Sileye Sarr v. Huntington Brook

CourtListener 10128476Txctapp5Sep 30, 2024

Full text

DISMISS and Opinion Filed September 30, 2024

S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-24-00407-CV

SILEYE SARR, Appellant
V.
HUNTINGTON BROOK, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01210-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Pedersen, III
Opinion by Chief Justice Burns
Appellant’s brief in this appeal is overdue. After appellant failed to respond

to our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted

without the reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by August 9, 2024.

By postcard dated August 13, 2024, we informed appellant the brief was overdue

and directed appellant to file a brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that

failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed a brief nor otherwise

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b),

(c).

/Robert D. Burns, III/
ROBERT D. BURNS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE
240407F.P05

–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

SILEYE SARR, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at
Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-24-00407-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-24-01210-
A.
HUNTINGTON BROOK, Appellee Opinion delivered by Chief Justice
Burns. Justices Molberg and
Pedersen, III participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is
DISMISSED.

Judgment entered September 30, 2024

–3–

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.