CourtListener 9435632•Zane Edward Holloway v. the State of Texas
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-23-00240-CR
NO. 09-23-00241-CR
NO. 09-23-00242-CR
NO. 09-23-00243-CR
NO. 09-23-00244-CR
__________________
ZANE EDWARD HOLLOWAY, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 359th District Court
Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause Nos. 20-04-04503-CR, 20-04-05020-CR,
22-07-09545-CR, 22-07-09546-CR, and 22-07-09548-CR
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On August 30, 2023, we notified the parties that the appeals would be
dismissed for want of prosecution unless the appellant arranged to file the records or
explained why he needed additional time to do so. The Court, however, received no
response to its request.
1
There is also nothing in the record that shows the appellant is entitled to
proceed without paying costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. Because the appellant has
not explained why he failed to file the records in his appeals, we dismiss the appeals
for want of prosecution. See id. 37.3(b).
APPEALS DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on October 24, 2023
Opinion Delivered October 25, 2023
Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.