2403005 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-d8dc8fbf0991251c6326352c6326e5df2403005 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.30
Staff
Nora Whitehead
Response/Comments

We confirm both points.

Question

From: Whitehead, Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 9:06:28 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Subject: RE: Question re IPO

We confirm both points.

From: [Redacted]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2024 11:08:56 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Subject: Question re IPO

Dear PNO:

I am working on a filing for a company with an IPO (“Company A”). As a result of the IPO, Company A’s preferred voting securities will automatically convert into shares of Company A common stock. One of the officers of Company A (“Officer B”) holds shares of Company A common stock but does not hold preferred shares, meaning that Officer B does not hold voting securities that convert upon the IPO. However, as a result of the conversion of preferred shares held by other shareholders and corresponding changes to Company A’s charter, Officer B’s voting percentage will increase with the IPO. For this email, we can assume that Officer B is instrumental in causing the IPO and that the relevant HSR thresholds are satisfied.

  1. Can you please confirm it remains PNO’s position that a shareholder who is instrumental in causing an IPO and whose voting percentage increases as a result of the IPO must file HSR, even if the shareholder (i) does not hold voting securities that are subject to automatic conversation at the time of the IPO and (ii) will not otherwise acquire additional voting securities as a result of the IPO?
  2. Assuming this remains the policy of PNO, we would file the HSR notification as an 801.30 transaction but none of the types of transactions listed in 801.30(a) are a perfect fit because Officer B will not acquire or convert voting securities. 801.30(a)(6) appears to be the best fit even though Officer B’s voting securities will not actually be converted because the conversion of other voting securities at the time of the IPO is what leads to the increase in voting percentage. Can you please confirm a filing in this scenario should be filed as an 801.30(a)(6) transaction?
Sheinberg, Samuel I.
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
HSRH elp
Tuesday, March 19, 20 24 9:0 7 AM
Walsh , Kat hry n E.; Berg, Kare n E.; M us ick, Vesselina; Shaffer, Kr ist in; Sheinberg, Samuel I. ;
Six, Anne; Fetterman, Michel le; Burton, June; Larson, Peter
FW: Quest ion re IPO
From: Wh itehead, Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov>
Sent: Tuesday , Marc h 19, 2024 9:06:28 AM ( UTC-05:00 ) Easte rn T im e ( US & Canada )
To:
Cc: HSRHe lp <HSRHe lp@ftc.gov>
Subject: RE: Question re IPO
We confirm both points.
From: HSRHe lp <HSRHe lp@ftc.gov>
Sent: Monda y, March 18, 2024 11:09 AM
To: Walsh , Kathryn E. <kw alsh@ftc.gov>; Berg, Karen E. <KBERG@ftc.gov>; Mus ick, Vesselina <vmusick@ftc.gov>;
Shaffer, Kristin <kshaffer@ftc.gov>; Sheinberg, Samuel I. <SSHEINBERG@ftc.gov>; Six, Anne <as ix@ftc.gov>; Wh itehead,
Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov>; Fetterman, M ichelle <mfetterman@ftc.gov>; Burton , June <jburton@ftc .gov>; Larson,
Peter <plarson@ftc.gov>
Subject: FW: Question re I PO
From:
Sent: Monda y, Ma rch 18, 2024 11:08:56 AM ( UTC-05 : 00 ) Eastern Ti me ( US & Canada )
To: HSRHe lp <HSRHe lp@ftc.gov>
Subject: Question re IPO
You don 't o ft en get email from
Dear PNO:
I am w ork ing on a fi ling for a company wi th an IPO (" Company A ") . As a result of the IPO , Company A' s preferred v ot ing
securit ies will automat i ca lly convert i nto shares of Company A common stock. One of the officers of Company A
(" Officer B") ho lds shares of Company A common stock but does not ho ld preferred shares, meaning that Officer B does
not ho ld vot ing securit ies that convert upon the I PO. How ev er, as a result of the conversion of preferre d shares held by
other shareholders and corresponding changes to Company A's charter, Officer B' s v ot ing percentage wi ll increase wi th
the IPO. For th is email, w e can assume that Officer B is i nstrumenta l in causing the IPO and that the relev ant HSR
thresho ld s are satisfi ed.
1. 	Can you please confirm it remains PNO ' s posit ion that a shareholder w ho is i nstrumenta l in causing an IPO and
whose vot ing percentage increases as a result of the IPO must fi le HSR , even if the sharehold er (i) does not ho ld
v ot ing securit i es that are subj ect to automatic conversation at the t i me of the I PO and (ii) wi ll not otherw i se
acquire addit ional vot ing securit ies as a result of the IPO?
2. 	Assuming th is remains the pol icy of PNO , w e w ou ld fi le the HSR not ification as an 801.30 transaction but none of
the types of transactions listed in 801.30(a) are a perfect fit because Officer B w ill not acquire or conv ert v ot ing
securit i es. 801.30(a )( 6) appears to be the best fit even though Off icer B' s v ot ing securit i es will not actually be
1
Complete printed PDF page 1
■
converted because the conversion of other voting securities at the time of the IPO is what leads to the increase
in voting percentage. Can you please confirm a filing in this scenario should be filed as an 801.30(a)(6)
transaction?
Thanks,
.
2
Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.