Bok Duk Kim v Cash Flex, et al.

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Chief Judge Moon, Senior Judges Cole and Duff

BOK DUK KIM

v. Record No. 2020-95-4 MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM
CASH FLEX MARCH 12, 1996
AND

LUMBERMEN'S MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS '
COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Bok Duk Kim, pro se, on brief).

(Michael L. Zimmerman; Brault, Palmer, Grove,
Zimmerman, White & Mims, on brief), for appellees.

Bok Duk Kim appeals a decision of the Workers' Compensation
Commission dismissing her application alleging an occupational
disease. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the
parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit.
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule
5A:27.

This appeal is controlled by the Supreme Court's decision in

The Stenrich Group v. Jemmott, Va. , , S.E.2d ,

(1996) (holding that "job-related impairments resulting from
cumulative trauma caused by repetitive motion, however labeled or
however defined, are, aS a matter of law, not compensable under
the present provisions of the Act").

Accordingly, we affirm the commission's decision

"Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not
designated for publication.

Affirmed.
2