CourtListener 10845747•In the Interest of M.A.R., a Child v. the State of Texas
In the Interest of M.A.R., a Child v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10845747Txctapp4Apr 15, 2026
Full text
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-26-00185-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.R., a Child
From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas
Trial Court No. 14-11-30314-MCV
Honorable Maribel Flores, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Adrian A. Spears II, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 15, 2026
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On February 25, 2026, appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal a February
26, 2026 order dismissing his motion to modify a child support order for want of prosecution. The
clerk’s record was filed on March 6, 2026. It shows the trial court vacated that order and granted
appellant a “trial de novo” for April 9, 2026.
“Unless specifically authorized by statute, Texas appellate courts have jurisdiction only to
review final judgments.” McFadin v. Broadway Coffeehouse, LLC, 539 S.W.3d 278, 283 (Tex.
2018); accord Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because the clerk’s
record did not include a final order, we ordered appellant to show cause in writing by April 6,
2026, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),
04-26-00185-CV
(c). We admonished appellant that if a supplemental clerk’s record was required to show he had
the right to appeal, appellant was required to ensure the supplemental clerk’s record containing a
signed, final order was filed in this court by April 6, 2026. Appellant did not respond to our order,
and no supplemental clerk’s record has been filed.
Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a),
(c).
PER CURIAM
-2-
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.