58103-5•State Of Washington, Respondent V. Garrett Carr, Appellant
Full text
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 58103-5-II Respondent, v. UNPUBLISHED OPINION GARRETT ALEXANDER CARR, Appellant. PRICE, J. — Garrett A. Carr appeals from his judgment and sentence, which imposed a $500 crime victim penalty assessment (VPA). Carr asks us to remand for the trial court to strike the VPA, and the State has no objection. We agree and remand for the trial court to strike the VPA. FACTS In October 2022, Carr was charged with one count of attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle and one count of possession of a stolen motor vehicle. Carr waived his right to a jury trial. Following a bench trial, the trial court convicted Carr of the attempting to elude charge but acquitted Carr for the charge of possession of a stolen vehicle. At sentencing, the trial court found that Carr was indigent. But the judgment and sentence imposed a $500 VPA under RCW 7.68.035. Carr appeals. Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two June 18, 2024
No. 58103-5-II 2 ANALYSIS Carr argues that the VPA should be stricken because the VPA is no longer authorized by statute. The State has no objection to remanding for the superior court to strike the VPA. We agree the VPA should be stricken. Effective July 1, 2023, the VPA is no longer authorized for indigent defendants. LAWS OF 2023, ch. 449 § 1; RCW 7.68.035(4). This legislative change governing the VPA applies to cases that were still on direct appeal when the change was enacted. State v. Ellis, 27 Wn. App. 2d 1, 16, 530 P.3d 1048 (2023). Here, because the trial court found Carr to be indigent and his direct appeal is still pending, the VPA is no longer authorized for him. CONCLUSION We remand for the trial court to strike the VPA from Carr’s judgment and sentence. A majority of the panel having determined that this opinion will not be printed in the Washington Appellate Reports, but will be filed for public record in accordance with RCW 2.06.040, it is so ordered. PRICE, J. We concur: VELJACIC, A.C.J. LEE, J.
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.