CourtListener 10433772•Joshua Puckett v. Shelby Dool D/B/A Rockin' D Motors, XL Funding, LLC D/B/A Axle Funding D/B/A Axle Funding, LLC, and XLF Holdings, Inc.
Joshua Puckett v. Shelby Dool D/B/A Rockin' D Motors, XL Funding, LLC D/B/A Axle Funding D/B/A Axle Funding, LLC, and XLF Holdings, Inc.
CourtListener 10433772Txctapp7Apr 24, 2025
Full text
In The
Court of Appeals
Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00095-CV
JOSHUA PUCKETT, APPELLANT
V.
SHELBY DOOL D/B/A ROCKIN’ D MOTORS, XL FUNDING, LLC D/B/A AXLE
FUNDING D/B/A AXLE FUNDING, LLC, AND XLF HOLDINGS, INC., APPELLEES
On Appeal from the 72nd District Court
Lubbock County, Texas
Trial Court No. DC-2024-CV-1784, Honorable John C. Grace, Presiding
April 24, 2025
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Joshua Puckett, appeals from the trial court’s Order Denying Application
for Temporary Injunction. Now pending before this Court is Puckett’s unopposed motion
seeking voluntary dismissal of the appeal. The Court finds that the motion complies with
the requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion
will not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As
no decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is
dismissed. Because the motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning
the payment of costs, costs will be taxed against Puckett. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d).
No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith.
Per Curiam
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.