us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-04ac022d4004cd1ebc18f329c790f1e0•2206002 Informal Interpretation
2206002 Informal Interpretation
us-ftc-hsr-informal-interpretations-04ac022d4004cd1ebc18f329c790f1e02206002 Informal InterpretationGuidance
We do not view agreeing to leases via email as automatically resulting in the lease being entered into outside of the US. The company will need to determine whether those leases were signed by US-located US entities (as distinguished from US-owned, foreign-located entities).
Question
From: Shaffer, Kristin <kshaffer@ftc.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 2:18:25 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: HSR Guidance Request
[Redacted]
We do not view agreeing to leases via email as automatically resulting in the lease being entered into outside of the US. The company will need to determine whether those leases were signed by US-located US entities (as distinguished from US-owned, foreign-located entities).
Best regards,
Kristin
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2022 12:10 PM
To: HSRHelp <HSRHelp@ftc.gov>
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: HSR Guidance Request
Dear PNO Team:
We write to confirm the treatment of revenues derived from leasing of physical assets where such assets are not located in the same place where the leases themselves are serviced or managed.
We represent Company A that derives 100% of its revenue from leasing of movable, physical assets in the form of foreign-flagged vessels. Company A manages and services its leases outside of the United States. No payment is accepted in the United States, and Company A does not maintain an office in the United States. Some of Company A’s customers are located in the United States, but Company A’s leases are agreed to by email. Notwithstanding where Company A manages its leasing operations, Company A’s vessels may enter the United States territory as part of some leasing arrangements.
Current interpretations provide that revenue from services is attributed to the country where services are performed, regardless of identity of the customer. See PNPM No. 155; Informal Interpretation No. 1405003; see also Informal Interpretation No. 1601001 (ship leases are contracts to provide a service). As such, Company A’s revenue would be allocated to the locations where it manages and services its leases of its vessels. We write to confirm this is still the PNO’s current position.
She inberg, Samuel I. From: HSRHelp Se nt: Tuesday, June 21, 2022 2: 18 PM To: Wa lsh, Kathryn E. ; Berg, Ka ren E. ; Musick, Vessel ina ; Sheinberg, Samuel I. ; Six, Anne; Wh itehead, Nora; Fetterman, Miche ll e S ubj ect : FW: HSR Gu idance Request From : Shaffer, Kr istin <ks haffe r@ ftc.gov> Se nt : Tuesda , June 21, 2022 2: 18:25 PM To: Cc: Sul>J e We do not view agreeing to leases via email as automatically r esu lt ing in the lease being entered i nto outside of the US. -The company wi ll need to determ ine whether those l ease s were signed by US- located US entit ies (as distingu ished from US -ow ned, foreign-located entit ies ). Best regards, Kr istin Kri st in Sh affer Attorney Pr emerger Notificati on O ffice Federal Trade Commi ssi on 202-32 - From: Se nt : Thursda y, June 16, 2022 12:10 PM To: HSRHe lp <HSR Help@ftc.gov> Cc : Subject : HSR Gu idance Request Dea r PNO Team : We w rite to confirm the treatment of revenues derived from l eas ing of phy sica l as set s where su ch assets are not located in the same place w here the lea ses them selv es are serviced or managed . We represent Company A that deriv es 100% of its revenue from lea si ng of movable, phy sica l as set s in the form of foreign-flagged v es sels. Company A manages and services its l ease s out si de of the United States. No pa y ment is ac cepted in the Un ited States, and Company A does not maintain an offi ce in the Un ited States. Some of Company A's customers are located in the United States, but Company A' s leases are agreed to by email. Notw ith standing where Company A manages its leasing operations, Company A' s vesse ls may enter the United States ter ritory as part of some leasing arrangements. Curr ent interpretations provi de that revenue from services is attr ibuted to the count ry where se rvi ces are perfo r med, regard les s of ident it y of the customer. See PNPM No. 155; Informa l Interpretation No. 1405003; see also Informal Interpretation No. 1601001 (sh ip l ease s are c ont racts to provi de a servi ce ). As such, Company A's revenue w ould be a ll ocated to the locations w here it manages and services it s l ease s of it s v es sels. We wri te to confirm th is is still the PNO 's cur rent po si tion . Please let us know if you have any questions or if there is any additional information that may be helpful in responding to this in ui . 1
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.