CourtListener 10872207•In Re Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters v. the State of Texas
In Re Texas Farm Bureau Underwriters v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10872207Txctapp4Jun 3, 2026
Full text
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00273-CV
IN RE TEXAS FARM BUREAU UNDERWRITERS
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 3, 2026
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On April 6, 2026, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Mandamus is an
extraordinary remedy, available only when the relator can show (1) the trial court clearly abused
its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law; and (2) there is no adequate remedy by way of
appeal. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). After
considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator has not shown that it is entitled
to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 24-17793, styled Vinson v. Texas Farm Bureau Insurance Company, pending
in the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas, the Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III presiding.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.