CourtListener 9500969•In Re Priscilla Graham Individually and A/N/F of Minor Child E.S. v. the State of Texas
In Re Priscilla Graham Individually and A/N/F of Minor Child E.S. v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 9500969Txctapp9May 9, 2024
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-24-00106-CV
__________________
IN RE PRISCILLA GRAHAM INDIVIDUALLY
AND A/N/F OF MINOR CHILD E.S.
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding
457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 20-02-02797-CV
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Priscilla Graham Individually and as
next friend of Minor Child E.S. argued that the trial court abused its discretion by
signing a temporary restraining order against all post-judgment discovery. On April
9, 2024, the Clerk of the Court issued a letter that notified the parties that the trial
court had signed a temporary injunction in a bill of review proceeding in Trial Court
Case Number 24-01-01649-CV, the appellate court had docketed the accelerated
appeal from the temporary injunction as Appeal Number 09-24-00115-CV, and that
this mandamus proceeding would be dismissed as moot unless a party filed a written
1
response showing grounds for continuing this original proceeding. No party
responded to the Clerk’s notice.
We conclude that this original proceeding has become moot, no exception to
the doctrine of mootness applies, and we lack jurisdiction over this original
proceeding. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for a writ of mandamus without
reference to the merits.
PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on May 8, 2024
Opinion Delivered May 9, 2024
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.