Chapter 23

us-hi-regs-official-6443acf2caa414e27f6286e338737ec37d8b01d6946d7eb355608d2ada6f212cChapter 23Regulation

HAWAII 	ADMINISTRATIVE 	RULES
TITLE 	6
DEPARTMENT 	OF BUDGET AND FINANCE
EMPLOYEES' 	RETIREMENT 	SYSTEM
CHAPTER 23
CONTESTED CASE 	HEARINGS
Subchapter 	1 	Contested Case 	Hearings 	on
Applications 	for 	Disability
Retirement 	and Accidental 	Death
Benefits
§6-23-1 	Scope
§6-23-2 	Definitions
§6-23-3 	Preliminary decision 	by 	the 	system;
notice 	of 	preliminary decision;
petition 	for 	contested case 	hearing
§6-23-4 	Filing 	of 	petition 	for 	contested 	case
hearing
§6-23-5 	Contents 	of 	petition
§6-23-6 	Contested case 	hearing
§6-23-7 	Time and 	place 	of hearing and notice
§6-23-8 	Docket
§6-23-9 	Computation 	of 	time; 	extension of 	time
§6-23-10 	Documents
§6-23-11 	Deposition; 	application 	for
§6-23-12 	Depositions; 	person 	before 	whom 	taken,
oath, 	examination, 	and 	cross
examination, 	record 	of
examination, 	filing 	of deposition
§6-23-13 	Use 	of depositions
§6-23-14 	Jurisdiction; 	presiding 	officer; 	powers
and 	duties
§6-23-14.01 	Default
23-1
346
§6-23-14.02
§6-23-15
§6-23-16
§6-23-17
§6-23-18
§6-23-19
§6-23-20
§6-23-21
§6-23-21.01
Motions 	to 	dismiss 	or 	for 	summary
judgment
Reassignment 	of 	petition
Conduct 	of 	contested case hearing
Recommended decision
Proposed decision
Filing 	of exceptions; 	extension of
time; 	finality 	of proposed
decision
Argument 	on exceptions
Final 	decision
Attorneys' 	fees 	upon 	successful
petition
Subchapter 2 	Other Contested Case 	Hearings
§6-23-22
§6-23-23
§6-23-24
§6-23-25
§6-23-26
§6-23-27
§6-23-28
§6-23-29
§6-23-30
§6-23-31
§6-23-32
§6-23-33
§6-23-34
§6-23-35
§6-23-36
§6-23-37
§6-23-38
§6-23-39
§6-23-40
§6-23-41
§6-23-42
§6-23-43
Scope
Definitions
Commencement 	of 	proceedings; 	service
Limitations 	period
Computation of 	time; 	extension of 	time
Appearances
Contents 	of 	petition; 	form; 	rejection
Consideration of 	petition
Jurisdiction; 	powers 	and 	duties 	of
presiding 	officer
Burden 	of 	proof
Prehearing 	conference
Notice 	of hearing
Memorandum in 	opposition
Procedure 	at 	hearings
Evidence; 	witnesses; 	exhibits
Motions
Motions 	to 	dismiss 	or 	for 	summary
judgment; 	disposition 	of 	claims
Intervention
Default
Filing 	of documents; 	public 	records
Deposition; 	application 	for
Depositions; 	person 	before 	whom taken,
23-2
oath, 	examination, 	and cross
examination, 	record 	of
examination, 	filing 	of deposition
§6-23-44 	Use 	of depositions
§6-23-45 	Disqualification of 	board member or
hearing 	officer
§6-23-46 	Reassignment 	of case
§6-23-47 	Ex parte 	contacts
§6-23-48 	Recommended decision
§6-23-49 	Proposed decision
§6-23-50 	Filing 	of 	exceptions; 	extension of
time; 	finality 	of proposed decision
§6-23-51 	Argument 	on 	exceptions
§6-23-52 	Final 	decision
§6-23-53 	Reconsideration 	of decision
SUBCHAPTER 1
CONTESTED CASE 	HEARINGS 	ON APPLICATIONS 	FOR 	DISABILITY
RETIREMENT AND ACCIDENTAL 	DEATH BENEFITS
§6-23-1 	Scope. 	This 	subchapter 	shall 	govern 	all
petitions 	for 	contested case 	hearing 	filed 	with 	the
system disputing a 	preliminary decision by the 	system
regarding an 	application 	for 	disability 	retirement
benefits 	or 	accidental 	death benefits, 	pursuant 	to 	the
medical 	board's 	or 	a 	designated entity's
certifications 	and 	findings 	under 	chapter 	6-22. 	[Eff
11/9/81; 	am and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp
APR 1· I 2022 	l 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 8 8-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2)
§6-23-2 	Definitions. 	Definitions 	applicable 	to
this 	subchapter are 	also 	provided 	in 	section 	88-21,
HRS, 	and 	sections 	6-20-1 	and 	6-22-2. 	As 	used 	in 	this
subchapter:
2 3-3
"Causation" 	refers 	to 	a 	finding 	as 	to 	whether 	or
not 	a 	member's 	disability or death 	is:
(1) 	The 	result 	of 	an 	accident 	occurring while 	in
the 	actual 	performance 	of duty 	at 	some
definite 	time and place; 	or
(2) 	The 	cumulative 	result 	of 	some 	occupational
hazard; 	or
(3) 	The 	result 	of 	wilful 	negligence 	on 	the 	part
of the member.
"Petition" 	means 	a 	request 	filed 	with 	the 	system
pursuant 	to 	section 	6-23-4, 	in which an 	applicant 	for
disability 	retirement 	benefits 	or 	accidental 	death
benefits 	disputes 	the 	system's 	preliminary decision
regarding 	the medical 	board's 	or designated entity's
certifications 	and 	findings. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and comp
11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 1 1 20?2 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS
§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	9f-2)
§6-23-3 	Preliminary decision by the system;
notice of preliminary decision; 	petition for contested
case hearing. 	(a) 	Upon 	receipt 	of 	the 	medical
board's 	or 	a 	designated entity's 	certifications 	and
findings 	pursuant 	to 	section 	6-22-8, 	the executive
director on 	behalf 	of 	the 	system shall make 	a
preliminary decision 	as 	to 	whether 	to 	accept, 	reject
or 	remand 	the medical 	board's 	or designated entity's
certifications 	and 	findings. 	The 	executive 	director 	on
behalf of 	the 	system, 	may 	reject 	the medical 	board's
or designated entity's 	certifications 	or 	findings,
including 	findings 	regarding 	causation, 	and make
independent 	determinations. 	The 	executive 	director 	on
behalf of 	the 	system, 	may 	remand 	the 	certifications
and 	findings 	to 	the medical 	board or designated entity
for 	any 	clarification 	or 	correction.
{b) 	Upon acceptance, 	rejection, 	or remand of 	the
medical 	board's 	or 	a 	designated entity's
certifications 	and 	findings, 	or 	any part 	thereof, 	the
executive 	director 	on 	behalf of 	the 	system shall,
within 	fifteen 	days 	thereafter, 	notify 	the 	applicant
of 	the 	system's preliminary decision and 	the medical
23-4
board's 	or designated entity's 	certifications 	and
findings.
(c) 	If any 	certification or 	finding 	accepted 	by
the 	executive 	director 	on 	behalf 	of 	the 	system 	in 	the
preliminary decision, 	or 	any 	independent 	determination
made 	by 	the 	executive 	director 	on 	behalf of 	the 	system
in 	the 	preliminary decision, 	is 	adverse 	to 	the
applicant, 	the 	executive director 	on behalf of 	the
system shall 	notify 	the 	applicant 	of the 	applicant's
right 	to 	file 	a 	petition 	for 	contested case 	hearing
disputing 	the 	preliminary decision pursuant 	to 	section
6-23-4 	and 	of 	the 	procedure 	for 	filing 	the 	petition.
[Eff 11/9/81; 	am and comp 11/26/2009; 	am and comp
A.PR 	1· 1 2022 	l 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS 	§§88'-82, 	91-2)
§6-23-4 	Filing of petition for contested case
hearing. 	After 	receipt 	of 	notice 	of 	the 	system's
preliminary decision 	pursuant 	to 	section 	6-23-3, 	an
applicant may 	file 	a 	petition 	for 	contested 	case
hearing disputing 	any adverse 	determination 	contained
in 	the 	preliminary decision. 	The 	petition 	shall 	be
filed 	in 	the 	office 	of 	the 	system 	in Honolulu no 	later
than 	thirty days 	from 	the 	date 	of 	receipt 	of 	the
written 	notification 	from 	the 	executive director 	of
the 	system's 	preliminary decision 	regarding 	the
medical 	board's 	or 	the 	designated entity's
certifications 	and 	findings. 	[ Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and comp
11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR t·1 ?0?2 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS
§§88-28, 	91-2) 	( Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2)
§6-23-S 	Contents of petition. 	(a) 	The 	petition
for 	contested case 	hearing disputing 	the 	system's
preliminary decision 	shall 	include 	the 	following:
(1) 	The 	identity 	of 	the 	petitioner. 	If the
petition 	is 	filed 	by a 	person or 	other
entity on behalf of 	the member or applicant,
the 	person or 	other 	entity 	shall 	state 	that
23-5
it 	has 	the 	right 	to 	represent 	the member or
applicant 	and shall 	submit 	proof 	of 	that
right 	with 	the 	petition; 	and
(2) 	The 	grounds 	for 	the 	petition, 	the 	specific
issues 	involved, 	the 	contentions 	of 	the
petitioner, 	and a 	description of 	the
evidence 	that 	the 	petitioner 	intends 	to
introduce 	in 	support 	of 	the 	contentions.
(b) 	An 	incomplete 	petition may 	be 	returned 	to
the 	petitioner with 	an explanation 	for 	the 	return. 	If
returned, 	the 	petitioner 	shall 	have 	fifteen 	days 	in
which 	to 	correct 	and 	refile 	the 	petition. 	Any 	petition
refiled within 	the 	fifteen-day 	period may be 	rejected
if 	the 	petition 	is 	still 	incomplete and 	the
incompletion 	is material 	and 	substantial.
(c) 	Any petition 	that 	is 	not 	filed 	within 	the
period 	prescribed 	in 	section 	6-23-4 	and any petition
that 	is 	returned and 	not 	corrected and 	refiled within
the 	period 	prescribed 	in 	subsection 	(b) 	shall 	be
rejected. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and comp 11/26/2009; 	am and
comp 	APR 	1· 1 20?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 	88-28, 	91-2 l
(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2)
§6-23-6 	Contested case hearing. 	When a 	petition
for 	contested 	case 	hearing 	is 	filed 	in 	accordance 	with
this 	subchapter, 	the 	petitioner 	shall 	be 	afforded a
contested case 	hearing 	before 	a 	hearing officer
appointed 	by 	the 	system. 	(Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and comp
11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1· 1 70?7 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS
§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2, 	91-9, 	92-16)
§6-23-7 	Time and p1ace of hearing and notice.
The 	hearing officer 	shall 	set 	the 	time 	and place 	of
hearing 	and 	give 	written 	notice 	thereof 	to 	the
petitioner. 	The 	notice 	of hearing 	shall 	conform to 	the
requirements 	of 	section 	91-9, 	HRS, 	and 	shall be
personally delivered or mailed by 	registered or
certified mail 	with 	return 	receipt 	requested 	at 	least
23-6
fifteen 	days 	before 	the 	hearing. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and
comp 11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1' 1 20?2 	l
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88~82, 	91-2,
91-9.5, 	92-9)
§6-23-8 	Docket. 	The 	system shall maintain 	a
docket 	of 	all 	petitions 	and each petition 	shall 	be
assigned a 	number. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and 	comp
11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 1 1 ?0,? 	l
(Au th : 	HRS 	§ § 8 8 - 2 8 , 	91 - 2 ) 	( I mp : 	HRS 	§ § 8 8 - 8 2 , 	91 - 2 )
§6-23-9 	Computation of time; 	extension of time.
(a) 	In 	c o mputing 	any 	period of 	time 	prescribed or
allowed 	by 	this 	subchapter, 	or 	any 	order 	of 	the 	board,
system or 	a 	presiding 	officer, 	the day 	of 	the 	act,
event, 	or default 	after 	which 	the 	designated period of
time 	is 	to 	run 	shall 	not 	be 	included. 	The 	last 	day 	of
the 	period 	shall 	be 	included 	unless 	it 	is 	a 	Saturday,
Sunday, 	or 	legal 	holiday 	in 	the 	State, 	in which event
the 	period of 	time 	runs 	until 	the 	end of 	the 	next day
which 	is 	neither a 	Saturday, 	Sunday, 	or 	legal 	holiday.
Intermediate 	Saturdays, 	Sundays, 	or 	legal 	holidays
shall 	not 	be 	included 	in 	the 	computation when 	the
period 	of 	time 	prescribed or 	allowed 	is 	seven days 	or
less. 	A half 	holiday 	shall 	not 	be 	considered a 	holiday
for 	purposes 	of 	these 	computations. 	All 	references 	in
this 	subchapter 	to 	days 	shall 	mean 	calendar days,
unless 	otherwise 	expressed.
(b) 	Except 	for 	the 	time 	for 	filing 	exceptions
pursuant 	to 	section 	6-23-19, 	whenever 	a 	person or
entity 	is 	required or 	allowed 	to 	act 	within 	a 	time
specified by 	this 	subchapter, 	the 	hearing 	officer or
the 	executive director 	on 	behalf 	of 	the 	system or
board may:
(1) 	With or without 	motion or 	notice 	extend 	such
period 	if 	written 	request 	therefor 	is made
before 	the 	expiration 	of 	the 	specified
period; 	or
23-7
(2) 	Upon motion, 	permit 	the 	act 	to 	be done 	after
the 	expiration of 	the 	specified period 	where
the 	failure 	to 	act 	was 	the 	result 	of
excusable 	neglect. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and 	comp
11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 1· t 20?7 	l
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-
82, 	91-2)
§6-23-10 	Documents. 	(a) 	If 	any document 	filed
in a 	proceeding governed by 	this 	subchapter 	is 	not 	in
substantial 	conformity with 	the 	applicable 	rules 	of
the 	system, 	or 	is 	otherwise 	insufficient, 	the 	board or
hearing 	officer or 	the 	executive director on behalf of
the 	system or board may, 	on 	its 	own motion or 	on 	the
motion 	of any party, 	strike 	such document 	or 	require
its 	amendment. 	If 	amended, 	the 	document 	shall 	be
effective 	as 	of 	the 	date 	of 	the 	original 	filing.
(b) 	All 	documents 	filed 	with or 	presented to 	the
board or 	hearing officer 	or 	the 	executive director on
behalf 	of 	the 	system or 	board, 	may 	be 	retained 	in 	the
files 	of 	the 	system. 	The 	system may 	permit 	the
withdrawal 	of original 	documents 	upon 	submission of
photostatic 	or 	properly authenticated 	copies 	to
replace 	the 	originals. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and comp
11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 1· 1 70?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS
§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2, 	91-9, 	92-16)
§6-23-11 	Deposition; 	application for. 	(a) 	Upo n
the 	written applicati o n 	o f 	a 	party 	to 	a 	proceeding
governed by 	this 	sub c hapter and 	for 	good cause 	sh o wn,
the 	hearing 	ofticer may 	at 	any 	time 	after 	the 	filing
of 	the 	petition, 	order 	the 	taking 	of 	testim o ny o f 	a
witness 	by 	oral 	examination.
(b) 	The 	application 	shall 	be made 	to 	the 	h e aring
officer 	and 	shall 	state 	the 	reasons 	why 	the 	deposition
should be 	taken, 	the 	time 	and 	place 	for 	taking 	the
deposition, 	the name 	and mailing 	address 	of 	the
witness, 	and 	the 	subject matter 	concerning which 	the
23-8
witness 	is 	expected 	to 	testify. 	If 	good 	cause 	is
shown, 	an 	order 	for 	the 	taking 	of 	the 	deposition
containing 	the 	appropriate 	instructions 	shall 	be made
and 	served upon 	the 	parties. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and 	comp
11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 11 20n 	l 	(Auth: 	HRS
§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS §§88~82, 	91-2)
§6-23-12 	Depositions; 	person before whom taken,
oath, 	examination, 	and cross-examination, 	record of
examination, 	filing of deposition. 	(a) 	The
deposition 	shall 	be 	taken 	before 	an 	officer 	authorized
to 	administer oaths. 	·
(b) 	The 	officer before 	whom 	the 	testimony 	is 	to
be 	taken 	shall 	put 	the 	witness 	to 	oath. 	The 	adverse
party shall 	have 	the 	right 	to 	cross-examine 	the
witness. 	The 	questions 	propounded 	to 	the 	witness 	and
the 	answers 	thereto 	shall 	be 	taken 	stenographically
and 	transcribed.
(c) 	All 	objections made 	at 	the 	time 	of 	the
examination 	shall 	be noted by the 	officer 	upon 	the
deposition. 	Evidence 	objected 	to 	shall 	be 	taken
subject 	to 	the 	objection. 	The 	officer 	taking 	the
deposition 	shall 	certify on 	the 	deposition 	that 	the
witness 	was 	duly sworn 	and 	that 	the 	deposition 	is 	a
true 	record 	of 	the 	testimony given by 	the 	witneis 	and
shall 	forward 	the 	deposition 	with 	two 	copies 	thereof
in a 	sealed envelope, 	endorsed with 	the 	title 	of 	the
proceeding, 	to 	the 	system at 	the 	system's 	office. 	[Eff
11/9/81; 	am and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp
APR 	1· 1 ?O?? 	l 	{Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS 	§§8"8-82, 	91-2)
§6-23-13 	Use of depositions. 	(a) 	A deposition
ordered 	and 	taken 	in 	accordance 	with section 	6-23-12
may 	be 	used 	in a 	proceeding 	if 	the 	hearing 	officer
finds 	that 	the 	evidence 	is 	otherwise 	admissible 	and:
(1} 	The 	witness 	is dead;
23-9
(2) 	The 	witness 	is 	out 	of the 	State, 	unless 	it
appears 	that 	the 	absence 	of 	the 	witness 	is
procured by 	the 	party offering 	the
deposition;
(3) 	The 	witness 	is 	unable 	to 	attend or 	testify
because of 	age, 	sickness, 	infirmity, 	or
imprisonment;
(4) 	The 	party offering 	the 	deposition 	has
endeavored and 	has 	been unable 	to 	procure
the 	attendance 	of 	the 	witness 	by 	subpoena;
or
(5) 	Upon application and 	notice, 	that 	such
exceptional 	circumstances 	exist 	as 	to 	make
it 	desirable, 	in 	the 	interest 	of 	justice and
with due 	regard 	to 	the 	importance 	of
presenting 	the 	testimony orally before 	the
board or hearing officer, 	to 	allow 	the
deposition 	to be made.
(b) 	If 	any part 	of 	the 	deposition 	is 	put 	in
evidence by a 	party, 	any 	other 	party may 	require 	the
production 	of 	the 	remainder of 	any 	other portions 	of
the 	deposition. 	[Eff 11/9/81; 	am and comp 	11/26/2009;
am and comp 	APR 1· 1 ?on 	l 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-
2) 	(Imp: 	HRS §§88-82·, 	91-2)
§6-23-14 	Jurisdiction; presiding officer; 	powers
and duties. 	(a) 	The 	hearing 	officer 	appointed by the
system shall 	preside 	over 	contested case hearings
governed by 	this 	subchapter. 	The 	chairperson of 	the
board or other member 	of 	the board designated by 	the
chairperson 	shall preside 	over 	hearings 	of arguments
on 	exceptions 	under 	section 	6-23-20. 	The 	hearing
officer, 	and chairperson of 	the 	board or other member
of 	the 	board designated by the 	chairperson, 	shall 	have
jurisdiction over 	those 	matters 	expressly authorized
by 	this 	subchapter, 	respectively.
(b) 	With 	respect 	to 	contested 	case 	hearings
governed by 	this 	subchapter, 	the 	hearing officer 	as
the 	presiding officer 	shall 	have 	the 	following 	powers
and duties:
23-10
(1) 	To determine 	the 	time and place 	of hearing
and, 	in 	the 	hearing officer's 	discretion or
at 	the 	request 	of a 	party, 	to 	continue 	or
postpone 	any 	hearing;
(2) 	To 	regulate 	the 	course 	and conduct of 	the
hearing;
(3) 	To administer oaths 	and 	affirmations;
(4) 	To examine 	witnesses;
(5) 	To 	issue 	subpoenas;
(6) 	To 	rule 	on offers 	of 	proof 	and 	receive
evidence;
(7) 	To 	hold 	conferences, 	before 	or during 	the
hearing, 	for 	the 	simplification of 	issues;
(8) 	To 	rule 	on motions 	and 	dispose 	of 	procedural
requests 	or 	similar matters;
(9) 	To 	remand, 	in the 	hearing officer's
discretion, 	to 	the 	medical 	board 	or
designated entity the 	certifications 	and
findings 	involved 	in 	the 	petition, 	or 	any
matter or 	issue 	related 	thereto; 	and 	to
accept 	from 	the 	medical 	board 	or designated
entity any new or amended 	report 	or
documents, 	including 	any 	new 	certifications
or 	findings;
(10) 	To make 	a 	recommended decision 	to 	the 	board;
(11) 	To dispose 	of any matter 	that 	normally 	and
properly 	arises 	before 	or 	in 	the 	course 	of
the 	hearing; 	and
(12) 	To 	take 	any 	other 	action authorized by 	this
subchapter or by 	law 	that 	the 	hearing
officer may deem 	necessary 	for 	the 	orderly
and 	just 	conduct 	of 	the 	hearing.
(c) 	With 	respect 	to 	hearings 	of 	arguments 	on
exceptions 	governed by 	this 	subchapter, 	the
chairperson of 	the 	board or 	other member 	of 	the 	board
designated 	as 	presiding 	officer 	shall 	have 	the
following 	powers 	and 	duties;
(1) 	To determine 	the 	time 	and place 	of 	the
hearing 	of arguments 	on 	exceptions 	and, 	in
the 	presiding 	officer's 	discretion or at 	the
request 	of a 	party, 	to 	continue 	or postpone
any hearing;
23-11
(2) 	To 	regulate 	the 	course 	and 	conduct 	of 	the
hearing; 	and
(3) 	To 	take 	any 	other 	action authorized by 	this
subchapter 	or by law 	that 	the 	presiding
officer may deem necessary 	for 	the 	orderly
and 	just 	conduct 	of 	the 	hearing.
(d) 	The 	substantive provisions 	of 	sections 	6-22-
5, 	6-22-6, 	and 	6-22-7 	shall 	apply 	to 	contested 	case
hearings 	and arguments 	on 	exceptions 	under 	this
subchapter. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am
and comp 	APR 11 ?On 	1 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2)
(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2, 	91-9, 	92-16)
§6-23-14. 01 	Defaul.t. 	(a) 	A presiding officer
may 	find 	a 	party to 	be 	in default 	upon motion 	by 	a
party or 	at 	the 	presiding 	officer's 	discretion, 	on the
following 	grounds:
( 1) 	Failure 	to 	comply with 	an 	administrative
order;
(2) 	Failure 	to 	appear 	at 	a 	pre-hearing
conference 	or 	hearing 	without 	good cause
being 	shown; 	or
(3) 	Failure 	to 	prosecute 	the 	case.
(b) 	When 	the 	presiding officer 	finds 	that 	a
default 	has 	occurred, 	the 	presiding officer may 	issue
a 	default 	order against 	the 	defaulting 	party. 	The
order 	shall 	include 	findings 	of 	fact 	showing 	the
grounds 	for 	the 	order, 	conclusions 	regarding 	material
issues 	of 	fact 	and 	law, 	and 	other 	terms 	or 	conditions,
as 	appropriate. 	Terms 	or 	conditions 	of a 	default
order 	can 	include dismissal 	of 	the 	petition. 	The
default 	order 	shall 	constitute 	a 	recommended decision
pursuant 	to 	section 	6-23-17 	if 	filed 	by a 	hearing
officer. 	The default 	order 	shall 	constitute 	a
proposed decision 	if 	filed 	by 	the 	chairperson 	or 	other
designated -member 	of 	the 	board. 	[Eff 	and comp
APR 1-1 20?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 	88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9, 	91-12, 	92-16)
23-12
§6-23-14.02 	Motions 	to dismiss or for 	swnmary
judgment. 	(a) 	The 	presiding 	officer, 	upon 	motion 	by
a 	party, 	may 	at 	any 	time 	issue 	an 	order 	for 	summary
judgment 	as 	to 	all 	or 	any 	part 	of 	the 	claims, 	if 	no
genuine 	issue 	of material 	fact 	exists 	and a 	party 	is
entitled 	to 	judgment 	as 	a 	matter of 	law.
(b) 	The 	presiding officer, 	upon motion by a
party or 	on 	the 	presiding 	officer's 	own motion, 	may 	at
any 	time 	issue 	an 	order dismissing 	the 	petition on 	the
grounds 	of 	lack of 	standing, 	lack of 	jurisdiction,
failure 	to 	state 	a 	claim on which 	relief may be
granted, 	or 	any 	other 	ground upon which 	the 	petition
may 	be dismissed prior 	to 	the 	hearing. 	In 	addition,
the 	presiding 	officer may 	issue 	an 	order 	of dismissal
of 	the 	petition upon a 	stipulation of 	the 	parties 	or
upon a 	voluntary dismissal 	by 	the 	petitioner.
(cl 	An 	order 	that 	grants 	or denies 	disposal 	of
some 	or all 	claims 	in the 	petition 	shall 	constitute 	a
recommended decision 	pursuant 	to 	section 	6-23-17 	if
issued by 	the 	hearing 	officer 	and 	not 	considered an
interlocutory order. 	An order 	that 	grants 	or denies
disposal 	of 	some 	or 	all 	claims 	in 	the 	petition 	shall
constitute 	a 	proposed decision 	pursuant 	to 	section 	6-
23-18 	if 	issued by the 	board upon 	receipt 	of 	a
recommended decision 	and 	not 	considered an
interlocutory order. 	An order 	that 	disposes 	of 	some
but 	not 	all 	of 	the 	claims 	in 	the 	petition 	shall be
considered an 	interlocutory order 	and 	shall 	be
appealable 	under section 	91-14, 	HRS, 	only 	after a
final 	decision 	has 	been 	issued, 	or 	if deferral 	of
review 	would deprive 	the 	appellant 	of 	adequate
judicial 	review 	under 	section 	91-14, 	HRS. 	[Eff 	and
comp 	APR 11 ?O?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2)
(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9, 	91-12, 	92-16)
§6-23-15 	Reassignment of petition. 	If 	for 	any
reason 	the 	hearing 	officer 	designated 	for 	the 	hearing
of 	the 	petition 	for 	contested case 	hearing 	is 	unable
to 	complete 	the 	hearing, 	the 	system may, 	without
23-13
34
abatement 	of 	the proceedings, 	assign 	the 	petition 	to
another 	hearing 	officer. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and 	comp
11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 1' 1 2022 	l
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2,
92-16)
§6-23-16 	Conduct of contested case hearing. 	(a)
The 	hearing 	officer 	shall 	convene 	the 	hearing 	and
summarize 	the 	issues 	in 	the 	petition. 	The 	petitioner
shall 	have 	the 	burden 	of proof, 	including 	the 	burden
of 	producing 	evidence 	and 	the 	burden of 	persuasion.
The 	degree 	or quantum of 	proof 	shall be 	a
preponderance 	of 	the 	evidence.
(b) 	Before presenting 	the 	case, 	the 	petitioner
shall 	have 	the 	opportunity to make 	an 	opening
statement. 	The deputy 	attorney 	general 	or 	other
counsel 	assigned 	to 	the 	respondent 	medical 	board or
designated 	entity 	shall 	also 	have 	the 	opportunity to
make 	an opening 	statement 	then 	or 	after 	the 	petitioner
has 	presented 	the 	petitioner's 	case. 	Opening
statements 	may be 	waived by either party.
(c) 	Witnesses 	shall 	testify 	in 	the 	following
order:
( 1) 	Witnesses 	for 	the 	petitioner;
{ 2) 	Witnesses 	called by the 	respondent;
{ 3) 	Witnesses 	for 	the 	petitioner 	in 	rebuttal;
( 4 ) 	Witnesses 	called by 	the 	respondent 	in
rebuttal;
(5) 	Additional 	witnesses 	as 	the 	presiding
officer may deem necessary.
(d) 	Witnesses 	shall be 	examined 	in 	the 	following
order:
( 1) 	Direct 	examination by 	the 	party calling the
witness;
(2) 	Cross 	examination by 	the 	other 	party;
(3) 	Redirect 	examination by 	the 	party calling
the 	witness;
(4) 	Recross 	examination by 	the 	other party;
(5) 	Examination by the 	presiding 	officer or 	any
member of 	the 	board.
23-14
(e) 	After 	the 	presentations 	of 	evidence 	is
concluded, 	unless 	the 	petition 	is 	submitted by either
party or 	both 	parties 	without 	argument, 	the 	petitioner
shall 	open 	the 	argument 	followed 	by argument 	by 	the
respondent 	and 	the 	petitioner may present 	rebuttal
argument 	which 	shall be 	limited 	to 	countering 	any
matter or 	argument 	presented by 	the 	respondent.
Reasonable 	time 	limits 	may be 	imposed by 	the 	hearing
officer 	for 	argument. 	Argument may 	be 	waived by either
party.
(f) 	The 	hearing officer, 	within 	such 	time 	limits
as 	the 	hearing officer may 	impose, 	may permit 	the
parties 	to 	submit 	written memoranda 	in 	support 	of
their 	respective 	positions 	and 	proposed 	findings 	of
fact 	and conclusions 	of 	law. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and
comp 11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1· 1 ~O?? 	] 	(Auth:
HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82,· 91-2, 	91-9~ 	91-
10, 	92-16)
§6-23-17 	Recommended decision. 	Within 	sixty
days 	after 	the 	close of 	the 	reception 	of 	evidence 	or
the 	filing 	of 	any memoranda 	or 	proposed 	findings 	of
fact 	or 	conclusions 	of 	law 	permitted by 	the 	hearing
officer, 	whichever 	is 	later, 	the 	hearing officer 	shall
make 	and 	file 	with 	the 	system a 	recommended decision
which 	shall 	include 	recommended 	findings 	of 	fact 	and
conclusions 	of 	law. 	If any 	party has 	been 	permitted to
file 	proposed 	findings 	of 	fact, 	the 	hearing 	officer
shall 	incorporate 	in 	the 	recommended decision 	a 	ruling
on each proposed 	finding 	so 	presented. 	[Eff 11/9/81;
am and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1 1 20?1 	]
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-8"2, 	91-2,
91-9, 	92-16)
§6-23-18 	Proposed decision. 	Upon 	receipt 	of 	the
reconunended 	decision, 	the 	board may accept 	it 	as 	its
proposed decision, 	or may 	remand 	the 	recommended
decision 	to 	the 	hearing officer 	for 	any 	clarification
2 3-15
or 	correction, 	or may modify 	the 	recommended decision
and 	issue 	its 	own draft 	of a 	proposed decision. 	A copy
of 	the 	proposed decision 	shall 	be 	served 	upon 	each
party. 	[Eff 11/9/81; 	am and comp 	11/26/2009; 	comp
APR 1" 1 2022 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS
§§88-82, 	91-2, 	91-11, 	92-16)
§6-23-19 	Filing of exceptions; 	extension of
time; 	finality of proposed decision. 	(a) 	Within
fifteen 	days 	after 	receipt 	of 	a 	copy of 	the 	board's
proposed decision, 	any party may 	file 	with 	the 	board
exceptions 	to any 	part 	thereof 	and 	request 	review 	by
the 	board. 	Each exception 	shall 	specify the 	portion of
the 	record and 	authorities 	relied on 	to 	sustain 	each
point. 	Within 	fifteen 	days 	after 	receipt 	of 	a 	copy of
a 	party's 	exceptions 	and 	request 	for 	review, 	any party
may 	file 	with 	the 	board a 	response 	to 	the 	exceptions
and 	request 	for 	review. 	In 	addition, 	a 	copy of the
exceptions 	and 	request 	for 	review, 	and 	response, 	shall
be 	served upon 	each of 	the 	parties 	who 	were 	served
with a 	copy of 	the 	proposed decision.
(bl 	Any party may apply 	for 	an extension of 	time
within which 	to 	file 	exceptions 	to 	the 	proposed
decision, 	or 	response, 	by 	filing 	a 	written 	application
setting 	forth 	the 	reasons 	for 	the 	request. 	The
application 	shall 	be 	filed 	before 	the 	expiration of
the 	respective 	period prescribed 	for 	the 	filing 	of
exceptions 	or 	response. 	Upon 	good cause 	shown, 	the
board, 	any member of 	the 	board, 	or 	the 	executive
director 	on 	behalf 	of the 	system, 	may extend the 	time
for 	filing 	exceptions 	or 	response, 	for 	an 	additional
period not 	to 	exceed 	fifteen days 	after 	the 	applying
party's 	receipt 	of 	the 	extension of time 	within which
to 	file 	exceptions 	or 	response.
(c) 	If no exceptions 	and 	request 	for 	review are
filed 	within 	the 	time 	specified, 	the 	proposed decision
shall 	become 	final, 	unless 	the 	board on 	its 	own motion
orders 	further 	proceedings 	to 	be 	held. 	[Eff 	11/9/81;
am and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 1 1 ?On
23-16
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2,
91-11, 	92-16)
§6-23-20 	Argument on exceptions. 	Upon 	the
filing 	of 	exceptions 	by a 	party adversely affected by
the 	proposed decision, 	the 	board shall 	grant 	such
party an 	opportunity 	to 	present 	arguments 	to 	the
board. 	The 	executive 	director 	shall 	set 	the 	time 	and
place 	of 	hearing 	of 	argument 	on exceptions 	and 	give
written 	notice 	thereof 	to 	the 	parties. 	[Eff 	11/9/81;
am and 	comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 11 2022 	l
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-82, 	91-2,
91-11, 	92-16)
§6-23-21 	Final decision. 	(a) 	Where 	exceptions
have 	been 	filed 	to 	the 	board's 	proposed decision, 	the
board, 	within 	sixty days 	after 	the 	hearing on 	the
exceptions, 	shall 	render 	its 	final 	decision. 	In
rendering 	its 	final 	decision, 	the 	board 	shall 	consider
the 	whole 	record 	or 	such 	portions 	thereof 	as may be
cited by 	the 	parties, 	and 	shall 	resolve 	all 	questions
of 	fact 	by what 	it 	deems 	to 	be 	the 	preponderance 	of
the 	evidence. 	The 	final 	decision 	shall 	be 	in 	writing
and 	shall 	contain 	findings 	of 	fact 	and conclusions 	of
law upon 	which 	the 	decision 	is 	based.
(b) 	The 	final 	decision 	shall 	be 	personally
delivered or mailed 	to 	the 	parties 	by 	registered or
certified mail 	with 	return 	receipt 	requested. 	[Eff
11/9/81; 	am and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp
APR 1· 1 2022 	l 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS
§§88-82, 	91-2, 	91-10, 	91-11, 	91-12, 	92-16)
§6-23-21.01 	Attorneys' 	fees 	upon successful
petition. 	(a) 	If 	after 	filing 	a 	petition, 	the
petitioner 	is 	the prevailing party before 	the 	board or
a 	court 	of 	competent 	jurisdiction, 	the 	petitioner may
23-17
file 	a 	motion with 	the 	system 	for 	reasonable
attorneys' 	fees 	and 	costs 	pursuant 	to 	the 	standards
set 	forth 	in 	rule 	1.5 of 	the 	Rules 	of 	Professional
Conduct adopted by the 	Hawaii 	Supreme 	Court. 	The
system's 	decision on 	the 	motion 	shall 	be made 	by 	the
executive director.
(b) 	The 	petitioner 	shall 	file 	a 	motion 	for
attorneys' 	fees 	and 	costs 	with 	the 	system no 	later
than sixty days 	from 	the 	date 	of 	the 	board's 	final
decision or 	the 	circuit 	court's 	ruling 	if 	the 	board's
decision 	is 	appealed, 	whichever 	is 	later. 	The motion
shall 	state 	the 	amount 	of 	fees 	and 	costs 	requested,
and 	shall 	attach 	the 	following:
(1) 	A copy of 	the 	fee 	agreement 	between 	the
petitioner and 	the 	petitioner's 	attorney, 	or
an 	affidavit 	or declaration 	signed by 	the
petitioner stating the 	attorney's 	fees
agreed 	upon 	between 	the 	petitioner and 	the
petitioner's 	attorney;
(2) 	A copy 	of 	the 	billing 	statement(s) 	from 	the
petitioner's 	attorney detailing 	the 	legal
work performed 	in 	connection with 	the
petitioner's 	case, 	including:
(A) 	The 	legal 	work 	performed 	shall 	be
itemized and 	described 	in detail 	by
each 	service, 	along 	with 	the 	time 	spent
on each 	service 	shown 	in 	increments 	of
one 	tenth 	of an 	hour 	or 	less. 	Lumped
entries 	or block billing 	shall 	not 	be
accepted; 	and
(B) 	Costs 	shall 	be 	itemized and 	described
in detail 	and accompanied by either:
(i} 	Invoices 	and 	receipts; 	or
(ii) 	An 	affidavit 	signed by 	the
petitioner's 	attorney 	attesting 	to
the 	costs; 	and
(3) 	Proof 	of payment 	of 	the 	requested attorneys'
fees 	and 	costs 	by 	the 	petitioner 	to 	the
petitioner's 	attorney.
(c) 	Reimbursement 	of attorneys' 	fees 	shall 	not 	be
awarded 	until 	the 	requirements 	of 	this 	section are
satisfied. 	The 	system may 	require 	additional 	details
23-18
and 	justification of 	time 	billed or 	costs 	claimed.
[Eff 	and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1· 1 2022 	l
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	88-82,
91-2)
SOBCHAPTER 2
OTHER CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS
§6-23-22 	Scope. 	This 	subchapter 	shall 	govern
all 	contested 	case 	hearings 	under 	chapter 	88, 	HRS,
except 	for 	petitions 	from 	preliminary decisions 	under
subchapter 	1, 	and 	petitions 	for 	declaratory 	rulings
under 	chapter 	6-20, 	subchapter 	4. 	The 	rules 	in 	this
subchapter 	shall 	not 	apply 	to 	hearings 	related 	to
claims 	arising 	under 	chapter 	92F, 	HRS. 	[Eff 	11/9/81;
am and 	comp 	11/26/2009; 	comp 	APR 1· 1 ?O?? 	] 	(Auth:
HRS §§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§~'9'1-2, 	91-9)
§6-23-23 	Definitions. 	Definitions 	generally
applicable 	to 	this 	subchapter 	are 	also 	provided 	in
section 	88-21, 	HRS, 	and section 	6-20-1. 	As 	used 	in
this 	subchapter:
"Informal 	decision" 	means 	a 	written determination
by 	the 	system that 	has 	not 	been 	expressly approved by
the 	board of 	trustees, 	to deny a 	member or 	petitioner
any 	alleged entitlement 	to 	a 	benefit, 	service 	credit,
or other alleged entitlement 	under 	chapter 	88, 	HRS.
"Petition" 	means 	a 	request 	for 	a 	contested case
hearing 	filed 	with 	the 	system requesting 	relief 	from
an 	alleged misapplication or 	violation of 	any
provision of 	chapter 	88, 	HRS, 	or 	rules 	promulgated
23-19
34
thereunder, 	setting 	forth 	an 	alleged entitlement 	to 	a
benefit, 	service 	credit, 	or 	other 	alleged entitlement,
and meeting 	the 	requirements 	of 	sections 	6-23-24 	and
6-23-28.
"Respondent" 	means 	any person proceeded against
in a 	petition under 	this 	subchapter. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am
and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR t· f 70?7 	l
(Auth: 	HRS §§8 8-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§88-21, 	91-2,
91-9)
§6-23-24 	Commencement of proceedings; 	service.
(a) 	A proceeding 	shall 	commence with 	the 	filing 	of 	a
petition pursuant 	to 	se c tion 	6-23-28 	for 	a 	contested
case 	hearing, 	including 	a 	certificate 	of 	service, 	at
the 	system's 	main office 	in Honolulu. 	Upon 	the 	filing
of 	a 	petition 	and 	certificate 	of 	service, 	the 	system
shall 	date 	stamp 	the 	petition 	and 	assign a 	docket
number, 	as 	provided 	in 	section 	6-23-8.
(b) 	The 	petitioner 	shall 	serve 	personally or by
first 	class mail 	one 	copy of 	the 	petition 	and
certificate 	of service 	on 	each of 	the 	parties 	to 	the
proceedings, 	or upon an 	agent 	or attorney 	representing
the 	party. 	[Eff 	11/9/81; 	am and 	camp 	11/26/2009; 	am
and 	comp 	APR 1· 1 ?n?? 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2)
(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9)
§6-23-25 	Limitations period. 	All 	petitions
under 	this 	subchapter 	are 	forever 	barred unless 	filed
within 	two 	years 	after 	the 	petitioner 	first 	knew 	or
should have 	known 	that 	the 	system had denied 	the
petitioner 	the 	alleged 	benefit, 	service 	credit, 	or
other 	entitlement 	under 	chapter 	88, 	HRS, 	that 	forms
the 	basis 	for 	the 	petition. 	Such 	knowledge 	includes
the 	petitioner's 	receipt 	of 	an 	informal 	decision 	from
the 	system denying 	the 	petitioner 	the 	alleged benefit,
service 	credit, 	or entitlement. 	The 	petitioner bears
the 	burden 	of 	proving 	that 	the 	petitioner has 	complied
with 	the 	imitations period. 	[Eff and 	comp 	11/26/2009;
23-20
comp 	APR t· 1 2022 	l 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2)
(Imp: 	HRS 	§§9 1-2, 	91-9, 	661-5)
§6-23-26 	Computation of time; 	extension of 	time.
(a) 	In 	computing 	any period of 	time 	prescribed or
allowe d 	by 	this 	subchapter, 	or 	any 	order 	of 	the 	board
or 	a 	hearing 	officer, 	the 	day 	of 	the 	act, 	event, 	or
defaul t 	afte r 	which 	the 	designated 	period 	of 	time 	is
to 	run 	shall 	not 	be 	included. 	The 	last 	day 	of 	the
period 	shall be 	inc l uded 	unless 	it 	is 	a 	Saturday,
Sunday, 	or 	legal 	holiday 	in 	the 	State, 	i n 	which event
the 	period of 	time 	runs 	until 	the 	end 	of 	the 	next day
which 	is 	neither 	a 	Saturday, 	Sunday, 	or 	legal 	holiday.
I ntermediate 	Saturdays, 	Sundays, 	or 	legal 	holidays
shall 	not 	be 	included 	in 	the 	computation when 	the
period of time 	prescribed or al l owed 	is 	seven days 	or
less. 	A half 	holiday 	shall 	not 	be 	considered 	a 	holiday
for 	purposes 	of 	these 	computations. 	All 	references 	in
this 	subchap t er 	to 	days 	shall 	mean 	calendar days,
unless 	otherwise 	expressed.
(b) 	Except 	for 	the 	time 	for 	filing 	exceptions
under 	section 	6-23-S0(b ), 	but 	including 	the
limitations 	period, 	whenever a 	person 	or agency 	is
required 	or 	allowed 	to 	act 	within a 	time 	specified by
this 	s u bchapter, 	the 	board 	or 	hearing 	officer may:
(1) 	Extend 	such period, 	for 	a 	reasonable 	amoun t
of 	time, 	if 	a 	written 	request 	is 	filed 	with
the 	board or 	hearing 	officer 	before 	the
specified period 	expires; 	or
(2) 	Upon motion, 	permit 	the 	act 	to 	be done 	after
the 	expiration of 	the 	specified perio d 	where
the 	failure 	to 	act 	was 	the 	result 	of
excusa ble 	neglec t. 	[ Eff and 	comp 	11/26/2009;
am and comp 	APR 1 1 ion 	1 	(Auth: 	HRS
§ § 8 8 - 2 8 , 	91 - 2 ) 	( I mp : 	HRS 	§ § 91 - 2 , 	91 - 9 )
§ G-23-27 	Appearanc es . 	Any party may 	appear 	in
person or 	by counsel 	or other 	representative . 	A
23-21
partner may appear 	on behalf 	of a 	partnership 	and 	an
officer may appear 	on 	behalf 	of a 	corporation. 	Persons
who 	appear 	as 	counsel must 	conform to 	the 	standards 	of
conduct 	and 	ethics 	required 	of 	practitioners before
the 	courts 	of 	the 	State. 	[Eff 	and 	comp 	11/26/2009;
comp 	APR 11 2022] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2)
(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9)
§6-23-28 	Contents of petition; 	form; 	rejection.
(a) 	The 	original 	and 	one 	copy of 	the 	petition 	shall 	be
filed 	with 	the 	system. 	The 	petition 	shall 	contain:
(1) 	The 	petitioner's 	name, 	mailing 	address, 	and
telephone 	number, 	and 	the 	petitioner's 	fax
number 	and 	e-mail 	address, 	if available;
(2) 	A brief 	statement 	of 	the 	nature 	of 	the
petitioner's 	interest, 	including 	reasons 	for
the 	submission of 	the 	petition;
(3) 	A designation 	of 	the 	specific 	statutory
provision, 	rule, 	or 	order 	in question;
(4) 	A complete 	statement 	of 	the 	relevant 	facts,
including 	the 	date 	of 	the 	alleged denial 	of
the 	benefit, 	service 	credit, 	or 	other
entitlement;
(5) 	A brief 	statement 	of 	the 	issues 	raised;
(6) 	A statement 	of 	the 	petitioner's
interpretation of 	the 	statute, 	rule, 	or
order 	or 	the 	petitioner's position or
contention with 	respect 	thereto;
(7) 	A statement 	containing 	the 	legal 	reasons,
including 	any 	legal 	authorities, 	in 	support
of 	the 	petitioner's 	interpretation and 	the
relief 	sought;
(8) 	The 	names 	of 	any 	other 	parties 	or 	potential
parties; 	and
(9) 	The 	petitioner's 	signature.
(b) 	The 	petitioner may 	use 	Form ERS 	202,
entitled 	"Petition 	for 	Contested Case 	Hearing, 	Sample
Format" 	dated August 	2009, 	Appendix A, 	located at 	the
end 	of 	this 	chapter, 	as 	a 	petition, 	or may 	file 	a
23-22
pet ition 	i n 	pleading or 	l e tter 	fo rm at, 	so 	long 	a s 	th e
p et it io n 	is 	l eg ib le and 	c om pl ie s 	wi th 	subsection 	(a) .
(c ) 	The 	ex ec ut iv e 	di re ct or on be half 	of 	th e
s yst e m may 	re je ct 	any p et it io n 	th a t 	does n ot 	c onform
to th e 	re qu ir e men ts 	of 	su bs ec t ion s 	( a) 	a nd 	(bl. 	The
r eje c ti on 	sh al l 	b e 	in 	writing 	and shall 	state 	the
r ea sons 	there fo r .
(d) 	A 	pe ti tio n 	that 	is 	not 	rejected 	will 	be
a ss ign ed by 	the 	s ys te m to 	a 	hea ri n g 	off i cer. 	[Eff 	a nd
co mp 	11/26/2009; 	am and co mp 	APR 1" 1 ?0?2 	J 	(Aut h:
HRS 	§ §8 8- 28, 	91 -2 ) 	{Imp: 	HRS § § 91- 2 , 	9 1 -9)
§6-23-29 	Consideration of petition. 	(a) 	Th e
he a ring o ff icer, 	with i n 	a 	r ea sonabl e 	a mount o f 	t ime
a ft er 	the p e tit i on ha s 	b een 	fil e d, 	s hal l 	do 	on e 	of 	t he
fo l lowing :
(1 ) 	Den y 	t he 	pe titi on whe r e:
(A) 	Th e 	qu es tio n - is 	sp e cul a tiv e 	o r 	pu rely
hy po th et i cal 	and doe s 	n ot 	i nvo l ve a n
exis ting 	situation or one which may
re as o nably b e 	ex pe ct ed 	to o ccu r 	in 	the
near 	fut u re;
(Bl 	Th e 	pe ti ti on er 's 	i n ter e st 	i s 	not 	of 	th e
type wh ich confers 	sufficient 	st andin g
to mai nt ai n 	a n 	action 	i n 	a 	co ur t 	of
law;
(Cl 	T he 	issu an c e 	of a 	fi na l 	de ci si on may
ad ve r sely 	a ff ect 	the 	in te re st o f 	th e
St a te , 	the 	system, 	or a ny of 	the
of fi ce rs 	o r 	empl oy e es 	in a ny 	litigation
which 	is 	pending or may be 	rea s ona b ly
be 	expected 	to 	ar is e ;
(Dl 	Th e 	pet it ion 	requests a 	decision on a
ma tt er 	other 	than 	th e 	al l eged
misapplication 	or 	viol a tio n 	of a ny
pr ov is i on o f 	cha p ter 	88, 	HR S, 	or 	rules
promul gated 	there u nder, 	s et tin g 	forth
a n 	all e ged ent i tle men t 	to a 	be n ef it,
service credit , 	or other all eg ed
en titlem en t, 	or 	o n 	a 	matter 	o th er wi se
23-23
not 	within 	the 	scope 	of 	th is
su bch a pter;
(E) 	The peti t io n 	requests 	a 	decision on a
s tatu t ory provision 	no t 	administered by
the 	boa r d 	o r 	th e 	ma tte r 	is 	not
otherwise 	with in 	the 	juri sd ic t ion of
the 	board; 	or
{F) 	The 	pet it ion 	is 	frivolous; 	or
(2) 	Se t 	the 	p et iti on 	f or 	he a rin g .
(b) 	Any order dismissi ng 	the 	petition under 	th is
se c tion 	shall:
(1) 	Be 	in wr iting;
(2 ) 	Include 	s ep arate 	findings 	of 	fact 	an d
conclusions 	of 	law; 	and
(3) 	Con s titute a 	recommended deci si on 	pursuant
to 	se ct ion 	6-23-48. 	[E f f 	and comp
11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR f 1 ?On 	]
(Auth: 	HRS 	§ §88 -2 8, 	91-2) 	(Imp: · HR S §§91-
2 , 	91-9, 	91-12, 	92-16)
§6-23-30 	Jurisdiction; 	powers 	and duties of
presiding officer. 	(a) 	The 	hearing of f ice r 	appointed
by 	the 	s ys te m shall 	pr e sid e 	ove r 	c ontested 	case
hearings governed by 	this 	subchapter. 	Th e 	cha ir per s on
o f 	the 	board or 	other member 	of 	the 	board d es ign at ed
by 	the 	ch a ir per so n 	sh all 	preside o ver 	hearings 	of
ar gu me nt s 	on ex ce pt io ns 	under 	section 	6 -2 3-51. 	The
bo ar d 	or 	th e 	he a rin g 	off i cer 	s ha ll 	h ave 	jurisd ic ti o n
over 	those 	matters 	expressly authorized by 	this
su bc ha pt er, 	respect i vely.
(b) 	With 	re sp ec t 	to 	contested cas e 	he arings
governed by 	this 	sub c hap te r, 	the 	hearing 	officer 	a s
presiding 	of fic er 	shall 	have 	the 	fo ll owing powers 	and
duties:
( 1) 	Con ti nu e 	or 	po s tpone, 	at 	th e 	re quest 	of 	a
party, 	any hea ring;
( 2 ) 	Re gul a te 	the 	cou rs e 	and c on du ct 	of 	the
hearing;
( 3 ) 	Administer oat hs 	and 	ta ke 	affidavits;
23-24
(4) 	Ex amin e 	wi tn ess es 	a nd admit 	or 	e xclude
docu mentary or other evidence;
(5 ) 	Is su e 	a nd 	di sp ose 	o f 	s ubp oe nas;
(6) 	Hol d 	co nferences, 	bef o re 	or 	dur i ng 	the
he ar ing , 	for 	the 	simplifi ca tion 	of 	iss ue s ;
(7 ) 	Ru le 	o n mo ti ons, 	req ue sts, 	off er s 	o f 	pro of ,
procedural 	req u ests, 	an d 	sim i lar matte rs;
(8 ) 	He ar 	and decide 	q ues tio ns 	of fact , 	law , 	or
di scr e t ion ; 	and
(9) 	Do a ll 	other ac ts 	and 	take 	all 	me asu r es
ne ce ssa ry, 	a s 	au t hor iz ed by ch ap ter 	88 , 	HRS ,
fo r 	the 	ma i ntenance 	of 	or de r 	and 	f or 	the
ef fic ient , 	fa ir , 	and 	impa rtia l 	adjudicat i on
o f 	is s ues 	ari si ng 	in p roceedin gs 	go ver ne d 	by
th is 	su bc hap ter.
(c) 	With 	re spe ct 	to 	he a rin gs 	of a rg u me nts 	on
e xceptions, 	th e 	ch ai rpe r son of 	th e 	bo ard o r 	o t her
member 	of 	th e 	board designated as 	presid i ng 	officer
s hall 	hav e 	th e 	fo ll owin g 	po wers 	and d uti es :
(1) 	To de te rmi ne 	th e 	tim e 	and 	plac e 	of 	th e
hear ing 	of 	arguments 	on 	except io ns 	and, 	in
t he 	pre si d i ng 	o f fice r 's 	d is cre ti on or at 	th e
re que st 	of a 	pa r ty, 	to c ontinue 	o r 	po stp on e
an y 	hearing;
(2) 	To 	r eg ulat e 	the 	co ur se 	an d 	con du ct 	of 	th e
hearing;
(3) 	To 	t ake 	an y 	oth er a ct i on au thor iz e d 	by 	th i s
su bc hap te r 	o r 	by 	law 	that 	th e 	pr es idi ng
o ffic e r 	may d e em ne cessary 	f or t he 	ord e rly
a nd 	just 	con duc t 	of 	t he he a rin g . 	[Eff 	an d
comp 	11/ 2 6/2009 ; 	am and comp 	APR 1" 1 20??
(Auth: 	H RS §§88-28, 	9 1- 2) 	( I mp : 	HRS 	§§ 	91 -
2, 	9 1-9, 	91- 10, 	92 -1 6)
§ 6-23-31 	Burden of proof . 	Except as 	otherwise
p rov ide d 	by 	law, 	th e 	p art y 	ini ti atin g 	th e 	pro ce edi ng
sh al l 	h ave 	th e 	burden o f 	pro o f , 	includ in g 	the b urd en
o f 	p ro ducing ev ide n ce 	and 	th e 	bur d e n 	o f 	per su asi on.
The 	par ty ha vin g 	th e 	burd e n 	of 	proof 	sha l l 	pr oc eed
first 	in 	the presentation of opening 	sta te ments,
23 -2 5
evidence, 	witnesses, 	and arguments, 	followed 	by the
other 	party. 	The degree 	or 	quantum of 	proof 	shall 	be 	a
preponderance 	of 	the evidence. 	[ Eff 	and comp
11/26/2009; 	comp 	APR 1 1 2022 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-
28, 	91-2} 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-10, 	92-16)
§6-23-32 	~rehearinq conference. 	(a) 	The
hearing officer, 	at 	any 	time 	before 	the 	hearing 	is
scheduled, 	may 	direct 	the 	parties 	and 	their 	counsel 	or
other 	representatives 	to 	appear 	at 	a 	prehearing
conference 	to 	consider:
(1) 	The 	simplification of 	issues 	and
stipulations 	as 	to 	facts 	and 	law not 	in
dispute;
(2) 	The 	necessity 	or 	desirability of 	amendment
to 	the 	pleadings;
(3) 	The 	exchange 	o f 	exhibits, 	documents, 	and
prepared testimony, 	admissions, 	and
stipulations 	as 	to 	the 	admissibility or
relevance 	o f 	exhibits;
(4) 	The 	limitation of 	the 	number 	of 	witnesses;
(5) 	Time, 	place, 	and 	other 	considerations, 	such
as 	time 	constraints, 	for 	the 	hearing; 	and
(6) 	Any other matters 	which may 	expedite 	the
disposition 	of the 	proceeding.
{b) 	If 	no 	prehearing 	conference 	is 	held, 	the
hearing officer may 	require 	each party 	to 	submit 	a
statement 	disclosing and 	identifying all 	witnesses 	to
be 	called at 	the 	hearing, 	all 	exhibits 	to 	be 	used 	at
the 	hearing, 	and 	other matters 	as 	shall 	simplify the
issues 	and 	expedite 	the 	disposition of 	the 	proceeding.
A copy of 	the 	statement 	shall 	be 	served on 	all 	parties
at 	a 	date 	prior 	to 	the 	hearing as 	designated 	by 	the
hearing officer. 	[Eff 	and 	comp 11/26/2009; 	am and comp
APR 1· 1 20?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 	88-2 	B, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS 	§§ 	91-2, 	91-9, 	92-16)
23-26
§6-23-33 	Notice of hearing. 	(a) 	At 	least
fifteen 	days 	prior 	to 	hearing, 	all 	parties 	shall 	be
given 	written 	notice 	of 	the 	hearing, 	including:
(1) 	The date, 	time, 	place, 	and 	nature 	of 	the
hearing;
(2) 	The 	section 	of 	the 	pertinent 	statutes 	or
rules 	involved;
(3) 	A concise 	statement 	of 	the 	issues 	and basic
facts 	giving 	rise 	to 	the 	petition. 	A copy of
the 	petition 	attached 	to 	the 	notice 	of 	the
hearing 	shall 	satisfy this 	requirement; 	and
(4) 	The 	right 	to 	retain 	counsel, 	if 	desired.
(b) 	The 	notice 	of hearing 	shall 	conform to 	the
requirements 	of 	section 	91-9, 	HRS, 	and shall 	be
personally delivered or mailed 	by 	registered 	or
certified mail 	with 	return 	receipt 	requested. 	[Eff
and 	comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR f" 1 20?.?
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9,
91-9.5)
§6-23-34 	Memorandum in opposition. 	Each
respondent, 	within 	thirty days 	after 	the 	receipt 	o f
the 	notice 	of hearing, 	may 	file 	and serve 	upon 	all
parties 	a 	memorandum 	in opposition 	stating 	concisely
and 	fully 	the 	respondent's 	legal 	and 	factual 	position.
(Eff 	and c omp 	11/26/2009; 	comp 	APR 11 ?On 	1 	(Auth:
HRS 	§§88- 2 8, 	91-2) (Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9)
§6-23-35 	Procedure at hearings. 	(a) 	All
hearings 	shall 	be 	conducted pursuant 	to 	chapter 	91,
HRS, 	and 	this 	subchapter, 	before 	a 	hearing 	officer.
All 	parties 	shall 	be 	afforded 	the 	full 	opportunity to
present 	evidence 	and 	argument 	on all 	issues. 	If 	there
is 	no 	dispute 	of 	fact, 	the 	hearing 	officer may permit
the 	parties 	to 	proceed by memoranda 	of 	law 	in 	lieu 	of
a 	hearing.
(b) 	The 	hearing 	shall proceed as 	follows:
23-27
(1) 	Opening 	statements. 	Petitioner 	shall 	first
present 	opening 	statements, 	followed 	by
respondents;
(2) 	Evidence. 	Petitioner 	shall 	first 	present
evidence, 	followed 	by 	respondents, 	followed
by any 	rebuttal 	evidence;
(3) 	Witnesses. 	Each 	witness 	shall 	be 	examined
first 	by the 	party calling 	the 	witness
before cross-examination by 	the 	opposing
party;
(4) 	Closing argument. 	After all 	evidence and
witnesses 	have 	been 	admitted, 	petitioner
shall 	first 	make 	closing 	arguments, 	if
necessary, 	and 	respondent 	shall 	then make
closing 	arguments, 	if necessary.
(c) 	The 	hearing 	shall 	conclude 	after 	closing
arguments 	have 	been made 	and 	the 	hearing 	officer 	is
satisfied 	that 	no 	further 	evidence 	or 	argument 	is
necessary. 	[Eff and 	comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp
APR 1· I 20n 	l 	{Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 	88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS§§ 	91-2, 	91-9, 	91-10, 	92-16)
§6-23-36 	Evidence; 	witnesses; 	exhibits. 	(a)
The 	hearing 	officer 	shall 	admit 	all 	evidence 	that 	is
not 	irrelevant, 	immaterial, 	unduly 	repetitious, 	or
otherwise 	unreliable 	or of 	little probative 	value.
Evidence 	relating 	to 	settlement 	that 	would 	be 	excluded
under 	rule 	408 	of 	the 	Hawaii 	Rules 	of 	Evidence,
chapter 	626, 	HRS, 	shall 	not 	be 	admissible.
(b) 	At 	hearing, 	witnesses 	shall 	be 	examined
orally, 	under 	oath. 	Parties 	shall 	have 	the 	right 	to
cross-examine 	witnesses, 	so 	long 	as 	the 	cross
examination 	is 	not 	unduly 	repetitious. 	At 	the
discretion 	of 	the 	hearing 	officer, 	re-direct
examination and 	re-cross 	examination may 	be 	permitted.
(c) 	For 	any 	exhibit 	sought 	to be 	admitted during
a 	hearing before 	a 	hearing 	officer, 	an 	original plus
one 	copy shall 	be 	distributed 	to 	the 	hearing officer,
and 	one 	copy shall 	be 	furnished 	to 	each party. 	[ Eff
and 	comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 1· 1 2022 	]
2 3-28
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 	88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9,
91-10, 	92-16)
§6-23-37 	Motions. 	(a) 	General. 	All 	motions,
except 	those made 	orally on 	the 	record during a
hearing, 	shall:
(1) 	Be 	in 	writing;
(2) 	Provide 	the 	name 	of 	the 	petitioner 	and
docket 	number of 	the 	case;
(3) 	State 	the 	factual 	or 	legal 	grounds, 	or 	both,
for 	the 	motion with 	particularity;
(4) 	Set 	forth 	the 	relief 	or 	order 	sought; 	and
(5) 	Be 	accompanied by an 	affidavit 	or
declaration 	or 	other 	evidence 	relied 	upon.
The motion may be 	accompanied by 	legal 	memorandum, 	not
to 	exceed 	twenty 	pages. 	All 	motions 	shall 	be
accompanied 	by a 	certificate 	of 	service 	and 	shall be
served on each 	party 	to 	the 	proceeding.
(b) 	Response 	to 	motions. 	Response 	to 	motions
shall 	be 	filed 	with 	the 	presiding 	officer within
thirty days 	after 	service 	of 	the 	motion. 	The 	response
shall 	be 	accompanied by an 	affidavit 	or declaration 	or
other 	evidence, 	and may be 	accompanied by 	legal
memorandum, 	not 	to 	exceed 	twenty pages. 	If 	no 	response
is 	filed 	within 	the 	designated period, 	the 	presiding
officer may deem 	that 	the 	responsive 	party has 	waived
any 	objection 	to 	the motion.
(cl 	Discretion. 	Upon 	the 	motion 	of 	a 	party, 	or
upon 	the 	presiding 	officer's 	own motion, 	the 	presiding
officer may 	extend 	or 	shorten 	the 	time 	for 	a 	party 	to
file 	a 	response 	to 	a 	motion, 	and may make 	such 	other
orders 	regarding 	a 	motion 	as 	the 	presiding 	officer
deems 	appropriate. 	The 	presiding 	officer may permit
oral 	argument 	where 	the 	officer deems 	it 	necessary or
desirable. 	[Eff 	and 	comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp
ApD 11 2022 	] 	{Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS
§§9T-'2, 	9"1-'9, 	91-10, 	92-16)
23-29
§6-23-38 	Motions 	to dismiss 	or for 	swnmary
judgment; 	disposition of claims. 	(a) 	The 	presiding
officer, 	upon 	motion by a 	party, 	may 	at 	any 	time 	issue
an 	order 	for 	summary 	judgment 	in 	favor 	of 	the
petitioner 	or 	respondent 	as 	to 	all 	or 	any 	part 	of 	the
claims, 	if 	no 	genuine 	issue 	of material 	fact 	exists
and a 	party 	is 	entitled 	to 	judgment 	as 	a 	matter of
law.
(b) 	The 	presiding officer, 	upon motion by a
party or 	on 	the 	presiding 	officer's 	own motion, 	may 	at
any 	time 	issue 	an 	order 	dismissing 	the 	petition on 	the
grounds 	of 	lack of 	jurisdiction, 	failure 	to 	state 	a
claim on which 	relief may 	be 	granted, 	or 	any 	other
ground upon 	which 	the 	petition may 	be 	dismissed prior
to 	the 	hearing. 	In 	addition, 	the 	presiding 	officer may
issue 	an 	order 	of dismissal 	of 	the 	petition upon 	a
stipulation 	of 	the 	parties 	or 	upon 	a 	voluntary
dismissal 	by 	the 	petitioner.
(c) 	An order 	that 	grants 	or denies 	disposal 	of
some 	or 	all 	claims 	in 	the 	petition 	shall 	constitute 	a
recommended decision pursuant 	to 	section 	6-23-48 	if
issued by 	the 	hearing 	officer and 	not 	considered an
interlocutory 	order. 	An 	order 	that 	grants 	or denies
disposal 	of 	some 	or 	all 	claims 	in 	the 	petition 	shall
constitute 	a 	proposed decision 	pursuant 	to 	section 	6-
23-49 	if 	issued by 	the 	board upon 	receipt 	of 	a
recommended decision and 	not 	considered an
interlocutory order. 	An 	order 	that disposes 	of 	some
but 	not 	all 	of 	the 	claims 	in 	the 	petition 	shall 	be
considered an 	interlocutory order 	and 	shall 	be
appealable 	under 	section 	91-14, 	HRS, 	only after 	a
final 	decision 	has 	been 	issued, 	or 	if 	deferral 	of
review 	would deprive 	the 	appellant 	of 	adequate
judicial 	review under 	section 	91-14, 	HRS. 	[Eff 	and
comp 11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1' f 2022 	] 	(Auth:
HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9, 	91-12, 	92-
16)
§6-23-39 	Intervention. 	(a) 	Upon 	timely motion
and 	at 	the 	discretion 	of 	the 	hearing officer, 	the
23-30
executive director 	or 	any person 	or 	agency may be
permitted 	to 	intervene 	as 	a 	party 	in a 	contested case
proceeding 	if 	the 	executive director, 	person, 	or
agency asserts 	a 	substantial 	interest 	in 	the 	outcome
of 	the 	contested case proceeding or 	the 	intervention
will 	be 	conducive 	to 	effectuating 	applicable 	laws 	or
governmental 	functions 	and 	purposes.
(b) 	The 	hearing 	officer 	shall 	have 	the
discretion 	to deny 	a 	motion 	to 	intervene 	for 	reasons
including but 	not 	limited 	to 	the 	following:
(1} 	The 	position of 	the 	person 	seeking
intervention 	is 	adequately 	represented by a
party already 	admitted 	to 	the 	proceeding;
(2) 	Granting 	the 	intervention will 	render 	the
proceeding 	inefficient 	and 	unmanageable;
(3) 	Granting 	the 	intervention will 	unduly delay
the 	proceeding; 	or
(4) 	Granting 	the 	intervention will 	harass,
hinder, 	or prejudice 	the 	rights 	of any party
to 	the 	proceeding.
(c) 	Motions 	to 	intervene 	shall be made 	pursuant
to 	section 	6-23-37. 	[Eff and 	comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and
comp 	APR t· t ?.O?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2)
(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-9, 	92-16)
§6-23-40 	Default. 	(a) 	The 	presiding officer
may 	find 	a 	party 	to 	be 	in default 	upon motion 	by a
party or at 	the 	presiding 	officer's 	discretion, 	on 	the
following 	grounds:
(1) 	Failure 	to 	comply with an 	administrative
order;
(2) 	Failure 	to 	appear 	at 	a 	conference 	or hearing
without 	good 	cause being 	shown; 	or
(3) 	Failure 	to 	prosecute 	the 	case.
(b) 	When 	the 	presiding 	officer 	finds 	that 	a
default 	has 	occurred, 	the 	presiding officer may 	issue
a 	default order against 	the 	defaulting 	party. 	The
order 	shall 	include 	findings 	of 	fact 	showing 	the
grounds 	for 	the 	order, 	conclusions 	regarding material
issues 	of 	fact 	and 	law, 	and 	other 	terms 	or 	conditions,
23-31
as 	appropriate. 	Terms 	or 	conditions 	of a 	default 	order
can 	include 	dismissal 	of the 	petition. 	The 	default
order 	shall 	constitute 	a 	recommended decision 	pursuant
to 	section 	6-23-48 	if 	filed 	by 	the 	hearing 	officer.
The default 	order 	shall 	constitute 	a 	proposed decision
if 	filed 	by the 	chairperson or other 	designated member
of 	the 	board. 	[Eff and comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp
APR 1· 1 2022 	l 	{Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 	88-28, 	91-2) 	{Imp:
HRS 	§§91~2, 	91-9, 	91-12, 	92-16)
§6-23-41 	Filing of documents; 	public records.
(a) 	Filing. 	If 	any document 	filed 	in a 	proceeding
governed by 	this 	subchapter 	is 	not 	in 	substantial
conformity with 	the 	applicable 	rules 	of the 	system, 	or
is 	otherwise 	insufficient, 	the 	presiding officer may,
at 	the 	presiding officer's 	discretion or on 	the motion
of 	any party, 	strike 	the 	document 	or 	require 	its
amendment. 	If amended, 	the 	document 	shall 	be 	effective
as 	of 	the 	date 	of 	the 	original 	filing.
(b} 	Public 	records. 	Notwithstanding 	section 	6-20-
4, 	all 	documents 	filed 	in 	a 	proceeding 	under 	this
subchapter 	shall 	be 	retained 	in 	the 	files 	of 	the
system and 	shall 	be 	government 	records 	that 	are 	open
to 	inspection and copying by members 	of 	the 	public,
except 	as 	provided 	in 	chapter 	92F, 	HRS, 	and 	other
applicable 	law. 	Any party who 	believes 	that 	a 	document
filed 	under 	this 	subchapter 	is 	not 	a 	government 	record
shall 	file 	a 	motion 	with 	the 	system, 	stating 	the 	legal
basis 	as 	to why 	the 	party 	believes 	that 	the 	document
is 	not 	a 	government 	record as 	defined 	in chapter 	92F,
HRS. 	(Eff and comp 11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp APR 1· 1 2022 l
(Auth: 	HRS §§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91'-9,
92F-ll, 	92F-12, 	92F-13, 	92F-14)
§6-23-42 	Deposition; 	application for. 	(a) 	Upon
the 	written application of 	a 	party to 	a 	proceeding
governed by 	this 	subchapter and 	for 	good cause 	shown,
the 	hearing 	officer may, 	at 	any 	time 	after 	the 	filing
23-32
of 	the 	petition, 	order 	the 	taking of 	testimony of 	a
witness 	by oral 	examination.
(b) 	The 	application 	shall be made 	to 	the 	hearing
officer 	and 	shall 	state 	the 	reasons why 	the 	deposition
should be 	taken, 	the 	time 	and 	place 	for 	taking 	the
deposition, 	the name and mailing address 	of 	the
witness, 	and 	the 	subject matter concerning which 	the
witness 	is 	expected to 	testify. 	If good cause 	is
shown, 	an 	order 	for 	the 	taking 	of 	the 	deposition
containing 	the 	appropriate 	instructions 	shall 	be made
and 	served 	upon 	the 	parties. 	[ Eff and 	comp
11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1· 1 2022 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS
§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2~ 	91-9, 	92-16)
§6-23-43 	Depositions; 	person before whom taken,
Oath, 	examination, 	and cross-examination, 	record of
Examination, 	filing of deposition. 	(a) 	The deposition
shall 	be 	taken before 	an 	officer 	authorized 	to
administer 	oaths.
{b) 	The 	officer before whom the 	testimony 	is 	to
be 	taken shall 	put 	the 	witness 	to 	oath. 	The 	adverse
party shall 	have 	the 	right 	to 	cross-examine 	the
witness. 	The 	questions 	propounded to 	the 	witness 	and
the 	answers 	thereto 	shall 	be 	taken 	stenographically
and 	transcribed.
(cJ 	All 	objections made 	at 	the 	time 	of 	the
examination 	shall 	be 	noted by the 	officer 	upon 	the
deposition. 	Evidence 	objected to 	shall 	be 	taken
subject 	to 	the 	objection. 	The 	officer 	taking 	the
deposition 	shall 	certify on 	the 	deposition 	that 	the
witness 	was 	duly 	sworn and 	that 	the 	deposition 	is 	a
true 	record 	of 	the 	testimony given by 	the 	witness 	and
shall 	forward 	the 	deposition 	with 	two 	copies 	thereof
in 	a 	sealed envelope, 	endorsed with 	the 	title 	of 	the
proceeding, 	to 	the 	board at 	the 	system's 	office. 	[Eff
and 	comp 11/26/2009; 	comp 	APR 11 2022 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS
§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-9)
23-33
§6-23-44 	Use of depositions. 	(a) 	A deposition
ordered and 	taken 	in accordance 	with 	section 	6-23-42
may be 	used 	in a 	proceeding 	if 	the 	hearing 	officer
finds 	that 	the 	evidence 	is 	otherwise 	admissible 	and:
(1) 	The 	witness 	is 	dead;
(2) 	The 	witness 	is 	out 	of 	the 	State, 	unless 	it
appears 	that 	the 	absence 	of 	the 	witness 	is
procured by 	the 	party offering 	the
deposition;
(3) 	The 	witness 	is 	unable 	to 	attend 	or 	testify
because 	of 	age, 	sickness, 	infirmity, 	or
imprisonment;
(4) 	The 	party offering 	the 	deposition 	has
endeavored 	and 	has 	been unable 	to 	procure
the 	attendance 	of 	the 	witness 	by 	subpoena;
or
(5) 	Upon 	application 	and 	notice, 	that 	such
exceptional 	circumstances 	exist 	as 	to make
it 	desirable, 	in 	the 	interest 	of 	justice and
with due 	regard 	to 	the 	importance 	of
presenting 	the 	testimony orally before 	the
board or hearing 	officer, 	to 	allow 	the
deposition 	to 	be made.
(b) 	If any 	part 	of 	the 	deposition 	is 	put 	in
evidence by a 	party, 	any 	other 	party may 	require 	the
production 	of 	the 	remainder of 	any 	other 	portions 	of
the 	deposition. 	[Eff and comp 11/26/2009; 	am and comp
APR 1· 1 ?0?7 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS 	§§91.:..2, 	91-9, 	91-10, 	92-16)
§6-23-45 	Disqualification of board member or
hearing officer. 	(a) 	No matter 	shall 	be 	heard by a
member 	of the 	board or by a 	hearing 	officer who:
(1) 	Has 	any 	direct 	financial 	interest 	in the
matter 	being heard;
(2) 	Has 	personally and 	substantially
participated:
(A) 	In an 	investigation 	relating 	to 	the
institution 	of 	the 	proceeding; 	or
23-34
(B) 	In 	the development 	of 	the evidence 	to
be 	introduced in 	the 	proceeding; 	or
(3) 	Is 	related 	within 	the 	third degree 	by 	blood
or marriage 	to 	any 	party 	to 	the 	proceeding
or 	any party's 	representative 	or 	attorney.
(b) 	A board member 	or hearing 	officer may 	be
disqualified 	from 	the 	case 	upon motion of a 	party or
at 	the 	presiding officer's 	discretion, 	only upon 	a
preponderance 	of 	the 	evidence 	showing 	grounds 	for
disqualification. 	A motion 	to 	disqualify a 	board
member 	or 	hearing 	officer 	shall 	be 	filed 	and decided
prior to 	the 	hearing. 	An 	order 	granting 	or denying 	a
motion 	to 	disqualify 	shall 	contain 	separate 	findings
of 	fact 	and 	conclusions 	of 	law. 	[Eff 	and 	comp
11/26/2009; 	comp 	APR 1 1 JO?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28,
91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS §§91-2, · 9 	-16)
§ 6-2 3-46 	Reassignment of case. 	If 	for 	any 	reason
the 	hearing 	officer designated 	for 	the 	hearing of a
case 	is 	unable 	to 	complete 	the 	hearing, 	the 	system
may, 	without 	abatement 	of 	the 	proceedings, 	assign 	the
case 	to 	another 	hearing 	officer. 	[Eff 	and comp
11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1 1 ?On 	l 	(Auth:
HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2} 	{Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	92-16}
§6-23-47 	Ex parte contacts. 	At 	no 	time 	after
the 	petition 	is 	served 	and 	filed 	shall 	any member 	of
the 	board or 	the 	hearing 	officer, 	who 	are 	deciding 	the
petition, 	consult 	any 	person on any 	issue 	of 	fact
except 	upon 	notice 	and 	opportunity 	for 	all 	parties 	to
participate, 	save 	to 	the 	extent 	required 	for 	the
disposition 	of 	ex 	parte matters 	authorized by 	law. 	Any
ex 	parte memorandum or 	other written communication
addressed 	to 	a 	board member 	or 	the 	hearing officer, 	by
or on behalf 	of any party, 	shall 	be 	regarded as
argument made 	in 	the 	proceeding and 	shall 	be 	served on
all 	other 	parties. 	[Eff and comp 11/26/2009; 	comp
23-35
APR 1· 1 2022 (Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-13, 	92-16)
§6-23-48 	Recommended decision. 	When 	a 	case 	is
heard by 	a 	hearing 	officer, 	the 	hearing 	officer 	shall
make 	and 	file 	with 	the 	board 	a 	recommended decision
which 	shall 	include 	recommended 	findings 	of 	fact 	and
conclusions 	of 	law. 	If any party has 	been 	permitted 	to
file 	proposed 	findings 	of 	fact 	and 	conclusions 	of 	law,
the 	recommended decision 	shall 	include 	rulings 	on each
proposed 	finding 	of 	fact 	and 	conclusion of 	law. 	The
hearing 	officer 	shall 	file 	the 	recommended decision
within 	sixty days 	after 	the 	close 	of 	the 	reception of
evidence 	or 	the 	filing 	of any post-hearing memoranda
or 	proposed 	findings 	of 	fact 	and 	conclusions 	of 	law,
whichever 	is 	later. 	[Eff and 	comp 11/26/2009; 	comp
APR 11 2022 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 	88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS §§91-2, 	91-9, 	91-11, 	92-16)
§6-23-49 	Proposed decision. 	Upon 	receipt of 	the
recommended decision, 	the 	board may accept 	it 	as 	its
proposed decision, 	or may 	remand 	the 	recommended
decision 	to 	the 	hearing officer 	for 	any 	clarification
or 	correction, 	or may modify 	the 	recommended decision
and 	issue 	its 	own 	draft 	of 	a 	proposed decision.
A 	copy 	of 	the 	proposed decision 	shall 	be 	served
on each party. 	[Eff and comp 	11/26/2009; 	comp
APR 11 2022 	l 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§ 	88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp:
HRS 	§§ 	91-2, 	91-9, 	91-11, 	92-16)
§6-23-50 	Filing of exceptions; 	extension of
time; 	finality of proposed decision. 	(a) 	Within
fifteen 	days 	after 	receipt 	of 	a 	copy of 	the 	board's
proposed decision, 	any party may 	file 	with 	the 	board
exceptions 	to any 	part 	thereof and 	request 	review by
the 	board. 	Each 	exception 	shall 	specify the 	portion of
23-36
the 	record 	and 	authorities 	relied on 	to 	sustain 	each
point. 	Within 	fifteen 	days 	after 	receipt of 	a 	copy of
a 	party's 	exceptions 	and 	request 	for 	review, 	any party
may 	file 	with 	the 	board a 	response 	to 	the 	exceptions
and 	request 	for 	review. 	In 	addition, 	a 	copy of 	the
exceptions 	and 	request 	for 	review, 	and 	response, 	shall
be 	served upon each of 	the 	parties 	who 	were 	served
with a 	copy of 	the 	proposed decision.
(b) 	Any party may 	apply 	for 	an 	extension 	of 	time
within which 	to 	file 	exceptions 	to 	the 	proposed
decision, 	or 	response, 	by 	filing 	a 	written application
setting 	forth 	the 	reasons 	for 	the 	request. 	The
application 	shall be 	filed 	before 	the 	respective
expiration 	of the period prescribed 	for 	the 	filing 	of
exceptions 	or 	response. 	Upon good 	cause 	shown, 	the
board, 	any member of 	the 	board, 	or 	the 	executive
director 	on behalf 	of 	the 	system, 	may extend 	the 	time
for 	filing 	exceptions 	or 	response, 	for 	an 	additional
period not 	to 	exceed 	fifteen 	days 	after 	the 	applying
party's 	receipt 	of 	the 	extension of 	time 	within which
to 	file 	exceptions 	or 	response.
(c) 	If 	no exceptions 	and 	request 	for 	review are
filed 	within 	the 	time 	specified, 	the 	proposed decision
shall 	become 	final, 	unless 	the 	board on 	its 	own motion
orders 	further 	proceedings 	to 	be 	held. 	[Eff 	and 	comp
11/26/2009; 	comp 	APR 1 '?On 	l 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28,
91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-11, 	91-12)
§6-23-51 	Argument on exceptions. 	Upon 	the 	filing
of exceptions by a 	party adversely affected 	by 	the
proposed decision, 	the 	board 	shall 	grant 	such 	party an
opportunity 	to 	present 	arguments 	to 	the 	board. 	The
executive director 	shall 	set 	the 	time 	and 	place 	of
hearing 	of 	argument 	on exceptions 	and 	give 	written
notice 	thereof 	to 	the 	parties. 	[ Eff and comp
11/26/2009; 	am and 	comp 	APR 11 ?0?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS
§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2', 	91-11)
23-37
§6-23-52 	Final decision. 	(a) 	Where 	exceptions
have 	been 	filed 	to 	the 	board's proposed decision, 	the
board, 	within 	sixty days 	after 	the 	hearing 	on 	the
exceptions, 	shall 	render 	its 	final 	decision. 	In
rendering 	its 	final 	decision, 	the 	board 	shall 	consider
the 	whole 	record 	or such 	portions 	thereof as may 	be
cited by 	the 	parties, 	and 	shall 	resolve 	all 	questions
of 	fact 	by what 	it deems 	to 	be 	the 	preponderance 	of
the 	evidence. 	The 	final 	decision 	shall 	be 	in 	writing
and 	shall 	contain 	findings 	of 	fact 	and 	conclusions 	of
law upon which 	the 	decision 	is 	based.
(b) 	The 	final 	decision 	shall be 	personally
delivered or mailed 	to 	the 	parties by 	registered or
certified mail 	with 	return 	receipt 	requested. 	[Eff
and 	comp 	11/26/2009; 	am and comp 	APR 1· 1 ?On 	l
(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§91-2, 	91-11,
91-12)
§6-23-53 	Reconsideration of decision. 	(a) 	A
motion 	for 	reconsideration 	shall be 	filed 	with 	the
board within 	fifteen 	days 	after 	the 	board 	files 	its
final 	decision. 	The motion 	for 	reconsideration 	shall
clearly 	specify 	that 	the 	motion 	is 	for
reconsideration.
(bl 	The motion 	for 	reconsideration 	shall 	state
specifically what 	points 	of 	law or 	fact, 	or 	both, 	the
motion 	asserts 	the board has 	overlooked or
misunderstood, 	together 	with brief 	arguments 	on 	the
points 	raised.
(c) 	No 	answer or 	reply 	to a 	motion 	for
reconsideration 	shall 	be 	required 	or considered 	unless
requested by 	the 	board. 	Oral 	argument 	on 	the motion
shall be 	at 	the 	discretion 	of 	the 	board.
(d) 	Only one motion 	for 	reconsideration 	shall 	be
filed 	by each party and 	the 	filing 	of 	a 	motion 	for
reconsideration 	shall 	not 	operate 	as 	a 	stay of 	the
board's 	final 	decision or 	order. 	(Eff 	and comp
11/26/2009; 	comp 	APR 	\ 	1 20?? 	] 	(Auth: 	HRS 	§§88-
28, 	91-2) 	(Imp: 	HRS 	§§'91-2, 	~l-9)
23-38
ERS 202 (August 2009) 	Appendix A
PETITION FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARING
SAMPLE FORMAT
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
El\1PLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
STATE OF HA WAIT
)
) 	DOCKETNo.: _________	In the Matter of
J 	(To be filled in by agency)
)
(Petitioner's first and last name) 	) 	PETIT[ON FOR CONTESTED CASE
) 	HEARING
Petitioner, 	)
) 	Attachments or E;,;hibits:
for a Contested Case Hearing, 	)
) 	1. --------------
)
) 	2. -------------
)
) 	3. --------~
)
) 	4.
)
PETITION FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARL'JG
1. 	PETITIONER'S INFORMATION
A. 	Petitioner's Name: (Type or write in the Petitioner's full legal name.)
B. 	Petitioner's Malling Address: (Type or write in the Petitioner's complete mailing
address. 	Unless the Petitioner is represented by an attorney, all notices and
pleadings in this proceeding will be mailed to this address.)
C. 	Petitioner's Telepb.one Number: (Type or write in the Petitioner's complete
telephone number.)
D. 	Petitioner's Fax Number: (Type or write in the Petitioner's complete fax number,
if available.)
E. 	Petitioner's E•Mall Address: (Type or write in the Petitioner's e-mail address, if
available.)
-1-
ERS 202 (August 2009) 	Appendix A
2. 	STATEl\ffiNT OF PETITIONER'S lNTEREST, REASONS FOR SUBMITTING
PETITION AND ISSUES
A. 	Nature of Petitioner's Interest: (Bn'ejly state the nature of Petitioner's interest in
this Petition. For example: "I am a member of the Employees' Retirement System,"
or "/ am a beneficiary of the Employees' Retirement System.")
B. 	Petitioner's Reasons for Submitting Petition: (Briefly staJe Petitioner's reasons
for filing this Petition. For example, "The Employees' Retirement System has
improperly calculated my service credits.")
C. 	Petitioner's Statement of Issues: (Briefly describe all of the issues being raised in
this Petition including all of the claims being made under the Petition. For example,
"Under Hawaii Revised Statutes§ 88-132, I am claiming military service credit
because I was an active member of the Employees' Retirement System when I went
on rniUtary leave in March 1972. ")
3. 	STATEl\lENT OF RELEVANT FACTS
(In this section of the Petition, state all of the facts that Petitioner believe,t CJre relevanr ro
the issues being raised in the Petition, including a chronology of events, if that would be
helpful to understanding the issues. If Petitioner is disputing a denial of retirement benefits,
service credits, or some other entitlement, state the date of the denial, the date when you
became aware of the denial, cmd how you discovered or learned of the denial.)
4. 	ST ATEl\fENT OF LEGAL REAS ONS SUPPORTING THE PETITION
(In this section of the Petition, state the legal reasons supporting Petitior1er' s claims or
positions on issues raised in the Petition. Ifthe legal reasons include arry court decisions or
other legal. authorities, identify them and state how they support Petitioner's claims or
positions.)
5. 	PETITIONER'S POSITION ON STATUTES, RULES, Ai"ffi ORDERS IN QUESTION
A, 	Statutes: (Identify any statures which are involved in the Petition and Petitioner's
position on those sfatutes. For example, if Petitioner is disputing a denial of
retirement benefits, identify all statutes under which Petitioner believes th.at those
benefits should be granted. If Petitioner is contesting the interpretation ofany
statutes by the Empwyees' Retirement System (ERS), identify the statutes in question
anti provide Petitioner's interpretation of those statutes.)
B. 	Rules: (Identify any ERS or other agency rules which are involved in rhe Petition.
For example, if Petitioner is claiming some right or benefit, identify all rules which
support Petitioner's claim. IfPetitioner is claiming that any ERS rules are invalid,
identify those rules and state the reasons that Petitioner claims they are invalid. If
Petitioner is contesting the ERS' 1'nterpretarion ofany rules, identify the rules, and
provide Petitioner's interpretation of those rules. If no ERS or other agtncy ruks
are involved, state "None" or "Not Applicable".)
ERS 202 (August 2009) 	Appendix A
C. 	Orders: (Identify any court, ERS or other agency orders which Petitioner claims
are involved in the Petition. For example, if Petitioner is claiming some right or
benefit, identify all orders which support Petitioner's claim. IfPetitioner is claiming
that a prior ERS order is invalid, identify the order, and state the reasons why
Petitioner claims iris invalid. lf Petirioner is contesting the ERS ' interpretation of
any orders, identify the orders ,and provick Petitioner's interpretaJion of those
orders. Attach a copy ofeach order identified to this Petition. Ifno orders are
involved, state "None" or "Not Applicable".)
6. 	RELIEF REQUESTED
(In this section, state exactly and completely what relief or remedy Petitioner is see/cjng from
the Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System under this Petition.)
7. 	NAMES OF OTHER PARTIES OR POTENTIAL PARTIES
(Stare the full n.ames and addresses, if !<Jzown, of any persons, jinns, or other entities that
Petitioner believes should be made parties to this proceeding or who are potentially parties
to this proceeding. lfthere are no other parties or potential parties, state "None" or "Not
Applicable. ")
8. 	APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER
If the Petitioner is being represented by an attorney or other agent in this proceeding,
provide the name, mailing address, telephone number, fax number (if available), and e-mail
address (if available) of the attorney or other agent below. By filling in this information,
Petitioner is authorizing the Employees' Retirement System to provide all notice.sand other
d ocumenLc; in this proceeding to the attorney or agent identified below instead of to the
Petitiooer.
A. 	Name:
B. 	Mailing Address:
C. 	Telephone Number:
0. 	Fax Number:
E. 	E•Mail Address:
Th is Petition is being filed pursuant to Section 91 ·9, Hawaii Rev ised Statutes, and Hawaii
Administrative Rules Chapter 6-23. I declare under penalty of perjury that the facts alleged in thls
Petition are, to the best of my knowledge , true and correct
DATED: (Type or write in Petitioner's city, state, and the dare the Petition is signed)
By ___ _ _ 	________ _ _
Petitioner ( signature)
-3-

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.