CourtListener 10132043•In Re: Ryan Wallace v. the State of Texas
Full text
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 3, 2024
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00736-CV
IN RE RYAN WALLACE
On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F10-73110
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Smith, Garcia, and Kennedy
Opinion by Justice Kennedy
Appellant previously filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking vacatur of
a 2013 conviction. On April 24, 2024, we dismissed the petition for want of
jurisdiction. See In re Wallace, No. 05-24-00317-CV, 2024 WL 1757246, at *1
(Tex. App.—Dallas Apr. 24, 2024, orig. proceeding).1 In this appeal, appellant
challenges our April 24 opinion. We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal
attempting to challenge that opinion and directed the parties to file letter briefs
addressing the jurisdictional issue.
1
We denied appellant’s motion for rehearing on June 4, 2024.
Although appellant filed a letter brief, nothing therein demonstrates our
jurisdiction over a new appeal challenging our prior opinion dismissing his petition
for writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
/Nancy Kennedy/
NANCY KENNEDY
JUSTICE
240736F.P05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
IN RE RYAN WALLACE On Appeal from the 265th Judicial
District Court, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-24-00736-CV Trial Court Cause No. F10-73110.
Opinion delivered by Justice
Kennedy. Justices Smith and Garcia
participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is
DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee the State of Texas recover its costs of this
appeal from appellant Ryan Wallace.
Judgment entered October 3, 2024
–3–
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.