CourtListener 10707477•Nannie Johnson-Smith v. Kimberly Mallory
Full text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00487-CV
Nannie Johnson-Smith, Appellant
v.
Kimberly Mallory, Appellee
FROM THE 395TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY
NO. 22-2938-F395, THE HONORABLE RYAN D. LARSON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on September 19,
2025. On September 19, 2025, we notified appellant that no clerk’s record had been filed due
to her failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s
record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit
a status report regarding this appeal by September 29, 2025. Further, the notice advised
appellant that her failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal
for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to
this Court’s notice, and the clerk’s record has not been filed.
If a trial-court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to
pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court
may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed
without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established
that she is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. Because
appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s
record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
__________________________________________
Karin Crump, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Crump and Ellis
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: October 14, 2025
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.