us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-ebf5f2a22028fdce7a642f2cd5235b61•8309008 Informal Interpretation
8309008 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-ebf5f2a22028fdce7a642f2cd5235b618309008 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
(redacted)
September 28, 1983
Dana Abrahamsen, Esq.
Premerger Notification Office
Federal Trade Commission
Washington, D.C. 20580
Re: Letter of September 14, 1983
Dear Mr. Abrahamsen:
During our telephone conversation yesterday, in which we discussed my September 14, 1983 letter, you stated that the substance of subsection (a) accurately reflects your informal advice. As for subsection (b), you again stated that its substance was accurate but agreed with me that replacing the world exceeds with the words is less than resolved any ambiguity. Accordingly, subsection (b) now reads:
The fee Company A earns through its collection of Company Bs receivables should be treated as consideration only to the extent that the fee is less than the fair market value for such service.
Thank you.
Sincerely yours,
(redacted)
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.