2412003 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-b75c1f333902a6e194060e9a1f315d552412003 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.1
Staff
Kathryn Walsh
Response/Comments

Assuming that both the Irrigation District and Energy Center Authority are agencies as well, we agree with your analysis.

Question

From: Walsh, Kathryn E.
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 2:31:48 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: HSRHelp
Subject: FW: Request for Informal Interpretation
Assuming that both the Irrigation District and Energy Center Authority are agencies as well, we agree with your analysis.
________________________________________
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2024 2:31:03 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: HSRHelp
Subject: Request for Informal Interpretation


Dear HSR Help: Please confirm our understanding that the acquisition described below is not subject to the HSR Act because the seller is an agency of a state, and thus not a “person” under 16 CFR 801.1(a)(2).
The assets to be acquired comprise a wind electric power generation facility owned by a California Wind Power “Authority” (the “WPA”). The WPA is a “joint powers authority” formed pursuant to a state statute that grants two or more public agencies the power to form such an entity for one of the public purposes enumerated in, and subject to, the statute. (link: Codes Display Text (ca.gov) )
The forming agencies were an Irrigation District and an Energy Center Authority. The WPA formation document provides that “There is hereby created pursuant to the Law, a public agency to be known as [the WPA]” (emphasis added) and that it was “established . . . to provide for the joint exercise of powers common to the [Irrigation District and Energy Center Authority].” Thus, by its enabling legislation and formation document, the WPA is a “public agency.”
Additional factors supporting the WPA as being an agency (and not a corporation or unincorporated entity engaged in commerce) are:
• The WPA is administered by a “Commission” required to be comprised of members of the board of the Irrigation District “sitting ex officio.” The members of board of the Irrigation District are directly elected by the public and is “the legislative body” of the Irrigation District. Thus, the governing body of the WPA are all publicly elected officials.
• The WPA has no employees.
• The WPA joint powers agreement under which it was formed states that upon dissolution or termination of WPA, all of its assets and surplus cash shall be transferred to the Irrigation District.
• WPA issued bonds are considered “municipal bonds.”
• All power generated by the WPA is and has been purchased by the Irrigation District pursuant to a Power Purchase Agreement.
Based on these factors we believe that the WPA is not a “person” under the HSR Act.
Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information.

-
-
Sheinberg, Samuel I.
From: 	HSRHelp
Sent: 	Thursday, December 12, 2024 2:32 PM
To: 	HSR Auto Forward List
Subject: 	FW: Request for Informal Interpretation
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2024 2:31:48 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
Assuming that both the	Irrigation District and Energy Center	Authority	are agencies as well,	we agree with
your analysis.
From: Walsh, Kathryn E.
To:
Cc: HSRHelp
Subject: FW: Request for Informal Interpretation
From:
Sent: Wednesday,	December 11,	2024	2:31:03 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US &	Canada)
To: HSRHelp
Subject: Request for Informal Interpretation
Dear	HSR	Help:	Please	confirm	our understanding	that	the acquisition	described below	is not	subject	to	the	HSR
Act because the seller is an agency	of a	state, and thus not a	“person” under 16 CFR	801.1(a)(2).
The assets	to	be	acquired	comprise a	wind	electric	power generation facility owned	by	a California Wind Power
“Authority” (the	“WPA”).	The	WPA is	a	“joint powers authority” formed pursuant to	a	state	statute	that grants two
or more public agencies the power to	form such	an entity for one of the	public	purposes enumerated	in,	and
subject	to,	the statute.	(link:	Codes	Display	Text (ca.gov)	)
The forming agencies	were	an	Irrigation	District and an Energy Center Authority.	The	WPA formation document
provides that “There is hereby created	pursuant to	the	Law,	a	public	agency to	be	known as	[the	WPA]”	(emphasis
added) and	that it	was	“established .	.	. to provide	for the joint exercise	of powers	common to the	[Irrigation	District
and	Energy Center Authority].”	Thus,	by	its	enabling	legislation	and formation	document, the	WPA	is a “public
agency.”
Additional factors	supporting the	WPA as	being an agency (and	not a corporation or unincorporated entity engaged
in commerce)	are:
 	The WPA is administered by	a	“Commission” required	to be	comprised	of	members of the	board	of the
Irrigation District “sitting ex	officio.”	The	members of board	of the	Irrigation	District are	directly	elected	by
the	public and	is	“the	legislative	body”	of the Irrigation District.	Thus, the	governing body of	the	WPA are	all
publicly elected	officials.
 	The WPA has	no	employees.
 	The WPA joint powers	agreement under	which it was	formed states that	upon dissolution or termination	of
WPA,	all of	its	assets	and	surplus	cash shall be	transferred	to the	Irrigation	District.
 	WPA issued	bonds	are considered “municipal bonds.”
 	All power generated by the WPA is	and	has been purchased by	the	Irrigation District pursuant	to	a Power
Purchase	Agreement.
Based on these	factors	we	believe	that	the	WPA is not	a “person” under the HSR	Act.
Please	let me	know	if you have any	questions	or	need additional information.
Thank you,
1
Complete printed PDF page 1
2
Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.