CourtListener 9998927•In Re: Deloris Phillips v. the State of Texas
Full text
DENIED and Opinion Filed July 8, 2024
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00788-CV
IN RE DELORIS PHILLIPS, Relator
Original Proceeding from the Probate Court No. 2
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. PR-24-02094-2
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Nowell, Carlyle, and Miskel
Opinion by Justice Carlyle
Before the Court is relator’s July 1, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus and
emergency motion for injunctive relief. Upon review, relator’s petition does not
meet the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure for consideration
of mandamus relief. See In re Backusy, No. 05-23-00674-CV, 2023 WL 4540278,
at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 14, 2023, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.1, 52.3(a)–(j), 52.7(a); see also In re Fears, No. 05-24-00154-CV, 2024 WL
748077, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Feb. 23, 2024, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)
(explaining how a relator may obtain certified or sworn copies of documents); In re
Stewart, No. 05-19-01338-CV, 2020 WL 401764, at *1 (Tex. App.—Dallas Jan. 24,
2020, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (explaining that our precedent requires
“exceptionally strict compliance” with rule 52.3(j) and that “[t]o comply with prior
opinions of this Court that interpret mandamus rules, relators should use the exact
words of rule 52.3(j) without deviation in their certification”).
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Having denied
the petition, we also deny as moot relator’s emergency motion.
/Cory L. Carlyle/
CORY L. CARLYLE
JUSTICE
240788F.P05
–2–
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.