us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-955475•HQ 955475: Classification of a gift bag made of plastic-coated paper
HQ 955475: Classification of a gift bag made of plastic-coated paper
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-955475HQ 955475: Classification of a gift bag made of plastic-coated paperGuidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 955475
February 25, 1994
CLA-2 CO:R:C:T 955475 BC
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 4819.40.0040
Richard J. Schultz, President
Plantation Design Group, Inc.
7410 Southwest Fourth Street
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33317
RE: Classification of a gift bag made of plastic-coated paper
Dear Mr. Schultz:
This responds to your letter of October 4, 1993, wherein you
requested a binding classification ruling for a gift bag made of
plastic-coated paper. You submitted a sample for our examination.
We have reviewed the matter and our decision follows.
FACTS:
The merchandise at issue, as represented by the sample, is a
flat-bottomed gift bag measuring 9.5 inches high by 7.5 inches
wide, with a 4.5 inch gusset. It is made of paper with a plastic
coating that provides a glossy surface. The paper has a plaid
pattern and the bag has two braided textile handles. These bags
are used by consumers who purchase them to package gifts, as an
alternative to wrapped boxes.
ISSUE:
What is the proper classification for the plastic-coated paper
gift bags at issue?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Classification under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) is governed by the General Rules of
Interpretation (GRI). GRI 1 provides that classification is
determined in accordance with the terms of the headings and any
relative section or chapter notes. Where goods cannot be
classified solely on the basis of GRI 1, the remaining rules will
be applied in sequential order.
Under GRI 1, classification in heading 4202, HTSUSA
(Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Annotated), is
suggested. That heading covers the following named articles and
similar containers:
Trunks, suitcases, vanity cases, attache cases,
briefcases, school satchels, spectacle cases, binocular
cases, camera cases, musical instrument cases, gun cases,
holsters and similar containers; travelling bags,
toiletry bags, knapsacks and backpacks, handbags,
shopping bags, wallets, purses, map cases, cigarette
cases, tobacco pouches, tool bags, sports bags, bottle
cases, jewelry boxes, powder cases, cutlery cases and
similar containers, of leather or of composition leather,
of plastic sheeting, of textile materials, of vulcanized
fiber or of paperboard, or wholly or mainly covered with
such materials or with paper.
It is arguable that the gift bag at issue is similar to a shopping
bag. It is constructed like many shopping bags, as evidenced by
the flat-bottomed shape and the braided textile handles. However,
we need not address this argument since the gift bag is excluded
from the heading on other grounds. The second part of heading
4202, HTSUSA (after the semicolon), provides that the articles of
that part, and similar containers, be made of certain named
materials, a list that does not include paper: leather, composition
leather, plastic sheeting, textile materials, vulcanized rubber,
and paperboard. The gift bag is made of paper (coated with
plastic), which, if imported in material form, would be classified
as paper in Chapter 48, HTSUSA. Since it is not made of the named
materials, the gift bag cannot be classified in heading 4202,
HTSUSA.
Another heading that is suggested for classification of the
gift bag is heading 4819, HTSUSA. This heading covers, among other
things, cartons, boxes, cases, bags and other packing containers,
of paper. Customs in the past has classified bags of the kind at
issue under heading 4819, HTSUSA. These bags were used for the
same purpose as the instant gift bags and evidenced the same
physical features, including plastic coated paper construction,
flat bottoms, and textile cord handles. (See New York Ruling
Letters 888004, dated July 14, 1993; 882749, dated March 15, 1993;
879382, dated October 23, 1992; 874235, dated June 24, 1992; and
869906, dated January 1, 1992.)
The Explanatory Notes (EN's) to the Harmonized Commodity
Description and Coding System constitute the official
interpretation of the nomenclature at the international level.
While not legally binding, they represent the considered views of
classification experts of the Harmonized System Committee. It has
been the practice of the Customs Service to follow, whenever
possible, the terms of the EN's when interpreting the HTSUS. In
Treasury Decision (T.D.) 89-80, Customs stated that the EN's should
always be consulted as guidance when classifying merchandise. (See
T.D. 89-80, quoting from a report of the Joint Committee on the
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988, endorsing use of the
EN's in the classification of goods. 23 Cust. Bull. 379 (1989),
54 Fed. Reg. 35,127 (August 23, 1989).) (See also Totes, Inc. v.
United States, No. 91-09-00714, slip op. 92-153 (CIT September 4,
1992), 26 Cust. Bull. No. 40, 35, 37 n. 3 (September 30, 1992),
citing T.D. 89-80 and acknowledging the authority of the EN's.)
The EN's for heading 48.19 provide the following concerning
the boxes, cartons, and bags of the heading: "This group covers
containers of various kinds and sizes generally used for the
packing, transport, storage or sale of merchandise, whether or not
also having a decorative value." (See the Harmonized Commodity
Description and Coding System, Vol. 2, p.685-86.) That the gift
bags at issue are used for packing purposes by consumers who
purchase them at retail does not exclude them from the heading's
coverage. The gift bags are in fact used to package merchandise;
they are used to package gifts. The EN's indicate the wide variety
of bags within the heading's scope by including various special
purpose bags, such as vacuum cleaner bags and bags for travel
sickness.
Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the gift bags at
issue are classified as bags for packaging under heading 4819,
HTSUSA.
HOLDING:
The plastic coated paper gift bags at issue are classifiable
under subheading 4819.40.0040, HTSUSA, which provides for "Cartons,
boxes, cases and other packing containers, of paper . . ., other
sacks and bags, including cones, other." The applicable rate of
duty is 5.3% ad valorem.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.