. 31, 1996
6
.5%
6
6
6
20
Apr. 1, 1996—Jun. 30, 19965.5%64618
Jul. 1, 1996—Sep. 30, 19966.5%66620
Oct. 1, 1996—Dec. 31, 19966.5%66620
Jan. 1, 1997—Mar. 31, 19976.5%18572
Apr. 1, 1997—Jun. 30, 19976.5%18572
Jul. 1, 1997—Sep. 30, 19976.5%18572
Oct. 1, 1997—Dec. 31, 19976.5%18572
Jan. 1, 1998—Mar. 31, 19986.5%18572
Apr. 1, 1998—Jun. 30, 19985.5%16570
Jul. 1, 1998—Sep. 30, 19985.5%16570
Oct. 1, 1998—Dec. 31, 19985.5%16570
Jan. 1, 1999—Mar. 31, 19994.5%14568
Apr. 1, 1999—Jun. 30, 19995.5%16570
Jul. 1, 1999—Sep. 30, 19995.5%16570
2005–38 I.R.B.562September 19, 2005

TABLE OF INTEREST RATES FOR CORPORATE
OVERPAYMENTS E
XCEEDING $10,000
FROM JANUARY 1, 1995 — PRESENT — Continued
1995–1 C.B.
RATETABLEPG
Oct. 1, 1999—Dec. 31, 19995.5%16570
Jan. 1, 2000—Mar. 31, 20005.5%64618
Apr. 1, 2000—Jun. 30, 20006.5%66620
Jul. 1, 2000—Sep. 30, 20006.5%66620
Oct. 1, 2000—Dec. 31, 20006.5%66620
Jan. 1, 2001—Mar. 31, 20016.5%18572
Apr. 1, 2001—Jun. 30, 20015.5%16570
Jul. 1, 2001—Sep. 30, 20014.5%14568
Oct. 1, 2001—Dec. 31, 20014.5%14568
Jan. 1, 2002—Mar. 31, 20023.5%12566
Apr. 1, 2002—Jun. 30, 20023.5%12566
Jul. 1, 2002—Sep. 30, 20023.5%12566
Oct. 1, 2002—Dec. 31, 20023.5%12566
Jan. 1, 2003—Mar. 31, 20032.5%10564
Apr. 1, 2003—Jun. 30, 20032.5%10564
Jul. 1, 2003—Sep. 30, 20032.5%10564
Oct. 1, 2003—Dec. 31, 20031.5%8562
Jan. 1, 2004—Mar. 31, 20041.5%56610
Apr. 1, 2004—Jun. 30, 20042.5%58612
Jul. 1, 2004—Sep. 30, 20041.5%56610
Oct. 1, 2004—Dec. 31, 20042.5%58612
Jan. 1, 2005—Mar. 31, 20052.5%10564
Apr. 1, 2005—Jun. 30, 20053.5%12566
Jul. 1, 2005—Sep. 30, 20053.5%12566
Oct. 1, 2005—Dec. 31, 20054.5%14568
September 19, 20055632005–38 I.R.B.

Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous
NOTE: This revenue procedure will be reproduced as the next revision of IRS Publication 1141,General Rules and Specifica-
tions for Substitute Forms W-2 and W-3.
26 CFR 601.602: Tax forms and instructions.
(Also Part I, Sections 6041, 6051, 6071, 6081, 6091; 1.6041–1, 1.6041–2, 31.6051–1, 31.6051–2, 31.6071(a)–1, 31.6081(a)–1, 31.6091–1.)
Rev. Proc. 2005–65
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Part A. General
SECTION 1. PURPOSE............................................................................................ 564
SECTION 2. WHAT’S NEW......................................................................................... 565
SECTION 3. GENERAL RULES FOR PAPER FORMS W-2 AND W-3.................................................... 566
SECTION 4. GENERAL RULES FOR FILING FORMS W-2 (COPY A) ELECTRONICALLY OR ON
MAGNETIC DISKETTE
................................................................................ 567
Part B. Specifications for Substitute Forms W-2 and W-3
SECTION 1A. SPECIFICATIONS FOR RED-INKSUBSTITUTE FORM W-2 (COPY A) AND FORM W-3
FILED WITH THE SSA
................................................................................. 567
SECTION 1B. SPECIFICATIONS FOR LASER-PRINTED SUBSTITUTE FORM W-2 (COPY A) AND FORM
W-3 FILED WITH THE SSA
............................................................................. 569
SECTION 2. REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBSTITUTE FORMS FURNISHED TO EMPLOYEES (COPIES B, C,
AND 2 OF FORM W-2)
................................................................................. 570
Part C. Additional Instructions
SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM PRINTERS................................................... 573
SECTION 2. INSTRUCTIONS FOR EMPLOYERS..................................................................... 573
SECTION 3. OMB REQUIREMENTS FOR BOTH RED-INK AND LASER-PRINTED SUBSTITUTE FORMS.................. 574
SECTION 4. COPIES OF FORMS................................................................................... 574
SECTION 5. EFFECT ON OTHER DOCUM
ENTS
...................................................
.................. 574
Part A. General
Section 1. Purpose
.01The purpose of this revenue procedure is to provide general rules and specifications from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
and the Social Security Administration (SSA) for paper substitute forms for Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, and Form W-3,
Transmittal of Wage and Tax Statements, for wages paid during the 2005 calendar year.
.02For purposes of this revenue procedure, substitute Form W-2 (Copy A) and substitute Form W-3 are forms that are not printed
by the IRS. Copy A or any other copies of a substitute Form W-2or a substitute Form W-3 must conform to the specifications in
this revenue procedure to be acceptable to the IRS and the SSA. No IRS office is authorized to allow deviations from this revenue
procedure. Preparers should also refer to the separate 2005 Instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3 for details on how to complete
these forms. See Part C, Section 4, for information on obtaining the official IRS forms and instructions. See Part B, Section 2, for
requirements for the copies of substitute forms furnished to employees.
2005–38 I.R.B.564September 19, 2005

.03For purposes of this revenue procedure, the official, IRS-printed red dropout ink Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 and their exact
substitutes are referred to as “red-ink.” TheSSA-approved, laser-printed, black-and-white Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 are referred
to as “laser-printed.”
Any questions about the red-ink Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 should be emailed to*
taxforms@irs.govor sent to:
Internal Revenue Service
Attn: Substitute Forms Program
SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, IR 6406
1111 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20224
Any questions about the black-and-white laser-printed Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 should be emailed to
l
aser.forms@ssa.govor sent to:
Social Security Administration
Data Operations Center
Attn: Laser Forms Approval, Room 359
1150 E. Mountain Drive
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702-7997
Also, see Sections 3.05 and 3.06 of Part A.
Note.You should receive a response within 30 days from either the IRS or the SSA.
.04The IRS maintains a centralized call site at its Enterprise Computing Center — Martinsburg (ECC)to answer questions related
to information returns (Forms W-2, W-3, 1099 series, 1096, etc.). You can reach the call site at 304-263-8700 (not a toll-free number)
or 1-866-455-7438 (toll-free). The Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) number is 304-267-3367 (not a toll-free number).
The hours of operation are Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern time. You may also send questions to the
call site via the Internet atm
ccirp@irs.gov. IRS/ECC does not process Forms W-2 (Copy A). Forms W-2 (Copy A) prepared on
paper and/or electronically must be filed with the SSA. IRS/ECC does, however, process waiver requests (Form 8508, Request for
Waiver From Filing Information Returns Electronically/Magnetically) and extension of time to file requests (Form 8809, Application
for Extension of Time To File Information Returns) for Forms W-2 (Copy A) and requests for an extension of time to furnish the
employee copies of Form W-2. See Publication 1220, Specifications for Filing Forms 1098, 1099, 5498 and W-2G Electronically or
Magnetically, for information on waivers and extensions of time.
.05The following publications provide detailed filingprocedures for certaininformation returns:
•2005 Instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3,
•Instructions for Forms W-2c and W-3c (Rev. December 2002), and
•Publication 1223, General Rules and Specifications for Substitute Forms W-2c and W-3c.
Section 2. What’s New
.01Magnetic media is being eliminated as a filing method. The lastyear for filing Forms W-2 on tapes and cartridges was tax
year 2004 (forms timely filed with the SSA in 2005). The last year for filing Forms W-2 on 3
1
/2inch diskette is tax year 2005 (forms
timely filed with the SSA in 2006). Diskettes will no longer be accepted after February 28, 2006.
.02For timeliness, to save printing expenses, and because users of Publication 1141 have access to the Internet and the IRS website,
Publication 1141 will now only be released for downloading from the IRS website. However, this revenue procedure will continue to
be released as hard copy in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
.03The Martinsburg Computing Center’s name was changed to the Enterprise Computing Center — Martinsburg (ECC).
.04Payee statements (Copies B, C, and 2 of Form W-2) may be furnished electronically, if employees give their consent (as de-
scribed in Treasury Regulations Section 31.6501–1(j)). Seealso Publication 15-A, Employer’s Supplemental Tax Guide.
.05We added three new codes (Q, Y, and Z) for use in box 12 of Form W-2. See the 2005 Instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3 for
details.
.06Form W-3PR is 7.0 inches wide and should be printed on 8.5 by 11-inch paper usinga .5-inch top margin with.75- inch left
and right margins.
.07Editorial changes were made. Redundancies were eliminated as much as possible.
September 19, 20055652005–38 I.R.B.

Section 3. General Rules for Paper Forms W-2 and W-3
.01Employers not filing electronically or on diskette must filepaper Forms W-2 (Copy A) along with Form W-3 with the SSA by
using either the official IRS form or a substitute form that exactly meets the specifications shown in Parts B and C of this revenue
procedure.
Note.Substitute territorial forms (W-2AS, W-2GU, W-2VI) shouldalso conform to the specifications as outlined in this revenue
procedure. These forms require the form designation (“W-2AS,” “W-2GU,” “W-2VI”) on Copy A to be in black ink.
Employers who file with the SSA electronically, on diskette, or on paper may design their own statements to furnish to employees.
These employee statements designed by employers must comply with the requirements shown in Parts B and C.
.02Red-ink substitute forms that completely conform to the specifications contained in this revenue procedure may be privately
printed without prior approval from the IRS or the SSA. Only the black-and-white laser-printed forms need to be submitted to the
SSAforapproval(seeSection1BofPartB).
.03As in the past, Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 may be generated using a laser-printer by following all guidelines and
specifications (also see Section 1B of Part B). In general, regardless of the method of entering data, using black ink on Forms W-2
and W-3 provides better readability for processing by scanning equipment. Colorsother than black are not easily read by the scanner
and may result in delays or errors in the processing of Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3. The printing of the data should be centered
within the boxes. The size of the variable data must be printed in a font no smaller than 10-point.
Note.With the exception of the identifying number and the corner register marks, the preprinted form layout for the red-ink Forms
W-2 (Copy A) and W-3, must be in Flint J-6983 red OCR dropout ink or an exact match. (See Section 1A.03 of Part B.)
.04Substitute forms filed with the SSA and substitute copies furnished to employees that do not conform to these specifications
are unacceptable. Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 filed with the SSA that do not conform may be returned. In addition, penalties may
be assessed for not complying with the form specifications.
.05If you are uncertain of any specification and want it clarified:
(1)Submit a letter or email citing the specific
ation to the appropriate address in section 3.06.
(2)State your interpretation of that specification.
(3)Enclose an example (if appropriate) of how the form would appear if produced using your understanding of the specifica-
tion.
(4)Be sure to include your name, complete address, phone number, and if applicable, your email address with your correspon-
dence.
.06Any questions about the specifications, especially those for the red-ink Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3, should be emailed
to*
taxforms@irs.govor sent to:
Internal Revenue Service
Attn: Substitute Forms Program
SE:W:CAR:MP:T:T:SP, IR 6406
1111 Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20224
Any questions about the black-and-white laser-printed Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 should be emailed to
l
aser.forms@ssa.govor sent to:
Social Security Administration
Data Operations Center
Attn: Laser Forms Approval, Room 359
1150 E. Mountain Drive
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702–7997
Note.You should receive a response within 30 days from either the IRS or the SSA.
.07Forms W-2 and W-3 are subject to annual review and possible change. Therefore, employers arecautioned against overstocking
supplies of privately-printed substitutes.
.08Separate instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3 are provided inthe 2005 Instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3. Form W-3 should
be used only to transmit paper Forms W-2 (Copy A). Form W-3 is a single sheet including only essential filing information. Be sure
2005–38 I.R.B.566September 19, 2005

to make a copy of your completed Form W-3 for your records. Copies of the current year official IRS Forms W-2 and W-3, and the
instructions for those forms, may be obtained from most IRS offices or by calling 1-800-829-3676. The IRS provides only cutsheet
sets of Forms W-2 and cutsheets of Form W-3. The instructions and information copies of the forms may also be found on the IRS
website atw
ww.irs.gov.
.09Because substitute Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 are machine-imaged and scanned by the SSA, the forms must meet the same
specifications as the official IRS Forms W-2 and W-3 (as shown in the exhibits).
Section 4. General Rules for Filing Forms W-2 (Copy A) Electronically or On Magnetic Diskette
.01Employers must file Forms W-2 (Copy A) with the SSA electronically or onmagnetic diskette if theyfile 250 or more calendar
year 2005 Forms W-2 (Copy A). The SSA publication MMREF-1, Magnetic Media Reporting and Electronic Filing, contains spec-
ifications and procedures for filing Form W-2 information with the SSA magnetically or electronically. Employers are cautioned to
obtain the most recent revision of MMREF-1(and supplements) due to any subsequent changes in specifications and procedures.
.02You may obtain a copy of the MMREF-1 by:
•Accessing the SSA website atwww.socialsecurity.gov/employer/pub.htm,
•Writing to:
Social Security Administration
OCO, DES; Attn: Employer Reporti
ng Services Center
300 North Greene Street
Baltimore, MD 21290-0300
•Calling your local SSA Employer Services Liaison Officer (ESLO) (the ESLOs' phone numbers are available atwww.socialsecu-
rity.gov/employer/empcontacts.htm), or
•Calling the SSA’s Employer Reporting Assistance staff at 1-800-772-6270.
.03Magnetic diskette or electronic filers do not file a paper Form W-3. See the SSA publication MMREF-1 for guidance on
transmitting Form W-2 (Copy A) information to SSA electronically.
.04Employers who do not comply with the magnetic media or electronic filing requirements for Form W-2 (Copy A) and who are
not granted a waiver by the IRS may be subject to penalties. Employers who file Form W-2 information with the SSA electronically
or on magnetic diskette must not send the same data to the SSA on paper Forms W-2 (Copy A). Any duplicate reporting may subject
filers to unnecessary contacts by the SSA or the IRS.
Part B. Specifications for Substitute Forms W-2 and W-3
Section 1A. Specifications for Red-Ink Substitute Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 Filed
with the SSA
.01The official IRS-printed red dropout ink Form W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 and their exact substitutes are referred to as red-ink in
this revenue procedure. Employers may file substitute Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 with the SSA. The substitute forms must be
exact replicas of the official IRS forms with respect to layoutand content because they will be read by scanner equipment.
.02Paper used for cutsheets and continuous-pinfed forms for substitute Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 that are to be filed with
the SSA must be white 100% bleached chemical wood, 18-20 pound paper only, optical characterrecognition (OCR) bond produced
in accordance with the following specifications:
•Acidity:Phvalue,average,notlessthan..................................................4.5
•Basisweight:17x22inch500cutsheets,pound..........................................18-20
•Metric equivalent—gm./sq. meter
(atoleranceof+5pct.isallowed) .......................................................68-75
•Stiffness: Average, each direction, not less than—milligrams
Crossdirection........................................................................50
Machinedirection .....................................................................80
•Tearing strength: Average, eachdirection, not less than—grams.............................40
September 19, 20055672005–38 I.R.B.

•Opacity:Average,notlessthan—percent.................................................82
•Reflectivity:Average,notlessthan—percent .............................................68
•Thickness:Average—inch..............................................................0.0038
Metricequivalent—mm................................................................0.097
(a tolerance of +0.0005 inch (0.0127 mm) is allowed) Paper cannot vary more than 0.0004
inch (0.0102 mm) from one edge to the other.
•Porosity:Average,notlessthan—seconds................................................10
•Finish (smoothness): Average, each side—seconds........................................20-55
(forinformationonly)theSheffieldequivalent—units......................................170-d200
•Dirt: Average, each side, notto exceed—parts per million..................................8
Note.Reclaimed fiber in any percentage is permitted, provided the requirements of this standard are met.
.03All printing of substitute Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 must be in Flint red OCR dropout ink except as specified below. The
following must be printed in nonreflective black ink:
•Identifying number “
22222” or “33333” at the top of the forms.
•Tax year at the bottom of the forms.
•The four (4) corner register marks on the forms.
•The jurat and “Signature, Title, Date” line at the bottom of Form W-3.
•The form identification number (“W-3”) at the bottom of Form W-3.
•All the instructions below Form W-3 beginning with “Send this entire page....” line to the bottom of Form W-3.
.04The vertical and horizontal spacing for all federal payment and data boxes on Forms W-2 and W-3 must meet specifications.
On Form W-3 and Form W-2 (Copy A), all the perimeter rules must be 1-point (0.014-inch), while all other rules must be one-half
point (0.007-inch). Vertical rules must be parallel to the left edge of the form; horizontal rules parallel to the top edge.
.05The official red-ink Form W-3 and Form W-2 (Copy A) are 7.5inches wide. Employers filing Forms W-2 (Copy A) with the
SSA on paper must also file a Form W-3. Form W-3 must be the same width (7.5 inches) as the Form W-2. One Form W-3 is printed
on a standard-size, 8.5 x 11-inch page. Two official Forms W-2 (Copy A) are contained on a single 8.5 x 11-inch page (exclusive of
any snap-stubs).
.06The top, left, and right margins for the Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 are .5 inches (
1
/2inch). All margins must be free of
printing except for the words “DO NOT STAPLE OR FOLD” on red-ink Form W-3. The space between the two Forms W-2 (Copy
A) is 1.33 inches.
.07The identifying numbers are “22222” for Form W-2 (Copies A (and 1)) and “33333” for Form W-3. No printing should appear
anywhere near the identifying numbers. For both Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3, the combination width of box a (Control
number) and the box containing the identifying number must be 2.5 inches.
Note.The identifying number must be printed in nonreflective black ink in OCR-A font of 10 characters per inch.
.08The depth of the individual scannable image on a page must be the same as that on the official IRS forms. The depth from the
top line to the bottom line of an individual Form W-2 (Copy A) must be 4.17 inches and the depth from the top line to the bottom line
of Form W-3 must be 4.67 inches. (See Exhibits A and B.)
.09Continuous-pinfed Forms W-2 (Copy A) must be separated into 11-inch deep pages. The pinfed strips must be removed when
Forms W-2 (Copy A) are filed with the SSA. The two Forms W-2 (CopyA) on the 11-inch page must not be separated (only the pages
are to be separated (burst)). The words “Do Not Cut, Fold, or Staple Forms on This Page” must be printed twice between the two
Forms W-2 (Copy A) in Flint red OCR dropout ink. Perforations are required on all other copies (Copies 1, B, C, 2, and D) to enable
the separation of individual forms.
.10Box 12 of Form W-2 (Copy A) contains four entry boxes – 12a, 12b, 12c, and 12d. Do not make more than one entry per box.
Enter your first code in box 12a (for example, enter Code D in box 12a, not 12d, if it is your first entry). If more than four items need
to be reported in box 12, use a second Form W-2 to report the additional items (see “Multiple forms” in the 2005 Instructions for
Forms W-2 and W-3). Do not report the same federal tax data to the SSA on more than one Form W-2 (Copy A). However, repeat
the identifying information (employee’s name, address, and SSN; employer's name, address, and EIN) on each additional form.
2005–38 I.R.B.568September 19, 2005

.11The checkboxes in box 13 of Form W-2 (Copy A) must be .14 inches each; the space before the first checkbox is .20 inches;
the spacing on each remaining side of the 3 checkboxes is .36 inches (see Exhibit A). The checkboxes in box b of Form W-3 must
also be .14 inches (see Exhibit B for other dimensions in box b).
Note.More than 50% of an applicable checkboxmustbecoveredbyan“X.”
.12All substitute Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 in the red-ink formatmust have the tax year, form number, and form title printed
on the bottom face of each form using type identical to that of the official IRS form. The red-ink substitute Form W-2 (Copy A) and
Form W-3 must have the form producer's EIN entered directly to the left of “Department of the Treasury,” in red.
.13The words “For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see back of Copy D.” must be printed in Flint red OCR
dropout ink in the same location as on the official Form W-2 (Copy A). The words “For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act
Notice, see back of Copy D of Form W-2.” must be printed at the bottom of the page of Form W-3 in black ink.
.14The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Number must be printed on substitute Forms W-3 and W-2 (on each ply) in the
same location as on the official IRS forms.
.15All substitute Forms W-3 must include the instructions that are printed on the same sheet below the official IRS form.
.16The back of substitute Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 must be free of all printing.
.17All copies must be clearly legible. Hot wax and cold carbon spots are not permitted for Form W-2 (Copy A). Interleaved carbon
should be black and must be of good quality to assure legibility onall copies and to avoid smudging. Fading must be minimized to
assure legibility.
.18Chemical transfer paper is permitted for Form W-2 (Copy A) only if the following standards are met:
•Only chemically-backed paper is acceptable for Form W-2 (Copy A). Front and back chemically-treated paper cannot be processed
properly by scanning equipment.
•Chemically-transferred images must be black.
•Carbon-coated forms are not permitted.
.19The Government Printing Office (GPO) symbol and the CatalogNumber (Cat. No.) must be deleted from substitute Form W-2
(Copy A) and Form W-3.
Section 1B. Specifications for Laser-Printed Substitute Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3
Filed with the SSA
.01The SSA-approved, laser-printed, black-and-white Forms W-2(Copy A) and W-3 are referred toas laser-printed. Specifica-
tions for the laser-printed black-and-white Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 are similar to the red-ink forms (Part B, Section 1A) except
for the items that follow (see Exhibits E and F). Exhibits are samples only and must not be downloaded to meet tax obligations.
(1) Forms must be printed on 8.5 x 11-inch single-sheet paper only, not on continuous-feed using a laser printer. There must be
two Forms W-2 (Copy A) printed on a page. There must be no horizontal perforations between the two Forms W-2 (Copy A) on each
page.
(2) All forms and data must be printed in nonreflective black ink only.
(3) The data and forms must be programmed to print simultaneously. Forms cannot be produced separately from wage data entries.
(4) The forms must not contain corner register marks.
(5) The forms must not contain any shaded areas including those boxes that are entirely shaded on the red-ink forms.
(6) Identifying numbers on both Form W-2 (“22222”) and Form W-3 (“33333”) must be preprinted in 14-point Arial bold font or
a close approximation.
(7) The form numbers (“W-2” and “W-3”) must be in 18-point Arial font or a close approximation. The tax year (“2005”) on
Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 must be in 20-point Arial font or a close approximation.
(8) No part of the box titles or the data printed on the forms may touch any of the vertical or horizontal lines, nor should any of
the data intermingle with the box titles. The data should be centered in the boxes.
(9) Do not print any information in the margins of the laser-printed forms (for example, do not print “DO NOT STAPLE OR
FOLD”inthetopmarginofFormW-3).
(10) The word “Code” must not appear in box 12 on Form W-2 (Copy A).
September 19, 20055692005–38 I.R.B.

(11) A 4-digit vendor code preceded by four zeros and a slash (for example, 0000/1234) must appear in 12-point Arial font, or a
close approximation, under the tax year in place of the Cat. No. onForm W-2 (Copy A) and in the bottom right corner of the “For
Official Use Only” box at the bottom of Form W-3. Do not display theform producer's EIN to the left of “Department of the Treasury.”
The vendor code will be used toidentify the form producer.
(12) Do not print Catalog Numbers (Cat. No.) on either form (10134D for Form W-2 (Copy A); 10159Y for Form W-3).
(13) Do not print the checkboxes in:
•Box (b) of Form W-3. The “X” should be programmed to be printedand centered directly below theapplicable “Kind of Payer.”
•The “Void” box of Form W-2 (Copy A). The “X” should be programmed to be printed to the right of “Void” because of space
limitations.
•Box13ofFormW-2(CopyA).The“X”shouldbeprogrammedtobeprinted and centered directly below the applicable box title.
(14) Do not print dollar signs. If there are no money amounts being reported, the entire field should be left blank.
(15) The space between the two Forms W-2 (Copy A) is 1.33 inches.
.02You must submit samples of your laser-printed substitute forms to the SSA. Only laser-printed, black-and-white substitute
Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 for tax year 2005 will be accepted for approval by the SSA. Questions regarding other forms (that is,
red-ink Forms W-2c, W-3c, 1099 series, 1096, etc.) must be directed to the IRS.
.03You will be required to send one set of blank and one set of dummy-data, laser-printed substitute Forms W-2 (Copy A) and
W-3 for approval. Sample data entries should be filled in to the maximum length for each box entry, preferably using numeric data
or alpha data, depending upon the type required to be entered. Include in your submission the name, telephone number, fax number,
and email address of a contact person who can answer questions regarding your sample forms.
.04To receive approval, you may first contact the SSA atl
aser.forms@ssa.govto obtain a template and further instructions in PDF
or Excel format. You may also send your 2005 sample, laser-printed substitute forms to:
Social Security Administration
Data Operations Center
Attn: Laser Forms Approval, Room 359
1150 E. Mountain Drive
Wilkes-Barre, PA 18702-7997
Send your sample forms via private mail carrier or certified mail in order to verify their receipt. You can expect approval (or
disapproval) by the SSA within 30 days of receipt of your sample forms.
.05The 4-digit vendor code preceded by four zeros and a slash (0000/) must be preprinted on the sample, laser-printed substitute
forms. Forms not containing a vendor code will be rejected and will not be submitted for testing or approval. If you do not have a
vendor code, you may contact the National Association of Computerized Tax Processors via email atp
resident@nactp.org.
.06 If you use forms produced by a vendor and have questions concerning approval,do not send the forms to the SSA for
approval. Instead, you may contact the software vendor to obtain acopy of SSA's dated approval notice supplied to that vendor.
Section 2. Requirements for Substitute Forms Furnished to Employees (Copies B, C, and
2ofFormW-2)
Note.Printers are cautioned that therules in Part B, Section 2, apply only to employee copies of Form W-2 (Copies B, C, and 2).
Paper filers who send Forms W-2 (Copy A) to the SSA must follow the requirements in Part B, Sections 1A and/or 1B.
.01All employers (including those who file onmagnetic diskette or electronically) must furnish employees with at least two copies
of Form W-2 (three or more for employees required to file a state, city, or local income tax return). The following rules are guidelines
for preparing employee copies.
The dimensions of these copies (Copies B, C, and 2), but not Copy A, may differ from the dimensions of the official IRS form to
allow space for reporting additional information, including additional entries such as withholding for health insurance, union dues,
bonds, or charity in box 14. The limitation of a maximum of four items in box 12 of Form W-2 applies only to Copy A, which is filed
with the SSA.
Note.Payee statements (Copies B, C, and 2 of Form W-2) may now be furnished electronically, if employees give their consent (as
described in Treasury Regulations Section 31.6501–1(j)). See also Publication 15-A, Employer’s Supplemental Tax Guide.
2005–38 I.R.B.570September 19, 2005

.02The minimum dimensions for employee copies only (not Copy A) of Form W-2 should be 2.67 inches deep by 4.25 inches
wide. The maximum dimensions should be no more than 6.5 inches deep by no more than 8.5 inches wide.
Note.The maximum and minimum size specifications are for tax year 2005 only and may change in future years.
.03Either horizontal or vertical format is permitted (see Exhibit D).
.04The paper for all copies must be white and printed in black ink. The substitute Copy B, which employees are instructed to
attach to their federal income tax returns, should be at least 9-pound paper (basis 17 x 22-500). Other copies furnished to employees
should also be at least 9-pound paper (basis 17 x 22-500).
.05Employee copies of Form W-2 (Copies B, C, and 2), including those that are printed on a single sheet of paper, must be easily
separated. Providing perforations between the individual copies satisfies this requirement, but using scissors to separate Copies B, C,
and 2 does not.
Note.The perforation requirement in this section does not apply to printouts of copies of Forms W-2 that are furnished electronically to
employees (as described in Treasury Regulations Section 31.6051–1(j)). However, these employeesshould be cautioned to carefully
separate the copies of Form W-2. See Publication 15-A, Employer’s Supplemental Tax Guide, for information on electronically
furnishing Forms W-2 to employees.
.06Interleaved carbon and chemical transferpaper employee copies must be clearly legible. Hot wax and cold-carbon spots are
not permitted for employee copies. All copies must be able to bephotocopied. Interleaved carbonshouldbeblackandmustbeof
good quality to assure legibility on all copies and to avoid smudging. Fading must be minimized to assure legibility.
.07The electronic tax logo on the IRS official employee copies is not required on any of the substitute form copies. To avoid
confusion and questions by employees, employers are encouraged to delete the identifying number (“22222”) and the word “Void”
and its associated checkbox from the employee copies of Form W-2.
.08All substitute employee copies must contain boxes, box numbers, and box titles that match the official IRS Form W-2. Boxes
that do not apply can be deleted. However, certain core boxes must be included. The placement, numbering, and size of this informa-
tion is specified as follows:
•The items and box numbers that constitute the core data are:
Box 1 — Wages, tips, other compensation,
Box 2 — Federal income tax withheld,
Box 3 — Social security wages,
Box 4 — Social security tax withheld,
Box 5 — Medicare wages and tips, and
Box 6 — Medicare tax withheld.
The core boxes must be printed in the exact order shown on the official IRS form.
•The core data boxes (1 through 6) must be placed in the upper right of the form. Substitute vertical-format copies may have the
core data across the top of the form (see Exhibit D). In no instance, will boxes or other informationbepermittedtotherightof
thecoredata.
•The form title, number, or copy designation (B, C, or 2) may be at the top of the form. Also, a reversed or blocked-out area to
accommodate a postal permit number or other postalconsiderations is allowed in the upper-right.
•Boxes 1 through 6 must each be a minimum of 1
1
/8inches wide x
1
/4inch deep.
•Other required boxes are:
b) Employer identification number (EIN),
c) Employer's name, address, and ZIP code,
d) Employee's social security number,
e) Employee's name, and
f) Employee's address and ZIP code.
September 19, 20055712005–38 I.R.B.

Identifying items must be present on the form and be in boxes similar to those on the official IRS form. However, they may be
placed in any location other than the top or upper right. You do not need to use the lettering system (b-f) used on the official IRS form.
The employer identification number (EIN) may be included with the employer's name and address and not in a separate box.
Note.Box a (“Control number”) is not required.
.09All copies of Form W-2 furnished to employees must clearly showthe form number, the form title, and the tax year prominently
displayed together in one area of the form. The title of Form W-2 is“Wage and Tax Statement.” It is recommended (but not required)
that this be located on the bottom left of substitute Forms W-2. Thereference to the “Department of the Treasury — Internal Revenue
Service” must be on all copies of substitute Forms W-2 furnishedto employees. It is recommended (but not required) that this be
located on the bottom right of Form W-2.
.10If the substitute employee copies are labeled, the forms must contain the applicable description:
•“Copy B, To Be Filed With Employee’s FEDERAL Tax Return.”
•“Copy C, For EMPLOYEE'S RECORDS.”
•“Copy 2, To Be Filed With Employee’s State, City, or Local Income Tax Return.”
It is recommended (but not required) that these be located on the lower left of Form W-2. If the substitute employee copies are not
labeled as to the disposition of the copies, then written notification using similar wordingmust be provided to each employee.
.11The tax year (2005) must be clearly printed on all copies of substitute Form W-2. It is recommended (but not required) that
this information be in the middle at the bottom of the Form W-2. The use of 24-pt. OCR-A font is recommended (but not required).
.12Boxes1,2,and9(ifapplicable)onCopyBmustbeoutlinedinbold 2-point rule or highlighted in some manner to distinguish
them. If “Allocated tips” are being reported, it is recommended (but not required) that box 8 also be outlined. If reported, “Social
security tips” (box 7) must be shown separately from “Social security wages” (box 3).
Note.Boxes 8 and 9 may be omitted if not applicable.
.13If employers are required to withhold and reportstate or local income tax, the applicable boxes
are also considered core infor-
mation and must be placed at the bottom of the form. State information is included in:
•Box 15 (State, Employer's state ID number)
•Box 16 (State wages, tips, etc.)
•Box17(Stateincometax)
Local information is included in:
•Box 18 (Local wages, tips, etc.)
•Box 19 (Local income tax)
•Box 20 (Locality name)
.14Boxes 7 through 14 may be omitted from substitute employee copies unless the employer must report any of that information to
the employee. For example, if an employee did not have “Social security tips” (box 7), the form could be printed without that box. But
if an employer provided dependent care benefits, the amount must be reported separately, shown in box 10, and labeled “Dependent
care benefits.”
.15Employers may enter more than four codes in box 12 of substitute Copies B, C, and 2 (and 1 and D) of Form W-2, but each
entry must use Codes A-Z (see the 2005 Instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3).
.16If an employer has employees in any of the three categories in box 13, all checkbox headings must be shown and the proper
checkmark made, when applicable.
.17Employers may use box 14 for any other information that they wish to give to their employees. Each item must be labeled.
(See the instructions for box 14 in the 2005 Instructions for Forms W-2 and W-3.)
.18The front of Copy C of a substitute Form W-2 must contain the note “This information is being furnished to the Internal Revenue
Service. If you are required to file a tax return, a negligence penalty or other sanction may be imposed on you if this income is taxable
and you fail to report it.”
.19Instructions similar to those contained on the back of Copies B and C of the official IRS Form W-2 must be provided to
each employee. An employer may modify or delete instructions thatdo not apply to its employees. (For example, remove Railroad
Retirement Tier 1 and Tier 2 compensation information for nonrailroad employees orinformation about dependent care benefits that
the employer does not provide.)
2005–38 I.R.B.572September 19, 2005

.20Employers must notify their employees who have no income tax withheld that theymay be able to claim a tax refund because
of the earned income credit (EIC). They will meet this notification requirement if they furnish a substitute Form W-2 with the EIC
notice on the back of Copy B, IRS Notice 797, Possible FederalTax Refund Due to the Earned Income Credit (EIC), or on their
own statement containing the same wording. They may also change the font on Copy C so that the EIC notification and Form W-2
instructions fit entirely on the back. For more information about notification requirements, see Notice 1015, Have You Told Your
Employees About the Earned Income Credit (EIC)?
Part C. Additional Instructions
Section 1. Additional Instructions for Form Printers
.01If magnetic diskette or electronic media is not used for filing with the SSA, the substitute copies of Forms W-2 (either red-ink
or laser-printed) should be assembled in the same order as the official IRS Forms W-2. Copy A should be first, followed sequentially
by perforated sets (Copies 1, B, C, 2, and D).
.02The substitute form to be filed by the employer with the SSA must carry the designation “Copy A.”
Note.Magnetic diskette/electronic filers do not submit either red-ink or laser-printed paper Form W-2 (Copy A) or Form W-3 to the
SSA.
.03Substitute forms (red-ink or laser-printed) do not require a copy to be retained by employers (Copy D of Form W-2). However,
employers must be prepared to verify or duplicate the information if it is requested by the IRS or the SSA. Paper filers who do not
keep a Form W-2 (Copy D) should be able to generate a facsimile of Form W-2 (Copy A) in case of loss.
.04Except for copies in the official assembly, no additional copies that may be prepared by employers should be placed ahead of
Form W-2 (Copy C) “For EMPLOYEE'S RECORDS.”
.05Instructions similar to those contained on the back of Copies B and C of theofficial IRS Form W-2 must be provided to each
employee. These instructions may be printed on the back of the substitute Copies B and C or may be provided to employees on a
separate statement. Do not print these instructions on the back of Copy 1 or 2 that is to be filed with the employee's state, city, or
local income tax return. Any Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3 that are filed with the SSA must have no printing on the reverse side.
Instructions similar to those provided as part of the IRS official forms must be provided as part of any substitute Form W-2 (Copy A)
or Form W-3.
Section 2. Instructions for Employers
.01Only originals of Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 may be filedwith the SSA. Carbon copies and photocopies are unaccept-
able.
.02Employers should type or machine-print data entries on the non-laser-generated forms wheneverpossible. Ensure good quality
by using a high-quality type face, inserting data in the middle of blocks that are well separated from other printing and guidelines, and
taking any other measures that willguarantee clear, sharp images. Black ink must be used with no script type, inverted font, italics or
dual-case alpha characters.
Note.12-point Courier font is preferred by the SSA.
.03Form W-2 (Copy A) requires decimal entries for wage data. Dollar signs should not be printed with money amounts on the
Forms W-2 (Copy A) and W-3.
.04The employer must provide a machine-scannable Form W-2 (Copy A). The employer must also provide employee copies
(Copies B, C, and 2) that are legible and able to be photocopied (by the employee). Do not print any data in the top margin of the
payee copies of the forms.
.05Any printing in box a (Control number) on Forms W-2 or W-3 may not touch any vertical or horizontal lines and should be
centered in the box.
.06The filer's employer identification number (EIN) must beentered in box b of Form W-2 and box e of Form W-3. The EIN
entered on Form(s) W-2 (box b) and Form W-3 (box e) must be the same as on Forms 941, 943, CT-1, Schedule H (Form 1040), or
any other corresponding forms filed with the IRS. Be sure to use EIN format (00-0000000) rather than SSN format (000-00-0000).
.07The employer's name, address,andEINmaybepreprinted.
.08If available, employers should use the official IRS-preprinted Form W-3 that they received with Publication 393 or Publication
2184 when filing red-ink Forms W-2 (Copy A) with the SSA.
September 19, 20055732005–38 I.R.B.

Section 3. OMB Requirements for Both Red-Ink and Laser-Printed Substitute Forms
.01The Paperwork Reduction Act (the Act) of 1995 (Public Law 104-13) requires that:
•The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approves all IRS tax forms that are subject to the Act.
•Each IRS form contains (in or near the upper right corner) the OMB approval number, if assigned. (The official OMB numbers
may be found on the official IRS printed forms and are also shown on the forms in Exhibits A, B, C, E, and F.)
•Each IRS form (or its instructions) states:
(1) Why the IRS needs the information,
(2) How it will be used, and
(3) Whether or not the information is required to be furnished to the IRS.
This information must be provided to any users of official or substitute IRS forms or instructions.
•Any substitute form or substitute statement to a recipient must show the OMB number as it appears on the official IRS form.
.02The OMB requirements for substitute IRS Form W-2 (Copy A) and Form W-3 are:
•The OMB number (1545-0008) must appear exactly as shown on the official IRS form.
•For any copy of Form W-2 other than Copy A, the OMB number must use one of the following formats:
(1) OMB No. 1545-0008 (preferred) or
(2) OMB # 1545-0008 (acceptable).
.03Any substitute Form W-2 (Copy A only) must state “For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see back of Copy
D.” Any substitute Form W-3 must state “For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see back of Copy D of Form W-2.”
If no instructions are provided to users of your forms, you must furnish them with the exact text of the Privacy Act and Paperwork
Reduction Act Notice.
Section 4. Copies of Forms
.01You can obtain official IRS forms and information copies of federal tax materials at local IRS offices or by calling the IRS
Distribution Center at 1-800-829-3676. Other ways to get federal tax material include:
•The Internet atwww.irs.gov.
•The IRS’ CD-ROM (Publication 1796).
Only contact the IRS, not the SSA, for forms.
Note.Many IRS forms are provided on the IRS website and on the Federal Tax Forms CD-ROM. But copies of Form W-2 (Copy
A) and Form W-3 cannot be used for filing with the IRS or SSA whenobtained by these methods because the forms do not meet the
specific printing specificationsas described in this publication. Copies of Forms W-2 and W-3 obtained from these sources are for
information purposes only.
.02You can access the IRS website atw
ww.irs.gov.
.03The IRS also offers an alternative to downloading electronic files and provides current and prior-year access to tax forms and
instructions through its Federal Tax Forms CD-ROM. The CD will be available for the upcoming filing season. Order Publication
1796, IRS Federal Tax Products CD-ROM, by using the IRS website atw
ww.irs.gov/cdordersor by calling 1-877-CDFORMS (1-877-
233-6767).
Section5.EffectonOtherDocuments
.01Revenue Procedure 2004-54, 2004-34 I.R.B. 325, dated August 23, 2004 (reprinted as Publication 1141, Revised 8-2004), is
superseded.
2005–38 I.R.B.574September 19, 2005

ListofExhibits
Exhibit A — Form W-2 (Copy A) (Red-Ink)
Exhibit B — Form W-3 (Red-Ink)
Exhibit C — Form W-2 (Copy B)
Exhibit D — Form W-2 (Alternative Employee Copies) (Illustrating Horizontal and Vertical Formats)
Exhibit E — Form W-2 (Copy A) (Laser-Printed)
Exhibit F — Form W-3 (Laser-Printed)
September 19, 20055752005–38 I.R.B.

2005–38 I.R.B.576September 19, 2005

September 19, 20055772005–38 I.R.B.

2005–38 I.R.B.578September 19, 2005

September 19, 20055792005–38 I.R.B.

2005–38 I.R.B.580September 19, 2005

September 19, 20055812005–38 I.R.B.

Part IV. Items of General Interest
Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking and Notice of
Public Hearing
Section 411(d)(6) Protected
Benefits
REG–156518–04
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service
(IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
and notice of public hearing.
SUMMARY: This document contains pro-
posed regulations providing guidance on
certain issues relating to the anti-cutback
rules of section 411(d)(6) of the Internal
Revenue Code, which generally protect
accrued benefits, early retirement benefits,
retirement-type subsidies, and optional
forms of benefit under qualified retire-
ment plans. The proposed regulations
would address the interaction between the
anti-cutback rules of section 411(d)(6)
and the nonforfeitability requirements
of section 411(a), and would also pro-
vide a utilization test under which certain
plan amendments would be permitted to
eliminate or reduce certain early retire-
ment benefits, retirement-type subsidies,
or optional forms of benefit. These pro-
posed regulations would generally affect
sponsors of, and participants in, qualified
retirement plans.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
must be received by November 10, 2005.
Requests to speak (with outlines of oral
comments to be discussed) at the public
hearing scheduled for December 6, 2005,
at 10 a.m. must be received by November
15, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–156518–04), room
5203, Internal Revenue Service, PO Box
7604, Ben Franklin Station, Washing-
ton, DC 20044. Submissions may be
hand-delivered Monday through Friday
between the hours of 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–156518–04),
Courier’s Desk, Internal Revenue Service,
1111 Constitution Avenue, NW, Wash-
ington, DC. Alternatively, taxpayers may
submit comments electronically, via the
IRS Internet site atwww.irs.gov/regsor
via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov(indicate IRS and
REG–156518–04). The public hearing
will be held in the Auditorium, Internal
Revenue Building, 1111 Constitution Av-
enue, NW, Washington, DC.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT: Concerning the proposed
regulations, Pamela R. Kinard at (202)
622–6060; concerning submissions of
comments, the hearing, and the requests
to be placed on the building access list to
attend the hearing, contact Treena Garrett,
(202) 622–7180 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed
amendments to 26 CFR part 1 under
section 411(d)(6) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). These proposed regulations,
when finalized, would revise Treasury
Regulations §1.411(d)–3 to provide guid-
ance on when a plan amendment may
alter a benefit entitlement with respect
to benefits accrued before the date of the
amendment to add a condition that is per-
mitted under section 411(a). These rules
are intended to reflect the holding inCen-
tral Laborers’ Pension Fund v. Heinz,
541 U.S. 739 (June 7, 2004). The pro-
posed regulations would also provide a
new method — a utilization test — under
which a plan amendment is permitted to
eliminate or reduce an early retirement
benefit, a retirement-type subsidy, or an
optional form of benefit.
Section 411(a) generally provides that
an employee’s right to the accrued benefit
derived from employer contributions must
become nonforfeitable within a specified
period of service. Section 411(a)(3) pro-
vides circumstances under which an em-
ployee’s benefit is permitted to be forfeited
without violating section 411(a). Section
411(a)(3)(B) specifically provides that a
right to an accrued benefit derived from
employer contributions is not treated as
forfeitable solely because the plan pro-
vides that the payment of benefits is sus-
pended for such period as the employee is
employed, subsequent to the commence-
ment of payment of such benefits: (1) in
the case of a plan other than a multiem-
ployer plan, by the employer who main-
tains the plan under which such benefits
were being paid; and (2) in the case of a
multiemployer plan, in the same industry,
the same trade or craft, and the same geo-
graphic area covered by the plan as when
such benefits commenced.
The definition of employment for
which benefit payments are permitted
to be suspended is further described in 29
CFR 2530.203–3 of the Department of La-
bor Regulations, which interprets section
203(a)(3)(B) of the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA),
as amended, the counterpart to section
411(a)(3)(B) of the Code. Employment
that satisfies the conditions described in
section 203(a)(3)(B) of ERISA and the
regulations thereunder is referred to as
“section 203(a)(3)(B) service.” See 29
CFR 2530.203–3(c).
Section 411(d)(6)(A) provides that a
plan is treated as not satisfying the re-
quirements of section 411 if the accrued
benefit of a participant is decreased by
an amendment of the plan, other than an
amendment described in section 412(c)(8)
of the Code or section 4281 of ERISA.
Section 411(d)(6)(B) provides that a plan
amendment that has the effect of eliminat-
ingorreducinganearly retirement benefit
or a retirement-type subsidy, or elimi-
nating an optional form of benefit, with
respect to benefits attributable to service
before the amendment is treated as imper-
missibly reducing accrued benefits. For
a retirement-type subsidy, this protection
applies only with respect to an employee
who satisfies the preamendment condi-
tions for the subsidy (either before or after
the amendment). Section 411(d)(6)(B)
also authorizes the Secretary of the Trea-
sury to provide, through regulations, that
section 411(d)(6)(B) does not apply to any
plan amendment that eliminates optional
forms of benefit (other than a plan amend-
ment that has the effect of eliminating or
reducing an early retirement benefit or a
retirement-type subsidy).
Section 645(b)(1) of the Economic
Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation
Act of 2001, Public Law 107–16 (115
2005–38 I.R.B.582September 19, 2005

Stat. 38) (EGTRRA) amended section
411(d)(6)(B) of the Code to direct the Sec-
retary of the Treasury to issue regulations
providing that section 411(d)(6)(B) does
not apply to any amendment that reduces
or eliminates early retirement benefits
or retirement-type subsidies that create
significant burdens or complexities for
the plan and plan participants unless such
amendment adversely affects the rights of
any participant in a more thande minimis
manner.
Section 204(g) of ERISA contains par-
allel rules to section 411(d)(6) of the Code,
including a similar directive to the Secre-
tary of the Treasury to issue regulations
providing that section 204(g) of ERISA
does not apply to any amendment that re-
duces or eliminates early retirement ben-
efits or retirement-type subsidies that cre-
ate significant burdensor complexities for
the plan and plan participants unless such
amendment adversely affects the rights of
any participant in a more thande minimis
manner. Under section 101 of Reorgani-
zation Plan No. 4 of 1978 (43 FR 47713)
and section 204(g) of ERISA, the Secre-
tary of the Treasury has interpretive juris-
diction over the subject matter addressed
in these proposed regulations for purposes
of ERISA, as well as the Code. Thus, these
proposed Treasury regulations issued un-
der section 411(d)(6) of the Code apply
as well for purposes of section 204(g) of
ERISA.
On July 11, 1988, final regulations
(T.D. 8212, 1988–2 C.B. 83) under section
411(d)(6) were published in theFederal
Register(53 FR 26050). These regula-
tions are contained in §1.411(d)–4.
In conjunction with the publication of
these proposed regulations, final regula-
tions (T.D. 9219) under sections 411(d)(6)
and 4980F are being published elsewhere
in this issue of the Bulletin. Those final
regulations are contained in §1.411(d)–3,
which sets forth conditions under which a
plan amendment is permitted to eliminate
an optional form of benefit and to elim-
inate or reduce an early retirement bene-
fit or a retirement-type subsidy that creates
significant burdens or complexities for the
plan and its participants, but only if the
elimination does not adversely affect the
rights of any participant in a more thande
minimismanner. However, those regula-
tions reserve 2 topics for later guidance
— the utilization test (currently reserved
in §1.411(d)–3(f)) and the interaction of
the permitted forfeiture rules under sec-
tion 411(a) with the anti-cutback rules un-
der section 411(d)(6) (currently reserved in
§1.411(d)–3(a)(3)). These proposed regu-
lations would address these 2 topics as de-
scribed below.
InCentral Laborers’, the plaintiffs
were 2 inactive participants in a multi-
employer pension plan who commenced
payment of their benefits in 1996 after
qualifying for subsidized early retirement
payments. The plan terms required that
payments be suspended if a participant
engaged in “disqualifying employment.”
At the time of their commencement of
benefits, the plan defined disqualifying
employment to include only employment
covered by the plan, but not work as a
construction supervisor. Both participants
were employed as construction supervi-
sors after they commenced payment of
benefits. Although the 2 participants’ ben-
efit payments were not suspended in 1996,
theplanwasamendedin1998toexpand
its definition of disqualifying employment
to include any employment in the same
trade or craft, industry, and geographic
area covered by the plan, and the plan
stopped payments to the 2 participants
on account of their disqualifying employ-
ment as construction supervisors. The 2
participants sued to recover the suspended
payments, claiming that the amendment
expanding the plan’s suspension provi-
sions violated section 204(g) of ERISA
(the counterpart to section 411(d)(6) of the
Code).
The Supreme Court, holding for the 2
participants, ruled that section 204(g) of
ERISA prohibits a plan amendment ex-
panding the categories of post-retirement
employment that result in suspension of
the payment of early retirement benefits al-
ready accrued. The Court found that, while
ERISA permits certainconditions that are
elements of the benefit itself (such as sus-
pensions under section 411(a)(3)(B) of the
Code or section 203(a)(3)(B) of ERISA),
such a condition may not be imposed after
a benefit has accrued, and that the right to
receive benefit payments on a certain date
may not be limited by a new condition nar-
rowing that right. The Court agreed with
the 7
th
Circuit that “[a] participant’s ben-
efits cannot be understood without refer-
ence to the conditions imposed on receiv-
ing those benefits, and an amendment plac-
ing materially greater restrictions on the
receipt of the benefit ‘reduces’ the bene-
fit just as surely as a decrease in the size of
the monthly benefit.”Central Laborers’at
744, quotingHeinz v. Central Laborers’
Pension Fund, 303 F.3d 802, 805 (7
th
Cir.
2002).
Rev. Proc. 2005–23, 2005–18 I.R.B.
991, limits the retroactive application of
Central Laborers’for qualified plans
under section 401(a) pursuant to the
Commissioner’s authority under section
7805(b)(8). The revenue procedure pro-
vides that the IRS will not disqualify a
plan solely on account of a plan amend-
ment adopted before June 7, 2004 that
violated section 411(d)(6) by adding or
expanding a suspension of benefit provi-
sion permitted under section 411(a)(3) if
certain requirementsare satisfied. These
requirements include the adoption of a
reforming amendment that provides for
the payment of benefits retroactive to June
7, 2004, to affected plan participants. Rev.
Proc. 2005–23 does not address partic-
ipants’ rights to recover benefits under
TitleIofERISA.
Rev. Proc. 2005–23 states that Trea-
sury and the IRS intend to propose regula-
tions that reflect the holding inCentral La-
borers’. The revenue procedure provides
that the proposed regulations will provide
guidance on when an amendment may add
a benefit entitlement condition that is per-
mitted under the vesting rules with respect
to benefits accrued before the date of the
amendment. Those rules are contained in
these proposed regulations.
Explanation of Provisions
Interaction of the Permitted Forfeiture
Rules Under Section 411(a) with the
Anti-Cutback Rules Under Section
411(d)(6)
The proposed regulations would ad-
dress the interaction of the vesting rules
in section 411(a) with the anti-cutback
rules in section 411(d)(6), taking into ac-
count the decision inCentral Laborers’.
The regulations would provide that a plan
amendment that decreases accrued bene-
fits, or otherwise places greater restrictions
on the rights to section 411(d)(6) protected
benefits violates section 411(d)(6), even
if the amendment merely adds a restric-
tion or condition on receipt of section
September 19, 20055832005–38 I.R.B.

411(d)(6) protected benefits that is other-
wise permitted under the vesting rules in
section 411(a)(3) through (11). The pro-
posed regulations would further provide
that such a plan amendment is permitted
under section 411(d)(6) to the extent it
applies with respect to benefits accruing
after the applicable amendment date.
The proposed regulations include 3 ex-
amples illustrating this rule. One example
includes facts similar toCentral Laborers’.
Another example illustrates the interaction
of section 411(d)(6) with the rule of parity
in section 411(a)(6)(D). The final exam-
ple addresses how a plan amendment that
changes the plan’s vesting schedule would
violate section 411(d)(6) if the amendment
were to place greater restrictions on the
rights to section 411(d)(6) protected ben-
efits. This example illustrates that the ap-
plication of this section 411(d)(6) rule to
a plan amendment changing a plan’s vest-
ing schedule is in addition to the require-
ments under section 411(a)(10)(A) (requir-
ing that the nonforfeitable percentage of a
participant’s accrued benefit as of the ap-
plicable amendment date not be decreased
by the plan amendment) and under section
411(a)(10)(B) (requiring that the plan per-
mit each participant having not less than 3
years of service to elect to have his or her
nonforfeitable percentage computed with-
out regard to the plan amendment). Thus,
if a plan amendment changes the plan’s
vesting schedule, the amendment must not
place greater restrictions (including vest-
ing restrictions) on a participant’s rights
to previously accrued benefits, and must
also comply with section 411(a)(10). As
indicated in the example, both of these
requirements are satisfied for an amend-
ment changing a plan’s vesting schedule
if each plan participant is entitled to ben-
efits based on the greater of the new and
old vesting schedules.
While the proposed regulations address
the addition of conditions specifically de-
scribed in section 411(a), these rules would
also apply in other situations. For exam-
ple, if a plan provides section 411(d)(6)
protected benefits that are conditioned on
the reemployment of the participant, then a
plan amendment adding additional restric-
tions with respect to benefits already ac-
crued on those benefits is required to sat-
isfy section 411(d)(6). However, a plan
amendment is permitted to add restrictions
with respect to future accruals.
Utilization Test
The proposed regulations would pro-
vide that a plan is permitted to be amended
to eliminate optional forms of benefit that
comprise a generalized optional form
1
for a participant with respect to benefits
accrued before the applicable amendment
date if certain requirements relating to the
use of the generalized optional form are
satisfied. However, under the utilization
test, a plan is not permitted to be amended
to eliminate core options (i.e.,astraight
life annuity, a 75% joint and contingent
annuity, a 10-year term certain and life
annuity, and the most valuable option for
a participant with a short life expectancy).
In order to eliminate a noncore optional
form of benefit under the proposed utiliza-
tion test, 2 conditions must be satisfied:
(1) the generalized optional form is avail-
able to a substantial number of participants
during the relevant look-back period and
(2) no participant must have elected any
optional form of benefit that is within its
generalized optional form during such rel-
evant look-back period.
If the utilization test is satisfied, the
plan could be amended to eliminate all
of the optional forms of benefit that com-
prise a generalized optional form without
having to satisfy the burdensome andde
minimisrequirements of §1.411(d)–3(e).
Treasury and the IRS believe that the uti-
lization test, by its nature, implicitly de-
termines — by reference to participant’s
elections — which optional forms of ben-
efit are considered valuable to plan partici-
pants. The fact that no participant in a sub-
stantial sample elected any optional form
of benefit that is within a generalized op-
tional form is a compelling indication that
elimination of that the entire generalized
optional form would not adversely affect
the rights of any participant in a more than
de minimismanner.
The utilization test would provide that
the generalized optional form being elimi-
nated must have been available to at least
100 participants who are taken into ac-
count during the look-back period. The
look-back period under the utilization test
in the proposed regulations is the 2 plan
years immediately preceding the plan year
in which the plan amendment eliminating
the optional form of benefit is adopted.
At least one of the plan years during the
look-back period must be a 12-month plan
year. If a plan does not have at least 100
participants who are taken into account
during those 2 plan years, the look-back
periodispermittedtobeexpandedtobe
the 3, 4, or 5 plan years immediately pre-
ceding the plan year in which the plan
amendment eliminating the optional form
of benefit is adopted in order to have a
look-back period that has at least 100 par-
ticipants who are taken into account. If a
plan does not have at least 100 participants
who can be taken into account during the
relevant 5-year period, the plan is not per-
mitted to use the utilization test.
For purposes of the utilization test, a
participant is generally taken into account
only if during the look-back period the par-
ticipant was eligible to elect to commence
payment of an optional form of benefit that
is part of the generalized optional form
being eliminated. However, a participant
would not be taken into account if the par-
ticipant: did not elect any optional form
of benefit with an annuity commencement
date that is within the look-back period;
elected an optional form of benefit that in-
cludes a single-sum distribution that ap-
plies with respect to at least 25% of the par-
ticipant’s accrued benefit; elected an op-
tional form of benefit that was only avail-
able during a limited period of time that
contained a retirement-type subsidy that
was not extended to the generalized op-
tional form being eliminated; or elected
an optional form of benefit with an annu-
ity commencement date that is more than
10 years before normal retirement age.
2
Treasury and the IRS believe that, in light
of these restrictions on participants who
are permitted to be taken into account in
applying the utilization test, the sample
size of 100 participants who are eligible
to elect the generalized optional form is
sufficiently large to demonstrate that elim-
ination of the generalized optional form
1
The termgeneralized optional formis defined in §1.411(d)–3(g)(8) as a group of optional forms of benefit that are identical except for differences due to the actuarial factors that areused
to determine the amount of the distributions under thoseoptional forms of benefit and the annuity starting dates.
2
The termannuity commencement dateis defined in §1.411(d)–3(g)(3) as the annuity starting date, except that, in the case of a retroactive annuity starting date,annuity commencement date
is the date of the first payment of benefits pursuant to a participant election of a retroactive annuity starting date, as defined in §1.417(e)–1(b)(3)(iv).
2005–38 I.R.B.584September 19, 2005

would not adversely affect the rights of any
plan participant in a more thande minimis
manner.
Under the proposed regulations, a plan
amendment eliminating a generalized
optional form under the utilization rule
cannot be applicable with respect to an
optional form of benefit with an annu-
ity commencement date that is earlier
than the number of days in the maxi-
mum QJSA explanation period (as defined
in §1.411(d)–3(g)(9)) after the date the
amendment is adopted. This waiting pe-
riod is the same as the waiting period
for the elimination of an optional form
of benefit under the redundancy rule in
§1.411(d)–3(c)(1)(ii).
Proposed Effective Date
The rules relating to section 411(a) non-
forfeitability provisions are proposed to be
effective June 7, 2004, the date of theCen-
tral Laborers’decision. The rules relat-
ing to the utilization test are proposed to
be effective for amendments adopted after
December 31, 2006. With respect to the
rules relating to the utilization test, these
proposed regulations cannot be relied upon
until they are adopted in final form in the
Federal Register.
Special Analyses
It has been determined that these pro-
posed regulations are not a significant reg-
ulatory action as defined in Executive Or-
der 12866. Therefore a regulatory assess-
ment is not required. It also has been deter-
mined that section 553(b) of the Adminis-
trative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 5)
does not apply to these regulations. Be-
cause these regulations do not impose a
collection of information on small entities,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
chapter 6) does not apply. Pursuant to sec-
tion 7805(f) of the Code, these proposed
regulations will be submitted to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Busi-
ness Administration for comment on their
impact on small business.
Comments and Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations, consideration
will be given to any written comments
(a signed original and eight (8) copies)
or electronic comments that are submitted
timely to the IRS. The Treasury and IRS
specifically request comments on the clar-
ity of the proposed rules and how they can
be made easier to understand. All com-
ments will be available for public inspec-
tion and copying.
A public hearing has been scheduled
for December 6, 2005, beginning at 10
a.m. in the Auditorium, Internal Revenue
Building, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW,
Washington, DC. Due to building secu-
rity procedures, visitors must enter at the
main entrance, located at 1111 Constitu-
tion Avenue, NW. In addition, all visitors
must present photo identification to enter
the building. Because of access restric-
tions, visitors will not be admitted beyond
the immediate entrance area more than 30
minutes before the hearing starts. For in-
formation about having your name placed
on the building access list to attend the
hearing, see the “FOR FURTHER INFOR-
MATION CONTACT” portion of this pre-
amble.
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) ap-
ply to the hearing. Persons who wish to
present oral comments must submit writ-
ten or electronic comments and an out-
line of the topics to be discussed and time
to be devoted to each topic (signed origi-
nal and eight (8) copies) by November 15,
2005. A period of 10 minutes will be allot-
ted to each person for making comments.
An agenda showing the scheduling of the
speakers will be prepared after the dead-
line for receiving comments has passed.
Copies of the agenda will be available free
of charge at the hearing.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these proposed
regulations is Pamela R. Kinard, Office of
Division Counsel/Associate Chief Coun-
sel(TaxExemptandGovernmentEnti-
ties), Internal Revenue Service. However,
personnel from other offices of the Internal
Revenue Service and Treasury Department
participated in their development.
*****
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is proposed
to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for
part 1 is amended by adding an entry in
numerical order to read, in part, as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Section 1.411(d)–3 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 411(d)(6) and section 645(b) of the
Economic Growth and Tax Relief Recon-
ciliation Act of 2001, Pub. L. 107–16 (115
Stat. 38).* * *
Par. 2. Section 1.411(d)–3 is amended
by:
1. Revising paragraph (a)(3).
2. AddingExamples 3and4to para-
graph (a)(4).
3. AddingExample 3to paragraph
(b)(4).
4. Revising paragraph (f).
5. AddingExample 6to paragraph (h).
6. Adding paragraphs (j)(3) and (j)(4).
The revisions and additions read as fol-
lows:
§1.411(d)–3 Section 411(d)(6) Protected
Benefits.
*****
(a) * * *
(3)Application of section 411(a) non-
forfeitability provisions with respect to
section 411(d)(6) protected benefits.The
rules of this paragraph (a) apply to a
plan amendment that decreases a par-
ticipant’s accrued benefits, or otherwise
places greater restrictions or conditions on
a participant’s rights to section 411(d)(6)
protected benefits, even if the amendment
merely adds a restriction or condition that
is otherwise permitted under the vesting
rules in section 411(a)(3) through (11).
However, such an amendment does not
violate section 411(d)(6) to the extent it
applies with respect to benefits that accrue
after the applicable amendment date.
*****
(4) * * *
Example 3.(i)Facts. Employer N maintains Plan
C, a qualified defined benefit plan under which an
employee participates upon completion of 1 year of
service and is vested in 100% of the employer-de-
rived accrued benefit upon completion of 5 years of
service. Plan C provides that a former employee’s
years of service prior to a break in service will be
reinstated upon completion of 1 year of service af-
ter being rehired. Plan C has participants who have
fewer than 5 years of service and who are accord-
ingly 0% vested in their employer-derived accrued
benefits. On December 31, 2007, effective January
September 19, 20055852005–38 I.R.B.

1, 2008, Plan C is amended, in accordance with sec-
tion 411(a)(6)(D), to provide that any nonvested par-
ticipant who has 5 consecutive 1-year breaks in ser-
vice and whose number ofconsecutive 1-year breaks
in service exceeds his or her number of years of ser-
vice before the breaks will have his or her pre-break
service disregarded in determining vesting under the
plan.
(ii)Conclusion. Under paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, the plan amendment does not satisfy the re-
quirements of paragraph (a) of this section, and thus
violates section 411(d)(6), because the amendment
places greater restrictions or conditions on the rights
to section 411(d)(6) protected benefits, as of January
1, 2008, for participants who have fewer than 5 years
of service, by restricting the ability of those partici-
pants to receive further vesting protections on bene-
fits accrued as of that date.
Example 4.(i)Facts—(A) Employer O sponsors
Plan D, a qualified profit sharing plan under which
each employee has a nonforfeitable right to a percent-
age of his or her employer-derived accrued benefit
based on the following table:
Completed years of serviceNonforfeitable percentage
Fewer than 30%
320%
440%
5
60%
680%
7100%
(B) In January 2005, Employer O acquires Com-
pany X
, which maintains Plan E, a qualified profit
sharing plan under which each employee who has
completed 5 years of service has a nonforfeitable
righ
t to 100% of the employer-derived accrued ben-
efit. In 2006, Plan E is merged into Plan D. On the
effectivedateforthemerger,PlanDisamended
to pr
ovide that the vesting schedule for participants
of Plan E is the 7-year graded vesting schedule of
Plan D. In accordance withsection 411(a)(10)(A),
the
plan amendment provides that any participant of
Plan E who had completed 5 years of service prior
to the amendment is fully vested. In addition, as re-
qui
red under section 411(a)(10)(B), the amendment
provides that any participant in Plan E who has at
least 3 years of service prior to the amendment is
pe
rmitted to make an irrevocable election to have
the vesting of his or her nonforfeitable right to the
employer-derived accrued benefit determined under
ei
ther the 5-year cliff vesting schedule or the 7-year
graded vesting schedule.Participant G, who has an
account balance of $10,000 on the applicable amend-
me
nt date, is a participant in Plan E with 2 years of
service as of the applicable amendment date. As of
the date of the merger, Participant G’s nonforfeitable
r
ight to G’s employer-derived accrued benefit is 0%
under both the 7-year graded vesting schedule of
Plan D and the 5-year cliff vesting schedule of Plan
E
.
(ii)Conclusion. Under paragraph (a)(3) of this
section, the plan amendment does not satisfy the
r
equirements of paragraph (a) of this section and
violates section 411(d)(6), because the amendment
places greater restrictions or conditions on the rights
to section 411(d)(6) protected benefits with respect
to G and any participant who has fewer than 7 years
of service and who elected (or was made subject to)
the new vesting schedule. A method of avoiding a
section 411(d)(6) violation with respect to account
balances attributable to benefits accrued as of the
applicable amendment date and earnings thereon,
would be for Plan D to provide for the vested per-
centage of G and each other participant in Plan E to
be no less than the greater of the 2 vesting schedules
(e.g., for G and each other participant in Plan E to be
fully vested if the participant completes 5 years of
service) for those account balances and earnings.
*****
(b) * * *
(4)* * *
Examp
le 3.(i)Facts. Plan C, a multiemployer
defined benefit plan in a particular industry, provides
that a participant may elect to commence distribu-
tions
only if the participant is not currently employed
by an employer maintaining the plan and provides
that, if the participant has a specified number of years
of se
rvice and attains a specified age, the distribution
is without any actuarial reduction for commencement
before normal retirement age. Since the plan’s incep-
tion
, Plan C has provided for suspension of pension
benefits during periods of disqualifying employment
(ERISA section 203(a)(3)(B) service). Before 2007,
the
plan defined disqualifying employment to include
any job as an electrician in the particular industry and
geographic location to which Plan C applies. This
def
inition of disqualifying employment did not cover
a job as an electrician supervisor. In 2005, Participant
E, having rendered the specified number of years of
se
rvice and attained the specified age to retire with a
fully subsidized early retirement benefit, retires from
E’s job as an electrician with Employer Y and starts
ap
osition with Employer Z as an electrician super-
visor. Employer Z is not a participating employer in
Plan C but is an employer in the same industry and ge-
o
graphic location as Employer Y. When E left service
with Employer Y, E’s position as a electrician super-
visor was not disqualifying employment for purposes
o
f Plan C’s suspension of pension benefit provision,
and E elects to commence benefit payments in 2005.
In 2006, effective January 1, 2007, Plan C, in accor-
d
ance with section 411(a)(3)(B), is amended to ex-
pand the definition of disqualifying employment to
include any job (including supervisory positions) as
an electrician in the same industry and geographic lo-
cation to which Plan C applies. On January 1, 2007,
E’s pension benefits are suspended because of E’s
disqualifying employment as an electrician supervi-
sor. (These facts are generally comparable to the facts
inCentral Laborers’ Pension Fund v. Heinz,541U.S.
739 (June 7, 2004).)
(ii)Conclusion. Under paragraphs (a)(3) and
(b)(1) of this section, the 2007 plan amendment
violates section 411(d)(6), because the amendment
places greater restrictions or conditions on a partici-
pant’s rights to section 411(d)(6) protected benefits
to the extent it applies with respect to benefits that
accrued before January 1, 2007. The result would
be the same even if the amendment did not apply
to former employees and instead applied only to
parti
cipants who were actively employed at the time
of the applicable amendment.
*****
(f)Utilization test—(1)General rule.A
plan is permitted to be amended to elim-
inate all of the optional forms of benefit
that comprise a generalized optional form
(as defined in paragraph (g)(8) of this sec-
tion) for a participant with respect to ben-
efits accrued before the applicable amend-
ment date if—
(i) None of the optional forms of bene-
fit being eliminated is a core option, within
the meaning of paragraph (g)(5) of this
section;
(ii) The plan amendment is not applica-
ble with respect to an optional form of ben-
efit with an annuity commencement date
that is earlier than the number of days
in the maximum QJSA explanation pe-
riod (as defined in paragraph (g)(9) of this
section) after the date the amendment is
adopted;
(iii) The generalized optional form has
been available to at least 100 participants
who are taken into account during the
look-back period; and
(iv) No participant has elected any op-
tional form of benefit that is part of the
generalized optional form with an annu-
ity commencement date that is within the
look-back period.
(2)Look-back period. For purposes of
this paragraph (f), the look-back period
is the 2 plan years immediately preceding
the plan year in which the plan amend-
ment eliminating the generalized optional
form is adopted. At least one of the plan
years during the look-back period must
be a 12-month plan year. However, if a
2005–38 I.R.B.586September 19, 2005

plan does not have at least 100 partici-
pants who are taken into account under this
paragraph (f) during those 2 plan years,
the look-back period is permitted to be ex-
panded to be the 3, 4, or 5 plan years im-
mediately preceding the plan year in which
the plan amendment eliminating the gen-
eralized optional form is adopted in or-
der to have a look-back period that has at
least 100 participants who are taken into
account under this paragraph (f). If a plan
does not have at least 100 participants who
are taken into account under this paragraph
(f) during the relevant 5-year period, the
plan is not permitted to add more plan
years to the look-back period and, accord-
ingly, such a plan is not permitted to use
the utilization test in this paragraph (f).
(3)Participants taken into account.Ex-
cept as provided in this paragraph (f)(3),
a participant is taken into account for pur-
poses of this paragraph (f) only if the par-
ticipant was eligible to elect to commence
payment of an optional form of benefit that
is part of the generalized optional form be-
ing eliminated with an annuity commence-
ment date that is within the look-back pe-
riod. However, a participant is not taken
into account if the participant either—
(i) Did not elect any optional form of
benefit with an annuity commencement
date that was within the look-back period;
(ii) Elected an optional form of benefit
that included a single-sum distribution that
applied with respect to at least 25% of the
participant’s accrued benefit;
(iii) Elected an optional form of bene-
fit that was only available during a limited
period of time and that contained a retire-
ment-type subsidy which at that annuity
commencement date was not extended to
the optional form of benefit with the same
annuity commencement date that is part of
the generalized optional form being elimi-
nated; or
(iv) Elected an optional form of benefit
with an annuity commencement date that
was more than 10 years before normal re-
tirement age.
(4)Default elections. For purposes of
this paragraph (f), an election includes the
payment of an optional form of benefit that
applies in the absence of an affirmative
election.
*****
(h) * * *
Example 6.(i)Facts involving elimination of
noncore options using utilization test—(A)In gen-
eral. Plan G is a calendar year defined benefit plan
under which participants may elect to commence
distributions after termination of employment in the
following actuarially equivalent forms, with spousal
consent, if applicable: a straight life annuity; a 50%,
75%, or 100% joint and contingent annuity; or a
5-year, 10-year, or a 15-year term certain and life an-
nuity. Participants whose benefits are under $5,000
are permitted to elect a single-sum distribution. The
annuities offered under the plan are generally avail-
able both with and without a social security leveling
feature. The social security leveling feature provides
for an assumed commencement of social security
benefits at any age selected by the participant be-
tween the ages of 62 and 67. Under Plan G, the
normal retirement age is defined as age 65.
(B)Utilization test. In 2007, the plan sponsor
of Plan G, after reviewing participants’ benefit elec-
tions, determines that no participant in the 2 prior plan
years (2005 and 2006) elected a 5-year term certain
and life annuity with a social security leveling option.
During the 2 prior plan years, Plan G has made the
5-year term certain and life annuity with a social secu-
rity leveling option available to 142 participants who
were at least age 55 and who elected an optional form
of benefit with an annuity commencement date dur-
ing that 2-year period. In addition, during 2005–06
plan years, 20 of the 142 participants elected a sin-
gle-sum distribution and there was no retirement-type
subsidy available for a limited period of time. Plan G,
in accordance with paragraph (f)(1) of this section, is
amended on September 1, 2007, effective as of Jan-
uary 1, 2008, to eliminate all 5-year term certain and
life annuities with a social security leveling option for
all annuity commencement dates on or after January
1, 2008.
(ii)Conclusion. The amendment satisfies the re-
quirements of paragraph (f) of this section. First, the
5-year term certain and life annuity with a social se-
curity leveling option is not a core option as defined
in paragraph (g)(5) of this section. Second, the plan
amendment is not applicable with respect to an op-
tional form of benefit with an annuity commence-
ment date that is earlier than the number of days in the
maximum QJSA explanation period after the date the
amendment is adopted. Third, the 5-year term cer-
tain and life annuity with a social security leveling
option has been available to at least 100 participants
who are taken into account for purposes of paragraph
(f)(4) of this section during the look-back period of
2005 and 2006. Fourth, during that period, no par-
ticipant elected any optional form that is part of the
generalized optional form being eliminated (i.e.,the
5-year term and life annuity with a social security lev-
eling option).
*****
(j) * * *
(3)Effective date for rules relating to
section 411(a) nonforfeitability provisions.
The rules provided in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section are effective June 7, 2004.
(4)Effective date for rules relating to
utilization test. The rules provided in para-
graph (f) of this section are effective for
amendments adopted after December 31,
2006.
*****
Mark E. Matthews,
Deputy Commissioner for
Services and Enforcement.
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on August 11,
2005, 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal
Register for August 12, 2005, 70 F.R. 47155)
Foundations Status of Certain
Organizations
Announcement 2005–65
The following organizations have failed
to establish or have been unable to main-
tain their status as public charities or as op-
erating foundations. Accordingly, grantors
and contributors maynot, after this date,
rely on previous rulings or designations
in the Cumulative List of Organizations
(Publication 78), or on the presumption
arising from the filing of notices under sec-
tion 508(b) of the Code. This listing does
notindicate that the organizations have lost
their status as organizations described in
section 501(c)(3), eligible to receive de-
ductible contributions.
Former Public Charities.The follow-
ing organizations (which have been treated
as organizations that are not private foun-
dations described in section 509(a) of the
Code) are now classified as private foun-
dations:
21st Century Womens Leadership Center,
Inc., New York, NY
A Better Way Foundation ABWF, Inc.,
New Haven, CT
A C P D D, Inc., Setauket, NY
A Razvin Trust for Russian American
Understanding, Great Neck, NY
Academie De Vie Charter School, Inc.,
Pasadena, TX
Acclaimed Dance Company, Inc.,
Baton Rouge, LA
Act Up, Inc., – Alternative Creative
Theater, Vernon, CT
Affordable Home Care, Inc.,
Portsmouth, VA
Agape Net, Inc., Houston, TX
Alan Seabrooks Multi Service Center for
Family Life, Inc., Brooklyn, NY
Allegro Performers Parents Association,
Kent, WA
Alleyne School Alumni of the USA, Inc.,
Brooklyn, NY
September 19, 20055872005–38 I.R.B.

Always Believe Foundation,
Greensboro, NC
American Academy of Distance Learning
& Training, Inc., Valley City, ND
American Friends for the Voice of Russian
Jewry, Brooklyn, NY
American Friends of Dor Vador
Institutions, Inc., Brooklyn, NY
American Friends of Etachadut Amosdos
Bkiryat Sefer, Brooklyn, NY
American Friends of Machon MIFNE,
Inc., New York, NY
American Friends of Z A K A, Inc.,
Brooklyn, NY
American Standard Bred Adoption
Program of Michigan, Inc., Hillman, MI
Amigos De Apostoles Y Profetas, Inc.,
Uniondale, NY
Amsterdam Sports Foundation, Inc.,
New York, NY
Annie R. Thomas Foundation,
Shreveport, LA
Aquarium Sea Cadets, Brooklyn, NY
Art Forum for Children, Inc.,
New York, NY
Arts From the Heart Arts Consortium,
Richmond, VA
Asian Community Media Institute, Inc.,
Saint Paul, MN
A S K, Inc., Baltimore, MD
Ates Turkish Charity, Glen Burnie, MD
Aurora Women and Girls Foundation,
Inc., Bristol, CT
Aviation Volunteer Fire Department
Engine Company 3, Inc., Bronx, NY
Badger Aquatics Club, Inc., Madison, WI
Bainbridge High School Instrumental
Music Boosters, Bainbridge Island, WA
Ballet Arts Dance Co., Inc., Endicott, NY
Bare Elements Theatre Group, Ltd.,
New York, NY
Bay Area Senior Resources,
San Francisco, CA
Bernardo Yorba Choir and Handbell
Music Boosters, Yorba Linda, CA
Best Beginnings, Inc.,
Franklin Square, NY
Betances Youth Program Advisory Board,
Inc., Bronx, NY
Biltmore School Alumni Association,
Asheville, NC
Bobbys Place, Inc., Birmingham, AL
Buffalo Philharmonic Orchestra Volunteer
Foundation, Inc., Buffalo, NY
Buffalo Premier Futbol Club, Inc.,
N. Tonawanda, NY
Bulldog Conditioning Club, Inc.,
Silver Spring, MD
Caldwell County Cares Historical Society,
Inc., Polo, MO
California Raisin Country Festival,
Fresno, CA
Cambridge Area Chamber of Commerce
Foundation, Cambridge, MN
Campus,Inc.,AnnArbor,MI
Cashmere Schools Foundation,
Cashmere, WA
Casita Park Housing Development Fund
Co., Inc., New York, NY
Catching Your Dreams, Inc., La Mesa, CA
Chamael Wrestling Club, San Jose, CA
Chano Pozo Foundation, Inc.,
New York, NY
Charitable Limb, Rogers, AR
Charlie Brown Foundation, Budd Lake, NJ
Chicago Oxford Society, Chicago, IL
Childrens A I R Foundation,
New York, NY
Choral Sounds of Chicago, Inc.,
Chicago, IL
Christian Affordable Home Ministries,
Stockbridge, GA
Christian Broadcasting Support
Organization, Inc., Mena, AR
Christmas in April Cleveland,
Cleveland, TN
Cire Foundation,Incorporated,
Broomfield, CO
Collective for Social Services, Inc.,
Cheverly, MD
Communities in Schools of San Francisco,
Inc., San Francisco, CA
Communities in Schools of Snohomish
County,Everett,WA
Community Health Reach Foundation,
Los Angeles, CA
Community of New Hope,
Chapel Hill, NC
Comprehensive Allied Health Intervention
Services, Inc., Fort Worth, TX
Computerized Training Institute of
America, Inc., Far Rockaway, NY
County Line Riders of Catalina, Inc.,
Tucson, AZ
Creative Learning School, Inc.,
Burlingame, CA
Creative New York, Inc., New York, NY
Crescendo Productions, Murray, UT
CrossHighBandBooster,Cross,SC
Crum Area Little League, Crum, WV
Custodians of Russian Culture, Inc.,
Brooklyn, NY
Dallas National 2003, Dallas, TX
Deborah Messi Memorial Fund, Inc.,
Garden City, NY
DeFranco Public Charity for the
Enhancement of Education, Inc.,
Niagara Falls, NY
Dental Care International Foundation,
Inc., Coram, NY
Diamond Gals of Ohio, Inc., Stow, OH
Dile Foundation, Inc., Randallstown, MD
Disability Network, Inc., Brooklyn, NY
Divide County Quarterback Club, Inc.,
Crosby, ND
Dolphin Whale & Marine Wildlife
Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA
Dome Artist Outreach, New York, NY
Dylan Malamala Cystic Fibrosis
Foundation, Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Earth Ecology Institute, Inc.,
Baton Rouge, LA
Emergency Medical Services
Command Memorial Foundation,
Inc., Brooklyn, NY
Emma Winograd Foundation, Inc.,
Suffern, NY
Esperanza Performing Arts Association,
Inc., San Diego, CA
Extra Loud, Inc., New York, NY
Eya Foundation, San Antonio, TX
Faith in Action of Fannin County, Inc.,
Blue Ridge, GA
Faith Urban Ministries, Euclid, OH
Families United Performing Art Learning
& Counseling Center, Long Beach, CA
Family Grief Center,
Colorado Springs, CO
Fantod Theater, Chicago, IL
First Home Foundation, Inc.,
Rego Park, NY
Foundation for Intercultural Travel, Inc.,
White Plains, NY
Foundation of Moral and Ethical
Development, Inc., Brooklyn, NY
Friends of A A M O R, Inc., Higganum, CT
Friends of Drama Foundation, Inc.,
White Plains, NY
General Service Industries, Tulia, TX
Generation Excellence, Inc., Flushing, NY
Global Emergency Org., Inc.,
Northport, NY
Grace Community Sports Program, Inc.,
Saint Albans, NY
Greater Mount Olive Missionary
Community Development Learning
Center, Hamilton Township, NJ
Greater South Loop Association,
Chicago, IL
Green Cure, Inc., Ventura, CA
Greenfield Parent Teacher Organization,
Greenfield, NH
2005–38 I.R.B.588September 19, 2005

Greg Evangelistic Ministries, Inc.,
North Miami, FL
Grifton Flood Relief, Grifton, NC
Healing Partners of Santa Fe, Inc.,
Santa Fe, NM
Heavensent 2000, Inc., Lithonia, GA
Help the Children Foundation, Inc.,
Brooklyn, NY
Helping Hands Ministry, Lyman, ME
Helpnet-USA, Inc., South Orange, NJ
Hereandnow Theatre Company,
S. Pasadena, CA
Higher Mission Foundation,
Kansas City, KS
Hughes Boys Center, Inc., Perris, CA
I-Gyan, Inc., Chestnut Hill, MA
Indian Nation, Coal Grove, OH
Indigenous Learning Institute,
Cushing, OK
Inmate Families Organization, Inc.,
Manchaca, TX
Inner City Community Development
Corp., Roosevelt, NY
Inner City Youth Alive, Philadelphia, PA
Interlink, Mankato, MN
International Committee for Preservation
of Gravesites of Geonai Pressburg,
Brooklyn, NY
International Multicultural Network of
Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
International Outreach Ministries, Inc.,
Pearland, TX
ITAV, Inc., Teaneck, NJ
J. H. Omega Mission Center, Inc.,
Flushing, NY
Jewish Lifeline, Inc., Brooklyn, NY
John Kruk Charities, Keyser, WV
Jump Start NY, Inc., New York, NY
Junior Scratch Tour of America,
Riverside, CA
Just Solutions, Brattleboro, VT
Kangaroo Kids a Corporation Caring for
Children, Palm Desert, CA
Kansas City Blaze Softball Club,
Olathe, KS
Key School of Vermont, Inc.,
Brownsville, VT
Kids First Educational Center,
Southfield, MI
Kimberly Youth Basketball Association,
Inc., Appleton, WI
Korean Association of Retired Persons,
Inc., New York, NY
Kuljit Bindra Charitable Foundation, Inc.,
New York, NY
L A Village Recreation and Rehabilitation
Center, Los Angeles, CA
La Costa Canyon High School Grad Nite
Association, Encinitas, CA
Lathrop Baseball Softball Association,
Lathrop, MO
Learning Adventures, Tigard, OR
Leesburg Summer Recreation League,
Leesburg, IN
Lew E Learning Center, Chicago, IL
Liddies Family Daycare, Carson, CA
Lidia Matticchio Bastianich Foundation,
New York, NY
Life International Mission, Inc.,
Dallas, TX
Lifeskills 101, Newcastle, CA
Lifeworks and Associates, Inc.,
Huntington Station, NY
Lincoln Charter School East PTO,
Denver, NC
Lloyd A. Schneider/Daphne H. Schneider
Mounds and Habitat Uniting Native
Tribes Foundation, Inc., McFarland, WI
Logos Institute, Gladwyne, PA
Lone Star Summer Swim League,
San Antonio, TX
Long Island Sound Sharks Football, Inc.,
Shoreham, NY
Lords Harvest, Inc., Lavallette, NJ
MaAfrika Tikkun USA, Inc.,
White Plains, NY
Macedonia Human Services Cultural
Training Center, Inc., Punta Gorda, FL
Marietta Scrappers Used Baseball, Inc.,
Smyrna, GA
MCR Budget Counselors, Inc.,
Merrilville, IN
Medical Aid Foundation, Inc.,
New York, NY
Mercy Mountain Housing, Inc.,
Williamsburg, KY
Mercy Mountain Transportation, Inc.,
Williamsburg, KY
MIA K, New York, NY
Midwest Magic Basketball Association,
Bartlett, IL
Ministry of Prayer,
Praise and Provision, Zimmerman, MN
Mirror to the Soul, Dallas, TX
Missouri Epsilon Scholastic Foundation,
Inc., Springfield, MO
Mochon Kocho Shel Halacha, Inc.,
Brooklyn, NY
Mosdot Chinuch Vchesed Dchasidei Gur,
Inc., Brooklyn, NY
Muslims on Long Island, Inc.,
Bethpage, NY
NAEC Community Development
Company, Inc., Amityville, NY
National Breast Cancer Directory, Inc.,
Hackensack, NJ
National Campaign Against Youth
Violence, Washington, DC
National Debt Counseling Corp.,
Huntington, NY
National Homeschool Music Ensembles,
Inc., Tecumseh, MI
National Sports Marketing Education
Foundation, Manhattan Beach, CA
Navy Sailing Foundation, Chicago, IL
NBC—USAHousing,Inc.,Thirty,
Cleveland, OH
New Avenue Theatre Project, Inc.,
New York, NY
New Creation Christian Camp, Inc.,
Hickman, NE
New Haven Healing Center and Hospice,
Phoenix, AZ
New Horizon Track Club, Inc.,
Dobbs Ferry, NY
New York Aid Society, Jericho, NY
Newschelle Corporation, Brooklyn, NY
Nor Cal Baseball, Inc., Danville, CA
North Carolina Action for Youth,
Goldsboro, NC
North Penn Panthers Wrestling Club,
Lansdale, PA
Northeast Ohio Womens Hockey
Organization, Columbia Station, OH
Omas Farm Food Unlimited, Incorporated,
Brooklyn, NY
One Rose Foundation, Inc., Flushing, NY
One Step, Inc., Bakersfield, CA
Operations Reach Out Across Miami,
Inc., Miami, FL
Orange After School Program, Inc.,
E. Barre, VT
Orange County Lutheran Youth Band,
Orange, CA
Organization of Black Airline Pilots,
Silver Spring, MD
Orland Park A Girls Fast Pitch Softball,
Palos Heights, IL
Paul J. Tsang Foundation, Chapel Hill, NC
Penn Hills Multipurpose Service
Corporation, Verona, PA
Permanent Rescue, Conway, SC
Perry Fund for Others, Charlottesville, VA
PFW Promotions, Inc., Princeton, NJ
Piney Woods Mental Health Consumers,
Inc., Zavalla, TX
Pittsburg High School Crime Stoppers,
Pittsburg, TX
Police Athletic League of North
Huntingdon Umpire School, Inc.,
North Huntingdon, PA
September 19, 20055892005–38 I.R.B.

Pool Hawks Booster Club,
Kaneohe Bay, HI
Press Freedom Foundation,
North Miami, FL
Princeton Youth Wrestling Club,
Princeton, MN
Priority Methang, Inc., Sunrise, FL
Prospect Park Players, Minneapolis, MN
Prospect Plaza Development Corporation,
Brooklyn, NY
PTO Massachusetts Parent-Teacher
Organization Runkle School,
Brookline, MA
R & R Foundation, Inc., Brooklyn, NY
Racing for the Cross Ministries, Elgin, SC
Reach Foundation, Shaker Heights, OH
Rescued Pet Foundation, Los Angeles, CA
Resources for Economic Development,
Mesa, AZ
Rev. Samuel Powels Foundation,
Blythe, CA
Richer Equine Sanctuary, Inc.,
Staten Island, NY
River of Life International Fisheries,
White Bear Lake, MN
RMS Music Parents Association, Inc.,
Homestead, FL
Rose of Sharon Enterprises Society,
Brooklyn, NY
Rough Cut Indians, Baton Rouge, LA
Saigon Childrens Charity USA,
New York, NY
Samalitan Christian Childrens Fund, Inc.,
Pasadena, CA
Second Chance for a New Life, Inc.,
Roselle, NJ
Seeds for Self-Reliance, Inc.,
New York, NY
Shasta Works, Inc., Redding, CA
Shekinah Creatives Unlimited,
Littlerock, CA
Shorewood Orchestra Boosters,
Shorewood, WI
Sisters-N-Company, St. Louis, MO
Society for Research Into Enlightenment,
Loon Lake, WA
St. Clair Athletic Booster Club,
St. Clair, MO
St. Joseph County Family Investment
Initiative Corporation, South Bend, IN
Star Community Development
Corporation, Ossining, NY
Stephens Hope Foundation, Chetek, WI
Styleworks, Brooklyn, NY
Suburban Housing Holding Corp.,
Bay Shore, NY
Suzanne Stanway Memorial, Inc.,
Highland Mills, NY
Tale Spinners, Wasilla, AK
Tatra Foundation for Music, Inc.,
Reading, MA
Tears Foundation, Houston, TX
T E N Female Athletics, Montgomery, AL
Thunder Baseball, Pace, FL
Town of Ossining PBA, Inc.,
Montrose, NY
Tremont Settlement House, Inc.,
Bronx, NY
Trinidad & Tobago Hummingbird Forum,
Inc., Brooklyn, NY
Trinity Social Justice Institute, Austin, TX
True Fruit Ministries, Inc.,
East Quogue, NY
True Light Day Care, Austin, TX
Union Day Care Center, Inc., Astoria, NY
United Albanian Appeal, Bronx, NY
United Confederation of Taino People,
Inc., Corona, NY
University City East, Inc.,
University City, MO
Upstage at WRHS, Inc., Holden, MA
Vandegrift Institute, Phoenix, AZ
Veex Health & Information Service Corp.,
Oakland, CA
Vehicle Access Network VAN,
Denton, TX
Village of New Hope, Fayetteville, GA
Villar-Hauser Theatre Development Fund,
Inc., New York, NY
Warner Robins Resident Council, Inc.,
Warner Robins, GA
Water Valley Community Church,
Greeley, CO
Waterman Wharf Rat Society, Inc.,
Galveston, TX
West Babylon Sunburst,
West Babylon, NY
West End Neighborhood Association,
Inc., Johnson City, TN
Western Technology Center Foundation,
Burns Flat, OK
Weston Babe Ruth Softball League,
Weston, CT
Whitnall 3–D Booster Club,
Hales Corners, WI
William T. Mayo Educational Center,
Inc., Baltimore, MD
Wilmington Bucs Baseball 16–U,
Wilmington, NC
Women of Grace Ministries, Inc.,
Macon, GA
Women of Proverbs 8 Council,
New York, NY
World Hope, Inc., Brooklyn, NY
World Peace Foundation, Brooklyn, NY
World Peace Through Technology
Organization, San Francisco, CA
World Space Theatre Company,
Chicago, IL
Wright Computer Connection,
Dayton, OH
Yale Alley Cats, Inc., New Haven, CT
Yellow Jackets Softball Club,
Westminster, CO
Youth Ballet of CNY, Inc., Scottsville, NY
Zoe Community Education &
Empowerment, Los Angeles, CA
If an organization listed above submits
information that warrants the renewal of
its classification as a public charity or as
a private operating foundation, the Inter-
nalRevenueServicewillissuearulingor
determinationletterwiththerevisedclas-
sification as to foundation status. Grantors
and contributors may thereafter rely upon
such ruling or determination letter as pro-
videdinsection1.509(a)–7oftheIncome
Tax Regulations. It is not the practice of
the Service to announce such revised clas-
sification of foundation status in the Inter-
nal Revenue Bulletin.
2005–38 I.R.B.590September 19, 2005

Definition of Terms
Revenue rulings and revenue procedures
(hereinafter referred to as “rulings”) that
have an effect on previous rulings use the
following defined terms to describe the ef-
fect:
Amplifieddescribes a situation where
no change is being made in a prior pub-
lished position, but the prior position is be-
ingextendedtoapplytoavariationofthe
fact situation set forth therein. Thus, if
an earlier ruling held that a principle ap-
plied to A, and the new ruling holds that the
same principle also applies to B, the earlier
ruling is amplified. (Compare withmodi-
fied,below).
Clarifiedis used in those instances
where the language in a prior ruling is be-
ing made clear because the language has
caused, or may cause, some confusion.
It is not used where a position in a prior
ruling is being changed.
Distinguisheddescribes a situation
where a ruling mentions a previously pub-
lished ruling and points out an essential
difference between them.
Modifiedis used where the substance
of a previously published position is being
changed. Thus, if a prior ruling held that a
principle applied to A but not to B, and the
new ruling holds that it applies to both A
and B, the prior ruling is modified because
it corrects a published position. (Compare
withamplifiedandclarified, above).
Obsoleteddescribes a previously pub-
lished ruling that is not considered deter-
minative with respect to future transac-
tions. This term is most commonly used in
a ruling that lists previously published rul-
ings that are obsoleted because of changes
in laws or regulations. A ruling may also
be obsoleted because the substance has
been included in regulations subsequently
adopted.
Revokeddescribes situations where the
position in the previously published ruling
is not correct and the correct position is
beingstatedinanewruling.
Supersededdescribes a situation where
the new ruling does nothing more than re-
state the substance and situation of a previ-
ously published ruling (or rulings). Thus,
the term is used to republish under the
1986 Code and regulations the same po-
sition published under the 1939 Code and
regulations. The term is also used when
it is desired to republish in a single rul-
ing a series of situations, names, etc., that
were previously published over a period of
time in separate rulings. If the new rul-
ing does more than restate the substance
of a prior ruling, a combination of terms
is used. For example,modifiedandsu-
persededdescribes a situation where the
substance of a previously published ruling
is being changed in part and is continued
without change in part and it is desired to
restate the valid portion of the previously
published ruling in a new ruling that is self
contained. In this case, the previously pub-
lished ruling is first modified and then, as
modified, is superseded.
Supplementedis used in situations in
which a list, such as a list of the names of
countries, is published in a ruling and that
list is expanded by adding further names in
subsequent rulings. After the original rul-
ing has been supplemented several times, a
new ruling may be published that includes
the list in the original ruling and the ad-
ditions, and supersedes all prior rulings in
the series.
Suspendedis used in rare situations
to show that the previous published rul-
ings will not be applied pending some
future action such as the issuance of new
or amended regulations, the outcome of
cases in litigation, or the outcome of a
Service study.
Abbreviations
The fol
lowing abbreviations in current use
and for
merly used will appear in material
publis
hedintheBulletin.
A—Individual.
Acq.—A
cquiescence.
B—Individual.
BE—Beneficiary.
BK—Bank
.
B.T.A.—Board of Tax Appeals.
C—Individual.
C.B.—Cu
mulative Bulletin.
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations.
CI—City.
COOP—Coo
perative.
Ct.D.—Court Decision.
CY—County.
D—Decede
nt.
DC—Dummy Corporation.
DE—Donee.
Del. Order
—Delegation Order.
DISC—Domestic International Sales Corporation.
DR—Donor.
E—Estate.
EE—Employee.
E.O.—Executive Order.
ER—Emp
loyer.
ERISA—Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
EX—Executor.
F—Fiduc
iary.
FC—Foreign Country.
FICA—Federal Insurance Contributions Act.
FISC—Fo
reign International Sales Company.
FPH—Foreign Personal Holding Company.
F.R.—Federal Register.
FUTA—Fed
eral Unemployment Tax Act.
FX—Foreign corporation.
G.C.M.—Chief Counsel’s Memorandum.
GE—Grante
e.
GP—General Partner.
GR—Grantor.
IC—Insura
nce Company.
I.R.B.—Internal Revenue Bulletin.
LE—Lessee.
LP—Limited
Partner.
LR—Lessor.
M—Minor.
Nonacq.—No
nacquiescence.
O—Organization.
P—Parent Corporation.
PHC—Persona
l Holding Company.
PO—Possession of the U.S.
PR—Partner.
PRS—Pa
rtnership.
PTE—Prohibited Transaction Exemption.
Pub. L.—Public Law.
REIT—Re
al Estate Investment Trust.
Rev. Proc.—Revenue Procedure.
Rev. Rul.—Revenue Ruling.
S—Subsi
diary.
S.P.R.—Statement of Procedural Rules.
Stat.—Statutes at Large.
T—Target
Corporation.
T.C.—Tax Court.
T.D.—Treasury Decision.
TFE—Trans
feree.
TFR—Transferor.
T.I.R.—Technical Information Release.
TP—Taxpay
er.
TR—Trust.
TT—Trustee.
U.S.C.—Uni
ted States Code.
X—Corporation.
Y—Corporation.
Z—Corporat
ion.
September 19, 2005i2005–38 I.R.B.

Numerical Finding List
1
Bulletins 2005–27 through 2005–38
Announcements:
2005-46, 2005-27 I.R.B.63
2005-47, 2005-28 I.R.B.71
2005-48, 2005-29 I.R.B.111
2005-49, 2005-29 I.R.B.119
2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.152
2005-51, 2005-32 I.R.B.283
2005-52, 2005-31 I.R.B.257
2005-53, 2005-31 I.R.B.258
2005-54, 2005-32 I.R.B.283
2005-55, 2005-33 I.R.B.317
2005-56, 2005-33 I.R.B.318
2005-57, 2005-33 I.R.B.318
2005-58, 2005-33 I.R.B.319
2005-59, 2005-37 I.R.B.524
2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.455
2005-61, 2005-36 I.R.B.495
2005-62, 2005-36 I.R.B.495
2005-63, 2005-36 I.R.B.496
2005-64, 2005-37 I.R.B.537
2005-65, 2005-38 I.R.B.587
Notices:
2005-48, 2005-27 I.R.B.9
2005-49, 2005-27 I.R.B.14
2005-50, 2005-27 I.R.B.14
2005-51, 2005-28 I.R.B.74
2005-52, 2005-28 I.R.B.75
2005-53, 2005-32 I.R.B.263
2005-54, 2005-30 I.R.B.127
2005-55, 2005-32 I.R.B.265
2005-56, 2005-32 I.R.B.266
2005-57, 2005-32 I.R.B.267
2005-58, 2005-33 I.R.B.295
2005-59, 2005-35 I.R.B.443
2005-62, 2005-35 I.R.B.443
2005-63, 2005-35 I.R.B.448
2005-64, 2005-36 I.R.B.471
Proposed Regulations:
REG-131739-03, 2005-36 I.R.B.494
REG-130241-04, 2005-27 I.R.B.18
REG-138362-04, 2005-33 I.R.B.299
REG-149436-04, 2005-35 I.R.B.454
REG-156518-04, 2005-38 I.R.B.582
REG-121584-05, 2005-37 I.R.B.523
Revenue Procedures:
2005-35, 2005-28 I.R.B.76
2005-36, 2005-28 I.R.B.78
2005-37, 2005-28 I.R.B.79
2005-38, 2005-28 I.R.B.81
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
2005-39, 2005-28 I.R.B.82
2005-40, 2005-28 I.R.B.83
2005-41, 2005-29 I.R.B.90
2005-42, 2005-30 I.R.B.128
2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.107
2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.141
2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.142
2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.269
2005-48, 2005-32 I.R.B.271
2005-49, 2005-31 I.R.B.165
2005-50, 2005-32 I.R.B.272
2005-51, 2005-33 I.R.B.296
2005-52, 2005-34 I.R.B.326
2005-53, 2005-34 I.R.B.339
2005-54, 2005-34 I.R.B.353
2005-55, 2005-34 I.R.B.367
2005-56, 2005-34 I.R.B.383
2005-57, 2005-34 I.R.B.392
2005-58, 2005-34 I.R.B.402
2005-59, 2005-34 I.R.B.412
2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.449
2005-61, 2005-37 I.R.B.507
2005-62, 2005-37 I.R.B.507
2005-63, 2005-36 I.R.B.491
2005-64, 2005-36 I.R.B.492
2005-65, 2005-38 I.R.B.564
2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
Revenue Rulings:
2005-38, 2005-27 I.R.B.6
2005-39, 2005-27 I.R.B.1
2005-40, 2005-27 I.R.B.4
2005-41, 2005-28 I.R.B.69
2005-42, 2005-28 I.R.B.67
2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.87
2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.123
2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.120
2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.261
2005-48, 2005-32 I.R.B.259
2005-49, 2005-30 I.R.B.125
2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.124
2005-51, 2005-31 I.R.B.163
2005-52, 2005-35 I.R.B.423
2005-53, 2005-35 I.R.B.425
2005-54, 2005-33 I.R.B.289
2005-55, 2005-33 I.R.B.284
2005-56, 2005-35 I.R.B.427
2005-57, 2005-36 I.R.B.466
2005-58, 2005-36 I.R.B.465
2005-59, 2005-37 I.R.B.505
2005-60, 2005-37 I.R.B.502
2005-61, 2005-38 I.R.B.538
2005-62, 2005-38 I.R.B.557
Tax Conventions:
2005-47, 2005-28 I.R.B.71
Treasury Decisions:
9208, 2005-31 I.R.B.157
9209, 2005-31 I.R.B.153
9210, 2005-33 I.R.B.290
9211, 2005-33 I.R.B.287
9212, 2005-35 I.R.B.429
9213, 2005-35 I.R.B.440
9214, 2005-35 I.R.B.435
9215, 2005-36 I.R.B.468
9216, 2005-36 I.R.B.461
9217, 2005-37 I.R.B.498
9218, 2005-37 I.R.B.503
9219, 2005-38 I.R.B.538
1
A cumulative list of all revenue rulings, revenueprocedures, Treasury decisions, etc., publishedin Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin
2005–26, dated June 27, 2005.
2005–38 I.R.B.iiSeptember 19, 2005

Finding List of Current Actions on
Previously Published Items
1
Bulletins 2005–27 through 2005–38
Announcements:
84-26
Obsoleted by
REG-149436-04, 2005-35 I.R.B.454
2004-72
Updated and superseded by
Ann. 2005-59, 2005-37 I.R.B.524
2005-36
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
2005-53
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-61, 2005-36 I.R.B.495
Notices:
2001-42
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
2005-4
Modified by
Notice 2005-62, 2005-35 I.R.B.443
2005-10
Clarified by
Notice 2005-64, 2005-36 I.R.B.471
2005-38
Modified by
Notice 2005-64, 2005-36 I.R.B.471
2005-51
Modified and superseded by
Notice 2005-57, 2005-32 I.R.B.267
Proposed Regulations:
REG-142686-01
Withdrawn by
Ann. 2005-55, 2005-33 I.R.B.317
REG-100420-03
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-57, 2005-33 I.R.B.318
REG-102144-04
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-56, 2005-33 I.R.B.318
Revenue Procedures:
64-54
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
66-33
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
69-13
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
70-8
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-46, 2005-30 I.R.B.142
71-1
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
72-22
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
83-77
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-63, 2005-36 I.R.B.491
87-8
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
87-9
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
89-20
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-52, 2005-34 I.R.B.326
90–11
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-40, 2005-28 I.R.B.83
90-30
Section4supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-54, 2005-34 I.R.B.353
Section5supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-55, 2005-34 I.R.B.367
Section6supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-56, 2005-34 I.R.B.383
Section7supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-58, 2005-34 I.R.B.402
Section8supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-59, 2005-34 I.R.B.412
90-31
Section4supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-52, 2005-34 I.R.B.326
Section5supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-54, 2005-34 I.R.B.353
Section6supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-55, 2005-34 I.R.B.367
Revenue Procedures— Continued:
Section7supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-56, 2005-34 I.R.B.383
Section8supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-58, 2005-34 I.R.B.402
Section9supersededby
Rev. Proc. 2005-59, 2005-34 I.R.B.412
93-22
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-44, 2005-29 I.R.B.110
98-18
Obsoleted by
Rev. Proc. 2005-45, 2005-30 I.R.B.141
99-39
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.449
2000-27
Modified and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
2000-31
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.449
2000-49
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-41, 2005-29 I.R.B.90
2001-9
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-60, 2005-35 I.R.B.449
2001-16
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-42, 2005-30 I.R.B.128
2002-9
Modified and amplified by
Rev. Rul. 2005-42, 2005-28 I.R.B.67
Rev. Proc. 2005-35, 2005-28 I.R.B.76
Rev. Proc. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.107
Rev. Proc. 2005-47, 2005-32 I.R.B.269
2002-49
Modified, amplified, and superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-62, 2005-37 I.R.B.507
2004-50
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-49, 2005-31 I.R.B.165
2004-54
Superseded by
Rev. Proc. 2005-65, 2005-38 I.R.B.564
2005-3
Amplified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-61, 2005-37 I.R.B.507
2005-6
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
1
A cumulative list of current actions on previously published items in Internal Revenue Bulletins 2005–1 through 2005–26 is in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2005–26, dated June 27, 2005.
September 19, 2005iii2005–38 I.R.B.

Revenue Procedures— Continued:
2005-16
Modified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-66, 2005-37 I.R.B.509
Revenue Rulings:
65-109
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
68-549
Obsoleted by
Rev. Rul. 2005-43, 2005-29 I.R.B.88
74-203
Revoked by
Rev. Rul. 2005-59, 2005-37 I.R.B.505
82-29
Modified and clarified by
Rev. Proc. 2005-39, 2005-28 I.R.B.82
2005-41
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-50, 2005-30 I.R.B.152
Treasury Decisions:
9186
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-53, 2005-31 I.R.B.258
9193
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-62, 2005-36 I.R.B.495
9205
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-63, 2005-36 I.R.B.496
9206
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-49, 2005-29 I.R.B.119
9207
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-52, 2005-31 I.R.B.257
9210
Corrected by
Ann. 2005-64, 2005-37 I.R.B.537
2005–38 I.R.B.ivSeptember 19, 2005
*U.S.G.P.O.: 2005—310–365/20023