Honeywell Corporation and Zurich American Insurance Company v. William H. Swiney, Jr.

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: 	Judges Elder, Felton and Senior Judge Willis
HONEYWELL CORPORATION AND
ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY
MEMORANDUM OPINION*
v. 	Record No. 0889-05-2 	PER CURIAM
AUGUST 9, 2005
WILLIAM H. SWINEY, JR.
FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION
(Charles F. Midkiff; Angela C. Fleming; Midkiff, Muncie, and Ross,
P.C., on brief), for appellants.
(Laura Ann McDonald; Laura Ann McDonald, P.C., on brief), for
appellee.
Honeywell Corporation and its insurer appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation
Commission finding that William H. Swiney, Jr. proved he adequately marketed his residual
work capacity beginning August 5, 2003. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
commission in its final opinion. See Swiney v. Honeywell Corp., VWC File No. 206-70-32
(Mar. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.
* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.