CourtListener 9441797•Danielle Guajardo v. Oscar Castillo
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-23-00176-CV
__________________
DANIELLE GUAJARDO, Appellant
V.
OSCAR CASTILLO, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 23-33180
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On June 5, 2023, Danielle Guajardo appealed from a final judgment
in Trial Cause Number 23-33180. After perfecting her appeal, however,
Guajardo failed to file a brief.
On September 27, 2023, we notified the parties that Guajardo had
not filed a brief and that her appeal would be submitted without briefs
unless, by October 9, 2023, she filed a brief supporting her appeal with a
1
motion explaining why the Court should extend the appellate timetable
that applies to the deadlines for filing briefs. We also warned Guajardo
that her appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the Court
submitted her appeal without a brief.
On October 23, 2023, we notified the parties that the Court would
submit the appeal on November 13, 2023, without briefs and without oral
argument. See Tex. R. App. P. 39.8. On October 24, 2023, the appellee,
Oscar Castillo, filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution.
In the absence of a brief assigning error for our review, we grant
Castillo’s motion to dismiss. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want
of prosecution. See id. 38.8(a)(1); id. 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on November 13, 2023
Opinion Delivered November 16, 2023
Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.