81293-9•State Of Washington, Respondent V. Douglas Floyd Roll, Appellant
State Of Washington, Respondent V. Douglas Floyd Roll, Appellant
81293-9WashctappMar 1, 2021
Full text
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DOUGLAS FLOYD ROLL, Appellant. No. 81293-9-I DIVISION ONE UNPUBLISHED OPINION PER CURIAM — Douglas F. Roll appeals his jury conviction for one count of third degree assault and one count of fourth degree assault, both with a domestic violence designation. Roll contends, and the State concedes, that the convictions violate double jeopardy because the underlying acts were part of a continuing course of conduct. The State also concedes that Roll’s judgment and sentence inadvertently left blank the expiration date for the no-contact order. We accept the State’s concessions. We remand to the trial court to vacate the fourth degree assault conviction, and to amend the judgment and sentence to specify the duration of the no-contact order.
No. 81293-9-I/2 2 Remanded. FOR THE COURT:
1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FILED 3/1/2021 Court of Appeals Division | State of Washington IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 81293-9-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE V. UNPUBLISHED OPINION DOUGLAS FLOYD ROLL, Appellant. PER CURIAM — Douglas F. Roll appeals his jury conviction for one count of third degree assault and one count of fourth degree assault, both with a domestic violence designation. Roll contends, and the State concedes, that the convictions violate double jeopardy because the underlying acts were part of a continuing course of conduct. The State also concedes that Roll’s judgment and sentence inadvertently left blank the expiration date for the no-contact order. We accept the State’s concessions. We remand to the tnal court to vacate the fourth degree assault conviction, and to amend the judgment and sentence to specify the duration of the no-contact order. No. 81293-9-1/2 Remanded. FOR THE COURT:
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.