100-02 Medicare Benefit Policy Manual: Chapter 1 - Inpatient Hospital Services Covered Under Part A

Medicare Benefit Policy Manual
Chapter 1 - Inpatient Hospital Services Covered Under
Part A
Table of Contents
(Rev. 10892, 08-06-21)
Transmittals for Chapter 1
1 – Definition of Inpatient Hospital Services
10 - Covered Inpatient Hospital Services Covered Under Part A
10.1 - Bed and Board
10.1.1 - Accommodations - General
10.1.2 - Medical Necessity - Need for Isolation
10.1.3 - Medical Necessity - Admission Required and Only Private Rooms
Available
10.1.4 - Charges for Deluxe Private Room
10.1.5 - All Private Room Providers
10.1.6 - Wards
10.1.6.1 - Assignment Consistent With Program Purposes
10.1.6.2 - Assignment Not Consistent With Program Purposes
10.1.7 - Charges
10.2 – Hospital Inpatient Admission Order and Certification
20 - Nursing and Other Services
20.1 - Anesthetist Services
20.2 - Medical Social Services to Meet the Patient's Medically Related Social
Needs
30 - Drugs and Biologicals
30.1 - Drugs Included in the Drug Compendia
30.2 - Approval by Pharmacy and Drug Therapeutics Committee
30.3 - Combination Drugs
30.4 - Drugs Specially Ordered for Inpatients
30.5 - Drugs for Use Outside the Hospital
40 - Supplies, Appliances, and Equipment
50 - Other Diagnostic or Therapeutic Items or Services

50.1 - Therapeutic Items
50.2 - Diagnostic Services of Psychologists and Physical Therapists
50.3 - Diagnostic Services Furnished to an Inpatient by an Independent Clinical
Laboratory Under Arrangements With the Hospital
50.4 - Diagnostic Services Furnished a Hospital Inpatient Under Arrangement
With the Laboratory of Another Participating Hospital
60 - Services of Interns or Residents-In-Training
70 - Inpatient Services in Connection With Dental Services
80 - Health Care Associated With Pregnancy
90 - Termination of Pregnancy
100 - Treatment for Infertility
110 - Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Services
110.1 - Documentation Requirements
110.1.1 - Required Preadmission Screening
110.1.2 - Required Post-Admission Physician Evaluation
110.1.3 - Required Individualized Overall Plan of Care
110.1.4 - Required Admission Orders
110.1.5 - Required Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment
Instrument (IRF-PAI)
110.2 - Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Medical Necessity Criteria
110.2.1 - Multiple Therapy Disciplines
110.2.2 - Intensive Level of Rehabilitation Services
110.2.3 - Ability to Actively Participate in Intensive Rehabilitation
Therapy Program
110.2.4 - Physician Supervision
110.2.5 - Interdisciplinary Team Approach to the Delivery of Care
110.2.6 – IRF Waivers and Flexibilities During the Public Health
Emergency for the COVID-19 Pandemic
110.3 - Definition of Measurable Improvement
120 - Services Related to and Required as a Result of Services Which Are Not Covered
Under Medicare
130 - Religious Nonmedical Health Care Institution (RNHCI) Services
130.1 - Beneficiary Eligibility for RNHCI Services
130.2 - Election of RNHCI Benefits
130.2.1 – Revocation of RNHCI Election

130.2.2 – RNHCI Election After Prior Revocation
130.3 – Medicare Payment for RNHCI Services and Beneficiary Liability
130.4 - Coverage of RNHCI Items Furnished in the Home
130.4.1 - Coverage and Payment of Durable Medical Equipment Under the
RNHCI Home Benefit
130.4.2 - Coverage and Payment of Home Visits Under the RNHCI Home
Benefit

1 – Definition of Inpatient Hospital Services
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
Inpatient hospital services are defined in Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (the Act)
and in the regulations (42 CFR 409.10):
A. Subject to the conditions, limitations, and exceptions set forth in this subpart, the term
"inpatient hospital or inpatient CAH services" means the following services furnished to
an inpatient of a participating hospital or of a participating CAH or, in the case of
emergency services or services in foreign hospitals, to an inpatient of a qualified hospital:
1. Bed and board.
2. Nursing services and other related services.
3. Use of hospital or CAH facilities.
4. Medical social services.
5. Drugs, biologicals, supplies, appliances, and equipment.
6. Certain other diagnostic or therapeutic services.
7. Medical or surgical services provided by certain interns or residents-in-
training.
8. Transportation services, including transport by ambulance.
B. Inpatient hospital services does not include the following types of services:
1. Posthospital SNF care, as described in 42 CFR 409.20, furnished by a hospital
or a critical access hospital that has a swing-bed approval.
2. Nursing facility services, described in 42 CFR 440.155 that may be furnished
as a Medicaid service under title XIX of the Act in a swing- bed hospital that
has an approval to furnish nursing facility services.
3. Physician services that meet the requirements of 42 CFR 415.102(a) for
payment on a fee schedule basis.
4. Physician assistant services, as defined in §1861(s)(2)(K)(i) of the Act.
5. Nurse practitioner and clinical nurse specialist services, as defined in
§1861(s)(2)(K)(ii) of the Act.
6. Certified nurse mid-wife services, as defined in §1861(gg) of the Act.

7. Qualified psychologist services, as defined in §1861(ii) of the Act.
8. Services of an anesthetist, as defined in 42 CFR 410.69.
10 - Covered Inpatient Hospital Services Covered Under Part A
(Rev. 234, Issued: 03-10-17, Effective: 01-01-16, Implementation: 06-12-17)
Patients covered under hospital insurance are entitled to have payment made on their
behalf for inpatient hospital services. (Inpatient hospital services do not include extended
care services provided by hospitals pursuant to swing bed approvals. See Pub. 100-02,
Chapter 8, §10.3, "Hospital Providers of Extended Care Services."). However, both
inpatient hospital and inpatient SNF benefits are provided under Part A - Hospital
Insurance Benefits for the Aged and Disabled, of Title XVIII).
Additional information concerning the following topics can be found in the following
chapters of this manual:
• 	Benefit Period is found in Chapter 3
• 	Counting Inpatient Days is found in Chapter 3
• 	Lifetime reserve days is found in Chapter 5
• 	Related payment information is housed in the Provider Reimbursement Manual
Blood must be furnished on a day which counts as a day of inpatient hospital services to
be covered as a Part A service and to count toward the blood deductible. Thus, blood is
not covered under Part A and does not count toward the Part A blood deductible when
furnished to an inpatient after the inpatient has exhausted all benefit days in a benefit
period, or where the individual has elected not to use lifetime reserve days. However,
where the patient is discharged on their first day of entitlement or on the hospital's first
day of participation, the hospital is permitted to submit a billing form with no
accommodation charge, but with ancillary charges including blood.
The records for all Medicare hospital inpatient discharges are maintained in CMS for
statistical analysis and use in determining future Prospective Payment System (PPS)
Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) classifications and rates.
Non-PPS hospitals do not pay for noncovered services generally excluded from coverage
in the Medicare Program. This may result in denial of a part of the billed charges or in
denial of the entire admission, depending upon circumstance. In PPS hospitals, the
following are also possible:

1. 	In appropriately admitted cases where a noncovered procedure was performed,
denied services may result in payment of a different DRG (i.e., one which
excludes payment for the noncovered procedure); or
2. 	In appropriately admitted cases that become cost outlier cases, denied services
may lead to denial of some or all of an outlier payment.
The following examples illustrate this principle. If care is noncovered because a patient
does not need to be hospitalized, the A/B MAC Part A denies the admission and makes
no Part A (i.e., PPS) payment unless paid under limitation on liability. Under limitation
on liability, Medicare payment may be made when the provider and the beneficiary were
not aware the services were not necessary and could not reasonably be expected to know
that the services were not necessary. For detailed instructions, see Pub. 100-04, Medicare
Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 30,"Limitation on Liability" section 20. If a patient
is appropriately hospitalized but receives (beyond routine services) only noncovered care,
the admission is denied.
NOTE: The A/B MAC Part A does not deny an admission that includes covered care,
even if noncovered care was also rendered. Under PPS, Medicare assumes that it is
paying for only the covered care rendered whenever covered services needed to treat
and/or diagnose the illness were in fact provided.
If a noncovered procedure is provided along with covered nonroutine care, a DRG
change rather than an admission denial might occur. If noncovered procedures are
elevating costs into the cost outlier category, outlier payment is denied in whole or in
part.
When the hospital is included in PPS, most of the subsequent discussion regarding
coverage of inpatient hospital services is relevant only in the context of determining the
appropriateness of admissions, which DRG, if any, to pay, and the appropriateness of
payment for any outlier cases.
If a patient receives items or services in excess of, or more expensive than, those for
which payment can be made, payment is made only for the covered items or services or
for only the appropriate prospective payment amount. This provision applies not only to
inpatient services, but also to all hospital services under Parts A and B of the program. If
the items or services were requested by the patient, the hospital may charge him or her
the difference between the amount customarily charged for the services requested and the
amount customarily charged for covered services.
An inpatient is a person who has been admitted to a hospital for bed occupancy for
purposes of receiving inpatient hospital services (see §10.2 below). Generally, a patient
is considered an inpatient if formally admitted as inpatient with the expectation that he or
she will require hospital care that is expected to span at least two midnights and occupy a
bed even though it later develops that the patient can be discharged or transferred to
another hospital and not actually use a hospital bed overnight.

The physician or other practitioner responsible for a patient's care at the hospital is also
responsible for deciding whether the patient should be admitted as an inpatient.
Physicians should use the expectation of the patient to require hospital care that spans at
least two midnights period as a benchmark, i.e., they should order admission for patients
who are expected to require a hospital stay that crosses two midnights and the medical
record supports that reasonable expectation. However, the decision to admit a patient is a
complex medical judgment which can be made only after the physician has considered a
number of factors, including the patient's medical history and current medical needs, the
types of facilities available to inpatients and to outpatients, the hospital's by-laws and
admissions policies, and the relative appropriateness of treatment in each setting. Factors
to be considered when making the decision to admit include such things as:
• 	The severity of the signs and symptoms exhibited by the patient;
• 	The medical predictability of something adverse happening to the patient;
• 	The need for diagnostic studies that appropriately are outpatient services (i.e.,
their performance does not ordinarily require the patient to remain at the hospital
for 24 hours or more) to assist in assessing whether the patient should be
admitted; and
• 	The availability of diagnostic procedures at the time when and at the location
where the patient presents.
Admissions of particular patients are not covered or noncovered solely on the basis of the
length of time the patient actually spends in the hospital. In certain specific situations
coverage of services on an inpatient or outpatient basis is determined by the following
rules:
Minor Surgery or Other Treatment - When patients with known diagnoses enter a
hospital for a specific minor surgical procedure or other treatment that is expected to keep
them in the hospital for only a few hours (less than 24), they are considered outpatients
for coverage purposes regardless of: the hour they came to the hospital, whether they
used a bed, and whether they remained in the hospital past midnight.
Renal Dialysis - Renal dialysis treatments are usually covered only as outpatient services
but may under certain circumstances be covered as inpatient services depending on the
patient's condition. Patients staying at home, who are ambulatory, whose conditions are
stable and who come to the hospital for routine chronic dialysis treatments, and not for a
diagnostic workup or a change in therapy, are considered outpatients. On the other hand,
patients undergoing short-term dialysis until their kidneys recover from an acute illness
(acute dialysis), or persons with borderline renal failure who develop acute renal failure
every time they have an illness and require dialysis (episodic dialysis) are usually
inpatients. A patient may begin dialysis as an inpatient and then progress to an outpatient
status.

Under original Medicare, the Quality Improvement Organization (QIO), for each hospital
is responsible for deciding, during review of inpatient admissions on a case-by-case basis,
whether the admission was medically necessary. Medicare law authorizes the QIO to
make these judgments, and the judgments are binding for purposes of Medicare coverage.
In making these judgments, however, QIOs consider only the medical evidence which
was available to the physician at the time an admission decision had to be made. They do
not take into account other information (e.g., test results) which became available only
after admission, except in cases where considering the post-admission information would
support a finding that an admission was medically necessary.
Refer to chapters 4 and 7 of Pub. 100-10, Quality Improvement Organization Manual
with regard to initial determinations for these services. The QIO will review the swing
bed services in these PPS hospitals as well.
NOTE: When patients requiring extended care services are admitted to beds in a
hospital, they are considered inpatients of the hospital. In such cases, the services
furnished in the hospital will not be considered extended care services, and payment may
not be made under the program for such services unless the services are extended care
services furnished pursuant to a swing bed agreement granted to the hospital by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services.
10.1 - Bed and Board
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1, HO-210.1
10.1.1 - Accommodations - General
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1.A, HO-210.1.A
The program will pay the same amount for routine accommodations services whether the
patient has a private room not medically necessary, a private room medically necessary
(Medicare does not pay for deluxe accommodations in any case), a semiprivate room (2-,
3-, or 4-bed accommodations), or ward accommodations, if its ward accommodations are
consistent with program purposes (see §10.1.6 below).
A provider having both private and semiprivate accommodations may nevertheless
charge the patient a differential for a private room if:
• 	The private room is not medically necessary; and
• 	The patient (or relative or other person acting on their behalf) has requested the
private room, and the provider informs them of the amount of charge at the time
of the request.

The private room differential may not exceed the difference between the customary
charge for the accommodations furnished and the most prevalent semiprivate
accommodation rate at the time of the patient's admission.
Where the provider bills for a private room as a covered service, i.e., shows the charge
for the room as a covered charge on the Form CMS-1450, the A/B MAC (A) will deem
the private room to be medically necessary. Where the provider, on the other hand,
shows a private differential as a noncovered charge, the A/B MAC (A) will assume that
the private room is not medically necessary.
If the beneficiary (or their representative) protests a charge for the private room on the
grounds that the privacy was medically necessary, such protest will, if not in written
form, be reduced to writing and forwarded to the A/B MAC (A). The A/B MAC (A) will
then develop the facts and make a specific determination regarding the medical necessity
of the private room. (If an A/B MAC (A) receives many protests of this kind, the
provider may need guidance on what constitutes medical necessity for privacy). If the
protest is received after the claim is processed, it will be treated as a request for
reconsideration.
If at any time in the course of development (or thereafter within the period when the
determination is not administratively final), the provider acknowledges that the private
room was medically necessary; the A/B MAC (A) will make an immediate finding to this
effect.
Where it is necessary to develop the medical necessity of a private room, the guidelines
in subsections §§10.1.2 and 10.1.3 below will apply.
10.1.2 - Medical Necessity - Need for Isolation
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1.B, HO-210.1.B
A private room is medically necessary where isolation of a beneficiary is required to
avoid jeopardizing their health or recovery, or that of other patients who are likely to be
alarmed or disturbed by the beneficiary's symptoms or treatment or subjected to infection
by the beneficiary's communicable disease. For example, communicable diseases, heart
attacks, cerebra-vascular accidents, and psychotic episodes may require isolation of the
patient for certain periods. (See §10.1.3 below concerning medical necessity not based
on need for isolation).
In establishing the medical necessity for isolation, the date of the physician's written
statement is not controlling, nor is the presence of a written statement. The crucial
question is whether a private room was ordered by the physician because it is necessary
for the health of the patient himself or herself or of other patients. In the absence of such
an order, a patient who requested the room with knowledge of the amount of the charge
may be charged appropriately, even though a physician subsequently submits a statement
that the room was medically necessary. There may be cases in which the physician's

written statement of medical necessity, though dated after admission or even after
discharge, merely confirms an order made informally at or before the time the beneficiary
was admitted to the private room (e.g., the physician made arrangements by phone for the
patient's admission, gave the diagnosis, and stated the beneficiary would need a private
room). In such cases, assuming that the private room was medically necessary, the lack
of a written statement by the physician, or the fact that the written statement was prepared
after discharge, would not be controlling. The patient may not be charged.
10.1.3 - Medical Necessity - Admission Required and Only Private
Rooms Available
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1.C, HO-210.1.C
A private room is considered to be medically necessary even though the beneficiary's
condition does not require isolation if he/she needs immediate hospitalization (i.e., the
beneficiary's medical condition is such that hospitalization cannot be deferred) and the
hospital has no semiprivate or ward accommodations available at the time of admission.
It need not be considered whether semiprivate or ward accommodations were available in
some other accessible hospital. Where medical necessity exists, the provider may not
charge the beneficiary a private room differential until semiprivate or ward
accommodations become available. Thereafter the provider may transfer the patient to
the nonprivate accommodations, or allow them to continue occupancy of the private
room, subject to an appropriate differential charge (described in §10.1.1 above) if they
request the private room with knowledge of the amount of the charge.
If the admission could be deferred until semiprivate or ward accommodations become
available, the beneficiary should be informed of the amount of the differential he/she
must pay for a private room if he/she wishes to be admitted immediately. The
beneficiary may be charged the specified differential if he/she has been admitted to the
private room at their request (or at the request of their representative) with knowledge of
the amount of the charge.
10.1.4 - Charges for Deluxe Private Room
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1.D, HO-210.1.D
Beneficiaries found to need a private room (either because they need isolation for
medical reasons or because they need immediate admission when no other
accommodations are available) may be assigned to any of the provider's private rooms.
They do not have the right to insist on the private room of their choice, but their
preferences should be given the same consideration as if they were paying all provider
charges themselves. The program does not, under any circumstances, pay for personal
comfort items. Thus, the program does not pay for deluxe accommodations and/or
services. These would include a suite, or a room substantially more spacious than is
required for treatment, or specially equipped or decorated, or serviced for the comfort and

convenience of persons willing to pay a differential for such amenities. If the beneficiary
(or representative) requests such deluxe accommodations, the provider should advise that
there will be a charge, not covered by Medicare, of a specified amount per day (not
exceeding the differential defined in the next sentence); and may charge the beneficiary
that amount for each day he/she occupies the deluxe accommodations. The maximum
amount the provider may charge the beneficiary for such accommodations is the
differential between the most prevalent private room rate at the time of admission and the
customary charge for the room occupied. Beneficiaries may not be charged this
differential if they (or their representative) do not request the deluxe accommodations.
The beneficiary may not be charged such a differential in private room rates if that
differential is based on factors other than personal comfort items. Such factors might
include differences between older and newer wings, proximity to lounge, elevators or
nursing stations, desirable view, etc. Such rooms are standard 1-bed units and not deluxe
rooms for purposes of these instructions, even though the provider may call them deluxe
and have a higher customary charge for them. No additional charge may be imposed
upon the beneficiary who is assigned to a room that may be somewhat more desirable
because of these factors.
10.1.5 - All Private Room Providers
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.E, HO-210.1.E
If the patient is admitted to a provider which has only private accommodations, and no
semiprivate or ward accommodations, medical necessity will be deemed to exist for the
accommodations furnished. Beneficiaries may not be subjected to an extra charge for a
private room in an all-private room provider.
10.1.6 - Wards
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1.F, HO-210.1.F
The law contemplates that Medicare patients should not be assigned to ward
accommodations except at the patient's request or for a reason consistent with the
purposes of the health insurance program.
When ward accommodations are furnished at the patient's request or for a reason
determined to be consistent with the program's purposes, payment will be based on the
average per diem cost of routine services (see §10.1.1 above). Where ward
accommodations are assigned for other reasons, the law provides what may be a
substantial penalty. (See §10.1.6.2 below).
Any request by the patient (or relative or other person responsible for his or her affairs)
for ward accommodations must be obtained by the provider in writing and kept in its
files.

10.1.6.1 - Assignment Consistent With Program Purposes
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1.F.1, HO-210.1.F.1
It is considered to be consistent with the program's purposes to assign the patient to ward
accommodations if all semiprivate accommodations are occupied, or the facility has no
semiprivate accommodations. However, the patient must be moved to semiprivate
accommodations if they become available during the stay.
Some hospitals have a policy of placing in wards all patients who do not have private
physicians. Such a practice may be consistent with the purposes of the program if the
A/B MAC (A) determines that the ward assignment inures to the benefit of the patient.
In making this determination, the principal consideration is whether the assignment is
likely to result in better medical treatment of the patient (e.g., it facilitates necessary
medical and nursing supervision and treatment). The A/B MAC (A) should ask a
provider having this policy to submit a statement describing how the assignments are
made, their purpose, and the effect on the care of patients so assigned.
If the A/B MAC (A) makes a favorable determination on a practice affecting all ward
assignments of Medicare patients in the institution, a reference should be made on the
appropriate billing form for patients to whom the hospital assigned a ward pursuant to
such practice.
10.1.6.2 - Assignment Not Consistent With Program Purposes
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1.F.2, HO-210.1.F.2
It is not consistent with the purposes of the law to assign a patient ward accommodation
based on their social or economic status, their national origin, race, or religion, or their
entitlement to benefits as a Medicare patient, or any other such discriminatory reason. It
is also inconsistent with the purposes of the law to assign patients to ward
accommodations merely for the convenience or financial advantage of the institution.
Additionally, under DRGs, there no longer is a reduction to payment or an adjustment to
the end of year settlement.
10.1.7 - Charges
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.1.G, HO-210.1.G
Customary charges means amounts which the hospital or skilled nursing facility is
uniformly charging patients currently for specific services and accommodations. The
most prevalent rate or charge is the rate that applies to the greatest number of semiprivate
or private beds in the institution.
10.2 – Hospital Inpatient Admission Order and Certification
(Rev. 234, Issued: 03-10-17, Effective: 01-01-16, Implementation: 06-12-17)

The order to admit as an inpatient (“practitioner order”) is a critical element in clarifying
when an individual is considered an inpatient of a hospital, including a critical access
hospital (CAH), and is therefore required for all hospital inpatient cases for hospital
inpatient coverage and payment under Part A. As a condition of payment for hospital
inpatient services under Medicare Part A, according to section 1814(a) of the Social
Security Act, CMS is requiring, only for long-stay cases and outlier cases, separate
physician certification of the medical necessity that such services be provided on an
inpatient basis. The signed physician certification is considered, along with other
documentation in the medical record, as evidence that hospital inpatient service(s) were
reasonable and necessary.
The following guidance applies to all inpatient hospital and CAH services unless
otherwise specified. For the remainder of this guidance, references to hospitals includes
CAHs. The complete requirements for the physician certification are found in 42 CFR
Part 424 subpart B, and requirements for admission orders are found at 42 CFR 412.3.
A. Physician Certification. Physician certification of inpatient services is required
for cases that are 20 inpatient days or more (long-stay cases), for outlier cases of
hospitals other than inpatient psychiatric facilities and for cases of CAHs. (See
CY 2015 Outpatient Prospective Payment System Final Rule, 79 FR 66997 and
42 CFR 412 Subpart F, 42 CFR 424.13 and 42 CFR 424.15):
1. 	Content: The physician certification includes the following information:
a. 	Reason for inpatient services: The physician certifies the reasons for
either— (i) Continued hospitalization of the patient for inpatient medical
treatment or medically required inpatient diagnostic study; or (ii) Special
or unusual services for outlier cases under the applicable prospective
payment system for inpatient services. For example, documentation of an
admitting diagnosis could fulfill this part of the certification requirement.
b. 	The estimated (or actual) time the beneficiary requires or required in the
hospital: The physician certifies the estimated time in the hospital the
beneficiary requires (if the certification is completed prior to discharge) or
the actual time in the hospital (if the certification is completed at
discharge). Estimated or actual length of stay is most commonly reflected
in the progress notes where the practitioner discusses the assessment and
plan. For the purposes of meeting the requirement for certification,
expected or actual length of stay may be documented in the order or a
separate certification or recertification form, but it is also acceptable if
discussed in the progress notes assessment and plan or as part of routine
discharge planning.
If the reason an inpatient is still in the hospital is that they are waiting for
availability of a skilled nursing facility (SNF) bed, the regulations at 42

CFR 424.13(c) and 424.14(e) provide that a beneficiary who is already
appropriately an inpatient can be kept in the hospital as an inpatient if the
only reason they remain in the hospital is they are waiting for a post-acute
SNF bed. The physician may certify the need for continued inpatient
admission on this basis.
c. 	The plans for posthospital care, if appropriate, and as provided in 42 CFR
424.13.
d. 	For inpatient CAH services only, the physician must certify that the
beneficiary may reasonably be expected to be discharged or transferred to
a hospital within 96 hours after admission to the CAH.
Time as an outpatient at the CAH does not count towards the 96 hour
certification requirement. The clock for the 96 hour certification
requirement only begins once the individual is admitted to the CAH as an
inpatient. Time in a CAH swing-bed also does not count towards the 96
hour certification requirement.
The 96-hour certification requirement is based on an expectation at the
time of admission. If a physician certifies in good faith that an individual
may reasonably be expected to be discharged or transferred to a hospital
within 96 hours after admission to the CAH, and something unforeseen
occurs that causes the individual to stay longer at the CAH, the CAH
would be paid for that unforeseen extended inpatient stay as long as that
individual’s stay does not cause the CAH to exceed its 96-hour annual
average condition of participation requirement. However, if a physician
cannot in good faith certify that an individual may reasonably be expected
to be discharged or transferred within 96 hours after admission to the
CAH, the CAH will not receive Medicare reimbursement for any portion
of that individual’s inpatient stay. This would be determined based on a
medical review of the case.
All certification requirements must be completed, signed, and documented
in the medical record no later than 1 day before the date on which the
claim for payment for the inpatient CAH service is submitted, as provided
in the FY15 IPPS Final Rule and 42 CFR 424.11 and 42 CFR 424.15.
e. 	Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs): The documentation that IRFs
are already required to complete to meet the IRF coverage requirements
(such as the preadmission screening (including the physician review and
concurrence), the post-admission physician evaluation, and the required
admission orders) may be used to satisfy the certification and
recertification statement requirements.

2. 	Timing: Outlier cases must be certified and recertified as provided in 42 CFR
424.13. Under extenuating circumstances, delayed initial certification or
recertification of an outlier case may be acceptable as long as it does not
extend past discharge. For all other long stay cases, the certification must be
signed and documented no later than 20 days into the inpatient portion of the
hospital stay.
3. 	Authorization to sign the certification: The certification or recertification
may be signed only by one of the following:
(1) 	A physician who is a doctor of medicine or osteopathy.
(2) 	A dentist in the circumstances specified in 42 CFR 424.13(d).
(3) 	A doctor of podiatric medicine if his or her certification is consistent
with the functions he or she is authorized to perform under state law.
Certifications and recertifications must be signed by the physician responsible
for the case, or by another physician who has knowledge of the case and who
is authorized to do so by the responsible physician or by the hospital’s
medical staff (or by the dentist as provided in 42 CFR 424.11 and 42 CFR
424.13). CMS considers only the following physicians, podiatrists or dentists
to have sufficient knowledge of the case to serve as the certifying physician:
the admitting physician of record (“attending”) or a physician on call for him
or her; a surgeon responsible for a major surgical procedure on the beneficiary
or a surgeon on call for him or her; a dentist functioning as the admitting
physician of record or as the surgeon responsible for a major dental procedure;
and, in the specific case of a non‐physician non‐dentist admitting practitioner
who is licensed by the state and has been granted privileges by the facility, a
physician member of the hospital staff (such as a physician member of the
utilization review committee) who has reviewed the case and who also enters
into the record a complete certification statement that specifically contains all
of the content elements discussed above. The admitting physician of record
may be an emergency department physician or hospitalist. CMS does not
require the certifying physician to have inpatient admission privileges at the
hospital.
4. 	Format: As specified in 42 CFR 424.11, no specific procedures or forms are
required for certification and recertification statements. The provider may
adopt any method that permits verification. The certification and
recertification statements may be entered on forms, notes, or records that the
appropriate individual signs, or on a special separate form. Except as
provided for delayed certifications, there must be a separate signed statement
for each certification or recertification. If all the required information is
included in progress notes, the physician's statement could indicate that the
individual's medical record contains the information required and that hospital
inpatient services are or continue to be medically necessary.

B. Inpatient Order: A Medicare beneficiary is considered an inpatient of a hospital
if formally admitted as an inpatient pursuant to an order for inpatient admission
by an ordering practitioner. As stated in the FY 2014 IPPS Final Rule, 78 FR
50908 and 50941, and as conveyed in 42 CFR 482.24, if the order is not properly
documented in the medical record prior to discharge, the hospital should not
submit a claim for Part A payment. Meeting the two midnight benchmark does
not, in itself, render a beneficiary an inpatient or serve to qualify them for
payment under Part A. Rather, as provided in Medicare regulations, a beneficiary
is considered an inpatient (and Part A payment may only be made) if they are
formally admitted as such pursuant to an order for inpatient admission by an
ordering practitioner.
With regard to the time of discharge, a Medicare beneficiary is considered a
patient of the hospital until the effectuation of activities typically specified by the
ordering practitioner as having to occur prior to discharge (e.g., “discharge after
supper” or “discharge after voids”). Thus, discharge itself can but does not
always coincide exactly with the time that the discharge order is written, rather it
occurs when the ordering practitioner’s order for discharge is effectuated.
1. 	Content: The ordering practitioner’s order contains the instruction that the
beneficiary should be formally admitted for hospital inpatient care. The order
must specify admission for inpatient services. Inpatient rehabilitation
facilities (IRFs) must adhere to the admission requirements specified in 42
CFR 412.622. The two midnight benchmark does not apply in IRFs.
2. 	Qualifications of the ordering/admitting practitioner: The order must be
furnished by a physician or other practitioner (“ordering practitioner”) who is:
(a) licensed by the state to admit inpatients to hospitals, (b) granted privileges
by the hospital to admit inpatients to that specific facility, and (c)
knowledgeable about the patient’s hospital course, medical plan of care, and
current condition at the time of admission. See section (B)(3) for a discussion
of the requirements to be knowledgeable about the patient’s hospital course.
The ordering practitioner makes the determination of medical necessity for
inpatient care and renders the admission decision. The ordering practitioner is
not required to write the order but must authenticate (sign, or in the case of an
initial order (under (B)(2)(a)) or a verbal order (under (B)(2)(b)), countersign)
the order reflecting that he or she has made the decision to admit the patient
for inpatient services.
The admission decision (order) may not be delegated to another individual
who is not authorized by the state to admit patients, or has not been granted
admitting privileges by the hospital's medical staff. However, a medical
resident, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or other non-physician
practitioner may act as a proxy for the ordering practitioner provided they are
authorized under state law to admit patients and the requirements outlined
below are met (FY 14 IPPS Final Rule and 42 CFR 412.3(b)).

a. 	Residents and non-physician practitioners authorized to make initial
admission decisions - Certain non-physician practitioners and residents
working within their residency program are authorized by the state in
which the hospital is located to admit inpatients, and are allowed by
hospital by-laws or policies to do the same. The ordering practitioner may
allow these individuals to write inpatient admission orders on his or her
behalf, if the ordering practitioner approves and accepts responsibility for
the admission decision by authenticating (countersigning) the order prior
to discharge. (See (A)(2) for guidance regarding the definition of
discharge time and (B)(3) for more guidance regarding knowledge of a
patient’s hospital course). In authenticating (countersigning) the order, the
ordering practitioner approves and accepts responsibility for the admission
decision. This process may also be used for practitioners (such as
emergency department physicians) who do not have admitting privileges
but are authorized by the hospital to issue temporary or “bridge” inpatient
admission orders.
b. 	Verbal orders- At some hospitals, individuals who lack the authority to
admit inpatients under state laws and hospital by‐laws (such as a
registered nurse) may nonetheless enter the inpatient admission order as a
verbal order. In these cases, the ordering practitioner directly
communicates the inpatient admission order to staff as a verbal (not
standing) order, and the ordering practitioner need not separately record
the order to admit. Following discussion with and at the direction of the
ordering practitioner, a verbal order for inpatient admission may be
documented by an individual who is not qualified to admit patients in his
or her own right, as long as that documentation (transcription) of the order
for inpatient admission is in accordance with state law including; scope‐
of‐practice laws, hospital policies, and medical staff bylaws, rules, and
regulations. In this case, the staff receiving the verbal order must
document the verbal order in the medical record at the time it is received.
The order must identify the ordering practitioner and must be
authenticated (countersigned) by the ordering practitioner promptly and
prior to discharge. Example: “Admit to inpatient per Dr. Smith” would
be considered an acceptable method of identifying the ordering
practitioner and would meet the verbal order requirement if the verbal
order (1) is appropriately documented in the medical record by the
individual receiving the verbal order when the order is received; and (2) is
authenticated (countersigned) by Dr. Smith promptly, prior to discharge.
c. 	Standing orders and protocols - The inpatient admission order cannot be
a standing order. While Medicare’s rules do not prohibit use of a protocol
or algorithm that is part of a protocol, only the ordering practitioner, or a
resident or other practitioner acting on his or her behalf under section

(B)(2)(a) can make and take responsibility for the inpatient admission
decision.
d. 	Commencement of inpatient status - Inpatient status begins at the time
of formal admission by the hospital pursuant to the order, including an
initial order (under (B)(2)(a)) or a verbal order (under (B)(2)(b)) that is
authenticated (countersigned) timely, by authorized individuals, as
required in this section. If the practitioner responsible for authenticating
(countersigning) an initial order or verbal order does not agree that
inpatient admission was appropriate or valid (including an unauthorized
verbal order), he or she should not authenticate (countersign) the order and
the beneficiary is not considered to be an inpatient. The hospital stay may
be billed to Part B as a hospital outpatient encounter.
3. 	Knowledge of the patient’s hospital course: CMS considers only the
following practitioners to have sufficient knowledge about the beneficiary’s
hospital course, medical plan of care, and current condition to serve as the
ordering practitioner: the admitting physician of record (“attending”) or a
physician on call for him or her, primary or covering hospitalists caring for the
patient in the hospital, the beneficiary’s primary care practitioner or a
physician on call for the primary care practitioner, a surgeon responsible for a
major surgical procedure on the beneficiary or a surgeon on call for him or
her, emergency or clinic practitioners caring for the beneficiary at the point of
inpatient admission, and other practitioners qualified to admit inpatients and
actively treating the beneficiary at the point of the inpatient admission
decision. A utilization review committee physician functioning in that role
does not have direct responsibility for the care of the patient and is therefore
not considered to be sufficiently knowledgeable to order the inpatient
admission. The order must be written by one of the above practitioners
directly involved with the care of the beneficiary, and a utilization committee
physician may only write the order to admit if he or she is not acting in a
utilization review capacity and fulfills one of the direct patient care roles, such
as the attending physician. Utilization review may not be conducted by any
individual who was professionally involved in the care of the patient whose
case is being reviewed (42 CFR 482.30(d)(3)).
4. 	Timing: The order must be furnished at or before the time of the inpatient
admission. The order can be written in advance of the formal admission (e.g.,
for a pre‐scheduled surgery), but the inpatient admission does not occur until
hospital care services are provided to the beneficiary. Conversely, in the
unusual case in which a patient is admitted as an inpatient prior to an order to
admit and there is no documented verbal order, the inpatient stay should not
be considered to commence until the inpatient admission order is documented.
CMS does not permit retroactive orders. Authentication by the ordering
practitioner of the order (either by signature or, in the case of an initial order

under (B)(2)(a) or a verbal order under (B)(2)(b), countersignature) is required
prior to discharge for all inpatient cases.
5. 	Specificity of the Order: The regulations at 42 CFR 412.3 require that, as a
condition of payment, an order for inpatient admission must be present in the
medical record. The preamble of the FY 2014 IPPS Final Rule at 78 FR
50942 states, “the order must specify the admitting practitioner’s
recommendation to admit ‘to inpatient,’ ‘as an inpatient,’ ‘for inpatient
services,’ or similar language specifying his or her recommendation for
inpatient care. While CMS does not require specific language to be used on
the inpatient admission order, it is in the interest of the hospital that the
ordering practitioner use language that clearly expresses intent to admit the
patient as inpatient that will be commonly understood by any individual who
could potentially review documentation of the inpatient stay. CMS does not
recommend using language that may have specific meaning only to
individuals that work in a particular hospital (e.g., “admit to 7W”) that will
not be commonly understood by others outside of the hospital.
If admission order language used to specify inpatient or outpatient status is
ambiguous, the best course of action would be to obtain and document
clarification from the ordering practitioner before initial Medicare billing
(ideally before the beneficiary is discharged). Under this policy, CMS will
continue to treat orders that specify a typically outpatient or other limited
service (e.g., admit “to ER,” “to Observation,” “to Recovery,” “to Outpatient
Surgery,” “to Day Surgery,” or “to Short Stay Surgery”) as defining a non‐
inpatient service, and such orders will not be treated as meeting the inpatient
admission requirements.
The admission order is evidence of the decision by the ordering practitioner to
admit the beneficiary to inpatient status. In extremely rare circumstances, the
order to admit may be missing or defective (that is, illegible, or incomplete,
for example “inpatient” is not specified), yet the intent, decision, and
recommendation of the ordering practitioner to admit the beneficiary as an
inpatient can clearly be derived from the medical record. In these extremely
rare situations, contractors have been provided with discretion to determine
that this information constructively satisfies the requirement that the hospital
inpatient admission order be present in the medical record. However, in order
for the documentation to provide acceptable evidence to support the hospital
inpatient admission, thus satisfying the requirement for the order, there can be
no uncertainty regarding the intent, decision, and recommendation by the
ordering practitioner to admit the beneficiary as an inpatient, and no
reasonable possibility that the care could have been adequately provided in an
outpatient setting.

This narrow and limited alternative method of satisfying the requirement for
documentation of the inpatient admission order in the medical record should be extremely
rare, and may only be applied at the discretion of the contractor.
20 - Nursing and Other Services
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.2, HO-210.2
Nursing and other related services, use of hospital facilities, and medical social services
ordinarily furnished by the hospital for the care and treatment of inpatients are covered
under hospital insurance and included in the Prospective Payment system payment.
NOTE: The services of a private-duty nurse or other private-duty attendant are not
covered. Private-duty nurses or private-duty attendants are registered nurses, licensed
practical nurses, or any other trained attendant whose services ordinarily are rendered to,
and restricted to, a particular patient by arrangement between the patient and the private-
duty nurse or attendant. Such persons are engaged or paid by an individual patient or by
someone acting on their behalf, including a hospital that initially incurs the costs and
looks to the patient for reimbursement for such noncovered services.
Where the hospital acts on behalf of a patient, the services of the private-duty nurse or
other attendant under such an arrangement are not inpatient hospital services regardless
of the control which the hospital may exercise with respect to the services rendered by
such private-duty nurse or attendant.
20.1 - Anesthetist Services
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.2.A, HO-210.2.A
If the hospital engages the services of a nurse anesthetist or other nonphysician
anesthetist (either on a salary or fee-for-service basis) under arrangements which provide
for billing to be made by the hospital, the cost of the service when provided to an
inpatient could be covered under Part A. (See the Medicare Claims Processing Manual
for more information.)
20.2 - Medical Social Services to Meet the Patient's Medically Related
Social Needs
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.2.B, HO-210.2.B
Medical social services are services which contribute meaningfully to the treatment of a
patient's condition. Such services include, but are not limited to:
• 	Assessment of the social and emotional factors related to the patient's illness, need
for care, response to treatment, and adjustment to care in the facility;

• 	Appropriate action to obtain case work services to assist in resolving problems in
these areas; and
• 	Assessment of the relationship of the patient's medical and nursing requirements
to their home situation, financial resources, and the community resources
available to them in making the decision regarding their discharge.
30 - Drugs and Biologicals
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.3, HO-210.3
Drugs and biologicals for use in the hospital, which are ordinarily furnished by the
hospital for the care and treatment of inpatients, are covered.
Three basic requirements must be met for a drug or biological furnished by a hospital to
be a covered hospital service:
1. 	The drug or biological must represent a cost to the institution in rendering
services to the beneficiary;
2. 	The drug or biological must meet the statutory definition. Under the statute,
payment may be made for a drug or biological only where it is included, or
approved for inclusion, in the latest official edition of the United States
Pharmacopoeia-National Formulary (USP-NF), the United States Pharmacopoeia
Drug Information (USP DI), or the American Dental Association (ADA) Guide to
Dental Therapeutics, except for those drugs and biologicals unfavorably evaluated
in the ADA Guide to Dental Therapeutics. Combination drugs are also included
in the definition of drugs if the combination itself or all of the therapeutic
ingredients of the combination are included, or approved for inclusion, in any of
the above drug compendia. Drugs and biologicals are considered approved for
inclusion in a compendium if approved under the established procedure by the
professional organization responsible for revision of the compendium; or be
approved by the pharmacy and drug therapeutics or equivalent committee of the
medical staff of the hospital for use in the hospital; and
3. 	Use of the drug or biological must be safe and effective and otherwise reasonable
and necessary as specified in the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15,
“Covered Medical and Other Health Services,” §50.
Drugs or biologicals approved for marketing by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) are considered safe and effective for purposes of this last
requirement when used for indications specified in the labeling. Therefore, use of
an FDA-approved drug or biological is covered if:
• 	It was administered on or after the date of the FDA's approval;

• 	It is reasonable and necessary for the individual patient; and
• 	All other applicable coverage requirements are met.
Drugs and biologicals, which have not received final marketing approval by the FDA, are
not covered unless CMS instructs the A/B MAC (A) to the contrary. However, FDA-
approved drugs are used for indications other than those specified on the labeling. As
long as the FDA has not specified such use as nonapproved, coverage is determined
taking into consideration the generally accepted medical practice in the community. For
example, the labeling of certain chemotherapeutic drugs indicates their use in the therapy
of specified types of cancer. However, based on experience and empirical evidence,
physicians may prescribe these drugs for a wider range of cancer treatments than what is
indicated in the labeling. Local medical review policy may or may not grant coverage,
depending on the circumstances.
Determinations as to whether use of a drug or biological is reasonable and necessary for
an individual patient are the responsibility of the Quality Improvement Organization
(QIO), if this is part of the review for a PPS acute care admission. However, if this is an
excluded service claim being reviewed by the A/B MAC (A), the A/B MAC (A) reviews
and makes a determination, unless it cannot and needs to refer it to the QIO for an initial
determination.
A hospital stay solely for the purpose of use of a drug or biological that is determined not
reasonable and necessary is not covered.
30.1 - Drugs Included in the Drug Compendia
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.2.A, HO-210.3.A
Medicare covers only those drugs and biologicals included, or approved for inclusion, in
the latest official edition or revision of the compendia as previously listed.
Where a drug is excluded from coverage because it is unfavorably evaluated in either the
AMA Drug Evaluations or Accepted Dental Therapeutics, the exclusion applies to all
uses for which the drug or biological was so unfavorably evaluated.
Drugs and biologicals are considered "approved for inclusion" in a compendium if
approved under the procedure established by the professional organization responsible for
revision of the compendium.
30.2 - Approval by Pharmacy and Drug Therapeutics Committee
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.3.B, HO-210.3.B
A pharmacy and drug therapeutics or equivalent committee is a medical staff committee
that confers with the hospital pharmacist in the formulation of policies pertaining to

drugs. Drugs and biologicals approved for use in the hospital by such a committee are
covered only if the committee develops and maintains a formulary or list of drugs
accepted for use in the hospital. The committee need not function exclusively as a
pharmacy and drug therapeutics committee but may also carry on other medical staff
functions.
Drugs and biologicals are considered approved for use in the hospital if selected for
inclusion in the hospital drug list of formulary under the procedure of the committee
established for that purpose. Express approval is required; the fact that a drug or
biological has not been specifically determined to be unacceptable for use in the hospital
does not constitute approval.
Drugs and biologicals are covered if approved for general use in the hospital, or if
approved for use by a particular patient or group of patients. Approval by a pharmacy
and drug therapeutics committee is an alternative to approval for inclusion of the drug or
biological in an approved drug compendium (see §30.1 above); such approval does not
preclude the need for a determination of medical necessity. An investigational drug is
not considered to meet the reasonable and necessary test since its efficacy has not yet
been established.
The decision of individual hospitals should not transcend the determinations of the Food
and Drug Administration and Public Health Service in respect to the safety and
effectiveness of drugs. Therefore, even if approved by an appropriate hospital
committee, the reasonable cost of an investigational or other nonapproved drug or
biological (e.g., Laetrile) cannot be reimbursed. This exclusion from payment applies
whether or not the drug or biological is administered during the course of an otherwise
covered hospital stay, since payment may not be made for items and services that are not
reasonable and necessary. A hospital stay solely for the purpose of administering a drug
or biological that is not reasonable and necessary, including an investigational drug or
biological, is not covered and the drug or biological itself is not covered.
30.3 - Combination Drugs
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.3.C, HO-210-3.C
Combination drugs are covered if the combination itself or all of the therapeutic
ingredients of the combination are included, or approved for inclusion, in any of the
designated drug compendia. Any combination drug approved for use in the hospital by
the pharmacy and drug therapeutics or equivalent committee is covered.
30.4 - Drugs Specially Ordered for Inpatients
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.3.D, HO-210.3.D

Coverage is not limited to drugs and biologicals routinely stocked by the hospital; a drug
or biological not stocked by the hospital, which the hospital obtains for the patient from
an outside source, such as a community pharmacy, can also be covered.
Drugs and biologicals not included in the drug list or formulary maintained by the
hospital's pharmacy and drug therapeutics committee may be covered if the hospital has a
policy which permits such drugs to be furnished to a patient at the special request of a
physician. However, in order to be covered, such drugs and biologicals must be included,
or approved for inclusion, in one of the designated drug compendia. (In addition, a
combination drug, or all of its therapeutic ingredients, would have to be included or
approved for inclusion in one of the compendia.)
30.5 - Drugs for Use Outside the Hospital
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.3.E, HO-210.3.E
Drugs and biologicals furnished by a hospital to an inpatient for use outside the hospital
are, in general, not covered as inpatient hospital services. However, if the drug or
biological is deemed medically necessary to permit or facilitate the patient's departure
from the hospital, and a limited supply is required until the patient can obtain a
continuing supply, the limited supply of the drug or biological is covered as an inpatient
hospital service.
40 - Supplies, Appliances, and Equipment
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.4, HO-210.4
Supplies, appliances, and equipment, which are ordinarily furnished by the hospital for
the care and treatment of the beneficiary solely during the inpatient hospital stay, are
covered inpatient hospital services.
Under certain circumstances, supplies, appliances, and equipment used during the
beneficiary's inpatient stay are covered under Part A even though the supplies, appliances
and equipment leave the hospital with the patient upon discharge. These are
circumstances in which it would be unreasonable or impossible from a medical
standpoint to limit the patient's use of the item to the periods during which the individual
is an inpatient. Examples of items covered under this rule are:
• 	Items permanently installed in or attached to the patient's body while an inpatient,
such as cardiac valves, cardiac pacemakers, and artificial limbs; and
• 	Items which are temporarily installed in or attached to the patient's body while an
inpatient, and which are also necessary to permit or facilitate the patient's release
from the hospital, such as tracheotomy or drainage tubes.

Hospital “admission packs” containing primarily toilet articles, such as soap,
toothbrushes, toothpaste, and combs, are covered under Part A if routinely furnished by
the hospital to all its inpatients. If not routinely furnished to all patients, the packs are not
covered. In that situation, the hospital may charge beneficiaries for the pack, but only if
they request it with knowledge of what they are requesting and what the charge to them
will be.
Supplies, appliances, and equipment furnished to an inpatient for use only outside the
hospital are not, in general, covered as inpatient hospital services. However, a temporary
or disposable item, which is medically necessary to permit or facilitate the patient's
departure from the hospital and is required until the patient can obtain a continuing
supply, is covered as an inpatient hospital service.
Oxygen furnished to hospital inpatients is covered under Part A as an inpatient supply.
50 - Other Diagnostic or Therapeutic Items or Services
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.5, HO-210.5
Other diagnostic or therapeutic items or services ordinarily furnished inpatients by the
hospital or by others under arrangements made by the hospital are covered. This
category of covered services encompasses items and services not otherwise specifically
listed as covered inpatient hospital services. (See the Medicare Benefit Policy Manual,
Chapter 15, “Covered Medical and Other Health Services.”)
Such services to hospital inpatients may be covered under Part A even when furnished off
the hospital premises. For example, diagnostic or therapeutic services of an audiologist
off the hospital premises are covered if billed for by the hospital under arrangements (see
Pub 100-01, the Medicare General Information, Eligibility, and Entitlement Manual,
Chapter 5, §10.3, for further information concerning “under arrangements”), if the
services are furnished at a speech and hearing center, and if the audiologist meets the
qualifications for an audiologist:
• 	Is licensed if applicable by the State in which practicing; and
• 	Is eligible for a certification of clinical competence in audiology granted by the
American Speech and Hearing Association; or
• 	Meets the education requirements for certification and is in the process of
accumulating the supervised experience required for certification.
50.1 - Therapeutic Items
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.5.A, HO-210.5

Therapeutic items, which are covered when ordinarily furnished by the hospital to its
inpatients, or when ordinarily furnished to hospital inpatients by others under
arrangements with them made by the hospital, include but are not limited to the
following:
• 	Surgical dressings, and splints, casts, and other devices used for the reduction of
fractures and dislocations;
• 	Prosthetic devices (other than dental) which replace all or part of an internal body
organ (including contiguous tissue) or replace all or part of the function of a
permanently inoperative or malfunctioning internal body organ; and
• 	Leg, arm, back, and neck braces, trusses, and artificial legs, arms, and eyes.
With respect to items that leave the hospital with the patient upon discharge, such as
splints or casts, the rules for determining whether the item is covered are the same as the
rules set forth above for supplies, appliances, and equipment.
50.2 - Diagnostic Services of Psychologists and Physical Therapists
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.5.B, HO-210.5
When a psychologist or physical therapist is a salaried member of the staff of a hospital,
their diagnostic or therapeutic services to inpatients of that hospital are covered. See the
Medicare Claims Processing Manual for information on distinguishing between
professional and technical services, and for information about billing and payment for
nonphysician practitioners.
50.3 - Diagnostic Services Furnished to an Inpatient by an Independent
Clinical Laboratory Under Arrangements With the Hospital
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.5.C, HO-210.5
Diagnostic services furnished to an inpatient by an independent clinical laboratory under
arrangements with the hospital are reimbursable under hospital insurance provided the
lab is certified by CLIA to perform the services.
An independent laboratory is one which is independent both of an attending or
consulting physician's office and also independent of any hospital which meets at least
the requirements to qualify as an emergency hospital (e.g., maintains clinical records, has
a utilization review plan, meets the health and safety requirements found necessary by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services).
A consulting physician is one whose services include history taking, examination of the
patient and, in each case, furnishing to the attending physician an opinion regarding

diagnosis or treatment. A physician providing clinical laboratory services for patients of
other physicians is not considered to be a consulting physician.
A laboratory operated by or under the supervision of a hospital (or the organized medical
staff of the hospital) that does not meet at least the definition of an emergency hospital is
considered to be an independent laboratory. However, a laboratory serving hospital
patients and operated on the premises of a hospital that meets the definition of an
emergency hospital is presumed to be subject to the supervision of the hospital or its
organized medical staff and is not an independent laboratory. A laboratory that a
physician or group of physicians maintains for performing diagnostic tests in connection
with their own or the group practice is also not considered to be an independent
laboratory.
An out-of-hospital laboratory is ordinarily presumed to be independent unless there is
written evidence establishing that it is operated by or under the supervision of a hospital
that meets at least the definition of an emergency hospital or of the organized medical
staff of such a hospital. Refer to “The Conditions of Participation for Hospitals” found at
42 CFR 482 and below for a description of independent lab approval requirements when
the hospital is participating.
Where a laboratory operated on hospital premises is claimed to be independent or where
an out-of-hospital facility is designated as a hospital laboratory, the CMS regional office
makes the determination concerning the laboratory's status.
A clinical laboratory is a laboratory where microbiological, serological, chemical,
hematological, radiobioassay, cytological, immunohematological, or pathological
examinations are performed on materials derived from the human body, to provide
information for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a disease or assessment of a
medical condition.
The "Conditions of Participation for Hospitals (HIRM-1)" call for independent clinical
laboratory services furnished under arrangements made by a hospital to be furnished only
by a laboratory meeting the specified conditions for coverage under the program. These
require that:
• 	Where State or applicable local law provides for licensing of independent clinical
laboratories, the laboratory is either licensed under law or is approved as meeting
the requirements for licensing by the State or local agency responsible for
licensing laboratories; and
• 	Such laboratories also meet the health and safety requirements prescribed by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services. (See “The Conditions of Participation
for Hospitals” at 42 CFR 482).
Where independent laboratory services are provided to patients of a participating hospital
under arrangements with the hospital, the law does not require as a condition of payment

in an individual case that the independent laboratory be approved under the program. In
processing individual claims, the A/B MAC (A), therefore, need not verify that the
services were obtained from an approved laboratory. The A/B MAC (A) should make
payment for laboratory services although it may know that the laboratory from which the
hospital has obtained the service is not approved under the program. However, it should
promptly refer this information to the appropriate regional office for review of the
determination of the hospital's compliance with the conditions of participation and for
whatever action the regional office deems appropriate. The above policy applies to PPS
exempt hospitals. Note that under PPS, there is no separate payment for lab services
furnished to inpatients.
50.4 - Diagnostic Services Furnished a Hospital Inpatient Under
Arrangement With the Laboratory of Another Participating Hospital
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.5.D, HO-210.5
Diagnostic services furnished a hospital inpatient under arrangements with the laboratory
of another participating hospital are reimbursable on a cost basis under Part A to the
hospital obtaining the services if the hospital is PPS exempt. If the hospital is not
exempt, there is not separate payment for lab services furnished to inpatients.
NOTE: Where a PPS exempt hospital obtains diagnostic laboratory services for
inpatients under arrangements described in §§50.3 and 50.4 the cost to the hospital
obtaining the services would be the reasonable charge for the laboratory's service.
60 - Services of Interns or Residents-In-Training
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.6, HO-210.6
Hospital insurance covers the reasonable cost of the services of medical or osteopathic
interns or residents-in-training under a teaching program approved by the appropriate
approving body.
In the case of services of interns or residents-in-training in the field of dentistry in a
hospital or osteopathic hospital, the teaching program must have the approval of the
Council on Dental Education of the American Dental Association.
The services of interns and residents-in-training in the field of podiatry who are in a
residency program approved by the Council on Podiatric Medical Education of the
American Podiatric Medical Association are covered on the same basis as the services of
other interns and residents in other approved residency programs.
70 - Inpatient Services in Connection With Dental Services
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.7, HO-210.7

When a patient is hospitalized for a dental procedure and the dentist's service is covered
under Part B, the inpatient hospital services furnished are covered under Part A. For
example, both the professional services of the dentist and the inpatient hospital expenses
are covered when the dentist reduces a jaw fracture of an inpatient at a participating
hospital. In addition, hospital inpatient services, which are necessary because of the
patient's underlying medical condition and clinical status or the severity of a noncovered
dental procedure, are covered.
When the hospital services are covered, all ancillary services such as x-rays,
administration of anesthesia, use of the operating room, etc., are covered.
Regardless of whether the inpatient hospital services are covered, the medical services of
physicians furnished in connection with noncovered dental services are not covered. The
services of an anesthesiologist, radiologist, or pathologist whose services are performed
in connection with the care, treatment, filling, removal, or replacement of teeth or
structures directly supporting teeth are not covered.
80 - Health Care Associated With Pregnancy
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.12, HO-210.13
Reasonable and necessary services associated with pregnancy are covered and
reimbursable under the Medicare program. Because pregnancy is a condition sufficiently
at variance with the usual state of health, it is appropriate for a pregnant woman to seek
medical care. The increased possibility of illness or injury accompanying this condition
is well recognized, and medical supervision is required throughout pregnancy and for a
brief period beyond. Skilled medical management is appropriate throughout the events of
pregnancy, beginning with diagnosis of the condition, continuing through delivery, and
ending after the necessary postnatal care. Similarly, if the pregnancy terminates, whether
spontaneously or for therapeutic reasons (i.e., where the life of the mother would be
endangered if the fetus were brought to term), the need for skilled medical management
and/or medical services is equally as important as in those cases carried to full term.
After the infant is delivered, items and services furnished to the infant cannot be covered
and reimbursed under the program on the basis of the mother's eligibility.
90 - Termination of Pregnancy
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
B3-4276.1,.2
Effective for services furnished on or after October 1, 1998, Medicare will cover
abortions procedures in the following situations:
1. If the pregnancy is the result of an act or rape or incest; or
2. In the case where a woman suffers from a physical disorder, physical injury, or
physical illness, including a life-endangering physical condition caused by the

pregnancy itself that would, as certified by a physician, place the woman in
danger of death unless an abortion is performed.
NOTE: The "G7" modifier must be used with the following CPT codes in order for
these services to be covered when the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest, or the
pregnancy is certified by a physician as life threatening to the mother:
59840 	59841 	59850
59851 	59852 	59855
59856 	59857 	59866
100 - Treatment for Infertility
(Rev. 1, 10-01-03)
A3-3101.13
Effective for services rendered on or after January 15, 1980, reasonable and necessary
services associated with treatment for infertility are covered under Medicare. Like
pregnancy (see §80 above), infertility is a condition sufficiently at variance with the usual
state of health to make it appropriate for a person who normally would be expected to be
fertile to seek medical consultation and treatment. A/B MACs (A) should coordinate
with QIOs to see that utilization guidelines are established for this treatment if
inappropriate utilization or abuse is suspected.
110 - Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Services
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
The inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) benefit is designed to provide intensive
rehabilitation therapy in a resource intensive inpatient hospital environment for patients
who, due to the complexity of their nursing, medical management, and rehabilitation
needs, require and can reasonably be expected to benefit from an inpatient stay and an
interdisciplinary team approach to the delivery of rehabilitation care.
The IRF benefit is not to be used as an alternative to completion of the full course of
treatment in the referring hospital. A patient who has not yet completed the full course of
treatment in the referring hospital is expected to remain in the referring hospital, with
appropriate rehabilitative treatment provided, until such time as the patient has completed
the full course of treatment. Though medical management can be performed in an IRF,
patients must be able to actively participate in and benefit from the intensive
rehabilitation therapy program provided in IRFs in order for an IRF claim to be
considered reasonable and necessary, in accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(3)(ii).
Therefore, patients who are not able to actively participate in and benefit from the
intensive rehabilitation therapy services because they are still completing their course of
treatment in the referring hospital should remain in the referring hospital until they are
able to do so.

Conversely, the IRF benefit is not appropriate for patients who have completed their full
course of treatment in the referring hospital, but do not require intensive rehabilitation.
Medicare benefits are available for such patients in a less-intensive setting.
IRF care is only considered by Medicare to be reasonable and necessary under
1862(a)(1)(A) of the Social Security Act if the patient meets all of the requirements
outlined in 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(3), (4), and (5). This is true regardless of whether the
patient is treated in the IRF for 1 or more of the 13 medical conditions listed in 42 CFR §
412.29(b)(2) or not. Medicare requires determinations of whether IRF stays are
reasonable and necessary to be based on an assessment of each beneficiary's individual
care needs.
For detailed guidance on the required qualifications of a therapist, required skills of a
therapist, and medically necessary and appropriately documented therapy services, see
Pub. 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, chapter 15, sections 220 and 230. The
policies in those sections describe a standard of care that should be consistent throughout
the therapy disciplines, regardless of the setting of care.
110.1 - Documentation Requirements
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
Part A/B Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) (A) must consider completion of
the requirements at 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(3), (4), and (5) in a patient’s IRF medical
record when determining whether an IRF admission was reasonable and necessary.
110.1.1 - Required Preadmission Screening
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
In accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(i) a preadmission screening is an evaluation
of the patient’s condition and need for rehabilitation therapy and medical treatment that
must be conducted by licensed or certified clinician(s) within the 48 hours immediately
preceding the IRF admission. A preadmission screening that includes all of the required
elements, but that is conducted more than 48 hours immediately preceding the IRF
admission, will be accepted as long as an update is conducted in person or by telephone
to document the patient’s medical and functional status within the 48 hours immediately
preceding the IRF admission in the patient’s medical record at the IRF. The
preadmission screening in the patient’s IRF medical record serves as the primary
documentation by the IRF clinical staff of the patient’s status prior to admission and of
the specific reasons that led the IRF clinical staff to conclude that the IRF admission
would be reasonable and necessary. As such, IRFs must make this documentation
detailed and comprehensive.
In accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(i)(B) the preadmission screening
documentation must indicate the patient’s prior level of function (prior to the event or
condition that led to the patient’s need for intensive rehabilitation therapy), expected

level of improvement, and the expected length of time necessary to achieve that level of
improvement. It must also include an evaluation of the patient’s risk for clinical
complications, the conditions that caused the need for rehabilitation, the treatments
needed (i.e., physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, or
prosthetics/orthotics), and anticipated discharge destination.
If the patient is being transferred from a referring hospital, the preadmission screening
could either be done in person or through a review of the patient’s medical records from
the referring hospital (either paper or electronic format), as long as those medical records
contain the necessary assessments to make a reasonable determination. However, a
preadmission screening conducted entirely by telephone should generally include
transmission of the patient’s medical records from the referring hospital to the IRF and a
review of those records by licensed or certified clinical staff member in the IRF to ensure
it includes a detailed and comprehensive review of the patient’s condition and medical
history in accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(i)(B).
The IRF should develop a thorough preadmission screening process for patients admitted
to the IRF from the home or community-based environment, which should ensure that
patient preadmission screenings include all of the required elements described in 42 CFR
§ 412.622(a)(3), (4), and (5). However, such admissions may not necessarily involve the
use of medical records from a prior hospital stay in another inpatient hospital setting
unless such records are pertinent to the individual patient’s situation.
Individual elements of the preadmission screening may be evaluated by any clinician or
group of clinicians designated by a rehabilitation physician, as long as the clinicians are
licensed or certified to perform the evaluation. Although clinical personnel are required
to evaluate the preadmission screening information in accordance with 42 CFR §
412.622(a)(4)(i), each IRF may determine its own processes for collecting and compiling
the preadmission screening information. The focus of the review of the preadmission
screening information will be on its completeness, accuracy, and the extent to which it
supports the appropriateness of the IRF admission decision, not on how the process is
organized.
The “rehabilitation physician” need not be a salaried employee of the IRF, but must be a
licensed physician who is determined by the IRF to have specialized training and
experience in inpatient rehabilitation, in accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(c). For ease
of exposition throughout this document, this physician will be referred to as a
“rehabilitation physician”.
All findings of the preadmission screening should be conveyed to a rehabilitation
physician prior to the IRF admission. Additionally, in accordance with 42 CFR §
412.622(a)(4)(i), the rehabilitation physician must document that he or she has reviewed
and concurs with the findings and results of the preadmission screening prior to the IRF
admission.
All preadmission screening documentation (including documents transmitted from the
referring hospital or other prior inpatient hospital stay, if applicable) must be retained in

the patient’s medical record at the IRF per the regulation at 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(i).
110.1.2 - Required Post-Admission Physician Evaluation
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
The post-admission physician evaluation documentation requirement, previously required
pursuant to 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(ii), was removed in the FY 2021 IRF PPS Final Rule
(85 FR 48424). However, the history and physical is still required under the Conditions
of Participation at 42 CFR § 482.24(c)(4)(i)(A).
110.1.3 - Required Individualized Overall Plan of Care
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
In accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(ii), information from the preadmission
screening and other information garnered from the assessments of all therapy disciplines
involved in treating the patient and other pertinent clinicians, must be synthesized by a
rehabilitation physician to support a documented overall plan of care. The overall plan of
care should generally detail the patient’s medical prognosis and the anticipated
interventions, functional outcomes, and discharge destination from the IRF stay, thereby
supporting the medical necessity of the admission. The anticipated interventions detailed
in the overall plan of care should generally include the expected intensity (meaning
number of hours per day), frequency (meaning number of days per week), and duration
(meaning the total number of days during the IRF stay) of physical, occupational, speech-
language pathology, and prosthetic/orthotic therapies required by the patient during the
IRF stay. These expectations for the patient’s course of treatment should generally be
based on consideration of the patient’s impairments, functional status, complicating
conditions, and any other contributing factors.
Whereas the individual assessments of appropriate clinical staff will contribute to the
information contained in the overall plan of care, the rehabilitation physician is
responsible (in accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(ii)) for developing the overall
plan of care with input from the interdisciplinary team.
In accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(ii), in order for the IRF admission to be
considered reasonable and necessary, the overall plan of care must be completed within
the first 4 days of the IRF admission; it must support the determination that the IRF
admission is reasonable and necessary; and it must be retained in the patient’s medical
record at the IRF.
While CMS believes that it may be good practice to conduct the first interdisciplinary
team meeting within the first 4 days of admission to develop the overall individualized
plan of care, CMS believes that there may be other ways of developing the overall
individualized plan of care. Thus, IRFs may develop this required documentation using
whatever internal processes they believe are most appropriate, provided that the
documentation fulfills all relevant regulatory requirements.

110.1.4 - Required Admission Orders
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
At the time that each Medicare Part A fee-for-service patient is admitted to an IRF, a
physician must generate admission orders for the patient's care as per the requirements at
42 CFR § 482.12(c)(2), § 482.24(c), and § 412.3. These admission orders should
generally be retained in the patient’s medical record at the IRF.
110.1.5 - Required Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Patient Assessment
Instrument (IRF-PAI)
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
As per the requirements at 42 CFR § 412.606(b), the IRF patient assessment instrument
(IRF-PAI) forms should generally be included in the patient’s medical record at the IRF
(either in electronic or paper format).
110.2 - Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility Medical Necessity Criteria
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
In order for IRF care to be considered reasonable and necessary, the documentation in the
patient’s IRF medical record (which must include the preadmission screening described
in section 110.1.1, the overall plan of care described in section 110.1.3, and the admission
orders described in section 110.1.4) must demonstrate a reasonable expectation that the
following criteria were met at the time of admission to the IRF. Certain exceptions to
these requirements may apply due to conditions arising during the Public Health
Emergency defined in 42 CFR § 400.200. These exceptions are described further in
Section 110.2.6 of this manual.
1. 	The patient must require the active and ongoing therapeutic intervention of
multiple therapy disciplines (physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech-
language pathology, or prosthetics/orthotics), one of which must be physical or
occupational therapy.
2. 	The patient must generally require an intensive rehabilitation therapy program, as
defined in section 110.2.2. Under current industry standards, this intensive
rehabilitation therapy program generally consists of at least 3 hours of therapy per
day at least 5 days per week. In certain well-documented cases, this intensive
rehabilitation therapy program might instead consist of at least 15 hours of
intensive rehabilitation therapy within a 7 consecutive calendar day period,
beginning with the date of admission to the IRF.
3. 	The patient must reasonably be expected to actively participate in, and benefit
significantly from, the intensive rehabilitation therapy program that is defined in
section 110.2.2 at the time of admission to the IRF. The patient can only be
expected to benefit significantly from the intensive rehabilitation therapy program
if the patient’s condition and functional status are such that the patient can
reasonably be expected to make measurable improvement (that will be of
practical value to improve the patient’s functional capacity or adaptation to

impairments) as a result of the rehabilitation treatment, as defined in section
110.3, and if such improvement can be expected to be made within a prescribed
period of time. The patient need not be expected to achieve complete
independence in the domain of self-care nor be expected to return to his or her
prior level of functioning in order to meet this standard.
4. 	The patient must require physician supervision by a rehabilitation physician,
defined as a licensed physician who is determined by the IRF to have specialized
training and experience in inpatient rehabilitation. The requirement for medical
supervision means that the rehabilitation physician must conduct face-to-face
visits with the patient at least 3 days per week throughout the patient’s stay in the
IRF to assess the patient both medically and functionally, as well as to modify the
course of treatment as needed to maximize the patient’s capacity to benefit from
the rehabilitation process. Beginning with the second week of admission to the
IRF, a non-physician practitioner who is determined by the IRF to have
specialized training and experience in inpatient rehabilitation may conduct 1of
the 3 required face-to-face visits with the patient per week, provided that such
duties are within the non-physician practitioner’s scope of practice under
applicable state law. In the first week of the patient’s IRF stay, the rehabilitation
physician is required to visit the patients a minimum of three times to ensure that
the patient’s plan of care is fully established and optimized to the patient’s care
needs in the IRF. For the second, third, fourth weeks of the stay, and beyond,
CMS will continue to require Medicare fee-for-services beneficiaries in the IRFs
to receive a minimum of three rehabilitation physician visits per week, but will
allow non-physician practitioners to independently conduct one of these three
minimum require visits per week.
5. 	The patient must require an intensive and coordinated interdisciplinary approach
to providing rehabilitation, as defined in section 110.2.5.
110.2.1 - Multiple Therapy Disciplines
(Rev. 112, Issued: 10-23-09, Effective: 01-01-10, Implementation: 01-04-10)
A primary distinction between the IRF environment and other rehabilitation settings is
the interdisciplinary approach to providing rehabilitation therapy services in an IRF.
Patients requiring only one discipline of therapy would not need this interdisciplinary
approach to care. For this reason, the information in the patient’s IRF medical record
(especially the required documentation described in section 110.1) must document a
reasonable expectation that, at the time of admission to the IRF, the patient required the
active and ongoing therapeutic intervention of multiple therapy disciplines (physical
therapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, or prosthetics/orthotics), one
of which must be physical or occupational therapy.
110.2.2 - Intensive Level of Rehabilitation Services
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)

A primary distinction between the IRF environment and other rehabilitation settings is
the intensity of rehabilitation therapy services provided in an IRF. For this reason, the
information in the patient’s IRF medical record (especially the required documentation
described in section 110.1) must document a reasonable expectation that at the time of
admission to the IRF the patient generally required the intensive rehabilitation therapy
services that are uniquely provided in IRFs. Although the intensity of rehabilitation
services can be reflected in various ways, the generally-accepted standard by which the
intensity of these services is typically demonstrated in IRFs is by the provision of
intensive therapies at least 3 hours per day at least 5 days per week. However, this is not
the only way that such intensity of services can be demonstrated (that is, CMS does not
intend for this measure to be used as a “rule of thumb” for determining whether a
particular IRF claim is reasonable and necessary).
The intensity of therapy services provided in IRFs could also be demonstrated by the
provision of 15 hours of therapy per week (that is, in a 7-consecutive calendar day period
starting from the date of admission). For example, if a hypothetical IRF patient was
admitted to an IRF for a hip fracture, but was also undergoing chemotherapy for an
unrelated issue, the patient might not be able to tolerate therapy on a predictable basis due
to the chemotherapy. Thus, this hypothetical patient might be more effectively served by
the provision of 4 hours of therapy 3 days per week and 1 ½ hours of therapy on 2 (or
more) other days per week in order to accommodate his or her chemotherapy schedule.
Thus, IRFs may also demonstrate a patient’s need for intensive rehabilitation therapy
services by showing that the patient required and could reasonably be expected to benefit
from at least 15 hours of therapy per week (defined as a 7-consecutve calendar day
period starting from the date of admission), as long as the reasons for the patient’s need
for this program of intensive rehabilitation are well-documented in the patient’s IRF
medical record and the overall amount of therapy can reasonably be expected to benefit
the patient. Many IRF patients will medically benefit from more than 3 hours of therapy
per day or more than 15 hours of therapy per week, when all types of therapy are
considered. However, the intensity of therapy provided must be reasonable and
necessary under section 1862(a)(1)(A) of the Act and must never exceed the patient’s
level of need or tolerance, or compromise the patient’s safety. See below for a brief
exceptions policy for temporary and unexpected events.
In accordance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(3)(ii), the required therapy treatments must
begin within 36 hours from midnight of the day of admission to the IRF. Therapy
evaluations are generally considered to constitute the beginning of the required therapy
services. As such, they should generally be included in the total daily/weekly provision
of therapies used to demonstrate the intensity of therapy services provided in an IRF.
The standard of care for IRF patients is individualized (i.e., one-on-one) therapy. Group
therapies serve as an adjunct to individual therapies. In those instances in which group
therapy better meets the patient’s needs on a limited basis, the situation/rationale that
justifies group therapy should be specified in the patient’s medical record at the IRF.
Brief Exceptions Policy - While patients requiring an IRF stay are expected to need and
receive an intensive rehabilitation therapy program, as described above, this may not be

true for a limited number of days during a patient’s IRF stay because patients’ needs vary
over time. For example, if an unexpected clinical event occurs during the course of a
patient’s IRF stay that limits the patient’s ability to participate in the intensive therapy
program for a brief period not to exceed 3 consecutive days (e.g., extensive diagnostic
tests off premises, prolonged intravenous infusion of chemotherapy or blood products,
bed rest due to signs of deep vein thrombosis, exhaustion due to recent ambulance
transportation, surgical procedure, etc.), the specific reasons for the break in the provision
of therapy services should generally be documented in the patient’s IRF medical record.
If these reasons are appropriately documented in the patient’s IRF medical record, such a
break in service (of limited duration) should generally not affect the determination of the
medical necessity of the IRF admission. Thus, A/B MACs (A) may consider approving
brief exceptions to the intensity of therapy requirement in these particular cases if they
determine that the initial expectation of the patient’s active participation in intensive
therapy during the IRF stay was based on a diligent preadmission screening, post-
admission physician evaluation, and overall plan of care that were based on reasonable
conclusions.
110.2.3 - Ability to Actively Participate in Intensive Rehabilitation
Therapy Program
(Rev. 112, Issued: 10-23-09, Effective: 01-01-10, Implementation: 01-04-10)
The information in the patient’s IRF medical record (especially the required
documentation described in section 110.1) must document a reasonable expectation that
at the time of admission to the IRF the patient’s condition is such that the patient can
reasonably be expected to actively participate in, and significantly benefit from, the
intensive rehabilitation therapy program that is defined in section 110.2.2.
110.2.4 - Physician Supervision
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
A primary distinction between the IRF environment and other rehabilitation settings is
the high level of physician supervision that accompanies the provision of intensive
rehabilitation therapy services. For this reason, the information in the patient’s IRF
medical record (especially the required documentation described in section 110.1) must
document a reasonable expectation that at the time of admission to the IRF the patient’s
medical management and rehabilitation needs require an inpatient stay and close
physician involvement. Close physician involvement in the patient’s care is
demonstrated by documented face-to-face visits from a rehabilitation physician at least 3
days per week throughout the patient’s IRF stay. Beginning with the second week of
admission to the IRF, a non-physician practitioner who is determined by the IRF to have
specialized training and experience in inpatient rehabilitation may conduct 1 of the 3
required face-to-face visits with the patient per week, provided that such duties are within
the non-physician practitioner’s scope of practice under applicable state law. In the first
week of the patient’s IRF stay, the rehabilitation physician is required to visit patients a
minimum of three times to ensure that the patient’s plan of care is fully established and
optimized to the patient’s care needs in the IRF. In the second, third, fourth weeks of the

stay, and beyond, CMS will continue to require Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries in
IRFs to receive a minimum of three rehabilitation physician visits per week, but will
allow non-physician practitioners to independently conduct one of these three minimum
required visits per week.
The purpose of the face-to-face visits is to assess the patient both medically and
functionally (with an emphasis on the important interactions between the patient’s
medical and functional goals and progress), as well as to modify the course of treatment
as needed to maximize the patient’s capacity to benefit from the rehabilitation process.
Other physician specialties may treat and visit the patient, as needed, more often than 3
days per week. However, the requirement for IRF physician supervision is intended to
ensure that IRF patients receive more comprehensive assessments of their functional
goals and progress, in light of their medical conditions, by a rehabilitation physician who
is determined by the IRF to have specialized training and experience in inpatient
rehabilitation at least 3 times per week. The required rehabilitation physician and non-
physician practitioner visits should generally be documented in the patient’s medical
record at the IRF per the requirements at 42 CFR § 482.24(4)(c)(vi).
110.2.5 - Interdisciplinary Team Approach to the Delivery of Care
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
An IRF stay will only be considered reasonable and necessary if at the time of admission
to the IRF the documentation in the patient’s IRF medical record indicates a reasonable
expectation that the complexity of the patient’s nursing, medical management, and
rehabilitation needs requires an inpatient stay and an interdisciplinary team approach to
the delivery of rehabilitation care. That is, the complexity of the patient’s condition must
be such that the rehabilitation goals indicated in the preadmission screening, and the
overall plan of care can only be achieved through periodic team conferences—at least
once a week—of an interdisciplinary team of medical professionals (as defined below).
Interdisciplinary services are those provided by a treatment team in which all of its
members participate in a coordinated effort to benefit the patient and the patient’s
significant others and caregivers. Interdisciplinary services, by definition, cannot be
provided by only one discipline. Though individual members of the interdisciplinary
team work within their own scopes of practice, each professional is also expected to
coordinate his or her efforts with team members of other specialties, as well as with the
patient and the patient’s significant others and caregivers. The purpose of the
interdisciplinary team is to foster frequent, structured, and documented communication
among disciplines to establish, prioritize, and achieve treatment goals.
In accordance with the requirements at 42 CFR 412.622(a)(5), at a minimum, the
interdisciplinary team must document participation by professionals from each of the
following disciplines (each of whom must have current knowledge of the patient as
documented in the medical record at the IRF):

• A rehabilitation physician who is determined by the IRF to have specialized
training and experience in inpatient rehabilitation;
• A registered nurse with specialized training or experience in rehabilitation;
• A social worker or a case manager (or both); and
• A licensed or certified therapist from each therapy discipline involved in treating
the patient.
The interdisciplinary team must be led by a rehabilitation physician either in person or
remotely via a mode of communication such as video or telephone conferencing, who is
responsible for making the final decisions regarding the patient’s treatment in the IRF.
This physician must document concurrence with all decisions made by the
interdisciplinary team at each meeting.
The periodic team conferences—held a minimum of once per week—must focus on:
Assessing the individual's progress towards the rehabilitation goals;
• Considering possible resolutions to any problems that could impede progress towards
the goals;
• Reassessing the validity of the rehabilitation goals previously established; and
• Monitoring and revising the treatment plan, as needed.
A team conference may be formal or informal; however, a review by the various team
members of each other's notes does not constitute a team conference. It is expected that
all treating professionals from the required disciplines will be at every meeting or, in the
infrequent case of an absence, be represented by another person of the same discipline
who has current knowledge of the patient. Documentation of each team conference
should generally include the names and professional designations of the participants in
the team conference. Signatures from participants of the interdisciplinary team meeting
are not required other than the rehabilitation physician’s concurrence as noted above.
The occurrence of the team conferences and the decisions made during such conferences,
such as those concerning discharge planning and the need for any adjustment in goals or
in the prescribed treatment program, must be recorded in the patient’s medical record in
the IRF. The focus of the review of this requirement will be on the accuracy and quality
of the information and decision-making, not on the internal processes used by the IRF in
conducting the team conferences.

110.2.6 – IRF Waivers and Flexibilities During the Public Health
Emergency for the COVID-19 Pandemic
(Rev. 10892; Issued: 08-06-21; Effective: 11-08-21; Implementation: 11-08-21)
Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) Flexibilities Issued on March 30, 2020
On March 30, 2020, CMS issued the interim final rule “Medicare and Medicaid
Programs; Policy and Regulatory Revisions in Response to the COVID-19 Public Health
Emergency” (CMS-1744-IFC). This interim final rule removed the IRF post-admission
physician evaluation requirement in 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(4)(ii) for all Medicare Part A
fee-for-service beneficiaries during the public health emergency (PHE) specified in 42
CFR 400.200. Thus, contractors shall not require documentation of post-admission
physician evaluations in the IRF medical records for Medicare Part A fee-for-service
beneficiaries during the PHE. As discussed in Section 110.1.2, CMS subsequently
removed the post-admission physician evaluation documentation requirement entirely
beginning with FY 2021 (e.g., for all IRF discharges beginning on or after October 1,
2020).
This interim final rule also revises the physician supervision requirement in 42 CFR §
412.622(a)(3)(iv) and § 412.29(e) to permit physician visits in the IRF required under
these provisions to be conducted via telehealth to safeguard the health and safety of
Medicare beneficiaries and the rehabilitation physicians treating them during the PHE.
Contractors shall allow rehabilitation physicians to use telehealth services as defined in
section 1834(m)(4)(F) of the Act to conduct the required 3 physician visits per week
during the PHE for the COVID-19 pandemic.
IRF Flexibilities Issued on April 30, 2020
On April 30, 2020, CMS issued the interim final rule “Medicare and Medicaid Programs,
Basic Health Program, and Exchanges; Additional Policy and Regulatory Revisions in
Response to the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency and Delay of Certain Reporting
Requirements for the Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program” (CMS-5531-
IFC). This interim final rule, codified at 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(3)(ii), waives the IRF “3-
hour rule” in accordance with section 3711(a) of the CARES Act.
As a result of the “3-hour rule” waiver, contractors shall not review Medicare Part A
fee-for-service beneficiaries admitted to IRFs during the PHE specified in section
1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act for compliance with 42 CFR § 412.622(a)(3)(ii).
That is, Medicare Part A fee-for-service beneficiaries admitted to IRFs during the PHE
do not need to receive at least 15 hours of intensive rehabilitation therapy per week. This
waiver applies to all patients admitted to IRFs during the PHE.
This interim final rule also modifies the IRF coverage and classification requirements in
42 CFR § 412.29(d), (e), (h), and (i) and § 412.622(a)(3)(i), (iii) – (iv), (4), and (5) for
the public health emergency (PHE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, when all of the
following criteria are satisfied at the time of admission to the IRF:

• 	Patient is admitted to a freestanding IRF solely to alleviate acute care hospital
bed capacity issues, and
• 	IRF is located in a state (or region, as applicable) that is experiencing a surge
during the Public Health Emergency, as defined in 42 CFR § 400.200.
The regulation at 42 CFR § 412.622(c), as amended by the April 30, 2020 interim final
rule, specifies that a “state (or region, as applicable) that is experiencing a surge” refers
to a state region that is in Phase 1 of the presidential “Guidelines for Opening Up
America Again” ((https://www.whitehouse.gov/openingamerica/), specifically, a state (or
region, as applicable) that satisfies all of the following, as determined by applicable
state and local officials:
1. 	All vulnerable individuals continue to shelter in place.
2. 	Individuals continue social distancing.
3. 	Individuals avoid socializing in groups of more than 10.
4. 	Non-essential travel is minimized.
5. 	Visits to senior living facilities and hospitals are prohibited.
6. 	Schools and organized youth activities remain closed.
The evolution of the Phase 1 criteria listed above are most likely to be clearly articulated
by a state’s governor. Further, contractors will need to be aware that there may not be a
clearly posted phase for a state or community that aligns with the presidential
“Guidelines for Opening Up America Again” cited at 42 CFR § 412.622(c).
Some of the criteria are likely to be in place across a number of phases, particularly the
criteria in (i), (ii), and (iii). An example of a more complicated criteria to apply is (iv).
Non-essential travel can still be minimized, even after stay at home orders are lifted in an
area to allow for additional access to health care services or to allow for additional
commerce (such as manufacturing) to improve the overall economic circumstances of a
region or state. There may also be circumstances where beach regions, which can
provide more ability for social distancing, of a state are reopening whereas more
concentrated population centers remain with higher restrictions. Thus, contractors
should apply the standard regionally, as applicable. Furthermore, schools and
organized youth activities may be closed simply because of the time of year (for instance,
during the summer months).
Additionally, contractors should recognize that, in some cases, states or regions can
move to Phase 2 or Phase 3 of the plan and then return to Phase 1 if they experience
another surge in cases.
In the April 30, 2020 interim final rule, CMS instructed freestanding IRFs to add the
letters “DS” to the end of their unique hospital patient identification numbers (the
numbers that identify the patients’ medical records in the IRF) to identify patients who
are being treated in a freestanding IRF hospital solely to alleviate inpatient bed capacity
in a state that is experiencing a surge during the PHE for the COVID-19 pandemic. The
modifier will be used to identify those patients for whom the requirements in 42 CFR §

412.622(a)(3)(i), (iii), (iv), (4) and (5) do not apply. Thus, contractors shall not review
freestanding IRF patient medical records that have “DS” at the end of their unique
hospital patient identifier numbers for meeting any of the following requirements:
• 	Needing at least 2 forms of therapy (one of which must be physical or
occupational therapy,
• 	Being sufficiently stable to tolerate the IRF intensive rehabilitation therapy
program,
• 	Requiring close medical supervision by a rehabilitation physician, as
demonstrated by at least 3 rehabilitation physician visits per week,
• 	Having a preadmission screening,
• 	Having an individualized overall plan of care, or
• 	Having an interdisciplinary approach to care, including weekly interdisciplinary
team meetings.
In addition, as noted at 85 FR 27573 contractors shall not include freestanding IRF
patient medical records that have “DS” at the end of their unique hospital patient
identifier numbers when reviewing whether the IRF meets the following coverage
requirements:
• 	Has in effect a preadmission screening procedure,
• 	Has in effect a procedure for ensuring that patients receive close medical
supervision by a physician,
• 	Has a plan of treatment for each patient, or
• 	Uses an interdisciplinary approach to care.
Contractors shall allow freestanding IRFs to be paid at the usual IRF prospective
payment amounts for these patients.
110.3 - Definition of Measurable Improvement
(Rev. 179, Issued: 01-14-14, Effective: 01-07-14, Implementation: 01-07-14)
A patient can only be expected to benefit significantly from an intensive rehabilitation
therapy program provided in an IRF, as required in section 110.2.3, if the patient’s IRF
medical record indicates a reasonable expectation that a measurable, practical
improvement in the patient’s functional condition can be accomplished within a
predetermined and reasonable period of time. In general, the goal of IRF treatment is to
enable the patient’s safe return to the home or community-based environment upon
discharge from the IRF. The patient’s IRF medical record is expected to indicate both the
nature and degree of expected improvement and the expected length of time to achieve
the improvement.
Since discharge planning is an integral part of any rehabilitation program and must begin
upon the patient’s admission to the IRF, an extended period of time for discharge from
the IRF would not be reasonable and necessary after established goals have been reached
or the determination has been made that further progress is unlikely.

For an IRF stay to be considered reasonable and necessary, the patient does not have to
be expected to achieve complete independence in the domain of self-care or return to his
or her prior level of functioning. However, to justify the need for a continued IRF stay,
the documentation in the IRF medical record must demonstrate the patient’s ongoing
requirement for an intensive level of rehabilitation services (as defined in section 110.2.1)
and an inter-disciplinary team approach to care (as defined in section 110.2.2). Further,
the IRF medical record must also demonstrate that the patient is making functional
improvements that are ongoing and sustainable, as well as of practical value, measured
against his/her condition at the start of treatment. Since in most instances the goal of an
IRF stay is to enable a patient’s safe return to the home or community-based environment
upon discharge, the patient’s treatment goals and achievements during an IRF admission
are expected to reflect significant and timely progress toward this end result. During
most IRF stays, therefore, the emphasis of therapies would generally shift from
traditional, patient-centered therapeutic services to patient/caregiver education, durable
medical equipment training, and other similar therapies that prepare the patient for a safe
discharge to the home or community-based environment.
CMS notes that as evidenced by the criteria established above, an IRF claim could never
be denied for the following reasons: (1) because a patient could not be expected to
achieve complete independence in the domain of self-care or (2) because a patient could
not be expected to return to his or her prior level of functioning.
120 - Services Related to and Required as a Result of Services Which
Are Not Covered Under Medicare
(Rev. 189, Issued: 06-27-14, Effective: 05-30-14, Implementation: 06-29-14)
Medical and hospital services are sometimes required to treat a condition that arises as a
result of services that are not covered because they are determined to be not reasonable
and necessary or because they are excluded from coverage for other reasons. Services
"related to" non-covered services (e.g., cosmetic surgery, non-covered organ transplants,
non-covered artificial organ implants, etc.), including services related to follow-up care
and complications of non-covered services which require treatment during a hospital stay
in which the non-covered service was performed, are not covered services under
Medicare. Services "not related to" non-covered services are covered under Medicare.
Following are examples of services "related to" and "not related to" non-covered services
while the beneficiary is an inpatient:
• 	A beneficiary was hospitalized for a non-covered service and broke a leg
while in the hospital. Services related to care of the broken leg during this
stay is a clear example of "not related to" services and are covered under
Medicare.
• 	A beneficiary was admitted to the hospital for covered services, but during the
course of hospitalization became a candidate for a non-covered transplant or

implant and actually received the transplant or implant during that hospital
stay. When the original admission was entirely unrelated to the diagnosis that
led to a recommendation for a non-covered transplant or implant, the services
related to the admitting condition would be covered.
• 	A beneficiary was admitted to the hospital for covered services related to a
condition which ultimately led to identification of a need for transplant and
receipt of a transplant during the same hospital stay. If, on the basis of the
nature of the services and a comparison of the date they are received with the
date on which the beneficiary is identified as a transplant candidate, the
services could reasonably be attributed to preparation for the non-covered
transplant, the services would be "related to" non-covered services and would
also be non-covered.
Following is an example of services received subsequent to a non-covered inpatient stay:
After a beneficiary has been discharged from the hospital stay in which the beneficiary
received non-covered services, medical and hospital services required to treat a condition
or complication that arises as a result of the prior non-covered services may be covered
when they are reasonable and necessary in all other respects. Thus, coverage could be
provided for subsequent inpatient stays or outpatient treatment ordinarily covered by
Medicare, even if the need for treatment arose because of a previous non-covered
procedure. Some examples of services that may be found to be covered under this policy
are the reversal of intestinal bypass surgery for obesity, complications from cosmetic
surgery, removal of a non-covered bladder stimulator, or treatment of any infection at the
surgical site of a non-covered transplant that occurred following discharge from the
hospital.
However, any subsequent services that could be expected to have been incorporated into
a global fee are not covered. Thus, where a patient undergoes cosmetic surgery and the
treatment regimen calls for a series of postoperative visits to the surgeon for evaluating
the patient's progress, these visits are not covered.
130 – Religious Nonmedical Health Care Institution (RNHCI) Services
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
Section 1821 of the Social Security Act provides for coverage of services furnished in a
Medicare qualified religious nonmedical health care institution (RNHCI), when the
beneficiary meets specific coverage conditions. The beneficiary must have a valid
election for RNHCI services and would otherwise qualify for care in a conventional
hospital or post hospital extended care facility that was not a religious nonmedical health
care institution.
The RNHCI benefit provides only for Part A inpatient services. The Medicare program
will only pay for nonmedical health care services furnished in RNHCIs, as defined in
Section 1861(ss)(1) of the Act and 42 CFR 403 Subpart G. The program does not pay for

supporting religious services or payment for the religious practitioner. The cost of
religious items/services and the cost of using a religious practitioner is a personal
financial responsibility and not covered by Medicare.
130.1 – Beneficiary Eligibility for RNHCI Services
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
A beneficiary may elect to receive care in an RNHCI based on his or her own religious
convictions or to revoke that election at any time if for any reason he or she decides to
pursue medical care. Section 1821(a) of the Act requires that as a condition for Part A
Medicare coverage, the beneficiary must have a condition that would qualify under
Medicare Part A for inpatient hospital services or extended care services furnished in a
hospital or skilled nursing facility that is not an RNHCI if it were not for their religious
convictions.
When a beneficiary has an effective election on file with CMS but does not have a
condition that would qualify for Medicare Part A inpatient hospital or posthospital
extended care services if the beneficiary were an inpatient of a hospital or a resident of a
SNF that is not an RNHCI, then services furnished in an RNHCI are not covered by
Medicare. A Medicare claim for services that were furnished to that beneficiary would
be treated as a claim for noncovered services. If the beneficiary only needs assistance
with activities of daily living, then the beneficiary's condition could not be considered as
meeting the Medicare Part A requirements. Prior to submitting a claim to Medicare it is
the responsibility of the RNHCI’s utilization review committee to determine that the
beneficiary meets the Medicare Part A requirements.
If no valid election is filed or the election has been revoked and no new election is in
effect, the beneficiary does not have Medicare coverage for services furnished in an
RNHCI. Consequently, a Medicare claim for services furnished to such a beneficiary
would also be treated as a claim for noncovered services.
In those cases where a beneficiary is admitted to an RNHCI with a valid election, the
submission of prior claim for medical services to the Common Working File will revoke
the election during the course of the RNHCI stay. If this is the first revocation, the
beneficiary may make a new election without any disruption to the benefit. If this,
however, is the second or subsequent revocation, the applicable waiting period applies
and the remainder of the stay is not covered by Medicare (see 130.2.2).
130.2 – Election of RNHCI Benefits
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
For an RNHCI to receive payment under the Medicare program, the beneficiary must
make a written election to receive benefits under §1821 of the Act. To elect religious
nonmedical health care services, the beneficiary or the beneficiary’s legal representative
must attest that the individual is conscientiously opposed to acceptance of nonexcepted

medical treatment, and the individual’s acceptance of such treatment would be
inconsistent with the individual’s sincere religious beliefs.
Religious non-medical care or religious method of healing means health care furnished
under established religious tenets that prohibit conventional or unconventional medical
care for the treatment of a beneficiary, and the sole reliance on these religious tenets to
fulfill a beneficiary's total health care needs.
Medical care or treatment means health care furnished by or under the direction of a
licensed physician that can involve diagnosing, treating, or preventing disease and other
damage to the mind and body. It may involve the use of pharmaceuticals, diet, exercise,
surgical intervention, and technical procedures.
The signed and notarized election must include a statement that the receipt of
nonexcepted medical services would constitute a revocation of the election and may limit
further receipt of payment of religious nonmedical health care services. The election is
effective on the date it is signed, and it remains in effect until revoked in writing or by the
receipt and filing of a claim for nonexcepted medical treatment.
The completed election form must be filed with the specialty contractor, a copy retained
by the RNHCI provider and a copy provided to the beneficiary. See Pub. 100-04,
Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 3, Section 170 for instructions on
submission of elections to the specialty contractor.
Section 1821 defines “excepted” medical treatment as medical care or treatment that is
received involuntarily or is required under Federal, State or local law. The term is
intended to identify the kinds of medical services that can be provided to a beneficiary
with an election for RNHCI services without revoking the election.
Examples of excepted medical care include, but are not limited to the following:
• A beneficiary that receives vaccinations required by a State or local jurisdiction.
This is compliant behavior to meet government requirements and not considered as
voluntarily seeking medical care or services; or
• A beneficiary who is involved in an accident and receives medical attention at the
accident scene, or in transport to the hospital, or at the hospital before being able to
make their beliefs and wishes known; or
• A beneficiary who is unconscious and receives emergency care and is hospitalized
before 	regaining 	consciousness 	or 	being 	able 	to 	locate 	his 	or 	her 	legal
representative.
“Nonexcepted” medical treatment is defined as medical care or treatment other than
excepted medical treatment. The term is intended to define the kinds of medical services

that, if received by a beneficiary who has previously elected RNHCI services, would
revoke the individual's election of services.
Examples of nonexcepted medical care could include but are not limited to the following:
• 	A beneficiary receiving medical diagnosis and/or treatment for persistent headaches
and/or chest pains.
• 	A beneficiary in an RNHCI who is transferring to a community hospital to have
radiological studies and the reduction of a fracture.
• 	A beneficiary with intractable back pain receiving medical, surgical, or chiropractic
services.
• 	A beneficiary who has requested a physician to prescribe a wheelchair or other
durable medical equipment item.
Note that the terms ‘excepted’ and ‘nonexcepted’ care represent mutually exclusive
conditions under §1821 of the Social Security Act. Medicare contractors may use the
examples above in making determinations of excepted and nonexcepted care.
130.2.1 - Revocation of RNHCI Election
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
Revocation is the cancellation of the RNHCI election and can be achieved in two ways:
either by submitting a written statement to the intermediary indicating the desire to cancel
the election or by seeking nonexcepted medical care for which Medicare payment is
sought.
See Pub. 100-04, Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 3, Section 170 for
instructions on submission of revocations to the specialty contractor. See section 180 of
that manual for a description of how Medicare non-specialty contractors revoke elections
upon billing for nonexcepted services.
130.2.2 - RNHCI Election After Prior Revocation
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
After an initial revocation, the individual may again file a written election to receive the
religious nonmedical health care benefit. This second election takes effect immediately
upon its execution. If an individual revokes a second election, the next (third) election
cannot become effective until 1 year after the date of the most recent revocation.
Subsequent elections are not effective until 5 years after the most recent revocation. Once
an election is revoked, Medicare payment cannot be made to an RNHCI unless a valid
election is filed. The RNHCI revocation does not interfere with the beneficiary’s ability
to seek other Medicare services within the limits of his/her Medicare coverage.

130.3 - Medicare Payment for RNHCI Services and Beneficiary
Liability
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
Medicare pays for RNHCI services under TEFRA payment rules (see Pub. 15-2, Provider
Reimbursement Manual, chapter 30). RNHCI services are subject to the inpatient
hospital cash deductible, when applicable. If services are for the 61 st through 90th day of
a benefit period or are for lifetime reserve days, RNHCI services are subject to
coinsurance (see Pub. 100-01, Medicare General Information, Eligibility and Entitlement
Manual, Chapter 3, Sections 10.1 and 10.2).
Under normal Medicare rules, a provider of services may only bill a beneficiary
deductible and coinsurance amounts. However, total Medicare payments to RNHCIs are
subject to limits established in sections 1821(c)(2) (A) or (B) of the Act. In the event that
the Medicare program reduces payments to RNHCIs based on these limits, RNHCIs may
also bill beneficiaries an amount equal to any such reduction.
130.4 - Coverage of RNHCI Items Furnished in the Home
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
Prior to the passage of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization
Act (MMA) of 2003, the Medicare program’s RNHCI benefit was limited to inpatient
services provided in an RNHCI facility. The MMA revised sections 1821(a) and 1861 of
the Social Security Act to extend coverage to RNHCI items and services that are
provided in a beneficiary’s home and that are comparable to items and services provided
by a home health agency that is not an RNHCI.
Beneficiaries elect the RNHCI benefit if they are conscientiously opposed to accepting
most medical treatment, since accepting such services would be inconsistent with their
sincere religious beliefs. The Medicare home health benefit provides skilled nursing,
physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech language pathology and home health aide
services to eligible beneficiaries under a physician’s plan of care. The home health
benefit also provides medical supplies, a covered osteoporosis drug and durable medical
equipment (DME) while under a plan of care (see chapter 7).
Medicare covers specified durable medical equipment and intermittent RNHCI nursing
visits provided in the home to RNHCI beneficiaries. These services comprise the RNHCI
home benefit. The remainder of the services covered under the Medicare home health
benefit are medical in nature and must be provided under the order of a physician. As
such, these services conflict with RNHCI beneficiaries’ conscientious opposition to
medical care.
The RNHCI home benefit must exclude the same services that are excluded from the
home health benefit, which include: drugs and biologicals; transportation; services that
would not be covered as inpatient services; housekeeping services; services covered
under the End Stage Renal Disease program; prosthetic devices; and medical social

services provided to family members. These exclusions are defined at 42 CFR 409.49.
Additionally, the RNHCI home benefit excludes the items or services provided by any
HHA that is not an RNHCI; or any supplier, independent RNHCI nurse or aide that is
working directly for a beneficiary rather than under arrangements with the RNHCI.
Medicare requires a brief letter of intent from the provider in order to determine the
number of RNHCIs that will be implementing the home service benefit.
In the case where an RNHCI chooses to provide home services then only care on an
intermittent basis, which is provided to an eligible beneficiary who is confined to their
home for health reasons, will be covered under the home benefit. The home benefit is not
to be confused with hospice care, which may involve more frequent visits and can
involve institutional services. If for some reason the home serviced patient requires more
than intermittent service, then institutional services may be required. However, the
patient would need to meet the criteria for admission to a RNHCI, or the patient would
require another institutional setting not necessarily covered by Medicare.
Similar to the inpatient RNHCI benefit, the physician role in certifying and ordering the
home benefit is replaced with the use of the RNHCI utilization review committee to
review the need for care and plan for initial and continued care in the home setting. The
home benefit will also require a prompt review of admission to the home service, since
the patient must be fully eligible (have a health condition that keeps them confined to the
home (42CFR409.42(a), have health needs that can be met with intermittent care, and
have a valid election) before billable services can be rendered and Medicare payment
requested. Additionally the utilization review committee is responsible for review and
approval of care plans and orders for DME items, and review of the need for the
continuation of services.
As in the original RNHCI benefit, Medicare will only pay for nonmedical services in the
home, but not for those religious items or services provided by the RNHCI.
Medicare covers these items and services for dates of service from January 1, 2005
through December 30, 2006. 	Total Medicare payments under this benefit for each
calendar year during this period are limited to $700,000.
130.4.1 - Coverage and Payment of Durable Medical Equipment Under
the RNHCI Home Benefit
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
Medicare covers a defined list of nonmedical DME items for RNHCI home services that
are comparable to items used in the inpatient RNHCI setting and could be provided by an
HHA. The DME items include canes, crutches, walkers, commodes, a standard
wheelchair, hospital beds, bedpans, and urinals. Those RNHCIs offering home services
may order these items without a physician order and without compromising the
beneficiary election for RNHCI care. The need for each item of DME ordered must be
supported by the RNHCI patient’s plan of care for the home setting and the RNHCI

nurses’ notes for home services. It must be noted that the benefit is applicable only to
what we shall refer to as “nonmedical DME items” and does not include any of the
related services provided by RNHCI staff members.
The RNHCI shall establish a payment arrangement with one or more DME suppliers to
obtain any of the items on the DME list (below) they may require for a beneficiary. The
supplier will provide the items and related instructions on use to the
beneficiary/family/care giver. The RNHCI will submit claims for these DME items to
the RNHCI specialty FI.
The RNHCI must stress to suppliers that DME claims are not to be submitted to the
DMERC because this will cause the beneficiary’s election for RNHCI care to be revoked.
DME Items and HCPCS Codes for use by RNHCI Home Service Units Canes
E0100 Cane, includes canes of all materials, adjustable or fixed, with tip
E0105 Cane, quad or three prong, includes canes of all materials, adjustable or fixed with
tip
Crutches
E0112 Crutches, underarm, wood, adjustable or fixed, pair, with pads, tips and handgrips
E0113 Crutch underarm, wood, adjustable or fixed, pair, with pad, tip and handgrip
E0114 Crutches, underarm, other than wood, adjustable or fixed, pair, with pads, tips and
handgrips
E0116 Crutch underarm, other than wood, adjustable or fixed, with pad, tip and handgrip
Walkers
E0130 Walker, rigid (pickup), adjustable or fixed height
E0135 Walker, folding (pickup), adjustable or fixed height
E0141 Walker, rigid, wheeled, adjustable or fixed height
E0143 Walker, folding, wheeled, adjustable or fixed height
Commodes
E0163 Commode chair, stationary, with fixed arms
E0167 Pail or pan for use with commode chair

Wheelchairs
K0001 Standard wheelchair
Hospital Beds & Accessories
E0250 Hospital bed, fixed height, with any type side rails, with mattress
E0255 Hospital bed, variable height, hi-lo, with any type side rails, with mattress
E0260 Hospital bed, semi-electric (head and foot adjustment), with any type side rails,
with mattress
E0275 Bed pan, standard, metal or plastic
E0276 Bed pan, fracture, metal or plastic
E0290 Hospital bed, fixed height, without side rails, with mattress
E0292 Hospital bed, variable height, hi-lo, without side rails, with mattress
E0325 Urinal; male, jug-type, any material
E0326 Urinal; female, jug-type, any material
Payment to RNHCIs for these specified DME items will be made based on the DME fee
schedule. Coinsurance applies to these items. Deductible does not apply to these items.
130.4.2 - Coverage and Payment of Home Visits Under the RNHCI
Home Benefit
(Rev. 45, Issued: 02-10-06; Effective: 05-11-06;Implementation: 05-11-06)
Medicare covers intermittent RNHCI nursing visits provided in the home to RNHCI
beneficiaries. The RNHCI nursing personnel may be skilled in ministering to a
beneficiary’s religious needs (not covered by Medicare), but do not have the training or
nursing skill sets required of credentialed/licensed health care professionals (e.g.,
registered nurse). While RNHCI nurses may provide tender loving care, they are focused
primarily on religious healing and meeting basic beneficiary needs for assistance with
activities of daily living (e.g., bathing, toileting, dressing, ambulation), as part of creating
a milieu for religious healing. The care provided by an RNHCI nurse is not at the level
of either a registered nurse or a licensed practical nurse. The physical care provided by
an RNHCI nurse is at a level that could be considered as supportive, but decidedly not
“skilled” as defined by the Medicare program.

For purposes of payment for RNHCI nursing services in the home, the following services
are comparable to the services of HHAs that are not RNHCIs (e.g., the RNHCI nurse and
the home health aide share the following basic tasks):
• 	Assist with activities of daily living which include: ambulation, bed to
chair transfer, and assist with range of motion exercises; bathing,
shampoo, nail care and dressing; feeding and nutrition; and toileting;
• 	Light housekeeping, incident to visit
• 	Documenting visit
By comparison the home health aide will routinely perform additional medically oriented
services (e.g., observation and reporting of existing medical conditions, taking and
reporting vital signs, and using basic infection control procedures).
Due to the uniqueness of RNHCI nursing in the Medicare program, Medicare pays for
RNHCI nursing visits at a percentage of the HHAs “low utilization payment adjustment”
(LUPA) rate for home health aides. Only a visit by an RNHCI nurse to a home will be
considered as billable to Medicare. A visit is defined as an episode in which an RNHCI
nurse will render physical care to an RHNCI beneficiary in the home setting. The visit is
a single billable unit that is not influenced by the number of involved caregivers or the
duration of the episode. The difference in skill levels and the incorporation of RNHCI
religious activity (noncovered by Medicare) into a visit, resulted in a payment rate that is
80% of the home health aide rate adjusted by metropolitan service area (MSA) wage
index rate for the involved RNHCI.
RNHCI nursing visits are paid using the LUPA system even in situations where the
involved patient would not be classified as low utilization. The HHAs have moved to
PPS, which is constructed on the medical model and therefore inappropriate for RNHCI
use. The same “labor”/”non-labor” portions applied in the HHA PPS will be used for
calculating the RNHCI nursing visit payments.
Example of LUPA Payment: An RNHCI in Baltimore, MD, provides twelve RNHCI
nursing visits over the course of a 30 day period.
1. Home Health Aide Visit (National standardized rate for 2005) 	$44.76
2. RNHCI Nurse Visit ……………………………(.80 * $ 44.76) 	35.81
3. Calculate the labor portion of the Standardized
Budget Neutral Per-Visit Payment Amount for
1 RNHCI nurse visit……………………...…….(.76775 * $.35.81) 	27.49
4. Apply wage index factor for Baltimore, MD..…(.9907 * $ 27.49) 	27.23

5. Calculate the non-labor portion of the
Standardized Budget Neutral Per-Visit Payment
Amount for 1 RNHCI nurse visit……………….(.23225 * $ 35.81) 	8.32
6. Subtotal—Low Utilization Payment Adjustment
(LUPA) wage for 1 RNHCI nurse visit…………..($ 27.49 + $ 8.32) 	$35.55
7. Total - Calculate total Low Utilization Payment
Adjustment (LUPA) for 12 RNHCI nurse visits
provided during the 30-day episode … 	…………(12 * $ 35.55) 	$426.60
Step 1. Take the HHA aide visit base rate ($ 44. 76) for the involved year (2005), from
the HHA update published annually each November in the Federal Register.
Step 2. To calculate the RNHCI nurse visit base rate, multiply the HHA base rate ($
44.76) by the allowed percentage for an RNHCI nurse visit (.80%) to allow for
religious activity and reduced physical care skill level = ($ 35.81)
Step 3. To calculate the labor portion of the Standardized Budget Neutral Per-Visit
Payment Amount for 1 RNHCI nurse visit, multiply the fixed allowance .76775
by the RNHCI nurse visit rate ($ 35.81) = ($ 27.49)
Step 4. Apply the wage index for the involved MSA from the HHA update published
annually each November in the Federal Register (Baltimore, MD = .9907)
multiplied by the labor portion of the RNHCI nurse visit ($ 27.49) = ($27.23).
Step 5. To calculate the non-labor portion of the Standardized Budget Neutral Per-Visit
Payment Amount for 1 RNHCI nurse visit, multiply the fixed allowance .23225
by the RNHCI nurse visit rate ($ 35.81) = ($ 8.32)
Step 6. To calculate the LUPA rate for 1 RNHCI nurse visit add the products from Step 4
($27.49) and Step 5 ($ 8.32) = ($ 35.55)
Step 7. To calculate the LUPA payment for RNHCI nurse visits to one beneficiary in a 30
day period, multiply the product of Step 6 ($ 35.55) by the number of visits (12) = ($
426.60)

Transmittals Issued for this Chapter

Rev # 	Issue Date 	Subject 	Impl Date 	CR#
R10892BP 08/06/2021 	Internet Only Manual Updates to Publication
(Pub.) 100-02 to Implement Updates to
Policy and Correct Errors and Omissions
(Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF)
11/08/2021 12353
R234BP 	03/10/2017 	Clarification of Admission Order and
Medical Review Requirements
06/12/2017 9979
R232BP 	12/22/2016 	January 2017 Update of the Hospital
Outpatient Prospective Payment System
(OPPS)
01/03/2017 9930
R179BP 	01/14/2014 	Manual Updates to Clarify Skilled Nursing
Facility (SNF), Inpatient Rehabilitation
Facility (IRF), Home Health (HH), and
Outpatient (OPT) Coverage Pursuant to
Jimmo vs. Sebelius
01/07/2014 8458
R176BP 	12/13/2013 	Manual Updates to Clarify Skilled Nursing
Facility (SNF), Inpatient Rehabilitation
Facility (IRF), Home Health (HH), and
Outpatient (OPT) Coverage Pursuant to
Jimmo vs. Sebelius – Rescinded and replaced
by Transmittal 179
01/07/2014 8458
R119BP 	01/05/2010 	Coverage of Inpatient Rehabilitation Services 01/04/2010 6699
R112BP 	10/23/2009 	Coverage of Inpatient Rehabilitation Services
– Rescinded and replaced by Transmittal 119
01/04/2010 6699
R45BP 	02/10/2006 	Revisions to Instructions for Contractors
Other Than the Religious Nonmedical Health
Care Institution (RNHCI) Specialty
Contractor Regarding Claims for
Beneficiaries with RNHCI Elections
05/11/2006 4218
R25BP 	11/05/2004 	Implementation of Coverage of Religious
Nonmedical Health Care Institution (RNHCI)
Items and Services Furnished in the Home,
MMA section 706.
04/04/2005 3529

R1BP 	10/01/2003 	Introduction to the Benefit Policy Manual 	N/A 	N/A
Back to top of Chapter