CourtListener 10660839•James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Beauregard Brite White Trust (The "Beau Trust") and of the Edward McMinn White Trust (The "Mac Trust"); Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Beau Trust and of the Mac Trust; And Clinton Wesley White, by and Through His Next-Friend, James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Beau Trust and of the Mac Trust v. Beauregard Brite White, Individually and as Trustee of the Beau Trust; Kathleen White (Hartnett); Edward McMinn White, Individually, and as Trustee of the Mac Trust; And Julie Bryan White
James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Beauregard Brite White Trust (The "Beau Trust") and of the Edward McMinn White Trust (The "Mac Trust"); Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Beau Trust and of the Mac Trust; And Clinton Wesley White, by and Through His Next-Friend, James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Beneficiary of the Beau Trust and of the Mac Trust v. Beauregard Brite White, Individually and as Trustee of the Beau Trust; Kathleen White (Hartnett); Edward McMinn White, Individually, and as Trustee of the Mac Trust; And Julie Bryan White
CourtListener 10660839Txctapp3Aug 26, 2025
Full text
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 26, 2025
NO. 03-24-00110-CV
James E. White, IV, Individually and as a Beneficiary of The Beauregard Brite White
Trust (the “Beau Trust”) and of The Edward McMinn White Trust (the “Mac Trust”);
Marti White Wright, Individually and as a Beneficiary of The Beau Trust and of The Mac
Trust; and Clinton Wesley White, by and through his next-friend, James E. White, IV,
Individually and as a Beneficiary of The Beau Trust and of The Mac Trust, Appellants
v.
Beauregard Brite White, Individually and as Trustee of The Beau Trust; Kathleen White
(Hartnett); Edward McMinn White, Individually, and as Trustee of The Mac Trust; and
Julie Bryan White, Appellees
APPEAL FROM THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY
BEFORE JUSTICES TRIANA, THEOFANIS, AND CRUMP
AFFIRMED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS
This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on February 14, 2024.
The Court withdraws its previous opinion and judgment issued May 29, 2025, and substitutes the
attached opinion and this judgment in their place. Having reviewed the record and the parties’
arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the trial court’s interlocutory
order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s interlocutory order. The appellants shall pay
all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.