2405001 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-fcd6e6140eccbe03e0a4a678e57153662405001 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
802.9
Staff
Kristin Shaffer
Response/Comments

We view these facts as incompatible with 802.9.

Question

From: Shaffer, Kristin <kshaffer@ftc.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 3:15:08 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Subject: RE: 802.9 Query

[Redacted]

We view these facts as incompatible with 802.9.

Best regards,

Kristin

From: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 11:52:16 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: 802.9 Query

We have an HSR reportability question that we believe would be exempt under 802.9. The transaction involves two parties: Party A and Party B. Party A is a foreign person. Party B is a US person and public issuer.

As part of the transaction, Party A will be acquiring substantially less than 10% of Party B’s issued and outstanding voting shares, but valued in excess of $119.5m. Party A is not a competitor of Party B, will not be nominating a candidate for the board of directors of Party B (or any subsidiary of Party B); does not intend to propose corporate action requiring shareholder approval; does not intend to solicit proxies; and is not being granted a board seat on Party B or any subsidiary of Party B. More generally, Party A does not intend to participate in the formulation or determination of Party B’s basic business decisions.

We believe that the HSR “passive” exemption is available for Party A’s acquisition of Party B’s shares, but wanted to confirm in light of other commercial arrangements between the parties.

Other Commercial Arrangements/Investments

Party A and Party B will engage in three other transactions outside of the US. None of these transactions are HSR reportable or give Party A any control over a Party B controlled business.

1- Manufacturing JV: Party B will form a manufacturing entity outside of the US. Party A will have a passive 12.5% interest in the entity. Party A will not have a board seat in this entity. Products manufactured by the Manufacturing Entity are primarily intended to be sold outside of the US.

2- R&D JV: Party A will form an R&D entity outside of the US. Party B will have a 49% interest in this entity, along with one out of three board seats. The entity will be controlled by Party A.

3- Supply Arrangement: Party B will be supplying to Party A with certain products pursuant to a series of commercial agreements (Party A is already a customer of Party B).

1111
Sheinberg, Samuel I.
From: 	HSRHelp
Sent: 	Friday, May 17, 2024 3:15 PM
To: 	Walsh, Kathryn E.; Berg, Karen E.; Musick, Vesselina; Sheinberg, Samuel I.; Six, Anne;
Whitehead, Nora; Fetterman, Michelle; Burton, June; Larson, Peter
Subject: 	FW: 802.9 Query
From: Shaffer, Kristin <kshaffer@ftc.gov>
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 3:15:08 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To:
Cc: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Subject: RE: 802.9 Query
We view these facts as incompatible with 802.9.
Best regards,
Kristin
Kristin Shaffer
Attorney
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
202-326-2388 | kshaffer@ftc.gov
From:
Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 11:52:16 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Cc:
Subject: 802.9 Query
All – Apologies if you’re getting this twice, I thought I sent this out earlier, realized I hadn’t heard back and it’s not in my sent.
We have an HSR reportability question that we believe would be exempt under 802.9. The transaction involves two parties: Party A
and Party B. Party A is a foreign person. Party B is a US person and public issuer.
As part of the transaction, Party A will be acquiring substantially less than 10% of Party B’s issued and outstanding voting shares, but
valued in excess of $119.5m. Party A is not a competitor of Party B, will not be nominating a candidate for the board of directors of
Party B (or any subsidiary of Party B); does not intend to propose corporate action requiring shareholder approval; does not intend
to solicit proxies; and is not being granted a board seat on Party B or any subsidiary of Party B. More generally, Party A does not
intend to participate in the formulation or determination of Party B’s basic business decisions.
We believe that the HSR “passive” exemption is available for Party A’s acquisition of Party B’s shares, but wanted to confirm in light
of other commercial arrangements between the parties.
Other Commercial Arrangements/Investments
Party A and Party B will engage in three other transactions outside of the US. None of these transactions are HSR reportable or give
Party A any control over a Party B controlled business.
1- Manufacturing JV: Party B will form a manufacturing entity outside of the US. Party A will have a passive 12.5% interest in the
entity. Party A will not have a board seat in this entity. Products manufactured by the Manufacturing Entity are primarily intended to
be sold outside of the US.
1
Complete printed PDF page 1
-
2- R&D JV: Party A will form an R&D entity outside of the US. Party B will have a 49% interest in this entity, along with one out of
three board seats. The entity will be controlled by Party A.
3- Supply Arrangement: Party B will be supplying to Party A with certain products pursuant to a series of commercial agreements
(Party A is already a customer of Party B).
Many thanks,
2
Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.