CourtListener 10710273•In Re Eric Springstun v. the State of Texas
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00377-CV
__________________
IN RE ERIC SPRINGSTUN
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding
457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas
Trial Cause No. 25-09-15036
__________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Eric Springstun filed a petition for a writ of mandamus (and he filed a motion
for temporary relief), seeking to compel the local administrative judge to rule on
Springstun’s Chapter 11 vexatious litigant request for permission to file a notice of
appeal in Trial Cause Number 25-09-15036. On October 13, 2025, Springstun
notified this Court that his mandamus proceeding is moot because the local
administrative judge signed an order granting him permission to appeal.1 We dismiss
1
The appeal has been docketed in the appellate court as Appeal Number 09-
25-00318-CV, Eric Springstun v. City of League City, Eric Cox, Donato Angelo De
Pinto, and The Wharf at Clear Lake Maintenance Association, Inc.
1
the mandamus proceeding and the motion for temporary relief without reference to
the merits.
PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on October 22, 2025
Opinion Delivered October 23, 2025
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.