us-cbp-cross-rulings-hq-086189•HQ 086189: PVC sheeting
Native CBP ruling rendition. Applicability is fact-specific; modification/revocation relationships and original publisher date are retained. Publisher sentinel year0001 means unknown date, not a historical legal adoption.
HQ 086189
April 18, 1990
CLA-2 CO:R:C:G 086189 NLP
CATEGORY: Classification
TARIFF NO.: 3920.42.5000
Mr. Jerome Weinstein
Apex Plastic Industries, Inc.
155 Marcus Blvd.
P.O. Box 11008
Hauppauge, NY 11788-0701
RE: PVC sheeting
Dear Mr. Weinstein:
This is in response to your letter dated December 18, 1989,
concerning the reconsideration of the classification of certain
PVC sheeting in Headquarter's Ruling Letter (HRL) 085108, dated
October 3, 1989, and subsequently, in 085841, dated November 30,
1989. It is your belief that the PVC sheeting does imitate
patent leather and should be classified in subheading
3920.42.1000, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
Annotated (HTSUSA).
ISSUE:
Does the PVC sheeting imitate patent leather?
LAW AND ANALYSIS:
In your letter you state that opacity has nothing to do with
whether the PVC sheeting imitates patent leather. However, as
stated in ORR Ruling 870-70 and discussed in HRL 085103 and HRL
085841, opacity is one of three criteria we look to in
determining whether plastic sheeting imitates patent leather.
The other two criteria we look to are whether the plastic
sheeting has a high gloss and a mirror-like finish.
In the instant case, neither the red or the white PVC
sheeting swatches imitate patent leather. Though the red sample
is not essentially opaque it reflects a poor image. The white
swatch is more opaque but it reflects almost no image.
Furthermore, as stated in HRL 085841, while the addition of a
backing might enable the swatches to be somewhat more reflective,
we classify goods in the conditions they are imported in.
-2-
HOLDING:
The red and white swatches are classifiable in subheading
3920.42.5000, which provides for other plates, sheets, film, foil
and strip, of polymers of vinyl chloride, flexible, other. The
duty rate is 4.2 percent ad valorem.
HRL 085841 is hereby affirmed.
Sincerely,
John Durant, Director
Commercial Rulings Division
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.