Dalila Agiza v. T Slash Bar Texas

CourtListener 10758629Txctapp4Dec 10, 2025

Full text

Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-25-00334-CV

Dalila AGIZA,
Appellant

v.

T SLASH BAR TEXAS,
Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2025CV01730
Honorable Cesar Garcia, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Lori Massey Brissette, Justice
Adrian A. Spears II, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 10, 2025

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

On October 13, 2025, we ordered appellant’s brief stricken. We further ordered appellant

to file an amended brief that complies with Rules 9.4 and 38.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure on or before October 31, 2025. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(k); TEX. R. APP. P. 38.9(a).

Neither the amended brief nor a motion for extension of time was filed. Instead, on October 14,

2025, appellant filed “Appellant’s Verified Objection and Motion to Reinstate Supplemental Brief

Limited to Jurisdictional Defects, and Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend” and “Appellant’s
04-25-003354-CV

Supplemental Objection and Motion for Reconsideration of October 13, 2025 Orders.” On

November 4, 2025, we denied these two motions, and we ordered appellant to file an amended

brief complying with Rules 38.1 and 9.4. on or before November 11, 2025. We admonished

appellant that if she failed to timely file the amended brief, we would dismiss for want of

prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a), 42.3.

Appellant has not filed the amended brief ordered by the court. Accordingly, this appeal is

dismissed. 1

PER CURIAM

1
All of appellant’s pending motions are denied.

-2-

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.