CourtListener 10729879•In Re Modesto E. Garza v. the State of Texas
Full text
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-25-00371-CV
IN RE Modesto E. GARZA
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
H. Todd McCray, Justice
Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2025
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING GRANTED.
MOTION FOR REHEARING DENIED.
Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief on June 10,
2025. We denied both on June 25, 2025. Relator subsequently filed a motion for extension of time
to file a motion for rehearing. The motion for extension of time complied with rule 49.8 of the
Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and is GRANTED.
This court has considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the emergency motion for
temporary relief, the motion for extension of time, the motion for rehearing, and the sworn record
filed by relator and determined that he is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the motion
for rehearing is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
1
This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2025CI07072, styled Modesto E. Garza v. Keera Ficken, pending in the 57th
Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.