us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-544308•HQ 544308: Valuation
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 544308
May 5, 1989
CLA-2 CO:R:C:V 544308 DHS
CATEGORY: Valuation
Ann L. Newton
Fabrique de Fer de
Charleroi (USA), Inc.
88 Danbury Road
Wilton, Connecticut 06897
RE: Valuation
Dear Ms. Newton:
This is in reference to your letter of February 14, 1989,
regarding the valuation used by the Customs Service of imported
steel plates.
You state that your company purchases steel from a Danish
steel mill. The steel is manufactured in Denmark then shipped by
vessel directly from the mill on the Danish coast to various
European ports. The steel is then placed upon another vessel and
subsequently shipped to the United States. In a majority of
cases the bill of lading listing both vessels is dated when the
steel leaves Denmark.
At the present time, you allege that Customs is excluding
the freight costs incurred as a result of shipping the steel from
the mill to the European port as "foreign inland freight".
You inquire whether the freight charges are dutiable as an
addition to the transaction value as foreign inland freight or
whether the charges are excluded as international freight from
the "price actually paid or payable."
The information you have submitted is too general for us to
make a definitive determination on this issue. Consequently,
this letter is being treated as an information letter under
section 177.1(d)(2), Customs Regulations (19 CFR 177.1(d)(2)).
As provided in section 152.101, Customs Regulations (19 CFR
152.101), the primary basis of appraisement is transaction value.
Transaction value is defined as the "price actually paid or
payable" for imported merchandise when sold for exportation to
the United States. This is more specifically defined in section
402(b)(4)(A) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, (TAA; 19 U.S.C.
1401a(b)(4)(A), as the following:
The term "price actually paid or payable" means
the total payment (whether direct or indirect, and
- 2 -
exclusive of any costs, charges, or expenses
incurred for transportation, insurance, and
related services incident to the international
shipment of the merchandise from the country of
exportation to the place of importation in the
United States) made, or to be made, for imported
merchandise by the buyer to, or for the benefit
of, the seller. (emphasis added)
It is clear freight costs involved in the international
movement of merchandise from the country of exportation are to be
excluded from the dutiable value of imported merchandise
appraised using the transaction value basis. The expenses
related to foreign inland freight charges, however, are not
covered by this provision.
Section 152.103(a)(5), Customs Regulations (19 CFR
152.103(a)(5)), regarding foreign inland freight provides:
(i) If the price actually paid or payable by the
buyer to the seller for the imported merchandise
does not include a charge for foreign inland
freight and other charges for services incident to
the international shipment of the merchandise (an
ex-factory price), those charges will not be added
to the price.
(ii) ...Charges for foreign inland freight and
other services incident to the shipment of the
merchandise to the United States may be considered
incident to the international shipment of that
merchandise within the meaning of the price
actually paid or payable if they are identified
separately and they occur after the merchandise
has been sold for export to the United States and
placed with a carrier for through shipment to the
U.S..
Absent more detailed information regarding the ports
involved in the movement of the imported merchandise, we are
unable to make any additional comments regarding the dutiability
[A the transportation charges.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.