State Of Washington, Respondent V. Travis V. Grant, Appellant

73919-1WashctappJan 23, 2017

Open source

Full text

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
TRAVIS V. GRANT
Appellant.
DIVISION ONE 	^
No. 73919-1-1 	^
UNPUBLISHED OPINION 	£:
FILED: January 23, 2017
Dwyer, J. — The State concedes error in this appeal. We accept the
State's concession.
The State concedes that defense counsel provided ineffective
assistance of counsel in failing to object to imposition of some of
the fees and for failing to inform the court that some of them weren't
mandatory upon a showing of indigency. 	The matter should be
remanded for a hearing regarding all legal financial obligations.
Br. of Resp't at 2.
"Therefore, this matter should be remanded for the court to re-address the
imposition of legal financial obligations on both the DUI and felony convictions."
Br. of Resp't at 7. 	We agree. This is the remedy that we afford.
No. 73919-1-1/2
Reversed and remanded.
We concur:
Q.,j^J^m 	fyJcet^
2-

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
THE STATE OF WASHINGTON,

DIVISION ONE
Respondent,

No. 73919-1-I oe

Vv.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION ©:
TRAVIS V. GRANT

Appellant. FILED: January 23, 2017 we

et tell
t

Dwyer, J. — The State concedes error in this appeal. We accept the
State’s concession.

The State concedes that defense counsel provided ineffective

assistance of counsel in failing to object to imposition of some of

the fees and for failing to inform the court that some of them weren't

mandatory upon a showing of indigency. The matter should be
remanded for a hearing regarding all legal financial obligations.

Br. of Resp’t at 2.
“Therefore, this matter should be remanded for the court to re-address the
imposition of legal financial obligations on both the DUI and felony convictions.”

Br. of Resp’t at 7. We agree. This is the remedy that we afford.

No. 73919-1-I/2

Reversed and remanded.

We concur:

Gein,

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.