0605003 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-cdcfd4d918870b0a427fce34395e95e00605003 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
15 USC 18a(a)(2) 7A(a)(2)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments
Agree.

Question

From: (redacted)

Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 20062:23 PM

To: Verne, B.Michael

Subject:Voting/non-voting stock valuation question

DearMike -- I would like to confirm that in the following circumstances, no HSRfiling is required. We represent a client who intends to purchase 100% of theshares of a target company for $120 million. The target has a total of 100,000outstanding shares, 1,000 (= 1 %) of which are voting and 99,000 (= 99%) arenon-voting. Except for the voting rights, the shares are otherwise identical, specifically,voting and non-voting shares are entitled to the same dividend payments and toan equal claim to the assets in the event of dissolution. Both voting andnon-voting shares are of the same class. Because the voting securities onlyrepresent 1% of the economic value of the target, the acquiring person valuesthe voting securities at less than $56.7 million. Given that Section 7A(a)(2)of the Clayton Act only looks to the value of the voting securities held by theacquiring person after the transaction, no filing should be required. Do youagree with that analysis? Best regards,

Verne, B. Michael
From:
Sent:
To: 	Verne, 8.Michael
Subject: 	Votinglnon-voting stock valuation question
Dear Mike -- I would like to confirm that in the following
circumstances, no HSR filing is required. We represent a client who
intends to purchase 100% of the shares of a target company for $120
million. The target has a total of 100,000 outstanding shares, 1,000
(= 1%) of which are voting and 99,000 (= 99%) are non-voting. Except
for the voting rights, the shares are otherwise identical,
specifically, voting and non-voting shares are entitled to the same
dividend payments and to an equal claim to the assets in the event of
dissolution. Both voting and non-voting shares are of the same class.
Because the voting securities only represent 1% of the economic value
of the target, the acquiring person values the voting securities at
less than $56.7 million. Given that Section 7A(a)(2) of the Clayton
Act only looks to the value of the voting securities held by the
acquiring person after the transaction, no filing should be required.
Do you agree with that analysis? Best regards'
,,t-+-
Y
9-gJ
To comply with IRS regulations, we advise you that any discussion of Federal tax issues in this e-mail
was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by you, (i) to avoid any penalties
imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) to promote, market or recommend to another party
any transaction or matter addressed herein.
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or attorney work product for the
sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without
express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender and delete all copies.
Complete printed PDF page 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.