CourtListener 10873400•In the Matter of the Marriage of Sandrine Kojidie Kom and Jean Paul M. Kom v. the State of Texas
In the Matter of the Marriage of Sandrine Kojidie Kom and Jean Paul M. Kom v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10873400Txctapp8Jun 8, 2026
Full text
COURT OF APPEALS
EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
EL PASO, TEXAS
————————————
No. 08-26-00221-CV
————————————
In the matter of the marriage of Sandrine Kojidie Kom and Jean Paul M. Kom,
Appellants
On Appeal from the 383rd District Court
El Paso County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2019DCM7783
M E MO RA N D UM O PI NI O N
Appellant, Jean Paul Kom, filed a notice of appeal on May 8, 2026, but neither paid the
appellate filing fees nor established a right to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App.
P. 5, 20.1; see also Tex. Gov’t Code §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order Regarding
Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, Before the Judicial
Panel on Multi-District Litigation, and in the Business Court, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July
26, 2024).
Under the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the fees for appealing to a court of appeals
are due at the time a notice of appeal is presented to the appellate court for filing. See Tex. R. App.
P. 5. On May 11, 2026, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellant that the fees were due and that
this appeal could be dismissed if he failed to pay the filing fees by May 22, 2026. The Clerk further
notified Appellant that the failure to comply with a Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure, an order of
this Court, or a notice from the Clerk requiring a response within a specified time could result in
dismissal of this appeal. Appellant neither paid the filing fees nor otherwise responded to the
Clerk’s notice. 1
We dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 42.3(c).
GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice
June 8, 2026
Before Salas Mendoza, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
1
On May 19, 2026, we issued an order requiring Appellant to file a response addressing and providing a reasonable
explanation for his late filed notice of appeal. Appellant adequately responded to our order, and we consider his notice
of appeal timely. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997); Tex. R. App. P. 26.3.
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.