us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-48a74f9ff338d1c586bfd54ab1742007•0703008 Informal Interpretation
0703008 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-48a74f9ff338d1c586bfd54ab17420070703008 Informal InterpretationGuidance
Question
From:(redacted)
Sent:Monday, March 12, 2007 11:47 PM
To:Verne, B. Michael
Subject:Rule 801.2(d)(2)(iii) Question
Mr.Verne:
We'reworking on a reportability analysis and are wondering if you could provideguidance on the following size-of-the-transaction question:
Aand B are consolidating to become wholly owned subsidiaries of a newly formedcorporation. Under Rule 801.2(d)(2)(iii), each party will be deemed both anacquiring and an acquired party. As I interpret the rule, there are thus twopotentially reportable transactions: (i) A acquires B and (ii) B acquires A.The question is whether the sizes of A and B are aggregated for purposes ofvaluing the transaction. I assume not, but would like confirmation.
Forexample if A's total assets or total net sales is $7m and B's is $53M, then Iinterpret the rule to yield two nonreportable transactions: A acquires B with atransaction size of $53M, and B acquires A with a transaction size of $7M.
Butif the two valuations are aggregated, the total transaction size would be $60Mand reportable. Can you provide guidance on the correct reading of this rule? Ihaven't found a written interpretation or example anywhere. Many thanks.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.