In Re Jane Layton v. the State of Texas

CourtListener 10779610Txctapp4Jan 21, 2026

Full text

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00831-CV

IN RE Jane LAYTON

Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 21, 2026

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED; MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF
DENIED AS MOOT

Relator filed her petition for writ of mandamus on December 24, 2025 challenging the trial

court order granting the real party in interests motion to disqualify relator’s counsel. Relator filed

a motion for emergency relief on January 5, 2026. Having reviewed the petition, motion, and

accompanying record, this court has determined that relator has not established that she is entitled

to the relief sought. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

The emergency motion for temporary relief is DENIED AS MOOT.

PER CURIAM

1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025-CV-04668, styled Asia Layton v. Cameron Todd Layton, pending in
the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David J. Rodriguez presiding.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.