State Of Washington, Respondent V. Douglas Floyd Roll, Appellant

81293-9WashctappMar 1, 2021

Full text

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
DOUGLAS FLOYD ROLL,
Appellant.
No. 81293-9-I
DIVISION ONE
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
PER CURIAM — Douglas F. Roll appeals his jury conviction for one count of
third degree assault and one count of fourth degree assault, both with a domestic
violence designation. Roll contends, and the State concedes, that the
convictions violate double jeopardy because the underlying acts were part of a
continuing course of conduct. The State also concedes that Roll’s judgment and
sentence inadvertently left blank the expiration date for the no-contact order. We
accept the State’s concessions. We remand to the trial court to vacate the fourth
degree assault conviction, and to amend the judgment and sentence to specify
the duration of the no-contact order.
No. 81293-9-I/2
2
Remanded.
FOR THE COURT:

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

FILED
3/1/2021
Court of Appeals
Division |
State of Washington

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 81293-9-I
Respondent, DIVISION ONE
V. UNPUBLISHED OPINION

DOUGLAS FLOYD ROLL,

Appellant.

PER CURIAM — Douglas F. Roll appeals his jury conviction for one count of
third degree assault and one count of fourth degree assault, both with a domestic
violence designation. Roll contends, and the State concedes, that the
convictions violate double jeopardy because the underlying acts were part of a
continuing course of conduct. The State also concedes that Roll’s judgment and
sentence inadvertently left blank the expiration date for the no-contact order. We
accept the State’s concessions. We remand to the tnal court to vacate the fourth
degree assault conviction, and to amend the judgment and sentence to specify

the duration of the no-contact order.

No. 81293-9-1/2

Remanded.

FOR THE COURT:

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.