us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-6c8b19a0d1b7bbcc63333254902b3b3d•0812008 Informal Interpretation
0812008 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-6c8b19a0d1b7bbcc63333254902b3b3d0812008 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
From: (redacted)
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 10:39 AM
To: Verne, B. Michael
Subject: RE: HSR question
Please note that, with respect to the below, my analysis is as follows:
1. Formation of Newco ("N"): A and 8 must file but N need not file per Section 802.41 (ex. 1).
2. Acquisition of assets from C: Both N and C must file. The intraperson exemption (Section 802.30) does not apply since 8 does not control N (only 49% ownership) and, therefore, the fact that 8 and C have the same controlling equityholder is rendered irrelevant in the analysis.
Please let me know if you agree.
Thanks again
------------------------
From: (redacted)
Sent: Friday, December 19,2008 3:38 PM
To: 'Verne, B. Michael' Subject: RE: HSR question
As a follow up, please note that A will own 51 % of Newco and 8 will own 49%.
------------------------
From: (redacted)
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 3:07 PM
To: 'Verne, B. Michael' Subject: HSR question
Mr. Verne:
Sorry to bother you again but I have another question.
The question is whether two HSR filings are required or just one.
Here's the scenario. Parties A and 8 will each contribute approx. $100mm to form Newco, and Newco will then spend $200mm+ to acquire assets from C. Note that 8 and C are "sister" entities, each publicly traded, but wI the same controlling equityholder. The two transactions would close substantially concurrently.
Again, thank you in advance.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.