CourtListener 10349788•John Ernest Lancaster v. the State of Texas
Full text
In the
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-24-00125-CR
JOHN ERNEST LANCASTER, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 8th District Court
Hopkins County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2430279
Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
MEMORANDUM OPINION
An unnamed tipster submitted a tip online to the Lake Country Crime Stoppers, Inc.,
stating that the tipster found a DVD containing child pornography at John Ernest Lancaster’s
house. The magistrate issued a search warrant based on an affidavit attaching the anonymous tip
and a jail record showing that Lancaster was in jail at that time. During the execution of the
search warrant, the police found a DVD containing child pornography depicting sexual assault of
a child. Using evidence seized while executing the same search warrant, the State charged, and
the trial court convicted, Lancaster of three counts of first-degree possession of child
pornography depicting sexual assault of a child. The trial court then assessed punishment at life
in prison on each count, with the sentences to run concurrently. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN.
§ 43.26(d)(2)(B)(ii) (Supp.). In a single brief, Lancaster appeals all three convictions, arguing
only that the affidavit for the search warrant did not contain probable cause because it relied
solely on an anonymous tip that was not sufficiently corroborated.
We addressed this issue in detail in our opinion of this date in Lancaster’s appeal in our
cause number 06-24-00124-CR. Based on the reasoning in that opinion, issued on the same date
herewith, we likewise determine that the affidavit was sufficient to support issuance of the search
warrant in this matter.
2
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Scott Stevens
Chief Justice
Date Submitted: December 11, 2024
Date Decided: February 26, 2025
Do Not Publish
3
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.