In re William Cobb

VERMONT SUPREME COURT Case No. 22-AP-156
109 State Street
Montpelier VT 05609-0801
802-828-4774
www.vermontjudiciary.org
ENTRY ORDER
JUNE TERM, 2022
In re William Cobb }
}
Original Jurisdiction
} Judicial Conduct Board
}
In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:
Respondent William W. Cobb is an attorney licensed to practice law in Vermont; he also
serves as the Caledonia County Probate Judge. On May 24, 2022, the Professional Responsibility
Board (PRB) filed with this Court a decision from a hearing panel of the PRB finding that
respondent committed five acts of misconduct, including engaging in conduct that is prejudicial to
the administration of justice and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or
misrepresentation. As aggravating factors, the PRB found, among other things, that respondent
committed multiple offenses, engaged in bad faith obstruction of the disciplinary proceeding,
engaged in dishonest and deceptive practices during the disciplinary process, and refused to
acknowledge the wrongful nature of his conduct. It recommended a 15-month suspension from the
practice of law and a public reprimand. The Court has ordered review of this decision on its own
motion.
The Judicial Conduct Board (JCB) has been provided with a copy of the PRB decision and
the Court has requested that the JCB conduct an initial inquiry into the matter. See Rule 7(1) of
Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges.
We conclude that the PRB decision provides sufficient evidence to show that respondent
poses a substantial threat of harm to the public or to the administration of justice. See generally In
re Kane, 2017 VT 48, ¶ 1, 204 Vt. 635 (mem.) (explaining that “[f]itness for [judicial] service requires
not only a knowledge of the law, but also the utmost in integrity” and “[t]o maintain public
confidence in the Judiciary, a judge must demonstrate honesty, candor, and the commitment to
ethical principles both on and off the bench”); see also Preamble, Code of Judicial Conduct
(providing that “[a]n independent, fair, and impartial judiciary is indispensable to our system of
justice” and “[t]he Vermont legal system is based upon the principle that an independent, impartial,
and competent judiciary, composed of persons of integrity, will interpret and apply the law that
governs our society”).

We therefore temporarily suspend respondent from his role as a probate judge, without loss
of compensation, “pending final determination of any proceeding under [the Rules of Supreme
Court for Disciplinary Control of Judges],” Rule 5(5) of the Rules of Supreme Court for Disciplinary
Control of Judges.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________________
Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice
_______________________________________
Harold E. Eaton, Jr., Associate Justice
_______________________________________
Karen R. Carroll, Associate Justice
_______________________________________
William D. Cohen, Associate Justice
_______________________________________
Nancy J. Waples, Associate Justice