CourtListener 10734889•In the Interest of L.S-F., a Child v. the State of Texas
In the Interest of L.S-F., a Child v. the State of Texas
CourtListener 10734889Txctapp4Nov 12, 2025
Full text
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00635-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF L.S-F.
From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2022-PA-00054
Honorable Angelica Jimenez, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Adrian A. Spears II, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Velia J. Meza, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 12, 2025
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
On October 3, 2025, Appellant Jason Saint-Fleur filed a notice of appeal, stating that he
intends to appeal from an order denying his motion for summary judgment, which was signed on
September 11, 2025. The clerk’s record reflects that on October 13, 2025, appellant filed a motion
to set the underlying cause for a final hearing on the merits. As the underlying cause has not yet
proceeded to a final hearing on the merits, there is no final judgment.
“Courts of appeals generally have appellate jurisdiction only over final judgments.” Rush
Truck Ctrs. of Tex., L.P. v. Sayre, 718 S.W.3d 233, 237 (Tex. 2025) (citing Lehmann v. Har Con
Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001)). Interlocutory orders may be appealed only if a specific
statute authorizes such an interlocutory appeal. See id. In his notice of appeal, appellant did not
04-25-00635-CV
cite any statutory authority that would permit an interlocutory appeal. Therefore, on October 24,
2025, we ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. Appellant has filed a written response, agreeing that we lack jurisdiction over this
appeal.
This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
-2-
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.