State of Washington v. Timothy Edward Nation

39149-3WashctappFeb 6, 2024

Full text

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
DIVISION THREE
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
Respondent,
v.
TIMOTHY EDWARD NATION,
Appellant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 39149-3-III
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
LAWRENCE-BERREY, J. — Timothy Nation appeals the trial court’s imposition of a
victim penalty assessment (VPA) and DNA collection fee due to recent legislation. The
State concedes. We accept the State’s concession and remand for the sentencing court to
strike both legal financial obligations (LFOs) from Mr. Nation’s judgment and sentence.
FACTS
A jury convicted Timothy Nation of custodial assault. During sentencing, defense
counsel asked the trial court to waive all discretionary fines because Mr. Nation was
disabled and received disability payments as income. The court agreed, but noted that
there were mandatory fines that could not be waived. As a result, the court imposed a
mandatory $500 VPA and a mandatory $100 DNA collection fee. Mr. Nation timely
appealed.
FILED
FEBRUARY 6, 2024
In the Office of the Clerk of Court
WA State Court of Appeals, Division III
No. 39149-3-III
State v. Nation
2
ANALYSIS
Mr. Nation contends the VPA and the DNA collection fees must be struck from his
judgment and sentence due to changes in the law. The State concedes. We accept the
State’s concession.
VPA
Under former RCW 7.68.035(1)(a) (2018), the sentencing court was required to
impose a VPA on any individual found guilty of a crime. Effective July 1, 2023,
the legislature amended RCW 7.68.035 to preclude superior courts from imposing a
VPA on a defendant who, at the time of sentencing, is found to be indigent as defined in
RCW 10.01.160(3). See LAWS OF 2023, ch. 449, § 1(4). Statutory amendments related to
LFOs imposed upon conviction generally apply to all cases pending on direct appeal that
are not yet final. See, e.g., State v. Wemhoff, 24 Wn. App. 2d 198, 201-02, 519 P.3d 297
(2022); State v. Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 749, 426 P.3d 714 (2018).
Mr. Nation’s case is pending on direct appeal and is not yet final. And although
the sentencing court did not check the indigency box on Mr. Nation’s judgment and
sentence, it seemed to have found him to be indigent based on its decision to impose only
mandatory LFOs. Therefore, the amended statute applies, and we direct the sentencing
court to strike the VPA from his judgment and sentence.
No. 39149-3-111
State v. Nation
DNA collection fee
Similarly, under former RCW 43.43.7541 (2018), the sentencing court was
required to impose a DNA collection fee of $100 for every sentence imposed for the
crimes specified in RCW 43.43.754. Effective July 1, 2023, the legislature amended
RCW 43.43.7541 by removing language that authorized imposition of the DNA collection
fee. See LAWS OF 2023, ch. 449, § 4. Again, the new statute applies to Mr. Nation's case
because it is pending on direct appeal. We therefore direct the sentencing court to strike
the DNA collection fee from his judgment and sentence.
Affirmed, but remanded to strike the VPA and DNA collection fees.
A majority of the panel has determined this opinion will not be printed in the
Washington Appellate Reports, but it will be filed for public record pursuant to
RCW 2.06.040.
Lawrence-Berrey, J.
WE CONCUR:
Fearing,~ >
3

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.