CourtListener 10873412•Ehi Lambert-Aikhionbare v. Trey Crook III, Chelsea Haynes, and Jack Manning
Ehi Lambert-Aikhionbare v. Trey Crook III, Chelsea Haynes, and Jack Manning
CourtListener 10873412Txctapp7Jun 8, 2026
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-26-00014-CV
EHI LAMBERT-AIKHIONBARE, APPELLANT
V.
TREY CROOK III, JACK MANNING, PARK CENTRAL HOA, CHELSEA HAYNES,
AND GOODWIN & COMPANY, APPELLEES
On Appeal from the 95th District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-25-03609, Honorable Monica Purdy, Presiding
June 8, 2026
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before PARKER, C.J., and DOSS and PRATT, JJ.
Appellant, Ehi Lambert-Aikhionbare, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial
court’s summary judgment. 1 Appellant’s brief was originally due April 30, 2026, but was
not filed. By letter of May 8, 2026, we notified Appellant that the appeal was subject to
dismissal for want of prosecution, without further notice, if a brief was not received by May
1 Originally appealed to the Fifth Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the
Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE § 73.001.
18, 2026. To date, Appellant has neither filed a brief nor had any further communication
with this Court.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).
Per Curiam
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.