2312008 Informal Interpretation

us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-14eecd8ac682a9fd207b9ea3f95a8a882312008 Informal InterpretationGuidance

Date
Rule
801.2
Staff
Nora Whitehead
Response/Comments

You may make one filing, but if Fund 1-A becomes the UPE, then you must notify the PNO via email before closing. PNO attorneys will then evaluate whether the waiting period should restart for an acquisition by Fund 1-A. If Fund 1-A consummates the acquisition without counsel notifying the PNO, then it risks closing without an accurate HSR on file (in violation of the Act).

You may also make two filings (with two fees) if you prefer.

Question

From: Whitehead, Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.gov>
Sent: Friday, December 1, 2023 10:27:48 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: UPE Filing question

You may make one filing, but if Fund 1-A becomes the UPE, then you must notify the PNO via email before closing. PNO attorneys will then evaluate whether the waiting period should restart for an acquisition by Fund 1-A. If Fund 1-A consummates the acquisition without counsel notifying the PNO, then it risks closing without an accurate HSR on file (in violation of the Act).

You may also make two filings (with two fees) if you prefer.

From: [Redacted]
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 1:25:25 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: UPE Filing question

All,

We have a quick question we were hoping to run by you. We represent BUYER, a private equity firm. BUYER is planning to make an acquisition of a company that is HSR reportable. There are two related and newly formed BUYER funds (FUND 1 and FUND 1-A) that will be funding the acquisition. As of the time of filing, we believe that Fund 1 will be the UPE of the acquiring entity. However, because the funding allocation is not yet confirmed (and won’t be confirmed at the time of filing) it is possible that Fund 1-A will end up being the UPE. Fund 1 and Fund 1-A will have the same item 5-8 information (and the same item 4(c)/(d) information).

We are planning to make a single filing and list Fund 1 as the UPE and simply note in the transaction description that it is still possible that Fund 1-A may end up being the UPE at closing and further note that the information provided for items 5-8 is the same regardless of which entity is the listed UPE. As a result, should Fund 1-A ultimately end up being the UPE, we would thus not need to submit a new filing.

We thought this would be consistent with prior guidance and more efficient than making two separate HSR filings (one for Fund 1 and a separate filing for Fund 1-A), but wanted to confirm with you all.

She inberg, Samuel I.
From: 	HSRHelp
Se nt: 	Fr iday, D ecember 1, 2023 10:28 AM
To: 	Wa lsh, Ka thryn E. ; Berg, Ka re n E. ; Musick, Vessel ina; Sha ffer, Kris t in; Sheinberg, Samuel I. ; Six, Anne;
Fetterman, Michelle; Burton, June; Larso n, Peter
S ubj ect : 	FW : UPE Fil i ng question
From: Whitehead, Nora <nwhitehead@ftc.go v>
Sent : Frida , December 1, 2023 10:27 :48 AM UTC-05:00 Eastern Time ( US & Canada)
To:
Cc:
HS 	p < 	e p 	c.gov>
Subject: RE: UP E Fi ling question
CONTROLLED
You may make one filing, but if Fund 1-A becomes the UPE, then you must not ify the PNO via email before closing. PNO
attorne ys w ill then evaluate w hether the w ait ing per iod should restart for an acquisition by Fund 1-A. If Fund 1-A
consummates the acquisit ion wi thout counsel notify ing the PNO , then it risks closi ng w ithout an accurate HSR on fi le (in
vio lat ion of the Act).
You may al so make t wo fi li ngs (wi th two fees) if you prefer.
From : HSRHelp <HSRHe lp@ftc.go v>
Se nt : Thursda y, November 30, 2023 1:26 PM
To: Walsh , Kathryn E. <kwalsh@ftc.gov>; Berg, Karen E. <KB ERG@ftc.gov>; Musi ck , Vesse li na <vmusick@ftc.gov>;
Shaffer, Kristin <kshaffer@ftc.gov>; She inberg, Samuel I. <SS HEINBERG@ftc.gov>; Six, Anne <as ix@ftc.gov>; Wh itehead,
Nora <nw hitehead@ftc.gov>; Fetterman, M ichelle <mfette rman@ftc.gov>; Burton, June <jburton@ftc.go v>
Subject : FW: UP E Fi li ng question
From:
Sent : 	- 05 :00) Eastern Time ( US & Canada)
To: HSRHe lp < HSRHelp@ftc.gov >
Cc:
Su
A ll ,
We have a qu ick question we were hoping to r un by you. We represent BUY ER, a private equit y firm . BUYER is planning
to make an acquisit ion of a company that is HSR reportab le. There are t wo related and newly formed BUYER funds
(FUND 1 and FUND 1-A) that wil l be fund ing the acquisition. As of the t ime of fi li ng, we be lieve that Fund 1 will be the
UPE of the acquiring ent it y. However, because the funding a ll ocation is not y et confirmed (and won't be confirmed at
the time of fi li ng ) it is possible that Fund 1-A will end up being the UPE. Fund 1 and Fund 1-A will have the same item 5-8
infor mat ion (and the same item 4(c)/(d) i nformat ion).
We are planning to make a single filing and list Fund 1 as the UPE and simply note in the transaction descri pt ion that it is
still possible that Fund 1-A may end up being the UP E at closi ng and further note that the information provided for items
5-8 is the same regardless of w hi ch entit y is the listed UPE. As a result, should Fund 1-A ult imately end up being the UPE ,
we would thus not need to submit a new fi li ng.
We thought th is would be consistent wi th pr ior guidance and more effi ci ent than making tw o separate HSR filings (one
for Fund 1 and a separate fi li ng for Fund 1-A ), b ut w anted to confirm w ith you all.
Thanks,
■ 1
Complete printed PDF page 1
2
Complete printed PDF page 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.