CourtListener 10659516•Jerald H. Miller, Jr. v. Tarrant County Appraisal District, Tarrant County Review Board, Tarrant County, City of Fort Worth, and Tarrant County Tax Assessor Collector
Jerald H. Miller, Jr. v. Tarrant County Appraisal District, Tarrant County Review Board, Tarrant County, City of Fort Worth, and Tarrant County Tax Assessor Collector
CourtListener 10659516Txctapp2Aug 21, 2025
Full text
In the
Court of Appeals
Second Appellate District of Texas
at Fort Worth
___________________________
No. 02-25-00351-CV
___________________________
JERALD H. MILLER, JR., Appellant
V.
TARRANT COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, TARRANT COUNTY REVIEW
BOARD, TARRANT COUNTY, CITY OF FORT WORTH, AND TARRANT
COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR, Appellees
On Appeal from the 141st District Court
Tarrant County, Texas
Trial Court No. 141-329967-21
Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J.
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Jerald H. Miller Jr. attempts to appeal from an order denying his
motion for recusal of the trial court judge. However, as we have previously explained
to Miller, “[a]n order denying a motion to recuse may be reviewed only . . . on appeal
from the final judgment.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a(j)(1)(A); see Miller v. Tarrant Cnty.
Appraisal Dist., No. 02-24-00478-CV, 2024 WL 4984675, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort
Worth Dec. 5, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op.). No final judgment has been rendered in this
case.
Our appellate jurisdiction is limited to the review of final judgments and
immediately appealable interlocutory orders. In re Lakeside Resort JV, LLC, 689 S.W.3d
916, 920 (Tex. 2024) (orig. proceeding); Miller, 2024 WL 4984675, at *1; Miller v.
Martinez, No. 02-24-00223-CV, 2024 WL 3195131, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth
June 27, 2024, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.). Consequently, we notified Miller of
our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over his appeal. We warned him that we could
dismiss the appeal unless, within ten days, he or any other party showed grounds for
continuing it. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 44.3. More than ten days have passed, and
we have not received a response.
Accordingly, we dismiss Miller’s attempted appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex.
R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); see Miller, 2024 WL 4984675, at *1 (dismissing attempted
interlocutory appeal from order denying recusal motion).
2
Per Curiam
Delivered: August 21, 2025
3
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.