1302007 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-6cf1e55bd5aa607f5f8151d790a9dd231302007 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.10(c)(1)
Staff
Michael Verne
Response/Comments

You use the 45 days prior to the 803.5(a) notice for the stock acquired during the year following notification as well as the stock already held. The whole point of calculating it prior to filing is to lock in a value. So the value of the stock held after the acquisition during the first year would be 2.5 MM x $70 = $175 MM, exceeding the $100 million (as adjusted) threshold and allowing additional acquisitions up to the $500 million (as adjusted) threshold during the 5 year period. The language you reference in #3 of using either the 45 day period prior to the notice or the 45 day period prior to the acquisition is laying out how you value the stock if it is reportable (45 days prior to the notice) or non-reportable (45 days prior to the acquisition).
UPDATE: October 15, 2015. This no longer reflects the position of the PNO.

Question

From: (Redacted)

Sent: Thursday,February 21, 2013 2:05 PM

To: Verne, B. Michael; Walsh,Kathryn

Subject:SOT -Stock Question

Mike and Kate:

Thanks, as always, for addressing these questions. Here is a situation I want to run by you.

1.Natural person, X, files an HSR on January 1. X alreadyholds 1,000,000 shares of stock with a current market price of $70 per share.(Market price being calculatedby the lowest price in the 45 days before the 803.5(a) notice is sent).

2. Xintends to acquire an additional1,500,000 in additional shares in the 12 months following expiration of the HSR waitingperiod. So at the "market price" calculatedoff the 803.5(a) notice, X will exceed the $100 million, as adjusted, threshold.X files at that higher threshold.

3. X,in fact, acquires the 1,500,000 shares in the 12 months following the expiration of the HSR waiting period. However, the "market price" of the stock droppedto $35 per share, as measuredby the lowest closing price in the 45 days prior to the acquisition.

It seems to me that,under 801.10(c)(1), to calculatethe "market price" for the stock held and acquiredin (3), we can use either the lowest closing bid price in the 45 days prior to the acquisition, orthe lowest closing bid price in the 45days prior to the 803.5(a) notice. Do Ihave this right?This is important to determine whether the $100 million was exceeded in the 12 months following the termination of the waitingperiod, so the 5 year graceperiod is locked in.

It would certainly seem unfair if the person were denied thebenefit of the 5 year period by a facts beyondhis control. (Both the stock price and the timing of thepurchases, which are subjectto restriction by the SEC).

,. '
Verne, B. Micha el
From:
Sen t: 	Thursday, February 21, 2013 2:05 PM
Verne, B. Michae l; Wa lsh, Kathryn
SOT - Stock Question
To:
Subject:
Mike and Kate:
Thanks, as always, for addressing these questions. Here is a situation I want to run by you.
1. 	Natural person, X, files an HSR on January 1. X already holds 1,000,000 shares of stoc k with a current ma rket
price of $70 per sha r e. (Market price being calculated by the lowest pr ice in the 45 days before the 803.S(a)
noti ce is se nt) .
2. 	X intends to acquire an additional l ,SOO,OO O in additional shares in the 12 months following expira tion of the
HS R waiting period. So at the "market price" calculated off t he 803.5(a) notice, X will exceed the $100 million,
as adjusted, threshol d. 	X files at t hat higher threshold.
3. 	X, in fact, acquires the 1,500,000 shares in the 12 months following the expira ti on of the HSR waiting
period. 	However, the " market price" ofthe stock dropped t o $35 per share, as measured by the lowest closing
price in the 45 days prior to the acquisit ion.
It seems to me that , under 801.10(c)(l), to calculate t he "ma rk et price" f or the sto ck held and acqu ired in (3) , we ca n
use ei the r the lowes t closing bid price i n the 45 days prio r t o the acquisitio n, o r the lowest closing bid price in th e 45
da ys prior to the 803.S(a) notice. 	Do I have t his right? This is important to determine whe t her the $100 million was
exceeded in t he 12 months following the termination of the waiting period, so the 5 year grace pe riod is locked in.
It would certainly seem unfair if the person we re denied t he benefit of the 5 year period by a facts beyond his
co ntr ol. (Both t he stock price and the t iming of the purcha ses, which are subject to restriction by the SEC}.
Thanks,
Please consider t he en vir onme nt before pr inting this email.
This email message and any attachments are being sent by 	are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not
th e intended recipient, please notify us immediately-by replying to this message or by sending an email t~ and destroy all
copies of this mes sage and any attachments. Thank yo u.
For more information
1
Complete printed PDF page 1
You use the 45 days prior to the 803.5(a) notice for the stock
acquired during the year following notification as well as the stock
already held. The whole point of calculating it prior to filing is to
lock in a value. 	So the value of the stock held after the acquisition
during the first year would be 2.5 MM x $70 = $175 MM,
exceeding the $100 million (as adjusted) threshold and allowing
additional acquisitions up to the $500 million (as adjusted)
threshold during the 5 year period. 	The language you reference
in #3 of using either the 45 day period prior to the notice or the 45
day period prior to the acquisition is laying out how you value the
stock if it is reportable (45 days prior to the notice) or non-
reportable (45 days prior to the acquisition).
~p-//
"2- I '1-1 	II 3
Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.