CourtListener 9454577•Lee Pevoteaux v. David Nacke
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-23-00190-CV
__________________
LEE PEVOTEAUX, Appellant
V.
DAVID NACKE, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 23-33202
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In June 2023, Lee Pevoteaux filed a notice appealing from the final judgment
in Trial Cause Number 23-33202. But after perfecting his appeal, Pevoteaux failed
to file a brief.
In October 2023, the Clerk of the Ninth Court of Appeals notified the parties
that Pevoteaux had not filed a brief and advised the parties that his appeal would be
submitted without briefs unless the Court received Pevoteaux’s brief by November
2, 2023, and a motion to extend the deadline for filing the brief. We also warned
1
Pevoteaux that his appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the Court
submitted his appeal without briefs.
On November 15, 2023, the Clerk notified the parties that on December 6,
2023, the Court had submitted the appeal without briefs and without oral argument.
See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. Since no brief has been filed in the appeal assigning any
error to a ruling of the trial court, we dismiss Pevoteaux’s appeal for want of
prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on December 6, 2023
Opinion Delivered December 7, 2023
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.