State of Washington v. Thok M. Gut

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION THREE
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
THOK M. GUT,
Appellant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 35961-1-III
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
SIDDOWAY, J. — Thok M. Gut appeals from the judgment and sentence imposed
for his Benton County convictions of felony driving while under the influence and
driving while license suspended in the third degree. His sole contention is that recent
caselaw requires striking of the $200 criminal filing fee that the court assessed as a legal
financial obligation (LFO). We remand for the court to strike the criminal filing fee.
In light of the limited issue raised, the facts leading to the convictions are
unimportant to the appeal. After a jury found Mr. Gut guilty of the crimes, the court
FILED
MARCH 12, 2019
In the Office of the Clerk of Court
WA State Court of Appeals, Division III

No. 35961-1-III
State v. Gut
2
imposed an overall 13-month sentence. The court found Mr. Gut indigent and imposed
LFOs, including a $500 victim assessment and a $200 filing fee. Mr. Gut’s DUI
conviction being his first felony offense, the court also imposed a mandatory $100
deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) collection fee. Mr. Gut appealed the entire judgment and
sentence.
Mr. Gut’s sole contention on appeal is that the $200 criminal filing fee must be
struck from his judgment and sentence based on State v. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426
P.3d 714 (2018). The State concedes this point, and we agree.
House Bill 1783, which became effective June 7, 2018, prohibits trial courts from
imposing discretionary LFOs on defendants who are indigent at the time of sentencing.
LAWS OF 2018, ch. 269, § 6(3); Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d at 745-47. Among the changes was
an amendment to former RCW 36.18.020(2)(h) (2015), to prohibit the imposition of the
$200 criminal filing fee on indigent defendants. LAWS OF 2018, ch. 269, § 17(2)(h).
As held in Ramirez, the changes to the criminal filing fee statute apply prospectively to
cases pending on direct appeal prior to June 7, 2018. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d at 747.
Accordingly, the change in law applies to Mr. Gut’s case. Because Mr. Gut was indigent
in the trial court and is still indigent on appeal, the $200 criminal filing fee should be
struck pursuant to Ramirez.

No. 35961-1-III
State v. Gut
The judgment of conviction is affirmed, but the matter is remanded to strike the
$200 filing fee from the judgment and sentence. 1
A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to RCW
2.06.040.
WE CONCUR:
!J 	j.
Fearinn 	I
1 This obviates the State's additional motion under RAP 18.9(c)(2) to dismiss the
appeal as moot and remand to strike the filing fee.
3