us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-113166•HQ 113166: Coastwise trade; salvage; 46 U.S.C. App 316(d), 19 CFR 4.97
HQ 113166: Coastwise trade; salvage; 46 U.S.C. App 316(d), 19 CFR 4.97
us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-113166HQ 113166: Coastwise trade; salvage; 46 U.S.C. App 316(d), 19 CFR 4.97Guidance
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 113166
July 21, 1994
VES-10-01-CO:R:IT:C 113166 BEW
CATEGORY: Carriers
Mr. Melvin Garrett
Vice President
Garrett Construction Co.
Post Office Box 9257
Corpus Christi, Texas 78469-9257
RE: Coastwise trade; salvage; 46 U.S.C. App 316(d), 19 CFR 4.97
Dear Mr. Garrett:
This is in response to your letters of July 15 and 19, 1994,
which request a ruling regarding the use of a foreign-flag vessel
in salvage operations relating to the M/V TEXAS EAGLE.
FACTS:
You state that on June 12, 1994, the M/V TEXAS EAGLE ran upon
rock jetties at Port Aransas, Texas. The next day she slid off
of the jetties and started sinking due to large holes in her
hull. She slowly moved south along the third sand bar in a
partially submerged state for approximately 600 yards completely
sinking. She is currently located in the surf zone on the second
sand bar. You state that you than contacted Aker Gulf Marine
concerning the salvage operation.
In your July 19, 1994, letter, you submitted the following chain
of events.
June 16, 1994 Contacted Bissio Marine about marine salvage
equipment. Rough seas, only work permitted was
cleaning loose debris from beach. All
preparations have been made for potential oil
spill.
June 17 and 18, 1994 Bad Weather no activity
June 19, 1994 Mobilized inland barge, and crane to M/V TEXAS
EAGLE. Started rigging and divers found that the
M/V TEXAS EAGLE was 1\2 full of sand. At this
point the 500 ton crane would break the boat in
1/2 if it tried to lift it. Returned to Port.
This was the first day of calm seas.
June 19, 1994 Put flashing navigation warning light on mast which
was 4 feet out of water.
June 20, 1994 Started fabrication of platform to be set up at
salvage site as work platform.
June 21, 1994 Drove and installed work platform at site (beside
M/V TEXAS EAGLE) set up a compressor and pumps on
platform.
June 22, 1994 Place sling on stern of M/V TEXAS EAGLE with use of
divers.
June 23, 1994 Went to site with divers. Weather too rough to work.
June 24, 1994 Took out diver to close engine room doors, but
excessive sand would not allow door to be closed.
June 25 - 29, 1994 Bad weather no activity.
June 30, 1994 Started air lifting sand from interior of boat
with 2 dive crews, working 24 hours per day.
July 1 and 2, 1994
Jetting sling under mid ship for lifting removing
sand from the interior.
July 3, 1994 Beautiful weather, flat seas. Time to lift and
Aker Gulf Marine crane superintendent determined
that he did not want his rig out in open water due
to heavy seas (his opinion only and influenced by
Holiday week-end).
July 4, 1994 No activity (no crane)
July 5, 1994 Contacted other large floating crane companys.
1. Ocean salvage - ANSWER: Approximately 3 weeks
will have machine passing area and if good weather
will pick up. But will not stop and wait for any
weather change.
2. Laredo Construction - ANSWER: Equipment out of
service 3 to 4 weeks.
3. King Fisher Marine - ANSWER: Does not have
required equipment.
4. Leroy Stanley - NO RESPONSE
July 06, 1994 No activity on site. Contacted Glenway and had
very positive response.
July 07, 1994 Negotiated contract for mob and demob and 3
consecutive days on site if required.
July 08, 1994 Signed contract with Glenway
July 10, 1994 Called out dive crews to clean out additional sand
in preparation of lift next day.
July 11, 1994 TITAN V, came in about 0630 and started preparing
for lift. U.S. Coast Guard told us that it would
be okay to carry the M/V TEXAS EAGLE in the slings
over to the north side of the north jetty to a
calm area for safety reasons. Mr. Frederickson
with Glenway called me and asked if I could get a
waiver in writing from the U.S.C.G. It was his
understanding that if he pulled up anchors while
the salvage was on the hook he would be violating
the Jones Act.
July 12, 1994 TITAN V came in Port due to weather and not having
a decision as to its legal ability to work inside
the 3-mile limit.
July 13, 1994 Entire day spent trying to find out legal measures
and correct interpretation of the Jones Act.
TITAN V still at our dock. Contact T $ T Marine -
answer: Not interested.
July 15, 1994 Duplicate of the 13th and contacted Bay
Construction about possible equipment.
July 16, 1994 Contacted Bissio Marine again and were informed
that they did not get message the fist time. They
said that they would come to look at it on the
19th or 20th and if they could do it, it would be
2 or 3 weeks before the work could start with
weather permitting. Contacted Ocean Salvage and
got the same answer about passing by in a couple
of weeks but not stoppling if seas were rough. No
firm date available. Bay construction looked at
site but would require more water depth for tug
than is available.
You further state that you presently have a boat out at the site
to change the warning light. The longer the M/V TEXAS EAGLE
remains at the surf line, she is subject to breaking up and
releasing the remaining oil on board. You state that she is a
not hazard to the shipping industry, but she is a hazard to small
boats and shrimp boats. Finally, you state that the kids on the
beach will continue to try to board her by means of using surf
boards to paddle out to the wreck location.
ISSUE:
Whether the use of a foreign-flag vessel within the territorial
waters of the United States for a salvaging operation is a
violation of U.S. coastwise laws.
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
Paragraph (d) of the Act of June 11, 1940, as amended (46 U.S.C.
App. 316(d)), provides, in pertinent part, that:
No foreign vessel shall, under penalty of
forfeiture, engage in salvaging operations on
the Atlantic or Pacific coast of the United
States, in any portion of the Great Lakes or
their connecting or tributary waters,
including any portion of the Saint Lawrence
River through which the international
boundary line extends, or in territorial
waters of the United States on the Gulf of
Mexico, except when authorized by a treaty or
in accordance with the provisions of [46
U.S.C. App. 725] of this title: Provided,
however, That if, on investigation, the
Secretary of the Treasury is satisfied that
no suitable vessel wholly owned by a person
who is a citizen of the United States and
documented under the laws of the United
States or numbered pursuant to section 288 of
this title, is available in any particular
locality he may authorize the use of a
foreign vessel or vessels in salvaging
operations in that locality and no penalty
shall be incurred for authorized use.
Similarly, Customs Regulations (19 CFR 4.97(a)) prohibit salvage
in the territorial waters of the U.S. by vessels other than a
vessel of the U.S., a numbered motorboat owned by a citizen,
Mexican or Canadian vessels as authorized by treaty, or a vessel
which has been granted special permission by the Commissioner of
Customs by virtue of the unavailability of a suitable U.S.
vessel.
Section 4.97(b), provides that upon receipt of an application,
the Commissioner of Customs will cause an investigation to be
made immediately to determine whether a suitable vessel of the
United States or a suitable numbered motorboat owned by a citizen
is available for the operation. If he finds that no such vessel
is available and that the facts otherwise warrant favorable
action, he will grant the application.
A copy of your correspondence was sent to the U.S. Coast Guard
Marine Safety Office, Corpus Christi, Texas, the Maritime
Administration, and the Customs office in Corpus Christi, Texas.
During the past several days, we have done an extensive
investigation of the facts and circumstances surrounding this
operation and have determined that there is not a suitable vessel
wholly owned by a person who is a citizen of the United States
and documented under the laws of the United States or numbered
pursuant to section 288 of this title available to do this
operation. Accordingly, we are authorizing the use of the TITAN
V, a Russian-flag vessel to perform the salvaging operation of
the M/V TEXAS EAGLE.
The coastwise laws pertaining to the transportation of
merchandise and passengers (46 U.S.C. 883 and 289, respectively)
prohibit the use of any vessel other than a vessel built in,
owned by citizens of, and documented in the United States to
transport merchandise or passengers between points in the United
States embraced within the coastwise laws.
In interpreting the coastwise laws, Customs has ruled that a
point in United States territorial waters is considered a point
embraced within the coastwise laws. The coastwise laws generally
apply to points in the territorial sea, defined as the belt,
three (3) nautical miles wide, seaward of the territorial sea
baseline, and to points located in internal waters, landward of
the territorial sea baseline, in cases where the baseline and the
coastline differ.
Even though the TITAN V is being authorized to perform the
salvaging operation, however, she is prohibited from transporting
passengers or merchandise from the shore to the wreck site.
HOLDING:
An investigation has been made and it is determined that a
suitable vessel of the United States or a suitable numbered
motorboat owned by a citizen is not available in the locality for
the salvage operation of the M/V TEXAS EAGLE.
The TITAN V, a foreign-flag vessel may be used for the salvage
operation of the M/V TEXAS EAGLE located within the territorial
waters Port Aransas without incurring a penalty for violation fo
the coastwise laws.
Sincerely,
Arthur P. Schifflin
Chief
Carrier Rulings Branch
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.